Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC AG PKT 2002-09-09 #N (; „,- (09 3 • AGENDA REPORT �. DATE: September 9, 2002 �� ?� TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council eclo THRU: John B. Bahorski, City Manager /� AI L FROM: Mac Cummins, Associate Planner /Special Projects Manager SUBJECT: Main St. Parking Meter Study SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Approve Parking Management Plan and direct staff proceed with the necessary actions to implement the program. Action this evening would be introduction of the proposed ordinance, which puts forth the areas of the City which will be metered, and sets fees for those meters. Subsequent to this, the Council would need to adopt a resolution directing staff as to where the revenues from the parking meters would be allocated. 2 possible resolutions are provided for Council review. The parking study was reviewed by the Ad Hoc Parking Committee and the final version before the Council this evening incorporates the recommended changes by the Committee. BACKGROUND: Approximately a year ago the Council authorized the formation of an Ad Hoc Parking Committee comprised of residents to look into the feasibility of placing parking meters on Main St. Staff circulated the "Main St. Parking Meter Study" to those members in June, and met with the group. In August, staff again met with the Committee, and incorporated a second set of changes into the document that is before the Council this evening. The primary issues regarding parking meters on Main St. are overall parking management and revenue to the City. The overall parking management plan for the old town area remains unchanged, except for the proposed addition of parking meters on Main St. and a one hour parking restriction on all streets between 5 & 12 St. The existing one hour parking areas will remain in place, and there is no change proposed for residential or merchant parking passes. The meters on Main St. are proposed to be installed between Ocean Ave. & Pacific Coast Highway, and on the non - residential areas of Ocean Ave., Central Ave., and Electric Ave. up to the alley between Main St. & 8 St. and Main St. & 10 St. The Study document works through the issues associated with metering these areas, but the primary issues relate to aesthetics, financial impacts, marketing concerns, and collection & maintenance of the system. Agenda Item Overview of current system: Currently the City contracts with the City of Long Beach for its services related to parking meter collection and service for the meters in the Electric Lot and the 100 Main block of Main St. lot. Additionally, Ampco maintains and collects the revenues from the Pay and Park machines in the beach lots. These areas represent the only areas of the old town area that are currently metered. The remainder of the area is free parking, with time restrictions. Overview of Study: The Main St. Parking Meter Study analyzes in depth the various technologies which may be employed if the Council chooses to move forward with the Parking Meter program for Main St. Additionally, the study considers all aspects of the parking program, including enforcement, marketing, aesthetic impacts to the community, and collection & maintenance of the system. Finally, the study recommends a preferred alternative which includes placing meters along Main St. from Ocean Ave. to Pacific Coast Highway and along the non - residential portions of Ocean Ave., Central Ave., and Electric Ave., terminating at the respective alleys on the 8th St. & 10 St. sides of Main St. Parking Committee Recommendations: As mentioned above in this report, the Parking Committee met twice to discuss this matter, and has recommended to the City Council several changes from the original staff recommended document. They are the following: • Recommended that 50% of the total revenue from the program be utilized for improvements to the Main St. Specific Plan Area and the other 50% be used for road improvements • Recommended that metering stop at the alleys on Ocean, Central, and Electric Avenues. The original staff recommendation was to meter between 8 & 10 on all three streets • Recommended leaving the existing meters in the Electric Avenue and Main St. parking lots for continuity. Staff had a concern regarding these meters as they are no longer serviced by the manufacturer and can not be serviced. As such, they would be replaced with new meters. • Change the hours of meter operation to 8 AM to 6 PM • Implement 1 hour maximum parking from 5 St. to 12 St. Staff has revised the Study to include the recommended changes and has changed the fiscal impact analysis accordingly. Staff has included an alternate resolution for City Council consideration which addresses where the money will ultimately be spent. Staff's recommendation is for the money to be broken down as follows: 20% in the Main St. Specific Plan Area, 30% to be utilized for street repair, and 50% to be used for the General Fund. Agenda Item - -- - -- - -- — - -- - - - - - -- -- - -- - - - -- - - — - - -- - - - - - assumes that the meters operate at approximately 50% occupancy over the course of the year, which is a relatively conservative estimate. Below is an illustration of how the annual net revenues of $491,800 would be distributed based on two proposed resolutions. Distribution of estimated annual net parking meter revenues of $491,800: Resolution #1 Resolution #2 $245,900 Main St. Specific Plan $ 98,360 Main St. Specific Plan $245,900 Road Improvements $147,540 Road Improvements $245,900 General Fund RECOMMENDATION: Approve Parking Management Plan, and direct staff to proceed with the actions necessary to implement the program. Action this evening would be introduction of the proposed ordinance, which puts forth the areas of the City which will be metered, and sets fees for those meters. Staff is recommending the approval of resolution #2. Staff is recommending approval of resolution #2 for the following reasons: 1. The fiscal situation the City is currently facing of General Fund operating deficits in Fiscal Year 2003 -04 of $590,000, in Fiscal Year 2004 -05 of $707,265 and in Fiscal Year 2005 -06 of $1,142,520, requires additional General Fund resources. Attached is the General Fund five -year financial projection. 2. This alternative gives the City Council the most flexibility to address unforeseen circumstances 3. The alternative resolution accomplishes the City's need for financial security and infrastructure improvements 0 ".. X .4..„ 6 ::: Mac Cummins Associate Planner /Special Projects Manager NOTED AND APPROVED: . John B.: ah• sk , City ''. ager / Agenda Item Attachments: 1. Proposed Ordinance 2. Proposed Resolution #1 3. Proposed Resolution #2 4. Minutes of last Parking Committee Meeting 5. Revenue Enhancement section of City Budget 6. Five year projected budget 7. Map of Proposed Parking Meter Areas 8. Potential Revenue & Cost Spreadsheets from Main St. Parking Meter Study 9. City of Seal Beach Main St. Parking Meter Study Agenda Item Attachment 1 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH REGARDING PARKING METERS AND AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 13 -109.1 of Article X of Chapter 13 of the Code of the City of Seal Beach is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 13 -109.1 Parking Meter Zones. Parking meter zones are hereby established at the off - street municipal parking lots and along Main Street, Ocean Avenue, Central Avenue and Electric Avenue as delineated on the "City of Seal Beach Parking Meter Zone Map" dated . Such map is incorporated herein by reference. The city manager or the designee thereof shall cause parking meters to be installed and maintained in all parking meter zones." Section 2. Section 13 -111 of Article X of Chapter 13 of the Code of the City of Seal Beach is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 13 -111. Hours and Days of Parking Meter Operation. Parking meters in the parking meter zones shall be operated between the hours of 8:00 a.m and 6:00 p.m. on every day unless otherwise indicated by signs at a particular zone." Section 3. Section 13 -117 of Article X of Chapter 13 of the Code of the City of Seal Beach is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 13 -117. Parking Meter Fees. The parking meter fee for parking meter zones shall be one dollar ($1.00) per hour on a year -round basis." Section 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining . portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council of the City of Seal Beach hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this _ day of . , 2002. - 1 of 2 - 706102.2 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS John Larson, Mayor ATTEST: Joanne Yeo, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Quinn M. Barrow, City Attorney -2of2- 706102.2 Attachment 2 . RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH REGARDING ALLOCATION OF PARKING METER FEES Whereas: The City Council- appointed Ad Hoc Parking Committee reviewed and commented on the Main St. Parking Meter Study; and Whereas: The City Council independently reviewed the Main St. Parking Committee Study; and Whereas: The City Council received and considered public input regarding the Main St. Parking Meter Study; THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Fee Allocation. Parking meter fees collected by the City shall be allocated as follows: 50 percent to Main Street improvements 50 percent to City -wide road improvements PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this _ day of , 2002. AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS John Larson, Mayor ATTEST: Joanne Yeo, City Clerk Resolution #1 706111.3 Attachment 3 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH REGARDING ALLOCATION OF PARKING METER FEES Whereas: The City Council- appointed Ad Hoc Parking Committee reviewed and commented on the Main St. Parking Meter Study; and Whereas: The City Council independently reviewed the Main St. Parking Committee Study; and . Whereas: The City Council received and considered public input regarding the Main St. Parking Meter Study; THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Fee Allocation. Parking meter fees collected by the City shall be allocated as follows: 20 percent to Main Street improvements 30 percent to City -wide road improvements 50 percent to General Fund PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this _ day of , 2002. AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS John Larson, Mayor ATTEST: Joanne Yeo, City Clerk • Resolution #2 706111.2 Attachment 4 / Members of Committee Present Stan Anderson John Bahorski Jay Bullock Douglas Wright Woody Woodruff Bill Ayes Charles Antos Chet Corbin Ron Bennett Bill Doanes Brian Kyle Dale Seal Beach Parking Committee August 19, 2002 1. Meeting called to order at 6:30 pm . 2. Stan Anderson Overview of issues & background Placing 257 dual headed meters on 100, 200, 300 Block of Main Street , between 8th & 10th Street. Converting metered Tots to Pay & Park. Parking will be metered from 8 am to 8 pm 7 days a week at $1.00 per hour on 2 hour meters and will have a limited number of 24 minute meters on Main Street. Revenue from metering estimated at $555,120 per year less $37,500 service at 50% occupancy will pay off in 4 months. Cost of meters $107,525 to $132,275. 3. Public Comment: Public present was opposed approximately 7 with 1 in favor 4. Committee comments all committee members present All committee members spoke COMMISSIONERS ALSO REVIEWED & voted in favor: a. Majority voted in favor of meters as Parking Management being main issue & use of revenue b. Not extending hours on meters an additional 2 hours to 8 pm - majority voted for hours of 8 am to 6 pm c. Metered lots to be Pay & Park or should we keep meters majority voted to keep meters in Main Street Tots • d. Keep metered money on Main Street and in Old Town voted to have 50% for Main St. area & 50% Road Improvements wanted majority of revenue to repair Main St. & Old Town e. No meters in front of residential - majority voted in favor Adjourned at approximately 8:30 Attachment 5 ADDITIONAL ITEM DEPARTMENT PROPOSED REVENUE ENHANCEMENT REVENUE Narf7D4150t454? liffrilerrient,Pieliiridikoleter'-:Vdbiarirciri:MarriStreefiVft&I 4ri,M4.1 OO 2 Non-Dept Increase Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) $75,000 s IR8tishirkpoolicie • •-e 1.5 • • • • • • • • • • • • Number: 1 Program: Non - Departmental Revenue Projection: $292,825 (FY2002 -03) $524,100 (FY2003 -04) .9 BUDGET ENHANCEMENT WORKSHEET Proposed Changes Y . "" �- Implement parking meter program along Main Street. The project would essentially involve installation of parking meters along Main St. and 1 block in either direction along Ocean Avenue, Central Avenue and Electric Avenue. Parking would be metered from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. with a 2- hour maximum at $1.00 per hour. r :13 F VEND $292,825 (FY2002 -03) tit a� '� = � r �'" $425,100 (FY2003 -04) . • Revenue generating program • Residents not used to "paying" • Maintains true market value of for parking in Old Town parking in "Old Town" area • Aesthetic concerns with meters • The vast majority of beach along street facade communities in Southern • City must contract out for California already having collection /maintenance of parking meters adjacent to their meters, as no staff exists for this beach businesses, therefore, function most beach visitors are already familiar with such a program Projected Annual Revenue: $462,000 Projected Annual Revenue $462,000 1 year expenditure - $169,775 Annual Maintenance - $ 37,500 (Installation /Maintenance) (Year 2 +) $425,100 • Year 1 Net Revenue: $292,825* *if program is initiated immediately 1 • ]� �y Y •:. y :..w � � :W1�..b. a._. ';rwsiL� ^,fwik�,fu�1.. y �' ^�rt ^ M YM.'� � 72 Other parking management systems exist. "Pay & Park" is the prime alternative, where a customer puts money into the machine and gets a ticket that they display on their car. Do nothing. This alternative maintains the status quo, which has 2 hour free parking along Main St. The City currently has parking enforcement people "chalk" the tires of the violating cars. However, this alternative does not generate any revenue for the City. Attachment 6 • 2002 -2003 2003 -2004 2004 -2005 2005 -2006 2006 -2007 Budget Budget Projected Projected Projected Beginning Fund Balance 7,629,449 7,691,793 7,101,235 6,393,970 5,251,450 Less: Reserves and Designations (3,065,000) (3,065,000) (3,065,000) (3,065,000) (3,065,000) Beginning Undesignated Fund Balance 4,564,449 4,626,793 4,036,235 3,328,970 2,186,450 General Fund Revenues* 17,102,443 16,992,541 17,260,266 * 17,329,345 * 17,399,806 ** Expenditures ** City Council 57,780 57,780 59,225 60,705 62,223 City Manager 520,267 478,241 490,197 502,452 515,013 City Clerk 154,473 184,589 189,203 193,933 198,782 Elections - 53,800 55,145 City Attorney 390,000 390,000 399,750 409,744 419,987 Administrative Svcs /Finance 387,120 382,222 391,778 401,572 411,612 Liability /Risk Management 580,400 505,400 518,035 530,986 544,261 Non - Departmental 468,923 471,823 483,619 495,709 508,102 Police Field Services 3,188,847 3,532,599 3,620,914 3,711,437 3,804,223 Police Support 2,470,493 2,502,258 2,564,814 2,628,935 2,694,658 Detention Facilities 500,000 500,000 512,500 525,313 538,445 Beach Parking 5,240 5,240 5,371 5,505 5,643 Fire Services 3,256,105 3,438,029 3,523,980 3,612,080 3,702,382 Animal Control 160,422 160,710 164,728 168,846 173,067 Planning Department 269,596 231,886 237,683 243,625 249,716 Building Department 350,898 358,023 366,974 376,148 385,552 Engineering Admin. Department 230,837 229,624 235,365 241,249 247,280 Storm Drains Department 136,786 137,498 140,936 144,459 148,071 Street Maintenance 237,324 232,366 238,175 244,130 250,233 Landscape Maintenance 427,046 419,098 429,575 440,314 451,322 Auto Maintenance Department 378,804 361,573 370,612 379,877 389,374 Refuse Collection 926,695 945,228 968,859 993,080 1,017,907 Building Maintenance 441,305 422,721 433,289 444,121 455,224 Signal Maintenance 74,622 73,868 75,714 77,607 79,547 Recreation Administration 210,326 207,122 212,300 217,608 223,048 Sports Leagues 52,523 52,523 53,836 55, 56,561 Leisure Classes 256,755 265,884 272,531 279,344 286,328 Aquatics 141,960 142,144 145,698 149,340 153,074 Transfers Out 764,552 840,850 861,871 883,418 905,503 Total Expenditures 17,040,099 17,583,099 17,967,531 ** 18,471,865 ** 18,877,138 Net Revenues (Expenditures) 62,344 (590,558) (707,265) (1,142,520) (1,477,332) Ending Undesignated Fund Balance $ 4,626,793 $ 4,036,235 $ 3,328,970 $ 2,186,450 $ 709,118 Undesignated Fund Balance Percentage of Total Expenditures 27.15% 22.96% 18.53% 11.84% 3.76% * Projected revenues include sales tax increase from the Rossmoor Center Redevelopment project and modest property tax increases. **Projected expenditures are increased by the CPI. • 18 • Attachment 7 Attachment 8 Potential Revenues (Phasing Option #3 Full Build Out) Main St. Parking Meters Potential Revenue (Conservative) Number of Meters Revenue Per Meter Total Revenue Total Revenue Total Revenue Per Day Per Day Per Mdnth Per Year Main St. 100 Block 68 $3.50 $238 00 $7,140.00 $85,680.00 200 Block 54 $3.50 $189.00 $5,670.00 $68,040.00 300 Block 41 $3.50 $143.50 $4,305.00 $51,660.00 Ocean Ave. 27 $3.50 $94.50 $2,835.00 $34,020.00 Central Ave. 23 $3.50 $80.50 $2,415.00 $28,980.00 Electric Ave. 12 $3.50 $42.00 - $1,260.00 $15,120.00 Existing Lots 76 $3.50 $266.00 $7,980.00 $95,760.00 Total 301 $1,053.50 $31,605.00 $379,260.00 Assumptions: 35% Occumpancy @ $1. /hour (Metered Parking 8 AM - 6 PM) Main St. Parking Meters Potential Revenue (Median) Number of Meters Revenue Per Meter Total Revenue Total Revenue Total Revenue Per Day Per Day Per Month Per Year Main St. 100 Block 68 $5.00 $340 00 $10,200.00 $122,400.00 200 Block 54 $5.00 $270.00 $8,100.00 $97,200.00 300 Block 41 $5.00 $205 00 $6,150.00 $73,800.00 Ocean Ave. 27 $5.00 $135.00 $4,050.00 $48,600.00 Central Ave. 23 $5.00 $1 -15.00 $3,450 00 $41,400.00 Electric Ave. 12 $5.00 $60.00 $1,800.00 $21,600.00 Existing Lots 76 $5 00 $380.00 $11,400 00 $136,800.00 Total 301 $1,505.00 $45,150.00 $541,800.00 Assumptions: 50% Occumpancy @ $1.00 /hour (Metered Parking 8 AM - 6 PM) Main St. Parking Meters Potential Revenue (Optimistic Case) . Number of Meters Revenue Per Meter Total Revenue Total Revenue Total Revenue Per Day Per Day Per Month Per Year ' Main St. 100 Block 68 $7.00 $476.00 $14,280 00 $171,360.00 200 Block 54 $7 00 $378.00 $11,340.00 $136,080.00 300 Block 41 • $7.00 $287.00 $8,610.00 $103,320.00 Ocean Ave. 27 $7.00 $189.00 $5,670.00 $68,040 00 Central Ave. 23 $7.00 $161.00 $4,830 00 $57,960 00 Electric Ave. 12 $7.00 $84.00 $2,520.00 $30,240.00 Existing Lots 76 $7.00 $532.00 $15,960 00 $191,520.00 Total 301 $2,107.00 $63,210.00 $758,520.00 Assumptions: 70% Occumpancy @ $1.00 /hour (Metered Parking 8 AM - 6 PM) a 2' m m m > zg m m O M co N +L.. Q: ID A W O1 O P O1 O O N co 'Q < M N C ... N N N N M N N M Oi e`7 N 04010404 0 O C O LL z E d 2 00000 00000 0 0000 00000 00000 O 0000 i 0 00 0 0 000 0 0000 m 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 an in 0 0 7 0 49 49 V! N N 49 49 49 49 49 49 V! V► 49 49 c > 0 z 10 m m t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 � � OOOOO 00000 O 0000 ; � 00000 00000 0 0000 LL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ` 0 0 0 0 m tfi Of t0 ui or ui 10 1(i 16 ui of ui of vvvv vvvvv v vv vv p ca 4949494949 494949 49 4949 49 49 m 'p > g z CO 7 LL O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ih a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 00 00000 0 10 cam 0 O m 040410104 N N N N N N O I D ID CO. CO i D C V 0MN D1 r 0M u1 D1 A . p 10 i0 of MD1 et 1�O OD 'Q i010 1 co j p 04 10 O101 M01 V' v 117 N 4- 4- r0 •0• O 49 49 494949 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 e0 49 49 O 1— 1. to 0 C 0 . 1) ID m ^ t � m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W ✓ a O co O O O O O O O o O 01 01 133 D 1 C ▪ { : r co co 10 ID CD r O 'It D1 In 0) y m 0) N O1O M 1(1 CO m co co 1n O 4. l IL M a v 10 v < C O V a M 10 M M I+1 X5551 N N C 64 64 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 O 0 2 U 0 CO ? . 5 0 c. O I " t0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CL v 00000 00 000 0 000 m vvvvv vvvvv a vvvv n p a 49 64 49 64 49 64 49 49 64 49 49 49 49 49 49 c .t a" u > _ ti 0 m e a1 ° 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q' 2 0 00 000 00000 0 0) 0) 0) CD '; m 001n 4)10 00000 O1 M 67v CC y m m Of�tD0) n W N 10 d' 01 0 0) O a 2 01 10 01 01 v M 01 v v v 0) M 0) 07 01 42 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 64 49 ro o U V 0 W d h a m ai z� 00000 00000 0 0000 11 — m 01 N 01 N N 01 N N N N N N N N N m z _ M M M M 07 M M M M M c' 7 M M M M 0 To' • O F m m m - O. O. N m0 m m0 m 0 • _m c _ • O LL _ p OLLp —12 -5: E as . El" w O — O 0 O— 0 m m c 0 0 F li m U IL m m 0 O c c e 0 — L y 0 L LL 0 C C 0 0 m O • T, 0) 5 0 500 y y L d L m c 2 UU 0 n Et OOc Oc yc w y >,. 2 L)c c z 0 c -- c o6 O o - c >< V m c c Q 0 n p_� rx z ' d ° z m n ° v g m 0 0 "-.5 C 0 O C O C C c 01 m U U N N 0 "ra 0 o m m 5 m d W W m • 2 N c.9.25.2 N N= NN — c W W W c c m awwww p 6464646464 o 0 1 1 1 1. mwE O L L a 2 2 2 2 2 a 1 1 22222 1 1 c m m m c 1 a a¢aa CL 5 00 3: 2 Attachment 9 City of Seal Beach Main St. Parking Meter Study September 2002 Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Map of Main St. Parking Meter Study Area 4 Introduction 5 Existing Parking Plan 6 Option #1: Traditional Parking Meters 9 Option #2: Pay & Park System 15 Site Visits With Other Cities 17 Potential Revenue 24 Potential Costs 25 Enforcement 26 Phasing 27 Recommendation 29 Attachments: 1. Revenue Analysis (Full Build Out Alternative) 2. Cost Analysis (Full Build Out Alternative) 3. Cost & Revenue Analysis (Option 1) 4. Cost & Revenue Analysis (Option 2) 5. Laguna Beach Site Visit Materials 6. Huntington Beach Site Visit Materials 7. Redondo Beach Site Visit Materials 8. Existing Parking Contracts 9. Parking Meter Descriptions & Pictures Main St. Parking Meter Study 2 August 2002 Executive Summary This parking meter study for the Main St. area comprises a comprehensive look at the existing parking issues relating to the commercial corridor of Main St. and the immediate adjoining streets of Ocean Ave, Central Ave, and Electric Ave. It further analyzes demand for parking in those areas and discusses different ways of addressing the problems of parking, while considering possible revenue generation. Staff is recommending that the Council put in parking meters along Main St. from Ocean Ave. to Pacific Coast Highway and along Ocean Ave, Central Ave, and Electric Ave between the alleys and Main St. Staff conducted site evaluation visits with the Cities of Laguna Beach, Huntington Beach, and Redondo Beach. These site visits gave the background information for the assumptions used in the analysis and the information collected is provided as a section within this study. The Main St. Parking Meter Study also addresses the need for a more comprehensive approach to parking management in the old town area. Staff's recommendation section sets out the goals and policies and possible solutions to more fair and equitable parking distribution within the old town area. This section addresses staff recommendations in terms of parking systems in different areas of the commercial corridor of Main St., projected timelines of approvals (Including Coastal Commission), implementation of one hour parking from 5th to 12 St., and discusses the potential financial implications of the program to the City. This includes revenue analysis and initial capital outlay. The program, when initiated, will cost the City between $125,120 and $153,920 to purchase the meters and approximately $50,000 a year in collection and maintenance. Revenues are expected to be around $541,800 a year. This assumes the following: The City will charge $1.00 per hour, 7 days a week, between the hours of 8 AM and 6 PM. The revenue figure further assumes a 50% occupancy rate over the course of the year, which is a relatively conservative outcome. Given this, staff expects the meters to pay themselves off in less than 4 months. Staff has also provided income projections for 35% and 70% occupancy for comparison purposes. Staff prepared and presented a draft Main St. Parking Meter Study to the City Council appointed parking committee. This report has been revised from its earlier version to incorporate the Committee's recommendations. Main St. Parking Meter Study 3 August 2002 MN is " if �'' l 4r ♦ /I VA A 0 t • • ♦i • ♦// 'AV. • I . , 1,11 46' .!efr 1 ■ 011 Ii #I ,h' °- .. ♦i -.� � i ii , ����, �i♦ �� Q A t) � ♦, i i� 8 ›N .e 41/ A *, -0 . II * ii o ii "0 Cuti e . CD $2?' I I/ 0 ( 75 1 . • . . . . . ,ep, • , 4 g . r t I - - . *• 1.( ' l% w 1 • 11'*---:44#40, k '.. s - , W / i I 2 a) 1 I ofki:„..1:::*, !:4-fr 7 *1)*Il / ' 4 / ..b"fr'le,::: ,..,.;:".„,,, -- 0) � �. � ' .:ts��'` -,� : .• kvizo4� ,A 4 -..-t--: 0 CO P • I s y • EL 0 // ♦ / . , Wn : , , 7 ..;." ,„...,',;:.4i:>:;' fi r' • :,41,4,va& / -.5 � el ■ ► � /II II *o' / /// ••. 0 �i �i I .I// •♦ CO I I/ ♦ /I /4 �� • o ■ 4.z 0 ›, 2 i t e . C5 . /0* ■ '/ wf I7 off/ III #,(V Introduction Staff has prepared this parking meter study as a means of analyzing the impacts, both fiscal and aesthetic, of placing parking meters along Main St. in old town Seal Beach. The study begins with a description of the existing parking plan and then will discuss different types of parking meter technologies, including traditional meters & variations, and pay and park systems. Within this framework, the different impacts to the City are analyzed. Each section contains information regarding: • Financial analysis of implementing that type of system • Technology involved in the system • Marketing issues related to the system • Aesthetic impacts of the system • Collection & maintenance issues related to the system After the analysis of the various technologies has been presented, staff has included examples of existing technologies in the marketplace for review. Staff visited Laguna Beach, Huntington Beach, and Redondo Beach to find similar alternatives in downtown areas near the coast. Staff has included financial analysis of each site visit & has included photos, along with descriptions, of the technologies implemented by other cities. A potential revenue and potential cost to the City discussion is provided, followed by a description of enforcement issues and potential phasing of any program, if implemented by the City Council. Finally, staff has made a recommendation regarding the parking plan for old town Seal Beach, including installing parking meters. Within the recommendation section, recommendations are made with regard to different technologies and their ability to benefit the City of Seal Beach, both in terms of revenue and aesthetics. Additionally, the overall parking system in old town near the commercial strip of Main St. is addressed by considering a uniform parking plan which includes phasing, marketing, and financing of meters or pay and park systems. Financial spreadsheets for cost & benefit analysis are provided as attachments, as are site visit materials, existing parking contracts, and parking meter pictures and descriptions. Main St. Parking Meter Study 5 August 2002 Existing Main St. Parking Plan The City currently has different parking plans in place without much cohesion. There appears to not be an overall parking plan. Currently, there is 2 hour parking along Main St. and the adjoining streets, with Pay and Park in the beach lots, and traditional parking meters in 2 surface lots on the 100 Block of Main St. and at Electric Ave. Beach Lots The City currently subcontracts with Ampco System Parking for a Pay and Park system at the beach lots. This is the system where a customer parks their car, purchases a ticket and places it on their dash, and then enjoys the beach. The City has been very happy with this system in this area, and just recently renewed the contract with Ampco. The system allows for excellent auditing of receipts, keeps excellent track of payments made, and allows for relatively easy enforcement. The system also works very well in areas with large parking lots as the visual blight of meters can detract from the area, but the pay machine must be placed somewhat centrally located and work for all of the parking spaces. Additionally, as Ampco paid all of the up front costs, there was no cost to the City. Restricted Time (Free) Parking The City currently allows for free parking along Main St. and the surrounding streets for varying amounts of time depending on where in the City you are located. On Main St., the time frame is 2 hours, and the surrounding residential streets are 1 hour. This is enforced by a parking enforcement chalking the tires of a vehicle and then checking at a later time. There are some major drawbacks to this system in that it unfairly allocates a scarce resource of parking. In the 100 & 200 blocks, it's entirely possible that persons are parking and walking to the beach or elsewhere to avoid paying a fee. In this scenario, parking is being taken away from potential customers of Main St. businesses. There may also be employees of businesses parking their vehicles in this fashion and moving them every couple of hours to avoid getting a ticket. Metered Lots The City currently has 2 lots on Main St. that have traditional parking meters. These meters were purchased in 1998 and installed shortly thereafter. The meters have become • somewhat antiquated technologically, and Duncan (the manufacturer) has notified the City that they will no longer be servicing the computer software, which performs the audit of the cash receipts from those machines. As such, the meters themselves are still in working condition, but clearly will need to be addressed within the year as Duncan will only service them until Dec. 31, 2002. After this, the City will be responsible for servicing the software, which will not be possible. Main St. Parking Meter Study 6 August 2002 The lots generated approximately $68,000 last year. This is in spite of the fact that there is ample free parking located directly adjacent to these lots. This, more than any other statistic, is probably the most telling regarding demand for parking in the area. Current Maintenance & Collection Plan As mentioned above, Ampco currently collects the monies collected at the Beach lots. As per the City's agreement with Ampco, Ampco collects all monies and the City receives a percentage depending on performance of the lots. If other pay type parking were to be placed along Main St., the Beach lots would most likely perform better. The traditional meter lots are currently serviced & collected by the City of Long Beach. Long Beach performs the maintenance on all meters. The City currently pays Long Beach $12,000 a year for this service. This cost covers all maintenance costs associated with changing out meter heads, parts that cost under $100, other routine maintenance, and collection. The money is brought to and weighed/counted at City Hall. The City currently has a volunteer weigh and bag the money. Having two separate outside entities managing parking maintenance and collection can prove troublesome and difficult to manage. While it has been relatively easy to this point, the City must consider having one operator handle maintenance in the future. As will be recommended in this study, Ampco is capable of performing these services & staff is recommending that the City pursue the option of contracting with Apmco. Main St. Specific Plan Findings: The Main St. Specific Plan analyzed the parking demand in 1996 and made the following findings with respect to parking in the old town area: • "There may well be an overall shortage of parking. However, an even more serious issue appears to be parking management and the distribution of parking spaces." (Page 1, Introduction & Summary; Background Studies) • "Parts of downtown have excess capacity, other parts have inadequate capacity." (Page 1, Introduction & Summary; Background Studies) • "Generally, people feel there is a parking problem in downtown." (Page 11, Introduction & Summary; Background Studies) • Specific Plan identified the following as problems which lead to the parking problem in old town (Page 12, Introduction & Summary; Background Studies): o 2 hour limits not enforced o People who work at businesses leave cars on street o People with lot stickers still park on street Main St. Parking Meter Study 7 August 2002 o Competition at 5 PM between residents & restaurant workers o Residential garages used for storage or illegally converted to apartments • "The parking counts indicate that the majority of the on- street parking spaces in the study area, as well as the parking in the public parking lot adjacent to Main St. are occupied during peak periods." (Page 53, Parking & Traffic Study; Background Studies) • "In light of their proximity to and support of area businesses, the curb spaces on Main St., and in the 800 & 900 blocks along Ocean Avenue, Central Avenue, and Electric Avenue are primarily commercial parking spaces." (Page 56, Parking & Traffic Study; Background Studies) • "During the off peak season there is ample parking in the study area, with approximately 50% of the parking supply being utilized at any one time." (Page 66, Parking & Traffic Study; Background Studies) • "The parking occupancy during the July parking surveys exceeded 85 percent in all the study areas except in the alleys and the beach lot." (Page 66, Parking & Traffic Study; Background Studies) The Main Street Specific Plan essentially found that demand and supply were in relative balance for the overall amount of parking provided in the downtown area. The reason for this was that the only paid parking at the time was at the beach lot, and the study further concluded that people were underutilizing the beach lots and parking on Main St. This problem persists today, with employees and beach goers using parking on Main St. rather than using other available parking. Demand for parking on Main St. is high, particularly in the summer time. While there are available spaces, the main bulk of those spaces (85 % +) are utilized. The average person perceives there to be a deficiency in parking when more than 80% of the parking is utilized. Consideration of the recommended parking meter program is in accordance with the adopted Main St. Specific Plan policy #6, which indicates that under "third phase management improvements," the City should "consider parking meters for curbside spaces on Main St." Main St. Parking Meter Study 8 August 2002 Option #1: Traditional Parking Meters There are multiple variations of "traditional" parking meters. Currently, the City utilizes this type of meter in the lots along Main St. at Electric and near Ocean Ave. respectively. The basic precept for this type of technology is that a person parks their vehicle at a stall which has a meter directly in front or slightly off to the side of the stall. The meter is paid and a certain time limit is granted. When that time limit expires, the meter has some type of mechanism to let the enforcement person know that the vehicle is in violation. These types of mechanisms vary from digital clocks which turn to a flashing red or yellow screen to the older "arrow," which gives way to a red mark of some kind. Monetary Collection Traditionally, these types of meters have been coin fed and operated. However, new technology allows them to be paid by either pre -paid card or coins. The more technology employed by the meter, the more expensive it is to purchase (explained in the cost/benefit section of this report). There are multiple options and different variations that the City could decide to go with, dependent on its needs and fiscal constraints. Market research indicates that having some type of plastic card payment system is becoming more essential. Patrons often do not carry the necessary coin money to "feed the meter," but do carry their wallets which contain their pre -paid cards etc. Having this type of technology will be key to helping the public better utilize the parking system, once it's in place. Placement of Meters There are multiple ways to place these types of meters at the stalls. In years past, a meter may have been placed at every stall, in a straight light down the street. However, technology now allows there to be one meter to be placed which services multiple stalls. These meters can service up to 8 stalls per meter. The more common approach is to service 2 stalls with one meter or 2 meters with one pole, and place it directly in between the two stalls on the curb face. The meter(s) in this situation typically have arrows or some other visual key to indicate to the driver that the meter is responsible for his/her • stall. This type of setup is displayed here to give a visual representation of what a typical arrangement might look like: Main St. Parking Meter Study 9 August 2002 1.1 � ;. ' d O 4. ' �' �. ���w ._ . O I L D I �._ N Meter. L - Marketing Issues • • This type of parking meter is relatively self explanatory and does not require nearly as much marketing /information distribution or signage as a "Pay and Park" system might require. The majority of patrons are comfortable with this type of system, as they have experienced it in other areas, particularly downtown areas. However, there would need to be readily available change machines. Main St. Parking Meter Study 10 August 2002 However, if the City chose to go with one meter head for two stalls (shown below), there would need to be ample signage or other instruction on the meter to indicate that they need to pay for the space. There is typically an arrow or other indication on the meter head itself which indicates which stall the meter(s) service. Cost of these types of meters These meters have the most fluctuation in terms of price. The City contracted with Duncan Industries in 1998 for the meters in the Main St. lots. The City purchased 82 Meters at that time for the 76 parking spaces in the Main St. & Electric & Main St. lots at a cost of $350 per meter. These meters do NOT have any type of parking card intake, and were placed with one meter for each stall. There are 301 parking stalls within the subject area (Including the existing parking meters), which would necessitate a minimum purchase of 301 meter heads, with the potential to save on the collection bucket & shaft by placing 1 shaft for every two meters. A breakdown of the various types of parking mechanisms is provided as Attachment 1. Staff consulted 3 different manufacturers during this process and solicited bids from each. Generally speaking, the technology of each company is substantially similar, each offering several different selling points. The meters themselves are broken down into the "mechanism" and "housing." Some manufacturers combine the cost into one overall cost, and others price them separately. Staff has combined the costs into single line items by type of meter and/or housing for easier analysis. The costs of the meters range from just under $350 to $480 per meter, including installation. Mechanism Types: POM is a group based out of Arizona and is currently the industry leader in Southern California. As mentioned in the surrounding cities section of this report, staff visited Laguna Beach, Huntington Beach, and Redondo Beach. All three cities are using POM meters, and virtually all newly purchased meters are from POM. They have 2 different types of mechanisms. The first mechanism has a wheel display that rotates to show a green display when the meter has been paid, a red display when the parked car is in violation, and a yellow display that reads "Jammed" when there is a technical problem with the meter. This is POM's most expensive and best quality product. It is also the meter which virtually all of the new meters for the cities that staff visited are putting in. The second type of POM mechanism is an LCD display which blinks green or red. The • electrical system is essentially the same, and runs on the same type of auditing software. As options, POM offers different housing types and either coin or coin & park card operations. The cost for these meters ranges from $350 to $480 per meter, including installation costs. Main St. Parking Meter Study 11 August 2002 Duncan Meters is the group which the City contracted with in 1998 to purchase meters for the Main St. & Electric Ave. lots. They have offered to sell us meters at the same cost as was utilized in 1998, roughly $390 per meter, including install costs. However, staff is leery of pursuing Duncan for 2 two reasons. Firstly, virtually all cities contacted through this study process were using POM meters or were changing out existing meters with newly purchased POM meters; and secondly City Staff just received word from Duncan that the software that is utilized to audit the meters purchased in 1998 will no longer be serviced by Duncan, nor will any technical support be offered on the product. This raises a red flag to staff regarding additional future long term arrangements. The third company contacted by staff is McKay meters. They produce mechanisms which utilize green and red LED lights which display on the back of the meter and then a small light on the front, depending on the status of the meter. They offer these meters in both coin operated and card operated mechanisms and range in price from $340 to $365 in price, including installation and housing type. Housing Types: There are different types of housings created to place the mechanism in. Typically these are Iron or Zinc or some combination of both. The cities that staff visited indicated that they have noticed that Zinc housings help avoid corrosion from salt air better than the older, more traditional iron, which tends to rust and corrode faster. Staff took digital photos of the effects of this type corrosion and has attached them within this report. The housing types make a difference in the cost of the meter, and staff has included different housing options with different mechanism types as individual line items, rather than list off all the different housing types AND all the different mechanism types. Additionally, the prices listed above for the different meters are inclusive of the different housing types. Traditional Meter Option #1: 2 Meter Heads with 1 shaft There is also the possibility of purchasing one pole shaft for each stall and mounting 2 heads on it. This would essentially look like this: Meter Meter • Main St. Parking Meter Study 12 August 2002 In this type of scenario, the city would purchase meter heads for each stall, and would mount 2 heads on one shaft. This would reduce the cost of the shaft, but the primary cost, the meter head, would remain. There are aesthetic affects which would be seen in this case. A reduction in number of shafts makes the visual appearance or intrusion of the meters themselves less noticeable, as there is only one shaft for every two parking spaces. Cost of this type of system: The cost of this type of system is essentially purchasing the different meters and a "twin meter adapter" which typically costs between $20 and $32 each. This cost is fully recovered by the reduction of installation cost of installing less total meter poles at $41 per meter installed. The main issue here is whether or not the City wishes to have two meter heads on one pole for aesthetic reasons. Traditional Meter Option #2: 1 Meter Head for 2 Parking Stalls The one head for 2 parking spaces essentially looks like this: Meter 4 As previously mentioned, this type of technology exists, and further reduces the visual impacts of the proposed parking meter. However, as there is only one meter head for 2 parking spaces, some patrons may have some confusion when first using the system. The • meters themselves are somewhat self - explanatory once you have used them, but may present some initial enforcement problems due to a consumer lack of understanding on how to use them. A typical coin only machine of this type costs approximately $425 per meter. Main St. Parking Meter Study 13 August 2002 Traditional Meter Option #3: Single Head Meter at each Stall This option is essentially what the City has at the Electric & Main St. parking lots. This is the typical configuration with a single meter at each stall. The brunt of the complaints regarding aesthetic concerns result from this type of setup. The costs of this type of system range in price from $340 to $480 per meter, including installation. Aesthetic Concerns Clearly there will always be some concern regarding parking meters and the way that they look to the casual eye. While it is impossible to completely eliminate this concern, there are many ways to reduce the impact to the surrounding streetscape. In no particular order, they are: 1. Encase the shaft in some type of material (ie wood with stucco exterior) 2. Paint 3. Create uniform streetscape with other facilities (ie newspaper racks, bike racks, benches etc.) These types of solutions can also help draw the potential parking meters into the uniform streetscape described within the Main Street Specific Plan. Pros & Cons of Traditional Meters Pros Cons 1. Clearly defined purpose 1. Possibly more visually impacting than "Pay & Park 2. Easy to use and operate 2. More maintenance than "Pay & Park" 3. Easy to understand 3. Collection may be more difficult 4. Potential for creative design 4. Customers must have coins or Pre - Paid Parking card 5. Less marketing needed 6. Less on -street signage needed Main St. Parking Meter Study 14 August 2002 Option #2: "Pay & Park" System The "Pay & Park" system is essentially where there are designated "pay machines" that the customer puts the money into and a card of some type is generated. The customer then places that card or receipt on their vehicle somewhere such that the parking enforcement personnel can see it. This is the type of system the City employs in the beach parking lots. Monetary Collection The collection of money in this option is significantly easier than in the more traditional metering system. By virtue of the fact that there are significantly less actual money collection points than with the metering system, collection is much easier. Also, the technology now allows for these payment boxes to accept paper money or credit cards. This is a growing concern among consumers, who may or may not carry the proper coinage or prepaid parking card. Placement of Machines This is the crux of the concern over this type of meter technology. There clearly needs to be one of these payment centers close enough to the parking stall such that the customer is not put off by walking too far to get the parking ticket and then walking back to their car. There may also be a scenario where someone is at dinner or shopping on the street, and realizes that they need additional time. Instead of "feeding the meter," they need to go to wherever the payment box is, and purchase another ticket. The placement of the physical payment/collection boxes is key to any hope of success for this type of technology. If customers don't know that there is a payment box or can't see it due to other streetscape factors, there will be serious enforcement problems. Depending on where these boxes are located there would probably need to be a minimum of 2 boxes on each side of Main St., in each block. Staff would probably recommend 3 in each block. This type of technology works well in a square parking lot, where the stalls extend in several different directions from the payment center. In a linear street fashion, such as Main St., they are not easily visible. There are also trees and other visual blockages in line of sight to such machines. If this option is taken, clearly there will need to be some - type of grace period for information and marketing so that the average customer can become accustomed to the system and will understand that they need to pay for parking; particularly given that up to this point, there has been no requirement to pay for parking. Marketing Issues There will be a need for signage to direct the average customer to the payment center. There will also be a need for signage at the machine. This extra added signage will Main St. Parking Meter Study 15 August 2002 undoubtedly have impacts on the aesthetic nature of Main Street. It is debatable as to whether or not the impacts of the additional signage will outweigh the impact of meters at the stalls or not. But it must be considered that this type of system will certainly require a number of additional signs at key locations directing the average customer to the payment center so they can pay for their parking. These signs will help aid in the process, but it will certainly be necessary to market the program in a myriad of additional sources to help the public learn that they must now pay for parking in the downtown area. Without this additional marketing, many people may not even notice the signs or payment machines and assume that they don't need to pay for parking. Cost of these types of meters These types of meters do not cost the City anything, as an arrangement can most likely be made with the various contractors to install the service machines, maintain the machines, and collect the revenues. Pros & Cons of Pay & Park Pros Cons 1. Less visually intrusive 1. Difficult to understand on linear street 2. Allows for easier pedestrian 2. Significant amount of marketing access to the sidewalk from the needed in initial phases street 3. Easier to maintain 3. If machine breaks, no revenue from ANY parking spaces 4. Easier to have financial audit done 5. Easier to collect revenues Main St. Parking Meter Study 16 August 2002 Site Visits With Other Cities Staff conducted site visits with 3 other beach cities. They were Laguna Beach, Redondo Beach, and Huntington Beach. All three employ parking meter systems in their downtown and beach areas. All three offer similar characteristics in certain ways to Seal Beach. The following is a description of what was seen at each city, including photos, and how they run their parking meter programs. City of Laguna Beach The City of Laguna Beach has installed parking meters throughout most of their downtown area. Staff consulted with Scott Leach, who is the manager of the parking meter division at the City. Mr. Leach provided staff with insight into the primary issues relating to the parking meter program in Laguna Beach. Staff was primarily concerned with analyzing the downtown area, as it resembles the small, quaint downtown that Seal Beach has. While staff acknowledges that the demographic and business characteristics of downtown Laguna Beach are vastly different from those found in Seal Beach, the location with reference to the ocean and the overall size of the commercial district are good reference points for Seal Beach. Laguna Beach has 2098 parking meters in the entire City, the main bulk of which have a 2 hour time limit (1178 meters). They also have 122 "pay and park" spaces, for a total of 2200 parking spaces which require consumers to "pay" for utilizing the parking space. Of the parking meters, 1659 are the newer electronic or digital models which staff is recommending in this study. There are 2 people who collect the revenue for the City from the meters. In the downtown area, which includes Pacific Coast Highway from Cliff Dr. to Forest Ave., and Broadway, Ocean Ave., Beach St., and the north part of Forest Ave near City Hall, there are 224 parking meters. Additionally, there are 259 meters in the eastern portion of the downtown area, which includes Laguna Ave., 2nd St., 3` St., El Paseo, Mermaid St., Park Ave., and the southern portion of Forest Ave. These areas are the primary commercial districts near "Main Beach" in Laguna Beach. All meters have a 2 hour time limit (there are also some loading zones with 20 min. time limits). (Map attached with other site visit materials as attachment 5) S •r E` 3 y � �f #1 �' N'� R � f . r sr f U 4 ,. Main St. Parki August 2002: , •,�._ The above photo was taken looking directly toward Main Beach, showing the angled parking utilized in the downtown area. The parking meters themselves are dual head meters, which one pole, as shown below: -. -, .. ,,,,„ _ . . ., , ,,,,„,,.. ..„,,, . 7 ,,-,., :, ir ...- fir itati •• ',....,tliienvidni ' ,,,,. + 4 , i J _� (, �x #� ;, J f t� . *;7+,::"1:1.7\1 . :, 7t M t 1}A r .. 4 i . Y f A ! 1 ## Sny j r.. . ... : „ .� ,, t . >. .. In addition to the meters themselves, Laguna Beach has placed stickers on the casings to further indicate which space is being paid for by which meter, and how long the time limit is for each meter. While the picture does not show inside the meters themselves, these are the new PO M meters which rotate colors depending on the status of the meter. It also indicates inside the glass viewing area ho much must be paid per unit time. By putting two meter heads on one pole, Laguna is able to reduce the overall aesthetic impact of the meters. The following is a view down the streetscape, showing the parking meters in relation to the street, parking stalls, and sidewalk: , s { ' ` Vi j . 1 ;. , M , I 7 . ? +. ate` '� ^•....,fi :.fir- , .r . ,. ,,,,14.'-.4 x ' ( . ,, n': • rte (- The similarities of parking meter technology used in downtown Laguna Beach and what is being considered in downtown Seal Beach are many. First, the parking on many of the Main St. Parking Meter Study 18 August 2002 streets is angled parking. Secondly, Laguna Beach was also concerned with aesthetic issues relating to parking meters, and installed the meters with two heads on each pole. The overall effect has been to have a revenue generating source which does not detract form the visual environment of the City. In terms of revenue, the City of Laguna Beach charges $1.00/hour citywide. The City instituted that fee in 1990 and will most likely be raising the fee in the near future. In budget study sessions for the upcoming 2002 -2003 fiscal year, Laguna Beach considered raising the fees to $1.50 an hour. At the time of the fee increase, there was citizen involvement due to what was seen as a large fee to pay for parking. However, Laguna Beach passed the fee, and it has stood since. $1.00 per hour is currently the industry standard, and Laguna Beach has always been on the cutting edge of fees for this type of use. As of September 1, the new fee becomes effective. The revenue generated from Laguna's parking meters is significant. Staff took samples from winter, spring, and summer to gain a perspective of usage, particularly on a percentage basis. The rationale for this is, as was mentioned earlier, the business and demographic characteristics of this downtown area are different from Seal Beach's. In the dead of winter, from Jan. 1, 2002 to Jan. 31, 2002, the City of Laguna Beach generated an average of $3.64 per meter and $4.37 per meter per day in the two downtown districts. This represents somewhere between 36% and 43% usage during that period. The City meters between the hours of 8 AM and 6 PM, as is being proposed in this study for Seal Beach. The raw revenue figures for those two areas of downtown during this period are $24,436 (224 meters) and $33,974 (259 meters). In the springtime, between May 1, 2001 and May 31, 2001, the two areas of downtown operated between 38% and 52% at $3.78 per meter and $5.17 per meter per day. Raw revenue figures represent $25,768 and $40,040 respectively. In the middle of summer, between August 1, 2001 and August 31, 2001, the fees are much greater. The downtown area parking areas generated $26.94 and $29.46 per meter per day respectively. On a percentage basis, this represents 270% and 290% usage. The raw revenue figures represent $181,435 and $228,763 for the two downtown parking areas respectively. The similarities to Seal Beach can be seen in terms of percentage usage. Even in the worst of times, in January, the City of Laguna Beach averages roughly 45% usage in their downtown area. During the summer, the meters themselves are utilized by paying customers more than 200% of their allowable usage. The City also utilizes angled parking, with 2 meters on each pole of a commercial street which dead ends into the beach. City of Huntington Beach Staff visited Huntington Beach and observed similar results to Laguna Beach. Downtown Huntington Beach, or for the purposes of this report, the "Business Zone," is the area along Main St. from Pacific Coast Highway to Orange street and the adjoining cross Main St. Parking Meter Study 19 August 2002 streets of Walnut and Olive. This layout is essentially identical to the situation in Seal Beach in that Main St. is 3 blocks long with 2 cross streets as one moves back from Pacific Coast Highway. Huntington Beach does not have nearly as much on street parking as Laguna, Redondo, or Seal Beach, and only has 75 parking meters for this area. The parking in this area is both angled and parallel to Main St. , C The above picture shows angled parking with a parking meter at each stall. Huntington Beach has chosen to place a meter at each stall rather than use the one pole with two meters approach that was seen above in Laguna. Further, Huntington has installed individual coin boxes for each meter. They have also made custom decals to place inside the meter head to let patrons know how much they need to pay and how long the time limit is for that meter, as shown below: ' 4` t44 Z ma E Yr: > fi1Y'f ;..��` .. Huntington has 2 full time employees who service the meters and manage the collection of revenues. They handle all of the servicing of the meters themselves, and do not Main St. Parking Meter Study 20 August 2002 outsource any of the services required of parking meters or maintenance. Huntington Beach collects $1.50 per hour from 6 AM to Midnight. They also offer an ability to purchase a parking pass which is good at all beach lots and anywhere there is a meter, EXCEPT the business zone. The parking pass costs $125 per year. Below is a photo of the newer meters, showing the $1.50 fee per hour: K : } ..✓o» ■ I.:. `11'3. i . . �M �'4iiCK5LS, k9t'' ES. Q`t,YAP.' E S lIL.L.fEDAL TO PARK 1Mk? L i CUT OF Cs; DF In terms of revenue, Huntington Beach generated $29,328 in January 2001. This represents approximately $13 per meter per day. Huntington Beach meters parking for 18 hours at $1.50 per hour, each day, so this represents 48% occupancy during this month. In August 2001, by contrast, the same area generated $59,002 in revenues. This represents 97% occupancy, or $26.22 per meter per day (Attached as attachment 6 with other Huntington Beach site visit materi als). The per meter per day figures will look slightly skewed from the Laguna Beach models, as Huntington Beach meters their parking for more hours, and charge more money. However, if one considers that at $1.50 per hour, over 18 hours, theoretical maximum capacity would be $27 per meter per day. Staff generated the above figures using this assumption. The similarities between Huntington Beach and Seal Beach can be seen in the geographic nature of their Main St., and the nature of the parking meters installed within that area. While their Main St. only has 75 meters, the percentage usage rate represents a telling characteristic of the amount of patrons coming to the area and their willingness to pay for parking. Seal Beach has a very similar configuration of businesses and streets. Staff again acknowledges that there are differences in demographic and business characteristics of Main St. Huntington Beach and Main St. Seal Beach, but also wishes to show the Council the estimates that are contained in this study are accurate in terms of percentage usage. Redondo Beach Staff visited with Mike Magdaleno with the City of Redondo Beach, currently the Municipal Enforcement Manager. There are a staff of 3 full time individuals who are responsible for collection and maintenance of the parking meters in Redondo. The City has placed parking meters throughout many parts of the City, including along the Main St. Parking Meter Study 21 August 2002 beachfront (called the "Esplanade "), and near their historic pier, etc. Staff feels that the most applicable comparison which can be made to Seal Beach is found in what is referred to in Redondo Beach as "The Village." This is an area which is very similar to Seal Beach in terms of parking and street facade, with angled street parking in a commercial area near the beach, with predominantly local businesses. This area is in the southern portion of Redondo Beach. z . ,:. -.-,, ,:„-- s , . • :...,,,,... . . '4 .. , , ,„ ,,,..,,-- -, le„, X fl rr . ., ... + f .. ,�t .„, - , ,, ,.. .+-• aM -. I 1. j .....,.. The interesting thing about this area of the City is that some of the parking is metered, some is not. Some of the metered parking has 1 hour, while directly across the street is 2 hour parking. In the non metered areas, some has 20 minute parking, and some has 2 hour parking. Apparently the City of Redondo Beach has crafted their parking scheme to the direct needs of the businesses which front the street. While staff does not agree with the approach, it clearly gives Seal Beach an opportunity to see what parking demand will generate in revenue with free parking in the immediate vicinity. Further, it will give an idea as to the true worth of those parking spots, as they are being utilized by patrons willing to pay. In terms of the mechanisms, Redondo Beach, much like Huntington Beach & Laguna Beach, are replacing all of their older parking meters with newer meters produced by POM. They employ both the twin head design and single meters for each space, depending on where you are in the City. Below is a picture of the Riveria Village, with meters along the street front, in contrast to another adjacent street, with 1 hour parking: 1 r . l; � .� ` `• �r "'�" :,„iI' BISQ[I 01 ■ . :711 E^; M 'fit " ": r. :,,?r -«A., w i t J , - - 3 r t M O. h C ft.Z . ' - - Main St. Parking Meter Study 22 August 2002 In terms of revenue, the City of Redondo Beach has 450 parking meters in this portion of the City, including a number of surface lots, and street parking meters for the "main strip" and the surrounding side streets. Redondo charges $.75 per hour, and meters are enforced in some areas 24 hours a day, and in other areas from 6 AM to 8 PM. As such, staff has not been able to generate a good comparison analysis of revenues generated on a percentage basis, but has compiled total revenue on a monthly basis. In July 2001, the Riviera Village lot generated $11,894 in revenues. In November, the same area generated $10,979 in revenue. (Site visit materials from Redondo Beach attached as attachment 7) This is interesting in its application to Seal Beach. It is apparent that this area has far too many meters in its adjacent lots for the demand of the parking in the area. Seal Beach does not have this situation, in that it only has 257 total parking spaces for the Main St. area, and the City of Redondo Beach sells parking passes which can be used in metered parking. This permit costs $100. Different from Huntington Beach, this permit allows people to park at any metered parking area. This is a major policy difference and helps to explain why the revenues for the area would be drastically reduced. It also explains that the majority of the patrons utilizing these lots have these types of permits, as the lots and street parking were filled the day that staff went to the site, as evidenced by the picture below: "', n e . ; ..,....)pA t t : • -.4: . ... , r, * '' 1 ;14'4I litittP '; t . ,•.1.. , :, f. . , , 1 ;-,z z s ' n The other interesting note on the City of Redondo Beach is that staff got to see first hand how the different casings rust and decay over time. Mike Magdaleno highly recommended that the City utilize a casing that uses some zinc, as compared to the meters that are made of cast iron. Cast iron casings will decompose significantly faster: s yk �Ma ' , Main St. Parking Meter Stud r� August 2002 Potential Revenue Staff has analyzed parking meters in terms of potential revenue to the City. There are 301 parking spaces included within the subject area, which includes all of Main St., and the adjoining non - residential 1 block areas along Ocean Ave, Central Ave, and Electric Ave. Staff has proposed within this study to purchase 320 parking meters, as some will undoubtedly break and will need to be replaced or fixed. The revenue stream comes from some basic assumptions. These are: 1. Parking meters will be metered from 8 AM to 6 PM, seven days a week 2. Parking meter rates will be $1.00 per hour 3. The parking spaces which are restricted to 24 minutes will remain. This will not cause a fluctuation in the revenue stream, as the City will still assume a 50% occupancy rate over time for these stalls The hours of metering at the cities visited are all consistent with what staff is assuming for the purposes of this report. Daytime hours are typically what are looked at. If the Council chose to meter at night, staff could analyze this as well. The rate is consistent with what all other cities are currently charging. Laguna Beach has just recently raised the rate for metered parking to $1.50 per hour. Huntington Beach charges $1.50 per hour and Redondo Beach charges $.75 per hour. As the industry standard is clearly at around $1.00 per hour at this time, staff has utilized this figure as the basis for analysis. The revenue stream was then looked at using 3 different scenarios; a conservative approach, a median or expected approach, and the best case scenario. The conservative approach assumes 35% occupancy at the spaces over the course of the year. The median approach assumes 50% occupancy, and the best case scenario assumes 70% occupancy. Given what staff found at the other Cities, it is completely reasonable to assume that Seal Beach will perform at 50% occupancy average over the course of the year. The spaces at Laguna Beach, for example, operate at significantly more than 100% in its downtown area during the summer, and averages better than 35% in January. Staff feels that the median, or 50% figure, will give the most accurate depiction of future revenues. Staff has, as previously mentioned, included 35% and 70% occupancy rates for comparison. At 50% occupancy, 301 parking meters will generate $541,800 a year. This breaks down to $45,150 a month. This is a gross figure, and presumes the assumptions made above. Staff has given a break down of the costs associated with the meters and has provided an attachment which shows the costs and revenues associated with the program. Main St. Parking Meter Study 24 August 2002 Potential Costs Staff has analyzed parking meters in terms of potential costs to the City. There are 301 parking spaces included within the subject area, which includes all of Main St., and the adjoining non - residential 1 block areas along Ocean Ave, Central Ave, and Electric Ave. This cost analysis includes the initial purchase costs, collection costs, and long term maintenance costs. Pay & Park Option This option essentially would not cost the City anything. Ampco parking has been the City's contractor for parking services at the beach lots for 2 years, and has entered into contract with the City for installation and maintenance of those facilities. Essentially, Ampco puts in the system, maintains the system, and collects the revenue. Then, Ampco pays the City revenue which includes a base fee, and then revenues equal to 65% of gross parking receipts greater than $300,000. In this situation, there are no costs to the City. The Parking Committee has not recommended this option to the Council, but the option to utilize this type of system still exists. Traditional Meter Option As outlined in the cost benefit analysis provided within this report, parking meters must be purchased initially in order to begin generating revenue. Staff inquired as to a revenue sharing situation with this type of system, but none of the contractors had such a system in place. As such, if the City were to move forward with this program, initial monies would need to be expended in order to obtain the parking meters. The initial costs are expected to range between $391 and $481 per meter, including installation. Assuming that the City needs to purchase 301 meters initially (including spare meters and parts), the sum total would be somewhere between $125,120 and $153,920, including installation. Once these costs are expended, there will be maintenance and repair costs in addition. Most of the Cities contacted use in house staff to repair and replace the parking meters. As Seal Beach does not have any such staff readily available, staff has contacted both Ampco and the City of Long Beach for possible maintenance /revenue collection services. The City is currently under contract with the City of Long Beach for services to collect on the existing metered lots and pays Long Beach a flat fee of $12,000 per year to perform routine maintenance and collect the revenues. This contract was recently approved for another year. Staff also contacted Ampco parking (With whom the City currently contracts for beach parking services) and was able to get an estimate of these maintenance costs. For the proposed "new" parking meters, the collection and maintenance costs would be $37,500. The total cost to the City would be approximately $50,000 a year. Main St. Parking Meter Study 25 August 2002 Enforcement Paramount to any new parking management system is the proper enforcement of the system amongst its users. Staff is aware that there will be some confusion initially over the need to pay for parking along Main St., but acknowledges that there needs to be enforcement so that users of those parking spaces are paying their fair share of the costs. Staff envisions this process being similar to the parking enforcement which the City employs now, utilizing parking enforcement personnel from the Police Department. There are enforcement tools which help with the process of writing tickets and allow for the tickets to be punched into electronic keypads and the ticket is generated immediately. Staff has looked at these types of technologies, but sees this as an expense that the Council may consider at a future date, depending on the actualized revenue from the meters. Staff is recommending that the current system of utilizing police personnel for enforcement be retained. Main St. Parking Meter Study 26 August 2002 Phasing There exist several opportunities to phase in the parking meters along Main St. There are 3 blocks along Main St. Staff has prepared the following analysis of various phasing options: Option 1: This option would place meters on the 100 & 200 blocks first, along with the non- residential portions of Ocean Avenue and Central Avenue between 8 and 10 Sts. This is clearly the highest demanding parking area, due to its close proximity to the beach and ocean. This area would serve as an excellent pilot area to observe the effect of the meters and on parking in the area. Staff has provided a cost summary associated with the initial costs of providing meters in this area, and what the projected revenue would be as Attachment 3. Staff envisions this option then placing meters at the northern end of Main St. as the second phase. This would occur after a baseline could be established following actual results from meter collection. Staff projects that this option would generate approximately $446,400 per year for the 248 meters in the area. The cost range for only placing meters in these areas would be between $105,570 and $129,870 (Including installation), depending on which type of mechanism the City Council ultimately decided to purchase. Option 2: This option would phase only the 100 block of Main St. and the non - residential portions Ocean & Central Avenues from 8 St. to 10 St. While this is the clearly the highest demanding parking block in the area, there may be some spillover onto the "free" parking on the 200 block, as it is still relatively close to the ocean. However, staff has provided this as an option so that the Council can see the incremental costs associated with adding meters to 200 block in the initial phasing. The initial costs and projected revenues are shown as Attachment 4. Staff projects that this option would generate approximately $307,800 per year for the 171 meters which would be located in this area. The cost range for only placing meters in this area would be between $74,290 and $91,390 (Including installation), depending on which type of mechanism the City Council ultimately decided to purchase. Option 3: This would be a full build alternative, with meters being placed on the 100, 200, and 300 blocks of Main St., and along Ocean, Central and Electric Avenues between 8 and 10 Sts. This would be the most costly of the three options depending on how the Council wishes to proceed with financing and purchase of the meters. The cost schedule and expected revenue generation are attached as Attachments 1 & 2. This is the recommended Main St. Parking Meter Study 27 August 2002 alternative and analysis of the costs and benefits is provided as part of the recommendation. Main St. Parking Meter Study 28 August 2002 Recommendation Staff is recommending placing parking meters on Main St. from Pacific Coast Highway to Ocean Avenue, including the side streets of Ocean Ave, Central Avenue, and Electric Avenue between 8 R. & 10 R. The rationale for this is: The City's current financial situation, and the demand for parking in the old town area. This are a total of 301 parking meters which would be required. The Parking Committee further recommends retaining the existing meters in the Electric Avenue & Main St. lots. Staff recommends that should the Council choose this option (rather than "pay and park ") that new meters be installed for uniformity in maintenance, as well as technical issues with the auditing software of the existing meters. Traditional Meter Installation Staff is recommending that the parking meters be installed simultaneously, rather than in phases on the 100, 200, and 300 blocks, as was discussed in this report. The rationale for this recommendation is that the City needs to have a cohesive parking management plan for the downtown area, rather than a hodgepodge of individual plans. The plan must include what areas will be "pay" and what areas will be free. It must further delineate how low long parking will be allowed in each area, and what the fee will be to park in the designated pay areas. This will bring together the parking system in old town and be far easier to understand for the average resident and visitor to the old town area. New meters will be installed in the Main St. and Electric Avenue lots. Traditional Meter Installation Costs & Revenues: As outlined in the cost & benefit analysis spreadsheets attached to this study, it will cost anywhere from $125,120 to $153,920 to purchase and install the parking meters (320), depending on which type of meter the City decides to purchase. This figure includes all installation costs. The annual maintenance costs associated with this program are expected to be somewhere around $50,000. Staff contacted Ampco parking, the current operator who maintains and collects the revenues for the beach lots regarding this service. They have provided staff with an initial estimate of $37,500 to collect and maintain the "new" meters. Utilizing the same firm to handle all the parking management, as will be discussed later, will have other positive effects in terms of City management of the contracts. Staff would recommend that the City either contract with Ampco or the City of Long Beach for these services. The anticipated revenues from this program are approximately $541,800. This is based on an assumption of 50% occupancy over the course of the year, and charging $1.00 per hour, between 8 AM and 6 PM, 7 days a week. Given these assumptions of costs and benefits, the program will generate a net revenue of $337,880 in the first year (assuming the meters are paid for in a one time cash transaction), and then $491,800 each year after. Main St. Parking Meter Study 29 August 2002 The above information is summarized below: Program Type Traditional Parking Meters: Location: Main St. (100, 200, 300 Blocks) Electric Ave. — Main to Alley — both sides Ocean Ave. — Main to Alley — both sides Central Ave. — Main to Alley — both sides Hours: 8 AM to 6 PM, 7 Days a week Cost: $1.00 per hour Time Limit: 2 Hour Max Parking (Existing 24 minute restricted parking would remain) Cost to City: $125,120 to $153,920 Install Costs $50,000/Year Maintenance Year 1 Costs: $203,920 (MAX) Year 2 & Future Costs: $50,000 Revenue: $541,800 Annually (Assumes 50% utilization) Net Revenue: $337,880 (Year 1) $491,800 (Year 2 & Future) Phasing: Beyond the simple arithmetic of the parking meter equation, staff is recommending that this system be implemented in one phase to further define the parking management system for the old town area. By placing meters in this area, the true net worth of those parking spaces will be realized, much needed revenues will be generated for the City, and the fairest distribution of parking will occur. Marketing: In terms of marketing, staff is recommending that meetings be held with the Chamber of Commerce, in addition to City Council meetings, and that articles be placed in the Sun • and News Enterprise newspapers if possible. ••Further, staff recommends that signs be • posted at the following intersections to help advise patrons of the new parking system: Ocean and Main St., Main St. & Central Ave., Main St. & Electric Ave., and Main St. & Pacific Coast Highway. These signs may or may not be temporary, depending on the enforcement demands and needs as the program initiates. While parking meters themselves are relatively self explanatory, the newness of the system and the need to pay Main St. Parking Meter Study 30 August 2002 for the parking meter will surprise some patrons. As such, staff would also recommend a grace period in the very early stages of implementation. Staff recommends that some allowances be given to the business community (ie some free parking cards etc.) in the early stages of implementation to help ease the transition to the new parking system. These cards may be used to give out to patrons of the businesses or in whatever fashion the business sees fit. Staff feels that this transition period is critical to the understanding and acceptance of the new parking system in place in this area. Aesthetics: From an aesthetic standpoint, staff is recommending that the meters be constructed of a zinc /iron mix and be installed with 2 meter heads for each pole. This, given what staff observed at other Cities, is the best approach from an aesthetic standpoint. The reduction of physical poles will reduce the barriers between the sidewalk and the street, and only place poles where necessary. Staff does not recommend utilizing a system where more than 2 spaces are being paid for in one location in the Main St. area. There is not enough right of way to place a Pay & Park machine or meter head for more than 2 spaces along Main St. The 2 meter heads for each pole system will ensure that each space has a pole directly adjacent to the space, and also reduces the visual impact of the pole & meter heads themselves. Further, staff is recommending that on the meter casing itself, identification be placed so that patrons realize which meter head they will need to pay in order to be in compliance for their space. This would be similar to the parking meters shown in Laguna Beach. For construction, the City is recommending an iron/zinc mix as that is the industry standard in beach cities to help combat the salt air from rusting and decomposing the parking meters. Financing: Staff is recommending that the program be financed with General Fund revenues, rather than bond for the necessary monies. Staff looked into the possibility of shared revenue programs, similar to the "Pay & Park" system at the beach lots. This type of program does not exist for traditional parking meters. As such, should the Council decide to put in parking meters, an expenditure of monies will need to take place. Staff recommends that the monies be expended in the first year with reserve General Fund revenues. Should the Council wish to borrow the money for this program, staff will gladly provide an analysis of debt servicing costs and impact to net revenues. Technology: Staff is recommending that the Council implement the system which incorporates meters which have the capacity to use both a "Park Card" and coins. This allows frequent visitor to purchase a "Park Card" and use it rather than coins. Staff recommends placing machines which distribute these cards at City Hall, and at 2 or 3 strategic locations to allow patrons the option of purchasing a card, rather than needing to be concerned with Main St. Parking Meter Study 31 August 2002 having the right amount of coin money. As mentioned above, staff is also recommending that a zinc /iron mix housing be used around the meter described above. Maintenance /Collection: Staff is recommending that an outsource contract be signed with someone to perform the routine maintenance and collection of revenues similar to the existing contract with the City of Long Beach. The City does not have the staff to assign any individuals to this program. If revenues are as expected, staff would recommend the Council consider bringing on a full time parking meter person at the end of the first year of the program. This would further reduce costs and potentially allow the City to fix broken meters in house, rather than outsourcing all of those expenses. In the short term however, staff recommends that the Council enter into an agreement with an outside agency to handle the collection and maintenance of the meters: Staff contacted Ampco parking to see if they maintain and collect revenues for traditional parking meters. Kerry Turner at Ampco indicated that they did in fact perform this service. Under conceptual terms, Ampco would service and maintain all parking meters along Main St., including changing out the meter mechanisms when necessary, ordering replacement parts, fixing the meters, and reinstalling them. Ampco would also collect the revenue and provide audit reports, based on the technology provided as part of the original purchase package from the meter manufacturer. This service would cost the City $37,500 per year for the new meters only, and parts would be additional. There would almost certainly be a provision for unusually strange labor above and beyond normal servicing of meters as well. Staff views this alternative as being far superior to contracting with the City of Long Beach again; as if the Council were to contract with Ampco, the City could bring all of the parking management under the umbrella of one outside contractor, rather than splitting the management with two out sources. This scenario greatly helps management of the parking program and allows for greater efficiency in performing analysis of the program. Existing Metered Lots The Parking Committee recommends that the existing 76 meters in the three lots at Electric Avenue and Main St. respectively remain with parking meters and not switch to Pay and Park. Staff recommends that if this option is chosen, that new meters be installed as the auditing software has been discontinued and the original manufacturer no longer services the software. Overall Program Recommendations: Staff recommends that the Council consider and implement the above recommended changes to the old town parking program. By putting in meters along Main St., the City can gain access to needed revenues and fairly allocate parking demand. In addition to Main St. Parking Meter Study 32 August 2002 this, staff is aware that there may be some spillover effect to neighboring residential streets. By continuing to enforce the 1 hour parking on those streets, staff is confident that the vast majority of patrons to Main St. commercial businesses will pay and park along Main St., rather than park their car on 8 or 10 Sts. and spend time walking to and from where they are going on Main St., only to have to return to move the car less than an hour later. In order to further this and to make the system uniform, staff is recommending implementing one hour parking be implemented on all streets between 5th St. & 12 St. Staff sees the symbiotic relationship between strict enforcement and the revenue generating metering system along Main St. as key to the success of the entire program. Without strict enforcement and education of patrons & residents, the program will fail. Programs such as these have been successful in other cities without causing significant drop offs in terms of patrons visiting the commercial areas. Parking at or near the beach is a prime commodity, and the City must consider it's true net worth in making these types of decisions. In doing so, and enforcing the program as applied, the City can gain necessary revenues and keep a more orderly parking system in place. Once the initial costs are recovered, staff recommends that the Council consider the following long term goals for the revenue stream: 1. Help to eliminate General Fund operating deficit for fiscal year 2003 -2004 and future years 2. Help pay for road improvements 3. Improve streetscape of Main St. (ie curb, gutter, & sidewalk) 4. Plant new trees along Main St. & Ocean Ave. 5. Create identification symbol for old town area (ie clock tower etc.) 6. Help subsidize other City programs as deemed appropriate by the Council Need For Coastal Permit: Any metering program within the Coastal Zone would require the City to apply for and obtain a Coastal Permit from the California Coastal Commission. Staff would recommend that if the Council desires to move forward with a pay for parking program, that a decision be made as to the direction of the program so that the appropriate permit requests of the Coastal Commission can be made. If the Council has any questions regarding the analysis or findings of this study, feel free to contact staff at any time. Schedule Timeline: As this project will require not only City Council approvals, staff envisions this process taking approximately 9 months from start to finish. The starting point would be the point Main St. Parking Meter Study 33 August 2002 at which the Council votes to direct staff to proceed with the process and apply to the Coastal Commission. The following is a breakdown of that potential schedule: • City Council votes to begin process • City submits to Coastal Commission (1 -2 Months) • Coastal Commission hearings (4 -6 months) • Coastal Commission approval & condition compliance (1 month) • Construction of meters & implementation of program (1 month) If the Council were to vote in favor of this project, it would take between 6 and 9 months to begin implementation of the program. Mac Cummins Associate Planner / Special Projects Manager Attachments (9) 1. Recommended Alternative Revenue Analysis 2. Recommended Alternative Cost Analysis 3. Cost & Benefit Analysis Option 1 4. Cost & Benefit Analysis Option 2 5. Laguna Beach Site Visit Materials 6. Huntington Beach Site Visit Materials 7. Redondo Beach Site Visit Materials 8. Existing Parking Contracts 9. Parking Meter Descriptions /Pictures /Specifications Main St. Parking Meter Study 34 August 2002 Attachment 1 Potential Revenues (Phasing Option #3 Full Build Out) Main St. Parking Meters Potential Revenue (Conservative) Number of Meters Revenue Per Meter Total Revenue Total Revenue Total Revenue Per Day Per Day Per Month Per Year Main St. 100 Block 68 $3.50 $238.00 $7,140.00 $85,680.00 200 Block 54 $3.50 $189.00 $5,670.00 $68,040.00 . 300 Block 41 $3.50 $143.50 $4,305.00 $51,660.00 Ocean Ave. 27 $3.50 $94.50 $2,835.00 $34,020.00 Central Ave. 23 $3.50 $80.50 $2,415.00 $28,980.00 Electric Ave. 12 $3.50 $42.00 $1,260.00 $15,120.00 Existing Lots 76 $3.50 $266.00 $7,980.00 $95,760.00 Total 301 $1,053.50 $31,605.00 $379,260.00 1 Assumptions: 35% Occumpancy @ $1.00/hour (Metered Parking 8 AM - 6 PM) Main St. Parking Meters Potential Revenue (Median) Number of Meters Revenue Per Meter Total Revenue Total Revenue Total Revenue Per Day Per Day Per Month Per Year Main St. 100 Block 68 $5.00 $340.00 $10,200.00 $122,400.00 200 Block 54 $5.00 $270.00 $8,100.00 $97,200.00 300 Block 41 $5.00 $205.00 $6,150.00 $73,800.00 Ocean Ave. 27 $5.00 $135.00 $4,050.00 $48,600.00 Central Ave. 23 $5.00 $115.00 $3,450.00 $41,400.00 Electric Ave. 12 $5.00 $60.00 $1,800.00 $21,600.00 Existing Lots 76 $5.00 $380.00 $11,400.00 $136,800.00 Total 301 $1,505.00 $45,150.00 $541,800.00 Assumptions: 50% Occumpancy @ $1.00 /hour (Metered Parking 8 AM - 6 PM) Main St. Parking Meters Potential Revenue (Optimistic Case) Number of Meters Revenue Per Meter Total Revenue Total Revenue Total Revenue Per Day Per Day . Per Month Per Year Main St. 100 Block 68 $7.00 $476.00 $14,280.00 $171,360.00 200 Block 54 $7.00 $378.00 $11,340.00 $136,080.00 300 Block 41 $7.00 $287.00 $8,610.00 $103,326.00 Ocean Ave. 27 $7.00 $189.00 $5,670.00 $68,040.00 Central Ave. 23 $7 00 $161.00 $4,830.00 $57,960.00 Electric Ave. 12 $7.00 $84.00 $2,520.00 $30,240.00 Existing Lots 76 $7.00 $532.00 $15,960.00 $191,520.00 Total 301 $2,107.00 $63,210.00 $758,520.00 Assumptions: 70% Occumpancy @ $1.00 /hour (Metered Parking 8 AM - 6 PM) • Attachment 2 4E. d d d > Z 00 We _m t0A�010 ^0100N I ��MN C p N N N N M N N N W M N N N N N w 0 O .- O a Z 1. d V 2m 00000 00000 0 0000 d o 00000 00000 0 0000 a� 00000 W W W W M ] M 0 W W W W W W t N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N c > w a e d 26 00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000 `c 00000 00000 o 0000 LL N 0 00000 1- «««« SEES Iff 6 6 NNIgNN ' NY7e O o a ..0... MMMMM N 49494949 M d 7 a' M 7 1 IL a 00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000 00000 00000 0 0000 I S E 00000 00000 o IaDaeao O d N N N N N N N N N O mama C « N M 10 0) w M Yf { o + � 0 h f0 h a+ N NM11')p MM a W V II1 I1 ON -0 O 0 N 66666 N N N N N N 6666 _ Q = 0 m d t o7,- 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0000 +°- 2« 00000 00000 0 olwaol w c .- m 10 ,0 le sd .= 0 a 066 ti N d O)�N IO Mlnw pp 01 wIo 1 L. Maa vaaav M mm mm 3 @ d W C 66666 N N N N N N 6666 d o . a .e C 0 • 0 00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000 o a — ;g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O V avvaa aaavv a vv n LL w N N N N N 4949494949 N 49494949 w C al d a • V 0 0000 00000 0 0000 0 00000 00000 0 0) 0)0)0) . N 0 0 I n 10 I O u i 0 0 0 0 M o o V a d DPIDO h O) N a a N 00) ) Q 2 M M M M a M M a a a M M M M N O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N - W U v w a I' • 00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N w Z E M M M M M M CO CO M M M M f+) M M Q N .. w O 1 m > w RI w W a O )..9 ›sw T a wp w 20m 0....m W C a d N w LLD G OLLO E a ` . q W o C Q c c d m coo 'a�I O. L LL Y 0. d. 2 d C 0 0 O C w w J m Q Jd . c d U d y��c a a t v v u C o o s c 5 4 O C 2 c w ,1 >, c c Q OJCa' Qa' Z -I a' 2 W . U Y 2 2 C) d • U C C C 0 0 o w o C 0 c w w u tRA 0 d c c c c Q 0 c c c c Q w w 2 . W W o r LNIVNN- N N N N_ V W W W c C w c awwwww 0 w w w w w c a O G E E 6 d 22222 a 22222 v 2-g'-= . .2 a a a a a a 0 0 0 0 � 0 > w w o , Attachment 3 Potential Revenues (Phasing Option #1) Main St. Parking Meters Potential Revenue (Conservative) Number of Meters Revenue Per Meter Total Revenue Total Revenue Total Revenue Per Day Per Day Per Month Per Year Main St. 100 Block 68 $3.50 $238.00 $7,140.00 $85,680.00 200 Block 54 $3.50 $189.00 $5,670 00 $68,040 00 Ocean Ave. 27 $3.50 $94.50 $2,835.00 $34,020.00 Central Ave. 23 $3.50 $80 50 $2,415.00 $28,980.00 Existing Lots 76 $3.50 $266.00 $7,980.00 $95,760.00 Total 248 $602.00 $18,060.00 $216,720.00 Assumptions: 35% Occumpancy ©$1.00/hour (Metered Parking 8 AM - 6 PM) Main St. Parking Meters Potential Revenue (Median) Number of Meters Revenue Per Meter Total Revenue Total Revenue Total Revenue Per Day Per Day Per Month Per Year Main St. 100 Block 68 $5.00 $340.00 $10,200.00 $122,400.00 200 Block 54 $5.00 $270.00 $8,100.00 $97,200.00 Ocean Ave. 27 $5.00 $135 00 $4,050.00 $48,600.00 Central Ave. 23 $5.00 $115.00 $3,450.00 $41,400.00 Existing Lots 76 $5.00 $380.00 $11,400.00 $136,800.00 Total 248 $1,240.00 $37,200.00 $446,400.00 Assumptions: 50% Occumpancy @ $1.00 /hour (Metered Parking 8 AM - 6 PM) Main St. Parking Meters Potential Revenue (Optimistic Case) Number of Meters Revenue Per Meter Total Revenue Total Revenue Total Revenue Per Day Per Day ` Per Month Per Year Main St. 100 Block 68 $7.00 $476.00 $14,280.00 $171,360.00 200 Block 54 $7.00 $378.00 $11,340.00 $136,080.00 Ocean Ave. 27 $7.00 $189.00 $5,670.00 $68,040.00 Central Ave. 23 $7.00 $161.00 $4,830.00 $57,960.00 Existing Lots 76 $7.00 $532.00 $15,960.00 $191,520.00 • 248 $1,736.00 • $52,080.00 $624,960.00 Assumptions: 70% Occumpancy © $1.00 /hour (Metered Parking 8 AM - 6 PM) 0 0 0 0 0 > Zo t m � w,. So AO)OON 0 � e9 N O e NNNN PI tel fN 4901 P1 N NNN V O C O LL Z 0 Ill rC .c O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 y 0 00 O O O O O 0 O O O O a 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 O O 0 0 0 0 O ` In WI III N 000)00 to ill ill IO 7 a N N N N N m > 0 O: E d 2 .c O O O O 0 O O O O O O 0000 ` c 00000 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O O 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 • O IL M N N N N N N N N N N N N N Cl N 0 0 0. P91919 2 0 19 P91919 b) e9 P 9 0 0 0 ID eN Me1►69N > 0 E c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. LL 0 00000 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N limo r ..... N 00n . V W e ° 9 1 0 0 N. P7). 0 4, c q2 O��� 2-2- NN N O op A 0 ) . co f y00 N en C L a d " — d 2_ .. O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m 00000 O O O O O 0 f A O) 0) t o C IG f0 0 ) CO 10 0 O 01 U) 0 07 1 O) N e9 H w {O m 0 ID H a 19 C U 19 et V V V a V V V 0 19 t9 e9 e9 N C N N N N N 1 O C W Q a 0 0 4 u. .. le E. O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 1 0 o N 33 et et �� 6961 � 0i 4040 V. V e9 W C CL E • N a ✓ a) m d, 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) 0 0 0 $ y A 000)0) 10 O In 000 0 t90 V f0 • N 0nao 07 N. 0) n- V N Mm O N *E. ax 0 000 01 0) V V v a to eA to to to m9 •9 to to to u9 to to eA to m 4 O .o o e 1 O 0 a C m 7 '�" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 4 Z n A n A A A A A A A A 16. n A A C N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 H O 1. 4 y u >. >. a 1a m m a a >. H T >• N >. Y A. N N N m w c Q c . d U O V 0 E I- 2 m 2 V o u, 2 at O � tLL Y Q �L� a 0 'a , F o E, .E a m i d Q -i d_ d E 01 U U • V U • d d _ u . • 0 ` 3 c3 .6 ° c 2 � a Y >. c) 2 c c e ? J . , a' 2 Z J Q � Q .W .. 0 y Q Q C c Q Q 4 Q y `�c O i)aieia� c 0 m ti2Smm o d c c c c Q o c c c C e 0 0 2 a) a, W W p NNNN — NN N N— 0 W W W c c 8 c a W W W W W p w w w w w c rn m m E E • • 0. ..... rf 0 a 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 c m m= 1- aaaaa aaaaa 0 (7(733 z• Attachment 4 Potential Revenues (Phasing Option #2) Main St. Parking Meters Potential Revenue (Conservative) Number of Meters Revenue Per Meter Total Revenue Total Revenue Total Revenue Per Day Per Day Per Month Per Year Main St. . 100 Block 68 $3.50 $238.00 $7,140.00 $85,680.00 Ocean Ave. 27 $3.50 $94.50 $2,835.00 $34,020.00 Existing Lots 76 $3.50 $266.00 $7,980.00 $95,760.00 Total 171 $598.50 $17,955.00 $215,460.00 Assumptions: 35% Occumpancy @ $1.00 /hour (Metered Parking 8 AM - 6 PM) Main St. Parking Meters Potential Revenue (Median) Number of Meters Revenue Per Meter Total Revenue Total Revenue Total Revenue Per Day Per Day Per Month Per Year Main St. 100 Block 68 $5.00 $340.00 $10,200.00 $122,400.00 Ocean Ave. 27 $5.00 $135.00 $4,050.00 $48,600.00 Existing Lots 76 $5.00 $380.00 $11,400.00 $136,800.00 Total 171 $855.00 $25,650.00 $307,800.00 Assumptions: 50% Occumpancy @ $1.00/hour (Metered Parking 8 AM - 6 PM) Main St. Parking Meters Potential Revenue (Optimistic Case) Number of Meters Revenue Per Meter Total Revenue Total Revenue Total Revenue Per Day Per Day Per Month Per Year Main St. 100 Block 68 $7.00 $476.00 $14,280.00 $171,360.00 Ocean Ave. 27 $7.00 $189.00 $5,670.00 $68,040.00 Existing Lots 76 $7.00 $532.00 $15,960.00 $191,520.00 171 $1,197.00 $35,910.00 $430,920.00 Assumptions: 70% Occumpancy @ $1.00 /hour (Metered Parking 8 AM - 6 PM) CD CD m CI > Z0 0 d C 1D F CCO A 07OON " O D � < 01N 0 O CV CV IV CV in CV N a7 C"7 M N IV CV CV IV V w O 0 O IL Z a_ N d 2 L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L. 0 O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O CL mr Ca O O O C C o C C C C C C C o InN NNN O NHNN N If7 It) h C d 6949696969 W W W W W N 69606961 . Ce M o L O O O o 0 O 0000 0000 1- C O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ci C O C C 0 C C CD O O C C 6 C LL m t I D { O D t I D t 0 0 { { C 4 m I CO { I D D CD CO O NNNN N N N N H 1f1 N NN N 1ff 0 O. N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N CD W W W W CC► W W W W W W W W W W CI re N C o zo I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O. w e o6CCO 000 d C o 0w 07 07a et It. as 070707 O I+1 r, N CD 0 0 NO07O OID 1/1 C+1 4- C+1 CO I: ID C a co ONm of CO. N I;4- 'IT Of CD Ha 1 OO A O 0D CO CD CO CD 07 CD CO CD CO Ti o A W W W W CO W W W W W W W W W W CO 1- O. Di d� :; °� a 000 00000 0 0000 C m 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O D l O 7 D 7 0 7 c d C 0 T 7 N ID ID 0 0 0 7111 f0 a 0 D 01 ONa CC9 ai CO a C C7 a v a vvav$ I. _ C9 eqC 01 C in C W W W W W W W W W 40 W W W W �C V L. CO L a a g o is LL 0 00000 o o o o o 0 0000 n t, v 00 000 00000 0 0000 m o v v vvv v vvv v cv > m WWW WW 69696969 69 0 c 3 m e c 0 S O �% a C) cii 00000 00 go 00 0 0000 v 0 0000 00 0 0)0)0)0) 0. y o tiO to li) C 117117 07 07 ap all m CI If1h0 O) co N N 007 t. . D. = P) C•7 i7 C7 V C") C V nr NT C) Co) M C+) N .. 41 69 49 69 69 WWWWW 49 6969 69 69 S 3 a 0 o n =d 0 000 0 00000 0 0000 a" Z 0) 07 0) 0) 0) O) 0) 0) 07 0) 0) CO 0)) O) 0) 4 r o o 1- ai u n 0 m 1) O. a t. m m m O m 0 O 0. a.. 0. co c u) ❑ 2 p D ❑ LL p T e W c Q c : m cOO 01 LL N Q V LL N Q C) 0 U O 2 c E < R' p t LL CI t LL y 2 c o'o w - 0 „, 0 Q -I 0 i 3: d 0 2 U U V U W 0 C7 Z 0 o�c> cd U o�c> le 0 m Z c o 0 o 0 C-.1 �re 2 c Z -J .. ° R: 11.1 m v Q Q c L. 0 ou off' 0 0005 c C of m 0 a) ) 2 cccc v cccc 0 tD 0WW o I 2NNNN NNNN O W W W c c .0 c aWWWWW O0 WWWW c 0) t03EE m d 1 1 -o ot.c a 0. MMMMM MMMMM '0 m 03 1 2 H 4444¢¢¢ ¢¢¢¢¢ M C C9� 2 Attachment 5 \ . i , , , - .. z , . ‘ - y ‘di ji; so•ot_:,,, \ { +aaan, i i tso 1 ' O o . DR y ^'D w o o 0 0 0 ' � _ ,A I. a1 W N N N EE N N N ��� Na +. f o . En t c � e �� � 'x] Cl7 d n G7 ,a � r . N1 O U i s f q+ y Fr �� ° A x ` , N w N N 4. N N w a ' a i � N A W Cr, o J ° UJ' Sr. sT ` rfw s } N i 9 1. 1...:- ' so Tr,. Of ii.. I iii m ok \ t 0 ,:„.3. '''' l a. f ''.1 .: 9 °'0' •p p r ., I.GUM. [ANIO fRO NT.G[RD Of "V1 �.0 \ ° N 1 '' t e /' a 1-y! CD V t \ [—t `?'�' / ` rh [. , : ..k : 0- 71 11■1 ? V ; C , 0 h ....,, in r— a �. . f ` ` h 11[ n4'V O rs `M 4' ir , ^ \ - _ 4:7 "% In E 3 M EGrON S ! 1. EN / f A aP� -- �N 'b O T ft, O. h p . Y� a *' _ Xr1∎ 'j\ ✓ _ • � � � ON T, DR �. " � 8 r � i +Y Nh AAA /' / P ;t / 4 _ b OD 0 / X i VVV/ 1PVX M [ + + �L E Ssa "N, ....s,, o Ai .` - g `7"4 N [ ..) o Vi I ��°N hf a z� sAN `\� t y J ". � N N NgDC �D 1 / ANV f t/' MNf , Liji /� ,� , �, Ull1 —' , J r.. N"F o % 4 < - ERIR��'LD"f 1 S 00 I I 6°0 } \' f �� L = r � +,_ 4 j' \ � � e... Px r N , y th: II NT' FLORA S7 " t. VVV �� �. M M i i 1'4 ; ` ; el f. • S T 1 Dr- , n • 6 d ° 1 r I 4? S.0.--.4: QDD [^ a ° an S , , f i ,�, `- a . � , ` 1 4 4 R ° cry, .. I a° •6- 5' �� . .s` \� +YY ; l N NI N + �, � 1' s 1 /. � V + y 0.000000 j� k Y t +E _ ? , N FOR .S ;' , :::: ^ °.D C C n n C E r a ' PI .1 r m C 01 f M� " E ( � N a , (p c »'11. IE p tN l /0 i e I h.1 f . r 01 01 () .+ + N N to w J v 0 O r N l..) M L f Y E f� ' D ^ /ls' Y � D Y l T l O N r / O T 1 . Y+ O SS Y+ • _ 1 1 l . +_ +t 1pR� T L4 sq, 1 ' j {■ + D t ; YES ,_____, ri, „,,,, , —�/ l� f 1 I1 \/� p ,, ,,,,, , ,,__ ,..:, „,,______, C . .:, — _ t . .. ik Y- .1.k.G.:1.),1.7...- 7------- 111(' 41�'/SI JJ �� \\ \ \V .M , j'44,...7j. $,� r L . tl � � • S . / / / /,1R 44 1[0 (/ Y p+' • ♦ ,,. .. I ,RR+ Y`uu •' r �E it \ +NN R N ' S� t ■ * / � 4... :, , V Y N \ ^ ,YRNI rr S Cb / IF ' 1 (C � p l ' Y Y p I. 1 T 1 , , l •R +~ I 9 Ypj EW ; Y� Wo. R� on M0 / - 1 1M N RDC1 it J ! p ( CER � j a E Y / lo •LLIpL ST _ r j • `A Z" 1 s D 9 Y R fl 1 4 + l � Rh1N l \\ a G + + ~i `9 � R IV1 3°°, 1 '""' 11 ` II 60, a� �o f r . z k.1R0 C R f + y 1, q -p e.. = M i —IOOL o �, e , p f��\,1,-, .1R ^ YV N h f t o+ I ■ i fN N 'f, \ RE C•TT • -R iIOR•St M3 h �� '�i tM�ll Ny f � 1 i 11 L � :11 . p -:4:54::' , �� AY gY lwp 1 I o ILJI , i % T I h Ell 1 1 .fatOcc T sr 0. .., s; 4 L - € 1 Meter inventory — All Zones / all spaces (revised 7/00, 3/01) A 328 . B 224 C 259 D 427 E 262 F 241 G 134 BTM 27 FTM 35 GL 208 ML 16 OA 20 OB 24 PO 15 Total parking meters 2098 Total # of spaces for Pay Station 122 Total all metered spaces 2220 Total all handicap spaces (with in metered zones) 25 Total all controlled parking spaces (with in metered zones) 2247 Time limit ' 20 minute "loading" (metered parking after 6pm and all day Sat/Sun) 13 30 minute 48 Multiple rate (30 min / 2 hrs) 16 1 hour 67 2 hour 1178 3 hour 103 4 hour 413 10 hour 382 Model & type Mechanical 439 Electronic / digital (APM) 1659 Machines (5 pay stations) # of spaces 122 • Lock code 01— 64 Battery powered (6v) Battery powered (9v) . Solar assist 0 Collection routes (meters) 20 Collection routes (machines) 9 Maintenance route # 1 Dale Maintenance route # 2 Dave . X: +f 4 n C !� �. a3t if y y, y , . s f '‹ ' r t ` k -°'.d" �? o �i, € ��; • • � ' � si , b , " 4'� � a4� °�. e I , �i' ��f. � ..S '-Xr`•��` ,� r7 r'��'` � , A ' • s ',Tr �_ � 11 20 02 w n �4 20 6 - � _ 4 ) +4r1 i � :fit!# :11s*• „ _- ,�:,,r,....-:'.4 , r im I.: �. "- PP °� { � aa, -, ..�a � ,' pY-i+ i _ �11f ..• 1 r .. s'rt .l,:l ,r 1. .w `- ,;.fl !.R� SX ;YFir7 -� �` . , Area # Avg Meters Revenue Monthly Avg Daily Avg A 328 $21,991.78 $67.05 $2.23 B 224 $24,436.98 $109.09 $3.64 BTM 27 $3,348.75 $124.03 $4.13 C 259 $33,974.76 $131.18 $4.37 D 427 $26,504.84 $62.07 $2.07 E 262 $482.96 $1.84 $0.06 F 241 $7,669.91 $31.83 $1.06 FTM 62 $3,637.75 $59.03 $1.97 G 134 $3,073.94 $22.94 $0.76 GL 208 $24,117.26 $115.95 $3.86 ML 16 $2,005.75 $125.36 $4.18 OA 20 $2,381.50 $119.08 $3.97 OB 24 $2,732.25 $113.84 $3.79 PO 15 $1,522.51 $101.50 $3.38 Totals 2247 $157,880.94 $84.63 $2.82 Weather Average: 2.9 Note: M figures in this report are based on actual dates of collections and not the date of deposits. Therefore these figures will not exactly match those of the Finance Department due to the lag difference between field revenue collections and subsequent entry/records of deposits. -°f'; -... X'jtw:Y.Fe F _ _ P'a SC.74°I. 37,7. � ^W .' 7. hY.f[$A`9CfifY � •T- - -:7if - Y a '}•Tr_^'5177-7:2"-71:::: - " -- �•fi ";• _�.�.'e-.�` c�_-',_ _ 'C =.�t .•e•-.�� :`.S.�x •a �r�'Y:.'::`.�.. .•.� F _ i -- + > =. t- �':",r'•r '.•∎t -mil = 'r L- :" or'"*"•24 :S :ti ;1 fir--,47„....,", `-qq `1'+ .,- e" ^_ _ sJ.•F.•,Af s -:s.a _ , eM _� . ' ,�. -; +•-,A �(f• T.4 4,• - 4 •. 'k ' .- t ?X ' . • 4 - 4, 41 ,-1...; ; • h'4 1-7„7e,,,,-,... ° . -f... ..Z-* c mss ,- ' I - e L �-�rnru , n�s�u MA!, ivv �z ;. a e . 3:• '_^ t o - ,F_ ^.•�.:: 4•..� ..,`t,, v'6:�_^ .};'�.a :1 .�. � ; e. ,, ". Q �n ,v, -Y , 4 . ' . • . • :, : aR .f L z ; 4s : F r ' � ',ji a , 2" r S °; Y • � "r :...V 3.. , U5 ` '" ' y j . r- ;*B- ,�.t r• .. €1• .4.. ;x. � n' r � - �b-�� .Y .;x• . .i�..fE._,:cfg.:. .:o� � i. ".9 arras: v. ���r: �s � . A �' s ,;:' �A : � - .. r ..,:,,' c[. s� a _ ' a a.: za"' � ':'��s- �: ».4s,.:.£,M. °;.L ... T � 9 . 0 r �� r ?� y t� I 4 20 0 1 4 - 5131/4001 a ��«7` � ,,x • Area *Avg Meters Revenue Monthly Avg Daily Avg OSIMISUCtrgliallaMPFAMSAMICIIINEIC A 328 $29,016.29 $88.46 $2.95 B 227 $25,768.12 $113.52 $3.78 BTM 27 $4,141.25 $153.38 $5.11 C 258 $40,040.20 $155.19 $5.17 D 426 $33,404.08 $78.41 $2.61 E 262 $3,955.15 $15.10 $0.50 F 242 $10,226.92 $42.26 $1.41 FTM 36 $4,338.50 $120.51 $4.02 G 125 $4,081.12 $32.65 $1.09 GL 208 $31,897.32 $153.35 $5A1 ML 16 $2,194.00 $137.13 $4.57 OA 20 $2,702.25 $135.11 $4.50 OB 24 $3,166.00 $131.92 $4.40 PO • 15 $651.46 $43.43 $1.45 Totals 2214 $195,582.66 $100.03 $3.33 Weather Average: 3.0 Note: All figures in this report are based on actual dates of collections and not the date of deposits. Therefore these figures will not exactly match th ose of the Finance Department due to the lag difference between field revenue collect and subsequent entry/records of deposits. • "+ ; 4nisr.a .rY .. may ^ .. , • d ':^'4, rA" -.= .- .?F''05.'. -'c ? *.Y ?+c .77• 7^ .ci. +^�;-47t;-:.f,";;_ ^'• r c + , -,,, . . . . , - .xxs - „ .-5 • Zxr _,,,, e y 4• ;: . a s '5 ,. ' .ti : • ".. p• . :- - - '_.,• s: . -15'. '. � r - A.5� ' 9' x..71,3-, ^,::•- . , ^u ^ff - " ;_7,11:'.._ r, R P �l - O =ua ... u u* ,. = , r - ;c5=' , . / .:-.4-;•.,; 1 7-.,. .:„.7-j.-.. - , :. ;ri; . 4, " : 4 ° � -I = ;w- t :- -•..:? 4,.:: -,:. : •I P! a kr2CVia-:i•y3 4 :- ' " �,: ' - e ` 2.-: ; ; ` ' ' ,1, (7 4 : ',. ; : , .� i '.c , Y,. Z:Ya ' a t" .l. ,1\ i� :At :1i i:I ill�. ;P' ` ' x ,., ., :. --r. ,-;,.. .- "04, ''hii: ^;1 ,,r,e7::4`''.'''"V,4.' ",� .� '.. ",3.r A , . ,J : = M a y ! , � y t 6 i .jiK i : � ...A : e. 2 ., .. h v 4 _ 1 ' • ' b. t } : V.a...:"i a.swi.A. : -...i^ u...ncv.z..ain.so.w :• :.:.+ A 1 A Ar.Qu aLa ha:. :a :: . :: .:.....x:... .�.aaaw , x.. •. 2. '" . s -. a` �ri� ' 6 M �s.2>'a..Saa`s„� wL'.va�' � u�.. •..5� fe'.:..e• x.,., st..�:ox",&•t'•+.:.x.' . . a ray " n R ''S ` f �#,� ° � , „, � `k w ( 7 ar d M �� _ " a' s ...., , • ' ' '4 $ m A tz' . r 1. 6 8k'U20 0 1• ,'u • , : 8l3 �,� • , ° ' * - Area # Avg Meters Revenue Monthly Avg Daily Avg ._,....... . _ .. ...... r .. A 328 $193,245.65 $589.16 $19.64 B 225 $181,435.69 $808.13 $26.94 BTM 27 $26,738.00 $990.30 $33.01 C 259 $228,763.28 $883.84 $29.46 D 427 $192,733.71 $451.54 $15.05 E 262 $75,170.91 $286.91 $9.56 F 241 $59,367.21 $246.16 $8.21 FTM 39 $29,536.25 - $757.90 $25.26 G 132 $26,852.15 $204.13 $6.80 GL 208 $163,868.40 $787.83 $26.26 ML 16 $13,734.25 $858.39 $28.61 OA • 20 $17,928.50 $896.42 $29.88 OB 24 $21,471.75 $894.66 $29.82 PO 15 $6,436.63 $429.11 $14.30 Totals 2222 $1,237,282.38 $648.89 $21.63 Weather Average: 3.3 Note: All figures in this report are based on actual dates of collections and not the date of deposits. Therefore these figures will not exactly match those of the Finance Department due to the lag difference between field revenue collections and subsequent entry/records of deposits. "�: T' _ _ � ; , F . -..1"410.7: , ..7--)...... , f .r, «•t•A r a - - :rxr rs!.s y + = r +aa+ - ifn- ; «, 7.77. -- p � x,.. •_ h ,., . 4 �: -... _ yr`, °, .' - _ ....4 -•'� ; - ._:r. yf ". _ - t -� 3;i � ,x:.,aa�J • ,� •i- ne"- .,nn� �• - ` -�_ ° :. �aw__.S _ , " -,t ..` <` f;4r_i, :t tiri.- ' =x i ;�',�> J t! � .a ^ �.' a t' ° . rr,. �3.y ; --cr _z,..�z� :� • r... • �` �;, r - _ � ; ��� °' �y�- = .�' • : .�� a {. i 1 a. M1 y �. CS. ir�r � 4 • ` � � _ • fi t d-, nq'y` ;J�:'�?, i s.� .s ^ %ia ,`r..� A ..!‘'''..1;:;11.,..-i =. n `. ,.. ply .. Y J " `` -x , N�' z.} 'r „ . 2_.�• r ,a..y ; 1. .x„�.S`w ir - J�•3. d = . + "7 b:s�ac:: �t.:: - .=-s' n.:�a:�':s:. ^. sw :leF.a �+: u�L� .ix��:+,i,: '.ra�w. s.::..:x '�,.?� . • .�'•,>•:�v..�:�.s�.8 :'1i....�o �: �mrs: ,w�...•st3..:�.:'a» a.:ri:sa.a{�S�n£.e Attachment 6 li " ! ' t o N .P4 ,,., H ' 1l i 1 1 ' �N 4 G i l d 38 MO V 7_70 `- .....„),T,... 1 [JET La 41 Q vi vi W d I, .• .1 1 4w w r\ w. 1 k i g ' C 1 /V ifE1V 7 h 1 J a M CIL I 1 D, iletz--_-- -- ..011 t .1 S 3Xd7 ~ ---.. \F ' 1S k 4 :;)1 .4 ,.....iiiih 4 . - ,!.:::, . :,;.' .; . %>ti :> .,.1%„. 4p e a'ffr r Cs) *4, kr � 03 • y �.fl c,01%5 C O / . mss +- F . _ ,,;.,, r a , 11 � o� T '( #* ti� / 4- 0 1. ( 04 e - 0 scv co .so 10 .- go '0\ . 1 o 1- 01. 01. to o 0 ca co p! 10 .co o) 1. co 0 ni am 6 co co o'co.r, .g P. -i 1.0- 10 10 o �)' N CA 01 10 0 go .01' < 0.4 CI 4 1: e• rl .47 Of a CA N 1-ID r:.p.. ii a-, n. a aroi 1-: pi: 6 O V C ..-- c o v....0 r a t o P . o 0 1 in P.- 1 _ y- .- ..- .- ,....- 04 .01 CM 4- 10 . nl`, " f' -:"- '..'„'. ' , 1. , , 40).404'1 . 0•40,404 40) a 40) 404 A4 404 404 40 . . < 0 10 10 ..-.. la 44 , 04 0 101.0' 04 s- ci , „et „et CA 0 CO CO 0 01 04, E 0 04 to 1....z'ali ez oi P: r: co• v, pi• Z .o. co ei go .cr ID r....- ..- , 0-.10' 4- 133.10 (4 1 1. 0 . a in ca at 0 .." 0 - a' 0 - 0 0 .4; 6 o cn:Pi ci I*: Pc o o cif• pr 'co, a , •■••,..„, • e..• 01 N N.01 10 10 10 CA 1.0 re 40 4040 a 40 40, 404 ay, 404 a ‘ 104 - 40 . 0 VI 2 3 ' 10 : 1°. ts' S tcl (7, ., 04 ID -,...-., P ' 6- es ni: NI pi 0:1 0; Cli 01 pi P.': < co -er o AO 04 4- 10 1... er 41. 02 .o. a la .c• as to pt Di CA 10 CI Pt 4. 1111 N. CD r‘ 6 6 6 04 01 41 6 es nr.-o I- pi' .0a, ty. Pi 04 47.,...a Ps CA a , .40 OD .0 0 10 01' w co co 40 'io 4" Os ta os ea oi 4o ; co' ---.: Y'---,2 ',- ' , , ,,•.,"?..,3,1 .-• '- - c, z ,„..T. et` to to -It o et e ics io.' -t- ui .. en' 0' 0 - al. l": el 01 11 r•- g ' .. „-... ei 6 6 es lo 4- co 6 or el' co co o ID r... 01 01 04 Is .41. 0 10 ,CD, 1 : 1 - 1 1t3 0 .. v t at .1 .. " 01.- 1'- C° 133 10 'w • CA 0 10:01 0 04 ea . .1. .: ...; ...,,vt 10 a 44 Cs F. a a 104 009:,04 40 404'411 iA 404•40 a z Go a co r) *a IA •0 CIO 4- - 1- 10 4 a 'a: P. 0 ,.. a! at 112 a: a: 1 `-„, a' a: p • 04 • • CO' at '0 10 gn 4- 4- 04 01 CO ...- V 10 04 01 10 OA ID 0 CO CD 0 0 0 10) CD 10 Pt CA PI 01 sr Pc pi 0.1 0_ Al 01 ca 6 6' r•-- 6 AO ce; Cl; IS CO Di co 47 of Z''jk '44 ,b' ,-;',„„ 0 -.;,,-4 . 0 :^,i' 4 10 C ', .ti • ,;• 4, *'.: ''', ';•.:. 1./1 M ei a 404 40 a a 4.0 404 4044A. 40 (----- . , 4..10 ...., • I, ,:,, . 0 . > N. coS '-' - • pe. - ' - p. c ''' at' 1-i • -;,-, ..:-■ t4-•,.-4. .."- ■ -,. s 1 - • r a! cd g qt-,.. - , x „ ,, - : ",,. CO - :,.,... Pc co 4- 0 r •. • - . 4-.. co ..,: -• . - • ea. ry us - a a ct 0; :,-..,,.,„,,, p . .:, ' , ....- .i. • , ...), la ..?' ' 11 o . 4 ( t:.•.‘" . " ' , - ''''.,":, '.. ', ..., ' .,,,,,:. ..4A 04.`40).10- a 41. 4A: 40 40t akin. fie. 4: .. Z.,.•i.' l — wwwo-2<•=--Icniu . m c o ill < ctiZE 4)3 2MM= u) ".... t --- --Jc- - I- ILJ IU Z Z 2 • .; ', '. ' M w 4' alt " • 0 > 0 < M -2 ", - , ., .- < p 1-• 0 ' : -,T) 0 w 3 In -:'":,:•,'• ':,: . t.,:, ‘ , O. 0 M ?, Z 0. .: a• '- ,....:-. ', - • ,,- . ', 1- , CE-4 co PO ., ow co co ca al atj. co) t6 cit co' el• 0 UP PM co, •• • A . • ;.• z < , ;‘, 0 e• • - ,„/,,. ",;•;" ••- ee-: • •,f- 44 044 44 41): u " • • S Zst z "Slj oi +11: oi :qr.. %.• oi. - Z et as Ce. ••• '4. Ci to '0) '-` 0.5 5 7; o 17- ca cti - to < Z „.„," ;' CU CC rc ID 01 PP " ••• e,11,t;: co re re Ps oi e 0 Ui 7, . PA 4* 444* 4 . 9 ; • 0 tg t ' co co ot ea • . .- 1 to Z ‘.t 7 , 1- 1 4OF ■PF 40) 44.e. Oh. • ' CO • <„, • . ' Irceir>-)-x-1>-Lu>-1—ix (I) IU UI 111 CC CC Z -1 CO iu -I commaameL2mnDm >-‘ 022Dma< r•t 1:4 F - up U1 Z ir 0 > u < CO < - 0 00W-21" O. Z 14; 03 3,14 Attachment 7 Map Quest: Maps • Page 1 of 2 Welcome' PA If.lvta'l le Map- : lip , CLSearch. ftShopping: saw Netscape , .. -,.• Netscape Presents Home 1 Help , „ .. .:19:•- i ,-72w rzL .f ` ....a. QVHE:ST, ••■• where are your old ...1.4,14 1. , 4.•,.. _v.tr40 - , 1 • 4, m ..... MI4P '.-- 1 i ' ". ` ' --.... "-'-''' " .'"' '... high school friends now? -,,,,•,;(• iit. rit,T,t,W,,„,2 . DRIVING DIRECTIChNIS ' ROAD TRIP PLANNER YELLOW AAG • maps - L • Address Location: • Airport Redondo Beach, CA • ZIP Code 90277, US • City • Area Code r STREETM .• Lat / Long C) Map a New Location (:) Get Directions To This Location • Road Atlas Key P. I g.2.03 e C %! :I: '.4i1a7.12. • Saved Maps . , . .. . ,.......- , :;..,. ,,; Arciv.Elaw.,:- ..'" .:i "14 -, R ., ..""--- . 4 i, \\:" . . ‘121...4.... 1 .1:76°114.1 -- . , • -. ....., . i . 4 ...--,,,,_ • ,„-",- .A,r.,%. ' ,AV, V ''' a,,, i ...., 1. -,/, ..,.. ...„, -,,, •,, , 75 . \ I • ■ •' ....0 ' , rkalleorirSt' City Guide :ei ....e, g , , -„,,,,,, - ..„--- . ,,.,..:‘._.., .. s.-... ''' Frecicin'do-B6iil l:ii Carmel .nn sr a co ...p...-,..;,..fro. , ,.--,A . . L w „ _kb • Los Anaeles Dini --,g ng ''...' '''..'',$t'Z.,;." 9 '-,'„.;"' . ., - ...' r q: - 5. 'i i .',„?: • :4iz . • • ' T.' ..Y :c -ii ' 1. V.. a, ' t,.._ -' ,, /- 0‹ . i -- - A fr( ° 1 : • Los Angeles News 1 ‘;7r4 . j 7' '' V' s '''' 'Y ' • Los Anaeles Movies 41'; ?:,.'1,,-- .,1f; kic, t5 4, e ‘‘..;,.. N N d , 1 ‘ _ ,- % ,,..-,,, Spencor St n i:: , ,, • Los Angeles Entertainment - %." - -tl!'" . .;)1.• - •:••; : *. '' i. " •-‘ -‘. '''' j' k 4 ;•" 0 Ei ;- -`,.' ' \'' - k ' C '' cl );-''' 1,` _. --i---- Ictlj t i - Ttark I - 6 : ''' .:-' ', 4.....! ., i 1 7 I si i tla Yellow Pages I•6,"i..:.Ni,l,":2 - .. Search Redondo Beach A ,' •%.17,/,::.-. : -:(..„ . ..:1,41u- 4 ,,,..-;;-:;,-5..-,:, ,.;. • I : 6„4,1t. 1:A.V p,,,; ,.4,z., , , . itO for 1 i NG l ' ''''''' `:,4 •...,:-. 3 - • W ete Park or — ,. 'Auto repair ..1 ,.„,... „.... , ..t..,-,.• , ...1 , ......e. 1..i ' ...t . A5 .-" ‘:".:DC' '4 '.. I I ' 0: t ) 11 1 . . .. - - .; " ., , -.; 7 ' ,.■ i -. .4‘..J. I ' 1 I. . g' I ..: .. . . . , ....14 - 4 % .,. .!..'.?,.....13-: ,,, ....„7:-...",:04.4,.• - ? , , i . ..,e % -C t s . 1 L PI Para isel,Railu, ; i r-: ..., , ...,'Search,.). ,+- ....„' .., -..< / .... , ...1,- ;I: ..-e, ..-. k. X.„' .•.%t ,4 it&,1 -.- P 44.. . 0;s ,.i. , , ... .r. .. 4,51- - 0. T • t73..eg• • c 41 .. . r"••• 0 I 1.-- • I .- •••-•'•'''.. - .f:',I -"' • ••"‘",... .r,'1, ,i,,,,f,,` ..Re oti„40 Bea.ch ^.. 0 9 & 1 -, -..e.", •-:4:,; .x...:,..„) , ,r.. ,.:,.. starenpa.0._,.. >,..,0 i 1 ,,L, -„-- -,...,-, , ,,/,,,,L , J ,o. ,..,:t1-,,.;.- ::,,.. .j I o i e: ...".eN 7...„ ,, waTI-d ' : k, .: I' tt ....,:*‘ : :‘..: . .1 N 'I'R. ; i' .:' 31:. A .`. 1 --- , --0,..1-.._:\ ' 1 '''''' -. ...1 ,Ark244:",„ ' • , ' '''' - 6 ' ' '' ' ' '') - i i ' ''' I. -Ave ue' - - , ,,,,,z.. '. v: _ p .. 1-1 I no n 0. _ — Sap i • : -- . LI - 4,.. ...„.......:4,,z(1 . - :. ,4 - 7 " - ;if ', ,'-..'lb::,, ...- t-s,t; .-.: '• - 4 ve 2-131*,, . It SPeCial. -9 :: 2'e t.. s :'''':; : "'":: : : ;- , 4 0 .4. •i .f :`:',," ..,'.:!: --c7..?°-141:', - A ve r re—nue -C A . ( 7 1— ,,. ,,„. – -- IT ---, , - if ., ril -- -__ -r '-e -- ci - I \i„.._...."- I 1_,_ 1 ''' , ...:•i,„,,, , ,•,,i; - • - o is . Z . ;. : 1. :: ... ; ,7 ... L. - : , .!.. '::.,,,....:;'. z ,:., .\ , k. ,.. -0— L .", ,,T, ....„ _. A . ....- ,.... 4 •:, .3••, L ;.?•••'..3.1/4:-Ir \ ... Z.-- -,,,, ? ....--L—T AVoid.Virusest , 41 . -i..-i';''.t:,." :2`....'4' -,, ,-,_ ." : - ;. 1 i'll&F; INN;`,1,1 - . 6 i1 , .'";4;',,:c:'.4. 1 4,";,„ . .lit . D• '• .•;' H 3 • . t'•-•.! •0 -7 - 0 . ' 'eS, * ...4 Kt ,_.., i ' - ,.. <- 4-1;F , .. . .. , . ' '' = ' e-N1/2, i.• 1 '.- , get hew nowt i, %, ,,;;-• •^" •• • AN) \ : .",',:t •'.., 41-. 0 N..1 tl % ‘,.... _,,1-1 1XX •::_rs,, "' • - • W ,e=....52 ,--:::. ; .;;'"..:::: :: :z%, --.. ' 1 -- frr It q 0 tit -'t II; '3 I lei"; - : - ,::■•'4-3: . 43.'1, 11 1;': 4 1'.:• • •• .. . "3. !tly , :,. „.k,- 19! 7 0 ,. -,.....-0, ,' -,- -- -. 4 A .1-- ,, • -, , „ ,. -...... 1 .,..,.... ,i „9 '''-CA,'" ,,,,... ,, : .: f2:4; . - I. L:- He J 3 ,,) l ' .: S . l I 1 % . ''' , :4 ....., ''..", ..;. ^,,,... " T,,..1 ' ' ... ' .:,,,: ,- Ae .• . r ., i Z, \-- J i A j.' 6'.."-'..\• . Pa_.,_ 1 .,, ,. ci- : , ... 1 .4: - . ; ..; s.::,:e,,F., .....• , ;,,,,,,,-,.. '. 1 ..e. i 0 , "'-' .. ' • • -, --. ' .1* ,. , ,, , I ...... •-.■.... '... - • .- • ' • %:- 2 , : - .-.-"' - ....'. e ...- - ellM9--1 ".‘ •:&.. C -It i 1 ds • ,- . . • • ' : . 2'1' • ' '" A re) t?'".---...--- .- / L'•,..,-,. - - ., 1 :'' ....1.,:? ....: 1 , , 1,1. , tz-... ',-, ,- - '4 ,..„," 1 41 '''. ---..--,'• , ''. -__ ..- _- ,... . . .,'.- ; 1! ,•••-4'3. R":%•):,''.3 l 1 1E' ' .. '.. .'".":'..: ..' - .3; 4 "3: '.3 ' ' f?':':' 4 ? • - • '.- ••• - - • - Calle'Do op r •P2002 Ma • uentoom Inc 02002 Nal• • ihon Teohno ,7___ b• es ....-. , _ .... ,- -,.... - CLICKING ON MAP WILL: r Zoom In a Re-center C Move Location ADDITIONAL MAP FEATURES: Customize Map Add A Location All ri reserved. Use Subject to License/Coovnaht Map Legend ' . http://www.mapouest.com/maps/map.adp?size=big&mapdata=jZ2,,a%2b7o2fXW8V%2borlp:... 4/1/2002 Welcome to the City of Redondo Beach Harbor Department Page 1 of 2 / l i:t :!i . i A , f±.f• ' :i -•1, Home City r!fR&d'ndo Beach H arbor Department Ceara it 141:Itlf l Find another City Department: zi Rest<turantwShops flotelskiparanents Boaturg,/ffarborFatrv! INNEZMIII Our apartment IMINCESEMI Rcrmitivrr ; Mips ( Parking/ant-dons igazzgliens Parking & Directions Directions: The following is a list of suggested routes to the Redondo Beach Pier and King Harbor. The Redondo Beach Pier is located at the western terminus of Torrance Boulevard ( "Where Torrance Boulevard meets the sea. "). King Harbor is located to the west of North Harbor Drive, north of the Redondo Beach Pier and south of Herondo Street (Redondo Beach border with Hermosa Beach on the north). To the Redondo Beach Pier and International Boardwalk: ■ From the Harbor Freeway (Route 110), exit Torrance Blvd. and head west to the Redondo Beach Pier. ■ From the San Diego Freeway (Route 405), exit Hawthorne Blvd. south to Torrance Blvd. and proceed west on Torrance Blvd. (two blocks) to the Redondo Beach Pier. ■ From Pacific Coast Highway (Route 1), take Torrance Blvd. west to the Redondo Beach Pier (two blocks). . To King Harbor: ■ From the Harbor Freeway (Route 110), exit Torrance Blvd. west to Catalina Avenue. Head north on Catalina Avenue to Beryl.Street. Head west on Beryl Street (one block) to King Harbor. • From the San Diego Freeway (Route 405), exit Hawthorne Blvd. south to Torrance Blvd. west. Proceed west on Torrance Blvd. to Catalina Avenue, head north on Catalina Ave. to Beryl Street. Head west on Beryl Street (one block) to King Harbor. • From Pacific Coast Highway (Route 1), take Beryl Street west (about four blocks) to King Harbor. For more information, view a map, or contact the Harbor Department. Parking: Thousands of parking spaces are available within the Harbor Enterprise for use by the public. Parking is available in parking structures, in surface lots, and on- street spaces. The following is a list of City - owned /operated parking areas. To better locate a parking facility or lot, view a map of the Harbor Enterprise. , Structures � 7165 4``' r '° am' „. j i Pier & Plaza Parking 9 } : t : . , Fi #i Locations: Pier Parking Structure: 100 W. Torrance Blvd. ("Where Torrance Boulevard .1011-r; • meets the sea.") Plaza Parking Structure: 180 N. Harbor 1 _ Drive © Pacific Avenue - r .K oct Capacity: Over 1,200 spaces (combined) Rate: $0.50 per 20 minutes; maximum of $3 I •A weekdays and $5 weekends in the f t f F f ' winter, and $5 weekdays and $7 , � ra�^', weekends in the summer (summer May _a :n 15 - Sept. 15); One Hour Free (with -- t � validation from participating merchants) � }y u_t ,- for cars entering Pier and Plaza Parking. .� s d - Structures between 11 am and 7pm Monday through Friday. • Convenient parking for the Pier, International Boardwalk, Veteran's Park, marinas and the Beach • hrtn. / /www.redondo.ora /harbor /oarkin 4/1/2002 Welcome to the City of Redondo Beach Harbor Department Page 2 of 2 Meters -- Parking Lot 13 Location: Yacht Club Way @ N. Harbor Drive Capacity: 72 spaces Rate: $0.25 per 20 minutes (quarters only) Convenient parking for the north end of the Harbor Meters -- North Harbor Drive Location: Along North Harbor Drive from Pacific Avenue to Yacht Club Way Rate: $0.25 per 20 minutes (quarters only) Convenient parking for marinas, North Harbor Drive restaurants, and hotels Meters -- South Harbor Drive Location: Along South Harbor Drive south of Torrance Blvd. Rate: $0.25 per 20 minutes (quarters only) Convenient parking for the Pier and beach Meters -- Lot 5 (Veterans Park) Location: Adjacent to (south) Veterans Park Rate: $0.25 per 20 minutes (quarters only) Convenient parking for the Pier and beach Privately- Operated Parking Lots Various privately- operated parking lots are available throughout the northern half of the Harbor Enterprise (along North Harbor Drive, Marina Way, Yacht Club Way and Portofino Way) at varying rates. These Tots are convenient for the restaurants, marinas and general recreation areas they are adjacent to. Restaurants /Shops 1 Hotels /Apartments 1 Boating /Harbor Patrol I Events I Our Department I Sights Recreation 1 Maps 1 Parking /Directions 1 Contact Us I Weather' Home 1 City of Redondo Beach Copynght © 2001 -2002. City of Redondo Beach Disclaimer _«_. / /......... ..�.t ....1.. esrn /1. orkr-sr /narlrin[7 kt1-1-11 4/1/2002 ,i \ -1 < c n < > 'v > r . -I m m co rIm �Ir cn Z;='Z'r' O D m ET) m '0 m 0 h< 0 Cn Cn = 0 i- m I 0 n b z ° • =; 0 D < _, � D r r m c _I I 0 xi '-x z r mDmrrr r� nD IZD 0 1 1- c,.) I - r - I 0 . ci -g0Z > m m nn1 D O D m* 1 1 m I I' ,* 1 L 1 I = I I g z I . 0) Kn I-' I I I I I 01 •� w © -n i ni g Z b Irn I I 11 w i 1 s i 1 1 I= 0 co i C i 1 w i V K4 I 1 = i 0 C 0 0 -A i AAC V jw 10 0 0 00000001001 Al A I U1 1 0 C 1 I X 00 W() 1 -•L A CO N s O) A V i . CO 01 lo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CT --i. I N N CO N O 0) -� -).1 ! A 01 0 I O I 0 N C O 0 -• s A s C+1 01 N A N -% N' A Z N V 0) -4 CA C.71 N3 0 03 0) CO 0) 0 0 V 0 0 00 0) 00 --1. 0) 0 I I I cn z 0 1 _ _ w IN m N IA N A N A 0 Cr s W CA) CO 01 N N 01 N W N CA U1 W I c O . . 1 -a _a � _ 0 0 c, C0) --L I A CO Ni V A A 1 (0 E I V A COO A CO A A A V C W IA -L O N CO N CO CO 0) - 01 01 0 I 1 1 C I I z 0 'N - �Ap �j > Ca I-•° 0 0 0 0 0. p�) 0 0 0 O N O O O O O O O O i O I O I Z I I I 0 1 r s ( - A j1 - 0) -� 0) CO ••••X N i N c I -' A (01 N I -► V A A I CO V A OD A 0O A A A C71 -4 CO Ca) C) - N N CO N 03 CO 03 -► Cn Cn 0 11/14/01 16:00 TT213 333 6875 ATLA COIN - _ 0 001 ACCOUNT: � EDOn1DO 2b,4 ' _ •; {''t ,,; h af ” ; DATE • NOV. 7 0/ • ,: p j : •,_ VERIFIED BY: CifillOS BAGS ' • NAME • . AMOUNT _ BREAKDOWN AMOUNT " • Tr Dc- PENNIES . 02. yE�QON00 /� . . / ,V. /L NC /SCA ,i NICKELS 202 5 5 / gvid �S' 1 . A p ' ° . 0l DIMES 102/ ; • • / Lai y / }p QUARTERS 4",2,-7A . > HALVES 3u" f 6aY /3 p/. L PT5 it ?, g S.B.A. 2 . 6611/74 • G t r . f ` f- S . T . D . 2 ,P. //Alga f Oilf. 3 CURRENCY 2 ,�ssr ! �J'P6.�,v+ !�'� TOTAL 7, Qr7. • 5 RrwERA 2 A% -- PICK UP DATE: NOV. b, a • . _ NOV 15 2881/9:85 AN/+67$6.15 AC RCPT1881A88826228NOV 8 6 8 81 ` r? TOTALS 09�� PARKING METER FEES __ ... r_........... _ - :..r..�.....,. 07/05/01 13:17 $213 383 8875 ATLA COIN -►- -� CITY 1 J)Ui�UU IQl uul /uuL ' ?e130140 ACCOUNT: 0 136 A -,,.; . �:: • t,� = : DATE. �� Y Sr��' ;- 1, • VERIFIED BY : CI I&LOS _ , BAGS •''L - AMOUNT BREAKDOWN AMOUNT .l - _ 1 • E5A...0N4 Sy 7 /7 PENNIES / 7 . / �ft$ + l O 1••I 3S NICKELS Z� / A/.�4A•,vcaszw 3b . . . Ig 5 DIMES • 65/ 77 1 Lo . lielUNDp 395 -s QUARTERS /7 /g' E 2. LD1 J3 /3gy / HALVES • 3 ,r. Ahume, , Ng°— S.B.A. 3 annUl. . /191 I _ S.T.D. R V /e/ 29 n CURRENCY 5 Lo l,.5 -327315 TOTAL' /70 &/ 3? 8 t;s��A 53x1 6i w6sT PICK UP DATE: AM 3,aI 30 TOTALS / /D(o/ 33 1 03/06/02 12:47 12213 383 6875 ATLA COIN -0.44 (.11Y Ik.pur1JV luutiuui ACCOUNT : REpoIDD .5E4 DATE : - /4AR 6 , OZ VERIFIED BY: GA' • BAGS LOT NAME AMOUNT BREAKDOWN AMOUNT 1 XS'R%ANADE P PENNIES I E S 1 EAST T �l. � 99 LoT �/ /z2, �S NICKELS 2f7, 9 / HE20n/DO 100.12 • DIMES ee 6• 10 2 LO T 13 /IV > • _ QUARTERS /Q ff j. --5- 2 C^/7 1127.1-1-° HALVES 2 - LOT 5 /ii 2 -7 • S.B.A. . 3 f• H/I NA /10.33 S.T.D. 1 ,S'PLA,vAp� 11 CURRENCY �+/S T / I L5' kviE .j •3 /q . �I TOTAL � /M. Y9 PICK UP DATE: MAR. 5,02 I 0,1-1. 3` i • • • MAR 07 2002/11:42 A1/ +11777.44 ACCT#: 1008A0000089845380000 RCPTN:81- 0024753/MAR 5 02 PARKING METER FEES 2/ TOTALS 11 / ;' i( • • Attachment 8 1 1 AGREEMENT 2 27232 3 THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered, in duplicate, as of March 8, 2001 4 for reference purposes only, pursuant to a minute order adopted by the City Council of the 5 City of Long Beach at its meeting held on March 6, 2001, by and between the CITY OF 6 SEAL BEACH, a municipal corporation, whose address is 211 Eighth Street, Seal Beach, 7 California 90740 ( "Seal Beach "), and the CITY OF LONG BEACH, a municipal corporation 8 ( "Long Beach "). 9 WHEREAS, Seal Beach installed parking meters in three (3) municipal 10 parking Tots located in the 100 block of Main, the southwest corner of Main and Electric, 11 and the southeast corner of Main and Electric, which require maintenance and collection 12 services; and a d o ry 13 WHEREAS, Long Beach is willing and able to provide maintenance and E aCo E o ear ° C g 14 collection services as described in and in accordance with this Agreement, and Seal Beach �.. C N O R 1 aO an ° ° 15 is willing to pay for said services; Y L .. �, y i d u c ET. 16 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual terms and conditions 17 contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 18 1. Term. A. This Agreement shall commence at midnight on February 1, 19 2001, and shall terminate at 11:59 p.m. on January 31, 2002. 20 B. This Agreement may be extended for two (2) additional periods of one (1) 21 year each by mutual agreement of the parties. Seal Beach shall notify Long Beach within 22 sixty (60) days prior to termination of the original term or any extension term of the desire 23 of Seal Beach to renew. Thereafter, Long Beach shall notify Seal Beach regarding an 24 increase in fees, if any. This Agreement shall then be amended to reflect the extension 25 in term and the change in fees, if any. 26 C. Either party may terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, 'by 27 giving sixty (60) days' notice of termination to the other party. 28 2. Definitions. The following definitions shall apply to this Agreement: 1 A. "Collection" shall mean collecting coins from parking meters twice weekly 2 from March through October and once per week from November through February. Long 3 Beach will place the coins in a secured collection cart provided by Seal Beach, and leave 4 said cart at the Seal Beach Finance Department. 5 B. "Maintenance" shall mean visually checking every parking meter, once 6 daily, between 7:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. (on regular Long Beach workdays) for jam -ups, 7 broken parts, graffiti, etc. Long Beach will make repairs immediately. If a parking meter 8 cannot be repaired in the field, Long Beach will install a replacement meter supplied by 9 Seal Beach. Seal Beach will also provide batteries. Emergency repairs and repairs due 10 to vandalism are not considered routine maintenance. 11 "Repair Service" shall mean cleaning, painting, performing major repairs (that 12 take over two [2] days to repair) and returning meters to the factory. c n > a N 13 C. "Immediate and free access" shall mean unobstructed entrance and exit F , 1 ; �' 14 to the parking lot where the parking meters are located and free parking for Long Beach L � L ° = 15 vehicles twenty -four (24) hours a day. e` � c F 16 3. Services. Long Beach shall perform maintenance on and collection from 17 seventy -six (76) Duncan Electronic (Model 90) parking meters located at three (3) parking 18 Tots at the 100 block of Main Street, the southwest corner of Main and Electric Streets, and 19 the southeast corner of Main and Electric Streets beginning fourteen (14) days following 20 commencement of the term of this Agreement. Maintenance may be performed where the 21 parking meters are located or, at the sole discretion of Long Beach, at Long Beach facilities 22 or at facilities selected by Long Beach. Seal Beach shall give immediate and free access 23 to Long Beach while Long Beach is performing services hereunder. Long Beach shall not 24 be liable for any delays caused by difficulties that it experiences when attempting to gain 25 immediate and free access. 26 Parts, except batteries, required for preventive maintenance are included in 27 the annual service fee. Long Beach will invoice Seal Beach for parts that cost more than 28 $100.00, at the actual cost of the part plus twenty percent (20 %). 2 1 4. Annual Service Fee. A. Seal Beach shall pay to Long Beach for 2 maintenance and collection services the sum of Twelve Thousand Dollars ($12,000.00) in 3 quarterly payments of Three Thousand Dollars ($3,000.00) within fifteen (15) days after 4 receipt of an invoice from Long Beach. 5 B. If Seal Beach requests services in addition to those identified herein, Seal 6 Beach shall pay to Long Beach for the parts and labor related to those services the actual 7 cost of the parts plus twenty percent (20 %) and labor at the rate of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) 8 per hour. - 9 C. If this Agreement is terminated pursuant to Section 1(C) above, then Seal 10 Beach shall not be entitled to any refund of any quarterly payment already paid but Seal 11 Beach shall have no further obligation to pay any.subsequent quarterly payment. Seal 12 Beach shall pay Long Beach for additional services performed prior to the effective date ° ° 13 of termination for which Long Beach has not been previously paid. C 00 7 O O c o a -' ° 1 4 5. Warrantv. A. Seal Beach warrants that the parking meters are in good � YU. � ° v I S L ° V 15 working order as of the commencement date of this Agreement. LY.: i d d P M mF 16 B. Long Beach makes no warranty or guarantee with respect to `' 17 maintenance. Any parts used in maintenance shall carry the warranty, if any, of the 18 manufacturer and Seal Beach shall look solely to the manufacturer if a part fails or is 19 defective. 20 6. Responsibilities of Seal Beach. A. Within three (3 business days 21 following the commencement date of this Agreement, Seal Beach shall deliver to Long 22 Beach a list containing the names of individuals who are authorized by Seal Beach to 23 request additional services. That list shall also contain the name, address and telephone 24 number of the person who will serve as Administrator of this Agreement. 25 B. If any parking meter cannot be maintained at its normal location so that 26 it must be removed, Seal Beach shall provide a replacement meter. 27 7. Assignment. Neither party shall assign its rights or delegate its duties 28 hereunder, or any interest herein, or any portion hereof, without the prior written approval 3 • 1 of the other party. Any attempted assignment or delegation shall be void, and any 2 assignee or delegate shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted 3 assignment or delegation. However, Long Beach may as it deems necessary subcontract 4 the performance of services hereunder. 5 8. Notice. Notice shall be in writing and personally delivered or deposited 6 in the U.S. Postal Service, first class, postage prepaid, addressed to Seal Beach at the 7 address first stated herein and to Long Beach at 333 West Ocean Boulevard, Long Beach, 8 CA 90802 Attn: City Manager. Notice shall be deemed given on the date of personal 9 delivery or on the date of deposit in the mail, whichever first occurs. 10 9. Mutual Indemnity. In accordance with Sections 895 through 895.8 of the 11 California Government Code, each party hereby assumes the liability imposed on it, its 12 officials, and employees for injury (as defined in Section 810 of the California Government ° ° O0 N 13 Code) caused by a negligent or wrongful act or omission occurring in performance of each �._ e q d o �ao c m `° rq rq •14 party as required in this Permit to the same extent that such liability would be imposed on O Ci O ° ° ° 15 the absence of these Sections. To that end, each party shall defend, indemnify and hold 0 u c s aa3Wa L'� p v 16 harmless the other party for any claim, demand, cause of action, loss, liability, damage, U� O0r e _ `' 17 cost, or expense that may be imposed on such party solely by virtue of Section 895.2 of 18 the California Government Code. 19 10. Miscellaneous. A. This Agreement shall not be amended, nor any 20 provision or breach hereof waived, except in writing signed by the parties which expressly 21 refers to this Agreement. 22 B. This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding between the parties 23 and supersedes all other agreements, oral or written, with respect to the subject matter 24 herein. 25 C. This Agreement is intended by the parties to benefit themselves only and 26 is not in any way intended or designed to or entered for the purpose of creating any benefit 27 or right for any person or entity of any kind that is not a party to this Agreement. 28 D. If there is any legal proceeding between the parties to enforce or interpret 1 this Agreement or to protect or establish any rights or remedies hereunder, the prevailing 2 party shall be entitled to its costs and expenses, including reasonable attorn.ey's fees. 3 E. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed pursuant to the laws 4 of the State of California (except those provisions of California law pertaining to conflicts 5 of laws). 6 F. In the event of any conflict or ambiguity between this Agreement and any 7 exhibit, the provisions of this Agreement shall govern. 8 G. In the performance of this Agreement, neither party shall discriminate on 9 the basis of race, religion, national origin, color, age, sex, sexual orientation, AIDS, AIDS 10 related condition, handicap, disability, or Vietnam Era veteran status. 11 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these present to 12 be duly executed with all of the formalities required by law as of the date first stated above. - u 7 c L N ° ° N � y � ry 13 CITY OF A BEACH, a municipal corporation C 0 7 Q� C =34i 14 7 L ry ° 4 pg,z , 2001 By ` _ ° = 15 hn B. Bahorski Titl City Manager E 16 o " Seal Beach" 17 18 CITY OF LONG BEACH, a municipal corporation 19 ARrt l 210 , 2001 20 ASSISTANT City Manager EXECUTED PURSUANT 21 - "Long Beach" TO SECTION 301 OF THE CITY CHARTER. 22 - This Agreement is approved as to form on 2 , 2001. 23 24 - ROBERT E. SHANNON, City Attorney 25 JWLA-1/1 By 26 J Deputy 27 DFG: rmb2- 23- 01 (SealBeachAnimalControl.EAG)99 -0010 F:\APPS\CtyLaw32\WPDOCS\DO20\P001100017862.WPD 28 • * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * CALIFORNIA ALL- PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE On 4)f.r.;/- /o SOD/ , before me , , Name, Title of Officer (Notary Public) personally appeared /� . /�� � - personally known to me - OR - -vr proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the personi,s-rwhose nameLs- Pis /.a-e- subscribed.to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that .,he/she /.they executed the same in _hle- /her /the±r authorized capacity(.ies - --, and that by _124-s' /her /their' signatures on the instrument the persons; or the entity upon behalf of which the person sracted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Z?, of Notary) ,JD4 n te • (Name - Type or Prmt) , JOAN E LEWIS th � = Commission # 1195940 _ ,•.... Notary Public - Cafifomia ` '- Orange County My Comm. Expires Oct 5, 2002 • 1 FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT NO. 27232 2 3 THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT NO. 27232 is made and 4 entered, in duplicate, as of July 1, 2002 for reference purposes only, pursuant to a 5 minute order adopted by the City Council of the City of Long Beach at its meeting on 6 March 6, 2001, by and between the CITY OF SEAL BEACH, a municipal corporation 7 ( "Seal Beach "), and the CITY OF LONG BEACH, a municipal corporation ( "Long . 8 Beach "). 9 WHEREAS, the parties entered Agreement No. 27232 whereby Long 10 Beach agreed to provide maintenance for parking meters in Seal Beach; and 11 WHEREAS, the parties desire to extend the term of said Agreement; 12 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual terms and conditions Q ° O 4 y � N 13 in Agreement No. 27232 and herein, the parties agree as follows: N O 14 O � 1. Section 1 of Agreement No. 27232 is hereby amended in its entirety to p w � v N ° " ° 15 read as follows: ze m u Fl m 16 "1. Term. A. This Agreement shall commence at midnight on February 17 1, 2002, and shall terminate at 11:59 p.m. on January 31, 2003. 18 "B. This Agreement may be extended for one (1) year by mutual 19 agreement of the parties. Seal Beach shall notify Long Beach within sixty (60) days 20 prior to expiration of the term of the desire of Seal Beach to renew. Thereafter, Long 21 Beach shall notify Seal Beach regarding an increase in fees, if any. This Agreement 22 shall then be amended to reflect the extension in term and the change in fees, if any. 23 "C. Either party may terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, by 24 giving sixty (60) days prior notice of termination to the other party." 25 2. Except as expressly amended herein, all of the terms and conditions in 26 Agreement No. 27232 are ratified and confirmed and shall remain in full force and 27 effect. 28 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this document to be 1 • • 1 duly executed with all formalities required by law as of the date first stated above. 2 CITY OF S' L B y, a municip- corporation / 3 4 4 /,/, c2 , 2002 By .d i Manager 5 "Seal Be =ch" 6 7 CITY OF LONG BEACH, a municipal corporation 8 • , 2002 By 9 City Manager 10 "Long Beach" 11 12 This First Amendment to Agreement No. 27232 is approved as to form on u � ? =odN 13 ,2002. d = F 14 ROBERT E. SHANNON, City Attorney (sl a u = oo`ua 15 By ; Deputy 16 17 This First Amendment to Agreement is approved as to form on 18 J44-1) f , 2002. 19 City Attorney, Seal Beach 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DFG.6 -17 -02(1 stAmd#27232)99 -00104 L:WPPS \CtyLaw32 \WPDOCS \D017\P002 \00032378. W PD 2 PARKING FEE COLLECTION AGREEMENT THIS PARKING FEE COLLECTION AGREEMENT ( "Agreement" herein), effective as of the date specified in Section 3 below, is entered into by and between the City of Seal Beach ( "City" herein), a California municipal corporation, and Ampco System Parking ( "Contractor" herein), a California corporation. RECITALS A. City owns certain automobile parking facilities and desires to have those facilities operated with automated fee collection equipment. _ B. Contractor represents that it is capable and willing to provide, install and maintain automated fee collection equipment at City's automobile parking facilities, as well as to collect revenues from such equipment, in accordance with this Agreement. . NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions herein contained, City and Contractor agree as follows: 1. Definitions. The following definitions shall apply to the following terms except where the provisions of this Agreement otherwise require. A. "Facilities" means City's automobile parking facilities designated in Section 2 . below. B. "Fee collection equipment" means automated machinery capable of collecting fees for parking and storage of motor vehicles upon the Facilities in accordance with the requirements set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. C. "Gross parking receipts" means all sums derived by Contractor from the parking and storage of motor vehicles upon the Facilities (whether on an hourly, daily, weekly, or monthly basis) less the following: refunds; discounts; allowances; sales, use, excise, parking, or gross receipts taxes attributable to the use or occupancy of the Facilities; and taxes imposed on the parking spaces /stalls or on vehicles entering or using the Facilities. D. "Scope of Services and Terms" means the services and contract requirements set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. - 2. Designation of Parking Facilities. This Agreement pertains to the following automobile parking facilities owned by City: S7296 \0001 \615292.4 - 1 of 10 - FACILITY LOCATION NUMBER OF SPACES Lot # 1 Lot # 8 Lot # 10 3. Term. A. Trial Period. The term of this Agreement shall commence on ( "Commencement Date" herein) and shall expire one year thereafter unless extended pursuant to paragraph B below or earlier terminated pursuant to Section 10 below. B. Extension. If neither party has provided to the other a written "Notice of Extension Cancellation" prior to the end of the tenth month following the Commencement Date, then the term of this Agreement shall expire four years after the Commencement Date unless earlier terminated pursuant to Section 10 below. 4. Contractor's Rights and Duties. A. Scope of Services. Contractor shall provide, install and maintain fee collection equipment at the Facilities, and shall collect revenues from such equipment, in accordance with the Scope of Services. B. Permits and Licenses. Contractor shall procure all permits and licenses necessary for its performance under this Agreement. C. Gross Parking Receipts Records. Contractor shall maintain a complete set of records, in a form approved by City, itemizing the gross parking receipts collected by Contractor pursuant to this Agreement. D. Compliance With Law. Contractor, its agents, employees and officers shall comply with all local, state and federal laws in connection with Contractor's performance under this Agreement. E. Personal Property. Contractor may install at its expense signage suitable for advertising purposes in or adjacent to the Facilities, as well as any personal property or trade fixtures Contractor deems necessary for conducting business upon the Facilities in accordance with this Agreement. All signage shall be approved by City prior to installation. S7296\0001\615292.4 - 2 of 10 - 5. City's Rights and Duties. A. Utilities and Service Charges. City shall pay all utility and service charges, other than telephone charges, relating to the Facilities. B. Taxes and Assessments. City shall pay all taxes and assessments levied upon or assessed against the Facilities. C. Audits. City may audit (using any appropriate method), without advance notice, Contractor's gross parking receipts records at any time during Contractor's normal business hours. D. Entry. City may enter upon the Facilities as City deems necessary or appropriate for inspection, repair or otherwise. - 6. Compensation. A. Contractor shall collect revenues from its fee collection equipment at the Facilities in accordance with the Scope of Services and may retain such revenues except as provided in paragraph B below. B. Contractor shall pay City the following fees in exchange for the privilege of operating fee collection equipment at the Facilities. 1, Base Fee. Contractor shall pay City a monthly base fee of $22,275. Contractor shall pay City the monthly base fee regardless of the actual revenue collected during any particular month by Contractor from its fee collection equipment at the Facilities. Notwithstanding the preceding, if the Commencement Date is not the first day of a month, or if the termination date is not the last day of a month, then Contractor shall pay City a prorated fee for that particular month. The initial monthly base fee shall be paid thirty days after the Commencement Date, and subsequent payments shall be on a monthly basis thereafter. 2. Shared Revenue Fee. In addition to the monthly base fee provided - for in paragraph A above, Contractor shall pay City an annual shared revenue fee in accordance with the following formula: a. If Contractor's annual gross parking receipts are between $370,000 and $480,000 inclusive, then Contractor shall pay City sixty percent of such gross parking receipts in excess of S7296\0001\615292.4 - 3 of 10 - three hundred seventy thousand dollars $370,000. b. If Contractor's annual gross parking receipts exceed $480,000, then Contractor shall pay City eighty percent of such gross parking receipts in excess of $480,000. Contractor's annual gross parking receipts shall be calculated based on Contractor's gross parking receipts for each twelve month period following the Commencement Date. Contractor shall deliver to City the annual shared revenue fee, together with a copy of Contractor's gross parking receipts records, no later than the thirtieth day following _ the end of each twelve month period following the Commencement Date. In the event that this Agreement is terminated prior to the end of any twelve month period following the Commencement Date, then the annual shared revenue fee shall be prorated for that period. 7. Indemnification. A. To the full extent authorized by law, Contractor shall defend (with counsel acceptable to City), indemnify, and hold harmless City, its employees, agents, and officers, from any liability, claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged, or threatened, as well as attorneys' fees, court costs, interest, defense costs (including expert witness fees) and any other costs or expenses of any kind whatsoever incurred in relation to, as a consequence of, arising out of, or in any way attributable to, in whole or in part, Contractor's performance under this Agreement. B. To the full extent authorized by law, City shall defend (with counsel acceptable to Contractor), indemnify, and hold harmless Contractor, its employees, agents, and officers, from any liability, claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged, or threatened, as well as attorneys' fees, court costs, interest, defense costs (including expert witness fees) and any other costs or expenses of any kind whatsoever incurred in relation to, as a consequence of, arising out of, or in any way attributable to, in whole or in part, City's performance under this Agreement. C. The obligations imposed by this Section 7 shall survive the termination of this Agreement. - S7296\0001\615292.4 - 4 of 10 - • 8. Insurance. A. Contractor shall maintain insurance in full force and effect during the term of _ this Agreement in accordance with the provisions below: 1. Commercial general liability insurance with coverage limits of not less than $5,000,000 for loss, damage or injury to person or property arising from Contractor's performance in connection with this Agreement. 2. Worker's compensation insurance, or satisfactory evidence that Contractor is self - insured, in accordance with California law. B. Each policy of insurance required by this Section 8 shall satisfy the following requirements: 1. Be issued by an insurance company that both (i) is admitted and licensed to do business in the State of California; and (ii) is rated B +VII or better according to the most recent A.M. Best Co. Rating Guide. 2. Name as additional insureds City, its employees, agents and officers. 3. Specify that it acts as primary insurance and that no insurance held or owned by the designated insureds shall be called upon to cover a loss. 4. Specify that it applies separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. . 5. Contain a clause substantially in the following words: "It is hereby understood and agreed that this policy may not be cancelled, nor the amount of coverage thereof reduced, until thirty days after receipt (as evidenced by receipt of a registered letter) by the City Manager of the City of Seal Beach of written notice of such cancellation or reduction of coverage." 6. Specify that any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the required policy, including breaches of warranty, shall not affect the coverage required to be provided. 7. Waive all rights of subrogation against the designated additional S7296 \0001 \615292.4 - 5 of 10 - insureds. 8. Specify that the cost of adjusting and defending claims against insureds (including court costs and attorney's fees) shall be paid in addition to any policy limits. C. Procurement of insurance by Contractor shall not be construed as a limitation of Contractor's liability or as full performance of Contractor's duties to defend, indemnify and hold harmless under Section 7 of this Agreement. 9 Cessation of Public Parking at Facilities. A. Nothing in this Agreement shall preclude City from ceasing public parking service at any of the Facilities for any reason. If City ceases public parking service at any of the Facilities during the term of this Agreement, then this Agreement shall automatically terminate as to that particular Facility. In such • event, Contractor shall promptly remove any fee collection equipment and personal property from that particular Facility and Contractor's compensation to City shall be reduced by a mutually agreeable amount. B. In the event any of the Facilities (in whole or in part) are acquired or condemned under eminent domain by any governmental authority, and Contractor elects not to terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 10 below, then this Agreement shall automatically terminate as to that particular Facility (to the extent of such acquisition or condemnation) and Contractor's compensation to City shall be reduced by a mutually agreeable amount. 10. Termination. A. City may terminate this Agreement without cause upon thirty days' written notice to Contractor. If City terminates this Agreement without cause within one year of the Commencement Date, then City shall pay Contractor the unamortized cost of installation of fee collection equipment at the Facilities. In addition, City may terminate this Agreement with cause upon ten days' written notice to Contractor for any of the following reasons if Contractor fails to remedy such cause within the ten day period (or, in the event the cause is of a nature that cannot be reasonably remedied within ten days, fails to commence the remedy within ten days and diligently continue to completion): 1. Contractor defaults in the performance of any of its obligations under this Agreement. 2. Contractor, its agent, employee or officer commits an unlawful act upon S7296\0001\615292.4 - 6 of 10 - or adjacent to any of the Facilities. 3. Bankruptcy or other insolvency proceedings are instituted by or against Contractor. B. Contractor may terminate this Agreement without cause upon ninety days' written notice to City. In addition, Contractor may terminate this Agreement for cause upon ten days' written notice to City for any of the following reasons if City fails to remedy such cause within the ten day period (or, in the • event the cause is of a nature that cannot be reasonably remedied within ten days, fails to commence the remedy within ten days and diligently continue to completion): 1. A strike, lockout or labor unrest substantially precludes public usage of • the Facilities. 2. Any governmental entity takes an action (such as condemnation) that substantially precludes public usage of the Facilities. 3. The Facilities are damaged by fire, disaster or other casualty to such an extent that public usage of the Facilities is substantially precluded. 11. Notices. Any notices or communications required or requested to be given under this Agreement shall be deemed properly given if mailed by United States mail, registered and postage prepaid, to the following addresses: To Contractor. Ampco System Parking 808 South Olive Street Los Angeles, CA 90014 Facsimile Number: (213) 312 -2104 • To City. City of Seal Beach Attn: Director of Administrative Services 211 8 Street Seal Beach, CA 90740 Facsimile Number: (562) 493 -9857 12. Assignment. Contractor shall not assign, delegate, transfer or hypothecate this Agreement or any interest therein directly or indirectly by operation of law or otherwise without the prior consent of City. Any attempt to do so without such consent shall be null and void and confer no right on any third party. • 13. Relationship of Parties. Contractor shall act hereunder as an independent S7296\0001\615292.4 - 7 of 10 - • contractor. This Agreement shall not, and is not intended to, constitute Contractor as an agent, servant, or employee of City. In addition, this Agreement shall not, and is not intended to, create the relationship of partnership, joint venture or association between City and Contractor. 14. Surrender. Upon the expiration or termination of this Agreement, Contractor shall promptly remove its fee collection equipment and personal property from the Facilities. 15. General Provisions. A. Descriptive Headings. The captions appearing at the commencement of the sections hereof and in any paragraph thereof, are descriptive only and for convenience in reference to this Agreement. Should there be any conflict between such heading, and the section or paragraph thereof at the head of which it appears, the section or paragraph thereof, as the case may be, and not such heading, shall control and govern in the construction of this Agreement. B. Brokers. City and Contractor each warrant that no broker or finder represented either party in obtaining this Agreement. C. Waiver. The waiver by City or Contractor of any breach of any term, covenant, or condition herein contained shall not be deemed to be a waiver of such term, covenant, or condition or of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant, or condition herein contained. No covenant, term, or condition of this Agreement shall be deemed to have been waived by City or Contractor unless in writing. D. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their respective successors and • assigns. . E. Litigation Fees. In the event legal action shall be necessary to enforce any term, covenant, or condition herein contained, the party prevailing in such action, whether reduced to judgment or not, shall be entitled to its reasonable court costs (including accountants' fees, if any, and attorneys' fees) expended in such action. F. Severability. If any term or provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, then such term or provision shall be amended so as to, and solely to, the extent necessary to cure such invalidity or unenforceability, and S7296 \0001 \615292.4 - 8 of 10 - in its amended form shall be enforceable. In such event, the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of such term or provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected thereby, and each term and provision of this Agreement shall be valid and be enforced to the fullest extent permitted by law. - G. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. [CONTINUED ON FOLLOWING PAGE] • S7296 \0001 \615292.4 - 9 of 10 - H. Integration. This instrument contains the entire Agreement between City and Contractor with respect to the transactions contemplated herein. No other prior oral or written agreements are binding upon the parties. Amendments hereto or deviations herefrom shall be effective and binding only if made in writing and executed by City and Contractor. TO EFFECTUATE THIS AGREEMENT, the parties have caused their duly authorized representatives to execute this Agreement on the dates set forth below. "City" "Contractor" City of Seal Beach Ampco System Parking I fr By: t, " / / By: c2-....A5 I (-LA, Patti Ca •bel , Mayor / Name: Arnold Klaub r Title: Vice President / Regional Manager Date: g $ a a Date: -7 /z 7(o a By: ►ice' 4 4 ame: 6-fr m ' • ivc� Title V , l /I1'Yy - c l e - - Date: 7/ D D Attest: 1 � By: ��' - - -- ' 6 . 1 JoAnne Yeo, City 4Ierk Li Approved as to form: By: C:11 ai, ,& ' . Quinn M. Barrow, City Attorney S7296\0001\615292.4 . - 10 of 10 - Exhibit A Fee Collection Equipment Ampco System Parking will provide the following fee collection equipment: (4) New Ventek Series V machines with shelters at a cost of $20,000 per machine (including shelter). The machines will have the following features; ❑ Pay and Display mode of operation ❑ Accepts U.S. coin and currency, credit card and debit card ❑ Returns change for overpayment ❑ Solar powered with battery back -up ❑ Backlit lexan covered LCD screen large enough to be easily read and understood , ❑ Custom ticket messaging and receipting ❑ Variable rates capability ❑ Heavy duty theft and vandal resistant "shotgun proof' locking steel vault housed internally locking removable money bag anti - crowbar access door protection stainless steel locking system drill' and pick resistant locking system ❑ Off -site modem communications capability ❑ Operating reports software compatible with PC/Windows . ❑ Modular design for ease of maintenance, repair and replacement ❑ Fully functional in temperatures ranging from 20F to 120F degrees Ampco System Parking will provide a fifth machine for Lot 10 when and if the business volume requires it. . Ampco System Parking will retain the ownership of the fee collection machines and any ancillary equipment. • S7296\0001\615303.2 -1 of1- • Exhibit B Scope of Services and Terms Automation of Beach Parking Revenue Collection June 12, 2000 May 10, 2000 Dear , Thank -you for sending your proposal for the City of Seal Beach — Beach Parking Lot Fee Collection Service. Due to the fact there is more than one company that can provide the services we have come up with a list of requirements the vendor would have to meet. • Provide free standing self contained Pay and Display machines powered by solar energy or battery and adequate signage. The machines must adapt to flexible pay rates and accept debit cards, credit cards, coins, up to $20 bills and give change. The machines must also be bi- lingual. • The machines must be bulletproof and vandal - proof. • The machines must provide complete and detailed audit trials without being opened up. City staff must be able to obtain information and or run audit reports through computer automation. Therefore the Finance Department should be able to log on to the Pay and Display Machine computer program and view what each machine is collecting in revenues at any time without physically going out to each machine. • The machines should automatically page the management companies staff when the machine malfunctions (i.e. paper jam, out of paper, out of change etc). The response time to fix a malfunctioning machine must not exceed one hour. • Management Company must service and collect revenues from machines seven days a week from Memorial weekend through Labor day weekend. From Labor Day weekend to Memorial weekend revenues must be collected Saturdays, Sundays and at a minimum two days during the week for all beach parking lots. It is also responsible for securing and depositing all revenue collected. • Management company must have been in business at least 10 years and operate lots throughout the United States. The Company must also provide audited financial statements for the past three years and a minimum of five references. • Monthly revenue reports and submission of the City's share of revenue must be provided ten days after the close of the month. • The City proposes a one -year interim term with an option to extend to a three -year permanent term. The City will have the right to cancel the agreement after one year with no S7296 \0001 \615304.3 - 1 of 2 - financial obligations for the City or the Management Company. The Management Company will retain ownership of the Pay & Display Machines and any ancillary equipment. • The Fee Schedule the City proposes is as follows: The Management Company will guarantee the City an amount equal to the Average Net Parking Income it received over the past four years of $267,300. In addition, gross revenue will be shared as follows: Revenue from $370,000 to $480,000 the city 60 %, management 40 %. Revenues over $480,000 the city 80 %, management 20 %. • The Management Company will be responsible for any stolen revenues and show proof of insurance and be bonded. If you are able to meet the above requirements please provide bids no later than May 15, 2000. Please be sure to call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Pamela Arends -King Director of Administrative Services/Treasurer City of Seal Beach • S7296 \0001 \615304.3 - 2 of 2 - AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO PARKING FEE COLLECTION AGREEMENT THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO PARKING FEE COLLECTION AGREEMENT ( "Amendment" herein), effective as of the date specified in Section 3 below, is entered into by and between the City of Seal Beach ( "City" herein), a California municipal corporation, and Ampco System Parking ( "Contractor" herein), a Califomia corporation. RECITALS A. On August 3, 2000, the City and Contractor entered into that certain "Parking Fee Collection Agreement" ( "Agreement" herein) under which Contractor agreed to provide, install and maintain automated fee collection equipment at City's automobile parking facilities, as well as to collect revenues from such equipment, in accordance with said Agreement. B. City and Contractor wish to amend and extend the term of the Agreement. . NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions herein contained, City and Contractor agree as follows: 1. Section 3 of the Agreement relating to term is hereby amended to read as follows: "3. Term. The term of this Agreement shall be one year commencing on November 1, 2001, and terminating on October 31, 2002. The term shall be extended for two, one year options unless either party provides written notice to the other party in accordance with Paragraph 11 of the Agreement at least sixty days prior to the expiration of the term." 2. Section 6B of the Agreement relating to Compensation is hereby amended to read as follows: "B. Contractor shall pay City the following fees in exchange for the privilege of operating fee collection equipment at the Facilities. 1. Base Fee. Contractor shall pay City a monthly base fee of $16,667.00. Contractor shall pay City the monthly base fee regardless of the actual revenue collected during any particular month by Contractor from its fee collection equipment at the Facilities. Notwithstanding the preceding, if the Commencement Date is not the first day of a month, or if the termination date is not the last day of a S7296 \0001 \615292.4 - - =icy: month, then Contractor shall pay City a prorated fee for that particular month. The initial monthly base fee shall be paid thirty days after the Commencement Date, and subsequent payments shall be on a monthly basis thereafter. 2. Shared Revenue Fee. In addition to the monthly base fee provided for in paragraph 1 above, Contractor shall pay City sixty -five percent of gross parking receipts in excess of three hundred thousand dollars $300,000. Contractor's annual gross parking receipts shall be calculated based on Contractor's gross parking receipts for each twelve month period following the Commencement Date. Contractor shall deliver to City the annual shared revenue fee, together with a copy of Contractor's gross parking receipts records, no later than the thirtieth day following the end of each twelve month period following the Commencement Date. In the event that this Agreement is terminated prior to the end of any twelve month period following the Commencementnate, then the annual shared revenue fee shall be prorated for that period." 3. Except as amended herein, the terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. TO EFFECTUATE THIS AMENDMENT, the parties have caused their duly authorized representatives to execute this Agreement on the dates set forth below. "City" "Contractor" City of Seal Beach Ampco System Parking t4eUJ / Altc By: 1 Willia F ���ne, Mayor Name: Arnold Klauber Title: Vice President Regional Manager Date 4zi{J tACV/ Date: ( 1 - ? ! d v By: Attest: . B Y /JoAnne Yeo, City CI - rk S7296 \0001 \615292.4 Date: Approved as to form: By: Quinn M. Barrow, City Attorney 57296 \0001 \615292.4 . Attachment 9 1 y y r -. � Y 1 ,.,... F = T ''‘' .. ' .ate d , . . t i l p . 4 ��3� �' � mail � . { �,, ate" 4 � "'-' ? ±� ' * +� j?� � t �_ F '"�'4 4,,, S 1 V- .m.:.�r�{r. -77,7','.:,,,,,,...„.5=A-.' .u� A pM,E kr, 'h � � ,- " i x r . . ,..: 1 : : , ,_ .._. _ AP -2 H � 1 u J 4. - FJectroni _.,..,. , , _., ,,._ ,t., : .- --_-_ , 1I Meter System INSERT CON O ( Solid state circuitry and quartz timing ) Parkcar TO DISPL TIME PURCHASED ?0. „..,C- lRusso: vine, Ar LISA C Microprocessor for storing complex rates and audit data C Free -fall coin chute, jam resistant and easy to clear ts . . ' i : s C Discriminates coins by size and m etallic content C High- visibility displays for easy enforcement r ( Lift out mechanism with modular, plug-in componen ) d M CAS an option, can accept ParkCard stored value card C Upgrade existing POM Models Nan d s (Optional solar pak to supplement battery during daylight (MeterManager PC software (SmartLock revenue management system - Thf --- \r -- i ..., "The Originators Of Metered Parking" * ,,, , , . , , arc > r _ �e SfYa ar "- `F �3 F ry � S t (.` ,,, iti 3 fk :+� f , fi , "".�. r7 _ee :.� iv > tis rst' $3;ey ` }+. �, - �` 'Y',�C. t r .rx w ° "' i " Ktq! f�;,i�tk :�� )'r tr r S +, ' k ... w Y k A kict:,lr �! - -.. ;':' 1 ' ` ' ma c , �� "� ., t�'�y4 . ..... jineering design. Rugged, dependable construction. Savings 01 Multi-Space Meters. APM Meters Feature: , 6.-7-- , Traditional multi-space pay-and-display machines ., ., ., , ,_ ,,,„.. _ Solid State circuitry and quartz timing ,, .,,,.„ o ... require walking hundreds of feet from ones Microprocessor br storing complex rates and audit data parked vehicle, then following complex _,... , . , . „:„, ,, ,-.4.- ,-, .;,..,, Free fall coin chute, jam resistant and easy to dear „ , 1 t ,. ... instructions to properly pay for parking .The .,,, ., Discriminates coins by size and metallic content f.: ,.,:i. j: APM 2X or 4X is only a few feet away Push one ,,",,:-..,-. High visibility displays — user friendly and easy to enforce from , 4 7k ' button for your space number, then insert coins or street or sidewalk I, '`:tjf-',4, ParkCard. Its that simple. _ift out mechanism with modular, plug-in components :: ,.'. e APM 2X And 4X Are Easy cc Optional ParkCard reader accepts disposable memory chip cards, :l ''''' ' . To Enforce. lectronic purse cards, or SAM-secured smartcards The APM-2X features a rotary status signal All APM features also available to Ar 2 X visible from the front and rear of the meter up to ' '"*%:- - : ' 3' ' s '''.. M ' It' -:',":-... upgrade existing POM Models N and S 80 away This signal shows red for expired mode, yellow for trouble mode, Itit• tilta:::r • Optional solar pak to supplement and green for paid parking. Separate signals for each space can be seen from ' ,,ir, ,.,„P ., battery during daylight, extends battery , the street or sidewalk. After initial time is purchased, the front display shows ;,..;, r:!!,..t, '5r.,.! 1 de individual symbols for the left and right ,..„..,,, ,,f•ANA,PiAn . , .,1%,:; , , , ,v? '1; i7;11 , ' • MeterManager PC software allows space, "E for Expired mode, "-" for Paid . .1 . A,1 , • - ' — 7 • f!. P;,i"-,01,.;.•,,tys, 4 - L' ,,, ''';'41:'Sg" creation of rate programs, auditing time mode, with "Jam" or "Fair to indicate .,/ 1...;1 , • al Iii 1 1 1#,014: trouble with the meter. A rear LCD sign nlli '-'7d revenue and tracking maintenance ' Irte411f3:i and inventory. POM communications is also available as a base model option ievices transfer data instantly without having to open themeter for walk-by enforcement. The APM-4X High visibility displays allow 1 3martLock revenue management system features a front and rear LCD digital for easy enforcement f rom The street or sidewalk. Peripheral port for program upgrades and accessories display with individual symbols for each 3acklight, LEDs available for night use and enforcement : Hard space, "E" for Expired mode, " for Paid tidal Resistant Housing Features Make APM ' s a rd time mode, with "Jam" or "Fail" to indicate Beat. trouble with the meter. ,,, ..... ..,. ,4tak., , Tapered base deflects upward blows to prevent forced removal of Our ParkCard® Stored Value Chip .. - ,.....- ,-- .K, - - , 41.--, , ,, , ,, : ,..0.,it .., .. ,,,.7., he meter from the post • Cards Add Convenience And f, ' '-- ' I, Domputer machined door for close tolerance to prevent Increased Revenue. R e a r . LCD signal is available a .,. 1)Weainrg ParkCard stored value chip cards are loaded lock and two heavy locking points to resist convenient for motorists, and they increase reak-in revenue through elimination of coin handling costs and vandalism to the meters. /ault in zinc or iron designs accept standard or expanded Distribution systems are available for dispensing disposable or reprogramm ab e ;apacity' sealed coin boxes in zinc or cyco(ac, or open top boxes cards and tracking sales and use of the cards in the parking meters. Let POM il P atented "Gripper Wedge show you how ParkCards can also be used l s:; 1 i . Model APM-E Fits Competitor Housings Or POM in multiple applications such as access ,,, - 7, - --:7 - 77 : e.,-P, , ,,, , , -„; , ,,. ,,, „ . 5- ::: , del E Housings. control, vending, laundromats and - . '•- ' ' - " A To upgrade existing mechanical mass transit. p. , - .„- - "'rs\ ,- _4 1„,i4,.... 4 Th ,, meters to electronics, simply The APM Is The Only Electronic _. -k , 1 : 4 4 - .rt7Lepy r r ic ir -,,, ; ,-, -- " I:AL; 1 ° e-, replace the mechanism. You'll see Meter System With The POM an immediate increase in revenue Name Behind It 1 -.1 ' ; ,,•;?-'-, • 4 .' . --- taicf ilia 'if 1 ‘,,,, „ :.•. , , - : . , ; 4' ‘ , due to jam resistance and quartz For over 60 years, POM has been T n timing. On street tests show designing and building meter systems to fit •:„';:ii.472;','444;',;:. dramatic improvement in cash the needs of our customers. Our commitment is unequaled ' . ..„....., ,., , . - , .... . flow, maintenance and enforcement in the industry. A commitment to product design and customer service. When you efficiency and public acceptance of compare the features of the APM model to others on the market take a close look ' ::P - . k„. this electronic meter over previously at the company that stands behind it — POM, we are "the originators of metered • tailed mechanical units. parking". t.,,,j64-f. ins );-',N..f4= I -,;, .7 1 ' t ' S ) 4 1 I :-, It---11*- '' i . LT • 1 . 41"1 • 8p S ! `. � -•• : ' . , % , I.ir � :::1 Cam' 9 _ '" - ,4' 2 4l E... �, ' rP' ' ' • i t ' , , ' - � ��t � ' ,� f^� A . f tlw 1, ., , ,:1h : f1 i 4'i - IF1" , � ' tk �i:' j ,••.,. t.; S■ ` ,! , 1 ?lF ,,, ,, ,,,} ' t ,.' l ''' :� i','.: : ; :', • 1 : a . ii( ' 7 .: �'� a :% y,, _�'k • ' Y.r p. tTN' — ' %;n,n �£z ,. -..a• r:4a: U i L L t: •d ` Yfti••.0 J t / z. Y r^!e ;6? +;[1','y':r i a ' . 1 d " - .•'1fl�•• Vt , , ,i r- `.. - .. ` 0 i.',,'.•i,S: ': ; f , oti � t � '' :'kj'. •• 4 S • � , Y y rn 1 '<: ti 1 > r N - 4_ u&r, —i \-. :• A pr:, , ,, soh":' r -.. *t ` ` `� ' to �" , c 1 m - cl - >z • i "{ y;lq t ii ' -` d,, ,'qty ?v:: �?" Z n { ''''' '' i a '*%"" • ...$ 4 x - z. ‘111 i --V �. ; : s- - • r % V ' i . ,n • ' T t1, ' �+�• < V. , �i� : /�, r I (_ a .. ' l y -. '•.y •+'7 .r • . .:.] %;;;.' �� ' •t4 ; "x , {" J am'. : , 2 ,.. : s :m . 00 r•.. H t ` . ^ '17 ., :: 1; ,.:' :rU - mow • . �,.:; . r , . e' �' . I �''_]' °: is _. r ,..9i,'' :'. : + f 1 114 , ..r Yi t 1, ,� =. _ . :'i il • .., • !,•_ rY.l,r vh ' i . } � ' ie ' Y• ,."' r� �1 " , i.. , lk I � SVr h r• ' S. tQ�• i Jts. r v �� • P te '. t s�1 i w X. gi••-. . l ti � , ` h 4 �i � iti 1r ti ..1.17. Z ~• � '.i- • , a . y .S , .G' - i` " � - - TAI �< • �f4 X ,4 - ' I i • 4 • 1. i N " , •..I•_ }._ ...- v .. .., � . . 1 . - C , '. .,. ,: :'• - ' S , '�' .M: •.J' Y �Ii :. y -nt.`Y - T••` r' . t 7• �/i. . AR - �: v , _. Sr � � - r t,:` Y • 4. G 4. •h � . y Y . �: , _ • r' � �t ' � i • J ...r, ::. ..: ' f, . .. • r , -. • ..: �: �'.'�1 M1: V: a'a � .. }. ' ri 4 - . . ; ; ;; " '� , ;. : r K ' r •`° :.C -c. „,,.* �,; :t...' ' •�: Rwt � .- 4P .�� • r!emgit Y . ,�Y s � i. i {{ ` r, :M 'c' . • ' v •, c , 1 :-, '1 .° ' • x - ; 't•, ,l-' t' ''' , : :t.. ° 9 . 1 r ,.,.. - - -- -- : ,^ - r..,, n ,.. ".'.s'T 1 �. •, ?': +, _ : -;.. 'vs - 1.' - -:�- :: . <4-t {P"_ .1 +. r �+\ r.. .•,, rw.�i ,r >F/.. •iir < <.• C'W .:F ._ - Gift..: ^Q .. , : 9 '� : ,,2 : •':• _ i.: _ - : k4 . .. ). : § � ; - C. .sr: ".:' - „ � % '.: Gr. ': : ::F...s , '' i . ..� .i, Y • r / F r � N . ' . �L t 4: ,. :, " y :... ... .. Y r. •• .,/.•• ' ii � :.ii• • �@� :�,.., �� � � Jam, .�+ • . 1 'q'. ` iii ~' _ - • ..yw'. . :: , i . ® r� � y`; : ' ' :, '':t: .. ir.i .- ?R , "" ..', ' L� 7 -7 A.. "•if: + k , r :!. r�� �'•! : >, .t .. 2,, ,.tom . r.: s, + «r:: ;�'1: 3 ` •a ..:. • „....;.,: e: � .,•' •. ' : � '. ': ,7ci ... .: ,., >:. � ^:6•_• ° . , .A.. , .,.x . - .`� � .,:• ,, . •fi � y. •'.�, �`^ ...5,...':,•.r r :. - 'Y,.._ . •- ..�.;� . _ :. . • .. .... - .i `f : :. v" . , ; ; , ..4 +tn c . ',a, - ', i' ' r. y -.,�•' vs- - } - 4,.:.... ".vt.� rr- .•v: -., ..... .• ,.M » -:�� . r., a .. r:.. lc �. .. .: y p� .,, ' -. } �ti..�7 ,. N,:. ter '- c :, �. � ; r ,� q,�. �. : . : k , .. >m,: , .4: . : :v .a y •{ i. , ,3, � • . •r,y ;.C � °'fir•, •f: '�{t d'i• . � ,n4 _ M -, ? .�,„<. A.h «� . 1�• w � . t ;a ...;::;;;W:71 � • •• f•., r� :•ta. ': . :.G \^..r :y .. t. _ r ' i - ;�y t '�"•� n� �t ,•.tx ,t -. _.. _. - .::•r•: -,M� : —.,1' "?a _ i` r . : ' /' :.'4:, r . .., ' . ` 4 *" . 4 ' - - T.t.. ;`•x r :: • 1 • r. } . - ` '•'� c ' ';Yv:.�:�.; . ;� n :rY^ ..r.7 - r ” r. _ �.a �?c . p . :fc_ � ,. �'..p� •'rc� .rr , ; ' " t _ W ' . k : ., w�':S6r •:,F. ::. . {f:0:.: ;• . b r . wr• Y':.-'''� ” .w �'`�:,..r •�. • •- - .i a . .; }• ' .:� : � ���'�,• .'. .• �.... .r.l� ") - �n . ;... } fe -..... .3in. 1y�S''x ••r17 � !' n ' aR. •. I. 44. � >S. +r� � !rl.: r'R�/ ' •' ,'� • - • ,� �La1 • Y ,. ... > p.,�.: 1 . .r.. , . �.x . :Y w . . ... • . •., 4 .• 1, . h K4G -i .. :.: .. .. . .. .. . A .. , !,a <,RV '�•. -' .��' (� :/, ��71 . .� �J. ... 5.. . / ,3 � ] 4F •..,�:.. r• �'i:: _ 'O. v• -�•�c. (( �� ,tea , .r y GG l _ 1 r � " : V , : ... , : . .. .. : J � I• .. � ( ,.. A V ., ; r • __ w . i.. . . � .. . . , ::: � :I. � n11' -: - Y x '.'f;.': ++:. . $ •�: :Y': :� � .!3 �/ �, a',. . fi x „ . ••- .r K , r ry t • •' ;J � ir, +,1rF i ' ... , may • _�.. : . 4 - ' , , y :... f,. Nlr Q� at ▪ - 4 d a - ▪ • • .� , -, ... . . :'. : ... , ..... , • - W .� . • ma y r i .z • • r Y .. .W • ' I .f.` . c 0 s • • ' • 1 l ., 1..: . 1 1 • cam • • • a1 , 1 1 -: ml �l ml �1 .1. .. = I s1 . , t _ ' old I . _. — 1 1 — *11 9- I ' ;_ll I ZII n n " x 1 • DUNCAN INDUSTRIES PARKING METER HOUSING MODEL 90 Z -5 SINGLE AND DUPLEX Time tested technology, superior workmanship and famous after -sale service make Duncan the world leader in metered parking. Model 90 parking meter housings have long been the industry standard for areas where maximum revenue security is important. The unique all iron lower housing design and internal locking mechanism combine to make compromise virtually impossible. Model 90 housings feature a larger coin vault to reduce collection frequency. Features: • Lower housing door is hinged internally to the lower housing. • Compatible with all Duncan electronic and mechanical mechanisms. • Tolerance between the lower housing door diameter and the • Zinc alloy upper housing with high impact, damage resistant lower housing door opening does not exceed .030 inches. dome. • Lower housing door, when open, positions the coin box at • Easy conversion to ductile iron upper housing. • Contoured ductile iron lower housing with high security internal an approximate 45 degree angle to permit easy removal, locking mechanism for maximum revenue security. collection and self aligning replacement. • Coin box cradle guide insures proper replacement and alignment of the coin box to again receive coins before the • Locked lower housing door is secured to the lower housing by vault door is re- locked. two opposing, cam activated, hardened steel bars. • Expanded capacity coin box. • Access to the coin compartment is gained through a lock and Options: key combination different from the upper housing. • No physical portion of the lock is exposed outside the meter • High security locks housing. • Sealed, expanded capacity, coin box • Variety of colors • Key entrance is through a deep pick resistant corridor, e�il��l��: UPPER HOUSING (Single and Duplex) through the door to tt' The key -way corridor is at last g p " hf outside surface of the doors key - way to the face of the lock. • Housing has an impact strength equal to or exceeding zinc alloy Zamac #5. • Lower housing has a minimum of .280 inches nominal wall thickness. • Cap assembly fits onto the mechanism housing portion with a metal -to -metal tongue and groove design. Specifications: PAINT • Tongue portion on the mechanism housing is 1/8" high and is Meter parts are processed through a five stage clean /iron • continuous except for an area not to exceed 2 3/16" where the phosphate system prior to paint. mechanism extends through the housing. The groove on the cap assembly overlaps the housing tongue portion by 1/8 ". • Meter parts are painted using a powder paint system that • Cap assembly is hinged to the upper housing to allow for applies a polyester TGIC powder paint electro- statically at a thickness of 2.5 - 3.5 Mils. inspection, removal or replacement of the meter mechanism. • • Cap -strap is capable of being detached by the removal of four Painted meter parts are oven -cured prior to assembly and internal screws. shipment. • Access to the upper housing is gained through separate lock combination and key and does not allow access to the coin compartment of the lower housing. Specifications DOME 0UNCAN • Dome lens is a one -piece lens made of high impact polycarbonate material and sealed into place on the lower A DOVER) RESOURCES COMPANY portion of the lens. 340 Industrial Park Road Specifications: LOWER HOUSING (Single and Duplex) P Box 849 Harrison Arkansas 72601 • Lower housing is a one -piece integral casting constructed of ductile iron. Toll Free 1 -800- 338 -6226 Telephone (870) 741 -5481 • Lower housing has a round door opening machined to a close Fax General (870) 741- 2868 tolerance providing a close fit of the vault door. Fax. International (870) 741-2423 • Lower housing door is on the front of the lower housing. e -mail: duncan @duncanparking.com http://www.duncanparking.com Made in USA .1• •... r.._,Y� '.. yy -�. •.:: �t. .R. -'..• ... :;b,p: �. N . 4: ,...k ,, .;., :. ,f7 •�, �h.'y" •1••?:s.. 5� : :' 'A ; ;. .; i ;:TE y ‚ , %\ _ 4 - „ A • l4 44 J 1 ‚- ,1 , - : : :t;; ::c::: $ ; t 1 ‚. aIIID / 7? ;* - - Otr ? j f , 4 tai , ?" x ,•°�'. tai a . >$ p q ---- j : p & C�� .. . .. . :: «.1 : ..;I:1 ;: .: : •• 'r , •• , • , .;.. iQ __ f c *�uF;, • : 4 , ( !•-'_ : . ; 4:44 • L * - * R , v 1 t : \ - 1rh j --g ( , „ MacKay > ti{:` 5.• � . �..... :: w - LA4. a HOUR TIME LIMT mechanism •h —. ri — . ..., . . •:.:._• -.' ... .... . . ? -; T ti McXay aiTM �� yr a { r ° 4 -- . :— — t . / - — - •The MacKay GuardlanTM is an advanced product built with expandable architecture to match today's needs and those of the ,. �'�, t y$ � y � o� ra F o: }�+' >?" 'a ��� y ,+� ��Y ''M1 �'ixfF,k7� : future -2 / _ • Programmed for flexible enforcement -::;::--'' options and constructed for ease of use • Built with a straight drop chute coin channel ,,v• an INDIGLO® back light and large rear 4 violation LCD •Manufactured under ISO 9002 certified quality processes. • • • •• • MacKay MetersTM backs its product lines with a solid warranty based on confidence in the quality of its products cover for specifications> .•••••.••• :". }�''�i`n�a k�7 \.4 - Yf / • side view ____ _______ ____ \\\LL1LL2LLL\2L\L((J [11. �� i le5. 'F �# I J GUARD T M , 4 ` i MacKay MacKay - i mechanism ,. General Specifications •Can show four 1.27cm ( inch) high •Microprocessor card capable of using 4�'` numeric digits, colon, plus four encryption algorithm (DES etc.) as 4. M anu f ac t ure d un I 9002 cert fi ' ' �. additional icons/symbols/messages. security against fraudulent use. i> -.�� 7 qua processes. 4r4' ; addtiona e GPM416, GPM896 (or equivalent) ` ' • Designed to work under normal street Special Expansion Features yp -7, � � � � , 1; vibration and extreme grime, rain, sleet •Main system board acts as card as rechargeable or non- car rechargeable rechargeable token/debit card or as ,"A., '% ,} ,. , and snow. motherboard, protecting initial capital service card: rate change, meter � f y a inves a nd providing a viable •Operating temperature range: feature programming, special feature. , k �, ' ., . -40°C (-40°F) to 80°C (176°F). technology migration and advancement , 4, - path. •Type GPM103 (or equivalent) MacKay Guardian Internal Time Keeping non- rechargeable token cards. E - PurseTM •Two expansion ports are accessible •Equipped with a time -of -day clock that from within the meter frame. These •Card receptacle rated for minimum k , is accurate to a few seconds - per -week. ports act as integration points for 200,000 insertions and constructed for ` r" future add -on hardware and easy maintenance. R c � , •Cert by independent laboratory. accessories. �� , i •A 365 -day calendar /Real Time clock Programmable Features - • � � V, � �, .,, with short-term power fail backup LED Display • Standard programming resident in during battery exchanges /replacement. •Programmable for maximum flexibility in 32KB re- programmable memory: `` , i45 - `r enforcement options. Uses dual colour Standard rate operation. �;ry'Y�' •Time -of -day clock is automatically (Red /Green) Super Bright LED's on Time-of-day operation. ' re- synchronised to the master hand both front and rear. _t.-,. held terminal's time-of-day clock - Day -of -week operation. MacKay during any data transfer. • LED visible at distance of 24 meters - Day -of -year operation. GuardianTM (80 feet) at night. •Ability to program for automatic daylight Software System savings time change. Coin Validation & Discrimination Management Features r`< • Clear View chute channel allows for • Meter revenue audit. *. ���� Power Source superior detection and removal of "'. , • Operates for a period of 12 months foreign objects. •Swapping /moving meters within 4 �, (plus), when configured for minimum a meter system. ower consum tion. •Coin chute is easily and quickly c4.4.z` p p replaced /serviced in the field without •Audit disable for coin /card check during: r-'44 Senses • electronically either single 9V the need for special tools, calibration .,. - Maintenance /testing. 1 � t lithium or 6V alkaline battery operation. or training. Time /rate programming. MacKay Front Display •Accepts up to 16 different - Meter maintenance. WatchmanrM •High contrast and high visibility Liquid coins /tokens through a single - Meter /post inventory. Crystal Display (LCD) and Light Emitting entrance slot. •Password protected user and group Diode (LED) technologies. •Can detect non - metallic jams such level security features. •LCD has programmable time -of- as paper /gum etc.** day /duration and INDIGLO® back light Portable Data Terminal •Validates electronically by two •Rugged DOS based computer, memory for effective night -time operation. different methods. gg expandable with communications/ •Large display - 2.5cm (1 inch) x 5cm rechargeable cradle and attached (2 inches). Shows four 1.27cm Data Transfer via Infra - Red IR communications device. ( inch) high numeric digits, colon, •Transfer of coin audit data in less • plus four additional icon/ symbols than 3 seconds, which includes an •Recommended minimum memory: 4MB /messages. individualised coin count as well as Warranty •Dual numeric displays available. clock date re synchronisation. y g J.J. MacKay Canada Limited guarantees •A typical meter rate or parameter for a period of one year from the date Rear Display change in less than 10 seconds. of shipment against defects in •Large and highly visible display workmanship and /or materials. 2.5cm - (1 inch) x 7.5cm (3 inches). ISO Card System The manufacturer provides a two -year Flashes red and silver to indicate •Uses one (or more) of the following warranty against defects in the main 'Time Expired' or solid silver for valid IS07816 compliant card payment circuit board. parking time. technologies: *INDIGLO® is a registered trade name of Timex Corp. * *Factory installed Options, 6 -8 weeks lead time. Specifications may change (refer to our website for up - - date specifications) Head Office: Sales Office: J.J. MacKay Canada Limited 1342 Abercrombie Road PO Box 338, New Glasgow ®—� -- Nova Scotia, Canada B2H 5E3 Phone (902) 752 -5124 i Fax (902) 752 -5955 ilk ,r6`* r 111 E E ,$. TM Head Office customer service and technical support: Toll free in North America: 1- 888- 4MACKAY Fax (902) 752 -4889 (462-2529) Email customer.service @jjmackay.com Web www.jjmackay.com •,; , , .... ,.. ,. a. ...r , w.. .: ,,. .. _ ...,..; : ::.. .... . ..... -..... ;. ,,; ,;..>�. y e -�;w . ; r... .; ,>r. ...r .tr . . r.r y....: ..�: , .i.<.,' t� ., _.• ,� .aK., . ,, t ,. ;.., a , .,.. , v x't o- ,.. , �,:,.... ,,; ;, .}, :<.,_.. :� ,..,;�. •,r•F ,. <,. r:f L .ter. s - ,t!�-� � -rt 1 a - . "3 .. .�... +' 4-,i.: :..3. .s . 'e�'�o. :S �,c- .4ct:Yb:�., ,r >. -„ .r.a'+.✓.rw,twrx�''.w,w „ .�rat•,�. .... •Sr•• .s.�r... ..� °,. fsur. a>�•; I+ - s'. ',,�:..:�t_ k. :;".�s:� .i;t<,.. ,, .re» k� ,d:- t .w.,. , . ,.., m ,; ,. {.,. . .,..,.,.t .. .. . ., �:'�r,+ +�, -t f:. $a.'n ,�"r . �' _ st. '/ a t'd. kti�� .� i. � �' r : $.:+r N . , ,�v . 4,, u .., �., . �,,: r., m y . - ;s., ,,,..... :,:. .., � :. e. .:'•;� . `,j � ..� '• �.�.,,,,+ ^ ::, } .�; �' .'w:.. ,,r,� a .,, ~, , .., , `�u �..; w . �5, ,.... , r,. w. , , . �, •: ,.., .. _ ... zf .rt�+� .� ' � _ .k , � >,., m t s r.� ;�;. �n . -- s • a _, � -a. y ,.� '�a, 1, r - ,,,'�` I/ t r . ..a* Y!" ,,,. , ,,� . . ..; �,. 1 A k� , ... , �t ,,. . , y .. .,. : ;i. �:. � �' a.� ae •"a w:.'SP :'�� 1F r � 'r .: i- - '�i T��. r�� ,•...x'. ?r. 'S(. ) : ,..- �r ..., b , ,,... ...,w :; .., , ,.r.,- l. t,� y; e ',:r. ..r3.- r F� r.:t�c'Y� k.:v ..e._ fif..:.l:�" _7f>•. ,z �. N'. „'F �i fi *P »`. "�t•� w�: ,: �,'� x 4 �t,� � ����aC .: f.F • •::�� if., !. .f .. a3.3.. :.G t r� , ._ `C ' r , � � . �q "�k'..�.. •r 5.�.`�^r� -.,;rc. ',: ... ., .:.. .zr,.. 5.w :,,r,...'��r., ,, �tw�• �,. :.1.•. � ... ..,. ..:•..,...,... � :�k 3' <.t. � . s, ?r t, : -s„o- �,.�.:, 7 . <r.. {,�� ,✓ .r, ,..>4,s., .G: , x . a ,.:, �,ti•... � ., s•rn :, :: ,. ,.: • µ •:.r, :,:.:,• !, r,. ✓s . ;t... b�.. ., � ,•} ,'S� ,:5r.,r.. ' �� � a a� � - �,�F,><` � :£. <.y, v t t: Y..,.. r,.. ..r ����5l. t: ,.. ,. -, w w L - +, .:.. ... ....tn�t;4 A° v.iiP G Csi.., } , d. �. '� „- i4 rF i. _. ?;.. -. n.+,.. Y +.. ;5�' :,, 4�/ ., !�' .. ro1". ... �.. ,.. ., ..: 'u.;,. ::. . ,y ...,,.r�' ., '.f,. .. ... - � ,.d. , ! - S�k:. yT'.` ,., ✓v.,a N ,.�!� 4f ' ..: .., ( :hM4:. .�.. ....?m,,, :. K -. ,. -,, ,. .,j1.. � M1 Y -. .Y�.' {•. {"K'7• , VP, a i : �l:_. :i:1 1 f G Fl^`. - . „r�� /.w �,{ / {.:... r: .rwe,',. ...� �a, -.: r. .�:"rt. ., i., ( i:�.. a, .. ,. ,. :. :•Fe > C : J ��4 ?v n-i �y,� ,. e a,.. ,� wY,U. ,: ,1 „F � ,, +k r,,.i, z cr• ,. �w, ... 'n M.e• ..1[^".., :.. ,. $i{ n : +' , -. r_ ;i '_r 4• : ., �: �.r,, �. ��.;.>r,: ,t?i��wr Tk - � . a ,xs�- "s}'�r,�w... w �{� `: ..,. , r. n d :�r,. ,ii { .;x °� .:� � . � , } ''y"^Fd , :. • ..�. .. ,. t ; . «: f� nLG�. .. - .. .. ..� ... �,r..r. '^S"a �' �f' �. -1- i , '' , �.'� ,,. �� �. , s ,�r M � " `w.:.. 4. �w ''• � ;�, ^B -'� : t t >} -; f r i3 tr �` iry r .n.t{t 4r �,�',�� ,.:.. ,, :t�; �. r :. �`:: � -,; �' :'^x .' .. .: ;.� t '.:.:. ; 6..... r' .' - i 1 •` s . 3 r r � -ar ! � '' ;. � ' ,,:, r+ +E'3� i �:. n s qr yyx �r 9 ,Lh4'�,rr ..r, S eFr z � ". ,.. < r� ., k+: � , � ,....'n ; :. . .l r • ?ive • •i 4 ;t/f.; u , � x' r,�? : t n .. ,,, .� } . +�l+ ,:r -.. ,: „ �,-�� , '^r�'.. ,,, ., s ,.., ,r • • ,x44 .. !�, , w •F ..., ;...,s �. -Y ,�.• w at. 3 a E.:. >n`h� .ti:�:vs� .� -.� r��?s r4 .;: �.,>< . �,': k r•." ..' .. , . .e a .. ,.,. ,., +r±!� , : r �- : �,.� �:,r - � •.r ... , &,�. :.;:l, t . e y ..:) : z -. r .:3 z»; ;' �s. ' � : u't .,�- L �� „ uwy .. , ,n7, a U' z f� �� � ,,,... mk"�"u3rd?;, :..;. �+X -,. _ t,t ,if ri dg .:•t';. '�a �.! i, . R Yt ar� �x� , nom: ., -:: :�.. ,�..,. �. , w , ,, �. �*�: ?� tr,,, .. ,.. ,� .��' ,,.. .4'.. � �: Y, �r r4, fr.ti;� c'� w. sa .:,r k. ,, . . -. .. ::,. �y}!':YJ ,.. ' ,,�"`• �,:.,� ... ,,: .. •: :�:. :. ,.,:e. ,,,f .: •y` k 1 '�a - ». �:3 ,. u.5. r-r_ •`�- ' -��,., ..' � ..t..._w�• - r r ::.. ,- �'x,4. .. •.. .. � �1 .cr.... '• , :' .i� s ,�- r^, i f ..:.. ',:r_t m� {� � .+: } ,...�' ,.w'. � A .r. < $ { ,> .... � e ��,�. -. �,...,... .r .. : + "� t..r. Sn'f•� r..: r�.�p�� •:I� ��3'3>ib... r. ">�' ..�i. �A ��i' ,.,�.. ..�;�... '.i -'� ,..;,, � -:: .• J...=, +„ i s <.. �,• h�j�'kxw �. �`ri•,...�n:ad: .c' �' tilr r��t�.:., 'y � 4, * 3 T � ,t,,,. °'� l .: ,•. .� ... '. `h'%� r :, -: �'e :... .., .i:. ::, ,. r :.d...: .y.,. S ��*i 3Y�''`- R$'i' rr t ;tw' ji !, :; ° +, fi , . .. .,, . ( +� xd � .,.. �: , � f ,:. r � , .'': ��.,; Lc? . r 1^. .�,. $+ ��..� . t r - :�,� �. .. fir_ „ z t . r,rw � ,g,,. - ,. �• • ,..a .- •., t f • ? y'•t� r:. - � .s�. �.c - t �i s :+.:. ' g 'fir �:.�d t 't �r,. .�,. «.: ,V" ,.•.,r rr,.���. .t r...: _ Ys :. :.s^tsr'' �s. -J v r' u"� :' "�i. ,T'��,. �. n h: ,� :. `;,:.''cua.F' - - •. -., aw. , . .:' :.., ., .::� r '.::: i p�t,,;k,:, ,�y•.•:. ✓, ": ���t�,. ,_ :. s.. - .ma::,?'? � .r .''� - ,•�.. � _,. cir..:, r� . p �:•:f . ,.,. .,, • ....... r �P r . • a ,i'. :, r,, , r'.. t , ,? . } 3 fi. • .c 3'#t a: fiR' ;," � � �t.. F4..• �t�, � r{ � , � . � Y. F;.. as ,.. s,.: ,.r. '?. ,.. L -s. :, �2s._ ... �' 3 - :. .. r :.o _ .�: k' ., ,.t , gym • t . ..... . , . _,,, � ..:.,:., !'0,.: irk .rur : .,. .at, ., r x .. �r,: ;.F. ..: �. •de - .3. >• ., .:n ..r^•! vl � { �r „ � „ , ..�•:.. ..1 a ,.....s.. ..Y - . a ..F : � i_. .. >. ..��ra ,. .. :�:'fi.{ , ., :.,.. r, . _, ... ,:, a.... - -.,, .. .. .......... . 1 , -, :',ti - 'c`' ...-+` - .Kn.s� . .r, sue,,., -. •?ut&rn„ , T•.... ,,, ::. ,._, ,, sY �Y :•:.,. .�+:� , rr ,, :, 1,i.. '� r., _r, �.. ' .A ,. i r�??w�w:.. ..,v ,.,. r� .....r. .... r."h T Rf',, u' ..,. �::.,.r .� � x i•. �.s >n.:. ... . ,�, ,r. w'ti ;k.. r :,x,',. !? .: u.:'S ,�. .. � .'�... ., �. .. ,.. r-r�.. s._. .... , e�'. h ". k �.r. n. ..._c.�,i r,r aws..hd �' ,Z'.. �y� 6 r ,aF.a" ww« l 4 kYr�.._ tt. �M`, :•:.�:r...r �4, :.:,,. ._ .,:.., r :•. +:. •1...,.. •. r e t, t z -,.,,. ,.r � -.a.. ,...,�..- .,,, .bw- , k'+c ,,.... .,.:r ...._. .s ..,c +4 ,.,. � .r... -Af.. fk.,r ..f .�U �L;� -f :.3 C.'. r � % -`� , 'r �.,:' >r �IIr9' ,r Y.. . �flY .,ss., C:i'}' ..:. i ,..,.., ., , - . , .tv. ,. •:..x�i :::w a ". Y .., ....r,1:C ..i ,. �hrl.,, f..'� • ,y'„ ,. ..:r ,5 •'�'^ e ,,...r. n�' „b � . .. M . ,.:,. � .n, .:,. .. ...'..,.. 8 •:3::• :. v., ,. $^' iv.r.<C� r.'ki.rcf .... .k t *S' .:...� _� } �3.. , Y .L,�r .., � :. : w. u.v , X.:i.o ':di '. .. x(. w•. ,x. ..s aa�.�$....,.4.. ::'3 .......��:trf�. .+.,, Js � �.• - ". � "": "�4 , ,�"c, _ " i.•i� t. 'S.�;j: :4.k ... �."(4 ,.,. ,' ,. _ -0 +l� x, x : . ,. tF+a, „r< � n ., n: x..d., t , k .1k $r�.t' K '�wm.... .. ..i ro � .. r .Sw.0 .... ,. • -.; .. ..:. ,: .:.::: af. x .,, :.. amd.tit'W � /vit ,_... u! . .. r .: . . ...,, .,, !,, ,.'$�'" „ � , �'b.:.. , r w.r('+ . _ ^W+ ,...., ... ..1. . r .,.....:,: .- .,.::. ..: +r'�, .x. .. 't.... ,;, �, e. u r.'s -` + #•.r.,,.. �;- v ,,.( t ,,, .., �����„ '$ r� k .,i!,�: rk' .• � . 1 �;- o , ,...... .:.,., , �: c . (�', .5t$... :r Sn, an. tb.� � .,, a,,} .r.,} M ,..k ,. ,,,. 4 �. :. + x. �' .... '� •� ;*; .,, ,,.., ,. , .. , .,:.. ,. .. .a. t� ...s• ✓rash t., 3, . r . . �, . �• � 1 ,,.: 7.r v... .. r �.. 4`U : �M1r.. .. S. �. � ..., .. a...�, r.. ... +..,,:. ::.,. '. :..: r ,.. M...: .•: :<, Y N.. ^a: � ^. �3;,r,X :. .w,,.. . i• „!,. ;, ,. ,/..,..., , 1 }, .k Ja, .. �.rr , ...i. ,,,.. ,. .,..:- J'. nr,� .t. 5...... ,.. . xr.... ,T�.' ,.: �:. k r L: „ fir. � �7,t.�,, b�.'�a+f. .fi,.. •�..� .. =.' .,f .l.. ,< • 4i�. ., t C r i t� � :: .. ,,. .w:�n. ., '� r , - -:� r b •.'r 1 �,`. >, r, r a ,A, t i a .. ,, .,. - .4 Y ., 1T�^ 'fi .. +*; � �k..s• ✓.: ; �rV m, � i• :.. .,.. ,.- 1 t � rt x.T :�; , lT', . � . y i4 �,�,�j } ,,�....r, ,r:._x4 (4..�.��4. ,{+. rc - u� �{ "S. ;, ,r t„ .5,, ,�,., r, .. 1. ... .. .s s. , }� i r.t 1 <,•�: w.', sr„ <.� .,. :• .� •. . .•EA"'Ty "''i ul., •. •.. .. : - -... ,. ,R ., l ,.... Ir. A A .A I,,..;r. .k. nr.. .. �• .. !• fA rv# `3P4 .1'F:',. f T. w.. .. .. n. � , ' ,..r.,tt. S r, ., t_: -. .. r 1�. -s ... ....- � �{� t A LtF .'dt" ��5 ..?.. �.;::. �' x fi , , r• •... Y r..:i+G t.� 1 ` �,-: g • ✓ Y` I"�. ;�'- ��,.... �:r �'Y . %- 9�r^ y.a"i „kb � .,,: .: ..: 5... .4..�� � .. 'ry.. r:� n.. ,Y, k' G., a� �.. :,r r fr'� y ,., , r ..,.4h{ �.. .. ..,,. ,..... 1. .. ,.,:. r .... , .ter_. ... s.. � ....: '?, e. f :, " u ..:'?{i!' ua -� . _. �,.,c d � , .„ r r. �" ,.r• _.; , ..:.., .. ,, ,. .. e .. ._. .,.., 5....,. ,,. '4 .4r.. �@ r . , d... �`' , ` 4.. .x39:. }_ '}'f.,?, - �. �, r.4 .•zi ,�"i+.' r ., ,Y.. f: (..... f95M1 .. . ..... .... ...... .:� , ... � ...:: +.. .� r - . .., .r, r iC'4r' .. >. _, t• f , , ^•9, .�}.. ,,.. ,.r ... a � � :.r.,. ..._ -.. ..- ..: .., .. .... , -. ,..: -. � �'� ....: r e , �"�YF".. wx,.+..k5' ' .: -.,. k :.�., 47 t , ,� _; E .•«F 3 ;:r Y, •t � '� ,.�. ,, ,>, t • ,.. .: .., ., s. � : :. ,..,... , n �:... a' .,, ...r � �r;., A ,rte � 1 .,. ,r .' ' � Y , ry •. �, ; .,. r7 { w •y h r� ::.t - z - �: .....,:- •-- -°'... • :: .:"�.. _. ., -.,;:_ .. - - .xrt ........ ...... ...... ..r.. -. ... ... .. .. .. "3' F. -}F.n 'k .3r _ , "55 r y' '�hI SY^ �T (}a` ]3� t:Y:�r:.. A t • }< . , ... . .,... 4 "^+.. � � ... , ar,'J,r�} - `� � , �^� M1 cr'• e. rkw� ' -iz'" ... r '-• ..., f.,, ' �. t.... .� ��� .� . ra. £ •' f;: -. .. -. -. ,, .,} -� - �+, s u m fi � u� rn �r ..;rt�u4i� i� ,�, , .. S 4. -..,. ;m .,,ir... f - � .0 /.... �i" ,f S ,. '. xt. &.�� -.:.. ' Y4r r>:i E �{ ,:::: v. �'." .. � t 1: '4•' ���i.,� /.' t'c'.e t t� r.,a'�,� , 1� x , ✓a - ;: 1� �., v , i r ;. r; � � . ., , ,;.. •. , '•'' •. t q ,:`, sr vs� � � t F.3� � s #�� `� 4 >� ? sE - .�.0 T ,b'inF , w"l -::# "fi •.,: �� : ; ; ,,:.: e is s . - `$� ..:: ° .:' . ..' '�; _ ?t �t : -- P '. t',_ =ter c� i �""*rc, �' f '� x � r.-�� , p � t c � y { t •X �� � 3 g �:��'•�••°'" ' t} � ( ��""'� �Mi � � � �'t+� s, t _ � �" s #'i :•f �.�Xn yr �' � S 4 -� skr�''` r '� •+ . ' 4. � h � < � .»i :. _ S +,,. � ;Y �' Y,yy �,y 4. i� F� i,.. tS'., .f�'k Y q F i ' r, s. ,.. M1 - k 1 . � 9 l <v';1 •Si'1 J �Y �� � s 5; t l �`'�,s��•� , - t { �s a . . � ���d" r a� �'�a� �� { :.Y: s �- y a ��w �'y' r t � _. -N { 7 "m r.. •r'3si. a� � a rf7€,'�S'' i . - r K : Y $ �, t,Y � i4�°` a. 'll ._rt ,^^ �� �' ri.. n '. $ s � A +:< � l/ �-a�, , ; r 7� '•� ���.. 'i^�'. ` ' Z . ��.a. � �(.h � i .�- ... . ;t � .�' . �'� t _, � Yy . t � �"�� +e• �' � r xp - -:r ``x§'�` 5`'� '9 '� :; 7 � w .� y -; t s r s }. y - �-:., f ,., r t } - � J,*S ��. �• 'F .3� r � i f 'i �' _ Y �, ; 7 �'�' n � ,1�h s --�. 'a'� 7 •+1 ' � i:i � t y.�' ss t Lela � r :;�� vi ;, � 't j -f•�� 4 'd• `, , � u ♦ \ F � ' "a °�. s '" -�' � ;Yx 5 � �,r nA ,- x z �"x, A �l' v i�� �• -_�wr _, : y �+ �1s ' � ^'� }w �`�- .tr .r yF �,,�. Sw a tk$t ! - } r l tr f ���-r �-s :�4'� � 4� t � i r, r � �,. ;' ATM ,� � �� ` : '�°"- . _,h , - r s^ .+ a � y z j, c , :. � �> � ,� N � 4 i y F 4 .xN . { .ar 1 r , � R •��xr Y• 4 +Y�ri t'� ) - ' ..�'". h �'�, a � � A�' � 4.; f � 'p� J y 1l� } n ' '. � ! t; 1 K.� A V 'TN �•A - ai f i,�,� '4 } '�'.� i i •0. Y om' ,�j '. y r ' Y .+`. '�,� � n y R t ,v A 4 � wl � ;� � A S � ` �A,"�� 4�{�1�l�' �� i�'( " . w l�t L..�• _ } t ;F 5 ,.� U »: �. v K a}� 3y, +: r s. s i t, "� A:, , ), ti,'3�°'SS.+�o� �'" ',� 'L ,� 4 : .MacKay � f+}' w, 'r t' i Y r L } ,�.w C L, s•1... �y �-� �i�Z{,�� w � � a � •• � t . � k4 , ><;. 1 - ..t �(, t * ,. t �,�(�r: ,+ ;� �� �, �� � ; ,, � � y , , j � housing ` �,;;� 3E .+: y.,rr; � :cs t r"e;; t i. �i j � d. ! 12 +:•4'4. .7, � 4 � N F � ''i�'et , - 4 z . Aw Y�+ r� ,. ., `ry n r .. s t t�� •, i , _ >: p . , '•� ++' ;tom ` ` \, .. t , tl +. 'L:, � � -' .. •' �- ... .. 5 ,. _ •Featuring our vandal proof housing completely �, �" � ' � �'' � ' constructed of durable ductile cast iron.: The _ ,ti `"� �` MKH 3500 is alarge- vault, high security meter �,�: , housing,. precision machined_ and designed for `�`•,` '�. , � pick -proof security. , ti �` ;: � '�° �a�� , ,�.. .�. �. :r' "' •Compatible with the: MacKay MetersTM r . -� industry - leading electronic and legacy ... ., .. .. � • .,•; -: = �..� mechanical mechanisms as well as our _ , , , . `. : - , ors' pr _ _ competit oducts. �k, ' �'' 1 ��:: =���R � �4 f �£��`��, 4 • M er fS0 9002 � � � ,��� anufactured and .. certified quality processes. f . � r'�' .�-� • •tip' , j ~ 4 , � , •MacKay MetersTM backs its product lines �; � �eQ COINS .�`�� = ,� �` 4 -�� �: with a solid warranty based. on confidence y� '� � ��� �;� �; 'may in the quality of its products. tE;i TI '� � r p1Cp� ��p �`` .. � . t�'a S�. `��� a{{a>La Fabrlque�'a U �� � �� '� ,' A 4 Q �� aet��uy � ,1. Masffay. � Cea ��� `i�'' 'fi '� , rl �.. � �e ° 6 u �. t!' .,r 5 � . °� S��(`�� ° °e ° e a" y •All MacKay housings are distinguished by their � t >.� � o ,,�,` �° ,�, �� �,, .� fix, „ _hex .,, shaped top.. a �� F;�I �`��� z ;; - -'� cover for specifications> x ".'2 T.{ , } di } p'� )t� # r s s n - r `w....^ ,rF�.J7ti'Y'f'x � "r r < t ry i � �� $ j' v i . 7�.4, s �' f. 4 t 3, y P� t n ;€yy'' i... t M1w �A5" \ � .!? '�ws., � -'�� .'�- r �' r s , - 4r '. �,v it �',��'�' :� 41is'�� }'� "'SS"�+�(''�FT�'.'t � ,;r"� � , >,t'a - .wed �:s°" -r a � s �' �`,�" � rv M 41SY•5r ii:' yF- 7r 'ms's' '� ` "ia ° ,� + , F - . .�.�+ r Tm'..i a ,fir x 'r r" : � : >�f ``°`•..,;•,� ` `+ "�a'� ? �' ' r'�sJ � 5� � ,. ttatia• zY, z yk r . �o - ..«__ -�__ t , �v • „. , err.•• - • - _ _ ' P . .: : ..,._ - rt l � _ .,.; -... , .. :. mac. 3x.^' mv�• ., ,: • V . .._., _ . ; .. ,_ �.e � .•s' . bar, '' .:' ', Y -; �" �% m... ",9�'° � 1i i�w.ma �v #s ".& ?}� 1��'4z�'�' A-r TK � art ' S � *• e'Ts�- ,�� -.;iat r'�:?�'s`� ��:�;vu1�"�33 �"xr.�.a� ; � ffi�wyr�� ,{� $��d.., �'�"*•°��u'�J .���'�� �,..s�"✓;.�6rta.1. mod' `"�`_ �`�. mac' _ -� � r � � .' ����s;� a a s art .era;•,. �i��R"" "s.': I �',l', l., , l ' %r �' /'�, r'.r ' ; 1,r'� � l.r t y;:,rh r� �' {A ,' $ {�. ^' .ti 1 tN i4e� r y:, 5�'' ,+n" �mz' r �� ��, �.'E �"". m 5 >'� / ' rikv � y � � .r� �� !,'.. tv/�, t /� s�� _ ,�/ ,� ail , }ld'ri , n ^ n� , i.'I Ca 'T � , � rt r �, ;�4c�•_ �, ";."' l��x �: +..�r d ��';� -` � si tl ��.�1,' 'y'y�' 1M1' "l4 �' �4 I .r��� r 'F . t ?'/' !� ,rpLr r, .s � I, V' U' W� 'a�, , �'y , ry - 'rl� •� - �k - � , ry. 'r. 5!: .,.- .�.'., a° ,rt. _ ir - xr +,^"w � ° . �:'- -° F.' � M1YM r J A.� , � ,t &': y� :1 1 '. tt / ;. d' �$;: p � °,, P', 4 , 11 ; h . 6�.'� � 4,s� '. :� ',� ,� :r' ^�, y �6r ��+ .,l t�r I � �I rh.:3 ! �4, I lrrr�� I`^. -. ft. a :S + r , 7�', ,_k; �- a; - ". s $.�a ?y'$'. ,1 , � ��• �,i .,m�;�±_ � 4p /.:. �4 y '4y': �� t 7' „ % �;r 7�Cr l�,.�I'�iN,. i r r�,m fN L l�. /�, p� �'f �i "��rrl., rv' � "r: n, �•� a'„ u .e. � "-�, t " ` FYI IF: � F�M'�t �. f�' � � rF ��k 6: ;.:' �: L`37� . ��!rG `'� � � �,,:. w..,. : �- -Y .r `.t ,.. t... ;.. y J ( v� �'�� �- MacKay housing � ., z '` �,' MKH 4500 - -� High Security Mechanism Housing: Precision- Collection Compartment: The collection annea{ed ASTM A356 ductile cast iron. Rugged, compartment is secure against entry from the mechanism �, extremely substantial construction. Tensile strength of compartment. With the door open, the coin box is easily 63,000 PSI. Brinell hardness of 143 -187. Experience on accessible. The vault is engineered for perfect alignment ��` location has proven its resistance to the elements, to ensure trouble -free coin acceptance of most coins � ��, �; tampering and abuse. The mechanical housing is of found in the world today, without need for modification. �. s'' modern design, neat and free of rough surfaces, sharp MKH;4000 corners or edges. Finish: The burr -free, raw casting is conversion- coated in a five -stage power spray pre- treatment system which ; �,,.. y ,� Housing Cap: Precision - annealed ASTM A356 ductile includes cleaning, rinsing, zinc phosphate coating, rinsing ;�f ' t ,�h �` iron with a tensile strength of 63,000 PSI. High security again, and then sealing. The pre- treatment system is ,: . <,, slide -lock cap features easy access to meter mechanism designed to remove grime and strengthens paint bonding. for servicing and protects the mechanism unit from dust It also establishes a chemical coating on the surface �' `` and moisture. The locking arrangement provides which will slow corrosion in the case of paint damage. simultaneous and positive positioning of the unit The conversion- coated castings are then electro- statically - mechanism. MacKay MetersTM are easily distinguished powder coated with high - quality paint. The castings are MKH350orwuv by the hex top. cured at predetermined temperatures for the appropriate �.��� � �" �� �"r�� � � time. Our castings have successfully passed the ASTM -BL .� ,� ` #� �'�� � � � t Display Window Large, clear, high - impact 17 1000 -hour salt spray resistance -to- corrosion test. '��"� r � � � _ of carbonate window dis la s the Li uid C stal Dis la �- � � ,, �� �, p Y p Y q rY p Y ��- r� �� � � � `` s � (LCD) of our electronic unit and provides excellent Locks: Mufti - tumbler and highly pick- resistant. The � � � � �� ,�� r -�� visibility. It is completely seated for maximum element security lock in the door is encased in tough ductile iron, �x��',� `� '� , £� r } ��i t ' and dust protection. with minimum area exposed, reducing its vulnerability to �����t�� { '" � *` i � ' vandalism. Various types of security locks are available. Instruction Plates: Large, easy -to -read plates on the �`�" MKH'3500` door and hours of enforcement cards in the cap contain Materials: Full hard brass, stainless steel, aluminium simple operating instructions. stampings, Zamac and ductile iron castings and high - ,,�� „ quality powder paint finish. All parts fabricated from steel _ Ventilation: Strategically placed vents in dome cap are plated to industry standards. ''� -" -�' ensure excellent visibility and reduce condensation both �"' above and below mechanism level. Meter Post: Standard Requirements: 5.1cm (2 inch) �. inner diameter standard galvanised pipe. Small weep and - Enforcement Hours Card' To facilitate easy removal, air vent holes drilled to eliminate condensation and MKH 30oorw�n in the event of a change in enforcement hours, a card prolong pipe life. These weep holes should be located -t . slot is provided under the complete protection of the approximately 30.5cm (12 inches) from the top and housing dome. Its position in the meter is clearly visible. 30.5cm (12 inches) from the bottom on opposite sides `;�- from each other. Holes should be about 1.27cm Coin Box Housing: Made of ductile cast iron. This ( inch) [n diameter. �`��.. extremely rugged material has a tensile strength of 65,.000 PSt. The design has been engineered to afford Typical Installation: Pipe level minimum 90.2cm � � the greatest amount of protection against vandalism, (35 inches) above walk. Parking meter height breakage and theft. 44.5cm (17 inches). Overall meter height MKH 3000 134.6cm (53 inches). Contact your local Distributor or ��. Door: The lower vault door is made of ductile cast iron our Customer Service Department for information on � having a tensile strength of 69,000 PSI. To minimise the the best method of installation for your location. � �� �: � risk of unauthorised entry, it is precision- machined to a tolerance of 0.005 inch and designed to withstand Warranty: J.J. MacKay Canada Limited guarantees for a g '��,`'��: tampering by prying or hammering with ordinary hand period of one year from the date of shipment, to repair or � tools. The door's internal coupling eliminates the replace any meter parts of manufacture determined to be necessity of exposed and vulnerable hinges. defective in materials or workmanship under normal use MKH 2500 and service. �� -�.` � , it�� I -- - - - - - -- --- � -J - - -- Head Office: Sales Office: �� -�4:�° J.J. MacKay Canada Limited �, ':'' 1342 Abercrombie Road ""'` PO Box 338, New Glasgow �"�' ®°"—'" � Nova Scotia, Canada B2H 5E3 MKH 2000 '�"� '°' s" '!�' ® ®� �. 7 � Phone (902) 752 -5124 r � � '+r Fax (902) 752 -5955 �_� � Head Office customer service � and technical support: ' "" Toll free in North America: 1- 888- 4MACKAY :,..,: <. Fax (902) 752 -4889 (462 -2529) � Email customer.service @jjmackay.com MKH 1000 Web www.jjmackay.com -- - - - -__ - y _ I ��, � _ MacKay r housing MKH 4500 High Security Mechanism Housing: Precision- Collection Compartment: The collection annealed ASTM A356 ductile cast iron. Rugged, compartment is secure against entry from the mechanism � .� � extremely substantial construction. Tensile strength of compartment. With the door open, the coin box is easily 63,000 PSI. Brinell hardness of 143 -187. Experience on accessible. The vault is engineered for perfect alignment ` location has proven its resistance to the elements, to ensure trouble -free coin acceptance of most coins I4 tampering and abuse. The mechanical housing is of found in the world today, without need for modification. modern design, neat and free of rough surfaces, sharp MKH'4000 corners or edges. Finish: The burr -free, raw casting is conversion- coated�in �.� ���„ -��_� a five -stage power spray pre- treatment system which �� . ,�1 Housing Cap Precision - annealed ASTM A356 ductile includes cleaning, rinsing, zinc phosphate coating, rinsing �: ;� � � cast iron with a tensile strength of 63,000 PSI. High again, and then sealing. The pre- treatment system is �k��� !>>' �'� `� security slide lock cap features easy access to meter designed to remove grime and strengthens paint bonding. �"'� '� �" �_� °���' mechanism for servicing and protects the mechanism It also establishes a chemical coating on the surface � f ��;,��� �` _ � ��- _ � unit from dust and moisture. The locking arrangement which will slow corrosion in the case of paint damage. ��,�,� {� �� {;���,� provides simultaneous and positive positioning of the unit The conversion - coated castings are then electro- statically � �,.�.., ; mechanism. MacKay MetersTM are' easily distinguished by powder coated with high - quality paint. The castings are �Itll�t�tFE;350�w� ��k� the hex top. cured at predetermined temperatures for the appropriate ,� time. Our castings have successfully passed the ASTM -BL �°. Display Window• Large, clear, high- impact 17 1000 -hour salt spray resistance -to- corrosion test. �� ;` ' polycarbonate window displays the Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) of our electronic unit and provides excellent Locks: Multi- tumbler and highly pick- resistant. The �� visibility. It is completely sealed for maximum element security lock in the door is encased in tough ductile iron, ' �` and dust protection. with minimum area exposed, reducing its vulnerability to � _ vandalism. Various types of security locks are available. `�"�` Instruction Plates: Large, easy -to -read plates on the MKH3500 door and hours of enforcement cards in the cap contain Materials: Full hard brass, stainless steel, aluminium simple operating instructions. stampings, Zamac and ductile iron castings and high - quality powder paint finish. All parts fabricated from steel `;:_ Ventilation: Strategically placed vents in dome cap are plated to industry standards. ;��� -� ensure excellent visibility and reduce condensation both �° above and below mechanism level. Meter Post: Standard Requirements: 5.1cm (2 inch) inner diameter standard galvanised pipe. Small weep and -- Enforcement Hours Card: To facilitate easy removal, air vent holes drilled to eliminate condensation and MKH 3000TUwr, in the event of. a change in enforcement hours, a card prolong pipe life. These weep holes should be located slot is provided under the complete protection of the approximately 30.5cm (12 inches) from the top and housing dome. Its position in the meter is clearly visible. 30.5cm (12 inches) from the bottom on opposite sides ��� from each other. Holes should be about 1.27cm ( inch) Coin Box Housing: Made of ductile cast iron. This in diameter. ,fit' extremely rugged material has a tensile strength.of - 65,000 PSI. The design has been engineered to afford Typical Installation: Pipe level minimum 81.6cm + the greatest amount of protection against vandalism, (32 inches) above walk. Parking meter height �� breakage and theft. 53.Ocm (20 inches). Overall meter height 134.5cm MKH 3000 (53 inches). Contact your local. Distributor or our Door: The lower vault door is made of ductile cast iron Customer Service Department for information on the having a tensile strength of 69,000 PSI. To minimise the best method of installation for your location. � � '� risk of unauthorised entry, it is precision- machined to a ', tolerance of 0.005 inch and designed to withstand Warranty: J.J. MacKay Canada Limited guarantees for a ��+ tampering by prying or hammering with ordinary hand period of one year from the date of shipment, to repair or tools. The door's internal coupling eliminates the replace any meter parts of manufacture determined to be -- necessity of exposed and vulnerable hinges. defective in materials or workmanship under normal use MKH2500 and service. f , �'W .��' E Head Office: Sales OffICe: ��' J.J. MacKay Canada Limited 1342 Abercrombie Road - PO Box 338, New Glasgow �—" " "'—°� "—' Nova Scotia, Canada B2H 5E3 M KH 2000 � ' � �_ ® �® �— �. ®� �. � Phone (902) 752 -5124 i Fax (902) 752 -5955 .�`' F Head Office customer service t . : ,:. t and technical support Tolf free in North America: 1- 888- 4MACK,4Y ` Fax (902) 752 -4889 (462 -2529) ��� Email customer.service @jjmackay.com MKH 1000 Web www.jjmackay.com ,- i .,� •au - .;.,._. �.,� yam ., -.g,,... w+. �.:• . T .: ; � � � •�rsr� ��„ - :-c. �q'r'`��' `, � * .r'. - r :.. a .a .� - '� ' � ' : a .-i,�. t "`'`.,. :' •ec. � r�4�`.�. • '�k'"2u:' x = x :�, !':- ��z? -'r ,,.,« .. ''.�, -� .. ;....a : "b .. � ":: a�> .'^�. � , ..:' W ,. _ .r • .t;"' -�, s �� a ry -.!�',. .y 3 ;q, �- ,, .mot � ;..,� �u i 'S .' '...,� ti..�V 1p..�'. . �r -.=..� !a. ' ,:�i. r4 :� `'$.. �,��A=+ �.e!' S'�.i,. q4 a'� ry..,, °W ..fit _ .. • : !' � n : . v . t'.xb�,,0� • �w` • � '. .N•: n, :` � ...r,�i'F x.. � � $ .ice di"..3 -4.. '�^• -�!�� ' _. .. 4 ,�r .. �.. "t „'F. ..- r, � S :xi uC-.. .,t}''E .�.1”. __....:_ _.. ..._,_.. ,:'. �, 1.�� � tc ;F ..: YG� r•?.j u4 A. r y t � Y� "^ _� ^� - .a, ::.., ?- •''3.�:�. .�c. � .�.: _:. „ ,. .J °'.r ;.'s. �a ....... � - - Y.s+, .,,:�: >r• x. • � + h. f.,.r a - a... r v.=s . z .� . . e � ;.,��.«:. s 3�„ A.. .3, .b ..� ., � �.. T[, k . �- � 2 '. -'� t 1 ���, P 'i . •�+4. h�'�� � ,� Y jy3'y bl :4x � ,..jr- . .. i,.. .'.�F y+C4• � l•C2„ ,0^. ... �r.. `: -..i 'r :- ����, x'ty �i4Yi. �.. ry Lae- ''s'�q` _ "F. r _. X- - .:. - � i . 'v9"' � ..:.' 4: c A`, u. _ ` l �,"E' '..ii i P, .,.r rxY' .�t� � � �. ��t v:. ... ,. �. l g:'� i n. �� a,. aie ,' +� -HiG v` -; { k• . t !+ �E 5 �ccz' F . 1., . a:v,v x' L "' ..,.':<� - . -�s'x �'' .�e•*c`. ` w �.. ?' ' 3�' "a'!er x , u � �h mk _ �S -.w.E � y .� �� Z .. '...: 3, �'s; ;.; �,:. ,.c.c;Tu�, ..:. �,, = a., ,�.. y.: z {�,_ . ,a_�' �'" } ..•»�tv to $.7� - _.� x '} Z .n fi.. �F,' � Y:;'.a' Y� �'S3� fi -• .:. :. ` �. . v ,,.� , f . ' ,: ,� ' , . ,. �3, - ..: 4 .r•:'x - .,; � .. �. _ ' .. : ,, . i. ,:... s ..,•4. ���r P�. r-✓ •.�:5: �'.�i � a1 34 � r ��.e'R .,n .� 3 :,7^ , .. ...: - � �,. _, rr � . ...�:.. .,, ,, •: e ,,,. ; �•r ,...- ,,� ..�`�a sr k �2 '� ,fr,� k - * e ..fix cam:• 5 ... ._ •.>r �'S ��.:- ;� y,( +, -:• <!,�... ';.. ..., <. ._ „�.�,.. �-` Yea,., r�. xx�_ ..'�i .� :��* °.n•^�” �-` r .s � r > , c i ��%,.. x �� yh ^Wt' �s 4 �� . � . , �... : .z. .. G ��, `� a. �3:.. ,:.� �. ,..:, i u'��5 �.�.,;:,,.. a.; r r -, �*; �`�na � at�+.e'� � - -: �. 7 2i . -.. -�F � . r��,sVe /^ Y,�.z ..� ,'�,.,. .. Y .. -�" : t i : -:.F.i L � k f K ��.: S �c' h , . i�r u=�c - ...:.i� - f;"w.': wy>i; ». 'n.*' ..?5 c t {e %: w. r.C"' ~y � ,5... - ,u�. + � r q �a 5 � a r ,^A .S "','ham. 5. f k„'"�v�`' �. . • 5 .'3" ;.` ..,.., ;- "' +reti.:r� '�'� u p <' � �''a. .' '�`. x' a :x '<t.i M F ,H :a:.�.r, � �x< x ' -;• T xk - - sa' ,. its ,�'. �-r :� ' :iu. z �'.?� , .,. ,. � �,,�:... :, . - .: ... : .' .. ,t :. ?. �'r, .c- i�',`� '`+rr � �' - ro, .1 _.,� � `��`i'�'r` - �` raz �.... ' ; -. y y � , , >t� •. ���?.,,,* ,�?^..,. � �,:�, .:'_.... ..,�,>_ ,_� .q. ,? � a� "gar �*-,5�� �'' ''�`.. ''`"�i�:i. "��R'� "„m.u::- ,�''� 5�. + '-mss. ; - � 'e- c .,;w�• �,5.• s: "� a ' � r r �'. x. ux , Y b„ .^�.1Fry� �� . - r � "� � 5 �r s. t :� °t .5 �� "' •yd` +- ', #'�,� u ��� cyy r +,i'��� ~ '''�'i� §e fi� ma ,;....� p is ti s.,, `� r ,, • -'a � Y !, gy - :4.. _ a:+y, 'm9 ;.'� � '�` ..,,�. w 4 :"fir - J . �" < D i u g' � ...;� _. w w^'4.�'"`ti ate`... 2 •�' �,�,���� $: 7 ,,r,. �`;fq ✓ •� a.0 '= jJ.� � C F `` vJ Y. v t:f I. 5 ":� 1 � ' 4.t '6 � h4� �, M ':" .. : T:'.. "��T. � y.� � .� . r b�!��� "Fryg�?' ' }<,_"... �. rte; 'e _ "t.t ; C � . •�a '• � R• 5:.. � `M':�.,t'S.. 5-•,G -'� k. .: � ...A t ^,w. r u �'rs ka= - ar , ••;.•,•L• G i " _ q ,_r,... �'�..:... _ � rr�...'�' c � w.'. M ��r'' „S �': - i� . .., •�� �, �'° a. ... � -:., ...,,, .,. ,�, `"a." �' : , x- ��,. ..�; . -^z ...:,, ms s,. � ..,- �.. _' .. „>,S h• .,�,.,., h .: ,. �._.r ... .., sK ,�, �i .. �,:..,.,. •� �''` ��� •^ a .•".'$ r.�- r �,. . F. } ,; • f :x�.: �� �k r.• •�'S5 . t (� ,�;�'� :rw C y � � r ?` vs s �' . � . . W U1i' •�`. F a 4 ;, . ... {. , � ... a,. �'S... W' C ;.. X. d ,;.' :. r� ..,. ..�+..Tkv��. 5 4 :. �a �l� � +.Fro . �� v. tic: L ,' "],� - �' . r . fi� :.. 5 , .c' .; ..,. 'sh ".. C� ;:o rs;.+ a r.�E �.�'.�i..... i� � � "�a�t� -`i, r. - -..0 �a� ".±`� a ...:�... _.�<�., .... .a•. `m.:,._..r r.i . f... .- .�. �r� '..'�: ..,.. t.. � yt4'i £^- � � .. ,y .: � z �:� t .... _ � d K L F,° ,A Ei�. T � .ir• ;"Y t `. f 'x , � � �` C ?���i- s :: � ,; z,. �� ^u '. � , y'.''� - ,.r V Y, 6 � � r �t` . � •'. rt ,"' , t �; • r'r� a '�.,st' FC�?:�y �;' ^ ._.: ,� ..:...... ,.:. ,. ,� _ "..,N qY �`� - •e.,` `�"�r '�`1 '�` .r ry"'cK �" - x, � �.''�• '' �. '�>_ "?, ' ?cr w^,r�� pi�; �+� y , '` %al„ k�a:+` ,�� , �, „ '* ,k y,i,� '�r'% �'�^�''.. g' ' �:u,. - '"�`-- tr,':..? ,f4 �`+�:.E., .. '�ss�'` ...E, -3�, 4 r:,� ��.«Z� ,� ". F ;. ,� r °a: 4� -�: L:� `�.' -,% zu,; �?� �"� ;4 s '�srx �:: •.� �• c is ° �''. � 'r �Yk � .�,Y =aws � ttcm`; _ .{�. �>~.�, � .^at��r� z x` �� a n �,� s �• w c., -�. �p•..,.,>�• . c .. '� �a, 4 2� .., '' y�. � x e,�"�•,, � n , �rY•" wv � >"c� v a _. e�' �., r' ,� N�.r", :. ..r :r.,tv:':�v::.p.. >•'- '�'- �' R'z ^�'. , �,y ,'„ rz ;?. � { " s .� , v •.:..',., ,�,. °; }R . •a;t. � #�.4'�� uureTM -. �i. e? :��„„ .. SY a:.. � Nei . k �. � .. � : � °S' � �� ' :.4x•, �� �r �:,�+r ",ka. �a •� r x „�.�,�,. �. '",�.p �� �� ����;c � � „v'' ry.�„yrt? y ax'� >�r.. �"G, '''.:. - E`°'" t � '' +. � se,� ° .��� '�reN�' � ��'� � s” } t�y°a'�� ;, sa a� ,,� a °��'����� r , Mr � `mktea"'- s,,���.a�` „� „ -� �r E,,-� '� ." r✓ ,h A ..' sd a �fi'' '' �`a kf•; i , fir., .v4 _ „�•r t i € �- - ` = '"f �,`'_�'r.��k �. _ 5 a. , v •� �. �t�y.�, � . a ' N cal .,r s s v �° "�- ` F . �^� w � "£' � �.s.�",,r fir' � '��; �'n 4r ��.�,� t �• ' �� ' .' t q$ d+. v t F_ ':gym, x k �, �. � s �y�, � � �" «1 r, �Lk ��`�'�r�,''�."`W; , 2.. � s 6�', 4 �'k rr ,�� ���., �, c, � kit � 4 `' t s ax �' r � i {� t.�iru -rd'i � �k,, v , I '�a ,... � �, t �� � • '� v � ff. ,iv!J•1r? ,;�l _W�;, +ry ,. ,. a, « „ � - 3 'L•���ank"•��.�i . r - r . I d �..- � F.;ie � - � °f.�v��. '.�' _ +$ ..� � �� � � �fi� � `��i'�� �� k multi -space ,� � ' i � ar m, i r �� t � � � � � � f � ��, Lam' � � } y rsf' k tS1 C , l � Y fi� � F i t , y �� }tn '�+ . 3 . , -Y. t r n � ®�.. '�5 �,kr7 t d ,:� +r� ����M' 'H a u,.,�: �+xut .a �ki�', n..A. �.✓a�. As, � >� r... ¢� . _ �. '7•lr + /'�ry i 1 J �0 J OJ L1SS "t I r 5V� r ����� q { , r�`j� � ����'� ' •The MacKay CustodianT"' features a 1 j4 VGA �,�k � "e - Y. u f r �, � �•. � `� , Liquid Crystal Display with self - adjusting � �# + contrast to temperature and light. �, M�` "� °" ' •Accepting different payment schemes such �� � �. ; T r ��u� ' ��`� °�° °�'� ' ( as coins, tokens, credit cards and smart ��� ! � � r ���l> � �v � � � (chip) cards. t ��� �. �, '���� ° ���.. � V � •Ticket printing with the MacKay Cust�dianTM .�`fi�� {,�� �� �� ��i` � ���� is very versatile. The thermal printer can a ���'��� ' � ����"�� �� � � °' provide alphanumeric printing in various x � �, �� '���4,� �� f � �_ �� i � i � � fonts, languages or graphical formats �;����� �, �:� -�� . r� (bitmap) on thermal paper with or without ���, t ��L s� self- adhesive labels. .r� dM ?, � S - i ��� ' >, y � z � y3 ar�fisx' u ,,,�,�;�T� k - � •The contemporary and unique external ���r���� ' � design of the MacKay CustodianT"' is ,� �� , '���= complemented with an expandable internal � � � _ �� >��. � ; architecture to match your needs today �� • ,.� *,� � li � 4 and well into the future. ,�`�,;�.� t y � ��� ' ' •Manufactured under ISO 9002 certified �rt�� ��r�"A� ,> a ���� quality processes. �^�, a .. r � 3 F ks� �, � i 'x�� ,'��'� , .- ..,..- . ���� � � � •MacKay Meters backs its product lines with �� �;���,� , a solid warranty based on confidence in the �;�y i�� quality of its products. r � y �: Tv Y� "' _ i , y j,,L yr.' N l s�4 ��� �,� .�� � y .��� �,�,�� ��# ��,� ,, ,,�����`�. ,��, ��, � f ,� cover for specifications> �„ � ma' . t�t > � t•` ^°�3 -,fry r* y y s� ;,`� .� { -. r 3 L w � �. r t',�� � .r�� ,{i� y� '4 � k t i��* xe�r t ,t �+ � r x�• r� ti, a��#'U�Er ; .s g - kr'� � � v+rt'EV' � f�-� � ! y.'S'`t f' , P.- r . a " y g a �` k � . ' y � s�r+t� � r�s f a � ^'t, � g S � � h � .:•* { � } ��-a � t` � '� a vg� 'fie �',�"� ,.� t,.* �.��" '�+ ; �c {�� 'i ��� �. w _ _..._ �s�{f•. x . , �r . ,� u� ' � `� r �Y� � � L _ �!�� �� � � ����k �` ..y .w� lei cS� y �� •. �>i: >t � .�4 M • .� �- -„ � • ,� - :. i T 4 � � L L I :: r � `4'" �;w w� - . , ;� e. :.r: � a .. t . 7 j - � 3 7 y . ,'` ?, TM ;" , MacKay _ a >{ multi -space General Specifications Components Features •Manufactured under ISO 9002 DlSplay Security certified quality processes • VGA LCD, 320 x 240 pixels •High security locks •Operating voltage: 12 volts DC •Viewing area 121mm (4 inches) •Eight (8) point locking •Operating temperature range: x 91 mm (3 5 js inches) mechanism on vault door -30 °C ( -22 °F) to +70 °C (158 °F) •Self- adjusting contrast to •Software controlled sensors • Humidity: Up to 90% RH (Non Condensing) temperature and light on main and vault doors EnClOSUre •Fibre optic back -light (Colour option available) •105dB intruder alarm system (Optional) • Dimensioris: 712mm (28 inches) (H) x 484mm Coin Acceptor Audit and Statistic (19 inches) (W) x 305mm (12 inches) (D) •Programmable - Accepts •Grand totals and subtotals for •Weight: 38 kg. (841bs.) up to 16 coins /tokens coins and card transactions per type •Welded reinforced steel of 3.4mm (10 gauge) •Ticket analysis by sales per tariff, Card Reader (Optional) period and others Pedestal • Single slot hybrid card reader •Full or quick audit tickets •Dimensions: 895mm (35 inches) (H) accepts credit card with magnetic software programmable x 484mm (19 inches) (W) x 305mm strip and most ISO 7816 chip cards (12 inches) (D) MalntenanCe •Weight: 61 kg. (134 lbs.) ButtOnS (TlCket and Cancel) •User - friendly graphic interface tools for • Welded reinforced steel of 3.4mm (10 gauge) •Piez° diagnostics, configuration and editing •Vandal resistant •Easy access modular design Power Supply •Sealed against ingress of water •110/220/240v, 50/50 Hz AC Single - Phase and dust to IP67 Flexibility •Stand -alone battery operation (Optional) Ke adS •User- friendly Windows0 based •Solar panel (Optional) yp editing of tariff, text and display •Vandal resistant •Multiple tariff structures such as overlapping Software /Hardware •Designed for installation in exposed period, pre - payment and free ticket etc. •Latest technology 32 Bit - 206 MHz Strong outdoor and hostile environments •The multi - lingual user- inten`ace, (display, ARM processor •Sealed against the ingress keypad and dedicated software) provides •Memory - 32M SDRAM - 16M Flash of water and dust to IP67 clear and concise operating instructions, •Real time clock •Rated for resistance to impact, shock messages, graphics and can also be used •Windows® CE operating system and vibration to MIL standards for advertisements and displaying additional information Communication Printer •Infrared (IR) •Heavy -duty printer head with Network System (Optional) •Wireless minimal moving parts ensuring quality, •Audits, statistics and current status • Landline reliability and endurance can be provided when linked to a central •Print life of over 20 million character lines computer using different media Payment Systems • Designed for high - resolution graphics '�"� rT �'��" °' •Coins and Tokens � � ; r ` x �r Cutter f � ` •Credit and Smart (Chip) Cards (Optional) •Guillotine t pe � %Y rs , y Also available in Ticket Printing • Full or partial paper cutting options Pay by Space version. t � ' � •Thermal printer offers alphanumeric (Software Selectable) I � „� printing in various fonts, languages or •Accessible for ease of maintenance > �� _�� � graphical formats (Bitmap) •Ticket Size: Standard -Short 75mm Cash BOX � E� ��:,�,� (3 inches) x 57mm (2 inches) or Long Two (2) are supplied with each terminal � r � .; 100mm (4 inches) x 57mm (2 inches) •Capacity 5.3 Litres (1.4 US Gallon) each , �s� r� =��S � p ���� : , Other lengths can be specially ordered •Self - locking on removal ���� �y���� � � -� -d�- •Ticket Capacity of up to 4,500 tickets per roll •High security lock Warranty •Thermal paper with or without self- •Unique key codes available J.J. MacKay Canada Limited guarantees adhesive labels for a period of one year from the date Heaters of shipment against defects in workmanship •Thermostatically controlled (AC power only) and /or materials. MaFKay Meters, the MacKay logo and MacKay Custodian are trademarks of J.J. MacKay Canada Limited. Windows and Windows CE are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and /or other countries. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. J.J. MacKay Canada Limited reserves the right to modify the specifications without prior notice. - -- — - Head Office: Sales Office: J.J. MacKay Canada Limited 1342 Abercrombie Road PO Box 338, New Glasgow .o � � � Nova Scotia, Canada B2H 5E3 --�- - �— ,� = ® � Phone (902) 752 -5124 �� ®°°' Fax (902) 752 -5955 61�';.1�';�;��." -��TM yead Office customer service P Specialists and technical support Toll free in North America: 1- 888- 4MACKAY Fax (902) 752 -4889 (462 -2529) Email customer.ser✓ice @jjmackay.com • MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: John B. Bahors City Manager Date: September 9, 2002 • • Subject: Addendum to Agenda Item N — Main Street Parking Meter Study After the distribution of the agenda packet, it was discovered that the name of Ad Hoc Parking Committee member Dale Case was inadvertently left off the minutes from the last Ad Hoc Parking Committee meeting. Revised minutes have corrected this oversight and are attached for your review. In addition, a copy of Council Member Antos's suggested modifications to the parking study are attached for City Council review. These changes were discussed at the August 19, 2002 Ad Hoc Parking Committee meeting. Council Member Antos requested City Council receive a copy of the suggested modifications for their review. If you have any questions concerning this material please call me. Attachments: / ' Members of Committee Present Stan Anderson John Bahorski , Jay Bullock Douglas Wright "' Woody Woodruff Bill Ayes Charles Antos Chet Corbin Ron Bennett Bill Doanes Brian Kyle Dale Case Seal Beach Parking Committee August 19, 2002 . 1. Meeting called to order at 6:30 pm 2. Stan Anderson Overview of issues & background Placing 257 dual headed meters on 100, 200, 300 Block of Main Street between 8th & 10th Street. Converting metered Tots to Pay & Park. Parking will be metered from 8 am to 8 pm 7 days a week at $1.00 per hour on 2 hour meters and will have a limited number of 24 minute meters on Main Street. Revenue from metering estimated at $555,120 per year less $37,500 service at 50% occupancy will pay off in 4 months. Cost of meters $107,525 to . $132,275. 3. Public Comment: Public present was opposed approximately 7 with 1 in favor 4. Committee comments all committee members present All committee members spoke COMMISSIONERS ALSO REVIEWED & voted in favor: a. Majority voted in favor of meters as Parking Management being main issue & use of revenue b. Not extending hours on meters an additional 2 hours to 8 pm majority voted for hours of 8 am to 6 pm c. Metered lots to be Pay & Park or should we keep meters majority voted to keep meters in Main Street Tots d. Keep metered money on Main Street and in Old Town voted to have 50% for Main St. area & 50% Road Improvements wanted majority of revenue to repair Main St. & Old Town e. No meters in front of residential - majority voted in favor Adjourned at approximately 8:30 August 15, 2002 To: Members of Ad Hoc Parking Committee From: Charles Anto�' City Councilman District 1 Subject: Suggested modifications and Changes to the Parking Study Parking Management One of the purposes of this Committee's work was to deal with parking management in the downtown area. Two areas that have not been properly evaluated are: Beach Parking and Merchant - Employee Parking. Both are tied together and need to be solved prior to installing any pay parking system. - Beach Parking PROBLEM - Currently the 8 & 10 Street Beach parking lots are utilized at less than 50% (according to visual observations). Beach visitors park on the streets and in the Main Street commercial areas. The City needs to take steps to increase the Beach Parking lot usage as well as decrease beach visitors parking on the residential streets and in the Main Street commercial areas. SOLUTION — Expand the one -hour parking on both sides of the street from 8 & 10 streets to include all streets between 5 and 12 streets. This would force beach visitors to use the 8 & 10 street beach parking lots or get a ticket. Most residents in the downtown area have resident parking stickers and guest stickers so it would have minimal impact on the residents. NOTE: Any City resident may buy a resident parking sticker and park in the one hour zones. Enforcement by the police is essential. - Merchant - Employee Parking PROBLEM — Currently merchants and employees park as follows: on Main Street, behind the stores or in the 8 Street Fire Department Parking Lot (with a parking permit). The goal is to reserve the Main Street parking and parking behind the stores for customers. Some alternative arrangements must be made to accommodate the merchants and their employees. It is clear that the 8 Street Fire Department Parking Lot has insufficient spaces to accommodate all merchants and their employees in the three blocks of Main Street. SOLUTION - Change the merchant parking sticker program to an annual sticker that is priced nearer to the resident or guest parking sticker. Permit merchant stickers to be used in the on street one -hour zones. This would better utilize the available parking over the day. Allowing employees of local businesses to park on the streets during the day (when the residents • Page 2 are at work) will not place a burden on the available street parking. Beach visitors currently park on the residential streets. They do not respect the neighborhoods, as shown by the trash they dump in the street or on the lawns when they leave. Employees of Main Street businesses will probably have more consideration for the residents than the infrequent visitor. Pay parking and Meter placement - Pay Parking . The City currently has parking meters in two lots at Electric Av. and Main Street as well as the public parking Tots in the 100 block of Main Street and 10 Street. A centralized pay parking system is used in the beach parking lots. The City's study recommends removing the existing parking meters in the Electric Av. and Main Street parking lots and installing a centralized pay parking system. If a pay parking system is going to remain in these two lots, then it should remain as is (meters) for the following reasons: we have the dual head poles already installed, a consistent pay parking system is Tess confusing for Main Street customers and when the centralized pay parking system fails (is broken) we lose all revenue until it is fixed. When one parking meter fails, we lose revenue from only one meter, until it is fixed. Mixing and matching lots of different pay parking systems will cause confusion, frustration and complaints. -Meter Placement The City's study recommends parking meters along the three blocks of Main Street, along Ocean Av. from 8 to 10 Streets, along Central Av. from 8 to 10 Streets and along Electric Av. from 8 to 10 Streets. The following areas are residential: Ocean Av., Central Av., and Electric Av., 10 Street to Main Street Alley as well as Ocean Av., and Electric Av., 8 Street to Main Street Alley. As such no meters should be placed along these blocks. The problem is that residents and their guests would be forced to pay to park in a residential area and be limited to a two hour maximum time before their car must be moved. In addition, a resident would be forced to feed a meter to unload groceries from their car if their door was located along one of the named streets. I see no justification for placing parking meters in any residential area. Use of Funds If the City Council adopts this study, this committee should make a stronger recommendation on the use of parking revenue. All the money, in excess of operation and maintenance needs, should be used for the following public works projects first: Page 3 Main Street public improvements (curbs, gutters, sidewalks and streets). All streets (curbs, gutters and sidewalks) in the downtown area [oldest area]. Alleys in the downtown area. Additional parking (beach parking .under Eisenhower Park). All streets (curbs, gutters and sidewalks) on the Hill [second oldest neighborhood]. All streets (curbs, gutters and sidewalks) in College Park West [third oldest neighborhood]. All streets (curbs, gutters and sidewalks) in College Park East [fourth oldest neighborhood]. After all area streets areXfinished, then any funds remaining should go to the general fund. Conclusion The City's Parking Study, as written, is flawed because it does not deal with parking in a comprehensive manner. It simply deals with the perceived advantages of parking meters, (types, location, brands etc.) and leaves parking management to take care of itself.