Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
CC AG PKT 2012-06-11 #D
3fSEAL e�t AGENDA STAFF REPORT - \.,L IFORN s DATE: June 11, 2012 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council THRU: Jill R. Ingram, City Manager FROM: Sean P. Crumby P.E., Assistant City Manager/Public Works SUBJECT: APPROVE SUBMITTAL OF MEASURE M ELIGIBILITY PACKAGE AND ITS COMPONENTS SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The City Council is asked to: ® Adopt the Pavement Management Program (Attachment D); • Adopt the Measure M Seven-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for fiscal years 2012/13 through 2018/19 (Attachment A); and o Authorize submittal of the Measure M Eligibility Package to the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: In November of 1990, the voters of Orange County approved Measure M, the Revised Traffic Improvement and Growth Management Ordinance. Measure M created a fund for transportation improvements to mitigate traffic impacts generated by existing and proposed development. Measure M authorizes the imposition of an additional half-cent retail transaction and use tax for a period of twenty (20) years. In November of 2006, Measure M was renewed by the voters of Orange County for an additional twenty (20) years and is now referred to as Measure M2. Funds identified as Measure M2 "turnback" funds are used on local and regional transportation improvement and maintenance projects. Other Measure M2 funds, for transportation related projects, are made available through several competitive programs included in the Combined Transportation Funding Program (CTFP). To be eligible to receive Measure M2 "turnback" and CTFP funds, the Local Transportation Authority (LTA) must find that the City has satisfied specific requirements which change every year (adopted by the City Council on or before June 30th). The Board of Supervisors of Orange County has designated the OCTA as the Local Transportation Authority. The City of Seal Beach has fulfilled the following initial requirements: Agenda Item D 1. Demonstrated compliance with the County's Congestion Management Program. 2. Maintained a mitigation impact fee schedule. 3. Adopted a seven-year Capital Improvement Program that includes all transportation projects funded partially or wholly by Measure M dollars. 4. Adopted and adequately funded a Local Pavement Management Plan (PMP). 5. Adopted a Traffic Demand Management Ordinance. 6. Satisfied Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Requirements. 7. Agreed to expend all Measure M revenues within three (3) years of receipt. All of these items must be maintained to retain eligibility. Not all of the requirements are needed every year. Some items must be renewed or resubmitted annually and some biannually. The Eligibility package is due to OCTA by June 29, 2012. This year's package will include: 1. Measure M seven-year Capital Improvement Program 2. Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Reporting Form 3. Updated Pavement Management Program 4. General Plan Compliance Documentation 5. Measure M Eligibility Checklist A summary explanation of each listed item is included below: 1. MEASURE M, SEVEN-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM The City Council adopts a comprehensive seven-year CIP each year. Staff has prepared an updated seven-year CIP specifically for the transportation facility improvement projects in a form consistent with the latest requirements of OCTA. The updated seven-year CIP is attached as Attachment A. 2. MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT (MOE) REPORTING FORM One of the requirements that went into effect when the voters approved Measure M was that the transportation revenue stream supplement and not replace the General Fund investment that local agencies spend on roadway maintenance. In fact the Measure M program compiled the average annual maintenance investment that each city made between FY 1985/86 through FY1989/90 and requires that local agencies continue to invest into the infrastructure with a minimum of that funding level. The Maintenance of Effort form indicates that this is being done for each local jurisdiction. The average annual MOE General Fund expenditure required for the City of Seal Beach, as determined for the Measure M Program, is $505,000. The FY 2012/13 budget contains a General Fund expenditure for public works/transportation related costs, which exceeds the baseline MOE requirements. The MOE and supporting documentation is attached as Attachment B. Page 2 3. 2012 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE The Pavement Management Plan is system that evaluates the existing network of pavements, identifies deficiencies, and recommends a cost effective system of improvements to relieve existing and future deficiencies. This plan is updated every two years as required by OCTA. The Pavement Management Plan will be submitted to OCTA before the June 29, 2012 deadline. The Pavement Management Program was presented to the City Council on May 14, 2012 and is attached as Attachment D. 4. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTATION A participating city must consider, as part of its General Plan, land use planning strategies that accommodate transit and non-motorized transportation. The City of Seal Beach has met these requirements within the currently adopted General Plan. A letter will be submitted to OCTA identifying these strategies. 5. MEASURE M ELIGIBILITY CHECKLIST To assist agencies in complying with Measure M2, OCTA has developed checklists to clarify requirements. The checklist has been filled out and it will be transmitted with all other documents as required by OCTA. It is recommended that these checklists be received and filed for transmitting with other required Measure M2 documents. Based on staffs analysis, this comprehensive package of required documents will maintain the City's compliance with the requirements of Measure M2 for fiscal year 2012/2013. Upon approval, the attached documents will be submitted to OCTA. Adoption and submission of the CIP developed by the Public Works Department will permit the City of Seal Beach to continue to receive the City's portion of the Measure M2 revenue funds. The Measure M Eligibility Checklist is attached as Attachment C. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: The submittal of the Measure M Eligibility Package is not a project within the California Environmental Quality Act. All projects delivered with the Capital Improvement Program will comply with all requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Detailed information will be presented at the appropriate time for those projects. LEGAL ANALYSIS: No legal analysis is required for this item. Page 3 FINANCIAL IMPACT: The City of Seal Beach received funding from the Measure M program through OCTA. A requirement to receive this funding is submittal of the enclosed eligibility package. The City of Seal Beach annually received approximately $350,000 and this year has $370,623 budgeted in revenue. The City also applies for a host of competitive grants and on average receives $1,000,000 in grant funds. This year, projects such as the Seal Beach Boulevard Realignment ($1.4M), Studebaker Ramp Reconstruction ($500,000), and Seal Beach Boulevard Rehabilitation ($500,000) were all constructed with competitive funding. Adoption of the resolution ensures that the City will continue to be eligible to fund maintenance activities and compete for needed infrastructure funding. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended City Council: o Adopt the Pavement Management Program (Attachment D); o Adopt the Measure M Seven-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for fiscal years 2012/13 through 2018/19 (Attachment A); and o Authorize submittal of the Measure M Eligibility Package to the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). SUBMITTED BY: NOTED AND APPROVED: g/% _ . �\ 2 . Sean P. Crum '.E. gp R. Ingram, C. :nager Assistant City Manager/Public Works • Prepared by: Cesar Rangel, Assistant Engineer Attachments: A. Measure M 7-year Capital Improvement Program B. MOE and supporting documentation C. Measure M Checklist D. Pavement Management Program Report Page 4 Attachment A Measure M 7-year Capital Improvement Program Page 5 • h an . 0 0 N U O 0 U: R to O C • Ouv M e+l 'u p ° v n . •0 e" 69 •0 .-. .•i I. L 0. IC h U ° oo U °° °o co• c o c • 0 c o" -0 p -ea ve E M 8 L FA L .-. .••1 d IC• V \�. 'y fiA 0 0 .Me.. a N W .0 o. G� w 0 a 0 0 r o ° vi - n o ° Its • O ° e+1 .V 0 - et ° M r •0 Cl i • n �.r -oo• - O N9 O 0 .-. y CD°O ° o j ° ° I._ o o° P, U o o ° " N ' n � v v N N Z `� = 0 CO 0 i.. H E p p :U- .-. O 00 :1) W. p O M... e+1 F19 -WI .b O ^iH VI lD vj n ca F v7 N en '. t` N V ca op ...... 6;+ cA 6:7 �, N vi 3 00i O 0 O .. v p O .. V G 0 N Y O O O %. O co 0 ° ° O b p °, Ca Ca ca. g G °csi - — .1�-. h N. V9 NI "— LI• —. z - z ., °amU 2 w C _ _c, w y h y °° O O 0 7 W L c ° o vl o r �, VI U \ p o U •∎ O o tG a EA ' 0 o e' '' vt n a��i I W 0 C V ° O .C V ° O U p o U s--:. o•cJ N e+� O O y N. on v n '�O Q - .., N4 c0 N 69 9 C b C E II . O V m O A o .q O • —co .12 D eh O 0. p O O:. U .0 o 0 U p N o 3 a v- d f N CI �p >Y. 0 W O w p r.` ° V] h O Cm RI ` C C - 0 O O 0 O= U .Y r. 0 -� _ •d W d 0 7 W A U •0 2 e. Q W co w 3 p n C 0- = Q I U 0 0 0 v - a U z, 13 o 0 c. c ca a s .0 aL' a c cn c C U P. co cn Q > d L .. ea 0 4 = .. .. .. .. .. 3 C 0 A E ° o o e o o c 0 cc < Z L _0 O o d U �` z 0 E_ 0 c d id 0 U rn n1 eu 'a y ela :. A CO u ° '� 0. .. ai L. u a, u T .L Qe O :.I Q" 'L 4' '3 R. a a, a F" At 0 (V • • y • -h • -O =0 O ° U b a C. R.o" d n." %. • o � OV J N N 0 in L L V3 Mr C. • O in o U o o U.- ° o 0 o i 0 O- 0 0 O" O o W o 0 N N 00 e V -u ,--. u 49 = O w S In W . U Os o U U n o CZ o 0 n oo in } -y, ,. o w y c; 0 U o °o .0 0 C ^J O\° y n i 0 °O al V \O n• 0 ,.0 N.. e vi O p oo 0 O O v O 00 O p O _ I, 0 - ez >. O N N r LL v3 :�. N 4'f ai Z h .o U ° O .U O O 0 O 0 C O O ci d 0 y O y O 0 csi h O 0 "C O R O O O O O O -O p v 4 N -U n O O .,E= 0 C - CS 4 7 W 6^'. O co W on L'^'. N yNg O ° Q. 'V C o o - 0 •0 o o -- o°° •o .o'. °O ° 4. °• c o uo oo °o CaC W 49 - � W N in d • v U H ° 'o w a �_ L f 7 y O N 7 N W O O O W ,'r • O on O O Cl y U \ 0 ° U v' o0 0 V ❑ .M er ° O M '1 O C EW : 0 in Fes',. N C4 in CO C V ° Q 0 U ti ,-9 Q. • o [>4a,i 0 d9 '0 N {N/9 al W s m Ti w o a) . U " o o CO •q o •=, 9 U n1 Op C C W y (� '"n CO O IL- m ` .. o° °o w 30 •o ti oo" o0 W o En CO o o o • •cw ° 0 C a ❑Z' a o a) 02 ..V ' 0 d V h h •E, W p' -. s N 2 y N y ,as crC co U a`i -0 m To L O M L . CO G) 3 C a V CC) 00 O L ,, C ••- - - 0 0 , a 0 0 .a •• d L W O O 0 0 •. m , z y 3 N .L o ,D e z 3 H .L y d z d e 0 e 0 U z d e 0 e 0 U O. CO F .e W CJ L L u) F 9 0 o ,, C. .o Q •L 0. C. 0 4 o Cr C. C. C. Cn I CO M /44 y O - O U p o° U O o O u co .u 'n v) u o0 oo •o c5 0 C L a. - h y O- O U ° O U O 0 y o ° y °o 0 o" oe C ON in [.1. C- 00 co I- a. i9 L 0 V9 u a .a n o • — O S c - c m E 'W c - h C. . •W 0 • y p, U as o .r- o ° vi tom- o ° u°9 - 0 o U w c c rn �°o °°C. 0 i u h ,_,, y 0000 a b CO 0 09 U 00 L O W c3 z y y ° U ° ° U ° U _O O co •y ON O O uN 00 0 L O -C ° CO ° n --C O\ W O ° E - -+ U o ao o. co U co L0 N $ in N' 'o ° Vi E 69 ° 69 u 0 o L: W La 7' ° — •O a, °N O O V C v N oo O • v N CO F N N O p a �'+ U O O - n N O� •U O 60 i:3 E y . `„ ' ' L. 3 . u G is -E u -E .--- w cc of °' - 0 o 0.. . _ S -n a m Gs :o' •Gr- o cia �' V - o U. "' V .r7 ^ ° 69 M ° 099 y �' >. dN , cL) 0 w / - O • - W m N • _ an • cC m O C V. J C -N M ° N9 ` N N. M ° f°9 CO Y� C .>I C ... �� 5 i =-t:o = c 00 'w.d .• : O c -p 5 0 s ate.. N•.:. 07 N O r,cc• U C 0 0 f�w Va Ca 9 O. °'' O aa O° 8. g p . c • O ., p o m E v m U. • p o TO E U o tn° 5 c °O o N o , o s 2 ^, . .0" CO• > in am o 00 c q , y. -• c cap O. - 00 C r ' c � H ` °� c c 0 C ' C G.•� u U F Cd C C I y a y L d.° u > •o W c C U 7W C 4 X u esi d G i ,� O -V v u G O L r 0 - • C o 0 •a .. 0 0 '- ..o. d . C u z E O C d U z E O e q U L V 1 "C? ' ."A � 1 Y L Qu y v ^ 1-7 D A • Ld u ", O P >• a CO i u O i L w .o L L Pr CO Q CO•V L L 1 Pk CO CO Om ti d- y h O U o O 0 p U 7- O 0 C40 D tO O - tel r 0 . to p b 1. 0 c.3 O v O O L 69 • V eV O 679 a ol co ....- 0 U' •• O U 0 '0 O ° 0 o 0 o 0 - uo C o ° ao E 1/417 o E " �? 6s 7 o y y y V! .0 y, .0 �: C — O R C �• .. Cc4 x Ti o — rn C'' N c O 6°9 �, 'U c p 0 0 l�.: oo vi se .. -0. o w U C p U • 0 O o v� O y b u pO p o '- ea ' 69 •O) L 0 O O 0 •p M-. co CD o O W O a n p O Cr .b co co O Vi vi 0 >' o :�' NE _ LV " [s. vi m • Z , a U O O U . CD _'0 V • 00 0 . 0 m . 0 C7 E L •y �. �" ° :c. In s O 69 M crt co Pa• OD 5 o i - 0 :e =C M C o C e - d N u p u o N u O o o V• > p o O ,D ° r, 0 O • ° o O O C1 N 7 WI O .7 O O 7 "Cl. v fiR 1• ~ 6 • CI W ai C V9 OSI Y a C E — a ` — W v Z C Z 0 o r, _ L• m . p y e 0 • V R :O O ° {s. O °•0 co, y U v' ° °_ U in °o ca es - ✓ M '-^ p M •-.' O M 69 in v "�' 69 "�" l0 U M y fs. C VVV V! ca - o 0 •-• 0 — • O O ° r O O N Nc at 6 3 - °U' N • .SC •• O-� p 0 .O co 0 O T U: "' o O O .M.. 0 0 en 0.. 3 0. N 0 C O ai. .ti Vf 7 C cs • '{.fir-. .--i V9 C 4. V :� O .n __ 3 C 4,- . V9 = L i _ O O O DD -C3 V 8 d U .0 to • y. V C ' `"C U •q: V v N Y � N L O o a- �n � O o U F v a 65 U Q S c c-• ` ,r 'L u L. E o 3 o .--- —, .. •. 0 •. y . CO C0z �' 3o G ° E � � - 0 7.1 •. as +a - q OD E Z 7 Fr 9. L � z , Eoo . az � •- o N y •O a L .– U H •O Fa d •0 a ea G _ O a, •� L V 0 U V L d' L L fi _° a y Fr ' L S. a V F a V L c° A.a .L Q •L a I. • a L r a a a a +0 0 CZ) H ON O O O O O 0 • r, 00 w 00 O O oo O O 0 o N. • O ON O , I '" vl 00 w IN 0 O 00 O 0 00 r y 0 [. 0 N 0 0 ., L, 0 00 O oo" r" w N rn . O b in O cn 0 0 00 en P U b O 0 0 N 0 N y N 0 r{ N WI - b 01 N N 0i v CO OO v o U ` i 0) 0O O t. h rz..4 U7 O O 00 O O 00 NN� N 0 - 0 ti 1� 5 7 O N O b O in a w "i v p eu C. aD U i . '3 Q W in R 0) .il• O 0 O 0 0 0 O VI 0 in O O eT M 0 'n O in i y 00 � 7 'Cr 41 to v 0 0 '.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oh 0 0 0 0 © pNy sr in 7 D\ h e cre1 co cii ea ;V„ u .1 0 0 sue. c:, L L Q Li 4-, r a Q L .0 - N c) Z v 04 C 01e R O Q< V] O O O O O 0 fie CS 00 r. W O 0 0 CO 0 O o n CO O 0 WI t` 00 ° N v� tel ON ■■•1 'D 00 r b r-1 69 W O O O 00 0 O O N 00 0 O n N o 0 od' v) -+ 00 V" IN sz v rr 69 W v H 0 h 0 f+) 0 O Oi o r- O V' 00 V o VD O O h O ,O ` ti ° O O t� I d '0 n Cl) U 0 4) vN 00 v F ^ M o o r ° 00 0 v O O f7 C C 0. 'n O ° OO\ o gl 2 [V '.V "CI D. N r-1 69 W • .a d F v i'+ O O O O 0 C c# C 4. S O ' try) • 0 O O " 7 N h 00 to �CyI vl "Cr 61 W o o 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 R. O-4 CA kr ) n 000 M Cr)in \D t` N R N ..i be W ZI d R V .. .� 'i, x 4 0i • q to C v u C 44 '0) "7 tC O a■ N CJ 'r 01 Z u pq a "r oD w o d vn Attachment B MOE and supporting documentation Page 6 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT REPORTING FORM Reporting Jurisdiction: City of Seal Beach Type of GENERAL FUND Transportation Expenditures: (please attach supporting budget documentation for each line item listed below, and record separately in CIP software) MAINTENANCE Total Expenditure Storm Drains 303,150 Street Maintenance 282,685 Landscape Maintenance 100,920 Subtotal Maintenance 686,755 CONSTRUCTION Subtotal Construction ADMINISTRATIVE/OTHER Engineering/Public Works " 121,477 Subtotal Other Total General Fund Transportation Expenditures 121,477 (less Total MOE Exclusions*) (—) MOE Expenditures 808,232 MOE Benchmark Requirement 505,000 (Shortfall) / Surplus 303,232 Certification: I hereby certify that the City of Seal Beach has budgeted and will meet tthhe Maintenance of Effort requirement for Fiscal Ye r 2012/2013. Ignatur Da e Shally Lin, Interim Director of Finance Title *Funding sources include federal,state,redevelopment,and bond financing E-1 CITY OF SEAL BEACH FY 2011/2012 MOE CALCULATION Less 57% Less Less Gas Tax (non-street Intergov Adjusted Dept# Budget Transfer related) Payments Actual GENERAL FUND: Engineering/Public Works 042 121,477 121,477 Storm Drains 043 352,150 (49,000) 303,150 Street Maintenance 044 967,341 (684,656) 282,685 • Add per State Audit Allowable Discretionary Costs: Landscape Maintenance 049 234,697 (133,777) 100,920 Subtotal 808,232 Less Measure M Threshold Requirement (505,000) Excess(Deficiency) Coverage 303,232 • REVENUE SUMMARY BY FUND • - I FY 2012-2013 2011-2012 2012-2013 Account Revenue 2010-2011 Amended 2011-2012 Proposed Number Source Actual Budget Estimated Budget Tidelands Beach-034: . 034-000-30425 Off-street Parking $ 162,092 $ 158,400 $ 158,400 $ 150,000 034-000-30630 Swimming Lessons - - - 14,200 034-000-30700 ReimbMiscSvcs • 10,921 11,100 11,100 11,000 034-000-30962 Donated Revenue - 3,600 3,600 3,600 034-000-30980 Other Agency Revenue 126,760 105,100 105,100 105,100 034-000-31500 Transfer In 710,104 940,700 925,774 863,499 034-000-31600 Landing Fees 81,210 80,000 80,000 80,000 034-000-31650 Property Rental 146,719 105,000 105,000 105,000 034-000-31700 Junior Lifeguard Fees 106,682 105,000 105,000 103,500 Total Tidelands Beach $ 1,344,488 $ 1,508,900 $ 1,493,974 $ 1,435,899 Gas Tax-040: 040-000-30420 Interest on Investments $ 353 $ 1,000 $ . 1,200 $ 1,300 040-000-32499 Gas Tax 2103 207,979 260,000 260,000 282,329 040-000-32500 Gas Tax 2105 133,786 139,000 139,000 125,718 040-000-32525 Gas Tax 2106 88,069 92,200 92,200 88,886 040-000-32530 Gas Tax 2107 178,580 186,200 186,200 180,423 040-000-32535 Gas Tax 2107.5 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 Total Gas Tax $ 614,767 $ 684,400 $ 684,600 $ 684,656 Measure M-041: . 041-000-30420 Interest on Investments $ 2,628 $ 1,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 041-000-33500 Local Turnback 264,435 262,000 262,000 370,623 Total Measure M $ 267,063 $ 263,000 $ 264,000 $ 372,623 Parking-in-Lieu-048 048-000-30865 Parking-in-Lieu $ 51,800 $ - $ 15,100 $ - Total Parking in lieu $ 51,800 $ - $ 15,100 $ - Riverfront Low/Mod Housing-061: 061-000-30420 Interest on Investments $ 7,436 $ 2,714 $ Z700 $ - 061-000-30423 Unrealized Gain/Loss on Invest - - - - 061-000-38555 Low/Mod Hsg Set Aside 445,677 258,674 268,700 - Total Riverfront Low/Mod Housing $ 453,113 $ 261,388 $ 271,400 $ - Riverfront Project Area-063: 063-000-30024 Proceeds of Long-term Debt $ 1,200,000 $ - $ - $ - 063-000-30420 Interest on Investments $ 24,334 $ 7,831 $ 7,800 $ - 063-000-30423 Unrealized Gain/Loss on Invest - - - - 063-000-31500 Transfers In 467,987 - - - Total Riverfront Project $ 1,692,321 $ 7,831 $ 7,800 $ - Riverfront Debt Service-065: - 065-000-30420 Interest on Investments $ 80 $ 39 $ 20 $ - 065-000-31500 Transfers In 733,749 718,229 594,500 - Total Riverfront Debt Service $ 733,829 $ 718,268 $ 594,520 $ - 21 General Fund Expenditure Summary • • 2012-2013 2010-2011 2011-2012 Proposed Department Actual Estimated Budget 010 City Council $ 87,458 $ 95,200 $ 85,400 011 City Manager 695,281 735,000 632,790 012 City Clerk 298,894 282,600 334,435 015 City Attorney 469,590 402,700 425,000 017 Finance Department 613,410 591,200 612,414 018 Risk Management 2,606,271 • 1,358,600 1,295,637 019 Non-Departmental 835,010 716,200 790,170 020 Information System Technolc 490,540 514,200 641,250 021 Police-EOC - 130,300 137,776 022 Police-Field Services 5,138,711 5,453,000 5,884,620 023 Police-Support Services 2,499,774 2,477,500 • 2,455,575 024 Police-Detention Facility 634,697 669,600 729,438 026 Fire Services 3,912,032 4,155,500 4,267,862 030 Planning 412,978 395,400 452,326 • 031 Building and Safety 382,132 306,500 432,588 042 Engineering 303,164 118,000 121,477 043 Storm Drain 314,980 340,200 352,150 044 Street Maintenance 939,762 904,600 967,341 049 Landscape Maintenance 180,947 183,200 234,697 050 Automobile Maintenance 301,026 304,600 461,421 051 Refuse 1,105,330 1,100,000 1,100,000 052 Building Maintenance 692,993 593,200 625,310 070 Recreation Administration 266,687 268,800 357,562 071 Sports 44,061 34,000 47,768 072 Parks and Recreation 308,839 302,400 364,420 073 Aquatics 147,731 144,500 143,798 074 Tennis Center 197,898 185,000 285,100 080 Transfer Out- 7,233,148 3,897,769 6,547,029 Total Expenditures $ 31,113,344 $ 26,659,769 $ 30,785,355 $16,000,000 $14,000,000 Er General Administration $12,000,000 1 $10,000,000 so Public Safety $8,000,000 ■ " { ®Public Works $6,000,000 n■i 4 II!IJI] :::::::out' r . ; FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 FY 2012-13 Actual Estimated Proposed FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 FY 2012-13 Actual Estimated Proposed General Administration $ 6,096,454 $ 4,695,700 $ 4,817,096 Public Safety 12,185,214 12,885,900 13,475,272 Public Works 2,732,872 2,443,800 2,762,396 Community Services 1,760,326 1,636,600 2,083,562 Refuse and Transfer Out 8,338,478 4,997,769 7,647,029 Grand Total $ 31,113,344 $ 26,659,769 $ 30,785,355 • 37 Ii City of Seal Beach l FY 2012-2013 0 DEPARTMENT: Public Works Account Code: 001-042 FUND: 001 General Fund-Administration&Engineering 2011-2012 2012-2013 2010-2011 Amended 2011-2012 Proposed Il Actual Budget Estimated Budget Personnel Services $ 58,534 $ 58,800 $ 57,400 $ 57,577 Maintenance and Operations 244,630 62,700 60,600 63,900 TOTAL $ 303,164_ $ 121,500 $ 118,000 $ 121,477 • • {I ACCOUNT NUMBER EXPLANATION 40001 Full-time Salaries ACM/Director of Public Works - 0.05 City Engineer - 0.05 Assistant Engineer - 0.10 ' Executive Assistant - 0.20 40003 Overtime Provides for personnel overtime 40007 Tuition Reimbursement Funds budgeted in this account are part of employee benefits costs. 40008 Auto Allowance Mileage expenses associated with local seminars,meetings and .EI training for the Director of Public Works. IS 40009 Cell Phone Allowance Telephone expense related to the City. 40010 Deferred Comp-Cafeteria Funds budgeted in this account are part of employee benefits costs. 40011 Deferred Compensation Funds budgeted in this account include this program's pro rata share of employee benefits costs. 40012 PERS Retirement Funds budgeted in this account area component of employee benefit costs. 40013 PARS Retirement Funds budgeted in this account include this program's pro rata share of employee benefits costs. 40014 Medical Insurance Funds budgeted in this account are part of employee benefits costs. 40015 Aflac Cafeteria Funds budgeted in this account are part of employee benefits costs. 40017 Medicare Insurance Funds budgeted in this account are part of employee benefits costs. 40018 Life and Disability Funds budgeted in this account are part of employee benefits costs. l 40100 Office Supplies Office supplies,CIP books,laminating and standard plans. 40300 Memberships and Dues APWA,ASCE,CA PE License, ITE, NWOCPWD,CEADOC 40400 Training and Meetings League of Cities,Traffic Engineering Course,report writing,map act, inspection courses,EIT training,water certification,professional engineering license. 44000 Contract Professional Svcs Miscellaneous Professional Engineering,Development Engineering Support;AutoCADD software subscription,Grant submission support and Development deposits. , 1 • • 1 126 • I • City of Seal Beach _ Y FY 2012 2013 DEPARTMENT: Public Works ' . Account Code: 001-042 FUND: 001 General Fund-Administration&Engineering • 2011-2012 2012-2013 Account 2010-2011 Amended 2011-2012 Proposed Description Number Actual Budget Estimated Budget PERSONNEL SERVICES . Full-Time Salaries 001-042-40001 $ 34,983 $ 36,700 $ 35,400 $ 35,735 Part-Time 001-042-40004 4,207 3,000 3,000 3,000 Tuition Reimbursement 001-042-40007 1,827 - - - Auto Allowance 001-042-40008 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 Cell Phone Allowance 001-042-40009 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700 Deferred Comp-Cafeteria 001-042-40010 76 100 100 63 Deferred Comp 001-042-40011 828 900 900 809 PERS Retirement 001-042-40012 5,242 6,100 5,800 5,888 PARS Retirement 001-042-40013 116 100 100 100 Medical Insurance 001-042-40014 3,771 3,900 3,900 3,859 Medicare Insurance 001-042-40017 240 700 700 714 Life and Disability 001-042-40018 344 400 400 336 Vacation Buy/Payout 001-042-40027 200 173 TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES $ 58,534 $ • 58,800 $ 57,400 $ 57,577 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS Office Supplies 001-042-40100 $ 1,565 $ 2,800 $ 2,800 $ 2,800 Memberships and Dues 001-042-40300 683 1,000 1,000 2,600 Training&Meetings 001-042-40400 1,360 3,500 1,400 3,500 Special Departmental 001-042-40800 - 400 400 - Contract Professional 001-042-44000 241,022 55,000 55,000 55,000 TOTAL MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS $ 244,630 $ 62,700 $ - 60,600 $ 63,900 . TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 303,164 $ 121,500 $ 118,000 $ 121,477 • • • r • 127 r■ 8 J City of Seal Beach I FY 2012-2013 • /1 DEPARTMENT: Public Works Account Code: 001-043 FUND: 001 General Fund-Storm Drains 2011-2012 2012-2013 1, 2010-2011 Amended 2011-2012 Proposed tljj Actual Budget Estimated Budget Personnel Services $ 177,515 $ 191,100 $ 187,100 $ 189,550 Maintenance and Operations 137,465 149,100 153,100 162,600 TOTAL $ 314,980 $ 340,200 $ 340,200 $ 352,150 ACCOUNT NUMBER EXPLANATION • 40001 Full-time Salaries ACM/Director of Public Works - 0.05 • City Engineer - 0.10 Associate Engineer - 0.25 Assistant Engineer - 0.20 • Maintenance Service Manager - 0.05 [I Executive Assistant - 0.10 Electrician - 0.05 • • Maintenance Service Supervisor - 0.10 Sr.Maintenance Worker - 0.20 Maintenance Worker - 0.60 Water Services Supervisor - 0.05 40003 Over-time Provides for personnel overtime .i 40004 Part-time Provides for personnel part-time 40010 Deferred Comp-Cafeteria Funds budgeted in this account are a component of employee benefit costs. 40011 Deferred Compensation Funds budgeted in this account include this program's pro rata share II of employee benefits costs. ld 40012 Pers Retirement Funds budgeted in this account are a component of employee benefit costs. 40013 Pars Retirement Funds budgeted in this account include this program's pro rata share of employee benefits costs. 11 40014 Medical Insurance Funds budgeted in this account are component of employee benefit costs. ti 40015 AFLAC Cafeteria Funds budgeted in this account are a component of employee benefit costs. 40017 Medicare Insurance Funds budgeted in this account are a component of employee benefit costs. U 40018 Life and Disability • Funds budgeted in this account are a component of employee benefit costs. 40700 Equipment/materials Materials for West End Pump Station. .i 41020 Electricity Electricity for West End Pump Station. 44000 Contract Professional Svcs NPDES program,catch basin cleaning,NPDES advertising,catch basin testing,storm drain video inspection,catch basin filter replacement, .i professional engineering services,winter storm pump rental and storm preparation flyers. . 45000 Intergovernmental State Water Resource Control Board,NPDES Permit County Orange, :i AQMD permit fee and LA County property tax. I :I 130 1 City of Seal Beach 1 FY 2012-2013 • DEPARTMENT: Public Works Account Code: 001-043 FUND: 001 General Fund-Storm Drains • 2011-2012 2012-2013 Account 2010-2011 Amended 2011-2012 Proposed Description Number Actual Budget Estimated Budget PERSONNEL SERVICES Full-Time Salaries 001-043-40001 $ • 131,805 $ 138,000 $ 136,800 $ 139,154 Overtime 001-043-40003 183 200 200 - Part-Time 001-043-40004 4,436 5,400 4,500 4,500 Deferred Comp-Cafeteria 001-043-40010 528 - 500 500 418 Deferred Compensation• • 001-043-40011 2,740 3,000 3,000 2,825 Pers Retirement • 001-043-40012 19,694 23,500 22,300 22,930 Pars Retirement 001-043-40013 108 200 200 200 Medical Insurance 001-043-40014 ' , 14,859 15,700 15,400 • 15,494 Medicare Insurance 001-043-40017 1,768 2,300 2,200 2,277 Life and Disability 001-043-40018 1,394 1,800 1,500 1,434 Vacation Buy/Payout 001-043-40027 - 500 500 318 TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES $ 177,515 $ 191,100 $ 187,100 $ 189,550 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS Equipment/Materials 001-043-40700 $ 827 $ 2,800 $ 1,900 $ 3,000 Electricity 001-043-41020 13,174 9,400 14,300 15,000 Contract Professional 001-043-44000 87,774 95,600 95,600 95,600 Intergovernmental 001-043-45000 35,690 41,300 41,300 49,000 TOTAL MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS $ 137,465 $ 149,100 $ 153,100 $ 162,600 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ •314,980 $ 340,200 $ 340,200 $ 352,150 • • 131 • I City of Seal Beach .1 FY 2012-2013 1 DEPARTMENT. Public Works • - Account Code: 001-044 ` FUND: 001 General Fund-Street Maintenance 2011-2012 2012-2013 .fl 2010-2011 Amended 2011-2012 Proposed Actual Budget Estimated Budget Personnel Services $ 524,142 $ 560,400 $ 557,500 $ 565,309 Maintenance and Operations 415,620 314,500 347,100 402,032 [1 TOTAL $ . 939,762 $ 874,900 $ 904,600 $ 967,341 1 ACCOUNT NUMBER EXPLANATION 40001 Full-time Salaries ACM/Director of Public Works - 0.25 City Engineer - 0.25 Associate Engineer - 0.25 Assistant Engineer - 0.30 -i ri Executive Assistant - 0.50 Maintenance Service Manager - 0.25 Maintenance Service Supervisor - 0.75 Electrician - 0.10 ei Senior Maintenance Worker - 0.45 Maintenance Worker - 1.70 40003 Over-time Provides for personnel overtime ti 40004 Part-time Provides for personnel part time • 40010 Deferred Comp-Cafeteria Funds budgeted in this account are part of employee benefits costs. 40011 Deferred Compensation Funds budgeted in this account include this program's pro rata share of employee benefits costs. tj 40012 Pers Retirement Funds budgeted in this account are part of employee benefits costs. 40013 Pars Retirement Funds budgeted in this account include this program's pro rata share of employee benefits costs. [1 40014 Medical Insurance Funds budgeted in this account are part of employee benefits costs. 40015 AFLAC Cafeteria Funds budgeted in this account are part of employee benefits costs. 40017 Medicare Insurance Funds budgeted in this account are part of employee benefits costs. 40018 Life and Disability Funds budgeted in this account are part of employee benefits costs. 40022 Flexible Spending-Cafeteria Funds budgeted in this account are part of employee benefits costs. 40700 Equipment/materials Asphalt hot/cold mix,traffic signs,graffiti abatement,pavers, sand bags,equipment,materials,and tools. 40800 Special Departmental Trimming of parkway and median trees. 40801 Street Sweeping Provides street sweeping. 41020 Electricity Electricity costs. 44000 Contract Professional Svcs Engineering services,trash/steam clean Main St.,pavement mgmt concrete rehabilitation,landscape medians and parkways, N. employee uniforms,pothole repair,citywide striping improvements, iltraffic control-10K,traffic signal maintenance,citywide traffic counts,and Dekra-lite(include holiday lighting). a 134 City of Seal Beach I FY 2012-2013 DEPARTMENT: Public Works Account Code: 001-044 FUND: 001 General Fund-Street Maintenance 2011-2012 2012-2013 Account 2010-2011 Amended 2011-2012 Proposed .Description Number Actual Budget Estimated Budget PERSONNEL SERVICES Full-Time Salaries 001-044-40001 $ . 389,582 $ 410,300 $ 410,300 $ 417,826 Overtime 001-044-40003 1,239 1,200 1,200 - Part-Time 001-044-40004 10,047 8,000 8,000 8,000 Deferred Comp-Cafeteria 001-044-40010 1,619 1,300 1,300 1,106 Deferred Compensation . 001-044-40011 7,531 8,300 8,300 7,956 Pers Retirement 001-044-40012 58,161 70,400 67,128 68,849 Pars Retirement 001-044-40013 213 200 200 200 Medical Insurance 001-044-40014 46,416 48,000 48,000 48,513 - AFLAC Cafeteria 001-044-40015 55 - - Medicare Insurance 001-044-40017 4,909 6,300 6,672 6,751 Life and Disability 001-044-40018 4,173 4,300 4,300 4,300 Flexible Spending-Cafeteria 001-044-40022 197 _ - - Vacation Buy/Payout 001-044-40027 - . 2,100 2,100 1,808 TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES $ 524,142 $ 560,400 $ 557,500 $ 565,309 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS Equipment/Materials 001-044-40700 $ 35,833 $ 36,000 $ 36,000 $ 36,000 Special Departmental 001-044-40800 68,094 60,000 60,000 70,000 Street Sweeping 001-044-40801 50,253 37,500 37,500 50,132 Electricity 001-044-41020 15,241 16,000 16,000 16,000 Contract Professional 001-044-44000 246,199 165,000 197,600 229,900 TOTAL MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS $ 415,620 $ 314,500 $ 347,100 $ 402,032 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 939,762 $ 874,900 $ 904,600 $ 967,341 • 135 r 4 r City of Seal Beach I FY 2012-2013 - El DEPARTMENT: Public Works Account Code: 001-049 FUND: 001 General Fund-Landscape Maintenance 1. 2011-2012 2012-2013 2010-2011 Amended 2011-2012 Proposed Actual Budget Estimated Budget ri Personnel Services $ 32,890 $ 34,700 $ 33,600 $ 33,497 Maintenance and Operations • 148,057 200,400 149,600 201,200 TOTAL $ 180,947 $ 235,100 $ 183,200 $ 234,697 s. ACCOUNT NUMBER EXPLANATION 40001 Full-time Salaries ACM/Director of Public Works - 0.05 11 Maintenance Service Supervisor - 0.10 City Engineer - 0.05 Electrician - 0.05 • 40003 Over-time Provides for personnel overtime 40004 Part-time Provides for personnel part-time ;I 40010 Deferred Comp-Cafeteria Funds budgeted in this account are part of employee benefits costs. 40011 Deferred Compensation Funds budgeted in this account include this program's pro rata share of employee benefits costs. . 40012 Pers Retirement Funds budgeted in this account are part of employee benefits costs. 40013 Pars Retirement Funds budgeted in this account include this benefit's pro rata share of employee benefits costs. 40014 Medical Insurance Funds budgeted in this account are part of employee benefits costs. ti El 40017 Medicare Insurance Funds budgeted in this account are part of employee benefits costs. 40018 Life and Disability Funds budgeted in this account are part of employee benefits costs. 0 40022 Flexible Spending-Cafeteria Funds budgeted in this account are part of employee benefits costs. 40700 Equipment/materials Arbor Park support(doggie bags and fencing),Gumgrove Park support(doggie bags and etc),misc playground equipment(Beach Tot Lot), Heather Park,Almond Park,and Marina Center. Ei 41020 Electricity Electricity at Parks. 44000 Contract Professional Svcs Park landscape maintenance/repairs,park fence repairs,playground safety repairs/maintenance,portable restrooms,pest control, • lighting repairs,tree trimming,irrigation repairs,Zoeter Field maint. Edison community garden improvements and tennis court repairs. : • I .I 138 • • City of Seal Beach I FY 2012-2013 • DEPARTMENT: Public Works . . Account Code: 001-049 FUND: 001 General Fund-Landscape Maintenance • 2011-2012 2012-2013 Account 2010-2011 Amended 2011-2012 Proposed Description Number Actual Budget Estimated Budget PERSONNEL SERVICES Full Time Salaries 001-04940001 $ 25,220 $ 26,500 $ 25,600 $ 25,713 Overtime 001-049-40003 566 . - - - Deferred Comp-Cafeteria ' 001-049-40010 60 100 100 40 Deferred Comp 001-049-40011 654 700 700 637 Pers Retirement 001-049-40012 3,783 4,400 4,200 4,237 Medical Insurance 001-049-40014 1,983 2,100 2,100 2,065 Medicare Insurance 001-049-40017 347 400 400 411 Life and Disability 001-049-40018 228 300 300 221 Flexible Spending-Cafeteria 001-049-40022 49 - - - Vacation Buy/Payout 001-049-40027 - 200 200 173 TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES $ . 32,890 $ 34,700 $ 33,600 $ 33,497 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS Equipment/Materials 001-04940700 $ 4,629 $ 3,900 $ 3,900 $ 4,700 Electricity 001-049-41020 15,208 16,700 16,700 13,000 Contract Professional 001-049-44000 128,220 179,800 129,000 183,500 TOTAL MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS $ 148,057 $ 200,400 $ 149,600 $ 201,200 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 180,947 $ 235,100 $ 183,200 $ 234,697 • 139 . Attachment C Measure M Checklist Page 7 MEASURE M ELIGIBILITY CHECKLIST Responsibility: Cities, County MEASURE M CHECKLIST YES NO Capital Improvement Program 1. Did you submit your draft Measure M seven-year Capital EEI Improvement Program (CIP) to OCTA by June 29? a. Did you utilize the required CIP development software? CI b. Have you indicated what percentage of funding will come Ell ED from each source for each of the projects? c. Have you listed projects in current year dollars? d. Did you include all projects that are partially, fully or potentially funded by Measure M? e. Have you established an estimated target date prior to © El August for submitting your final, adopted Measure M seven-year CIP to OCTA? Maintenance of Effort 2. Did you submit your Maintenance of Effort certification and supporting budget documentation to OCTA by June 29? a. Did you use the Maintenance of Effort Reporting Form included in the Preparation Manual? Pavement Management Program 3. Did you submit a Pavement Management Program (PMP) Update ® Q to OCTA for this eligibility cycle? 4. If you answered "no" to question #3, did you submit a PMP Update Q to OCTA through the previous eligibility cycle by June 30? a. Did you use the current PMP Certification form? b. Is the PMP consistent with the OCTA Countywide Pavement En El Management Program? Resolution of Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) Consistency 5. Did you submit a resolution demonstrating consistency with the Q Q MPAH. (odd year only) 6. Have you enclosed a figure representing your most current Q circulation element? (odd year only) Page 1 of 3 7. Do you have a current Local Signal Synchronization Plan that is consistent to the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan? (due 2014) Mitigation Fee Program 8. Does your jurisdiction currently have a defined development impact 0 mitigation fee program in place? (odd year) a. If you answered yes to #8, have you included a copy of your current impact fee schedule; or b. If you answered yes to #8, have you provided OCTA with a ® 0 copy of your mitigation fee nexus study; or c. If you answered yes to #8, have you included a copy of your council approved policy; or d. If you answered yes to#8, have you provided OCTA with a ® 0 copy of your council resolution approving the mitigation fee program? Time Limits For Use of Net Revenues 9. Has your jurisdiction observed the time limits for the use of net 1=1 CI revenues over the last year per the requirements outlined in the ordinance? Supplanting of Developer Commitments 10. Has your jurisdiction insured they have not supplanted developer commitments for transportation projects and funding with Measure M funds? • Planning Strategies 11. Does your jurisdiction consider as part of its General Plan, land use EEI planning strategies that accommodate transit and non-motorized transportation? 12. Have you provided a letter identifying land use planning strategies that accommodate transit and non-motorized transportation consideration in the general plan? Traffic Forums 13. Did representatives of your jurisdiction participate in the regional traffic forum(s)? Congestion Management Program 14. Has your jurisdiction completed the required CMP checklist?(odd yr) Q Q Page 2 of 3 Submitted By: Name (Print) Signature Title Jurisdiction Phone Number Date Page 3 of 3 Attachment D Pavement Management Program Report Page 8 City of Seal Beach SEA[ `h o O . S 0: •If '• cod-.******t-tx- N: „I h f it Final Pavement Management Program Report May 2012 Nichols Consulting Engineers htd. ... . . .. Engineering & Environmental Servi ,. .. -.. . „,. 9550 Warner Avenue, #250-04 • Fountain Valley, CA 92708 • 714.848.8897 • Fax 714.848.2667 1 MINICHOLS CONSULTING ENGINEERS, CHTD. Engineering and Environmental Services 9550 Warner Avenue, #250-04 Fountain Valley,CA 92708 (714) 848-8897 A334.07.30 City of Seal Beach Pavement Management Program Final Report Submitted to: City of Seal Beach 211 8th Street Seal Beach, CA 90740 May 2012 City of Seal Beach Pavement Management Program Final Report Table of Contents Introduction 1 Purpose 1 City's Street Network 2 Existing Pavement Condition 3 Maintenance & Rehabilitation Strategies 5 Pay Now or Pay More Later 6 Expenditures for Pavement Maintenance 7 Funding Sources 8 Budget Needs 9 Scenario 1: Unconstrained Budget($11.8 million) 12 Scenario 2: Maintain PCI at 80 ($800,000/year) 12 Scenario 3: Existing Budget ($575,000/year) 14 Scenario 4: Do Nothing 15 Discussion 16 Conclusions 19 Appendix A: Street Inventory and PCI Report Appendix B: Maintenance and Rehabilitation History Appendix C: City's Projected Resurfacing Program Appendix D: City's Projected Slurry Seal Program Appendix E: Sections Selected For Treatment ($575,000/year, City's Existing Budget) Collaboration.Commitment.Confidence.sM City of Seal Beach Pavement Management Program Final Report List of Tables Table 1. Network Summary Statistics by Functional Class 1 Table 2. Percent of Pavement Area by Condition (2012) 3 Table 3. Pavement Condition by Functional Class (2012) 4 Table 4. Pavement Condition Category Breakdown for 2004-2012 5 Table 5. Average Network Condition for 2004-2012 5 Table 6. Pavement Budgets (2004 to 2018) 7 Table 7. 7-Year Preventative Program Cycle 8 Table 8. Summary of Results from Needs Analysis 9 Table 9. Summary of Results for Scenario 1 - Unconstrained Budget 12 Table 10. Summary of Results for Scenario 2 - Maintain PCI at 80 13 Table 11. Summary of Results for Scenario 3 - Existing Budget 14 Table 12. Summary of Results for Scenario 4- Do Nothing 15 List of Figures Figure 1. Current Pavement Condition by % of Network Area 4 Figure 2. Costs to Maintain Pavements Over Time 7 Figure 3. Cost Effectiveness of Treatments 10 Figure 4. PCI vs. Unfunded Backlog for Unconstrained Budget ($11.8 million) 12 Figure 5. PCI vs. Unfunded Backlog for Maintain PCI at 80 ($0.8 million/year) 13 Figure 6. PCI vs. Unfunded Backlog for Existing Budget ($575,000/year) 14 Figure 7. PCI vs. Unfunded Backlog for Zero Budget 15 Figure 8. Pavement Condition Index for Each Scenario 16 Figure 9. Effect of Different Scenarios on Unfunded Backlog 17 Figure 10. Percentage of Road Network Area of Each Condition Category for Different Budget Scenarios 18 igCollaboration.Commitment.Confidence.SM ii City of Seal Beach Pavement Management Program Final Report Introduction The City of Seal Beach has utilized a Pavement Management Program (PMP) to manage its street network since 2004. The first PMP software used was the StreetSaver® program, but in 2010, the City converted to the MicroPAVER software to be compliant with the requirements of the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). Both programs are similar and rate pavements on a 0-100 Pavement Condition Index(PCI) scale. Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd. (NCE) was selected by the City of Seal Beach to update the City's pavement management system in 2012. The entire network (approximately 41 centerline miles or 212 pavement sections) were surveyed. The surveys were completed in March 2012, and all survey data were entered into MicroPAVER database. During this round of inspections NCE was directed by City Staff to re-segment Elder Avenue from E/Fuchsia Street to W/Ironwood Avenue to better reflect the maintenance treatments that had been and were being done to the street. Additionally, NCE was asked to rename the street segments that involved Beverly Manor Drive to North Gate Road. Also, Ironwood Avenue from S Candleberry to N Heather Street was split into two sections (section ID: 050-S Candleberry Avenue to N Elder Avenue/section ID:100-S Elder Avenue to N Heather Street). Finally, Anderson Street was added into MicroPAVER database. These bring the total sections for the City to 212. The table below summarizes the lengths and area of the pavement network by functional class: Table 1. Network Summa Statistics b Functional Class Functional Class Sections Centerline Miles Lane Miles Area (sf) Arterial 18 8.9 38.5 3,567,019 Collector 38 8.5 15.9 1,731,708 Residential 156 23.8 46.4 4,145,363 Totals 212 41.2 100.8 9,444,090 As part of this project, a pavement needs analysis was performed on the pavement network. Four budgetary scenarios were also analyzed. Purpose The purpose of this report is to assist policy makers in utilizing the results of the PMP. Specifically, this report links the PMP recommended repair program costs to the City of Seal Beach's current and projected budgets and identifies various maintenance and rehabilitation strategies. The analysis assesses the adequacy of current and projected revenues to meet the maintenance needs recommended by the PMP program. It also maximizes the return from pavement funding by: (1) Implementing a multi-year road rehabilitation and maintenance program; (2) Developing a preventative maintenance program; and (3) Prioritizing and selecting the most cost effective repairs. This study determines the overall condition of the pavement network and highlights options for improving the current network-level PCI. These options are developed by conducting "what-if" analyses. By varying the budget amounts available for pavement maintenance and repair, one can see how different funding strategies can impact the City's streets over the next seven years. Collaboration.Commitment.Confidence.sM City of Seal Beach Pavement Management Program Final Report City's Street Network The City of Seal Beach was incorporated in 1915 and has been in operation under its own charter since 1964. It covers an area of 11.6 square miles in the western corner of Orange County. The City's total population in 2010 was 24,168. Originally called Bay City, Seal Beach was developed in the early 1900's as a resort destination for residents of the Los Angeles area. Its early growth was accelerated by the construction of the Pacific Electric Railway Trolley, which reached the City in 1906. In 1926, oil was discovered in the City and the oil boom that followed resulted in the development of Seal Beach into the mainly residential community it is today. The City is divided into several distinct communities, each of which is described in detail in the following paragraphs. Old Town comprises the area south of Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) and Marina Drive, between 1st Street and Seal Beach Boulevard, and was developed in the 1920's. It is the oldest area within the City's corporate limits. High density residential and commercial land uses are prevalent in this area. Large single-family residential lots located directly on the beach are found in the Gold Coast District. The City's mile long beach in Old Town is used for surfing and swimming. The Seal Beach Pier, located at the end of Main Street, provides fishing facilities and a restaurant. Much of Old Town dates back to the 1920's. The original street network was laid out in a grid formation and constructed of concrete. Over the years, many of these streets have been overlaid with asphalt. Bridgeport is the area located west of PCH, north of Marina Drive and southwesterly of San Gabriel River. It was primarily developed in the 1960's and consists of medium and high density residential land uses. Marina Hill was developed in the 1950's and consists of single-family homes. This area is located north of PCH and west of Seal Beach Boulevard, adjacent to the southerly edge of the Hellman Ranch property. It is further divided into Marina Hill-North and Marina Hill-South with Bolsa Avenue forming the boundary. Surfside, a colony which was incorporated in the 1930's, consists of single-family homes located on the south portion of Anaheim Bay. Although a gated community, pedestrian and bicycle access to the beach is available. Leisure World covers the portion of the City between Westminster Boulevard and the San Diego Freeway westerly of Seal Beach Boulevard. It was built in 1961. It is a gated retirement community of 600 acres. Leisure World provides a secure, serene environment for seniors 55 and older. Medical, religious, commercial and recreational facilities are all provided within the compound limits. College Park East is a single-family residential area developed in the late 1960's. It is located between the San Diego Freeway and Lampson Avenue, west of the Bolsa Chica Channel in the northeast section of the City. Streets within this community were constructed in the late sixties. The original thickness of the asphalt concrete was only 2 inches and too thin to accommodate the traffic loads. College Park West is a small neighborhood bordering Long Beach. It is located in North West of the City. Its streets are named after colleges. Private Streets The following neighborhoods have private streets and are maintained by an association and no City funds go toward their maintenance. • Leisure World • Centex Homes • Riverbeach Condominiums • Surfside • Heron Pointe Collaboration.Commitment.Confidence.sM 2 City of Seal Beach Pavement Management Program Final Report Existing Pavement Condition As previously noted, the City of Seal Beach is responsible for the repair and maintenance of approximately 41 centerline miles of streets. The surface area of the network is approximately 9.4 million square feet or 1 million square yards. The replacement value of the City's streets is approximately$109.3 million. (This is the cost to replace the pavement and does not include sidewalk, ramps, curb&gutter etc.) The Pavement Condition Index (PCI) is a measurement of pavement grade or condition and ranges from 0 to 100. A newly constructed road would have a PCI of 100, while very poor streets would have a PCI of 40 or less. Table 2 provides pavement condition breakdowns by PCI ranges or condition category and summarizes the condition of the network in the City of Seal Beach. A large portion of the City's streets are in"Good"or "Very Good" condition category, as shown in Figure 1. Table 3 provides the pavement condition by Functional Class. Table 2. Percent of Pavement Area b Condition 2012 %of Pavement Rating PCI Range Pavement Description of Pavement Condition Area The pavement is new or almost new and will not require significant 86 100 69% improvement for some time, but may require localized minor repairs. The pavement is structurally sound and has very little or no rou s hness. The pavement is in good shape but has some surface defects 75-85 11% indicating the need for routine maintenance. The pavement is .enerall structural) sound and has onl minor roue hness. The pavement has a fair number of defects such as cracking, Fair 60-74 5% material loss, depressions, etc. indicating the need for maintenance or repair.The pavement is beginning to become structurally deficient and ma have noticeable rou.hness. The pavement has significant defects such as major cracking, Poor 41-59 11% significant surface distortions and material loss indicating a need for rehabilitation (i.e. structural improvement). The pavement is structurall deficient and has noticeable rou.hness. The pavement has major defects indicating the need for major 0-40 4% rehabilitation or reconstruction. The pavement is structurally inadequate. Collaboration.Commitment.Confidence.SM 3 City of Seal Beach Pavement Management Program Final Report Figure 1. Current Pavement Condition by%of Network Area ■ Very Poor 4% r • Fair Po 11o% S% ■Good/Very Good •Fair Poor •Very Poor Table 3. Pavement Condition b Functional Class 2012 Functional Class Average PCI (weighted by area) Arterial 82 Collector 83 Residential 89 All 85 The City of Seal Beach's current weighted average PCI for roadways is 85 or in the "Good" condition category. The weighted average is determined as follows: E(PCIixA,) PCI = i=' N AI i=1 Where PC/a area weighted average PCI of pavement network PCIF PCI of pavement section number i A;=area of section number i N=total number of section in City's network This average PCI of 85 is a 1-point increase from the last update in 2010 (This needs to reflect the increase from 2010) and is largely due to the significant amount of maintenance activities that have occurred in the past three years. The street inventory and PCI report is included in Appendix A. A summary of the maintenance and rehabilitation history is included in Appendix B. Table 4 summarizes the condition of the road network from 2004-2012. The percentages of pavements in good and very good condition have significantly increased since 2008. Conversely, the percentage of pavements in poor to very poor condition has gradually decreased over time. Collaboration.Commitment.Confidence.SM 4 City of Seal Beach Pavement Management Program Final Report Table 4. Pavement Condition Cat=!• Breakdown for 2004-2012 Percent of Network Area Condition Category PCI Range 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 86-100 46% 54% 41% 69% 69% 75-85 13% 7% 20% 6% 11% Fair 60-74 11% 16% 17% 8% 5% Poor 41-59 12% 14% 12% 6% 11% 0-40 18% 9% 10% 11% 4% Table 5 below shows the network average PCI in the past 7 years. As can be seen, the weighted average condition of the pavement network has improved since 2006, with the highest increase in the last two years. Again,this is attributable to the significant repairs that have occurred in this period. Table 5. Avera.e Network Condition for 2004-2012 Year 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 Average Network PCI 79 74 76 84 85 The improvement in the pavement condition continues to keep the City eligible for a 10% reduction in local matching fund requirements for the renewed Measure M2 competitive grant. This is a new incentive approved as part of the Renewed Measure M2; specifically, the Measure M2 Regional Capacity Program - which will provide Measure M2 grant funding for arterial, intersection, and freeway/arterial improvements- includes an incentive for successful implementation of pavement management programs. The incentive is a 10% reduction in local matching fund requirements, if either of the following conditions apply i.e. a. Show measurable improvement of paved road conditions during the previous reporting period defined as an overall weighted (by area) average system improvement of one PCI point with no reduction in the overall weighted (by area) average PCI in the Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) or local street categories; or b. Have road pavement conditions during the previous reporting period within the highest 20% of the scale for road pavement conditions in conformance with OCTA Ordinance No. 3, defined as a PCI of 75 or higher. The City's PCI rating continues to comply with the Measure M2 subtext"b" mentioned above. Since 2008, the City has maintained a PCI greater than the OCTA required condition of 75. Even though the analysis for this update shows the potential decrease in the overall PCI from 85 to 79, the City will still remain eligible for the 10% reduction in local matching fund requirement. No two inspectors will arrive at the exact same PCI on a given street segment. There is a level of subjectivity to all survey data collection. As inspection data is gathered by different inspectors there can be small variances to what they see, measure and record. The accepted industry standard deviation for inspected Pavement Condition Index(PCI) numbers is± 10 points. Maintenance & Rehabilitation Strategies A variety of Maintenance and Rehabilitation (M&R) strategies may be applied to maintain pavements. They include slurry seals, asphalt concrete overlays and reconstruction, all of which extend the pavement life. The following paragraphs briefly describe the various strategies that are utilized in the City. Collaboration.Commitment.Confidence.SM 5 City of Seal Beach Pavement Management Program Final Report Slurry Seals are a mixture of slow setting asphalt emulsion, fine aggregate (sand-like), and water. This mixture is spread over the entire pavement surface and is about 3/8" thick. In addition to protecting the asphalt concrete surface and subgrade from water damage, the slurry seal provides a new wearing surface. This type of treatment is analogous to oil changes for a car i.e. necessary maintenance that increases the life of a car (or, in this case, increases the life of the pavement so they do not prematurely require more costly repairs). Asphalt Concrete (AC) Overlays typically involves placing 1.5 to 4 inches of asphalt concrete over the existing surface. Overlays are placed when the pavement has deteriorated to a point that a seal coat will not bring the pavement back to an acceptable level of service, usually because of structural inadequacy. This may be caused by: • Age • Climate • Air&water penetrating the pavement through cracks • Aggregate base or subgrade soil failures • Heavier traffic loads than anticipated in the original design Reconstruction involves removing the existing layers of asphalt concrete and base and reconstructing an entirely new pavement section. Maintenance Intervals A seal coat is applied at regular intervals, usually 5 to 7 years. After several intervals of seal coats, an overlay is typically required to address structural issues. The intervals between overlays and reconstruction depend upon the road classification as well as the original design life. Major roads have higher traffic volumes, speeds, and loads, which increases pavement wear and demand a higher level of service for safety reasons. Every street eventually fails or reaches a point where it is cheaper to reconstruct than to repair. Pay Now or Pay More Later The PMP is designed to achieve an optimal network PCI somewhere between the low to mid 80's, which brings the network into a "good" condition category. In other words, the system will recommend priority list of maintenance treatments in an attempt to bring all the streets in the City of Seal Beach to a good condition,with the majority of the roads falling in the mid 80's. The cost to repair and maintain a pavement depends on its current PCI. In the "good" category, preventive maintenance treatments such as slurry seals have minimal costs. They are applied before pavement deterioration has become severe and usually cost approximately$0.30/sq. ft. About 80% of the City's streets would benefit from these relatively inexpensive, life-extending treatments. As noted in Table 4, approximately 5% of the City's streets fall into the "fair" condition category. Pavements in this range show some form of distress or wear that require more than a life-extending treatment. The pavements typically require a thin overlay,with costs in the range of$2.08/sq. ft. The remaining 15% of the City of Seal Beach's streets fall below a PCI of 60. The City's policies indicate that a thick overlay or reconstruction is the most appropriate treatment. The costs for these treatments range from $4.40 to$9.26/sq. ft. Figure 2 demonstrates that pavement maintenance follows the old colloquial saying of "pay me now, or pay me more later." History has shown that it costs less to maintain roads in good condition than to repair roads that have failed. By allowing pavements to deteriorate, roads that once cost only $0.30/sq. ft. to slurry seal may soon cost$2.08 to $4.40/sq. ft. to overlay and upwards of$9.26/sq. ft. to reconstruct. Collaboration.Commitment.Confidence.SM 6 City of Seal Beach Pavement Management Program Final Report Pavement Condition Very Good g otbing Good S y Seal 2"AC Over Fair II Poor d"AC Overlay and Digouts In■ Very Poor 59.26/st Pavement Life Figure 2. Costs to Maintain Pavements Over Time One of the key elements of a pavement management repair strategy is to keep roads in the "good" and "fair"categories from deteriorating. This is particularly true for roads in the"fair"range, due to the fact that they are at the point where pavement deterioration accelerates if left untreated. Expenditures for Pavement Maintenance It is estimated that the City of Seal Beach will have funds of$575,000/year for pavement expenditures for the next seven years. Table 6 summarizes the past and future estimated budget amounts. Three continuing funding programs have been allocated to meet the needs of preventative maintenance and rehabilitation. • Arterial Rehabilitation Program • Local Street Rehabilitation Program • Preventative Program (Slurry Seal) Table 6. Pavement Bud!ets 2004 to 2018 Year 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012-2018 Arterial Rehabilitation 0.3 1.13 0.35 0.50 0.20 ($Million)" Preventative Program 0.08 0.1 0.15 0.15 0.10 ($Million) Local Street Rehabilitation 1.41 1.86 0.4 5.05 0.28 ($Million) Arterial rehabilitation has been funded with Measure M2 grants which augment City funds. illCollaboration.Commitment.Confidence.sM 7 City of Seal Beach Pavement Management Program Final Report Note that the City currently has $575,000 a year budgeted for the seven-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP). This includes$100,000 for slurry seals, $200,000 for arterial rehabilitation, and $275,000 for local rehabilitation. Historically, Seal Beach has been successful at obtaining additional funds and receiving Measure M competitive grants. Therefore, this report assumes that, on average, $575,000 a year will be spent on paving. The City has established a seven year cycle to address the needs of the Preventative Program. Each year the City will be focusing maintenance efforts in a different area of the City. There are many advantages in this strategy. A more cost-effective mobilization from a chosen contractor is the largest monetary benefit. Table 7 shown below reflects the various areas of the City along with the year in which that area is scheduled for treatments. This report finds the City ready to perform maintenance work for year 3 of this cycle. Table 7. 7-Year Preventative Pr..ram cle Year Zone 1 Hill/Cove 2 Old Town 3 CPE Phase I 4 CPE Phase II 5 CPE Phase III 6 CPE Phase IV 7 CPW/Bridgeport Funding Sources The following is a discussion of future revenues available to the City for street maintenance. Measure M2 Turnback Measure M2 is the Y2-cent local retail sales tax approved by voters in November 1990 and renewed in 2006 until 2040. The program will provide$450 million to local agencies for street maintenance and local traffic improvements. These funds are used alone or in conjunction with other sources to address transportation improvements such as rehabilitation, signals, street widening, etc. The City's share is approximately$400,000 per year and will be used to fund resurfacing projects. Measure M2 Competitive Grants In addition to the Turnback funds, the Comprehensive Transportation Program (CTP) also includes a competitive grant process for projects such as capacity program, signal synchronization and transit. The Arterial Highway Rehabilitation Program (AHRP) will fund projects such as overlays and reconstruction. Eligible expenditures include bike lanes, bus turnouts/pads, and replacement of parking lanes, curbs, gutters, catch basins, curb ramps and some sidewalks. City streets that are included in the Master Plan of Arterial Highway(MPAH) system are eligible. Local Revenues/General Funds Local revenues that may be used for street rehabilitation include retail sales tax, redevelopment fees, assessment districts and property taxes. These revenue sources are also used for vital city activities such as police, fire and administrative services. In 2010, the City budgeted and expended more than $1.2 million on local paving projects. Gas Tax California, like the rest of the nation, built its interstate system primarily with federal and state funds derived from per gallon gasoline and diesel fuel excise taxes, commonly called the gas tax. Being a fixed amount, the excise tax needs periodic increases to maintain buying power and to keep up with the effects Collaboration.Commitment.Confidence.sM 8 City of Seal Beach Pavement Management Program Final Report of inflation, a politically difficult sell. By the 1980's it became apparent that the gas tax was not keeping up with inflation and that other revenue would be needed to continue to fund transportation improvements. Budget Needs Based on the principle that it costs less to maintain roads in good condition than bad, the PMP strives to develop a maintenance strategy that will first improve the overall condition of the arterials to an optimal PCI somewhere between the mid and upper 80's, and then maintain it at that level. The average PCI for the City's streets is 85, which is in the "Good" condition category, but there is still a portion of the streets that exhibit load-related distresses. In addition, there is currently a significant unfunded backlog of several million dollars. If these issues are not addressed, the quality of the arterials will inevitably decline. In order to correct these deficiencies, a cost-effective funding and maintenance and rehabilitation strategy must be implemented. The first step in developing a cost-effective maintenance and rehabilitation strategy is to determine the maintenance "needs" of the City of Seal Beach's streets. Using the budget needs module, maintenance needs over the next seven years were estimated at $11.8 million. These costs significantly exceed the City's current funding levels of$4.03 million. If the City of Seal Beach rehabilitated every street within the City, the average PCI will be 93 in 2018. If, however, no maintenance is applied over the next seven years, already distressed roads will continue to deteriorate, and the PCI will drop to 73 by 2018. The results of the budget needs analysis are shown in Table 8 below. Of the$11.8 million in maintenance needs shown, approximately $1.1 million (9 percent) is earmarked for preventative maintenance, while $10.7 million (91 percent) is allocated for more costly rehabilitation and reconstruction treatments. Table 8. Summa of Results from Needs Anal sis Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 PCI with Treatment 98 97 95 95 93 95 93 PCI without Treatment 85 83 81 79 77 75 73 Budget Needs($million) 6.9 0.5 0.2 1.0 0.2 2.2 0.8 Preventive Maintenance 12% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Rehabilitation 88% - - - - - - It is important to note that these budgetary numbers have been compiled using current projects as a basis for construction costs. An inflation factor of 5% was used for this analysis. The cost-effectiveness of preventative maintenance treatments is demonstrated in Figure 3 which compares the current condition of the network and the maintenance needs estimated. The portion of the network in good and very good condition (80% of the City's streets) requires only $1.0 million over the next seven years, whereas the 20% in the "fair" to "very poor" condition needs approximately $10.8 million. Collaboration.Commitment.Confidence.SM 9 City of Seal Beach Pavement Management Program Final Report Figure 3. Cost Effectiveness of Treatments • Very Poor 4% Poor • Fair P 11% 5/ •Good/Very Good •Fair Poor •Very Poor Network Area by Condition • Good/Very Good,$1.0M )0, • Fair,$1.0M •Good/Very Good •Fair Poor •Very Poor Poor,$4.3M igCollaboration.Commitment.Confidence.SM 10 City of Seal Beach Pavement Management Program Final Report Budget Scenarios Having determined the maintenance needs of the City's street, the next step is to conduct what-if analysis. The program projects the consequences of different scenarios on PCI and unfunded backlog. By examining the effects on these indicators, the advantages and disadvantages of different funding levels and maintenance strategies become clear. The following scenarios were analyzed for this report: Scenario 1: Unconstrained Budget($11.8 million) -the total amount for the next seven years and the budget for each year are the same as identified in the budget needs analysis, i.e. $11.8 million. This scenario will spend $6.9 million in 2012 to rehabilitate the City's entire pavement. It will improve the condition of the streets to a PCI of 93 by 2018 and eliminate the unfunded backlog. Scenario 2:Maintain PC/at 80($800,000/year)- The budget required to maintain the City's streets at a PCI of 80 would be $800,000/year. In the meantime, the unfunded backlog will grow from $5.3 million to $7.9 million by 2018. Scenario 3:Existing Budget($575,000/year)- This scenario illustrates the impacts of the City's current budget on the network. The PCI of the network will deteriorate to 79, and the unfunded backlog will grow from $5.3 million to$9.3 million by 2018. Scenario 4 Do Nothing-This Scenario illustrates that a zero budget will increase the unfunded backlog to $26.9 million after seven years and the pavement condition will deteriorate from a PCI of 85 to 73 by 2018. Note that the unfunded backlog consists of pavement maintenance that is needed, but which cannot be accomplished due to lack of funding. Shrinking budgets have forced many California cities and counties to defer much-needed road maintenance. By deferring maintenance, not only does the frequency of citizens'complaints about the condition of the network increase, but the cost to repair these roads rises as well. Collaboration.Commitment.Confidence.SM I I City of Seal Beach Pavement Management Program Final Report Scenario 1: Unconstrained Budget ($11.8 million) To eliminate the unfunded backlog will require$11.8 million for the next seven years. The average PCI will increase to 93 from its current level of 85 by 2018. Table 9. Summa of Results for Scenario 1-Unconstrained Bud!.t Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total Budget($ million) 6.9 0.5 0.2 1.0 0.2 2.2 0.8 11.8 Rehabilitation ($million) 6.79 0.40 0.13 0.85 0.00 2.00 0.52 10.69 Preventive Maintenance($million) 0.08 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.15 0.25 0.24 1.07 Unfunded Backlog ($million) - - - - - - - PCI 98 97 95 95 93 94 93 $20 _.. 98_..... 97 95 95 93 94 93 100 - 90 - 80 � U - 70 x m - 60 E. $10 - - 50 - 40 r - 30 d o m - 20 d - 10 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 c $0 - I I I I I - 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Year ■Unfunded Backlog ■riI■Pavement Condition Index Figure 4.PCI vs.Unfunded Backlog for Unconstrained Budget($11.8 million) Collaboration.Commitment.Confidence.sM 12 City of Seal Beach Pavement Management Program Final Report Scenario 2: Maintain PCI at 80 ($800,000/year) The budget required for maintaining the City's network at an average PCI of 80 will be $800,000/year. In the meantime, the unfunded backlog will increase from $5.3 million to$7.9 million by 2018 Table 10. Summa of Results for Scenario 2-Maintain PCI at 80 Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total Budget($ million) 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 5.6 Rehabilitation ($ million) 0.71 0.69 0.62 0.55 0.42 0.20 0.00 3.19 Preventive Maintenance ($million) 0.08 0.11 0.18 0.24 0.36 0.57 0.80 2.34 Unfunded Backlog ($ million) 5.3 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.7 6.3 7.9 PCI 87 86 86 85 83 81 80 $30 100 80 - 90 87 86 86 85 - 80 Q. 83 81 - 70 d c $20 c - 60 c F. mi - 50 m o - 40 �. c $10 - $7.9 d $5.3 $5.3 $5.4 $5.5 $5.7 $6.3 - 30 d iIII , IIIT 1 I 0 Y 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 U m Year 13 co c [ ■Unfunded Backlog i■Rir■Pavement Condition Index w c m Figure 5. PCI vs.Unfunded Backlog for Maintain PCI at 80($0.8 million/year) NCollaboration.Commitment.Confidence.SM 13 City of Seal Beach Pavement Management Program Final Report Scenario 3: Existing Budget ($575,000/year) In this scenario, the average PCI will deteriorate to approximately 79 from its current level of 85. Pavements in this category are still in "Good" condition. Not only does the pavement condition deteriorate, but the unfunded backlog grows from $5.9 million to$9.3 million by 2018. What this implies is that the City is"falling behind"with the increased number of streets that are deteriorating. Table 11. Summa of Results for Scenario 3-Existin. Bud.et Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total Budget 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 4.03 ($million) Rehabilitation ($thousand) 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 3.30 Preventive Maintenance ($million) 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.70 Unfunded Backlog 5.9 6.2 6.5 6.9 7.3 8.0 9.3 ($million) PCI 87 86 84 83 82 81 79 $30 - 100 87 86 84 83 82 90 c 81 79 .2 - 80 4 U_ 4 a. 70 $20 - v - 60 8 E. 50 g 0 U 40 E o $10 - $9.3 m Sc $8.0 - 30 a m $5.9 $6.2 $6.5 $6.9 $7.3 13 20 c - 10 $0 . i I 1 I ■ l , 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Year Unfunded Backlog II.•■Pavement Condition Index Figure 6. PCI vs.Unfunded Backlog for Existing Budget($575,000/year) igCollaboration.Commitment.Confidence.SM 14 City of Seal Beach Pavement Management Program Final Report Scenario 4: Do Nothing In this scenario, the average PCI will deteriorate to approximately 73 from its current level of 85. Pavements in this category are in "Fair" condition. Not only does the pavement condition deteriorate, but the unfunded backlog grows from $12.1 million to$26.9 million by 2018. Table 12. Summa of Results for Scenario 4-Do Nothing Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total Budget($ million) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Rehabilitation ($ K) 0.0 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Preventive Maintenance($million) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Unfunded Backlog ($million) 12.1 13.7 15.6 17.6 19.8 22.6 26.9 PCI 85 83 81 79 77 75 73 $50 100 85 83 - 90 c $40 - 81 79 77 73 80 _ 4 a. 75 a 70 m w v E $30 - 60 0 $26.9 - v $22.6 3 50 0 U• $20 $15.6 $17.6 $19.8 `. 40 E o m s $12.1 $13.7 30 a A m o $10 j 20 o w - 10 f I 'p $0 I I I I - 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Year Unfunded Backlog Pavement Condition Index Figure 7. PCI vs.Unfunded Backlog for Zero Budget iiCollaboration.Commitment.Confidence.SM 15 City of Seal Beach Pavement Management Program Final Report Discussion Figure 8 illustrates the change in PCI over time for the different budget scenarios. Note that in the unconstrained funding scenario, the PCI will reach 93 after seven years. This is due to the cyclical nature of preventative maintenance treatments that are applied once every 5 to 7 years. By comparison, the existing budget will result in a drop of the PCI to 79 by 2018. 100 95 - 98 97 95 95 94 93 93 90 87 86 86 85 85 - 86 -3 84 85 84 81 83 83 a 80 - 82 80 0. 81 81 79 79 75 77 75 73 70 - 65 - 60 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Year Ending —�—Unconstrained Budget t Maintain PCI at 80 +Existing Budget t Do Nothing Figure 8. Pavement Condition Index for Each Scenario On the following page, Figure 9 illustrates the change in unfunded backlog over time for the different budget scenarios. Note that the unconstrained budget has no unfunded backlog. Collaboration.Commitment.Confidence.SM 16 City of Seal Beach Pavement Management Program Final Report $9.3 $10.0 0. .5.9 $6.2 $6.5 $6.9 $7.3 $8.0 $ m $5 ' $5 $5. $6 o c E w v� c �, $- 2012 2013 2014 2015 ar 2016 2017 2018 •Unconstrained Budget •Maintain PCI at 80 •Existing Budget Figure 10 (below) illustrates the change in the percentage of the road area with each condition category for the different budget scenarios. With Scenario 3 (Existing Budget), the "Very Poor" category increases to 12% from the current 4%. But with $800,000/year (Maintain PCI at 80), the "Good" and "Very Good" category increase to 87%from the current 80%. • Very Poor 4,'v Poor • Fair 119b 5% •GoodlVcry Good •Fair Poor ■Very Poor Current Conditions-2012 Collaboration.Commitment.Confidence.sM 17 City of Seal Beach Pavement Management Program Final Report Poor 1% • Fair 0% •Good/Very Good •Fair Poor •Very Poor Scenario 3: Existing Budget-2018 Poor 1% • Fair\ •Good/Very Good •Fair Poor •Very Poor Scenario 2:Maintain PCI at 80-2018 Figure 10. Percentage of Road Network Area of Each Condition Category for Different Budget Scenarios kgCollaboration.Commitment.Confidence.SM 18 City of Seal Beach Pavement Management Program Final Report Conclusions The City of Seal Beach has a substantial investment in their street network as evidenced by the replacement cost of approximately $109.2 million. The network average PCI of the City is 85. Overall, 80% of the City's street network is in the "Good" and "Very Good" condition category. In the meantime, about 15% of the streets are in "Poor" or "Very Poor" condition category. This requires a significant amount of money to bring them into the "Good" condition category. If sufficient funding is unavailable for street maintenance, the average PCI of the network is expected to decrease and the unfunded backlog will increase. The higher backlog will result in increased future costs as more capital intensive treatments (such as reconstruction) will be necessary as streets are deferred where less expensive treatments (such as surface seals or overlays)are currently feasible. Our analysis indicates that the City needs to spend $11.8 million in pavement maintenance and rehabilitation in the next seven years, in order to eliminate the unfunded backlog. By doing so, many streets then can be maintained in good condition with on-going preventive maintenance. This will eventually save money by avoiding reaching the level of major rehabilitation (such as reconstruction) until the end of the pavement's service life. Pavement Budget The City's current budget for pavement maintenance and rehabilitation is $4.03 million for next seven years. At this budget level, the network average PCI is expected to decrease from the current level of 85, which is in "Good" condition category, to 79. In addition, 13% of the network will fall in the "Poor" and "Very Poor"category. As a minimum, we suggest that the City of Seal Beach consider increasing pavement expenditures to achieve the following objectives: • To preserve and improve pavements in the"Good"category • Reduce the percentage of pavements in the"Poor"and"Very Poor"categories • Maintain the average PCI at 80 Note too that the new Measure M2 guidelines recently adopted by OCTA allow for a 10% reduction in matching funds if one of the following conditions are met: a. Shows measurable improvement of paved road conditions during the previous reporting period defined as an overall weighted (by area) average system improvement of one Pavement Condition Index(PCI)point with no reduction in the overall weighted(by area)average PCI in the Master Plan of Arterial Highways(MPAH)or local street categories; -or- b. Have road pavement conditions during the previous reporting period within the highest 20%of the scale for road pavement conditions in conformance with OCTA Ordinance No. 3, defined as a PCI of 75 or higher. The City's PCI rating continues to comply with the Measure M2 subtext"b" mentioned above. Since 2008 the City has maintained a PCI greater than the OCTA required condition of 75. Even though the analysis for this update shows the potential decrease in the overall PCI from 85 to 79, the City will still remain eligible for the 10% reduction in local matching fund requirement. In terms of priorities,the City should: a. Fully fund all preventive maintenance activities. b. "Package"surface seal projects to produce cost effective bids. c. Apply sufficient stop gap funds to streets that are deferred. Examples of other sources of funding include: • Assessment districts • Local Transportation Bond Collaboration.Commitment.Confidence.SM 19 City of Seal Beach Pavement Management Program Final Report • Developers'fees • Parking fees • Truck impact fees • Federal&State Grants Pavement Maintenance Strategies The City's pavement maintenance strategies include slurry seals, overlays and reconstruction. It is tempting to invest in the worst streets and only fund overlay or reconstruction projects. However, it is equally important to preserve good pavements. Crack sealing, one of the least expensive treatments, can keep moisture out of pavements and prevent the underlying aggregate base from premature failures. Surface seals are also cost-effective for pavements currently in good condition. Therefore, we recommend that the City continues its preventive maintenance program to preserve the good pavements. In addition, other strategies such as cold-in-place recycling or full depth reclamation should be considered when considering rehabilitation treatments. These may save the city significant amounts over more conventional treatments. Maintenance and Rehabilitation Decision Trees The maintenance and rehabilitation decision trees and the associated unit costs should be reviewed and updated annually to reflect new construction techniques/repairs and changing costs so the budget analysis results can be reliable and accurate. Pavement Management Program Update OCTA requires cities submitting pavement rehabilitation projects for Measure M2 funding to utilize a PMP. This includes updating the condition for all MPAH streets every two years, and non-MPAH streets every six years. We recommend that the City of Seal Beach comply with the above requirements so as not to jeopardize any federal, state or local transportation funds. This is particularly critical since significant funding increases are needed to maintain the pavement network in"good"condition. Collaboration.Commitment.Confidence.SM 20 City of Seal Beach Pavement Management Program Final Report APPENDIX A Street Inventory and PCI Report Collaboration.Commitment.Confidence.sM City of Seal Beach Street Inventory and PCI Report Street Name Section From To Lanes Length Width Area(ft2) FC ST PCI Date PCI ID (ft) (ft) 10TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH 2 660 40 26,400 © AC 1/9/2012 99 10TH 200 S/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC 2 950 40 38,000 © AC 1/9/2012 98 10TH 300 S/SEAL N/OCEAN 2 210 25 5,250 © AC 1/9/2012 63 11TH 400 S/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC 2 900 40 36,000 © AC 1/9/2012 99 12TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH 2 860 37 31,820 Ei AC 1/9/2012 99 12TH 200 S/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC 2 810 40 32,400 © PCC 1/8/2012 100 12TH 300 S/SEAL N/OCEAN 2 210 24 5,040 © AC 1/9/2012 83 13TH 200 S/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC 2 710 40 28,400 © AC 1/8/2012 99 13TH 300 S/SEAL N/OCEAN 2 210 25 5,250 © AC 1/9/2012 87 14TH 100 S/ELECTRIC ClaIIIIIIIM 2 1,010 21 21,210 © AC 1/9/2012 38 14TH 200 S/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC 2 660 40 26,400 © AC 1/8/2012 100 14TH 300 S/SEAL N/OCEAN 2 210 25 5,250 © AC 1/9/2012 63 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH 1 1,110 21 23,310 ®® 1/9/2012 24 100 5/ELECTRIC f'.ja __ °'4 liMimMli 17TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH 1 1,260 21 26,460 © AC 1/9/2012 60 1ST 100 S/OCEAN N/MARINA 2 887 40 35,480 © AC 1/8/2012 100 t . _ 1131111 __ � 1�� ' S N€'PCH - 1ST 200E S/MARINA N/PCH 2 2,172 23 49,956 © AC 1/10/2012 68 1ST 200W S/PCH N/MARINA 2 2,172 22 47,784 © AC 1/10/2012 72 2ND 100 S/OCEAN N/CENTRAL 2 860 40 34,400 © AC 1/10/2012 99 3RD ST 100 S/OCEAN N/CENTRAL 2 760 40 30,400 © AC 1/10/2012 99 4TH ST 100 S/OCEAN N/MARINA 2 1,200 40 48,000 © AC 1/10/2012 99 5TH 100 S/MARINA N/PCH 4 660 60 39,600 El AC 1/10/2012 95 5TH 200 S/OCEAN N/MARINA 2 1,400 40 56,000 in AC 1/10/2012 99 6TH 100 S/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC 2 1,300 40 52,000 © AC 1/10/2012 100 7TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/MARINA 2 210 40 8,400 © AC 1/10/2012 99 7TH 200 S/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC 2 1,280 40 51,200 11 AC 1/10/2012 100 8TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH 2 460 40 18,400 © AC 1/10/2012 100 8TH 200 S/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC 2 1,150 40 46,000 © AC 1/10/2012 100 Nichols Consulting Engineers,Chtd. Page 1 of 7 City of Seal Beach Street Inventory and PCI Report Street Name Section From To Lanes Length Width Area(ft2) FC ST PCI Date PCI ID (ft) (ft) ADOLFO LOPEZ 100 W/END 425 E/SEAL BEACH 2 800 60 48,000 © AC 1/11/2012 84 ADOLFO LOPEZ 200 W/SEAL BEACH 425 W/SEAL BEAC 2 425 60 25,500 ©m 1/11/2012 68 AGUA 100 S/MARLIN N/END 2 220 27 5,940 © AC 1/8/2012 98 ALMOND 100 E/OLEANDER W/ASTER 2 4,390 36 158,040 Q AC 1/3/2012 95 ALMOND 200 E/VIOLET ROSE CIR 2 765 37 28,305 0 AC 1/3/2012 100 ALMOND 300 ROSE CIR W/OLEANDER 2 705 37 26,085 0 AC 1/3/2012 99 ANDERSON 100 W/S PCH END CDS 2 255 38 9,690 © AC 4/9/2012 57 ASTER 100 5/ALMOND N/BIRCHWOOD 2 1,239 37 45,843 © AC 1/5/2012 86 ASTER 200 N/BIRCHWOOD N/CANDLEBERRY 2 206 37 7,622 © AC 1/5/2012 99 AVALON 100 S/CATALINA N/END 2 430 33 14,190 © AC 1/12/2012 98 BALBOA 100 S/BOLSA N/CATALINA 2 1,060 37 39,220 ® AC 1/11/2012 31 BANYAN 100 E/CAMELIA W/COLUMBINE 2 600 33 19,800 © AC 1/3/2012 97 BASSWOOD 100 E/ASTER W/LAMPSON 2 410 36 14,760 Q AC 1/5/2012 100 BAYOU 100 E/BAYSIDE W/HARBOR 2 630 33 20,790 © AC 1/12/2012 100 BAYSIDE 100 S/BOLSA N/CRESTVIEW 2 1,410 33 46,530 © AC 1/12/2012 98 BEACHCOMBER 100 S/BOLSA N/SEA BREEZE 2 1,160 33 38,280 © AC 1/12/2012 100 BERYL COVE 100 S/EMERALD COVE N/MARLIN 2 360 33 11,880 © AC 1/8/2012 98 BIRCHWOOD 100 E/OLEANDER W/ASTER 2 3,660 33 120,780 © AC 1/3/2012 98 BLUE BELL 100 S/ALMOND N/BIRCHWOOD 2 710 33 23,430 © AC 1/3/2012 79 CAMELIA 100 S/ALMOND N/BANYAN 2 590 33 19,470 © AC 1/3/2012 90 CANDLEBERRY 100 E/FUCHSIA W/LAMPSON 2 2,210 36 79,560 © AC 1/5/2012 100 CANDLEBERRY 200 E/MARIGOLD W/FUCHSIA 2 1,560 37 57,720 © AC 1/5/2012 100 CANDLEBERRY 300 E/WISTERIA W/OLEANDER 2 1,660 33 54,780 © AC 1/4/2012 97 CARAVEL 100 5/MARINA N/CORSAIR 2 360 37 13,320 © AC 1/10/2012 99 CARMEL 100 E/SURF W/COASTLINE 2 360 37 13,320 © AC 1/11/2012 97 CARNATION 100 S/ALMOND N/END 2 230 33 7,590 © AC 1/3/2012 86 CATALINA 100 E/BALBOA W/COASTLINE 2 1,910 37 70,670 © AC 1/11/2012 98 CATALINA 200 E/END W/BALBOA 2 2,470 37 91,390 © AC 1/11/2012 98 CENTRAL 100 E/12TH W/MAIN 2 860 40 34,400 Q AC 1/8/2012 100 CENTRAL 200 E/1ST W/2ND 1 260 20 5,200 Q AC 1/8/2012 100 Nichols Consulting Engineers,Chtd. Page 2 of 7 City of Seal Beach Street Inventory and PCI Report Street Name Section From To Lanes Length Width Area(ft2) FC ST PCI Date PCI ID (ft) (ft) CENTRAL 300 E/2ND W/MAIN 2 2,160 40 86,400 C AC 1/8/2012 100 CENTRAL WY 100 E/2ND W/1ST 2 260 40 10,400 E AC 1/10/2012 99 CENTRAL WY 200 E/4TH W/2ND 2 560 38 21,280 E AC 1/10/2012 99 CENTRAL WY 300 E/5TH W/4TH 2 260 38 9,880 E AC 1/10/2012 100 CLIPPER 100 E/CARAVEL W/ELECTRIC 2 910 33 30,030 E AC 1/10/2012 87 CLOVER 100 S/ALMOND N/END 2 130 33 4,290 E AC 1/3/2012 75 COASTLINE 100 S/CARMEL N/END 2 480 27 12,960 E AC 1/11/2012 98 COASTLINE 200 E/CARMEL W/BALBOA 2 2,380 33 78,540 E AC 1/11/2012 97 COLLEGE PARK 100 E/HARVARD W/HARVARD 2 2,590 37 95,830 C AC 1/6/2012 97 COLLEGE PARK 200 E/HARVARD W/CITY LIMIT 2 940 44 41,360 C AC 1/6/2012 96 COLUMBINE 100 S/ALMOND N/BANYAN 2 210 33 6,930 E AC 1/3/2012 97 CORAL 100 E/END W/BAY VIEW 2 230 27 6,210 E AC 1/12/2012 98 CORSAIR 100 S/CARAVEL N/SCHOONER 2 1,020 33 33,660 E AC 1/10/2012 97 CREST 100 S/CATALINA N/CRESTVIEW 2 210 33 6,930 E AC 1/12/2012 98 CRESTVIEW 100 E/CATALINA W/AVALON 2 3,060 33 100,980 E AC 1/12/2012 98 CRYSTAL 100 S/CRYSTAL COVE N/END 2 240 27 6,480 A AC 1/8/2012 98 CRYSTAL COVE 100 E/MARBLE COVE W/OPAL COVE 2 520 33 17,160 E AC 1/8/2012 98 DAFFODIL 100 S/ALMOND N/END 2 230 33 7,590 E AC 1/3/2012 90 DAHLIA 100 S/ALMOND N/END 2 230 33 7,590 E AC 1/3/2012 97 DAISY 100 S/ALMOND N/BIRCHWOOD 2 410 33 13,530 E AC 1/3/2012 67 DAISY 200 S/CANDLEBERRY N/DOGWOOD 2 210 33 6,930 E AC 1/6/2012 87 DAISY CIRCLE 100 S/FIR N/END 2 230 33 7,590 E AC 1/6/2012 79 DARTMOUTH 100 E/END W/HARVARD 2 180 34 6,120 E AC 1/6/2012 81 DOGWOOD 100 E/DAISY W/IRONWOOD 2 1,470 33 48,510 E AC 1/6/2012 84 DOGWOOD 200 E/MARIGOLD W/FUCHSIA 2 1,520 33 50,160 E AC 1/6/2012 94 DOGWOOD 300 E/WISTERIA W/OLEANDER 2 1,710 33 56,430 E AC 1/4/2012 83 DOLPHIN 100 S/SEAL WAY N/OCEAN 2 226 24 5,424 E AC 1/11/2012 64 DOLPHIN 200 N/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC 2 582 24 13,968 E AC 1/8/2012 99 DORY 100 S/GALLEON N/SCHOONER 2 360 28 10,080 E AC 1/10/2012 94 DRIFTWOOD 100 E/BALBOA W/COASTLINE 2 1,460 33 48,180 E AC 1/8/2012 100 EBBTIDE 100 5/COASTLINE N/END 2 230 27 6,210 E AC 1/11/2012 99 ELDER 100 HEATHER W/IRONWOOD 2 2,002 36 72,072 E AC 3/9/2012 100 Nichols Consulting Engineers,Chtd. Page 3 of 7 City of Seal Beach Street Inventory and PCI Report Street Name Section From To Lanes Length Width Area(ft') FC ST PCI Date PCI ID (ft) (ft) ELDER 200 E/OLEANDER HEATHER 2 1,130 36 40,680 © AC 1/6/2012 80 ELDER 300 E/VIOLET W/PRIMROSE 2 1,380 33 45,540 © AC 1/4/2012 96 ELECTRIC 100 E/5TH WI CORSAIR 2 510 37 18,870 Q AC 1/10/2012 98 ELECTRIC 200 E/CORSAIR W/END 2 380 33 12,540 Ei AC 1/10/2012 97 ELECTRIC 300 E/SEAL BEACH 19 W/SEAL BEACH 2 190 34 6,460 Q AC 1/8/2012 98 ELECTRIC N 200 E/SEAL BEACH 14TH 1 820 27 22,140 Q AC 1/8/2012 100 ELECTRIC N 300 14TH W/MAIN 1 1,590 27 42,930 Q AC 1/8/2012 99 ELECTRIC S 100 E/6TH W/MAIN 1 910 27 24,570 Q AC 1/16/2012 81 ELECTRIC S 200 E/SEAL BEACH 14TH 1 755 27 20,385 Q AC 1/16/2012 100 EMERALD COVE 100 E/BERYL COVE WI JADE COVE 2 580 33 19,140 © AC 1/8/2012 99 EMERALD PL 100 S/EMERALD COVE N/END 2 230 27 6,210 © AC 1/8/2012 98 FATHOM 100 E/SILVER SHOALS W/BALBOA 2 810 33 26,730 © AC 1/8/2012 100 FERN 100 S/ALMOND N/END 2 230 33 7,590 © AC 1/3/2012 96 FIR 100 E/GOLDENROD W/IRONWOOD 2 1,460 33 48,180 © AC 1/4/2012 100 FIR 200 E/ROSE W/HEATHER 2 1,260 33 41,580 © AC 1/4/2012 75 FIR 300 E/SUNFLOWER W/ROSE 2 330 33 10,890 © AC 1/4/2012 100 FIR 400 E/WISTERIA W/SUNFLOWER 2 1,220 33 40,260 © AC 1/4/2012 100 FIR CIRCLE 100 S/FIR N/END 2 130 60 7,800 © AC 1/4/2012 79 FUCHSIA 100 S/BIRCHWOOD N/ELDER 2 640 33 21,120 © AC 1/5/2012 100 FUCHSIA CIRCLE 100 S/FIR N/END 2 330 33 10,890 © AC 1/5/2012 100 GALLEON 100 S/ELECTRIC N/DORY 2 970 33 32,010 © AC 1/10/2012 86 GOLDENROD 100 S/ALMOND N/END 2 230 33 7,590 © AC 1/3/2012 96 GOLDENROD 200 S/ELDER N/END 2 610 33 20,130 © AC 1/8/2012 100 GUAVA 100 E/IRONWOOD W/END 2 530 33 17,490 © AC 1/4/2012 100 GUAVA 200 E/PANSY W/HEATHER 2 1,360 33 44,880 © AC 1/6/2012 78 HARBOR no ,_ E M •.1 `° 760 MEM MOW *101173 :3 ; 012,WEE HARVARD 100 S/COLLEGE PARK W/END 2 3,310 37 122,470 © AC 1/6/2012 97 HAZELNUT 100 S/GUAVA N/HEATHER 2 1,210 33 39,930 © AC 1/4/2012 100 HAZELNUT 200 E/HEATHER W/ROSE 2 1,610 33 53,130 ©m 1/4/2012 74 Nichols Consulting Engineers,Chtd. Page 4 of 7 City of Seal Beach Street Inventory and PCI Report Street Name Section From To Lanes Length Width Area(ft') FC ST PCI Date PCI ID (ft) (ft) HEATHER 100 S/ALMOND N/END 2 230 33 7,590 © AC 1/3/2012 97 HEATHER 200 S/ELDER N/HAZELNUT 2 790 37 29,230 Q AC 1/5/2012 63 HEATHER 300 S/HAZELNUT N/LAMPSON 2 490 37 18,130 El AC 1/5/2012 99 IRIS 100 S/ALMOND N/END 2 230 33 7,590 © AC 1/3/2012 86 IRONWOOD 50 S/CANDLEBERRY ELDER 0 524 33 17,292 El AC 1/5/2012 100 IRONWOOD 100 ELDER N/HEATHER 2 1,967 33 64,911 Q AC 1/5/2012 39 IRONWOOD 200 E/ROSE W/IRIS 2 1,420 33 46,860 Ill AC 1/5/2012 = IRONWOOD 300 El WISTERIA W/TULIP 2 322 37 11,914 p® 1/3/2012 ISLAND VIEW 100 S/BOLSA N/SEA BREEZE 2 1,110 33 36,630 © AC 1/12/2012 100 JADE COVE 100 S/EMERALD COVE N/MARLIN 2 360 33 11,880 © AC 1/8/2012 99 JASMIN 100 S/ALMOND N/END 2 230 33 7,590 © AC 1/3/2012 97 LAGUNA 100 0 S/MARLIN 0 N/END 2 380 27 10,260 © AC 1/8/2012 98 LAM PSON 200 E/BASSWOOD WI SEAL BEACH 4 3,300 60 198,000 A AC 1/4/2012 88 LAMPSON 300 E/E CITY LIMIT E/BASSWOOD 4 7,400 60 444,000 A AC 1/5/2012 91 LANDING 200 E/SEAL BEACH 2 1,210 21 25410 um.,rt,.92012 25 LOYOLA PLAZA 100 S/COLLEGE PARK N/END 2 330 25 8,250 ©m 1/6/2012 85 MAIN 200 S/OCEAN AVE N/ELECTRIC 2 1,190 57 67,830 Q AC 1/12/2012 84 MAR VISTA 100 E/CATALINA WI COASTLINE 2 1,610 33 53,130 © AC 1/8/2012 100 MAR VISTA 200 W/COASTLINE PCH 2 123 36 4,428 © AC 1/11/2012 100 MARBLE COVE 100 S/CRYSTAL COVE N/MARLIN 2 360 33 11,880 U AC 1/8/2012 98 MARIGOLD 100 S/BIRCHWOOD N/CANDLEBERRY 2 160 33 5,280 © AC 1/6/2012 78 MARIGOLD 200 S/CANDLEBERRY N/DOGWOOD 2 160 33 5,280 © AC 1/6/2012 87 MARINA 100 E/PCH 6TH 3 629 61 38,369 o AC 1/12/2012 37 MARINA 200 E/6TH W/W CITY LIMIT 2 2219 50 110,950 0 AC 1/12/2012 85 MARINE 100 E/ELECTRIC W/DOLPHIN 1 320 24 7,680 is AC 1/8/2012 99 MARLIN 100 E/SEAL BEACH W/BALBOA 2 1,610 37 59,570 © AC 1/12/2012 98 NEPTUNE 100 S/SEAL N/OCEAN 2 210 24 5,040 © AC 1/11/2012 84 NORTH GATE 100 W/SEAL BEACH 76 W/SEAL BEACH 2 760 42 31,920 © AC 1/16/2012 99 Nichols Consulting Engineers,Chtd. Page 5 of 7 City of Seal Beach Street Inventory and PCI Report Street Name Section From To Lanes Length Width Area(ft2) FC ST PCI Date PCI ID (ft) (ft) NORTH GATE 200 76 E/SEAL BEACH W/END 2 3,300 25 82,500 E AC 1/16/2012 100 OCCIDENTAL 100 E/STANFORD W/HARVARD 2 160 33 5,280 E AC 1/6/2012 96 OCEAN 100 E/ELECTRIC W/MAIN 2 2,440 51 124,440 C AC 1/8/2012 99 OCEAN 200 E/MAIN W/1ST 2 2,490 52 129,480 C AC 1/11/2012 99 OLD RANCH PARKWAY 100 SEAL BEACH 200 W/SEAL BEAC 3 520 48 24,960 A AC 1/11/2012 58 OLD RANCH PARKWAY 200 200 W/SEAL BEACH 720 WI SEAL BEAC 4 200 64 12,800 A AC 1/11/2012 63 OLEANDER 100 S/ALMOND N/FIR 2 1,320 36 47,520 E AC 1/4/2012 64 OPAL COVE 100 S/CRYSTAL COVE N/MARLIN 2 360 33 11,880 E AC 1/9/2012 98 PANSY 100 S/ALMOND N/END 2 430 33 14,190 E AC 1/3/2012 99 PANSY 200 S/FIR N/GUAVA 2 160 33 5,280 E AC 1/6/2012 93 PRIMROSE 100 S/DOGWOOD N/ELDER 2 210 33 6,930 E AC 1/4/2012 98 PRIMROSE CIR 100 S/ALMOND N/END 2 430 33 14,190 E AC 1/3/2012 99 PRINCETON 100 E/END W/HARVARD 2 230 30 6,900 E AC 1/6/2012 83 RIVIERA 100 S/MARLIN N/BOLSA 2 560 31 17,360 E AC 1/12/2012 96 ROSE 100 S/ALMOND N/END 2 430 33 14,190 C AC 1/3/2012 99 ROSE 200 S/FIR N/HAZELNUT 2 390 37 14,430 C AC 1/4/2012 66 ROSSMOOR CTR 100 E/SEAL BEACH W/WEST RD 2 864 30 25,920 C AC 1/16/2012 99 ROSSMOOR CTR 200 E/WEST RD W/MONTECITO 2 364 28 10,192 C AC 1/16/2012 35 SAND PIPER 100 S/BOLSA N/TAPER 2 1,110 33 36,630 E AC 1/12/2012 30 SCHOONER 100 E/GALLEON W/DORY 2 660 33 21,780 E AC 1/10/2012 94 SEA BREEZE 100 S/BOLSA N/CATALINA 2 1,160 33 38,280 E AC 1/12/2012 100 SEAL 100 E/11TH W/10TH 1 290 15 4,350 E PCC 1/12/2012 86 SEAL BEACH BLVD 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH 1 1,510 40 60,400 A AC 1/16/2012 83 SEAL BEACH BLVD 100 S/PCH N/BOLSA 6 1,640 97 159,080 A AC 1/9/2012 100 SEAL BEACH BLVD 200 S/BOLSA N/ADOLFO LOPEZ 2 3,320 99 328,680 A AC 1/11/2012 100 SEAL BEACH BLVD 300 S/ADOLFO LOPEZ N/WESTMINSTER 6 4,080 98 399,840 A AC 1/16/2012 91 SEAL BEACH BLVD 400 S/WESTMINSTER N/BEVERLY MANOF 6 4,536 95 430,920 A AC 1/16/2012 99 SEAL BEACH BLVD 500 OLD RANCH PKY 0 N/LAMPSON 6 833 89 74,137 A AC 1/11/2012 99 SEAL BEACH BLVD 600 5/LAMPSON ST.CLOUD DR 6 915 77 70,455 A AC 1/9/2012 81 Nichols Consulting Engineers,Chtd. Page 6 of 7 City of Seal Beach Street Inventory and PCI Report Street Name Section From To Lanes Length Width Area(ft2 PCI Date PCI ID (ft) (ft) (111110110 PCI BEACH BLVD 700 ST.CLOUD DR PLYMOUTH 6 1,491 77 114,807 A AC 1/9/2012 100 SEAL BEACH BLVD 800 S/ROSSMOOR N/BRADBURY 6 1,040 97 100,880 A AC 1/9/2012 100 SEAL WAY 100 E/ELECTRIC W/14TH 1 1,240 13 16,120 © PCC 1/9/2012 84 SEAL WAY 200 E/14TH W/11TH 1 920 15 13800 © PCC 1/9/2012 100 SILVER SHOALS 100 S/BOLSA N/FATHOM 2 300 33 9900 © AC 1/11/2012 33 SOUTH SHORE 100 S/BOLSA N/TAPER 2 1060 33 34980 © AC 1/12/2012 29 STANFORD 100 N/COLLEGE PARK W/COLLEGE PARK 2 1860 32 59520 © AC 1/6/2012 97 SUNFLOWER 100 S/ALMOND N/END 2 430 33 14190 © AC 1/3/2012 99 SUNFLOWER 200 S/FIR N/IRONWOOD 2 560 37 20720 © AC 1/4/2012 65 SURF 100 S/CATALINA N/END 2 480 33 15840 © AC 1/11/2012 98 TAPER 100 S/BOLSA N/CATALINA 2 1110 33 36630 © AC 1/12/2012 27 TEABERRY 100 S/ALMOND N/END 2 430 33 14190 is AC 1/3/2012 99 TULIP 100 S/IRONWOOD N/LAMPSON 2 70 36 2520 © AC 1/3/2012 100 VIOLET 100 S/ALMOND N/CANDLEBERRY 2 660 33 21780 © AC 1/3/2012 99 WESTMINSTER 100 W/CITY LIMIT E/SEAL BEACH 4 4360 79 344440 Qm 1/16/2012 75 WISTERIA 100 S/DOGWOOD N/IRONWOOD 2 990 37 36630 ©m 1/4/2012 91 WISTERIA 200 S/END N/DOGWOOD 2 1040 33 34320 © AC 1/3/2012 91 YALE 100 E/COLLEGE PARK W/COLLEGE PARK 2 1160 33 38280 © AC 1/6/2012 96 YALE CIRCLE 100 E/END W/YALE 2 130 48 6240 © AC 1/9/2012 92 A-Arterial C-Collector E-Residential Very Poor 0-40 4% Poor 41-59 11% Fair 60-74 5% Nichols Consulting Engineers,Chtd. Page 7 of 7 City of Seal Beach Pavement Management Program Final Report APPENDIX B Maintenance and Rehabilitation History igCollaboration.Commitment.Confidence.sM Oty of Seal Beach 5/29/2012 2012 PMP Update Maintenance and Rehabilitation History Street Name Section From To Length(ft)Width Aft) Area(ft')ft" ST' Treatment Treatment Description Date 10TH 200 S/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC 950 40 38,000 E AC 2/1/2000 Overlay-AC(Major MR) 10TH 300 S/SEAL N/OCEAN 210 25 5,250 E AC 2/1/2000 Overlay-AC(Major MR) 11TH 200 S/ELECTRIC N/LANDING 210 37 7,770 E AC 7/1/1997 Surface Treatment-Slurry Sea(Global MR) - 11TH 300 S/SEAL N/OCEAN 210 25 5,250 E AC 7/9/2012 Surface Treatment-Slurry Sea(Global MR) 12TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH 860 37 31,820 C AC 1/1/2008 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR) 12TH 300 S/SEAL N/OCEAN 210 24 5,040 E AC 7/9/2012 Surface Treatment-Slurry Sea(Global MR) 13TH 100 5/ELECTRIC N/PCH 960 21 20,160 E AC 7/1/1997 Surface Treatment-Slurry Sea(Global MR) 13TH 300 S/SEAL N/OCEAN 210 25 5,250 E AC 7/9/2012 Surface Treatment-Slurry Sea(Global MR) 14TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH 1010 21 21,210 E AC 7/1/1997 Surface Treatment-Slurry Sea(Global MR) 14TH 300 S/SEAL N/OCEAN 210 25 5,250 E AC 7/9/2012 Surface Treatment-Slurry Sea(Global MR) _ 15TH 100 5/ELECTRIC N/PCH 1110 21 23,310 E AC 7/1/1997 Surface Treatment-Slurry Sea(Global MR) 16TH 100 5/ELECTRIC N/PCH 1160 21 24,360 E AC 7/1/1997 Surface Treatment-Slurry Sea(Global MR) 17TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH 1,260 21 26,460 E AC 7/1/1997 Surface Treatment-Slurry Sea(Global MR) _ 1ST 100 S/OCEAN N/MARINA 887 40 35,480 E AC 5/24/2010 Overlay-AC(Major MR) 1ST 200E S/MARINA N/PCH 2,172 23 49,956 E AC 5/1/2003 Surface Treatment-Slurry Sea(Global MR) 151 200W S/PCH N/MARINA 2,172 22 47,784 E AC 5/1/2003 Surface Treatment-Slurry Sea(Global MR) 5TH 100 5/MARINA N/PCH 660 60 39,600 C AC 1/1/2010 Surface Treatment-Slurry Sea(Global MR) 6TH 100 S/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC 1,300 40 52,000 E AC 5/24/2010 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR 7TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/MARINA 210 40 8,400 E AC 5/24/2010 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR 7TH 200 S/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC 1,280 40 51,200 E AC 5/24/2010 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR 8TH 100 5/ELECTRIC N/PCH 460 40 18,400 E AC 5/24/2010 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR 8TH 200 S/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC 1,150 40 46,000 E AC 5/24/2010 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR ADOLFO LOPEZ 100 W/END 425 E/SEAL BEACH 800 60 48,000 E AC 1/1/2007 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR ADOLFO LOPEZ 200 W/SEAL BEACH 425 W/SEAL BEACH 425 60 25,500 E AC 1/1/2007 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR) AGUA 100 S/MARLIN N/END 220 27 5,940 A AC 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) ALMOND 100 E/OLEANDER W/ASTER 4,390 36 158,040 C AC 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) ALMOND 200 E/VIOLET E EDGE ROSE CIR 765 37 28,305 C AC 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) ALMOND 300 E EDGE ROSE CIR W/OLEANER 705 37 26,085 A AC 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) ASTER 100 S/ALMOND N/BIRCHWOOD 1,239 37 45,843 E AC 10/1/2011 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR) ASTER 200 N/BIRCHWOOD N/CANDLEBERRY 206 37 7,622 A AC 10/1/2011 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR) AVALON 100 S/CATALINA N/END 430 33 14,190 A AC 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) BALBOA 100 S/BOLSA N/CATAUNA 1,060 37 39,220 C AC 5/1/2003 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) BALBOA 200 S/PCH N/BOLSA 660 37 24,420 E AC 5/1/2003 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) BANYAN 100 E/CAMEUA W/COLUMBINE 600 33 19,800 E AC 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) BASSWOOD 100 E/ASTER W/LAMPSON 410 36 14,760 C AC 5/1/2011 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR) BAYOU 100 E/BAYSIDE W/HARBOR 630 33 20,790 E AC 1/1/2008 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR) BAYSIDE 100 S/BOLSA N/CRESTVIEW 1,410 33 46,530 C AC 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) BEACHCOMBER 100 5/BOLSA N/SEA BREEZE 1,160 33 38,280 E AC 1/1/2008 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR) BERYL COVE 100 S/EMERALD COVE N/MARLIN 360 33 11,880 A AC 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) BLUE BELL 100 S/ALMOND N/BIRCHWOOD 710 33 23,430 E AC 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) BOLSA 100 E/SEAL BEACH W/MAIN 2,810 37 103,970 A AC 1/1/2006 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) CAMELIA 100 S/ALMOND N/BANYAN 590 33 19,470 E AC 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) CANDLEBERRY 100 E/FUCHSIA W/LAMPSON 2,210 36 79,560 E AC 6/30/2011 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR) CANDLEBERRY 200 E/MARIGOLD W/FUCHSIA 1,560 37 57,720 E AC 5/24/2010 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR) CANDLEBERRY 300 E/WISTERIA W/OLEANDER 1,660 33 54,780 E AC 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) CARAVEL 100 S/MARINA N/CORSAIR 360 37 13,320 A AC 1/1/2010 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) CARMEL 100 E/SURF W/COASTLINE 360 37 13,320 A AC 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) Nichols Consulting Engineers,Chtd. Page 1 of 5 City of Seal Beach 5/29/2012 2012 PMP Update Maintenance and Rehabilitation History treat Name Section From to Length(ft)Width(ft) Area(ft') FC" ST" Treatment Treatment Description ID Date CARNATION 100 S/ALMOND N/END 230 33 7,590 E AC 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) CATALINA 100 E/BALBOA W/COASTLINE 1,910 37 70,670 C AC 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) CATALINA 200 E/END W/BALBOA 2,470 37 91,390 C AC 8/11/1999 Surface Trea tment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) CENTRAL 100 E/12TH W/MAIN 860 40 34,400 C AC 5/24/2010 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR) CENTRAL 200 E/1ST W/2ND 260 20 5,200 C AC 5/24/2010 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR) CENTRAL 300 E/2ND W/MAIN 2,160 40 86,400 C AC 5/24/2010 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR) CLIPPER 100 E/CARAVEL W/ELECTRIC 910 33 30,030 A AC 1/1/2010 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR( CLOVER 100 S/ALMOND N/END 130 33 4,290 E AC 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) COASTLINE 100 S/CARMEL N/END 480 27 12,960 E AC 1/1/2010 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) COASTLINE 200 E/CARMEL W/BALBOA 2,380 33 78,540 C AC 1/1/2008 Surface Trea tment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) COLLEGE PARK 100 E/HARVARD W/HARVARD 2,590 37 95,830 C AC 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) COLLEGE PARK 200 E/HARVARD W/CITY LIMIT 940 44 41,360 E AC 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) COLUMBINE 100 S/ALMOND N/BANYAN 210 33 6,930 E AC 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) CORAL 100 E/END W/BAY VIEW 230 27 6,210 A AC 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) CORSAIR 100 S/CARAVEL N/SCHOONER 1,020 33 33,660 E AC 1/1/2010 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) CREST 100 S/CATALINA N/CRESTVIEW 210 33 6,930 E AC 6/30/2012 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) CRESTVIEW 100 E/CATALINA W/AVALON 3,060 33 100,980 A AC 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) CRYSTAL 100 S/CRYSTAL COVE N/END 240 27 6,480 A AC 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) CRYSTAL COVE 100 E/MARBLE COVE WI OPAL COVE 520 33 17,160 A AC 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) DAFFODIL 100 S/ALMOND N/END 230 33 7,590 E AC 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) DAHLIA 100 S/ALMOND N/END 230 33 7,590 E AC 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) DAISY 100 S/ALMOND N/BIRCHWOOD 410 33 13,530 C AC 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) DAISY 200 S/CANDLEBERRY N/DOGWOOD 210 33 6,930 E AC 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) DAISY CIRCLE 100 S/FIR N/END 230 33 7,590 E AC 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) DARTMOUTH 100 E/END W/HARVARD 180 34 6,120 E AC 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) DOGWOOD 100 E/DAISY W/IRONWOOD 1,470 33 48,510 E AC 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) DOGWOOD 200 E/MARIGOLD W/FUCHSIA 1,520 33 50,160 E AC 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) DOGWOOD 300 E/WISTERIA W/OLEANDER 1,710 33 56,430 E AC 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) DOLPHIN 100 S/SEAL WAY N/OCEAN 226 24 5,424 E AC 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) DORY 100 S/GALLEON N/SCHOONER 360 28 10,080 E AC 1/1/2010 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) DRIFTWOOD 100 E/BALBOA W/COASTLINE 1,460 33 48,180 E AC 1/1/2008 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR) ELDER 100 HEATHER W/IRONWOOD 2,002 36 72,072 E AC 6/30/2011 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR) ELDER 200 E/OLEANDER HEATHER 1,130 36 40,680 E AC 1/1/2007 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) ELDER 300 E/VIOLET W/PRIMROSE 1,380 33 45,540 E AC 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) ELECTRIC 100 E/5TH WI CORSAIR 510 37 18,870 A AC 1/1/2010 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) ELECTRIC 200 E/CORSAIR W/END 380 33 12,540 A AC 1/1/2010 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) ELECTRIC N 200 E/SEAL BEACH 14TH 820 27 22,140 A AC 6/30/2010 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR) ELECTRIC N 300 14TH W/MAIN 1,590 27 42,930 A AC 7/1/2010 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR) ELECTRIC S 200 E/SEAL BEACH 14TH 755 25 18,875 A AC 6/30/2010 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR) EMERALD COVE 100 E/BERYL COVE W/JADE COVE 580 33 19,140 A AC 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) EMERALD PL 100 5/EMERALD COVE N/END 230 27 6,210 A AC 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) FATHOM 100 E/SILVER SHOALS W/BALBOA 810 33 26,730 E AC 8(12/1999 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) FERN 100 S/ALMOND N/END 230 33 7,590 E AC 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) FIR 100 E/GOLDENROD W/IRONWOOD 1,460 33 48,180 E AC 5/24/2010 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR) FIR 200 E/ROSE W/HEATHER 1,260 33 41,580 C AC 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) FIR 300 E/SUNFLOWER W/ROSE 330 33 10,890 C AC 5/24/2010 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR) FIR 400 E/WISTERIA W/SUNFLOWER 1,220 33 40,260 C AC 5/24/2010 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR) Nichols Consulting Engineers,Chtd. Page 2 of 5 City of Seal Beach 5/29/2012 2012 PMP Update Maintenance and Rehabilitation History treet Name Section From To Length(ft)Width(ft) Area(ft') PC' ST' Treatment Treatment Description ID Date FIR CIRCLE 100 S/FIR N/END 130 60 7,800 E AC 5/1/2003 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) FUCHSIA 100 S/BIRCHWOOD N/ELDER 640 33 21,120 C AC 5/24/2010 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR) FUCHSIA CIRCLE 100 S/FIR N/END 330 33 10,890 E AC 5/24/2010 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR) GALLEON 100 S/ELECTRIC N/DORY 970 33 32,010 E AC 1/1/2010 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) GOLDENROD 100 S/ALMOND N/END 230 33 7,590 E AC 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) GOLDENROD 200 S/ELDER N/END 610 33 20,130 E AC 5/24/2010 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR) GUAVA 100 E/IRONWOOD W/END 530 33 17,490 E AC 6/30/2010 Overlay-AC(Major MR) GUAVA 200 E/PANSY W/HEATHER 1,360 33 44,880 E AC 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) HARBOR 100 S/BAYSIDE N/BAYOU 760 33 25,080 E AC 1/1/2006 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) HARVARD 100 S/COLLEGE PARK W/END 3,310 37 122,470 C AC 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) HAZELNUT 100 5/GUAVA N/HEATHER 1,210 33 39,930 E AC 5/24/2010 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR) - HAZELNUT 200 E/HEATHER W/ROSE 1,610 33 53,130 E AC 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) HAZELNUT 300 ['WISTERIA W/SUNFLOWER 1,310 33 43,230 E AC 1/1/2006 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) - HEATHER 100 S/ALMOND N/END 230 33 7,590 E AC_1/1/2008 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) HEATHER 200 5/ELDER N/HAZELNUT 790 37 29,230 C AC 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) _ HEATHER 300 S/HAZELNUT N/LAMPSON 490 37 18,130 C AC 1/1/2008 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR) IRIS 100 S/ALMOND N/END 230 33 7,590 E AC 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) IRIS 200 HAZELNUT AVE IRONWOOD AVE 226 32 7,232 E AC 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) IRONWOOD 50 S/CANDLEBERRY ELDER 524 33 17,292 E AC 6/30/2011 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR) IRONWOOD 100 ELDER N/HEATHER 1,967 33 64,911 E AC 10/1/1993 Overlay-AC(Major MR) IRONWOOD 200 E/ROSE W/IRIS 1,420 - 33 46,860 E AC 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) IRONWOOD 300 E/WISTERIA W/TULIP 322 37 11,914 E AC 1/1/2006 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) IRONWOOD 400 W/TULIP W/SUNFLOWER 1,020 37 37,740 A AC 1/1/2006 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) ISLAND VIEW 100 S/BOLSA N/SEA BREEZE 1,110 33 36,630 E AC 1/1/2008 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR) JADE COVE 100 5/EMERALD COVE N/MARUN 360 33 11,880 A AC 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) JASMIN 100 S/ALMOND N/END 230 33 7,590 E AC 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) LAGUNA 100 0 S/MARLIN O N/END 380 27 10,260 A AC 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) LAMPSON 100 W/BASSWOOD 200 E/0 BASSWOOD 200 56 11,200 A AC 7/1/2002 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR) LAMPSON 200 E/BASSWOOD W/SEAL BEACH 3,300 60 198,000 A AC 7/1/2002 Overlay-AC(Major MR) LAMPSON 300 E/E CITY LIMIT 200 E/BASSWOOD 7,200 60 432,000 A AC 7/1/2002 Overlay-AC(Major MR) LANDING 100 E/12TH W/11TH 260 42 10,920 E AC 7/1/1997 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) LANDING 200 E/SEAL BEACH W/12TH 1,210 21 25,410 E AC 7/1/1997 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) LOYOLA PLAZA 100 S/COLLEGE PARK N/END 330 25 8,250 E AC 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) MAIN 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH 690 55 37,950 A AC 6/1/1995 Overlay-AC(Major MR) _ MAIN 200 5/OCEAN AVE N/ELECTRIC 1,190 57 67,830 A AC 6/30/2008 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) MARBLE COVE 100 S/CRYSTAL COVE N/MARLIN 360 33 11,880 A AC 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) MARIGOLD 100 S/BIRCHWOOD N/CANDLEBERRY 160 33 5,280 E AC 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) MARIGOLD 200 S/CANDLEBERRY N/DOGWOOD 160 33 5,280 E AC 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) MARINA 100 E/PCH 6TH 629 61 38,369 E AC 10/1/1996 Overlay-AC(Major MR) MARINA 200 E/6TH W/W CITY LIMIT 2,219 50 110,950 A AC 10/1/1996 Overlay-AC(Major MR) MARUN 100 E/SEAL BEACH W/BALBOA 1,610 37 59,570 E AC 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) NEPTUNE 100 S/SEAL N/OCEAN 210 24 5,040 E AC 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) NORTH GATE 100 W/SEAL BEACH 76 W/SEAL BEACH 760 42 31,920 E AC 5/24/2010 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR) NORTH GATE 200 76 E/SEAL BEACH W/END 3,300 25 82,500 E AC 5/24/2010 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR) OCCIDENTAL 100 E/STANFORD W/HARVARD 160 33 5,280 A AC 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) OCEAN 100 E/ELECTRIC W/MAIN 2,440 _ 51 124,440 A AC 1/1/2007 Overlay-AC(Major MR) OCEAN 200 E/MAIN W/1ST 2,490 52 129,480 A AC 1/1/2007 Overlay-AC(Major MR) Nichols Consulting Engineers,Chtd. Page 3 of 5 City of Seal Beach 5/29/2012 2012 PMP Update Maintenance and Rehabilitation History Street Name Section From - Length(ft)Width(ft) Area(ft') FC" 5T" Treatment Treatment Description ID Date OLD RANCH PARKWA 100 SEAL BEACH 200 WI SEAL BEACH 520 48 24,960 A AC 1/1/1986 Overlay-AC(Major MR) OLD RANCH PARKWA 200 200 W/SEAL BEACH 720 W/SEAL BEACH 200 64 12,800 A AC 1/1/1986 Overlay-AC(Major MR) OLD RANCH PARKWA 300 720 W/SEAL BEACH W/22 FWY 1,030 34 35,020 A AC 1/1/1986 Overlay-AC(Major MR) OLEANDER 100 S/ALMOND N/FIR 1,320 36 47,520 E AC 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) OPAL COVE 100 S/CRYSTAL COVE N/MARLIN 360 33 11,880 A AC 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) PANSY 100 5/ALMOND N/END 430 33 14,190 E AC 5/1/2003 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) - PANSY 200 5/FIR N/GUAVA 160 33 5,280 E AC 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) PRIMROSE 100 S/DOGWOOD N/ELDER 210 33 6,930 E AC 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) PRIMROSE OR 100 S/ALMOND N/END 430 33 14,190 A AC 1/1/1990 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) PRINCETON 100 E/END W/HARVARD 230 30 6,900 E AC 1/1/2008 Surface Trea tment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) PURDUE CIRCLE 100 5/END N/COLLEGE PARK 68 27 1,836 A AC 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) RIVIERA 100 5/MARLIN N/BOLSA 560 31 17,360 E AC 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) ROSE 100 5/ALMOND N/END 430 33 14,190 C AC 5/1/2003 Surface Trea tment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) ROSE 200 S/FIR N/HAZELNUT 390 37 14,430 C AC 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) ROSE 300 5/HAZELNUT N/LAMPSON 440 37 16,280 C AC 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) ROSSMOOR CTR 100 E/SEAL BEACH W/WEST RD 864 30 25,920 C AC 5/1/2003 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) SAND PIPER 100 5/BOLSA N/TAPER 1,110 33 36,630 E AC 1/1/2006 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) SCHOONER 100 E/GALLEON W/DORY 660 33 21,780 E AC 1/1/2010 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) SEA BREEZE 100 5/BOLSA N/CATAIINA 1,160 33 38,280 E AC 1/1/2008 Overlay-AC(Major MR) SEAL BEACH BLVD 100 S/PCH N/BOLSA 1,640 97 159,080 A AC 6/30/2011 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR) SEAL BEACH BLVD 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH 1,510 40 60,400 A AC 8/1/2001 Overlay-AC(Major MR) SEAL BEACH BLVD 200 5/BOLSA N/ADOLFO LOPEZ 3,320 99 328,680 A AC 1/1/2008 Overlay-AC(Major MR) SEAL BEACH BLVD 300 S/ADOLFO LOPEZ N/WESTMINSTER 4,080 98 399,840 A AC 5/24/2010 Overlay-AC(Major MR) SEAL BEACH BLVD 400 5/WESTMINSTER N/BEVERLY MANOR 4,536 95 430,920 A AC 5/24/2010 Overlay-AC(Major MR) SEAL BEACH BLVD 500 OLD RANCH PKY O N/LAMPSON 833 89 74,137 A AC 5/24/2010 Overlay-AC(Major MR) SEAL BEACH BLVD 600 5/LAMPSON ST.CLOUD DR 915 77 70,455 A AC 5/10/2010 Overlay-AC(Major MR) SEAL BEACH BLVD 700 ST.CLOUD DR PLYMOUTH 1,491 77 114,807 A AC 5/10/2010 Overlay-AC(Major MR) SEAL BEACH BLVD 800 S/ROSSMOOR N/BRADBURY 1,040 97 100,880 A AC 5/10/2010 Overlay-AC(Major MR) SEAL WAY 200 E/14TH W/11TH 920 15 13,800 E AC 5/24/2010 Overlay-AC(Major MR) SILVER SHOALS 100 5/BOLSA N/FATHOM 300 33 9,900 E AC 1/1/2006 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) SOUTH SHORE 100 S/BOLSA N/TAPER 1,060 33 34,980 E AC 8/12/1999 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) STANFORD 100 N/COLLEGE PARK W/COLLEGE PARK 1,860 32 59,520 E AC 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) SUNFLOWER 100 S/ALMOND N/END 430 33 14,190 E AC 5/1/2003 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) SUNFLOWER 200 S/FIR N/IRONWOOD 560 37 20,720 E AC 6/1/1995 Overlay-AC(Major MR) SURF 100 S/CATALINA N/END 480 33 15,840 A AC 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) TAPER 100 5/BOLSA N/CATALNA 1,110 33 36,630 E AC 1/1/2006 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) TEABERRY 100 S/ALMOND N/END 430 33 14,190 A AC 1/1/2006 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) TULIP 100 5/IRONWOOD N/LAMPSON 70 36 2,520 E AC 5/24/2010 GRIND&OVERLAY(Major MR) VIOLET 100 S/ALMOND N/CANDLEBERRY 660 33 21,780 E AC 5/1/2003 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) VIOLET 200 S/ELDER N/FIR 160 33 5,280 E AC 5/1/2003 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) WESTMINSTER 100 W/CITY LIMIT E/SEAL BEACH 4,360 79 344,440 A AC 8/1/1987 Overlay-AC(Major MR) WESTMINSTER 200 E/BOLSA CHICA W/SEAL BEACH 10,610 72 763,920 A AC 10/1/1997 Overlay-AC(Major MR) WISTERIA 100 S/DOGWOOD N/IRONWOOD 990 37 36,630 C AC 1/1/2009 Surface Trea tment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) WISTERIA 200 S/END N/DOGWOOD 1,040 33 34,320 E AC 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) YALE 100 E/COLLEGE PARK W/COLLEGE PARK 1,160 33 38,280 E AC 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) YALE CIRCLE 100 E/END W/YALE 130 48 6,240 E AC 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment-Slurry Seal(Global MR) Nichols Consulting Engineers,Chtd. Page 4 of 5 Gty of Seal Beach 5/29/2012 2012 PMP Update Maintenance and Rehabilitation History Street Name Section From To Length(ft)Width(ft) Area(ft') IC' ST* Treatment Treatment Description ID Date Note: 1."FC"is Functional Classification A-Arterial C-Collector E-Residential 2."sr is Surface Type AC-Aspahlt Concrete FCC-Portland Cement Concrete Nichols Consulting Engineers,Chtd. Page 5 of 5 City of Seal Beach Pavement Management Program Final Report APPENDIX C City's Projected Resurfacing Program Collaboration.Commitment.Confidence.sM City of Seal Beach Arterial Resurfacing Program Year Street Name Section ID From To Length Width(ft) Area(ft') PCI Before Treatment Cost Treatment (ft) Treatment 2012-2013 ELECTRIC N 300 14TH W/MAIN 1,620 27 43,740 66 $ 192,456.00 Cold Mill&Fill(4"AC) Total $ 192,456.00 Year Street Name Section ID From To Length Width(ft) Area(ft') PCI Before Treatment Cost Treatment (ft) Treatment 2013-2014 ELECTRIC S 300 W/MAIN 14TH 1,580 27 42,660 42 $ 187,704.00 Cold Mill&Fill(4"AC) Total $ 187,704.00 Year Street Name Section ID From To Length Width(ft) Area(ft') PCI Before Treatment Cost Treatment (ft) Treatment 2014-2015 WESTMINSTER 100 W/CITY LIMIT E/SEAL BEACH 4,360 79 344,440 70 $ 1,515,536.00 Cold Mill&Fill(4"AC) Total $ 1,515,536.00 Year Street Name Section ID From To Length Width(ft) Area(ft') PCI Before Treatment Cost Treatment (ft) Treatment 2015-2017 WESTMINSTER 200 E/BOLSA CHICA W/SEAL BEACH 10,610 72 763,920 29 $ 7,073,899.20 R&R Total $ 7,073,899.20 Year Street Name Section ID From To Length Width(ft) Area(ft') PCI Before Treatment Cost Treatment (ft) Treatment 1=I I 1ST 200W S/PCH N/MARINA 2,172 22 47,784 41 $ 210,249.60 Cold Mill&Fill(4"AC) Total $ 210,249.60 Year Street Name Section 1D From To Length Width(ft) Area(ft') PCI Before Treatment Cost Treatment (ft) Treatment 2018-2019 ELECTRIC S 100 E/6TH W/MAIN 910 25 22,750 63 $ 100,100.00 Cold Mill&Fill(4"AC) 2018-2019 OLD RANCH PARKWAY 100 SEAL BEACH 200 W/SEAL BEACH 520 48 24,960 69 $ 109,824.00 Cold Mill&Fill(4"AC) Total $ 209,924.00 Arterial Resurfacing Program 2012-2018 Nichols Consulting Engineers,Chtd. Page 1 of 1 City of Seal Beach Local Street Resurfacing Program Plan Year Street Name From To Length Width(ft) Area(ft') PCI before Treatment Cost Treatment (ft) Treatment Eanne SAND PIPER S/BOLSA N/TAPER smog= 36,630 30 lilgal Cold Mill&Fill 2"AC 2012-2013 SOUTH SHORE S/BOLSA N/TAPER 1,060 33 34,980 29 $89,199 Cold Mill&Fill 2"AC 2012-2013 TAPER S/BOLSA N/CATALINA 1,110 33 36,630 27 $93,407 Cold Mill&Fill(2"AC) MEM $276,012 Plan Year Street Name From To Length Width(ft) Area(ft') PCI before Treatment Cost Treatment (ft) Treatment EI:=121 IRONWOOD Vagralan. W/TULIP ®=MMENEMEHIMECIM Zinall Cold Mill&Fill 2"AC 2013-2014 IRONWOOD ELDER N/HEATHER 1,967 33 64,911 47 $165,523 Cold Mill&Fill(2"AC) MEM $195,904 Plan Year Street Name From To Length Width(ft) Area(W) PCI before Treatment Cost Treatment (ft) Treatment r S/ELECTRIC N/PCH MEKIIIIEMMEECIMIE=1 $54,086 Cold Mill&Fill 2"AC 2014-2015 15TH S/ELECTRIC N/PCH 1,110 21 23,310 20 $59,441 Cold Mill&Fill(2"AC) Total lailjnEj Plan Year Street Name From To Length Width(ft) Area(ft') PCI before Treatment Cost Treatment (ft) Treatment 2015-2016 laUg S/ELECTRIC N/LANDING IIIIERIMEMIIIIIEBEINEM $19,814 Cold Mill&Fill 2"AC 2015-2016 13TH S/ELECTRIC N/PCH 960 21 20,160 35 $51,408 Cold Mill&Fill 2"AC 2015-2016 BALBOA S/BOLSA N/CATALINA 1,060 37 39,220 24 $100,011 Cold Mill&Fill(2"AC) Total $171,233 Plan Year Street Name From To Length Width(ft) Area(ft') PCI before Treatment Cost Treatment (ft) Treatment 2016-2017 MARINA E/PCH 6TH 629 61 38,369 20 $97,841 Cold Mill&Fill(2"AC) MEM $97,841 Plan Year Street Name From To Length Width(ft) Area(ft') PCI before Treatment Cost Treatment (ft) Treatment 2017-2018 Egi HAZELNUT AVE IRONWOOD AVE 11.30.1MMZEIMEIMIIIIMME Cold Mill&Fill 2"AC 2017-2018 SILVER SHOALS S/BOLSA N/FATHOM 300 33 9,900 22 $25,245 Cold Mill&Fill 2"AC 2017-2018 VIOLET S/ELDER N/FIR 160 33 5,280 45 $13,464 Cold Mill&Fill(2"AC) MEM 10=11 Nichols Consulting Engineers,Chtd. Page 1 of 2 5/4/2012 City of Seal Beach Local Street Resurfacing Program Plan Year Street Name From To Length Width(ft) Area(ft') PCI before) Cost Treatment (ft) Treatment 2018-2019 EIZIEZIEDBIBIalMENDIMEM 24,3601.mismou Cold Mill and Fill 2"AC 2018-2019 17TH S/ELECTRIC N/PCH 1,260 21 26,460 60 $67,473 Cold Mill and Fill 2"AC 2018-2019 ANDERSON W/S PCH END CDS ® 38 9,690 57 $24,710 Cold Mill and Fill(2"AC) MIEM $154,301 "Ironwood will be funded through sewer enterprise funds as the construction is being done to rehabilitate sanitary sewer facilities. Nichols Consulting Engineers,Chtd. Page 2 of 2 5/4/2012 City of Seal Beach Pavement Management Program Final Report APPENDIX D City's Projected Slurry Seal Program igCollaboration.Commitment.Confidence.sM City of Seal Beach 5/4/2012 Local Street Slurry Program Plan Year Street Name From To Length Width(ft) Area(sf) FD PCI Date PCI before Treatment Treatment (ft) Treatment Cost 2013 ASTER S/ALMOND N/BIRCHWOOD 1,239 37 45,843 E 1/5/12 89 $13,753 Slurry Seal 2013 CLOVER S/ALMOND N/END 130 33 4,290 E 1/3/12 81 $1,287 Slurry Seal 2013 FIR CIRCLE S/FIR N/END 130 60 7,800 E 1/4/12 79 $2,340 Slurry Seal 2013 HEATHER S/ELDER N/HAZELNUT 790 37 29,230 C 1/3/12 77 $8,769 Slurry Seal 2013 PANSY S/FIR N/GUAVA 160 33 5,280 E 1/3/12 81 $1,584 Slurry Seal 2013 ROSE S/FIR N/HAZELNUT 390 37 14,430 C 1/4/12 81 $4,329 Slurry Seal 2014 ELDER E/OLEANDER W/FUCHSIA 1,790 36 64,440 E 3/9/12 83 $19,332 Slurry Seal 2014 GUAVA E/PANSY W/HEATHER 1,360 33 44,880 E 1/4/12 78 $13,464 Slurry Seal 2015 HAZELNUT E/HEATHER W/ROSE 1,610 33 53,130 E 1/4/12 80 $15,939 Slurry Seal 2015 SUNFLOWER S/FIR N/IRONWOOD 560 37 20,720 E 1/3/12 76 $6,216 Slurry Seal 2016 ALMOND E/OLEANDER W/ASTER 4,390 36 158,040 C 1/3/12 91 $47,412 Slurry Seal 2016 BASSWOOD E/ASTER W/LAMPSON 410 36 14,760 C 1/5/12 85 $4,428 Slurry Seal 2016 BLUE BELL S/ALMOND N/BIRCHWOOD 710 33 23,430 E 1/3/12 86 $7,029 Slurry Seal 2016 CAMELIA S/ALMOND N/BANYAN 590 33 19,470 E 1/3/12 90 $5,841 Slurry Seal 2016 CANDLEBERRY E/WISTERIA W/OLEANDER 1,660 33 54,780 E 1/5/12 91 $16,434 Slurry Seal 2016 CARNATION S/ALMOND N/END 230 33 7,590 E 1/3/12 88 $2,277 Slurry Seal 2016 DAFFODIL S/ALMOND N/END 230 33 7,590 E 1/3/12 84 $2,277 Slurry Seal 2016 DAISY S/ALMOND N/BIRCHWOOD 410 33 13,530 C 1/6/12 90 $4,059 Slurry Seal 2016 DAISY CIRCLE S/FIR N/END 230 33 7,590 E 1/6/12 86 $2,277 Slurry Seal 2016 DOGWOOD E/DAISY W/IRONWOOD 1,470 33 48,510 E 1/6/12 92 $14,553 Slurry Seal 2016 DOGWOOD E/MARIGOLD W/FUCHSIA 1,520 33 50,160 E 1/6/12 90 $15,048 Slurry Seal 2016 ELDER ENIOLET W/PRIMROSE 1,380 33 45,540 E 1/6/12 92 $13,662 Slurry Seal 2016 FERN S/ALMOND N/END 230 33 7,590 E 1/3/12 94 $2,277 Slurry Seal 2016 IRIS S/ALMOND N/END 230 33 7,590 E 1/5/12 89 $2,277 Slurry Seal 2016 MARIGOLD S/CANDLEBERRY N/DOGWOOD 160 33 5,280 E 1/6/12 89 $1,584 Slurry Seal 2016 OLEANDER S/ALMOND N/FIR 1,320 36 47,520 E 1/4/12 89 $14,256 Slurry Seal 2016 PRIMROSE S/DOGWOOD N/ELDER 210 33 6,930 E 1/4/12 93 $2,079 Slurry Seal 2017 5TH S/MARINA N/PCH 660 60 39,600 C 1/10/12 89 $11,880 Slurry Seal 2017 CLIPPER E/CARAVEL W/ELECTRIC 910 33 30,030 E 1/10/12 85 $9,009 Slurry Seal 2017 COLLEGE PARK E/HARVARD W/HARVARD 2,590 37 95,830 C 1/6/12 94 $28,749 Slurry Seal Nichols Consulting Engineers,Chtd. page 1 of 3 City of Seal Beach 5/4/2012 Local Street Slurry Program Plan Year Street Name From. To Length Width(ft) Area(sf) FC PCI Date PCI before Treatment Treatment (ft) Treatment Cost 2017 COLLEGE PARK E/HARVARD W/CITY LIMIT 940 44 41,360 E 1/6/12 86 $12,408 Slurry Seal 2017 CORSAIR S/CARAVEL N/SCHOONER 1,020 33 33,660 E 1/10/12 97 $10,098 Slurry Seal 2017 DARTMOUTH E/END W/HARVARD 180 34 6,120 E 1/6/12 84 $1,836 Slurry Seal 2017 DORY S/GALLEON N/SCHOONER 360 28 10,080 E 1/10/12 92 $3,024 Slurry Seal 2017 ELECTRIC E/CORSAIR W/END 380 33 12,540 A 1/8/12 94 $3,762 Slurry Seal 2017 ELECTRIC E/5TH W/CORSAIR 510 37 18,870 C 1/8/12 98 $5,661 Slurry Seal 2017 GALLEON S/ELECTRIC N/DORY 970 33 32,010 E 1/10/12 91 $9,603 Slurry Seal 2017 HARVARD S/COLLEGE PARK W/END 3,310 37 122,470 C 1/6/12 90 $36,741 Slurry Seal 2017 LOYOLA PLAZA S/COLLEGE PARK N/END 330 25 8,250 E 1/6/12 89 $2,475 Slurry Seal 2017 OCCIDENTAL E/STANFORD W/HARVARD 160 33 5,280 E 1/6/12 81 $1,584 Slurry Seal 2017 PRINCETON E/END W/HARVARD 230 30 6,900 E 1/6/12 83 $2,070 Slurry Seal 2017 SCHOONER E/GALLEON W/DORY 660 33 21,780 E 1/10/12 94 $6,534 Slurry Seal 2017 YALE E/COLLEGE PARK W/COLLEGE PARK 1,160 33 38,280 E 1/6/12 92 $11,484 Slurry Seal 2018 AVALON S/CATALINA N/END 430 33 14,190 E 1/12/12 98 $4,257 Slurry Seal 2018 BAYSIDE S/BOLSA N/CRESTVIEW 1,410 33 46,530 E 1/12/12 98 $13,959 Slurry Seal 2018 CARMEL E/SURF W/COASTLINE 360 37 13,320 E 1/11/12 97 $3,996 Slurry Seal 2018 CATALINA E/BALBOA W/COASTLINE 1,910 37 70,670 E 1/11/12 98 $21,201 Slurry Seal 2018 CATALINA E/END W/BALBOA 2,470 37 91,390 E 1/11/12 98 $27,417 Slurry Seal 2018 COASTLINE S/CARMEL N/END 480 27 12,960 E 1/11/12 98 $3,888 Slurry Seal 2018 COASTLINE E/CARMEL W/BALBOA 2,380 33 78,540 E 1/11/12 97 $23,562 Slurry Seal 2018 CORAL E/END W/BAY VIEW 230 27 6,210 E 1/12/12 98 $1,863 Slurry Seal 2018 CREST S/CATALINA N/CRESTVIEW 210 33 6,930 E 1/12/12 98 $2,079 Slurry Seal 2018 CRESTVIEW E/CATALINA W/AVALON 3,060 33 100,980 E 1/12/12 98 $30,294 Slurry Seal 2018 DORY S/GALLEON N/SCHOONER 360 28 10,080 E 1/10/12 94 $3,024 Slurry Seal 2018 EBBTIDE S/COASTLINE N/END 230 27 6,210 E 1/11/12 99 $1,863 Slurry Seal 2018 SURF S/CATALINA N/END 480 33 15,840 E 1/11/12 98 $4,752 Slurry Seal 2018 TEABERRY S/ALMOND N/END 430 33 14,190 E 1/3/12 99 $4,257 Slurry Seal 2019 10TH S/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC 950 40 38,000 E 1/9/12 98 $11,400 Slurry Seal 2019 12TH S/ELECTRIC N/PCH 860 37 31,820 C 1/9/12 99 $9,546 Slurry Seal 2019 12TH S/SEAL N/OCEAN 210 24 5,040 E 1/9/12 83 $1,512 Slurry Seal Nichols Consulting Engineers,Chtd. page 2 of 3 City of Seal Beach 5/4/2012 Local Street Slurry Program Plan Year Street Name From To Length Width(ft) Area(sf) FC PCI Date PCI before Treatment Treatment (ft) Treatment Cost 2019 13TH S/SEAL N/OCEAN 210 25 5,250 E 1/9/12 94 $1,575 Slurry Seal 2019 ELECTRIC E/SEAL BEACH 19 W/SEAL BEACH 190 34 6,460 C 1/8/12 98 $1,938 Slurry Seal 2019 ELECTRIC N E/SEAL BEACH W/MAIN 2,410 27 65,070 C 1/8/12 99 $19,521 Slurry Seal 2019 MAIN S/OCEAN AVE N/ELECTRIC 1,190 57 67,830 C 1/12/12 96 $20,349 Slurry Seal 2019 MARINA E/6TH W/W CITY LIMIT 2,219 50 110,950 C 1/12/12 85 $33,285 Slurry Seal Note: 1-"Plan Year'is the fiscal year palnning for the treatment 2-"FC"is Functional Class 2013-FY 2012-2013 CPE Phase I A-Arterial 2014-FY 2013-2014 CPE Phase II C-Collector 2015-FY 2014-2015 CPE Phase III E-Residential 2016-FY 2015-2016 CPE Phase IV 2017-FY 2016-2017 CPW/Bridgeport 2018-FY 2017-2018 Hill/Cove 2019-FY 2018-2019 Old Town Nichols Consulting Engineers,Chtd. page 3 of 3 City of Seal Beach 5/4/2012 Local Street Slurry Program Plan Year Street Name From To Length(ft) Width(ft) Area(sf) FC PCI Date PCI before Treatment Treatment Treatment Cost 2013 ASTER S/ALMOND NI BIRCHWOOD 1,239 37 45,843 E 1/5/12 89 $13,753 Slurry Seal 2013 CLOVER S/ALMOND N/END 130 33 4,290 E 1/3/12 81 $1,287 Slurry Seal 2013 FIR CIRCLE S/FIR N/END 130 60 7,800 E 1/4/12 79 $2,340 Slurry Seal 2013 HEATHER S/ELDER N/HAZELNUT 790 37 29,230 C 1/3/12 77 $8,769 Slurry Seal 2013 PANSY S/FIR N/GUAVA 160 33 5,280 E 1/3/12 81 $1,584 Slurry Seal 2013 ROSE S/FIR N/HAZELNUT 390 37 14,430 C 1/4/12 81 $4,329 Slurry Seal 2014 ELDER E/OLEANDER W/FUCHSIA 1,790 36 64,440 E 3/9/12 83 $19,332 Slurry Seal 2014 GUAVA E/PANSY W/HEATHER 1,360 33 44,880 E 1/4/12 78 $13,464 Slurry Seal 2015 HAZELNUT E/HEATHER W/ROSE 1,610 33 53,130 E 1/4/12 80 $15,939 Slurry Seal 2015 SUNFLOWER S/FIR N/IRONWOOD 560 37 20,720 E 1/3/12 76 $6,216 Slurry Seal 2016 ALMOND E/OLEANDER W/ASTER 4,390 36 158,040 C 1/3/12 91 $47,412 Slurry Seal 2016 BASSWOOD E/ASTER W/LAMPSON 410 36 14,760 C 1/5/12 85 $4,428 Slurry Seal 2016 BLUE BELL S/ALMOND N/BIRCHWOOD 710 33 23,430 E 1/3/12 86 $7,029 Slurry Seal 2016 CAMELIA S/ALMOND N/BANYAN 590 33 19,470 E 1/3/12 90 $5,841 Slurry Seal 2016 CANDLEBERRY E/WISTERIA W/OLEANDER 1,660 33 54,780 E 1/5/12 91 $16,434 Slurry Seal 2016 CARNATION S/ALMOND N/END 230 33 7,590 E 1/3/12 88 $2,277 Slurry Seal 2016 DAFFODIL S/ALMOND N/END 230 33 7,590 E 1/3/12 84 $2,277 Slurry Seal 2016 DAISY S/ALMOND N/BIRCHWOOD 410 33 13,530 C 1/6/12 90 $4,059 Slurry Seal 2016 DAISY CIRCLE S/FIR N/END 230 33 7,590 E 1/6/12 86 $2,277 Slurry Seal 2016 DOGWOOD E/DAISY W/IRONWOOD 1,470 33 48,510 E 1/6/12 92 $14,553 Slurry Seal 2016 DOGWOOD E/MARIGOLD W/FUCHSIA 1,520 33 50,160 E 1/6/12 90 $15,048 Slurry Seal 2016 ELDER ENIOLET W/PRIMROSE 1,380 33 45,540 E 1/6/12 92 $13,662 Slurry Seal 2016 FERN S/ALMOND N/END 230 33 7,590 E 1/3/12 94 $2,277 Slurry Seal 2016 IRIS S/ALMOND N/END 230 33 7,590 E 1/5/12 89 $2,277 Slurry Seal 2016 MARIGOLD S/CANDLEBERRY N/DOGWOOD 160 33 5,280 E 1/6/12 89 $1,584 Slurry Seal 2016 OLEANDER S/ALMOND N/FIR 1,320 36 47,520 E 1/4/12 89 $14,256 Slurry Seal 2016 PRIMROSE S/DOGWOOD N/ELDER 210 33 6,930 E 1/4/12 93 $2,079 Slurry Seal 2017 5TH S/MARINA N/PCH 660 60 39,600 C 1/10/12 89 $11,880 Slurry Seal 2017 CLIPPER E/CARAVEL W/ELECTRIC 910 33 30,030 E 1/10/12 85 $9,009 Slurry Seal 2017 COLLEGE PARK E/HARVARD W/HARVARD 2,590 37 95,830 C 1/6/12 94 $28,749 Slurry Seal Nichols Consulting Engineers,Chtd. page 1 of 3 City of Seal Beach 5/4/2012 Local Street Slurry Program Plan Year Street Name From To Length(ft) Width(ft) Area(sf) FC PCI Date PCI before Treatment Treatment Treatment Cost 2017 COLLEGE PARK E/HARVARD W/CITY LIMIT 940 44 41,360 E 1/6/12 86 $12,408 Slurry Seal 2017 DARTMOUTH E/END W/HARVARD 180 34 6,120 E 1/6/12 84 $1,836 Slurry Seal 2017 DORY S/GALLEON N/SCHOONER 360 28 10,080 E 1/10/12 92 $3,024 Slurry Seal 2017 ELECTRIC E/CORSAIR W/END 380 33 12,540 A 1/8/12 94 $3,762 Slurry Seal 2017 GALLEON S/ELECTRIC N/DORY 970 33 32,010 E 1/10/12 91 $9,603 Slurry Seal 2017 HARVARD S/COLLEGE PARK W/END 3,310 37 122,470 C 1/6/12 90 $36,741 Slurry Seal 2017 LOYOLA PLAZA S/COLLEGE PARK N/END 330 25 8,250 E 1/6/12 89 $2,475 Slurry Seal 2017 OCCIDENTAL E/STANFORD W/HARVARD 160 33 5,280 E 1/6/12 81 $1,584 Slurry Seal 2017 PRINCETON E/END W/HARVARD 230 30 6,900 E 1/6/12 83 $2,070 Slurry Seal 2017 SCHOONER E/GALLEON W/DORY 660 33 21,780 E 1/10/12 94 $6,534 Slurry Seal 2017 YALE E/COLLEGE PARK W/COLLEGE PARK 1,160 33 38,280 E 1/6/12 92 $11,484 Slurry Seal 2018 10TH S/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC 950 40 38,000 E 1/9/12 98 $11,400 Slurry Seal 2018 12TH S/ELECTRIC N/PCH 860 37 31,820 C 1/9/12 99 $9,546 Slurry Seal 2018 12TH S/SEAL N/OCEAN 210 24 5,040 E 1/9/12 83 $1,512 Slurry Seal 2018 13TH S/SEAL N/OCEAN 210 25 5,250 E 1/9/12 94 $1,575 Slurry Seal 2018 5TH S/MARINA N/PCH 660 60 39,600 C 1/9/12 95 $11,880 Slurry Seal 2018 CORSAIR S/CARAVEL N/SCHOONER 1,020 33 33,660 E 1/10/12 97 $10,098 Slurry Seal 2018 ELECTRIC E/5TH W/CORSAIR 510 37 18,870 C 1/8/12 98 $5,661 Slurry Seal 2018 ELECTRIC E/CORSAIR W/END 380 33 12,540 C 1/8/12 97 $3,762 Slurry Seal 2018 ELECTRIC E/SEAL BEACH 19 W/SEAL BEACH 190 34 6,460 C 1/8/12 98 $1,938 Slurry Seal 2018 ELECTRIC N E/SEAL BEACH W/MAIN 2,410 27 65,070 C 1/8/12 99 $19,521 Slurry Seal 2018 MAIN S/OCEAN AVE N/ELECTRIC 1,190 57 67,830 C 1/12/12 96 $20,349 Slurry Seal 2018 MARINA E/6TH W/W CITY LIMIT 2,219 50 110,950 C 1/12/12 85 $33,285 Slurry Seal 2018 SCHOONER E/GALLEON W/DORY 660 33 21,780 E 1/10/12 94 $6,534 Slurry Seal 2019 AVALON S/CATALINA N/END 430 33 14,190 E 1/12/12 98 $4,257 Slurry Seal 2019 BAYSIDE S/BOLSA N/CRESTVIEW 1,410 33 46,530 E 1/12/12 98 $13,959 Slurry Seal 2019 CARMEL E/SURF W/COASTLINE 360 37 13,320 E 1/11/12 97 $3,996 Slurry Seal 2019 CATALINA E/BALBOA W/COASTLINE 1,910 37 70,670 E 1/11/12 98 $21,201 Slurry Seal 2019 CATALINA E/END W/BALBOA 2,470 37 91,390 E 1/11/12 98 $27,417 Slurry Seal 2019 COASTLINE S/CARMEL N/END 480 27 12,960 E 1/11/12 98 $3,888 Slurry Seal Nichols Consulting Engineers,Chtd. page 2 of 3 City of Seal Beach 5/4/2012 Local Street Slurry Program Plan Year Street Name From 7rr Length(ft) Width(ft) Area(sf) FC PCI Date PCI before Treatment Treatment Treatment Cost 2019 COASTLINE E/CARMEL W/BALBOA 2,380 33 78,540 E 1/11/12 97 $23,562 Slurry Seal 2019 CORAL E/END W/BAY VIEW 230 27 6,210 E 1/12/12 98 $1,863 Slurry Seal 2019 CREST S/CATALINA N/CRESTVIEW 210 33 6,930 E 1/12/12 98 $2,079 Slurry Seal 2019 CRESTVIEW E/CATALINA W/AVALON 3,060 33 100,980 E 1/12/12 98 $30,294 Slurry Seal 2019 DORY S/GALLEON N/SCHOONER 360 28 10,080 E 1/10/12 94 $3,024 Slurry Seal 2019 EBBTIDE S/COASTLINE N/END 230 27 6,210 E 1/11/12 99 $1,863 Slurry Seal 2019 SURF S/CATALINA N/END 480 33 15,840 E 1/11/12 98 $4,752 Slurry Seal 2019 TEABERRY S/ALMOND N/END 430 33 14,190 E 1/3/12 99 $4,257 Slurry Seal Note: 1-"Plan Year"is the fiscal year palnning for the treatment 2-"FC"is Functional Class 2013-FY 2012-2013 CPE Phase I A-Arterial 2014-FY 2013-2014 CPE Phase II C-Collector 2015-FY 2014-2015 CPE Phase III E-Residential 2016-FY 2015-2016 CPE Phase IV 2017-FY 2016-2017 CPW/Bridgeport 2018-FY 2017-2018 Hill/Cove 2019-FY 2018-2019 Old Town Nichols Consulting Engineers,Chtd. page 3 of 3 City of Seal Beach Pavement Management Program Final Report APPENDIX E Sections Selected for Treatment ($575,000/year, City's Existing Budget) OCTA Required MICollaboration.Commitment.Confidence.sM City of Seal Beach Section Selected for Treatment($575,000/year,City's Existing Budget) o v a, Length Width o Treatement Year Street Name 0 From To J (ft) (ft) Area(sf) FC ST PCI Treatment Cost v u a 2012 11TH 300 S/SEAL N/OCEAN 2 210 25 5,250 E AC 01/12 64 2"AC Overlay $9,240 2012 1ST 200W 5/PCH N/MARINA 2 2,172 22 47,784 E AC 01/12 72 2"AC Overlay $49,451 2012 ADOLFO LOPEZ 200 W/SEAL BEACH 425 W/SEAL BEACH 2 425 60 25,500 E AC 01/12 74 Slurry Seal $21,069 2012 BLUE BELL 100 S/ALMOND N/BIRCHWOOD 2 710 33 23,430 E AC 01/12 79 Slurry Seal $7,150 2012 CLOVER 100 S/ALMOND N/END 2 130 33 4,290 E AC 01/12 75 Slurry Seal $3,113 2012 DAISY CIRCLE 100 S/FIR N/END 2 230 33 7,590 E AC 01/12 79 Slurry Seal $2,308 2012 DARTMOUTH 100 E/END W/HARVARD 2 180 34 6,120 E AC 01/12 81 Slurry Seal $868 2012 DOLPHIN 100 S/SEAL WAY N/OCEAN 2 226 24 5,424 E AC 01/12 64 2"AC Overlay $9,542 2012 ELDER 200 E/OLEANDER HEATHER 2 1,130 36 40,680 E AC 01/12 80 Slurry Seal $8,061 2012 ELECTRIC S 200 E/SEAL BEACH W/MAIN 1 2,360 25 59,000 C AC 01/12 72 2"AC Overlay $60,996 2012 FIR CIRCLE 100 S/FIR N/END 2 130 60 7,800 E AC 01/12 79 Slurry Seal $2,380 2012 GUAVA 200 E/PANSY W/HEATHER 2 1,360 33 44,880 E AC 01/12 78 Slurry Seal $18,353 2012 HAZELNUT 200 E/HEATHER W/ROSE 2 1,610 33 53,130 E AC 01/12 74 Slurry Seal $44,069 2012 MARIGOLD 100 S/BIRCHWOOD N/CANDLEBERRY 2 160 33 5,280 E AC 01/12 78 Slurry Seal $2,159 2013 12TH 300 S/SEAL N/OCEAN 2 210 24 5,040 E AC 01/12 83 Slurry Seal $730 2013 ADOLFO LOPEZ 200 W/SEAL BEACH 425 W/SEAL BEACH 2 425 60 25,500 E AC 01/12 74 Slurry Seal $25,503 2013 DAISY CIRCLE 100 S/FIR N/END 2 230 33 7,590 E AC 01/12 79 Slurry Seal $3,737 2013 DARTMOUTH 100 E/END W/HARVARD 2 180 34 6,120 E AC 01/12 81 Slurry Seal $1,727 2013 ELECTRIC N 100 E/MAIN W/6TH 1 960 27 25,920 C AC 01/12 46 Grind/Fill 2"AC $88,996 2013 HEATHER 200 S/ELDER N/HAZELNUT 2 790 37 29,230 C AC 01/12 63 Grind/Fill 2"AC $61,172 2013 IRONWOOD 200 E/ROSE W/IRIS 2 1,420 33 46,860 C AC 01/12 62 Grind/Fill 2"AC $104,216 2013 OLD RANCH PARKWAY 200 200 W/SEAL BEACH 720 W/SEAL BEACH 4 200 64 12,800 A AC 01/12 63 Grind/Fill 2"AC $26,753 2013 OLD RANCH PARKWAY 300 720 W/SEAL BEACH W/22 FWY 2 1,030 34 35,020 A AC 05/10 41 Grind/Fill 4"AC $120,241 2013 PRINCETON 100 E/END W/HARVARD 2 230 30 6,900 E AC 01/12 83 Slurry Seal $1,001 2013 ROSE 200 S/FIR N/HAZELNUT 2 390 37 14,430 C AC 01/12 66 2"AC Overlay $24,687 2013 ROSE 300 S/HAZELNUT N/LAMPSON 2 440 37 16,280 C AC 01/12 58 Grind/Fill 2"AC $46,683 2014 12TH 300 S/SEAL N/OCEAN 2 210 24 5,040 E AC 01/12 83 Slurry Seal $1,345 2014 BOLSA 100 E/SEAL BEACH W/MAIN 2 2,810 37 103,970 C AC 01/12 57 Grind/Fill 2"AC $374,830 2014 DAISY CIRCLE 100 S/FIR N/END 2 230_ 33 7,590 E AC 01/12 79 Slurry Seal $5,222 2014 DARTMOUTH 100 E/END W/HARVARD 2 180 34 6,120 E AC 01/12 81 Slurry Seal $2,940 2014 IRONWOOD 300 E/WISTERIA W/TULIP 2 322 37 11,914 C AC 01/12 32 Grind/Fill 2"AC $58,681 2014 PRINCETON 100 E/END W/HARVARD 2 230 30 6,900 E AC 01/12 83 Slurry Seal $1,849 2014 ROSSMOOR CTR 200 E/WEST RD W/MONTECITO 2 364 28 10,192 C AC 01/12 46 Grind/Fill 2"AC $36,744 2015 DAISY CIRCLE 100 S/FIR N/END 2 230 33 7,590 E AC 01/12 79 Slurry Seal $6,743 2015 IRONWOOD 400 W/TULIP W/SUNFLOWER 2 1,020 37 37,740 C AC 01/12 54 Grind/Fill 2"AC $142,862 2015 MAIN _100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH 2 690 55 37,950 C AC 01/12 50 Grind/Fill 2"AC $143,657 2015 MARINA 100 E/PCH 6TH 3 629 61 38,369 C AC 01/12 37 Grind/Fill 2"AC $175,558 2015 PURDUE CIRCLE 100 S/END N/COLLEGE PARK 2 68 27 1,836 E AC 01/12 59 Grind/Fill 2"AC $6,950 2016 1ST 200E S/MARINA N/PCH 2 2,172 23 49,956 E AC 01/12 68 2"AC Overlay $90,217 Nichols Consulting Engineers,Chtd. Page 1 of 2 City of Seal Beach Section Selected for Treatment($575,000/year,City's Existing Budget) ° w v Length Width ' Treatement Year Street Name °_ From To a J (ft) (ft) Area(sf) FC ST ° PCI Treatment Cost a 2016 ADOLFO LOPEZ 200 W/SEAL BEACH 425 W/SEAL BEACH 2 425 60 25,500 E AC 01/12 74 2"AC Overlay $39,014 2016 DAFFODIL 100 S/ALMOND N/END 2 230 33 7,590 E AC 01/12 90 Slurry Seal $1,144 2016 DAISY 100 S/ALMOND N/BIRCHWOOD 2 410 33 13,530 E AC 01/12 67 2"AC Overlay $24,533 2016 DARTMOUTH 100 E/END W/HARVARD 2 180 _ 34 6,120 E AC 01/12 81 Slurry Seal $5,589 2016 IRONWOOD 100 ELDER N/HEATHER 2 1,967 33 64,911 C AC 05/10 50 Grind/Fill 2"AC $258,002 2016 SUNFLOWER 200 S/FIR _N/IRONWOOD 2 560, 37 20,720 E AC 01/12 65 Grind/Fill 2"AC $56,461 2017 BALBOA 100 S/BOLSA N/CATALINA 2 1,060 37 39,220 C AC 01/12 31 Reconstruction(AC $372,151 6"/AB 10") 2017 BALBOA 200 1S/PCH N/BOLSA 2 660 37 24,420 E AC 01/12 63 Grind/Fill 2"AC $101,915 2018 10TH 300 S/SEAL N/OCEAN 2 210 25 5,250 E AC 01/12 63 Grind/Fill 2"AC $23,006 2018 11TH 200 S/ELECTRIC N/LANDING 2 210 37 7,770 E AC 01/12 54 Grind/Fill 2"AC $34,049 2018 14TH 300 S/SEAL N/OCEAN 2 210 25 5,250 E AC 01/12 63 Grind/Fill 2"AC $23,006 2018 17TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH 1 1,260 21 26,460 E AC 01/12 60 Grind/Fill 2"AC $115,951 2018 1ST 300 N/PCH 597NE/PCH 2 597 24 14,328 E AC 01/12 59 Grind/Fill 2"AC $62,787 2018 OLEANDER 100 ;5/ALMOND N/FIR 2 1,320 36 47,520 E AC 01/12 64 Grind/Fill 2"AC $208,238 Note: 1-"FC"is Functional Class A-Arterial C-Collector E-Residential 2-"ST"is Surface Type AC=Asphalt Concrete,PCC=Portland Cement Concrete Nichols Consulting Engineers,Chtd. Page 2 of 2