Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC AG PKT 2014-06-02 #1Slick The Sea "Seal Beach: TI Surf, Sun, & 2014/15 to 2018/19 FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (Final cover under construction) TABLE OF CONTENTS City Council and Executive Team ........ ............................... i.2 Message from the Director ........ ............................... i.3 — i.4 CIP Accomplishments ........ ............................... i.5 — i.6 CIP Process ........ ............................... i.7 — i.8 CIP Summary Schedule By Fund Type ........ ............................... i.9 — i.15 By Project Type ........ ............................... 06 — 07 SECTION I - BEACH AND PIER Summary Sheet ........ ............................... 1.1 Individual Project Detail Sheets ........ ............................... 1.2-1.7 SECTION II - BUILDING AND FACILITIES Summary Sheet ........ ............................... 2.1 Individual Project Detail Sheets ........ ............................... 2.2-2.11 SECTION III - PARKS Summary Sheet ........ ............................... 3.1 Individual Project Detail Sheets ........ ............................... 3.2 SECTION IV - SEWER Summary Sheet ........ ............................... 4.1 Individual Project Detail Sheets ........ ............................... 4.2-4.6 SECTION V — STORM DRAIN Summary Sheet ........ ............................... 5.1 Individual Project Detail Sheets ........ ............................... 5.2 SECTION VI - STREETS AND TRANSPORTATION Summary Sheet ........ ............................... 6.1 —6.2 Individual Project Detail Sheets ........ ............................... 6.3-6.17 SECTION VII -WATER Summary Sheet ........ ............................... 7.1 —7.2 Individual Project Detail Sheets ........ ............................... 7.3-7.14 SECTION VIII — UNFUNDED PROJECTS /NEEDS Summary Sheet ........ ............................... 8.1 Principal Officers City Council ElleryDeaton .......................... ............................... ..........................Mayor David Sloan ............. ............................... ..........................Mayor Pro -Tem Michael Levitt ............. ............................... ........................Council Member Gary Miller ................ ............................... ........................Council Member Gordon Shanks ......... ............................... ........................Council Member City Executive Team Jill Ingram .................. ............................... ...........................City Manager Joe Bailey ........ ............................... .........................Marine Lifeguard Chief Quinn Barrow ............... ............................... ...........................City Attorney Jim Basham .............. ............................... Director of Community Development Vikki Beatley ................................... ............................... Finance Director Sean Crumby .......................... ............................... Director of Public Works Linda Devine .................... ............................... ...........................City Clerk Patrick Gallegos . ............................... ......................Assistant City Manager Joe Stilinovich ....................................... ............................... Chief of Police Page i.2 June 9, 2014 Message from the Director of Public Works: Honorable Mayor, Members of the City Council and Citizens of the City of Seal Beach: The Department of Public Works is pleased to submit the fiscal year 2014/15 to 2018/19 5- year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for the City of Seal Beach. The CIP is a vital planning document that outlines priorities for the City's infrastructure. The first year of the CIP is included and identical to the Capital Improvements section of the City's FY 2014 -15 budget document. Whereas the budget is the plan for the next 12 months of the City, the CIP strategically plans and prioritizes projects to maximize the efficient use of funds. The financial resources of the City vary with the economy, but the needs of the infrastructure and community are consistent. The CIP generally presents a balanced approach to invest in the City's infrastructure by proactively managing the assets and planning the most effective method of expenditure. The Staff is looking for innovative ways to deliver on needs for the City, in an efficient deliver method that does not impact City residents quality of life nor business and visitors ability to enjoy the City as well. The Capital Improvement program allows for planning of large expenditures and aggressive pursuit of grant funding to augment City funds. Projects within the CIP are divided into seven (7) operational areas; Beach & Pier, Building & Facilities, Parks, Sewer System, Storm Drain System, Street & Transportation and Water. The proposed CIP includes 50 projects to be delivered during the next 5 years totaling over $32 million in value. The funding sources start with local funds including the City's General Fund, grants, enterprise accounts, and fees. Those funds are aggressively augmented with grants. Numerous unfunded needs are currently identified and listed in the unfunded needs section totaling more than $145 million. Unfunded projects are crucial to identifying and planning future needs for the City. Those needs should be and are reviewed annually to locate funding sources. Responsible planning of the Capital Improvement Program will always include unfunded needs, and further highlight the importance of efficiency with expenditure of the City's fiscal resources. The ultimate goal for the Capital Improvements Program is to effectively manage the City's physical assets by delivering capital projects that meet schedule, stay within budget, and minimize the impact to the public. Not every alternate funding source is utilized as they sometimes add in duration and can attach conditions in exchange for the funding. Grant opportunities are individually assessed for viability. The amount of expenditures outlined within this Capital Improvement Program is consistent with the expenditures from previous years. The City of Seal Beach has aggressively constructed Capital Improvements without excessive amounts of bonds or loans. The Page i.3 Pavement Management Program countywide indicated among the Cities in Orange County the condition of the streets in Seal Beach is among the highest in the county. The Capital Improvement Program is delivered as a team effort by the staff from the entire City. The Public Works Department is staffed with 4 engineers, one inspector, and 16 technical and maintenance staff. In addition to the typical construction obstacles, every project expends effort and resources on obtaining funding, property ownership, environmental processing, etc. I would like to thank the staff for their hard work and dedication that makes all of these projects possible. Sean Crumby, P.E. Director of Public Works Page i.4 CIP Accomplishments In Fiscal Year 2013/14 the City completed twelve Capital Improvement Projects totaling over $5.9 million in value. A list of those projects is below: AMOUNT Beach and Pier BP1401 Pier Plaza Storage Repair $78,000 Sewer SS0901 City Wide Sewer Lining and Pipe Rehabilitation $1,672,000 Storm Drain SD1201 Marina Avenue Storm Drain Upgrade $1,732,000 SD1402 Environmental Cleanup Grant $51,000 Streets & Transportation Water ST1107 Golden Rain Intersection Improvements $359,000 ST1202 & ST1204 Annual Local and Arterial Paving Project $685,000 ST1201 Annual Slurry Seal Project $91,000 ST1205 Annual Concrete Repair $63,000 ST1499 13th Street Emergency Repair $45,000 Annual Striping Contract $50,000 WT1101 Ocean Alley Water & Sewer (Main St to 6th St) $856,000 Facilities BG1201 & BG1204 Marine Safety Building & City Hall $258,000 Annual Tennis Court Resurfacing $27,000 TOTAL $5,967,000 The City also has ten (10) capital projects currently in construction and are as follows: 1. ST1404 Annual Concrete Program 2. ST1402 Local Street Paving Program 3. ST1401 Annual Slurry Seal Program 4. ST1408 Traffic Management Center Relocation 5. ST1203 Main Street Lighting Project 6. BG1302 Emergency Generator at City Hall & Fire Station #44 7. SS0901 8th Street Pump Station Rehabilitation 8. WT1401 Ocean Avenue Alley Rehabilitation (1St Street to 6th Street) 9. Lampson Avenue Backup Power 10. West End Pump Station Emergency Repair Page i.5 The City's CIP consists of the following seven major areas: 1. Beach & Pier 2. Building & Facilities 3. Parks 4. Sewer 5. Storm Drain 6. Streets & Transportation 7. Water Beach & Pier. The City's Beach and Pier are landmark tourist attractions that draw approximately 2 million visitors per year. The Pier is made up of a wooden deck with lighting, utility infrastructure, and a restaurant. The beach includes 3 parking lots, approximately 2 miles of dry sand beach, 2 sets of public restrooms, 2 parks, and landscaping. Building & Facilities. The City's Building and Facilities house employees, visitors, tenants and business owners citywide in 22 structures. Structures include City Hall, Police Station, 2 Fire Stations, city maintenance facilities, and recreation and community centers. A facility master plan was adopted in FY 2011/12. Projects within this CIP were identified within that Facility Master Plan. Others are included in the unfunded needs. Parks. The City's Park infrastructure provides landscaping and the City's Urban Forest. Seal Beach has 70 park and landscape sites citywide. The forestry has over 150 species to maintain and nourish. Three projects are included within this year's CIP. Sewer. The City provides sewer collection for the residents of Seal Beach and passes the raw sewage to the Orange County Sanitation District for treatment. The City's Sewer System has more than 160,000 feet of pipe, 700 manholes, and 7 pump stations. Storm Drain. The City's Storm Drain System collects surface runoff in 11 drainage areas throughout the City with one Storm Drain pump station. Streets & Transportation. The City's Streets and Transportation System is responsible for more than 101 lane miles, continuous traffic flow, landscaped medians, traffic signals and utility work within the streets. Water. The Water Division conveys potable water to all residents, business owners, tenants and the Naval Base. The infrastructure includes two booster stations, two reservoirs, four wells, telemetry, valves, pressure regulation stations, fire hydrants, meters and control center. Page i.6 CIP PROCESS The Capital Improvement Program is comprised of construction projects and equipment purchases (excluding vehicles) which cost $10,000 or more. The CIP also includes activities that can be planned for or occur on an irregular or one time basis. Minor capital outlays of less than $10,000 and reoccurring maintenance activities will be included with the operation and maintenance budget. The Capital Improvement Program is a plan that identifies the capital projects to be funded during a five year planning horizon. The CIP is updated annually, and the first year of the plan serves as the current year capital budget. The CIP is a planning document to help City Council systematically schedule and finance capital projects to ensure cost - effectiveness as well as conformance with established policies. The CIP is organized into the same functional groups used for the operating programs. The CIP reflects a balance between capital replacement projects that repair, replace, or enhance existing facilities, equipment or infrastructure, and capital facility projects that significantly expand or add to the City's existing fixed assets. The CIP will emphasize project planning with projects typically progressing through the following phases: Identification of Project. Improvements within the Capital Improvement Plan are generated or identified as follows: Advanced planning: Most of the improvements are identified within a Planning document or Master Plan. Many master plans are required by funding agencies. All master plans are adopted by the City Council. Currently the City has master plans adopted as follows: • Street Pavements: Pavement Management Plan (updated every 2 years most recently April 2014), Concrete Rehabilitation Master Plan (2013) • Water System: Water Master Plan (2011), Urban Water Management Plan (2011), Water Rate Study (2010) • Sanitary Sewers: Sewer Master Plan (1999 & 2005), Sewer Rate Study (2000) • Storm Drains: Master Plan of Drainage (2008) • Street Trees: Street Tree Master Plan (2011) • Facilities: Facility Master Plan (2011), Pier Condition Assessment (2008) • Local Implementation Plan (2003) • Fleet: Fleet Management Plan (2012) 2. Reaction to need or opportunity: Projects may originate through a need or opportunity. An example of a project that was delivered as a result of a need is the 13th Street Emergency Repair that occurred due to erosion from private property. An example of a project that occurred due to an opportunity is the Environmental Cleanup Grant. The City capitalized on a grant opportunity to upgrade and replace city infrastructure. 3. Desire from the community: Projects may originate through a desire from the community. One example in the proposed CIP is Lighting Upgrades to the City's flagpoles. Page i.7 Finally, before a project can be identified for inclusion into the CIP, funding for the project must be secured, or it will remain on the unfunded list of the CIP. A. Permitting and Environmental Analysis. Environmental Analysis is performed on every CIP project to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and in some cases with the National Environmental Quality Act (NEPA). Permitting is required from a variety of agencies and is assessed for every project. Permits may be necessary from agencies such as the California Coastal Commission, Caltrans, Department of Wildlife Fish & Game, Army Corps of Engineers, State Lands Commission, County of Orange, etc. B. Design. Projects are designed in -house with public works staff wherever possible. The City's engineering staff in many cases does not have the available time or resources to perform the design, or the expertise to perform the design. In these cases, the City will locate and secure the service of an appropriately qualified consultant. Construction documents including plans and specifications are prepared and approved by the City Council prior to beginning construction. C. Construction. Improvements will be constructed in a manner that will minimize impacts to the residents. The City employs a construction manager (with materials testing) to ensure that all construction projects are carried out safely, and constructed to meet the construction documents. D. Incorporate into maintenance activities. All CIP projects are incorporated into the maintenance activities of the City. The maintenance staff will incorporate any new facilities into all routine inspections and ongoing maintenance programs. Staff will include new facilities into future maintenance budgets. E. Equipment Acquisitions. Equipment acquisitions such as vehicles, heavy machinery, computers, office furnishings, and other equipment items are included in the Capital Improvement Program and are acquired and installed independently from construction contracts. Page i.8 w J r) W W 'C'^) vJ Z Q Z 5G Z) G LL C/) / m I — U N > O O a !Z 4. a m v � m � Z O 06 N LLo� � ao O �o NO N Z Q - O � cc LL o -0 � o ° ac 0-(0 1 O LL � N �(0 0-6 T O - LL L2 o 0 ac Q "' I O C, cc LL N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W o O O N N O O O 00 O O 0 n O N 0 n - - 0 V 61) 61) O O O O O O M N 61) 61) 00 00 00 O O O M (\I 61) 61) 0 0 0 00 00 00 0 0 0 M N 6�1 6c� 6c� O O O O O O 00 00 0O V 00 M N V O O O O O O O Q Q Q Q O Q 0 0 0 0 OO OO OO OO OO OO OO OO OO OO OO OO OO OO OO OO OO 0000000000000 000 0 O O O N N O O O 00 O m O N N 0 0 0 0 N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 � o 0 o°o °ou°�u°� °o OD m°[- M 11 M (O M 6�1 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 61� O O O O O O In O O N 6�1 6c� 6c� 0 0 0 0 0 0 O In O O N 6�1 6c� 6c� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O (n O O N 6�1 6c� 6c� 000 0 In 0 O N 6�1 6c� 6c� 0 0 0 0 0 OO OO OO O O O O 000 0 0 ° 0 M 6�1 6c� 6c� 6c� 00 0 0 OO X01- (0 (0 N 6�1 6c� 61� Oo c 00 n (R (f O c O Lr (» (f O c O Lr (» (f o c O c 00 Lr N (fT (f O c oLr N (» (f OO c 0 Lr N (R (f N C m E m > O V O' (� �O ! c LL E a) O N N= E N N N p N N O E U c N E r O N O- a) EU QE Qa }ate d 9 c m O' .2 a) c �'o E N aci (n o d d U d d c E o = c E d 'n d a) a. m rn� O rn 2 0 >. > o d a) LL a o o t p O .o m N - m as m °) rn - o d m LL d o m LL m aE) c a E E .a) d d o H O E `m - o LL E E E° LL 0 t U d d E o t m d c c .� a) LL E U m E a` m N N r `o m m a) d � o as m -0 c �j 'v as a = c d $ m n U t- °� c N N O m a) c d LL o a�i d t d w LL o 0 m t °-) z m m Q Q d U N t 3 E a a) -c U s c m E LL E o a) rn o H ac) ( LL m > cA o d d vii E> °� d °3 m m U N J N a) 0-12 N (6 t W J U U c U 7 7 N i O) O c m m Q m i .— a) (6 � Q cu a) E U d E w o- LL a) U U 7 _ a) 0 d Q O i i O U LL N '° m LL (� C c y d a) 0 E U .� �_ N m U m m c— = c= X 7 7 7 H N c c c LL tF N U w 7 m c LL Z Dr- LLlUZ U UdLLJddfAQU��QLL ¢¢¢O ¢¢ (6 V M N N M V N V N M N M N I- O_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 OO 0 0 0 0 0 0 (' m In 0 00 O O 0 0 0 =000 00 m N N 4 M V 0 0 )0 0 )O N M In M a) V In In In In N V V In In In 0 00 0 M O O O M N 0 00 O M N 0 00 0 M N O 0 0 M N 0 Oo 0 N II (f? wil Z� CB LL LU J r) W W U C C� Z Q Z G LL / ^ m LL U N N O O a !Z +., a m v � Z OW N ao� 00 O �o NO N Z 0 r O L o -0 � o ° ac Q (0 z O N -0 �2 0 0- Lr) z O�a L2 o ° ac 0-4 T O C, Cc a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O°°°° c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c C C C 0 0 0 0 0 o c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c �3 �2 0 M l0 N� 0 0 N CD CD ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER EF 00 O 00 0 0 0 0 O 00 O O 00 0 00 CD 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c O O O O O O O O c O In 0 0 0 0 0 In c O�In 00 O M O N tT V In N N ER ER ER ER ER (R (R ER EF a E m fn N 01 LL d O N O M d t C U N Q Q t w d 7 t N O N E O y N >` N O) — p` O (6 d d Oi N d E a 2 y O m> Y (6 E O O N C Q d' 3 m m j N N ; E- C -p O 1n T T Q 7 N- O M M M CO < LL mr U d y E y N �wUa�OCiicii¢¢O W M O 0 °0') "T 0 (°O O v0aacq�3 �3 �3 �3� lnmmmmcncncncncn� O o 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O O 0 O O 0 O o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O o 0000000000000000 M M In 00 O O O to O r r O O r O r O N V I- V (O W d) — M M M to V N � — N N 6�1 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c�U311 U3 0 0 0 0 II0 O O O (n (n n(n 0 O 0 ° W O O 0 V r - V (O d) 6�1 61) 61) 61) 613 O O 00 110T O � °° c o CF) c 6�1 6c� 6c� 6c� IIEA O O O O I I 0 0 o O o 0 LO ° 0 (n (n (n (n 11 6n 0q 00 llI 0000000o10n 0 o 0 ll� M N IIV N E N N T N >O t N C 7 E O !Z N '0 In i N U O d O N N N d' v E 20 O N E _ O O m U 0- 12 L Q— O T 7 E a) O N m d t N N O O N N N Q N N N ) Q(0 N t 3 m 7 O N O N Q Q O O > M m O O LL Q J 0- N N J J O Q U U J J U O N N O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O) M V In to to to M M M M c:) l 0LOLOolio0110 (R (i)11(i) (i)11(i) (i)11(i) II oC, LLO 0 ll (R (i)11(i) (i)11 (F c cu a r a) E N 01 �O cu N cu C N a) N > C N N U E N N . N > Q C 3 N c 7 E O O O O U G a Q p N N C > 1i �j 1°n ° c m C Q N 7 y 7 U LL m LL C LL m — U) > V t f6 E f6 m O N LL� az V O M O O J O H m (7 W (7 0 H F cn to m fn m U cn ° 11(A J Q 0 0 Z� CB (L w V w N 0 w � w L' V LL Lid Q C4 ) w a w co U' C V O c� *acs 0Q. F- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0001�0000001� 0 LO 0 0 0 O O LO LO N O M 00 00 LO LO M O N N O O m 00 O N N LO N 00 M M O O O O O O O � - O O O O O O O O' C C C C C O �\ O LO LO 0 0 0 O � O MI-- LO O M 0 - - N N N (f} 0 O O O O O O O ^1 O' C C C C C O O LO LO O O LO LO O M I-- LO r- N N O I- (f)- (f)- (f)- (f)- (f} W O O O O O O O J 0 0 0 0 0 0 O p O w w O O Lf p W - (D MI-- LO — r- W a - N N N x _ N � Z p a O O O O O O O z :) O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 o O �L - o Lfi Lfi000 0 N M I-- LO - O O f A m - L NC N - LO r- - Lf 1- 61k 61k 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O I� 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO 0 0 0 O O LO LO N O M 00 qqt LO LO O - N N O N � (0 LO N I�- N N - M N M qqt Lf ' 61k (A (A (f} (f} (f} (f} (f} 61k (A (f} w V w N 0 w � w L' V LL Lid Q C4 ) w a w co U' C V O c� *acs 0Q. F- % [ k�k 2 # � Q � . $ � . � }) #� Bk § v � �$ ■� §N t % [ k�k 2 # � Q � . $ � . � }) #� Bk § v t k k � � 0 a � v$ K §k Ilk. 2 2� k a t k k � � 0 a � v$ K ) R 0 § LL 1 CD m v 04 4 t § [ x � A � � « k . / k$ . � 0 a � k \� � k #kt B4 § v � � v$ � Ell �i k 2 �k � a § 0 � k ) m u S § � k v$ 3 � � \ � k$ 2� � 0 a < �$ � � v$ iCol a § �$ a� � 4E 7 # � � Q k }$ #kk B4 § v ) �$ �o � W O (7 Z C Z D a m a U O O N � � o C p k U U h N � m O Z O O O h O h Z 4 V U C U)� m z I� LU LL m IL U n O N Z� �N o h C Z U 4 i Z� U �o N a O 4 U ±m h C UM M h y y U 4 O i h U w a U �o �N I y C o O � � a � o y � a V U �o �N 0 Q U �M tlL I y y O � � a V 0 Q U �M tlL U m I V V\ V O N w J LLJ 0 W n 2 U ry W C� r n /y� C /VJ W 0— U Ca -a U o2 O Q > Q N Q Q O H Ls T 0 O N O 01 00 3 d O m -0 OD 00 NO N 01 O aom N O N O rn o(O aom 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O V 0 0 0 N M N O 6�1 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� III �° 00 o °m 00 0-6 7 O O O m ao N � � O 00000 O O O U M O O O O O O 0 0 a 0 O� 0 0 0-4 -O a O m N `w 'a v c f6 t U v m m N C U ,O O (6 E C d m , E a d o N U (6 N C N C N t (6 d N ) N a m a N N E C N N C rn.�a Q Q 0 u O- 1' y N N Z } N ; L C o m L - a d U In LL �(n (nt L U d d o d d a a N O O V N O(3 L2 a a a a a a m m m m m m d 0000000001. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C C C C C C C C 0 O O O O M O r M M N M M O O N r- V N I- 00 M M N N M V�l V�l V�l V�l V�l V�l V�l V�l V�l uJi U3 O IIO (n u(n o I °O O 00 ° ° �� V 6�1 6c� or 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O° 0 0 N r- V M N 0 � M M N N 0 O O 0 C 0 V V O O W 00 c � c -0 U LL E m = E E w E d K cn w o m ° � > o 0 N E Q E 7 Q Q (6 o m E ( E E d d E C E U rnw o m Q Y s O o° C d O E wo 7 2 N t (� (6 u m O Q 0 U J J C 0 m U N T — O N ?i fn d U m O U T N N 3 O M - m N 00 >M N 0 jt LL Z7 W UcAU y22U5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O N M V V V M M M M ` m m m m m m m m m m a OIIO 0110 OIIO 0110 °O II °O OIIO °o II °o 0110 0110 0110 OIIO 0110 D M � O a in N 0 0 0 0 0 O O C 000000 C 0 O O O ILO O (MO O M I- I- M N V M N M 00 O O O O 00 0 o Oo 0 0 0 0 O OO O 000 °0° O O O O O O O O O O LO O N r I- I- M N W N N N C N N > O _ m C N 01 (6 d O y t C 0 m a cu a m E d 7 O o N d ,� E O N N C V; 2 - J a C2 > > 0 ° cn cn Q Q N � n fn fn fn fn fn T d U r4 m V V\ �N O N W J W W 2 \C/)\r U ry W C� r n /y� C v^J W LL U -o U 0 3 O Q > Q m Q Q a5 O H U T N O d O Q 00 Z O E a o 00 00 NO N C Q C O L o N U �-- N O d O Q � Z O a o �(0 0 Q LO 1 O C, Cx IL N 6 M p ON C 0-4 _a O Cx EL C, N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O In 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V V a3 0 0 1 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 O M M O N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O I- O 0 N O O (\I (\I 61) 61) 61) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m o o m o o O I- O M N N N N 6�1 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O r 0 0 N 00 N N 61) 61) 61) 61) 61) 61) 61) 0 0000000 O r 0 0 N O O � N N 00 000000000000 O O I� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �� M O O r O 0 0 OO O N 0 N 0 O N N N N c m N a5 N a) N O) m m E O O O E 62-2- > C Y N O E O O) E Q E 0) 2 N a O .±• O O 0 d a O E Q > a) a) 'n d o o) as c as o. >_ 'o O cu d 0) d a) c _rn m w E c d d o O .o as E a) c a) Do O) a) �) U an d N N N a5 a C aJ J O 'E 3 a) C N N N m o d 0 c O 0 0 aEi >� d rn 0)— ~ Q d Q m U U C y 3 E 0 ' p) d y Q N d a5 c a5 fn i fn U M c U O 6 >i c _ O E as ~ .� d as d c O It c y M I- N 00 0 N M V In 0 r 00 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 In 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N M V V M M M M M M M M M r H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H O r M r M O O W M 00 O 0 00 M O O W M 0 C 0) (0 O r 0) 0) M N N N N N N N N N O O O O Q Q Q O O Q O C CI 0000000I I CI O CI CI O CI C O O O O 0 r r 0 0 1- 0 r I� V a0 M W 0 M M U N r r n CD EfJ EfJ EfJ EfJ EfJ EfJ EfJ EfJ EfJ EfJ EfJ Ef O O 00 00 c O O c ui o c 00 0 (C n 0 C O M 00000 O O O O O O O O O O 0 V � M N ER ER Ef O O O O O O U) 0 O- 0) V 6c, 6c, 00 � Cl 6c, 6c, O O O N C t m E 0 N > > m O -c 0 E 0 7 C 0- C M i O 0 > — c 8 Q '0 0 E - t a) a' a) t d o E o a) 0 o E U a) c o m a) a > N O= 0--o N a) O U O O U E o> m Of i Q m m � a5 y �> .y )> N m u N O a) Q o Q w E d O a5 d d 3: d c N N c a -C E a C O_ (6 N m E J O Q U U J V M N M V N M V 00 O O O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 7 M V In M M M M M M M H H H H H H H H H H H H O O 0) 0 O O O V 00 O 0 V 0 V O O V V 0 C O M O O O r M J Q F 0 F a� d w LU a o� Z LU a LU L) W Lf ma 1 Z /G L_0 r U LU U) m V� y O O N �w N O CIL 0 O d aLf �o NO N C Q fA Z O a o d -a fp co O Q O C Q Z O a o d co 0 w 0 CL (c) 0 a`o° N O a coo C Q 6 Z O a c, N lf) N O O N C Q V Z O a � N U W 0 IL w R rn Q D 7 W 'a N O O IL m O O C 00c LO LO C V V C v> v> to O O C LO LO C V V C 61) 69�to c c ! 7 7 ' LL LL U R R f Q Q ! R R f U U W W R 3 c C IO p p p p N 7 Ful p i p q, p i N R F W R s IL R c LL rn c Y U W 0 N W 'a V O O IL m O 00010 0 0 0 0 _C 0000 00 00 O 0 0 0 0 00 00 O fA fA fA V O O O O Cl) N O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O fA fA fA C C c 0 7 LL LL L LL F c 'Q 'Q W LL R W c a c O LL R R CL w a` c R IL R N R O U R U O J N O IL m O O O O O O V O N 69 c F LL R W c � O W (7 � o O E c Q 7 E LL C W E N w N Q R 7 U i N W 'a M O a m O O O O O O O O c F LL R CDW c W (7 0 v c 7 LL C W E N w N Q R 7 U i N W 'a O LO E m O O O O O OIO O 00 O 00 O O O V O O fA N Ell) I Ell) � c F LL R W c W (7 0 CD v c 7 LL C w E s N O Z c R N s U R W m N O 10 a m A0 V3 O O O O O O O O O O O O ER V3 O CD CD O V lA 69 A0 R J F ~ 0 F Q W a� M n FY 2014115 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Beach & Pier PROJECT NAME Pier Utility Upgrade Project PROJECT MANAGER David Spitz, Associate Engineer LOCATION City Pier PRIORITY Medium DESCRIPTION PROJECT No. BP1002 TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,200,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Not Started ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION This project will replace the existing water, sewer and gas lines under The lines have deteriorated over the years and constant repairs are too costly. the Pier which serve the restaurant operation and pier fire protection. Repairs are needed to maintain pier safety. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: This project will reduce the need for on -going maintenance by staff. MAP PICTURE Page 1.2 Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total Water Capital $ 450,000 $ 450,000 Sewer Capital $ 450,000 $ 450,000 General Fund $ 300,000 $ 300,000 TOTAL $1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 Expenditures Design $ 150,000 $ 150,000 Construction $1,050,000 $ 1,050,000 TOTAL $1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 Page 1.2 FY 2014/15 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Beach & Pier PROJECT NAME Pier Re- Decking Final Phase PROJECT MANAGER David Spitz, Associate Engineer LOCATION City Pier PRIORITY Medium DESCRIPTION PROJECT No. BP1004 TOTAL PROJECT COST $300,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Not Started ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION This proposed project will replace the existing pier decking with new The existing decking has deteriorated and is in need of replacement and timber decking. This is a four phase project whose first phase was in FY rehabilitation. The new deck will provide a more uniform surface for the thousands of 06/07. Phases 2 and 3 were constructed in FY 08/09. This project has pier visitors each year. been on hold due to assessment of utilities and unknown conditions with the Pier Restaurant. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: Constructing the project will reduce maintenance of the pier decking. MAP Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total General Fund $ 300,000 $ 300,000 TOTAL $ 300,000 $ 300,000 Expenditures Construction $ 300,000 $ 300,000 TOTAL $ 300,000 $ 300,000 PICTURE Page 1.3 FY 2014115 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Beach & Pier PROJECT NAME Local Coastal Plan Preparation and Processing PROJECT MANAGER Jim Basham, Director of Community Development LOCATION Seal Beach Coastal Zone PRIORITY Medium DESCRIPTION PROJECT No. BP1102 TOTAL PROJECT COST $240,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECTSTATUS Design ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION The City staff and consultant team will be working with the California By having a Local Coastal Program the City is authorized to issue Coastal Coastal Commission to process a Local Coastal Plan for the City of Seal Development Permits (CDP). Issuing of permits will save the City and private Beach. property owners time and money by not having to apply for the CDP directly with the California Coastal Commission. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: This project will reduce annual permitting cost for the City and its residents. MAP PICTURE itures Page 1.4 Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total Water Capital $ 80,000 $ 80,000 Sewer $ 80,000 $ 80,000 General Fund $ 80,000 $ 80,000 TOTAL $ 240,000 $ $ 240,000 itures Page 1.4 FY 2014115 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Beach & Pier PROJECT NAME Pier Structural Assessment Implementation PROJECT MANAGER David Spitz, Associate Engineer LOCATION City Pier PRIORITY High DESCRIPTION PROJECT No. BP1103 TOTAL PROJECT COST $100,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECTSTATUS Design ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION Medium severity, repairs will be made based on the approved 2008 Pier The Pier was previously inspected in 2008 and this assessment will continue with the Structural Assessment Study. recommended 5 -year assessment program. Findings will be used to direct future pier repairs. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None. 826 ��Z Fs MOO d00 cb - -- _ - - -- -'0' EISEN X UNICIPAL PIER, MAP PICTURE Page 1.5 Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total General Fund $ 100,000 $ 100,000 TOTAL $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Expenditures Professional Services $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Construction $ 90,000 $ 90,000 TOTAL $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Page 1.5 FY 2014115 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Beach & Pier PROJECT NAME Five Year Pier Structural Assessment PROJECT MANAGER David Spitz, Associate Engineer LOCATION City Pier PRIORITY High DESCRIPTION PROJECT No. BP1501 TOTAL PROJECT COST $100,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECTSTATUS Design ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION Perform a structural assessment of the City's pier. This is done every The City is required to assess the structural stability of the pier every 5 years. The five years. last assessment was performed in 2008. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None. 826 ��Z Fs MOO d00 S�Q cb EISEN ti y� '.� X SFq� o� ti °° UNICIPAL PIER, MAP PICTURE Page 1.6 Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total General Fund $ 100,000 $ 100,000 TOTAL $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Expenditures Professional Services $ 100,000 $ 100,000 TOTAL $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Page 1.6 6i/� ?1_10)1a1(Aeez4y_ FY 2014/15 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Beach & Pier PROJECT NAME Sand Nourishment PROJECT MANAGER David Spitz, Associate Engineer LOCATION City Beach PRIORITY High DESCRIPTION PROJECT No. BP1502 TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,000,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Design ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION The City will piggyback on Stage 13 of the Army Corp of Engineers The City needs to periodically nourish its beach beyond back passing and moving sand Dredging Project to nourish Sunset /Sufside. from one side of the pier to the other. The City is always on the lookout for nourishment opportunities and teaming up with the Army Corps of Engineers is a very cost effective solution. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None. 00 oux PACfFIC tit .Gf MUNICIPAL. PIER MAP Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total Page 1.7 O ao c E E w Z V O O c� m 0 0 0 0 L R N } O a R O 00 0 c O Q a v 0 00 N 000 0 0 O c 0 N N N V W b3 b3 Y 0 O C 0 a L O 00 b3 b a o d O h U [ b3 b3 00 00 A A O Q N N N c Q L b3 00 b3 O � 00 ti aocc A N ti 3 is N N c - n 3 nN i O - - a o J o S w o � N 0 c li - a c � O C W w � 0 aN 0 a W a n d E c > a � U o a J O E O L a o d cd c a N D E - _) O O ao c E E w Z V O O c� m 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 00 0 c 0 0 0 0 00 O 00 000 0 0 O c 0 N N N V N b3 b3 b3 b3 b3 b3 00 b3 b O O O U [ b3 b3 00 00 A A O O b3 00 b3 00 00 o O O O V b3 b3 0 0 0 0 OO O 0 b3 b3 � S) C O � `w c v C7 °o v c LL C A v E K c A `o Ul S) M O N c� m 00 00 00 b3 b3 S) S) C C LL LL A a v � c U w C7 v w o N o v c V � N LL LL A 2 U `o 3 a° a Y m C rn E W N O M c� m 00 c o c N C b3 6 A S O � � u S i C c i u v 0 E a E U C 'o U U O V c� m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c O O O O 00 O c 0 N N M c M N M N b3 b3 N b3 b3 b3 N b3 b3 b 00 00 0 N b3 b3 � S) c O � H v c C7 0 0 v v E O 0 O O U 1 m Ul N O V c� m LL 00 00 00 00 O c � M N c N b3 F b3 b3 S) S) b3 F b3 b N S O C C > > O U [ A A a t U U A 3 is N c n 3 v 7 o S w o � U N 0 c li a c w � v `w E c > U o a _ E c E O S) U m U v � m } T � 7 if o U Z M O V O N c� m c� m � 0 0 N l0 V A b3 A Sl O � H c C7 °o LL C E U a K a U a J N N O N c� m U! E a E c t J O LL U M O N 0 m 0 0 N o b3 b3 °0 00 N o b3 b3 c O � H c C7 °o LL E v T Ul 0 E `o U A LL v U V O N c� m a O a� W } in a FY 2014/15 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Buildings & Facilities PROJECT NAME New City Swimming Pool PROJECT MANAGER Michael Ho, City Engineer LOCATION To Be Determined PRIORITY Medium DESCRIPTION PROJECT No. BG0904 TOTAL PROJECT COST $4,850,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECTSTATUS Conceptual ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION This project will construct a new swimming pool at a location that has yet The existing pool has ongoing maintenance with rising annual costs. The City has to be determined. invested into repairs of the pool to provide a temporary repair. Construction of a new facility will better suit the needs of the community. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: Undetermined. Capital outlays will be reduced for maintenance. Additional facilities may increase ongoing routine maintenance. rs c§- PICTURE Page 2.2 Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total General Fund $ 400,000 $ 4,450,000 $ 4,850,000 TOTAL $ 400,000 $ 4,450,000 $ 4,850,000 Expenditures Design $ 400,000 $ 400,000 Construction $ 4,450,000 $ 4,450,000 TOTAL $ 400,000 $ 4,450,000 $ 4,850,000 Page 2.2 FY 2014/15 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Buildings & Facilities PROJECT NAME Underground Storage Tank Remediation PROJECT MANAGER David Spitz, Associate Engineer LOCATION City Yard PRIORITY High DESCRIPTION PROJECT No. BG1203 TOTAL PROJECT COST $50,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECTSTATUS Ongoing ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION This project will continue the underground storage tank remediation Monitoring and /or remediation is legally required by the State and County however project started by the City in the 1990's and which is nearing completion. grant funds are available. The project is ongoing until the State will close out the site. The location is the Public Works Yard. Lately, the City has mostly been monitoring the project, however the City is attempting to close out the site with the State. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None - 1 SEACREST CT - 2 WHEELHOUSE CT 3 MARINER WY - - -- 4 TOP SIDE CT D 011TED STATi 5 COMPASS CT _ �4 MEAPONS Sr ADpC ti i � Maos MAP PICTURE Page 2.3 Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total General Fund $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 50,000 TOTAL $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 50,000 Expenditures Design $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 50,000 TOTAL $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 50,000 Page 2.3 FY 2013/14 - 2017/18 PROJECT CATEGORY Buildings & Facilities PROJECT NAME Emergency Power for CH, FS44 PROJECT MANAGER Michael Ho, City Engineer LOCATION 8th Street Parking Lot PRIORITY Medium DESCRIPTION PROJECT No. BG1302 TOTAL PROJECT COST $500,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECTSTATUS Design ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION This project will construct an emergency backup power supply for City In the event of an emergency or natural disaster, several key facilities for the City do Hall and Fire Station 44. not have a reliable backup power supply. This project will construct one backup power supply that can power City Hall and Fire Station 44. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: Maintenance for this facility will be built into future budgets. O O MAP PICTURE Page 2.4 Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total Sewer Fund $ 100,000 $ 100,000 General Fund $ 400,000 $ 400,000 TOTAL $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Expenditures Design $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Construction $ 450,000 $ 450,000 TOTAL $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Page 2.4 PROJECT CATEGORY Buildings & Facilities PROJECT NAME Council Chambers Remodel PROJECT MANAGER Michael Ho, City Engineer LOCATION City Hall PRIORITY High DESCRIPTION To upgrade the audio, video and communication infrastructure throughout the Council Chambers. Also to add a conference room, restroom and increase security for the Council Chambers. FY 2014115 - 2018/19 PROJECT No. BG1401 TOTAL PROJECT COST $300,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECTSTATUS Ongoing ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION The Council Chambers has no conference room, restroom, secondary exit and outdated audio video equipment. This project will provide a more secure area and entrance /exit for the Mayor and City Council. The new audio and video equipment will provide networking capabilities monitors and the ability to hook up additional computer at multiple locations. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None r y h P syr• � M O MAP Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total General Fund $ 300,000 $ 300,000 TOTAL $ 300,000 $ 300,000 Expenditures Design $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Construction $ 250,000 $ 250,000 TOTAL $ 300,000 $ 300,000 Page 2.5 FY 2014/15 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Buildings & Facilities PROJECT NAME SBTV3 Control Room Upgrade PROJECT MANAGER Michael Ho, City Engineer LOCATION City Hall PRIORITY Medium DESCRIPTION PROJECT No. BG1402 TOTAL PROJECT COST $225,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Ongoing ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION To relocate the SBTV3 in the control room above the cascade between The current SBTV3 has been in its location for over 10 years. The equipment has City Hall and Council Chambers to the storage room over Council outgrown in size and making the room inaccessible. Technology has changed over Chambers. This includes all A/V equipment data, networking and the years leaving behind the control room equipment outdated and past its useful life. computers. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None H n. a. h a JP 7 M �i � p - 4� b w ci 7 MAP PICTURE Page 2.6 Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total Cable Foundation Fund $ 225,000 $ 225,000 TOTAL $ 225,000 $ 225,000 Expenditures Design $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Construction $ 205,000 $ 205,000 TOTAL $ 225,000 $ 225,000 Page 2.6 FY 2014115 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Buildings & Facilities PROJECT NAME City Yard Building Improvement Project PROJECT MANAGER Michael Ho, City Engineer LOCATION City Yard PRIORITY Medium DESCRIPTION To repair leaking roof, ADA requirements, fire alarm and sprinklers, emergency exits, mechanical and electrical work. This project will construct a public lobby. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: �<3 are �6 G� �m4 ga yiz }}8 g F .F MAP a Fe, _ Bmm�ro Piopemin PROJECT No. BG1403 TOTAL PROJECT COST $270,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECTSTATUS Ongoing ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION The 2011 Facilities Condition Assessment outlined numerous improvements to the City Yard. This project will follow those required improvements. None PICTURE Page 2.7 Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total Water Fund $ 135,000 $ 135,000 Sewer Fund $ 135,000 $ 135,000 TOTAL $ 270,000 $ 270,000 Expenditures Design $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Construction $ 260,000 $ 260,000 TOTAL $ 270,000 $ 270,000 Page 2.7 v FY 2014/15 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Buildings & Facilities PROJECT NAME North Seal Beach Community Center Remodel PROJECT MANAGER Michael Ho, City Engineer LOCATION North Seal Beach Community Center PRIORITY Medium DESCRIPTION To perform a light remodel to the facility and bring the facility into compliance with current ADA standards. Also, the facility needs a new electrical service- On-going Operating & Maintenance Impact: PROJECT No. BG1501 sa> $47,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Ongoing - 0o- 3 Donated Funds o- S� $ 22,000 cwt dt Yt H $ 25,000 TOTAL $ 47,000 $ 47,000 Y.ope- Steaksdre IMe Onry4 EfNMMnienl '�MaU�' %T��kWi SrWi101"`per 1�uoWO. rkegvrtw. PROJECT No. BG1501 TOTAL PROJECT COST $47,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Ongoing ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION The Building and Facilities Assessment Report identified needs for the North Seal Beach Community Center. This year a donation of $22,000 was received to perform a light remodel to the facility. In order to perform the remodel code requirements will be necessary to bring the facility into compliance with ADA standards, and the electrical service needs to be replaced. The City will augment the donated funds in order to perform the light remodel. None PICTURE Expenditures Design $ 4,000 $ 4,000 Construction $ 41,000 $ 41,000 Construction Management $ 2,000 $ 2,000 TOTAL $ 47,000 $ 47,000 Page 2.8 Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total Donated Funds $ 22,000 $ 22,000 General Fund $ 25,000 $ 25,000 TOTAL $ 47,000 $ 47,000 Expenditures Design $ 4,000 $ 4,000 Construction $ 41,000 $ 41,000 Construction Management $ 2,000 $ 2,000 TOTAL $ 47,000 $ 47,000 Page 2.8 FY 2014/15 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Buildings & Facilities PROJECT NAME Mary Wilson Library Carpet Replacement PROJECT MANAGER Michael Ho, City Engineer LOCATION Mary Wilson Library PRIORITY Medium DESCRIPTION PROJECT No. BG1502 TOTAL PROJECT COST $5,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Ongoing ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION To perform replacement of carpets within the Mary Wilson Library The lease in which the City provides the facility to the County of Orange outlines that the City will replace carpet every 5 years. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None :I ppe, W.Y M N 5 as ti O` `c �'o � F cllc9 S Izlc dr MAP Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Fundina Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Proposed 5 -year total PICTURE Page 2.9 PROJECT CATEGORY Buildings & Facilities PROJECT NAME City Flagpole Lighting Improvements PROJECT MANAGER Michael Ho, City Engineer LOCATION Citywide PRIORITY Medium DESCRIPTION To properly light all City owned flagpoles FY 2014/15 - 2018/19 PROJECT No. BG1503 TOTAL PROJECT COST $25,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Ongoing ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION The federal government has lighting standards for properly lighting and paying respect to the Nations flag. Residents within the community have expressed desire to properly light flags. This project will light all flagpoles throughout the City with dark skies compliant and energy efficient lighting. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None Fundina Source MAP Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 Budget Budget Proposed Proposed Proposed 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total _ Nam PICTURE Page 2.10 FY 2014/15 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Buildings & Facilities PROJECT NAME Citywide Financial Information System PROJECT MANAGER Victoria Beatley, Director of Finance LOCATION Citywide PRIORITY Medium DESCRIPTION PROJECT No. BG1504 TOTAL PROJECT COST $100,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Ongoing ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION This project is the first step in the process of replacing the financial The City's financial management system is more than 14 years old, and does not management system. A consultant will assist with analysis of city needs provide effective reporting tools to comply with current citywide needs. and vendor selection. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None d F�th— Ave S� :tipper Way �; �' Coastline 0, 41 1 Dr Bolsa A- d,. s m N 5 h �s 0y t -o o ti h Cn7 m5 Rye � H Ffl ti S 9 5 4�, h n 1 h 4S ° Icln J 1 MAP Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Fundina Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Proposed 5 -year total PICTURE Page 2.11 Cl) L Y W Qw a'=^ 1 Cl) O_ C� r G U � w Cl) 41 m V � 0 d' 0 1. � o N Q `m O T d LO -0 rn o rn cL O W 3 2 m U co 0 CL O 3 d 0O m r N O N Q O O 3 d O m N U O U) CL U O 3 d 0 m N 0 ON 0) - 7 O m a O a_ V! Y L R a O Nr N a O .o �o O LO p o om r ELT 0 i p Om r ELT 0 i p Om t ELT 0 i p t ELT p p Om t ELT O H O O O 0 O O O 0 Cl) O O O O Cl) O O O O Cl) O O C O Cl) O O O O Cl) J H O H Q W } d FY 2014/15 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Parks PROJECT NAME Citywide Court Rehabilitation (Tennis /Basketball) PROJECT MANAGER Cesar Rangel, Assistant Engineer LOCATION Citywide PRIORITY Low DESCRIPTION PROJECT No. PR1501 TOTAL PROJECT COST $150,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECTSTATUS Will Start ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION To resurface tennis courts at the Tennis Center and basketball courts at Tennis and basketball courts need maintenance to the surface. Natural wear and tear various locations citywide. This will also include crack filling, final coating from weather, use and time effects the surface. Depending on location and usage, and painting. the average life of a court resurface varies from 3 to 6 years. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: Annual f H J A 8 C E pit- Proposed Proposed zz �. 2014 -2015 E 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 it Funding Source Budget i Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total General Fund $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 150,000 TOTAL $ 30,000 $ 30,000 V C E F G H J $ 30,000 $ MAP PICTURE Page 3.2 Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total General Fund $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 150,000 TOTAL $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 150,000 Expenditures Design In House $ - Construction $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 150,000 TOTAL $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 150,000 Page 3.2 w W H W ''W^ W V! \1 ZQ O� U D ''W^ Cl) V! -C o° C - V T O O Cc d N N ER ER O O 0 Ln N ER C R d J N � N � L LL W > R a � V! w lZ L C0 L R 0 r O T O C0 C0 I= 7t��7 O O O O O O O O O O LQ 00 00 N R H Q R � CL M C R a a V! R E O M r 7t R � H LL R Q R U L 3 T N R E CD le r v) v) R Z i H N li O a 't c " O L .5 G Q �v Ns N 0 s C R R Q O W) I= IO Ov IOv I L7 L I • • 1 M. 7 L�7 L I • • 1 M. 7t��7 tom, I • • 1 M. I L7 L I • • 1 M. 7t��7 tom, IO sm, R � H LL R Q R U 3 E R L O a` al C J v) C C Q N O co R J H 0 0 W a o 0 a d LC m 1-u ti � O N ,• to O C O 0 W T d 0 � 0 lf) 0 C CL L O r N r to O Q L N i O O - d O � N � O N ON C 0 CL 6 L O d O o° C - V T O O Cc d N N ER ER O O 0 Ln N ER C R d J N � N � L LL W > R a � V! w lZ L C0 L R 0 r O T O C0 C0 I= 7t��7 O O O O O O O O O O LQ 00 00 N R H Q R � CL M C R a a V! R E O M r 7t R � H LL R Q R U L 3 T N R E CD le r v) v) R Z i H N li O a 't c " O L .5 G Q �v Ns N 0 s C R R Q O W) I= IO Ov IOv I L7 L I • • 1 M. 7 L�7 L I • • 1 M. 7t��7 tom, I • • 1 M. I L7 L I • • 1 M. 7t��7 tom, IO sm, R � H LL R Q R U 3 E R L O a` al C J v) C C Q N O co R J H 0 0 W a FY 2014/15 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Sewer System PROJECT NAME 10 Year Sewer Improvement Master Plan PROJECT MANAGER Michael Ho, City Engineer LOCATION 8th St. & Pier Pump Stations PRIORITY Mandatory DESCRIPTION PROJECT No. SS0901 TOTAL PROJECT COST $2,500,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECTSTATUS Design ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE State Loan JUSTIFICATION To repair, reline, upsize and rehabilitate sewer pipes and pump stations The 2005 adopted Sewer Master Plan outlined a 10 year Capital Improvement Plan city wide. to upgrade, reconstruct, reline and improve two pump stations. See next page for detailed locations and scope of work. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: Constructing the project will reduce maintenance activities. MAP Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total Sewer Fund $2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 TOTAL $2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 Expenditures Design $ 200,000 $ 200,000 Construction $2,300,000 $ 2,300,000 TOTAL $2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 PICTURE Page 4.2 FY 2014/15 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Sewer System PROJECT NAME Sewer System Master Plan Update PROJECT MANAGER Michael Ho, City Engineer LOCATION Citywide PRIORITY High DESCRIPTION The study will update the City's Sanitary Sewer Master Plan. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: MAP PROJECT No. SS1301 TOTAL PROJECT COST $250,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECTSTATUS Design ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION The City strategically plans for improvements to the sanitary sewer system. The sewer system master plan insures that the Clty complies with all codes and requirements, upgrades structurally deficiency and inadeguately sized sanitary sewers. Preparation of a master plan is a requirement of the Citys' Waste Discharge Requirements permit and is typically performed every 5 -7 years. The most recent sanitary sewer plan was prepared in 2005. Constructing the project will reduce maintenance activities. Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total Sewer Fund $ 250,000 $ 250,000 TOTAL $ 250,000 $ 250,000 Expenditures Consultant $ 250,000 $ 250,000 TOTAL $ 250,000 $ 250,000 PICTURE Page 4.3 FY 2014/15 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Sewer System PROJECT NAME Sewer System Rate Study PROJECT MANAGER Michael Ho, City Engineer LOCATION Citywide PRIORITY High DESCRIPTION PROJECT No. SS1401 TOTAL PROJECT COST $100,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECTSTATUS Design ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION The study will update the City's Sanitary Sewer Rate Structure so that A rate study is necessary to insure that the appropriate fees are charged for the the appropriate fees are charged to ratepayers for the services recieved. service of the sewer system. A key component to a rate study is outreach to the rate payers regarding input towards future fees. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: Constructing the project will reduce maintenance activities. MAP PICTURE Page 4.4 Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total Sewer Fund $ 100,000 $ 100,000 TOTAL $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Expenditures Consultant $ 100,000 $ 100,000 TOTAL $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Page 4.4 FY 2014/15 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Sewer System PROJECT NAME Annual Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation Project PROJECT MANAGER Michael Ho, City Engineer LOCATION Citywide PRIORITY High DESCRIPTION PROJECT No. SS1501 TOTAL PROJECT COST $65,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECTSTATUS Design ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION To repair, reline, and /or rehabilitate aged sewer manholes city wide. The majority of Sanitary Sewer Manholes were constructed throughout the city 20 -40 years ago. Many are below the water table. This programs seeks to locate and rehabilitate a few of the worst manholes every year. By proactively rehabilitating the worst manholes the City will prevent failures and sewer spills. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: Constructing the project will reduce maintenance activities. MAP PICTURE Page 4.5 Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total Sewer Fund $ 25,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 65,000 TOTAL $ 25,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 65,000 Expenditures Construction $ 25,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 65,000 TOTAL $ 25,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 65,000 Page 4.5 FY 2014/15 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Sewer System PROJECT NAME Annual Sewer Lining Program PROJECT MANAGER Michael Ho, City Engineer LOCATION Citywide PRIORITY High DESCRIPTION To repair sewer lines without having to open cut into a street by relining the interior of the pipe with a new structural pipe. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: PROJECT No. SS1602 TOTAL PROJECT COST $400,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Design ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION The majority of Sanitary Sewer lines were constructed throughout the city more than 40 years ago. Many are below the water table. This annual program seeks to rehabilitate sewer lines without having to dig trenchs into a street. The City will complete all of the identified lining projects currently called out within the Sewer Master Plan with SS0901. This annual program will begin in 2015 to line sewers that need rehabilitation at that time. Constructing the project will reduce maintenance activities. MAP PICTURE Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total Sewer Fund $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $100,000 $ 100,000 $ 400,000 Expenditures Design $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 40,000 Construction $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 360,000 TOTAL $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $100,000 $ 100,000 $ 400,000 Page 4.6 R m V � O N O N QNZ 1.1 C� W NG W I.L T O Cl) 'L V! \1 Z� O_ Cl) r V! U W � o N oa�6i d T LO o rn CL 00 2 o m 00 0 N rn CL d r o m a 0 0 NN rn Q o a o m N � O p 0 a Q �_ 7 O m d O N In p 0 O CL 7 O m d O N D c L 0 E L 0 CO r 0 r 0 CO I 110- ° 6�11 u v3 O O O O ER R 0 ER ER O O O O O n ER J 0 a w d FY 2014/15 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Storm Drain System PROJECT NAME CPE Storm Drain Master Plan Improvement PROJECT MANAGER David Spitz, Associate Engineer LOCATION Citywide PRIORITY High DESCRIPTION PROJECTNo. SD1401 TOTAL PROJECT COST $700,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECTSTATUS Design ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION These funds will be set aside for a home purchase in College Park East In College Park East, a large portion of the natural surface drainage flows to along Ironwood Avenue between Candleberry Avenue and Heather underground pipes between homes. The pipes are currently undersized for this Avenue. capacity. By purchasing property, a large under ground pipe can be constructed to handle the current and future capacity of the storm water. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total General Fund $ 700,000 $ 700,000 TOTAL $ 700,000 $ 700,000 Expenditures TOTAL $ 700,000 $ 700,000 PICTURE Page 5.2 Arbor Park � � • PH'mG�c O� �n � _ Arbor Qog Park � � �PVe Lemgend�wd • AVe Lengrcw eJ Aw Pn wzahn PVe RParkr t,n ¢ Aw 3 � Maxenul Aw Pnm y r'd Rancn v lCVUrse r Ao_ 4w �9 �° Are £Ider PVe � Oo9:anU Pw EIdM Ave � ���dA � Ave Mm Aa y -0� CanJeberry Ave 4nnaube'°Y � IeiCe �m Gvmmere nOP>Aw � ��dS�aFlll �m, t ea�y� Ssnlflnncn P6rk � nnn�re�:e,r • a Pain o„d m 0 G- do omv.F y O M A © meAO w a�anFwr v x' MAP Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total General Fund $ 700,000 $ 700,000 TOTAL $ 700,000 $ 700,000 Expenditures TOTAL $ 700,000 $ 700,000 PICTURE Page 5.2 W W . cn �a J � J � i D fn w } O 4� 0_ O d 1 aLf m i �rn N O d ]� 0 N C Z W o 0 a O N �o y CN Z O Oi 0 N a o w y t O d Q N Z O (0 ao°f N U 0 ° o i 0-6 _ O � d a C, -0 LO ° i 0-41 O y C w E 0 a E rn c rn J G1 w N co O N_ F N O N 7 LL f6 w w O v C 7 LL 00 O O0 N 00 O 0 N r O F 00 00 00 00 00 O o o � o °c 0 0 W r- 6�1 6c�i6c� 6c� 6c� 00 O 0 O 7 F LL f6 w C w O 0 C 7 LL ; w O a` rn c 'v O rn w 7 N O M_ F N O O O 0 O 000 m LO LO 6�1 6c� r y v F 7 � LL C LL � v CO 7 Cl) y O m w O �2 w f6 Q 7 `w c w U c w E w OI f6 f6 U f`6 F W O V F N ° 00 00 c O O c (00 O (NO C (n (n (n v ° 00 00 c O O c (O O N C( (O O (O C r y w i F LL L y 0 � q LL � � C `1 c (O 7 Z CO y L_ O co w u O E2 C O v w 'c w Q w N E W T O V F N CD CD 00 00 O O o U) N 0 Oo 0 O 0 O O 0 O CD 0 00 00 0 0 N f6 m O F F y m O V 7 LL ; w 0 2 cn w 7 N f6 C Q O F N r O F f6 OI O a` rn c U U) G1 v N f6 U O J N O F N 0 00 LO I- C:) 00 0 N (n 0 00 0 N (n 0 O 0 0 N ER O O O 0 N 00 0 0 N r O F ZA a r W W 7 V/ � a J � J � cn N O s 4� 12 C O C a u m i �rn N O C ]� O N C Z Lf) °mod �V OD N C, ? O Q Oi d N o 0 N � N O C Q N ? O O a o d N U O O O Z O a IL C, N U W 0 CN i O a d` b N E f`6 OI O o` rn c U l6 N v W W cn Q Cl) O W F N OI00 °° O O » » 00 I00 O O » » OIO O O » » 00 010 O O 00 04 04 6�1 6c� OIO O O 6�1 6c� OIO O O N N 6�116c� W r N O O N F Q V rn O o` Q v v U c O U c Q v O W F N 00 00 LO L N fA fA f 00 00 0 ui l LO N f fA fA f O O ( O LO l LO N f fA fA f O O O u1 l LO N f fA fA f O O ( O LO l LO N f fA fA ( O O f LO L t ER ER f r fx6 F) I f6 I � V i O LL E f`6 OI O o_ OI C .Q c Q LO O W F N l6 CA O o` c v E U l6 Q W f�6 C L cn c Q c0 O W F N °O C? 1°n °? fA ER f 00 00 O O N f fA fA f O O O O f N f t ER ER f O O O O f N f fA fA f O O O O f N f t ER ER f O O c O O f N f t ER ER f i r � C F LL I I � W W c� O � O C 7 LL E OI O o` rn c l6 a v F G1 W cn c Q f` O W F N N c W E O Q v rn rn rn c Y l6 o_ 3 O F v O W O W F N °O_ °O 00 00 fR fR O O °O °O l6 U F N_ O W U m LL A C 7 E E O U N C a) W N E O � Q LL E 'v W W C v Q W c U) fA O W F N r W E W O Q E v a u U U) l6 J O N W C Q v 2 U o_ O W F N 0 II' 7 G. O O O O 0 co Cl) Ci t fp EfT I y J F ~ O F i Q i W I � W T ZA o_ FY 2014/15 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Streets and Transportation PROJECT NAME Main Street Lighting Improvements PROJECT MANAGER Michael Ho, City Engineer LOCATION Main Street PRIORITY Medium DESCRIPTION This project will replace the existing lighting on Main Street with decorative lighting. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: Geslxew0.re� tyre ark Y,yr a�2 ag � �P'g cer° Avc � yF° op raarvnta Ore C MAP PROJECT No. ST1203 TOTAL PROJECT COST $240,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECTSTATUS Will start ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total General Fund BrM9epg1 L S. 5 % S % 3 5� Y' TOTAL $ 240,000 $ 240,000 Expenditures „ £emmuniry u mub � A.A 9 9erreAVe 1 Park $ 240,000 $ 240,000 0.'e � Zo ;Pieta k e 5881 BBBCA ei irp � y MAP PROJECT No. ST1203 TOTAL PROJECT COST $240,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECTSTATUS Will start ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION For the past 15 years, the City has been investing in trees on Main Street. The lighting on Main Street is becoming impacted as the trees mature. There have been requests from residents and the Chamber of Commerce to replace the existing lighting with decorative lighting. None PICTURE Page 6.3 Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total General Fund $ 240,000 $ 240,000 TOTAL $ 240,000 $ 240,000 Expenditures Construction $ 240,000 $ 240,000 TOTAL $ 240,000 $ 240,000 Page 6.3 FY 2014115 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Streets and Transportation PROJECT NAME Comprehensive Parking Manag. Plan PROJECT MANAGER Jim Basham, Director of Community Development LOCATION N/A PRIORITY Medium DESCRIPTION PROJECT No. ST1207 TOTAL PROJECT COST $140,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECTSTATUS Will Start ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION This plan provides various policies and programs that result in more This project will study parking in the city. efficient use of parking resources. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None zr 41 u �� n war.wwell � 's S yq a and gg� MAP PICTURE Page 6.4 Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total General Fund $ 140,000 $ 140,000 TOTAL $ 140,000 $ 140,000 Expenditures Design $ 140,000 $ 140,000 TOTAL $ 140,000 $ 140,000 Page 6.4 FY 2014/15 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Streets and Transportation PROJECT NAME Rule 20A Undergrounding PROJECT MANAGER David Spitz, Associate Engineer LOCATION N/A PRIORITY Medium DESCRIPTION This allocation will provide inspection services during construction of underground utilities by SCE. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: MAP IL 0 PROJECT No. ST1302 TOTAL PROJECT COST $10,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECTSTATUS Will Start ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION Location to be determined by City Council. None Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total General Fund $ 10,000 $ 10,000 TOTAL $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Expenditures Design $ 10,000 $ 10,000 TOTAL $ 10,000 $ 10,000 PICTURE Page 6.5 FY 2014/15 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Streets and Transportation PROJECT NAME Traffic Management Center Upgrade (TMC) PROJECT MANAGER David Spitz, Associate Engineer LOCATION Citywide PRIORITY Medium DESCRIPTION To relocate the existing TMC from the City Yard to City Hall On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: D E F H J A 6 D E fi 605 F MAP PROJECT No. ST1408 TOTAL PROJECT COST VIA.fi WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECTSTATUS Ongoing ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None BE2.1 4 2: 3 3 5 �5 C D E F G H J A B' �. •D E MAP PROJECT No. ST1408 TOTAL PROJECT COST $661,700 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECTSTATUS Ongoing ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION The existing TMC was constructed over 10 years ago with aging technology and damaged equipment. The City has applied for and successfully was awarded an OCTA grant. Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total Measure M $ 661,700 $ 661,700 TOTAL $ 661,700 $ 661,700 Expenditures Design $ 60,000 $ 60,000 Construction $ 601,700 $ 601,700 TOTAL $ 661,700 $ 661,700 PICTURE Page 6.6 FY 2014/15 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Streets and Transportation PROJECT NAME Westminster Ave Rehabilitation PROJECT MANAGER Cesar Rangel, Assistant Engineer LOCATION Citywide PRIORITY Medium DESCRIPTION PROJECT No. ST1409 TOTAL PROJECT COST $2,000,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Ongoing ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION This project will resurface and stripe a class II bike path on Westminster The City received $1,000,000 to rehabilitate the pavement and stripe a class II bike Ave. between Seal Beach Blvd. and East City Limits. path. It is funded by a grant from the Orange County Transportation Authority. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: MAP Proposed 2014 -2015 Funding Source Budget Measure M2 $ 620,000 City Wide Grants $1,000,000 State Gas Tax $ 380,000 TOTAL $ 2,000,000 Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total $ 620,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 380,000 $ 2,000,000 Expenditures Design In House $ Construction $2,000,000 $2,000,000 TOTAL $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 PICTURE Page 6.7 DESCRIPTION JUSTIFICATION This program applies maintenance slurry seals to streets to extend the Slurry Seal is a proven strategy to extend the life of asphalt pavements. The program life of the pavement. The Pavement Management System data will be is well received by residents. used as a guideline to select project streets. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None MAP Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 Fundinq Source Budget Budget Proposed Proposed Proposed 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total Expenditures Design In House $ - Construction $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $100,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000 TOTAL $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $100,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000 PICTURE Page 6.8 PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET FY 2014/15 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Streets and Transportation PROJECT No. ST1501 PROJECT NAME Annual Slurry Seal Project TOTAL PROJECT COST $500,000 PROJECT MANAGER Cesar Rangel, Assistant Engineer WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract LOCATION Citywide PROJECT STATUS Ongoing PRIORITY High ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None DESCRIPTION JUSTIFICATION This program applies maintenance slurry seals to streets to extend the Slurry Seal is a proven strategy to extend the life of asphalt pavements. The program life of the pavement. The Pavement Management System data will be is well received by residents. used as a guideline to select project streets. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None MAP Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 Fundinq Source Budget Budget Proposed Proposed Proposed 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total Expenditures Design In House $ - Construction $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $100,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000 TOTAL $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $100,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000 PICTURE Page 6.8 im 0 FY 2014/15 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Streets and Transportation PROJECT NAME Local Street Resurfacing Program PROJECT MANAGER Cesar Rangel, Assistant Engineer LOCATION Citywide PRIORITY High DESCRIPTION PROJECT No. ST1502 TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,375,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Will Start ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION This project will resurface local streets per the pavement management In 2014, a pavement management system was adopted that analyzed surface system. conditions and planned a cost efficient pavement maintenance schedule. City streets deteriorate over time and require maintenance. This project will reduce future maintenance costs and add value to neighborhoods. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None MAP Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 Funding Source Budget Budget Proposed Proposed Proposed 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total Expenditures Design In House $ Construction $ 275,000 $ 275,000 $ 275,000 $275,000 $ 275,000 $ 1,375,000 TOTAL $ 275,000 $ 275,000 $ 275,000 $275,000 $ 275,000 $ 1,375,000 PICTURE Page 6.9 Ut FY 2014/15 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Streets and Transportation PROJECT NAME Arterial Street Resurfacing Program PROJECT MANAGER Cesar Rangel, Assistant Engineer LOCATION Citywide PRIORITY High DESCRIPTION PROJECT No. ST1503 TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,000,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECTSTATUS Ongoing ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION This project will resurface arterial streets per the pavement management In 2014, a pavement management system was adopted that system. analyzed surface conditions and planned a cost efficient pavement maintenance schedule. City streets deteriorate over time and require maintenance. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None MAP PICTURE Page 6.10 Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total Prop 42 Traffic Relief $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,000,000 TOTAL $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,000,000 Expenditures Design In House $ - Construction $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,000,000 TOTAL $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,000,000 Page 6.10 FY 2014/15 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Streets and Transportation PROJECT NAME Annual Concrete Repair Program PROJECT MANAGER Cesar Rangel, Assistant Engineer LOCATION Citywide PRIORITY High DESCRIPTION This program replaces portions of deteriorated concrete sidewalks, curbs and gutters within the City, and brings handicap ramps current to Americans with Disability Act Standards. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: MAP PROJECT No. ST1504 TOTAL PROJECT COST $250,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECTSTATUS Ongoing ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION The program is required to eliminate trip hazards and safety issues. Reduced liability exposure is a benefit of this activity. None PICTURE Page 6.11 Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total Prop 42 Traffic Relief $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 250,000 TOTAL $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 250,000 Expenditures Design In House $ - Construction $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 250,000 TOTAL $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 250,000 Page 6.11 FY 2014/15 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Streets and Transportation PROJECT NAME Annual Striping Program PROJECT MANAGER Luis Estevez, Deputy Director of Public Works LOCATION Citywide PRIORITY High DESCRIPTION This project will restripe worn pavement markings, bike lanes and traffic lanes. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: MAP PROJECT No. ST1505 TOTAL PROJECT COST $150,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Ongoing ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION The program will keep a uniformity of pavement marking and striping citywide. PICTURE Page 6.12 Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total State Gas Tax $ 50,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 150,000 TOTAL $ 50,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 150,000 Expenditures Design In House $ - Construction $ 50,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 150,000 TOTAL $ 50,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 150,000 Page 6.12 FY 2014/15 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Streets and Transportation PROJECT NAME Annual Signage Replacement PROJECT MANAGER Cesar Rangel, Assistant Engineer LOCATION Citywide PRIORITY High DESCRIPTION This project will replace damaged or missing signs. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: MAP PROJECT No. ST1506 TOTAL PROJECT COST $50,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Ongoing ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION The program will keep a uniformity of signage throughout the City. t PICTURE Page 6.13 Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5- yeartotal State Gas Tax $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 50,000 TOTAL $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 50,000 Expenditures Design In House $ - Construction $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 50,000 TOTAL $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 50,000 Page 6.13 FY 2014/15 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Streets and Transportation PROJECT NAME Street Tree Planting Program PROJECT MANAGER David Spitz, Associate Engineer LOCATION Citywide PRIORITY Medium DESCRIPTION This program provides funding for the installation of new trees throughout the City. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: MAP PROJECT No. ST1507 TOTAL PROJECT COST $100,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECTSTATUS Ongoing ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION Locations are identified continually. This program helps improve the local environment for residents and visitors. PICTURE Page 6.14 Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total General Fund $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 100,000 TOTAL $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 100,000 Expenditures Construction $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 100,000 TOTAL $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 100,000 Page 6.14 ism r /, FY 2014/15 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Streets and Transportation PROJECT NAME Old Town Parking and Signing Improvements PROJECT MANAGER David Spitz, Associate Engineer LOCATION Citywide PRIORITY Medium DESCRIPTION The existing signs in Old Town have faded, lost its reflection and are hard to see. They have detoriated through natural wear and tear. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: MAP PROJECT No. ST1508 TOTAL PROJECT COST $100,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Ongoing ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION Locations are identified continually. This program will help replacing the existing signs. Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total Gas Tax $ 100,000 $ 100,000 TOTAL $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Expenditures Construction $ 100,000 $ 100,000 TOTAL $ 100,000 $ 100,000 PICTURE Page 6.15 FY 2014/15 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Streets and Transportation PROJECT NAME Westminster Ave Median Improvements PROJECT MANAGER David Spitz, Associate Engineer LOCATION Westminster Ave PRIORITY High DESCRIPTION PROJECT No. ST1509 TOTAL PROJECT COST $100,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Will Start ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION This project will remove the existing asphalt medians and replace with The asphalt in the median has cracks, rubble and is beyond deterioration. The new landscaping. landscape will beautify the area. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None MAP Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 Fundinq Source Budget Budget Proposed Proposed Proposed 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total Expenditures Design $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Construction $ 90,000 $ 90,000 TOTAL $ 100,000 $ 100,000 PICTURE Page 6.16 FY 2014/15 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Streets and Transportation PROJECT NAME PCH and Anderson Landscape Improvements PROJECT MANAGER David Spitz, Associate Engineer LOCATION PCH and Anderson PRIORITY High DESCRIPTION PROJECT No. ST1510 TOTAL PROJECT COST $50,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Will Start ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION This project will remove the existing asphalt medians and replace with The asphalt in the median has cracks, rubble and is beyond deterioration. The new landscaping. landscape will beautify the area. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None MAP Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 Fundinq Source Budget Budget Proposed Proposed Proposed 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total Expenditures Design $ 5,000 $ 5,000 Construction $ 45,000 $ 45,000 TOTAL $ 50,000 $ 50,000 PICTURE Page 6.17 w LU Q W Cl) 1 V! I.L 22 H 2 U D ''W^ Cl) V! a� N o C R N m R t C O N R O T O H I= == I° °vl °v I N ER ER ER O O O O I� V I N ER ER R � C O 7 H LL R C Q N R U L O N Q E V! C O .5 C C O U a N R C O U) Q E R J M O r r H O O O V ER R O H t c V C C R N 2 c a E N R Q a, c C CD O M r H 0 o Lr Ef> 69 Ef O O O O LO O O C O OO LLr ER ER Ef R 'a L C L O 7 H LL LL R Q Q .L s R a m U C O L \ Q N � Q V! C N E O O. E Q N 7 C a, Q> C N V O CD O r H °O 0 °O M ER O O O O M ER R O H N R C. a E N N R CD O H lo o O O 00 0 LO LO 0 0 0 ° r r a a o o ,I6�,, 6c" 16c" ER p O i o r � R � C O 7 H LL R cl U V! L r N N R N O O. E E ywfn CO a R R m E 0 t R c Q N O r H O O 00 R O H C 0 O R t N R V! N Y a a, N O U M O H I °O °O °O ° LO O O d Irn in f 1'„ O O O O ER R � C O 7 H LL R i U L C N N R C. a a N R v U O r H O O O O ER R O H O a d LC m VO N O O L CL Z O W l() 0 N p 4 O N L l(� Q r Z O d O � 0 O ON a O O C d O � N � M NO °N a Q Z O d O N °N p L Q V Z O O d N C R N m R t C O N R O T O H I= == I° °vl °v I N ER ER ER O O O O I� V I N ER ER R � C O 7 H LL R C Q N R U L O N Q E V! C O .5 C C O U a N R C O U) Q E R J M O r r H O O O V ER R O H t c V C C R N 2 c a E N R Q a, c C CD O M r H 0 o Lr Ef> 69 Ef O O O O LO O O C O OO LLr ER ER Ef R 'a L C L O 7 H LL LL R Q Q .L s R a m U C O L \ Q N � Q V! C N E O O. E Q N 7 C a, Q> C N V O CD O r H °O 0 °O M ER O O O O M ER R O H N R C. a E N N R CD O H lo o O O 00 0 LO LO 0 0 0 ° r r a a o o ,I6�,, 6c" 16c" ER p O i o r � R � C O 7 H LL R cl U V! L r N N R N O O. E E ywfn CO a R R m E 0 t R c Q N O r H O O 00 R O H C 0 O R t N R V! N Y a a, N O U M O H I °O °O °O ° LO O O d Irn in f 1'„ O O O O ER R � C O 7 H LL R i U L C N N R C. a a N R v U O r H O O O O ER R O H w LU Q W Cl) 1 V! I.L O� r U D ''W^ Cl) V! 0 N 0 o Qq-j o (1) d to m V 0 o, N O O ) 0 W 7 �i a � 00 ``•c�111111 0 N N 0 0 l(� O r 0 O N N L O 0 7 d O m N � 0 p 0 (1) CL 7 O m d O N 0 ON 0) - 7 O m a O N 00 00 00 O 00 O O 00 0 ER ER ER ER O O Ef3 69 CD CD O O O V O V 69 69 O O O O O O O O 00 00 � r 69 69 ER ER O O � IT ER ER C R C LL H LL H R R .Q .Q R R U U L L R R N R N CL L O V IZ .L. E V! R L E Y L O L N � R N J r N O O �D �D r r H H N R V t U R V! O m Q R Nt N R M O �D H N ER ER O O O N ER IN a M, R C 16 0 H LL C L E 5 R IZ N R Q O W IZ E R J O �D H O O O 0 W R H H O F- LU } a FY 2014/15 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Water System PROJECT NAME Water Sta, Rehab. - Beverly Manor PROJECT MANAGER David Spitz, Associate Engineer LOCATION Beverly Manor Road PRIORITY High DESCRIPTION PROJECT No. WT0904 TOTAL PROJECT COST $2,700,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Construction ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION This project will construct upgrades and improvements to the Beverly The water system requires continual capital maintenance to maintain reliability and to Manor Water Well, Booster Station and Reservoir as identified in the meet water quality standards. 2003 Water System Master Plan. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: It will eliminate the existing monthly maintenance cost. a MAP PICTURE 171, / 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source O SNP a ciuerraus� 4 $2,700,000 $ 2,700,000 LA PSON OR RD SEE II Jl Expenditures P1�t � UNITED z �ui�i rEkEE� .y`cY ' ELIIEk 'i EE SrarES EL E E'E:: Construction " E EF FEED �, ... NA UAL III IEF kE L $2,700,000 WEAPONS STATION E,FIE" a _, 11 E I -. .2 Th - OS Maps. MAP PICTURE !7_ Page 7.3 Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total Water Fund $2,700,000 $ 2,700,000 TOTAL $2,700,000 $ 2,700,000 Expenditures Design $ 120,000 $ 120,000 Construction $2,580,000 $ 2,580,000 TOTAL $2,700,000 $ 2,700,000 !7_ Page 7.3 FY 2014/15 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Water System PROJECT No. WT1103 PROJECT NAME Lampson Water Well -Connections Improvements TOTAL PROJECT COST $400,000 PROJECT MANAGER Michael Ho, City Engineer WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract LOCATION Lampson Ave. PROJECT STATUS Construction PRIORITY Hiqh ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None DESCRIPTION JUSTIFICATION In the spring of 2011, the City opened anew Domestic Water Well on Most water system facilities are designed and operated with numerous connection Lampson Avenue. The facilitiy was constructed with one connection to points. This is done so that in the event of a main break the system can remain in the system on Lampson Avenue extending westward between the well service. This project will construct a second connection point for the Lampson site and Basswood Avenue. This project will install a second connection Avenue Well into the City domestic water system. extending eastbound on Lampson Avenue to Heather Street- On-going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None MAP PICTURE Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 'i:.. t 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed I M•.n .r Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total Water Fund V9 MCI C.rMT.l It TOTAL $ 400,000 $ 400,000 bae:N f Design $ 20,000 �fq� ttls $ 380,000 $ 380,000 TOTAL $ 400,000 $ 400,000 auanakrrr . 5Ek 11 3! ;EE C II' � € SEE ' n INITED MAP PICTURE Page 7.4 Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total Water Fund $ 400,000 $ 400,000 TOTAL $ 400,000 $ 400,000 Expenditures Design $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Construction $ 380,000 $ 380,000 TOTAL $ 400,000 $ 400,000 Page 7.4 FY 2014115 - 2018119 PROJECT CATEGORY Water System PROJECT NAME Main Line Repl. Hellman PROJECT MANAGER Michael Ho, City Engineer LOCATION Hellman Ranch Properties PRIORITY Hiqh DESCRIPTION PROJECT No. WT1301 TOTAL PROJECT COST $600,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Pre - planning ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION This project will replace an 18" transmission line on Hellman Ranch to This is a replacement of an existing line. It provides redundancy for the part of the feed Marina and Old Town. system serving Old Town. It will maintain system reliability. The existing pipeline is in poor condition. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: Constructing the project will minimize the water main breaks in this area. MAP PICTURE Page 7.5 Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total Water Fund $ 100,000 $ 500,000 $ 600,000 TOTAL $ 100,000 $ 500,000 $ 600,000 Expenditures Design $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Construction $ 500,000 $ 500,000 TOTAL $ 100,000 $ 500,000 $ 600,000 Page 7.5 FY 2014/15 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Water System PROJECT NAME Ocean Avenue Alley (1st to 6th) PROJECT MANAGER Cesar Rangel, Assistant Engineer LOCATION Citywide PRIORITY Medium DESCRIPTION PROJECT No. WT1401 TOTAL PROJECT COST $300,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Construction ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION This project rehabilitates water and sewer facilities within the Ocean This project will update deteriorated water and sewer facilities within the Ocean Avenue Alley between 1 st Street and 6th Street. Avenue Alley between 1 st Street and 6th Street. The pavement in the alley will be removed in order to rehabilite the utilities and be replaced with concrete at the conclusion of construction. C.— On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: None h S MAP e ^ P-A" nn cF y3 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 b .off �C Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total Sewer Fund $ 9� $ 150,000 Water Fund $ 150,000 $ 150,000 Grace Ca n,y Scal aeae.A C. ,c hlpd o' E,.nh- Par S PICTURE res Page 7.6 Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total Sewer Fund $ 150,000 $ 150,000 Water Fund $ 150,000 $ 150,000 TOTAL $ 300,000 $ 300,000 res Page 7.6 =00- FY 2014115 - 2018119 PROJECT CATEGORY Water System PROJECT NAME Water Rate Study PROJECT MANAGER City Engineer LOCATION City Wide PRIORITY Hiph DESCRIPTION The study will update the rate structure forthe City's Potable Water System. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: MAP PROJECT No. WT1501 TOTAL PROJECT COST $100,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Consultant PROJECT STATUS Planned ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE N/A JUSTIFICATION The operation of the City's Water System is funded through a water enterprise fee that is charged to the residents bimonthly. The rate structure is typically studied and set approximately every 5 years. This will insure that the fee charged is appropriate for the services that are rendered. None PICTURE Page 7.7 Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total Water Fund $ 100,000 $ 100,000 TOTAL $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Expenditures Design $ 100,000 $ 100,000 TOTAL $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Page 7.7 FY 2014/15 - 2018119 PROJECT CATEGORY Water System PROJECT NAME Anaheim Bay Water System Improvements PROJECT MANAGER City Engineer LOCATION Anaheim Bay PRIORITY Hiph DESCRIPTION PROJECT No. WT1502 TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,875,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Planned ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE N/A JUSTIFICATION To construct a new water main line from the end of the existing facility to The existing water main under the Anaheim Bay feeding Sunset Park has past its useful the flood control channel bridge at the Huntington Beach City Boundary. expected life. The City of Huntington Beach has agreed to provide water to the Sunset Aquatic Park. The new line will connect to Huntington Beach's existing water line. The City of Huntington Beach will continue to provide water to Sunset Aquatic Park. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: - MAP PICTURE Page 7.8 Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5- yeartotal Water Fund $ 1,875,000 $ 1,875,000 TOTAL $ 1,875,000 $ 1,875,000 Expenditures Design $ 180,000 $ 180,000 Construction $ 1,695,000 $ 1,695,000 TOTAL $ 1,875,000 $ 1,875,000 Page 7.8 FY 2014115 - 2018119 PROJECT CATEGORY Water System PROJECT NAME College Park West Water Rehabilitation PROJECT MANAGER City Engineer LOCATION College Park West PRIORITY High DESCRIPTION PROJECT No. WT1503 TOTAL PROJECT COST $975,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Planned ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE N/A JUSTIFICATION To replace the 2 main lines feeding College Park West at the north and In the 2012 Water Master plan, the plan identified these two 8" ACP lines needing south ends of College Park West. replacement. The lines have passed its useful life. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: - fly 1®Jo d EPIIM16r•5� � � P y� eP° 7 © � V I aoa � Finn Pux a a B.Nr nni Ear + F >ttrS C O BWrvpnFe m .wry ��a g P.� ♦ _ r worw MAP PICTURE Page 7.9 Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total Water Fund $ 975,000 $ 975,000 TOTAL $ 975,000 $ 975,000 Expenditures Design $ 90,000 $ 90,000 Construction $ 885,000 $ 885,000 TOTAL $ 975,000 $ 975,000 Page 7.9 FY 2014115 - 2018119 PROJECT CATEGORY Water System PROJECT NAME Water Meter Replacement Study PROJECT MANAGER David Spitz, Associate Engineer LOCATION Lampson Avenue PRIORITY Medium DESCRIPTION PROJECT No. WT1504 TOTAL PROJECT COST $100,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Planned ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION To prepare a study to analyze the need and feasibility of replacing the The existing water meters has past its useful life throughout the City. These meters are existing aged water meters with new technology. physically read at each property. Newer technology will provide wireless and realtime data without going into the field or each property. This will save time and money in the long run by saving fuel, staff and maintenance cost. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: - MAP PICTURE Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed mI 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source uw.�rr Budget Budget 5- yeartotal Water Fund $ 100,000 $ 100,000 TOTAL $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Expenditures Design $ 100,000 $ 100,000 TOTAL $ 100,000 $ 100,000 auc �s � maow manes oroa Mace MAP PICTURE Page 7.10 Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5- yeartotal Water Fund $ 100,000 $ 100,000 TOTAL $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Expenditures Design $ 100,000 $ 100,000 TOTAL $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Page 7.10 PROJECT CATEGORY Water System PROJECT NAME Water System Infrastructure Repairs PROJECT MANAGER David Spitz, Associate Engineer LOCATION Citywide PRIORITY Hiph DESCRIPTION This project repairs water system deficiencies as identified within the Water Master Plan FY 2014115 - 2018119 PROJECT No. WT1601 TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,600,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Ongoing ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION The water system requires continual upkeep to keep it reliable. The system provides drinking water to residents and businesses as well as for fire protection. This program provides funding for the annual and emergency replacement of water system components such as pipelines, water valves, and water station components. Specific locations are consistent with the Water Master Plan. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: Emergency repairs will be reduced MAP PICTURE Page 7.11 Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total Water Fund $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $400,000 $ 400,000 $ 1,600,000 TOTAL $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $400,000 $ 400,000 $ 1,600,000 Expenditures Design $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 160,000 Construction $ 360,000 $ 360,000 $360,000 $ 360,000 $ 1,440,000 TOTAL $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $400,000 $ 400,000 $ 1,600,000 Page 7.11 UW7 &e e x A a� FY 2014115 - 2018119 PROJECT CATEGORY Water System PROJECT NAME Leisure World Well Improvements PROJECT MANAGER Associate Engineer LOCATION Leisure World PRIORITY Medium DESCRIPTION PROJECT No. WT1602 TOTAL PROJECT COST $70,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Planned ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE N/A JUSTIFICATION To upgrade the SCADA communications equipment at the Leisure World The existing Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition ( SCADA) system at the Leisure Well Site. World Well site is analog. To match the city wide system this must convert to a digital system. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: - MAP PICTURE Page 7.12 Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total Water Fund $ 70,000 $ 70,000 TOTAL $ 70,000 $ 70,000 Expenditures Design $ 7,000 $ 7,000 Construction $ 63,000 $ 63,000 TOTAL $ 70,000 $ 70,000 Page 7.12 DESCRIPTION JUSTIFICATION This project will rehabilitate the well site pumps, generators, motors and This project will rehabilitate the Bolsa Chica Water Well as identified in the 2003 water treatment equipment. Water System Master Plan. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: Project will eliminate the maintenance of the electrical pump & equipment &e"1(Ae_e7rz PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET FY 2014/15 - 2018/19 PROJECT CATEGORY Water System �� 1111T µ6NY qy PROJECT No. WT1603 PROJECT NAME Bolsa Chica Well Improvement Project TOTAL PROJECT COST $600,000 PROJECT MANAGER Michael Ho, City Engineer 't WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract LOCATION Bolsa Chica Road PROJECT STATUS Design PRIORITY Medium NR:CIIIY ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None DESCRIPTION JUSTIFICATION This project will rehabilitate the well site pumps, generators, motors and This project will rehabilitate the Bolsa Chica Water Well as identified in the 2003 water treatment equipment. Water System Master Plan. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: Project will eliminate the maintenance of the electrical pump & equipment PICTURE Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total Water Fund $ 600,000 $ 600,000 TOTAL $ 600,000 $ 600,000 Expenditures Design $ 60,000 $ 60,000 Construction $ 540,000 $ 540,000 TOTAL $ 600,000 $ 600,000 Page 7.13 NMI r7A AC P[IA AV- . L., pr ppY AV �� 1111T µ6NY qy r,.yh b i [F E6 'CI 't rHPIS]AL AV NR:CIIIY SU C F3 L " " =WM NV ICJ Pi:l IIIfNII ri I1 PIIf.I IIrY Nr - ' i [IR1111UIK 13 IEPXJIE€II NY ] i111d FW1 NY 1 13 UIIIIR'.NIIC 1} � drypY yy 11 ••- AIIPR'N 1 COTFEL NY ie N[LRTIIN N7 '-� .. . .. I b NA91AYiN4 S' MAP PICTURE Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total Water Fund $ 600,000 $ 600,000 TOTAL $ 600,000 $ 600,000 Expenditures Design $ 60,000 $ 60,000 Construction $ 540,000 $ 540,000 TOTAL $ 600,000 $ 600,000 Page 7.13 `�`qrf7, &et7t,(;6`a� FY 2014115 - 2018119 PROJECT CATEGORY Water System PROJECT NAME Lampson Ave Water Main Replacement PROJECT MANAGER David Spitz, Associate Engineer LOCATION Lampson Avenue PRIORITY Medium DESCRIPTION PROJECT No. WT1604 TOTAL PROJECT COST $2,670,000 WORKED PERFORMED BY Contract PROJECT STATUS Planned ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCE None JUSTIFICATION To remove and replace the existing 12" ACP waterline on Lampson Ave The existing Lampson waterline has historically failed and caused numerous main line from Seal Beach Blvd. to Basswood St. breaks. It has outlasted its useful life. On -going Operating & Maintenance Impact: - i 2; `W � e • �� fRSOlOa n p� ilYdH�rr Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed - w Funding Source h4 a� Water Fund $ 2,670,000 / TOTAL $ 2,670,000 $ 2,670,000 SIM II J1 SEt Il_ Design e� $ 800,000 Construction ¢� 4.. $ 1,870,000 TOTAL T�Fmss %' 'ID1001 Bros maps ap MAP PICTURE Page 7.14 Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 2017 -2018 2018 -2019 Proposed Funding Source Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 5 -year total Water Fund $ 2,670,000 $ 2,670,000 TOTAL $ 2,670,000 $ 2,670,000 Expenditures Design $ 800,000 $ 800,000 Construction $ 1,870,000 $ 1,870,000 TOTAL $ 2,670,000 $ 2,670,000 Page 7.14 SECTION VIII - UNFUNDED PROJECTS /NEEDS SUMMARY SHEET FY 2014115 2018119 5 year CIP Budget UNFUNDED NEEDS /PROJECTS Project Name Cost Beach and Pier 8th and 10th Street City Parking Lot Rehabilitation $ 300,000 8th and 10th Street Utility Undergrounding and Lighting Improvements $ 200,000 Lighting Improvements to Seal Beach Tennis Center $ 500,000 Buildings and Facilities $ 500,000 Facility Improvements Citywide (per Facility Master Plan) $ 38,853,000 Pier Entrance Improvements $ 100,000 Pier Tot Lot Improvements $ 100,000 Main Street - Streetscape Improvements (Street Furniture) $ 150,000 Public Works Building Repairs $ 50,000 McGaugh Pool Deck Rehabilitation $ 200,000 ADA Upgrades to all City Buildings $ 500,000 Community Center Improvements $ 1,500,000 Master Plan - High Priority Needs $ 41,453,000 Parks $ 32,000,000 New Pedestrian lighting on Electric Ave Greenbelt $ 300,000 Lighting Improvements to Zoeter $ 50,000 Lighting Improvements to Seal Beach Tennis Center $ 100,000 Citywide Irrigation Improvements $ 500,000 Citywide Park and Turf Renovation $ 1,000,000 Zoeter Field Rehabilitation (including stands) $ 100,000 Arbor Park Field Restoration $ 50,000 Heather Park Restrooms $ 250,000 Arbor Park Drainage Improvements $ 50,000 City Entry Monument Signs $ 100,000 Alley Pavement Rehabilitation $ 2,500,000 Storm Drain Master Plan - High Priority Needs $ 11,000,000 Master Plan - Median Priority Projects $ 32,000,000 Master Plan - Low Priority Projects $ 29,000,000 $ 72,000,000 Streets and Transportation Seal Beach Boulevard and Rossmoor Center Way Intersection Improvements $ 200,000 Westminster Avenue Storm Drain Undergrounding $ 3,000,000 Leisure World Connectivity Study $ 25,000 Median Landscape Rehabilitation on Seal Beach Blvd $ 200,000 Traffic Signal Upgrades $ 1,000,000 Traffic Signals - Battery Backup Replacement $ 25,000 Lampson Avenue Bicycle Lane Improvements $ 100,000 Goald Coast Stub Ends Improvements $ 300,000 Concrete Rehabilitation $ 1,000,000 Street Paving Rehabilitation $ 18,000,000 Alley Pavement Rehabilitation $ 5,000,000 $ 28,850,000 TOTAL $ 145,303,000 Page 8.1