HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Min 2013-04-03 City of Seal Beach - Planning Commission
April 3, 2013
Chair Massa-Lavitt called the regular meeting of the Planning Commission to
order at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers and Commissioner Sloan led the
Salute to the Flag.
ROLL CALL
Present: Chair Massa-Lavitt;
Commissioners: Goldberg, Campbell, Cummings, Sloan
Staff Present: Jim Basham, Director of Community Development
Jerry Olivera, Senior Planner
Crystal Landavazo, Assistant Planner
Quinn Barrow, City Attorney
Tina Knapp, Deputy City Clerk
Linda Devine, City Clerk
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Cummings moved, second by Campbell, to approve the agenda, as presented.
AYES: Goldberg, Campbell, Cummings, Massa-Lavitt, Sloan
NOES: None Motion Carried
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Chair Massa-Lavitt opened oral communications. Speaker(s): Seth Eaker, 13th
Street, reported that the Run Seal Beach event is April 13th — the last day to
register is April 9th. Mr. Eaker also commended the City's police, Lion's, City
staff, and volunteers for ensuring a safe St. Patrick's Day. There were no other
speakers — Chair Massa-Lavitt declared oral communications closed.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Campbell moved, second by Cummings, to approve the recommended actions
on the consent calendar, as presented.
AYES: Campbell, Cummings, Massa-Lavitt, Sloan
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: Goldberg Motion Carried
1. Approved Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of March 20, 2013.
SCHEDULED MATTERS
No items at this time.
Page 2 - Planning Commission 04/03/13
PUBLIC HEARINGS
2. Municipal Code Amendment (MCA) 13-1 [Citywide]
Subject: Municipal Code Amendment (MCA) 13-1 regarding senior
housing, single room occupancy housing, transitional and
supportive housing, emergency shelters, and off-street
parking.
Recommendation: That the Planning Commission review the proposed
amendment to the Municipal Code, required pursuant to
the certified 2008 Housing Element, and adopt the
attached Resolution, Attachment `A', recommending City
Council adoption of the amendment.
The Director of Community Development introduced John Douglas, Housing
Element consultant from J.H. Douglas & Associates. Most of the items before
the Commission are implementation items from the Housing Element currently in
effect (2008-2014). The first item has five sub-parts that have to do with zoning
regulations pertaining to senior housing, single room occupancy housing,
transitional and supportive housing, emergency shelters, and off-street parking.
The first part is regarding senior, age-restricted housing and it makes regulations
for senior housing the same as those for non-age restricted housing. Currently,
there are limitations in senior housing that are not present for non-age restricted
housing. State law requires that senior housing requirements be the same as
those for non-age restricted housing. It was determined that the change to the
City's ordinance was needed when the California Department of Housing and
Community Develop (HCD) reviewed the current Housing Element — the City is
required to standardize the requirements for both. Next, Single Room
Occupancy (SRO) housing requirements:
• Developed out of state law
• Jurisdictions should accommodate a wide-variety of housing types as part
of their zoning regulations
• SRO's are typically lower income, very small, motel type size
• Minimum unit size for one person is 150 square feet
• Minimum unit size for two people is 175 square feet
State law says that cities have to apply the same standards to transition and
supporting housing facilities as they do to any type of conventional residential
use. The difference between transitional and supportive housing is that
supportive housing typically has services that go along with it. Supportive
housing is typically targeted for people who need assistance with their daily
living. Transitional and supportive housing does not change the regulations that
apply to group homes/rehab facilities.
It is currently required by state law that units within an affordable housing
development that are studio and 1 bedroom are required to have one off-street
parking space. In the ordinance, the City is conforming its regulations to meet
this requirement.
Page 3 - Planning Commission 04/03/13
As part of state law, every city in the state has to identify at least one zoning
district where an emergency shelter can be established by a simple
administrative procedure. The ordinance would conform the City's regulations to
state law, establish definition in the Municipal Code, and establish the
development standards of emergency shelters. The standards include a cap of
10 beds and require separation of emergency shelters of at least 300 feet and
require the operator to submit a management plan including hours of operation,
staffing, security, and intake. Emergency shelters are allowed on the Boeing
property as part of the Boeing Specific Plan.
Chair Massa-Lavitt opened the public hearing. Speakers: Seth Eaker, 13th
Street, reported that the Chamber of Commerce has two issues with the
proposed Municipal Code Amendment 13-1 language — the use of the word
"hotels" in Section 11.4.05.127 and ensuring that the language in Section
11.6.05.010 does not conflict with the City's current policies regarding vacation
rentals. Mr. Eaker also commented that the business community feedback in
general seemed to support Boeing as the location for an emergency shelter.
Rick Bennett, Blue Heron, is the Heron Pointe Homeowners Association
president and indicated that neither he nor any of the neighbors he had spoken
with received notice of tonight's public hearings; he was informed by his
accountant, who lives in Island Village in Long Beach, that the Planning
Commission was hearing issues related to the Boeing and Accurate Storage
properties. He requested that the hearings be continued to a later date so that
more residents could participate. Staff confirmed that 138 property owners within
a 500-foot radius were mailed the hearing notice and that it was published in the
"Sun" newspaper pursuant to Municipal Code requirements. This was beyond
the minimum requirements in that the only requirement was to publish the notice
in the paper. The City Attorney commented that there would be two other
opportunities to speak on these items — at public hearings before the City
Council.
Four speakers voiced concern about the extent of noticing for this item and one
voiced concern about traffic that would result from this item. One other speaker
was opposed to the item before the Commission. There were no other speakers
— Chair Massa-Lavitt declared the public hearing closed.
It was clarified that if the Planning Commission takes no action on this item
tonight that it is presented to the City Council as recommended for approval from
the Commission pursuant to Section 11.5.15.020 of the Seal Beach Municipal
Code. Postponing the hearing on this item would affect the timing in meeting the
deadline for the Housing Element. The decision identifying the Boeing property
as the location for possible emergency shelters was decided upon by the City
Council last year.
Page 4 - Planning Commission 04/03/13
After Planning Commission deliberation; Goldberg moved, second by Cummings,
to adopt Resolution 13-4 adopting Municipal Code Amendment 13-1 regarding
senior housing, single room occupancy housing, transitional and supportive
housing, emergency shelters, and off-street parking with direction to staff that two
changes be made — ensure that the language in Section 11 .6.05.010 does not
conflict with the City's current policies regarding vacation rentals and the word
"hotel" be replaced with "units" in Section 11.4.05.127. Staff will also correct the
error on page eight of Municipal Code Amendment 13-1, in Section 11 .6.05.010,
where "due to a person's" language is repeated.
AYES: Goldberg, Campbell, Cummings, Massa-Lavitt, Sloan
NOES: None Motion Carried
With no objections, the Chair ordered that staff extend the mailing of notices of
public hearings regarding Housing Element items at/near the Boeing property to
the property owners in Heron Pointe.
3. Specific Plan Amendment 13-2
Boeing Integrated Defense Systems (BIDS) Specific Plan Area
Subject: Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) 13-2 to the Boeing
Integrated Defense Systems (BIDS) Specific Plan
regarding emergency shelters.
Recommendation: That the Planning Commission review the proposed
amendment to the BIDS Specific Plan, required pursuant
to the certified 2008-2014 Housing Element, and adopt the
attached Resolution, Attachment 'A', recommending City
Council adoption of the amendment and Mitigated
Negative Declaration with Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program.
Mr. Douglas provided the staff report on this item. The ordinance regarding MCA
13-1 amends the Municipal Code to allow emergency shelters. The Municipal
Code references the development standards that would apply to emergency
shelters and references the Boeing Specific Plan as the location within the City
where they would be permitted subject to the development standards. This
amendment is to the BIDS Specific Plan that would specifically allow emergency
shelters as part of the regulations for the Specific Plan in three of the four
planning areas. Mr. Douglas provided a map of the Boeing Specific Plan
showing the four planning areas. The draft ordinance to amend the BIDS
Specific Plan would allow the shelters to be located anywhere in Planning Areas
1, 2, and 3. Planning Area 4 is excluded as an option. Development standards
include:
• Maximum of 10 beds
• Minimum 300 foot separation between shelters
• Management Plan required (hours, staffing, security, etc.)
Page 5 - Planning Commission 04/03/13
The permission of the property owner would be required to build an emergency
shelter, the City does not build emergency shelters — they are built by private or
non-profit entities. The property owner retains control of the property. No
emergency shelter would be established unless the landowner was to sell or
lease property for this purpose.
There is no state law specifying number of beds, other than the general
requirement that cities have to be able to accommodate the estimated number of
homeless population. 10 beds was chosen because it was at the small end of
the range that is typically being considered in cities in Orange County.
Chair Massa-Lavitt opened the public hearing. Speakers: Seth Eaker, 13th
Street, reported that the Chamber of Commerce would support staff's
recommendation that Planning Area 1 be used for this purpose; in addition, he
commented on Accurate Storage as commercial industrial space and the
Chamber would generally support the recommendations, but would ask for
consideration that light industrial/commercial be continued on this property. Marc
Loopesko, Old Town, asked for clarification as to what would happen if the City
denied all of these zone changes — what is the state's penalty to any given
municipality. The City Attorney advised that historically the two main concerns
surrounding adopting of the Housing Element are that building permits City-wide
could be suspended by the state and that City-wide funding can be withheld. Mr.
Douglas advised that the state has said that any city that does not implement
these ordinances will not be eligible to receive certification of 2008-2014 Housing
Element —the current Housing Element will be out of compliance — and the 2013-
2021 Housing Element will not be eligible for certification.
Rick Bennett, Blue Heron, indicated again that neither he nor any of the
neighbors he had spoken with received notice of tonight's public hearings. There
were no other speakers — Chair Massa-Lavitt declared the public hearing closed.
Mr. Douglas advised that the more restrictive a City is, the greater the scrutiny
from the HCD.
Commissioner Goldberg indicated he would prefer to limit the zoning to Planning
Area 1, but if the Commission moved forward with all three planning areas then
he would like to postpone the hearing until residents of Heron Pointe could
attend. Commissioner Sloan concurred with Goldberg.
After Planning Commission deliberation; Cummings moved, second by
Campbell, to adopt Resolution 13-5 adopting Specific Plan Amendment 13-2 to
add emergency shelters to list of permitted uses in the Boeing Integrated
Defense Systems (BIDS) Specific Plan.
AYES: Campbell, Cummings, Massa-Lavitt
NOES: Goldberg, Sloan Motion Carried
Page 6 - Planning Commission 04/03/13
With no objections, Chair Massa-Lavitt called for a recess at 8:51 p.m. and
reconvened the meeting at 9:00 p.m.
4. General Plan Amendment (GPA) 13-3
Zoning Map Amendment (ZMA) 13-4
1011 Seal Beach Boulevard (Accurate Storage)
Subject: General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment for
a 4.5 acre parcel at 1011 Seal Beach Boulevard to
implement Program 1a of the 2008 — 2014 Housing
Element of the City's General Plan.
Recommendation: That the Planning Commission review the proposed
General Plan and Zoning Map amendments for the
Accurate Storage property, pursuant to the certified 2008
Housing Element, and adopt the attached Resolution,
Attachment 'A', recommending City Council adoption of
these amendments and Mitigated Negative Declaration
with Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
Mr. Douglas indicated in the previous Housing Element cycle the City was not
able to demonstrate that it had enough sites for high density housing to meet its
fair-share need. In order to obtain certification of the Housing Element, the City
was required to commit to adopting one or more zone changes that would create
additional high density zoning to meet the minimum requirement. The City had a
shortfall of 19 high density housing units. The City was required to identify a
site(s) that could accommodate at least 19 housing units. There was a lengthy
vetting process reviewing a variety of sites, including the Shops at Rossmoor and
the Boeing property. The Accurate Metals, now Accurate Storage, property is
4.5 acres in size and an environmental review was done and a mitigated
negative declaration was posted for the project. The environmental review that
was done was for the maximum development that could occur, which is for 90
residential units — derived from 4.5 acres times 20 units per acre, which is the
maximum density allowed in the RHD zone. This amendment would allow the
owner to redevelop to residential should he so choose. A traffic study was done
for the project and concluded that if the project were developed at the maximum
90 unites there would be no significant traffic impacts.
Chair Massa-Lavitt opened the public hearing. Speakers: Jim Caviola, Ocean
Avenue, indicated he felt developing 90 units was too many when only 19 were
required, another location should be found for this requirement, and that Heron
Pointe should have been notified of this hearing. Another speaker also felt 90
units were too many when only 19 were required. Two other speakers were
opposed to the item before the Commission and felt another location should be
found. Michelle Gamble, Blue Heron, indicated that neither she nor any of the
neighbors she had spoken with received notice of tonight's public hearings. She
also opposed the item before the Commission.
Page 7 - Planning Commission 04/03/13
Alisha Patterson, Rattan & Tucker, spoke as the representative for the property
owner. The owner of the property supports the rezoning of the property to
residential on the condition that MCA 13-5 be adopted, allowing him to continue
using his property for industrial use purposes. There were no other speakers —
Chair Massa-Lavitt declared the public hearing closed.
Chair Massa-Lavitt indicated she felt the Shops at Rossmoor parking lot is a
better site for this purpose. Staff indicated that the radius point used for the
public hearing notice included homes in Heron Pointe towards the end of the cul-
de-sac.
After Planning Commission deliberation; Goldberg moved that the public hearing
be deferred to the next meeting — motion failed as no second was made.
Sloan moved that Resolution 13-6 be approved with the recommendation to City
Council that the property be zoned for both high density residential (limited to
what is required in the Housing Element) and low density residential use —
motion failed as no second was made.
Goldberg moved that Resolution 13-6 be denied and recommend to the City
Council that Boeing create a Planning Area 5 (one acre) for the purpose of
zoning for residential units — motion failed as no second was made.
Campbell moved, second by Cummings, to adopt Resolution 13-6 adopting
General Plan Amendment 13-3 and Zoning Map Amendment 13-4 and Mitigated
Negative Declaration with Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
regarding the property located at 1011 Seal Beach Boulevard and designating
said property for Residential High Density Use.
AYES: Campbell, Cummings
NOES: Goldberg, Massa-Lavitt, Sloan Motion Failed
No other motion was made; therefore, the item is forwarded to City Council as a
recommendation for approval pursuant to Section 11 .5.15.020 of the Seal Beach
Municipal Code.
5. Municipal Code Amendment (MCA) 13-5 [Citywide]
Subject: Municipal Code Amendment (MCA) 13-5 regarding non-
conforming uses
Recommendation: That the Planning Commission review the proposed
amendment to the Municipal Code regarding the standards
and procedures for non-conforming uses, and adopt the
attached Resolution, Attachment 'A', recommending City
Council adoption of the amendment.
Mr. Douglas reported that this item reflects the City's desire to move forward with
the Accurate Storage site in a manner that the property owner can support. MCA
Page 8 - Planning Commission 04/03/13
13-5 indicates that non-conforming uses may continue indefinitely even though
they do not conform to the zoning.
Chair Massa-Lavitt opened the public hearing. Speakers: Alisha Patterson,
Rattan & Tucker, spoke as the representative for the property owner. MCA 13-5
is important to the owner so that he can continue using his property for industrial
use purposes. There were no other speakers — Chair Massa-Lavitt declared the
public hearing closed.
After Planning Commission deliberation; Sloan moved, second by Cummings, to
adopt Resolution 13-7 adopting Municipal Code Amendment 13-5 regarding
nonconforming uses and structures.
AYES: Goldberg, Campbell, Cummings, Massa-Lavitt, Sloan
NOES: None Motion Carried
DIRECTOR'S REPORT
The Director of Community Development stated that the Request for Proposal
deadline for the Local Coastal Program deadline passed; proposals were
received, interviews will be held, and Staff will recommend action to the City
Council in the near future. The deadline for the Request for Proposal for the
restaurant space at the end of the pier ends April 12th. Several interested parties
have contacted the property management company and indicated they will
submit proposals.
COMMISSION CONCERNS
Staff was asked to provide each Commissioner with the sections of the Municipal
Code relevant to planning. Staff was asked to look at improving the process of
noticing for public hearings — consider placing 1/4 page ads in the "Sun".
ADJOURNMENT
With no objections, Chair Massa-Lavitt adjourned the Planning Commission
meeting at 10:22 p.m.
Deputy City Cler
Approved: f � ' 4 %IT?)
Chair
Attest: ---/ tjHN itr
Deputy City Clerk