Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Res 5126 2003-04-14 RESOLUTIONNUMBE~-0 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 03-1, AMENDING THE LAND USE AND HOUSING ELEMENTS (LIMITED COMMERCIAL! RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY GENERAL PLAN REVISIONS) I THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH DOES HEREBY RESOLVE: Section I, On July 8, 2002 the City Council authorized initiation of General Plan and Zone Change studies to consider alternative land uses for the existing L-C zoned areas on Seal Beach Boulevard. The Planning Deparl1nent held "Public Information Meetings" to discuss the direction of the City Council, the history of zoning of the area, and issues for discussion on July 31 and November 20, 2002, Based on the diSCUSSIOns at those information meetings staff has proceeded with the request as presented. Section 2, Pursuant to 14 Calif. Code of Regs, ~ 15025(a) and ~~ II.C and JJJ of the City's Local CEQA Guidelines, staff prepared an Initial Study and a Negatlve Declaration, whIch was circulated for public review and commcnt from August February 14,2003 to March 17,2003, in cornpliancc WIth the provisions of the California Envlromnental Quality Act and the City's Local CEQA Guidelines, The Negative Declaration was reviewed by the Planning Commission at a public hearing held on March 5, 2003 in relation to the subject land use proposals, The Negative Declaration was revIewed and adopted by the City Council at a public hearing held on April 14,2003 in relation to the subject land use proposals. I SectIon 3, A duly noticed public hearing was held before the Planning Commission on March 5, 2003 to consider the subject applications, At the pubhc hearing, the Planning Commission invited and considered any and all testimony offered in favor 01' opposition to said applicatIons, Section 4. A duly noticed public hearing was held before the City Council on April 14, 2003 to consider the subject applications, At the public hearmg, the City Counctl inVIted and considered any and all testimony offered in favor or opposition to said applications, Section 5. The record of the hearings indicates the following: (a) The City of Seal Beach seeks to consider alternative land uses for the existing L-C zoned areas on Seal Beach Boulevard, (b) On July 8, 2002 the City Council authoIized initiation of General Plan and Zone Change studies to consider alternative land uscs for the existing L-C zoned areas on Seal Beach Boulevard, I (c) The Planning Deparl1nent hcld "Public Information Meetings" to discuss the direction of the City Council, the history of zoning of the area, and issues for discussion on July 31 and November 20, 2002 (d) A mixture of single family and multi-family residential uses in the Residential Medium and Residential HIgh Density (RMD and RHD) zones abuts the subject area to the west and south, Directly across Seal Beach Boulevard, to the east, is Resolution Number ~~ the main shIp loading facilities for the Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station, in the Public Land Use/Recreation (PLU/R) Zone. North of the subject area along Seal Beach Boulevard are new single-fmnily residences in the RMD zone. This residential development was previously zoned C-2, I (e) The City has previously approved reVISIons to the Land Use Element and a zone change regarding lIIe "Shore Shop" properties located north of Landing Avenue along Seal Beach Boulevard. The City adopted ''Negative Declaration 98-3 - Anaheim Bay Villas - General Plan Land Use Element Amendment and Zone Change from General Commercial Land Use Element desigilation and C-2 Zone to Residential Medium Density Land Use Element desigilation and Residential Medium Density (RMD) Zoning designation". This Negative Declaration evaluated potential impacts for a General Plan Land Use Element Amendment and Zone Change to allow for the construction of 9 resIdences immediately to lIIe north of the 3 properties currently located in the C-2 zone north of Landmg A venue, The accompanying zone change request was approved by lIIe City, the California Coastal Commission, and 8 of the 9 permitted homes have been constructed, (I) The proposed residential development standards would permit a density of 17.4 units per acre, or I unit for each 25-foot wide lot within the project area, Many of the properties are currently developed with existing legal, non-conforming multiple-family residential properties, and it is not anticipated that these developments would be removed for lIIe replacement WIllI single-family residences, due to the economic factors involved with high rental rates m this area ofthe City. I (g) If all of lIIe existing legal non-conforming multIple-family reSIdential unit developments (50 units) were to demolished and replaced with allowable new single family units only (approxImately 27 units), the area would experience a net loss of 23 units, resulting in a net population loss to this area of the community, and a maximum potential loss of 0,16% of the total number of housing units within the City, Section 6. Based upon substantial evidence in the record of the Plal11ling Commission and City Council hearings regarding the applicatIOn, including lIIe facts stated in ~ 5 of lIIis resolution, and in lIIe environmental documentation prepared in conjunction willI this project, and pursuant to ~~ 28-2600 and 28-2602 of the City's Code, the City Council hereby finds t!1lIt General Plan Land Use Element Amendment 03-1 will be beneficial to the short term and long term land use goals of lIIe City of Seal Beach. The City Council further finds that approval of the subject applications will promote the public health, safety and welfare, Therefore, the City Council finds that the requested mnendments to the General Plan Land Use Element of lIIe City of Seal Beach will be in the public interest, and makes the following findings of fact: (a) The proposed General Plml Amendments will conform land uses to the goals and poliCies of the Land Use Element for the subject area, as revised, and provides for a comprehensive development option whIch accomplishes the following goals of the City ill achieving sustainable development on the subject property: I, Creates a land use classification that is compatible and consistent with the prevailing pattern ofland uses m the immediate vicinity, I 2, Promotes the general integrity of lIIe neighborhood by allowing for a combination of both retail, office and residential uses that are intended to encourage revitalization of the subject properties, 3. Creates a comprehensive development program for under- utilized and potentially incompatible properties. (b) The City Council has identified lIIe project objective of allowing for greater flexibIlity in the allowable land uses within the "Limited Commercial" General Plan Land Use Element land use desigilation and the "Limited Commercial" provisions of the Seal Beach Zoning Ordinance, Resolution Number ..1i;l,{p (c) In 1992 the City established the "Limited Commercial" General Plan Land Use Element land use designation and the "Limited Commercial" provisions of the Seal Beach Zoning Ordinance in an attempt to encourage private revitalization ofthc subject properties along Seal Beacl1 Boulevard. Prior to 1992 the properties were located in a "General Commercial" Land Use Element and Zoning designation, and no new commercial development had occurred in the area in over 20 years, (d) The 1992 revisions were adopted to encourage a range of mixed- use developments, including new residential development. It was hoped the ability to also construct residential land uses in conjunction with a commercial or office use would serve as an additional incentive for pnvate revitalization efforts. Those efforts have not been successful, and the City is now proposing to allow a free-standing residential development in the area also, I (e) The proposed amendments to the "Limited Commercial" Land Use designations and Zoning provisions, and the necessary General Plan Amendments, will not be detrimental to the short term or long-term goals or objectives of the City of Seal Beach and are m the interest of the public health, safety and welfare, The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan, as amended, Section 7, Based on the foregoing SectIons I through 6, the City Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment 03-1 Amending the Land Use and Housing Elements, as set forth below: I. Revise Page 22 and 23 of the Land Use Element to read as follows: "COMMERCIAL LAND USE 1, LIMITED COMMERCIAL! RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY LAND USE I _ The purpose of creating a mixed-use zoning standard is to develop a land use and development standard that creates a climate for renewal, encourages vehicle trip reduction, and reinforces the "village" theme, The proposed development standards and guidelines will guide the orderly improvement of those areas along Seal Beach Boulevard, south of Pacific Coast Highway and north of the Electric. Avenue alley that are located in the "Limited Commercial/Medium Density Residential" land use designation. The development standards should provide a transition between the more intense commercial uses along Seal Beach Boulevard and the residential areas to the west, The allowable uses and intensity of development permitted should be compatible with the adjoining residential areas, Current land uses along Seal Beach Boulevard located in the "Limited Commercial/Medium Density Residential" land use designation consist of a mixture of high denSity residential, low intensity office, small commercial uses, and vacant land. The proposed development standards should act as an incentive to help renew thiS area, and bring about economic development to an area of the City which does not present a desirable "window" into the City, A major obJective of the proposed development standards should be to recognize the inherent opportunities of the area, and encourage full utihzation of those opportumtIes. I In developing standards and guidelines for the area, a mixture of residential, professional office, service commercial, low intensity retail commercial, and institutional uses are contemplated, The office, commercial, service and institutional uses should be restricted to those that seem to fit the size, scale, and intensity of the existing development pattern of the community, The intent would. be to Resolution Number tr.I~ encourage the sort of enterprise that can be conducted without adversely impacting adjoinmg residential areas and to provide services that local residents would be lI1clined to walk to, I In 1992 the City established the "Limited Commercial" General Plan Land Use Element land use designation and the "Limitcd Commercial" provisions of the Seal Beach Zoning Ordinance in an attempt to encourage private revitalization <!f properties along Seal Beach Boulevard, Prior to 1992 these properties were located in a "General Commercial" Land Use Element and Zoning designation, and no new commercial development had occurred in the area in over 20 years, The 1992 revisions were adopted to encourage a range of mixed- use developments, including new residential development. It was hoped the ability to also construct residential land uses in conjunction With a commercial or office use would serve as an additional incentive for pIivate revitalization efforts, Those efforts have not been successful, and the City has also determined it is appropriate to allow for free-standing residential development in the area also. The City is also reVising thiS land use designation category to "Limited Commercial/Residential Medimn Density' to further clarify the additional uses of property in this land use designation to include residential uses. Additionally, Anaheim Bay and ocean views are offered from the second story along Seal Beach Boulevard, This is a slt'llng marketing amenity for residential property and would provide additional ocean view homesites in the City of Seal Beach," 2, Revise the Land Use Element "Summary Table of Existing and Proposed Land Uses in Acres" by reducing the Commercial General Category by 0,3 acres and increasing the Limited CommerciaVResidential medium Density Category by 0.3 acres, Page 15-16 of the Land Use Element is revised accordingly to read as follows: I "LAND USE TABLE The following table depicts the existing and proposed land use acreage for each land use category in the General Plan. Proposed! Desilffiation Develooed Undevelooed Total Residential Low 670,6 0,0 670.6 Medimn 652.5 0,0 652.5 High 161.0 0,0 161.0 Commercial Limited CommerciaV Residential Medium Density 2,6 0.0 2.6 I Professional Ollice 0.0 0.0 0.0 Service 55,8 0.0 55,8 General 162,2 0,3 162,5 Industrial Light 126,2 0,0 1262 Oil Extraction 28.2 0,0 28.2 Ouasi-Public Golf Course 264,8 0.0 264.8 Resolution Number 4i,2,tp Wetlands 32.8 0,0 32,8 Public City Parks 8 \.4 7.0 88.4 City Schools 13.4 0.0 13.4 Flood Basin 34,7 0.0 34.7 Beaches 52,0 0,0 52.0 Police Station \.5 0,0 1.5 I Fire Stations 1.0 0,0 1.0 Civic Center 06 0,0 0.6 City Yard 3.0 0,0 3.0 P.E. RIW 8.2 0,0 8,2 Towne Center Greenbelt 12.4 0,0 12.4 Military 5.000.0 0,0 5.000.0 TOTAL: 7,364,5 7.3 7,371.8" 3, Revise Table ] 6 of the Housing Element "Seal Beach Acreage by General Plan Land Use Designations" by reducing the Commercial General Category by 0,3 acres and increasing the Limited CommerciallResidential Medium Density Category by 0,3 acres, Table 16 of the Housing Element is revised accordingly to read as follows: "TABLE 16 Seal Beach Acreaee bv General Plan Land Use Deslmstions Proposed! I Desu!llation Developed Undeveloped Total Residential Low 670.6 0,0 670.6 Medium 652.5 0.0 652,5 High - 161.0 0,0 161.0 Commercial Lirnited Commerciall ReSidential Medium Density 2,6 0,0 2.6 Professional Office 0.0 0,0 0,0 Service 55,8 0,0 55.8 General 1622 0,3 ]62.5 Industrial Light 126,2 0,0 126.2 Oil Extraction 28,2 0,0 28,2 Ouasi-Pubhc Golf Course 264,8 0,0 264,8 Wetlands 32.8 0.0 32.8 I Public City Parks 81.4 7,0 88.4 City Schools 13.4 0,0 13.4 Flood Basin 34,7 00 347 Beaches 52,0 0,0 52,0 Police Station 1.5 0,0 1.5 Fire Stations 1.0 0.0 1.0 Civic Center 0.6 0,0 0.6 Resolution Number ~~~ City Yard 3.0 0.0 3.0 P.E. R/W 8,2 00 8,2 Towne Center Greenbelt 12.4 0.0 12.4 MIlitarv 5.000.0 0,0 5.000,0 TOTAL: 7,364,5 7.3 7,371.8" I 4, The "City of Seal Beach Land Use Plan" is revised to amend the "Land Use Map" to indicate this proposed change in Land Use Dcsignation for the three parcels norll1erly of Landing A venue from "General Commercial" to "Limited CommerciallResidential Medimn Density" and those properties between the Electric Avenue Alley and Landing Avenue from "Limited Commercial" to "Limited Commercial/Residential Medium Density" as shown below: Proposed General Plan Land Use Designations - General Plan Amendment 03-1, Limited Commercial/Residential Medium Density Zoning Revisions I N A " ~ ~ - ~. ...... /' / / PropoNd General PieR Land Un Designations L:J LOR Low Denslly Resldentlsl L~~ .i MDR Medium Density Restdenhal [:',?) HDR HIgh De.S1ay Resldent,aI ~ CG Comm"",.I- Goneral 1-] LClMDR Um.... Commerc,ellM""um 1..-.. Densltv R881d8llbal p Public M Mllllaty o 250 500 F88I. M I Resolutl.on Number 5/1.(, PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTEo/fthe City Council 0 Beach at a meeting thereof held on the J.l e day of 2003, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSENT: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers J~~~ Mayor ATT Ci rk STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CITY OF SEAL BEACH } } } SS I, Joanne M, Yeo, City Clerk of SeaJ Beach, California, ~.:2% certify that the foregoing resolution is the onginal copy of Resolution Number on file in the office of the City Cler assed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of~fty of Seal Beach, at a gul mee ing thereof held on the /. ~ day of " 2003. I I I PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015,5 C,C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, County of Orange Resolution Number ~~ This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county afore- said; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or inter- lested in the above-entitled maUer. I am the principal clerk of the printer of the SEAL BEACH SUN, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published weekly in the City of Seal Beach, County of Orange and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Orange, State of California, under the date of 2/24/75, Case Number A82583; that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following .ates, to-wit~ Io~ all in the year 2003. Proof of Publication of ............................................... ............................................... NanCE OF ~ changed 10 L1mlt.d~Comm.r- '. PU~L1C HEARING :l~"'l;sr Medium Donsl-I - f NOllCE IS HEREBY OIVEN Envlron~1 _""" 'I Iha' the City Council 0' Ihel p\ An Inlbal Study and proposed I CIty 01 Seal B_h will hold., I' NegIIbve ~ have been I public h..rlng on Mond.y, ~I drculaled for public rovlow end April 14, ~ at 7:00 p.m. In . comments Comments were I the CII~ Council Chambers. . receIVed until March 17 2003 I ~I~I~===- U and Will be conSidered by the I lowing ltema: I ~ CauneU dun~g theJr public I ,- hearing on 1110 SUOj8CI roqu8S1lI I . ,..,' I INFT1AL STUDYINEOATlVE C_ Sectlono' . . DECLARAlION 03-1 ., , GENERAL PLAN AMEND- Arbcle 11 6. llmlled Cammer- MENT 03-1, ZONE CHANGE CUll Zono, SocIIono 29-2600 10,1 03-1 2S.~614 SEAL BEACL~OULEV:"RD I Appllconl' . LAND USE ELEME/'lT AND. City pi Sui ~ I ZONE REVISIONS : Dwnor: VanoUl pnvate property own- el'l .' I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Roquooh To odopI N"l/8Qvo DocIOIBIlon 03.1 and 10 revise the General, Plan. Zoning Ordmance Bnd ZonIng Mop 10 ollow lor Ilnglol 1IIm,IY rolldonl/ol development I within tho.e areas on sea'l -1lotAololnI_ZaIId LimIted Commercial ll.C) Dr General Commercial (C.2) Th818 IIl88S cuR8ntly aJIOw ""1 --~onIylnc:on- juncllon w11h en _bill buaI- n... USI wllhlrllhe L-Q zone. and do not allow resldenl..1 I d...~.. 011 wdhln 1110 Co I 2 zoned antU Properties cur- I rently zoned C.2 would bl, Joanne Yea. CIIy Clerk changed 10 L.c 'Tho dooIgno1Ion "'-. cI 0__1 '---h of 1t.1 L..C zone would be -'7 -- UOHftO . , ......:...:.... .. Pub Seal 98800 Sun Journel . 4I3r.lOO3 AJ. the above lime end place en -peraonomoy6eheord dill _ II you chellengo the ~posed acbons In court, you , may be limited 10 raising only those Issue. you or someone I . oIoe I8IIlId 011110 public heldng ; , doaa1bed In 1hs noIk:o, Olin WIll- ,Ian COIfll8jlOlldIlllCl doIM1rod 10 ' the CIty cI SnI_... 01 pnot I . 10, the pubic heotlng . I . DATEO-1lua24ll1~clM.rm: 2003 - '. I ,2003, Signature PUBLICATION PROCESSED BY: THE SEAL BEACH SUN 216 Main Street Seal Beach, CA 90740 (562) 430-7555 I