HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC AG PKT 2014-04-14 #F AGENDA STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 14, 2014
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
THRU: Jill R. Ingram, City Manager
FROM: Sean P. Crumby P.E., Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: 2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORT
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
That the City Council adopt the 2014 Pavement Management Program (PMP)
Report.
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS:
The Pavement Management Program is an asset management system used by
agencies to effectively and equitably manage a street system for an entire city.
The management system catalogs and rates all of the streets within the City. It
also maps out the performance of the streets over time and with projected budget
numbers, and prepares recommendations for future maintenance and
rehabilitation. This management system helps agencies not only to maximize the
efficiency of the funds spent, but also helps to plan future needs for the City.
Pavement Management became prevalent during the 1990's. During that period
-the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) began requiring that cities
implement a Pavement Management Program to remain eligible to receive
Measure M street funding. OCTA has since updated the request that all streets
within the City are included within a Pavement Management Program (PMP) that
is updated every 2 years. The State of California also requires that Pavement
Management Programs are implemented in order to receive Gas Tax funding.
Currently, the City receives approximately $350,000 in Measure M turnback
funds annually, and has historically received over $300,000 annually in
competitive Measure M grants.
The City of Seal Beach has been utilizing a PMP since the early part of the
1990's, and has been updating that system every two years since 2004. The
City of Seal Beach has invested heavily on the street system during this time and
the PMP has assisted the City with optimizing this investment. In 2004 the City
began utilizing a software system called the Metropolitan Transportation System
for PMP. In 2009 OCTA prepared a study and standardized the requirements of
the PMP that the cities utilize. One of the requirements is that the streets be
Agenda Item F
rated on a 0-100 scale. Many of the agencies (including Seal Beach) had
already been on this system, but standardizing allowed the State to compare
ratings among agencies. It also has allowed the State to compile the information
from all of the agencies into a comprehensive report (California Statewide Local
Streets and Roads Needs Assessment) that is used to lobby for transportation
funding in Sacramento. OCTA has compiled a report entitled "Countywide
Assessment of Existing and Future Pavement Needs" with similar goals in mind.
The firm of Nichols Consulting Engineers (NCE) was selected to prepare this
update. NCE promptly sent a team of inspectors to the City to evaluate every
street within the City. NCE then prepared the Pavement Management Report.
NCE has authored both the County and Statewide reports and are experts in this
field.
The City of Seal Beach has been extremely effective in management of the City's
streets and roadways. A comparison of the average rating or Pavement
Condition Index within the last two years is listed below. A rating of 100 indicates
a new pavement and 0 is a failed pavement.
Agency Average PCI
State of California 68
County of Orange 77
City of Seal Beach 84
Orange County in general has been effective in maintaining the networks of
streets and roads with the Measure M Program. Of the 35 agencies within
Orange County, the City of Seal Beach has a PCI ranking that is one of the
highest in the County.
A copy of the report has been available for review at the Public Works
Department and is included as attachment "B".
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:
This project complies with all requirements of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) and is categorically exempt under section 15301.
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
No legal analysis is required for this item.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
There is no impact to the General Fund with this action. The proposed
Pavement Management Program identifies approximately $14.9 million in street
improvements that could be made if the City had an unlimited budget.
Page 2
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt the 2014 Pavement Management Program Report.
SUBMITTED BY: NOTED AND APPROVED:
G '
Sean P. Crumby, P.E. ill . Ingram,
Director of Public Works Ci y Manager
Prepared by: David Spitz, Associate Engineer
Attachments:
A. 2014 Pavement Management Program Report
Page 3
4 r
INCE Collaboration. Coinniftent. Confidence"'
City of Seal Beach SEA(e�q
2013-2014 Pavement Management Program Update
211 8th Street
Seal Beach, CA 90740 IFORN�P
fill•1
Final Report
April 2014
A334.08.30
�pFESSIO
� m
C 045027
LU
EXP.'S 3/
sp CIViV\�o��`P
OF CAS
Margot Yapp, PE
Vice President
Fountain Valley, CA
9550 Warner Ave., Suite 232
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
(714) 848-8897
Cngineering&Environmental Services -�� -
City of Seal Beach
2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................. 1
PavementBudget.................................................................................................. 4
INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................5
Purpose............................................................................................................... 5
City's Street Network............................................................................................. 6
Existing Pavement Condition................................................................................... 7
MAINTENANCE & REHABILITATION STRATEGIES...................................... 12
Pay Now or Pay More Later................................................................................... 12
Expenditures for Pavement Maintenance .................................................. 14
FUNDINGSOURCES................................................................................... 15
MeasureM2 Turnback.......................................................................................... 15
Measure M2 Competitive Grants............................................................................ 15
Local Revenues/General Funds.............................................................................. 15
GasTax............................................................................................................. 15
BUDGETNEEDS ......................................................................................... 16
BUDGET SCENARIOS ................................................................................. 18
Scenario 1: Unconstrained Budget......................................................................... 19
Scenario 2: Maintain the Current PCI of 83............................................................. 20
Scenario 3: Existing Budget.................................................................................. 21
Scenario4: Do Nothing........................................................................................ 22
SUMMARY ................................................................................................. 23
CONCLUSIONS ..........................................................................................26
a. Pavement Funding........................................................................................... 26
b. Pavement Maintenance Strategies ..................................................................... 28
c. Maintenance and Rehabilitation Decision Tree...................................................... 28
d. Pavement Management Program Update............................................................. 28
Appendix A: OCTA certification letter
Appendix B: QC Plan
Appendix C: Street Inventory - PCI Report
Appendix D: Work History
Appendix E: MPAH Resurfacing Program
Local Resurfacing Program & Local Slurry Program
Appendix F: Seven-Year Work Plan
MPAH (current funding)
Local (current funding)
Appendix G: Alternate Funding Alternatives
i
Engineering&Environmental Services www.ncenet.com
City of Seal Beach
2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
Tables Index
Table 1. Network Summary Statistics by Functional Class ............................................. 5
Table 2. Percent of Pavement Area by Condition (2012) ............................................... 8
Table 3. Pavement Condition by Functional Class (2014) .............................................. 9
Table 4. Historical PCI Breakdown (2004-2014)......................................................... 10
Table 5. Network Average PCI (2004-2014) .............................................................. 10
Table 6. Pavement Budgets (2004-2018).................................................................. 14
Table 7. Seven-Year Preventative Program Cycle....................................................... 14
Table 8. Summary of Results from Needs Analysis ..................................................... 16
Table 9. Summary of Results for Scenario 1.............................................................. 19
Table 10. Summary of Results for Scenario 2 ............................................................ 20
Table 11. Summary of Results for Scenario 3 ............................................................ 21
Table 12. Summary of Results for Scenario 4............................................................ 22
Figures Index
Figure 1. Current Pavement Condition by % of Network Area ........................................ 9
Figure 2. Costs to Maintain Pavements Over Time...................................................... 13
Figure 3. Cost Effectiveness of Treatments ............................................................... 17
Figure 4. PCI vs. Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 1................................................ 19
Figure 5. PCI vs. Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 2................................................ 20
Figure 6. PCI vs. Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 3................................................ 21
Figure 7. PCI vs. Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 4................................................ 22
Figure 8. Pavement Condition by Scenario by Year..................................................... 23
Figure 9. Deferred Maintenance by Scenario by Year.................................................. 24
Figure 10. Percentage of Road Network Area of Each Condition Category for Different
BudgetScenarios................................................................................................... 25
Figure 11. Asphalt Price Index (1999-2013, Caltrans)................................................. 27
ii
Engineering&Environmental Services F www.ncenet.com
kk
City of Seal Beach
2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
M2 - BIENNIAL SUBMITTAL
CITY OF SEAL BEACH
DUE: MONDAY, JUNE 30, 2014
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................... 1-3
1. Pavement Management Program certification .......................... Appendix A
2. QC/QA Plan .........................................................................Appendix B
3. Micro PAVER data files ....................................................................... CD
a. Street name
b. Section identifiers (Branch ID, Section ID)
c. Direction (if applicable)
d. Begin and end of section
e. Length, widths and true areas
f. Rank (arterials, collector, local etc)
g. Number of travel lanes
h. Pavement Condition Index (PCI) and date of inspection
i. Type of recommended treatment
j. Cost of recommended treatment
4. Pavement Management Plan
a. Average (weighted by area) PCI
i. Entire pavement network ...................................... Appendix C
ii. MPAH streets .......................................................Appendix C
iii. Local Streets (LSS) ...............................................Appendix C
b. Projected PCI under existing funding levels (2014 through 2020)
i. Entire pavement network ....................................... Appendix E
ii. MPAH streets ....................................................... Appendix E
iii. Local Streets (LSS) ............................................... Appendix E
c. Seven-year work plan for M&R
(by street sections, with treatments based on existing budget)
i. Street name ........................................................ Appendix F
ii. Limits of work ...................................................... Appendix F
iii. Lengths and widths............................................... Appendix F
iv. Pavement areas
1. Each street ................................................... Appendix F
2. Total area for Local Streets (LSS)...................... Appendix F
3. Total area for MPAH streets .............................. Appendix F
4. Total area for entire public streets network.........Appendix F
Engineering&Enviruimleni.al oer4ices L www.ncenet.com
City ofSeal Beach
2013-14 Pa ement Management P Update
v. FUO[1iOOd| C|dSSifiCdMOOS /Se[t|OO rdOk3\ .................. Appendix E
vi. PCI and most n8C8Ot date Of |O5pe[t|OO .................... Appendix C
vii. Type Of tn8dtrO8Ot.................................................. Appendix E
v/8. Cost Of tr8dtrO8Ot .................................................. Appendix E
ix. Year Of treatment .................................................. Appendix E
o( Alternative funding levels required to:
i. Ma|Otd|O existing average O8tvvOrk PCI......................Appendix G
/i. TO irOpn]v8 average network PCI .............................Appendix G
5. BdCWOg by year Of unfunded pavement n8hdhi||tdMOn, n8StOrdMOn and
n8COOStnUCt|OO O88dS ................................................................. 19 - 22
6. M2 |OCd| match r8dU[tiOn.................................................................... 10
iv EngiO88h /�
O� EOVi[ODnl8Otal Services
Ilk
City of Seal Beach
2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Seal Beach performs biennial updates of its Pavement Management
Program (PMP) to assist policy makers in the best use of City funds for street
maintenance while complying with the Orange County Transportation Authority
(OCTA)'s Measure M2 Program. This report summarizes the findings from the
2013/2014 PMP Update.
The City is responsible for the maintenance and repair of approximately 41.3
centerline miles of pavements, which includes 12.6 miles in the Master Plan Arterial
Highway (MPAH) "Arterial" network and 28.7 miles of local streets. In order to
manage this network, the City utilizes the Micro PAVER pavement management
program (PMP).
The current weighted average Pavement Condition Index' (PCI) of the City is 83.
Overall, more than half of the City's Street network is in the every good" and "good"
condition category. Approximately nineteen percent (18.9%) of the pavement
network area is in the "Poor" or "Very Poor" condition category. Table 1 provides a
breakdown of the network PCI based on the functional class, and shows that local
streets are currently in better condition than the Arterials/MPAH network.
Weighted Functional Pavement Centerline
Average Classification F Area (sf) 11 Mileage 11 PCI
Arterial/MPAH 4,191,202 12.6 75
Local Streets 5,259,654 28.7 89
Total
1 The weighted average PCI is a result of multiplying the area of each street section by the PCI of that section,
totaling all of the sections together and then dividing by the total of the network areas or functional classification.
1
Engmuering&E( vu L)mi ic0Lai Lei vi6u6 •
City of Seal Beach
"�,<,F,wl 2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
Table 2 offers a summary of the current network condition by condition category.
Condition
of
Category Range of
j�� j (sf)
Arterials/MPAH 21.4 2,023,514
Very Good 86-100
Local 46.3 4,374,550
Arterials/MPAH 7.8 733,325
Good 75-85
Local 2.3 217,860
Arterials/MPAH 1.2 110,540
60-74
Local 2.2 207,974
Arterials/MPAH 4.7 446,389
Poor 41-59
Local 2.9 274,466
Arterials/MPAH 9.3 877,434
Very Poor 0-40
Local 2.0 184,804
The incentive is a 10% reduction in local matching fund requirements, if either of
the following conditions apply i.e.
a) Show measurable improvement of paved road conditions during the previous
reporting period defined as an overall weighted (by area) average system
improvement of one PCI point with no reduction in the overall weighted (by
area) average PCI in the Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) or local
street categories;
or
b) Have road pavement conditions during the previous reporting period within
the highest 20% of the scale for road pavement conditions in conformance
with OCTA Ordinance No. 3, defined as a PCI of 75 or higher.
The City's PCI rating continues to comply with the Measure M2 subparagraph "b"
above. Since 2008, the City has maintained a PCI greater than 75. Even though
the analysis for this update shows the potential decrease in the overall PCI from 85
to 83, the City will still remain eligible for the 10% reduction in local matching fund
requirement.
2
Engineering&Environmental Services IF www,ncenet.com
Ilk
City of Seal Beach
2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
Four budget scenarios were performed as part of this report to illustrate budget
impacts on the City's roadway network. The first two scenarios include an unlimited
budget and to keep the network in its current condition. A third budget scenario
was run with the premise of keeping the average PCI above 75 (keep the City
eligible for the 10% reduction). And finally scenario four deals with the premise
that the City has zero dollars for its pavement maintenance and rehabilitation for
the next seven years.
Scenario 1: Unconstrained Budget — the total amount for the next seven years
and the budget for each year are the same as identified in the budget needs
analysis, i.e. $14.9 million. This scenario will spend $10.8 million in 2014 to
rehabilitate the City's entire pavement. It will improve the condition of the streets
to a PCI of 87 by 2020 and eliminate the unfunded backlog.
Scenario 2: Maintain PCI at 83 - The budget required to maintain the City's
streets at a PCI of 83 would be $10.1 million over the next seven years. In the
meantime, the unfunded backlog will decrease from $8.9 million to $8.4 million by
2020.
Scenario 3: Existing Budget - This scenario illustrates the impacts on the
network at the City's current budget of $4.0 million over seven years. The PCI of
the network will deteriorate to 74, and the unfunded backlog will grow from $5.3
million to $16.4 million by 2020.
Scenario 4: Do Nothing — This Scenario illustrates that a zero budget will
increase the unfunded backlog to $24.1 million after seven years and the pavement
condition will deteriorate from a PCI of 83 to 68 by 2020.
Note that the unfunded backlog consists of pavement maintenance that is needed,
but which cannot be accomplished due to lack of funding. Shrinking budgets have
forced many California cities and counties to defer much-needed road maintenance.
By deferring maintenance, there are multiple consequences including, the
frequency of citizens' complaints about the condition of the network, the amount of
claims increases and the cost to repair these roads rises as well.
All pavement inspections were completed during the winter months of 2013/2014
and do not reflect the planned or designed work intended to go out to construction
during fiscal year 2013/2014. Funds budgeted for construction during the summer
of 2014 include approximately $2,000,000 for Westminster Avenue from Seal Beach
Blvd to Bolsa Chica Road along with $100,000 for local road paving and $50,000 for
slurry seal treatments. Any and all work completed in this current year will be
reflected in the next biennial report in 2016. As a result, PCI ratings have
decreased slightly since the PMP report in 2014 owing mostly to current fiscal year
road paving not occurring before the street network was rated during the winter
months of 2013/2014.
3
Engineering&Environmental Services www,ncenet.com
1�SEA-4-
j
City of Seal Beach
C'941Foft 2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
Pavement Budget
The City's current budget for pavement maintenance and rehabilitation is $4.03
million for next seven years. At this budget level, the network average PCI is
expected to decrease from the current level of 83, which is in "Good" condition
category, to 75. In addition, 17% of the network will fall in the "Poor" and "Very
Poor" category.
As a minimum, we suggest that the City of Seal Beach consider increasing
pavement expenditures to achieve the following objectives:
• To preserve and improve pavements in the "Good" category
• Reduce the percentage of pavements in the "Poor" and "Very Poor"
categories
• Maintain the average PCI at 80
Conclusions
The City has a street system that is in overall "Good" condition with more than half
of the streets currently in the "Good" to "Very Good" categories and a network
average PCI of 83. Approximately, 19% of the City's street network currently falls
into the "Very Poor" to "Poor" categories.
The City has met OCTA's Measure M2 Program requirements for receiving a 10%
reduction in the local funding match by maintaining a PCI higher than 75 .
Current funding levels will result in a reduction in the overall PCI to 74 by 2021.
This is a concern that needs to be addressed.
NCE recommends that the City consider:
• Increasing the funding level in order to maintain a current PCI above 75. This
will allow the City to continue to meet OCTA's requirements for receiving a
10% reduction in the local funding match.
• Seek out grants or alternate funds that might be available to supplement
existing funding.
• Update the pavement management system as required by OCTA to ensure
that Measure M2 funds are not jeopardized.
• As part of the biennial update, the maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R)
decision trees and the associated unit costs should be reviewed and updated
to reflect new construction techniques/methods as well as changes in costs to
keep the budget analysis results reliable and accurate. At the same time, any
M&R activities should be updated in the City's database biennially.
4
Engineering&Environmental Services
City of Seal Beach
2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
INTRODUCTION
The City of Seal Beach has utilized a Pavement Management Program (PMP) to
manage its street network since 2004. The first PMP software used was the
StreetSaver® program, but in 2010, the City converted to the Micro PAVER software
to be compliant with the requirements of the Orange County Transportation
Authority (OCTA). Both programs are similar and rate pavements on a 0-100
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) scale.
Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd. (NCE) was selected by the City of Seal Beach to
update the City's pavement management system in 2013. The entire network
(approximately 41 centerline miles or 214 pavement sections) were surveyed. The
surveys were completed in October 2013, and all survey data were entered into
Micro PAVER database.
The table below summarizes the lengths and area of the pavement network by
functional class:
Functional Sections Centerline Lane Miles Area (sf)
Class Miles 11 A
Arterial 21 10.0 40.6 3,721,087.00
Collector 41 8.5 16.1 1,225,365.00
Residential 152 22.7 44.2 3,151,071.00
r—Totalls 214 41. 1 9,450,856.00
Table 1. Network Summary Statistics by Functional Class
As part of this project, a pavement needs analysis was performed on the pavement
network. Four budgetary scenarios were also analyzed.
Purpose
The main goals were:
1. Updating the existing pavement network and performing condition surveys.
2. Updating historical maintenance, e.g., previously resurfaced pavements.
3. Updating the maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) decision tree and
associated costs.
4. Performing budgetary analysis and determining the funding needs.
The purpose of this report is to assist decision makers in utilizing the results of the
Micro PAVER PMP. Specifically, this report links the recommended repair program
costs to the City of Seal Beach's current and projected budget alternatives to
improve overall maintenance and rehabilitation strategies. This report assesses the
5
Engineering&Environmental Services F www,ncenet.com
City of Seal Beach
2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
adequacy of existing revenues to meet the maintenance needs recommended, and
maximizes the return from expenditures by:
• Implementing a multi-year road rehabilitation and maintenance program;
• Developing a preventative maintenance program; and
• Selecting streets for the most cost effective repairs.
The report describes the overall condition of the City's maintained roads and
highlights options for improving them. These options are developed by conducting
"what-if" analyses using the Micro PAVER program. The effects of different funding
strategies by varying the budget amounts available for pavement maintenance and
repair of the City's roads can be demonstrated over the next seven years.
Citv'c, g5tr+-et. NP—tkmorlle
The City of Seal Beach was incorporated in 1915 and has been in operation under
its own charter since 1964. It covers an area of 11.6 square miles in the western
corner of Orange County. The City's total population in 2010 was 24,168.
Originally called Bay City, Seal Beach was developed in the early 1900's as a resort
destination for residents of the Los Angeles area. Its early growth was accelerated
by the construction of the Pacific Electric Railway Trolley, which reached the City in
1906. In 1926, oil was discovered in the City and the oil boom that followed
resulted in the development of Seal Beach into the mainly residential community it
is today.
The City is divided into several distinct communities, each of which is described in
detail in the following paragraphs.
Old Town comprises the area south of Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) and Marina
Drive, between 1st Street and Seal Beach Boulevard, and was developed in the
1920's. It is the oldest area within the City's corporate limits. High density
residential and commercial land uses are prevalent in this area. Large single-family
residential lots located directly on the beach are found in the Gold Coast District.
The City's mile long beach in Old Town is used for surfing and swimming. The Seal
Beach Pier, located at the end of Main Street, provides a regional attraction to the
City.
Much of Old Town dates back to the 1920's. The original street network was laid out
in a grid formation and constructed of concrete. Over the years, many of these
streets have been overlaid with asphalt.
Bridgeport is the area located west of PCH, north of Marina Drive and
southwesterly of San Gabriel River. It was primarily developed in the 1960's and
consists of medium and high density residential land uses.
Marina Hill was developed in the 1950's and consists of single-family homes. This
area is located north of PCH and west of Seal Beach Boulevard, adjacent to the
6
Engineering&Environmental Services I L www,ncenet.com
City of Seal Beach
2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
southerly edge of the Hellman Ranch property. It is further divided into Marina Hill-
North and Marina Hill-South with Bolsa Avenue forming the boundary.
Surfside, a colony which was incorporated in the 1960's, consists of single-family
homes located on the south portion of Anaheim Bay. Although a gated community,
pedestrian and bicycle access to the beach is available.
Leisure World covers the portion of the City between Westminster Boulevard and
the San Diego Freeway westerly of Seal Beach Boulevard. It was built in 1961. It
is a gated retirement community of 600 acres. Leisure World provides a secure,
serene environment for seniors 55 and older. Medical, religious, commercial and
recreational facilities are all provided within the compound limits.
College Park East is a single-family residential area developed in the late 1960's.
It is located between the San Diego Freeway and Lampson Avenue, west of the
Bolsa Chica Channel in the northeast section of the City. Streets within this
community were constructed in the late sixties. The original thickness of the asphalt
concrete was only 2 inches over poor underlying soil and too thin to accommodate
the traffic loads.
College Park West is a small neighborhood bordering Long Beach. It is located in
North West of the City. Its streets are named after colleges.
Private Streets
The following neighborhoods have private streets and are maintained by an
association and no City funds go toward their maintenance.
• Leisure World
• Centex Homes
• Riverbeach Condominiums
• Surfside
• Heron Pointe
Existing Pavement Condition
As previously noted, the City of Seal Beach is responsible for the repair and
maintenance of approximately 41 centerline miles of streets. The surface area of
the network is approximately 9.5 million square feet or 1 million square yards. The
replacement value of the City's streets is approximately $87.4 million. (This is the
cost to replace the pavement and does not include sidewalk, ramps, curb & gutter
etc.)
The Pavement Condition Index (PCI) is a measurement of pavement grade or
condition and ranges from 0 to 100. A newly constructed road would have a PCI of
100, while very poor streets would have a PCI of 40 or less.
7
Engineering&Environmental Services
City of Seal Beach
"�,<,F,wl 2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
Table 2 provides pavement condition breakdown by PCI ranges or condition
category and summarizes the condition of the network in the City of Seal Beach. A
large portion of the City's streets are in "Good" or "Very Good" condition category,
as shown in Figure 1. Table 3 provides the pavement condition by Functional Class.
Description
The pavement is new or almost new and will not
Very o require significant improvement for some time, but
Good 86-100 67.7% may require localized minor repairs. The pavement
is structurally sound and has very little or no
rou hness.
The pavement is in good shape but has some
Good 75-85 10.0% surface defects indicating the need for routine
maintenance. The pavement is generally
structurally sound and has only minor roughness.
The pavement has a fair number of defects such as
cracking, material loss, depressions, etc. indicating
60-74 3.4% the need for maintenance or repair. The pavement
is beginning to become structurally deficient and
may have noticeable roughness.
The pavement has significant defects such as major
cracking, significant surface distortions and
Poor 41-59 7.6% material loss indicating a need for rehabilitation
(i.e. structural improvement). The pavement is
structurally deficient and has noticeable roughness.
The pavement has major defects indicating the
Very Poor 0-40 11.3% need for major rehabilitation or reconstruction. The
pavement is structurally inadequate.
T;oble 2. Percent of Pavement Area by Condition (2012
8
Engineering&Environmental Services IF www,ncenet.com
Ilk
City of Seal Beach
2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
Very Poor,
11.3%
Poor, 7.6%�
■Good/Very Good
Fair, 3.4% ■Fair
Good/Very Poor
Good, 77.7%
■Very Poor
Figure 1. Current Pavement Condition by % of Network Area
Functional
(weighted by area)
Arterial 75
Collector 84
Residential 91
Table 3. Pavement Condition by Functional Class (2014)
The City of Seal Beach's current weighted average PCI for roadways is 83 or in the
"Good" condition category. The weighted average is determined as follows:
N
Y(PCI; X At)
PCI
Q N
Al
i=1
Where
PCI,= area weighted average PCI of pavement network
PCI;= PCI of pavement section number i
A; = area of section number i
N = total number of section in City's network
9
Engineering&Environmental Services www,ncenet.com
Ilk
City of Seal Beach
2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
The street inventory and PCI report is included in Appendix A. A summary of the
maintenance and rehabilitation history is included in Appendix B.
Table 4 summarizes the condition of the road network from 2004-2014. The
percentages of pavements in good and very good condition have significantly
increased since 2008. Conversely, the percentage of pavements in poor to very
poor condition has gradually decreased over time.
V ��F Percent of Network Area up_
ondition Category PCI Range 2006 2008 2010 2012 2 0 1 —M
Very Good 86-100 54% 41% 69% 69% 68%
Good 75-85 7 o 20% 6% 11% 10%
60-74 16% 17% 8% 5% 3%
Poor 41-59 14% 12% 6% 11% 8%
Very 0-40 9% 10% 11% 4% 11%
Table 4. Historical PCI Breakdown (2004-2014)
Table 5 below shows the network average PCI in the past 7 years. As can be seen,
the weighted average condition of the pavement network has improved since 2006,
with the highest increase from 2008-2012. This is attributable to the significant
repairs that have occurred in this period.
II .
Average Network PCI 74 76 84 85 83
Table 5. Network Average PCI (2004-2014)
The Measure M2 Regional Capacity Program - which will provide Measure M2 grant
funding for arterial, intersection, and freeway/arterial improvements - includes an
incentive for successful implementation of pavement management programs. The
incentive is a 10% reduction in local matching fund requirements, if either of the
following conditions apply i.e.
c) Show measurable improvement of paved road conditions during the previous
reporting period defined as an overall weighted (by area) average system
improvement of one PCI point with no reduction in the overall weighted (by
area) average PCI in the Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) or local
street categories;
or
d) Have road pavement conditions during the previous reporting period within
the highest 20% of the scale for road pavement conditions in conformance
with OCTA Ordinance No. 3, defined as a PCI of 75 or higher.
10
Engineering&EI y u ui m ic0Lai�ei mu6 F www,ncenet.com
City of Seal Beach
2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
The City's PCI rating continues to comply with the Measure M2 subparagraph "b"
above. Since 2008, the City has maintained a PCI greater than 75. Even though
the analysis for this update shows the potential decrease in the overall PCI from 85
to 83, the City will still remain eligible for the 10% reduction in local matching fund
requirement.
No two inspectors will arrive at the exact same PCI on a given street segment.
There is a level of subjectivity to all survey data collection. As inspection data is
gathered by different inspectors there can be small variances to what they see,
measure and record. The accepted industry standard deviation for inspected
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) numbers is f 10 points.
11
Engineering&Environmental Services
City of Seal Beach
2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
MAINTENANCE & REHABILITATION STRATEGIES
A variety of Maintenance and Rehabilitation (M&R) strategies may be applied to
maintain pavements. They include slurry seals, asphalt concrete overlays and
reconstruction, all of which extend the pavement life. The following paragraphs
briefly describe the various strategies that are utilized in the City.
Slurry Seals are a mixture of slow setting asphalt emulsion, fine aggregate (sand-
like), and water. This mixture is spread over the entire pavement surface and is
about 3/8" thick. In addition to protecting the asphalt concrete surface and
subgrade from water damage, the slurry seal provides a new wearing surface. This
type of treatment is analogous to oil changes for a car i.e. necessary maintenance
that increases the life of a car (or, in this case, increases the life of the pavement
so they do not prematurely require more costly repairs).
Maintenance Intervals: A seal coat is applied at regular intervals, usually 5 to 7
years. After several intervals of seal coats, an overlay is typically required to
address structural issues. The intervals between overlays and reconstruction
depend upon the road classification as well as the original design life. Major roads
have higher traffic volumes, speeds, and loads, which increases pavement wear and
demand a higher level of service for safety reasons. Every street eventually fails or
reaches a point where it is cheaper to reconstruct than to repair.
Asphalt Concrete (AC) Overlays typically involves placing 1.5 to 4 inches of
asphalt concrete over the existing surface. Overlays are placed when the pavement
has deteriorated to a point that a seal coat will not bring the pavement back to an
acceptable level of service, usually because of structural inadequacy.
This may be caused by:
• Age
• Climate
• Air & water penetrating the pavement through cracks
• Aggregate base or subgrade soil failures
• Heavier traffic loads than anticipated in the original design
Reconstruction involves removing the existing layers of asphalt concrete and base
and reconstructing an entirely new pavement section.
Pay Now or Pay More Later
The PMP is designed to achieve an optimal network PCI somewhere between the
low to mid 80's, which brings the network into a "good" condition category. In
other words, the system will recommend priority list of maintenance treatments in
an attempt to bring all the streets in the City of Seal Beach to a good condition,
with the majority of the roads falling in the mid 80's.
The cost to repair and maintain a pavement depends on its current PCI. In the
good" category, preventive maintenance treatments such as slurry seals have
12
Ei-igr,,eering&Eiivu uimiciitai�ei vi6c6 co
„oF'stii<eF..
City of Seal Beach
�q FoRNP-' 2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
minimal costs. They are applied before pavement deterioration has become severe
and usually cost approximately $0.40/sq. ft. Almost 80% of the City's streets
would benefit from these relatively inexpensive, life-extending treatments.
As noted in Table 4, approximately 3% of the City's streets fall into the "fair”
condition category. Pavements in this range show some form of distress or wear
that require more than a life-extending treatment. The pavements typically require
a thin overlay, with costs in the range of $2.15/sq. ft.
The remaining 19% of the City of Seal Beach's streets fall below a PCI of 60. The
City's policies indicate that a thick overlay or reconstruction is the most appropriate
treatment. The costs for these treatments range from $4.40 to $9.25/ sq. ft.
Figure 2 demonstrates that pavement maintenance follows the old colloquial saying
of "pay me now, or pay me more later." History has shown that it costs less to
maintain roads in good condition than to repair roads that have failed. By allowing
pavements to deteriorate, roads that once cost only $0.30/sq. ft. to slurry seal may
soon cost $2.08 to $4.40/sq. ft. to overlay and upwards of $9.26/sq. ft. to
reconstruct.
Pavement Condition
Very Good Do Nothing
Good Slurry Seal- $0.40 sf
Fair 2"AC Overlay - $2.15 sf
................................ ............................................
Poor 4"AC Overlay and Digouts -
$4.40 sf
Very Poor
Reconstruction -
$9.25 sf
Pavement Life
Figure 2. Costs to Maintain Pavements Over Time
One of the key elements of a pavement management repair strategy is to keep
roads in the "good" and "fair" categories from deteriorating. This is particularly
true for roads in the "fair" range, due to the fact that they are at the point where
pavement deterioration accelerates if left untreated.
13
Engineering&Environmental Services www.ncenet.com
City of Seal Beach
�``.4��FORN?• 2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
Expenditures for Pavement Maintenance
It is estimated that the City of Seal Beach will have funds of $575,000/year for
pavement expenditures for the next seven years. Table 6 summarizes the past and
future estimated budget amounts. Three continuing funding programs have been
allocated to meet the needs of preventative maintenance and rehabilitation.
• Arterial Rehabilitation Program
• Local Street Rehabilitation Program
• Preventative Program (Slurry Seal)
Arterial Rehabilitation ($ Million)* 0.3 1.13 0.35 0.50
Preventative Program ($ Million) 0.08 0.1 0.15 0.15
Local Street Rehabilitation ($ Million) 1.41 1.86 0.4 5.05
Table 6. Pavement Budgets (2004-2018)
Note that the City currently has $575,000 a year budgeted for the seven-year
Capital Improvement Program (CIP). This includes $100,000 for slurry seals,
$200,000 for arterial rehabilitation, and $275,000 for local rehabilitation.
Historically, Seal Beach has been successful at obtaining additional funds and
receiving Measure M competitive grants. Therefore, this report assumes that, on
average, $575,000 a year will be spent on paving.
The City has established a seven-year cycle to address the needs of the
Preventative Program. Each year the City will be focusing maintenance efforts in a
different area of the City. There are many advantages in this strategy. A more
cost-effective mobilization from a chosen contractor is the largest monetary benefit.
Table 7 shown below reflects the various areas of the City along with the year in
which that area is scheduled for treatments.
1 CPE Phase III
2 CPE Phase IV
3 CPW /Bridgeport
4 Hill/Cove
5 Old Town
6 CPE Phase 1
7 CPE Phase 2
Table 7. Seven-Year Preventative Program Cycle
14
Engineering&Environmental Services www.ncenet.com
City of Seal Beach
2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
All pavement inspections were completed during the winter months of 2013/2014
and do not reflect the planned or designed work intended to go out to construction
during fiscal year 2013/2014. Funds budgeted for construction during the summer
of 2014 include approximately $2,000,000 for Westminster Avenue from Seal Beach
Blvd to Bolsa Chica Road along with $100,000 for local road paving and $50,000 for
slurry seal treatments. Any and all work completed in this current year will be
reflected in the next biennial report in 2016. As a result, PCI ratings have
decreased slightly since the PMP report in 2014 owing mostly to current fiscal year
road paving not occurring before the street network was rated during the winter
months of 2013/2014.
FUNDING SOURCES
The following is a discussion of future revenues available to the City for street
maintenance.
Measure M2 Turnbacle
Measure M2 is the 1/2-cent local retail sales tax approved by voters in November
1990 and renewed in 2006 until 2040. The program will provide $450 million to
local agencies for street maintenance and local traffic improvements. These funds
are used alone or in conjunction with other sources to address transportation
improvements such as rehabilitation, signals, street widening, etc. The City's share
is approximately $400,000 per year and will be used to fund resurfacing projects.
Measure M2 Competitive Grants
In addition to the Turnback funds, the Comprehensive Transportation Program
(CTP) also includes a competitive grant process for projects such as capacity
program, signal synchronization and transit. The Arterial Highway Rehabilitation
Program (AHRP) will fund projects such as overlays and reconstruction. Eligible
expenditures include bike lanes, bus turnouts/pads, and replacement of parking
lanes, curbs, gutters, catch basins, curb ramps and some sidewalks. City streets
that are included in the Master Plan of Arterial Highway (MPAH) system are eligible.
Local Revenues:;/General Funds
Local revenues that may be used for street rehabilitation include retail sales tax,
redevelopment fees, assessment districts and property taxes. These revenue
sources are also used for vital city activities such as police, fire and administrative
services.
Gas Tax
California, like the rest of the nation, built its interstate system primarily with
federal and state funds derived from per gallon gasoline and diesel fuel excise
taxes, commonly called the gas tax. Being a fixed amount, the excise tax needs
periodic increases to maintain buying power and to keep up with the effects of
inflation, a politically difficult sell. By the 1980's it became apparent that the gas
15
Engineering&Environmental Services IF www,ncenet.com
.,oF'sEiiTe,,
r u = F9Z't
I IL City of Seal Beach
2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
tax was not keeping up with inflation and that other revenue would be needed to
continue to fund transportation improvements.
BUDGET NEEDS
Based on the principle that it costs less to maintain roads in good condition than
bad, the PMP strives to develop a maintenance strategy that will first improve the
overall condition of the arterials to an optimal PCI somewhere between the mid and
upper 80's, and then maintain it at that level. The average PCI for the City's
streets is 85, which is in the "Good" condition category, but there is still a portion of
the streets that exhibit load-related distresses. In addition, there is currently a
significant unfunded backlog of several million dollars. If these issues are not
addressed, the quality of the arterials will inevitably decline. In order to correct
these deficiencies, a cost-effective funding and maintenance and rehabilitation
strategy must be implemented.
The first step in developing a cost-effective maintenance and rehabilitation strategy
is to determine the maintenance "needs" of the City of Seal Beach's streets. Using
the budget needs module, maintenance needs over the next seven years were
estimated at $14.9 million. These costs significantly exceed the City's current
funding levels of $4.03 million. If the City of Seal Beach rehabilitated every street
within the City, the average PCI will be 87 in 2020. If, however, no maintenance is
applied over the next seven years, already distressed roads will continue to
deteriorate, and the PCI will drop to 68 by 2020.
The results of the budget needs analysis are shown in Table 8 below. Of the $14.9
million in maintenance needs shown, approximately $1.8 million (12 percent) is
earmarked for preventative maintenance, while $13.1 million (88 percent) is
allocated for more costly rehabilitation and reconstruction treatments.
Year 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total
PCI with Treatment 97 95 93 90 87 86 87 -
PCI without Treatment 82 80 77 75 72 70 68 -
Budget - . million)
Preventive Maintenance 5% 80% - - 14% 64% 16% 12%
Rehabilitation 95% 20% 100% 100% 86% 36% 84% 88%
Table 8. Summary of Results from Needs Analysis
16
Engineering&Environmental Services F www,ncenet.com
hk
.,oF'sEiiTe,,
r u - �9Z't
I IL City of Seal Beach
2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
It is important to note that these budgetary numbers have been compiled using
current projects as a basis for construction costs. An inflation factor of 3% was
used for this analysis.
The cost-effectiveness of preventative maintenance treatments is demonstrated in
Figure 3 which compares the current condition of the network and the maintenance
needs estimated. The portion of the network in good and very good condition (78%
of the City's streets) requires only $1.8 million over the next seven years, whereas
the 22% in the "fair" to "very poor" condition needs approximately $13.1 million.
Network Area by Condition
Figure 3. Cost Effectiveness of Treatments
Very Poor,
11.3%
Poor, 7.6%l
■Good/Very Good
Fair, 3.4% ■Fair
Good/Very Poor
Good,
■Very Poor
Good/Very
Good, $4.4 M
■Good/Very
Good
■Fair
ry �•• Poor
■Very Poor
Fair, $0.7 M
L Poor, $2.4 M
17
Engineering&Environmental Services www,ncenet.com
City of Seal Beach
2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
BUDGET SCENARIOS
Having determined the maintenance needs of the City's street, the next step is to
conduct what-if analysis. The program projects the consequences of different
scenarios on PCI and unfunded backlog. By examining the effects on these
indicators, the advantages and disadvantages of different funding levels and
maintenance strategies become clear. The following scenarios were analyzed for
this report:
Scenario 1: Unconstrained Budget — the total amount for the next seven years
and the budget for each year are the same as identified in the budget needs
analysis, i.e. $14.9 million. This scenario will spend $10.8 million in 2014 to
rehabilitate the City's entire pavement. It will improve the condition of the streets
to a PCI of 87 by 2020 and eliminate the unfunded backlog.
Scenario 2: Maintain PCI at 83 - The budget required to maintain the City's
streets at a PCI of 83 would be $10.1 million over the next seven years. In the
meantime, the unfunded backlog will decrease from $8.9 million to $8.4 million by
2020.
Scenario 3: Existing Budget - This scenario illustrates the impacts on the
network at the City's current budget of $4.0 million over seven years. The PCI of
the network will deteriorate to 74, and the unfunded backlog will grow from $5.3
million to $16.4 million by 2020.
Scenario 4: Do Nothing — This Scenario illustrates that a zero budget will
increase the unfunded backlog to $24.1 million after seven years and the pavement
condition will deteriorate from a PCI of 83 to 68 by 2020.
Note that the unfunded backlog consists of pavement maintenance that is needed,
but which cannot be accomplished due to lack of funding. Shrinking budgets have
forced many California cities and counties to defer much-needed road maintenance.
By deferring maintenance, not only does the frequency of citizens' complaints about
the condition of the network increase, but the cost to repair these roads rises as
well.
is
Engineering&Environmental Services www,ncenet.com
City of Seal Beach
y`44y,1FORN � 2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
Scenario 1: Unconstrained Budget
The total amount for the next seven years and the budget for each year are the
same as identified in the budget needs analysis, i.e. $14.9 million. This scenario
will spend $10.8 million in 2014 to rehabilitate the City's entire pavement. It will
improve the condition of the streets to a PCI of 87 by 2020 and eliminate the
unfunded backlog.
Year 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total
Budget ($M) 11.36 0.37 0.07 0.03 0.13 0.95 1.94 14.86
Rehabilitation ($M) 10.80 0.07 0.07 0.03 0.11 0.34 1.63 13.08
Preventative Maintenance 0.55 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.61 0.31 1.78
$M
Unfunded Backlog ($M) - - - - - - -
PCI (entire network) 97 95 93 90 87 86 87
Table 9. Summary of Results for Scenario 1
$20 97 95 93 100
90 87 86 87
90
80
$15 U
70 a
axi
+ 60 °
0
Y $10 50 °
+
U
CO fu
40 0
-o U
a)
30
� a'
$5 E
20 >
as
CL
10
$0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0
$0 0
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiUnfunded Backlog --s.-PCI
Figure 4. PCI vs. Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 1
19
Engineering&Environmental Services www,ncenet.com
City of Seal Beach
y`44y,1FORN � 2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
Scenario 2: Maintain the Current PCI of 83
The budget required to maintain the City's streets at a PCI of 83 would be $10.1
million over the next seven years. In the meantime, the unfunded backlog will
decrease from $8.9 million to $8.4 million by 2020.
Year 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total
Budget ($M) 2.49 2.49 2.03 0.03 0.13 0.95 1.94 10.08
Rehabilitation ($M) 1.94 2.19 2.03 0.03 0.11 0.34 1.63 8.29
Preventative Maintenance 0.55 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.61 0.31 1.78
($M)
Unfunded Backlog ($M) 8.86 7.46 6.13 6.69 7.27 7.89 8.44
PCI (entire network) 87 88 88 85 83 82 82
Table 10. Summary of Results for Scenario 2
$20 100
87 88 88 85 90
83 82 82
80
$15 a
0 70
X
60 -°
0
o $10 $8.9 50 ,
U $7.9 $8.4 0
$7.5
ca $6.1 $6.7 $7.3 40 U
t
a) 30 c:
_0 a)
$5
20 >
a
10
$0 0
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiUnfunded Backlog PCI
Figure 5. PCI vs. Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 2
20
Engineering&Environmental Services www.ncenet.com
City of Seal Beach
`?�,FORNP 2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
Scenario 3; Existing Budget
This scenario illustrates the impacts on the network at the City's current budget of
$4.0 million over seven years. The PCI of the network will deteriorate to 74, and
the unfunded backlog will grow from $5.3 million to $16.44 million by 2020.
Budget ($M) 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.56 0.57 0.57 0.57 4.0
Rehabilitation ($M) 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.46 0.47 0.47 0.47 3.3
Preventative Maintenance 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.7
($M)
Unfunded Backlog ($M) 10.78 11.46 11.86 12.26 12.80 13.67 16.44
PCI (entire network) 84 83 81 80 78 76 74
PCI (MPAH) 78 78 76 75 73 71 71
PCI (Local) 90 89 88 1 87 85 84 1 83
Table 11. Summary of Results for Scenario 3
$20 100
84 83 81 80 78 $16.4 90
76 - 80 .�
$15 a
o $12.3 $12.8 $13.7 74 70 v
11.9
$10.8 $11.5 60
� c
6 $10 50
o
40 v
m -
-0 30 v
-o $5 E
c �
w 20 >
c O
10
$0 0
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Unfunded Backlog PCI
Figure 6. PCI vs. uei,ei rea imiairitenance for Scenario 3
21
Engineering&Environmental Services F www,ncenet.com
Ilk
f City of Seal Beach
y`4(y,!FORN � 2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
Scenario 4: Do Nothing
This Scenario illustrates that a zero budget will increase the unfunded backlog to
$24.1 million after seven years and the pavement condition will deteriorate from a
PCI of 83 to 68 by 2020.
Year 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total
Budget ($M) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rehabilitation ($M) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Preventative Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
($M)
Unfunded Backlog ($M) 11.36 12.89 14.32 15.84 17.66 20.00 24.10
PCI (entire network) 82 80 77 75 72 70 68
Table 12. Summary of Results for Scenario 4
$30 100
82 90
$25 80 77 $24.1
Ln 75 72 80
o $20.0 va
70
$20 x
$17.7 70 °
61 $15.8 68 60
$14.3 50 °
U $15 $12.9
M$ 11.4 40 0
Q) U
-0 $10
c 30 v
w
E
c �
20 m
$5 a
10
$0 0
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Unfunded Backlog tPCI
Figure 7. PCI vs. Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 4
22
Engineering&Environmental Services •
City of Seal Beach
2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
Note: chart below defines the Budget years shown in the preceding Scenarios.
YEAR FISCAL YEAR
2014 2014/2015
2015 2015/2016
2016 2016/2017
2017 2017/2018
2018 2018/2019
2019 2019/2020
2020 2020/2021
SUMMARY
Figure 8 illustrates the change in PCI over time for the different budget scenarios.
Note that in the unconstrained funding scenario, the PCI will reach 87 after seven
years. This is due to the cyclical nature of preventative maintenance treatments
that are applied once every 5 to 7 years. By comparison, the existing budget will
result in a drop of the PCI to 74 by 2020.
100
97
95 95
93
90
U 90 88
88 87
X 87 85 86 87
85 0-84
83 ■ 83 81 83 8 82
80 82 80 ■—■ 8\■ 78
E 75 77 74
■
75
a 70 72
70
68
65
60 -
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Scenario 1: Unconstrained Budget (Scenario 2: Maintain PCI
—m—Scenario 3: Existing Budget Scenario 4: Do Nothing
Figure S. Pavement Condition by Scenario by Year
23
Engineering&Environmental Services WWW.ncenet.com
City of Seal Beach
2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
$25
$20
0
cn $15
0
$10
$5 - -
$0
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
■Scenario 1: Unconstrained Budget ■Scenario 2: Maintain PCI
■Scenario 3: Existing Budget ■Scenario 4: Do Nothing
Figure 9. Deferred Maintenance by Scenario by Year
Figure 9 illustrates the change in unfunded backlog over time for the different
budget scenarios. Note that the unconstrained budget has no unfunded backlog.
Figure 10 (next page) illustrates the change in the percentage of the road area with
each condition category for the different budget scenarios. With Scenario 3
(Existing Budget), the "Very Poor" category increases to 12% from the current
11%. But with $10.1 million for the next seven years (Maintain PCI at 83), the
"Good" and "Very Good" category increase to 92% from the current 78%.
24
Engineering&Environmental Services www.ncenet.com
City of Seal Beach
2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
Very Poor,
11.3% Current Condition
Poor, 7.6%l
■Good/Very Good
Fair, 3.4% ■Fair
Good/Very Poor
LL Good, ■Very Poor
Lb..—
Very Poor,
Poor, 0% 8% Scenario 2:
Maintain PCI at 83 - 2020
Fair, 0%pp— ■Good/Very Good
■Fair
Poor
••. -
Good, ■Very Poor
6L� --aA
Very Poor, Scenario 3:
12% Existing Budget - 2020
Poor, 5%
■Good/Very Good
■Fair
Fair, 11% Poor
L Good/Very ■Very Poor
Good,
LL ��
Figure 10. Percentage of Road Network Area of Each Condition Category for Different
Budget Scenarios
25
Engineering&Environmental Services www,ncenet.com
City of Seal Beach
2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
CONCLUSIONS
The City of Seal Beach has a substantial investment in their street network as
evidenced by the replacement cost of approximately $109.2 million. The network
average PCI of the City is 83. Overall, 78% of the City's street network is in the
"Good" and "Very Good" condition category. In the meantime, about 19% of the
streets are in "Poor" or "Very Poor" condition category. This requires a significant
amount of money to bring them into the "Good" condition category.
If sufficient funding is unavailable for street maintenance, the average PCI of the
network is expected to decrease and the unfunded backlog will increase. The
higher backlog will result in increased future costs as more capital intensive
treatments (such as reconstruction) will be necessary as streets are deferred where
less expensive treatments (such as surface seals or overlays) are currently feasible.
Our analysis indicates that the City needs to spend $14.9 million in pavement
maintenance and rehabilitation in the next seven years in order to eliminate the
unfunded backlog and maintain the PCI at its current level. By doing so, many
streets then can be maintained in good condition with on-going preventive
maintenance. This will eventually save money by avoiding reaching the level of
major rehabilitation (such as reconstruction) until the end of the pavement's service
life.
a. Pavement Funding
The City's current budget for pavement maintenance and rehabilitation is $4.0
million for the next seven years. At this funding level, the network average PCI is
expected to decrease from the current level of 83, which is in "Good" condition
category, to 74, which is a borderline "Good" and "Fair" condition category.
As a minimum, we suggest that the City of Seal Beach consider increasing
pavement expenditures to achieve the following objectives:
• To preserve and improve pavements in the "Good" category
• Reduce the percentage of pavements in the "Poor" and "Very Poor"
categories
• Increase funding to not allow the PCI to drop below 75
Should the City allow the pavement condition to fall below the projected PCI of 75,
it will no longer be eligible for the 10% reduction in matching funds.
It should be noted that a significant unknown is the future cost of rehabilitation;
with the recent volatility in oil prices, we would recommend that the City carefully
monitor future construction costs and be ready to adapt to large increases if
necessary. The graph below illustrates the changes in the Asphalt Price Index
(source: Caltrans) since 1999. As can be seen, asphalt prices have been extremely
volatile since 2010.
26
Ei-igii,eering&Et yu uiiiiiental Services IF www,ncenet.com
City of Seal Beach
2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
800
700
600
x
d
E 500
W
V
a` 400
A
CL 300
Q
200
100
0
01 O rl N cn qt Ln tD r� 00 M O rl N M
M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � � � r-1
M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
rl N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Figure 11. Asphalt Price Index (1999-2013, Caltrans)
In light of the substantial financial commitment that is required to maintain and/or
improve road conditions and the increase in construction costs, it is relevant to
discuss the various possible financing alternatives to help fund pavement
rehabilitation and preventative maintenance for the City. The following alternatives
are some of the possible ways that the City should consider to generate additional
revenue to fund needed rehabilitation and maintenance of City maintained roads.
1) Truck Route Permit Fee - Leverages a surcharge fee on trucks for use of City
streets to help recoup the costs of heavy wheel loads imposed by truck
traffic.
2) Residential Waste Collection Fee - Surcharge is leveraged on waste
companies to account for damage to pavement incurred by heavy waste
collection trucks.
3) Development Repairs - Fees assessed to new developments to account for
increased traffic associated with new residential and commercial tenants.
4) Establish Utility Cut Impact Fee - Fee is leveraged against utility to provide
compensation for reduced pavement life due to utility cuts and patches.
5) Pursue local transportation sales tax measure
6) Devote more revenues to street maintenance
7) Establish Downtown or Business Improvement Districts
8) Establish Citywide Assessment Districts
27
Engineering&Environmentai services www.ncenet.com
City of Seal Beach
2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
bm Pavement Maintenance Strategie
The City's pavement maintenance strategies include slurry seals, overlays and
reconstruction. It is tempting to invest in the worst streets and only fund overlay or
reconstruction projects. However, it is equally important to preserve good
pavements. Crack sealing, one of the least expensive treatments, can keep
moisture out of pavements and prevent the underlying aggregate base from
premature failures. Surface seals are also cost-effective for pavements currently in
good condition. Therefore, we recommend that the City continues its preventive
maintenance program to preserve the good pavements.
In addition, other strategies such as cold-in-place recycling or full depth
reclamation should be considered when considering rehabilitation treatments. These
may save the city significant amounts over more conventional treatments.
c. Maintenance and Rehabilitation Decision 7^
The maintenance and rehabilitation decision tree and the associated unit costs
should be reviewed and updated annually to reflect new construction
techniques/repairs and changing costs so the budget analysis results can be reliable
and accurate.
a. Pavement Management Program Update
OCTA requires cities submitting pavement rehabilitation projects for Measure M2
funding to utilize a PMP. This includes updating the condition for all Arterial / MPAH
streets every two years, and non-arterial streets every six years.
We recommend that the City of Seal Beach comply with the above requirements so
as not to jeopardize any local transportation funds. This is particularly critical since
significant funding increases are needed to maintain the pavement network in
%N good" condition.
2s
Engineering&Environmental Services www,ncenet.com
Collaboration. Commitment. Confidence"'
VVIJONCE 'L
Appendix A
Engineering& Environmental Services www.ncenet.com
A Collaboration. Commitment. Confidence"'
.V.,
Pavement Management Program
Certification
Engineering& Environmental Services www.ncenet.com
January 7, 2014
RENEWED MEASURE M
LOCAL PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CERTIFICATION
The City of Seal Beach certifies that it has a Pavement Management Plan in conformance with the criteria
stated in the Orange County Local Transportation Authority Ordinance No. 3. This resolution requires that a
Local Pavement Management Plan be in place and maintained to qualify for allocation of revenues generated
from Measure M.
The system was developed by Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd. using the *MicroPAVER compatible
pavement management system, and contains, at a minimum, the following elements:
• Inventory of MPAH and local routes reviewed and updated biennially. The last update of the
inventory was completed 2013 for Arterial (MPAH) roads and 2013 for local roads.
• Assessment of pavement condition for all routes in the system, updated biennially. The last field
review of pavement condition for MPAH and Local streets was completed 2012.
• Percentage of all sections of pavement needing: Preventative Maintenance 56%, Rehabilitation 37%,
Reconstruction 7%.
• Budget needs for preventative maintenance, rehabilitation and/or reconstruction of deficient
sections of pavement for:
Current Biennial Period $51.9 M(MPAH)/$39.4 M(Local),
Following Biennial Period $0.3 M(MPAH)/$0.2 M(Local) .
• Funds budgeted or available for Preventative Maintenance, Rehabilitation and/or Reconstruction.
Current Biennial Period $1.15M (MPAH/Local),
Following Biennial Period $1.15M (MPAH/Local).
The Local Pavement Management Plan is consistent with countywide pavement condition assessment
standards as described in the OCTA Countywide Pavement Management Program Guidelines adopted by the
OCTA Board of Directors on May 24, 2010.
* An electronic copy of the Local Pavement Management Plan with MicroPAVER compatible files must be
submitted with the certification statement.
A copy of this certification is being provided to the Orange County Transportation Authority.
Submitted by:
Local Jurisdiction Type Name
City of Seal Beach Michael Ho, P.E.
Title
City Engineer Signed
Collaboration. Commitment. Confidence"'
VVIJONCE 'L
Appendix 6
Engineering& Environmental Services www.ncenet.com
*V A Collaboration. Commitment. Confidence"
JONCE 'L
�.
QC/QA Plan
Engineering& Environmental Services www.ncenet.com
The contents of this report is the confidential property of Nichols Consulting
Engineers, Chtd. (NCE) and should not be copied, modified, retransmitted, or
used for any purpose except with NCE's written authorization.
Collaboration. Commitment. Confidence. sm 1
y ,
City of Seal Beach
2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
Quality Control Plan
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 1
1.1 Objectives........................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Structure ............................................................................................................ 1
2. QUALITY CONTROL PLAN...........................................................................2
2.1. Condition Survey Procedures................................................................................ 2
2.2. Accuracy Required For Data Collection .................................................................. 5
2.3. Inspectors'Qualifications and Experience............................................................... 6
3. SAFETY PROCEDURES................................................................................ 7
Appendix A - Resumes of Field Inspectors
Collaboration. Commitment. Confidence. sm 1
City of Seal Beach
2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
Quality Control Plan
1. INTRODUCTION
When performing data collection in any field, the need for quality control is paramount. This need for
quality data is essential for accurate planning, analysis and design. NCE's "Quality Assurance
Management Plan" (QAMP) affirms that:
"NCE is dedicated to achieving technical and management excellence and to
delivering professional engineering and environmental services that meet or
exceed our clients'needs. NCE's Quality Assurance (QA) Program is designed to
achieve these goals. This QA Management Plan (QAMP) describes NCE's QA
Program, which is based on four principles: client satisfaction, employee
participation, problem prevention, and continuous quality improvements."
NCE's QAMP establishes minimum quality standards for performance and procedures for assuring that
our clients receive quality service. It requires the participation of employees at every level. It encourages
Project Managers and technical staff to take pride in their work and responsibility for ensuring that the
work is done correctly the first time. The program is designed to reduce the incidence of problems
related to quality and results in implementation, where necessary, of corrective actions and
modification of work procedures to minimize the incidence of future problems.
NCE has also prepared detailed and specific Quality Control Plans for projects, and the most notable
example is for the Long Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) —Western Regional Support Contract for
the Federal Highway Administration. This is a 150 page document that covers data collection on
highways, including deflection, profile, pavement distresses, traffic, maintenance and rehabilitation
history, materials testing and sampling as well as a document control.
1.1 Objectives
This document constitutes a formal Quality Control Plan (QCP) for the City of Seal Beach. The focus is on
data collection issues as part of the pavement management update.
Specifically, it is intended for the 2013/2014 Pavement Management Update. The focus is on the
collection of network-level pavement distress data (defined by NCHRP Synthesis 401 Quality
Management of Pavement Data Collection, as "Network-level data collection involves collection of large
quantities of pavement condition data, which is often converted to individual condition indices or
aggregated into composite condition indices.")
1.2 Structure
The following components are addressed in this QC Plan:
• Condition survey procedures used
• Accuracy required for data collection
• Inspector qualifications and experience
• Safety
Collaboration.Commitment.Confidence.sm
1 0
City of Seal Beach
2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
Quality Control Plan
1. QUALITY CONTROL PLAN
1.1. Condition Survey Procedures
The governing document in performing condition surveys for the City of Seal Beach is ASTM D6433-09
"Standard Practice far Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index Surveys." Both asphalt
concrete (AC) and Portland cement concrete (PCC) pavements are included in this protocol. The
following distresses are collected for each pavement type.
Asphalt Concrete (AC) Pavements 11. Patching and utility cut patching
1. Alligator(fatigue) cracking 12. Polished aggregate
2. Bleeding 13. Potholes
3. Block cracking 14. Railroad crossing
4. Bumps and sags 15. Rutting
5. Corrugation 16. Shoving
6. Depression 17. Slippage cracking
7. Edge cracking 18. Swell
8. Joint reflection cracking 19. Weathering
9. Lane/Shoulder drop off 20. Raveling
10. Longitudinal and transverse
cracking
Portland cement concrete (jointed) 10. Patching (small)
1. Blowup/Buckling 11. Polished aggregate
2. Corner Breaks 12. Popouts
3. Divided slab 13. Pumping
4. Durability("D") cracking 14. Punchout
5. Faulting 15. Railroad crossing
6. Joint seal damage 16. Scaling, map cracking and
7. Lane/shoulder drop off crazing
8. Linear cracking 17. Shrinkage cracks
9. Patching (large) and utility cuts 18. Spalling (corner)
19. Spalling (joint)
Any exceptions to the above procedures will be discussed with the City before any surveys are
performed. These are usually related to distresses or situations that are not covered in the manuals.
Examples include slippage cracks, roller check marks or edge cracking on streets with no curbs and
gutters. Others include the use of seals or open-graded asphalt concrete mixes. Any modifications will
be documented and submitted to the City for approval.
All distress or condition surveys are performed as walking surveys, and a minimum 10% sampling rate is
utilized. Field crews are typically composed of a one-person crew teaming up when required for higher
volume facilities such as arterials. The sample units for this project will be based upon the length and
Collaboration.Commitment.Confidence.sm
2 0
�QF strii;y•,,,
r,.
i�
City of Seal Beach
2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
Quality Control Plan
width of the street sections. This data will be collected to match the existing management sections of
MicroPAVER.
Collaboration.Commitment.Confidence.sm
4
ti��5t hf•�•.
F
ffJ
City of Seal Beach
2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
Quality Control Plan
1.2. Accuracy Required For Data Collection
The accuracy required for data collection has two components, both of which are further described in
the following paragraphs.
• Re-inspections
• PCI comparisons with past surveys
2.2.1 Re-Inspection "Check"
At least five percent of all inspections are randomly re-inspected by other team members. A different
inspector will review these sites and determine the revised pavement distress measurements.
If the initial inspection is determined to be inaccurate, the original inspector is given refresher
training before being allowed to continue with any further inspections. Should the data be
inaccurate for a certain day, all the data for that day will be re-inspected following refresher
training to ensure accuracy.
Acceptability Criteria
At the time of re-inspection, the actual distresses will be re-inspected and verified, and any corrections
made, if necessary. Distress types and severities must be the same and re-measured quantities within
±10%of the original measured quantity.
If corrections are required on more than 10% of the re-inspected sample units, then an additional 5%
will be re-inspected. This will continue until all more than 95% of the re-inspected sections meet the
acceptability criteria.
2.2.2 PCI Comparison with Past Surveys
As another level of quality control, the new PCIs are compared with the previous PCIs. If they differ by
more than ±10 PCI points, these sections are automatically flagged for further investigation.
If PCI is+10 points:
The section is investigated to see if a maintenance and rehabilitation event has occurred since the last
survey, but which has not been recorded. This can only be resolved with feedback from the City.
Typically, it may include activities such as:
• Crack sealing activities—changes medium or high severity cracking to low severity
• Patching activities- alligator cracking that has been removed and patched, so that the resultant
PCI is increased.
• Surface seals
• Overlay
Collaboration.Commitment.Confidence.sm
5
1 J -
City of Seal Beach
JFOUN,.... 2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
Quality Control Plan
Therefore, an up to date maintenance and rehabilitation history file in the MicroPAVER database is
desirable, both for historical accuracy as well as to provide additional quality control.
If PCI is-10 points
The section is checked to see if the average deterioration rate (usually 3 to 4 points per year) is
exceeded. If the drop in PCI is within the range of what is acceptable, no further action is required. If the
drop is more than the acceptable range, a re-inspection will be performed. The default performance
curves in the MicroPAVER program form the basis for what is acceptable.
1.3. Inspectors' Qualifications and Experience
All NCE's inspectors are required to attend formal training on condition distress surveys. For example,
any of NCE's inspectors working on the LTPP project are required to attend a week-long training
workshop every year to maintain their certifications. The Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) of
Washoe County requires inspectors to be calibrated prior to performing any work using the ASTM D
6433 protocols (also known as the MicroPAVER surveys).
For MicroPAVER (or ASTM D6433) surveys, NCE's technicians underwent the OCTA technician
certification exercise held in March 2012.
Similarly, in agencies that use the StreetSaver system, NCE's inspectors attend the distress training
conducted by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC). After the formal training, they work
with an experienced inspector before they are allowed to work on their own. Within the first month of
working on their own, up to 20% of their work is checked weekly. Any necessary corrections are made
immediately.
Finally, NCE conducts a one-day training and calibration workshop for all NCE staff involved with data
collection.This is conducted once a year.
Conducted Inspector Name D �Jrainin
Franc Escobedo October 7, 2013 Lisa K. Senn
Marvin Mann October 21, 2013 Lisa K. Senn
David Bivins October 21, 2013 Lisa K. Senn
Resumes of technicians utilized on this project are included in Appendix A.
Collaboration.Commitment.Confidence.sm
6
^y OV Fjf.
City of Seal Beach
2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
Quality Control Plan
3. SAFETY PROCEDURES
NCE administers a health and safety program in compliance with the Nevada Occupational Safety and
Health act (Section 618.383) and Cal OSHA Title VIII, Section 3203. The program is documented in NCE's
Workplace Safety Program Manual.
Generally, the safety procedures include:
• Inspectors to wear a Class 2 safety vest at all times;
• Flashing beacon on all vehicles utilized for surveys; and
• Stopped vehicles to be parked at locations away from moving traffic e.g. nearby parking,
shoulders etc.
On streets where there is a high volume of traffic or high speeds, additional measures may be necessary,
such as:
• Surveys to occur during off-peak periods or on weekends;
• Additional inspector to watch out for traffic; and
• Traffic flaggers in extreme cases.
In extreme cases where it is not possible to walk on the pavement surface, surveys will be performed
from sidewalks or raised medians. However, this is extremely rare for city or county roads/streets; this is
most often encountered on state highways, and lane closures are the most likely option at this point.
Collaboration.Commitment.Confidence.sm
7 0
City of Seal Beach
2013-14 Pavement Management Program Update
Quality Control Plan
Appendix A
Resumes of Field Inspectors
Collaboration.Commitment.Confidence.sM 1q
.
V . ,
in
Lisa K. Senn
Senior Project Manager Education
A.A., Business Administration, 2000
Ms. Senn is a Senior Project Manager and has responsibility for the day to Cuesta College
day management of NCE's Southern California office. She has 15 years of
experience on a wide range of pavement management and transportation
projects. Affiliations
American Public Works Association
Ms. Senn has managed Pavement Management System (PMS) projects and
has been responsible for the field training of all PMS personnel, overseeing
field surveys and QC procedures for various cities and counties throughout Registrations and Certifications
MicroPAVER Level 1 & 2, 2012
California. She has trained engineers and technicians on both
StreetSaverg or MicroPAVER. In addition, she has conducted training on
various aspects on pavement management. Joined NCE
2011
Currently, Ms. Senn is developing the MicroPAVER training workshops for
OCTA which will be conducted in January 2014 through November 2014.
This includes both the computer training as well as field distress training. Total Years of Experience
She will also be responsible for conducting the workshops. Ms. Senn is also 15
preparing for the annual training for the City of Woodland. This training
covers re-fresher distress training and computer training on StreetSaver @.
Ms. Senn is an active member of MTC's Software Development team and
has assisted with beta testing of new modules and enhancements for
StreetSaver®.
Pavement Management
Ms. Senn is responsible for the analysis and quality control of pavement distress data, updating maintenance and
rehabilitation decision trees and the treatment unit costs, and the development of budget scenarios and summary
reports. She has developed the most cost-effective maintenance treatments and strategies, prepared custom
multiple-year detailed street maintenance plans and budget option reports, and linked GIS maps with management
sections in the client's PMP database. She is also an advanced user of both the MicroPAVER and StreetSaver®
pavement management software. Her clients include the following cities and counties:
Calabasas Lompoc Petaluma Ventura Co.
Calistoga Los Altos Hills Pismo Beach Santa Clarita
Camarillo Los Gatos Pittsburg Sebastopol
Chula Vista Milpitas Rocklin Stanton
Corona Mission Viejo San Carlos St. Helena
Danville Napa San Diego Thousand Oaks
Fullerton Oakley San Mateo Vacaville
Galt Orange, City San Ramon West Covina
Grover Beach Orange Co. Santa Barbara Windsor
La Habra Oxnard Santa Barbara Co. Woodland
Lathrop Pacifica Sonoma Co.
Engineering& Environmental Services www.ncenet.com
Lisa K. Senn
21 Page
Representative Projects
Corona, CA I Project Manager
Corona, CA
Ms. Senn has managed the City's annual PMS updates which included pavement condition surveys and budgetary analysis. In
2012 & 2013, Ms. Senn assisted the County as they made a change in their PMS software, from Micro PAVER to StreetSaver®.
This included a review of current functional classifications, generating a list of roads needing surveys prior to conversion and
helping to define information migrated. She collaborated with City's GIs department to obtain a current shapefile for GIS
integration for StreetSaver®. Once complete, Ms. Senn trained with City staff on the use of StreetSaver® including database
entry and how to generate GIs Maps.
County of Orange, CA I Project Manager
Orange County, CA
Ms. Senn is the project manager for the current 3 year contract with the County of Orange in its contract Cities of Lake
Forest and Dana Point. She set requirements for quality control of collected pavement distress data, updating maintenance
and rehabilitation decision trees and the treatment unit costs, and the development of budget scenarios and summary
reports. She works closely with Cartegraph who is contracted data collection for roads and non-pavement asset collection.
Ms. Senn will be working with County and City staff for determining unit costs, applicable treatments for the 7 year
budgeting scenarios and developing the respective street sections that will be rehabilitated over the next 7 years.
Mission Viejo, CA I Project Manager
Mission Viejo, CA
The City has approximately 178 centerline miles of local and collector streets and 52 miles of arterial highways
(approximately 1,082 pavement sections). Ms. Senn has managed a number of the recent biennial updates the City has
completed on its streets. Surveys were done with either walking surveys' or windshield surveys' and its MicroPAVER
database was updated with the pavement condition data. Pavement maintenance and rehabilitation historical records for the
past 2 years were also entered into the database. As part of the project, the maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) decision
tree was updated with new treatments and unit costs re-evaluated prior to performing any budgetary analyses. In addition,
the City's projected 20-year pavement budget was analyzed and a 7-year work plan prepared. Numerous custom reports
were prepared for the City, and finally, an executive summary was submitted to OCTA for the Measure M2 program.
Fullerton, CA I Project Manager
Fullerton, CA
Ms. Senn is the project manager for the City's biennial pavement management condition surveys and budget analyses. The
condition surveys cover the City's entire pavement network, over 290 centerline miles. Ms. Senn worked with the City to
update preventative maintenance and rehabilitation strategies and treatment unit costs to more accurately reflect the effects
of different multiple-year budgets on the pavement network's condition and the backlog of work. She also coordinated the
migration of the City's GIs shapefiles to Micro PAVER in order to provide a visual linkage to sections in the City's pavement
network.
Chula Vista, CA I Project Manager
Chula Vista, CA
The project included an update the City's pavement management condition surveys and budget analyses. The condition
surveys covered the City's entire pavement network, over 440 centerline miles. Ms. Senn worked with the City to update
preventative maintenance and rehabilitation strategies and treatment unit costs to more accurately reflect the effects of
different multiple-year budgets on the pavement network's condition and the backlog of work. She also provided training for
City staff members for distress collection using the StreetSaver® MobilRater software.
Engineering& Environmental Services www.ncenet.com
V in di
,;1INCE 'L Collaboration. ,
County of Santa Barbara, CA I Project Manager
County of Santa Barbara, CA
Ms. Senn has been the Project Manager for all projects with the County since 2003. She helped to define the yearly rotation
of roads to be surveyed, managed the survey crews, data entry technicians and QA procedures for the projects. Ms. Senn
assisted with the data gathering for the yearly "Road Book", which encompassed the yearly maintenance and rehabilitation
projects. In 2010, Ms. Senn assisted the County as they made a change in their PMS software, from MicroPAVER to
StreetSaver®. This included a review of current functional classifications, generating a list of roads needing surveys prior to
conversion and helping to define information migrated. She collaborated with County's GIS department to obtain a current
shapefile for GIS integration for StreetSaver®.
City of Woodland, CA I Project Manager
City of Woodland, CA
Ms. Senn was contracted to train City staff to segment street sections, identify distresses based upon the MicroPAVER's ASTM
D6433-11 test method and finally to field review staff's survey sites. She set requirements for quality control of collected
pavement distress data, updating maintenance and rehabilitation decision trees and the treatment unit costs, and the
development of budget scenarios and summary reports.
City of Santa Barbara, CA I Project Manager
City of Santa Barbara, CA
In 2009 the City of Santa Barbara brought the PMS operations in house. Previously they had consultants collect distress data
and prepare reports but in 2009 that changed. Ms. Senn was contracted to prepare classes to teach the MircoPAVER distress
collection and quality control of collected pavement distress data, updating maintenance and rehabilitation decision trees and
the treatment unit costs, and the development of budget scenarios and summary reports. She assisted staff on the
development of the most cost-effective maintenance treatments and strategies, prepared custom multiple-year detailed
street maintenance plans and budget option reports.
Asset Management
Ms. Senn has managed the collection of data related to sidewalk, curb and gutter, tree root damage, ADA ramps, cross
slopes of street segments, trip fall hazards, culverts, storm drains and catch basins. This included visiting a variety of storm
drain features, including manholes, catch basins, streams and curb inlets, and determining the feature's physical
characteristics and its connection to other nearby storm drain features. These projects included visiting thousands of feet of
concrete and identifying, quantifying and recording them spatially in order to incorporate them on maps for future reference.
Representative Projects
County of Orange, CA I Project Manager
County of Orange, CA
In 2012 the County or Orange contracted with NCE for three years. Years one and three were to update the County and its
contracting Cities of Dana Point and Lake Forest, PMS databases using semi-automated distress collection. Year two was
dedicated to cataloging non-pavement assets for each agency. The mobile data collection units gathered high-resolution 3600
degree geo-referenced right-of-way (ROW) street level digital imagery along with 3D point cloud data. The mobile mapping
system gave the ability to visualize, measure, edit, and validate infrastructure assets (such as pavements, markings, lanes,
surface areas, shoulders, signs, and drainage features) with a high level of accuracy. The assets the County and its contract
cities collected were curb &gutter, sidewalk, signalizations, signs, striping, drop-inlets and manhole covers. ArcMAP 10.2 was
used to drop' points to the various layers of the agencies shapefiles.
Engineering& Environmental Services www.ncenet.com
� +� .boration. Commitment. Confid-
�J
City of Sunnyvale, CA I GIS Coordinator
City of Sunnyvale, CA
In conjunction with their pavement management update also had NCE gather imagery for curb & gutter as well as striping. .
The mobile data collection units gathered high-resolution 360° degree geo-referenced right-of-way (ROW) street level digital
imagery along with 3D point cloud data. The mobile mapping system gave the ability to visualize,measure,edit,and validate
infrastructure assets (such as pavements, markings, lanes, surface areas, shoulders, signs, and drainage features) with a high
level of accuracy. ArcMAP 10.2 is used to drop' points to the various layers of the agencies shapefiles.
Pavement Evaluation Services
Ms. Senn managed numerous deflection testing projects. These projects included using deflection testing to measure a
pavement's structural properties by applying an load on the pavement and measuring the resulting deflection.
In connection with deflection testing, coring was done to measure existing pavement thicknesses to determine pavement
structural capacity. Used in conjunction with deflection testing and visual observations of current cracking conditions and
roadside draining, core testing provides the necessary data to provide sound repair or maintenance recommendations.
She was involved in the review traffic patterns to verify the accuracy of traffic indexes. She managed and participated in
performing classified truck counts where necessary to determine these indexes.
Engineering& Environmental Services
Coliaboration. Confidence'
Franc Escobedo
Engineering Field Technician
Education
Mr. Escobedo has over ten years of experience as a pavement management Computer Operations Program
technician for NCE. He has performed numerous pavement condition surveys Computer Learning Center, Los Angeles,
throughout California and Washington and has collected distress data for CA, 1983-84
various Pavement Management Systems, including the MTC PMS (all versions),
MicroPaver, Carte-Graph, and Hansen systems. Mr. Escobedo has completed Network Engineering &Administrative
the MTC 'Distress Identification" courses for both Asphalt Concrete and
Portland Cement Concrete Pavements, and now assists with the training of Program Computer Learning Center,
agency staff for both courses. Anaheim, CA, 1997
Roadway Pavement Distress Surveys Certified Network Administration
Computer Learning Center, Anaheim, CA
Mr. Escobedo performs all activities relating to pavement data collection using 1997
hardcopy forms or a Personal Digital Assistant (PDA). As part of the quality
control process, he performs cross-checks of data in the PMS database. Mr.
Escobedo has performed quality control checks of field collected data and Registrations and Certifications
pavement maintenance history to ensure that PMS databases are accurate and OCTA MicroPAVER Certification 2012
up to date. During this process, he also generates detailed reports, which are MTC StreetSaver Certification 2013
needed to help perform his cross-checks of the data collected.
Mr. Escobedo is very involved with training technicians and engineers in
performing data collection for agencies all over the State of California. Listed Total Years of Experience
below are a handful of agencies where Mr. Escobedo has performed condition 12
surveys. This easily includes over 5,000 centerline miles of roads and streets.
Additional Related Experience
Franc is very proficient in all MicroPaver distresses identification procedures. He
has not only attended yearly in-house training but has assisted in training local
agencies on Micro PAVER distress identification and collection procedures. Franc
participated in the calibration testing in March of 2012 as part of the OCTA's
qualification testing.
Representative Projects
• Bell La Habra Torrance
• Buena Park Vernon Chula Vista
• Cudahy San Marino Mission Viejo
• Corona San Dimas Vista
• Tustin Fullerton Tulare
�
Coliaboration. Commitment. Confid-
jI
Marvin Mann
Field Technician Education
Certificate - Architecture Technology,
Mr. Marvin Mann joined NCE in 2011 as a pavement management Diablo Valley College, 2010
technician and is experienced in collecting distress data for MTC Pavement
Management Systems. Mr. Mann has completed the MTC "Distress Certificate - 3D Arts, San Francisco State
Identification" courses for both Asphalt Concrete and Portland Cement University, 2002
Concrete Pavements and NCE in-house QA/QC training programs. Mr.
Mann's also has background in construction materials, construction Associates Degree in Wood Technology,
processes and construction specifications. Laney College, 1997
Mr. Mann has performed condition surveys for handful of agencies ranging
from rural to metropolis. He has completed condition surveys for close to Affiliations
1500 center line miles of roads and streets which include surveys on USGBC Green Associate 2009
bituminous Asphalt Concrete Pavements, Portland Cement Concrete
Pavements, and gravel surfaced roads. Listed below are some of the
agencies where Mr. Mann has performed condition surveys.
Joined NCE
2011
Representative Projects
Total Years of Experience
• Orange 0 City of 0 Ada County, 3
County Lakeport Idaho
• City of 0 Contra Costa 0 Lake County
Torrance Count
• City of Chula 0 Mendocino 0 City of San
Vista County Bruno
City of Ventura 0 Stanislaus
Clearlake County Count
In addition to conducting field surveys, Mr. Mann has performed all
functions related to data collection and is an active participant in the QC
process. As part of the quality control process, he performs cross-checks
of data in the PMS database. Mr. Mann has performed quality control
checks of field collected data and pavement maintenance history to ensure
that PMS databases are accurate and up to date. During this process, he
also generates detailed reports, which are needed to help perform his
cross-checks of the data collected.
Collaboration. Commitment. Confidence"'
VVIJONCE 'L
Appendix C
Engineering& Environmental Services www.ncenet.com
*V A Collaboration. Commitment. Confidence"
JONCE 'L
Pavement Management Plan
Average (weighted by area ) PCI for:
i . Entire Pavement Network
ii . MPAH Network
iii . Local Network
Engineering& Environmental Services www.ncenet.com
4; City of Seal Beach 2/24/2014
2014 PMS Update
Street Inventory and PCI Report (MPAH)
MPAH/ �.Secti JnFrorn��To Section Surface Length Width Last Inspection
Narne,A& Anreas Mon CI
Date
i
MPAH 1ST 100 S/OCEAN N/MARINA A AC 887 40 35,480 znel 10/15/2013 100
MPAH 1ST 300 N/PCH 597NE/PCH A AC 597 24 14,328 znel 10/14/2013 58
MPAH 1ST 200E S/MARINA N/PCH A AC 2,172 23 49,956 znel 10/16/2013 66
MPAH 1ST 20OW S/PCH N/MARINA A AC 2,172 22 47,784 znel 10/16/2013 66
MPAH BOLSA 100 E/SEAL BEACH W/BALBOA C AC 1,985 37 73,445 zne2 10/15/2013 100
MPAH BOLSA 200 E/BALBOA W/MAIN C AC 993 37 36,741 zne2 12/3/2013 57
MPAH ELECTRIC 100 E/5TH W/CORSAIR C AC 510 37 18,870 znel 10/15/2013 98
MPAH ELECTRIC 200 E/CORSAIR W/END C AC 380 33 12,540 znel 10/15/2013 93
MPAH ELECTRIC 300 E/SEAL BEACH 19 W/SEAL BEACH C AC 190 34 6,460 znel 10/15/2013 94
MPAH ELECTRIC N 100 E/MAIN W/6TH C AC 960 27 25,920 znel 10/15/2013 46
MPAH ELECTRIC N 200 E/SEAL BEACH 14TH C AC 820 27 22,140 znel 10/15/2013 98
MPAH ELECTRIC N 300 14TH W/MAIN C AC 1,590 27 42,930 znel 10/15/2013 94
MPAH ELECTRIC S 100 E/6TH W/MAIN C AC 910 25 22,750 znel 10/15/2013 85
MPAH ELECTRIC S 200 E/SEAL BEACH 14TH C AC 755 25 18,875 znel 10/15/2013 97
MPAH ELECTRIC S 300 14TH W/MAIN C AC 1,605 25 40,125 znel 10/15/2013 40
MPAH LAMPSON 100 W/BASSWOOD 200 E/O BASSWOOD A AC 200 56 11,200 zne6 10/29/2013 77
MPAH LAMPSON 200 E/BASSWOOD W/SEAL BEACH A AC 3,300 60 198,000 zne6 10/29/2013 81
MPAH LAMPSON 300 E/E CITY LIMIT 200 E/BASSWOOD A AC 7,400 60 444,000 zne6 10/29/2013 92
MPAH MARINA 100 E/PCH 6TH C AC 629 61 38,369 znel 10/15/2013 24
MPAH MARINA 200 E/6TH W/W CITY LIMIT C AC 2,219 50 110,950 znel 10/15/2013 88
MPAH OLD RANCH PARKWAY 100 SEAL BEACH 200 W/SEAL BEACH A AC 520 48 24,960 zne3 10/21/2013 44
MPAH OLD RANCH PARKWAY 200 200 W/SEAL BEACH 720 W/SEAL BEACH A AC 200 64 12,800 zne3 10/21/2013 60
MPAH OLD RANCH PARKWAY 300 720 W/SEAL BEACH W/22 FWY A AC 1,030 34 35,020 zne3 10/21/2013 24
MPAH SEAL BEACH BLVD 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH A AC 1,510 40 60,400 znel 10/15/2013 95
MPAH SEAL BEACH BLVD 100 S/PCH N/BOLSA A AC 1,640 97 159,080 zne6 10/15/2013 99
MPAH SEAL BEACH BLVD 200 S/BOLSA N/ADOLFO LOPEZ A AC 3,320 99 328,680 zne6 10/15/2013 100
MPAH SEAL BEACH BLVD 300 S/ADOLFO LOPEZ N/WESTMINSTER A AC 4,080 98 399,840 zne6 10/14/2013 92
MPAH SEAL BEACH BLVD 400 S/WESTMINSTER N/BEVERLY MANOR A AC 4,536 95 430,920 zne6 10/29/2013 83
MPAH SEAL BEACH BLVD 500 OLD RANCH PKY O N/LAMPSON A AC 833 89 74,137 zne6 10/29/2013 96
MPAH SEAL BEACH BLVD 600 S/LAMPSON ST.CLOUD DR A AC 915 77 70,455 zne6 10/29/2013 84
MPAH SEAL BEACH BLVD 700 ST.CLOUD DR PLYMOUTH A AC 1,491 77 114,807 zne6 10/29/2013 93
MPAH SEAL BEACH BLVD 800 S/ROSSMOOR N/BRADBURY A AC 1,040 97 100,880 zne6 10/29/2013 96
MPAH WESTMINSTER 100 W/CITY LIMIT E/SEAL BEACH A AC 4,360 79 344,440 zne6 10/14/2013 58
MPAH WESTMINSTER 200 E/BOLSA CHICA W/SEAL BEACH A AC 10,610 72 763,920t zne6 10/14/2013 36
Very Poor 0-40 4`.''0
MENEEMPF-
Poor 41-59 4% www.ncenet.com
Engineering & Environmental S- Fair 60-74 2% 1 111111
�`� N C E City of Seal peach 2/24/2014
2014 PMS Update
Street Inventory and PCI Report (Local)
MPAH/ :N a m'eX Sect Section Surface Length Width - Last Inspection
Local immL JE - Date PCI
Local 10TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH E AC 660 40 26,400 znel 10/16/2013 92
Local 10TH 200 S/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC E AC 950 40 38,000 znel 10/30/2013 98
Local 10TH 300 S/SEAL N/OCEAN E AC 210 25 5,250 znel 10/31/2013 72
Local 11TH 200 S/ELECTRIC N/LANDING E AC 210 37 7,770 znel 10/16/2013 56
Local 11TH 300 S/SEAL N/OCEAN E AC 210 25 5,250 znel 10/31/2013 86
Local 11TH 400 IS/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC E AC 900 40 36,000 znel 10/31/2013 99
Local 12TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH C AC 860 37 31,820 znel 10/16/2013 98
Local 12TH 200 S/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC E PCC 810 40 32,400 znel 10/30/2013 95
Local 12TH 300 S/SEAL N/OCEAN E AC 210 24 5,040 znel 10/30/2013 81
Local 13TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH E AC 960 21 20,160 znel 10/16/2013 44
Local 13TH 200 S/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC E AC 710 40 28,400 znel 10/30/2013 97
Local 13TH 300 S/SEAL N/OCEAN E AC 210 25 5,250 znel 10/30/2013 87
Local 14TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH E AC 1,010 21 21,210 znel 10/16/2013 32
Local 14TH 200 S/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC E AC 660 40 26,400 znel 10/31/2013 95
Local 14TH 300 S/SEAL N/OCEAN E AC 210 25 5,250 znel 10/31/2013 58
Local 15TH 100 IS/ELECTRIC N/PCH E AC 1,110 21 23,310 znel 10/16/2013 23
Local 16TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH E AC 1,160 21 24,360 znel 10/16/2013 52
Local 17TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH E AC 1,260 21 26,460 znel 10/16/2013 67
Local 2ND 100 S/OCEAN N/CENTRAL E AC 860 40 34,400 znel 10/28/2013 98
Local 3RD ST 100 S/OCEAN N/CENTRAL E AC 760 40 30,400 znel 1 10/28/2013 99
Local 4TH ST 100 S/OCEAN N/MARINA E AC 1,200 40 48,000 znel 10/28/2013 99
Local 5TH 100 S/MARINA N/PCH C AC 660 60 39,600 znel 10/30/2013 88
Local 5TH 200 S/OCEAN N/MARINA E AC 1,400 40 56,000 znel 10/30/2013 90
Local 6TH 100 S/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC E AC 1,300 40 52,000 znel 10/30/2013 100
Local 7TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/MARINA E AC 210 40 8,400 znel 10/16/2013 98
Local 7TH 200 S/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC E AC 1,280 40 51,200 znel 10/30/2013 100
Local 8TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH E AC 460 40 18,400 znel 10/16/2013 100
Local 8TH 200 S/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC E AC 1,150 40 46,000 znel 10/30/2013 100
Local ADOLFO LOPEZ 100 W/END 425 E/SEAL BEACH E AC 800 60 48,000 zne6 10/13/2013 81
Local ADOLFO LOPEZ 200 W/SEAL BEACH 425 W/SEAL BEACH E AC 425 60 25,500 zne6 10/13/2013 63
Local AGUA 100 S/MARLIN N/END E AC 220 27 5,940 zne5 10/25/2013 94
Local JALMOND 100 E/OLEANDER IW/ASTER C AC 4,390 36 158,040 zne3 10/21/2013 1 91
Engineering & Environmental Services Page 1 of 6
�`� N C E City of Seal peach 2/24/2014
2014 PMS Update
Street Inventory and PCI Report (Local)
F - Length
Local Narn"en I D Date PCI
Local ALMOND 200 E/VIOLET ROSE CIR C AC 765 37 28,305 zne3 10/21/2013 99
Local ALMOND 300 ROSE CIR W/OLEANDER C AC 705 37 26,085 zne3 10/21/2013 98
Local ASTER 100 S/ALMOND N/BIRCHWOOD E AC 1,239 37 45,843 zne3 10/21/2013 100
Local ASTER 200 N/BIRCHWOOD N/CANDLEBERRY E AC 206 37 7,622 zne3 10/21/2013 97
Local AVALON 100 S/CATALINA N/END E AC 430 33 14,190 zne2 10/25/2013 97
Local BALBOA 100 S/BOLSA N/CATALINA C AC 1,060 37 39,220 zne2 10/25/2013 27
Local BALBOA 200 S/PCH N/BOLSA E AC 660 37 24,420 zne2 10/25/2013 100
Local BANYAN 100 E/CAMELIA W/COLUMBINE E AC 600 33 19,800 zne3 10/21/2013 88
Local BASSWOOD 100 E/ASTER W/LAMPSON C AC 410 36 14,760 zne3 10/21/2013 100
Local BAYOU 100 E/BAYSIDE W/HARBOR E AC 630 33 20,790 zne2 10/31/2013 96
Local BAYSIDE 100 S/BOLSA N/CRESTVIEW E AC 1,410 33 46,530 zne2 10/31/2013 95
Local BEACHCOMBER 100 S/BOLSA N/SEA BREEZE E AC 1,160 33 38,280 zne2 10/25/2013 100
Local BERYL COVE 100 S/EMERALD COVE N/MARLIN E AC 360 33 11,880 zne5 10/25/2013 96
Local BIRCHWOOD 100 E/OLEANDER W/ASTER E AC 3,660 33 120,780 zne3 10/17/2013 98
Local BLUE BELL 100 S/ALMOND N/BIRCHWOOD E AC 710 33 23,430 zne3 10/21/2013 74
Local CAMELIA 100 S/ALMOND N/BANYAN E AC 590 33 19,470 zne3 10/21/2013 88
Local CANDLEBERRY 100 E/FUCHSIA W/LAMPSON E AC 2,210 36 79,560 zne3 10/17/2013 98
Local CANDLEBERRY 200 E/MARIGOLD W/FUCHSIA E AC 1,560 37 57,720 zne3 10/17/2013 100
Local CANDLEBERRY 300 E/WISTERIA W/OLEANDER E AC 1,660 33 54,780 zne3 10/18/2013 96
Local CARAVEL 100 S/MARINA N/CORSAIR E AC 360 37 13,320 znel 10/28/2013 97
Local CARMEL 100 E/SURF W/COASTLINE E AC 360 37 13,320 zne2 10/28/2013 96
Local CARNATION 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 230 33 7,590 zne3 10/21/2013 87
Local CATALINA 100 E/BALBOA W/COASTLINE E AC 1,910 37 70,670 zne2 10/25/2013 97
Local CATALINA 200 E/END W/BALBOA E AC 2,470 37 91,390 zne2 10/25/2013 95
Local CENTRAL 100 E/12TH W/MAIN C AC 860 40 34,400 znel 10/31/2013 100
Local CENTRAL 200 E/1ST W/2ND C AC 260 20 5,200 znel 10/31/2013 100
Local CENTRAL 300 E/2ND W/MAIN C AC 2,160 40 86,400 znel 10/28/2013 100
Local CENTRAL WY 100 E/2ND W/1ST E AC 260 40 10,400 znel 10/28/2013 99
Local CENTRAL WY 200 E/4TH W/2ND E AC 560 38 21,280 znel 10/28/2013 99
Local CENTRAL WY 300 E/5TH W/4TH E AC 260 38 9,880 znel 10/28/2013 98
Local CLIPPER 100 E/CARAVEL W/ELECTRIC E AC 910 33 30,030 znel 10/28/2013 97
Local 1C LOVER 1 100 IS/ALMOND dN/END E AC 130 33 4,290 zne3 10/21/2013 99
Engineering & Environmental Services Page 2 of 6
�`� N C E City of Seal peach 2/24/2014
2014 PMS Update
Street Inventory and PCI Report (Local)
Surface MPAH/ Section Section Length
Local Nam"en I DA Date PCI
Local COASTLINE 100 S/CARMEL N/END E AC 480 27 12,960 zne2 10/28/2013 95
Local COASTLINE 200 E/CARMEL W/BALBOA E AC 2,380 33 78,540 zne2 10/25/2013 93
Local COLLEGE PARK 100 E/HARVARD W/HARVARD C AC 2,590 37 95,830 zne4 10/16/2013 94
Local COLLEGE PARK 200 E/HARVARD W/CITY LIMIT C AC 940 44 41,360 zne4 10/16/2013 64
Local COLUMBINE 100 S/ALMOND N/BANYAN E AC 210 33 6,930 zne3 10/21/2013 89
Local CORAL 100 E/END W/BAY VIEW E AC 230 27 6,210 zne2 10/25/2013 93
Local CORSAIR 100 S/CARAVEL N/SCHOONER E AC 1,020 33 33,660 znel 10/28/2013 96
Local CREST 100 S/CATALINA N/CRESTVIEW E AC 210 33 6,930 zne2 10/25/2013 94
Local CRESTVIEW 100 E/CATALINA W/AVALON E AC 3,060 33 100,980 zne2 10/25/2013 96
Local CRYSTAL 100 S/CRYSTAL COVE N/END E AC 240 27 6,480 zne5 10/25/2013 96
Local CRYSTAL COVE 100 1 E/MARBLE COVE W/OPAL COVE E AC 520 33 17,160 zne5 10/25/2013 96
Local DAFFODIL 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 230 33 7,590 zne3 10/21/2013 87
Local DAHLIA 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 230 33 71590 zne3 10/21/2013 96
Local DAISY 100 S/ALMOND N/BIRCHWOOD E AC 410 33 13,530 zne3 10/21/2013 59
Local I DAISY 200 S/CANDLEBERRY N/DOGWOOD E AC 210 33 6,930 zne3 10/17/2013 80
Local DAISY CIRCLE 100 IS/FIR N/END E AC 230 33 7,590 zne3 10/18/2013 73
Local DARTMOUTH 100 E/END W/HARVARD E AC 180 34 6,120 zne4 10/16/2013 77
Local DOGWOOD 100 E/DAISY W/IRONWOOD E AC 1,470 33 48,510 zne3 10/17/2013 89
Local DOGWOOD 200 E/MARIGOLD W/FUCHSIA E AC 1,520 33 50,160 zne3 10/17/2013 88
Local DOGWOOD 300 E/WISTERIA W/OLEANDER E AC 1,710 33 56,430 zne3 10/18/2013 71
Local DOLPHIN 100 1 S/SEAL WAY N/OCEAN E AC 226 24 5,424 znel 10/30/2013 70
Local DOLPHIN 200 N/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC E AC 582 24 13,968 znel 10/30/2013 92
Local DORY 100 S/GALLEON N/SCHOONER E AC 360 28 10,080 zne2 10/28/2013 94
Local DRIFTWOOD 100 E/BALBOA W/COASTLINE E AC 1,460 33 48,180 zne2 10/28/2013 99
Local IEBBTIDE 100 S/COASTLINE N/END E AC 230 27 6,210 zne2 10/28/2013 96
Local ELDER 100 HEATHER W/IRONWOOD E AC 2,002 36 72,072 zne3 10/17/2013 100
Local ELDER 200 E/OLEANDER HEATHER E AC 1,130 36 40,680 zne3 10/17/2013 99
Local ELDER 300 E/VIOLET W/PRIMROSE E AC 1,380 33 45,540 zne3 10/18/2013 90
Local EMERALD COVE 100 E/BERYL COVE W/JADE COVE E AC 580 33 19,140 zne5 10/25/2013 96
Local EMERALD PL 100 S/EMERALD COVE N/END E AC 230 27 6,210 zne5 10/25/2013 96
Local FATHOM 100 E/SILVER SHOALS W/BALBOA E AC 810 33 26,730 zne2 10/28/2013 99
Local IFERN 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 230 33 7,590 zne3 10/21/2013 94
Engineering & Environmental Services Page 3 of 6
�`� N C E City of Seal peach 2/24/2014
2014 PMS Update
Street Inventory and PCI Report (Local)
F - Length
Local NameN I r Date PCI
Local FIR 100 E/GOLDENROD W/IRONWOOD E AC 1,460 33 48,180 zne3 10/17/2013 99
Local FIR 200 E/ROSE W/HEATHER E AC 1,260 33 41,580 zne3 10/17/2013 80
Local FIR 300 E/SUNFLOWER W/ROSE E AC 330 33 10,890 zne3 10/17/2013 100
Local FIR 400 E/WISTERIA W/SUNFLOWER E AC 1,220 33 40,260 zne3 10/17/2013 100
Local FIR CIRCLE 100 S/FIR N/END E AC 130 60 7,800 zne3 10/17/2013 100
Local FUCHSIA 100 S/BIRCHWOOD N/ELDER E AC 640 33 21,120 zne3 10/17/2013 100
Local FUCHSIA CIRCLE 100 S/FIR N/END E AC 330 33 10,890 zne3 10/17/2013 99
Local GALLEON 100 S/ELECTRIC N/DORY E AC 970 33 32,010 znel 10/28/2013 78
Local GOLDENROD 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 230 33 71590 zne3 10/21/2013 97
Local GOLDENROD 200 IS/ELDER N/END E AC 610 33 20,130 zne3 10/17/2013 99
Local GUAVA 100 E/IRONWOOD W/END E AC 530 33 17,490 zne3 10/18/2013 99
Local GUAVA 200 E/PANSY W/HEATHER E AC 1,360 33 44,880 zne3 10/18/2013 99
Local HARBOR 100 S/BAYSIDE N/BAYOU E AC 760 33 25,080 zne2 10/31/2013 20
Local HARVARD 100 S/COLLEGE PARK W/END E AC 3,310 37 122,470 zne4 10/16/2013 94
Local HAZELNUT 100 S/GUAVA N/HEATHER E AC 1,210 33 39,930 zne3 10/18/2013 99
Local HAZELNUT 200 E/HEATHER W/ROSE E AC 1,610 33 53,130 zne3 10/18/2013 80
Local HAZELNUT 300 E/WISTERIA W/SUNFLOWER E AC 1,310 33 43,230 zne3 10/18/2013 44
Local HEATHER 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 230 33 7,590 zne3 10/21/2013 97
Local HEATHER 200 S/ELDER N/HAZELNUT C AC 790 37 29,230 zne3 10/17/2013 99
Local HEATHER 300 S/HAZELNUT N/LAMPSON C AC 490 37 18,130 zne3 10/17/2013 97
Local IRIS 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 230 33 7,590 zne3 10/21/2013 88
Local IRIS 200 HAZELNUTAVE IRONWOOD AVE E AC 226 32 7,232 zne3 10/18/2013 35
Local IRONWOOD 50 S/CANDLEBERRY ELDER C AC 524 33 17,292 zne3 10/17/2013 100
Local IRONWOOD 100 ELDER N/HEATHER C AC 1,967 33 64,911 zne3 10/17/2013 100
Local PRONWOOD 200 E/ROSE W/IRIS C AC 1,420 33 46,860 zne3 10/18/2013 41
Local IRONWOOD 300 E/WISTERIA W/TULIP C AC 322 37 11,914 zne3 10/16/2013 100
Local IRONWOOD 400 W/TULIP W/SUNFLOWER C AC 1,020 37 37,740 zne3 10/18/2013 40
Local ISLAND VIEW 100 S/BOLSA N/SEA BREEZE E AC 1,110 33 36,630 zne2 10/25/2013 100
Local JADE COVE 100 S/EMERALD COVE N/MARLIN E AC 360 33 11,880 zne5 10/25/2013 94
Local JASMIN 100 S/ALMOND IN/END E I AC 230 33 7,590 zne3 10/21/2013 95
Local LAGUNA 100 0 S/MARLIN 0 N/END E I AC 380 27 10,260 zne5 10/25/2013 97
Local ILANDING jL 1 100 E/12TH JW/11TH E I AC 260 42 10,920 znel 10/16/2013 40
Engineering & Environmental Services Page 4 of 6
�`� N C E City of Seal peach 2/24/2014
2014 PMS Update
Street Inventory and PCI Report (Local)
Surface MPAH/ &Nam Section From To Section Length
Local I __M I DA Date
Local LANDING 200 E/SEAL BEACH W/12TH E AC 1,210 21 25,410 znel 10/16/2013 100
Local LOYOLA PLAZA 100 S/COLLEGE PARK N/END E AC 330 25 8,250 zne4 10/16/2013 80
Local MAIN 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH C AC 690 55 37,950 znel 10/30/2013 55
Local MAIN 200 S/OCEAN AVE N/ELECTRIC C AC 1,190 57 67,830 znel 10/30/2013 89
Local MAR VISTA 100 E/CATALINA W/COASTLINE E AC 1,610 33 53,130 zne2 10/28/2013 99
Local MAR VISTA 200 JW/COASTLINE PCH E AC 123 36 4,428 zne2 10/28/2013 99
Local MARBLE COVE 100 S/CRYSTAL COVE N/MARLIN E AC 360 33 11,880 zne5 10/25/2013 97
Local MARIGOLD 100 S/BIRCHWOOD N/CANDLEBERRY E AC 160 33 5,280 zne3 10/17/2013 72
Local MARIGOLD 200 S/CANDLEBERRY N/DOGWOOD E AC 160 33 5,280 zne3 10/17/2013 85
Local MARINE 100 E/ELECTRIC W/DOLPHIN E AC 320 24 7,680 znel 10/31/2013 91
Local MARLIN 100 E/SEAL BEACH W/BALBOA E AC 1,610 37 59,570 zne5 10/25/2013 96
Local NEPTUNE 100 S/SEAL N/OCEAN E AC 210 24 5,040 znel 10/14/2013 94
Local NORTH GATE 100 W/SEAL BEACH 76 W/SEAL BEACH E AC 760 42 31,920 zne6 10/30/2013 97
Local NORTH GATE 200 76 E/SEAL BEACH W/END E AC 3,300 25 82,500 zne6 10/30/2013 100
Local OCCIDENTAL 100 E/STANFORD W/HARVARD E AC 160 33 5,280 zne4 10/16/2013 79
Local OCEAN 100 E/ELECTRIC W/MAIN C AC 2,440 51 124,440 znel 10/15/2013 90
Local OCEAN 200 E/MAIN W/1ST C AC 2,490 52 129,480 znel 10/15/2013 93
Local OLEANDER 100 S/ALMOND N/FIR E AC 1,320 36 47,520 zne3 10/18/2013 56
Local OPAL COVE 100 S/CRYSTAL COVE N/MARLIN E AC 360 33 11,880 zne5 10/28/2013 97
Local PANSY 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 430 33 14,190 zne6 10/18/2013 91
Local PANSY 200 IS/FIR N/GUAVA E AC 160 33 5,280 zne6 10/18/2013 99
Local PRIMROSE 100 S/DOGWOOD N/ELDER E AC 210 33 6,930 zne3 10/18/2013 96
Local PRIMROSE CIR 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 430 33 14,190 zne3 10/21/2013 94
Local PRINCETON 100 E/END W/HARVARD E AC 230 30 6,900 zne4 10/21/2013 63
Local PURDUE CIRCLE 100 S/END N/COLLEGE PARK E AC 68 27 1,836 zne4 10/16/2013 52
Local RIVIERA 100 S/MARLIN N/BOLSA E AC 560 31 17,360 zne5 10/25/2013 96
Local ROSE 100 S/ALMOND - N/END C AC 430 33 14,190 zne3 10/21/2013 94
Local ROSE 200 S/FIR N/HAZELNUT C AC 390 37 14,430 zne3 10/17/2013 99
Local ROSE 300 S/HAZELNUT N/LAMPSON C AC 440 37 16,280 zne3 10/17/2013 99
Local I ROSSMOOR CTR 100 E/SEAL BEACH W/WEST RD C AC 864 30 25,920 zne3 10/31/2013 89
Local ROSSMOOR CTR 200 E/WEST RD W/MONTECITO C AC 364 28 10,192 zne3 10/31/2013 37
Local ISAND PIPER 100 S/BOLSA IN/TAPER E AC 1,110 33 36,630 znel 10/31/2013 100
Engineering & Environmental Services Page 5 of 6
�`� N C E City of Seal peach 2/24/2014
2014 PMS Update
Street Inventory and PCI Report (Local)
Length MPAH/ Nam"en Section From To Section Surface Area (sf) Zone Last Inspection PCI
DA Date
Local SCHOONER 100 E/GALLEON W/DORY E AC 660 33 21,780 znel 10/28/2013 91
Local SEA BREEZE 100 S/BOLSA N/CATALINA E AC 1,160 33 38,280 zne2 10/25/2013 100
Local SEAL 100 E/11TH W/10TH E PCC 290 15 4,350 znel 10/30/2013 72
Local SEAL WAY 100 E/ELECTRIC W/14TH E PCC 1,240 13 16,120 znel 10/30/2013 88
Local SEAL WAY 200 E/14TH W/11TH E PCC 920 12 11,040 znel 10/30/2013 100
Local SILVER SHOALS 100 S/BOLSA N/FATHOM E AC 300 33 9,900 zne2 10/28/2013 27
Local SOUTH SHORE 100 S/BOLSA N/TAPER E AC 1,060 33 34,980 zne2 10/25/2013 100
Local STANFORD 100 N/COLLEGE PARK W/COLLEGE PARK E AC 1,860 32 59,520 zne3 10/16/2013 94
Local SUNFLOWER 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 430 33 14,190 zne3 10/18/2013 99
Local SUNFLOWER 200 IS/FIR N/IRONWOOD E AC 560 37 20,720 zne3 10/18/2013 43
Local SURF 100 S/CATALINA N/END E AC 480 33 15,840 zne2 10/28/2013 97
Local TAPER 100 S/BOLSA N/CATALINA E AC 1,110 33 36,630 zne2 10/25/2013 100
Local TEABERRY 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 430 33 14,190 zne2 10/18/2013 98
Local TULIP 100 S/IRONWOOD N/LAMPSON E AC 70 36 2,520 zne3 10/16/2013 100
Local VIOLET 100 S/ALMOND N/CANDLEBERRY E AC 660 33 21,780 zne3 10/18/2013 98
Local VIOLET 200 S/ELDER N/FIR E AC 160 33 5,280 zne3 10/18/2013 48
Local WISTERIA 100 S/DOGWOOD N/IRONWOOD E AC 990 37 1 36,630 zne3 10/17/2013 91
Local WISTERIA 200 S/END N/DOGWOOD E AC 1,040 33 34,320 zne3 10/17/2013 90
Local YALE 100 E/COLLEGE PARK W/COLLEGE PARK E AC 1,160 33 38,280 zne4 10/16/2013 86
Local YALE CIRCLE 100 E/END W/YALE E AC 130 48 6,240 zne4 10/16/2013 84
C-Collector E- Residential
Very Poor 0-40 4%
Poor 41-59 6%
Fair 60-74 10%
Engineering & Environmental Services Page 6 of 6
Collaboration. Commitment. Confidence"'
VVIJONCE 'L
Appendix D
Engineering& Environmental Services www.ncenet.com
*V A Collaboration. Commitment. Confidence"
JONCE 'L
Pavement Management Plan
Work History
( Maintenance & Rehabilitation )
Engineering& Environmental Services •
City of Seal Beach 2/25/2014
�!N C E 2014 PMS Update
Maintenance and Rehabilitation Treatments
Name Section Section ST* Length Width Area (sf)* Date Work
10TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH E AC 660 40 26,400 1/1/1970 New Construction - Initial (Major MR)
10TH 200 S/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC E AC 950 40 38,000 2/1/2000 Overlay - AC (Major MR)
10TH 300 S/SEAL N/OCEAN E AC 210 25 5,250 2/1/2000 Overlay - AC (Major MR)
11TH 200 S/ELECTRIC N/LANDING E AC 210 37 7,770 7/1/1997 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
11TH 300 S/SEAL N/OCEAN E AC 1 2101 25 5,250 1/1/1970 New Construction - Initial (Major MR)
11TH 400 S/OCEAN N/ ELECTRIC E AC 900 40 36,000 1/1/1970 Initial Construction
12TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH C AC 860 37 31,820 1/1/2008 GRIND &OVERLAY (Major MR)
12TH 200 S/ OCEAN N/ ELECTRIC E PCC 810 40 32,400 10/1/1997 New Construction - PCC (Major MR)
12TH 300 S/SEAL N/OCEAN E AC 210 24 5,040 1/1/1970 New Construction - Initial (Major MR)
13TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH E AC 960 21 20,160 7/1/1997 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
13TH 200 S/ OCEAN N/ ELECTRIC E AC 710 40 28,400 1/1/1970 Initial Construction
13TH 300 S/SEAL N/OCEAN E AC 210 25 5,250 7/2/2012 Slurry Seal (Global MR)
14TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH E AC 1,010 21 21,210 7/1/1997 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
14TH 200 S/ OCEAN N/ ELECTRIC E AC 660 40 26,400 1/1/1970 Initial Construction
14TH 300 S/SEAL N/OCEAN E AC 210 25 5,250 7/2/2012 Slurry Seal (Global MR)
15TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH E AC 1,110 21 23,310 7/1/1997 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
16TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH E AC 1,160 21 24,360 7/1/1997 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
17TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH E AC 1,260 21 26,460 7/1/1997 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
1ST 100 S/OCEAN N/MARINA E AC 887 40 35,480 5/24/2010 Overlay - AC (Major MR)
1ST 300 N/PCH 597NE/PCH E AC 597 24 14,328 1/1/1970 New Construction - Initial (Major MR)
1ST 200E S/MARINA N/PCH E AC 2,172 23 49,956 5/1/2003 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
1ST 20OW S/ PCH N/ MARINA E AC 2,172 22 47,784 5/1/2003 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
2ND 100 S/ OCEAN N/CENTRAL A AC 860 401 34,400 1/1/1970 Initial Construction
3RD ST 100 S/ OCEAN N/CENTRAL A AC 760 40 30,400 1/1/1970 Initial Construction
4TH ST 100 S/ OCEAN N/ MARINA A AC 1,200 40 48,000 1/1/1970 Initial Construction
5TH 100 S/MARINA N/PCH C AC 660 60 39,600 1/1/2010 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
5TH 200 S/OCEAN N/MARINA E AC 1,400 40 56,000 1/1/1970 New Construction - Initial (Major MR)
6TH 100 S/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC E AC 1,300 401 52,000 5/24/2010 GRIND &OVERLAY (Major MR)
7TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/MARINA E AC 210 40 8,400 5/24/2010 GRIND &OVERLAY (Major MR)
7TH 200 S/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC E AC 1,280 40 51,200 5/24/2010 GRIND &OVERLAY (Major MR)
8TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH E AC 460 40 18,400 5/24/2010 GRIND &OVERLAY (Major MR)
8TH 200 S/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC E AC 1,1501 40 46,000 5/24/2010 GRIND &OVERLAY (Major MR)
•
Cngineei ii ig Environmental Services Page 1 of 7
City of Seal Beach 2/25/2014
�!N C E 2014 PMS Update
Maintenance and Rehabilitation Treatments
ame Section Section ST* Length Width Area (sf)* rk
ADOLFO LOPEZ 100 W/END 425 E/SEAL BEACH E AC 800 60 48,000 1/1/2007 GRIND &OVERLAY (Major MR)
ADOLFO LOPEZ 200 W/SEAL BEACH 425 W/SEAL BEACH E AC 425 60 25,500 1/1/2007 GRIND &OVERLAY (Major MR)
AGUA 100 S/ MARLIN N/ END A AC 220 27 5,940 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
ALMOND 100 E/OLEANDER W/ASTER C AC 4,390 36 158,040 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
ALMOND 200 E/VIOLET E EDGE ROSE CIR C AC 765 371 28,305 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
ALMOND 300 E EDGE ROSE CIR W/OLEANER A AC 705 37 26,085 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
ASTER 100 S/ALMOND N/ BIRCHWOOD E AC 1,239 37 45,843 10/1/2011 GRIND &OVERLAY (Major MR)
ASTER 200 N/ BIRCHWOOD N/CANDLEBERRY A AC 206 37 7,622 10/1/2011 GRIND &OVERLAY (Major MR)
AVALON 100 S/ CATALINA N/ END A AC 430 33 14,190 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
BALBOA 100 S/BOLSA N/CATALINA C AC 1,0601 37 39,220 5/1/2003 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
BALBOA 200 S/PCH N/BOLSA E AC 660 37 24,420 6/11/2012 ARHM Rehabilitation (Major MR)
BANYAN 100 E/CAMELIA W/COLUMBINE E AC 600 33 19,800 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
BASSWOOD 100 E/ASTER W/LAMPSON C AC 410 36 14,760 5/1/2011 GRIND &OVERLAY (Major MR)
BAYOU 100 E/BAYSIDE W/HARBOR E AC 1 630 331 20,790 1/1/2008 GRIND &OVERLAY (Major MR)
BAYSIDE 100 S/BOLSA N/CRESTVIEW C AC 11410 33 46,530 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
BEACHCOMBER 100 S/BOLSA N/SEA BREEZE E AC 1,160 33 38,280 1/1/2008 GRIND &OVERLAY (Major MR)
BERYL COVE 100 S/ EMERALD COVE N/ MARLIN A AC 360 33 11,880 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
BIRCHWOOD 100 E/ OLEANDER W/ASTER A AC 3,660 33 120,780 4/1/1984 New Construction (Major MR)
BLUE BELL 100 S/ALMOND N/BIRCHWOOD E AC 710 33 23,430 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
BOLSA 100 E/SEAL BEACH W/MAIN A AC 2,810 37 103,970 1/1/2006 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
BOLSA 100 E/SEAL BEACH W/BALBOA A AC 1,985 37 73,445 6/11/2012 ARHM Rehabilitation (Major MR)
CAMELIA 100 S/ALMOND N/BANYAN E AC 590 33 19,470 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
CANDLEBERRY 100 E/FUCHSIA W/LAMPSON E AC 2,210 36 79,560 6/30/2011 GRIND &OVERLAY (Major MR)
CANDLEBERRY 200 E/MARIGOLD W/FUCHSIA E AC 1,560 371 57,720 5/24/2010 GRIND &OVERLAY (Major MR)
CANDLEBERRY 300 E/WISTERIA W/OLEANDER E AC 1,660 33 54,780 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
CARAVEL 100 S/ MARINA N/ CORSAIR A AC 360 37 13,320 1/1/2010 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
CARMEL 100 E/ SURF W/COASTLINE A AC 360 37 13,320 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
CARNATION 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 230 33 7,590 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
CATALINA 100 E/BALBOA W/COASTLINE C AC 1 1,910 371 70,670 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
CATALINA 200 E/END W/BALBOA C AC 2,470 37 91,390 8/11/1999 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
CENTRAL 100 E/12TH W/MAIN C AC 860 40 34,400 5/24/2010 GRIND &OVERLAY (Major MR)
CENTRAL 200 E/1ST W/2ND C AC 260 20 5,200 5/24/2010 GRIND &OVERLAY (Major MR)
•
Lngineei si ig Environmental Services Page 2 of 7
City of Seal Beach 2/25/2014
�!N C E 2014 PMS Update
Maintenance and Rehabilitation Treatments
Name Section Section ST* Length Width Area (sf)* rk A
CENTRAL 300 E/2ND W/MAIN C AC 2,160 40 86,400 5/24/2010 GRIND &OVERLAY (Major MR)
CENTRAL WY 100 E/ 2ND W/ 1ST A AC 260 40 10,400 1/1/1970 Initial Construction
CENTRAL WY 200 E/4TH W/ 2ND A AC 560 38 21,280 1/1/1970 Initial Construction
CENTRAL WY 300 E/ 5TH W/4TH A AC 260 38 9,880 1/1/1970 Initial Construction
CLIPPER 100 E/ CARAVEL W/ ELECTRIC A AC 1 9101 33 30,030 1/1/2010 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
CLOVER 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 130 33 4,290 7/9/2013 Slurry Seal (Global MR)
COASTLINE 100 S/CARMEL N/END E AC 480 27 12,960 1/1/2010 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
COASTLINE 200 E/CARMEL W/BALBOA C AC 2,380 33 78,540 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
COLLEGE PARK 100 E/HARVARD W/HARVARD C AC 2,590 371 95,830 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
COLLEGE PARK 200 E/HARVARD W/CITY LIMIT E AC 940 44 41,360 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
COLUMBINE 100 S/ALMOND N/BANYAN E AC 210 33 6,930 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
CORAL 100 E/ END W/ BAY VIEW A AC 230 27 6,210 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
CORSAIR 100 S/CARAVEL N/SCHOONER E AC 1,020 33 33,660 1/1/2010 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
CREST 100 S/CATALINA N/CRESTVIEW E AC 210 33 6,930 6/30/2012 Slurry Seal (Global MR)
CRESTVIEW 100 E/ CATALINA W/AVALON A AC 3,060 33 100,980 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
CRYSTAL 100 S/ CRYSTAL COVE N/ END A AC 240 27 6,480 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
CRYSTAL COVE 100 E/ MARBLE COVE W/ OPAL COVE A AC 520 33 17,160 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
DAFFODIL 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 230 33 7,590 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
DAHLIA 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 230 33 7,590 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
DAISY 100 S/ALMOND N/BIRCHWOOD C AC 410 33 13,530 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
DAISY 200 S/CANDLEBERRY N/DOGWOOD E AC 210 33 6,930 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
DAISY CIRCLE 100 S/FIR N/END E AC 230 33 7,590 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
DARTMOUTH 100 E/END W/HARVARD E AC 180 34 6,120 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
DOGWOOD 100 E/DAISY W/IRONWOOD E AC 1,470 33 48,510 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment- Slurry Seal (Global MR)
DOGWOOD 200 E/MARIGOLD W/FUCHSIA E AC 1,520 33 50,160 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
DOGWOOD 300 E/WISTERIA W/OLEANDER E AC 1,710 33 56,430 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
DOLPHIN 100 S/SEAL WAY N/ OCEAN E AC 226 24 5,424 7/2/2012 Slurry Seal (Global MR)
DOLPHIN 200 N/ OCEAN N/ ELECTRIC E AC 582 24 13,968 1/1/1970 Initial Construction
DORY 100 S/GALLEON N/SCHOONER E AC 360 28 10,080 1/1/2010 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
DRIFTWOOD 100 E/BALBOA W/COASTLINE E AC 1,460 33 48,180 1/1/2008 GRIND &OVERLAY (Major MR)
EBBTIDE 100 S/ COASTLINE N/ END A AC 230 27 6,210 1/1/1970 Initial Construction
ELDER 100 HEATHER W/IRONWOOD E AC 2,0021 36 72,072 6/30/2011 GRIND &OVERLAY (Major MR)
•
Lngineeii si ig 6, Environmental Services Page 3 of 7
City of Seal Beach 2/25/2014
�!N C E 2014 PMS Update
Maintenance and Rehabilitation Treatments
Name Section To Section ST* Length Width Area (sf)* rk
ELDER 200 E/OLEANDER HEATHER E AC 1,130 36 40,680 7/9/2013 Slurry Seal (Global MR)
ELDER 300 E/VIOLET W/PRIMROSE E AC 1,380 33 45,540 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
ELECTRIC 100 E/ 5TH W/CORSAIR A AC 510 37 18,870 2/12/2013 ARHM Rehabilitation (Major MR)
ELECTRIC 200 E/CORSAIR W/END A AC 380 33 12,540 1/1/2010 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
ELECTRIC 300 E/SEAL BEACH 19 W/SEAL BEACH A AC 1 1901 34 6,460 1/1/1970 New Construction - Initial (Major MR)
ELECTRIC N 100 E/MAIN W/6TH A AC 960 27 25,920 7/2/2012 Slurry Seal (Global MR)
ELECTRIC N 200 E/SEAL BEACH W/MAIN A AC 2,410 27 65,070 6/30/2010 GRIND &OVERLAY (Major MR)
ELECTRIC N 300 14TH W/ MAIN A AC 1,590 27 42,930 5/6/2013 ARHM Rehabilitation (Major MR)
ELECTRIC S 100 E/6TH W/MAIN A AC 910 251 22,750 7/2/2012 Slurry Seal (Global MR)
ELECTRIC S 200 E/SEAL BEACH W/MAIN A AC 1 2,360 25 59,000 6/30/2010 GRIND &OVERLAY (Major MR)
EMERALD COVE 100 E/ BERYL COVE W/JADE COVE A AC 580 33 19,140 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
EMERALD PL 100 S/ EMERALD COVE N/ END A AC 230 27 6,210 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
FATHOM 100 E/SILVER SHOALS W/BALBOA E AC 810 33 26,730 8/12/1999 Surface Treatment- Slurry Seal (Global MR)
FERN 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 230 33 7,590 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
FIR 100 E/GOLDENROD W/IRONWOOD E AC 1,460 33 48,180 5/24/2010 GRIND &OVERLAY (Major MR)
FIR 200 E/ROSE W/HEATHER C AC 1,260 33 41,580 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
FIR 300 E/SUNFLOWER W/ROSE C AC 330 33 10,890 5/24/2010 GRIND &OVERLAY (Major MR)
FIR 400 E/WISTERIA W/SUNFLOWER C AC 1,220 33 40,260 5/24/2010 GRIND &OVERLAY (Major MR)
FIR CIRCLE 100 S/FIR N/END E AC 130 601 7,800 7/9/2013 Slurry Seal (Global MR)
FUCHSIA 100 S/BIRCHWOOD N/ELDER C AC 640 33 21,120 5/24/2010 GRIND &OVERLAY (Major MR)
FUCHSIA CIRCLE 100 S/FIR N/END E AC 330 33 10,890 5/24/2010 GRIND &OVERLAY (Major MR)
GALLEON 100 S/ELECTRIC N/DORY E AC 970 33 32,010 1/1/2010 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
GOLDENROD 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 230 33 7,590 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
GOLDENROD 200 S/ELDER N/END E AC 610 33 20,130 5/24/2010 GRIND &OVERLAY (Major MR)
GUAVA 100 E/IRONWOOD W/END E AC 530 33 17,490 6/30/2010 Overlay - AC (Major MR)
GUAVA 200 E/PANSY W/HEATHER E AC 1,360 33 44,880 7/9/2013 Slurry Seal (Global MR)
HARBOR 100 S/BAYSIDE N/BAYOU E AC 760 33 25,080 1/1/2006 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
HARVARD 100 S/COLLEGE PARK W/END C AC 3,310 37 122,470 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
HAZELNUT 100 S/GUAVA N/HEATHER E AC 1,2101 33 39,930 5/24/2010 GRIND &OVERLAY (Major MR)
HAZELNUT 200 E/HEATHER W/ROSE E AC 11610 33 53,130 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
HAZELNUT 300 E/WISTERIA W/SUNFLOWER E AC 1,310 33 43,230 1/1/2006 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
HEATHER 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 230 33 7,590 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
•
Lngineeii ii ig L-nvironmental Services Page 4 of 7
City of Seal Beach 2/25/2014
�!N C E 2014 PMS Update
Maintenance and Rehabilitation Treatments
Name Section JELFrom To Section ST* Length Width Area (sf) rk
HEATHER 200 S/ELDER N/HAZELNUT C AC 790 37 29,230 7/9/2013 Slurry Seal (Global MR)
HEATHER 300 S/HAZELNUT N/LAMPSON C AC 490 37 18,130 1/1/2008 GRIND &OVERLAY (Major MR)
IRIS 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 230 33 7,590 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
IRIS 200 HAZELNUT AVE IRONWOOD AVE E AC 226 32 7,232 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
IRONWOOD 50 S/CANDLEBERRY ELDER E AC 1 5241 33 17,292 6/30/2011 GRIND &OVERLAY (Major MR)
IRONWOOD 100 ELDER N/HEATHER E AC 1,967 33 64,911 5/6/2013 ARHM Rehabilitation (Major MR)
IRONWOOD 200 E/ROSE W/IRIS E AC 1,420 33 46,860 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
IRONWOOD 300 E/ WISTERIA W/TULIP E AC 322 37 11,914 5/6/2013 ARHM Rehabilitation (Major MR)
IRONWOOD 400 W/TULIP W/SUNFLOWER A AC 1,020 371 37,740 1/1/2006 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
ISLAND VIEW 100 S/BOLSA N/SEA BREEZE E AC 1,110 33 36,630 1/1/2008 GRIND &OVERLAY (Major MR)
JADE COVE 100 S/ EMERALD COVE N/ MARLIN A AC 360 33 11,880 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
JASMIN 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 230 33 7,590 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
LAGUNA 100 0 S/ MARLIN 0 N/ END A AC 380 27 10,260 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment- Slurry Seal (Global MR)
LAMPSON 100 W/ BASSWOOD 200 E/ O BASSWOOD A AC 200 561 11,200 7/1/2002 GRIND &OVERLAY (Major MR)
LAMPSON 200 E/BASSWOOD W/ SEAL BEACH A AC 1 3,300 60 198,000 7/1/2002 Overlay - AC (Major MR)
LAMPSON 300 E/ E CITY LIMIT 200 E/ BASSWOOD A AC 7,200 60 432,000 7/1/2002 Overlay - AC (Major MR)
LANDING 100 E/12TH W/11TH E AC 260 42 10,920 7/1/1997 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
LANDING 200 E/SEAL BEACH W/12TH E AC 1,210 21 25,410 7/1/1997 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
LOYOLA PLAZA 100 S/COLLEGE PARK N/END E AC 330 251 8,250 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
MAIN 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH A AC 690 55 37,950 6/1/1995 Overlay - AC (Major MR)
MAIN 200 S/OCEAN AVE N/ELECTRIC A AC 1,190 57 67,830 6/30/2008 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
MAR VISTA 100 E/ CATALINA W/ COASTLINE E AC 1,610 33 53,130 1/1/1970 Initial Construction
MAR VISTA 200 W/COASTLINE PCH E AC 123 36 4,428 1/1/1970 New Construction - Initial (Major MR)
MARBLE COVE 100 S/ CRYSTAL COVE N/ MARLIN A AC 360 33 11,880 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment- Slurry Seal (Global MR)
MARIGOLD 100 S/BIRCHWOOD N/CANDLEBERRY E AC 160 33 5,280 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
MARIGOLD 200 S/CANDLEBERRY N/DOGWOOD E AC 160 33 5,280 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
MARINA 100 E/PCH 6TH E AC 629 61 38,369 10/1/1996 Overlay - AC (Major MR)
MARINA 200 E/ 6TH W/W CITY LIMIT A AC 2,219 50 110,950 10/1/1996 Overlay - AC (Major MR)
MARINE 100 E/ELECTRIC W/DOLPHIN E AC 3201 24 7,680 1/1/1970 New Construction - Initial (Major MR)
MARLIN 100 E/SEAL BEACH W/BALBOA E AC 11610 37 59,570 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
NEPTUNE 100 S/SEAL N/OCEAN E AC 210 24 5,040 1/1/2008 ISurface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
NEPTUNE 100 S/SEAL N/OCEAN E AC 210 24 5,040 7/2/2012 Slurry Seal (Global MR)
•
Lngineei ii ig L-nvironmental Services Page 5 of 7
City of Seal Beach 2/25/2014
�!N C E 2014 PMS Update
Maintenance and Rehabilitation Treatments
ame Section Section ST* Length Width Area (sf)* Work Is
NORTH GATE 100 W/SEAL BEACH 76 W/SEAL BEACH E AC 760 42 31,920 5/24/2010 GRIND &OVERLAY (Major MR)
NORTH GATE 200 76 E/SEAL BEACH W/END E AC 3,300 25 82,500 5/24/2010 GRIND &OVERLAY (Major MR)
OCCIDENTAL 100 E/ STANFORD W/ HARVARD A AC 160 33 5,280 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
OCEAN 100 E/ELECTRIC W/MAIN A AC 2,440 51 124,440 1/1/2007 Overlay - AC (Major MR)
OCEAN 200 E/MAIN W/1ST A AC 21490 52 129,480 1/1/2007 Overlay - AC (Major MR)
OLD RANCH PARKWAY 100 SEAL BEACH 200 W/SEAL BEACH A AC 520 48 24,960 1/1/1986 Overlay - AC (Major MR)
OLD RANCH PARKWAY 200 200 W/ SEAL BEACH 720 W/SEAL BEACH A AC 200 64 12,800 1/1/1986 Overlay -AC (Major MR)
OLD RANCH PARKWAY 300 720 W/ SEAL BEACH W/ 22 FWY A AC 1,030 34 35,020 1/1/1986 Overlay -AC (Major MR)
OLEANDER 100 S/ALMOND N/FIR E AC 1,320 361 47,520 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
OPAL COVE 100 S/ CRYSTAL COVE N/ MARLIN A AC 360 33 11,880 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
PANSY 100 S/ALMOND N/ END E AC 430 33 14,190 5/1/2003 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
PANSY 200 S/FIR N/GUAVA E AC 160 33 5,280 7/9/2013 Slurry Seal (Global MR)
PRIMROSE 100 S/DOGWOOD N/ELDER E AC 210 33 6,930 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
PRIMROSE CIR 100 S/ALMOND N/ END A AC 430 33 14,190 1/1/1990 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
PRINCETON 100 E/END W/HARVARD E AC 230 30 6,900 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
PURDUE CIRCLE 100 S/ END N/COLLEGE PARK A AC 68 27 1,836 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
RIVIERA 100 S/MARLIN N/BOLSA E AC 560 31 17,360 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
ROSE 100 S/ALMOND N/ END C AC 430 33 14,190 5/1/2003 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
ROSE 200 S/FIR N/HAZELNUT C AC 390 37 14,430 7/9/2013 Slurry Seal (Global MR)
ROSE 300 S/HAZELNUT N/LAMPSON C AC 440 37 16,280 7/9/2013 Slurry Seal (Global MR)
ROSSMOOR CTR 100 E/SEAL BEACH W/WEST RD C AC 864 30 25,920 5/1/2003 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
ROSSMOOR CTR 200 E/ WEST RD W/ MONTECITO A AC 364 281 10,192 1/1/1970 Initial Construction
SAND PIPER 100 S/BOLSA N/TAPER E AC 1,110 33 36,630 5/6/2013 ARHM Rehabilitation (Major MR)
SCHOONER 100 E/GALLEON W/DORY E AC 660 33 21,780 1/1/2010 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
SEA BREEZE 100 S/BOLSA N/CATALINA E AC 1 1,160 33 38,280 1/1/2008 Overlay - AC (Major MR)
SEAL 100 E/ 11TH W/ 10TH A PCC 290 15 4,350 1/1/1970 Initial Construction
SEAL BEACH BLVD 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH A AC 1,510 401 60,400 8/1/2001 Overlay - AC (Major MR)
SEAL BEACH BLVD 100 S/PCH N/BOLSA A AC 1,640 97 159,080 6/30/2011 GRIND &OVERLAY (Major MR)
SEAL BEACH BLVD 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH A AC 1,510 40 60,400 7/2/2012 Slurry Seal (Global MR)
SEAL BEACH BLVD 1 200 S/BOLSA N/ADOLFO LOPEZ A I AC 1 3,320 99 328,680 1/1/2008 Overlay -AC (Major MR)
SEAL BEACH BLVD 1 300 S/ADOLFO LOPEZ N/WESTMINSTER A AC 4,080 98 399,84015/24/2010 Overlay - AC (Major MR)
SEAL BEACH BLVD 1 400 S/WESTMINSTER N/BEVERLY MANOR A AC 4,5361 951 430,920 5/24/2010 Overlay - AC (Major MR)
•
Lngineering & L-nvironmental Services Page 6 of 7
City of Seal Beach 2/25/2014
�!N C E 2014 PMS Update
Maintenance and Rehabilitation Treatments
ame Section Section ST* Length Width Area (sf)*
ID Rank (if)* (if)* IFOWMLork A.
SEAL BEACH BLVD 500 OLD RANCH PKY O N/ LAMPSON A AC 833 89 74,137 5/24/2010 Overlay - AC (Major MR)
SEAL BEACH BLVD 600 S/ LAMPSON ST. CLOUD DR A AC 915 77 70,455 5/10/2010 Overlay -AC (Major MR)
SEAL BEACH BLVD 700 ST. CLOUD DR PLYMOUTH A AC 1,491 77 114,807 5/10/2010 Overlay - AC (Major MR)
SEAL BEACH BLVD 800 S/ROSSMOOR N/BRADBURY A AC 1,040 97 100,880 5/10/2010 Overlay - AC (Major MR)
SEAL WAY 100 E/ELECTRIC W/14TH E PCCJ 1,2401 13 16,120 1/1/1970 New Construction - Initial (Major MR)
SEAL WAY 200 E/14TH W/11TH E AC 920 15 13,800 5/24/2010 Overlay - AC (Major MR)
SILVER SHOALS 100 S/BOLSA N/FATHOM E AC 300 33 9,900 1/1/2006 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
SOUTH SHORE 100 S/BOLSA N/TAPER E AC 1,060 33 34,980 5/6/2013 ARHM Rehabilitation (Major MR)
STANFORD 100 N/COLLEGE PARK W/COLLEGE PARK E AC 1,860 321 59,520 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
SUNFLOWER 100 S/ALMOND N/ END E AC 430 33 14,190 5/1/2003 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
SUNFLOWER 200 S/FIR N/IRONWOOD E AC 560 37 20,720 6/1/1995 Overlay - AC (Major MR)
SURF 100 S/ CATALINA N/ END A AC 480 33 15,840 6/30/2010 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
TAPER 100 S/BOLSA N/CATALINA E AC 1,110 33 36,630 5/6/2013 ARHM Rehabilitation (Major MR)
TEABERRY 100 S/ALMOND N/ END A AC 430 33 14,190 1/1/2006 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
TULIP 100 S/IRONWOOD N/LAMPSON E AC 70 36 2,520 5/24/2010 GRIND &OVERLAY (Major MR)
VIOLET 100 S/ALMOND N/ CANDLEBERRY E AC 660 33 21,780 5/1/2003 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
VIOLET 200 S/ELDER N/FIR E AC 160 33 5,280 5/1/2003 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
WESTMINSTER 100 W/CITY LIMIT E/SEAL BEACH A AC 4,360 79 344,440 8/1/1987 Overlay - AC (Major MR)
WESTMINSTER 200 E/BOLSA CHICA W/SEAL BEACH A AC 10,610 72 763,920 10/1/1997 Overlay - AC (Major MR)
WISTERIA 100 S/DOGWOOD N/IRONWOOD C AC 990 37 36,630 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
WISTERIA 200 IS/END N/DOGWOOD I E AC 11040 33 34,320 1/1/2009 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
YALE 100 E/COLLEGE PARK W/COLLEGE PARK E AC 1,160 33 38,280 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
YALE CIRCLE 100 E/END W/YALE E AC 130 48 6,240 1/1/2008 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal (Global MR)
Total Square Feet Maintained in 2012 &2013: 1,530,990
* Definitions = Section Rank - Functional Classification (A = Arterial, C = Collector, E = Residential/Local)
ST- Surface Type
(If) - Linear Foot
(sf) - Square Feet
•
Engineering & Environmental Services Page 7 of 7
Collaboration. Commitment. Confidence"'
VVIJONCE 'L
Appendix E
Engineering& Environmental Services www.ncenet.com
*V A Collaboration. Commitment. Confidence"
�.IONCE 'L
Projected PCI under Existing Funding
Over Next Seven Years
Average (weighted by area ) PCI for:
i . Entire Pavement Network
ii . MPAH Network
iii . Local Network
Engineering& Environmental Services www.ncenet.com
�" City of Seal Beach 2/25/2014
SJONCE Y2014 PMP
2020 Projected PCI (MPAH)
Section PA HI/ • - - • Width
Name ID • • • -•
MPAH 1ST 100 S/OCEAN N/MARINA A AC 887 40 35,480 83
MPAH 1ST 200E S/MARINA N/PCH A AC 2,172 23 49,956 88
MPAH 1ST 200W S/ PCH N/ MARINA A AC 2,172 22 47,784 85
MPAH 1ST 300 N/PCH 597NE/PCH A AC 597 24 14,328 88
MPAH BOLSA 100 E/SEAL BEACH W/BALBOA C AC 1,985 37 73,445 83
MPAH BOLSA 200 E/BALBOA W/MAIN C AC 993 37 36,741 91
MPAH ELECTRIC 100 E/ 5TH W/ CORSAIR C AC 510 37 18,870 79
MPAH ELECTRIC 200 E/CORSAIR W/END C AC 380 33 12,540 91
MPAH ELECTRIC 300 E/SEAL BEACH 19 W/SEAL BEACH C AC 190 34 6,460 75
MPAH ELECTRIC N 100 E/MAIN W/6TH C AC 960 27 25,920 94
MPAH ELECTRIC N 200 E/SEAL BEACH 14TH C AC 820 27 22,140 79
MPAH ELECTRIC N 300 14TH W/ MAIN C AC 1,590 27 421930 83
MPAH ELECTRIC S 100 E/6TH W/MAIN C AC 910 25 22,750 94
MPAH ELECTRIC S 200 E/SEAL BEACH 14TH C AC 755 25 18,875 78
MPAH ELECTRIC S 300 14TH W/MAIN C AC 1,605 25 40,125 34
MPAH LAMPSON 100 W/ BASSWOOD 200 E/ O BASSWOOD A AC 200 56 11,200 88
MPAH LAMPSON 200 E/BASSWOOD W/ SEAL BEACH A AC 3,300 60 198,000 85
MPAH LAMPSON 300 E/ E CITY LIMIT 200 E/ BASSWOOD A AC 7,400 60 444,000 73
MPAH MARINA 100 E/PCH 6TH C AC 629 61 38,369 18
MPAH MARINA 200 E/ 6TH W/ W CITY LIMIT C AC 2,219 50 110,950 86
MPAH OLD RANCH PARKWAY 100 SEAL BEACH 200 W/ SEAL BEACH A AC 520 48 24,960 88
MPAH OLD RANCH PARKWAY 200 200 W/ SEAL BEACH 720 W/ SEAL BEACH A AC 200 64 12,800 88
MPAH OLD RANCH PARKWAY 300 720 W/ SEAL BEACH W/ 22 FWY A AC 1,030 34 35,020 91
MPAH SEAL BEACH BLVD 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH A AC 1,510 40 60,400 76
MPAH SEAL BEACH BLVD 100 S/PCH N/BOLSA A AC 1,640 97 159,080 81
MPAH SEAL BEACH BLVD 200 S/BOLSA N/ADOLFO LOPEZ A AC 3,320 99 328,680 83
MPAH SEAL BEACH BLVD 300 S/ADOLFO LOPEZ N/WESTMINSTER A AC 4,080 98 399,840 73
MPAH SEAL BEACH BLVD 400 S/WESTMINSTER NORTH GATE A I AC 4,536 951 430,920 85
MPAH SEAL BEACH BLVD 500 OLD RANCH PKY O N/ LAMPSON A I AC 833 891 74,137 77
Engineering & Environmental Services 1of2
`" City of Seal Beach 2/25/2014
SJONCE Y2014 PMP
2020 Projected PCI (MPAH)
Section - • - •- •
• • • - -•
• •-
PCI
MPAH SEAL BEACH BLVD 600 S/ LAMPSON ST. CLOUD DR A AC 915 77 70,455 100
MPAH SEAL BEACH BLVD 700 ST. CLOUD DR PLYMOUTH A AC 1,491 77 114,807 100
MPAH SEAL BEACH BLVD 800 S/ROSSMOOR N/BRADBURY A AC 1,040 97 100,880 94
MPAH WESTMINSTER 100 W/CITY LIMIT E/SEAL BEACH A AC 4,360 79 344,440 52
1 MPAH IWESTMINSTER 200 E/BOLSA CHICA JW/SEAL BEACH I A I AC 1 10,6101 721 763,920 30
:F www.ncenet.com
Engineering & Environmental Services 2of2
#�; 1 C City of Seal Beach 2/25/2014
1 L 2014 PMP
Projected PCI with Treatments(MPAH)
MPAH/ Name Section From To Section Surface Length Width Area (sf) PCI After Cost Treatment Type
Local ID Rank Type (ft) (ft) Treatment 1ST 100 S/OCEAN N/MARINA A AC 887 40 35,480 83
MPAH 1ST 200E S/MARINA N/PCH A AC 2,172 23 49,956 100 $110,628 2"AC Overlay
MPAH 1ST 200W S/PCH N/ MARINA A AC 2,172 22 47,784 100 $102,736 2"AC Overlay
MPAH 1ST 300 N/PCH 597NE/PCH A AC 597 24 14,328 100 $43,650 2"AC Overlay
MPAH BOLSA 100 E/SEAL BEACH W/BALBOA C AC 1,985 37 73,445 83
MPAH BOLSA 200 E/BALBOA W/MAIN C AC 993 37 36,741 100 $131,163 4"AC Overlay and Digouts
MPAH ELECTRIC 100 E/5TH W/CORSAIR C AC 510 37 18,870 79
MPAH ELECTRIC 200 E/CORSAIR W/END C AC 380 33 12,540 96 $5,167 Slurry Seal
MPAH ELECTRIC 300 E/SEAL BEACH 19 W/SEAL BEACH C AC 190 34 6,460 75
MPAH ELECTRIC N 100 E/MAIN W/6TH C AC 960 27 25,920 100 $124,623 4"AC Overlay and Digouts
MPAH ELECTRIC N 200 E/SEAL BEACH 14TH C AC 820 27 22,140 79
MPAH ELECTRIC N 300 14TH W/ MAIN C AC 1,590 27 42,930 89 $19,327 Slurry Seal
MPAH ELECTRIC S 100 E/6TH W/MAIN C AC 910 25 22,750 100 $32,610 2"AC Overlay
MPAH ELECTRIC S 200 E/SEAL BEACH 14TH C AC 755 25 18,875 78
MPAH ELECTRIC S 300 14TH W/MAIN C AC 1,605 25 40,125 34
MPAH LAMPSON 100 W/ BASSWOOD 200 E/0 BASSWOOD A AC 200 56 11,200 100 $18,585 2"AC Overlay
MPAH LAMPSON 200 E/BASSWOOD W/SEAL BEACH A AC 3,300 60 198,000 100 $110,3851 Slurry Seal
MPAH LAMPSON 300 E/E CITY LIMIT 200 E/BASSWOOD A AC 7,400 60 444,000 73
MPAH MARINA 100 E/PCH 6TH C AC 629 61 38,369 18
MPAH MARINA 200 E/6TH W/W CITY LIMIT C AC 2,219 50 110,950 95 $44,380 Slurry Seal
MPAH OLD RANCH PARKWAY 100 SEAL BEACH 200 W/SEAL BEACH A AC 520 48 24,960 100 $113,119 4"AC Overlay and Digouts
MPAH OLD RANCH PARKWAY 200 200 W/SEAL BEACH 720 W/SEAL BEACH A AC 200 64 12,800 100 $33,003 2"AC Overlay
MPAH OLD RANCH PARKWAY 300 720 W/SEAL BEACH W/22 FWY A AC 1,030 34 35,020 100 $343,663 Reconstruction
MPAH SEAL BEACH BLVD 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH A AC 1,510 40 60,400 76
MPAH SEAL BEACH BLVD 100 S/PCH N/BOLSA A AC 1,640 97 159,080 81
MPAH SEAL BEACH BLVD 200 S/BOLSA N/ADOLFO LOPEZ A AC 3,320 99 328,680 83
MPAH SEAL BEACH BLVD 300 S/ADOLFO LOPEZ N/WESTMINSTER A AC 4,080 98 399,840 73
MPAH SEAL BEACH BLVD 400 S/WESTMINSTER NORTH GATE A AC 4,536 95 430,920 100 $172,369 Slurry Seal
MPAH SEAL BEACH BLVD 500 OLD RANCH PKY O N/ LAMPSON A AC 833 89 74,137 77
MPAH SEAL BEACH BLVD 600 S/LAMPSON ST. CLOUD DR A AC 915 77 70,455 100 $120,218 2"AC Overlay
MPAH SEAL BEACH BLVD 700 ST. CLOUD DR PLYMOUTH A AC 1,491 77 114,807 100 $197,815 2"AC Overlay
MPAH SEAL BEACH BLVD 800 S/ROSSMOOR N/BRADBURY I A I AC 1 1,040 97 100,880 99 $41,563 Slurry Seal
MPAH WESTMINSTER 1 100 W/CITY LIMIT E/SEAL BEACH I A I AC 1 4,360 1 79 344,440 52
MPAH WESTMINSTER 200 1 E/BOLSA CHICA W/SEAL BEACH I A I AC 1 10,6101 72 763,920 30
4,191,202 $1,765,004
IF
Engineering&Environmental Services 1 of 1 L Corr?
City of Seal Beach 2/25/2014
;!NCE 2014 PMP
2020 Projected PCI (Locals)
MPAH/ Section Section Surface Length Width 2020
Local Name ID From . Projected Rank Type (ft) (ft)
----------A I - I M Local 10TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH E AC 660 40 26,400 85
Local 10TH 200 S/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC E AC 950 40 38,000 79
Local 10TH 300 S/SEAL N/OCEAN E AC 210 25 5,250 99
Local 11TH 200 S/ELECTRIC N/LANDING E AC 210 37 7,770 50
Local 11TH 300 S/SEAL N/OCEAN E AC 210 25 5,250 85
Local 11TH 400 S/OCEAN N/ ELECTRIC E AC 900 40 36,000 81
Local 12TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH C AC 860 37 31,820 79
Local 12TH 200 S/ OCEAN N/ ELECTRIC E PCC 810 40 32,400 76
Local 12TH 300 S/SEAL N/OCEAN E AC 210 24 5,040 85
Local 13TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH E AC 960 21 20,160 38
Local 13TH 200 S/ OCEAN N/ ELECTRIC E AC 710 40 28,400 78
Local 13TH 300 S/SEAL N/OCEAN E AC 210 25 5,250 85
Local 14TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH E AC 1,010 21 21,210 26
Local 14TH 200 S/ OCEAN N/ ELECTRIC E AC 660 40 26,400 76
Local 14TH 300 S/SEAL N/OCEAN E AC 210 25 5,250 52
Local 15TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH E AC 1,110 21 23,310 17
Local 16TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH E AC 1,160 21 24,360 46
Local 17TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH E AC 1,260 21 26,460 64
Local 2ND 100 S/ OCEAN N/ CENTRAL E AC 860 40 34,400 79
Local 3RD ST 100 S/ OCEAN N/ CENTRAL E AC 760 40 30,400 81
Local 4TH ST 100 S/ OCEAN N/ MARINA E AC 1,200 40 48,000 81
Local 5TH 100 S/MARINA N/PCH C AC 660 60 39,600 85
Local 5TH 200 S/OCEAN N/MARINA E AC 1,400 40 56,000 79
Local 6TH 100 S/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC E AC 1,300 40 52,000 83
Local 7TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/MARINA E AC 210 40 8,400 79
Local 7TH 200 S/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC E AC 1,280 40 51,200 83
Local 8TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH E AC 460 40 18,400 83
Local 8TH 200 S/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC E AC 1,150 40 46,000 83
'
Engineering & Environmental Services 1 of 7
City of Seal Beach 2/25/2014
;!NCE 2014 PMP
2020 Projected PCI (Locals)
MPAH/ Section Section Surface Length Width 2020
To Projected Rank Type (ft) (ft)
PCI
Local ADOLFO LOPEZ 100 W/END 425 E/SEAL BEACH E AC 800 60 48,000 99
Local ADOLFO LOPEZ 200 W/SEAL BEACH 425 W/SEAL BEACH E AC 425 60 25,500 57
Local AGUA 100 S/ MARLIN N/ END E AC 220 27 5,940 75
Local ALMOND 100 E/OLEANDER W/ASTER C AC 4,390 36 158,040 80
Local ALMOND 200 E/VIOLET ROSE CIR C AC 765 37 28,305 81
Local ALMOND 300 ROSE CIR W/ OLEANDER C AC 705 37 26,085 79
Local ASTER 100 S/ALMOND N/ BIRCHWOOD E AC 1,239 37 45,843 83
Local ASTER 200 N/ BIRCHWOOD N/ CANDLEBERRY E AC 206 37 7,622 78
Local AVALON 100 S/ CATALINA N/ END E AC 430 33 14,190 78
Local BALBOA 100 S/BOLSA N/CATALINA C AC 1,060 37 39,220 21
Local BALBOA 200 S/PCH N/BOLSA E AC 660 37 24,420 83
Local BANYAN 100 E/CAMELIA W/COLUMBINE E AC 600 33 19,800 86
Local BASSWOOD 100 E/ASTER W/LAMPSON C AC 410 36 14,760 83
Local BAYOU 100 E/BAYSIDE W/HARBOR E AC 630 33 20,790 77
Local BAYSIDE 100 S/BOLSA N/CRESTVIEW E AC 1,410 33 46,530 76
Local BEACHCOMBER 100 S/BOLSA N/SEA BREEZE E AC 1,160 33 38,280 83
Local BERYL COVE 100 S/ EMERALD COVE N/ MARLIN E AC 360 33 11,880 77
Local BIRCHWOOD 100 E/ OLEANDER W/ASTER E AC 3,660 33 120,780 79
Local BLUE BELL 100 S/ALMOND N/BIRCHWOOD E AC 710 33 23,430 94
Local CAMELIA 100 S/ALMOND N/BANYAN E AC 590 33 19,470 77
Local CANDLEBERRY 100 E/FUCHSIA W/LAMPSON E AC 2,210 36 79,560 79
Local CANDLEBERRY 200 E/MARIGOLD W/FUCHSIA E AC 1,560 37 57,720 83
Local CANDLEBERRY 300 E/WISTERIA W/OLEANDER E AC 1,660 33 54,780 85
Local CARAVEL 100 S/ MARINA N/ CORSAIR E AC 360 37 13,320 78
Local CARMEL 100 E/ SURF W/ COASTLINE E AC 360 37 13,320 77
Local CARNATION 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 230 33 7,590 85
Local CATALINA 100 E/BALBOA W/COASTLINE E AC 1,910 37 70,670 78
Local ICATALINA 1 200 JE/END JW/BALBOA E AC 1 2,470 37 91,390 1 76
Engineering & Environmental Services 2 of 7 L '
City of Seal Beach 2/25/2014
;!NCE 2014 PMP
2020 Projected PCI (Locals)
MPAH/ Section Section Surface Length Width 2020
To Projected Rank Type (ft) (ft)
PCI
Local CENTRAL 100 E/12TH W/MAIN C AC 860 40 34,400 83
Local CENTRAL 200 E/1ST W/2ND C AC 260 20 5,200 83
Local CENTRAL 300 E/2ND W/MAIN C AC 2,160 40 86,400 83
Local CENTRAL WY 100 E/ 2ND W/ 1ST E AC 260 40 10,400 81
Local CENTRAL WY 200 E/ 4TH W/ 2ND E AC 560 38 21,280 81
Local CENTRAL WY 300 E/ 5TH W/ 4TH E AC 260 38 9,880 79
Local CLIPPER 100 E/ CARAVEL W/ ELECTRIC E AC 910 33 30,030 78
Local CLOVER 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 130 33 4,290 81
Local COASTLINE 100 S/CARMEL N/END E AC 480 27 12,960 76
Local COASTLINE 200 E/CARMEL W/BALBOA E AC 2,380 33 78,540 82
Local COLLEGE PARK 100 E/HARVARD W/HARVARD C AC 2,590 37 95,830 100
Local COLLEGE PARK 200 E/HARVARD W/CITY LIMIT C AC 940 44 41,360 88
Local COLUMBINE 100 S/ALMOND N/BANYAN E AC 210 33 6,930 78
Local CORAL 100 E/ END W/ BAY VIEW E AC 230 27 6,210 74
Local CORSAIR 100 S/CARAVEL N/SCHOONER E AC 1,020 33 33,660 77
Local CREST 100 S/CATALINA N/CRESTVIEW E AC 210 33 6,930 75
Local CRESTVIEW 100 E/ CATALINA W/AVALON E AC 3,060 33 100,980 77
Local CRYSTAL 100 S/ CRYSTAL COVE N/ END E AC 240 27 6,480 77
Local CRYSTAL COVE 100 E/ MARBLE COVE W/ OPAL COVE E AC 520 33 17,160 77
Local DAFFODIL 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 230 33 7,590 85
Local DAHLIA 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 230 33 7,590 85
Local DAISY 100 S/ALMOND N/BIRCHWOOD E AC 410 33 13,530 53
Local DAISY 200 S/CANDLEBERRY N/DOGWOOD E AC 210 33 6,930 85
Local DAISY CIRCLE 100 S/FIR N/END E AC 230 33 7,590 97
Local DARTMOUTH 100 E/END W/HARVARD E AC 180 34 6,120 97
Local DOGWOOD 100 E/DAISY W/IRONWOOD E AC 1,470 33 48,510 78
Local DOGWOOD 200 E/MARIGOLD W/FUCHSIA E AC 1,520 33 50,160 77
Local DOGWOOD 300 tE�WISTERIA W/OLEANDER E AC 1,710 33 56,430 64
Engineering & Environmental Services 3 of 7
City of Seal Beach 2/25/2014
;!NCE 2014 PMP
2020 Projected PCI (Locals)
MPAH/ Section Section Surface Length Width 2020
To Projected Rank Type (ft) (ft) PCI
Local DOLPHIN 100 S/SEAL WAY N/ OCEAN E AC 226 24 5,424 64
Local DOLPHIN 200 N/ OCEAN N/ ELECTRIC E AC 582 24 13,968 81
Local DORY 100 S/GALLEON N/SCHOONER E AC 360 28 10,080 75
Local DRIFTWOOD 100 E/BALBOA W/COASTLINE E AC 1,460 33 48,180 81
Local EBBTIDE 100 S/ COASTLINE N/ END E AC 230 27 6,210 77
Local ELDER 100 HEATHER W/IRONWOOD E AC 2,002 36 72,072 83
Local ELDER 200 E/OLEANDER HEATHER E AC 1,130 36 40,680 81
Local ELDER 300 E/VIOLET W/PRIMROSE E AC 1,380 33 45,540 79
Local EMERALD COVE 100 E/ BERYL COVE W/JADE COVE E AC 580 33 19,140 77
Local EMERALD PL 100 S/ EMERALD COVE N/ END E AC 230 27 6,210 77
Local FATHOM 100 E/SILVER SHOALS W/BALBOA E AC 810 33 26,730 81
Local FERN 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 230 33 7,590 75
Local FIR 100 E/GOLDENROD W/IRONWOOD E AC 1,460 33 48,180 81
Local FIR 200 E/ROSE W/HEATHER E AC 1,260 33 41,580 85
Local FIR 300 E/SUNFLOWER W/ROSE E AC 330 33 10,890 83
Local FIR 400 E/WISTERIA W/SUNFLOWER E AC 1,220 33 40,260 83
Local FIR CIRCLE 100 S/FIR N/END E AC 130 60 7,800 83
Local FUCHSIA 100 S/BIRCHWOOD N/ELDER E AC 640 33 21,120 83
Local FUCHSIA CIRCLE 100 S/FIR N/END E AC 330 33 10,890 81
Local GALLEON 100 S/ELECTRIC N/DORY E AC 970 33 32,010 88
Local GOLDENROD 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 230 33 7,590 78
Local GOLDENROD 200 S/ELDER N/END E AC 610 33 20,130 81
Local GUAVA 100 E/IRONWOOD W/END E AC 530 33 17,490 81
Local GUAVA 200 E/PANSY W/HEATHER E AC 1,360 33 44,880 81
Local HARBOR 100 S/BAYSIDE N/BAYOU E AC 760 33 25,080 14
Local HARVARD 100 S/COLLEGE PARK W/END E AC 3,310 37 122,470 75
Local HAZELNUT 100 S/GUAVA N/HEATHER E AC 1,210 33 39,930 81
Local HAZELNUT 200 E/HEATHER JW/ROSE E AC 1 1,610 33 1 53,130 1 99
Engineering & Environmental Services 4 of 7
City of Seal Beach 2/25/2014
;!NCE 2014 PMP
2020 Projected PCI (Locals)
MPAH/ Section Section Surface Length Width 2020
To Projected Rank Type (ft) (ft)
PCI
Local HAZELNUT 300 E/WISTERIA W/SUNFLOWER E AC 1,310 33 43,230 38
Local HEATHER 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 230 33 7,590 78
Local HEATHER 200 S/ELDER N/HAZELNUT C AC 790 37 29,230 81
Local HEATHER 300 S/HAZELNUT N/LAMPSON C AC 490 37 18,130 94
Local IRIS 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 230 33 7,590 97
Local IRIS 200 HAZELNUT AVE IRONWOOD AVE E AC 226 32 7,232 29
Local IRONWOOD 50 S/CANDLEBERRY ELDER C AC 524 33 17,292 83
Local IRONWOOD 100 ELDER N/HEATHER C AC 1,967 33 64,911 83
Local IRONWOOD 200 E/ROSE W/IRIS C AC 1,420 33 46,860 97
Local IRONWOOD 300 E/ WISTERIA W/TULIP C AC 322 37 11,914 83
Local IRONWOOD 400 W/TULIP W/ SUNFLOWER C AC 1,020 37 37,740 34
Local ISLAND VIEW 100 S/BOLSA N/SEA BREEZE E AC 1,110 33 36,630 83
Local JADE COVE 100 S/ EMERALD COVE N/ MARLIN E AC 360 33 11,880 83
Local JASMIN 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 230 33 7,590 76
Local LAGUNA 100 0 S/ MARLIN 0 N/ END E AC 380 27 10,260 78
Local LANDING 100 E/12TH W/11TH E AC 260 42 10,920 34
Local LANDING 200 E/SEAL BEACH W/12TH E AC 1,210 21 25,410 83
Local LOYOLA PLAZA 100 S/COLLEGE PARK N/END E AC 330 25 8,250 85
Local MAIN 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH C AC 690 55 37,950 94
Local MAIN 200 S/OCEAN AVE N/ELECTRIC C AC 1,190 57 67,830 87
Local MAR VISTA 100 E/ CATALINA W/ COASTLINE E AC 1,610 33 53,130 81
Local MAR VISTA 200 W/COASTLINE PCH E AC 123 36 4,428 81
Local MARBLE COVE 100 S/ CRYSTAL COVE N/ MARLIN E AC 360 33 11,880 78
Local MARIGOLD 100 S/BIRCHWOOD N/CANDLEBERRY E AC 160 33 5,280 97
Local MARIGOLD 200 S/CANDLEBERRY N/DOGWOOD E AC 160 33 5,280 75
Local MARINE 100 E/ELECTRIC W/DOLPHIN E AC 320 24 7,680 99
Local MARLIN 100 E/SEAL BEACH W/BALBOA E AC 1,610 37 59,570 77
Local NEPTUNE 100 S/SEAL N/OCEAN E AC 210 24 5,040 75
Engineering & Environmental Services 5 of 7
City of Seal Beach 2/25/2014
;!NCE 2014 PMP
2020 Projected PCI (Locals)
MPAH/ Section Section Surface Length Width 2020
To Projected Rank Type (ft) (ft)
PCI
Local NORTH GATE 100 W/SEAL BEACH 76 W/SEAL BEACH E AC 760 42 31,920 78
Local NORTH GATE 200 76 E/SEAL BEACH W/END E AC 3,300 25 82,500 83
Local OCCIDENTAL 100 E/ STANFORD W/ HARVARD E AC 160 33 5,280 88
Local OCEAN 100 E/ELECTRIC W/MAIN C AC 2,440 51 124,440 99
Local OCEAN 200 E/MAIN W/1ST C AC 2,490 52 129,480 74
Local OLEANDER 100 S/ALMOND N/FIR E AC 1,320 36 47,520 50
Local OPAL COVE 100 S/ CRYSTAL COVE N/ MARLIN E AC 360 33 11,880 78
Local PANSY 100 S/ALMOND N/ END E AC 430 33 14,190 99
Local PANSY 200 S/FIR N/GUAVA E AC 160 33 5,280 81
Local PRIMROSE 100 S/DOGWOOD N/ELDER E AC 210 33 6,930 77
Local PRIMROSE CIR 100 S/ALMOND N/ END E AC 430 33 14,190 75
Local PRINCETON 100 E/END W/HARVARD E AC 230 30 6,900 57
Local PURDUE CIRCLE 100 S/ END N/ COLLEGE PARK E AC 68 27 1,836 88
Local RIVIERA 100 S/MARLIN N/BOLSA E AC 560 31 17,360 77
Local ROSE 100 S/ALMOND N/ END C AC 430 33 14,190 75
Local ROSE 200 S/FIR N/HAZELNUT C AC 390 37 14,430 81
Local ROSE 300 S/HAZELNUT N/LAMPSON C AC 440 37 16,280 81
Local ROSSMOOR CTR 100 E/SEAL BEACH W/ WEST RD C AC 864 30 25,920 85
Local ROSSMOOR CTR 200 E/ WEST RD W/ MONTECITO C AC 364 28 10,192 94
Local SAND PIPER 100 S/BOLSA N/TAPER E AC 1,110 33 36,630 83
Local SCHOONER 100 E/GALLEON W/DORY E AC 660 33 21,780 80
Local SEA BREEZE 100 S/BOLSA N/CATALINA E AC 1,160 33 38,280 83
Local SEAL 100 E/ 11TH W/ 10TH E PCC 290 15 4,350 94
Local SEAL WAY 100 E/ELECTRIC W/14TH E PCC 1,240 13 16,120 97
Local SEAL WAY 200 E/14TH W/11TH E PCC 920 12 11,040 83
Local SILVER SHOALS 100 S/BOLSA N/FATHOM E AC 300 33 9,900 21
Local SOUTH SHORE 100 S/BOLSA N/TAPER E AC 1,060 33 34,980 83
Local STANFORD 100 N/COLLEGE PARK W/COLLEGE PARK I E AC j 1,860 32 1 59,520 j 83
Engineering & Environmental Services 6 of 7
City of Seal Beach 2/25/2014
;!NCE 2014 PMP
2020 Projected PCI (Locals)
MPAH/ Section Section Surface Length Width 2020
To Projected Rank Type (ft) (ft) PCI
Local SUNFLOWER 100 S/ ALMOND N/ END E AC 430 33 14,190 81
Local SUNFLOWER 200 S/FIR N/IRONWOOD E AC 560 37 20,720 37
Local SURF 100 S/ CATALINA N/ END E AC 480 33 15,840 78
Local TAPER 100 S/BOLSA N/CATALINA E AC 1,110 33 36,630 83
Local TEABERRY 100 S/ALMOND N/ END E AC 430 33 14,190 79
Local TULIP 100 S/IRONWOOD N/LAMPSON E AC 70 36 2,520 83
Local VIOLET 100 S/ALMOND N/ CANDLEBERRY E AC 660 33 21,780 79
Local VIOLET 200 S/ELDER N/FIR E AC 160 33 5,280 42
Local WISTERIA 100 S/DOGWOOD N/IRONWOOD E AC 990 37 36,630 80
Local WISTERIA 200 S/END N/DOGWOOD E AC 1,040 33 34,320 79
Local YALE 100 E/COLLEGE PARK W/COLLEGE PARK E AC 1,160 33 38,280 97
Local YALE CIRCLE 100 E/END W/YALE E AC 130 48 6,240 82
.F- www.ncenet.com
Engineering & Environmental Services 7 of 7
�.y�A C City of Seal Beach 2/25/2014
`� L 2014 PMP
Projected PCI with Treatments(Locals)
Treatment MPAH/ Name Section From To Section Surface Length Width Area (sf) PCI After Cost Loca I ID Rank Type (ft) (ft) Treatment
Local 10TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH E AC 660 40 26,400 100 $ 10,560.00 Slurry Seal
Local 10TH 200 S/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC E AC 950 40 38,000 79
Local 10TH 300 S/SEAL N/OCEAN E AC 210 25 5,250 100 $ 13,085.00 2"AC Overlay
Local 11TH 200 S/ELECTRIC N/LANDING E AC 210 37 7,770 50
Local 11TH 300 S/SEAL N/OCEAN E AC 210 25 5,250 100 $ 2,100.00 Slurry Seal
Local 111TH 400 IS/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC E AC 1 900 401 36,000 81
Local 12TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH C AC 860 37 31,820 79
Local 12TH 200 S/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC E PCC 810 40 32,400 76
Local 12TH 300 S/SEAL N/OCEAN E AC 210 24 5,040 100 $ 2,801.00 Slurry Seal
Local 13TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH E AC 960 21 20,160 38
Local 13TH 200 S/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC E AC 710 40 28,400 78
Local 13TH 300 S/SEAL N/OCEAN E AC 210 25 5,250 100 $ 2,100.00 Slurry Seal
Local 14TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH E AC 1,010 21 21,210 26
Local 114TH 200 S/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC E AC 1 660 40 26,4001 76
Local 14TH 300 S/SEAL N/OCEAN E AC 210 25 5,250 52
Local 15TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH E AC 1,110 21 23,310 17
Local 16TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH E AC 1,160 21 24,360 46
Local 17TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH E AC 1,260 21 26,460 64
Local 2ND 100 S/OCEAN N/CENTRAL E AC 860 40 34,400 79
Local 3RD ST 100 S/OCEAN N/CENTRAL E AC 760 40 30,400 81
Local 4TH ST 100 S/OCEAN N/MARINA E AC 1,200 40 48,000 81
Local 15TH 100 S/MARINA N/PCH C AC 1 660 601 39,600 100 $ 15,840.00 Slurry Seal
Local 5TH 200 S/OCEAN N/MARINA E AC 1,400 40 56,000 88 $ 24,477.00 Slurry Seal
Local 6TH 100 S/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC E AC 1,300 40 52,000 83
Local 7TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/MARINA E AC 210 40 8,400 79
Local 7TH 200 S/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC E AC 1,280 40 51,200 83
Local 8TH 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH E AC 460 40 18,400 83
Local 8TH 200 S/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC E AC 1,150 40 46,000 83
Local ADOLFO LOPEZ 100 W/END 425 E/SEAL BEACH E AC 800 60 48,000 100 $ 119,637.00 2"AC Overlay
Local JADOLFO LOPEZ 200 IW/SEAL BEACH 425 W/SEAL BEACH E AC 1 425 601 25,500 57
Local AGUA 100 S/MARLIN N/END E AC 220 27 5,940 75
Local ALMOND 100 E/OLEANDER W/ASTER C AC 4,390 36 158,040 92 $ 67,066.00 Slurry Seal
Local ALMOND 200 E/VIOLET ROSE CIR C AC 765 37 28,305 81
Local ALMOND 300 ROSE CIR W/OLEANDER C AC 705 37 26,085 79
Local ASTER 100 S/ALMOND N/BIRCHWOOD E AC 1,239 37 45,843 83
Local ASTER 200 N/BIRCHWOOD N/CANDLEBERRY E AC 206 37 7,622 78
Local AVALON 100 S/CATALINA N/END E AC 430 33 14,190 78
Local BALBOA 100 S/BOLSA N/CATALINA C AC 1,060 37 39,220 21
+
Engineering&Environmental Services 1 of 5
�.y�A C City of Seal Beach 2/25/2014
`� L 2014 PMP
Projected PCI with Treatments(Locals)
Treatment MPAH/ Name Section From To Section Surface Length Width Area (sf) PCI After Cost Loca I ID Rank Type (ft) (ft) Treatment 91
Local BALBOA 200 S/PCH N/BOLSA E AC 660 37 24,420 83
Local BANYAN 100 E/CAMELIA W/COLUMBINE E AC 600 33 19,800 95 $ 7,920.00 Slurry Seal
Local BASSWOOD 100 E/ASTER W/LAMPSON C AC 410 36 14,760 83
Local BAYOU 100 E/BAYSIDE W/HARBOR E AC 630 33 20,790 77
Local BAYSIDE 100 S/BOLSA N/CRESTVIEW E AC 1,410 33 46,530 76
Local IBEACHCOMBER 100 S/BOLSA N/SEA BREEZE E AC 1 1,160 331 38,280 83
Local BERYL COVE 100 S/EMERALD COVE N/MARLIN E AC 360 33 11,880 77
Local BIRCHWOOD 100 E/OLEANDER W/ASTER E AC 3,660 33 120,780 79
Local BLUE BELL 100 S/ALMOND N/BIRCHWOOD E AC 710 33 23,430 100 $ 55,046.00 2"AC Overlay
Local CAMELIA 100 S/ALMOND N/BANYAN E AC 590 33 19,470 89 $ 8,262.00 Slurry Seal
Local CANDLEBERRY 100 E/FUCHSIA W/LAMPSON E AC 2,2101 36 79,560 1 79
Local CANDLEBERRY 200 E/MARIGOLD W/FUCHSIA E AC 1,560 37 57,720 83
Local CANDLEBERRY 300 E/WISTERIA W/OLEANDER E AC 1,660 33 54,780 85 $ 26,164.00 Slurry Seal
Local CARAVEL 100 S/MARINA N/CORSAIR E AC 360 37 13,320 78
Local ICARMEL 100 E/SURF W/COASTLINE E AC 360 37 13,320 77
Local CARNATION 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 230 33 7,590 94 $ 3,036.00 Slurry Seal
Local CATALINA 100 E/BALBOA W/COASTLINE E AC 1,910 37 70,670 78
Local CATALINA 200 E/END W/BALBOA E AC 2,470 37 91,390 76
Local CENTRAL 100 IE/12TH W/MAIN C AC 8601 40 34,400 83
Local CENTRAL 200 E/1ST W/2ND C AC 260 20 5,200 83
Local CENTRAL 300 E/2ND W/MAIN C AC 2,160 40 86,400 83
Local CENTRAL WY 100 E/2ND W/ 1ST E AC 260 40 10,400 81
Local ICENTRAL WY 200 E/4TH W/2ND E AC 560 38 21,280 81
Local CENTRAL WY 300 E/5TH W/4TH E AC 260 38 9,880 79
Local CLIPPER 100 E/CARAVEL W/ELECTRIC E AC 910 33 30,030 78
Local CLOVER 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 130 33 4,290 81
Local COASTLINE 100 S/CARMEL N/END E AC 480 271 12,960 76
Local COASTLINE 200 E/CARMEL W/BALBOA E AC 2,380 33 78,540 88 $ 35,359.00 Slurry Seal
Local COLLEGE PARK 100 E/HARVARD W/HARVARD C AC 2,590 37 95,830 100 $ 150,500.00 2"AC Overlay
Local COLLEGE PARK 200 E/HARVARD W/CITY LIMIT C AC 940 44 41,360 100 $ 91,592.00 2"AC Overlay
Local ICOLUMBINE 100 S/ALMOND N/BANYAN E AC 210 33 6,930 90 $ 2,941.00 Slurry Seal
Local CORAL 100 E/END W/BAY VIEW E AC 230 27 6,210 74
Local CORSAIR 100 S/CARAVEL N/SCHOONER E AC 1,020 33 33,660 77
Local CREST 100 S/CATALINA N/CRESTVIEW E AC 210 33 6,930 75
Local CRESTVIEW 100 E/CATALINA W/AVALON E AC 3,060 33 100,980 77
Local CRYSTAL 100 S/CRYSTAL COVE N/END E AC 240 27 6,480 77
Local CRYSTAL COVE 100 E/MARBLE COVE W/OPAL COVE E AC 520 33 17,160 77
Local DAFFODIL 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 230 33 7,590 94 $ 3,036.00 Slurry Seal
+
Engineering&Environmental Services 2 of 5
�.y�A C City of Seal Beach 2/25/2014
`� L 2014 PMP
Projected PCI with Treatments(Locals)
Treatment MPAH/ Name Section From To Section Surface Length Width Area (sf) PCI After Cost Loca I ID Rank Type (ft) (ft) Treatment
Local DAHLIA 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 230 33 7,590 94 $ 3,318.00 Slurry Seal
Local DAISY 100 S/ALMOND N/BIRCHWOOD E AC 410 33 13,530 53
Local DAISY 200 S/CANDLEBERRY N/DOGWOOD E AC 210 33 6,930 100 $ 5,113.00 Slurry Seal
Local DAISY CIRCLE 100 S/FIR N/END E AC 230 33 7,590 100 $ 18,367.00 2"AC Overlay
Local DARTMOUTH 100 E/END W/HARVARD E AC 180 34 6,120 100 $ 11,193.00 2"AC Overlay
Local IDOGWOOD 100 E/DAISY W/IRONWOOD E AC 1 1,470 331 48,510 87 $ 21,203.00 Slurry Seal
Local DOGWOOD 200 E/MARIGOLD W/FUCHSIA E AC 1,520 33 50,160 89 $ 21,286.00 Slurry Seal
Local DOGWOOD 300 E/WISTERIA W/OLEANDER E AC 1,710 33 56,430 64
Local DOLPHIN 100 S/SEAL WAY N/OCEAN E AC 226 24 5,424 64
Local DOLPHIN 200 N/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC E AC 582 24 13,968 87 $ 6,288.00 Slurry Seal
Local DORY 100 IS/GALLEON N/SCHOONER E AC 360 28 10,080 75
Local DRIFTWOOD 100 E/BALBOA W/COASTLINE E AC 1,460 33 48,180 81
Local EBBTIDE 100 S/COASTLINE N/END E AC 230 27 6,210 77
Local ELDER 100 HEATHER W/IRONWOOD E AC 2,002 36 72,072 83
Local JELDER 200 E/OLEANDER HEATHER E AC 1 1,130 361 40,680 81
Local ELDER 300 E/VIOLET W/PRIMROSE E AC 1,380 33 45,540 88 $ 19,905.00 Slurry Seal
Local EMERALD COVE 100 E/BERYL COVE W/JADE COVE E AC 580 33 19,140 77
Local EMERALD PL 100 S/EMERALD COVE N/END E AC 230 27 6,210 77
Local FATHOM 100 E/SILVER SHOALS W/BALBOA E AC 810 33 26,730 81
Local FERN 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 230 33 7,590 75
Local FIR 100 E/GOLDENROD W/IRONWOOD E AC 1,460 33 48,180 81
Local FIR 200 E/ROSE W/HEATHER E AC 1,260 33 41,580 100 $ 30,676.00 Slurry Seal
Local IFIR 300 E/SUNFLOWER W/ROSE E AC 1 330 331 10,890 83
Local FIR 400 E/WISTERIA W/SUNFLOWER E AC 1,220 33 40,260 83
Local FIR CIRCLE 100 S/FIR N/END E AC 130 60 7,800 83
Local FUCHSIA 100 S/BIRCHWOOD N/ELDER E AC 640 33 21,120 83
Local FUCHSIA CIRCLE 100 S/FIR N/END E AC 330 33 10,890 81
Local GALLEON 100 S/ELECTRIC N/DORY E AC 970 33 32,010 100 $ 48,384.00 2"AC Overlay
Local GOLDENROD 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 230 33 7,590 78
Local GOLDENROD 200 S/ELDER N/END E AC 610 33 20,130 81
Local IGUAVA 100 E/IRONWOOD W/END E AC 1 530 331 17,490 81
Local GUAVA 200 E/PANSY W/HEATHER E AC 1,360 33 44,880 81
Local HARBOR 100 S/BAYSIDE N/BAYOU E AC 760 33 25,080 14
Local HARVARD 100 S/COLLEGE PARK W/END E AC 3,310 37 122,470 75
Local HAZELNUT 1 100 IS/GUAVA N/HEATHER I E AC 1,210 33 39,930 81
Local HAZELNUT 1 200 JE/HEATHER W/ROSE E AC 1,610 33 53,130 100 $ 97,393.00 2"AC Overlay
Local HAZELNUT 1 300 1 E/WISTERIA W/SUNFLOWER E AC 1,310 33 43,230 38
Local HEATHER 1 100 IS/ALMOND N/END E AC 230 33 7,590 78
+
Engineering&Environmental Services 3 of 5
�.y�A C City of Seal Beach 2/25/2014
`� L 2014 PMP
Projected PCI with Treatments(Locals)
Treatment MPAH/ Name Section From To Section Surface Length Width Area (sf) PCI After Cost Loca I ID Rank Type (ft) (ft) Treatment
Local HEATHER 200 S/ELDER N/HAZELNUT C AC 790 37 29,230 81
Local HEATHER 300 S/HAZELNUT N/LAMPSON C AC 490 37 18,130 100 $ 7,252.00 Slurry Seal
Local IRIS 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 230 33 7,590 100 $ 11,251.00 2"AC Overlay
Local IRIS 200 HAZELNUT AVE IRONWOOD AVE E AC 226 32 7,232 29
Local IRONWOOD 050 S/CANDLEBERRY ELDER C AC 524 33 17,292 83
Local 1IRONWOOD 100 JELDER N/HEATHER C AC 1 1,967 331 64,911 83
Local IRONWOOD 200 E/ROSE W/IRIS C AC 1,420 33 46,860 100 $ 318,009.00 Reconstruction
Local IRONWOOD 300 E/WISTERIA W/TULIP C AC 322 37 11,914 83
Local IRONWOOD 400 W/TULIP W/SUNFLOWER C AC 1,020 37 37,740 34
Local ISLAND VIEW 100 S/BOLSA N/SEA BREEZE E AC 1,110 33 36,630 83
Local JADE COVE 100 S/EMERALD COVE N/MARLIN E AC 3601 33 11,880 86 $ 5,509.00 Slurry Seal
Local JASMIN 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 230 33 7,590 76
Local LAGUNA 100 0 S/MARLIN 0 N/END E AC 380 27 10,260 78
Local LANDING 100 E/12TH W/11TH E AC 260 42 10,920 34
Local ILANDING 200 1 E/SEAL BEACH W/12TH E AC 1,210 21 25,410 83
Local LOYOLA PLAZA 100 S/COLLEGE PARK N/END E AC 330 25 8,250 100 $ 6,101.00 Slurry Seal
Local MAIN 100 S/ELECTRIC N/PCH C AC 690 55 37,950 100 $ 167,628.00 4"AC Overlay and Digouts
Local MAIN 200 S/OCEAN AVE N/ELECTRIC C AC 1,190 57 67,830 96 $ 27,132.00 Slurry Seal
Local MAR VISTA 100 E/CATALINA W/COASTLINE E AC 1 1,610 331 53,130 81
Local MAR VISTA 200 W/COASTLINE PCH E AC 123 36 4,428 81
Local MARBLE COVE 100 S/CRYSTAL COVE N/MARLIN E AC 360 33 11,880 78
Local MARIGOLD 100 S/BIRCHWOOD N/CANDLEBERRY E AC 160 33 5,280 100 $ 12,777.00 2"AC Overlay
Local IMARIGOLD 200 S/CANDLEBERRY N/DOGWOOD E AC 160 33 5,280 92 $ 2,112.00 Slurry Seal
Local MARINE 100 E/ELECTRIC W/DOLPHIN E AC 320 24 7,680 100 $ 11,679.00 2"AC Overlay
Local MARLIN 100 E/SEAL BEACH W/BALBOA E AC 1,610 37 59,570 77
Local NEPTUNE 100 S/SEAL N/OCEAN E AC 210 24 5,040 75
Local NORTH GATE 100 W/SEAL BEACH 76 W/SEAL BEACH E AC 1 760 421 31,920 78
Local NORTH GATE 200 76 E/SEAL BEACH W/END E AC 3,300 25 82,500 83
Local OCCIDENTAL 100 E/STANFORD W/HARVARD E AC 160 33 5,280 100 $ 7,248.00 2"AC Overlay
Local OCEAN 100 E/ELECTRIC W/MAIN C AC 2,440 51 124,440 100 $ 210,945.00 2"AC Overlay
Local JOCEAN 200 E/MAIN W/1ST C AC 2,490 52 129,480 74
Local OLEANDER 100 S/ALMOND N/FIR E AC 1,320 36 47,520 50
Local OPAL COVE 100 S/CRYSTAL COVE N/MARLIN E AC 360 33 11,880 78
Local PANSY 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 430 33 14,190 100 $ 21,838.00 2"AC Overlay
Local PANSY 200 S/FIR N/GUAVA E I AC 1 1601 331 5,2801 81
Local PRIMROSE 100 S/DOGWOOD N/ELDER E AC 210 33 6,930 77
Local PRIMROSE CIR 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 430 33 14,190 75
Local PRINCETON 100 E/END W/HARVARD E AC 2301 30 6,900 57
+
Engineering&Environmental Services 4 of 5
�.y�A C City of Seal Beach 2/25/2014
`� L 2014 PMP
Projected PCI with Treatments(Locals)
Treatment MPAH/ Name Section From To Section Surface Length Width Area (sf) PCI After Cost Loca I ID Rank Type (ft) (ft) Treatment
Local PURDUE CIRCLE 100 S/END N/COLLEGE PARK E AC 68 27 1,836 100 $ 8,142.00 4"AC Overlay and Digouts
Local RIVIERA 100 S/MARLIN N/BOLSA E AC 560 31 17,360 77
Local ROSE 100 S/ALMOND N/END C AC 430 33 14,190 75
Local ROSE 200 S/FIR N/HAZELNUT C AC 390 37 14,430 81
Local ROSE 300 S/HAZELNUT N/LAMPSON C AC 440 37 16,280 81
Local ROSSMOOR CTR 100 E/SEAL BEACH W/WEST RD C AC 1 864 301 25,920 100 $ 10,368.00 Slurry Seal
Local ROSSMOOR CTR 200 E/WEST RD W/MONTECITO C AC 364 28 10,192 100 $ 83,627.00 Reconstruction
Local SAND PIPER 100 S/BOLSA N/TAPER E AC 1,110 33 36,630 83
Local SCHOONER 100 E/GALLEON W/DORY E AC 660 33 21,780 86 $ 9,806.00 Slurry Seal
Local SEA BREEZE 100 S/BOLSA N/CATALINA E AC 1,160 33 38,280 83
Local SEAL 100 E/ 11TH W/ 10TH E PCC 290 15 4,350 100 $ 10,220.00 2"AC Overlay
Local SEAL WAY 100 E/ELECTRIC W/14TH E PCC 1,240 13 16,120 100 $ 23,704.00 2"AC Overlay
Local SEAL WAY 200 E/14TH W/11TH E PCC 920 12 11,040 83
Local SILVER SHOALS 100 S/BOLSA N/FATHOM E AC 300 33 9,900 21
Local ISOUTH SHORE 100 S/BOLSA N/TAPER E AC 1 1,060 331 34,980 83
Local STANFORD 100 N/COLLEGE PARK W/COLLEGE PARK E AC 1,860 32 59,520 89 $ 26,796.00 Slurry Seal
Local SUNFLOWER 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 430 33 14,190 81
Local SUNFLOWER 200 S/FIR N/IRONWOOD E AC 560 37 20,720 37
Local SURF 100 S/CATALINA N/END E AC 480 33 15,840 78
Local TAPER 100 S/BOLSA N/CATALINA E AC 1,110 33 36,630 83
Local TEABERRY 100 S/ALMOND N/END E AC 430 33 14,190 79
Local TULIP 100 S/IRONWOOD N/LAMPSON E AC 70 36 2,520 83
Local IVIOLET 100 S/ALMOND N/CANDLEBERRY E AC 1 660 331 21,780 79
Local VIOLET 200 S/ELDER N/FIR E AC 160 33 5,280 42
Local WISTERIA 100 S/DOGWOOD N/IRONWOOD E AC 990 37 36,630 89 $ 16,011.00 Slurry Seal
Local WISTERIA 200 S/END N/DOGWOOD E AC 1,040 33 34,320 88 $ 15,001.00 Slurry Seal
Local YALE 100 E/COLLEGE PARK IW/COLLEGE PARK I E AC 1,160 33 38,2801 100 1 $ 67,826.00 2"AC Overlay
Local YALE CIRCLE 100 E/END JW/YALE I E AC 130 48 6,2401 91 1 $ 2,496.001 Slurry Seal
5,259,654 $ 2,008,126.00
+
Engineering&Environmental Services 5 of 5
Collaboration. Commitment. Confidence"'
VVIJONCE 'L
Appendix F
Engineering& Environmental Services www.ncenet.com
*V A Collaboration. Commitment. Confidence"
JONCE 'L
Seven-Year Plan for Road
Maintenance and Rehabilitation
Engineering& Environmental Services •
1
Street Name Section From Length Width Area (ftz) PCI Before Treatment Cos Treatment
— (ft) (ft) �,7reatment
kearlmWr Street Name Section From Length Width Area (ftz) PCI Before Treatment Cost Treatment
ID (ft) (ft) Treatment
Year Street Name Section From Length Width Area (ftz) PCI Before Treatment Cost Treatment
(ft) Treatment
1 1 11 ' ' �� � • ' '
Street Name Section Length Width Area (ftz) PCI Before Treatment Cost Treatment
(ft) (ft) ITLreatment �
1 . 1 11 ' �®�� •. 11 11 . .
eet Name T i Length Width Area (ftz) PCI Before Treatment Cost Treatment
(ft) (ft)-miW��treatment M=�—
WSTFAfflan• • .a Tkommm mimm 1 1 1 1 1 1
1•
�eet Name� - - � Length W d) Are PCI B Treatment Cost Treat
(ft) ment
1 : 1 •• ••• ME• • • ��®i
Year Street Name 4Fem -�Ippmp- Length Width Area (ftz) PCI Before Treatment Cost Treatment
ID (ft) (ft) Treatment
1 •1 TO U M 1 1 ®lllCCia® :1 • • '
Year Street Name Section From To Length Width Area (ftz) PCI Before Treatment Cost Treatment
ID (ft) (ft) Treatment
wilgilliqlwn • 11 :� ••• 11 :� ••• 11 11 :1 . .
. MEREPT-MM 1
www.ncenet.com
City of Seal Beach 2/25/2014
NAN N C E 2014 PMS Update
Local Street Resurfacing Program
Plan Year Street Name To Length Width Area (ft2) PCI before Treatment Cost Treatment
2014-2015 11TH S/ELECTRIC N/LANDING Z10 37 7,770 Treatment 47 $19,814 Cold Mill & Fill (2" AC)
12014-2015 13TH S/ELECTRIC N/PCH 960 21 20,160 35 $51,408 Cold Mill & Fill (2" AC)
2014-2015 1 BALBOA S/BOLSA N/CATALINA 1,060 37 39,220 24 $100,011 Cold Mill & Fill (2" AC)
Total 2,230 1 67,150 1 $171,233
Plan Year Street Name From To Length Width Area (ft2) PCI before Treatment Cost Treatment qq=
2015-2016 MARINA E/PCH 6TH 629 61 38,369 Treatment 20 $97,8411 Cold Mill & Fill (2" AC)
2015-2016 ISILVER SHOALS S/BOLSA N/CATALINA 1 1,060 37 39,220 27 1 $100,011 Cold Mill & Fill (2" AC)
Total 1 1,060 39,220 1 $100,011
Treatment Plan Year Street Name From To Length Width Area (ft2) PCI before Treatment Cost Treatment
2016-2017 IRIS HAZELNUT AVE IRONWOOD AVE 226 32 7,232 68 $18,442 Cold Mill & Fill (2" AC)
2016-2017 SILVER SHOALS S/BOLSA N/FATHOM 300 33 9,900 22 $25,245 Cold Mill & Fill (2" AC)
2016-2017 HARBOR S/BAYSIDE N/BAYOU 760 33 25,080 20 $63,954 Cold Mill & Fill (2" AC)
2016-2017 VIOLET S/ELDER N/FIR 160 33 5,280 45 $13,464 Cold Mill & Fill (2" AC)
Total 1,4461 1 47,4921 1 $121,105
Plan Year Street Name From To Length Widt][ Area (ft2) PCI before Treatment Cost Treatment
2017-2018 16TH Treatment
S/ELECTRIC N/P 1,1601 21 1 24,360 35 $62,118 Cold Mill and Fill (2" AC)
2017-2018 17TH S/ELECTRIC N/PCH 1,260 21 26,460 60 $67,473 Cold Mill and Fill (2" AC)
12017-2018 ANDERSON IW/S PCH END CDS 255 38 9,690 57 $24,710 Cold Mill and Fill (2" AC)
Total 2,675 60,510 $154,301
Treatment Plan Year Street Name From TO Length Widtll I Area (ft2) PCI before Treatment Cost Treatment
2018-2019 IRIS HAZELNUT AVE IRONWOOD AVE I 22bl 32 1 7,232 88 1 $18,442 Cold Mill and Fill (2" AC)
12018-20191 IRONWOOD JW/ROSE W/IRIS 1,420 33 46,860 41 $119,493 Cold Mill and Fill (2" AC)
2018-2019 ISUNFLOWER S/FIR N/IRONWOOD 560 37 20,720 43 $52,836 Cold Mill and Fill (2" AC)
Total 2,206 74,812 $190,771
Plan Year Street Name From To Length Widl I Area (ft2) PCI before Treatment Cost Treatment
2019-2020 Treatment
HAZELNUT E/WISTERIA W/SUNFLOWER 1 1,310 33 43,230 1 1 $110,237 Cold Mill and Fill (2" AC)
2019-2020 VIOLET S/ELDER N/FIR 160 33 5,280 48 $13,464 Cold Mill and Fill (2" AC)
12019-2020 JOLEANDE.R S/ALMOND N/FIR 1,320 36 47,520 56 $121,176 Cold Mill and Fill (2" AC)
Total 2,790 96,030 $244,877
i
En neerin & Environmental Services
Engineering Page 1 of 2 Ilk
City of Seal Beach 2/25/2014
NAIIIIIII N C E 2014 PMS Update
Local Street Resurfacing Program
Plan Year Street Name From To Length Width Area (ft2) PCI before Treatment Cost Treatment
Treatment
PRINCTON E/END W/HARVARD 1 2301 30 6,900 63 1 $17,595 Cold Mill and Fill (2" AC)
2020-2021 COLLEGE PARK E/HARVARD CITY LIMIT 940 44 41,360 64 $105,468 Cold Mill and Fill (2" AC)
12020-20211 DARTMOUTH E/END W/HARVARD 180 34 6,120 77 $15,606 Cold Mill and Fill (2" AC)
Total 1,350 54,380 $138,669
Grand Total 1 13,757 439,594 $ 1,120,965
i
En neerin & Environmental Services
Engineering Page 2 of 2
City of Seal Beach 4/9/2014
�%N r` E 2014 PMS Update
Local Street Slurry Program
Plan Street Name From - Date PCI Treatment Treatment
•- • •
2015 ALMOND E/OLEANDER W/ASTER 4,390 36 158,040 C 10/21/2013 91 $54,886 Slurry Seal
2015 BLUE BELL S/ALMOND N/BIRCHWOOD 710 33 23,430 E 10/21/2013 74 $8,544 Slurry Seal
2015 CANDLEBERRY E/WISTERIA W/OLEANDER 1,660 33 54,780 E 10/18/2013 96 $19,976 Slurry Seal
2015 CARNATION S/ALMOND N/END 230 33 7,590 E 10/21/2013 87 $2,636 Slurry Seal
2016 IDAFFODIL S/ALMOND N/END 230 33 1 7,590 E 10/21/2013 87 $2,636 Slurry Seal
2016 DAISY S/ALMOND N/BIRCHWOOD 410 33 13,530 C 10/21/2013 87 $4,934 Slurry Seal
2016 DAISY CIRCLE S/FIR N/END 230 33 7,590 E 10/18/2013 73 $2,636 Slurry Seal
2016 DOGWOOD E/DAISY W/IRONWOOD 1,470 33 48,510 E 10/17/2013 89 $17,689 Slurry Seal
2016 DOGWOOD E/MARIGOLD W/FUCHSIA 1,520 33 50,160 E 10/17/2013 88 $18,291 Slurry Seal
2016 IELDER E/VIOLET W/PRIMROSE 1,380 33 45,540 E 10/18/2013 90 $16,606 Slurry Seal
2016 FERN S/ALMOND N/END 230 33 7,590 E 10/21/2013 94 $2,636 Slurry Seal
2016 IRIS S/ALMOND N/END 230 33 7,590 E 10/21/2013 88 $2,636 Slurry Seal
2016 MARIGOLD S/CANDLEBERRY N/DOGWOOD 160 33 5,280 E 1 10/17/2013 85 $1,925 Slurry Seal
2016 OLEANDER S/ALMOND N/FIR 1,3201 36 47,520 E 10/18/2013 56 $17,328 Slurry Seal
2016 1PRIMROSE S/DOGWOOD N/ELDER 210 33 6,930 E 10/18/2013 96 $2,527 Slurry Seal
2017 CLIPPER E/ CARAVEL W/ ELECTRIC 910 33 30,030 E 10/28/2013 97 $11,498 Slurry Seal
2017 COLLEGE PARK E/HARVARD W/HARVARD 2,590 37 95,830 C 10/16/2013 94 $33,281 Slurry Seal
2017 COLLEGE PARK E/HARVARD W/CITY LIMIT 940 44 41,360 E 10/16/2013 64 $14,364 Slurry Seal
2017 DARTMOUTH E/END W/HARVARD 180 34 6,120 E 10/16/2013 77 $2,125 Slurry Seal
2017 IDOR Y S/GALLEON N/SCHOONER 360 28 10,080 E 10/28/2013 94 $3,860 Slurry Seal
2017 ELECTRIC E/CORSAIR W/END 380 33 12,540 A 10/15/2013 93 $4,801 Slurry Seal
2017 GALLEON S/ELECTRIC N/DORY 970 33 32,010 E 10/28/2013 78 $12,256 Slurry Seal
2017 HARVARD S/COLLEGE PARK W/END 3,310 37 122,470 C 10/16/2013 94 $42,533 Slurry Seal
2017 LOYOLA PLAZA S/COLLEGE PARK N/END 330 25 8,250 E 10/16/2013 80 $2,865 Slurry Seal
2017 IOCCIDENTAL E/ STANFORD W/ HARVARD 160 33 5,280 E 10/16/2013 79 $1,834 Slurry Seal
2017 PRINCETON E/END W/HARVARD 230 30 1 6,900 E 10/21/2013 63 1 $13,987 Slurry Seal
2017 SCHOONER E/GALLEON W/DORY 660 33 21,780 E 10/28/2013 91 $8,339 Slurry Seal
2017 YALE E/COLLEGE PARK W/COLLEGE PARK 1,160 33 38,280 E 10/16/2013 86 $13,294 Slurry Seal
2018 BEACHCOMBER S/BOLSA N/SEA BREEZE 1,160 33 38 280 E 10/25/2013 99 $15,312 Slurry Seal
2018 BERYL COVE S/ EMERALD COVE N/ MARLIN 360 33 11,880 E 10/25/2013 91 $4,895 Slurry Seal
2018 COASTLINE E/CARMEL W/BALBOA 2,380 33 78 540 E 10/25/2013 91 $31,416 Slurry Seal
2018 DRIFTWOOD E/BALBOA W/COASTLINE 1,460 33 48 180 E 10/28/2013 98 $19,272 Slurry Seal
2018 EMERALD COVE E/ BERYL COVE W/ JADE COVE 580 33 19,140 E 1 10/25/2013 91 $7,886 1 Slurry Seal
Engineering& Environmental Service Page 1 of 2
City of Seal Beach 4/9/2014
�%N r` E 2014 PMS Update
Local Street Slurry Program
Plan Street Name From - Date PCI Treatment Treatment
•- • •
2018 JADE COVE S/ EMERALD COVE N/ MARLIN 360 33 11 880 E 10/25/2013 89 $4,895 Slurry Seal
2019 10TH S/OCEAN N/ELECTRIC 950 40 38 000 E 10/30/2013 97 $15,200 Slurry Seal
2019 13TH S/ OCEAN N/ ELECTRIC 710 40 28,400 E 10/30/2013 95 $11,360 Slurry Seal
2019 DOLPHIN N/ OCEAN N/ ELECTRIC 582 24 13,968 E 10/30/2013 90 $5,587 Slurry Seal
2019 IMAIN S/OCEAN AVE N/ELECTRIC 1,190 57 1 67,830 C 10/30/2013 87 $27,132 Slurry Seal
2020 JALMOND E/OLEANDER W/ASTER 4,390 36 158,040 C 10/21/2013 89 $63,217 Slurry Seal
2020 CARNATION S/ALMOND N/END 230 33 7,590 E 10/21/2013 85 $3,036 Slurry Seal
2020 DAFFODIL S/ALMOND N/END 230 33 71-59-0- E 10/21/2013 85 $3,036 Slurry Seal
2021 FIR E/GOLDENROD W/IRONWOOD 1,460 33 48,180 E 1 10/17/2013 95 $19,850 Slurry Seal
2021 FUCHSIA CIRCLE S/FIR N/END 330 33 10,890 E 10/17/2013 95 $4,487 Slurry Seal
2021 IHAZELNUT E/HEATHER W/ROSE 1,610 33 53 130 E 10/18/2013 78 $21,252 Slurry Seal
2021 1HEATHER S/HAZELNUT N/LAMPSON 490 37 18,130 C 10/17/2013 95 $7,252 Slurry Seal
1,582,2481 $606,010
Note:
1. "Plan Year" is the fiscal year planning for the treatment
2014- FY 2014-2015 CPE Phase III
2015- FY 2015-2016 CPE Phase IV
2016- FY 2016-2017 CPW/Bridgeport
2017- FY 2017-2018 Hill/Cove
2018- FY 2018-2019 Old Town
2019- FY 2019-2020 CPE Phase I
2020- FY 2020-2021 CPE Phase II
2. 'FC" is Functional Class
A-Arterial
C - Collector
E - Residential
•
Engineering& Environmental Services Page 2 of 2
Collaboration. Commitment. Confidence"'
VVIJONCE 'L
Appendix G
Engineering& Environmental Services www.ncenet.com
*V A Collaboration. Commitment. Confidence"
JONCE 'L
�.
Alternative Funding Levels
Engineering& Environmental Services •
` City of Seal Beach 2/25/2014
N C E 2014 PMS Update
Alternante Funding Levels
SCENARIO 2: MAINTAIN PCI
' • • � • • � I WI-11 ' •• • • ' '• • '
1 81% 3% 3% 2% 12%
1 85% 4% 0% 1% 10%
1 80% 12% 0% 0% 8%
1 72% 20% 0% 0% 8%
1 63% 29% 0% 0% 8%
1 • 58% 34% 0% 0% 8%
1 1 43% 49% 0% 0% 8%
SCENARIO 3: EXISTING FUNDING
' • .• • '75% 3% 7% 12%
74% 2% 7% 12%
1 61% 19% 2% 6% 12%
1 53% 29% 2% 5% 11%
1 44% 38% 1% 5% 12%
1 • 37% 45% 1% 5% 12%
1 1 15% 57% 11% 5% 12%
Engineering& Environmental Services