Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC AG PKT 2012-06-25 #K (attachment - 5 Year CIP)City of Seal 2012/13 to 2016/17 5 YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM City of Seal Bead City Council and Executive Team Message from the Director CIP Accomplishments CIP Process CIP Summary Schedule By Fund Type By Project Type TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I - BEACH AND PIER Summary Sheet Individual Project Detail Sheets SECTION II - BUILDING AND FACILITIES Summary Sheet Individual Project Detail Sheets SECTION III - PARKS Summary Sheet Individual Project Detail Sheets SECTION IV - SEWER Summary Sheet Individual Project Detail Sheets SECTION V - STORM DRAIN Summary Sheet Individual Project Detail Sheets SECTION VI - STREETS AND TRANSPORTATION Summary Sheet Individual Project Detail Sheets SECTION VII - WATER Summary Sheet Individual Project Detail Sheets SECTION VIII - UNFUNDED PROJECTS /NEEDS Summary Sheet i.2 i.3 i.4 i.6 i.8 - i.14 i.15 - i.16 1.1 1.2 - 1.6 2.1 2.2 -2.10 3.1 3.2 - 3.4 4.1 4.2 - 4.6 5.1 5.2 - 5.3 6.1 6.2 - 6.9 7.1 7.2 - 7.8 8.1 of Seal Bead City Council Michael Levitt...... Gary Miller...... Ellery Deaton......... David Sloan Gordon Shanks City Management Team Jill Ingram...... Quinn Barrow Joe Bailey Shally Lin... . Sean Crumby Linda Devine Robert Luman Greg Hastings Principal Officers Mayor Mayor Pro -Tem Council Member Council Member Council Member City Manager City Attorney Marine Lifeguard Chief .Interim Finance Director .Assistant City Manager /Director of Public Works City Clerk Interim Chief of Police Interim Director of Community Development i? City of Seal Beacl June 25, 2012 Message from the Director of Public Works: Honorable Mayor, Members of the City Council and Citizens of the City of Seal Beach: The Department of Public Works is pleased to submit the fiscal year 2012/13 to 2016/17 5- year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for the City of Seal Beach. The CIP is a vital planning program that outlines priorities for the City's infrastructure. The CIP strategically plans and prioritizes projects within a budget to maximize the efficient use of funds. The CIP presents a balanced approach to invest in the City's infrastructure by proactively managing the assets and planning the most effective method of expenditure. It allows for strategic planning which includes identification of funding alternatives to aid in spending of only City internal funds. Projects within the CIP are divided into seven (7) operational areas; Beach & Pier, Building & Facilities, Parks, Sewer System, Storm Drain System, Street & Transportation and Water. The proposed CIP includes 46 projects to be delivered during the next 5 years totaling over $27 million in value. The funding sources come from the City's General Fund, grants, enterprise accounts, and fees. Numerous unfunded needs are currently identified and listed in the unfunded needs section totaling more than $138 million. Unfunded projects are crucial to identifying and planning future needs for the City. Responsible planning of the Capital Improvement Program will always include unfunded needs. This further highlights the importance of efficiency with expenditure of the City's fiscal resources. The ultimate goal for the Capital Improvements Program is to effectively manage the City's physical assets by delivering capital projects that meet project schedule, staying within budget, and minimizing the impact to the public. It is important to seek alternative funding sources for projects in order to provide maximum flexibility for the General Fund. The amount of expenditures outlined within this Capital Improvement Program is reduced slightly from the last fiscal year and significantly from two years ago. The reduction in expenditure amount is not an indication that the need for Capital Investment has changed, but rather an adjustment to meet the amount of revenue received by the City. The expenditures within the CIP will reflect the needs of the City being balanced with the available revenues being received. Much of the funding for transportation improvements are derived from Gas Tax and Measure M2 (1/2 cent local sales tax). Revenue from both sources is down and thusly expenditures reflect that. In the future, as the economy rebounds and revenues increase additional capital projects can be brought forward at that time. j/LIAe.....j�/ Sean Crumby, P.E. Assistant City Manage (Director of Public Works i.3 City of Seal Bead CIP Accomplishments In Fiscal Year 2011/12 the City completed twelve Capital Improvement Projects totaling over $8.1 million in value. A list of those projects is below: Beach & Pier RMC 1St Street Lot Building & Facility UST Remediation Fire Station Canopy Energy Efficiency Parks Arbor Park Resurfacing Heron Point Slope Repair Sewer AMOUNT $2,196,000 $ 15,000 $ 65,000 $ 128,800 $ 75,000 $ 65,000 College Park East Sewer System Rehabilitation $3,200,000 Streets & Transportation Tree Planting Program Seal Beach Boulevard Resurfacing Seal Beach Boulevard Medians Main Street Beautification Water $ 10,000 $ 498,000 $ 468,000 $ 215,000 Ocean Alley Rehabilitation Repairs $1,173,000 The City also has six (6) capital projects currently in construction and are as follows: • Seal Beach Boulevard Realignment • Adolfo Lopez 12 -inch water main construction • Annual Concrete Rehabilitation (FY 11/12) • Arterial and Local Street Rehabilitation (FY 11/12) • Studebaker /College Park Drive Intersection Improvements • Annual Slurry Seal Program (FY 11/12) The City's CIP consists of the following seven major areas: 1. Beach & Pier 2. Building & Facilities 3. Parks 4. Sewer 5. Storm Drain 6. Streets & Transportation 7. Water i.4 C of SeWBeYci Beach & Pier. The City's Beach and Pier are landmark tourist attractions that draw approximately 2 million visitors per year. The Pier is made up of a wooden deck with lighting, utility infrastructure, and a restaurant. The beach includes 3 parking lots, approximately 2 miles of dry sand beach, restrooms, 2 parks, and landscaping. Building & Facilities. The City's Building and Facilities house employees, visitors, tenants and business owners citywide in 22 structures. Structures include City Hall, Police Station, 2 Fire Stations, city maintenance facilities, and recreation and community centers. A facility master plan was adopted in FY 2011/12. Several of the projects within this CIP were identified within that Facility Master Plan. Parks. The City's Park infrastructure provides landscaping and the City's Urban Forest. Seal Beach has 70 park and landscape sites citywide. The forestry has over 150 species to maintain and nourish. Three projects are included within this year's CIP. Sewer. The City provides sewer collection for the residents of Seal Beach and passes the raw sewage to the Orange County Sanitation District for treatment. The City's Sewer System has more than 160,000 feet of pipe, 700 manholes, and 7 pump stations. Storm Drain. The City's Storm Drain System collects surface runoff in 11 drainage areas throughout the City with one Storm Drain pump station. Streets & Transportation. The City's Streets and Transportation System is responsible for more than 101 lane miles, continuous traffic flow, landscaped medians, traffic signals and utility work within the streets. Water. The Water Division conveys potable water to all residents, business owners, tenants and the Naval Base. The infrastructure includes two booster stations, two reservoirs, four wells, telemetry, valves, pressure regulation stations, fire hydrants, meters and control center. i.5 C �fSeYI BeTcl CIP PROCESS The Capital Improvement Program is comprised of construction projects and equipment purchases (excluding vehicles) which cost $10,000 or more. The CIP also includes activities that can be planned for or occur on an irregular or one time basis. Minor capital outlays of less than $10,000 and reoccurring maintenance activities will be included with the operation and maintenance budget. The Capital Improvement Program is a plan that identifies the capital projects to be funded during a five year planning horizon. The CIP is updated annually, and the first year of the plan serves as the current year capital budget. The CIP is a planning document to help City Council systematically schedule and finance capital projects to ensure cost - effectiveness as well as conformance with established policies. The CIP is organized into the same functional groups used for the operating programs. The CIP reflects a balance between capital replacement projects that repair, replace, or enhance existing facilities, equipment or infrastructure, and capital facility projects that significantly expand or add to the City's existing fixed assets. The CIP will emphasize project planning with projects typically progressing through the following phases: 1. Identification of Project. Improvements within the Capital Improvement Plan are generated or identified as follows: Advanced planning: Most of the improvements are identified within a Planning document or Master Plan. Many master plans are required by funding agencies. All master plans are adopted by the City Council. Currently the City has master plans adopted as follows: • Street Pavements: Pavement Management Plan (updated every 2 years), Concrete Rehabilitation Master Plan (2009) • Water System: Water Master Plan (2003), Urban Water Management Plan (2011), Water Rate Study (2010) • Sanitary Sewers: Sewer Master Plan (1999 & 2005), Sewer Rate Study (2000) • Storm Drains: Master Plan of Drainage (1999 & 2008), Storm Drain Ad -Hoc Committee (2005) • Street Trees: Street Tree Master Plan (2011) • Facilities: Facility Master Plan (2004 and 2011), Pier Condition Assessment (2003 and 2008) • NPDES: Storm Water Quality Master Plan (2001), Local Implementation Plan (2003) • Fleet: Fleet Management Plan (2002, 2006 and 2012) Reaction to need or opportunity: Projects may originate through a need or opportunity. An example of a project that was delivered as a result of a need is the Heron Pointe Slope Repair project that occurred due to a slope failure within Gumgrove Park. An example of a project that occurred due to an opportunity is the Sand Nourishment program in 2009. The City capitalized on the Army Corps nourishing Orange County's beaches and had 77,000 cubic yards of sand deposited onto the City's East Beach. Desire from the community: Projects may originate through a desire from the community. One example in the proposed CIP is Main Street Lighting Improvements. i.6 C of SeWBeYci Finally, before a project can be identified for inclusion into the CIP, funding for the project must be secured, or it will remain on the unfunded list of the CIP. 2. Design. Projects are designed in -house with public works staff wherever possible. The City's engineering staff in many cases does not have the available time of resources to perform the design, or the expertise to perform the design. In these cases, the City will locate and secure the service of an appropriately qualified consultant. Construction documents including plans and specifications are prepared and approved by the City Council prior to beginning construction. 3. Construction. Improvements will be constructed in a manner that will minimize impacts to the residents. The City employs a construction manager (with materials testing) to ensure that all construction projects are carried out safely, and constructed to meet the construction documents. 4. Incorporate into maintenance activities. All CIP projects are incorporated into the maintenance activities of the City. The maintenance staff will incorporate any new facilities into all routine inspections and ongoing maintenance programs. Staff will include new facilities into future maintenance budgets. 5. Equipment Acquisitions. Equipment acquisitions such as vehicles, heavy machinery, computers, office furnishings, and other equipment items are included in the Capital Improvement Program and are acquired and installed independently from construction contracts. i.7 C a T 0 (OU) o o 5 QO E D- O_ < O H Funding Source General Fund CD CD CD CD CD CD CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 000000000000d--1-0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LC) 0 0 0 0 0) N 0 0 0 0 O o O 00 O LO O N L() N 0 0 CO CO 0) 0 0) 0 0 O O 0 ER O 0 0 O O 0 OH O 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 O O ER ER ER ER O 0 ER O O 0 ER O 0 O O O ON ER ER O O °� ER ER 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000d-`1"0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 LO 0 0 0 0 0) N O 0 0 0 0 V — 0 N LO N O O CO 00 0) N H CO ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER 0) c • •N 0 O O C O a) 0 m E U a) m a) o- E a) O O CL ) ) t N U a ( s a) � N d N N H ms (0 To 0— (0 (6,) Q • E d Q Pa • v U N> N ina 0 3 i 0 "= O 2 O U En rcs a) a) a) a) o a) c d d d J d D H 0 0 0 0 0 a) 0 O E a) 2 0 0 O a) a) E w a3 C a°) a) 0 a) • O O Q d _ 0 ) a) E N m u3 a� >, ((no a) 0 C N 0 0 C a) > • O C E E E > • 0 Q Q E ( _c E (D a) • O 0 No co O N C a) E O Q E C a) E a) N W a) O) a) C .F2 0 > a3 Z N O d CL d CL d C7 C7 C7 C7 CD CD CD 0 0 m m m m m m m m m m m m N C a) > O Q E O O C O d L O rn c E -(7) u) C z V V O 0 N 0 H CO m U) 0) E O) O d 0).a) C O C (6 d C a) -0 C H o a) a) C — )D 0 7 >+ C Q • D NO N- g) 00 0 O 0 ER O O O ER O O O co LC) ER O 0 O aa)) aa)) >- } 0 O O ER ER ER ER ER co O O O O O co O O O O O O L() C) O O • LO ER ER ER ER ER ER C Qa E a� O C CL' a3 C • C LL' Y CD • as d N O > a) CD .N LL V U co > a) O 0_ E E _• c _C • 0 N N m m 0 - N H H • 0) City TrafficlDevelo Parking In Lieu ST1204 Main Street Lighting Improvements State Gas Tax aa)) aa)) aa)) >- >- } 00 00 0 O O M M 0 00 00 0 O O N N O ER ER ER ER ER O O O O 0 0 0 0 N N 0 ER ER ER ER ER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N 0 ER ER ER ER ER O O O O 0 0 0 0 N N 0 ER ER ER ER ER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 N N 0 ER ER ER ER ER Annual Slurry Seal Project O H Measure M Funds ST1203 Local Street Resurfacing Program Prop 42 Traffic Relief ST1202 Arterial Street Resurfacing Program C a O H Funding Source 0 O 0 N 0 oo 0c oo 0c O O O O LO LO O O O 0 O O O EA ST1205 Annual Concrete Repair Program OLOCO0 Cfl O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 o 0000 O O LC) O LC) O O O 0 O 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O OO O V O Cfl WWWWWWWWW O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O V O 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O V O 0 0 O M N M O 0)000U) C O CO r CO () N o 00 000 0 N- oo 0 o00 0 O O O O 00 N O O O O O O- H o co EA ER ER ER ER EA Sewer Capital Fund O O c O o • Q o a) d d • c d Q To > ( N U aJ O O d d 03 03 L ozs 00 2 0 O a) J LL a3 c o It. 6 > c Q E Q c a) • a) d O LE a) O n 0 0 N M a) H ED N 03 c-75 O (.7) O O E 0) O d c O a) a) a) 0 c c a) a) c O 0 O 0 EFT O 0 0 0 ER O O O O O - 0 O O 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 ER ER ER ER O O d- 0 0 0 O O CO 0 0 0 LO M O O M M N V N EA ER ER EA EA EA EA Water Capital Fund c 0 N Q o a) d d a) c d Q To > N U N d O O V N 0 0 N O) 0 O M CO 000 0 L am) - N N l CO Cfl 0 O 0 0 EFT O 0 0 0 ER O O O ER O 0 0 O) EFT ER ER ER ER 0 - O O O O 0 CO O O O O N N LO LO N EA ER ER ER ER E a a w 0 co co c O N c Q X w c a) 0 as >, •c 0 E E O a3 d c O N 0 w O d O) c U a) a) • E' 0 O ac) W E c > c O H Q ds E • N E 0) c O c J (T) CL • U as a) _ icsa = U) 0 N CL d $ 27,291,720 $ 14,801,720 J 0 1- Approved Approved Approved Approved Approved 2012 -2013 2013 -2014 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016- 2017 5 -year totall Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Co Co Co Co Co Co Co Co Co 00 Co Co Co Co Co Co 00 Co Co Co Co Co Co 00 Co O CO 00 CO Ln CO O I,- L, O O I,- Ln M • Ln Ln O Ln Ln M N 00 00 00 O (A (A (A (A (A (A (A (A (A O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O CO CO In O • O • O- - M O I,- Ln (A (A (A (A (A O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O CO CO Ln O • O • O CO I's Ln C• O (A (A (A (A (A O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O Co Co Co Co Co CO CO Ln O • O • O- - M O I,- Ln (D Co Ln N N Ln o O O O O O o O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO CO Ln 0 • 0 • 0 O I,- Ln LO O• ) N N N O) Co Co Co Co Co Co Co Co Co 00OOOOOO�o 00 Co Co Co Co Co Co 00 Co O CO 00 CO Ln CO CO O L, O Co Ln O O • Ln Ln Ln N N M Ln M I� N (A (A (A (A (A (A (A (A (A O O O LC) (O O O O Lf) N O O O Lf) O O O arc M M Cr; O N O 00 `a vat dot m U a rts Loll h CC 4-1 raft' IN. M rj CV 31 al UM � 1►� i l ►� i A ATE--1•1 :14 '1'] i : 3'10101'110[cV'Ia: 31 al UM � 1►� i l ►� i A ATE--1•1 :14 '1'] i : 3'10101'110[cV'Ia: 2014 CIP BY FUNDING SOURCE 2015 CIP BY FUNDING SOURCE 31 al UM � 1►� i l ►� i A ATE--1•1 :14 '1'] i : 3'10101'110[cV'Ia: 2016 CIP BY FUNDING SOURCE 0. /, a 4)§ § � � � � J 2 1 a� a$ 4. ikk r $ tX IT is" 114 IZC k 31 al UM � 1►� i l ►� i A ATE--1•1 :14 '1'] i : 3'10101'110[cV'Ia: 1 0V losal f�� VC A Aft Project Number & Name Beach and Pier } } } } } } } } } } } } o o 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O OO N 0 0 ER ER ER ER ER ER O O O 0 ER O O 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 00 O N 0 CO ER ER ER ER O) .(0 (0 0 O 0 73 as C O O rn U a) C C a) -C CO a) a) 'Es a °- E E d To d (0 (0 N L.L C ((0 ((0 'O 0 a3 Q - N �o cm . Q .c (6 (6 D N N j j >.. 0 ( 0 0 '(j ° = = co D E U t/5" LL a) a) oo a) a) R 0_ 0_ J O_ 0_ N N V N CO C 0 0 0 0 0 iS 0_ 0_ 0_ 0_ 0_ 7 CO CO CO CO m m O O O 0 ER O O O 0 LO ER O 0 0 0 00_ 00_ 00_ 00 00_ 00_ 0 0 0 0_ O 0 (!) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N LO LO O N 0 0 0 LO ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER O O O O ER O O O O ER O O O O o O o O V (f) O O O Lo- (3) ER O O O O ER O O O O ER O O O O l!7 ER O O O O O) co 0 O) N- CO CO o co co Lfi ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER o 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 LO LO (0 O O O O O (3) (0 ER ER ER ER EFT ER O O 0 O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O o o o O O O 00 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O V V CO O O O (f) 0 0 0 0 0 0 (f) O) N 0 O O N l!7 0 N 0 0 0 CO CO 0 Lx 7) (fl (0 ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER 12 a) c O) w J (6 V - _ O E c J LL -c O o — Na) E (_) a) > O Q a3 0 O 2 O a) Q O_ 1 O c >O -L-,w E co °) ' °— C _ a) a) 0_ V) E O E 0) E Q Q Q j o _ E (o 0_ = (0 O 'O O U = Q °- 0) m a) u) 0 a) o E a) (0 D aE) m °' 0 w E .§ (n N 2 = a) N (1) 0) a) u) a) 7 To 7 a) = co c U a) I U a as (7 Z 2 u) D 0 5 w C 2 0 L 0 0)N N N N N N 0O N N 0 CD CD CD CD CD CD CD 0 CD CD 0o 0o 0o 0o 0o 0o 0o 2 0o m Storm Drain w C � a) N g O i E E a3 a) E Ul (0 W as a) C 2 O C 0 m E 0 T O N a) U) Z r N V) O O W 0 0 a) co u) N E O) O 0 0 O a3 C as Q a D E as a) ( C co O) (0 a) 0 O a3 0_ o- 0_ a) 2 a) D O) Q (0 0 C c E E E a) a) wrn } a) a) 2 ru c C ° i0 i0 Q C O O O O O 0) CO V N N C CU CZ) 2: 116 IC 94 441 Lr) icK ILL CK a3 H a) N O Q (0 Q O U) O) D m Project Number & Name co co co co co co co } } } } } } } } o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 (!i 0 0 CO- 0 0 V LO 0 (( ) N ((0 x ER ER ER ER EFT EFT EFT EFT EFT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O LO- 0 0 O O N LO N ER ER EFT EFT EFT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO- 0 0 0 0 0 N LO N ER ER EFT EFT EFT ER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O LO- 0 0 O O N LO N ER ER EFT EFT EFT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O LO- 0 0 O O N LO N ER ER EFT EFT EFT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O LO- O 0 CO- 0 OV O 0 N LO N CO LO ER ER ER ER EFT EFT EFT EFT EFT Q sts E D 0 O a) 0 O (7 0 a) 0 0 CO O U CO �. L CO CT) m To C (n Q O O N E as E O) (6 O 0 d O O) d 0) U C U (0 w ul 's w a) N 0 0 Q J N O N N Q c E o 2 U o) C U) N a3 C m C T 2 U D O O 0 N N (h U co co co co co co co co O O O ri ER O O O (0 ER O O O o (0 ER O O O (0 ER O O O (0 ER O O O ao a0 ER (0 (0 (0 (0 CD CD CD CD (0 (0 CD CD o o 0 0 0 0 0 o o v 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 o o 0 V 0 0 0 o 0 - CO 0 0 LO (0 N CO (0 L() N- 69- ER ER EFT EFT EFT EFT O O O O 0 ER O O O O 0 O O O O 0 O O O O 0 0 LO V o o o o o O W 0 0 ON ( N W ER ER EFT EFT O 0 O 0 0 0 (0 LO O O O O Ln C E E a) 0 o_ 2 _ _c 0 Ul N Q N 0 0 2 E a) a) 2 Q d C E 0 > 0_ U > =0 C O 2 4) 03 C m 3 CO 0--I m C L as a) E Q a) U N N a) N C E (0 (0 = o_ '. N > > w — 0 (n (n 0 0 Q > a) w ul C a`) a`) o_ o- a) a`) C (6 (6 E E O (6 ' CO J co O 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) N x- N V CO 0v co N co (0 ER O O O O 0 ER O O O O 0 ER O O O O O ER O O O O 0) O) ER O co Ln N ER a E d E 0 E co" a o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 O N LO I� N N LO ER EFT EFT EFT O O 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O- N N N ER EFT EFT EFT O) 0 w 7 (0 C - O O C QU a) W .E E 2 O > O o as 06 E O O- E a) c E .(0 E 0) O J a) U Y H a) d 0 d N c a) m O w N (6 W I co O 0 N 0 N N Ct 0 0 $ 27,691,720 $ 14,801,720 J O H Beach and Pier (BP) BP1002 Pier Utility Upgrade Project 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O CO LO CO 0 00 0 CO CO 0 OD OD N 0 0 0 0 Tr N- ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER O O 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O ON ER ER ER ER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO M M O O 0 0 0 V V V N 0 0 ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER C C C C C C C C C 7 7 7 0 7 0 7 7 7 0 7 • 0 7 LL LL LL H LL H LL LL LL H LL H LL a L L C L L L 'Q 'Q N N 'y 'a 'Q N a) N a a. O a a. :.= ° . CD id • a °o 00 y O E CD 0 ° 0 0 y v 0 ✓ v R v N v v LL LL • O • LL • E LL LL R N N a o i E E a L V) V! c a ai ai a a Y a L L N N 7 7 ti ti 0 O 7 7 N Qj I ♦ L L V R L L O N N F. _r a a M O O N O O O .- r I() a r a r a r it m m m m 5 YEAR TOTAL &eetzt', PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET PROJECT CATEGORY Beach & Pier PROJECT NAME Pier Utility Upgrade Project PROJECT MANAGER David Spitz, Associate Engineer LOCATION City Pier PRIORITY Medium FY 2012/13 - 2016/17 DESCRIPTION This project will replace the existing water, sewer and gas lines under the Pier which serve the restaurant operation and pier fire protection. PROJECT No. BP1002 TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,000,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Not Started ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION The lines have deteriorated over the years and constant repairs are too costly. Repairs are needed to maintain pier safety. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: This project will reduce the need for on -going maintenance by staff. MUNICIPAL PIER Funding Source Water Capital Sewer General Fund TOTAL Expenditures Design Construction TOTAL MAP Proposed 2012 -2013 Budget Proposed 2013 -2014 Budget Proposed 2014 -2015 Budget Proposed 2015 -2016 Budget Proposed 2016 -2017 Budget $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 300,000 $1,000,000 PICTURE Proposed 5 -year total $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 300.000 $ 1.000.000 $ 90,000 $ 910,000 $ 90.000 $ 910.000 $1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 Page 1.2 �a /5C-e I, e 2. PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET PROJECT CATEGORY Beach & Pier PROJECT NAME Pier Deck Rehabilitation Project PROJECT MANAGER David Spitz, Associate Engineer LOCATION City Pier PRIORITY High FY 2012/13 - 2016/17 DESCRIPTION This proposed project will replace the existing pier decking with new timber decking. This is a four phase project whose first phase was in FY 06/07. Phases 2 and 3 were constructed in FY 08/09. This project has been on hold due to assessment of utilities and unknown conditions with the Ruby's Diner Remodel. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: MAP Funding Source Proposed 2012 -2013 Budget Proposed 2013 -2014 Budget PROJECT No. TOTAL PROJECT COST WORKED PERFORMED BY PROJECT STATUS ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE BP1004 $300,000 Contract Design None JUSTIFICATION The existing decking has deteriorated and is in need of replacement and rehabilitation. The new deck will provide a more uniform surface for the thousands of pier visitors each year. Constructing the project will reduce maintenance of the pier decking. Proposed 2014 -2015 Budget Proposed 2015 -2016 Budget Proposed 2016 -2017 Budget PICTURE Proposed 5 -year total General Fund $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 Expenditures $ 300,000 Design Construction $ 20,000 $ 280,000 $ 20,000 $ 280,000 TOTAL $ 300,000 $ 300,000 Page 1.3 01/7 (7711111 PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET FY 2012/13 - 2016/17 PROJECT CATEGORY Beach & Pier PROJECT NAME Local Coastal Plan Preparation and Processing PROJECT MANAGER Greg Hastings, Director of Community Development LOCATION Seal Beach Coastal Zone PRIORITY High DESCRIPTION The City staff and consultant team will be working with the California Coastal Commission to process a Local Coastal Plan for the City of Seal Beach. PROJECT No. TOTAL PROJECT COST WORKED PERFORMED BY PROJECT STATUS ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE BP1102 $240,000 Contract Design None JUSTIFICATION By having a Local Coastal Program the City is authorized to issue Coastal Development Permits (CDP). Issuing of permits will save the City and private property owners time and money by not having to apply for the CDP directly with the California Coastal Commission. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: This project will reduce annual permitting cost for the City and its residents. Funding Source Water Fund Sewer Fund General Fund TOTAL Expenditures Construction TOTAL MAP Proposed 2012 -2013 Budget Proposed 2013 -2014 Budget Proposed 2014 -2015 Budget Proposed 2015 -2016 Budget Proposed 2016 -2017 Budget $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 Proposed 5 -year total $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 240,000 PICTURE $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 240,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 240,000 Page 1.4 667 a,��aC(lJecrcti 0 PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET FY 2012/13 - 2016/17 PROJECT CATEGORY Beach & Pier PROJECT NAME Pier Structural Assessment Implementation PROJECT MANAGER David Spitz, Associate Engineer LOCATION City Pier PRIORITY High DESCRIPTION Repairs will be made based on the approved 2008 Pier Structural Assessment Study. PROJECT No. TOTAL PROJECT COST WORKED PERFORMED BY PROJECT STATUS ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE BP1103 $100,000 Contract Design None JUSTIFICATION The Pier was previously inspected in 2008 and this assessment will continue with the recommended 5 -year assessment program. Findings will be used to direct future pier repairs. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None. MUNICIPAL PIER Funding Source Proposed 2012 -2013 Budget MAP Proposed 2013 -2014 Budget Proposed 2014 -2015 Budget Proposed 2015 -2016 Budget Proposed 2016 -2017 Budget Proposed 5 -year total General Fund $ 100,000 Expenditures $100,000 Professional Services $ 10,000 Construction $ 90,000 $ 10,000 $ 90,000 TOTAL $ 100,000 $100,000 PICTURE Page 1.5 City of Seal Beach PROJECT CATEGORY Beach & Pier PROJECT NAME Pier Structural Assessment PROJECT MANAGER David Spitz, Associate Engineer LOCATION City Pier PRIORITY High FY 2012/13 - 2016/17 DESCRIPTION Perform a structural assesment study of the City's pier. PROJECT No. TOTAL PROJECT COST WORKED PERFORMED BY PROJECT STATUS ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE BP1501 $100,000 Contract Design None JUSTIFICATION The City is required to assess the structural stability of the pier every 5 years. The last assessment was done in 2010. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None. MUNICIPAL PIER Funding Source Proposed 2012 -2013 Budget MAP Proposed 2013 -2014 Budget Proposed 2014 -2015 Budget Proposed 2015 -2016 Budget Proposed 2016 -2017 Budget Proposed 5 -year total General Fund Expenditures $100,000 $100,000 Professional Services $100,000 $100,000 TOTAL $100,000 $100,000 PICTURE Page 1.6 SECTION II - BUILDING AND FACILITIES SUMMARY SHEET t J� J rok M 4 3R, a� m O 0 N a o O — m a a O N a o O CO 0_o a a QO 0, o m BG0904 New Swimming Pool Fund 001 - General Fund m O H BG1201 Marine Safety Building Improvements LO s3 Fund 001 - General Fund s3 s3 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 o O O o o O O O O o 0 N N O O N N O O O O O O O N N O O N O O v O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 00 00 00 00 N O O N N O O O O N N s3 m O H 0 m BG1204 City Hall Remodel s3 s3 s3 s3 s3 s3 s3 s3 Fund 001 - General Fund O O O O O O O O s3 s3 a c c c c c O O O O 1- LL H H H LL LL to t0 t0 c To a `w `w `w 'p_ `w c c c "O O c C7 C7 ( O ,_ 0 0) y w 3 - N °o v "o ✓ c LL LL • a c n` J LL 0 BG1205 Structural Improvements to M BG1301 McGaugh Pool ADA Improvements Fund BG1207 City Garage Improvements Fund LO s3 m H 5 YEAR TOTAL 67 744 eFS�t PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET PROJECT CATEGORY Building & Facilities PROJECT NAME New City Swimming Pool PROJECT MANAGER Michael Ho, City Engineer LOCATION To Be Determined PRIORITY Medium DESCRIPTION This project will construct a new swimming pool at a location that has yet to be determined. FY 2012/13 - 2016/17 PROJECT No. BG0904 TOTAL PROJECT COST $4,900,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Conceptual ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION The existing pool has ongoing maintenance with rising annual costs. The City has invested into repairs of the pool to provide a temporary repair. Construction of a new facility will better suit the needs of the community. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: Undetermined. Capital outlays will be reduced for maintenance. Additional facilities may increase ongoing routine maintenance. Funding Source General Fund Expenditures Design Construction TOTAL MAP Proposed 2012 -2013 Budget Proposed 2013 -2014 Budget Proposed 2014 -2015 Budget Proposed 2015 -2016 Budget Proposed 2016 -2017 Budget Proposed 5 -year total PICTURE $ 400,000 $ 4,500,000 $ 4,900,000 $ 400,000 $ 4,500,000 $ 400,000 $4,500,000 $ 400,000 $ 4,500,000 $ 4,900,000 Page 2.2 0/7 ef'ioectvi, PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET PROJECT CATEGORY Building & Facilities PROJECT NAME Marine Safety Building Improvements PROJECT MANAGER Michael Ho, City Engineer LOCATION Lifeguards PRIORITY High FY 2012/13 - 2016/17 DESCRIPTION Marine Safety Building Improvements PROJECT No. TOTAL PROJECT COST WORKED PERFORMED BY PROJECT STATUS ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE BG1201 $25,000 Contract Ongoing None JUSTIFICATION The Marine Safety building is in need of repairing as outlined in the City's Building Facilities Assessment Report. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None 'ro Funding Source MAP Proposed 2012 -2013 Budget • noun, Proposed 2013 -2014 Budget d 8 Proposed 2014 -2015 Budget EI Proposed 2015 -2016 Budget SEAL BEACH POUCF THE JACK HALEY COMMUNkTY gp � TM /i'gU.dkk; isss 1 1 I Proposed 2016 -2017 Budget Proposed 5 -year total General Fund Expenditures $ 25,000 $ 25,000 Testing TOTAL $ 25,000 $ 25,000 PICTURE Page 2.3 °G7 742ZL., PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET FY 2012/13 - 2016/17 PROJECT CATEGORY Building & Facilities PROJECT NAME Structural Assessment of Police Department PROJECT MANAGER Michael Ho, City Engineer LOCATION Police Department PRIORITY High DESCRIPTION This project will provide structural assessment of the Police Department. PROJECT No. BG1202 TOTAL PROJECT COST $50,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Ongoing ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION The Police Department is over 50 years old and has had renovations performed in the past. The city is at the point where a structural assessment of the Police Department is needed to determine the useful life of the building and determine what repairs are needed in the upcoming years. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None Funding Source MAP Proposed 2012 -2013 Budget Proposed 2013 -2014 Budget Proposed 2014 -2015 Budget Proposed 2015 -2016 Budget Proposed 2016 -2017 Budget Proposed 5 -year total General Fund $ 50,000 Expenditures $ 50,000 Testing $ 50,000 $ 50,000 TOTAL $ 100,000 PICTURE Page 2.4 017/7 e&ecivi PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET PROJECT CATEGORY Building & Facilities PROJECT NAME Underground Storage Tank Remediation PROJECT MANAGER Michael Ho, City Engineer LOCATION City Yard PRIORITY High FY 2012/13 - 2016/17 DESCRIPTION This project will continue the underground storage tank remediation project started by the City in the 1990's and which is nearing completion. The location is the Public Works Yard. PROJECT No. TOTAL PROJECT COST WORKED PERFORMED BY PROJECT STATUS ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE BG1203 $50,000 Contract Ongoing None JUSTIFICATION Remediation is legally required by the State and County and grant funds are no longer available. The project may need to be extended based on test results. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None 1 SEACREST CT 2 WHEELHOUSE CT 3 MARINER WY 4 TOP SIDE CT 5 COMPASS CT UNITED STAB JVEAPONS ST 62004 Thames-Bras Maps Funding Source MAP Proposed 2012 -2013 Budget Proposed 2013 -2014 Budget Proposed 2014 -2015 Budget Proposed 2015 -2016 Budget Proposed 2016 -2017 Budget Proposed 5 -year total General Fund $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Expenditures $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 50,000 Testing TOTAL $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 50,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 50,000 PICTURE Page 2.5 PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET FY 2012/13 - 2016/17 PROJECT CATEGORY Building & Facilities PROJECT NAME City Hall Remodel PROJECT MANAGER Michael Ho, City Engineer LOCATION City Hall PRIORITY High DESCRIPTION This project involves remodels to City Hall and Council Chambers PROJECT No. TOTAL PROJECT COST WORKED PERFORMED BY PROJECT STATUS ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE BG1204 $200,000 Contract Ongoing None JUSTIFICATION The City Hall is in need of repairs and certain remodels as outlined in the recent Building and Facilities Assessment Report. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None G[ n'S Isle de Lopez Funding Source MAP Proposed 2012 -2013 Budget Proposed 2013 -2014 Budget Proposed 2014 -2015 Budget Proposed 2015 -2016 Budget Proposed 2016 -2017 Budget Proposed 5 -year total General Fund $ 200,000 Expenditures $ 200,000 Construction $ 200,000 $ 200,000 TOTAL $ 200,000 $ 200,000 PICTURE Page 2.6 017/7 PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET FY 2012/13 - 2016/17 PROJECT CATEGORY Building & Facilities PROJECT NAME Structural Improvements to Mary Wilson Library PROJECT MANAGER Michael Ho, City Engineer LOCATION Mary Wilson Library PRIORITY High DESCRIPTION This project involves repairs to the Mary Wilson Library. Dr PROJECT No. TOTAL PROJECT COST WORKED PERFORMED BY PROJECT STATUS ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE BG1205 $20,000 Contract Ongoing None JUSTIFICATION The Mary Wilson Library is in need of repairs as outlined in the recent Building and Facilities Assessment Report. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None FAttiAlro Ave CO35tl1M Or Bd5A Ave ti Funding Source MAP Proposed 2012 -2013 Budget Proposed 2013 -2014 Budget Proposed 2014 -2015 Budget Proposed 2015 -2016 Budget Proposed 2016 -2017 Budget Proposed 5 -year total General Fund $ 20,000 Expenditures $ 20,000 Construction $ 20,000 $ 20,000 TOTAL $ 20,000 $ 20,000 PICTURE Page 2.7 PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET PROJECT CATEGORY Building & Facilities PROJECT NAME McGaugh Pool ADA Improvements PROJECT MANAGER Michael Ho, City Engineer LOCATION McGaugh Pool PRIORITY High FY 2012/13 - 2016/17 DESCRIPTION This project will provide ADA improvements to the current swimming pool. PROJECT No. TOTAL PROJECT COST WORKED PERFORMED BY PROJECT STATUS ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE BG1301 $100,000 Contract Ongoing None JUSTIFICATION The existing swimming pool requires improvements to be in compliance with ADA rules and regulations. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None 4 4 a x J Funding Source MAP Proposed 2012 -2013 Budget Proposed 2013 -2014 Budget 0 Proposed 2014 -2015 Budget Proposed 2015 -2016 Budget Proposed 2016 -2017 Budget Proposed 5 -year total General Fund $ 100,000 Expenditures $100,000 Construction $ 100,000 $100,000 TOTAL $ 100,000 $ 100,000 PICTURE Page 2.8 6/7 PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET PROJECT CATEGORY Buildings and Facilities PROJECT NAME City Garage Improvements PROJECT MANAGER Michael Ho, City Engineer LOCATION PRIORITY Medium FY 2012/13 - 2016/17 DESCRIPTION This project will provide improvements to the garage at the City Yard. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: Glove Perk 1 Funding Source MAP PROJECT No. BG1207 TOTAL PROJECT COST $100,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Design ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION The garage structure at the City Yard is in need of repairs and improvements as outlined in the recent Building and Facilities Assessment Report. Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2012 -2013 2013 -2014 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 Proposed Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total General Fund Expenditures $ 100,000 $100,000 Construction $ 100,000 $100,000 TOTAL $ 100,000 $100,000 PICTURE Page 2.9 667 (,we,7/3c'T' PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET FY 2012113 - 2016117 PROJECT CATEGORY Buildings and Facilities PROJECT NAME Emergency Power for CH, FS44, Lifeguard HQ, & Sewer Pump Station PROJECT MANAGER Michael Ho, City Engineer LOCATION 8th Street Parking Lot PRIORITY Medium DESCRIPTION This project will construct an emergency backup power supply for City Hall, Fire Station 44, Lifeguard Headquarters, and the 8th Street Lift Station. PROJECT No. BG1302 TOTAL PROJECT COST $500,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Design ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION In the event of an emergency or natural disaster, several key facilities for the City do not have a reliable backup power supply. This project will construct one backup power supply that can power City Hall, Fire Station 44, Lifeguard Headquarters, and 8th Street Sewer Pump Station. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: Maintenance for this facilitiy will be built into future budgets. I SEACREST CT 2 WHEELHOUSE CT 3 MARINER WY 4 TOP SIDE CT 5 COMPASS CT 0 UNITED STAT :WEAPONS S PF. .°0 C2004 710 mos Bios Moos Funding Source MAP Proposed 2012 -2013 Budget Proposed 2013 -2014 Budget Proposed 2014 -2015 Budget Proposed 2015 -2016 Budget Proposed 2016 -2017 Budget Proposed 5 -year total General Fund Sewer Fund $ 400,000 $ 100,000 $ 400,000 $ 100,000 TOTAL Expenditures $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Design Construction $ 100,000 $ 400,000 $ 100,000 $ 400,000 TOTAL $ 500,000 $ 500,000 PICTURE Page 2.10 Ask (-i a) D) 00 00 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O N N LO- L() 1, x- x- N N N N 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O N N LO- LO - N- x- N N N N ER ER ER ER ER ER >+ 16 A 16 A 16 E 1- • E 1- • E 1- 3 3 3 C a c a C c 0 3 E E 0 0 0 0 c > 0 > > O O ° O 2 m Q ' Q O_ R £ 3 £ N E O x U ao) w ID u) la £ la N d C d N d c c > O 0 O v a (0 oes E (9 a Q- d c - c 3 0 E c 0 E _c m o a) c ✓ J c 0 Y Y 1- 0i S a a laa c d 0 o s m m c Ta 'a 0 0 w x 0 N CO O 0 0 N N_ N_ W a a a E9 6 YEAR TOTAL Mee aw.m1aaeeeM- Ed!. Geed &ecteetzel. PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET FY 2012/13 - 2016/17 PROJECT CATEGORY Parks PROJECT NAME Edison Park Community Gardens Expansion PROJECT MANAGER David Spitz, Associate Engineer LOCATION Edison Park PRIORITY Low PROJECT No. PR1201 TOTAL PROJECT COST $10,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Will Start ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None DESCRIPTION JUSTIFICATION The City operates a community garden within the Edison Park. This The City typically has a waiting list of 40 to 50 farmers waiting to get into the park. project expands the gardens into an unused portion of the park. The wait can last years attempting to get into the park. The expansion will provide additional gardens for those wishing to utilize the empty space within Edison Park. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None � cros twin we. Park -- Funding Source MAP Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2012 -2013 2013 -2014 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 Proposed Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total Park Improv. (Quimby) $ 10,000 Expenditures $ 10,000 Construciton Inspection Total PICTURE Page 3.2 &eetzeetew, PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET FY 2012/13 - 2016/17 PROJECT CATEGORY Parks PROJECT NAME Heather Park Lighting Improvements & Tennis Court Resurfacing PROJECT MANAGER David Spitz, Associate Engineer LOCATION Heather Park. PRIORITY Low DESCRIPTION Heather Park is a city owned and operated park at the corner of Heather and Lampson Avenue. The park has two tennis courts. This project will upgrade the lighting and resurface the tennis courts. PROJECT No. TOTAL PROJECT COST WORKED PERFORMED BY PROJECT STATUS ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE PR1202 $22,000 Contract Will Start None JUSTIFICATION The lighting improvements are for efficiency and aesthetics. The new lights will save the City electricity cost in the future. During the budget study session a desire arose from the community to resurface the tennis courts. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None Lamaae.Ave O lEarnrood !gemmed Ave Fir Awe Fir Ave Funding Source MAP Proposed 2012 -2013 Budget Proposed 2013 -2014 Budget Proposed 2014 -2015 Budget Proposed 2015 -2016 Budget Proposed 2016 -2017 Budget Proposed 5 -year total Park Improv. (Quimby) $ 22,000 Expenditures $ 22,000 Construciton Inspection Total PICTURE Page 3.3 &ecteetzel. PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET PROJECT CATEGORY Parks PROJECT NAME Seal Beach Tennis Center Improvements PROJECT MANAGER David Spitz, Associate Engineer LOCATION Tennis Center PRIORITY Low FY 2012/13 - 2016/17 DESCRIPTION Seal Beach operates a 7 acres tennis facility on the corner of Lampson Avenue and Basswood Drive. The proposed project will provide miscellaneous improvements to the Facility. PROJECT No. TOTAL PROJECT COST WORKED PERFORMED BY PROJECT STATUS ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE PR1203 $25,000 Contract Will Start None JUSTIFICATION In 2011 the City of Seal Beach adopted a Facility Master Plan. This plan identified numerous improvements throughout the facility. This project rehabilitates a few of those needs. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None Funding Source MAP Proposed 2012 -2013 Budget Proposed 2013 -2014 Budget Proposed 2014 -2015 Budget Proposed 2015 -2016 Budget Proposed 2016 -2017 Budget Proposed 5 -year total Park Improv. (Quimby) $ 25,000 Expenditures $ 25,000 Construciton Inspection Total PICTURE Page 3.4 U N N N Q N I� co N O ,Li d 0 ILLO O LC 2 0_ d O ON m Sewer System (SS) O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O ) ) L() L() N N N- CO- M 00 00 00 00 00 00 O O O O ER ER ER ER 0 0 0 0 0 0 EA EA 0 0 0 0 0 0 EA EA O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O LO LO CO- CO- EA EA EA EA EFT O O O EFT 0 0 0 O O O EA EA a R -a R -a R -a o O 7 0 7 0 7 J H t� LL H LL H LL a) m a a 'a 'a LL R R CD C U 0 0 C a L L L ill a) ill a — a a -a a R 2 E c Q� F. ww R R m a a a) R d' 2 R a CU u) a a 2 t a) w C E R E cc J L L as o (n cn cn cn R fa fa L O Q Q CO r N O O O O co N N co O CO C C C r r r CO CO CO CO O O O O U) EFT O O O O U) EFT 0 0 0 O O O LO LO EA EA Sewer System Rate Study O in 5 YEAR TOTAL PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET FY 2012/13 - 2016/17 PROJECT CATEGORY Sewer System PROJECT NAME 10 Year Sewer Improvement Master Plan PROJECT MANAGER Michael Ho, City Engineer LOCATION Citywide PRIORITY Mandatory DESCRIPTION To repair, reline, upsize and rehabilitate sewer pipes and pump stations city wide. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: Funding Source Proposed 2012 -2013 Budget MAP Proposed 2013 -2014 Budget Proposed 2014 -2015 Budget PROJECT No. SS0901 TOTAL PROJECT COST $6,500,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Design ALTERNATIVE FUNDING SOURCE State Loan JUSTIFICATION The 2005 adopted Sewer Master Plan outlined a 10 year Capital Improvement Plan to upgrade, reconstruct, reline and improve two pump stations. See next page for detailed locations and scope of work. Constructing the project will reduce maintenance activities. Proposed 2015 -2016 Budget Proposed 2016 -2017 Budget Proposed 5 -year total State Revolving Fund $ 6,500,000 Expenditures Design Inspection Construction Total $ 6,500,000 Page 4.2 067 0,ct/63reete.1 • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET FY 2012/13 - 2016/17 PROJECT CATEGORY Sewer System PROJECT NAME Sewer System Master Plan Update PROJECT MANAGER Michael Ho, City Engineer LOCATION Citywide PRIORITY High DESCRIPTION The maintenance, operation, and capital expenditures are planned through the preparation of a Sewer System Master Plan. PROJECT No. SS1301 TOTAL PROJECT COST $100,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Design ALTERNATIVE FUNDING SOURCE Sewer Fund JUSTIFICATION The Sewer System Master Plan was prepared in 1999 and again in 2005. This document is used to effectively plan management of the City's sewer system. This update will review Closed Circuit Television of the entire system and prepare capital improvement recommendations. It is common to update this document approximately every 5 years. On-going Operating & Maintenance Impact: Constructing the project will reduce the daily maintenance activities. Funding Source Proposed 2012 -2013 Budget MAP Proposed 2013 -2014 Budget Proposed 2014 -2015 Budget Proposed 2015 -2016 Budget Proposed 2016 -2017 Budget Proposed 5 -year total PICTURE Sewer Capital Fund $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Expenditures $ 100,000 Design $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Total $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Page 4.5 (,efr� ��aCUJea PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET PROJECT CATEGORY Sewer System PROJECT NAME Sewer System Rate Study PROJECT MANAGER Michael Ho, City Engineer LOCATION Citywide PRIORITY High FY 2012/13 - 2016/17 DESCRIPTION The study will update the rate structure for the City's Sanitary Sewer System. PROJECT No. SS1401 TOTAL PROJECT COST $50,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Design ALTERNATIVE FUNDING SOURCE JUSTIFICATION The operation of the City's Sanitary Sewer System is funded through a sewer enterprise fee that is charged to the residents bimonthly. The rate structure is typically studied and set approximately every 5 years. This will insure that the fee charged is appropriate for the services that are rendered. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: By constructing the project it will reduce the daily maintenance. Funding Source Approved 2012 -2013 Budget MAP Approved 2013 -2014 Budget Approved 2014 -2015 Budget Approved 2015 -2016 Budget Proposed 2016 -2017 Budget 5 -year total Sewer Capital Fund $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Expenditures $ 50,000 Design $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Total $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Page 4.6 (,efr� ��aCU Jea 0 PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET FY 2012/13 - 2016/17 PROJECT CATEGORY Sewer System PROJECT NAME Annual Sewer Lining Program PROJECT MANAGER Michael Ho, City Engineer LOCATION Citywide PRIORITY High DESCRIPTION To repair sewer lines without having to open cut into a street by relining the interior of the pipe with a new structural pipe. On-going Operating & Maintenance Impact: Funding Source Proposed 2012 -2013 Budget MAP Proposed 2013 -2014 Budget Proposed 2014 -2015 Budget PROJECT No. SS1202 TOTAL PROJECT COST $200,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Design ALTERNATIVE FUNDING SOURCE JUSTIFICATION The majority of Sanitary Sewer lines were constructed throughout the city more than 40 years ago. Many are below the water table. This annual program seeks to rehabilitate sewer lines without having to dig trenchs into a street. The City will complete all of the identified lining projects currently called out within the Sewer Master Plan with SS0901. This annual program will begin in 2015 to line sewers that need rehabilitation at that time. Constructing the project will reduce maintenance activities. Proposed 2015 -2016 Budget Proposed 2016 -2017 Budget Proposed 5 -year total PICTURE Sewer Capital Fund $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 200,000 Expenditures Design (In House) Construction Inspection Total $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 100.000 $ 100,000 $ 200,000 Page 4.4 (,efr� ��aCUJea • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET FY 2012/13 - 2016/17 PROJECT CATEGORY Sewer System PROJECT NAME Annual Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation Project PROJECT MANAGER Michael Ho, City Engineer LOCATION Citywide PRIORITY High DESCRIPTION To repair, reline, and /or rehabilitate aged sewer manholes city wide. PROJECT No. TOTAL PROJECT COST WORKED PERFORMED BY PROJECT STATUS ALTERNATIVE FUNDING SOURCE SS1201 $50,000 Contract Design JUSTIFICATION The majority of Sanitary Sewer Manholes were constructed throughout the city 20 -40 years ago. Many are below the water table. This programs seeks to locate and rehabilitate a few of the worst manholes every year. By proactively rehabilitating the worst manholes the City will prevent failures and sewer spills. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: Constructing the project will reduce maintenance activities. Funding Source Proposed 2012 -2013 Budget $ MAP Proposed 2013 -2014 Budget Proposed 2014 -2015 Budget Proposed 2015 -2016 Budget Proposed 2016 -2017 Budget Proposed 5 -year total Sewer Capital Fund $ 10,000 Expenditures $ 10, 000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 50,000 Construction 10,000 $ $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 50,000 Total 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 50,000 Page 4 .3 SECTION V - STORM DRAIN SUMMARY SHEET -D N O O N 1 Q N vai Sig Ak M� a LO W O ilfg r~1 N 1 N NN O 0 M 7 d 0 m ▪ I- r) ) 302161 IN, 1v o CO ����.,, p N CD c0 6 7 ^� d O m y f\1 -o In 1 V+� N O 4) Lift O N 0) O V 7 d O m R 3 Storm Drain (SD) O L Q a co 2 0 cn cn0 N co co O O W ✓ V V V co O) O) N N co co LO LO W co n EA ER EA ER ER ER ER ER oar oar o0 0o co ✓ V ' V co LO LO n EA ER EA ER ER SD1202 Navy Drainage Easements F 5 YEAR TOTAL &eetzteetel PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET PROJECT CATEGORY Storm Drain System PROJECT NAME Storm Drain Master Plan Improvements PROJECT MANAGER David Spitz, Associate Engineer LOCATION Citywide PRIORITY High DESCRIPTION This project will add, upgrade and rehabilitate storm drain pipes and facilities. FY 2012113 - 2016/17 PROJECT No. SD1201 TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,569,480 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Design ALTERNATIVE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION The Storm Drain Master Plan has identified over $90 million in repairs, upgrades and replacements. These projects will reduce the potential of flooding in the affected areas. See next page for detailed locations and scope of work. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None Funding Source Fund 001- General Fund Expenditures Design Inspection Construction Total MAP Proposed 2012 -2013 Budget $ 1,569,480 Proposed 2013 -2014 Budget Proposed 2014 -2015 Budget Proposed 2015 -2016 Budget Proposed 2016 -2017 Budget PICTURE Proposed 5 -year total $ 1,569,480 $ 1,569,480 $ 1,569,480 Page 5.2 667 PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET PROJECT CATEGORY Storm Drain System PROJECT NAME Navy Drainage Easement Improvements PROJECT MANAGER David Spitz, Associate Engineer LOCATION Citywide PRIORITY High DESCRIPTION This project will maintain drainage easements located within the Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station FY 2012/13 - 2016/17 PROJECT No. TOTAL PROJECT COST WORKED PERFORMED BY PROJECT STATUS ALTERNATIVE FUNDING SOURCE SD1202 $182,400 Contract Design None JUSTIFICATION The City has a drainage easement that allows surface water runoff from the eastern half of Old Town and the Hill to drain into the Anaheim Bay. The easement has been in place since November of 1950. The City and United States Navy are working out an extension of this drainage easement. The Navy has requested maintenance work be completed within the easement in exchange for extension of the easement. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None MAP Funding Source Approved 2011 -2012 Budget Approved 2012 -2013 Budget Approved 2013 -2014 Budget Approved 2014 -2015 Budget Approved 2015 -2016 Budget PICTURE 5 -year total Fund 001- General Fund $ 182,400 Expenditures $ 182,400 Design (with permitting) Construction Total $ 182,400 $ 182,400 Page 5.3 Streets and Transportation (ST) o o o o O 0 o o oo o 00 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O LO LO O 00 00 CO CO EA EA EA EA EA EA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N EA EA EA EA EA EA EA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N EA EA EA EA EA EA EA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 N N EA EA EA EA EA EA EA O O O O O O 0 0 O ST1201 Annual Slurry Seal Project 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 O O 0 O Lf) LO - 0 0 0 0 N N EA EA EA EA EA EA Fund 040 - Gas Tax 00 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 o DO cro '7 .- CCOO N EA EA EA EA 0 0 0 0 O [O F N 2 C N O o) • O A O U H N H C H LL M N a J N N a g w °- a) 0 rn O a • 0 o LL v c o - u_ LL c � ST1202 Arterial Street Resurfacing Program ST1203 Local Street Resurfacing Program M 0 O N c0 O O EA O ST1205 Annual Concrete Repair Program O O LO EA O O LO EA O O ID 0 0 EA O O ID EA CO N m 0 00 O 0 N EA O O LO EA O O LO EA O O ID 0 0 EA O O ID EA t0 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO LO 0 0 EA EA O O ID EA U) U) U 0 E U 1- c - LL LL C E c N U) c O F c N Y p' t0 a 0 O .N c 2 ▪ LL U) a E e, U m T.) co co O N co O O ID EA O ST1207 Street Tree Planting Program 00 O 0 O EA O O EA O O EA O O N 0 0 EA O O N EA Fund 001 - General Fund 00 00 O O O EA EA O O EA O O N O O N 0 0 EA O O N EA ST1302 Utility Undergrounding Project 00 O EA O EA 00 O ai 63 O CO 63 O N 63 O N CO 63 0 CO 63 O M co 63 5 YEAR TOTAL &eci-l'&3fe,d PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET FY 2012/13 - 2016/17 PROJECT CATEGORY Streets and Transportation PROJECT NAME Golden Rain Road Intersection Improvements PROJECT MANAGER David Spitz, Associate Engineer LOCATION Golden Rain Rd. & Seal Beach Blvd. PRIORITY Medium DESCRIPTION Traffic signal improvements PROJECT No. ST1107 TOTAL PROJECT COST $400,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Will start ALTERNATIVE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION This project will update the oldest traffic signal within the city to meet the current standard of the MUTCD. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None MAP Proposed 2012 -2013 Funding Source Budget Traffic Impact Fees Func $400,000 Expenditures Design $ 40,000 Construction $440,000 Inspection $ 20,000 TOTAL $ 400,000 Proposed 2013 -2014 Budget Proposed 2014 -2015 Budget Proposed 2015 -2016 Budget Proposed 2016 -2017 Budget Proposed 5 -year total $ 400,000 $ 40,000 $ 440,000 $ 20,000 $ 400,000 PICTURE page 6.1 &eci-l'&3fe,d PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET PROJECT CATEGORY Streets and Transportation PROJECT NAME Annual Slurry Seal Project PROJECT MANAGER Cesar Rangel, Assistant Engineer LOCATION Citywide PRIORITY High FY 2012/13 - 2016/17 DESCRIPTION This program applies maintenance slurry seals to streets to extend the life of the pavement. The Pavement Management System data will be used as a guideline to select project streets. PROJECT No. ST1201 TOTAL PROJECT COST $500,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Ongoing ALTERNATIVE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION Slurry Seal is a proven strategy to extend the life of asphalt pavements. The program is well received by residents. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: This reduces pot holes and cracking in streets. Proposed Proposed 2012 -2013 2013 -2014 Funding Source Budget Budget Proposed 2014 -2015 Budget Proposed 2015 -2016 Budget Proposed 2016 -2017 Budget Proposed 5 -year total Fund 040 -Gas Tax $100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Expenditures Design (inhouse) Construction Inspection Total $100,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000 $ 90,000 $ 10,000 $100,000 $ 90,000 $ 10,000 $ 100,000 $ 90,000 $ 10,000 $ 100,000 $ 90,000 $ 10,000 $ 100,000 $ 90,000 $ 10,000 $ 100,000 $ 450,000 $ 50,000 $ 500,000 PICTURE page 6.2 PROJECT CATEGORY Streets and Transportation PROJECT NAME Arterial Street Resurfacing Program PROJECT MANAGER David Spitz, Associate Engineer LOCATION Citywide PRIORITY High PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET FY 2012/13 - 2016/17 DESCRIPTION This project will resurface arterial streets as identified within the Pavement Management Program. The City has traditionally and will continue to use grant funds to augment the funding used within this program. PROJECT No. ST1202 TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,000,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Ongoing ALTERNATIVE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION The pavement management system has analyzed surface conditions and planned a cost efficient pavement maintenance schedule. City streets deteriorate over the years and require maintenance. This project will reduce future maintenance costs and provide a safe driving surface for motorists. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: This will reduce the annual maintenance and pothole repairs. Funding Source MAP Proposed 2012 -2013 Budget Proposed 2013 -2014 Budget Proposed 2014 -2015 Budget Proposed 2015 -2016 Budget Proposed 2016 -2017 Budget Proposed 5 -year total PICTURE Prop 42 Traffic Relief $200,000 Expenditures Design Construction Inspection TOTAL $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 20,000 $170,000 $ 10,000 $ 200,000 $ 20,000 $ 170,000 $ 10,000 $ 200,000 $ 20,000 $ 170,000 $ 10,000 $ 200,000 $ 20,000 $170,000 $ 10,000 $ 200,000 $ 20,000 $170,000 $ 10,000 $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ 850,000 $ 50,000 $ 1,000,000 page 6.3 City of Seal Beach PROJECT INFORMATION SHEE PROJECT CATEGORY Streets and Transportation PROJECT NAME Local Street Resurfacing Program PROJECT MANAGER David Spitz, Associate Engineer LOCATION Citywide PRIORITY High FY 2012/13 - 2016/17 DESCRIPTION This project will resurface local streets per the pavement management system. PROJECT No. ST1203 TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,375,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Will Start ALTERNATIVE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION In 2006, 2008, & 2010, a pavement management system was adopted that analyzed surface conditions and planned a cost efficient pavement maintenance schedule. City streets deteriorate over time and require maintenance. This project will reduce future maintenance costs and add value to neighborhoods. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: This will reduce the annual maintenance and pothole repairs. Funding Source MAP Proposed 2012 -2013 Budget Proposed 2013 -2014 Budget Proposed 2014 -2015 Budget Proposed 2015 -2016 Budget Proposed 2016 -2017 Budget Proposed 5 -year total Measure M $275,000 $ 275,000 $ 275,000 Expenditures Design Construction Inspection Total $275,000 $275,000 $1,375,000 $ 25,000 $ 230,000 $ 20,000 $ 275,000 $ 25,000 $ 230,000 $ 20,000 $ 275,000 $ 25,000 $ 230,000 $ 20,000 $ 275,000 $ 25,000 $ 230,000 $ 20,000 $ 275,000 $ 25,000 $ 230,000 $ 20,000 $ 275,000 $ 125,000 $1,150,000 $ 100,000 $1,375,000 PICTURE page 6.9 ()of'eeetryi PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET PROJECT CATEGORY Streets and Transportation PROJECT NAME Main Street Lighting Improvements PROJECT MANAGER David Spitz, Associate Engineer LOCATION Citywide PRIORITY Medium FY 2012/13 - 2016/17 DESCRIPTION This project will prepare a lighting study and then replace the existing lighting on Main Street with decorative lighting. PROJECT No. TOTAL PROJECT COST WORKED PERFORMED BY PROJECT STATUS ALTERNATIVE FUNDING SOURCE ST1204 $688,000 Contract Will start None JUSTIFICATION For the past 15 years, the City has been investing in trees on Main Street. The lighting on Main Street is becoming impacted as the trees mature. There have been requests from residents and the Chamber of Commerce to replace the existing lighting with decorative lighting. This project studied the lighing need on Main Street in 2011 , and plans were prepared to install updated lighting in 2012. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None RD Fs UNITED STATES NAVAL WEAPONS STATION SEE 11 J1 1 PEPPERTREE 2 JUNIPER ':, 3 ELDER 14. 9 CARROT., 6 BLUE SEEi1, ti EYERGREEIi SUMMER IRE El ROYAL C• -E 10 RRAESLOOU 11 TAMAR; 00 . 02006 Thomas Bros_ Maps. Funding Source Parking In -Lieu Fees General Fund Expenditures Design Construction Inspection Total MAP Proposed 2012 -2013 Budget Proposed 2013 -2014 Budget Proposed 2014 -2015 Budget Proposed 2015 -2016 Budget Proposed 2016 -2017 Budget PICTURE $ 198,000 $ 490,000 $ 60,000 $ 590,000 $ 38,000 $ 688,000 $ Proposed 5 -year total $ 198,000 $ 490,000 $ 60.000 $ 608,000 $ 30,000 $ 698,000 page 6.4 67 /7 efr: 'e et ej PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET PROJECT CATEGORY Streets and Transportation PROJECT NAME Annual Concrete Repair Program PROJECT MANAGER Cesar Rangel, Assistant Engineer LOCATION Citywide PRIORITY High FY 2012/13 - 2016/17 DESCRIPTION This program replaces portions of deteriorated concrete sidewalks, curbs and gutters within the City, and brings handicap ramps current to Americans with Disability Act Standards. PROJECT No. ST1205 TOTAL PROJECT COST $250,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Ongoing ALTERNATIVE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION The program is required to eliminate trip hazards and safety issues. Reduced liability exposure is a benefit of this activity. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None MAP Funding Source Proposed 2012 -2013 Budget Proposed 2013 -2014 Budget Proposed 2014 -2015 Budget Proposed 2015 -2016 Budget Proposed 2016 -2017 Budget PICTURE Proposed 5 -year total Prop 42 Traffic Relief $ 50,000 Expenditures Design (inhouse) Construction Inspection Total $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 250,000 $ $ 45,000 $ 5,000 $ - $ 45,000 $ 5,000 $ - $ 45,000 $ 5,000 $ - $ 45,000 $ 5,000 $ - $ 45,000 $ 5,000 $ $ 225,000 $ 25,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 250,000 page 6.5 PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET PROJECT CATEGORY Streets and Transportation PROJECT NAME Comprehensive Parking Manag. Plan PROJECT MANAGER David Spitz, Associate Engineer LOCATION N/A PRIORITY Medium DESCRIPTION FY 2012113 - 2016/17 PROJECT No. ST1206 TOTAL PROJECT COST $150,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Will Start ALTERNATIVE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION This plan provides various policies and programs that result in more This project will study parking in the city. efficient use of parking resources. Chow Funding Source Traffic Impact Fee Expenditures TOTAL On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None e r� � .erwrnr rm.i [1 • MAP g V 9 1 Proposed 2012 -2013 Budget $ 150,000 Proposed 2013 -2014 Budget Proposed 2014 -2015 Budget Proposed 2015 -2016 Budget Proposed 2016 -2017 Budget PICTURE Proposed 5 -year total $ 150,000 page 6.6 6z/7 efr te ej PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET PROJECT CATEGORY Streets and Transportation PROJECT NAME Street Tree Planting Program PROJECT MANAGER David Spitz, Associate Engineer LOCATION Citywide PRIORITY Medium DESCRIPTION This program provides funding for the installation of new trees throughout the City. FY 2012/13 - 2016/17 PROJECT No. ST1207 TOTAL PROJECT COST $100,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Ongoing ALTERNATIVE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION Locations are identified continually. This program helps improve the local environment for residents and visitors. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: Increase cost for annual tree maintenance. Funding Source General Fund Expenditures Construction TOTAL MAP Proposed 2012 -2013 Budget Proposed 2013 -2014 Budget Proposed 2014 -2015 Budget Proposed 2015 -2016 Budget Proposed 2016 -2017 Budget PICTURE Proposed 5 -year total $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 100,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 100,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 100,000 page 6.7 067 a,��aC(lJecrc�i 0 PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET PROJECT CATEGORY Streets and Transportation PROJECT NAME Utility Undergrounding Project PROJECT MANAGER David Spitz, Associate Engineer LOCATION N/A PRIORITY Medium FY 2012/13 - 2016/17 PROJECT No. ST1302 TOTAL PROJECT COST $10,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS WiII Start ALTERNATIVE FUNDING SOURCE None DESCRIPTION JUSTIFICATION This allocation will provide inspection services during construction of Location to be determined by City Council. underground utilities by SCE. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact None Funding Source General Fund Expenditures TOTAL MAP Proposed 2012 -2013 Budget Proposed 2013 -2014 Budget Proposed 2014 -2015 Budget Proposed 2015 -2016 Budget Proposed 2016 -2017 Budget PICTURE Proposed 5 -year total $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 page 6.8 E 1 0 (0 W o U) O_ N O a) d LC) U r • o • N a) U o o aom oN 0) OLC') 3 U) Q 0 0) 0 3 d 0 m (o • ON 0) o O m d O o M o N 0 O) o_ N 7 O d O Water System 00 00 °v °v 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 00 0000 00 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v v 0 0 0 0 0 O O V V CO CO O O O O O I"- I"- CO CO N N V V 00 CO CO N N ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 M M 0 0 N N CO CO N N V V ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER O O O O 00 ER 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 0- • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO 0 0 0 0 00 ER ER ER ER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ER ER ER ER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- • 0 ° v N M O O O O T r r N O � . � H H H H N O N 1- H a O H a O H 5 YEAR TOTAL eff<Ple 1/C-e PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET FY 2012/13 - 2016/17 PROJECT CATEGORY Water System PROJECT NAME Water Sta, Rehab. - Beverly Manor PROJECT MANAGER David Spitz, Associate Engineer LOCATION Beverly Manor Road PRIORITY High DESCRIPTION This project will construct upgrades and improvements to the Beverly Manor Water Well, Booster Station and Reservoir as identified in the 2003 Water System Master Plan. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact UNITED STATES NAVAL WEAPONS STATION SEE H J1 1 ENPERTREE JUNIPER UNIPER VT ELDER VP 1 CARROTLOOE BW 5 E SERGE 5 EVERGREEN ] SUMMER THE 5 ROYAL OAK 'J ASPEN WY 10 BRNESVOOG 11 TAMARACK 1 ©2114 Thomas Bros. Mapg MAP Funding Source Proposed 2012 -2013 Budget Proposed 2013 -2014 Budget PROJECT No. WT0904 TOTAL PROJECT COST $2,700,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Construction ALTERNATIVE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION The water system requires continual capital maintenance to maintain reliability and to meet water quality standards. It will eliminate the existing monthly maintenance cost. Proposed 2014 -2015 Budget Proposed 2015 -2016 Budget Proposed 2016 -2017 Budget PICTURE Proposed 5 -year total Water Capital Fund $1,200,000 $1,500,000 Expenditures Design - Complete Construction Inspection TOTAL $ 2,700,000 $1,100,000 $ 100,000 $1,350,000 $ 150,000 $ 2,450,000 $ 250,000 $1,200,000 $1,500,000 $ 2,700,000 page 7.2 e&ect,t3feetew, PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET PROJECT CATEGORY Water System PROJECT NAME Water System Infrastructure Repairs PROJECT MANAGER David Spitz, Associate Engineer LOCATION Citywide PRIORITY High FY 2012/13 - 2016/17 DESCRIPTION This project repairs water system deficiencies as identified within the Water Master Plan PROJECT No. WT1202 TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,600,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Ongoing ALTERNATIVE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION The water system requires continual upkeep to keep it reliable. The system provides drinking water to residents and businesses as well as for fire protection. This program provides funding for the annual and emergency replacement of water system components such as pipelines, water valves, and water station components. Specific locations are consistent with the Water Master Plan. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: Emergency repairs will be reduced. SEAL BEACH OP4N E COUNTY MAP Funding Source Proposed 2012 -2013 Budget Proposed 2013 -2014 Budget Proposed 2014 -2015 Budget Proposed 2015 -2016 Budget Proposed 2016 -2017 Budget PICTURE Proposed 5 -year total Water Capital Fund Expenditures Design Construction Inspection TOTAL $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 30,000 $ 340,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 340,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 340,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 340,000 $ 30,000 $ 120,000 $ 1,360,000 $ 120,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 1,600,000 page 7.6 677 aiceetek PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET PROJECT CATEGORY Water System PROJECT NAME Lampson Water Well - Backup Power PROJECT MANAGER Michael Ho, City Engineer LOCATION Lampson Ave. PRIORITY High DESCRIPTION In the spring of 2011, the City opened a new Domestic Water Well on Lampson Avenue. The facilitiy was constructed with the ability to add a permanent backup power. This project will install the backup power system. FY 2012113 - 2016/17 PROJECT No. WT1102 TOTAL PROJECT COST $340,840 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Construction ALTERNATIVE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION In the event of a natural disaster or extended power outage, this will allow this well site to continue to remain in service. The facility is currently able to be operated with a mobile generator. The City has one generator in its inventory to power numerous city facilities. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None SEE 11 31 ;Ek L. I12 e MFN Ye car. Y• yeti UNITE i wC It Cid n Novn v20a4 Thomas pins Mews MAP Funding Source Proposed 2012 -2013 Budget Proposed 2013 -2014 Budget Proposed 2014 -2015 Budget Proposed 2015 -2016 Budget Proposed 2016 -2017 Budget PICTURE Proposed 5 -year total Water Capital Fund $ 340,840 Expenditures Design Construction Inspection TOTAL $ 340,840 $ 10,000 $ 310,840 $ 20,000 $ 10,000 $ 310,840 $ 20,000 $ 340,840 $ 340,840 page 7.3 077 PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET FY 2012113 - 2016117 PROJECT CATEGORY Water System PROJECT NAME Lampson Water Well - Connections Improvements PROJECT MANAGER Michael Ho, City Engineer LOCATION Lampson Ave. PRIORITY High DESCRIPTION In the spring of 2011, the City opened a new Domestic Water Well on Lampson Avenue. The facilitiy was constructed with one connection to the system on Lampson Avenue extending westward between the well site and Basswood Avenue. This project will install a second connection extending eastbound on Lampson Avenue to Heather Street. PROJECT No. WT1103 TOTAL PROJECT COST $234,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Construction ALTERNATIVE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION Most water system facilities are designed and operated with numerous connection points. This is done so that in the event of a main break the system can remain in service. This project will construct a second connection point for the Lampson Avenue Well into the City domestic water system. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None J I arP... RY OLD RAW( CLWATAT • � `� .,-,.....R121, . SEE II j1 5EE [. 1I g % _ ° ^ "," UNITED aWC tC n + 020D4 mamas 0,0* h1. MAP Funding Source Proposed 2012 -2013 Budget Proposed 2013 -2014 Budget Proposed 2014 -2015 Budget Proposed 2015 -2016 Budget Proposed 2016 -2017 Budget PICTURE Proposed 5 -year total Water Capital Fund $ 234,000 Expenditures $ 234,000 Design Construction Inspection $ 20.000 $ 189.000 $ 25.000 $ 20,000 $ 189,000 $ 25,000 TOTAL $ 234,000 $ 234,000 page 7.4 &eetzt PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET PROJECT CATEGORY Water System PROJECT NAME Ocean Avenue Alley (1st to Main) PROJECT MANAGER David Spitz, Associate Engineer LOCATION Citywide PRIORITY Medium FY 2012/13 - 2016/17 DESCRIPTION This project rehabilitates water and sewer facilities within the Ocean Avenue Alley between Main Street and 1st Street. PROJECT No. WT1201 TOTAL PROJECT COST $800,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Construction ALTERNATIVE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION This project will update deteriorated water and sewer facilities within the Ocean Avenue Alley between 1st Street and Main Street. The pavement in the alley will be removed in order to rehabilite the utilities and be replaced at the conclusion of construction. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None Funding Source Water Capital Fund Sewer Capital Fund TOTAL Expenditures Design Construction Inspection TOTAL MAP Proposed 2012 -2013 Budget Proposed 2013 -2014 Budget Proposed 2014 -2015 Budget Proposed 2015 -2016 Budget Proposed 2016 -2017 Budget PICTURE $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 800,000 Proposed 5 -year total $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 800,000 $ 80,000 $ 670,000 $ 50,000 $ 80,000 $ 670,000 $ 50,000 $ 800,000 $ 800,000 page 7.5 • z ect,J PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET PROJECT CATEGORY Water System PROJECT NAME Water Well Rehab.- Bolsa Chica PROJECT MANAGER Michael Ho, City Engineer LOCATION Bolsa Chica Road PRIORITY Medium FY 2012/13 - 2016/17 PROJECT No. WT1402 TOTAL PROJECT COST $600,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Design ALTERNATIVE FUNDING SOURCE None DESCRIPTION JUSTIFICATION This project will rehabilitate the well site pumps, generators, motors and This project will rehabilitate the Bolsa Chica Water Well as identified in the 2003 water treatment equipment. Water System Master Plan. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: Constructing the project will eliminate the maintenance of the electrical & pump equipment. MAP Funding Source Proposed 2012 -2013 Budget Proposed 2013 -2014 Budget Proposed 2014 -2015 Budget Proposed 2015 -2016 Budget Proposed 2016 -2017 Budget PICTURE Proposed 5 -year total Water Capital Fund Expenditures Design - Complete Construction Inspection TOTAL $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 550,000 $ 50,000 $ 550,000 $ 50,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 page 7.8 67, PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET PROJECT CATEGORY Water System PROJECT NAME Main Line Repl. Hellman Permits PROJECT MANAGER Michael Ho, City Engineer LOCATION Hellman Ranch Properties PRIORITY High FY 2012/13 - 2016/17 DESCRIPTION This project will replace an 18" transmission line on Hellman Ranch to feed Marina and Old Town. PROJECT No. WT1301 TOTAL PROJECT COST $550,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Pre - planning ALTERNATE FUND SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION This is a replacement of an existing line. It provides redundancy for the part of the system serving Old Town. It will maintain system reliability. The existing pipeline is in poor condition. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: Constructing the project will minimize the water main breaks in this area. MAP Funding Source Proposed 2012 -2013 Budget Proposed 2013 -2014 Budget Proposed 2014 -2015 Budget Proposed 2015 -2016 Budget Proposed 2016 -2017 Budget PICTURE Proposed 5 -year total Water Capital Fund Expenditures Design & Permitting Construction Inspection TOTAL $ 50,000 $500,000 $ 550,000 $ 50,000 $ 450,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 450,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $500,000 $ 550,000 page 7.7 CITYQFSEAL Fr 2012/13 - zc SECTION VIII - UNFUNDED PROJECTS /NEEDS SUMMARY SHEET BEACH 16/17 5 year CIP Budget UNFUNDED NEEDS /PROJECTS Project Name Cost Beach and Pier Pier Structural Assessment Implementation $ 100,000 City Parking Lot Rehabilitation $ 200,000 Pier Abutment Room Repair $ 100,000 $ 400,000 Buildings and Facilities Facility Improvements Citywide (per Facility Master Plan) $ 38,853,000 Pier Entrance Improvements $ 100,000 Pier Tot Lot Improvements $ 50,000 Main Street - Streescape Improvements (Street Furniture) $ 150,000 Public Works Building Repairs $ 50,000 McGaugh Pool Deck Rehabilitation $ 200,000 Mary Wilson Library Carpeting Replacement $ 20,000 Council Chambers A/V Improvement Project $ 100,000 ADA Upgrades to all City Buildings $ 500,000 Community Center Improvements $ 1,500,000 $ 41,523,000 Parks New Pedestrian lighting on Electric Ave Greenbelt $ 300,000 Lighting Improvements to Zoeter $ 50,000 Lighting Improvements to Seal Beach Tennis Center $ 100,000 Citywide Irrigation Improvements $ 500,000 Citywide Park and Turf Renovation $ 1,000,000 Zoeter Field Rehabilitation (including stands) $ 100,000 Arbor Park Field Restoration $ 50,000 Heather Park Restrooms $ 250,000 City Entry Monument Signs $ 100,000 $ 2,450,000 Storm Drain Master Plan - High Priority Needs Master Plan - Median Priority Projects Master Plan - Low Priority Projects Streets and Transportation $ 11,000,000 $ 32,000,000 $ 29,000,000 $ 72,000,000 8th St City Hall Parking Lot Rehabilitation $ 100,000 Westminster Avenue Storm Drain Undergrounding - (Study Only) $ 100,000 Leisure World Connectivity Study $ 25,000 Median Landscape Rehabilitation on Seal Beach Blvd $ 200,000 Traffic Signal Upgrades $ 500,000 Traffic Management Center Upgrades $ 300,000 Concrete Rehabilitation $ 1,000,000 Street Paving Rehabilitation $ 18,000,000 Alley Pavement Rehabilitation $ 5,000,000 $ 25,225,000 TOTAL $ 141,598,000 page 8.1