HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC AG PKT 2014-06-23 #HTO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
THRU: Jill R. Ingram, City Manager
That the City Council approve the submittal of the City's Measure M2 Eligibility
Package and its components, which include the following:
1 A 7-year Measure M2-specific Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for
fiscal years 2014115 through 2020121;
2. A Maintenance of Effort Reporting Form and Supporting Documentation
for the City of Seal Beach to the Orange County Transportation Authority
(OCTA);
3. The OCTA Measure M2 Eligibility Checklist;
4. A Pavement Management Plan update and supporting certification; and
5. A Local Signal Synchronization Plan update.
If approved by the City Council, the City Engineer will file the City's Measure M2
Eligibility Package.
In November 1990, the voters of Orange County approved Measure M, the
Revised Traffic Improvement and Growth Management Ordinance. Measure M
created a fund for transportation improvements to mitigate traffic impacts
generated by existing and proposed development. Measure M authorizes the
imposition of an additional half-cent retail transaction and use tax for a period of
20 years. In November 2006, Measure M was renewed by the voters of Orange
County for an additional 20 years and is now referred to as Measure M2.
Funds identified as Measure M2 "turnback" funds are used on local and regional
transportation improvement and maintenance projects. Other Measure M2
funds, for transportation related projects, are made available through several
competitive programs included in the Combined Transportation Funding Program
(CTFP).
Agenda Item — H
To be eligible to receive Measure M2 "turnback" and CTFP funds, the Local
Transportation Authority (LTA) must find that the City has satisfied specific
requirements on or before June 30th. These requirements change every year.
The Board of Supervisors of Orange County has designated the Orange County
Transportation Authority (OCTA) as the Local Transportation Authority.
The City has fulfilled the following initial requirements:
1 Demonstrated compliance with the County's Congestion Management
Program.
1 Maintained a mitigation impact fee schedule.
3. Adopted a seven-year Capital Improvement Program that includes all
transportation projects funded partially or wholly by Measure M dollars.
4. Adopted and adequately funded a Local Pavement Management Plan
(PM P).
5. Adopted a Traffic Demand Management Ordinance.
6. Satisfied Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Requirements.
7. Agreed to expend all Measure M and M2 revenues within three years of
receipt.
8. Adopt and comply with a Local Signal Synchronization Plan.
All of these items must be maintained to retain eligibility. Not all of the
requirements are needed every year. Some items must be renewed or
resubmitted annually and some biannually. The Eligibility package is due to
OCTA by June 30, 2014. This year's package will include:
1. A Measure M2-specific seven-year Capital Improvement Program
2. Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Reporting Form
3. General Plan Compliance Documentation
4. Measure M2 Eligibility Checklist
5. Pavement Management Plan update
6. Local Signal Synchronization Plan Update
A summary of each of these items is included below:
The City is required to prepared and submit a seven-year Capital Improvement
Program (CIP) of transportation projects that is specific to Measure M2 and in a
form consistent with OCTA requirements. The updated Measure M2-specific
seven-year CIP is attached.
Not all of the projects in the Measure M2-specific CIP are yet funded. Those that
are not therefore do not appear on the citywide CIP previously adopted by the City
Council.
am
2. MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT (MOE) REPORTING FORM
One of the requirements that went into effect when the voters approved Measure
M, and reapproved Measure M2, was that the transportation revenue stream must
supplement and not replace general fund investments in roadway maintenance by
local agencies. To this end, the Measure M program compiled the average annual
maintenance investment made by each city from FY 1985/86 through FY 1989/90,
and requires that local agencies continue to invest into the infrastructure with a
minimum of that funding level. The Maintenance of Effort (MOE) form must be
submitted to demonstrate compliance with this requirement.
The average annual MOE General Fund expenditure required for the City of Seal
Beach, as determined for the Measure M Program, is $505,000. The adopted
FY2013/14 budget contains a General Fund expenditure for public
works/transportation related costs, which exceeds the baseline MOE requirements.
This information is reflected in the attached MOE form.
3. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTATION
A participating city must consider, as part of its General Plan, land use planning
strategies that accommodate transit and non-motorized transportation. The City's
General Plan meets these requirements. A letter documenting this will be
submitted to OCTA.
4. MEASURE M2 ELIGIBILITY CHECKLIST
To assist agencies in complying with Measure M2, OCTA has developed checklists
to clarify requirements. The checklist has been completed, and it will be transmitted
with all other documents as required by OCTA.
, I �ltlkainlfuoe
OCTA requires preparation of a Pavement Management Plan to evaluate the
existing pavement network, identify deficiencies, and recommend cost effective
improvements to relieve existing and future deficiencies. This plan must be
updated every two years. The City Council previously adopted the City's Pavement
Management Plan on April 14, 2014. It will be submitted to OCTA before the June
30, 2014 deadline,
6. LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN UPDATE
The Local Signal Synchronization Plan (LSSP) is a local program consistent with
the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan of the County of Orange
which provides a three-year plan identifying traffic signal synchronization, street
routes and traffic signals to be improved. The LSSP outlines the costs associated
with the identified improvements, funding and phasing of capital, and the operations
and maintenance of the street routes and traffic signals.
9M
Based on staffs analysis, this comprehensive package of required documents will
maintain the City's compliance with the requirements of Measure M2 for fiscal year
2014/2015. Upon approval, the attached documents will be submitted to OCTA in
order for the City to continue receiving its portion of Measure M2 funds.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:
The submittal of the Measure M2 Eligibility Package is not a project within the
California Environmental Quality Act.
[IN I -
The City Attorney has reviewed this report and has approved it as to form.
The City receives funding from the Measure M2 program through OCTA. A
requirement to receive this funding is submittal of the enclosed eligibility
package. The City annually receives approximately $350,000, and this year has
$450,347 budgeted in revenue. The City also applies for a host of competitive
grants and on average receives $500,000 in grant funds. This year's projects
such as the Seal Beach Traffic Management Center (TMC) Relocation
($586,000), Westminster Avenue Bicycle Improvement ($2M), and Filter Inserts
Installation ($10,000) were all funded with competitive grant funding.
Adopting this resolution ensures that the City will continue to be eligible to fund
maintenance activities and compete for needed infrastructure funding.
That the City Council approve by minute action the submittal of the City's
Measure M2 Eligibility Packages and its components, which include the
following:
1. The 7-year Measure M2 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for fiscal
years 2014/15 through 2020121;
2. A Maintenance of Effort Reporting Form and Supporting Documentation
for the City of Seal Beach to OCTA;
3. OCTA Measure M2 Eligibility Checklist;
4. A Pavement Management Plan update and supporting certification; and
5. A Local Signal Synchronization Plan update.
AMM,
SUBMITTED BY:
Sean P. Crumby, P.E.
Director of Public Works
Prepared by: David Spitz, Associate Engineer
Attachments:
NOTED AND APPROVED:
J II . ngram, City M n ger
A. Measure M2 7 -year Capital Improvement Program
B. MOE and Supporting Documentation
C. Measure M2 Eligibility Checklist
D. OCTA Letter and Supporting Documents
E. PMP Certification
F. Local Signal Synchronization Plan Update
Page 5
E
to
�F:
U
A�
2
a. —
C,
C*4
C)
o C'I
E :3
2.2
s. 2
a.
E
4)
> C*4
P Y)
CL to
E
co
m
m
ar
t5
p
a
E
CL
C
m
oa
0
E
c
.2
>
(D
G
00 w
in N
IL
IL
a
I
0
0
ck
V4
0
Ct
60
4N
44 40
I
LL
E
IL
ID
0
OY
10
t;
W'S
di
.0 pN
E
16 ( r_ n
CL
AL
C3
O
O C:,
0 N C,
(a to fie
0
00 Ct
C, o
0 0 N 0 eq
69 bFj 69 60 an
o 'o
o o o
O cD
to te 6s 44
u3 trt 43 a3 w
o o cD
to 6o ut to 43
O O
cl,
c� o
O c;
to LO 4 to 4,*4
IL cr 00
CD
LL
Fo 40
t
t7 a4
to 44
0
04
C3 O cn 0 V)
Ge 60 03 qt ob
0 O 0 C�
q Ct
0 0
0 m 0 at
0 m
0 CD
0 C)
'o ull
6% 44
0 69 fiq 0 C,
0
C
o t
C2,
U� w 0
69 to W) m in
Ct R
'n
C, to
0 fo 69 63 V�
00 4
0
c:i
0 o kn
CL R
0
UC� 'o (D
6% 5,
C2
C. 0 U,
0 61 V) to 0 C* to C, 1 0
O Ct
LO
u3 u3 40 to 44
w ir
L, 0
9
E
<
Ck
<
E
a
-
i.
V,
c
m
01
CL
CL
(D
U 0
c
co
2
Qj m
4
c,
o
r-
a mr
M
4) c
0, <
U
(n
CL
w
x
E �;
L
E
0
=
7-
u
t
N
.2
CL
IL
CL
CL
04
C3 O cn 0 V)
Ge 60 03 qt ob
0 O 0 C�
q Ct
0 0
0 m 0 at
0 m
0 CD
0 C)
'o ull
6% 44
0 69 fiq 0 C,
0
C
o t
C2,
U� w 0
69 to W) m in
Ct R
'n
C, to
0 fo 69 63 V�
00 4
0
c:i
0 o kn
CL R
0
UC� 'o (D
6% 5,
C2
C. 0 U,
0 61 V) to 0 C* to C, 1 0
O Ct
LO
u3 u3 40 to 44
w ir
L, 0
z
E
m
2—
C'I
C.
Z7 O
C14
0 04
��
�,c
E
f
2
E
4)
> CV
2 fn
CL M
E
m
v
I
O
N
L2
LL
Cl! ti
U') to
r- 11
W4 i1v
C) C)
0 0
C� Ct
C> 0
r� r.
mil
tl*
O
O
x
r-
f-
CD
04
N
U7
tP!
N fn u3 Eq
to
CD
54
E
Ct
0 C> 11 0
h.
2
40
Ct
F C,
Ct
C2,
0 0
0
2
C.
.2 N 62,
0
'D
CL
Ct
6
ON C> C,
a)
64
0
a
'n
C;
C>
CD
M,
M
CD
CD
100
C,
CL
L)
O
O
V5 Ri
O C> — 0
C4 ce 61� ul
—
vl�
L
cx
mE
m
3
w
CL
.2
F
41
O
2
0) r
Ln C
U) <
C)
co
O O
rA
i;4 U
uc E
0 1
z
E
0
0
co, 0
a.
9
CL
4A
"f
IL
r-
f-
CD
04
N
U7
tP!
N fn u3 Eq
to
CD
(D
O
O
Ct
0 C> 11 0
h.
2
40
Ct
F C,
Ct
C2,
0 0
Ct
w
C.
.2 N 62,
0
0
C) a
C� q
0 in C) 0
A CA fA 4
m
O
Lo
Cf C4
Ln m
o C;
0 C,
O
C)
O
(D
ca
C>
CD
CD
Ct
CD
(D
69 64 eA iq
a
CD
2
ca
Ct
F C,
Ct
C2,
w 49 61� 61,
w
0
P
0
Ct
6
ON C> C,
o
64
0
a
'n
C;
C>
CD
M,
10 C
CD
CD
100
C,
pd
L)
O
O
V5 Ri
O C> — 0
C4 ce 61� ul
—
vl�
0
C) a
C� q
0 in C) 0
A CA fA 4
m
O
Lo
Cf C4
Ln m
o C;
0 C,
O
C)
O
(D
ca
04
cli
4f*
O
O c)
ct
o o o N ok r-
t"
o C!
o o
c� ct
o o
o c� o 9
0% V� 64 40*
o 11 cl
ct
c;
ON o -
49 ea 64 4oll
fn
c3 o c3
fA N w in
c',
M) ce
cl
c, o
6q 6%
cl
o ck
c�
o ON o
fa en w
ct
c, co,
ca
ca
w w u 0
2
(D
IL
2
ca
U)
i4
0
P
c
0
16
M
'n
10 C
mss,
100
(Z <
L)
in
of
V5 Ri
L
mE
r
w
CL
.2
F
IL
04
cli
4f*
O
O c)
ct
o o o N ok r-
t"
o C!
o o
c� ct
o o
o c� o 9
0% V� 64 40*
o 11 cl
ct
c;
ON o -
49 ea 64 4oll
fn
c3 o c3
fA N w in
c',
M) ce
cl
c, o
6q 6%
cl
o ck
c�
o ON o
fa en w
ct
c, co,
ca
ca
w w u 0
M
E
m
Z
CL
T3 Q
4D CIJ
-= 0
0
E
T 2
2 to
CN
E
0)
>
CL m
E
CL (A
N LL
ca
GI
v
N
25
C'4
45
U-
a C�
.n to
60 Vol
0 0
0
V)r N
H.,
iC
0
o 0
CoL
0 0 0
0 0
O Ct
O o C,4 C, C4
6q fin 6% N
o
o
ct
0 0 C', 0 04
N to V3 V) 40
o Cl
C�
0 to V� 04 N
&*
fa tA
a 0 cli CD N
CO 69 In V3 44
O O
0 ON N C, 4
0 0 Cj 0
to (a 60 M
4* R
0 ON N 0 N
fOA ON 10 40
LU X U 0
N
LL
to
41
to N
C) 0
04 N
V) 4N
o
o
ci
O
m
0
0
0
0
a
QC
Ct
w
N
44
0 0 04 0
60 t9 te
>
a
c
C
cc
O
E
W. to � 64
4m
E
Lu
vi
O
o o N o
to tq
ww
O
o
o
cl
c
cm
CD
L .Q
-C
ts
ti N
a)
'a
7E
A
4)
03 m
M-C
:3
CC
(D
N
Z M
o
u)
to ir
P E
A%
O
12
is
C L
T
V
03
C,
CL
ID c
vi
1)
<
ti
E
IL
CL
0.
o 0
CoL
0 0 0
0 0
O Ct
O o C,4 C, C4
6q fin 6% N
o
o
ct
0 0 C', 0 04
N to V3 V) 40
o Cl
C�
0 to V� 04 N
&*
fa tA
a 0 cli CD N
CO 69 In V3 44
O O
0 ON N C, 4
0 0 Cj 0
to (a 60 M
4* R
0 ON N 0 N
fOA ON 10 40
LU X U 0
N
LL
to
41
to N
C) 0
04 N
V) 4N
o
o
ci
O
m
0
CD 0
0 o N o
N N to t9 40
0
ow
0 o N 0
" f9 m " mw
0
0
0
a
QC
Ct
w
N
44
0 0 04 0
60 t9 te
>
a
c
C
cc
W. to � 64
4m
E
Lu
vi
2 Im
o o N o
to tq
ww
O
o
o
cl
c
cm
L .Q
ts
ti N
a)
'a
(D vi
ff tx
4)
03 m
M-C
:3
CC
(D
N
Z M
o
u)
to ir
P E
A%
Z
is
C L
T
V
CL
CD 0
0 o N o
N N to t9 40
0
ow
0 o N 0
" f9 m " mw
tri w;
C', 0 "
ta to 4% 49 1 40
0
0
0
a
0
L6 0
Q " o
6n W v� of
Ct
w
N
44
0 0 04 0
60 t9 te
a
c
C
ct
W. to � 64
4m
vi
o o N o
to tq
ww
O
o
o
cl
c
tri w;
C', 0 "
ta to 4% 49 1 40
45 tp
tq V�
CJ 64 .
W"k
0 CD
60% too Go I I
0 0
CD
CD
Ct
0 0 04 0
60 t9 te
45 tp
tq V�
CJ 64 .
W"k
0 CD
60% too Go I I
0 0
0 nay
Cy O
C, 0 64 0
ull &3�
0
0
C�
0 C2,
0
0
0
0
a
0
Ct
(D
0 a ON 0
0 0 (4 0
O
0)
0
0
0
Ct
0.
cz
Ln
uy
2
0
0
0 0 N 0
C)
#
U3
S9 69 03
41%
0
0
0
CD
0 0 C'J
0 0 0 0
C',
0
Vy to
'o
N 0
O
4D
N
Om
(D
C
V
m p
M
.2 .0
co
1 0
o
w
Ck
>
0
Ir ir
a
0 0
:3
r
s
0
0
r
C14
IL
V
V CZ)
0
IL
0 C14
6
cr
E
CL
to
(D
>"Z
2
CL m
CL
iz
cc
ry
0
(n
CL
E
2
E
o.
m
E
4!
C6
0
=
N
E
U )
13
M
C)
M
r
0
>
ma
W
E
z
:3
Z
IL
t;
0 nay
Cy O
C, 0 64 0
ull &3�
0
0
C�
0 C2,
0
"
*4
0 0 N 69 V� 0 1 N
W�
0
0 c2o
0 C,
0 CD
6e t0 a .1 4140
01 0
0
Cl
C;
°ra 0 C4 0
S Wk 60 V*
0
0
ct R
0 C,
cli
O
C,
LL
0)
P0, ,
O G
0
cj�
C14 N
0
Llm
m
E
0
0
0
a
0
Ct
(D
0 a ON 0
0 0 (4 0
69 V3 N V)
to
0
0
Ct
0.
cz
Ln
uy
N
0
0
0 0 N 0
C)
#
U3
S9 69 03
41%
0
0
0
CD
0 0 C'J
0 0 0 0
C',
0
Vy to
'o
N 0
O
4D
N
Om
0
C
"
*4
0 0 N 69 V� 0 1 N
W�
0
0 c2o
0 C,
0 CD
6e t0 a .1 4140
01 0
0
Cl
C;
°ra 0 C4 0
S Wk 60 V*
0
0
ct R
0 C,
cli
O
C,
LL
0)
P0, ,
O G
0
cj�
C14 N
0
Llm
m
E
Lu
(D
0 0 (4 0
0 0 0
la M, (a
to
0
0
Ct
0.
cz
Ln
uy
N
Ql
C)
60 N 6q N
GOP
0
0
O
.0
0 0 C'J
U�
r-
0
0
C�
'o
N 0
us
C4
rm-
N
Ix
C
V
m p
M
.2 .0
co
1 0
o
w
co
>
0
Ir ir
a
0 0
:3
r
s
0
r
IL
V
CL
IL
0
0
0-
C2, C." 9 .041 NA
0
0 0
0 0 4 04
to 6v
m
Ct
(D
0 0 (4 0
0 0 0
la M, (a
to
0
0
Ct
Ct
Ln
uy
N
Ql
C)
60 N 6q N
GOP
0
0
O
Ct
0 0 C'J
U�
r-
0
0
C�
'o
N 0
us
C4
by Vi to "
N
0
0
0-
C2, C." 9 .041 NA
0
0 0
0 0 4 04
to 6v
m
Ct
0 0 0
la M, (a
to
0
C�
C.
Ck
U)
0
69 69 V) w
44
O
Ct
U�
r-
go
P�
0
0
0-
C2, C." 9 .041 NA
0
0 0
0 0 4 04
to 6v
m
LU X (5 0
0 =
C� q
d3 M
C) p
a cl
V3 to
a 0 F
111 0
0
C)
o
E
0
sf
0
0
(D
>
0 C3
tl> f9 V) V)
M
2
c
CL
cq
0
E
to
4)
0
01
p
C3
04
C3
C3
fl CN
0)
m
co
�
6N9
1191
0) 0
Cj
In
8)
5
ME
E j�
L
z
13
9L
IL
E
(D
> N
CL w
0
CL
(a
U-
Lo
rn
co
E
Rnm
>
2
E
co
0
m Ll5
65
o
m
m
w
U)
F-
E
1
E
A
E
z
'C
2
Q
CL
o
IL
CL
C-4
LU X (5 0
0 =
C� q
d3 M
C) p
a cl
V3 to
a 0 F
111 0
o
0
C)
o
E
0
0
0
0
(D
>
0 C3
tl> f9 V) V)
M
2
c
CL
0
E
4)
0
01
p
0)
m
co
0) 0
Cj
In
8)
5
(4r) 2c
E j�
L
z
13
9L
IL
o
0
C)
o
0 61). V) C',
be fn
0
0
0
0
0
0 C3
tl> f9 V) V)
40
0 0 0 0 a
to 64 (a be I^
64 ur, to to V�
q". . . .1. �
0) V) V3 te ta
0
W4 d C�
R
m
0 C, 3
q". . . .1. �
0) V) V3 te ta
0
W4 d C�
R
m
0 m m
�
q". . . .1. �
0) V) V3 te ta
0
W4 d C�
R
m
(D
0
m 2
0):F
Cr Lo
I
MI
0 0
Ct
Ct
0 0
Ln w
w wt
o
0 a
0 a
O Ct
0 Q
0
C.
o I
sk
C.
O
6,
W�
0
E
44
Cl
o v) o C. v) 6, C�
w
cD
ift
p
O C> 0
m
v) 60 w 4e
CL
M '4
4&
�c
�5
o
V) 99. 6e w
44
Ow o o o
C
C
(D
CL
N
-6
<
B
a
ca
03 ca
lcn-
to Ca FL
a.
U)
<
7i
IL
9L
CL
IL
M ii
AL
IL
14 V) V) 61) 69 1 ilb I
2
-a
LU Ir C3 0
LL
O
C> R
LL
tU
C.
o I
sk
C.
O
6,
W�
14 V) V) 61) 69 1 ilb I
2
-a
LU Ir C3 0
LL
O
C> R
LL
tU
C.
Ct
Ct
Ct
C.
Cl
O
0 0 w
0
R Vi w w
44
Cl
o v) o C. v) 6, C�
w
cD
ift
m
O C> 0
m
v) 60 w 4e
Ow
M '4
4&
�c
�5
o
V) 99. 6e w
44
Ow o o o
14 V) V) 61) 69 1 ilb I
2
-a
LU Ir C3 0
LL
O
C> R
LL
tU
O
Ct
Ct
Ct
O
Cl
° °
Cl
Ct
m
O C> 0
m
ch
10
�c
�5
-- 1
cc
(D
CL
E
03 ca
lcn-
to Ca FL
c3
7i
IL
9L
O
Ct
Ct
Ct
O
Cl
° °
Cl
Ct
O C> 0
Ow Ow 0 w 0 6.)
M V> W, fA
m b.) w 6% 40
1 01 - I
0 0 CD CD
r9, .to ..V* . 1.1
6.) w 4a
0
0
0
0
°w w
2
oa
zz
w Ir 0 0
33
E
m
Z
CL c-4
0
00
-� C14
0
0
E
tm
2
4) v
E
(u
>
p w
am
E 4)
CM
in
r.
U- U-
c, S
0
0
wi
r- to
Eq OF
O
C�
t9 M
OD
OR VW �
Co
Co
R
m
a.
LL
CN
O
r to
o 0 to w to
tq
in to 0) fA fa
"°°6469 44
Ul *a to 64 40
C', of
Cl)
0 0 0 " 40 C4
m
M ri
0
°in 0 to N N
fiq 40
0)
C'i m w;
u-, U)
to to
in 6% tiF
0.
O
CN
to N
O
O
C�
LL
O
W
R
W
2
Cf
to
CD 0 to to
69 to to to
0
40
fl
P
0
to
40
m
.LU
5
E
p
9t
0
m
r
Q-
4i
2
24
>
:E
2
E*
At
4)
N -0
m C
42:!
CO
0
75
o
o
in
oc)
c
CO L)
a
y.
211
5
�E
v
4)
E
z
Im
r
to
g.
CL
CL
IL
'o
CL
CL
13
O
r to
o 0 to w to
tq
in to 0) fA fa
"°°6469 44
Ul *a to 64 40
C', of
Cl)
0 0 0 " 40 C4
m
M ri
0
°in 0 to N N
fiq 40
0)
C'i m w;
u-, U)
to to
in 6% tiF
0.
O
CN
to N
O
O
C�
LL
O
W
R
W
C�
Cf
to
CD 0 to to
69 to to to
0
40
O
r to
o 0 to w to
tq
in to 0) fA fa
"°°6469 44
Ul *a to 64 40
C', of
Cl)
0 0 0 " 40 C4
m
M ri
0
°in 0 to N N
fiq 40
0)
C'i m w;
u-, U)
to to
in 6% tiF
0.
O
CN
to N
O
O
C�
LL
0
O
W
R
W
C�
ttl to iA to
to
CD
CD
C)
fl
Ct
0
to
40
.LU
5
r
Q-
4i
2
24
>
2
E*
0
4)
N -0
m C
CO
in
E
me
z
to
g.
CL
CL
IL
CL
CL
0
O
W
R
O
C�
ttl to iA to
to
CD
CD
c'
fl
Ct
0
W eq t9 40
40
6q 64 fA 64 4A
to te to t9 40
Tt
0
a c'
to 14 64 la 40
1
9 I
9_ 0 0 'A to I " I
O
-0 a -01
a
6q 64 fA 64 4A
to te to t9 40
Tt
0
a c'
to 14 64 la 40
1
9 I
9_ 0 0 'A to I " I
Z-1
2—
CN
CD
CN
C>
0 C4
S =
E :3
a.
E
> CN
P
E
CL
m iz
m
as
lw
CD
:i :! I
U- U-
0 Ol
c a 0 0 m
0 5
C�
CIL Cv m Ct
0 m "
;;
w 0) MW
CD 0 0
ul
C.4
C',
O Cb
C) C2,
OW fia to
W) C, fa to C) 60)
OW ta w 9%
to 6s (a of
5) CD In a
01,
0
O
0 0
1 0
0 1 Is 1
0 0
0 C�
V) V) u w' C4
VW
C� ct
0
of w
O ct
o C,
en w
O
O
1c,
'a
o
2
m
to
p
C
M,
Vw
2
U3 0 to U3
.0
Cl
N
C1
F is
a
4,
CL
(D
16
v ai E
U)
>
<
a
WO
(D
>
E m
2
V; LU
<
9,20M
CL
C
m c
0
7�j
(D
Lz
tan,
0
CL ,t4
r
L:
E
a
CL
1
R
IL
t
(L
O Cb
C) C2,
OW fia to
W) C, fa to C) 60)
OW ta w 9%
to 6s (a of
5) CD In a
01,
0
O
0 0
1 0
0 1 Is 1
0 0
0 C�
V) V) u w' C4
VW
C� ct
0
of w
O ct
o C,
en w
O
O
1c,
o
Ck
to
p
o
Vw
' Cq
U3 0 to U3
.0
Cl
N
O Cb
C) C2,
OW fia to
W) C, fa to C) 60)
OW ta w 9%
to 6s (a of
5) CD In a
01,
0
O
0 0
1 0
0 1 Is 1
0 0
0 C�
V) V) u w' C4
VW
C� ct
0
of w
O ct
o C,
en w
O
O
1c,
Ck 0 0
0
to 5, wl
g .... 1.�
C) C,
C) C,
p
C) 0
m
CD
Cp
Ct
C,
to 0)
Vw
.0
Cl
N
C1
F is
CL
E
a
>
2
<
CL
tm
0
CL ,t4
E
zo
t
CL
CL
Ck 0 0
0
to 5, wl
g .... 1.�
C) C,
C) C,
p
C) 0
m
CD
Cp
Ct
C,
to 0)
Vw
Ck 0 0
0
to 5, wl
g .... 1.�
C) C,
C) C,
p
C) 0
m
0
O
Cp
Ct
0
Ck 0 0
0
to 5, wl
g .... 1.�
C) C,
C) C,
p
C) 0
m
MAppendix 1:
Maintenance of Effort Reporting Form
OCTA
Jurisdiction: Seal Beach
Type of GENERAL FUND Transportation Expenditures:
Please attach supporting budget documentation for each line item listed below.
ublic Works
Certification:
I hereby certify jhat4he-qity/C
Effort :
rement for Fi
of Eff-
Signature (Finance Director)
Is 1=1
Total General Fund Transportation Expenditures 1$1,083,936
(Less Total MOE Exclusions*)
MOE Expenditures
MOE Benchmark Requirementl$551,
unty of Seal Beach
Year 2014/2015
(Shortfall) / Surplus 1$532,728
has budgeted and will meet the Maintenance
Director of Finance/City Treasurer d i 0 • -Zo
Title Date
GENERAL FUND:
Engineering /Public Works
Storm Drains
Street Maintenance
• A
Less Gas
Dept# Budget Tax Transfer
042 $ 96,000
4 400,300
044 $ 1,154,400 (661,900)
Add per State Audit Allowable Discretionary Costs:
Landscape Maintenance 049 $ 335,200
Less Measure M Threshold Requirement
Less 57% Less
non - street Intergov Adjusted
related Payments Actual
96,000
(49,000) •
492,500
$ (191,064) $ 144,136
Subtotal $ 1,083,936
ROM
Excess (Deficiency) Coverage $ 532,728
City of e. Beach FY 2014-2015
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
Employee salaries costs
Account Code:
001 -042
FUND:
001 General Fund - Administration
and Engineering
Employee benefits costs
40008
Auto Allowance
Employee benefits costs
2013 -2014
Cell Phone Allowance
2014 -2015
40010
2012 -2013
Amended
2013 -2014
Proposed
Employee benefits costs
Actual
Budget
Estimated
Budget
Personnel Services
$ 62,071
$ 72,600
$ 58,400
$ 59,100
Maintenance and Operations 86,479
36,900
35,300
36,900
Medicare Insurance
Employee benefits costs
TOTAL
$ 148,550
$ 109,500
$ 93,700
$ 96,000
ACCOUNT NUMBER EXPLANATION
40001
Full -time Salaries
Employee salaries costs
40004
Part -time
Employee salaries costs
40007
Tuition Reimbursement
Employee benefits costs
40008
Auto Allowance
Employee benefits costs
40009
Cell Phone Allowance
Employee benefits costs
40010
Deferred Comp - Cafeteria
Employee benefits costs
40011
Deferred Compensation
Employee benefits costs
40012
PIERS Retirement
Employee benefits costs
40013
PARS Retirement
Employee benefits costs
40014
Medical Insurance
Employee benefits costs
40015
AFLAC Cafeteria
Employee benefits costs
40017
Medicare Insurance
Employee benefits costs
40018
Life and Disability
Employee benefits costs
40027
Vacation Buy /payout
Employee benefits costs
40100
Office Supplies
Office supplies
40300
Memberships and Dues
APWA, ASCE, CA PE License, ITE, NWOCPWD, CEADOC
40400
Training and Meetings
League of Cities, Traffic Engineering Course, report writing. map act,
inspection courses, EIT training, water certification, professional
engineering license
44000
Contract Professional Svcs
Miscellaneous Professional Engineering, Development Engineering
Support, AutoCAD software subscription, Grant submission
support, and GIS upgrade.
to
I City of Seal Beach I FY 2014-2015
DEPARTMENT: Public Works . Account Code: 001-042
FUND: 001 General Fund - Administration and Engineering
0
F
I
137
2013-2014
2014-2015
Account
2012-2013
Amended
2013-2014
Proposed
Description
Number
Actual
Budget
Estimated
Budget
PERSONNEL SERVICES
Full-time Salaries
001-042-40001
$
39,022
$
36,800
$
36,800
$
38,800
Part-time
001-042-40004
1,134
18,100
3,600
5,200
Tuition Reimbursement
001-042-40007
2,517
1,900
1,900
-
Auto Allowance
001-042-40008
4,200
-
200
-
Cell Phone Allowance
001-042-40009
3,258
3,600
3,600
1,600
Deferred Comp - Cafeteria
001-042-40010
244
400
300
200
Deferred Comp
011-142-40111
821
900
911
900
PERS Retirement
001-042-40012
5,662
4,800
4,800
5,200
PARS Retirement
001-042-40013
75
300
100
100
Medical Insurance
001-042-40014
4,117
4,500
4,500
4,900
AFLAC Cafeteria
001-042-40015
-
-
100
-
Medicare Insurance
001-042-40017
488
900
900
700
Life and Disability
001-042-40018
351
400
400
500
Vacation Buy/Payout
001-042-40027
175
-
300
1,000
TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES
$
62,071
$
72,600
$
58,400
$
59,100
MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS
Office Supplies
001-042-40100
$
2,809
$
2,800
$
2,800
$
2,800
Public/Legal Notices Engineer
001-042-40200
-
2,600
-
-
Memberships and Dues
001-042-40300
815
-
1,000
2,600
Training and Meetings
001-042-40400
1,658
3,500
3,500
3,500
Contract Professional
001-042-44000
81,197
28,000
28,000
28,000
TOTAL MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS
$
86,479
$
36,900
$
35,300
$
36,900
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
$
148,550
$
109,500
$
93,700
$
96,000
0
F
I
137
City of Seal
Beach
Full -time Salaries
40003
FY 2014 -2015
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
40010
Deferred Comp - Cafeteria
Account Code:
001 -043
FUND:
001 General Fund
- Storm Drains
PARS Retirement
40014
Medical Insurance
40015
AFLAC Cafeteria
40017
2013 -2014
40018
2014 -2015
40026
Comptime Buy /payout
2012 -2013
Amended
2013 -2014
Proposed
40700
Equipment/Materials
Actual
Budget
Estimated
Budget
Personnel Services
$
190,337
$ 215,300
$ 195,900
$ 224,200
Maintenance and Operations
135,794
166,100
166,100
176,100
TOTAL
$
326,131
$ 381,400
$ 362,000
$ 400,300
ACCOUNT NUMBER EXPLANATION
40001
Full -time Salaries
40003
Over -time
40004
Part-time
40010
Deferred Comp - Cafeteria
40011
Deferred Compensation
40012
PERS Retirement
40013
PARS Retirement
40014
Medical Insurance
40015
AFLAC Cafeteria
40017
Medicare Insurance
40018
Life and Disability
40026
Comptime Buy /payout
40027
Vacation Buy /payout
40400
Training and Meetings
40700
Equipment/Materials
41020
Electricity
44000
Contract Professional Svcs
45000 Intergovernmental
Employee salaries costs
Employee salaries costs
Employee salaries costs
Employee salaries costs
Employee salaries costs
Employee salaries costs
Employee salaries costs
Employee salaries costs
Employee salaries costs
Employee salaries costs
Employee salaries costs
Employee benefits costs
Employee benefits costs
Staff trainings
Materials for West End Pump Station and replacement trash pump
Electricity for West End Pump Station
NPDES program consultant, catch basin maint., NPDES advertising, catch
basin testing, storm drain video inspection, catch basin filter replacement,
professional engineering services, winter storm pump rental, storm
preparation flyers, and employee uniforms
State Water Resources Control Board, NPDES permit County Orange,
AQMD permit fee and LA County property tax
140
City of Seal Beach I FY 2014-2015
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works,
Account Code:
001-043
FUND:
mnGenem|pund
- StonnDrains
2013-2014
201*-2015
Account
2012-2013
Amended
2013-2014
pmpnaoa
Description
Number
Actual
Budget
Estimated
PERSONNEL SERVICES
Full-time Salaries
001'043^0001
$
137.686
$
143.200
$
137.800
$
144.600
Over-time
001-048'40003
278
5.000
1.000
5.000
Part-time
001-G4348004
6.574
21.500
12.700
25.800
Cell Phone Allowance
001'043-40008
7
500
Deferred Comp Cafeteria
001'04340010
833
1.000
1.700
1.400
Deferred Compensation
001'04340011
2.769
2.900
2.900
3.000
PERS Retirement
001813-40012
21.747
18.300
17.900
18.000
PARS Retirement
001'043-40013
165
300
200
400
Medical Insurance
001-043-40014
15.820
18.700
16.900
17,800
ApUvC Cafeteria
001-043-*0015
-
'
200
Medicare Insurance
001-04340017
1.895
2.600
2.200
3.700
Life and Disability
001-043-40010
1.408
1.000
1.600
1.900
CumpnmeBuy/Poynut
001-04340025
187
'
nOn
'
voxadonguy/Puynut
001-043-40027
1,028
1.900
TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES
mm|mTEmxwcE AND OPERATIONS
Training and Meetings
001'043-40400
$
-
$
1.000
$
1.000
*
1.000
Equipment/Materials
001-04340700
3.052
3.000
3.000
15'000
Electricity
001-04341020
12'905
15.000
15.000
15.000
Contract Professional
001'043-4*000
83.287
98.100
08.100
98100
Intergovernmental
001'043'45000
36,550
TOTAL MAINTENANCE AND
OPERATIONS
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
0
141
City of Seal Beach
FY 2013-2014
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
Full-time Salaries
Employee salaries costs
Account Code:
001-044
FUND: 001 General Fund
- Street Maintenance
Part-time
Employee salaries costs
40010
Deferred Comp - Cafeteria
Employee benefits costs
2013-2014
Deferred Compensation
2014-2015
40012
2012-2013
Amended
2013-2014
Proposed
Employee benefits costs
Actual
Budget
Estimated
Budget
Personnel Services $
572,929 $
505,100
$ 553,254
$ 585,200
Maintenance and Operations
335,370
520,650
503,550
568,900
Employee benefits costs
40022
Flexible Spending - Cafeteria
TOTAL $
908,299 $
1,025,750
$ 1,056,804
$ 1,154,100
ACCOUNT NUMBER EXPLANATION
40001
Full-time Salaries
Employee salaries costs
40003
Over-time
Employee salaries costs
40004
Part-time
Employee salaries costs
40010
Deferred Comp - Cafeteria
Employee benefits costs
40011
Deferred Compensation
Employee benefits costs
40012
PERS Retirement
Employee benefits costs
40013
PARS Retirement
Employee benefits costs
40014
Medical Insurance
Employee benefits costs
40015
AFLAC Cafeteria
Employee benefits costs
40017
Medicare Insurance
Employee benefits costs
40018
Life and Disability
Employee benefits costs
40023
Cafeteria - Taxable
Employee benefits costs
40022
Flexible Spending - Cafeteria
Employee benefits costs
40026
Comptime Buy/payout
Employee benefits costs
40027
Vacation Buy/payout
Employee benefits costs
40300
Membership Dues
Annual membership
40400
Training and meetings
Staff training and development
40700
EquipmenUMaterials
Asphalt hot/cold mix, traffic signs, graffiti abatement, pavers,
sand bags, equipment, materials, and tools
40800
Special Departmental
Trimming of parkway and median trees
40801
Street Sweeping
Provides street sweeping
41000
Telephone
Cell phone costs
41020
Electricity
Electricity costs
44000
Contract Professional Svcs
Traffic signal maint., plant/shrub replacement, Main St. sidewalk
pressure washing, citywide pavement rehab., lighting maint. Contract,
concrete rehab., landscape maint. of medians/tract, employee uniform,
irrigation system repairs, traffic engineer services, 1-405 expansion
lobbying, and Citywide traffic counts
144
Ll
C'fo of Seal Beach
FY 2014_2015
DEPARTMENT: Public Works Account Code: 01-044
FUND oo1 General Fund 'Street Maintenance
Description
Account
Number_
PERSONNEL SERVICES
_
Full-time Salaries
001-04*-40001
Over-time
001'04440003
Part-time
001-0*+40004
Cell Allowance
001'844-40009
Deferred Comp 'Cafeteria
001'04440010
Deferred Compensation
001'0*4-40011
PERSRet|rement
001'04440012
PARS Retirement
001-044-40013
Medical Insurance
001-0444001*
ArLACOafeteria
001'044-40015
Medicare Insurance
001'0*4-40017
Life and Disability
001'0*4-40018
Cafeteria Taxable
001'044-40023
Cumptimeouy/Poyou/
001'044-40026
VaomiunBvy/Payou!
001'04440027
TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES
MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS
Membership
001'044-40300
Training and Meetings
001-01*'40400
Equipment/Materials
001-04440780
Special Departmental
001-044-40800
Street Sweeping
001-04440001
Telephone
001-044-41000
s|ocmcuv
001'044-41020
Contract Professional
001-044-44000
TOTAL MAINTENANCE
AND OPERATIONS
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
145
2013-2014
2014-205
2012-2013
Amended
2013-204
Proposed
Actual
Budget
Estimated
Budget
$
408'789
$
375.900
$
415.500
$
425.500
*.177
5.00¢
4.100
5.000
20.002
5.800
6.600
8.200
10
'
'
'
2.231
2,600
5.100
4.400
7.651
7,600
8.000
87100
64.764
48.000
54.654
56.100
363
100
100
100
50,628
49,600
47tOOV
58,900
'
-
*oo
500
5,850
6,00
6,00
OJO
4,309
4.100
3.800
5,800
^""
'
~'-
'
-
2,801
400
1,700
5,900
$
o
aUO
$
sOO
$
sOU
'
1,500
1,500
1.500
18,644
38,000
20,000
36,000
69,808
100,000
106,008
106,000
51.233
53'200
52.800
53^200
'
1.200
500
1'200
10,178
16,000
16,000
16,000
184,407
306,250
306,250
354,500
145
City of Seal
Beach
Full-time Salaries
40003
FY 2014-2015
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
40011
Deferred Compensation
Account Code:
001-0*e
FUND:
mn General Fund
' Landscape Maintenance
Medicare Insurance
40010
Life and Disability
40028
CompUme8vy/ppyovt
40027
2013-2014
40700
3014-2015
2012-2013
Amended
2013'2014
Proposed
Actual
Budget
Estimated
Budget
Personnel Services
$
35.020
$ 34.400
$ 34,800
$ 59.600
Maintenance and Operations
2008*2
244,950
230950
275,600
TOTAL
ACCOUNT NUMBER EXPLANATION
4000
Full-time Salaries
40003
Over-time
40010
Deferred Comp Cafeteria
40011
Deferred Compensation
40012
PsnGneimmont
40014
Medical Insurance
40017
Medicare Insurance
40010
Life and Disability
40028
CompUme8vy/ppyovt
40027
VauaUonBuy/payout
40700
Equipment/materials
4100 Telephone
41020 Electricity
44000 Contract Professional Svcs
Employee salaries costs
Employee salaries costs
Employee benefits costs
Employee benefits costs
Employee benefits costs
Employee benefits costs
Employee benefits costs
Employee benefits costs
Employee benefits costs
Employee benefits costs
Arbor Park support (doggie bags and ienc|ng).GumgmvaPark
support (doggie bags and etc).mioc playground equipment (Beach
Tot LoV, Heather Park, Almond Park. and Marina Center
Phone costs
Electricity atParks
Park landscape mainL. Heather/Edison Park portable naotmoma.
pest control, tree trimming, lighting repairs, certified playground
safety inspections, park irrigation repairs, park fencing repairs,
zvek`r Park sports field maintenance, plant/shrub replacement,
and GB/Lampsun eucalyptus tree soil and treatment
148
City of Seal Beach FY 2014-2015
DEPARTMENT: Public Works Account Code: 001-049
FUND: 001 General Fund - Landscape Maintenance
2013-2014
2014-2015
Account
2012-2013
Amended
2013-2014
Proposed
Description
Number
Actual
Budget
Estimated
Budget
PERSONNEL SERVICES
Full-time Salaries
001-049-40001
$
26,411
$
26,800
$
26,800
$
45,700
Overtime
001-049-40003
795
-
-
-
Deferred Comp - Cafeteria
001-049-40010
148
300
400
900
Deferred Comp
001-049-40011
655
700
700
900
PERS Retirement
001-049-40012
4,116
3,500
3,500
6,100
Medical Insurance
001-049-40014
2,099
2,300
2,300
3,700
Medicare Insurance
001-049-40017
369
500
500
700
Life and Disability
001-049-40018
234
300
300
500
Comptime Buy/Payout
001-049-40026
18
-
-
1,100
Vacation Buy/Payout
001-049-40027
175
-
300
-
TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES
$
35,020
$
34,400
$
34,800
$
59,600
MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS
Equipment/Materials
001-049-40700
$
13,702
$
17,950
$
17,950
$
17,000
Telephone
001-04941000
-
-
400
Electricity
001-049-41020
23,156
13,000
13,000
13,000
Contract Professional
001-049-44000
164,084
214,000
200,000
245,200
TOTAL MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS
$
200,942
$
244,950
$
230,950
$
275,600
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
$
235,962
$
279,350
$
265,750
$
335,200
r -I
LA
REVENUE SUMMARY BY FUND I FY 2014-2015
Account
Gas Tax - 040:
040-000-30420
040-000-30702
040-000-32499
040-000-32500
040-000-32526
040-000-32530
040-000-32535
Total Gas Tax
Measure M - 041:
041-000-30420
Total Measure M
Measure M2 - 042:
042-000-30420
042-000-31500
042-000-33500
Total Measure M2
Interest on Investments $ 1,456 $ 1,000 $ 3,600 $ 3,800
Transfer In 362,702 - - -
Local Fairshare 369,931 370,600 370,600 370,000
$ 734,089 $ 371,600 $ 374,100 $ 373,800
Parking4n-Lieu - 048
048-000-30865 Parking-In-Lieu $ 21,300 $ $ 30,218 $
Total Parking In-Lieu $ 21,300 $ $ 30,218 $
Traffic Impact AB1 600
049-000-30420
Interest on Investments
$
2013-2014
$
2014-2015
Revenue
3,800
2012-2013
Amended
2013-2014
Projected
Source
61,725
Actual
Budget
049- 000 -31500
Estimated
Budget
962,128
-
-
Interest on Investments
$
3,088
$ 1,300
$
3,000
$ 3,500
Reimburse 50150 Project
3,800
-
-
1,950
-
Gas Tax 2103
226,202
368,100
050-000-30131
368,100
271,900
Gas Tax 2106
$
114,358
121,500
$
121,500
124,900
Gas Tax 2106
89,872
85,300
1,100
85,300
102,000
Gas Tax 2107
Total Seal Beach Cable
181,369
180,900
$
180,900
153,600
Gas Tax 2107.5
92,000
6,000
6,000
6,000
6,000
$
620,889
$ 763,100
766,750
$ 661,900
Interest on Investments
$
2,942
$ 2,000
$
-
$ -
$
2,942
$ 2,000
$
"
$
Interest on Investments $ 1,456 $ 1,000 $ 3,600 $ 3,800
Transfer In 362,702 - - -
Local Fairshare 369,931 370,600 370,600 370,000
$ 734,089 $ 371,600 $ 374,100 $ 373,800
Parking4n-Lieu - 048
048-000-30865 Parking-In-Lieu $ 21,300 $ $ 30,218 $
Total Parking In-Lieu $ 21,300 $ $ 30,218 $
Traffic Impact AB1 600
049-000-30420
Interest on Investments
$
422
$
3,500
$
3,800
049-000-30976
Traffic Impact Fees AB1600
18,816
61,725
-
049- 000 -31500
Transfer In
962,128
-
-
Total Measure M2
$
981,366
$
65,225
$
3,800
Seal Beach Cable - SO:
050-000-30131
PEG Fees Publ Access, Edu, Gov
$
114,109
$
00,000 $
90,000
$
90,000
050-000-30420
Interest on Investments
1,759
1,100
1,600
$
2,000
Total Seal Beach Cable
$
115,868
$
91,100 $
91,600
$
92,000
Roberti-Z'Borg Urban Open Space - 070:
070-000-30975 Grant Reimbursement
Total Roberti-Z'Berg Urban Open Space
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) - 072:
072-000-30988 Other Agency Revenue
Total CDBG
23
$ 412 $ $ $
$ 412 $ $ $
$ 179,834 $ 180,000 $ 180,000 $ 1180,000_
$ 179,834 $ 180,000 $ 180,000 $ 180,000
Appendix D:
Eligibility Checklist
OCTA
Responsibility: Cities, County
Eiji OVA W.F Seal Beach
f r x' f,
1 Did you submit your draft Renewed Measure M seven -year Capital Improvement 0
0 ❑
❑
Program (CIP) to OCTA by June 30?
a. Did you utilize the required Web Smart CIP? 0
0 ❑
❑
b- Have you indicated what percentage of funding will come from each source for
e
❑
each of the projects? ❑
c. Have you listed projects in current year dollars? E
E
❑
d- Did you include all projects that are partially, fully, or potentially funded by 0
0 ❑
❑
Measure M?
e. The council approval date to adopt the final 7 -Year CIP is: 23- Jun -14
(Must be prior to July 31) W
MAIN 71
fW. r 11111.lj
2. Did you submit your Maintenance of Effort certification form (Appendix 1) and 0 ❑
supporting budget documentation to OCTA by June 30?
a. Did you use the Maintenance of Effort Reporting Form included in the M2 0 ❑
Eligibility Guidelines?
3. Did you submit a Pavement Management Program (PMP) update to OCTA for this 0 I ❑ ❑
eligibility cycle?
a. Did you use the current PMP Certification form (Appendix F)? 0 ❑ 1 ❑
b. Is the PMP consistent with the OCTA Countywide Pavement Management 0 ❑ ❑
Program?
4. If you answered "no" or "Na" to question 3, did you submit a PMP Update to OCTA ❑ ❑ 2
through the previous eligibility cycle by June 30?
5. Did you submit a resolution demonstrating consistency with the MPAH? ❑ I ❑ 2
6. Have you enclosed a figure representing your most current circulation element? ❑ ❑ 2
7. Do you have a current Local Signal Synchronization Plan that is consistent to the 0 ❑ ❑
Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan?
8. Has your jurisdiction observed the time limits for the use of net revenues over the I 0 ❑
last year per the requirements outlined in the ordinance?
9. Has your jurisdiction insured they have not supplanted developer commitments for 0 I ❑
transportation projects and funding with Measure M funds?
1 of 2
3. Did you submit a Pavement Management Program (PMP) update to OCTA for this 0 I ❑ ❑
eligibility cycle?
a. Did you use the current PMP Certification form (Appendix F)? 0 ❑ 1 ❑
b. Is the PMP consistent with the OCTA Countywide Pavement Management 0 ❑ ❑
Program?
4. If you answered "no" or "Na" to question 3, did you submit a PMP Update to OCTA ❑ ❑ 2
through the previous eligibility cycle by June 30?
5. Did you submit a resolution demonstrating consistency with the MPAH? ❑ I ❑ 2
6. Have you enclosed a figure representing your most current circulation element? ❑ ❑ 2
7. Do you have a current Local Signal Synchronization Plan that is consistent to the 0 ❑ ❑
Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan?
8. Has your jurisdiction observed the time limits for the use of net revenues over the I 0 ❑
last year per the requirements outlined in the ordinance?
9. Has your jurisdiction insured they have not supplanted developer commitments for 0 I ❑
transportation projects and funding with Measure M funds?
1 of 2
Appendix D:
Eligibility Checklist
10. Does your jurisdiction currently have a defined development impact mitigation fee 71 ❑ I El
program in place?
a. If you answered yes to question 10, have you included a copy of your current 1:1 P1 ❑
impact fee schedule; or
b. If you answered yes to question 10, have you provided OCTA with a copy of 0 ❑ El
your mitigation fee nexus study; or
C. If you answered yes to question 10, have you included a copy of your council El
approved policy; or
d. If you answered yes to question 10, have you provided OCTA with a copy of F-1 2 ❑
your council resolution approving the mitigation fee program?
I I • Does your jurisdiction consider as part of its General Plan, land use planning 21 1 F-1
strategies that accommodate transit and non-motorized transportation ?
12. Have you provided a letter identifying land use planning strategies that F-1 El
accommodate transit and non-motorized transportation consideration in the
general plan? :1
13. Did representatives of your jurisdiction participate in the regional traffic forum(s)? ❑
a. If you answered yes, provide date of attendance: 10/16/13, 2/13/14, 5/6/13
Name ri -1)
at
Associate Engineer
Title
2 of 2
Seal Beach
Jurisdiction
)f fi 4
dspitz@sealbeachca.gov
Contact E-mail
June 5, 2014
May Hout
Orange County Transportation Authority
600 South Main Street
Orange, CA 92868
Measure M2 Eligibility for Fiscal Year 201412015
May Hout:
In order to maintain compliance with the requirements for Measure M2 Eligibility, the
City of Seal Beach is required to "Consider, as part of the Eligible Jurisdiction's General
Plan, land use strategies that accommodate transit and non-motorized transportation."
The City's General Plan, first adopted in 1973 and most recently amended in 2003,
incorporates goals and strategies within both its Circulation Element and Land Use
Element that specifically target these areas of importance.
In the City's Land Use Element of the General Plan, A major goal of the City is stated on
page LU-39, with regard to incorporating transportation systems into physical
development: "Seat Beach should carefully consider the development of freeways, and/or
rapid transit systems and endorse such proposals only when it is considered to be in the
community's best interests. Efforts should be made to improve traffic circulation in the
coastal section of the City and along major arterial streets, but not exclusively private
auto vehicular traffic."
Within the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan, on page C-53, within the
Circulation Element, the City outlines its goals and objectives for Public Transportation.
More specifically, the City's main goal is to "Maintain participation in a public transit
system that provides mobility to City residents and employees as a logical alternative to
automobile travel." One policy of this goal is to "Coordinate with OCTA and other
appropriate entities to improve bus service to and within the City."
Another policy is to "Implement and expand, whenever feasible, programs aimed at
enhancing the mobility of senior citizens and disabled persons." A third policy under this
goal is to "require proposed developments to include transit facilities, such as park-and-
ride sites, bus benches, shelters, pads or turnouts, where appropriate, in their
improvement plans or as needed in proximity to their development." Just recently the
City built two new bus stops within its coastal areas including at 1St Street and PCH and
on Main Street, at Electric Avenue. These new stops are designed (one near a major
apartment complex, the other in the center of downtown shopping and retail) to facilitate
additional residents using public transit.
Continuing on Page C-54 of the City's General Plan, the City has laid out goals and
objectives for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities. The main goal is to "Provide a citywide
system of safe, efficient, and attractive bicycle and pedestrian routes for commuter,
school, and recreational use." The City's policies include provisions to: "Develop and
adopt a planned bikeway system that is consistent with the County of Orange Master Plan
of County-wide Bikeways, and other adopted Master Plans, to assure that local bicycle
routes will be compatible with routes of neighboring jurisdictions", "Develop programs
that encourage the safe utilization of easements and/or rights-of-way along flood control
channels, public utilities, railroads, and streets wherever possible for the use of bicycles
and/or pedestrians", and "Ensure accessibility of pedestrian facilities to the elderly and
disabled." Some recent examples of these in Seal Beach include a rehabilitation of our I't
Street Beach Parking lot which is the major "End" node to the San Gabriel River Train, a
multi-use trail that stretches from the mountains to the ocean. Along with the redesign
and construction of the trail's end point, the City participated in a repaving and restriping
of the actual river trail that lies within its city boundaries. Future projects include a new
bike trail on Westminster Avenue.
These are some of the elements within the City's General Plan which show that the City
provides goals and policies to accommodate transit and non-motorized transit. Should
you have any questions or require further information, please contact me at (562) 431-
2527 ext 1331.
City of Seal Beach
Cc Public Works Director, City of Seal Beach
City Engineer, City of Seal Beach
I
E
5
I
J
D
J
Land Use Element
Circulation
Annexation
Seal, Beach should carefully consider the development of
freeways, and/or rapid transit systems and endorse such
proposals only when it is considered to be in the commu-
nity's best interest. Efforts should be made to improve traffic
circulation in the coastal section of the City and along major
arterial streets, but not exclusively private auto vehicular traf-
fic.
In the event annexation issues were to arise in the future, the
City of Seat Beach shall only consider the annexation of un-
incorporated territories, or requests by unincorporated areas
for annexation, when such -action would be beneficial to all
parties involved. Currently, the City has no officially desig-
nated, "sphere of influence' land use areas and there are no
current plans to annex any adjoining unincorporated areas
from the County of Orange or from its neighboring munici-
palities.
Planning Area I - Old Town/Surfside
Downtown Seal Beach/Main Street Specific Plan
City of Seal Beach General Plan
(1W03)
• Encourage a mix of land uses, inqluding4fices, busi-
nesses, and retail stores to serve local residents and visi-
tors.
• Regulate visitor-serving uses so as to not overwhelm the
area at the expense of small town character.
• Prepare building and design provisions to enhance the
pedestrian orientation of Main Street and ensure that the
surrounding area is maintained.
• Encourage architectural and economic diversity.
• Develop standards and processes to ensure compatibility
and balance between residential and commercial uses.
• Establish a parking program to address local resident
and visitor needs to ensure and to minimize potential
traffic safety impacts, pedestrian-vehicle conflicts, and
parking impacts.
LU-39
Appendix F:
, Pavement Management Plan Certification
The City mf certifies that it has a Pavement Management Plan in
conformance with the criteria stated in the Orange County Transportation Authority Ordinance No. 3.This
ordinance requires that a Local Pavement Management Plan be in place and maintained to qualify for allocation
uf revenues generated from Measure K0.
The plan was developed by °using the N1icnzpmver pavement monmgementmymtemr
and contains, at a minimum, the following elements:
°Inventory of MPAH and local routes reviewed and updated biennially. The last update of the inventory was
completed on for Arterial (MPAH) streets and
for local streets.
• Assessment ofpavement condition for all routes in the system, updated biennially. The last field review of
pavement condition was completed ,
• Percentage wf all sections of pavement needing:
Preventive Maintenance . Rehsbi|itotimn Reconmtruction
• Budget needs for preventative maintenance, rehabilitation and/or reconstruction of deficient sections of
pavement for:
Current biennial perod -V1V1r1* "101 .Rdlowingbiennio|period 111 W00-1,
• Funds budgeted or available for Preventative K0a(ntananoe Rehabilitation and/or Reconstruction.
Current biennial period .FoUmwingbiennia|pehod
• Backlog by year of unfunded pavement rehabilitation, neotorat|on, and reconstruction needs.
• The Local Pavement Management Plan ie consistent with countywide pavement condition assessment
standards as described in the OCTA Countywide Pavement Management Program Guidelines adopted
by the OCTA Board nf Directors nn May 24.2O1Ooa amended nn December 1U`2U12.
°An electronic copy ofthe Local Pavement Management Plan with Micro Paver compatible files must be
submitted with the certification statement.
A copy of this certification is being provided to the Orange County Transportation Authority.
Signed
Title
Jurisdiction
Date
LOCAL SIGNAL
SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN
2014 UPDATE
June 30, 2014
Orange County Transportation Authority
ATTN: Anup Kulkarni
Regional Modeling and Traffic Operations
Planning Division
P.O. Box 14184
Orange, CA 92863 -1584
Subject: Local Signal Synchronization Plan Submittal as Part of the Measure M2
Eligibility Process
Dear Mr. Kulkarni:
The City of Seal Beach is pleased to submit its Local Signal Synchronization Plan as part of the
Measure M2 eligibility process. The submittal includes the following components:
A completed "Local Signal Synchronization Plan Consistency Review Checklist" form
establishing consistency between the Local Signal Synchronization Plan and the
Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan.
2. An updated Local Signal Synchronization Plan for Fiscal Years 2014/2015 to 2016/17
including and all required elements as identified in the "Guidelines for the Preparation of
Local Signal Synchronization Plans ".
The City looks forward to continuing the implementation of the beneficial programs and
construction projects required and made possible by Measure M2.
If you have any questions, please call me at (562) 431 -2527 ext. 1331.
Sincerely,
David Spitz, P.E., QSD
Associate Engineer, City of Seal Beach
Enclosures
A. Local Signal Synchronization Plan Consistency Review Checklist
B. Local Signal Synchronization Plan
LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN CONSISTENCY REVIEW CHECKLIST
The Local Agency Name: City of Seal Beach Plan Date: June 30, 2014
Local agencies must submit a copy of the Local Signal Synchronization Plan, a completed
consistency review checklist, and any supporting documentation. Complete the table below.
Complete the table below:
Local Agency Statement
Page(s) in LSSP
Yes - No
1) Signal synchronization goals of the agency are consistent with
those outlined as part of the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization
Master Plan. Include information on how the traffic signal
1 -1
Yes
synchronization street routes and traffic signals may be coordinated
with traffic signals on the street routes in adjoining jurisdictions.
2) Traffic signal synchronization street routes are identified, including
all corridors along the regional signal synchronization network
2 -1
Yes
located within the local agency.
3) Traffic signal inventory for all traffic signal synchronization street
3 -1
Yes
routes.
4) Three -year plan separately showing costs, available funding, and
phasing for capital, operations, and maintenance of signal
synchronization along the traffic signal synchronization street routes
4 -1
Yes
and traffic signals. Include a separate planning level estimate of
completes stem implementation cost.
5) Signal synchronization review, revision, and assessment of
synchronization activities along the traffic signal synchronization
5 -1
Yes
street routes and traffic signals.
I certify that the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge.
Signature
David SDitz, Associate Enaineer. Citv of Seal Beach
Printed Name, Title, & Local Agency
Date
LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN
Local Signal Synchronization Plan (2014 Update) City of Seal Beach
1. TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION GOALS, POLICIES AND
OBJECTIVES
Purpose and Need
The Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program, which comprised of a 750 -mile
regional signal synchronization network with about 2,000 traffic signals throughout
Orange County, is a part of the Measure M2 approved by Orange County voters in
November 2006. The goals of the program are to improve the flow of traffic on Orange
County streets and roads by implementing multi- agency traffic signal synchronization.
The M2 program, which began in 2011, required that each local jurisdiction adopt a
Local Signal Synchronization Plan (LSSP) to be eligible for M2 funding. The City of Seal
Beach has adopted its LSSP in 2010.
Subsequent to the adoption of the 2010 LSSP, the City of Seal Beach is required to
maintain and update the plan for the duration of the Measure M2 program to remain
eligible for funding. By implementing, maintaining, and operating an LSSP in
conformance with the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan, the City of
Seal Beach benefits through a local match reduction of 10 percent of eligible costs as
part of the Regional Capacity Program.
The following components are included in the LSSP:
• Signal synchronization goals
• Traffic signal synchronization street routes
• Traffic signal inventory
• Three -year capital, operations, and maintenance plan
• Signal synchronization timing review, revision, and assessment
Goals and Objectives
Coordination of traffic signals on major arterials results in the reduction of vehicle stops,
delays, queuing, travel times and emissions, and provides for a less congested and
comfortable drive for both local and regional traffic. The City of Seal Beach
acknowledges the Measure M2 Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program goals
and supports a multi- agency corridor -based approach that optimizes traffic signals
based on existing traffic patterns. The City supports local agency responsibility for
signal timing and working with neighboring agencies to develop synchronization timing.
1 -1
Local Signal Synchronization Plan (2014 Update)
City of Seal Beach
2. TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION STREET ROUTES
Traffic signal coordination is currently implemented in various corridors in the City of
Seal Beach. These corridors include all street routes identified in OCTA's Regional
Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan. The Traffic Signal Synchronization Street
Routes in the City of Seal Beach are shown in Figure 1.
The following synchronized corridors are maintained by the City of Seal Beach:
1. Seal Beach Boulevard is classified in the OCTA Master Plan of Arterial
Highways as a Major arterial carrying between 18,000 and 25,000 vehicles daily
south of Westminster Boulevard. North of Westminster Boulevard and in the
vicinity of the SR -22/1 -405 freeway, Seal Beach Boulevard carries between
40,000 to 46,000 vehicles daily. It has a posted speed of 50 mph from Pacific
Coast Highway (SR -1) to the SR -22/1 -405 freeway and 45 mph north of the
freeway interchange to the Northern City Limits.
2. Westminster Boulevard carries approximately 27,000 vehicles daily. The
corridor is classified as a Primary arterial in the OCTA MPAH. The posted speed
is 50 mph between the Western City Limits to Kitts Highway and 60 mph
easterly to the Eastern City Limits.
The City of Seal Beach has an on -call contract with Albert Grover & Associates, Traffic
Engineering consultants, to monitor and maintain the City's traffic signal system.
The following synchronized corridor is maintained by the State of California (Caltrans):
1. Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) is a Primary arterial per the OCTA MPAH. It
carries approximately 45,000 vehicles daily. The posted speed is 40 mph.
2 -1
405 1605
AVE
C3
VP�e
22
405 22
0
m
x
U
Q
W
m
� Q
W
(n
WESTMINSTER BLVD
�v
m
Aqc /F /c c ��Pv
�qS
T
c
HwgY (SR\�J
1
Legend
CITY SYNCHRONIZED ROUTE
Figure 1 CALTRANS SYNCHRONIZED ROUTE N
City of Seal Beach W E
Synchronized Routes
S
A,.BFRT
June 30. 2014
Local Signal Synchronization Plan (2014 Update) City of Seal Beach
3. TRAFFIC SIGNAL INVENTORY
This section provides traffic signal inventory information for the traffic signals along
the Signal Synchronization Street Routes identified in the previous section. The
inventory information include the following:
• Traffic Signal Location
• Cycle Length for the AM, MD, PM and Wknd peak periods
• Traffic Signal Controller Type
• Maintenance Responsibility
The above information is shown in Table 3 -1.
The traffic signal inventory information will form part of the database OCTA is
compiling which will be made available through a web -based viewing tool for use by
local agencies.
3 -1
Local Signal Synchronization Plan (2014 Update)
City of Seal Beach
Table 3 -1: TRAFFIC SIGNAL INVENTORY
City of Seal Beach
Corridor
Cross - street
Intersection
Cycle Length (Sec)
Controller
Type
Maintenance
Responsibility
AM
MD
PM
WKND
Seal Beach Blvd
Bradbury Rd
Rossmoor Center
Way
........... ....
Towne Center Dr
St. Cloud Dr
...
Lampson Ave
1 -405 NB/
Old Ranch Pkwy _
1 -405 SB/
Beverly Manor Rd
Golden Rain
.... . ...... .
St. Andrews Dr
Westminster Blvd
100
100
100
100
110
110
100
Econolite ASC /3
Model 2070
Los Alamitos
Seal Beach
100
100
100
110
100
Model 2070
Seal Beach
100
100
110
100
Model 2070
Seal Beach
_ ..........................
100
100
110
100
Model 2070
Seal Beach
100
100
110
100
Model 170E
Model 170E
Model 2070
Caltrans
120
120
120
120
Caltrans
60
60
60
60
Seal Beach
.
60
60
60
60
Model 2070
............
Seal Beach
120
120
120
120
Model 2070
Seal Beach
................................................. ...............................
Road C
... ...............................
60
60
60
60
Mode12070
Seal Beach
Apollo Dr _........... .
Adolfo Lopez Dr
Heron Pointe/
Forrestal Ln
Bolsa Ave/
Anchor Way
60
60
60
60
Model 2070
Seal Beach
. ...........................
60
60
60
60
Model 2070
Seal Beach
60
60
60
120
60
Free
Model 2070
Model 2070
Seal Beach
Free
Free
Seal Beach
Westminster Blvd
Apollo Dr
Road B
Seal Beach Blvd
Kitts Hwy
60
60
60
60
Model 2070
....................................................
Model 2070
Seal Beach
...............................
Seal Beach
....... ...............................
60
60
60
60
.... ...............................
120
60
120
60
120
60
120
60
Model 2070
Model 2070
................................. �. ...............................
Seal Beach
Seal Beach
Pacific Coast Hwy
(SR -1)
1St St
120
120
120
120
Model 170E
Model 170E
Caltrans
....................... ............................
.tn
5 St ..........................—
Main St /Bolsa Ave
12th St/Balboa Dr
..............................
120
120
120
120
Caltrans
............................
120
120
120
120
Model 170E
Caltrans
120
120
120
120
Model 170E
Caltrans
........................................... ...............................
Seal Beach Blvd
120
120
120
120
Model 170E
Caltrans
City of Seal Beach System:
Central System - QuicNet
Controller Operating Software - 2033 Program on 2070 Controller
Caltrans System:
Model 170E Controller (Local) – C8 Version 4
Field Master Model 170E Controller – TRFM Program
3 -2
Local Signal Synchronization Plan (2014 Update)
City of Seal Beach
4. TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION SYSTEM AND
THREE YEAR PLAN
Implementing, maintaining and updating signal synchronization includes initial and
recurring capital equipment investment and regular signal timing plan updates. This
section contains the three -year budgetary estimates for maintaining the traffic signal
synchronization system for the City of Seal Beach. Two levels of budgetary
estimates for capital, operations and maintenance plan are provided:
Constrained Level — budget estimate based on available funding the local
agency will commit for the signal synchronization efforts. The Constrained
Funding Needs information is summarized in Table 4 -1.
Unconstrained Level — budget estimate based on expenditures required to
fully implement the short -term and long -term synchronization programs. The
Unconstrained Funding Needs information is summarized in Table 4 -2.
For planning purposes, candidate traffic signal synchronization projects at the
Unconstrained Level and planned for the next three years, are also provided in
Table 4 -3. The City of Seal Beach, along with neighboring jurisdictions, plan to
submit these as part of future Project P Calls for Projects.
4 -1
Local Signal Synchronization Plan (2014 Update)
City of Seal Beach
Table 4 -1: THREE YEAR TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION OUTLOOK
Funding Needs for Synchronized Operation (Constrained)
City of Seal Beach
MAINTENANCE PROJECTS
FY14/15
FY15/16
FY16/17
TOTAL
Communication and Software Maintenance
$ 10,000
$ 10,000
$ 10,000
$ 30,000
Subtotal Maintenance Projects:
$ 10,000
$ 10,000
$ 10,000
$ 30,000
CAPITAL PROJECTS
FY14/15
FY15/16
FY16/17
TOTAL
Seal Beach Blvd TMC Improvements
$ 71,000
$ 2,000
$ 2,000
$ 75,000
Subtotal Capital Projects:
$ 71,000
$ 2,000
$ 2,000
$ 75,000
OPERATIONS PROJECTS
FY14/15
FY15/16
FY16/17
TOTAL
Citywide Signal Timing Mon itorin /Maintenance
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$ 15,000
Subtotal Operations Projects:
$ 5,000
$ 5,000
$ 5,000
$ 15,000
Total Funding Needs (Constrained):
FY14/15
FY15/16
FY16/17
TOTAL
$ 86,000
$ 17,000
1 $ 17,000
$ 120,000
Note: Type of Traffic Signal Synchronization Expenditures in Year of Expenditure Dollars
HVI
Local Signal Synchronization Plan (2014 Update)
City of Seal Beach
Table 4 -2: THREE YEAR TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION OUTLOOK
Funding Needs for Synchronized Operation (Unconstrained)
City of Seal Beach
MAINTENANCE PROJECTS
FY14/15
FY15/16
FY16/17
TOTAL
Communication and Software Maintenance
$ 20,000
$ 20,000
$ 20,000
$ 60,000
Subtotal Maintenance Projects:
1 $ 20,000
$ 20,000
1 $ 20,000
1 $ 60,000
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
FY14/15
FY15/16
FY16/17
TOTAL
Citywide Signal Synchronization
$ 20,000
$ 20,000
$ 20,000
$ 60,000
Seal Beach Blvd TMC Improvements
$ 700,000
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
$ 800,000
Lampson Ave Fiber Communications
$ 400,000
$ 400,000
Lampson Ave Controller Upgrades)
$ 60,000
$ 60,000
Lampson Ave CCTV Camera Installation
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
Subtotal Construction Projects:
$ 720,000
$ 70,000
$ 580,000
$ 1,370,000
OPERATIONS PROJECTS
FY14/15
FY15/16
FY16/17
TOTAL
Citywide Signal Timing Monitoring/Maintenance
$ 20,000
$ 20,000
$ 20,000
$ 60,000
Citywide Signal Timing Review
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
Lampson Ave Signal Timing
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
Subtotal Operations Projects:
$ 20,000
$ 70,000
$ 70,000
$ 160,000
Total Funding Needs (Unconstrained):
FY14/15
FY15/16
FY16/17
TOTAL
$ 760,000
$ 160,000
$ 670,000
$ 1,590,000
Note: Type of Traffic Signal Synchronization Expenditures in Year of Expenditure Dollars
4 -3
Local Signal Synchronization Plan (2014 Update)
City of Seal Beach
Table 4 -3: LSSP IMPLEMENTATION
Candidate Signal Synchronization Projects
City of Seal Beach
CORRIDOR
IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY
ESTIMATED COST
Seal Beach Boulevard
Signal Synchronization & TMC Improvements
(2018 -2019)
$ 1,050,000.00
Total Estimated Cost:
$ 1,050,000.00
I,
Local Signal Synchronization Plan (2014 Update)
City of Seal Beach
5. TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION ASSESSMENT
The City of Seal Beach periodically conducts corridor -wide projects to both update
signal timing and upgrade obsolete traffic signal infrastructure.
The City is currently participating in the Seal Beach Boulevard Regional Traffic Signal
Synchronization Program (RTSSP), a Project P funded multijurisdictional traffic signal
coordination project. It will involve the construction and installation of new and /or
upgraded traffic signal control and communication hardware and software; construction
and construction management; system integration; development, implementation, and
fine - tuning of coordination timing plans; providing ongoing monitoring and maintenance
of timing and communication. A consultant was hired in Spring 2014. Before /After
studies are expected in 2014/2015.
The City is also a participant in the West County Connectors Project, a joint partnership
between OCTA and Caltrans. The project links High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV)
lanes /carpool lanes on the 1 -405, 1 -605 and SR -22 freeways. Currently in the
construction stage, the City of Seal Beach developed and implemented project
detour /timing on Seal Beach Boulevard and Westminster Boulevard. Albert Grover &
Associates, the City's On -Call Traffic Engineering consultants, monitors and maintains
the City's traffic signal system.
The City of Seal Beach, via its traffic engineering consultants and maintenance
contractors, pro - actively monitors traffic operations along traffic signal synchronization
routes. The provision of Measure M2 funds, both for periodic signal timing updates and
traffic signal system infrastructure upgrades, are critical for successful traffic signal
synchronization. The City's Corridor Operational Performance is presented in Figure 5.
5 -1
ry
w
CO
Z_
H
CO
w
v 4,
z 4 O
a
g
ti
HOV38 lV3S
O`
y ,
U
w
co
w
4
>
' \ r
a
p
Oil \ J cc
Vt
O) \ Q
z
Q
W
m \
Z `\
O
J
N
Q `
W
U)
CO
z
o
\
N
}
m
W
HOV38 lV3S
O`
y ,
U
w
co
w
4
>
' \ r
a
p
Oil \ J cc
Vt
O) \ Q
z
Q
W
m \
Z `\
O
J
�tl
N
WVHV2iJ U
w
c
N
}
m
m
O
Z
O
O
a
0
C�
N
z
(O
VanGvsloe
z
CL
II
X
�tl
G�
O
N
O
W
N
P
\F1G GO
m`
PPG
�
E
r
a
O
0
E
`o
G�
O
N
O
W
N
(6
O
O
O
0
N
(O
I-
W
CL
X
J
N
Oo
0
U
COO
T
O
I
I
O E
!
O
o
'O
O
>
>
_
_
_
U n
F-
H
H
°
n