The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC Res 5079 2002-11-12 I I I RESOLUTION NO. 6019 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA TO ADOPT THE URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN, THI~ CITY COUNCIL OFTHE CITY OF SEAL DEACIl HEREBY RESOLVES: WHEREAS, the CalIfornlll Legislature enacted Assembly Bill 797 (Water Code Section 10610 et Sllll., known as the Ulhan Water Management Planning Act) during the 1983-1984 Regu!lll SessIOn, and as amended subsequently, which mandates that every suppliel prOViding water for mumcipal purposes to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 ucre feet of water annually, prepare an Urban Water Management Plan, the pnmary objective of wluch IS to plan for the conservation and efficient use of watCl; and WHEREAS, the City is an urban supplier of water providing water to a populal1on over 26,000, and WHEREAS the City desires to update the Ulban Water Management Plan dated Muy 29,2001 ailcr public review and hearing und filed With the California Depaltment of WlIter Resources within thirty days of adoption; IInd WHEREAS the City has therefore, prepared and circulated for pubhc review a drail Ulban Water Management Piau Update-2002, and a properly nol1ced public hearmg regarding smd Plan was held by the City Council on November 12, 2002 und WHEREAS the City of Seal Beach did prepare and shall file said Plan With the Cahfomill Dcpal1ment of Water Resources by December 12,2002, NOW, TIlEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Counell of t~e City of Scal Beach liS follows: The Urban Water Management Plan Update -2002 is hereby adopted and ordeled filed With the City Clerk; The Public Works Director is hereby authorized and directed 10 tile the Urban Wuter Management Plan Update - 2002 With the California Department of Water Resources wltlnn 30 days after tlus date PASSED, illOVED Beach thiS ... day of AYES: D b the City Council of the City of Seal 2002 by the following vote: NOES. Council Membe ABSENT: Council Member ABSTAIN: Couneil Members ~ltJ1J ~"" Mayor Resolution Number ~~~ ST ATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS CITY OF SEAL BEACH ) I, Joanne M. Yeo, City Clerk of the City of Seal Beach, California, d~eb certify that the foregoing ResolUl1on is the original copy of Resolution Number on file in the office of the City Clerk, passed, approved, and ~pted by ~ Coun ~fthe City of Seal Beach at a meeting thereof held on the ~ day of ~t"u A ~ 2002. I I ( I ....., , I I I Resolution Number ~ CITY OF SEAL BEACH ::~,,~t ~Vj.L l':"~"$" f'''' -. .:'.... J'~ ,~ < '.' . ,"1,,,,,,..."1 '... rJl 1l!\i.~.._"1'.i~...~.' ,.~ .7"'1':1.' :e....,.. <7 .;: """'.; 'Prf.~" ~9i1"'E...I!f:', ,.I ", IIt'''rr''.t,~'':.P''.L'''... .,..,j,...':.[.'i!t ';J,,;...:':'~i-i'-~ .~':\"'..~.J.:;t; ~.t'{1< J-o.;- '.If ~.; . f." J. l~<"'. ," II. . "I'l';M' :., }~""'~;~' _, ;0" ~t. ':7~ . ',*,t ~'~} . ".. . . . . :.' tl . ~\ .- '. 0 <,I.. URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE 2002 Resolut"ion Number ~ Table Of Contents PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ,.,...,...................,....,..,....'"......,...................................,...................,...............,........,... I PUBLIC PARTICIPA1ION . .. .. I PLAN AD0P1l0N. .... . .. ....... .1 AGENCY COORDINATION .................,........................".........,..........................,.,............................................... 2 IN IERAGENCYCooRDlNArlON .... .. .. 2 SUPPLIER SEHVICR AREA ........,....,.,.,........,......................................,......,.................,..,...................,.............,..3 CLIMArE . ....., .....".... 3 01JlER DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS 3 WAl I:R HISTORY OF ORANGE COUNTY .... .... .... 4 PASl DROUGHT, WATER DEMAND, ANDCONSERVArlON INFORMATION. . ., 6 W A TRR SOURCES (SUPPLY) ...........................,................................,..........................................................,....... 7 WATER SUI'PLY SOURCES, ... 7 GROUNDWATFR _ .. ... 7 RELIABILITY PLANNING ....................,......,...................................,............ .......................................,............. 13 RELlABILI1Y .... ,...... . 13 FREQUENCY AND MAGNI11JDE OF SUPPLY DEFICIENCIES......... , .............. . ....... ...,..... '.. ........, ........ . 14 PLANS TO ASSURE A R1:LIABLE WATER SUPPLY. ".. ......, ......' ............. .14 IMI'ORTED WMER .. . , .......... 14 RELlABll.11 Y COMPARISON .. . . 16 TRANSFER OR EXCHANGE OI'PORTUNITillS ...........................,........................................., ...................... 17 W MER TRANSrnRS , '.... .. 17 WATER USE PROVISIONS..... .................,............................,....................,.......................,..................,..,.......... 18 PAST. CURREN I AND PROJECTED WATER USE .. 18 RF-SII)ENTIAL SECTOR . ... 20 COMMERC'lALSECroR.... .. ...... .. . .... . 20 INDUSTRIAL SECTOR, , . ...... .... . . ...... .. 20 INsnfUTloNALlGovERNMENTALSECfOR. . ....... ........ 21 AGRICUL rURAL SECTOR ...... . . . . .... .... 21 SUPPLY AND DEMAND COMPARISON PROVISIONS..,............................................................,.....,.......,... 22 SUPPLY AND DF.MAND COMPARJSON ..... ..... ...., ... ...... .22 WATER DEMAND MANAGEMENT MEASURES .................................,.........................................................31 DMM 1 ,- INTERJORANDExlERJOR WATER AUDITS roR SINGLE FAMILY AND MULTI-FAMILY CUSIOMERS.. 31 DMM 2 -- PLlIMBlNG RFrRonr .. ... ,. ..,... ..... . _ .. 32 DMM 3 -- DISTRIBlITlON SYSTEM WATER AUDITS, LEAK DEJECTION AND REPAIR... .... ,.. 32 DMM4--MEIERINGWITHCOMMODITYRA1ES .. ...... ......33 DMM 5 -- LARGE LANDSCAPE WATER AUDITS AND INCENTIVES ...... . ........ ... . .. .... 33 DMM 6 -- LANDSCAPE WATER CONSERVATION REQUIREMENTS. .... , . ..... .34 DMM 7 -- PUBLIC INFORMATION ....... ...... ..... . ........... 34 DMM 8 -- SCHOOL EDUCA liON .. .. ......... . . ...... ...., . ... 35 DMM9--COMMERC1ALANDINDUSfRIALWArERCONSERVATION........... ............. ...... 36 DMM 10 -- NEW COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL WATER USE REVIEW . ....... ... .. ... ....36 DMM It-- CONSERVArIONPRJCING. WATER SERVICE AND SEWER SERVICE ... . ... ...., ..... 36 DMM t2 -- LANDSCAPE W A rER CONSERVATION FOR NEW AND EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ...... ........ 37 DMM 13 -- WA1ER WASIEPROHIIIITION.. .. . .., ..... ..... ... ..... ....,. ..,.., ....... .37 DMM 14 -- WATER CONSERVATION COORDINAroR....., ......... .... . ..... . .......... ..... 37 DMM 15 '. FINANCIAL INCENTIVES 38 DMM 16 -- ULTRA-LOW FLUSH TOILET REPLACEMENT .... ,.......38 WATER SHORTAGE CONTINGENCY PLAN............................. .............................,..,...,..........................,....40 PREPARATION FORCATASTROPJIIC WATER SUPPLY INTERRUPTION..... 40 WAl ER SIlORrAGE EMERGENCY RESI'ONSE . 40 SUPPLEMENTAL WA1ER SUPPI.1ES ..... .. 41 DESALINATION .. ......., .., 41 WATER TRANSfERS.. . ...... . ..... . .... ....... 41 LoNG TERM ADDITIONAL WATER SUPPLY OPTIONS. ,.. ... .. ...... ........... 41 , WATER SIIORTAGE CONTINGENCY ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION ........................................,...............42 CI1YOrSEALBEAcHWA1ERSHORTAGEREsl'ONSE .. , .. 42 STAGES OF ACTION ......,.......................,...,...........,..,............................,.......................,.....................................43 RATIONING STAGES AND REDUCTION GOAL~. PRIORITY BY U~E HEALlll AND SAFETYREQIJlREMENTS W A TfR SliOR rAGE STAGES AND TRIGGERING MECHANISMS WATERALLOlMENTMLlHons . . 43 43 .. 44 44 45 I I I I I I Resolution Number :iii...1!1 ' PROlllBITIONS, CONSUMPTION REDUCfION METHODS AND PENALTIES ........................,..........,..46 MANDATORYI'ROHlBlTIONSONWATERWASTlNG '" ......... ........... .46 EXCESSIVEUSEPENALllES. . ...... ....." ................. ....,..................... ...., .............. ......47 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE IMPACfS AND MEASURES TO OVERCOME IMPACTS..................48 REDUCTION MEASURING MECIIANISM..,.................................,.................................,.........,......................49 MECHANISM 10 DEl ERMlNEREDUCTIONS IN WATER USE....,.. .... ....... ....... . 49 WATER RECyCLING....,.,.....................,..........................,......,.....,..,...................,.....,.......,.................................50 WASTEWATFR SYSTbM DESCRIPrlON.. .. . ... ,...... .. . . . 50 RECYCLED WATER PIANNlNO ........ .. .50 APPENDIX A ......., ....,.....................,..,...............,..,............................,.............,.................,..,......................,.........52 LISIOFGROUI'SWHOPARTICIPATEDINTHEDEVELOPMENTOFTHlSPIAN. ......... ....... .. 52 APPENDIX B,.............................................,..........,.......,...."......................, ............................,............................. 53 REsOLUrlON To AOOPTTHE URBAN WATER MANAGEMENTI'IAN... 53 API'ENDIX C ............................................,.........................................................,.....,..............,....................,.........55 LIST OF TABLES POPUlATION PROJJ;:CrlONS..., ......... .... ..,........... . ............ ........ . CURRENT AND PllOJECfElI W A f'ER SUPPI,IES .. CITY OF SEAL BMCII . ..... ...... ..... WAJEIISUPPLYSOURCES. .. , ..... ............ ................. .. . '" SUPPLY RELIAIULI'I Y . ... ...... ............................ ..... .... ........... .. ..... .. ......... ...... ., I' AS r, CURRENT AND PROJEcrEI) W A 1 ER USE NUMBER OF CONNEcrlONS BY CUSTOMER TYPE*.. .... .. ........ .. . ..... . . ... .. ....... ULFT REl RO~'I1' PROGRAM...... ,...... .............. . .... ..... .. ... .... ........... .. ... , ... .. .... . . WATERRATIONINGSTAGESANDREDUcrlONGOALS .....,..... ........................ .. .... WATERSIIORTAGES1AGESANIITRIGGERINGMECIIANISMS........... ........... ........ .. . CONSUMP liON RI!.DUcrlON METI10DS....... ............ .... ...... . .. .... ... . .., . . .5 7 .12 12 16 19 20 38 . 43 .45 .. 47 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE I: SEAL BEACH NORMAL YEAR SUPPLY AND DEMAND.... ....... ...... ...... ....., .. ....... 24 FIGURE 2: SEAL BEACH DRY-YEAR SUPPLY AND DEMAND.............. ..... ........... ..... ,........ ...... . 25 FIGURE 3. SEAL BEACH MULTIPLE DRY- YEARS SUPPLY AND DEMAND......,........... ....... .... .. . . 26 FIGURE 4. SEAL BEACH MAXIMUM-DA Y SUPPLY AND DEMAND....,.............................................27 Reso-lution Number ~71 City of Seal Beach 2002Urban Water Management Plan UPDATE Contact Sheet I Date plan submitted to the Department of Water Resources: Name of person preparing this plan: Ergun Sakall, Consulting Civil Engineer Phone: 714 925 4927 Fax: 7148380480 E-mail address:ergunbakall@home.com The Water supplier is a: Municipality The Water supplier is a: Retailer Utility services provided by the water supplier include: Water Is This Agency a Bureau of Reclamation Contractor? No Is This Agency a State Water Project Contractor? No I I I I I ___~aar..n_ Resolution Number ~ SEAL BEACH 2000 URBAN WATER MANAGEM N ......_ -...,;I;;........... J...._ - ____ .. _-- - "I Public Participation Law 10642. Each urban water supplier shall encourage the active involvement of diverse social, cultural, and economic elements of the population within the service area prior to and during the preparabon of the plan, Pnor to adopting a plan, the urban water supplier shall make the plan available for public inspection and shall hold a public hearing thereon Pnor to the hearing, notice of the time and place of heanng shall be published . . After the heanng, the plan shall be adopted as prepared or as modified after the hearing. Public Participation The City of Seal Beach has actively encouraged community participation in development of its urban water management planning efforts since the first plan was prepared In 1985. Public meetings were held prior to adoptIon of the previous plans, For this updafe to the Urban Water Management Plan, a public meeting was held to review and receive comments on the draft plan before the City Council approval Notices of public meetings were posted in the CIty Hall. Legal public notices for the meefing was published in the local newspaper and posted at Cify facilities. Copies of the draft plan were available at fhe City Hall and the Library Plan Adoption The City of Seal Beach prepared thiS update of ItS Urban Water Management Plan during fall 2002. The updafed plan was adopted by City Council on November 12, 2002 and submitted to the California Department of Wafer Resources within 30 days of Council approval. Attached fa the cover letter addressed fo the Department of Water Resources and as Appendix B are copies of the signed Resolution of Plan Adoption, This plan includes all information necessary to meet the reqUIrements of California Water Code Division 6, Part 2.6 (Urban Wafer Management Planning), Agency Coordination Law 10620 (d) (2) Each urban water supplier shall coordinate the preparation of its plan with other appropriate agencies in the area, including other water supphers that share a common source, water management agencies, and relevant pubhc agencies, to the extent practicable. Interagency Coordination The City of Seal Beach is a refall cusfomer of MuniCipal Water Dlstricf of Orange Counfy (MWDOC) who In turn is a member agency of Metropolitan Water Disfrict of Southern California (MWD). The CIty derives 75% of its water supplies from the Orange County Groundwater Basin managed by Orange County Water Districf (OCWD). Groundwater sources for the City of Seal Beach are shared in common with other urban and agricultural interesfs in fhe area, The City therefore coordinated the development of this plan with the following agencies: . MWDOC (acfs as a wholesaler) . OCWD . MWD Resolution Number M!f ~ . ----- SEAL BEACH 2000 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN ...... , LJI .... Supplier Service Area Law 10631. A plan shall be adopted in accordance with this chapter and shall do all of the following: I 10631. (a) Desclibe the service area of the supplier, includmg current and projected populatIOn, climate, and other demographic factors affectmg the supplier's water management planning. The projected population estimates shall be based upon data from the state, regional, or local service agency population projections within the service area of the urban water supplier and shall be in five-year increments to 20 years or as far as data is available, Climate Seal Beach has a Southern California coastal climate. Summers are mild and dry, and winters are cool, With an annual average of 12 inches of precipitation, with mosf of the rainfall occurring between November and March. The region is subject to wide variations in annual precipifation. Late nighf and early morning marine layer helps reduce summer irrigation requirements. Elevations within the City vary between 5 to 50 feet above sea level. There are virtually no days where temperafures fall below freezing. I Deviation from the average annual precipitation was experienced in 1998 due to the EI Nino conditions for the western United States. Other Demographic Factors The City of Seal Beach is located on the coast in the southwest corner of Orange Counfy It occupies an area of about 11 6 square miles (7369 acres) Incorporation of the City occurred in 1915.The Cify provides wafer service to all residential and industrial and most commercial uses. The majority of the City IS dedicated fo milifary use (5000 acres) all of which IS owned by United States Government. Low denSity residential use In the form of single family dwellings, are located in communities known as College Park East, College Park West and Marina Hill Medium densify residential uses are located in Bridgeport, Old Town and Leisure World. High-density residential communities consist of Rossmore Condominiums, Surfside Colony, River Beach and portions of Old Town. Commercial areas are locafed along Main Street in Old Town and Bixby Ranch. Industrial and manufacturing consisting of space and military applications are concentrated at the confluence of Seal Beach Boulevard and Westminster Avenue I Water History of Orange County When fhe Metropolitan Water District of Southern Califomla (Metropolitan) was formed in the late 1920's, Orange County had mosfly an agriculturally based economy with the CitieS of Santa Ana, Anaheim, and Fullerton the primary centers of urban development. Although other cities and reSidential communities existed In Orange County af fhat flme, it was fhese three cities fhat joined With ten other cities in Southern California to forn1 Metropolitan in 1928. I I I Resolu,tion Number tJO 1f COllecfively, these charter members of Metropolitan recognized the limited wafer supply available within the region; fhey realized fhat fhe continued prosperity and economic development of soufhem California required the acquisition of supplemental water supplies. The foreslghl of these cIties made if possIble for the continued deveJopmenf of southem California and Orange County, A few years later, In 1933, the Orange County Wafer Districf (OCWD) was formed to protect and manage the County's natural underground wafer resources and to defend its water rights to the Santa Ana River Basin Orange County's population grew modestly from 118,674 in 1930 fo 216,224 in 1950 The populabon boom occurred after World War /I in soufhem California and Orange County, By 1950, fhe communities overlying the Lower Santa Ana River Groundwater Basin realized that the local underground supply was nof sufficient to meet fhe fufure demands of fhe area, as evidenced by the major overdraft and seawater infrusion fhaf had occurred during fhls period, This factor, along wifh fhe increasing water needs of outlying areas Within the county, necessifated fhe formation of MWDOC in 1951 to acquire supplemental water supplies from Metropolifan to facIlitate continued economic development. Subsequent annexations to MWDOC -coupled with major public Improvemenfs such as wafer conveyance systems, sewage freafment plants, freeways, storm drains, and requisite utilities-have facilitated rapid regional growth and development. Today, Orange Counfy's populatIon IS nearly 2.9 million, of which approximately 65% or 1 8 million of the population is within MWDOC service area. MWDOC provides water to ItS member agencies for municipal, industrial, agricultural and groundwater replenishment purposes, To supply wafer, the Districf enters info a written service agreement with a member agency; in turn, MWDOC contracts With Metropolitan. MWDOC has acquired, through participation in joint powers agreemenfs (JPA) for certain pipelines, capacify rights, which were sold or released by MWDOC to its member agencies. In January 2001, MWDOC officially merged with the Coastal Municipal Water District, a service area of 59 square miles With a population of 250,000. This consolidation was initiated in 1996 as part of an effort to streamline local government, and a joint application was filed with the Local Agency Formation Commission. The new district will continue to be known as the MuniCipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC), and will serve all of Orange County expect for fhe cities of Anaheim, Fullerton and Santa Ana. In terms of water management, MWDOC became a signatory to the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) in 1991, monifored by the California Urban Water Conservation CounCIl, which outlInes 14 Best Management Practices for urban water conservation. The urban water conservation practices are intended to reduce long-term urban demands from what they would have been Without implementation of these practices and are in additional fo programs fhat may be institufed during occasional wafer supply shortages. For longer than thirty years, MWDOC Public Information and Wafer Educafion programs have reached thousands of consumers and students annually, The programs are performed on behalf of, and in coordination WIth, the District's member agencIes. The city of Seal Beach being a member agency directly benefits from all MWDOC programs. These programs help the public and students understand current water Issues, as well as challenges, opportunities and costs involved in securing a reliable supply of high qualify wafer. MWDOC also represent its member agencies' interests in such Metropolitan Water Disfrict planning efforts as the Wafer Surplus and Droughf Management (WSDM) Plan and fheir new rate structure, MWDOC is also the stimulus behind the "Focus on Orange County's Wafer Future" effort, the Orange Counfy Water Plan. The goal of "Focus" is to Improve water planning Orange County in order to ensure a high degree of reliability and quality in fufure water supplies. Resolution Number ~i'~ Table 1 shows the population fotal for the CIty from 2002, with projections to 2020 , Table 1 Population Projections 2002 2005 2010 2015 2020 Service Area 26200 27000 28000 29500 30000 Pooulation I Past Drought, Water Demand, and Conservation Information The state and local region experienced a prolonged drought from 1988 through 1992. The City met its customers' needs through careful management of groundwater and imported supplies Communify Involvement made if possible to have voluntary rationing during 1989-91, The City continues fo have a very small residential and commercial growth. The commercial sector is increasing more due to Increased tourism. There is no agricultural activity to mention in the City, The cifizens of Seal Beach have a high commifmenf to qualify of life and environmental issues. They are active participants in resource and planning discussions held by Cify I staff and the City Council. Wafer conservation is one of several high priority policies actively implemented in the City, and programs such as residential water audits, and ultra-low flush tOllef replacements are well accepfed Water Sources (Supply) Law 10631 A plan shall be adopted in accordance with this chapter and shall do all of the following: 1063\ (b) Identify and quantify, to the extent practicable, the existing and planned sources of water available to the supplier over the same five-year increments [to 20 years or as far as data is available.] Water Supply Sources The City of Seal Beach fortunately has two of water sources: local groundwater from Orange Counfy Main Groundwater Basin and imported water fhrough MWDOC and MWD, I I I I - - - Resolution Number ~~ SEAL BEACH 2000 URBAN WATER MANAGEM~ r"~- " -."" Table 2 Current and Projected Water Supplies Water SUDoly Sources 2002" 2005 2010 2015 2020 Purchased from USBR Purchased from DWR Purchased from wholesaler 4300 4300 4300 4300 4300 IImoorted Waler from MWDOCI CltV oroduced aroundwaler 7200 7200 7200 7200 7200 CltV oroduced surface water Transfers Exchanaesln Recycled Water 1 Recycled I,:,ater used for ground water recharoe adds to ow suoolvl Other Total 11500 11500 11500 11500 11500 Units of Measure Acre-feeUYear " These floures Indicate capacltv of eXlslino Cltv facIlities, not actual produclion Groundwater The water supply resources In Orange County are enhanced by the exisfence of a large groundwater basin, The City of Seal Beach Wafer Division is an operator of ground water prodUCing facilities in the Orange County Groundwater Basin ("Basin"). The Orange Counfy Ground Water Basin is described at pages 3-1 through 3-14 of the Orange County Water Distnct Master Plan Report, dated April 1999 ("MPR") and incorporated herein by reference. Orange Counfy Water Dlstnct (OCWD) under the Orange County Water District Act, Water Code App., Ch 40 ("Acf"), manages the Basin. The Act empowers OCWD to Impose replenishment assessments and basin equity assessmenfs on producfion and to require registration of water producing facilities and the filling of certain reports, however OCWD is expressly prohibited from limiting extraction unless a producer agrees (Section 40-2(6)(c)) and from impairing vested rights fo the use of water (Section 40-77), Thus, producers may install and operate production facilities under the Act; OCWD approval is not required. Although the rights of the producers within the Basin vis a vis one another have not bee adjudIcated, they nevertheless exist and have not been abrogafed by fhe Act. (Secflon 40-77) The rights consist of municipal appropriators' righfs and may include overlaying and ripanan rights. The Department of Water Resources (DWR) has Identified the Basin as overdrafted in its most current bulletin that characferizes the condition of the Basin, Bulletin 118. Bulletin 118 is currently being updafed by DWR) The efforts being undertaken by OCWD to eliminate long-ferm overdraft in the Basin are described in fhe OCWD Master Plan Report (MPR) dated April 1999, including in particular, Chapters 4,5,6,14 and 15 of the MPR Although the water supply assessment statute (Wafer Code Section 10910(f)) refers to elimination of "long-term overdraft", overdraft refers to condlllons which may be managed for optimum basin storage, rather than eliminated OCWD Act defines annual groundwater overdraft to be the quantity by which production exceeds the natural replenishmenf of fhe Basin. Accumulafed overdraft is defined in the OCWD acf to be fhe quantity of water needed in the groundwater basin forebay fo prevent landward movement of seawater into the fresh groundwater body. Seawater Intrusion control facilities have been constructed by OCWD since its inception, and have been effecfive in preventing landward movement of seawater. These facIlities allow greater ufilization of the storage capacity of the Basin OCWD has invesfed over $250 million In seawater Intrusion control (injection barriers); recharge facilities, laboratories, and Basin monitoring to effectively manage the Basin. Consequently, alfhough the Basin is defined to be in an "overdraft" condition, it is actually managed to allow utilization of up to 500,000 AF or more of storage capacity during dry periods, acting as an underground reservoIr and buffer against drought periods OCWD stated goal is to operate the Basin to maintain accumulated overdraft Resolution Number ~ SEAL BEACH 2000 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN of 200,000 AF. If the Basin is too full, artesian conditions can occur in many areas including the coastal zone, causing rising wafer conditions and water logging, an adverse condition. OCWD continuous to develop new replenishment methods and supplies, recharge capacity and basin protection programs to meet the projected demand from the Basin during normal and drought periods. Groundwater conditions in the Orange County groundwater basin are Influenced by the natural hydrologic conditions of rainfall, groundwater seepage and stream flow. I Groundwater extraction and injection through wells, use of imported water for groundwafer replenishment, and water use efficiency practices also Influence the basin. Groundwater is not acfually an indigenous source of supply but rather sforage of supply that Includes natural runoff, treated wastewater, and imported water. Runoff from local rainfall,s the main source of recharge for -the smaller basins and accounts for some of the recharge of the Lower Santa Ana River Basm. (LSAR Basin). The amount of runoff recharge is highly variable and can only be estimated, Most of the recharge of the LSAR Basin is from Santa Ana River flow percolated in-stream or diverted to off- stream spreading baSins operated by the OCWD. OCWD is responsible for the protection of water righfs fo fhe Santa Ana River in Orange County as well as management and replenishment of fhe Basin. The LSAR Basin underlies fhe north and central area of Orange County. The annual production of fhe LSAR Basin averaged 328,000 acre-feet between 1995 and 1999, generally increasing with time. Santa Ana River base flow IS comprised mamly of treated wastewater discharged from I treafment plants in Riverside County and San Bernardino County. Thus, about half of the water recharging the LSAR aquifer is incidenfally recycled wastewater. In addition, OCWD injects about 5,000 AF/yr of recycled wastewater treated from ifs Water Factory 21 plant into the LSAR BaSin near the coast. The OCWD recharge operafions both expand the production capabilify of the LSAR Basin and prevent seawater Intrusion into the aquifers. Production capability of the LSAR Basin is being Increased by increasing both the recharge supply and the number of production wells for the extraction of water from fhe basin. Aquifers fhat presently store low-quality water -wafer high in nitrates, salt color, or industrial pollutants -are being pumped, and the produced water is being treafed at local wafer treatment plants or blended With potable water, Drawing out low-quality water and replaCing it with high-quality recharge water anticipate aqUifer cleanup. So called "In-Lieu" program also helps groundwater production and quality by replacing quantities of groundwater with Imported water to reduce groundwater pumping in coastal areas. The In-Lieu Program has served as an efficienf groundwater replenishment method since the 1970s. Currently, the In-Lieu Program is deSignated as the BaSin Water Supply Management Program under the terms of the 1997 BaSin Wafer Management Agreement with the MWD. OCWD is required to annually invesfigate the condition of the Basin, assess overdraft I and accumulated overdraft, and determine the amount of water necessary for replenishment (Section 40-77). OCWD has studied the Basin replenishmenf needs and pofentlal projects fo address growth in demand until 2020, This IS described in detail in the OCWD Master Plan Report, dated Apn11999. In April, 2002, Board of Directors of OCWD declared by Resolution No. 02-4-63 that the accumulated overdraft as of June 30, 2001 was 328,000 AF and that fhe estimafed annual overdraft for the current wafer year July 1,2001 to June 30, 2002 was 95,000 AF; and that the esflmafed annual overdraft for fhe ensuing water year from July 1, 2002 to June 30, 2003 would be I I I - T__ Resolution Number ~~~ SEAL BEACH 2000 URBAN WATER MANAGEMEN AN -- - - - ~ - -..--- 95,000 AF. With groundwater pumping expected to be around 380,000 AF for the current water year, the basin's accumulated overdraft will significantly increase. In a memorandum dated June 3, 2002 to fhe OCWD Board of Directors, General Manager Virginia Grebblen stated that the accumulated overdraft would be slightly over 400,000 AF on June 30, 2002 The n;Jemorandum further offered three pOfenfial solufions fo fhe problem: 1-ModlflYlng the imported in-lieu program to allow much greater replenishment delivenes to the basin 2-Developing greater recharge capacity, which would give OCWD fhe ability to sink larger quantities of imported replenishment water when available 3-Lowering the Basin Production Percentage (BPP) As of the date of this Urban Water Managemenf Plan Update, It had not been defermined what course of action, If any, the OCWD Board of Directors would pursue If should be noted that under OCWD management of overdraft to maximize its utilization for annual production and recharge operations, overdraft varies over time as the Basin is managed to keep it in balance over the long term, The Basin is not operated on an annual "safe-Yield" basis. (OCWD MPR, Section 3.2) The Cify of Seal Beach obtains about 3000 acre-feet per year (AFY) from fhree wells, from an average depth of 800 feet (Table 3). There has been some saline intrusion info fhe upper aqUifers of the Basin, but it has not affected the strata from which the City wells produce. Water quality is within standards set for acceptable dnnklng water by the federal governmenf and fhe California Departmenf of Health Services, · Beverly Manor Well -The well, constructed in 1969, is housed in an enclosed building along -side the two booster pumps referred to as the Beverly Manor Booster. The well pump, driven by a natural gas engine, pumps direcfly into the Beverly Manor Reservoir. If has a capacity of 2000 gpm. · Bolsa Chica Well-This well, consfructed in 1979, is located on Bolsa Chica Road south of the San Diego Freeway The well pump can be driven with an electric motor as well as a natural gas engine The well discharge pressure IS maintained by varying the speed of electnc mofor by means of Toshiba Variable Frequency Drive or by a Murphy controller acting on the natural gas engine, The maximum output into the distnbution system is 2800 gpm at 68 psi. · Leisure World Well -leisure World Well is located behind a fenced enclosure in Leisure World on Beverly Manor Road, Well pump IS electrical motor-driven. The well pumps into Beverly Manor Reservoir buf has the ability to pump directly into the Leisure World Distribution System. · Well No.7 - Well No.7, located on the south Side of Westminster Avenue and just east of Seal Beach Boulevard, has not been utilized in recent years and IS on "Inactive" status. TABLE 3 CITY OF SEAL BEACH GROUNDWATER WELLS '~1:"'~.):': l' -;;';':;J1.~~/. 'i-:; .,,/.., . :;...l,.t:ri.- .........~-lt, ~;.4.f..::.~ l:.,;', .. .,;i:',a <~"j.;, if \;.:.....;;.,fr:...r ,PerfOrallons . ;l"":\:';" ;f J~'t~~4; "."f"fJ ." o.~ t{'.3" I,!> .;1. ""',,.. ~ ..... e : I;..l;,~t ~,;;;'*;~'-:; "1"".0 ~ .'.weli.... \~"'''f' it, : T~~'~ ~Elf:,~..; i:..... .~. ..':U"A;.J".-t :;.:Well'~' ..'i.Wen:,rf '.. Oale- .Bore;'. i.LI!h!09: "-r.EI'46'~, r: Cased'l ,....,'!... I'" .,r'i . .1, 8V;,'I\,.' - ......'!t. "A~..",'lI (f.. ".. ,~.. I. ..., ". ~. fj. ..~ ~ .Orlned:": ~'Deplh~, lft'Sltef~" Stala Wan No,,: " Subtype" ~ Status"'", .t,O'8pth. ' "YIN,," '~YIN.t ~Ground'~ '.Top; -.aottom . " Well OS5Il1 W-07C02 Single Inacllve 7/1/S0 674 Y N 900 674 S80 6S4 No 7 Casing Bolsa OS5IllW-DSHOl S,ngle Acbve 1/14177 10S0 Y Y 2100 1040 370 1020 ChiCO Casing Beverly OS5I12W-01 A04 Single Acbve 11/27/6 920 Y N 1120 800 400 800 Manor Casing 8 Leisure 05S/12W-01A03 S,ngle Acbve 417162 840 Y N 980 840 420 840 Wo~d Casing Resolution Number .::ii21.1 SEAL BEACH 2000 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN ~ r -- . , - - .- .- . ~ - TABLE 4 CITY OF SEAL BEACH GROUND WATER SUPPLY SOURCES .01'. ........ ........" r:' .~..~.>.... ~ ::..1....; ...~-t ,4"" .1...... .......t. ~ ..' ..... ~..~L4. 'P.' ~J~"~': ..;:........'J, I"",':...:..tl-.", . 't ';.Q.i!lo"" .' t... ~ .'.... <' '.~ r SourC8.t, i,ll f't' ~t1; ;-r::..).j["JCapacity~~::l~..'.. ...~. 'j' :;ISt~tUS'::r;~ ~: 'l"i:fr":;;r.~ M!?IIV!l F?rCl!~ '~i':.)~~:\>~ '....~. ..J.")'l,'..1..~ ~.. 1'1 "'_"",.r.', 't. I.. '"..; ,1-,'\11, . ~ -.. .;t...,.r't. . t ' ....,. I.... ,A). 'J. ,'...1.. I.. Balsa Chlca Well 2800 gpm @ 68 pSI (4 0 MGD) Active 400HP Electnc Molar 250 HP Natural wNanable Speed Dnve Gas Engine Beverly Manor 2000 gpm @ 10 pSI (2 86 MGD) ActIve Nona 100 HP Natural Well Gas EngIne LeIsure World 3200 gpm @ 10 pSI (4 6 MGD) ActIve 250 HP Electnc Motor N/A Well Well No 7 600 gpm @ 65 pSI (0 86 MGD) Inactive 50 HP Electnc Motor N/A Melropohtan Water Dlstnct 4580 gpm (6 4 MGD) ActIve N/A N/A (MWD) I Imported Wafer is obfained through fhe Municipal Water Districf of Orange County (MWDOC) as mentioned previously. The imported water is supplied by OC-35 Connection to Metropolitan Water Distnct of Southern California (MWD) system. The connection IS located at Springdale Street and Westminster Avenue, This is a shared facilify with City of Hunfingfon Beach, which operates the facility and communicafes with MWDOC and MWD for the requested flows. The maximum flow capacity of the connection for Seal Beach is 6.4 million gallons per day (MGD), Reliability Planning I Law 10631. A plan shall be adopted in accordance with this chapter and shall do all of the following: 10631 (c) Desclibe the Jehability of the water supply and vulnerability to seasonal or climatic sh011age, to the extent practicable, 10631 (c) For any water source that may not be available at a consistent level of use, given specific legal, environmental, water quality, or chmatic factors, descnbe plans to replace that source with altemal1ve sources or water demand management measures, to the extent practicable. 10631 (c) Provide data for each of the following: (I) An average water year, (2) A single dry water year, (3) Multiple dry water years, I 10632. The plan shall provide an urban water shortage contmgency analysis, which includes each of the following elements, which are within the authority of the urban water supplier: 10632 (b) An estimate of the mimmum water supply available during each of the next three-water years based 011 the dricst three-year historic sequence for the agency's water supply. I I I Resolution Number :5019 SEAL BEACH 2000 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN .- -... "'I"'_~IJ Reliability Reliability is a measure of a water service system's expected success in managing water shortages To plan for long-ferm wafer supply reliability, the City has very few supply augmentation but several demand reduction opfions. In addition to climafe, other facfors that can cause water supply shortag~s are earthquakes, chemical spills, and energy outages af freatment and pumping facilities. Reliability planning requires information about: (1) the expected frequency and severity of shortages; (2) how additional water management measures are likely to affect the frequency and severity of shortages, (3) how available contingency measures can reduce the impact of shortages when they occur. The City of Seal Beach has adopfed a system-wide annualized demand reduction target of no more than 25 percent. It IS believed that anything over a 25% reducfion would cause an economic hardship within the city, The 25 percent cnferion is an overall use reduction target. The City used the Department of Water Resources' Bulletin 160-98 the California Wafer Plan Update, chapters 7,8 and 9, Options for Meeting Future Water Needs, In the development of the reliabllify comparison section. Frequency and Magnitude of Supply Deficiencies The City experienced fhe effects of the stafewide drought during 1976-77; during which all-residential and commercial landscape watering was suspended for the duration of the water shortage, During 1987-89, the communify was better prepared fo handle drought impacts, due to the adopfion of no-waste ordinances and successful voluntary rationing on the part of the community. Water conservafion programs, including free showerheads and foilet leak detection dye fablefs for residential customers, and the educational water conservation programs With the local schools were very effective, The current and fufure supply projections through 2020 are shown in Table 3. The future supply projections assume normal imported water delJveries and average annual recharge to the Main Orange Counfy Basin, Plans to Assure a Reliable Water Supply The future supply projections rely on proper management of the Orange County Groundwater Basin and successful implementation of the MWD's WSDM "wisdom" plan. Imported Water City of Seal Beach, as mentioned previously, relies on MuniCipal Wafer District of Orange County (MWDOC) and MWD for imported water supplJes. MWDOC supplies ItS member agencies With wholesale imported water provided by the MWD from both the Colorado River Aqueduct and Sfate Water Projecf sysfem. MWD IS the only source of imported water presently available to MWDOC and ifs member agencies. With the increasing population estimates, MWDOC's retail member agencies, as a whole, are expected fo increase fheir dependence upon imported water supplies in the future. The Sfafe Wafer Project (SWP) conveys water from Northern California to areas south of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta through a series of rivers, canals, reservoirs, aqueducts, and pumping plants. Wafer from fhe SWP originafes at Lake Oroville, Resolution Number~ SEAL BEACH 2000 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN .- located on the Feafher River in Northern California, and subsequently flows into the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. From the delfa, the water is then transported by the California Aqueduct through the Central Valley and into the Southern California. This system is owned and operated by the State Department of Water Resources (DWR). Colorado River wafer IS conveyed from the California-Arizona border to the mefropolltan area via the Colorado River Aqueduct (CRA). Its 242-mile journey begins from the intakes at Lake Havasu to the terminal reservoir known as Lake Matthews, located near fhe Clfy of Riverside. The CRA is owned and operated by MWD. 1 Both fhe Northern California and Colorado River supplies, however, are faced with potential and uncertain reductions It is projected thaf the SWP supply to agencies south of the Delta Will be reduced due to increased use within the areas of its origin. In the past decade, deliveries from the SWP have been reduced by nearly ten percenf In dry years. Moreover, the growing environmenfal challenges associated with the Bay- Delfa, such as saltwater Intrusion from the San Francisco Bay and the return flow of Delta agriculturallrngation wafer, have threatened fo degrade fhe quality of water Soufhern California receives from the SWP. Confaminants such as bromide, Total Organic Carbon, and pafhogens are a small sampling of water quality concerns over Sfate Project water. Southern California is also facing major cutbacks in the water supply traditionally drawn from the Colorado River. This resource will undergo reductions as result of U.S. Supreme Court decision. Under a 1922 agreement, California is allowed 4.4 million acre-feet of water each year from the Colorado River. Over a period of time, however, the State has been diverting un-utilized and surplus water when it has been available. California has relied on this "exfra" water, as it has had to confend with the growing demands of the region During fhe lasf five years, California water agencies with rights to the Colorado River (Including MWD) have averaged 5,2 million acre-feet annually. Due to increased demand and competition from the six other states that draw from the river, California is currently obligafed to develop a water plan to stay within the state's 4.4-million acre-foot apportionment. The proposal balances storage programs with increased conservation efforts and water transfers, MWDOC is currently investigating programs that would reduce fhe District's reliance on imported water resources. 1 Reliability Comparison Table 5 details estimated water supply projections associated wifh several water supply reliability scenarios. For further information on fhe dafa, see Three-year Minimum Supply and Water Shortage Contingency Plan sections. Table 5 Supply Reliability Multiole Drv Water Years Averagel Single Dry Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Normal Water (Volume) (Volume) (Volume) Water Year 2003 2004 2005 Year 2000 (Volume) (Volume} 11500 11500 11500 11500 11500 Unit of Measure: Acre-feetlYear I, As mentioned earlier the City has dual sources of supply For the next three years (2003 through 2005) any reduction In groundwater supplies can be supplanted by Increased purchases available from Metropolitan Water District (MWD) through MWDOC. MWD has documented availability of sufficient supplies for the next three years In the Report on Metropolitan Water Supplies dated February 2002 I I I Resolution Number~~<i SEAL BEACH 2000 URBAN WATER MANAGE~ 'P'l.... Transfer or Exchange Opportunities Law 10631. A plan shall be adopted in accordance with this chapter and shall do all of the following: 10631 (d) Describe the opportunities for exchanges or transfers of water on a short-tenn or long-term basis. Water Transfers The City relies on MWD for exploring dry year wafer fransfer options with agricultural districts and others sfatewide. Since groundwater recharge operations are dependent upon purchase of imported water supplies to a certain extent MWDOC is discussing transfers with of her agencies in other parts of the State, Water Use Provisions Law ] 0631. A plan shall be adopted m accordance with this chapter and shall do all of the following: 1063] (e) (I) Quantify, to the extent records are available, past and current water use, over the same five-year increments described in subdivision (a), and projected water use, identifying the uses among water use sectors including, but not necessarily limited to, all of the following uses: (A) Single-family residential; (B) Multifamily, (C) Commercial; (D) Industrial; (E) InstitutIOnal and governmental; (F) Landscape; (G) Sales to other agencies; (H) Saline water intrusion barriers, groundwater recharge, or conjunehve use, or any combinatIOn thereof; and (I) Agneultural. (2) TIle water use projecl1ons shall be in the same 5-year mcrements to 20 years or as far as data is available. Past, Current and Projected Water Use Since 1990, new connections are being added af a rafe about 1 % per year, but because of new plumbing efficiency standards, landscape guidelines, and of her conservation programs, water demand is steady. Unaccounted water losses average about 10% of total production. The City is currently evaluafing a proposed developmenf project entitled "Boeing Space and Communications Specific Plan" (The project). The Project is located in the City of Seal Beach in northwest Orange County. The 107 -acre site is located southwest of the intersecfJon of Seal Beach Boulevard and Westminster Boulevard, The Project consists of four Planning Areas . Planning Area 1 - Approximately 41 acres for Core Campus of BSC. Exisllng 345,000 square-feet (SF) of space including manufacfuring, office, research and development, Iighf industrial, warehouse and distribution, and support services. An additional 345,000 SF is planned for this Planning Area. Resolution Number SEAL BEACH 2000 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN . Planning Area 2 - Approximately 16 acres and 345,000 SF of existing manufacturing and research and developmenf and office space. Planning Area 2 includes allowances for new business park uses, including manufacturing, office, research and development, light industnal, warehouse and distribution, and support services Planning Area 2 will not exceed 345,000 SF of new or existing facilities, . Planning Area 3 - Approximately 45 acres with up to 628,000 SF space for business park which may include manufacturing, office, research and I development, light industrial, warehouse and distribution, and support services, . Planning Area 4 - Approximately 5 acres with 32,500 SF of space planned for 120-room hotel and commercial land uses. Table 6 Past, Current and Projected Water Use Water Use Sectors 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 Single family 1447 1568 1531 1560 1599 1640 1668 residential Multi-famllv residential 1682 1723 1716 1752 1800 1850 1886 Commercial 606 579 577 468 481 490 566 Indusfrial Institutional and 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 Qovemmental · Landscape Sales to other agencies Saline barriers Groundwafer recharge (recycled water) Coniuncfive use Aariculture Boeing Specific Plan 300 300 300 300 .. Unaccounted-for 215 230 225 220 230 240 260 system losses Total With Boeing 4500 4610 4720 4880 SpeCific Plan Total Wifhout Boeing 4150 4300 4249 4200 4310 4420 4580 SpeCific Plan Umt of Measure: Acre-feeVYear . Esfimated *. Proposed Project Table 7 Number of Connections by Customer Type. Customer TVDe 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 Single family residential 4472 4600 4800 5000 5200 Multl-familv residential 615 625 635 650 675 Commercial 320 330 340 350 360 Industrial Institutional and aovernmental Landscaoe/recreatlon Aanculture Other (Recvcle water) Total 5407 5555 5775 6000 6235 * The residential figures do nof include Leisure World served by a single master meter I I I I I Resolution Number~~~ SEAL BEACH 2000 URBAN WATER MANAGE~ ~ It is apparent that the City needs to improve infonnation about Its customers. Previously, the City identified and billed customers on the basis of streef address and the meter size The City IS unable fo easily distinguish a commercial customer from a residenflal customer. Obviously, each would have different needs and different appropriate raflonlng allocations. Therefore, the City IS In the process of redesigning Its wafer billing system. The figures used in the table above was obtained from MWDOC's "Focus on Orange County's Water Future" dated December 11, 2000, Residential Sector In the City of Seal Beach, Single-family resldenfial cusfomers average 2 04 persons per connection, Multi-family reSidential cusfomers average 1.93 persons per housing Unit. Total sysfem per capita wafer use averages 143 gallons per capita per day. Water efficiency Improvements appear fa be reducing per capita wafer use, Commercial Sector The City has a mix of commercial customers, ranging from markets, resfauranfs, small stores, offices, beauty shops, and gas stations to multi-story office bUildings and resfaurants and of her facilities serving the visitor population. The sector is growing at abouf less than 1 % per year. Businesses for fhe growing tourist industry are also contributing, This trend is expected to continue fhrough 2020, Industrial Sector The City has no industrial sector other than some light aerospace manufacturing The Industrial sector has decreased much in the lasf decade. However, the Cify IS currently evaluating a proposed development project entitled "Boeing Space and Communications Specific Plan" as mentioned above. Institutional/Governmental Sector The City has a stable institutionaVgovernmental sector, primarily local government, schools, visitor serving public facilities, and a much-scaled down Naval Base, Agricultural Sector There IS no agriculture of any significance In the Cify. Resolution NUmber ~7 SEAL BEACH 2000 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Supply and Demand Comparison Provisions Law 10635 (a) Every urban water supplier shall include, as part of its urban water management plan, an assessment of the reliability of its water service to its customers during normal, dry, and mulhple dry water years. This water supply and demand assessment shall compare the total water supply sources available to the water supplier with the total projected water use over the next 20 years, in five-year mcrements, for a normal water year, a single dry water year, and multiple dry water years. The water service reliability assessment shall be based upon the information compiled pursuant to Section 10631, includmg available data frorn the state, regional, or local agency population projections within the service area of the urban water supplier. I Supply and Demand Comparison Assessment of Demands Water demands are reviewed in this assessment for two conditions, . Existinq and committed demand (without the Proiect) ("baseline") This provides a baseline condition as of the date of the assessment, consisting of exisflng land uses, plus development that IS already in progress. . Existinq and committed demand. Dlus the Prolect (wifh -Proiect) I Comparison of Demand and Supply Fufure water demands and supplies, sfarting in 2005, were compared in two'different ways, based on the two projections described above (baseline and wlth-Projecf): . On a tofal annual quantify basis (stated in acre-feet per year (AFY)) . On a peak flow (maximum day) baSIS (stated in gallons per minute (gpm)) . Demand and supply were compared under fhree climatic conditions base (normal) conditions and single-dry and multiple-dry year conditions, These conditions are applicable to comparisons of annual demands and nof the peak now demands, Peak flow is a measure of the water delivery system's ability to meet the highest - day demands placed on fhe system Within a gIven year. Peak demands occur dunng the hot, dry season and as a result do not vary Significantly by dry-year conditions whereas dry year conditions significantly Increase total annual demands. For the purposes of this assessment total annual dry - year demands were assumed fa be 7 percent greater than the normal demands, I Figures 1 through 4 below compares current, and projected water supply and demand. It indicates fhat the City of Seal Beach has sufficienf water fo meet its cusfomers' needs, through 2020 This is based on continued commitment to conservation programs and implementation of vanous projects and programs detailed in the document entitled "Report on Metropolitan Water Supplies- February 2002" by MWD and additional conjunctive use of groundwater basin by OCWD, Figures Listed below proVide compares projecfed water demands and supplies under fhe base and with the proposed Boeing SpeCific Plan Project development conditions: SEAL BEACH 2000 fi~~~~W:A~ Jl~~~, , Figure 1: Normal Year Supply and Demand Figure 2: Single Dry -Year Supply and Demand Figure 3: Multiple Dry -Year Supply and Demand Figure 4: Maximum Day Supply and Demand I Notes, 1- Demand figures for year 2002 are act/lalnumbers, Due to local dry year condlllOlls actual demand for year 2002 is higher than normal year projected demand Projections for yem' 2005 l/IId later are normal year demand projections ay noted. 2- Smgle DIY- Year and Multiple Dry-Year supply figures have been updated based onllew mformation aJ-ai/able slllce the adoption of UWMP-2000 Figure 1: Seal Beach Normal Year Supply and Demand .... III ~ .... Gl a. - Gl I Gl LL . l!! u < 14000 .." ...",~; '..... .,,' 0<' .' ..... -.. , t"";L!; ...t:~...,,, l:~~"f:'~~.l.: ,.';:O.'$Tn:L( , ,'~\""I-li :;";: tW;i ~\r .~~:~J'~ :".:~~.:t;~.' ::~i~~, !~(",.\'.~II"1J~"f.~' '.;f~~~'}-,,~~:. ................. 'i'1!l"1~, t"'f,fl..4 ~I ........... "........,. 12000 _ -t::-"~rfl"tr' ",~~,l'~r~ 'r..-:O:~:t6-;...:r:' ;:f~ If,: ...~;,.~:~,,~,.;t-. .~IJ( -:-:~~.~" !'::\!. : ..... :~1'::,.'tl:.''''' ':.-r..r:,t. I~. t.. . "'( ~.. l..oC" ~1.~. ,'~ '.,.', ',~M2' :'1' . it..... ~;;:...;. ',_ -":~r"J ~~r:'! . . ;:.', t' ..J! f.~ ~ 10000" ...,.".. "'''''''' . "." '.... " .' ~~': " "' ., ",1' 8000 ~. l ..\. ~ .... .. ~.. ... .J,,' ::=,::t- ....1 - ~ J _ h r;'; . ~td., ."~' ~ l~"\;;..... . ~, .... -'\0(" .:.. -;r"l' t", .":t~. ..~..to: ,." 1'1" :-lt~~: >.u . '~'a-~~' rl'~~' ,~1." -~ .... .-v. ~" ....i,(i ,..,... ).' . . . ..It. ..~ _.'. .. ..~ ~... .~.. '_ :c~'.;' ~\r.:'f :1 ~ ~,,- ',r _.:' +~ 1>i" - ',l....."..1 ut"t.'.. :l"t .." d'" ~~'~ ,10~_ .' I"". ~3 .:l~~ f' ~~ ,If'. ~.. ," .. ,~ s.~ f..V :. ':.~I' ~ .~, ".L . it ..J .;t,~.. ... ii' 't~ ~";~ ~"t" w. I ~ ..~~ ':roa.d.' II ......\i ,,:. '. ., r~' ..., H .~-:' .. 'I. ...r -}:........':/J,l./. - . oLh.... . ..'l!......... 4'...~.-. ~.. '.'.. ...... oJ ~ ..:!'" 'i '.....1 ,;':' l~'.' ....... ~ oS' ~'':I -""'~ , .J ....~'.,.~ ..... ,~_.. ~." .~~~,/.~. .....: ...... .:.'ij-~ ~ll$. 'l)Jt~ a-I..{~I'-"'~"~, (4-Jil....".. ... .,). i:'rl g;t'P 1~'5'\-...J ~;:'_~ ...~~: il -2t ~ :'f!.i ,oJ: .u.."'=':. : ". ;~ ,..~., r... . ~"....,.,...... ''J l-, .'n'l,':." o ::\ ':~j ....J,l'~ .,:;~~~~~~' !....~..:.:-.: c~'.j~."'.....'_ '-,.: '. " c:::J Groundwater Supply (jgSJ Imported Supply -- Demand with Projecf -- Baseline Demand 6000 ," ," 4000 2000 2002 2005 2010 2015 2020 I (in Acre-Fool) 2002 2005 2010 2015 2020 Current Supplies Imported Supplies 4300 4300 4300 4300 4300 Groundwater Supplies 7200 7200 7200 7200 7200 Total Supplies 11500 11500 11500 11500 11500 Baseline Demand 4250 4200 4310 4420 4580 Demand with Project 4550 4500 4610 4120 4880 Reserve Sllpplv 6950 7000 6890 6780 6620 Resolution Number SEAL BEACH 2000 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Figure 2: Seal Beach Dry-Year Supply and Demand 14000 '.J~ .::...\...... ~I .. '~''Il. %"'J) - '.' . "Joi:.tC '~''''' t.'1t' l'~",)~""'I~1 ~'e'IJ.' '. f. t, "+"t";"..,.:! I i'M"':J'.I~. ,~". '.; ~ ..,,;:.;\itI..-'t)J. '~~,!,;:~~ 1~~"'~~~::I'jo!.,'~:1 h.i':r.:'~ : ;d:"'~. ,.:.t.;t: r.5..;.if..........IiI'~..lff.:::J.:....lll.:..;-r.:'t......~.;..:...... .~~I;I;I; ""~I'~~. i...~J-"'_~.:." ~-t: ,r; ",n;"'''i.':_ M..';'i"8.' t.i.V} t..!.:. -:~ ~.t,t..::.... ~~';..r( ..~' ~ '~/", ,oJ"" i'" l.~tW f ~:-~., ~:'::! 1.;"~1' '....~ ..~'1J:...:.. . .. ,;l".. -..1-,... .iff'. "-'V.l ~:? 't'i'1~I' ....""r.j .:.,. . . ;"<1 ... .0. ." .~: 12000 8000 6000 ~~. , .0' 4000 2000 0 d'" '+.:: 5: [=:J Groundwater Supply ",': IJE] Imported Supply ~. " -- Demand with Project ,. .;~ -- Baseline Demand " ..', :a 10000 Ql >- .. Ql Co - Ql Ql U. . Ql .. U < I 2002 2005 2010 2015 2020 (m Acre-Foot) 2002 2005 2010 2015 2020 . Current SUDDlies ImDorted SUDDhes 4300 4300 4300 4300 4300 Groundwater SUDDlies 7200 7200 7200 7200 7200 Total SUDDlies 11500 11500 11500 11500 11500 Basehne Demand 4548 4494 4612 4730 4900 Dernand with PlOiect 4869 4815 4933 5050 5222 Reserve SunDlv 6631 6685 6567 6450 6278 I I I I I SEAL BEACH 2000~~~~..tmR fj~GE~ - Figure 3: Seal Beach Multiple Dry-Years Supply and Demand 14000 '.":1' ~.!f....rJ ~!&'~'q!<1""1l.~~.:r.Pt,I~~{\; ,,~'l'.I~.;1-.;r.~:"'I'f.' !i"'''}"v' '~';'''r".;.Q' :\o..,.:.::;ry~..'tl\l.....t"l~\r.t.q'..... .1:,\",".1 .~~1'1'" :"1- .....fI."'!...."...~1 ~"tI :~~l.,-;.:/'.. .1V."{~" ~. ~ .'. 'I' "1"" ',oriI:' :."';:'" t"'i,...~lf\.'jl:..... ~.,~6.'.~..,.+'";JU'VP.:l'''>:....l 'l"" 12000 "~'4--!~.r=..n' J .(~J~.A"'::'lI~~'l~:~~')'&.~"~"';'I~dii.tl.;;' ~'1'r~~1, ~.....'M' ,"';::0., -''I. ",':,. :''J!:''-'' ... . '... ..... . 14. . ~'l.) i; ..."..... " III nt_'1 'wt;r.~ ..t.~l'" ......_~ i.. ,;'1 ~,~. 1.';:",' "J: ~l.' -::'.f. ," :~, "\ "~'J .:_~.:.",,: ... .tF~ '''l~t...J ~~...t.o.l ~. ... .:..' ~::... f.""'., "c:.2 t'h"'liJ'4 :.:- )-m 10000 :\<, .:.r:a.t.l '~l;'.. '.~1 r ~,~I'~ 11.". l' ',J:. ~ to,l:;' ~<~f .' ..... ':1., ~ . ""t,~ ...: jI-r. -. j.'t ;1.'1 ....':"; . ':t. L.. i/J ' ~~' I ~ y ~..r.{''t f:;',:,J. ~'t'~;:.:. ",: & 8000 -~. :~t."~'. :~"~..r~' It.t.; ........:.;,1, .... .~ ,:./J! ~~~~L ~ ~.: 1:~':~ g: 6000 :., ,.,....! .,t.- ~;' . .~.,::;: ','. .... 17 i~' .~t:~: ~~1J- t1'~lJf::' :~:-}:..' e! '.1......., .' . ,. o 4000 .:.'"j, ( lJ. ~;~ _, ,-ti ~...,' ? .~':':~'.~ I'" J)~.. _... I < J. .:~;.~:' ~ ~.'.~ . J ~' ..P'~ . '"\' li 1.)...'"' \~ .'11:0-': t jJ.~1' ~'.r ,'\! I ~..- ~'.!"" "oI.otifl'!'" .tJ' ir~:' t.. ~,,'.>h". ..,..... It.'. ..~ "''fi'~' it'..; -.. r,'.-~;;' 1,'1-. ~'~'.:Y "1' 'Ii ':..~ r ~rt..r T" r~~.;;.r ,-t ',... 'c' -~~:P-; ~.) ~"' ~,~' 2000 'J ";' If -: 'or~': j.~., ".!I X'Of ',''or -: 0/>. ~"'~ ; "111; ~.: ~..1" '"'' ~p .~..., l/ ~l"'-I !I'.. ':.. 1.'::JL(l';'" : ..f, ...~ :ri.', ~l ~,'!l- ......;VLo~ ,.:,,,'! :1. ~::':.." ~.1.:t~~}o....-:tf9,:,ot{ ," J. ....r... '.,. :~It'{;l~/ l''''~'-~;~ "f"'~ fJ .~~'rf7 - :.\~th..'f'C' " ","1'10: II ,'. ," 'l.r If ~;:,~~.. ~~';'~.l>~H- ~~'~ :;'__I::!l:;;'~ '}:j ~~ ..,'~ ~~ o 2002 2005 2010 2015 2020 c:::J Groundwater Supply ~ Imported Supply -- Demand with Project -- Baseline Demand (,n Acre-Foo,) 2002 2005 2010 2015 2020 Current Supplies Imported SUPlllies 4300 4300 4300 4300 4300 Groundwater Supplies 7200 7200 7200 7200 7200 Total Supplies 11500 11500 11500 11500 11500 Baseline Demand 4578 4494 4612 4730 4900 Demand with Proiect 4869 4815 4933 5050 5222 Reserve Supply 6631 6685 6567 6450 6278 Resolution Number 6b1 SEAL BEACH 2000 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Figure 4: Seal Beach Maximum-Day Supply and Demand 8000 7000 6000 .' ;1' ", 5000 11' . [ 4000 CI . .~ '. ..7' .ti '" . " ,,} 1~. c:::J Groundwafer Supply IE3llmported Supply -- Demand with Projecf -- Baseline Demand I 2002 2005 2010 2015 2020 (m /Ulm) 2002 2005 2010 2015 2020 Current SUlllllies Imported Supplies 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 Groundwater Supplies 4500 4500 4500 4500 4500 Total Supplies 7200 7200 7200 7200 7200 Baseline Demand 4800 4800 4800 4800 4800 Demand with ProJect 5150 5150 5150 5150 5150 Reserve SUDDlv 2050 2050 2050 2050 2050. I Imported water supplies are subject to availability. To assist local water providers in assessing the adequacy of local water supplies that are reliant in whole or in part on Metropolitan imported supply, Metropolitan has provided Information concerning the availabilify of the supplies to ifs entire service area, This report, entitled "Report on Metropolitan's Water Supplies" (February 11, 2002) ("Metropolitan Report"), is consistent With Metropolitan's RegIonal Urban Water Management Plan (December, 2000) ("RUWMP"). In order to assure supply reliability for its service area, Metropolitan has developed Its Water Resource Strategy The key elements of Mefropolltan's strategy are' . Portfolio of Diversified Supplies: Metropolitan continues to develop a portfolio of diversified supplies. The diverse water project Investments reduce the risk of failure in any single part of the portfolio. Risks sfem from cost, quality, or supply availability. It also reduces fhe potential impact of a severe drought or an emergency such as a major earthquake. The portfolio of diverSified supplies avoids fhe pitfalls of "putting all your eggs in one basket." I . Supplv Reserves to Mitiaate Uncertainties: Metropolitan plans to mlflgate for supply uncertainfies by continuing to secure supplies and build infrastrucfure improvements that are available in advance of the time of need and can provide back up capabilities This adaptive management approach creates supply reserves that maintain Mefropolitan's flexibility in responding to changes in demand and supply conditions I I I Resoiution Number ~~ SEAL BEACH 2000 URBAN WATER MANAGE~ - -- . New Rate Structure: Metropolitan's Board of Directors approved a new rate structure In October 2001. The rafe structure provides the necessary financing capabillfies to support fhe IRP and strategic planning vision that Metropolitan is a regional provider of services, maintains the reliable delivery of imported water supplies, encourages the development of additional local supplies like recycling and conservaflon, and accommodates a water transfer market. Through its regional services, Mefropolitan ensures a baseline of reliability and qualify for Imported water deliveries in its service area. By unbundling its full-service water rate, Metropolitan provIdes greater opportunity for member agencies to competitively manage their supplies and demand to meet future needs in a responsible, least-cost manner. . Imolementina water manaaemenf oroarams thaf suooort the develooment of cost-effective local resources: Metropolitan has established and implemented programs to provide financial incentives to member agencies In the development of local resources. These programs include the Local Projecfs Program (water recycling and groundwater recovery), Conservation Program, and Request-for- Proposal process for ocean desalination projects. These programs are meeting the resource objectives in the IRP. The status and progress of Mefropolltan's efforts in implementing programs to support the development of conservation and local resources managemenf programs are documented in Metropolitan's RUWMP and Metropolitan's Annual Progress Report to the Callforma State Legislafure on Achievemenfs in Conservation, Recycling and Groundwater Recharge, dafed February 1, 2002, · Securino addItional imoorted suoolies throuoh oroorams that Increase the availabilitv of water delivered throuah the Colorado River Aaueduct and the California Aqueduct: Mefropolitan has implemented several programs fo continue the reliable deliveries of water supplies through the Colorado River Aqueduct, the California Aqueduct and the development of in-basin groundwater sforage. These efforts include participating in federal'and state Initiatives such as the California Water Use Plan for the Colorado River, CALFED for the Bay-Delta, and the Sacramento Valley Water Managemenf Agreement. Beyond these initIatives, Metropolitan has acqUIred additional supplies through cooperative agreements and business partnerships with entitles in the Central Valley and within. fhe Colorado River system to Implement water transfers, storage, conservation and land managemenf programs, FInally, in accordance wifh Metropolitan's IRP and Slrategic Plans, Metropolitan and the member agencies have moved ahead in maximizing the use of available water supplies through in-basin groundwater conjunctive use programs, The status and progress of Metropolitan's efforts in Implementing programs fo secure additional supplemenfal imported water supplies are documented In the Metropolitan's RUWMP and the document entitled, "Report on Metropolitan's Water Supplies" (Metropolitan Report) · Providlna the infrastructure needed to Intearate imoorted and local sources of suoolv: Metropolitan's Capital Investment Plan (CIP) includes projects that have been identJfied from its sfudies of projected water needs that are embodied in Board-approved documents such as the IRP, Distribution System Overview Study, and the Chief Executive Officer's Business Plan. The Identification, assessment and prioritization of 155 reliability and rehabilitation projects have been completed in the CIP, The status and progress of Metropolitan's infrastructure improvements are documented in Metropolitan's Capital Invesfment Plan, This plan IS presented to Metropolitan's Board of Directors as part of the annual budget review. · Esfablishlna a comorehensive manaaement clan for deallna wifh oeriodlc surplus and shortage condifions: In April 1999, Metropolitan's Board of Directors adopted fhe Water Surplus and Drought Managemenf Plan (WSDM Plan). This plan will guide the management of Mefropolitan's wafer supplies during surplus and shortage condlflons to achieve fhe reliability goals of the IRP Resolution Number 5;19 SEAL BEACH 2000 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN "'~ The establishment of a comprehensive management plan for dealing with penodic surplus and shortage conditions is documented in the RUWMP and Metropolitan Report No. 1150, Water Surplus and Drought Management Plan. Water Demand Management Measures I Law 10631 (f) Provide a description of the supplier's water demand management measures. This description shall include all of the followmg: (I) A descripllon of each water demand management measure that is cun.ently being implemented, or scheduled for implemental1on, mclndmg the steps necessary to implement any proposed measures, includmg, but not limited to, all of the following:. . ., . .., ...... . The City of Seal Beach is committed to implementing wafer conservation programs. ThiS Section discusses wafer conservation. As mentioned in the cover letter to this Plan, the City of Seal Beach is a signatory to the Memorandum of Understanding regarding Urban Water Conservation in California (MOU) as of year 2000 and is therefore a member of the California Urban Water Conservation Council (CUWCC) The following are Just some of the benefits of being a member of the CUWWC: conferences, BMP workshops, free publications, research regarding water management pracfices, leadership on water legislation and networking with other agencies and interest groups. For the purpose of responding to the Urban Water Management Planmng Act the City I will address the 16 Demand Management Measures. Descriptions of the City's water conservation programs are below, The City will in good faith address and comply with the BMP targefs lisfed in the CUWCC MOU where applicable. DMM 1 -- Interior and Exterior Water Audits for Single Family and Multi-Family Customers IMPLEMENTATION DESCRIPTION The City, in cooperation with MWD and MWDOC may offer free residential water use surveys to Single-family and multi-family cusfomers. If is the City's goal to complete surveys for 15% of the single family and 15% of the multi- family connections over the next ten years. The City's finance department IS In the process of developing an inquiry program to sort I billing records by water use within secfors, so thaf letters offenng the free surveys can be mailed to the highest water users. If a customer does nof participate and remains on the highest wafer use list the subsequent year, the customer would receive additional letters offenng a water use survey. Institutional and governmental cusfomers will also be offered water use surveys. All City-owned faCIlities Including the City Hall, fhe City's corporaflon yard facilities, and public restrooms Will be surveyed and retrofitted. I DMM 2 -- Plumbing Retrofit IMPLEMENTATION DESCRIPTION Through MWD and MWDOC the City partiCipates in the distribution of showerheads, aerators, and tOilet tank leak detection tablets. The City will targef 10% of the single- family homes and multi-family homes every two years. In order to reach the fargeted 10% every two years fhe City may need to distribufe excess devices due to fhe probability of distribution to people oufside the fargeted group. I I I Resolution Number~~~ SEAL BEACH 2000 URBAN WATER MANAGE , IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE. The City will continue fo implement this DMM at a targeted rate of 10% of single and multi-family customers every two years, However, actions required by this DMM are included as part of DMM 1 and DMM 16, which City believes is a more efflclenf approach to implementing DMM 2. For each dwelling unit the survey team would complete a cusfomer data form (including number of people per household, number of bathrooms, age of appliances, and lot and landscaped area square footage). This data will then be used to analyze the customer's water use. Clfy staffs would review the surveyed customers' wafer use records, and compare historic with current use for one year after the survey. If the reduction in water use were not In line with DMM water savings estimates, staff would flag the customer's account and offer a follow up survey DMM 3 -- Distribution System Water Audits, leak Detection and Repair IMPLEMENTATION DESCRIPTION' The City has conducted water audits and leak defection and repair since 1991, as described in its 1990 Urban Water Management Plan. City staffs are trained at AWWA- sponsored training programs. Since the City IS located in an earthquake zone, It has incorporated the system water audit and leak detection, and meter calibration (production and customer meters) programs into its utility operations, On average, City wafer department crews spend about 30 days surveYing approximafely 10 miles of main and laterals per year The City also has an annual valve exercise program, to ensure that interconnections wifh adjacent utilities actually work. In coordination with the Orange County Fire AuthOrity, the water department complied with recent amendments to California Code of Regulations Title 19, Division 1, Chapter 9, pertaining to standardization of fire hydrants and assOCiated fire protection equipment. The City has acquired standby generators to assist in water distribution in an emergency. The City meets or exceeds minimum fire flow requirements, in accordance With Callforma Water Works Sfandards. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE The City has permanently incorporated this DMM into its operations and maintenance procedures, and established a three-year rotation schedule. City crews will survey at least 10 miles of main and laterals per year on an on-going basis METHODS TO EVALUATE EFFECTIVENESS The accounting staff annually review the data records to confirm that the unaccounted for water losses stay under 10%. DMM 4 -- Metering with Commodity Rates IMPLEMENTATION DESCRIPTION The City IS fully metered for all customer sectors, including separate meters for single-family residential, commercial, With the exception of City owned offices and landscapes. There are approximately 610 multi-family complexes, with over 8,000 dwelling units in the City. Commercial/industrial/institutional cusfomers are required to have fire sprinkler systems. The Ciiy'requires residential fire sprinklers in all new single and multi-family constiliction. Separate meters are required on fire sprinkler systems, With associated monthly service charges. Resolution Number ~i1~ SEAL BEACH 2000 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE: The City will confinue to install and read meters on all new services, and will continue to conduct Its meter calibration and replacement program, METHODS TO EVALUATE EFFECTIVENESS Periodic review of customer water use - ' comparing current water use per capita with historic data. CONSERVATION SAVINGS: Metered accounts may result in a 20% reduction in demand compared to non- metered accounts. BUDGET: Meter installation costs are part of new service connection fees, I DMM 5 -- Large Landscape Water Audits and Incentives IMPLEMENTATION DESCRIPTION' Irrigation surveys will be conducted for the City's large landscape customers (currently defined as three acres or greater). The MWD sponsored Mobile Lab team conducts the surveys. During the survey, the team calculates a water budget for the site -- the amount of water necessary for that site based on the size of the landscape and the climate. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE and METHODS TO EVALUATE EFFECTtVENESS The City plans fo complete the large landscape customers' wafer use surveys over the next five years The City will continue to Implement this DMM by annual review of customers' water use, and by offering on-site follow-up evaluaflons to customers whose total water use exceeds their total annual water budget. CONSERVATION SAVtNGS, Landscapes that are upgraded based on survey recommendations could result in a 15% reduction in water demand I DMM 6 -- Landscape Water Conservation Requirements IMPLEMENTATION DESCRtPTION: The City will establish a landscape ordinance Including firescaping gUidelines and to conform to California Water Code Section 65590 et seq. (AB325), which covers new and existing commercial, Industrial, institutlonall governmental, and multi-family customers, and Includes new single-family homes. The Cify has water efficient landscaping af median strips. The benefits are as listed: (1) the public can see attracfive low-water using landscapes, (2) the City IS demonstrating its commitment to improved efficiencies in public water uses, (3) City public works crews will have improved safety records, because of reduced exposure to injUry while maintaining landscaping in the median sfrips, and (4) there will be cost savings associated with lower water bills, reduced median strip maintenance, and fewer street and gutter repairs as a result of eliminating runoff, IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE: The City will permanently Incorporafe this DMM into ItS ordinances. METHODS TO EVALUATE EFFECTIVENESS. The City will monitor the cost savings on all city properties, the attendance to the Water Efficient Landscape (WEL) demonstration garden and the number of WEL materials distributed. The RCD will report annually on the landscape water savings associated with fhis DMM to the City. CONSERVATION SAVINGS: The landscape ordinance may lead to a similar 15% reduction due to landscape surveys and water budgef irngafion scheduling, I I I I SEAL BEACH 2oofO~~.&WA~R~A1fE~l~ DMM 7 -- Public Information IMPLEMENTATION DESCRIPTION: The City promotes water conservation and other resource efficiencies in coordination with MWD and MWDOC, The City will dlstribufe public information through bill inserts, brochures, and special events every year. City water bills are being redesigned to show gallons used per day for the last billing penod compared to the same period the previous year (previously, the' bill only indicated fotal billing period usage in billing units (one hundred cubit feet of water, which IS 748 gallons) This year the City established a World Wide Web Home Page for Public Works Department, which includes information on water usage, conservation, and other resource issues IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE: The City Will continue to provide public information services and materials to remind fhe public about water and other resource issues, METHODS TO EVALUATE EFFECTIVENESS The City Will track the commenfary regarding the Information provided. CONSERVATION SAVINGS: The Cify has no method to quantify the savings of this DMM but believes that this program IS in the public's Interest DMM 8 -- School Education IMPLEMENTATION DESCRIPTION: The Cify continues to work with MWDOC and the school district to promote water conservation and other resource efficiencies at school facilities and to educate students about these issues As part of the commercialllndustriallinstitutional water conservation programs, all public school toilets, urinals, showerheads, and faucet aerators have been replaced with ultra-low flow models. The Cify relies on MWDOC fo implement DMM 8 MWDOC on behalf of the City provides educational materials for several grade levels, State and County water system maps, posters, workbooks, Interactive compufer software, and videos, and sponsors teachers' Project Water Education for Teachers (WET) training, science fairs, and water conservation contests, IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE: The Cify will continue to implement fhis DMM af fhe levels described. METHODS TO EVALUATE EFFECTIVENESS, The City will continue to survey the institufions and educafors on the number of programs, materials and attendance at water conservation activities. CONSERVATION SAVINGS: The City has no mefhod to quantify fhe savings of this DMM buf believes that this program is in fhe public's interest. DMM 9 -- Commercial and Industrial Water Conservation IMPLEMENTATION DESCRIPTION: The City will develop a program for commercial and industrial users. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE and CONSERVATION SAVtNGS. The City Will develop an implemenfafion schedule of this DMM at a predetermined annual target rate for the next five years. The City Will make savings evaluations. METHODS TO EVALUATE EFFECTIVENESS The City will Implement this DMM by annual review of customers' water use, and by offenng on-site follow-up evaluations to customers. Resolution Number ~ SEAL BEACH 2000 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN DMM 10 -- New Commercial and Industrial Water Use Review IMPLEMENTATION DESCRIPTION: The City building department will coordinate the implementation of this DMM in cooperation with the Public Works Department. Staff will review the building plans to determine the water use efficiency before a permit is issued to the new cusfomer. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE: The City will implement this DMM. I METHODS TO EVALUATE EFFECTIVENESS: The staff will report on plan improvemenfs and compare it wifh histoncal data fo determine the increase in water use effiCiency. CONSERVATION SAVtNGS: Commercial water reduction achieved from DMMs excluding Ultra Low Flush TOIlet Replacement is estimated at 12% to 15% in gallons per employee per day DMM 11 -- Conservation Pricing, Water Service and Sewer Service tMPLEMENTATION DESCRIPTION: The City of Seal Beach does not presently have an inclining block rate structure for all customer sectors. If fhe City were to implement an inclining block rate structure residential customers would receive a lifeline allotment as the base block Usage above the water budget is billed at a higher block rafe. METHODS TO EVALUATE EFFECTIVENESS: If Implemented City staff would monitor the number of violators who use water In excess of their established allotment. I CONSERVATION SAVINGS: The incentive of thiS DMM is to decrease the cusfomer's water costs and water use fhrough price incentives as described above. DMM 12 -- Landscape Water Conservation for New and Existing Single Family Homes IMPLEMENTATION DESCRtPTION' As discussed under DMM 6, the City has not yet adopted a landscape ordinance pertaining to new and existing single-family homes. The City works with MWDOC and others to promote efficient landscaping practices, IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE: The City has not yet incorporated this DMM Into ItS ordinances, but will continue to dlstnbute conservation related matenals to all new service connections. DMM 13 -- Water Waste Prohibition IMPLEMENTATION DESCRIPTION: The City esfablished a "Conservation of Public Wafer I Supply" ordinance in 1991, which IS actively enforced Enforcemenf includes the "gutter flooder" patrol, to educafe customers, and if necessary, Issue warnings and citations for violations. See Appendix for the "Conservation of Public Water Supply" Ordinance. IMPLEMENTATtON SCHEDULE: The City has permanently incorporated this DMM into its ordinances. METHODS TO EVALUATE EFFECTIVENESS: All citations and violations are reported annually. Over the period of thiS DMM the City has seen a reduction in the number of violations. I I I Resolution NUmber ~ SEAL BEACH 2000 URBAN WATER MANAGEM CONSERVATION SAVINGS: The City has no method to quantify fhe savings of this DMM but believes that this program is in the public's interest BUDGET Enforcement costs are a part of the water department's overhead, DMM 14 -- Water Conservation Coordinator IMPLEMENTATION DESCRtPTION: The City designated a water conservation coordinator In 2000. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE: The City will continue to implement this DMM. METHODS TO EVALUATE EFFECTIVENESS: The City will continue to survey fhe instifutions and educators on the number of programs, materials and attendance at water conservaflon activities CONSERVATION SAVINGS: The City has no method to quantify the savings of this DMM but beheves thaf this program is in the public's interest DMM 15 -- Financial Incentives IMPLEMENTATION DESCRIPTION: The City cost-share commercial and industrial audit costs through the water rates paid to MWDOC. DMM 16 -- Ultra-low Flush Toilet Replacement IMPLEMENTATION DESCRIPTION: The City participafes in a high visibility ultra-low flush toilet replacement program implemented by MWDOC, This program encourages residents to replace their wafer guzzling toilets with 1.6 gallons per flush ULFTs The City through MWDOC has distributed a total of 1263 ULFT foJlets to date, In coordination with MWDOC and partially funded by MWD, OCWD and OCSD, the program offers rebates to customers, free distributions and drop shipments. DMM 16 is also implemented in coordination with DMM 1, DMM 2, and DMM 8 The City considers its ULFT program to be exemplary, because a significant number (1263) of the non- conserving toilets In the City have now been replaced with ultra-low flush models. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE: The City will continue to implemenf fhls DMM until the City's goal IS met at least 80% of all non-conserving and low-flush model foilets In the City will be replaced with ultra-low flush models. Table 8 ULFT Retrofit Program Year # of ULFT Retrofits 2000 200 2001 200 2002 200 2003 200 2004 200 2005 200 2006 200 2007 200 2008 200 2009 200 2010 200 e - estimate Resolution NUmber SEAL BEACH 2000 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN METHODS TO EVALUATE EFFECTIVENESS' The City relies on MWDOC who will calculate annual ULFT replacement program water savings to confirm the savings are within 10% of calculated retrofit-on-resale water savings, using the CUWCC MOU Exhibit 6 methodology and water savings estimates. Exhibit 6 has become an Industry standard for evaluation of ULFT replacement programs. I Water Shortage Contingency Plan Preparation for Catastrophic Water Supply Interruption Law 10632. The plan shall provide an urban water shortage contingency analysis which includes each of the following elements which are wlthm the authority of the urban water supplier: t0632 (c) Actions to be undertaken by the urban water supplier to prepare for, and Implement during, a catastrophic interruption of water supphes including, but not limited to, a regIOnal power outage, an earthquake, or other disaster. I Water Shortage Emergency Response J[11 !;}91, In accordance ,with thlil requirements of A~sembly 811111 X, the City water, and emergency'services departments developed a comprehensive water shortage contingency plan, which was incorporated into the City's Emergency Response Plan in early 1992. The City's plan is consistent with provisions In the County's Emergency Response Plan. Both plans contain procedures for the distnbution of potable water in a disaster; these procedures are consisfent with guidelines prepared by the California State Office of Emergency Services, The City recognizes the importance of the DMMs in redUCing water demand and Will stnve to implement fhe programs within the constraints of small sfaff and resources. The City would call media attention fo the wafer supply situation during a shortage and would step up public water education programs, encourage property owners to apply for a landscape and interior water use survey and continue to advertise fhe importance of customers to Install ULF plumbing fixtures, During declared shortages, or when a shortage declaration appears imminent, the Public Works Director, who serves as fhe authorized representative, activates a City water shortage response plan, During a declared water shortage, the City will accept applications for new building permits but will nof issue permits until the shortage declaration is rescinded. I - .... Resolution Number ~ "l7 SEAL BEACH 2000 URBAN WATER MANAGEME~ Supplemental Water Supplies To offset future pofentlal water shortages due to drought or disasfer, the City IS considering the fOllowing supplemenfal water supplies. Desalination I MWDOC has entered Into a tentative contracf to purchase product water from a seawater desalination plant proposed by a private entity in Huntington Beach. MWDOC is in discussion and analysIs to determine if desalinafion would be cost-effective for drought water shortage mitigation and/or as an emergency water supply, Preliminary analysis indicates that since desalination remains both expensive and energy intensive, If would probably be cost effective only if the County's other water supplies were greatly reduced or not available at all. Challenges Include that the current water distribution system is not designed for potable water fo be input af ocean level, and therefore desalination water would have to be pumped up Into the service area. There are a number of potential desalination planf sites, Including the proposed AES power plant site in Huntington Beach. In fhe event of a major disaster, electric service could be disrupted, so desalinated water might have to be produced and distributed using diesel power Achieving all necessary permlfs, arranging funding and actual construction could be time consuming and would probably take years. Feasibility study results are expecfed by lafe 2001, Water Transfers See the Transfer or Exchange Opportunities section. I Long Term Additional Water Supply Options To meef future long-ferm water demand beyond 2020, the City is relying on MWDOC and OCWD who is studying In vanous water supply proposals, MWD is negotiating for additional water storage In various groundwafer basins. The full range of options available to MWD are described in WSDM plan. OCWD has seriously studied reverse osmosIs freatmenf of tertiary treated waste water to recharge the Main Orange Counfy Groundwater Basin in amounts ranging from 70000 acre-feet to 100000 acre-feet per year which would be in addition to the natural recharge and imported water purchases Water Shortage Contingency Ordinance/Resolution Law I 10632 The plan shall provide an urban water shortage contingency analysis which includes each of the following elements which are wltlIin the authority of the urban water supplier: 10632 (h) A draft water shortage contingency resolutIOn or ordinance. City of Seal Beach Water Shortage Response As mentioned earlier, the City adopted a "Conservation of Public Wafer Supply" Ordinance in 1991, which addresses City's water shortage response. A copy of the ordinance IS Included In the Appendix. Resolution Number ~1~ - SEAL BEACH 2000 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN - ..... Stages of Action Law 10632. The plan shall provide an urban water shortage contingency analysis which includes each of the following elements which are within the authority of the urban water supplier: I 10632 (a) Stages of action to be undertaken by the urban water supplier in response to water supply shortages, mcludmg up to a 50 percent reduction in water supply and an outline of specific water supply cond!t1ons which are applicable to each stage. Rationing Stages and Reduction Goals The City has developed a four- stage rationing plan (see Table 10) to invoke during declared water shortages. The rationing plan includes voluntary and mandafory rationing, depending on the causes, severify, and anticipated duration of the water supply shortage. Table 9 Water Rationina Staaes and Reduction Goals Shortage Stage Customer Type of Condition Reduction Rationing Goal Program Up to 15% I 15% Voluntarv 15 - 25% II 25% Mandatorv 25 - 35% III 35% Mandatorv 35 - 50% IV 50% or > Mandatorv I Priority by Use .' Priorities for use of available potable water during shortages were based on legal requiremenfs set forth in the California Water Code, Sections 350-358. Wafer allocations are established for all customers according to the following ranking sysfem: . Minimum health and safety allocations for interior residential needs (includes single family, multi-family, hospitals and convalescent facilities, retirement and mobile home communities, and student housing, and fire fighting and publiC safety) . Commercial, industrial, Institutional/governmental operations {where water is used for manufactunng and for minimum healfh and safety allocations for employees and visitors}, to mamfam jobs and economic base of the community {not for landscape uses} . Permanent agriculture (orchards, vineyards, and other commercial agriculture which would require at least five years to return to production) . Annual agnculfure (floriculture, strawberries, other truck crops) I . EXisting landscaping . New customers, proposed projecfs without permits when shortage declared. I I I , ~ Resolution Number SEAL BEACH 2000 URBAN WATER MANAGEME ...... Health and Safety Requirements Based on commonly accepted esfimates of inferior residential water use In the United States, Table 16 Indicates per capita health and safety wafer requirements, In Stage I shortages, customers may adjust either interior or outdoor water use (or both), in order to meet the voluntary water reduction goal Stage II, Stage III and Stage IV are mandatory rationing programs, which is likely to be declared only as the result of a prolonged water shortage or as a result of an emergency Water Shortage Stages and Triggering Meehan.isms As fhe water purveyor, fhe City of Seal Beach must provide fhe minimum health and safety water needs of the community at all times. The water shortage response is designed fo provide a minimum of 50% of normal supply during a severe or extended "'Vater shortage. The rationing program triggering levels shown below are meant to ensure that this goal is met. Rationing stages may be triggered by a shortage in one water source or a combination of sources, The City's potable water sources are groundwater, and Imported. Rationing sfages may be triggered by a supply shortage or by contamination In one source or a combination of sources. Because shortages overlap Stages, triggers automatically Implement the more restrictive Stage. Specific criferia for triggering the City's rationing stages are shown in Table 11, Table 10 Water Shortage Stages and Triggering Mechanisms Percent Stage I Stage II Stage III Stage IV Reduction of Up to 15% 15 - 25% 25 - 35% 35 - 50% > SUDDlu Water Supply Condition Total supply IS Total supply is Total supply is Total supply IS Current 85 - 90% of 75-85% of 65 - 75% of less than 65% of Supply "normal" "normal II "normal " "normal" " And Or Or Or Below "norm at" year Below "normal" Fourth Fifth consecutive IS declared year is declared consecutive below below "normal" year "normal" year IS IS declared Or Or declared Or Or Future Supply Projected supply Projected supply Projected supply Projected supply Insufficient to insufficient to Insufficient to Insufficient to provide 80% of provide 75% of provide 65% of provide 50% of "normal" deliveries "normal" deliveries "normal" deliveries "normal" deliveries for the next two for the next two for the next two for the next two years years. years~ years Or Or Or Or Groundwater No excess First year of excess Second year of No excess groundwater groundwater excess groundwater pumping pumping taken, groundwater pumping available. undertaken must be "replaced" pumping taken, Or Within four years. must be "replaced" Reduced wllhln four years groundwater pumping due to replenishment of previously pumped groundwater Or Or Or Or Water Quality Contamlnallon of Contamlnallon of Contamination of 10% of water 20% of water 30% of water supply (exceeds supply (exceeds supply (exceeds primary drinking primary drinking primary drinking water standards) water standardsl water standards \ Or Disaster Loss Disaster Loss Resolution NUmber ~'1t'J1 ~ SEAL BEACH 2000 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Water Allotment Methods The City has not established allocation method for each customer type. Prohibitions, Consumption Reduction Methods and Penalties I . Law 10632 The plan shall provIde an urban water shortage contingency analysis wInch mcludes each of the following elements which are within the authority of the urban water supplier: 10632 (d) AdditIOnal, mandatory prohibitions against specific water use practices dunng water shortages, including, but not limited to, prohibiting the use of potable water for street cleamng 10632 (e) ConsumptIOn reduction methods in the most restriCl1ve stages. Each urban water supplier may use any type of consumption reduction methods in its wllter sh0l1age contmgency analysis that would reduce water use, are appropriate for its area, and have the ability to achieve a water use reduction consistent With up to a 50 percent reduction in water supply, 10632 (I) PenaltIes or charges for excessive use, where applicable, I Mandatory Prohibitions on Water Wasting The Seal Beach Conservafion of Public Supply Ordinance (see Appendix) Includes prohibitions on various wasteful water uses such as lawn watering during mid-day hours, washing sidewalks and driveways with potable water, and allowing plumbing leaks to go uncorrected more than 24 hours after customer notification. Table 11 Consumption Reduction Methods Examples of Consumption Reduction Methods Stage When Method Takes Effect Demand reducllon nrooram All staQes Reduce pressure In water lines Flow restriction Violations onlv Restrict bUlldlno permits III IV Restrict for onlv OrlOrltv uses Use Prohibitions All staoes Water shortaoe PrlClno Per capita allotment bv customer lvpe Plumblno fixture replacement Voluntarv ratlomno I Mandatorv ratlomno 11,111, IV Ineenllves to reduce water consumotlon Education Prooram All Stages Percentaoe reduction bv customer tvoe Other Other I See Appendix the "Conservation of Public Water Supply" Ordinance and MoratOrium on New Connections - which defails the reduction methods - regarding Table 12. I I I Resolution Number ~ '1Q SEAL BEACH 2000 URBAN WATER MANAGEM~ - .- Excessive Use Penalties Any customer violating fhe regulations and restrictions on water use set forth In the "Conservation of Public Water Supply" Ordinance shall receive a wntten warning for the first such violation. Upon a second violation, the cusfomer shall receive a written warning and the district may cause a f1ow-restrictor to be Installed in the service. If a f1ow-restrlcfor is placed, fhe violator shall pay fhe cost of the insfallation and removal. If water service is disconnecfed, it shall be restored only upon payment of the turn-on charge fixed by the City Council, Revenue anCl Expenditure Impacts and Measures to Overcome Impacts Law 10632 The plan shall provide an urban water shortage contingency analysis which includes each of the following elements whIch are witllln the aUlhonty ofthe urban water suppliel: 10632 (g) An analysIs of the impacts of each of the actions and conditIOns described 111 subdivisions (a) to (t), inclusive, on the revenues and expenditures of the urban water supplier .. 10632 (g) [An analysis of the Impacts of each of the] proposed measures to overcome those [revenue and expenditure] impacts, such as the development of reserves and rate adjustments. All surplus revenues that the City collects are currently used to fund the capital Improvemenfs. The City has nof yet estimated projecfed ranges of water sales by shortage stage fo best undersfand the Impact each level of shortage Will have on projected revenues and expendifures by each shortage stage. .' Reduction Measuring Mechanism Law 10632, The plan shall proVide an urban water shortage contingency analysIs which includes each of the following elements which are withm the authority of the urban water supplier' 10632 (I) A mechanism for determining actual reducl10ns in water use pursuant to the urban water shortage contingency analysis, Mechanism to Determine Reductions in Water Use Under normal water supply condlfions, potable water production figures are recorded daily. Totals are reported weekly to the Chief Water Operator Totals are reported monthly to the Public Works Director and Incorporated Into the water supply report. Resolution Number ~1~ SEAL BEACH 2000 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN During a Sfage I or Sfage II water shortage, daily production figures will be reported to the Director. The Director will compare the weekly production to the target weekly production to venfy thaf the reduction goal is being met. Monthly reports are senf to the City Council If reduction goals are not met, the Director will notify the City Council so that corrective action can be taken. During a Stage III or Stage IV wafer shortage, the procedure listed above will be followed, with the addlfion of a daily production report to the Public Works Dlrecfor. I Water Recycling Wastewater System Description Law 10633, The plan shall provide, to the extent aVailable, infonnal1on on recycled water and Its potential for use as a water source in the service area of the urban water supplier. To the extent practicable, the preparatIOn of the plan shall be coordinated with local water, wastewater, groundwater, and planning agencies and shall include all of the following: 10633 (a) A descripl10n of the wastewater colleel1on and treatment systems in the suppher's service area.. . I Recycled Water Planning The City of Seal Beach presently has no practical source of recycled water as the City sends all wasfewater to OCSD for treatment and the treatment plants are considerable distance away from the Cify boundaries. However OCWD in conjunction wifh OCSD provld~s highly freated wastewater for injection into the ground to prevent seawater intrusion along the coast These two agencies are also in the process of proceeding (or very likely to proceed) with the previously mentioned Groundwafer Recovery Project to recharge the groundwater basin, which supplies 75% of Seal Beach's total water needs. Quantity of Waste Water Collected and Treated All wasfewater collected from the City is treafed af fhe County Sanifation Distnct plants locafed in Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley. Total annual quanflty of wasfe wafer collecfed from City of Seal Beach and treated is estimated fo be 2000 acre-feet per year. Potential for Use of Recycled Water I Unlike some other parts of Orange County where recycled water has been available and ufilized for non-potable purposes for the past several years, City of Seal Beach does not have access to recycled water, The wastewater treatment plant owned and operafed by the City for a long time was demolished in 1972 and all wastewater flows were routed to Orange County Sanitation District system for freatment and disposal I I I Resolu,tion Number !JiJ 1!J- SEAL BEACH 2000 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN As a background, recycled water usage in Orange Counfy commenced at Irvine Ranch Water District and other south Orange County water districts. The wastewater treatment plants owned and operated by these agencies lacked inexpensive alternafives for the disposal of treafed wastewater generated Therefore land disposal by means of landscape Irrigation was employed. Soon most everyone realized the recycled water as a valuable resource and many newly developing areas required construction of separafe sysfems for disfrlbuflon of recycled water thaf led to significant increases in the use of recycled water, Along fhese lines, in the 1980s, the Orange Counfy Water District (OCWD) who has the responsibility of managing the Orange County Groundwater Basin embarked upon a program to extend the recycled water use to the central and western parts of Orange County, This program, referred as the Green Acres Projecf, was designed to deliver recycled wafer from the Orange Counfy Sanitation District (OCSD) Plant No 1 fo the citIes of Santa Ana, Fountain Valley, Costa Mesa, Newport Beach and Huntington Beach in two phases Phase I of the project completed recycled water distribution facilities to Fountain Valley, Sanfa Ana, and Costa Mesa Phase II of the project serving parts of Newport Beach was also completed. However, the plans fo serve portion of the project meant to serve the CIty of Huntington Beach was designed but not constructed. The project IS currently on hold and it's future is uncertain. The two main requirements in order to utilize recycled wafer are one: availabIlity and a two: a dlstnbution system. Presently the City of Seal Beach has neither The recycled wafer from the Green Acres project has not yet come to Huntington Beach and it is doubtful If it ever will. Even if it were to reach Huntington Beach it would stili be several miles from Seal Beach The other possibility is to obtain recycled water from the CIty of Long Beach This would require bUilding several miles of transmission pipeline, The fact that the City of Long Beach IS in Los Angeles County and the County Sanitation Dlsfncts of Los Angeles County supplies their recycled water from their wastewater treatment plant further complicates the issue politically, Even if a source of recycled wafer were to be found and transmission pipeline were to be built to bring it to Seal Beach, fhe co sf of construcflng a new piping sysfem in fhe existing streets and alleys to distnbute It would be extremely expensive in comparison to continued purchase of imported water. , Resolution Number ~~ SEAL BEACH 2000 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN APPENDIX A List Of Groups Who Participated In The Development Of This Plan I . City Council . City Manager and staff · Public Works Director/Assistant City EngineerlWater Department and Water Conservation Staff · Planning Department . Consultants . Other basin-wide, regional, state and federal agencies with shared water supplies and/or neighboring water interests I I I I I Resolution Numbe;r. !fiJtl SEAL BEACH 2000 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT I'L APPENDIX B Resolution To Adopt The Urban Water Management Plan CITY OF SEAL BEACH ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA The City Council of the Clly of Seal Beach does hereby resolve as follows WHEREAS the California Legislature enacted Assembly BII1797 (Water Code Section 10610 et seq, known as the Urban Water Management Planning Act) dUring the 1983-1984 Regular Session, and as amended subsequently, which mandates that every supplier providing water for mUnicipal purposes to more than 3,000 customers or supplYing more than 3,000 acre feel of water annually, prepare an Urban Water Management Plan, the primary objective of which IS to plan for the conservation and efficient use of water, and WHEREAS the City IS an urban supplier of water providing water to a population over 26,000, and WHEREAS the Plan shall be periodically reviewed at least once every five years, and that the City shall make any amendments or changes to ItS plan which are indicated by the review, and WHEREAS the City deSires to update the Urban Water Management Plan dated May 29, 2001 after public review and hearing and flied With the California Department of Water Resources Within lhlrty days of adoption, and WHEREAS the City has therefore, prepared and circulated for public review a draft Urban Water Management Plan Update-2002, and a properly noticed public hearing regarding said Plan was held by the City Council on November 12,2002 and WHEREAS the City of Seal Beach did prepare and shall file said Plan With the California Department of Water Resources by December 12, 2002, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Seal Beach as follows 1 The 2002 Urban Water Management Plan Update IS hereby adopted and ordered flied With the City Clerk, The Public Works Director IS hereby authorized and directed to file the 2002 Urban Water Management Plan Update With the California Department of Water Resources Within 30 days after thiS date, The Public Works Director IS hereby authorized and directed to implement the Water Conservahon Programs as set forth In the 2002 Urban Water Management Plan Update, which Includes water shortage contingency analYSIS and recommendahons to the City Council regarding necessary procedures, rules, and regulahons to carry out effective and eqUItable water conservation and water recycling programs, In a water shortage, the City Council IS authOrized to declare a Water Shortage Emergency according to the Water Shortage Stages and Triggers indicated In the Plan, and Implement necessary elements of the Plan, The Public Works Director shall recommend to the City Council addlllonal regulations to carry out effective and equitable allocation of water resources; and ADOPTED this 12'h day of November 12, 2002, by the follOWing vote AYES Council Members NOES None ABSENT' None ABSTAIN None ATTEST City Clerk, Approved as to Form and Legality City Attorney Resolution Number ~ PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C,C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, County of Orange This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county afore- said; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or inter- ested in the above-entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of the SEAL BEACH SUN, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published weekly in the City of Seal Beach, County of Orange and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Orange, State of California, under the date of 2/24n5. Case Number A82583; that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: 10 !Z-vt)QC- all in the year 2002. I Proof of Publication of ............................................... ............................................... NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN 1ha.1ha C11y Councd o/'he C11y 01 Seal Beach wdf conduct. publIC heanng on Tu... day. November 121h, at 7 00 P m In Iha C11y Coonal 01_ 211 EIghIh Street, Seal Beach, to conSider an amendment to the ary'. Urban Waler Management Plan. 2000, adopted by Ihe Clly CounctJ on May 29th, 2001 In accordance With recenlleglSJalJon the updated Plan 2002 Includes delalled diSCUSSion on Groundwater Basm Management. current Basin COnditions, updated demand figure. and reliability comparl80ns. discus. SIOIl of wastewater callecbon and treat- menl, and dlSCUSSlOO of feasIbility and BVaIIabddy 01 recycled water 11 the City servICe area At Ihe above time and place RImer- ested persons may be heard If 80 deSIred Wnnen commenl8 may al80 be subnutled and should be addressed to the City Council c/o the City Clerk, City Hall, 211 e 8th Street, S.al Beach, and such comments should be recelYBd pnor to the heanng dala If the proposed acllOl1S ere challenged In court, you may be limited 10 ralle only those ISSues you or IIOm8On8 ~ raISed alUle publIC hearing descnbed If1 thiS nollce, or In wnnen carrespan-- dence delivered 10 the City 01 S8al Beach at. or pnor 10, lhe publiC hear- Ing Or, DATED THIS 18'h day 01 Oclobar. 2002 Joanne M Yeo, City Cleric City 01 Seal Beach Publwhed In 1110 SBBlBaach Sui. Jour- nal, 1012412002 I I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at Seal Beach, CA, C this '2~day of ~1okk' , 2002. ignature PUBLICATION ROCESSED B;i: THE SEAL BEACH SUN 216 Main Street Seal Beach, CA 90740 (562) 430-7555 I