The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC Res 5455 2006-04-24 RESOLUTION NUMBER 5455 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF SEAL BEACH ADOPTING MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 06-1, 400 MARINA DRIVE PROJECT, AND INSTRUCTING STAFF TO FILE APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION WITH THE COUNTY OF ORANGE WHEREAS, on November 21,2005 Schwendener Corporation submitted requests for a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and Tentative Parcel Map with the Department of Development Services; and I WHEREAS, The proposed project seeks approval of the following actions, as requested by Schwendener Corporation: [J Amend the Land Use and Housing Elements of General Plan to designate a 13,667 square foot, 0.31.acre, property from Commercial General to Residential High Density; [J Change the zoning designation on this parcel from General Commercial (C-2) to Residential High Density (RHD), District I to be consistent with the General Plan revision; [J Approve Tentative Parcel Map 2005-257 to create 4 parcels on the approximately 0.31 acres, with a minimum parcel size of 2,937.5 square feet; and WHEREAS, the City has prepared "Proposed Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 06-1, General Plan Amendment 06-1, Zone Change 06-1 and Tentative Parcel Map 2005-257 - 400 Marina Drive Project" (SCH # 2006021131) as required by the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and WHEREAS, the comment period on Mitigated Negative Declaration 06-1 ended on March 27, 2006. The City received 6 responses to the Mitigated Negative Declaration. The City had received comments on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration from: [J Orange County Fire Authority; [J California Coastal Commission; [J Califomia Department of Transportation, District 12; [J Southem California Association of Governments; [J Pat Keams; and [J City of Seal Beach Environmental Quality Control Board Minutes of March 15, 2006; and I WHEREAS, the City prepared a "Response to Comments" document dated March 28, 2006, that includes written responses to all of the above-received comments on the subject Initial StudylMitigated Negative Declaration and determining that all issues raised during the public comment period have be,en evaluated and no significant impacts have been raised. A copy of that document was provided for the information ofthe City Council; and '" \ . > \ WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on April 5, 2006 to consider, Mitigated Negative Declaration 06-1 and the requested General Plan Amendment 06-1, Zorie Change 06~1 and Tentative Parcel Map 2005-257; and . ! WHEREAS, the Planning.Cl?mmission received into evidence the Staff Report of April 5, 2006, along with all attachments thereto, and considered all public testimony presented; and I WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determined to recommend to the City Council the adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration 06-1 through the adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. 06-17; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered the adoption of the subject Mitigated Negative Declaration 06-1, 400 Marina Drive Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Responses to Comments documents, along with a Staff Report . '- Resolution Number 5455 on April 24, 2006 at a noticed public hearing and received additional public comments; and WHEREAS, the City has addressed each of these concerns within the Initial StudylNegative Declaration document. Moreover, although CEQA does not require responses to comments made concerning a negative declaration, the City responded in writing to comments received, in the "Responses to Comments for Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 06-1, 400 Marina Drive Project" document dated March 28, 2006. I NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby: I. Finds that there is substantial evidence in the record that the project may have a significant effect on the environment, but mitigation measures imposed herein would avoid or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effect would occur and there is no substantial evidence in the record that any significant effect would remain after mitigation. 2. Finds that there has been no evidence presented that Mitigated Negative Declaration 06-1 has been "substantially revised" so as to require recirculation under the California Environmental Quality Act. 3. Adopts Mitigated Negative Declaration 06-1 - 400 Marina Drive Project. 4. Approves and adopts as conditions of approval the Mitigation Measures set forth in "Exhibit A" of this resolution for Mitigated Negative Declaration 06-1, the 400 Marina Drive Project. 5. Determines that approval of this project involves no potential for adverse effects, either individually or cumulatively, on wildlife resources and will not have an adverse impact on fish and wildlife, since there are no identified wildlife resources on or adjacent to the site. I 6. Finds that the foregoing findings are based on substantial evidence in the record, including without limitation, the draft Mitigated Negative Declaration 06-1, staff reports and both oral and written testimony. The documents that comprise the record of the proceedings are on file with the Department of Development Services, 211 Eighth Street, Seal Beach. The custodian of said records is the Director of Development Services. 7. Instructs the Director of Development Services to file appropriate documentation with the County of Orange. I PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Seal Beach at a meeting thereof held on the 24th day of Aoril ,2006, by the following vote: AYES: councilmembers~ilY.) ~J/JLJn~ ~ ')/f:J/1~ , , J /~ Councilmembers ~ ;;;;: Councilmembers NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Councilmembers ~4..B- Charles Antos Mayor Resolution Number 5455 ATTEST: ~.A J1~~ Li da Devme City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS CITY OF SEAL BEACH ) I I, Linda Devine, City Clerk of Seal Beach, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is the original copy of Resolution Number 5455 on file in the office of the City Clerk, passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Seal Beach, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 24th day of Aoril , 2006 ~~ City Clerk I I ~:""'~''''''""" -. .l ..' I ...... ,/~:)'~~' '.~''''1'' : ,,\. . ~ '" ..... :. I" .', ~ .z"_.. \ . . r; ~ " ; '\ i, ' , ,. ..-:!~:;!'." ...........r ..... ;. ~ "'~J'. " , '. .. - t ." .. ..... t/ ' .... ..- ", ". ' . \.. " ........ ' "'11. . .;.r ".......,.. .J-"'~'" I I I Resolution Number 5455 "EXHIBIT A" MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 06-1: 400 MARINA DRIVE PROJECT ADOPTED MITIGATION MONITORING and REPORTING PROGRAM, dated April 24, 2006 Mitigation Measure (MM) CULTURAL RESOURCES CUL-1 An archaeologist and a Native American Monitor appointed by the City of Seal Beach shall be present during earth removal or disturbance activities related to rough grading and other excavation for foundations and utilities. If any earth removal or disturbance activities result in the discovery of cultural resources, the Project proponent's contractors shall cease all earth removal or disturbance activities in the vicinity and immediately notify the City selected archaeologist andlor Native American Monitor, who shall immediately notify the Director of Development Services. The City selected archaeologist shall evaluate all potential cultural findings in accordance with standard practice, the requirements of the City of Seal Beach Archaeological and Historical Element, and other applicable regulations. Consultation with the Native American Monitor, the Native American Heritage Commission and data/artifact recovery, if deemed appropriate, shall be conducted. Timing Prior to issuance of a grading permit Responsible Party for Date Implementation Completed Comments Director of Development Services Mitigation Measure (MM) CUL-2 If evidence of subsurface paleontologic resources is found during construction, excavation and other construction activity in that area shall cease and the contractor shall contact the City Development Services Department. With direction from the City Development Services Department, an Orange County Certified Paleontologist shall prepare and complete a standard Paleontologic Resource Mitigation Program. CUL-3 Should any human bone be encountered during any earth removal or disturbance activities, all activity shall cease immediately and the City selected archaeologist and Native American monitor shall be immediately contacted, who shall then immediately notify the Director of Development Services. The Director of Development Services shall contact the Coroner pursuant to Sections 5097.98 and 5097.99 of the Public Resources Code relative to Native American remains. Should the Coroner determine the human remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission shall be contacted pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. Timing During grading During grading Resolution Number 5455 Responsible Party for Date Implementation Completed Comments Director of Development Services I Director of Development Services I I I I I Resolution Number 5455 Mitigation Measure (MM) CUL-4 If more than one Native American burial is encountered during any earth removal or disturbance activities, a "Mitigation Plan" shall be prepared and subject to approval by the City of Seal Beach Community Development Department and the California Coastal Commission. The Mitigation Plan shall include the following procedures: Continued Native American Monitorina . All ground disturbance in any portions of the project area with the potential to contain human remains or other cultural material shall be monitored by a Native American representative of the MLD. Activities to be monitored shall include all construction grading, controlled grading, and hand excavation of previously undisturbed deposit, with the exception of contexts that are clearly within undisturbed soil profiles. · Exposure and removal of each burial shall be monitored by a Native American. Where burials are clustered and immediately adjacent, one monitor is sufficient for excavation of two adjoining burials. · Excavation of test units shall be monitored. Simultaneous excavation of two test units if less than 20 feet apart may be monitored by a single Native American. Timing During grading Responsible Party for Date Implementation Completed Comments Director of Development Services I Mitigation Measure (MM) CUL-4 (Continued) . If screening of soil associated with burials or test units is done concurrently with and adjacent to the burial or test unit, the Native American responsible for that burial or test unit will also monitor the screening. If the screening is done at another location, a separate monitor shall be required. . All mechanical excavation conducted in deposits that may contain human remains (i.e., all areas not completely within undisturbed soil profiles) shall be monitored by a Native American. Notification Procedures for New Discoveries . When possible burials are identified during monitoring of mechanical excavation, or excavation of test units, the excavation shall be temporarily halted while the find is assessed in consultation with the lead field archaeologist. If the find is made during mechanical excavation, the archaeologist or Native American monitoring the activity shall have the authority to direct the equipment operator to stop while the find is assessed. If it is determined that the find does not constitute a burial, the mechanical excavation shall continue. Timing Resolution Number 5455 Responsible Party for Date Implementation Completed Comments I I I I I I Resolution Number 5455 Mitigation Measure (MM) CUL-4 (Continued) Notification Procedures for New Discoveries (Continued) . If the find is determined to be a human burial, the lead archaeologist shall immediately notify the Site Supervisor for the developer, as well as the Principal Investigator. The Principal Investigator shall immediately notify the MLD and the Director of Development Services for the City of Seal Beach. The City shall provide the Coastal Commission with weekly updates describing any such finds in writing. Identification of Additional Burials . For all discovered human burials, attempts shall continue to be made to locate additional burials nearby through hand excavation techniques. This shall be done through the excavation of 1 x 1 m exploratory test units (ETUs) placed along transects extending radially from each identified burial or burial cluster. The spacing of the ETUs shall be determined upon consultation with the Project Archaeologist and the MLD. The radial transects shall be designed to test areas within 50 feet (15 m) from the edge of each burial or burial cluster. Excavation of these units shall be limited to areas containing intact cultural deposit (Le., areas that have not been graded to the underlying undisturbed soil profiles) and shall be excavated until the undisturbed soil profiles are encountered, or to the excavation depth required for the approved grading plan. The soil from the ETUs along the radial transects shall be screened only if human remains are found in that unit. Timing Responsible Party for Date Implementation Completed Comments Mitigation Measure (MM) CULTURAL RESOURCES (Continued) CUL-4 (Continued) Identification of Additional Burials (Continued) . Controlled grading shall be conducted within these 50-foot heightened investigation areas with a wheeled motor grader. The motor grader shall use an angled blade that excavates 1 to 2 inches at a pass, pushing the soil to the side to form a low windrow. Monitors shall follow about 20 feet behind the motor grader, examining the ground for evidence of burials. . When a burial is identified during controlled grading, the soil in windrows that may contain fragments of bone from that burial shall be screened. At a minimum this shall include the soil in the windrow within 50 feet of the burial in the direction of the grading. . If additional burials are found during controlled grading, additional ETUs will be hand excavated in the radial patterns described above. Timing Resolution Number 5455 Responsible Party for Date Implementation Completed Comments I I I I I I Resolution Number 5455 Mitigation Measure (MM) CUL-4 (Continued) Burial Removal and Storace . Consultation with the MLD shall occur regarding the treatment of discovered human burials. If the MLD determines it is appropriate to have discovered human remains pedestaled for removal, that activity shall be conducted in a method agreed to by the MLD. . After pedestaling or other agreed upon burial removal program is completed, the top of a burial shall be covered with paper towels to act as a cushion, and then a heavy ply plastic will be placed over the top to retain surface moisture. Duct tape shall be wrapped around the entire pedestal, securing the plastic bag and supporting the pedestal. Labels shall be placed on the plastic indicating the burial number and the direction of true north in relation to the individual burial. Sections of rebar shall be hammered across the bottom of the pedestal and parallel to the ground. When a number of parallel rebar sections have been placed this way, they shall be lifted simultaneously, cracking the pedestal loose from the ground. The pedestal shall then be pushed onto a thick plywood board and lifted onto a pallet. A forklift shall carry the pallet to a secure storage area or secure storage containers located on the subject property. Timing Responsible Party for Date Implementation Completed Comments Mitigation Measure (MM) CUL 4 (Continued) Burial Removal and Storace (Continued) . If another agreed upon burial removal program is utilized, that method shall be carried out in a manner agreed upon after consultation with the MLD and concurrence by the California Coastal Commission. Studv of Burial Remains . If the burials are removed in pedestal and are incompletely exposed, osteological studies are necessarily limited to determination (if possible) of age, sex, position, orientation, and trauma or pathology. After consultation, and only upon written agreement by the MLD, additional studies that are destructive to the remains may be undertaken, including radiocarbon dating of bone or DNA studies. If the MLD determines that only non- destructive additional studies may be allowed, one shell may be removed from each burial and submitted for radiocarbon dating. The assumption here is that the shell would have been part of the fill for the burial pit, and therefore would provide a maximum age for the burial. Timing Resolution Number 5455 Responsible Party for Date Implementation Completed Comments I I I I I I Resolution Number 5455 Mitigation Measure (MM) CUL-4 (Continued) Studv of Burial (Continued) Remains . The MLD may indicate a willingness to consider some additional exposure and study of the skeletal material removed from the sites. Such study would not involve removal of the remains from the project area, but rather would be undertaken near the storage area. To the extent allowed by the MLD, the bones would be further exposed within the existing pedestals or other medium containing the human remains and additional measurements taken. Consultation with the MLD regarding the feasibility of these additional studies prior to reburial would occur. Reoatriation of Burials and Associated Artifacts . Once all portions of the project area have been graded to the underlying culturally sterile marine terrace deposits, or to the excavation depth required for the approved grading plan, the repatriation process shall be initiated for all recovered human remains and associated artifacts. Once a reburial site has been identified and prepared, the remains and associated artifacts shall be transported from the secure storage area to the site for reburial. Appropriate ceremony will be undertaken during this process at the discretion of the MLD. Timing Responsible Party for Date Implementation Completed Comments Mitigation Measure (MM) CUL 4 (Continued) Additional Studies . Considerable additional data relating to regional research issues may be uncovered if substantial numbers of human burials and other archaeological features are encountered during the construction monitoring for the development. If this occurs, additional analysis shall be conducted. The analysis shall be designed to more completely address the research issues discussed in the approved "Research Design: and to provide additional mitigation of impacts to the sites in light of the new finds. The following studies would be potentially applicable: o Radiocarbon Dating. In considering the implications of the burials in interpreting site use and regional settlement, it is critical to assess the time range represented by the interments. Do they correspond to the full temporal range of site use, or only a limited timeframe? Although direct dating of the bones may not be possible due to the destructive nature of the radiocarbon technique, the MLD may approve the removal of a single shell from the interior of each burial for dating. Although this shall not provide a direct date of the burial, assuming the shell was part of the burial fill it should provide a maximum age (that is, the burial should not be older than the shell). In addition, an equivalent number of additional samples from non- burial contexts would also be taken for comparative purposes. These data would provide a more secure measure of the intensity of occupation during different periods. Timing Resolution Number 5455 Responsible Party for Date Implementation Completed Comments I I I Resolution Number 5455 Mitigation Measure (MM) CULTURAL RESOURCES (Continued) CUL-4 (Continued) Additional Studies (Continued) I o Sediment Cores. Dating results obtained to date on the Hellman Ranch/John Laing Homes properties may suggest a possible link between the use of the sites within the project area and the productivity of the adjacent lagoon and estuary systems. To assess this link using independent environmental data on the subject property, two sediment cores will be taken from suitable locations of the property. Sediments in the cores shall be examined and described in the field by a geologist, and samples collected for dating and pollen analysis. These data shall then be used to help reconstruct the habitats present on the property during the periods the sites were occupied. This analysis shall be included in the final report documenting the testing, data recovery, and construction monitoring phases of this investigation. I o Comparative Studies. The substantial assemblage of artifacts recovered during the monitoring on the Hellman Ranch/John Laing Homes properties provides a basis for comparison with other sites and shall contribute to an understanding of regional patterns. This analysis shall be included in the final report (see below). I Responsible Party for Date Timing Implementation Completed Comments Mitigation Measure (MM) CULTURAL RESOURCES (Continued) CUL 4 (Continued) Additional Studies (Continued) o Animal Interments. Animal interments may be discovered within the project area. Because these are not human remains, somewhat more intensive study is possible. Because these features are uncommon and represent very culture-specific religious practices, they are useful in reconstructing cultural areas during certain times in prehistory. Analysis of animal interments will include: (1) exposure to determine burial position; (2) photo documentation; (3) examination of skeleton for age/sex; traumatic injury, pathology, butchering, or other cultural modification; (4) radiocarbon dating; and (5) examination of grave dirt for evidence of grave goods or stomach contents. Curation . Cultural materials recovered from the cultural resources monitoring and mitigation program for the development shall be curated either at an appropriate facility in Orange County, or, in consultation with the City, at the San Diego Archaeological Center. Timing Resolution Number 5455 Responsible Party for Date Implementation Completed Comments I I I I I I Resolution Number 5455 Mitigation Measure (MM) CUL 4 (Continued) Preoaration of Final Reoort . The final technical report shall be prepared and submitted to the City and the Califomia Coastal Commission within 12 months .of the completion of the archeological field work. The report shall conform to the guidelines developed by the California Office of Historic Preservation for Archaeological Resource Management Reports (ARMR). It will be prepared in sufficient quantity to distribute to interested regional researchers and Native American groups. It shall thoroughly document and synthesize all of the findings from all phases of the cultural resources program. Funding shall be provided by the landowner. Timing Responsible Party for Date Implementation Completed Comments Mitigation Measure (MM) GEO-1 Engineering design for all structures shall be based on the probability that the Project area will be subjected to strong ground motion during the lifetime of development. Construction plans shall be subject to the City of Seal Beach Municipal Code and shall include applicable standards, which address seismic design parameters. GEO-2 Mitigation of earthquake ground shaking shall be incorporated into design and construction in accordance with Uniform Building Code requirements and site specific design. The Newport-Inglewood fault shall be considered the seismic source for the Project site and specified design parameters shall be used. GEO-3 The potential damaging effects of regional earthquake activity shall be considered in the design of each structure. The preliminary seismic evaluation shall be based on basic data including the Uniform Building Code Seismic Parameters and the geo-technical site-specific report prepared for the Project. Structural design criteria shall be determined in the consideration of building types, occupancy category, seismic importance factors, and possibly other factors. GEO-4 Conformance with the latest Uniform Building Code and City Ordinances can be expected to satisfactorily mitigate the effect of seismic ground shaking. Conformance with applicable codes and ordinances shall occur in conjunction with the issuance of building permits in order to insure that over excavation of soft, broken rock and clayey soils within sheared zones will be required where development is planned. Timing Prior to issuance of a building permit Prior to issuance of a building permit Prior to issuance of a building permit Prior to issuance of a building permit Resolution Number 5455 Responsible Party for Date Implementation Completed Comments Building Official I Building Official Building Official I Building Official I I I I Resolution Number 5455 Mitigation Measure (MM) GEOLOGY AND SOILS GEO-5 The project proponent shall incorporate measures to mitigate expansive soil conditions, compressible/collapsible soil conditions and liquefaction soil conditions, and impacts from trenching, which measures would be identified in site-specific reports prepared by the project's geotechnical consultant. Recommendations shall be based on surface and subsurface mapping, laboratory testing, and analysis. The geotechnical consultant's site specific reports shall be approved by a certified engineering geologist and a registered civil engineer, and shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Project applicant shall reimburse City costs of independent third-party review of said geotechnical report. GEO-6 Loose and soft alluvial soils, expansive clay soils, and all existing uncertified fill materials shall be removed and replaced with compacted fill during site grading in order to prevent seismic settlement, soil expansion, and differential compaction. GEO-? All surfaces to receive compacted fill shall be cleared of existing vegetation, debris, and other unsuitable materials which should be removed from the site. Soils that are disturbed during site clearing shall be removed and replaced as controlled compacted fill under the direction of the Soils Engineer. Timing Prior to issuance of a grading permit During grading During grading Responsible Party for Date Implementation Completed Comments City Engineer Building Inspector Building Inspector Mitigation Measure (MM) GEOLOGY AND SOilS GEO-8 All grading procedures, including soil excavation and compaction, the placement of backfill, and temporary excavation shall comply with City of Seal Beach Standards. GEO-9 Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained weed- free and planted with interim landscaping within ninety (90) days of completion of grading, unless building permits are obtained. Planting with interim landscaping shall comply with NPDES Best Management Practices. GEO-10 As soon as possible following the completion of grading activities, exposed soils shall be seeded or vegetated with a seed mix and/or native vegetation to ensure soil stabilization. GEO-11 Precise grading plans shall include an Erosion, Siltation, and Dust Control Plan. The Plan's provisions may include sand bagging, soil compaction, revegetation, temporary irrigation, scheduling and time limits on grading activities, and construction equipment restrictions on-site. This plan shall also demonstrate compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403, which regulates fugitive dust control. Timing During grading Upon completion of grading Upon completion of grading Prior to issuance of grading permit Resolution Number 5455 Responsible Party for Date Implementation Completed Comments Public Works and Building Inspectors I Public Works and Building Inspectors Public Works and Building Inspectors Public Works Director and Building Official I I I I I Resolution Number 5455 Mitigation Measure (MM) HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HAZ-1 The Project proponent shall provide to the Director of Development Services documentation from the Orange County Airport Land Use Commission as to the compliance of the proposed project with the "Airport Environs Land Use Plan for Joint Forces Training Base Los Alamitos". Issuance of building permits shall not occur until said compliance notification is received by the Director of Development Services. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY HYD-1 Prior to the issuance of the first grading or building permit, a comprehensive Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer or a registered professional hydrologist to protect water resources from impacts due to urban contaminants in surface water runoff. The WQMP shall be prepared in coordination with the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Orange County, the City of Seal Beach, and the California Coastal Commission to insure compliance with applicable National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements. The WQMP shall include a combination of structural and non-structural Best Management Practices (BMPs) as outlined in the Countywide NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. Project applicant shall reimburse City costs of independent third- party review of said Water Quality Management Plan. Timing Prior to issuance of building permits Prior to issuance of grading or building permit Responsible Party for Date Implementation Completed Comments Director of Development Services Director of Public Works and Building Official Mitigation Measure (MM) HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY HYD2 The amount of sediment movement during construction will be minimized by the use of NPDES BMP's, including, but not limited to, sandbags, silt fences, straw bales and rock check dams. The construction and condition of the BMP's will be periodically inspected during construction and repairs will be made, when necessary, as required by the NPDES. HYD3 The project is required to meet Stormwater Management regulations of the City of Seal Beach as set forth in Chapter 9.20, Storm Water Management Program. A copy of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) if required, and a Monitoring Plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer a minimum of thirty (30) days prior to commencing grading operations for approval. A Grading Permit shall not be issued by the Building Department or Public Works Department until the SWPPP has been approved by the City Engineer. The SWPPP shall emphasize structural and non-structural Best Management Practices (BMPs) in compliance with NPDES Program requirements. Specific measures shall include: OAII loose piles of soil, silt, clay, sand, debris, or other earthen materials shall be protected in a reasonable manner to eliminate any discharge to waters of the State. ODuring construction, temporary gravel or sandbag containment walls shall be used as necessary to prevent discharge of earthen materials from the site during periods of precipitation or runoff. Timing During construction Prior to issuance of grading permit Resolution Number 5455 Responsible Party for Date Implementation Completed Comments Public Works and Building Inspectors I City Engineer I I I I I Resolution Number 5455 Mitigation Measure (MM) NOISE N-1 Prior to commencement of construction activities, notice shall be provided to surrounding residents within a 500-foot distance of the project site, regarding anticipated construction activity dates and times when substantial noise is anticipated to occur. Prior to distribution, the notice shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Development Services. N-2 To reduce construction- related noise impacts, construction shall be limited to periods of reduced noise sensitivity and thus reduce sleep disturbance and other noise nuisance potential. Pursuant to the City's Noise Ordinance, the construction contractor shall ensure that general construction activities (which includes construction vehicle staging and idling engines) be conducted only between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on Saturday, and do not take place at any time on Sunday or local, State, or Federal holidays. '. Timing Prior to commenceme nt of construction During construction Responsible Party for Date Implementation Completed Comments Director of Development Services Building Inspector Mitigation Measure (MM) NOISE (Continued) N-3 Prior to Building/Grading Permit issuance, the Building/Grading Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department to ensure compliance with the following: !:lAII construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers, to the satisfaction of the Building Official; !:lOuring construction, stationary construction equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive noise receptors, to the satisfaction of the Building Official; and !:lOuring construction and to the satisfaction of the Building Official, stockpiling and vehicle staging areas shall be located as far as practical from noise sensitive receptors. N-4 All construction-related noises will cease upon completion of the project. Timing Prior to issuance of grading or building permit Upon project completion * * * * Resolution Number 5455 Responsible Party for Date Implementation Completed Comments Building Official I Building Official I I