HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC AG PKT 2012-10-22 #H95.1
AGENDA STAFF REPORT
t
DATE: October 22, 2012
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
THRU: Jill R. Ingram, City Manager
FROM: Sean P. Crumby P.E., Assistant City Manager /Public Works
SUBJECT: AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR FUNDS THROUGH
ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
It is requested that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 6922 authorizing
application for grant funds from Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA)
for the Regional Transportation Signal Synchronization Program.
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS:
OCTA has opened the 2013 Call for Projects through the Combined
Transportation Funding Program (CTFP) funded by Measure M2. This CTFP has
a funding opportunity for the Seal Beach related to the Regional Transportation
Signal Synchronization Program. Staff identified a project to submit for this
current Call for Projects.
Project Details
The project scope of work is to relocate the City's Traffic Management Center
(TMC) located at the City Corporation Yard on Adolfo Lopez Drive to City Hall.
The TMC controls all the traffic signals on Seal Beach Boulevard from the 1 -405
Freeway to Bolsa Avenue which is approximately 11,700 feet or almost 2.5 miles.
The connectivity between all the traffic signals uses fiber optic cables. The fiber
optic cables are then brought into the Corporation Yard on Adolfo Lopez Drive.
The current TMC allows staff to monitor or change in real time. The TMC also
allows staff to visually see in real time two signalized intersections on Seal Beach
Blvd at, 1.Golden Rain and 2. Westminster Avenue.
By relocating the existing TMC to City Hall, it will allow engineering staff to:
1. Monitor the traffic in real time,
2. Adjust signal timing as needed,
3. Upgrade the communications in field, and
4. Increase the bandwidth between City Hall, Corporation Yard and Police
Department.
The proposed project intends to fund the complete relocation of the TMC, add
state of the art fiber optic cable from the Corporation Yard to City Hall by
Agenda Item H
underground cables and overhead where possible. In addition to the cabling, the
project calls for an upgrade of the TMC with new monitors, computers, servers
and other necessary appurtenances. The grant will also allow for future ongoing
maintenance of the equipment, computers and monitoring of the entire system.
Grant Details
This 2013 Call for Projects is a competitive grant that the City of Seal Beach has
successfully been awarded to in the past for other types of projects. Measure M2
funding is a great opportunity for Seal Beach to apply.
The TMC Project staff intends to apply for a rough order of magnitude of
$600,000. This grant requires a 20% match or $120,000 from the City.
The project timeline is 12 months from the date of award. OCTA will notify Seal
Beach approximately early 2013. Staff will have 12 months to substantially
complete this project. Staff is dedicated to meet this vigorous schedule.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:
Submittal of the grant applications are not identified as a project within the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). If the projects move forward they
will all comply with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA). Detailed information will be presented at the appropriate time.
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
No legal analysis is required for this item.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The Call for Projects requires a 20% minimum local match. The project total cost
is $600,000 and the City's contribution is $120,000. Funds have not yet been
budgeted for this project. Funding options will be presented if the grant is
awarded to the City prior to moving forward with the project.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council adopt Resolution No. 6922 authorizing
application for grant funds from Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA)
for the Regional Transportation Signal Synchronization Program.
SUBMITTED BY:
Sean P. Crumby, E.
Assistant City Manager/Puba Works
NOTED AND APPROVED:
C, R .��
Au
Jil R. Ingram, Ci M pager
Prepared by: Michael Ho, Deputy Director of PW /City Engineer
Page 2
RESOLUTION NUMBER 6922
A RESOLUTION OF THE SEAL BEACH CITY COUNCIL
APPROVING THE SUBMITTAL OF TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT
CENTER RELOCATION PROJECT TO THE ORANGE COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY FOR FUNDING UNDER THE
COMPETITIVE MEASURE M2 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION
SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the Measure M2 Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program
targets over 2,000 signalized intersections across Orange County to maintain
traffic signal synchronization, improve traffic flow, and reduce congestion across
jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, the City of Seal Beach has been declared by the Orange County
Transportation Authority to meet the eligibility requirements to receive revenues
as part of Measure M2 ; and
WHEREAS, the City of Seal Beach has a currently adopted a Local Signal
Synchronization Plan consistent with the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization
Master Plan as a key component of local agencies' efforts to synchronizing traffic
signals across local agencies' boundaries
WHEREAS, the City of Seal Beach will provide matching funds for each project
as required by the Orange County Comprehensive Transportation Funding
Programs Procedures Manual; and
WHEREAS, the City of Seal Beach will not use Measure M funds to supplant
Developer Fees or other commitments; and
WHEREAS, the City of Seal Beach desires to implement multi - jurisdictional
signal synchronization listed below.
THE SEAL BEACH CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY RESOLVE:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Seal Beach hereby requests the
Orange County Transportation Authority allocate funds in the amounts specified
in the City's application to said City from the Regional Transportation Signal
Synchronization Program to implement regional signal synchronization
throughout various streets within Seal Beach.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED by the Seal Beach City Council at a
regular meeting held on the 22nd day of October 2012 by the following vote:
AYES:
Council Members
NOES:
Council Members
ABSENT:
Council Members
ABSTAIN:
Council Members
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Resolution Number 6922
STATE OF CALIFORNIA }
COUNTY OF ORANGE } SS
CITY OF SEAL BEACH }
I, Linda Devine, City Clerk of the City of Seal Beach, do hereby certify that the
foregoing resolution is the original copy of Resolution Number 6922 on file
in the office of the City Clerk, passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council
at a regular meeting held on the 22nd day of October 2012.
City Clerk
FY 2013 Call for Projects
Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program
Project P
Supplemental Application Information
Seal Beach TMC Relocation and Fiber Bridge Gap
10/12/2012
Agency: City of Seal Beach
Contact Name: Michael Ho
Contact Number: (562) 431 -2527 x1322
Contact Email: mho(a�sealbeachca.gov
Project P Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program Application Checklist
Project P Application Checklist
Included
RTSSP Online Application — submitted through OCFundTracker
Online
1. Vehicle Miles Traveled
2. Benefic Cost Ratio
3. Project Characteristics
4. Transportation Significance
5. Maintenance of Effort
6. Project Scale
7. Number of Jurisdictions
8. Current Project Readiness
9. Funding Over -Match
Section 1: Key technical information
a. Project limits of the corridor to synchronize
Pg. 2 -4
b. Designation of the corridor to synchronize: priority corridor, signal synchronization
network corridor, or master plan of arterial highways corridor
c. Project start date and end date, including any commitment to operate signal
synchronization beyond the three year grant period
d. Signalized intersections that are part of the project
e. Traffic Forum members: None
Section 2: Lead agency
Pg. 4
Section 3: Resolutions of support from the project's Traffic Forum members
Pg. 3 -4
Section 4: Preliminary plans for the proposed project by task (detail below)
The plans shall include details about both phases of the project: Primary Implementation and the
Ongoing Maintenance and Operation. The plan should be organized using the following setup.
Primary Implementation shall include details about the following:
Pg. 5 -6
a. Project Administration (required)
b. Developing and implementing optimized signal synchronization timing (required)
c. Producing a Before and After Study for the proposed project (required)
d. Engineering design of signal system improvements (optional)
e. System integration (optional)
f. Proposed signal improvements (optional)
g. Contingencies (optional)
h. Construction management (optional)
Ongoing Maintenance and Operation will begin after the Primary Implementation of the project is
completed. It shall include details about the following:
a. Monitoring and improving optimized signal timing (required)
b. Communications and detection support (optional)
c. Project final report (required)
Section 5: Total proposed project cost by task
Pg. 7 -8
Section 6: Project schedule for the 3 year grant period by task
Pg. 8
Section 7: Matching funds
Pg. 9
Section 8: Environmental clearances and other permits
Pg. 10
Section 9: Calculations used to develop selection criteria inputs
Pg. 10 -11
Section 10: Any additional information deemed relevant by the applicant
Pg. 12
Appendices
Pg. 12
Section 1: Key Technical Information
a. The proposed project would relocate the City's current TMC from the City Corporation Yard
(1776 Adolfo Lopez Drive) to City Hall (211 8th Street) and bridge the gap of approximately
3,000 lineal feet of fiber optic. Figure 1 shows a map of the project.
aotsasatooaa
—7 a: IF SAM wrsairrtosi
[,wrs rira a.r..
c.n..aw.x� crs
E?1y_i_Z _TTY
r
S;:.
New TMC Location
IHroposeci Project l
Ne:., Fiber Optic
1PAtGMO 013.12 f itvarrawo�roW sawoa
Legend
0 Traffic Management Center at City Yard 40 Seal Beach Traf a Signal
Existing Fiber Optic Communications * Caltrans - i -rafric Signal
Existing Copper (llardwire) Communications
Scat Beach /Los Alamitos
its :Model 170/2070 Traffic Signal Controller Shared Traffic Signal
ccry CCTV Camera
weenve Proposed Project New Fiber Optic 2013 Call for Projects
RTSSP
Figure 1: Signalized intersection and proposed project limits
2
1"
Bets Av
Proposed Project
ERA& RINIAV'$
V
Ih
Vile•: Fiber Optic
{.IYllq C�MIY
9
�•
YMM Mn1[r
C .oft.
Gr
1PAtGMO 013.12 f itvarrawo�roW sawoa
Legend
0 Traffic Management Center at City Yard 40 Seal Beach Traf a Signal
Existing Fiber Optic Communications * Caltrans - i -rafric Signal
Existing Copper (llardwire) Communications
Scat Beach /Los Alamitos
its :Model 170/2070 Traffic Signal Controller Shared Traffic Signal
ccry CCTV Camera
weenve Proposed Project New Fiber Optic 2013 Call for Projects
RTSSP
Figure 1: Signalized intersection and proposed project limits
2
b. Designation of the corridor to synchronize:
® Priority Corridor ❑ Signal Synchronization Network Corridor
❑Master Plan of Arterial Highways Corridor
c. Project start date: within 12 months of award Project end date: within 18 months of award.
All agencies commit to operate signal synchronization beyond the three year grant period
for: ❑0 years ❑1 year ❑2 years ❑ 3 years ® Other The City is committed to
operate for the life of the proposed system
d. Below signalized intersections are part of the project:
1
Seal Beach Blvd @
Bolsa Avenue
15 Westminster Ave @ Apollo Dr
2
Seal Beach Blvd @
Heron Point
16 Westminster Ave @ Road B
3
Seal Beach Blvd @
Adolfo Lopez Drive
17 Westminster Ave @ Kitts Hwy
4
Seal Beach Blvd @
Apollo Drive
18 Seal Beach Blvd. @ Bradbury
5
Seal Beach Blvd @
Road C
6
Seal Beach Blvd @
Westminster
7
Seal Beach Blvd @
St. Andrews
8
Seal Beach Blvd @
Golden Rain Rd
9
Seal Beach Blvd @
1 -405 SB on /off ramp
10
Seal Beach Blvd @
1 -405 NB on /off ramp
11
Seal Beach Blvd @
Lampson Ave
12
Seal Beach Blvd @
St. Cloud
13
Seal Beach Blvd @
Towne Center Dr
14
Seal Beach Blvd @
Rossmoor Center Way
e. Traffic Forum members: None
Section 2: Lead Agency
® City of Seal Beach will be the lead agency
❑ OCTA agency is requested to be the lead
❑ County of Orange will be the lead agency
Section 3: City of Seal Beach Resolution: See Next Page
3
RESOLUTION NUMBER 6922
A RESOLUTION OF THE SEAL BEACH CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE
SUBMITTAL OF TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT CENTER RELOCATION PROJECT TO
THE ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY FOR FUNDING UNDER
THE COMPETITIVE MEASURE M2 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SIGNAL
SYNCHRONIZATION PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the Measure M2 Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program targets over 2,000
signalized intersections across Orange County to maintain traffic signal synchronization, improve traffic
flow, and reduce congestion across jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, the City of Seal Beach has been declared by the Orange County Transportation Authority to
meet the eligibility requirements to receive revenues as part of Measure M2 ; and
WHEREAS, the City of Seal Beach has a currently adopted a Local Signal Synchronization Plan
consistent with the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan as a key component of local
agencies' efforts to synchronizing traffic signals across local agencies' boundaries
WHEREAS, the City of Seal Beach will provide matching funds for each project as required by the
Orange County Comprehensive Transportation Funding Programs Procedures Manual; and
WHEREAS, the City of Seal Beach will not use Measure M funds to supplant Developer Fees or other
commitments; and
WHEREAS, the City of Seal Beach desires to implement multi - jurisdictional signal synchronization listed
below.
THE SEAL BEACH CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY RESOLVE:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Seal Beach hereby requests the Orange County Transportation
Authority allocate funds in the amounts specified in the City's application to said City from the Regional
Transportation Signal Synchronization Program to implement regional signal synchronization throughout
various streets within Seal Beach.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED by the Seal Beach City Council at a regular meeting held on the
22nd day of October 2012 by the following vote:
AYES: Council Members
NOES:
Council Members
ABSENT:
Council Members
ABSTAIN:
Council Members
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA }
COUNTY OF ORANGE } SS
CITY OF SEAL BEACH }
I, Linda Devine, City Clerk of the City of Seal Beach, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is the original
copy of Resolution Number 6922 on file in the office of the City Clerk, passed, approved, and adopted by the
City Council at a regular meeting held on the 22nd day of October 2012.
City Clerk
S
Section 4: Preliminary Plans for the Project
Primary Implementation
a. Project Administration
The City of Seal Beach will lead the project using a contractor to install the overhead and
underground fiber optic cable between the Corporation Yard and City Hall. The
contractor will also install fiber to bridge the gap between Golden Rain Road and 1 -405
NB on /off ramp. Once completed with the fiber install, Seal Beach will hire a systems
integrator to relocate the TMC. Shortly after, Seal Beach will hire separate systems
integrator for ongoing maintenance. Seal Beach internal staff will be solely responsible
for the future ongoing maintenance of the TMC and all signal operations.
b. Developing and implementing optimized signal synchronization timing (required)
Synchronization will be the sole responsibility of Seal Beach. Staff has forecasted that
when this project is complete, immediate timing changings will be required to facilitate
nearby construction activities, AM Peak, PM Peak, Mid -day Peak and Weekend Peak. In
2009, Seal Beach was successful in a multi- jurisdictional effort in synchronizing all the
traffic signals on Seal Beach Blvd /Los Alamitos Blvd from PCH to north Los Alamitos city
limits. This grant request will further optimize the corridor.
c. Producing a Before and After Study for the project (required)
Seal Beach will prepare a before and after study to include the following topics:
• Project description: To discuss the current TMC system and communications
gaps. Inventory all physical equipment, and identify the needs.
• Data collection: To collect traffic counts at major intersections and two various
locations during different parts of the year.
• List of TMC improvements
• Recommendations
• Conclusion: a summary of the before and after study and its findings.
d. Engineering design of signal improvements for the project (recommended if not
existing)
The City of Seal Beach will use select through the City's RFP process an engineering
firm to prepare plans to install the new fiber optics and /or upgrade cameras as needed.
6i
e. System integration (optional)
The City of Seal Beach will assume system integration costs.
f. Proposed signal improvements (optional)
With the results of the before study, it will identify if the existing cameras at two
signalized intersections will need to be upgraded. Other signal improvements will be in
the cabinets.
g. Contingencies (optional)
The City of Seal Beach will assume a 10% contingency for the installation of fiber optics.
h. Construction management (optional)
The City of Seal Beach will assume 15% for construction management for the
installation of fiber optics.
Ongoing Maintenance and Operation
The ongoing maintenance and operation period will start after once the new TMC is
relocated and live. The City will select a new contractor or consultant as the City's
systems integrator to monitor and perform routine maintenance. Staff will continue to use
its current traffic signal maintenance company for field operations and to maintain City's
traffic signal equipment.
a. Final report
Seal Beach will prepare the final report for the project. This report will be completed after
the three year grant period. In addition to the CTFP Guideline requirements, the report
will include the before and after report and an update of the results from the ongoing
maintenance and operations phase (general findings from the monthly drives, timing
updates, detection support, etc.).
0
Section 5: Total Proposed Project Cost by Task
Primary Implementation
The Primary Implementation will last for one year and include the following elements (See Table
2).
Table 2. Estimated Cost of Proposed TMC Relocation and Fiber Optic Bridge Gap
a. Project Administration
$20,000
b. Developing and Implementing Optimized Signal Synchronization Timing
$72,000
c. Producing a Before and After Study for the proposed project
$15,000
d. Engineering design of Signal Systems Improvements
$100,000
Total 1 — Project Admin, Developing /Implement Timing, Final Report, and Engineering Design
$207,000
e. System integration
$50,000
f. Proposed Signal System Improvements
Agency
Location
Description of Work at This
Location
Unit
Price
Unit
Measure
Total
Seal Beach
City Corporation
Yard
Decommission ex. TMC
$30,000
LS
$30,000
Seal Beach
City Hall
Construct new TMC
$200,000
LS
$200,000
Seal Beach
Various Locations
Construct new fiber optic
$45 /LF
4,000LF
$180,000
Seal Beach
Various Locations
Upgrade Field Equipment
$4,000 /ea
18
$72,000
Subtotal: Estimated cost of "Proposed Signal System Improvements" (sum of above)
$482,000
g. Contingency (up to 10% of the estimated costs of "Proposed Signal System Improvements ")
$48,200
h. Construction management (uD to 15% of the estimated costs of "Proposed Signal System Improvements" for support
and inspection costs
$72,300
Total 2- Signal System Improvements, Construction Support/Inspection, and Contingency Costs
$652,500
Totals 1 +2
$859,500
Please refer to Chapter 8 of the CTFP Guidelines for additional information about eligible and ineligible items as part of Project P. Examples of eligible
signal synchronization improvements: new or upgraded detection, including inductive loops, video, and others; New or upgraded communication
systems; Replacement of fiber optic or copper cabling; Software and hardware for system traffic control; Interconnect conduit; Intersection /field system
modernization and replacement; Traffic signal controllers; Controller cabinets; CCTV, GPS, etc.; Minor signal improvements; Emergency vehicle preempt
(signal equipment only); Transit signal priority (signal equipment only); Channelization improvements; Traffic signal phasing improvements; New or
upgrades to existing Traffic Management Center (TMC) or Traffic Operations Center (TOC); Motorist information systems; and Adaptive traffic signal
systems.
7
Ongoing Maintenance and Operation
a. Monitoring and improving optimized signal timing
Estimated Cost: $288,000 (see Table 3)
b. Communications and detection support
Estimated Cost: $57,60 0 (see Table 3)
Table 3. Estimated Cost of Proposed Ongoing Maintenance and Operation for Seal Beach Blvd
Description of Work
Description
Unit
Unit
Cost
b. Developing and implementing optimized
signal synchronization timing
3/13
Price
Measure
3/13
Monitoring and
Drive monthly and improve timing parameters along
$500 per
24 signals
$288,000
improving optimized
24 signals for 24 months after signal timing
signal per
for 24
9/14
signal timing
4/13
month
months
12/13
Communications and
Regularly monitor, maintain, and provide reports on
$100 per
24 signals
$57,600
detection support
communication and detection issues along for 24
signal per
for 24
signals for 24 months after signal timing is
month
months
implemented City wide
Project final report
Project team will develop a final report for the project.
Negligible
Negligible
$0
This report will be completed after the three year
rant period.
Proposed Ongoing Maintenance and Operation
$345,600
Total Project Cost Including Primary Implementation and Ongoing Maintenance and
Operation for Three Year Grant Period
Total Estimated Cost: $1,205,100 (Table 2 + Table 3 = $859,500 +$345,600)
Comments( if any): The number of signals include system wide and inter - jurisdictional
connections to Caltrans and Los Alamitos.
Section 6: Project Schedule by Task for the 3 Year Grant Period
Project start date: March, 2013
Project end date: June, 2017
Primary Implementation
Task
Starting Date
Ending Date
a. Project Administration
3/13
3/16
b. Developing and implementing optimized
signal synchronization timing
3/13
6/14
c. Producing a before and after stud
3/13
10/14
d. Engineering design of Signal Systems
Improvement
3/13
12/13
e. System integration
8/14
11/14
f. Proposed Signal System Improvements,
Construction Support/Inspection, and
Contingency Costs
4/13
9/14
g. Contingency
4/13
11/14
h. Construction management
12/13
9/14
n
Onaoina Maintenance and Operation
Task
Starting Date
Ending Date
a. Monitoring and improving optimized signal
timing
6/14
6/17
b. Communications and detection support
6/14
6/17
c. Producing a Final Report
5/17
6/17
Section 7: Matching Funds
Table 2 (Implementation): M2 Funds Requested
$687,600
Phase Match Amount
Amount of
In -kind match amount
Funding Source
Cash match amount
$171,900
Total Phase Cost
$859,500
Table 3 (Ongoing Activities): M2 Funds Requested
$276,480
Phase Match Amount
Amount of
In -kind match amount
Funding Source
Cash match amount
$69,120
Total Phase Cost
$345,600
Project Total: M2 Funds Requested
$964,080
Total Match Amount (min 20 %)
Amount of
In -kind match amount (max 20 %)
Funding Source
Cash match amount
$241,020
Total Project Cost
$1,205,100
Total Match Ratio (to total project cost) $241,020 / $1,205,100 = 20%
Details of Matching Funds
Direct Cash Match -
Amount of
Agency
Funding Source
Phase
Contribution
Seal Beach
CIP
Primary
$171,900
Implementation
On -Going
Seal Beach
CIP
Maintenance and
$69,100
Operations
TOTAL
$241,020
In -kind match (Improvements of equipment)
Specific Improvements (List items and Cost)
A enc
Improvement
Phase
Date of
Construction
Expenditure
Hourly Rate
Agency
Position
$0
Phase
Hours **
(fully
Total
$0
Project
25,672
2.0
$0
On Westminster btw
TOTAL
$0
In -kind match Staffing commitment
* *Note - Staff hours should not exceed staffing and reasonable dedicated time
Section 8: Environmental clearances and other permits
A categorical exemption will be obtained for this project upon project award.
Section 9: Calculations used to Develop Selection Criteria Inputs
1. Vehicle Miles Traveled (VIVIT):
Segment
Staff
Type of
VMT = ADT *D
No. of
Hourly Rate
Agency
Position
Service to
Phase
Hours **
(fully
Total
Project
25,672
2.0
burdened
On Westminster btw
Seal Beach Blvd &
$0
WCL
26,998
0.83
22,408
On Los Alamitos Blvd
$0
btw Bradbury &
Rossmoor Wy
$0
0.33
TOTAL
$0
* *Note - Staff hours should not exceed staffing and reasonable dedicated time
Section 8: Environmental clearances and other permits
A categorical exemption will be obtained for this project upon project award.
Section 9: Calculations used to Develop Selection Criteria Inputs
1. Vehicle Miles Traveled (VIVIT):
Segment
Current Average
Distance (mi)
VMT = ADT *D
Daily Traffic
On Westminster btw
Seal Beach Blvd &
Bolsa Chica
25,672
2.0
51,344
On Westminster btw
Seal Beach Blvd &
WCL
26,998
0.83
22,408
On Los Alamitos Blvd
btw Bradbury &
Rossmoor Wy
41,725
0.33
13,769
On SBB btw Bradbury
& Rossmoor Center
Wy
41,264
0.21
8,665
On SBB btw Rossmoor
Center Wy & St Cloud
49,035
0.28
13,729
On SBB btw St Cloud
& Lampson
47,751
0.17
8,117
10
On SBB btw Lampson
Calculations and Estimated Points
Criteria
& 405 Fwy
48,527
0.28
13,587
On SBB btw 405 fwy &
Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) (20 points)
Golden Rain
43,951
0.61
26,810
On SBB btw Golden
Calculation for VMT/Total Project Cost = 220,237/$1,205,100 =0.18
Rain & Westminster
40,270
0.56
22,551
On SBB btw
Signal Coordination; Communications and detection support; New or
10
upgraded communication systems; Intersection /field system modernization
Westminster & Bolsa
and replacement
4.
Ave
24,687
1.35
33,327
On SBB btw Bolsa &
5.
Maintenance of Effort: (5 points)
5
PCH
17,960
0.33
5,926
Project Scale: (10 points)
Total Project VMT
220,237
Source of current average daily traffic: Most recent corridor counts dated March 2012
11
Calculations and Estimated Points
Criteria
Estimated
Points
1.
Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) (20 points)
VMT = 220,237 (See above Table)
15
2.
Benefit Cost Ratio: (15 points)
0
Calculation for VMT/Total Project Cost = 220,237/$1,205,100 =0.18
3.
Project Characteristics: (10 points)
Signal Coordination; Communications and detection support; New or
10
upgraded communication systems; Intersection /field system modernization
and replacement
4.
Transportation Significance: (10 points)
Priority corridor
10
5.
Maintenance of Effort: (5 points)
5
0 years beyond 3 year grant period
6.
Project Scale: (10 points)
a. Number of signals / Project length (mi) = 18/6.95mi = 2.5sig /mi
7
b. Number of signals being synchronized/ Total number of corridor
signals= 100%
7.
Number of Jurisdictions: (20 points) OC Public Works, Caltrans, Los
Alamitos & Seal Beach
16
8.
Current Project Readiness (5 points)
5
Project start date: March 2013
9,
Funding Match: (5 points)
$241,020 / $1,205,100 = 20%
0
Total Points
68
11
Section 10: Include any additional information or documentation deemed relevant by the
applicant
Project Summary
® All guidelines were met for this project
❑ Not all qualifications were met, provide an explanation below of why
the guidelines were not met for this project.
12