HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Res 5125 2003-04-14
RESOLUTION NUMBER~02r
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH ADOPTING
NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO, 03-1,
RELATING TO GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT 03-1, ZONE CHANGE 03-1
AND ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT 03-1, IN THE
CITY OF SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA (SEAL
BEACH BOULEVARD BETWEEN ELECTRIC
AVENUE TO 125 FEET NORTH OF LANDING
AVENUE)
I
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE:
Section l. On July 8, 2002 the City Council authorized initiation of
General Plan and Zone Change studies to consider alternative land uses for the existing
L-C zoned areas on Seal Beach Boulevard, The Planning Deparl1nent held "Pubhc
Information Meetings" to discuss the direction of the City Council, the history of zoning
of the area, and issues for discussion on July 31 and November 20,2002.
Section 2, Pursuant to 14 Calif. Code of Regs. ~ l5025(a) and ~~ Il.C
and III of the City's Local CEQA GUidelines, staff prepared an Initial Study and a
Negative Declaration, which was circulated for public review and comment from August
February 14,2003 to March 17,2003, in compliance with the provisions of the California
Enviromnental Quality Act and the City's Local CEQA Guidelines, The Negative
Declaration was reviewed by the Planning Commission at a public hearing held on March
5, 2003 in relation to the subject land use proposals. The Negative Declaration was
reviewed by the City Council at a public hearing held on April 14, 2003 in relation to the
subject land use proposals,
I
Section 3. A duly noticed public hearing was held before the Planmng
CommIssion on March 5, 2003 to consider the subject land use applications, At tile
public hearing, the Plal11ling Commission invited and considered any and all testimony
offered in favor or oppOSItion to said land use applicattons.
Section 4, A duly nottced public heming was held before the City
Council on Apnl 14, 2003 to conSIder the subject land use applicattons. At the pubhc
hearing, the City Council invited and considered any and all testimony offered in favor or
oppOSItion to said revIsed apphcations.
Section 5, The record of the hearings before the Planning Commission
and City Counctl indIcates the following:
(a) The City of Seal Beach seeks to consider altemative land uses for
the existing L-C zoned areas on Seal Beach Boulevard.
I
(b) On July 8, 2002 the City Council authorized initiation of General
Plan and Zone Change studies to consider alternative land uses for the existing L-C zoned
areas on Seal Beach Boulevard.
(c) The Plamllng Department held "Public lnfonnation Meetings" to
discuss the direction of the City Council, the history of zoning of the area, and issues for
discussion on July 31 and November 20, 2002,
I
I
I
Resolution Number ~~~
(d) Based on the input from the "Public Information Meetings",
Planning Department staff prepared the appropriate Initial StudyINegative Declaration
for review and comments in accordance With the provisions of tile Cahforma
Envimnmental Quality Act.
(e) A mixture of single family and multi-family residential uses in the
ReSidential Medium and Residential High Density (RMD and RHD) zones abuts the
subject area to the west and south. Directly across Seal Beach Boulevard, to the east, is
the main ship loading facilities for the Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station, in the Public
Land Use/Recreation (PLU/R) Zone. North of the subject area along Seal Beach
Boulevard are new single-family residences in the RMD zone, This residential
development was previously zoned C-2,
(f) The City has previously approved reVISIOns to the Land Use
Element and a zone change regarding the "Shore Shop" properties located north of
Landing Avenue aJong Seal Beach Boulevard. The City adopted "Negative Declaration
98-3 - AnalIeim Bay Villas - General Plan Land Use Element Amendment and Zone
Change from General Commercial Land Use Element designation and C-2 Zone to
Residential Medium Density Land Use Element desi!,'llation and Residential Medium
DenSity (RMD) Zoning designation", This Negative Declaration evaluated potentIal
impacts for a General Plan Land Use Element Amendment and Zone Change to allow for
the construction of 9 residences immediately to the north of the 3 properties currently
located in the C-2 zone north of Landing Avenue, The accompanying zone change
request was approved by the City, the California Coastal Commission, and 8 of the 9
pennitted homes have been constructed.
(g) The proposed residential development standards would permit a
density of 17.4 units per acre, or I unit for each 25-foot wide lot Within the project area,
Many of the properties are cUITently developed with existmg legal, non-conforming
multiple-family, ~siP_~tial properties, and it is not anticipated that these developments
would be renio:ved..fo~the replacement with single-family residcnces, due to the
economic.[acl'oh irivd.I'{;'ep~With high rental rates in this area of the City.
. -i\~\
(hL...hr aJ!!.of the existing legal non-confonning multiple-family
residential unit developments;(50 units) were to demolished and replaced with allowable
new single family units only/approximately 27 umts), the area would experience a net
loss of 23 units, resulting'in a net population loss to this area of the commumty, and a
maximum potentiallos.!! of6,16% of the total number of housing units within tlle City,
(I) Staff has prepared an Initial .Study and proposed Negative
Declaration as required by the California Environmental Quality Act. Staff has received
three comment letters, with the County of Orange indicatIng "The City may wish to zone
thiS strip "recreatIon/open space" to accommodate the bikeway and associated
landscaping." The area being discussed in the County letter is the "existing or proposed
Class I (paved off-road) bikeway along the west side of Seal Beach Boulevard within the
project site," The Class I bikeway is along the east side of Seal Beach Boulevard and is
located on public right-of-way, and public rights-of-ways are not placed into zoning
categories, The other commenting agencies, the Southern California Association of
Governments and the Governor's Office of Planning and Research, expressed no concern
with the proposal.
(j) No new information was brought forward at the public hearing
with regard to potential environmental impacts that was not addressed in the ImtIal Study.
SectIon 6, The City Council affirms that it independently reviewed
Negative Declaration No. 03-1 prior to acting on the applications and hereby finds as
follows:
(a) Negative Declaration No, 03-1 was prepared by staff and therefore
reflects the independentjudgrnent of the City of Seal Beach; and
(b) There is no substantial evidence in the record, which would
Resolution Number ~~~
support a fair argument that approval of the subject land use applicatIons might have a
significant environmental impact.
Section 7. Based on the foregoing Sections I through 6, the City
Council hereby adopts Negative Declaration 03-1 in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTErtl the City Cou~fthe City of Seal
Beach at a meeting thereof held on the ;. _ day of /J",~ '
2003, by the following vote:
I
AYES: Councilmembers
NOES: Councilmembers
ABSENT: Councilmembers
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers
JblV ~IY\
Mayor
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE
CITY OF SEAL BEACH
}
}
}
SS
I
I, Joarme M. Yeo, City Clerk of Seal Beach, California, do hereby~ify that the foregoing
resolution is the ol1gmal copy of Resolution Number 'd?,;z ~ on file in the office of
the City Cler assed, approved, and adopted by the City Council O~ity of Seal Beach,
at a re r mee "ng thereof held on the /. - day of
.
2003,
I
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2015,5 C,C.P.)
Resolution Number 5/:tf!'
This space is for the County
Clerk's Filing Stamp
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
County of Orange
I
r am a citizen of the United States
and a resident of the county afore-
said; I am over the age of eighteen
years, and not a party to or inter-
ested in the above-entitled matter,
I am the principal clerk of the printer
of the SEAL BEACH SUN, a
newspaper of general circulation,
printed and published weekly in the
City of Seal Beach, County of
Orange and which newspaper has
been adjudged a newspaper of
general circulation by the Superior
Court of the County of Orange, State
of California, under the date of
2/24/75, Case Number A82583, that
the notice of which the annexed is a
printed copy (set in type not smaller
than nonpareil), has been published
in each regular and entire issue of
said newspaper and not in any
supplement thereof on the following
dates, to-wit:
Lllolo~
all in the year 2003.
Proof of Publication of
...............................................
I
...~..................~.......................
NOTICE OF i changed to lImlted-Commor- ,
PUBLIC HEARING aoJIRosldonllaJ ModlUm Dons,-
Iy (L-clAMO)
NOTICE OF
PUBLIC HEARING Envl_monlol Review:
An I_I Study and proposed
NOnCE IS HeReBY GIVEN Nsgobvo llocIo..hon hoYo!loan '
that the Clly Council or th, arculBted for publIC I'8VI8W and
CIty 01 Seal BlMCh will hold. comments _Comments were
puflllc h.. ring on Mander. received unld March 17, 2003
April 1411003, .t 7'00 p.rn. ~ and will be considered by Ihe
Ihe Cfty Council Chamber, ,CJ11y Council dun~g IhBlr publiC
211 Eighth ...... "'1 Beech I JfilBnng on the 8Ubject requests
Callfoml.. to CDnslder the w= '
lowing Item.: I, Code SectIoRl:
AltJcJe 11 6, Umlled Cormler.
INITlAl STUDYINEGATlVE .. ClOI Zono, Socbons 211-2600 to '
DEClARAnONll3-1 '.26-2614
GENERAl PlAN AMEND- .
MENT 03-1, ZONE CHANGE " ~Ppl~-=I ao-~
03-1 _ ny ~,
SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD ~.___
L-C -,~
LAND USE ELEMENT AND Venous Prtvolo proporty OWIt-
ZONE REVISIONS 0.. .
!loquos.: . At the obovo Ilmo end PIoco 011
To odopl NogotIvo DocIs..hon. -- ""'"""" moy lie hoonl
03.1 ana to ""'0 lhe Gano..I' ~ so - I you eh8Dongo tho
Plan, Zoning Ordinance and proposed action. In court, you
Zonl1lg Map 10 allow tor lingle' may be Ilmlled 10 raising only
lemur. I'8IIdenllal dever menl1 those Issue. you or someone
with n Ihosl areas o:Seal~ erS8ll1ll1dallhepubltcheanng
Beach Bouievard ct.rr8ndy zoned I, descnbed In UlIs 11OOce, or In wnI.
limited Commercial (l.C) or I, Ien COrre&pondel1C8 delMtred 10
Gonorol Commorclol (C-2) I :~~SooIIIc -o/''''pnot
Those orou cunonay.- roo- ,0 p ....ng -
-~cnylncon- '. ft'~ft";'" ,
JUnctKlnwllh an 0I10WIIliI0 bllSfo' ~,~ ".24thdsyolMan:h,
n8.. UN wllhln the L..c zone 2003 . . .....
and do not allow resldentl.i I Joa Y .
_Iopmont.. 011 wIII1In tho c.. nno so. Crty CIolk
2 zoned orou PlOportf....... CIty 01 80011looi:h
rentJy zoned C"2 would be I P b SoaI B
chonIfod 10 L-C Tho do< odh., I U ooc:h SUn Joumol
0' tfie L.C z~~~_wO.:id be 41312003 I :
I certify (or declare) under penalty of
perjury that the foregoing is true and
correct.
Dated at Seal Beach, CA\
this L \ day of ~r~\
I ature
PUBLICATION ROCESSED B
THE SEAL BEACH SUN
216 Main Street
Seal Beach, CA 90740
(562) 430-7555
,2003.
I
,