Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC AG PKT 2012-06-11 #F •.1' v' E A C QF'. ,t '9 AGENDA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 11, 2012 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council THRU: Jill R. Ingram, City Manager FROM: Sean P. Crumby P.E., Assistant City Manager/Public Works SUBJECT: AUTHORIZING VARIOUS APPLICATIONS FOR FUNDS THROUGH GRANT PROGRAMS SUMMARY OF REQUEST: It is requested that the City Council: a Adopt Resolution No. 6260 authorizing application for grant funds under the Environmental Cleanup Program Tier 1; • Adopt Resolution No. 6261 authorizing application for the Bicycle Corridor Improvement Program; and • Adopt Resolution No. 6262 authorizing application for State-Local Partnership Program funds. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: Three grant opportunities have been identified and currently are accepting applications. These open call for projects includes grant programs in Environmental Cleanup Tier 1, Bicycle Corridor Improvement, and State-Local Partnership program (SLPP) funds. The three grant programs are detailed as follows: Environmental Cleanup, Tier 1 Grant Program The Environmental Cleanup, Tier 1 Grant Program (ECP Tier 1) is a grant that is offered by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) as part of the Measure M program that provides grant funds to local agencies to improve overall water quality in Orange County from transportation-generated pollution. Projects eligible for ECP Tier 1 include equipment purchases and upgrades to existing catch basins and related best management practices such as screens, filters, inserts and other street-scale low flow diversion projects. Based upon the specific criteria, City staff submitted an application for installing 49 filter insets (DrainPacs) at various citywide catch basin locations. These locations have been identified as being potential contributors of litter, debris, and other pollutants which could enter into the City's storm drain system and drain to the ocean. Installing DrainPacs capture and treat urban runoff before entering Agenda Item F the municipal storm drain system. DrainPacs has been selected to be installed as a result of its effectiveness to improve water quality and the City's current experience maintaining and cleaning DrainPacs. Currently, 90% of the City's catch basins have DrainPacs installed by United Storm Water, Inc. The City's in house maintenance crew clean and maintain these devices. The majority of the DrainPacs are over 5 years old and are in need of replacement. The ECP Tier 1 allows local agencies to utilize the County of Orange's Vendor Master Agreements, which includes inclusive and competitive pricing for equipment and installation. The vendors that were selected through the County's request include Bio Clean Environmental Services, Inc., United Storm Water, Inc., and West Coast Storm. Staff recommends United Storm Water, Inc. for its competitive pricing, extensive experience as well as its previous experience (5 years) installing the City's existing DrainPacs. Bicycle Corridor Improvement Grant Program The Bicycle Corridor Improvement Grant Program (BCI) is a grant that is offered by the State of California and OCTA and provides funds available for bicycle improvement projects to local agencies. Projects eligible for the BCI include bicycle facilities, trails, and safety/outreach programs. An application was submitted to upgrade the bicycle facilities within Westminster Avenue between Seal Beach Boulevard and Bolsa Chica Avenue. Currently the street has a Class III bike lane (less than 4' wide) which would be replaced by a Class-II bike lane (5' wide) for the approximately 2 mile long section of road. The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Pavement Management Program (PMP) identify Westminster Avenue as a facility that will need resurfacing. This grant will combine the resurfacing funds and expand the existing bicycle lane facility. State-Local Partnership Program The State-Local Partnership Program (SLPP) is offered by the State of California and processed through OCTA. It is funded through the Proposition 1B ballot measure that was authorized by California voters through the Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006. These funds are intended for construction ready, transportation projects of regional significance, of which can include rehabilitation, capital construction, and construction management so long as the work provides a minimum 15 year useful life for the project. Funds are available to every Orange County city based upon the city's population. These are non-competitive funds that require an equal matching contribution of funds from the City using the Measure M2 turnback funding. The funding available to Seal Beach will be approximately $318,000. An application was submitted proposing road rehabilitation for the SLPP funds available to Seal Beach. The streets selected to receive this funding are those Page 2 that were identified within the City's Pavement Management Plan (PMP). The streets within the PMP will be forwarded from those identified as needing rehabilitation. The roads selected for this application are: o Ironwood Avenue from Elder Avenue to Heather Street; G Ironwood Avenue from Wisteria Avenue to Tulip Street; o Sandpiper Drive from Bolsa Avenue to Taper Drive; o Southshore Drive from Bolsa Avenue to Taper Drive; ® Taper Drive from Bolsa Avenue to Catalina Avenue; and o Electric Avenue North from Main Street to 14th Street. Should this project not be approved, a second priority road rehabilitation project has been submitted. The roads selected for the second priority application are: e 1st Street from Pacific Coast Highway to Marina Avenue; e Marina Avenue from Pacific Coast Highway to 6th Street; ® Balboa Drive from Bolsa Avenue to Catalina Avenue; and o Electric Avenue South from Main Street to 14th Street. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: Submittal of the grant applications are not identified as a project within the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). If the projects move forward they will all comply with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Detailed information will be presented at the appropriate time. LEGAL ANALYSIS: No legal analysis is required for this item. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The ECP Tier 1 requires a 25% minimum local match. The project total cost is $14,300 and the City's contribution is $3,600. Funds have not yet been budgeted for this project. Funding options will be presented if the grant is awarded to the City prior to moving forward with the project. The BCI requires a 12% minimum local match. The project total cost is $1,000,000 and the City's contribution is $150,000. Funds have not yet been budgeted for this project, but have been identified in the Capital Improvement Program. Funding options will be presented if the grant is awarded to the City prior to moving forward with the project. The SLPP requires a local match using Measure M2 turnback funds. The anticipated funding would be for $318,000 which would require City Measure M2 turnback match of $318,000. The City has these funds available. Matching Page 3 funds will be under the City's Local and Arterial Street resurfacing programs which are budgeted at $475,000. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council: O Adopt Resolution No. 6260 authorizing application for grant funds under the Environmental Cleanup Program Tier 1; O Adopt Resolution No. 6261 authorizing application for the Bicycle Corridor Improvement Program; and o Adopt Resolution No. 6262 authorizing application for State-Local Partnership Program funds. SUBMITTED BY: NOTED AND APPROVED: 4;// Sean P. Crumby, PTE. 1 Jill, R. Ingram, C ty anager Assistant City Manager/Pub is Works Prepared by: Cesar Rangel, Assistant Engineer Attachments: A. Resolution No. 6260 (ECP Tier 1) and application B. Resolution No. 6261 (BC) and application C. Resolution No. 6262 (SLPP) and application Page 4 Attachment A Resolution No. 6260 Environmental Cleanup Program Tier 1 Application Page 5 RESOLUTION NUMBER 6260 A RESOLUTION OF THE SEAL BEACH CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION FOR FUNDS FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP, TIER 1 GRANT PROGRAM UNDER ORANGE COUNTY LOCAL TRANSPORTATION ORDINANCE NO. 3 FOR THE FILTER INSERTS INSTALLATION PROJECT WHEREAS, Orange County Local Transportation Ordinance No.3, dated July 24, 2006, and is known and cited as the Renewed Measure M Transportation Ordinance and Investment Plan makes funds available through the Environmental Cleanup Program to help protect Orange County beaches and waterways from transportation-generated pollution (urban runoff) and improve overall water quality. WHEREAS, the Environmental Cleanup, Tier 1 Grant Program consists of funding purchases and installation to catch basins with Best Management Practices, such as screens, filters, inserts, and other "street-scale" low flow diversion projects. WHEREAS, OCTA has established the procedures and criteria for reviewing proposals; and WHEREAS, City of Seal Beach possesses authority to nominate water quality improvement projects that have a transportation pollution nexus to finance and construct the proposed project; and WHEREAS, by formal action the City Council authorizes the nomination of Filter Inserts Installation Project, including all understanding and assurances contained therein, and authorizes the person identified as the official representative of the City of Seal Beach to act in connection with the nomination and to provide such additional information as may be required; and WHEREAS, the City of Seal Beach will maintain and operate the equipment acquired and installed; and WHEREAS, the City of Seal Beach will give OCTA's representatives access to and the light to examine all records, books, papers or documents related to the funded Tier 1 Grant Project; and WHEREAS, the City of Seal Beach will cause work on the project to commence within a reasonable time after receipt of notification from OCTA and that the project will be carried to completion with reasonable diligence; and WHEREAS, the City of Seal Beach will comply where applicable with provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, the American with Disabilities Act, and any other federal, state, and/or local laws, rules and/or regulations; THE SEAL BEACH CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY RESOLVE: Section 1. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager as the official representative of the City of Seal Beach to accept funds for the Environmental Cleanup,Tier 1 Grant Program for the Filter Inserts Installation Project; and, Section 2. The City Council agrees to fund its share of the project costs and any additional costs over the identified programmed amount. Section 3. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute the resolution. Resolution Number 6260 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Seal Beach City Council at a regular meeting held on the 11th day of June 2012 by the following vote: AYES: Council Members NOES: Council Members ABSENT: Council Members ABSTAIN: Council Members Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA } COUNTY OF ORANGE } SS CITY OF SEAL BEACH } I, Linda Devine, City Clerk of the City of Seal Beach, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is the original copy of Resolution Number 6260 on file in the office of the City Clerk, passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting held on the 11th day of June 2012. City Clerk aGa; - .'' 1,.-.'.- ue .:.: - zet' ~ . ^ i �� r -, s'�-?7 S� • rGr" i",,,nom � T >. �}• -ss` . a-- `� r. i. ky'' f* - '"'»! , r 3 >< r e �. -w t.„,} 6r ' `€ r v�yq^f { 't„5 f ; ,r i f a ;k.t ” ^'a .• 4 cra -9.,:-..-P4'..., - ; 'P.- - ' -� C-�, i tj s 'k";+:, , ,i U na .. 3 a d4 47 ? t" r o ,�'>;` l S • ,,.'3F' tr 7 "v detsC 14:•:=?-'0...,:ikVi.i'...: v *-'h}[ n +s 4S y?`��' .,-' t-X -. -' r :,. e _rY • 4 Y ! j� Y i�. ., ' 6 r � -:. yiL?, . -", ` ,Z., c▪ •• ,! 'nl3: rs• Trtk -r' `2� S .d r✓ .� # t ... r3�'7- _ l. . - � "•,r }^+ .t: ji '^t +. 7 +=,h `x ` t r s t ,a �<� ? '' ,i�aa" I , , G c ,s -, ,?'i' -?j �i X• .�r . .j4, j 4 ;sz x ' '� ' - r . ,x �,F 0,&.�ib • y�, i h , tiyl �z•�?3: 4 i k:' i pr, _ '� t + �te t> "F b 1 .:� �_a> n.' t "- {:14- n i r F h.. "a - �'. , � k ,2,, *r�' °: ,."�'al. v, �t,z? ,e: rr t k f '?=+ � iuJ r vr ' ;; __�� " .t 'Y S 141,,,;-- - ez .r T ' '.'r - 4s ��:1^ . _f f r' ' ;t.s _l ‘-';"4,4:, :.'1'- 45'.';'.1k, :ti 2„-r.0-. t ? � .,�,a+ •x ,a,, �- CITY OF SEAL EACH 2 Environment!' Cleanup Program Tier 1 2012 Grant Application 2012 April 20, is :.._ , .1 `t�F R27'�t`, ".r Orange County Transportation Authority Dan Phu 600 South Main Street Orange, CA 92663 ifP::;1 t `t .„, . ; tx > " 'x r ?i lr ,{fy�i.1 `Fw ?e_ r r 4SKZ,• "� r.,,a :rY - i.-, �ft • {�;4 • s ''a`� k.7'' . ,ya•ti�irt " * f , ?. ; nJ i ce : ss a v s� -i r Qs, +, ' ?T :fi r,--1 a v 1 t;. y,n.1 , _ Ycm 7 „,. . .:�', K ",.,� ` i " ~ � Y+ , ` "ts ad . ri.. s h' s h Y �i £6 i� 'Tt,t tea.,' T) �` ra s � } 9p.i. y, L t :,i u a ,',3_ ` �a � ft't`' � , 'Jh i; r . 3 . �'”?..i ` -*- �F A t t�- tom ', (.L re' �4x si.+'� ef. , -{ .2..-- , 's.-- 4�, }fi `Z r a.— a 3 a �, -t�s� S. g. ' � } w G : s.<x"+ Tom, ...x h . {a ^c, +^c f"'4 a �,$; ' *: ��: � .� 3x; ▪ .0,,;,,,,:t.,•-:.,.. .-'. -a „,,,,,,,..--,7',- 1 t, .-” ' ^ .y Table of Contents M2 Environmental Cleanup Program Tier 12012 Grant Application Sections Page ECP Tier 1 Grant Application • Part One (General Project Information) 1 • Part Two (Detailed Project Information) 3 • Part Three (Funding) 7 • Part Four(Grant Draft Resolution) 9 • Checklist 11 Attachments A. Organizational Chart 12 B. Project Location Map 13 C. Watershed Map 14 D. Design/Concept Drawings and Specifications 15 E. Project Site Photos 16 of sEai e•. •9a J2. Air( I I Exhibit 12-1 ECP Tier 1 Grant Application Form Orange County Transportation Authority M2 Environmental Cleanup Program (Project X) Part One: General Project Information (Non-scored) Project Title: Filter Inserts Installation Project Lead Agency Information(Project FUNDS REQUESTED $10,700 75% Administrator responsible for day-to-day LOCAL MATCH $ 3,600 25% project implementation) TOTAL PROJECT COST $14,300 100% Name/Title: David Spitz/Associate Engineer IS Project is a stand alone project. Address: 211 8th Street ❑ Project is part of a larger project. Seal Beach, CA 90740 Total Project Cost(if part of a larger project) Phone: (562)431-2527 ext.1331 Email: dspitz@sealbeachca.gov Joint Applicant or Third Party: Joint Applicant or Third Party: Name/Title:Not Applicable Name/Title: Agency: Agency: Address: Address: Phone: Phone: Email: Email: i. Is this proposed project designated as the eligible agency's highest priority for funding? Yes_X No ii. Proposed Schedule: Provide an estimate of the project's proposed schedule: Start Date Completion Date Design and Permitting(if applicable) N/A N/A Award of Contract 8/27/12 9/27/12 Construction 10/1/12 12/31/12 1 � ECP Tier 1 Grant Application Form Part One: General Project Information (continued) • iii. Project Management Provide an assessment of the management capabilities of the Lead Agency. At a minimum, include an organization chart (include as attachment), showing key project individuals who will be responsible for ensuring that the project is completed and long-term suitability is obtained. The Public Works Department will service as the lead for this Project. The grant project management and administration will be overseen by David Spitz, Associate Engineer, Public Works Department, who is also the City's NPDES coordinator. The City's Maintenance Department, overseen by Jeff Watson, Maintenance Service Manager, inspects and cleans all the municipal catch basin twice a year, Spring and Fall. Additionally, the City's Maintenance Service Supervisor, who has overseen installation of Drainpacs on over 200 catch basins, will oversee the work performed by United Storm Water, Inc. See Attachment A (organizational chart). iv. Integrated Regional Water Management Plan (IRWMP) Is the proposed project identified in an existing IRWMP? Yes No If yes,provide further information on why it was included in the IRWMP: Not Applicable v. Description and Scope of Proposed Project Include a brief description of the proposed project, including why the project is important for controlling transportation-related pollutants to a watershed(s). The City of Seal Beach is a residential beach community with a population of 26,010. The California State Water Resources Control Board has stated that trash has had a serious impact on the beneficial uses of California's coastal shorelines. The City of Seal Beach is located along the California coastline, North Orange County Watershed Area. The City's storm drain system consists of two-hundred and seventeen (217) catch basins ranging from three (3) feet to twenty (20) feet in width, all within the City's right-of-way. Currently, 90% of the City's catch basins have DrainPacs installed by United Storm Water Inc. The City of Seal is proposing a Filter Insert Installation (Project) to install forty-nine (49) filter inserts (DrainPacs) at various citywide catch basin locations. These locations either contain outdated filters inserts, defective inserts, or no filter inserts at all. The work is planned to be performed between October and December of 2012. See Attachment B (project locations). 2 ECP Tier 1 Grant Application Form Part Two: Detailed Project Information (Scored) 1. Identify the priority areas of this project. Describe the need for the selected BMP(s). (5 points) This project will serve the City of Seal Beach citywide at various locations where DrainPacs are missing or are being replaced. The proposed DrainPacs will be installed on arterial, collectors and local roads, which are comprised of industrial, commercial, and residential developments including food service establishments, automotive repair facilities, and public school and parks. These locations have been identified as being potential contributors of litter, debris and other pollutants which would enter into the City's storm drain system. Installing DrainPacs will capture and treat urban runoff before entering the municipal storm drain system. The reason why DrainPacs have been selected to be installed is because it is a simple and effective means to improve water quality. Additionally, the City has had prior experience maintaining and cleaning DrainPacs with grant results. 2. List the pollutant(s)which would be mitigated and the source(s) generating the pollutants. (2 points per pollutant, up to 10 points) The City's major sources of storm water pollutants are suspended solids, vegetation, oil and litter. They are unsightly and repel visitors from the beach. Additionally, they are harmful to the environment, not only destroying habitat but affecting the aquatic life forms it contacts. Animals become entangled in trash such as plastic six-pack rings. Others eat trash such as plastic bags and choke. These pollutants are primarily generated from pedestrians, such as around schools and fast-food businesses and careless disposal practices. Also arterial and collector streets of high traffic volumes generate large amounts of brake dust and oil, which wash into catch basins. 3. List the waterway(s) associated with the project, including applicable 303(d) listings, and provide a project map depicting the waterway(s). (2 points for listing waterways(s) plus 2 points per 303 (d)impairment addressed by the proposed BMP(s) up to 10 points total) The Project encompasses citywide installation of DrainPacs, see Attachment B. As shown in Attachment C, the City of Seal Beach drains to two local watersheds. The Anaheim Bay drains a watershed of approximately 402 acres, covering one-third of the City's drainage area. Trash, floating litter, and nickel have been recurring problems in the bay. Anaheim Bay is on the 303(d)-listing as impaired for deldrin, nickel, polychlorinated biphnyls, and toxicity. Installing new and replacing outdated catch basin inserts is proposed for this area. The DrainPac is capable of retaining a number of 3 I ECP Tier 1 Grant Application Form these pollutants. The easterly two-thirds of the City falls within San Gabriel- Coyote Creek, draining a watershed of approximately 165 miles, 85.5 square miles of which lie in North Orange County and the remainder in Los Angeles County. Although it's not listed as impaired per the Region 8 (Santa Ana) 303d lists it is listed as impaired by the Los Angeles Regional Board. There has been indication of many exceedances of copper, lead, and zinc. Again, the DrainPac is capable of retaining a number of these pollutants. 4. Provide detailed manufacturer's information for the proposed BMP(s) including how the equipment would operate and the estimated design life of the project. How is this determined? (5 points) The product's design life is estimated by United Storm Water, Inc. for ten (10) years. The equipment drawings and specifications are referenced and discussed in Attachment D. 5. Provide relevant information on performance efficiency and/or effectiveness including pollutant capture,storage capacity,flow capacity, etc. (5 points) For the Project, the City of Seal Beach proposes to install new and replace outdated DrainPacs with the newest generation from United Stormwater Inc. These DrainPac prohibit most trash and debris from entering the municipal storm drain system without affecting water flow conditions helping to prevent flooding. These multi-layer filtration devises are installed in a manner that does not interfere with lateral line water flow. During periods of increased or heavy water flow, the DrainPac has a PVC mesh for overflow/by-pass. The DrainPac is capable of retaining 97% of total suspended solids, effectively preventing litter, debris, heavy metals and others from entering the City's storm drain system. Over the years, approximately 7 tons of debris/pollutants are removed annually from filters currently installed in the City's catch basins. By replacing aged and defective filter inserts and adding inserts to the rest of the City's catch basins, the City conceivably remove an additionally one to two more tons of pollutants annually, that currently enters into our waterways and ocean. 4 ECP Tier 1 Grant Application Form Part Two: Detailed Project Information (continued) 6. Explain how the proposed BMP(s) meet(s) the jurisdiction's needs compared to other equipment(or BMPs). (5 points) The City of Seal Beach has already implemented both drop inlet and curb inlet DrainPacs in over 200 catch basins. The City has evaluated and identified DrainPacs as the most effective device that captures and treats urban runoff prior to entering the City's storm drain system. 7. Include a detailed work plan demonstrating a definite implementation period. (5 points) The Project is ready to proceed immediately upon finalization of grant documentation. No permits are necessary, as the Project is essentially a re- habilitation of already-developed infrastructure. The City owns and maintains all catch basins citywide. If awarded funding for the Project, the City will utilize the County's Vendor Master Agreement, which will need to be approved by the City Council to proceed with procurement. 8. Provide a 5-year operations and maintenance(O&M) plan for the lifespan of the proposed project(i.e.,schedule of inspections,cleaning and disposal of pollutants, repairs, etc.). (5 points) After the Project has been completed, the City will resume with its regular street-sweeping, inspection and cleaning schedule. The street sweeping will remove any trash, organic debris, and/or particulates that accumulate in the gutters in front of catch basins. Annually in the Spring, City Staff installs catch basin screens on over 95% of the catch basins and in the Fall, City Staff removes the screens to prevent flooding. Additionally, the current Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board requires catch basins to be cleaned once per year, however, City Staff inspects and cleans all City catch basins twice a year. • 9. Describe the anticipated benefits to water quality and any additional benefits that would result from the proposed BMP(s). (5 points) Implementing the proposed Project as described above will result in the following benefits: • Gross pollutants will be significantly reduced through the installation of the catch basin DrainPacs. Currently, in unprotected catch basins, silt, debris, trash and other unsuitable material enters into a catch basin and travels to the Pacific Ocean and pollutes coastal waters. • The DrainPacs will reduce the amount of heavy metals that are currently reaching ocean waters. These heavy metals are the result of automotive usage and careless disposal practices. 51 ECP Tier 1 Grant Application Form If approved, this Project will have a positive impact on the residents and visitors to Seal Beach. Improving the water quality will have benefits to the local and regional economy by ensuring that beaches are clean and ocean water is safe. 10. Is this project the highest priority for your agency?Yes_X_ No (15 points will be given to the agency's highest priority project) 11.What is the methodology for measuring pollutant(s) reduction(s) before and after BMP(s) is/are implemented? (5 points) The City already has at least six years of records detailing the volume of trash, organic debris, and particulates that have been removed. This includes catch basins with and without DrainPacs. Quantification is conducted during each cleaning process accomplished by using a vacuum truck, which then the solids are weighted (tons). The pre-and post-debris volumes are analyzed to determine the total debris volume reduction. 12. How will the effectiveness of the project be monitored and assessed?How frequently will monitoring and assessment occur? (5 points) The pre- and post-debris volume data will be compiled and compared to determine the total annual debris reduction and the average reduction per catch basin. Currently, the City inspects and cleans all municipal catch basins twice a year, Spring and Fall. This standard will continue to be implemented with the newly installed DrainPacs. 13. BONUS: How many Tier 1 type or similar BMPs are currently installed within the street right of way? Do not include projects/BMPs funded with Tier 1 M2 ECAC funds. (Up to 5 bonus points may be awarded to jurisdictions that have previously funded the implementation of structural BMPs—1 point per BMP implemented) Currently the City has 180 DrainPacs installed, which is over 80% of the municipal catch basins with installed DrainPacs. Additionally, the City manually installs catch basin screens during the Spring and removed in the Fall to prevent flooding. 14. BONUS: Is the agency proposing matching funds exceeding the minimum of 25%? If yes, at what percentage amount? (0.5 point for each 5% over 25%, up to 5 points maximum) No. 6 ECP Tier 1 Grant Application Form Part Three: Funding (The information below is used to score numbers 15 and 16 of the Application Review Checklist [5 points each]) Project Title: Filter Inserts Installation Project Phone: (562)431-2527 ext. 1331 Contact: David Spitz.Associate Engineer Email: dspitz @sealbeachca.gov Agency: City of Seal Beach Budget Summary The following table for the proposed project shall be completed with a reasonable estimate of cost for all work items. Total Project Cost(TPC) $14,300.00 Total Amount of Funding Requested(not to exceed$100,000) $10,700.00 Total Contractual Service Costs for Project $0 Total Contractual Service Costs for Requested Funding $0 Total Capital Costs for Project for Requested Funding $14,300.00 Direct Project Administration,Inspection,Evaluation Costs $0 Total Project Costs of Supplies,Materials and Equipment(SM&E) $ included in contractual service costs Total Project Costs of SM&E for Requested Funding $N/A Local Funding Share Detail Cash Contribution $ 3,600 Total Project Cost $ 14,300 In-Kind Services* $ - Other Grants $ - Total Funding Share $ 3,600 %of TPC 25.2 Source(s)of Match 1. *In-Kind Services:Salaries and benefits for employees who will perform work on the proposed project are eligible as a matching requirement. Please provide details on how in-kind services are calculated. Identify the Fiscal Year(s)of In-Kind expenditure and amount for each year.Use no acronyms. Not Applicable • 2. Other Grants-Eligible applicants may use grants awarded by other agencies(non-ECP grants)to meet all or part of the matching funds requirements. The non-ECP grant must be dedicated to the project in which M2 funding is requested to receive credit for the full amount of the grant. For non-ECP grants that cover multiple projects,only that portion of the grant specific to the project will be allowed credit. Please list the name and amount of any respective non-ECP grants that are proposed as a match. Not Applicable 7 ECP Tier 1 Grant Application Form Part Three: Funding (continued) Estimated Capital Costs Item# Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Catch Basin Inserts(length 4'or less) 3.5 feet 15 $ 232.14 $ 3,482.10 2 Catch Basin Inserts(length 6'- 10') 7 feet 8 $ 451.16 $ 3,609.28 3 Catch Basin Inserts(length 10.1'- 16') 10 feet 4 $ 550.00 $ 2,200.00 4 Catch Basin Inserts(length 10.1'-16') 14feet 8 $ 550.00 $ _4,400.00 5 Catch Basin Inserts(length 10.1'-16') 16 feet 1 $ 550.00 $ 550.00 Subtotal: $ 14,241.38 Estimated Capital Costs Item# Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount Included within the Couty/United Storm Water Inc.Vendor Master Agreement Subtotal: $ - Other Costs Item# Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount Not Applicable Subtotal: $ - TOTAL PROJECT COST $14,241.38 8 ECP Tier 1 Grant Application Form Part Four: Tier 1 Grant Program Resolution RESOLUTION NUMBER A RESOLUTION OF THE SEAL BEACH CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION FOR FUNDS FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP, TIER 1 GRANT PROGRAM UNDER ORANGE COUNTY LOCAL TRANSPORTATION ORDINANCE NO. 3 FOR THE FILTER INSERTS INSTALLATION PROJECT WHEREAS, Orange County Local Transportation Ordinance No.3, dated July 24, 2006, and is known and cited as the Renewed Measure M Transportation Ordinance and Investment Plan makes funds available through the Environmental Cleanup Program to help protect Orange County beaches and waterways from transportation-generated pollution (urban runoff) and improve overall water quality. WHEREAS, the Environmental Cleanup, Tier 1 Grant Program consists of funding purchases and installation to catch basins with Best Management Practices, such as screens, filters, inserts, and other "street-scale" low flow diversion projects. WHEREAS, OCTA has established the procedures and criteria for reviewing proposals; and WHEREAS, City of Seal Beach possesses authority to nominate water quality improvement projects that have a transportation pollution nexus to finance and construct the proposed project; and WHEREAS, by formal action the City Council authorizes the nomination of Filter Inserts Installation Project, including all understanding and assurances contained therein, and authorizes the person identified as the official representative of the City of Seal Beach to act in connection with the nomination and to provide such additional information as may be required; and WHEREAS, the City of Seal Beach will maintain and operate the equipment acquired and installed; and WHEREAS, the City of Seal Beach will give OCTA's representatives access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers or documents related to the funded Tier 1 Grant Project; and WHEREAS, the City of Seal Beach will cause work on the project to be commenced within a reasonable time after receipt of notification from OCTA and that the project will be carried to completion with reasonable diligence; and WHEREAS, the City of Seal Beach will comply where applicable with provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, the 91 ECP Tier 1 Grant Application Form American with Disabilities Act, and any other federal, state, and/or local laws, rules and/or regulations; THE SEAL BEACH CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY RESOLVE: Section 1. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager as the official representative of the City of Seal Beach to accept funds for the Environmental Cleanup, Tier 1 Grant Program for the Filter Inserts Installation Project; and, Section 2. The City Council agrees to fund its share of the project costs and any additional costs over the identified programmed amount. Section 3. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute the resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Seal Beach City Council at a regular meeting held on the day of 2012 by the following vote: AYES: Council Members NOES: Council Members ABSENT: Council Members ABSTAIN: Council Members Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA } COUNTY OF ORANGE } SS CITY OF SEAL BEACH } I, Linda Devine, City Clerk of the City of Seal Beach, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is the original copy of Resolution Number on file in the office of the City Clerk, passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting held on the day of , 2012. City Clerk 101 ECP Tier 1 Grant Application Form Checklist Mandatory Application Items (check all items included in this package) X Review of CTFP Funding Program Guidelines _X Application (Part 1 -3) X_Environmental Documentation (if applicable) X_Preliminary Cooperative Agreement(if applicable) X_25%Matching Fund Requirement X_Project Cost Estimate X_Proposed Budget _X_Maps X_Design/Concept Drawing X_Digital Project Site Photos X Project Schedule X Draft Resolution 11 I ECP Tier 1 Grant Application Form ATTACHMENT A ORGANIZATIONAL CHART 121 GN feb4;ill �I SN t11M1 ► ` 0% co .0 5 O N > D a5 a) ' t U_ as is O ° L N is 'a"c C m O +, w w a.• C a) 0 C • d Y as a)) N c O N 'o h a) co m � � c mU N d • E .y O Q' !0 0 j C O_ ti af4. 0 Wcn E ( .' Q 'x o -a as F.!:. C Y..-c` 4 0 Q O co m > rn r�yy'_a i� Q O 0 0 EL - a) d 0 Q W ,:...r.-. m 0 0. a R Z PH gct y r V 0 y s i O C a) U N _U _U U_ 4, U_ . U_ N••'Yl' ` in a`) run 'Z1 Z > Zx : oo Z •C ZU) Z � m 8 to � co C/) co -0 CO .. C/) co a N 0 C) v 0 a as -o w a o v m 13 c -o 0 as s , m c5 t m m S.D. 5 d � m m2 mY 92 5 r3 C 4? a) > lL . IL w 0 w 0 u. w w C � ' Lfl 1 I I I �cR ,i R mo3 `m E c7) u) 4 . , • ,, ER • 01 t +"z ECP Tier 1 Grant Application Form ATTACHMENT B PROJECT LOCATION MAP 131 City of Seal Beach Filter Inserts Installation Project N W (\'� E "`fr S Al 11 11:( ® 8�. . � ` Lamps e irMi ,,,,,, ,,, . lip..A-..,',1;---4.s =.: . iii 1/ . .. 4430 : r�d �'"wryly 405 e *Os* 0A1V011 :' I1i 4 'A r�yw�f�� �, !■,A1i1 1 �■1 Westminster Ave e� Irll • Gs I =- G ,--/ � Safi _r_--•„ 1 ,�� '` ' m`' U.S. Naval Weapons Station �I r / - ii_ 9 GL +' f e e /lam `'4� `. K � I '=-,..L.1, "\ 44*4' il Il Anaheim Bay ,\ &IL _�g&--,,1',AV elffearaearakint0A '•N 1\r" Pacific Ocean Publ/e ►®ras Legend: 0 Install Catch Basin Inserts ECP Tier 1 Grant Application Form ATTACHMENT C WATERSHED MAP 140 '-::'''..14 f,'",#•.t-P...."47Y- =•-te'''..j.'7'4"--.„.''''''Ar-=-..._-'-.ir..7, --.-. :•,--- •7•••••--• -'•"7-r,--- '''-•-"-::----7-.• '''-- - -' .-. - *A...4. --......e....., .--A .4 5,....T....1 -....-4. .....e...' 4_4,:-•--■..-4.5-- -. "` -,-- -,-A-, • .-- - • -. • ;if _..,y,c4.1 ,-..1 ..-......71 ... T,,, ...-,41:;„;.......•:*".,.-. -rir. ...„, 7- •„le_ • 2,,..•”.71,. ••, 4-..'-`,:.°-' -- .. • •,'•`,""± A° .,$.T.• ..„ ...t_Ncrir.:a-r.,;:-.:-. , .-_-4,1.:.. ..,....t, , ,r, •••...,_: .1--,..„,.., - .,:',. ' ''.-.4-,..' •:- „ '' '- : •_-- - '-r•-.-- ..••..,,E.- - . ',...„. -Alt Re.....",:i 4f.:7.6 el. ."`:,•-.7::5;'.711,V r+.0 4 :':-....,,...1.0%'•- .•--:•".°.'", ;,r.eiV.'..-• , r....-•' •*-.. .`.41!: _ .-•••••-,,, ••••-"-r. 4 • (2, .7.,•••„,-iFf."."---_-- .14.4 f,..'".-.;:-,47 .if ::.- ; -- - .. 1„,...o ' ' "‘- -,. •„" ..- _:',.......- ' A-• ,..*. . ..„,_ „...av_...„t ..,... .._, ,. ,p ,.., .....,420,, ,,, .4. _...,; ..,t.......... ....,Wpc.. ...: -......•*P.-4-.;FK.'''1 ''. • ';«:` -‘,41.1 .....; --t: -......--r7;'. .,,...51f>ii '' . 4_j,..1,-"..--rt--- . - •':•••, .... . .`0 ••`".1.t-4..."2:‘,.-,'.';,. . -•-' -4.- i* ...* ,....' 11 ■- .- .-•-,:- ...• .• ,01-4 ,:f...i '.. ksil., '.4.1 4.•,,O.•'...,,;•-•,j..s.'....,'•'.•- ''• .:•,....-, ,. .,•,-t.i.-4-,:-.,- . t,,. -1, tf.:°,.A„'4 .--.. 4,,,-... ..,.....,,r, ,,J,..,,,,,t,1„, . ...r.4...._.-,---1'..:‘ .„za ..-,',..•4,,,i,...1-- --.----.'.';-,,•-,- ,,,. • ' ..--' :;. :1 `7"..-•-.",1 , X ` -.:. --••,-•-„,,1-14... -,-Y.- r.--" ,.::e•---• ;•,..: „ •• -' -f ..v.-..- ' -. , -,, .!*.1--,.-..- - .-- .•‘. ,.v..1- I-,.A.....--..•; 1V!..1:1,.:;.. b. .. . -1.., c-e:•,, -,-,. • 4 ..._., ,..: __ • r- , •le. $ .t-S '..1 ' ..• _ -..' -fer.1.-PY,ftt% ,As• +,44"-:...'/• •6 •-.•-, •-'- ..."`:^1,' .' - -• '.,` -,...' ...- -, •M -.: El r•i•-0441 ...,"•.`•-• •a. -..... •:,',. .....,, ... .;..f. - , .... ,,,, F"--134-2.1.'i -. .XI:4: "." - ' 4S.:,-. .-.1'.:S' - ''' g'''''' N i-t.- .04yd ‘,.-..: • ,T.„4:1 4..,;;..Y.r : ' i-' '.'17:X.--i"!3•1-1--5-' "•-foll,--- :.= 11'.,.,.1)17:---:::-.17•470.-•:::-,•,)-ii.Pti ,..t- . . .('3: 1%4-Tr.t.,,,•:,1"1.,%3,;.•;-•r- L-' fit*i.'r-at.i3t- 2- t,,E,:..,- 41,y ,.• --...-kP,-...'1,2*;..c„.,^-in 4- .V.'..', ' ,Fie.c_^rinfz, 4,..*,.....%!.....it. ., IT,r,„.4/1_14.1fAt:;: ,....yr, -'7,,:5 ''''. - -4.4.:, N- .„,-- .,.. . 9. 1.... , . ....-- -V= .i ',1,- .'... • : .. ,,," _., . ."1/4. :z ...L. -.: .x. CI Or ••• ei , 4-',' los er ' .--- ...-,, • 0 - 4.'t _pa 7.4 ., ,- -ii,---- ,'7"- s"'""*"..."L'97%;, "- -2-...,„,, „...::.--_-,- ---- R '' '....:', - 'fn %!* .,..0! -' • ,r/ i 1-2- •-• *lei "-- - C"? =-- t r -. • ::,-. .rcf, = 3 , 01 ■'44,- • 1 !... r ,... - . -.- i v., t•":: ' 7: . 1 -a. t_ ,.. . :U - ri ... . b.;I 1„6..4- ,c) „t ",_ fr '...54. „., s.),. .71" • 6 -:: :.., ..-: n. - .r L.ty.r= • • ... - ,,..y -rye -,--- - r-t - “ -' ( CLi . ... . a• 0 , s -, .,; ,14.,:. L.:, -7.. .• i .. t.„„te...03 4,147 . 0 . ,., ."1- , . '''''ft. , ,r,..; .3 --.,-,....,_._...,;•. ,_ E...'., 2 I .a .•••••• _ . ,.. , ._1 0 ..,1 , • ...,_•;_,•_..,_ _. ,._.,,.. ,•.. • i " .. ' ., .4 .. ....-.. - 0 .'. i".4:' ..ff' ' :-.". .. Ag.. .,isi.:,_-:.t....-,;`,,,e........;...':-•-;::.;-'-1---,.`"-% , ''sy - ' •.* , %-•:_. •••••r sell - .... _ ...:. 1 r '• - . .,.t • .,. .r • P -- +74., i .P.S.,'■' / NI \ XI lot Jwymen•Immt .. I'''' 4-' . "t..40,4. •••• 1 . . -",-,'"-4:• .:- , jvf,-- , ../ %...... • - - ...... „,4 .,:. ''' 'i'•`1, ......e.k., ,fl- ' , -: -. . -1,,,, .-.:.:... % n - * ... , ...,--- ,- / - - .•.., • .;. ° ...'' '''.I- ''''441''.PIWCVSW/Ati3.:r- : yr , :., Pv-=, (,0,....., .,-,_ _..._ 1 i . .....„: -,;..- ,.., 0.,-,...-..„,.1.,... ,:• , .,.: ,,,;-,T,44. ,, *, •et .•-, " -0. t- " - ti• '.:"'-•=f-`am'- ;. 'z--.''' ` .'• ,f , ,ro, , ---k.-" 4-4.' ' .,,_, ., ..,-. *,,,,,... n 4' /0... ,:,... ,.,..,4_,•_,, ,-..„..r.., d*:1,-. • -, .,-,. 4, --- t- S •09- '• • . -" -- •- .11';',- 41' ''''-*):.,L,.. gt ''',,..‘"• 1.` •:::. :. --•--,...,If. 4 'I/ -. , • . .. II . .. 1W:4 0.)N. . ,t2 4.er ?ark' • . . ,.. ' . ,''V' .., ..• it ••• • • •i 'a; ,. 4:1 • kaa E. -'''- -.?''','. ';417.-0. '7' ',.. -- , .■.,...4...". . ..1;• -il t. ,.... , .." 1:'-' 'j`:-- 7. '.4 ( . ---: - • .•,. .- k. .' r .. 'I 1 "-•-, " ,, .4.' „,.._ ,.!,_. _ .r.....lc, .• .„. a! ..."'...C.--::••:-....,-'•*al• nabg.. .--c. mu_ '4. • • - .• • '"''''h'.1..5cm .A' --V...... '. 'I.' -4E:1"; --4 •. 'N.,Z , 'N - ,aft44..„.... ..:,..tr.-'1,...... -1--...„....„• , .:„ 31,,,,,,,,,i,_ - - :3-. -k.,' 1 ;1 Pe .”- ... Irr-.,k."-- ,_:.., r---...;,.., .., - . I/. - ,- :--k..-:.}'> , _,.-- e. . .:;,-4,- -, 1- • ,E _.. _ . „ , . . • 4- lir, ..,,..... . . . F.....12.1 a. .r -,•.,„5,. -',,-,• - , , ., • -11/4 Irr. •,....,;•-...`',4" .:,„ - .'4!. Ng-, '••, ' --1 - „,12 --*., .-.' e• ..- ve '-S"-ft",7... : Jett...... -or- ',...',."-.45;b41W':',--.'.*'!"1, ..' .,.."e'..-;." ..L.+41-4-..,t4.37,, ',$.4.■&(_-_,.10'. ' - ,"fp.,-.±...,....,....., r ,.,.,• - s- • , ■• -- "r'77ar gr2-1.--- ...,- ti --iit:'T' ' " h .\_ ,,k,' ,..1,....;;,,•-1-......, .--,40-,... , . .., :S.-- . 4 ., .4. ' - • ..'--'.....'•',., ...:e .-,,,<-,, ' -r•ae*,,,ri,li,07..i.f...,_,,..* ,,ssr..-"" , ' , '-• '- I; J4 , • '- -' ^--'•-•' , .74-4':. -t. -.11ft_,-- "4- . ` -0.711 . • t . J. ...,%, '1,,,,,i.L . ,.14,-.: -.'s Wilrika.■.4104 ...' ,.. . 4.2:.' ,-,- _ to , ... 0. .... .- .. - „, -N, • . . --...... .....,rea....m.f,,Folfi •• A"" f v.44 :4, a , • - ,, . -r c: 1 y , , •. , - . • .c. . - ".--.'• --' 0-{,.... J, . r•I.-...--t_.........*_,,4,,,,:-r• "z-- ' ' - --..vir,‘,4 .• ,-: - - • '';. _-7'sir,,,-;.-.41 •,,,„ -, - ,?;;; ......:: ' ...,-ill r.h7 .. I.'It o. . ........,b-. .71 ::'- - - -1'-.I. --.." '74;• • .1:'4;0'1 •-; rt 'N4V0.,...t,S,To -1, i''" - • _.•is . '). .„0„,.......,..„ .. . , , . . 'T- 74444. . .41••• rt., .1i"Li- ''• NI N•4„, -*re' "- C:7.** '•'-r.:0 - 5 01.- i'• -' , , -.., :'• ,,,--,,i•P.. . ii,•. .0 ... •• - 0 r.'. • ... ,-,.... ...... , d?..,,, ,C. L.,..., ..,,, '• 'n. • 'W :(' ,-0* ■ t ...' -.. r . . ',.''''II I • ir" 'f.: L. •; ,.. :'...,1•''l .'0 ' ‘Ny.g.::,,,......„..400..-. - ..7., ..■ C 7. 1; k P4 .., ' • • . ..• -si. ) ,_•--:, _ , ..... , --, ,....4.. ---.. :•.:.• -----112. 7--- , rz rri '''... ■-*4-' '''' f - ---•..,4,':.-,. )' , •., __,•••ro.7... ■, ,.- .., '.,..„-,...,..*.r..... . -77• •'" ',.. ...7.• A, •.,. i•--7( ...=, L . .,.....N ...f..t. ,',...,,v,,..,_,,, ■. ...;.1,...4., ,..... ECP Tier 1 Grant Application Form ATTACHMENT D DESIGN/CONCEPT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS 151 I j a o » ) g 0 , Z)\|§ | a 0 z § ƒ�n i q% 71 - -, m* o. a&!;! ! !, > m t§ » Q#E ,2 z .'& | 1 |_ IR 2 ! ! < �ago-g.'-t- m \i 0#4#» , - - - - s( OW Fl .- k 160P 2. 01 |§ = (� 4° } � k � � � �� Z,.:....��co r S F. � �» � rn � m $ ° DO0 E 2 \ 2CD2Em ' elm D . ¢ co . co amcn „ 03 x- ]k\/\ ƒ n =E� @£z§ »/`; ° ° R. 3 ?\ i&! WIEW ;}ER® �2F ! ■ �/ .71 Q- o > �k/ k J /t; 0 Z E w° - ®` � � i. 2 2 a () f| - ' °I EW §l = ? [& } I| il II 2�k 2 � -| f mm & � f\ • • c21 /§ f | � ' � - E_ , . _ ° /RI i- 1 |; | 3ƒ � !e , \ ;2 !° | _ 0 �� ` :,11 NON-WOVEN POLYPROPYLENE FILTER CLOTH Technical Data 3.5 oz. Specifications PROPERTY TEST Value Weight ASTM D 3376' 3.5 (oz./sq yd) ASTM D 33762 3.3 Thickness (mils) ASTM D 17772 50 Tensil (lbs.) ASTM D 46322 95 Elongation(%) ASTM D 46322 50 Puncture(lbs.) ASTM D 48332 55 Mullen Burst(psi) ASTM D 37862 200 Trapezoidal Tear(lbs.) ASTM D 45332 40 Permeability(cm/sec) ASTM D 44912 0.25 Permittivity (sec.-1) ASTM D 44912 2.2 Flow Rate(gal/sq ft./min) ASTM D 44912 150 EOS (AOS—US std sieve) ASTM D 47512 70 UV Resistance ASTM D 43552 70 (% Strength retention hrs of exposure— 150) 1 =Typical Value 2=Minimum Average Woven Polypropylene Filter STOP-RIP WEAVE Technical Data 6.4 oz. PROPERTY TEST UNITS VALUE RESULTS Weight ASTM D-3776 oz Square Yard 6.4 Tensile Strength ASTM D-1682 lbs Warp 120 (grab method) Fill 209 Elongation ASTM D-3786 % Warp 39 (grab method) Fill 71 Burst Strength ASTM D-3786 psi N/A 341 Puncture Strength ASTM D-3787 bs N/A 95 (mod) Trapezoid Tear ASTM D-2261 lbs Warp 57 Fill 82 Abrasion Resistance ASTM D-4886 lbs Warp 80 Fill 115 Shade N/A % N/A 70 NON-WOVEN POLYPROPYLENE FILTER CLOTH Technical Data 8 oz. Specifications PROPERTY TEST Value Weight ASTM D 37761 8.0 (oz./sq yd) ASTM D 37762 9.2 Thickness (mils) ASTM D 17772 85 Tensil(lbs.) ASTM D 46322 215 Elongation(%) ASTM D 46322 50 Puncture(lbs.) ASTM D 48332 115 Mullen Burst(psi) ASTM D 37862 360 Trapezoidal Tear(lbs.) ASTM D 45332 85 Permeability(cm/sec.—1) ASTM D 44912 0.25 Permittivity(sec.—1) ASTM D 44912 1.2 Flow Rate (gal/sq ft./min) ASTM D 44912 100 EOS (AOS—US std sieve) ASTM D 47512 80 UV Resistance ASTM D 43552 70 (% Strength retention hrs of exposure— 150) 1=Typical Value 2=Minimum Average NON-WOVEN POLYPROPYLENE FILTER CLOTH Technical Data 12 oz. Specifications PROPERTY TEST Value Weight ASTM D 37761 12.0 (oz./sq yd) ASTM D 37762 11.0 Thickness (mils) ASTM D 17772 120 Tensil (lbs.) ASTM D 46322 325 Elongation(%) ASTM D 46322 50 Puncture(lbs.) ASTM D 48332 170 Mullen Burst(psi) ASTM D 37862 550 Trapezoidal Tear(lbs.) ASTM D 45332 115 Permeability(cm/sec) ASTM D 44912 0.25 Permittivity(sec.—1) ASTM D 44912 0.8 Flow Rate(gal/sq ft./min) ASTM D 44912 80 EOS (AOS—US std sieve) ASTM D 47512 100 UV Resistance . ASTM D 43552 70 (%) Strength retention hrs of exposure— 150) 1=Typical Value 2=Minimum Average NON-WOVEN POLYPROPYLENE FILTER CLOTH Technical Data 16 oz. Specifications PROPERTY TEST Value Weight ASTM D 3776' 16.0 (oz./sq yd) ASTM D 37762 15.0 Thickness (mils) ASTM D 17772 150 Tensil (lbs.) ASTM D 46322 425 Elongation(%) ASTM D 46322 50 Puncture(lbs.) ASTM D 48332 250 Mullen Burst(psi) ASTM D 37862 750 Trapezoidal Tear(lbs.) ASTM D 45332 165 Permeability (cm/sec) ASTM D 44912 0.25 Permittivity(sec.—1) ASTM D 44912 0.6 Flow Rate (gal/sq ft./min) ASTM D 44912 45 EOS (AOS—US std sieve) ASTM D 47512 120 UV Resistance ASTM D 43552 70 (% Strength retention hrs of exposure— 150) 1=Typical 2=Minimum Average PVC MESH Construction: 11 x 11 ends/inch Coating: Flexible PVC Core Yarn: 1000 denier Polyester Fabric Weight: ASTM D-3776 10 oz./sq. yd. Tensil Strength: ASTM D-5034 Warp. 2111bs./inch Grab Method Fill 247 lbs./inch Tear Strength ASTM D-2261 87 lbs. Wrap and fill Tongue Method (12") Mullen Burst Strength ASTM D-3786 357 lbs./sq. inch Caliper: 30 mils (Fabric thickness) Opening Size ASTM E-11-61 5 mm Fire Retardancy: As required, Mill run fabric is self- extinguishing horizontal burning mod. Increased fire retardancy can be supplied upon special order to meet specified tests. Cold Crack: No cracking after 24 hours @ -40F, 2" mandrel WOVEN POLYPROPYLENE FILTER SUPER MESH Technical Data PROPERTY TEST RESULTS Thickness ASTM D-1777 28 mil Construction N/A Warp: 44 Fill: 30 Selvage N/A Woven Weave N/A 2/1 Twill Finish N/A Tentered&Calendered Weight N/A 5.4 oz/sq.yd. Abrasion/ ASTM D-1175 mdf Warp: 110 lbs. Resistance Fill: 90 lbs. Tensile Strength ASTM D-1682 Warp: 355 lbs. (grab method) Fill: 270 lbs. Tear Strength ASTM D-2263 Warp: 135 lbs. (trapezoid method) Fill: 105 lbs. Burst Strength ASTM D-751 510/lbs./sq. in. Puncture Strength ASTM D-751 110 lbs Air Flow N/A >700 cfm Flow Rate (gal/min/ft.2) N/A 145 U a) N L Cl) a) U) N±•) -a'a L L N -0 LO _O E LD ._ W C 0 C CO N § C T U ° c E•CDL O 0) N ° O 1 CO ' a Q T N N ± a) a) p a) -O U _ -p ` : @ U— co o ° '� O 4-- C y�j C- C Lj L 7 CA 0 .0 a) C a) •O 0 7 a) L U O Q pL CD O O moCD N -O U C >s N �� CD C- 4- N L U N'- c o N (D U p Q L a- co v7 N d C C @ > 0 o Q o U _O C) C O CD CD •u) CD 4.3 (D E a) > CD -0.0 L CD O .0 C a) a) CO CD a o N m ° ° c CO ° c-0 CD o) L 'D CD L L-O 0"a E _ +., 7 O C- C 17 43 co u ° 0 0 0. 0°)•,13 .,.-5 a 7 = CD "a C CD 7 N CD U 0 > C O +, a) ra CD 40 V 0 CSC 7 U- CD .0 O 42 fl E C U) 0 4- L Cl) 0__O °..a •W U +a p) L aim C m 0) c ° o- >' •CO L•COL a C RI L.a) CO �' C .0 O'@ [D a L ' O_ C p L .CC .o ON E � � co LE +' C a) co L .0-C N +� C 0 U N E CLp g U o Lp° OU° �` C a)\-° cCD L N ,� ❑ N �o� °)`mss ,- 0.L) = m �� C C. Z El4 � UE o CO O CAD a) ° 7 7 i a N ° N E u N LL -p r +' -o au_C c o c co C CCD c CD ° @ o o Cri CL L C o Lo °)° � ,�, m oQ cu g ) L_ •° 0n ° iC Nm° co s~ 1, o) � � _° ° 0.°i Nc 121) L N W E L C N N N O N N O 4) L CD L g ❑ � C 0 .0 — 'Ln E o 7 0."i U) °c CC L LLD 0) .N C) N E U O °- $ CO >,-(73 cC L 0 CO C u) N�' +O) 'C c!) y CA N 0-0 CO A N N V L E L N E C C- 4-' co c C O r 0713-.5 C C 'W CD (0 N C 7 O N N CC C CO ,C 4_1 N 'c >,E-a E - 0..c N 0) 4- 0 ms E CT] C c ° ,� E ° °)@ NON a) La ° _° C7� °� U cL •O cLOoyomsm.Co � E -a � ° a) L) mnL � � 7 ❑ L. C N L N - C N 7 C 0 O CD U CD O E C1• a .0 0.C) 4L- ° C a) O C 4-' O >, -- �• c a) •L p - 7 a) U •a a = N a) O U .N T >• L.p C L T s L U O N a) co C >• CA CO n= m 1 co a) ° mm m ° °� CaC-ID Ca a) L E 4- E L m 'a U V ..c � >+U.L U E a 4, U 03= CD C a L � N C 13 L � c_0m� 7•x rn -a o mm — a) � E Zo .0) o ' o ? � c 0.°i° ° ° m � a)LN40 -C CO ° ./ 13' N N-p a) C p- N a) m L "a E E ❑ J0 L C a ri t L U d• U c 'O _ U O N ;- O 25 a) C a) _U r CD 4C R ? aci a) a) �_o 03 aa)) C-•- c N _0 ° ❑ " a)o 0.) a c m � m CECCDD Q3 Li H E E L- L L O"O a) T 7 N.c7 L U a) Q r ` c •O LD a a)— .0 CDs L L 'Cn o) ° L - L o 0. N >CDmvo� � E w C 5= N U_ a) O C a) °4- 0 > >` CA L L CD L L L CD .' a) as �? .C1..? E Clj •U U c c ° N Q) 4- C C- - O �2 Oa a) L ., a; a).Y f .1 >,„ a) a) .w N 0 C (D co 'c U E E m N N CC.5- CO A -a w= CND U U c_.-0 C CO _.� L N o L 7 co O d C 0 a�-F)..-0 m +' U 7 O 4- N r_ o c_ LD O- U a) 7 N °LI.J ^\+•� H o ac c a c �o Lin c-0 �v ° o c c.) L7) (.0 _C � N Ufa C . a.oc0-c_ a� a a°imtri -0 a) >.'- ONU ° `o p ° cD Q o c o 7 `.) C O °)s CO 0.:_.°-_. ° a m aNi � a c°) c �— DCLu W Cn CD❑C.)U)C)Q ❑ E t— m p_ N N c C N a)- L C O Z CD E NL C) 7'UL� C N CCI C O C O-a U L L a 4..1 U tD a) a) y D U- a) U) O Li L) o..N .S E a. a- ECP Tier 1 Grant Application Form ATTACHMENT E PROJECT SITE PHOTOS 16g • :::-..,,,,,.'1I.'''.1.-,::::';',:.i.I--;'1.--:1:7:i1;.'-.- .., . . . .. , . . . 1 , • .1 . • t•••05.---r...!'..1. . , • - ' • , ' ' -* ' ..:;,•-4 7,;t1.' *.; '• - . . .... .0 .. , 4 , •.. ..-.:- .-. " . ••• - •.,,,_, _ •_.. • •; '.•, ,7" • ' '-:''''''''''2,.-'43•tk • •k'• • ' -- ''...*:.--t*,:•;'---"-•• ' ,, ' • -- . c• • 77,- . •'• '1-f.4,=,,,-,,P.:•,f;Z,,•,0,.„ , 1• '- • - 1 ' '- ' 1 • - . ,. . ..... • • - - .., , ,,/ ' •"tri'f:•=,,,,..,„.7C:••-•••••• _,- ..• , . ' .•':'.F••••17,•? ,TO • ,,.,.f.,f.,?..,-„,01.1.0,:4„",„,, • • '• /-.•/". .. /....••■•• • te „••_-•••-•,' - , •• 1 .,'•-• , • f • —• •'/, , if •.4 , / , - . - , .• , ,_ , , - i . • ; # , =, . ••• - . ' ., . .. . , f • f • ' . ' • - \ . , . 1 .. . ' . . . , . . , . ' • . . . . 1 1 .. • A . _. , . f ,, •:, . I , . . .■ , ., .. ' • , i. ' . ' ■ , 1.. ' • , 1 . . . .':4,4,:,..i1=_. • . 4 4 ...;..,--:,.... :,._----:'1'--...,-, ..• .:,,i.:.';--..•'''-'11'"W4,,t-'.":-.-:,-,t-i.7. . ; .':. .-7441,.,,Citt'A„... . a . . .;.,;:t';',141.4•'',",•,..7.7;,11i .', 7/.%'-'0'.•::•....rii:. '....,...A4. , .. . ,.,,77 ..': f.r1,4,. .. . . ' ,.;','' '\ .■''' .. . ,., . '.-."'-,:',....,,:-... ..''-''''.'-....— ' Z 6' ' . .i,;!.:-.,.'.., -*.,4°-"',..".' - - . i ' . s ■''.7,_.,2,,,.;-;;;„-.^....a....,,,,,-.4; ,:..,,,,...4., i.,,: —. i , . . , -..• .. ,r, ' :1' 4 ' .• ... ■4 . .- • , • i . , 4 I . ' I , ' ......: '-:,..,:.__,-. . . = . . 1 , . 1 (.,‘...!.- ,_, • I 1 . . _ t,:s't4.,..,,',1: .•..,- . . , : -,. ' *i:*-1''';'*,r**.*'1‘"•-,*=:'. - ■ **J 1 . - -.1 % i 0 ,, \ - ) . • '_ ; . - . • - • — • i .., . 4.. , . , _ . , , ..., .. - ......' , , - -r9:11.71"--'...----i•--. 't- '''''.g.7,.., '41'. I- I. . •i - ' . . . ' ..-- ,-,..• ,;. ;.'.',;;.i .:::,."-.;ai.:;:.;"1!'t7.;...-',-.....'.° ."--4.4-, :.':.4,,,*_.: ,..- .,..--,....... "5,t ,'Z'''. i ' -..... •:.+.:7,'''.r „:.''....k"..-::')..;*,C1 il:::('-':'/' ''',;474 4',".:Yel.,■:' $V7i.i.':41ift.:V,,`::' - ': W.) „. .. , . . . ..i..„.., ,..„...„ .....,. ,..„.... ,., ....,., ''''''' . . _,;, A ,.,.., • , •.;' .7.1.5.4.-iif;.■l*- •%,-;114,:lirli 14.ec.‘'.'7,..::t.L...' ::,,:":',4 • , ,, . • •• , . , - , . • -, , , 4, ;-. ,.,,'r?4,..1.,-,, "- -.5.,.„'....•:,,,-''41,-1',%\----- A'74''':, ".4-- V : i ;A . t 4) ' ',,,. ""-.'• ','", -r,"1 - 7!. 1 - ..-',....i...,.;.,•'.‹. -••T..... ..„...,..„ ...„, 1 . . , ., . '1N-.:'!:-r_ ..,`.•....:-., .'-4,4„,, ,-,,--' *,.. -4* !,:, ',0141 t. 6.4 .,.. ,. . , . . ..,.‘. i t:- - ,; ;,::' L r : . , - , .1;,-4 ct * 4-' ''. INC , . '7..'--, ' ..ti-lf-v, t-_:::-.•._..-.: ..-4,,..;.s...,1,,,,,-',,,-Y'.,;.);-; ' 144:1,,--. ..,-. ,- .".)'4.:-tu',.Y---"- - .k.-,,,,r.„,e.7. , 1' 1 *--.#-'4,•.,•'•.•-;, ,...-1,.' , ••••,..• ... -..-....•444,1°....%.r_:4,t••',•'''.7;•\"'•.'40 -. 1'. • c'2,l's.. ",'''--/'4'-44''.. 4 4•5•4''',./.•4 '4,), ft 4..c,... t • , '...i . 9 . ,•., '•!"t-1. '1:-. 1e.' „:".....; 11L.'- . ... .... - L'-‘7'-',1N1•,,- ''..( i 4' '.1;,,-",:',-,1:-,-.4;.,;V;i: Aki..,,41 ,°44, ' I:. r ' ck ,1.=:.t07-•-■r".t.f‘t7='.;Xit:-.;;T;t.I''.. ' , . . -- .::. 5 ' ..',..'1. ' :::41.5-v4'.'.-.s._.-,sqW."..c. ,i;-.7*,.--. . i #=•....:-. '• 1 . ., 4 . . , r''' i.4 , ..; '.''• ',..• r . "q■t'.;.,'•8--.4- --.k.4.---.,,,.. ....- - ,„•tt,-„,4,„S,,•,,,4..1.,-. • IL____ * .k -•• ,.' -,::...., -'..,•,;.:,,,,,St.',. . , ., A ...-.;, —..:.„:,„. 1- c44,--,,,-,,,i_-..,.,..,_-. • .: ., - ..,...-4...,...., '.:-. 4,c,.,.4.. -,.., .,„....1„,'.,..0.,.....,t.,-,...,......_ ,-••,,„._-,--..3.,-.,.....•,.., -. --.- • .... • t..-‘,-4.,1,....t;:,,,,.:-. ,„•• -.,...m....,...-',..•.,.4,,,,..,..14,74•-`,..i• . z.-4......,..."‘..--',-, '••1 ...- ,•- -., t ---..z..., ..4..,r.......3.-'4......-.4.......,-•-•:„.:-•...-;;•,..,%-,s,t;•,,,,,:,:•.1,..„.it.."..'..-:-,,, t- : 3 ' , 0 ..._. ' . '.'•,":"2V..-74,,*‘7'--- "":,"-,..',.--...,'';',1,•=7.:i.---,--:..'5-,4.'"- --i!r•!.....-ti.tA rig; 1..,7 ---__ , • , . .._.,,,..,:lf?'?„1.:',, ..1,;;:•.Z.=-• '.. ...",..::A. ,"?-'.•>F", ,,:t;=:r-17,,,,:=‘,;:-.;•.:• 'Ll;":":',". I' ,. ., ,,..;;;;;,-;,;•.,,,=,=•• --0„:.--- ..4,•-,:,...71•44......i.,..,,-.1.,%`,."-•:-:-•,.....V"'-`;'-11-..'..‘"'-z-'4;.,9. , -— -, .i„.7-:.!,,,,.. 1.<4....e.:Zi'.;q,i■Z•-tg-;..i.7'-'.7-.:-. 7;..•:.;". ,;,;:,•,•-7-r:'',Y1'..',-1.;":.:-.=•:,..';,;;A: . ..; •1• - _,4.,...?:,-=:-...-',.-,!.:,•...1‘4,-"..ifi›.',,;k•-•.;-st,tin.,'..,1:',,,..k.;,---;•,..;_,,,,ti.„........- .•„.•.•••*• 1:' •-. -, - ,"4.;'-r.'.4:2":1 ,:t;F.4`.11.•?.....47,:.:'.7i,".. ..i.":".7..:`:=.',"••'N.":-'.. •• _. ..• •..:.'',:•,;' , . .;;"‘;.- s,.4:4"tfi4inf12. 2- I:: .--t' ,. :.- ' . .:1Z1:7-Z-31.''.• Iiii(74-z7.--,Z.t.:1g;;7:::t:.ri.j'e:gt::tti= '1 '''-' '-,,Z:"'w".4•,'"?-'-•.'-:=.;,,-...-.:-47,'''''`'''''•;1'..,,,, 1:"*":".!.. =■''''Ikl•-':1:.•-•'" i. •r .,, . • eii.-11'•' I,''4,';''.'.K''., ',.=,':,.-1.1.,.-..lh' ,N,-,,,,,.,,.,....•..-.?..,...4.•...1‘.vga-•-4.it,1•.,1...,..1".-.p&t::, .•... . ,tAt4,--;.kgsliere?,...-.'-4,- ...t .-- --. •..,r7)::+.- .- ,i'-/...;w.' -.-ii-s - , - 1 ?,'-.''.`.,'.f,O'....A'..."'.V..,.',:.tt,...ii,,'''.,.-'.t 1,;...7..7,..•.,.-,1.i''."1 t..- ,,=.,-:.....,.-•--:'.."-?.,.,..'i f1-.,'"1.-..-•..r-•?.°.'T v..-.•.,.•;14,.:.'.„-.,,",.",'"41,,^.4..•7.•,-.,,4:,v-;--:"'-''''70 t +&1 C'4.7:..,'''':.4•.,4i4,_.'.1f'4,t...'•i..4'ti,,-3 1.,,f`•:t,I•7.,4',.„,',•',;•0..••..‘•1 j...'.445;,•-t,:,0.„.,,.'41-v71'A.'''v'6''.7:'4A,-4,'..;•€.7:.-4.7%•.i.,-''.:i'4•,.,::,s?„,”,.,-,.;f3,,.,.4--.,-,._7,.CV..iR,l=4,.,444i..1.,4,--v'.t.--.'-k457V-,4:.---,-'„.4-,.,,t'.re'-17:t,.1m..,''e.-;..,',..2 6:.-r.,.1.4,,.,-.44•,4.--4,-.,:i7.;-4l,7,,,1%-7-e-,,.4N-.4,,,-:4-,-4t4-''x-4•,1.-1.:-7,,.'„',P,.•i,.‘,'.*f..4N,t4,-1,-.,,t*.„.4,4-.,,-,,.-.,.-,4,:. . ...•... ,;. :._ . ''-8 - ---. i...,.-:: -*.....4,i, 7e1,i'..17•:'*".:745.:1,1.01"t:;;CIFL-1i.1t•L'7kit'S „?.V...s. '• ' • -- -k.,••,4,.:4, .. . 7 •K, ,'Ai'iUs.,....,,,,••,Ve.-- ,''.4 et'.'. 71'ii..*-'.1:1••,Z,,%•1‘71.4-",,.:V,,^--f • •, •,•- .7:7''''''*1 ., i'it•'.''ill-,,..n•IL,L-Stra•-',..7--''tt._--:...4er.:•";,i1k1„'.;".,: -1%, -:5...t..!A., ..k • • -‘. 11 , -.I), ., 7,.. :... r”: ': ' ,.....,7,:y7if te - /;-.'5CrIk..,,,,...;-',- -.,*•-P: --.d4„..•••'1,. It ••••••'. 1.-Z,....44 7 +'•*,••••••-?."- '"-•': le,,1,-F:, ..,-,:.=.4.,',_,J.;,,,„"':•.f:F7..„"t'f •-• "-,i'.1:;,:".5 S. t.......... ",,'''.■•y•t•••.' ikkr•l-t.4.;, i• „,;•••■•4'',-4'..,14.,,, ••■•,3,:t11,:1-1.t.,•;;',.....r,-44,, ,V.„,-- ,..4 I . . :,..7,-:-..-,..,N t-,:- ,•,. ilv. #_...,. -v...e.•_ia,:4,1,A„,-t•:, •_:t•..ts-f,d,,A,77.F.N41,, ,.....A 1.. . . .„, ., ,,,?,-,-,...,.. , 4,1,/,_•••.;',.:f,,...-...,,*47.1C:,:-..,,,'.1.',A-'0".<.■.-.-;:.--•.-4,41:71....4'..,'t*--. . . •-.• - 5 ."4 ' z . • *,.... . .. '' '-''.,'-.--.,. .:;% '.•... --...;=~:e --,4 ''..T.tv`It.;...: ..4,,?:' i- - ', ...P; .r 4,At.4,.-47.4•,-.•0:,74 - • •••.„• ., •••. , .. -,;' ,..... .i•-•'::,'".- ',",","":"."..4,, '''..7_•:',L1..4';•4*.t.,.i...•:-&-,,C ti-4.14,, .:',".-7-..'.-.Lf-- :.'::-.•,-1.-•,•1. .‘, --- -'T., - . • - .47. k.•.'4,.'•'-k7;':4.-c;•0■7-Z-C'';;'''-'10=4:41,.;.„..`- i_..,..,. '.- ,-'1;'14t#44,,10..ft.;. •••-•:•• ..;',,,,,■,'7. -:,rt ,,,,----,...-,-,r..•.. 1 -` ' '. r_ ..`..,!!)--.,.;s,..:..-#....,.,-.,,,:t1',.7,..,....-;,,,-.,,,,...-.--....-:•-.=-.,-;'7,-.4'1.'4, c i r • , . Na I ' . . ■ " • , •. . :., i . . •-• 3 0.1.:k . --- - 7 *E.-_,,, • ' .....m. i..: - , , • • . • • •-- -1:- .-...----•-.•.-c:-i. !•"7.4;.,4•:7„,,,;•„,....„•,-,,,,,,:-,:i•':.•:,,..',-;•,,,,:f:L t•f.,,,',•••,_i•l:.:• ,,.., ,54 • 1-, `•-•.i,. 7 •-::•'" . - V.'' ';‘,,,- ',-', —--- 'r,-,-•'•-e0V -414,N, . - ti '' '•44k ..,,,, ,11'7 ,,',14;`ef."14tv.','.?liW,I.V''s-rlk.,, : .... , ;::,41t.: •...;:e‘...,:c:1";..5.:4«,,!''.,•;-,•';.- .-=,-..., ..1.,,1... , ...-. —-—,'...-.'..•5 '-.;.-,.._-:°:-."..:c:--.:=*?-:';.'".•;:r.;:r.LbZ''-1,,..4":.". • :":..';'.:1\''' . • • .-..:...--..,,A.4-,....--,;.;.:,,..,.:,...T...,:,..:‘,/,.,,.....,;„ .,.. . A ,,..• , ... . • ..,. ...... , .. _ • • - .. 7.: •,. . _ .„ • .• . . .., ,,. .1- - , . . • . . k, ,.. 1 :..... . - . . .. , - .-----,..Y.,...-,..-,----,: -,',.-• .°.,t44,..•.... , 4 . 7 ...,,,..' .-.4.• .: ; - .._, -'- . • v. 8 f V ,.. . • - ,-• i - , . . . .., , ,_.., - . . _ .,• ...„ , „...... , - . , . . t •,---...,„k- , - ''' •— • , . . . . , .. ,..,.. .r•_.,-,-.-,', . , ,,:,,..‘,....,-,1-...„?..::„.._:-.1',,f t..i•-",'f-l'k";'",'-',":"tt.-,'"`";'-'1.--';'''.''P,. ' . ;t:7-.;-: ,;''. .-- -T...,,,....,-,:.-;.,,,.:T•'''''.e•-.4:-..'-':•'-.4::.:-.4..i7.:;',",°,-'n ''-'7,:lci.,.;...,„0-1.;;;!.;;z...I."!' . ,-,,'•'•-;-- -s-7-;- -;:::-...;:'-'''';:•:;-::-• '''''-;;;;;;;:;;."•.°?,;,,."',1,'51;!-i,;f4t053),7,4,44447;,47,;;rf:041;;r;"'-,";;f,C,;;:I, ;4.7 . ..-.'-". '..-:.'4:::i.,itlf,:ii,V4'14!.i,.f:40.4';',.fl'irEll;.::,,:f,:,:iiig.:,4:,-,Z y;. .,:.•‘,:, _. . ., .......t; .,•, ,---., • . . ' . .. r: .:, • ..,...„ , ,... - ' .4.' • I....,, .-' - .,, 'i .,, ..k . . 1 , . ,,. • I , . . . , ?'. J _., ; I ..-_--...... ' -4. • ',,,-;r:: •-• i 1 I , .• , I . (2 1 I . I 1 . . '• '\ 1 iil ' I • "•• . ; i' I) ' ( • •-- z ow ; I r.,2 .. . . . , ;i ei'4 ; ) 1 ‘,'• ' ; 1 z 04 E,. J „ j :t t ?1 - , I ; , I f' 4 I 1 ••,.. 1 • • --•_„„,. ) - ....... .... "---r- I . .. .. --1,_ • . 1,„i..., J '•• q • i—-.1:- ,. Il . . :, '.".;•. .1-.714;',•-.±; !•,•kl•: i''2.;•:' .'• 4 . . 4 • • - . • -r4 : _ . (' h , : : ,1 ;" "4 aJ t d + < i' t l , S+sys S T 1 I y ' • j ..k i e P �. r, u ' U; i 1 � �• S f{ i.......:t- 4 1 f lJ4.�Ff1 5�i L , 4 Y y;.' e 4 r SS yr, :--;:t.` '4 '}A,s![ V 1 w y� �rb+y�fty. .a-.�.•c jT-�i , 'i a<+ejhs f "1� � 4 r4ti x y k -ter yk C. 'A ;ry, m` ;' 4y a: 1�°iw��-'ey4+i {:c* ."' -7 . �S ,9ytE '"� r.t c"`.41. • `tom'. ��+j 17,..;,,Z-:,;.„. fn�,l..(��'a/. • , .:.....,„••-•,=_I• s.1..... :: 3... ...:,r.,F,,,k.....;,.- ......wi ,,,, , • '' '''• ''''' ''''''A'''''''"*- '. -4-tivi,;,!vpz.-..---.,:, ,.- ,,. , :: ... . ,_ ... -- -.....,:.. , . ., t F r r • 3. ...1 �� •K " . �; 4 �' i{ ,. , x 3i S c F •"--,',.lif,I.,,,'. .,,.."0,,,''.,,,-0,-„.'' ' 't;•.1., 4;"...,,;'-'4V.v....",,..01,.' v.----.:-:-... ,„ t d t ^ 9c} 4s Lp a` x .i f • - -, „.-..-..:.•-1,1,.. .1..,-,-?...?;c„,„,,,,--..47.„,.r.;,i,:a..,17. :::„1.4‘77-re..,,,x4,3., am ya€ . t- • • s � 5� `L a-, x0.. ,- * '" ,x�,R Y-.fir.., �}t '4 •r sexy l 7::::'.1.t.'::.,7;,.'1`.::: .yE J iY t 44 L G t CS i V 4« � r 4+1 'sue ;C ,per' �, i#i ri • ■.h A1 ? .r...... r i r• rr{+ \ . . _._ i OY' # e asfyey. : 5My .`T • Attachment B Resolution No. 6261 Bicycle Corridor Improvement Program Application Page 6 RESOLUTION NUMBER 6261 A RESOLUTION OF THE SEAL BEACH CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR FUNDS FOR THE BICYCLE CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FUNDED WITH CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY PROGRAM UNDER THE 2005 SAFE, ACCOUNTABLE, FLEXIBLE, EFFICIENT,TRANSPORTATION ACT-LEGACY FOR USERS OR SUBSEQUENT FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION ACT FOR WESTMINSTER AVENUE CLASS-II BICYCLE LANE PROJECT WHEREAS, the United State Congress enacted the Safe,Accountable, Flexible Efficient, Transportation Equity Act — Legacy for Users August 2005, which makes Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality funds available to the Orange County Transportation Authority(OCTA); and WHEREAS, OCTA has established the procedures and criteria for reviewing proposals; and WHEREAS, City of Seal Beach possesses authority to nominate bicycle projects funded using Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality funding and to finance, acquire, and construct the proposed project; and WHEREAS, by formal action the City Council authorizes the nomination of Westminster Avenue Bicycle Lane Improvements Project, including all understanding and assurances contained therein, and authorizes the person identified as the official representative of the City of Seal Beach to act in connection with the nomination and to provide such additional information as may be required; and WHEREAS, the City of Seal Beach will maintain and operate the property acquired, developed, rehabilitated, or restored for the life of the resultant facility or activity; and WHEREAS, with the approval of the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and OCTA, the City of Seal Beach or its successors in interest in the property may transfer the responsibility to maintain and operate the property; and WHEREAS, the City of Seal Beach will give Caltrans and OCTA's representatives access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers or documents related to the bicycle project; and WHEREAS, the City of Seal Beach will cause work on the project to be commenced within six months following notification from the State that funds have been authorized to proceed by the Federal Highway Administration and that the project will be carried to completion with reasonable diligence; and WHEREAS, the City of Seal Beach commits $150,000 of Traffic Development Impact Fees(13 percent local agency match)of total project cost as match to the requested $1,000,000 in OCTA CMAQ funds for a total project cost estimated to be$1,150,000; and WHEREAS, the City of Seal Beach will comply where applicable with provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, the American with Disabilities Act, Federal Transit Administration Title VI, and any other federal state and/or local laws, rules and/or regulations; and WHEREAS, the City of Seal Beach's City Council authorize the execution of any necessary cooperative agreements between the City of Seal Beach and OCTA to facilitate the delivery of the project. Resolution Number 6261 THE SEAL BEACH CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY RESOLVE: Section 1. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager as the official representative of the City of Seal Beach to apply for the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality funding under the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, and Efficient Transportation Equity Act—Legacy for Users for Westminster Avenue Bicycle Lane Improvements Project. Section 2: That the City of Seal Beach agrees to fund its share of the project costs and any additional costs over the identified programmed amount. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Seal Beach City Council at a regular meeting held on the 11th day of June .2012 by the following vote: AYES: Council Members NOES: Council Members ABSENT: Council Members ABSTAIN: Council Members Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA } COUNTY OF ORANGE } SS CITY OF SEAL BEACH } I, Linda Devine, City Clerk of the City of Seal Beach, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is the original copy of Resolution Number 6261 on file in the office of the City Clerk, passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting held on the 11th day of June 2012. City Clerk CITY OF SEAL BEACH Bicycle Corridor Improvement (BCI) Program Grant Application for Western Avenue Bicycle Lane Improvements Project from Seal Beach Boulevard to Bolsa Chica Road in the City of Seal Beach Prepared for: OF SEAL 4 fel _cam=�ls _ s 4/FpRNe? City of Seal Beach 211 Eighth Street Seal Beach, CA 90740 Prepared By: AKAL Consultants 34 Monserrat Place Foothill Ranch, California (949) 586-1006 Consultants Project Services April 30,2012 Ms.Adriann Cardoso - Manager- State&Federal Programming Orange County Transportation Authority 600 South Main Street Orange, California-92868 • Attention: Mr.Louis Zhao,Associate Transportation Funding Analyst Subject: Bicycle Corridor Improvements Program Grant Application for the Western Avenue Bicycle Lane Improvements Project in the City of Seal Beach. Dear Ms. Cardoso: Enclosed are five copies and one unbound original of the subject Bicycle Corridor Improvements (BCI)Program Grant Application for the Western Avenue Bicycle Lane Improvements project in the City of Seal Beach. Also, attached is a CD with electronic files of the Grant Application including GIS Map and Shape files. Please feel free to contact the undersigned at (949) 586-1006 or (949) 293-1487, if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely AKAL Consultants (dba of AAHK,Inc—a California Corporation) • Kanwal J Singh,M.S., P.E. Principal Engineer cc: Sean Crumby,P.E., Asst. City Manager/Director of Public Works, City of Seal Beach Michael Ho,P.E., City Engineer, City of Seal Beach Cesar Rangel,Asst. Engineer, City of Seal Beach • AKAL Consultants(dba of AAHK,Inc—a California Corporation) 34 Monserrat Place,Foothill Ranch,CA 92610 Phone: (949)586-1006 Western Avenue BCI Program Grant Application Table of Contents I. GRANT APPLICATION Page No. 1. Part One— General Project Information 1 2. Part Two—Funding 3 3. Part Three—Evaluation Criteria 5 4. Part Four—Agency Resolution [Draft] 10 5. Part Five—Assurances 12 6. Part Six—Cooperative Agreement Concurrence 13 7. Checklist & Evaluation Criteria 14 8. BCI Program Addendum 1 15 9. Addendums Confirmation 16 II. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A— CEQA Notice of Exemption Attachment B —Project Site Photos Attachment C— GIS Map and Shape File (copy on CD only) Attachment D— Project Site Map Attachment E —Preliminary Engineering Plans Attachment F—Air Quality Calculations • Bicycle Corridor Improvement Program Application Form PART ONE: GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION Applications are due no later than April 30,2012 at 4:00 PM PROJECT TITLE: Westminster Avenue Bicycle Lane Improvements Project AGENCY: CITY OF SEAL BEACH Phase of work and type of project this application is applying for: ODesign ©Bicycle Facility ORight-of-Way OBicycle Safety/Outreach ©Construction ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY APPLICANT CMAQ FUNDS REQUESTED $ 1,000,000 87% Project Administrator/person with day-to-day responsibility for LOCAL MATCH $ 150,000 13% implementing project(Name,tide,agency,address,phone,email) TOTAL BCI PROJECT COST $ 1,150,000 100% Name/Title: Michael Ho,P.E.,City Engineer Agency: CITY OF SEAL BEACH ©Project is a stand alone project. Address 211 Eighth Street,Seal Beach, CA 90740 Project is part of a larger project. Total Project Cost(if part of a larger $ - Phone: (562)431-2527 ext 1322 project) (Round dollars to nearest thousands) Email: MHo( sealbeachca.gov Agency Contact(Name,title,agency,address,phone,email) PARTNER(S)(Name,title,agency,address,phone,email) Name/Title: Name/Title: Agency: Agency: Address Address Phone: Phone: Email: , Email: PROPOSED SCHEDULE: Date Start Environmental [NEPA] 8/1/2013 Complete Environmental [NEPA] 11/30/2013 Start Plans,Specifications,and Cost Estimates 12/1/2013 Complete Plans,Specifications,and Cost Estimates 1/31/2014 ' Start Right-of-Way Acquisition N/A Right-of-Way Certification [for E76] 2/1/2014 Submit Request for Authorization for Const(E-76) 2/1/2014 Start Advertise 7/1/2014 Award Construction 9/30/2014 Project Completion(open for use) 6/30/2015 Page 1 PART ONE: GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION (cont.) PROJECT SCOPE OF PROPOSED PROJECT Describe the project's location,limits of work,size,etc.(Not the justification or benefits). Proposed Class-II bike lane project will replace existing Class-III bike lane along Westminster Avenue from Seal Beach Boulevard to Bolsa Chica Road in the City of Seal Beach. Class-II bike lanes will be 5'wide and approximately 2 mile long in each direction and will include widening of the pavement section,reconstruction of failed sections of pavement,cold-planing and resurfacing,pavement striping&markings and signage etc. Westminster Avenue runs in east-west direction within the project limits and currently has 4 lanes(2 lanes in each direction)with striped median and Class-III bike lane in each direction. . PURPOSE AND NEED OF PROPOSED PROJECT Provide the purpose and need. Proposed project will improve safety and connectivity of the travelling bicyclists and encourage higher use of the facility by bicyclists. Upgrading of the bike lane to Class-II will match the existing Class-II bike lane west of Seal Beach Boulevard. FUNDING JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSED PROJECT Provide a explanation and justification for funding. City is requesting$1,000,000.00 in BCI CMAQ grant funds and City will provide$150,000.00 of Traffic Development Impact Fees as local match. Implementation of the proposed improvements will result in a better and safer bike lanes for the bicyclists and enhance the experience of the travelling public along Westminster Avenue. Page 2 PART TWO: FUNDING Contact: Michael Ho Phone: (562)431-2527 ext 1322 Agency: CITY OF SEAL BEACH Email: MHo(a�sealbeachca.aov PROJECT COMPONENT COSTS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PHASE: Construction Documents $ 20,000 Environmental Documents $ 15,000 TOTAL PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING $ 35,000 RIGHT-OF-WAY PHASE(ACQUISITION N/A -Capital $ - Support Costs $ - TOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY $ - CONSTRUCTION PHASE: Construction contract items $ 965,770 Contingencies $ 94,230 Construction engineering $ 90,000 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION $ 1,150,000 *see next sheet for details LOCAL FUNDING SHARE DETAIL Phases Fiscal Year/ BCI CMAQ Match Total Cost Total Cost2 Percent Match (12%or more) Preliminary Engineering - $ - - - $ - - Right-of-Way - $ - $ - $ - $ - Construction 2013-14 $ 1,000,000 $ 150,000 $ 1,150,000 $ - 13.0% TOTAL $ 1,000,000 $ 150,000 $ 1,150,000 $ - 13.0% 1.Fiscal Year is the year in which the funds will first be allocated to the project. This is should not be filled in as a cash flow. 2. Fill in only when BCI program project is a segment or phase of a larger project,not a stand-alone project. SOURCE(S)OF MATCH Preliminary (spell out;no acronyms) Engineering Not Applicable, 100%funded by City funds Right-of-Way Not Applicable Construction Traffic Development Impact Fees MAINTENANCE(The project must be maintained in a functional and operational manner as its intended purpose for the expected life cycle for the type of project. If it is not maintained in such a manner,reimbursement of all or a portion of the BCI funds may be required. With the exception of up to 3 years of funds for establishing landscaping,maintenance costs are ineligible for CMAQ funds and must be funded locally) Who will maintain? City of Seal Beach What is the source of maintenance funds? City General Funds If project is within Caltrans Right-of-Way application,must be signed by Deputy District Director,Maintenance N/A DDD Maintenance Date: Page 3 PART TWO: FUNDING (continued) ITEM ESTIMATE-DIRECT ITEM COSTS Item# Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $20,000.00 $ 20,000 2 Traffic Control and Construction BMP's LS 1 $20,000.00 $ 20,000 3 1.5" Cold Plane Existing Pavement and Removal SF 357,000 $ 0.45 $ 160,650 4 2"AC Overlay TON 4,463 $ 90.00 $ 401,670 5 R&R Failed Pavement Sections [20' Thk 8"712'] SF 35,700 $ 8.50 $ 303,450 6 Striping,Markings and Signage LS 1 $60,000.00 $ 60,000 $ - Construction Engineering [-10%] 1 $94,230.00 $ 94,230 $ - Contingency H0%] 1 $90,000.00 $ 90,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - $ - TOTAL DIRECT COST $ 1,150,000 TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 1,150,000 Page 4 PART THREE: EVALUATION CRITERIA WEIGHTED CRITERIA • 1 Matching Funds(20 points) Minimum match of 12%receives 0 points; 13-22%match receives 4 points;23-32%match receives 8 points; 33- 42%match receives 12 points;43-52%match receives 16 points;53%match or more receives 20 points. What is the percent match being provided? 13% 4 pts 2 Coordination(10 points) a. Is the project listed on a bicycle plan?List below.(examples: OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan(CBSP),Safe Route to School Plan,Local City Plan,etc.).(5 points) 5 pts. Yes. Project is listed on the OCTA's Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan(CBSP)"Table 2.1-Regional Priority Projects"and City's Bicycle Lane Map and City's General Plan. b. Is the project prioritized as part of a multi jurisdictional collaborative strategy or similar effort?List below.(5 points) 5 pts. Project is listed on the OCTA's Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan(CBSP)"Table 2.1 -Regional Priority Projects". 3 Connectivity,Relationships,and Priority(20 points) For bicycle facility projects,item 3a will be completed by OCTA. Skip 3b and 3c. Use the provided box to describe the direct relationship to streets,bicycle facilities,pedestrian facilities,transit systems,employment centers,and activity centers. A Geographic Information Systems(GIS)Shape File,detailed map,and exact location must be provided. For bicycle safety/outreach projects,skip 3a and complete 3b and 3c. a Bikeway Priority Index Ranking-BICYCLE FACILITY PROJECTS ONLY Only bicycle facility projects are submit to the Bikeway Priority Index Ranking(BPIR). The project will be ranked and scored based on the Bikeway Priority Index Ranking(BPIR). The BPIR will rank the project among other submittals pts. in the current call and points will be applied based on ranking. The projects will be separated into three tiers based on ranking. Tier 1 (top 33%)will receive 18 points. Tier 2(middle 33%)will receive 12. Tier 3(bottom 33%)will receive 6 points. BPIR RANK# I (to be filled out by OCTA) List direct relationships to streets,bicycle facilities,pedestrian facilities,transit systems,employment centers and activity centers or other important information not noted in this application(2 points) Proposed Class-II facility will connect to existing Class-II bike lane along Westminster Avenue west of Seal Beach Boulevard and Class-I facility along San Gabriel River. Proposed project is within 1/4 mile of the Leisure World Village Post Office,Seal Beach Village Shopping Center,US Naval Weapons Station and Boeing Facility;and less than 1 1/2 mile from the Beach,City Hall and Seal Beach Shopping Center. OR Relationship to Surface Transportation,Improvements to Connectivity to/between Employment and Activity Centers- b BICYCLE SAFETY/OUTREACH PROJECTS ONLY The project should have one direct relationship to the streets,bicycle facilities,pedestrian facilities,transit systems, employment centers,and activity centers. This relationship may be one of function,proximity,or impact. Please list these relationships.(18 points) pts. c Estimated number of people who will receive bicycle safety/outreach information(2 points) Include methodology and justification for estimate. pts. Total Points Page 5 ####pts. Page 5 PART THREE: EVALUATION CRITERIA (continued) WEIGHTED CRITERIA(CONTINUED) 4 Project Readiness(20 points total) If item is not complete,mark"N/A"under Document Type and Date Approved/Completed. Document Type Date Approved/Completed a. Is preliminary engineering complete*?(5) Preliminary Plans 4/24/2012 5 pts. b. Is the CEQA documentation complete?(5) Categorically Exempt 4/24/2012 5 pts. c Is the NEPA documentation complete?(5) 0 pts. d Is ROW acquisition complete?(5) No ROW Acquisition Reqd. N/A 5 pts. 5 Cost-benefit(10 points total) For bicycle facility projects,fill out the total distance on 5a. For bicycle safety/outreach projects,fill out 5b. Scoring will be ranked once all project applications have been received. a. Cost benefit criteria that is calculated through the cost-ratio element based on total dollars spent on bicycle facilities over total project distance(Total project cost divided by total project length). Please enter total project distance in miles.Projects will be ranked. Tier 1 (top 33%)will receive 10 points. Tier 2(middle 33%)will receive 7. Tier 3(bottom 33%)will receive 4 points.(10 Points) pts. Total Project Total Distance(in miles) Cost Per Mile $ 1,150,000.00 I 2 I $ 575,000.00 OR b. Please explain the cost benefit ratio of bicycle safety/outreach programs in terms of air quality,health and mobility?If more space is required,please attach a separate form. (10 points) pts. 6 Safety Enhancements and Amenities(15 points maximum) a. Check all that apply. Points are cumulative with a maximum of 10 points. Points are only received for one bicycle facility and must be the same throughout the project. (10 points maximum) Will this project provide any of the following safety enhancements? Total 10 pts. Bicycle Facility Type Class I&II Bike Paths(8 points) 8 Class III Bike Paths(includes Sharrows)(4 points) Amenities Bike storage lanes(1 point) Bike Safety signage(1 point) 1 Bicycle lockers(1 point) Sharrow(2 points) Educational materials(1 point) 1 * Complete PE=30%or more engineering drawings Total Points Page 6 25 pts. Page 6 PART THREE: EVALUATION CRITERIA (continued) WEIGHTED CRITERIA(CONTINUED) b. List and explain improvements that will be made to increase bicycle safety and reduce bicycle related accidents. 1 point for each safety improvement.(5 points maximum) 1 Pavement resurfacing will improve ride-ability and improve safety. 1 pts. 2 Bicycle lane striping will delineate the right of way assigned to bicyclists and motorists and improve safety 1 pts. 3 Increased bike lane width will improve safety for the bicyclists. 1 pts. 4 Improved signage for the bicyclists and motorists will improve safety. 1 pts. 5 Augmented street sweeping program will improve safety. 1 6 Educational materials 7 8 Total 5 pts. 7 Public and Agency Support(5 points maximum) 5 pts. Provide a list of public organizations and agencies that have or will provide letters of support for the project. Letters should be attached to the application or may be sent directly to OCTA,but must be received by June 14,2012.One point for each public organization or agency,no more than 5 points will be awarded List of Supporting Organizations and Agencies Date Received(To completed by OCTA) 1 Main Street Cyclery 2 BikeLongBeach Organization 3 Downtown Long Beach Associates 4 Seal Beach Bicycle Club 5 Athletic Singles Association • 6 7 8 Total Points Page 5 ### pts. Total Points Page 6 ### pts. Total Points Page 7 7 pts. Total Points: ### pts. PASS/FAIL CRITERIA Use a separate sheet ofpaper if necessary.If any of the criteria below are not met, the proposal will not be ranked or evaluated. A "no"answer to any of the following questions irnmediately disqualifies the proposal. A 'yes"still requires supporting evidence for the project to be considered for funding. 1 State and Federal Compliance a. Is the project consistent with CMAQ,federal,state,regional or local requirements,guidelines and policies? CMAQ requirements can be found here: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/transprog/federal/cma /Official CMAO Web Page.htm Yesrl No b Is the project,as proposed,in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act?What evidence is there to support this claim? El Yes El No © Not Applicable There is no existing or proposed sidewalk along this stretch of the roadway. Page 7 PART THREE: EVALUATION CRITERIA (continued) PASS/FAIL CRITERIA(CONTINUED) 2 Financial Viability a. Is the project financially viable?The local agency must have the ability to meet financial processing requirements,must have a sufficient level of funding to provide cash flow for the project,and provide adequate personnel to manage and administer the project. Please describe any evidence supporting this conclusion. (The governing body is required to submit a resolution to this effect along with the application.) X Yes No City will provide Traffic Development Impact Fees as local match. City general fund will be utilized to provide cash flow for expenditures on this project. City will assign sufficient staff resources and consultants for timely implementation of the proposed improvements for this project. 3 Air Quality CMAQ projects must have a measureable and quantifiable air quality improvement. Please provide the improvements to the following air quality resources using the Southern California Air Quality Resources Board's(SCAQMD)South Coast Methods software found here: http://www.arb.ca.gov/planning/tsaq/eval/eval.htm. All measurements must be provided in points abs). Instructions to using the software is included as part of this Pollutant Auto Trip End Factor Auto VMT Factor Reductions(lbs/year) ROG 0.738 0.200 40 NOx 0.315 0.220 27 PM 0.016 • 0.051 4 CO 6.274 2.338 55 ENTERING AIR QUALITY DATA The following material is provided by the Southern California Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD). Local agencies will need the following materials to complete this requirement: 1.South Coast Methods Program 2.South Coast Emissions Factors Tables The software,expanded instructions,and data tables can be found here: http://www.arb.ca.gov/planning/tsau/eval/eval.htm. Project definition:Bicycle paths(Class 1)or bicycle lanes(Class 2)that are targeted to reduce commute and other non-recreational auto travel. Class 1 facilities are paths that are physically separated from motor vehicle traffic. Class 2 facilities are striped bicycle lanes giving preferential or exclusive use to bicycles. Bike lanes should meet Caltrans'full-width standard depending on street facility type. How emissions are reduced:Emission reductions result from the decrease in emissions associated with auto trips replaced by bicycle trips for commute or other non-recreational purposes. Data Required: 1.CMAQ Funding dollars 2.Number of operating days per year(out of 365 days) 3.Average length of bicycle trips(in miles) 4.Average daily traffic volume on roadway parallel to bicycle project 5.City population 6.Bicycle project class(1 or 2) 7.Types of activity centers in the vicinity of the bicycle project 8.Length of bicycle path or lane(in miles) SEE ATTACHED TABLES. Page 8 PART THREE: EVALUATION CRITERIA (continued) ENTERING AIR QUALITY DATA(CONTINUED) INPUTS FIELD DEFAULT UNIT UNITS COMMENT Funding Dollars FUNDING N/A Dollars Use CMAQ dollars Class 1 -20 years Effectiveness Period LIFE 15 Years �%. Class 2- 15 years. Days D _200 Days of use/year - , onsider local climate in number Average Length of gtault is based on the National Bicycle Trips L 1.8 Miles per trip jci!ne direction Personal Transportation Survey Annual Average e Two-d ion traffic volumes on : Daily Traffic ADT N/A Trips pie day roadway plka1lel to bike project. e N • Adjustment on ADT II See.Adjustment ctors tabel. for auto trips I! %-. =djustnients are bale``do n facility replaced by bike trips I 4 l class,ADT,project leriitth,and from bike facility A 0.002 I N/A community characteristic•-iS)Credit for Activity I Centers near project. C 0.00 f N/A e See Activity Lenten"ale.•'ADJUSTMENTFACTORS . ::"- .T :: .;`:` : ..:' � ,: . .. - : / LENGTH.OF 1A Q :TEL % CTORS I AVERACI BIKE PROJECT 3 CIT1' .'- TH.POP. ADJUSTMANT FACTORS DAILW (ONE j' 0,00 on-university FOR UUVERSITY TOWNS BIKE FACILITY T' •Ir'FIC(ADT) DIREC:'1IO: P Itown, ,000 Wl POP.<250,000 j A1iT � / I nu.'\ .- 10 ' 104 r::: vehicles per day > 1& miles 0%9 ` 0.0155 Class 1&CVss 2 _ 2 Wl}O±8 ` 0.0207 12,000<Al)T-:/ < b.—Vile- ,0.0014 1 0.0073 II =24.000 vehicles'% &</ c iiles 10.002 / 0.0109 e per daP '- m 0027 �� 0.0145 —� 24,0[►0 / <1‘. e _10.001 / 0.0052 Cla 2 =30, vehicles4 1 ' <./=2 mi es 10.00 H / 0.0078 ♦ per day 130,000 j:: miles ;0.001g/ , 0.0104 ■ ■ I ACTIVT Y GEN RS CREDIT Ti n r: ITT3I?I"I/M►nLE) . ::.:�. L=':-::;;;;': NUMBER ♦♦_.CREDIT WITHIN 1/2 MILE /CREDIT WITHIN 1/4 MILE 3 or less ♦ W 0.0005 1 0.001 3 to 7 •♦ - 0.001 0.002 7 or more ♦ 0.0015 �I 0.003 *Includes Bank,church,hospital, ht rail statiyn,park and ride,office park,post office,public library,shopping area or grocery storAk�/ity or junior college :EMISSIONS FACTOR INPUTS OR'AUTO.TRAVEL':.:::':'s_:: ' .;:'':..':, R::.:: DEFAULT 1 UNITS DEFAULT + UNITS POLLUTANT AUTO TRIP FACTOR AUTO VMT FACTOR ROG 1.020 grams/trip 0.266 grams/mile NOx 0.458 grams/trip 0.319 grams/mile PM10 0.016 grams/trip 0.219 grams/mile Page 9 PART FOUR: BCI PROGRAM AGENCY RESOLUTION SAMPLE AGENCY RESOLUTION REQUESTING FUNDS FOR APPROVED PROJECT RESOL UTIONMUST BE RECEIVED BY OCTA NO LATER THAN THE JUNE 30,2012. RESOLUTION NO XXXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR FUNDS FOR THE BICYCLE CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FUNDED WITH CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY PROGRAM UNDER THE 2005 SAFE,ACCOUNTABLE,FLEXIBLE, EFFICIENT,TRANSPORTATION ACT-LEGACY FOR USERS OR SUBSEQUENT FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION ACT FOR WESTMINSTER AVENUE CLASS-II BICYCLE LANE PROJECT. WHEREAS,the United State Congress enacted the Safe,Accountable,Flexible,Efficient,Transportation Equity Act- Legacy for Users August 2005,which makes Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality funds available to the Orange County Transportation Authority(OCTA);and WHEREAS,OCTA has established the procedures and criteria for reviewing proposals;and 1 WHEREAS,CITY OF SEAL BEACH possesses authority to nominate bicycle projects funded using Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality funding and to finance,acquire,and construct the proposed project;and WHEREAS,by formal action the CITY COUNCIL authorizes the nomination of WESTMINSTER AVENUE BICYCLE LANE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT,including all understanding and assurances contained therein,and authorizes the person identified as the official representative of the CITY OF SEAL BEACH to act in connection with the nomination and to provide such additional information as may be required;and WHEREAS,the CITY OF SEAL BEACH will maintain and operate the property acquired,developed,rehabilitated,or restored for the life of the resultant facility or activity;and WHEREAS,with the approval of the California Department of Transportation(Caltrans)and OCTA,the CITY OF SEAL BEACH or its successors in interest in the property may transfer the responsibility to maintain and operate the property;and WHEREAS,the CITY OF SEAL BEACH will give Caltrans and OCTA's representatives access to and the right to examine all records,books,papers or documents related to the bicycle project;and WHEREAS,the CITY OF SEAL BEACH will cause work on the project to be commenced within six months following notification from the State that funds have been authorized to proceed by the Federal Highway Administration and that the project will be carried to completion with reasonable diligence;and WHEREAS,the CITY OF SEAL BEACH commits$150,000 of Traffic Development Impact Fees 13 PERCENT LOCAL AGENCY MATCH)of total project cost as match to the requested$1,000,000 in OCTA CMAQ funds for a total project cost estimated to be$1,150,000. WHEREAS,the CITY OF SEAL BEACH will comply where applicable with provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act,the National Environmental Policy Act,the American with Disabilities Act,Federal Transit Administration Title VI,and any other federal,state,and/or local laws,rules and/or regulations; WHEREAS,the CITY OF SEAL BEACH's CITY COUNCIL authorize the execution of any necessary cooperative agreements between the CITY OF SEAL BEACH and OCTA to facilitate the delivery of the project. Page 10 PART FOUR: BCI PROGRAM AGENCY RESOLUTION (continued) SAMPLE AGENCY RESOLUTION REQUESTING FUNDS FOR APPROVED PROJECT NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the City of SEAL BEACH,hereby authorizes Jill R.Ingram,City Manager as the official representative of the CITY OF SEAL BEACH to apply for the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality funding under the Safe,Accountable,Flexible,Efficient Transportation Equity Act-Legacy for Users for WESTMINSTER AVENUE BICYCLE LANE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that the City of SEAL BEACH,agrees to fund its share of the project costs and any additional costs over the identified programmed amount. ; Signed Date Mayor Printed(Name and Title)Michael P.Levitt,Mayor Signed Date Clerk Recorder Printed(Name and Title)Linda Devine,City Clerk • Page 11 PART FIVE: ASSURANCES This page uwsi be signed for the project to be considered for finding. CITY OF SEAL BEACH possesses legal authority to nominate this bicycle project and to finance,acquire,and construct the proposed project;and by formal action(e.g.,a resolution)the Implementing Agency's governing body authorizes the nomination of the bicycle project,including all understanding and assurances contained therein,and authorizes the person identified as the official representative of the Implementing Agency to act in connection with the nomination and to provide such additional information as may be required. CITY OF,SEAL BEACH will maintain and operate the property acquired,developed,rehabilitated,or restored for the life of the resultant facility or activity. With the approval of the OCTA,California Department of Transportation,the Implementing Agency or its successors in interest in the property may transfer the responsibility to maintain and operate the property. CITY OF SEAL BEACH will give the OCTA or California Department of Transportation's representative access to and the right to examine all records,books,papers,or documents related to the transportation enhancement activity. CITY OF SEAL BEACH will comply where applicable with provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act,the National Environmental Policy Act,the Americans with Disabilities Act,the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archaeology and Historic Preservation,CTC Guidelines,FHWA Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Guidance, FTA requirements if applicable,any other federal,state,and/or local laws,rules and/or regulations. If Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality funds or projects are used for other than the intended purposes as defined by federal or state guidelines,the implementing agency may be required to remit all state and federal funds back to the OCTA. I certify that the information contained in this Bicycle Corridor Improvement Program application,including required attachments,is accurate and that I have read and understand the important information and agree to the assurances on this form. / Signed fuoi __II Date � 7 1( 17 • (Administering Agency Represe olive) Printed(Name and Title)Sean Crumby,P.E.,Asst.City Manager/Director of Public Works • Administering Agency CITY OF SEAL BEACH Page 12 PART SIX: COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT CONCURRENCE This page must be signed for the project to be considered for funding. Project Implementing Agency has reviewed the attached draft Bicycle Corridor Improvement Program cooperative agreement template and has determined that the cooperative agreement is: ©Sufficient and meets the expectations of the Project Implementing Agency. No further changes necessary. Sufficient,with the suggested modifications: Please list and explain: Bicycle Corridor Improvement Program cooperative agreement will be finalized and executed between Project Implementing Agency and OCTA if the project is selected for funding. I certify that the information contained in this Bicycle Corridor Improvement Program application,including required attachments,is accurate and that I have read and understood the important information and agree to the assurances on this form. Signed I/ �4`/ Date /f (Administering Agency •epresentative/ Printed(Name and Title) Sean Crumby,P.E.,Asst.City Manager/Director of Public Works Administering Agency CITY OF SEAL BEACH Page 13 CHECK LIST AND EVALUATION CRITERIA Check list of Application Items (check all items included in this package) x Application(Part 1-3) x Cover Letter x- Table of Contents x- Unbound,original single sided copy x- 5 copies x- PART 1-General Project Information • x- PART 2-Funding x- PART 3-Evaluation Criteria x Draft Resolution(PART 4) Signed Final Resolution(when available) x Assurances (PART 5) x Cooperative Agreement Concurrence(PART 6) x Environmental Documentation [CEQA] x Project Site Photos Maps x GIS Map and Shape File x- Project Site Maps x Design/Concept Drawing Right of Way [No additional ROW Required] x Right of Way Map _- Right of Way Certification(if applicable) x Air Quality Calculations Evaluation Criteria and Point Distribution Weighted Criteria Points Percentage Matching Funds 20 20% Coordination 10 10% Connectivity,Relationships and Priority 20 20% Project Readiness 20 20% Cost Benefit 10 10% Safety Enhancements and Amenities 15 15% Public and Agency Support 5 5% Total 100 100% Pass/Fail Criteria State and Federal Compliance Financial Viability Air Quality Page 14 ADDENDUMS CONFIRMATION CONFIRMATION OF AGENCY RECEIPT OF ADDENDUMS I, Sean Crumby certify that I have received and read the following addendums to the Bicycle Corridor Improvement Program 2012 Call for Projects. All materials are incorporated into the City of Seal Beach's application submittal. DATE ADDENDUMS 4/3/2012 Addendum 1 Agency City of Seal Beach Name(Print) Sean ,rumby,P.E. Title Asst.City Manager/Director of Public Works 1 Signature __ ��� Date y2� lip 1 16 BICYCLE CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADDENDUM 1 The following pages have been replaced in the Bicycle Corridor Improvement Program 2012 Call for Projects Application package. Revisions to the application were made to the following pages: Page 6: Revise question 6a to allow for multi-class bicycle facilities. Page 8: Revise question 3 to add internet link to air quality factor tables. Page 9: Completely delete page 9. Revised pages are attached to this application package. Please use the revised pages in place of pages 6 and 8 and sign the addendum confirmation available here: http://www.octa.net/bikecall.aspx Page 15 REVISED PART THREE: EVALUATION CRITERIA (continued) WEIGHTED CRITERIA(CONTINUED) 4 Project Readiness(20 points total) If item is not complete,mark"N/A"under Document Type and Date Approved/Completed. Document Type Date Approved/Completed a. Is preliminary engineering complete*?(5) pts. b. Is the CEQA documentation complete?(5) pts. c. Is the NEPA documentation complete?(5) pts. d. Is ROW acquisition complete?(5) pts. 5 Cost-benefit(10 points total) . '- For:�bicale=facili -'r6ectsfillout'.�tlietotal'distace' n5,a.�or.liic'cl �safe %oiilieacT r`oects�•fill'oif=5liA4-=' orin`:will'be raked: `race= ll:"ro•ecta lic't {b �_ -' '::� = A° '�==?= ��„ .-..$.. . ..,t�.—. - ::at:P•.J. :�P, a ions:have_ e�n�received:`:::��'-_;��:�Msp��_....._ � `� .:.� a. Cost benefit criteria that is calculated through the cost-ratio element based on total dollars spent on bicyle facilities over total project distance(Total project cost divided by total project length). Please enter total project distance in miles.Projects will be ranked. Tier 1(top 33%)will receive 10 points. Tier 2(middle 33%)will receive 7. Tier 3 (bottom 33%)will receive 4 points.(10 Points) pts. - Total Project Total Distance(in miles) Cost Per Mile OR b. Please explain the cost benefit ratio of bicycle safety/outreach programs in terms of air quality,health and mobility:If more space is required,please attach a separate form. (10 points) pts. 6 Safety Enhancements and Amenities(15 points maximum) a. Check all that apply. Points are cumulative with a maximum of 10 points. Points are divided by facility type. If the project is the same class throughout the facility,fill in 100%in the"Percentage"line. For Class I and II facilities that include Class III facilities,fill out the percentage of each facility. For example,if the project will include 1/2 mile of Class II and 1/2 mile of Class III(total 1 mile),fill in 50%for"Class I&II Bike Paths"and 50%for"Class III Bike Paths."(10 points maximum). Will this project provide any of the following safety enhancements? Total - pts. Bicycle Facility Type Class I&II Bike Paths(8 points) 0.0 Percentage:_ 0% Class 111 Bike Paths(includes Sharrows)(4 points) 0.0 Percentage: 0% Total: 0% Amenities Bike storage lanes(1 point) Bike Safety signage(1 point) Bicycle lockers(1 point) Sharrow(2 points) Educational materials(1 point) * Complete PE=30%or more engineering drawings Total Points Page 6 - pts. Page 6 REVISED PART THREE: EVALUATION CRITERIA (continued) PASS/FAIL CRITERIA(CONTINUED) 2 Financial Viability a. Is the project financially viable?The local agency must have the ability to meet financial processing requirements,must have a sufficent level of funding to provide cash flow for the project,and provide adequate personnel to manage and administer the project. Please describe any evidence supporting this conclusion. (The governing body is required to submit a resolution to this effect along with the application.) Yes No • • 3 Air Quality CMAQ projects must have a measureable and quantifiable air quality improvement. Please provide the improvements to the following air quality resources using the Southern California Air Quality Resources Board's(SCAQMD)South Coast Methods software found here: http://www.arb.ca.gov/planning/tsaq/eval/eval.htm. All measurements must be provided in points(lbs). Instructions to using the software is included as part of this Pollutant Auto Trip End Factor Auto VMT Factor Reductions(lbs/year) ROG NOx PM CO ENTERING AIR QUALITY DATA The following material is provided by the Southern California Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD). Local agencies will need the following materials to complete this requirement: 1.South Coast Methods Program 2.South Coast Emissions Factors Tables The software,expanded instructions,and data tables can be found here: http://www.arb.ca.eov/planning/tsaq/eval/eval.htm. The data tables can be found here: http://www.arb.ca.gov/planning/tsao/eval/sc-emftables.pdf Project definition:Bicycle paths(Class 1)or bicycle lanes(Class 2)that are targeted to reduce commute and other non-recreational auto travel. Class 1 facilities are paths that are physically separated from motor vehicle traffic. Class 2 facilities are striped bicycle lanes giving preferential or exclusive use to bicycles. Bike lanes should meet Caltrans'full-width standard depending on street facility type. How emissions are reduced:Emission reductions result from the decrease in emissions associated with auto trips replaced by bicycle trips for commute or other non-recreational purposes. Data Required: 1.CMAQ Funding dollars 2.Number of operating days per year(out of 365 days) 3.Average length of bicycle trips(in miles) 4.Average daily traffic volume on roadway parallel to bicycle project 5.City population 6.Bicycle project class(1 or 2) 7.Types of activity centers in the vicinity of the bicycle project 8.Length of bicycle path or lane(in miles) Page 8 • ADDENDUMS CONFIRMATION CONFIRMATION OF AGENCY RECEIPT OF ADDENDUMS I, Scan Crum by ccrtify that 1 have received and read the following addendums to the Bicycle Corridor Improvement Program 2012 Call for Projects. All materials are incorporated into the City of Seal Beach's application submittal. DATE ADDENDUMS • 4/3/2012 Addendum l • • • Agency City of Seal Beach Name(Print) Sean ,rumby,P.E. Title Asst.City Manager/Director of Public Works Ala 1 i Signature � Date 17 y I� 16 Its NJ . I City of Seal Beach, 211 8th Street ® ®®®®®® Seal Beach, CA 90740 MEMITTin, 562-431-2527 NOTICE OF EXEMPTION TO: Clerk-Recorder, County of Orange 12 Civic Center Plaza, Room 106 Santa Ana, CA 92701 Westminster Avenue Bicycle Lane Improvement Project Project Title Westminster Avenue between Seal Beach Blvd. and Bolsa Chica Road Project Location-Specific City of Seal Beach County of Orange Project Location-City Project Location-County Bicycle Lane/Street Improvements Description of Nature, Purpose, and Beneficiaries of Project City of Seal Beach, Public Works Department Name of Public Agency Approving Project Sean P. Crumby, Assistant City Manager/Director of Public Works, City of Seal Beach Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project The project is exempt from CEQA under the following authority: (Check One) Ministerial (14 Cal. Code of Regs. §15268) Declared Emergency (14 Cal. Code of Regs. §15269(a)) Emergency Project (14 Cal. Code of Regs. §15269(b), (c), (d) & (e)). State subsection letter. Statutory Exemption. (14 Cal. Code of Regs. §§15260 et seq.) State statutory number: X Categorical Exemption. (14 Cal. Code of Regs. §§15300 et seq.) State class and section number: Section 15301, Class 1 subsection (c) No possibility of physical impact. (14 Cal. Code of Regs. §15061(b)(3)) Existing highways and streets, bicycle and pedestrian trails Reasons why project is exempt Jerry Olivera (562) 431-2527 #1316 Contact Person Area Code Telephone Extension Address: 211 Eighth Street Seal Beach, CA 90740 Date Received for Filing: Signature Senior Planner Title C:\Users\Amit Singh\Contacts\Desktop\Seal Beach BC!Grant\City Info\CEQA NOE.doc\LwM04-04-00 Western Avenue Bicycle Lane Improvements — Site Photos IPIE _ ,.., '', ..: 1, ' 'I� s s is f'sas— «� , x r , yam. f i 3 }.l ,:',,` " r.,:"..-"-:"..,SRS �`: .3aq s'f.,:sk f F x d x, '` x a,`6 < ss., .. Project Site Photo 1: Westminster Avenue FIRE WOR KS �Y r 1 Y '1 .a alas-• 1 P -0 � �'3' ft 'y}yy f { -' at V te- a i ` � -> '4 ,i sy ' .¢p . c ._gib...•__ - Project Site Photo 2: Westminster Avenue SP-1 Western Avenue Bicycle Lane Improvements— Site Photos e — 4 , t R.. i 1 - - wit,-- /*it ,,,, - - awes - ,,,,,,..iiii,,,„ ''il k t. Project Site Photo 3: Westminster Avenue ,;. { - u a " a l s $ Project Site Photo 4: Westminster Avenue SP-2 J Attachment C Resolution No. 6262 State-Local Partnership Program Application Page 7 RESOLUTION NUMBER 6262 A RESOLUTION OF THE SEAL BEACH CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR FUNDS FOR THE STATE- LOCAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM UNDER THE PROPOSITION 1B HIGHWAY SAFETY, TRAFFIC REDUCTION, AIR QUALITY, AND PORT SECURITY BOND ACT OF 2006 FOR ARTERIAL AND LOCAL STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM CIP NO. ST1202&ST1203 WHEREAS, the California voters approved Proposition 1B Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006, which makes State-Local Partnership Program (SLPP) funds available to the Orange County Transportation Authority(OCTA); and WHEREAS, OCTA has established the procedures and criteria for nominating proposals; and WHEREAS, Seal Beach possesses authority to nominate projects funded using Measure M2 Fair Share and State-Local Partnership Program funding and to finance, acquire, and construct the proposed project; and WHEREAS, by formal action the City Council authorizes the nomination of Arterial and Local Street Resurfacing Program CIP No. ST1202 & ST1203Priorities 1 and 2 projects including all understanding and assurances contained therein, and authorizes the Director of Public Works as the official representative of Seal Beach to act in connection with the nomination and to provide such additional information as may be required; and WHEREAS, should priority project no 1 not be approved, and priority project no 2 be approved, the City of Seal Beach will proceed with implementation of priority project no 2; and WHEREAS, Seal Beach will maintain and operate the property acquired, developed, rehabilitated, or restored for the life of the resultant facility(ies) or activity; and WHEREAS, with the approval of the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), California Transportation Commission (CTC), and OCTA, Seal Beach or its successors in interest in the property may transfer the responsibility to maintain and operate the property; and WHEREAS, Seal Beach will give Caltrans, CTC, and OCTA's representatives access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers or documents related to the project; and WHEREAS, Seal Beach will cause work on the project to be commenced within six months following notification from the State that funds have been allocated by the CTC and that the project will be carried to completion with reasonable diligence; and WHEREAS, Seal Beach commits $337,332 of Seal Beach's Measure M2 Fair Share to provide 51% total project cost as match to the requested $318,000 in OCTA Formula SLPP funds for a total project cost estimated to be$655,332; and WHEREAS, Seal Beach will comply where applicable with provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, the American with Disabilities Act, and any other federal, state, and/or local laws, rules and/or regulations; and Resolution Number 6262 WHEREAS, the City of Seal Beach City Council authorizes the execution of any necessary cooperative agreements between the City of Seal Beach and OCTA to facilitate the delivery of the project; and WHEREAS, the City of Seal Beach City Council authorize the revision of the City of Seal Beach's Capital Improvement Program to facilitate the delivery of the project;and WHEREAS, the City of Seal Beach City Council delegates signature authority to the Director of Public Works to facilitate the delivery of the project. NOW, THEREFORE, THE SEAL BEACH CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY RESOLVE: Section 1. Authorizes the Director of Public Works as the official representative of the City of Seal Beach to apply for the State-Local Partnership Program funding under the Proposition 1B Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction,Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006 for Arterial and Local Street Resurfacing Program CIP No. ST1202 &ST1203. Section 2. To fund its share of the project costs and any additional costs over the identified programmed amount. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Seal Beach City Council at a regular meeting held on the 11th day of June . 2012 by the following vote: AYES: Council Members NOES: Council Members ABSENT: Council Members ABSTAIN: Council Members Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA } COUNTY OF ORANGE } SS CITY OF SEAL BEACH } I, Linda Devine, City Clerk of the City of Seal Beach, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is the original copy of Resolution Number 6262 on file in the office of the City Clerk, passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting held on the 11th day of June , 2012. City Clerk ". f 'iiT 1.,�¢^xRT! ts. S { -�+5 [ F i J .,1.. .{ 1 y. { 7 � y eft ,, #} � 4f '/.1 .,L ' T cry, 4,-,,4-1 ,.1r.1-,t'4i ,- } � t ',.',',V* , y. k 4 _ �. ;. .f XY b y a �; jit f�t� 9‘,.I...' '..?'" F r._ .t. 1�SEA .4 , _ r k ti Y :. .,'. f'p .yam r n. s '� C ,t 1 s O y n "fir �' �u r 'C ' t F 2< r ,� sx 1izY�,�w-'�� ,yee rL i ::il ��'�" ® ',7=,'-:-..:.:::-,4',".- ,,--•••-,,,Y �l '4 ^' w.. ,,� t"'rn;�a+�?% ,�. ?. }}r}55,, l , � 1 '' x� - - .? �r'T.C'4j `Py yA!y�2 4X 'Y�1 4' >(�1^ .'� ik �° F f .: a v '�` .: 1". CITY HAI.I .21'I I k I I[I I SiiIU I T t y 't ti } ', ,�tt .''AI,Ill- 11 CAF II OR".l 907-00. -a G J 2 =� F _ i { 's T.cv ; � � - � :..- , i �< s µ „N; �.�{SG2);d3�1 2522,w.wwciscid h�a�h ci!t $4 .. z ti t t T� r z t i♦ r. `= `"r[a „ r'ti X ;.r t..k T�' -4' , �� �S �' ' �y. ,t 7 � �-`Xi.lSs� ,v� w �c Y C t'� ' i k 7 'I r ) r � � 4A _ uV M Y4�t- 5/14/2012 Mr.Kia Mortazavi Executive Director, Planning Orange County Transportation Authority 550 S.Main Street Orange, CA 92863 Subject: State-Local Partnership Program Formula Grant 2012 Call for Projects Dear Mr. Mortazavi: Seal Beach is pleased to nominate the following projects for consideration for funding through the State-Local Partnership Program Formula Grant 2012 Call for Projects. In total Scat Beach is requesting$318,000. The total value requested does not exceed the allotted formula distribution. The following list is based on priority. e Arterial and Local Street Resurfacing Program CIP No. ST1202 & ST1203 9 Arterial and Local Street Resurfacing Program CIP No. ST1202 & ST1203 (if both projects become funded, this project name will change,however,if only one of the two projects become funded,this will be the project's name) Priority Project No. 1 is a road resurfacing project for Arterial and Local Streets within Seal Beach California. The roads that arc to be resurfaced are Ironwood Avenue from Elder Avenue to Heather Street,Ironwood Avenue from Wisteria to Tulip, Sandpiper Drive from Bolsa Avenue to Taper Drive, Southshorc Drive from Bolsa Avenue to Taper Drive,Taper Drive from Bolsa Avenue to Catalina Avenue and Electric Avenue North from Main Street to 14th Street. This project is intended to grind existing asphalt and resurface with new, rubberized asphalt concrete complete and new striping. Priority Project No. 2 is also a road resurfacing project for Arterial and Local Streets within Seal Beach California. The roads that are to be resurfaced are 1st Street from Pacific Coast Highway to 14th Street,Electric Avenue South from Main Street to 14th Street,Marina Avenue from 6th Street to Pacific Coast Highway and Balboa Drive from • Boise Avenue to Catalina Avenue. This project is intended to grind existing asphalt and resurface with new, rubberized asphalt concrete complete and new striping. . • 1 � u .. �.•.�-_�,._ �. •_. .., ;;;: , � _ r� • _ .r .. �, ISbC2IT)YL HA5L1,:2.1`1 EIGHTH BLACCLIFORNbISA eTriR9clQLt,7Ec4aT Q u s,H,49 wvry c_ • ; �t,' x i'" }f...t '� -� ,; ✓ t�f :. = _`� n F,",$ q�.'f.,,s t4 1� ear 'y 1 • The Seal Beach City Council anticipates approving these projects for nomination on June 25, 2012 and will certify the nominations are true and correct. If you have any questions on Seal Beach's submittal,please contact David SpitZ, Associate Engineer,at 5G2-431-2527 extension 1331 or by email at ds)it_ sealbeachca.gov. Sincerely, . Sean Sean Crumby Director of Public Works Attachments Table of Contents Project Programming Request (Priority 1) .Page 1 Part 2: Nomination Form (Priority 1) ..Page 4 Part 3: Signature Certification (Priority 1) .Page 5 Resolution (Priority 1) Page 6 Map (Priority 1) ..Page 8 Project Programming Request (Priority 2) .Page 9 Part 2: Nomination Form (Priority 2) Page 12 Part 3: Signature Certification (Priority 2) Page 13 Resolution (Priority 2) ..Page 14 Map (Priority 2) Page 16 Appendix 4: Cooperative Agreement Concurrence .Page 17 Addendum No. 1 Agency Confirmation ..Page 18 • STATE OF CALIFORNIA o DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECT PROGRAMMING REQUEST DTP-0001 (REV.6/11) General Instructions si New Project ❑ Amendment(Existing Project) Date: 05/10/12 District EA Project ID PPNO MPO ID TCRP No. • 12 County Route/Corridor PM Bk PM Ahd Project Sponsor/Lead Agency ORA OCTA/Seal Beach MPO Element Capital Outlay Project Mgr/Contact Phone E-mail Address David Spitz 562-431-2527 dspilz©sealbeachca.gov Project Title Arterial and Local Street Resurfacing Program CIP No. ST1202&ST1203 Location, Project Limits, Description,Scope of Work, Legislative Description This is a road resesurfacing project for Arterial and Local Streets within Seal Beach California. The roads that are to be resurfaced are Ironwood Avenue from Elder Avenue to Heather Street, Ironwood Avenue from Wisteria to Tulip, Sandpiper Drive from Bolsa Avenue to Taper Drive, Southshore Drive from Bolsa Avenue to Taper Drive,Tager Drive from Boise Avenue to Catalina Avenue and Electric Avenue North from Main Street Component Implementing Agency Reimbursements PA&ED Seal Beach PS&E Seal Beach Right of Way Seal Beach Construction Seal Beach Legislative Districts Assembly: 67 1 Senate:135 Con,ressional: 46 Purpose and Need The City has developed a Pavement Management Plan (PMP)which has identified certain street segments that are in need of resurfacing treamtemts. The roads identified for this project fall in the highest priority of the City's PMP and are slated for resurfacing treatments for fiscal year 2012/2013, By resurfacing these streets now, the City can provide those streets with 20+ more years of usefull life at a specific treatment level and cost. Further delays in resurfacing these roads may require more complicated rehabilation in the future at a greater cost to the City. Project Benefits The benefits to this resurfacing project are a longer lasting road and a cost to resurface now that is much less than a future cost to resurface should the City wait to repave these streets at a later date. Additionally, recent construction projects in the vacinity of Ironwood Avenue have had numerous trucks using Ironwood Avenue in a route to get back to the Freeways and as such has made the need to resurface Ironwood avenue a high priority for the City. Project Milestone Proposed Project Study Report Approved 06/30/12 Begin Environmental(PA&ED) Phase 07/01/12 Circulate Draft Environmental Document (Document Type ICE 07/31/12 Draft Project Report End Environmental Phase(PA&ED Milestone) 07/31/12 Begin Design (PS&E)Phase 08/01/12 End Design Phase(Ready to List for Advertisement Milestone) 10/31/12 Begin Right of Way Phase n/a End Right of Way Phase(Right of Way Certification Milestone) n/a Begin Construction Phase(Contract Award Milestone) 07/01/13 End Construction Phase(Construction Contract Acceptance Milestone) 9/31/13 Begin Closeout Phase 10/01/13 End Closeout Phase(Closeout Report) 12/31/13 ADA Notice For individuals with sensory disa.i dies, his document is available in alternate formats. For mformahon call(918)854.6410 or TOO(916)654-3880 orwrite Records and Forms Management,1120 N Street,MS-89,Sacramento,CA 95814. Page 1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA o DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECT PROGRAMMING REQUEST DTP-0001 (REV.6/11) Date: 05/10/12 District County Route EA Project ID PPNO TCRP No. 12 ORA Project Title: Arterial and Local Street Resurfacing Program CIP No.ST1202&ST1203 Proposed Total Project Cost Notes Component Prior 12113 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18+ Total E&P(PA&ED) _ PS&E RIW SUP(CT) CON SUP(CT) ' • 40,000 40,000 RAN CON 615,372 615,372 TOTAL 655.372 655,372 Fund No.1: IProp 1B Program Code Proposed Funding Component Prior 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18+ Total Funding Agency E&P(PA&ED) OCTA PS&E RNV SUP(CT) CON SUP(CT) . . __.._._. _ RAN RAN CON 318.000 318,000 TOTAL 318,000 318,000 Fund No.2: (Measure M Program Code Proposed Funding Component Prior 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18+ Total Funding Agency E&P(PA&ED) Seal Beach _ --- PS&E — — RNV SUP(CT) CON SUP(CT) 40,000 40,000 RAN -— -_- CON 297,372 297,372 TOTAL 337,372 337,372 Fund No.3: I Program Code Proposed Funding Component Prior 12/13 13/14 14/15 15116 16117 17/18+ Total Funding Agency E&P(PA&ED) PS&E - RAN SUP(CT) CON SUP(CT) . -- RAN - - - CON -------- TOTAL Page 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA•DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECT PROGRAMMING REQUEST DTP-0001 (REV.6/11) Date: 05/10/12 District County Route EA Project ID PPNO TCRP No. 12 ORA Project Title: Arterial and Local Street Resurfacing Program CIP No.ST1202&ST1203 Fund No.4: ( Program Code Proposed Funding Component Prior 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18+ Total Funding Agency E&P(PA&ED) PS&E R/W SUP(CT) CON SUP(CT) RNV CON TOTAL Fund No.5: Program Code Proposed Funding Component Prior 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18+ Total Funding Agency _._ E&P(PA&ED) PS&E RAN — CON SUP(CT) - ------ RAN -- — - --- CON TOTAL Fund No.6: I Program Code Proposed Funding Component Prior 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18+ Total — Funding Agency — E&P(PA&ED) PS&E RAN SUP(CT) ----- -- — CON SUP(CT) RAN - •- ------- EON TOTAL Fund No.7: I Program Code Proposed Funding Component Prior 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18+ Total Funding Agency E&P(PA&ED) — R SUP(CT)-�- - - -- _ _ /W CON SUP(CT) -- ��� CON TOTAL Page 3 STATE-LOCAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM FORMULA GRANT PART 2: NOMINATION FORM Project Title Arterial and Local Street Resurfacing Program CIP ST1202 & ST1203 Agency City of Seal Beach PROJEC.I'INFORMA'T'ION This is a road resurfacing project for Arterial and Local Streets within Seal Beach California. The roads that are to be resurfaced are Ironwood Avenue from Elder Avenue to Heather Street, Ironwood Avenue from Wisteria to Tulip, Sandpiper Drive from Bolsa Avenue to Taper Drive, Southshore Drive from Bolsa Avenue to Taper Drive, Taper Drive from Bolsa Avenue to Catalina Avenue and Electric Avenue North from Main Street to 14th Street. This project is intended to grind existing asphalt and resurface with new, rubberized asphalt concrete complete and new striping. CURRENT PROJECT STATUS Currently this project has begun design and environmental documentation. All Design and environmental approvals are expected before the deadlines as listed in the Timely Use of Funds Schedule provided. The City will be able to go to construction in the Spring/Summer of 2013 once the funds are allocated. Construction is expected to take less than three months to complete. SUPPORT OF SCAG REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION GOALS Some of the goals of this project as it reflects the goals of SCAG are to Maximize mobility and accessibility for people and goods in the region by providing better access to commercial locations, helps preserve and ensure a sustainable regional transportation system by increasing the pavement live of certain arterial roads within Seal Beach and by actively encouraging non-motorized transportation through use of new bike lanes on arterial roads that link regional bicycle facilities. Attachments: Project Map State Transportation Improvement Program Project Programming Request(PPR) Council and Board Certification and Signatures Page 4 STATE-LOCAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM FORMULA GRANT PART 3: SIGNATURE CERTIFICATION Ate.Information and Certification APPLICANT AGENCY: Orange County Transportation Authority APPLICANT Address: 550 South Main Street Orange,CA.92863 APPLICANT Contact Person: Adriann Cardoso Phone##: (714)560-5915 Ismail: acardoso @oeta.net RECIPIENT/IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: City of Seal Beach IMPLEMENTING AGENCY Address: 211 St Street,Seal Beach CA 90740 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY Contact Person: David Spitz, Associate Engineer _ Phone II: 562-431-2527 extension 1331 Email:dspitz@sealbeachca.gov._ To the best of my knowledge and belief,the data and information in this request are true and correct and I am authorized by my council, board,authority,commission,or ruling body to file the request on behalf of the applicant, recipient,and/or implementing agency. APPLICANT AND RECIPIENT Name and Title: Kia Mortazavi, Executive Director, Planning,OCTA Signature(in blue ink): Date: RECIPIENT AND IMPLEMENTING AGENCY Name andTitle: - et:it4.Sean Cruneby, Director of Public Works _ Signature(in blue ink): Date: r//`F / 2- Page 5 STATE-LOCAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM FORMULA GRANT RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR FUNDS FOR THE STATE-LOCAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM UNDER THE PROPOSITION 1B HIGHWAY SAFETY,TRAFFIC REDUCTION,AIR QUALITY,AND PORT SECURITY BOND ACT OF 2006 FOR ARTERIAL AND LOCAL STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM CIP NO.ST1202& ST1203 WHEREAS,the California voters approved Proposition 1B Highway Safety,Traffic Reduction,Air Quality,and Port Security Bond Act of 2006,which makes State-Local Partnership Program(SLPP)funds available to the Orange County Transportation Authority(OCTA);and WHEREAS,OCTA has established the procedures and criteria for nominating proposals;and WHEREAS,Seal Beach possesses authority to nominate projects funded using Measure M2 Fair Share and State- Local Partnership Program funding and to finance,acquire,and construct the proposed project;and WHEREAS,by formal action the City Council authorizes the nomination of Arterial and Local Street Resurfacing Program CIP No.ST1202&S'I'1203Priorities I and 2 projects including all understanding and assurances contained therein,and authorizes the Director of Public Works as the official representativc of Scal Beach to act in connection with the nomination and to provide such additional information as may be required;and WHEREAS,should priority project no 1 not be approved,and priority project no 2 be approved,the City of Seal Beach will proceed with implementation ofpriority project no 2;and WHEREAS,Seal Beach will maintain and operate the property acquired,developed,rehabilitated,or restored for the life of the resultant facility(ies)or activity;and WHEREAS,with the approval of the California Department of Transportation(Caltrans),California Transportation Commission(CTC),and OCTA,Seal Beach or its successors in interest in the property may transfer the responsibility to maintain and operate the property;and WHEREAS,Seal Beach will give Caltrans,CTC,and OCTA's representatives access to and the right to gamine all records,books,papers or documents related to the project;and WHEREAS,Seal Beach will cause work on the project to be commenced within six months following notification from the State that funds have been allocated by the CTC and that the project will be carried to completion with reasonable diligence;and WHEREAS,Seal Beach commits$337,332 of Seal Beach's Measure M2 Fair Share to provide 51%total project cost as match to the requested$318,000 in OCTA Formula SLPP funds for a total project cost estimated to be 5655,332. WHEREAS,Seal Beach will comply where applicable with provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, the National Environmental Policy Act,the American with Disabilities Act,and any other federal,state,and/or local laws,rules and/or regulations; WHEREAS,the City of Seal Beach City Council authorizes the execution of any necessary cooperative agreements between the City of Seal Beach and OCTA to facilitate the delivery of the project. WHEREAS,the City of Seal Beach City Council authorize the revision()film City of Seal Beach's Capital Improvement Program to facilitate the delivery of the project. WHEREAS,the City of Seal Beach City Council delegates signature authority to the Director of Public Works to facilitate the delivery of the project. Page 6 STATE-LOCAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM FORMULA GRANT NOW,'11-IEREF ORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Seal Beach,hereby authorizes the Director of Public Works as the official representative of the City of Seal Beach to apply for the State-Local Partnership Program funding under the Proposition 1B Highway Safely,Traffic Reduction, Air Quality,and Port Security Bond Act of 2006 for Arterial and Local Street Resurfacing Program CIP No. ST1202&ST1203 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that the City of Seal Beach,agrees to find its share of the project costs and any additional costs over the identified programmed amount. Signed Date Mayor Printed(Name and Title) Signed Date Clerk Recorder Printed(Name and Title) Page 7 W An `s E City of Seal Beach Arterial & Local Street Resurfacing Project z IRONWOOD .Av "' J CIP No.ST1202 & ST1203 {` l• f Priority 1 Map i ®Streets to pave ' 5 �q'YNI. 6 N � � F d immilw ill in ' ' -'16101 —,r_,, 1 � �ly�~ , F 111110Mar CATALINA AV z tky g S. .3 DRIFTWOOD pW W g g y1 �V�` FATHOM AV di r i >Aihk .. mielk �. -��r/ 1111111 ® � � 4.1 avail , *Ate 444kv<4,04-fita 4- at"' 1*11)\4,./#2074041 ,1,04.. co S.i 1 I etAcrift ft, ■ Page 8 STATE OF CALIFORNIA a DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECT PROGRAMMING REQUEST DTP-0001(REV,6111) General Instructions El New Project ❑ Amendment(Existing Project) Date: 05/10/12 District EA Project ID PPNO MPO ID TCRP No. 12 County Route/Corridor PM Bk PM Ahd Project Sponsor/Lead Agency ORA OCTA/Seal Beach MPO Element Capital Outlay Project Mgr/Contact Phone E-mail Address David Spitz 562-431-2527 dspitz®sealbeachca.gov Project Title Arterial and Local Street Resurfacing Program GIP No. ST1202&ST1203 Location,Project Limits, Description, Scope of Work, Legislative Description This is a road resesurfacing project for Arterial and Local Streets within Seal Beach California. The roads that are to be resurfaced are 1st Street from Pacific Coast Highway to 14th Street, Electric Avenue South from Main Street to 14th Street, Marina Avenue from 6th Street to Pacific Coast Highway and Balboa Drive from Boise Avenue to Catalina Avenue.This project is intended to grind existing asphalt and resurface with new, Component Implementing Agency Reimbursements PA&ED Seal Beach PS&E Seal Beach Right of Way Seal Beach Construction Seal Beach Legislative Districts Assembly:167 J Senate:135 Congressional: 46 Purpose and Need The City has developed a Pavement Management Plan (PMP)which has identified certain street segments that are in need of resurfacing treamtemts. The roads identified for this project fall in the highest priority of the City's PMP and are slated for resurfacing treatments between fiscal years 2013/2014 and 2016/2017. By resurfacing these streets now,the City can provide those streets with 20+more years of useful)life at a specific treatment level and cost. Further delays in resurfacing these roads may require more complicated rehabilation in the future at a greater cost to the City. Project Benefits The benefits to this resurfacing project are a longer lasting road and a cost to resurface now that is much less than a future cost to resurface should the City wait to repave these streets at a later date. Additionally, 1st Street and Marina Avenue are City Arterials from PCH toward both large residential and commercial areas so these roads are important to provide feasible transportation cooridors for high levels of traffic. Electric Avenue will contain a bike trail that links major regional bicycle facilities. Project Milestone Proposed Project Study Report Approved 06/30/12 Begin Environmental(PA&ED) Phase 07/01/12 Circulate Draft Environmental Document [Document Type )CE 07/31/12 Draft Project Report End Environmental Phase (PA&ED Milestone) 07/31/12 Begin Design (PS&E) Phase 08/01/12 End Design Phase(Ready to List for Advertisement Milestone) 10/31/12 Begin Right of Way Phase n/a End Right of Way Phase (Right of Way Certification Milestone) n/a Begin Construction Phase(Contract Award Milestone) 07/01/13 End Construction Phase(Construction Contract Acceptance Milestone) 9/31/13 Begin Closeout Phase 10/01/13 End Closeout Phase(Closeout Report) 12/31/13 ADA Notice For individuals with sensory disabilities,this document is avadab a In a tamale formats. hor information cal(9 6)654.6410 or TDD(916)654-3580 or write Records and Forms Management,1120 N Street,MS-89,Sacramento.CA 95814. Page 9 STATE OF CALIFORNIA o DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECT PROGRAMMING REQUEST DTP-0001(REV.6/11) Date: 05/10/12 District County Route EA Project ID PPNO TCRP No. 12 ORA Project Title: Arterial and Local Street Resurfacing Program CIP No.ST1202&ST1203 Proposed Total Project Cost Notes Component Prior 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18+ Total E&P(PA&ED) _ ___ � -- _ ------- ----•�- - .. _ PS&E - RAN SUP(CT) -. CON SUP(CT) 45,000 45,000 RAN CON 595,806 595,806 TOTAL 640,806 640,806 Fund No.1: 'Prop 1B Program Code Proposed Funding Component Prior 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18+ Total Funding Agency E&P(PA&ED) OCTA _!VW SUP(CT) CON SUP(CT) CON 318,000 -- _ �_— —T-- - .--318,000 TOTAL 318,000 318,000 Fund No.2: Measure M Program Code Proposed Funding Component Prior 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18+ Total Funding Agency E&P(PA&ED) Seal Beach RAN SUP(CT) __ --- _ CON SUP(CT) 45,000 45,000 R14V --- - .. CON 277,806 — 277,806 TOTAL 322.806 322.806 Fund No.3: ( Program Code ___________- Proposed Funding Component Prior 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18+ Total Funding Agency -.- E&P(PA&ED) ---- - - — — PS&E _ _ R/W SUP(CT) — -_ __. . CON SUP(CT) • RAN -_ _• •-- --- - ----•--------- CON , TOTAL i 1 Page 10 I STATE OF CALIFORNIA o DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECT PROGRAMMING REQUEST DTP-0001 (REV 6n1) Date: 05/10/12 District County Route EA Project ID PPNO TCRP No. 12 ORA _ Project Title: Arterial and Local Street Resurfacing Program CIP No. ST1202uST1203 -_ - - -_ --'_-_--__ __ --- Fund No.4: pma,�ncmuv --- Proposed Funding --' �mm»nComponent Prior 2nn 13n4 14n5 15/16 16n7 17n8+ Total Funding Agency s&P(p*&so)_ PS&E -- SUP��l_ - CON SUP(CT) ' . ----- - — __- __— . CON TOTAL Fund No.6: Program Proposed Funding Component Prior 12n3 13/14 14/15 1e16 16/17 17/18+ Total Funding Agency s&P(PA&sm) _ PS&E _mu_ _ n ___ _ _ __ _ aupV:T ____ _ . CON SUP(CT) . ___ . _ . _ . _ RAN . oow TOTAL Fund No.6: Program Code pmposedpumUum Component Prior 12n3 13114 14/15 15n6 16/17 17n8+ Total Fvnu(nnAo»n*v .. E&P(PA&ED) PS&E ''- -- - -- ��m� SUP p{Cr) RNV ' '---'— ---- --' - -'---- C� TOTAL fund No.7: | Program Code � ---. - — Proposed Funding --- Component Prior 12n3 13n4 14/15 1�1s 15/17 17/18+ Total Funding Agency E&P(PA&ED) _ ' PS&E . RAN�SUP 8� _ l __ CoNoup(CT) __ RAN � ��� ----- CON TOTAL Page 11 STATE-LOCAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM FORMULA GRANT PART 2: NOMINATION FORM Project Title Arterial and Local Street Resurfacing Program CIP ST1202 & ST1203 Agency City of Seal Beach PROJECT INFORM A'I'I ON This is a road resurfacing project for Arterial and Local Streets within Seal Beach California. The roads that are to be resurfaced are 1st Street from Pacific Coast Highway to Marina Avenue, Marina Avenue.from Pacific Coast Highway to Gtr' Street, Balboa Drive from Bolsa Avenue to Catalina Avenue and Electric Avenue South from Main Street to 14th Street. This project is intended to grind existing asphalt and resurface with new, rubberized asphalt concrete complete and new striping. CURRENT PROJECT STATUS Currently this project has begun design and environmental documentation. All Design and environmental approvals are expected before the deadlines as listed in the Timely Use of Funds Schedule provided. The City will be able to go to construction in the Spring/Summer of 2013 once the funds are allocated. Construction is expected to take less than three months to complete. SUPPORT OF SCAG REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION GOALS Some of the goals of this project as it reflects the goals of SCAG are to Maximize mobility and accessibility for people and goods in the region by providing better access to commercial locations, helps preserve and ensure a sustainable regional transportation system by increasing the pavement live of certain arterial roads within Seal Beach and by actively encouraging non-motorized transportation through use of new bike lanes on arterial roads that link regional bicycle facilities. Attachments: Project Map State Transportation Improvement Program Project Programming Request (PPR) Council and Board Certification and Signatures Page 12 STATE-LOCAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM FORMULA GRANT PART 3: SIGNATURE CERTIFICATION Agency Information and Certification APPLICANT AGENCY: Orange County Transportation Authority APPLICANT Address: 550 South Main Street Orange,CA. 92863 APPLICANT Contact Person: Adriann Cardoso Phone#: (714)560-5915 Email: acardoso@octa.net RECIPIENT/IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: City of Seal Beach — IMPLEMENTING AGENCY Address: 211 8t Street, Seal Beach CA 90740 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY Contact Person: David Spitz,Associate Engineer Phone#: 562-431-2527 extension 1331 Email: dspitz crsealbeachca.gov To the best of my knowledge and belief,the data and information in this request are true and correct and I am authorized by my council,board,authority,commission,or ruling body to file the request on behalf of the applicant,recipient,and/or implementing agency. APPLICANT AND RECIPIENT Name and Title: Kia Mortazavi, Executive Director, Planning,OCTA�� -_ Signature(iii blue ink): Date: RECIPIENT AND IMPLEMENTING AGENCY Name and Title: .-- Sean Crumby,Director of Public Works_ Signature(in blue ink): Date: Page 13 STATE-LOCAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM FORMULA GRANT RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR FUNDS FOR THE STATE-LOCAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM UNDER THE PROPOSITION 113 HIGHWAY SAFETY,TRAFFIC REDUCTION,AiR QUALITY,AND I'ORT SECURITY BOND ACT OF 2006 FOR ARTERIAL AND LOCAL STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM CIP NO.STI202& STI203 WHEREAS,the California voters approved Proposition [B Highway Safety,Traffic Reduction,Air Quality,and Port Security Bond Act of 2006,which makes Slate-Local Partnership Program(SLPP)funds available to the Orange County Transportation Authority(OCTA);and WHEREAS,OCTA has established the procedures and criteria for nominating proposals;and WHEREAS,Seal Beach possesses authority to nominate projects funded using Measure M2 Fair Share and State- Local Partnership Program funding and to finance,acquire,and construct the proposed project;and WHEREAS,by formal action the City Council authorizes the nomination of Arterial and Local Street Resurfacing Program CIP No.ST1202&ST1203Prioritics 1 and 2 projects including all understanding and assurances contained therein,and authorizes the Director of Public Works as the official representative of Seal Beach to act in connection with the nomination and to provide such additional information as may be required;and WHEREAS,should priority project no I not be approved,and priority project no 2 be approved,the City of Seal Beach will proceed with implementation of priority project no 2;and WHEREAS,Seal Beach will maintain and operate the property acquired,developed,rehabilitated,or restored for the life of the resultant facility(ics)or activity;and WHEREAS,with the approval of the California Department of Transportation(Cattails),California Transportation Commission(CTC),and OCTA,Seal 1,3cach or its successors in interest in the property may transfer the responsibility to maintain and operate the property;and WHEREAS,Seal Beach will give Caltrans,CTC,and OCTA's representatives access to and the right to examine all records,books,papers or documents related to the project;and WHEREAS,Seal Beach will cause work on the project to be commenced within six months following notification from the State that funds have been allocated by the CTC and that the project will be carried to completion with reasonable diligence;and WHEREAS,Seal Beach commits 5337,332 of Seal Beach's Measure M2 Fair Share to provide 51%total project cost as match to the requested$313,000 in MIA Formula SLPP funds for a total project cost estimated to be $655,332. WHEREAS,Seal Beach will comply where applicable with provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, the National Environmental Policy Act,the American with Disabilities Act,and any other federal,state,and/o•local laws,rules and/or regulations; WHEREAS,the City of Seal Beach City Council authorizes the execution of any necessary cooperative agreements between the City of Seal Beach and OCTA to facilitate the delivery of the project. WHEREAS,the City of Seal Beach City Council authorize the revision of the City of Seal Beach's Capital improvement Program to facilitate the delivery of the project. WHEREAS,the City of Seal Beach City Council delegates signature authority to the Director of Public Works to facilitate the delivery of the project. Page 14 STATE-LOCAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM FORMULA GRANT NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Seal Beach,hereby authorizes the Director of Public Works as the official representative of the City of Seal Beach to apply for the State-I.ocal Partnership Program funding under the Proposition 1B Highway Safety,Traffic Reduction,Air Quality,and Port Security Bond Act of 2006 for Arterial and Local Street Resurfacing Program CH'No. ST1202&ST1203 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that the City of Seal Beach,agrees to fund its share of the project costs and any additional costs over the identified programmed amount. Signed Date Mayor Printed(Name and Title) Signed Date Clerk Recorder Printed(Name and Title) Page 15 N W`' E v S 7 cRESrviEwAv City of Seal Beach R ' CATAU AV Arterial & Local Street MARVISTA AV Resurfacing Project � ;,.R DRIFTWOOD � I I o CIP No. ST1202 & ST1203 o w . 1 g a Priority 2 Map g FATHOM AV _ I r curvER WY t I — W x GOASTl1NE DR 4R. ¢ -' 90LNA AV 1491 LESZljt 4'. 49- 401.a®Streets to pave Fn. t Wie. 111\1` I:,.� `m1— , q \ czg y ? yet' A", 4i. 4,- 40, 4,,,if , 1, = . ' I IIIIII � gi.%%eir'W4W * gel,X, At...!--, it,* AO \Page 16 STATE-LOCAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM FORMULA GRANT APPENDIX 4: COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT CONCURRENCE Project Implementing Agency has reviewed the attached draft Proposition IB State-Local Partnership Program Call for Projects cooperative agreement template and has determined that the cooperative agreement is: X Sufficient and meets the expectations of the Project Implementing Agency. No further changes necessary. Sufficient,with the suggested modifications: Please list and explain: State-Local Partnership Program Call for Projects cooperative agreement will be finalized and executed between Project Implementing Agency and OCTA if the project is selected for funding. I certify that the information contained in this State-Local Partnership Program Call for Projects nomination,including required attachments,is accurate and that I have read and understood the important information and agree to the assurances on this form. Signed Date 51/14// (Administering Agency Representative) Printed(Name and 'Sean Crumby Director of Title) Public Works Administering Agency Seal Beach Page 17 Addendum No.1 ADDENDUM NO. 1 AGENCY CONFIRMATION Addendum Date Addendum No. 1 May 1, 2012 I, Sean Crumby certify that I have received and read the following addendums to the State-Local Partnership Program Call for Projects Guidelines. All materials are incorporated into the City of Seal Beach's nomination submittal. Agency City of Seal Beach Name (Print) Sean Cruinby Title Public Works Director Signature 4-- Date 5/14/2012 Page 18