The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC AG PKT 2015-03-23 #E Ca AGENDA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 23, 2015 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council THRU: Jill R. Ingram, City Manager FROM: Joe Stilinovich, Chief of Police SUBJECT: COUNTYWIDE 800 MHZ RADIO AGREEMENT SUMMARY OF REQUEST: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 6545 authorizing the City Manager to sign Amendment to Joint Agreement for the Operation, Maintenance and Financial Management of the Orange County 800 Megahertz Countywide Coordinated Communications System. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: Over the last twenty years, several large scale disasters and terrorist events have caused public safety to respond and operate in a multi-agency environment. At the time of the events, there was no standard or requirement for these agencies' radio systems to be able to communicate with each other. As a result, public safety response to these incidents was not as effective as it could have been. Due to this identified lack of interoperability, the federal government implemented a new standard mandating interoperability of public safety communications systems. The standards of this mandate were formulated and developed through the work of a committee called "Project 25" and the standard is referred to as P25. The Federal Government mandate for completion of the P25 changeover/compliance is 2018. Due to the high degree of communication integration in Orange County, the County has taken the lead in coordinating this project. Orange County Communications and member agencies have developed a plan to upgrade the existing 800 megahertz radio system. This process has been ongoing for several years. Last year, Orange County Communications submitted a proposal to all member cities for each community to sign. The proposal outlined a timeline and estimated costs for the entire project, but the agreement encompassed only last year. Agenda Item E Orange County Communications has reviewed this agreement and decided to implement a full-term agreement that would provide for the entirety of this agreement and eliminate the need to redo this process every year. The County has partnered with Motorola as the selected vendor for this project. Motorola has submitted a bid for Seal Beach's portion of this project that totals $865,562.00. This includes the cost of the mobile and handheld radios, and the required backbone upgrades. The Agreement (attached), prepared by Orange County Communications, outlines the planned expenditures for our current fiscal year and the following three fiscal years to upgrade Seal Beach's 800 MHz radio system. It should be noted that the planned cost approved last year totaled $1,054,918. Cost estimates have changed over the course of the project, but they have always been lower due to reductions in equipment costs. The cost savings shown between these two agreements is $189,356.00. The federal government has mandated P25 compliance by 2018. By participating in the countywide group, the City of Seal Beach has achieved savings through group purchasing practices. Our continued participation is necessary in order to maintain our current communications capabilities. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: There is no environmental impact related to this item. LEGAL ANALYSIS: The City Attorney has reviewed and approved as to form. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Each party to the Agreement will be responsible for its fair share of the system extension. According to the cost estimates in the Agreement, the City's fair share cost in future years will not exceed the following amounts: FY 17-18 Radio FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Remaining �agM ;pm nt Shared Costs Shared Costs Shared Costs Costs Total $601,550.00 $14,970.00 $25,835.00 $67,574.00 $155,633.00 $865,562.00 The costs for FY14-15 were included in the adopted budget. Actual costs in future years will be based on cost quotes from third party vendors, whose contracts will be approved by the County. The City's actual fair share costs in future years will be determined at the beginning of each fiscal year and will be incorporated in future budgets. Page 2 RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 6545 authorizing the City Manager to sign Amendment to Joint Agreement for the Operation, Maintenance and Financial Management of the Orange County 800 Megahertz Countywide Coordinated Communications System. SUBMITTED NOTED AND APPROVED: Joe Stilinovich N�ll . Ingram, City Ma a er Chief of Police Prepared by: Steve Ditmars, Dispatch Administrator, West Cities Police Communications Attachments: A. Resolution No. 6545 B. Amendment to Joint Agreement for the Operation, Maintenance and Financial Management of the Orange County 800 Megahertz Countywide Coordinated Communications System Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. 6545 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH APPROVING AMENDMENT TO JOINT AGREEMENT FOR THE OPERATION,MAINTENANCE,AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OF THE ORANGE COUNTY 800 MEGAHERTZ COUNTYWIDE COORDINATED COMMUNICATION SYSTEM WHEREAS,the City of Seal Beach on or about November 23,2004 executed a document entitled Joint Agreement for the Operation, Maintenance,and Financial Management of the Orange County 800 Megahertz Countywide Coordinated Communications System (Agreement), provides for the management and governance of the 800 MHz Countywide Coordinated Communications System (800 MHz CCCS). WHEREAS,the 800 MHz CCCS requires significant enhancement in order to extend the life of the system. WHEREAS, the City of Seal Beach desires to amend the Agreement to provide their commitment to the System Extension and describe their implementation and funding obligations THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council hereby approves the proposed Amendment to the Agreement presented to the City Council on March 23, 2013. SECTION 2. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the Amendment for and on behalf of the City of Seal Beach. SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this Resolution, PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED by the Seal Beach City Council at a regular meeting held on the 23`d day of March, 2015 by the following vote: AYES: Council Members: NOES: Council Members: ABSENT: Council Members: ABSTAIN: Council Members: ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA } COUNTY OF ORANGE } SS CITY OF SEAL BEACH } I, Tina Knapp, City Clerk of the City of Seal Beach, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is the original copy of Resolution Number 6545 on file in the office of the City Clerk,passed,approved,and adopted by the Seal Beach City Council at a regular meeting held on the 23`d day of March, 2015. City Clerk AMENDMENT TO JOINT AGREEMENT FOR THE OPERATION,MAINTENANCE AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OF THE ORANGE COUNTY 800 MEGAHERTZ COUNTYWIDE COORDINATED COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM THIS AMENDMENT("Amendment")is entered into on , 2015 by and between the Parties listed on Exhibit A, attached hereto,which are sometimes individually referred to as"Party"or collectively referred to as the"Parties." RECITALS A. On November 23; 2004,the Parties executed that certain document entitled Joint Agreement for the Operation, Maintenance and Financial Management of the Orange County '800 Megahertz Countywide Coordinated Communications System ("Agreement"), which provides for the management and governance of the 800 MHz Countywide Coordinated Communications System("800 MHz CCCS"). B. The 800 MHz CCCS requires significant enhancement in order to extend the life of the system. C. Pursuant to Section 15.10 of the Agreement, the Governance Committee and the ,County have developed a long-range implementation plan to extend the CCCS, and have developed a scope of work,which includes all the activities, infrastructure and project schedule information for fiscal years 2014-19 described on Exhibit B. attached hereto ("System Extension"). D. The Governance Committee and County have also developed the overall estimated cost of the System Extension, including each Party's estimated funding share by fiscal year described on Exhibit C, attached hereto. E. A Party's funding plan for the System Extension may consist of one or more of the following: 1) a Party's cash contribution, 2) a Party or a group of Parties financing all or a portion of the System Extension through the issuance of tax exempt bonds or other public financing mechanisms, and/or 3) a Party or group of Parties financing all or a portion of the System Extension through the County approved System Extension vendor. F. The Parties desire to amend the Agreement to provide their commitment to the System Extension and describe their implementation and funding obligations. G. This Amendment has been approved by the Governance Committee. AGREEMENT NOW,THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged,the Parties hereby agree as follows: Page 1 of 11 1. Implementation Obli atg ions. The Parties hereby commit to fund and implement the System Extension as described on Exhibit B and Exhibit C. a. California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA"). The County shall be the lead agency for purposes of CEQA and shall obtain all necessary approvals for the System Extension. b. Party Cost Share. The Parties intend to implement and fund the System Extension over several years beginning in fiscal year 2014-15 through fiscal year 2018-19. Each Party is responsible for its fair share contribution to the System Extension. The total estimated budget for the System Extension and each Party's fair share contribution is depicted on Exhibit C ("Cost Share"). A Party's Cost Share is determined by the number of subscriber radios used by the Party on the CCCS, as well as the Party's proportionate share of the System Extension dedicated to System Backbone. Each Party shall pay its total Cost Share in five fiscal year payments beginning in fiscal year 2014-15 through fiscal year 2018-19 in accordance with the procedures in Subsection (c)below. Each Party acknowledges that its Cost Share for the System Extension is an estimate and is expressed as a not to exceed amount. Each Party's Cost Share will be based on an actual quote by a third party vendor who will perform the System Extension under a contract or series of contracts approved and managed by the County("Contractor"). A Party's actual Cost Share amount will be determined prior to the beginning of each fiscal year in which it is due and will be based on the Contractor's scope of work for the respective fiscal year. Therefore,the Cost Share depicted on Exhibit C may change, and may be periodically updated by the Parties to reflect any changed equipment or authorized System Extension modification expenses. C. Invoicing&Payment. The County will calculate the actual Cost Share amount due the following fiscal year, and will invoice each Party by July 1. Each Party shall pay its respective Cost Share to the County within thirty(30) days of the start of the fiscal year. A Party is exempt from the payment procedures of this Subsection Lc for the relevant fiscal year if it has: i. Executed a binding agreement with the County approved Contractor, agreeing to pay or finance its Cost Share through the Contractor directly, or ii. Executed a binding agreement with the County agreeing to jointly finance its Cost Share. d. Cost Share Responsibility. Upon execution of this Amendment, each Party is responsible for its actual Cost Share regardless of the form and manner of payment described herein, such that the Party cannot terminate its Cost Share obligation for any reason. In the event of a withdrawal from the system in accordance with Section 20 of the Agreement or in the case of a default for failure to pay its Cost Share in accordance with this Amendment, each Party remains obligated to pay to County the Party's outstanding Cost Share as that obligation becomes due. Should any Party fail to pay its respective Cost Share when due, the County shall take action as is appropriate to obtain such payment. Nothing herein shall be construed as the County's exclusive remedy for the remediation of defaults by a Party or Parties, Page 2 of 11 .and the County reserves the right to pursue any and all available rights and remedies at law or in equity. e. County Trust Account. The County shall deposit all Cost Share contributions into a trust account that is managed solely for the purpose of the System Extension. 2. Stem Extension Administration. The Orange County Sheriff-Coroner Department/Communications &Technology Division shall administer all agreements for the System Extension, and regularly report such progress to the Governance Committee. 3. Participating Agencies. The Parties hereby update the list of Participating Agencies described on Exhibit D, attached hereto,which shall replace in its entirety Exhibit C of the Agreement. Participating Agencies will continue to contribute to overall backbone costs through the payment of a separate and established entry fee for every radio added to the system. 4. Capitalized Terms. Any capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement. 5. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts,each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute but one and the same instrument. 6. Full Force. Except as expressly set forth herein, the Agreement shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect. Page 3 of 11 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above. THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, .a political subdivision of the State of California 1°J : Chairman of the Board of Supervisors SIGNED AND CERTIFIED THAT A COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN DELIVERED "TO THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD By:_., ..,..�.�.,.,�..., Clerk of the Board of Supervisors County of Orange,California APPROVED AS TO FORM: COUNTY COUNSEL By The City Of City Manager Date Seal Beach Jill ingrain Approved as to form: The City Of City Attorney Date Seal Beach Steven Flower Page 4 of 11 EXHIBIT A PARTIES TO THE AMENDMENT RESPONSIBLE ADDRESS PHONE ENTITY ADMINISTRATOR City Manager 12 Journey, Suite 100 Aliso Viejo 949/425-2512 Aliso Viejo, CA 92656-5335 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Anaheim City Manager 714/765-5162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Brea City Manager 1 Civic Center Circle 714/990-7770 Brea, CA 92821-5732 Buena Park City Manager 6650 Beach Blvd. 714/562-3550 Buena Park, CA 90620 ii Costa Mesa City Manager 77 Fair Drive 714/754-5328 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 C r es s City 275 Orange Avenue 714/229-6688 y Mana g er 'Cypress, CA 90630 33282 Golden Lantern, Suite 203 Dana Point City Manager 949/248-3513 Dana Point, CA 92629 F1(0200 Slater Avenue Fountain Valley City Manager untain Valley, CA 92708 714/593-4410 303 W. Commonwealth Ave Fullerton City Manager Fullerton, CA 92832 714/738-6310 11222 Acacia Parkway Garden Grove City Manager 714/741-5100 Garden Grove, CA 92840 ' Huntington Beach City Administrator 2000 Main Street 714/536-5575 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 1 Civic Center Plaza Irvine City Manager Irvine, CA 92623-9575 949/724-6246 La Habra City Manager 201 E.La Habra Blvd. 562/905-9701 La Habra, CA 90633 Page 5of11 RESPONSIBLE ADDRESS PHONE# ENTITY ADMINISTRATOR La Palma City Manager 7822 Walker Street 714/690-3333 La Palma, CA 90623 Laguna Beach City Manager 505 Forest Avenue 949/497-0704 Laguna Beach, CA 92651 Laguna Hills City Manager 24035 El Toro Road 949/707-2610 Laguna Hills, CA 92653 . 27801 La Paz Road Laguna Niguel City Manager 949/362-4300 y g Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 Laguna Woods City Manager 24264 El Toro Road 949/639-0525 Laguna Woods, CA 92653 Lake Forest City Manager 25550 Commercentre Drive 949/461-3410 Lake Forest, CA 92630 Los Alamitos City Manager 3191 Katella Avenue 562/431-3538 Los Alamitos, CA 90720 ext. 201 Metro Cities Fire Manager 201 S. Anaheim Blvd., Suite 302 714/765-4077 Authority Anaheim, CA 92805 Mission Viejo City Manager 200 Civic Center 949/470-3051 Mission Viejo, CA 92691 I 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach City Manager 949/644-3000 Newport Beach, CA 92663-3884 300 East Chapman Ave. Orange City Manager 714/744-2222 Orange, CA 92866 Orange County Fire Fire Chief 1 Fire Authority Road 714/573-6010 Authority Irvine, CA 92602 Orange, County of 'CEO 333 W. Santa Ana Blvd. 714/834-6200 Santa Ana, CA 92701 Page 6 of 11 ENTITY ADMINISTRATOR ADDRESS PHONE # RESPONSIBLE 401 East Chapman Ave Placentia City Administrator Placentia, CA 92870 714/993-8117 Rancho Santa 949/635-1800 Margarita City Manager 22112 El Pasco ext. 210 Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 100 Avenida Presidio San Clemente City Manager 949/361-8322 San Clemente, CA 92672 32400 Pasco Adelanto San Juan Capistrano City Administrator 949/443-6317 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Santa Ana City Manager 20 Civic Center Plaza 714/647-5200 Santa Ana, CA 92701 211 8th Street 562/431-2527 Seal Beach City Manager Seal Beach, CA 90740 ext. 300 7800 Katella Avenue 714/379-9222 Stanton City Manager Stanton, CA 90680-3162 ext. 240 300 Centennial Way Tustin City Manager Tustin, CA 92780 714/573-3010 Villa Park City Manager 17855 Santiago Blvd.Villa Park, CA 92861 714/998-1500 West Cities Police West-Comm 1911 Seal Beach Blvd. Communications Administrator Seal Beach, CA 90740 562/594-7243 8200 Westminster Blvd. 714/898-3311 Westminster City Manager Westminster, CA 92683 ext. 402 Yorba Linda City Manager 4845 Casa Loma Avenue yorba Linda, CA 92886 714/961-7110 Page 7 of 11 EXHIBIT B GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF SYSTEM EXTENSION AND PROJECT SCHEDULE 1.0 Overview The System Extension plan will focus on extending the life of the existing CCCS radio system by systematically replacing end-of-life equipment in strategic phases culminating in an upgrade to P25 compliance with the goal of continuing to provide quality radio communications to the law, fire, lifeguard and public works agencies in Orange County. 2.0 Description of System Extension 2.1 System Backbone—Radio infrastructure equipment that is at or near the end of its expected life will be directly replaced with the current version of the same equipment that will maintain all existing features and functionalities and is able to work with the existing backhaul network. Specifically, this will involve the replacement of 565+ existing Quantar radio base stations and ancillary equipment at 25 radio sites with 800 MHz 3600 baud GTR8000 base stations and ancillary equipment. This will be accomplished in accordance with the following schedule: System Backbone schedule: Northwest Cell=24 Quantars replaced in 2015 Southwest Cell=40 Quantars replaced in 2015 Laguna Cell=33 Quantars replaced in 2016 Moorhead IR Site=8 Quantars replaced in 2016 North Cell= 105 Quantars replaced in 2016 South Cell= 135 Quantars replaced in 2017 Crystal Cove IR Site=4 Quantars replaced in 2017 Countywide Cell =210 Quantars replaced in 2017 Carbon Canyon IR Site=3 Quantars replaced in 2017 Silverado IR Site=3 Quantars replaced in 2017 2.2 Law Enforcement Dispatch Consoles—Police Dispatch Gold Elite consoles will be out-of-service by the vendor in 2018 and will need to be replaced prior to 2018 to maintain the existing console priority feature once the system is upgraded to P25. Console priority is a•feature unique to law enforcement dispatch and allows dispatch to have the ability to transmit and receive audio simultaneously and is an officer safety necessity. Existing Gold Elite Console equipment will be replaced with its successor console, the MCC7500. Due to the complexity of the replacement at each law dispatch center, only 6 dispatch centers can be upgraded each year. A schedule has been developed to address the 20 law dispatch centers on the system, as shown below. Page 8 of 11 Console schedule: FY14/15 -Loma Ridge, Irvine, Laguna Beach,Huntington Beach FYI 5/16 -Anaheim,Brea, West Comm, Santa Ana,Tustin FYI 6/17 - Orange, Fullerton, Costa Mesa, Garden Grove,Westminster FYI 7/18 -Placentia,La Palma,Newport Beach,Fountain Valley, Buena Park, La Habra 2.3 System Field Equipment — When the System Backbone is upgraded to the P25 standard in FY 2018/2019, all subscriber radio equipment will also need to be P25 capable. Subscriber radios that are capable of being upgraded will need to receive the software/firmware upgrade prior to the backbone upgrade. Older subscriber radio equipment that is not capable of being upgraded to the P25 standard will need to be replaced prior to the P25 upgrade. Each agency will be responsible for the purchase of either replacement radios,or the necessary subscriber upgrade package for upgradable radios. 2.4 P25 Upgrade—When all backbone sites and law dispatch consoles have completed their equipment replacement, the vendor will initiate the necessary equipment and software update to bring the system up to the 7.18 software platform for P25 compliance. This final phase of the System Extension plan is scheduled for FY 2018/2019. Page 9 of 11 EXHIBIT C TOTAL ESTIMATED SYSTEM EXTENSION COST& ESTIMATED PARTY COST SHARE BY FISCAL YEAR ESTIMATED COST ACTUAL ESTIMATED COST INOT TO EXCEED COST FY 14-16 Radlo Counts Cfty/AvaltcyCon r rirr,iG, . .: 41110+444 1214 4 411at only ff -0- TWAL aaWa.wr 1 14o.tMwrst a 41w44 o safm a a.m.urno (Pffi Cepeel� 1fbP4ve4�e aouthw"t Loguna C'aw*ywM* a.dnon4 :Wft 3011,"n 1a&*2 f4ft CONS 04M4. Cob 11TVIA09040V a 441, �t 1 lit "� d4mhAUaA'u 17 14 , 4 . 1 1W2 21421,17l 1 .'43 rrarrew w 09 21071 58821q 1 11 AM 04[170 210 11 485V 2a70t1+b' a 1,9fm1np4lreua 7 200 X140118001 41014410& aY 7balda MAN, 47dFM0 1418"CV7 ° .;n;ubf✓1 t493, 7... 20... 02Q_.. 890 3,249.150. 41,417 140-,»:�, '",�7° W 423 '0_..:wo 4 ""Wlurelflf<' 24 170 104. 8 fi;1 Y. 0410 . A,4w08 114060.. � 14. I fyM 1 ,1fi 13 411_ 211200 40A 94MA 1103 0727a 411tt 1 yre' 1tk pf weNk,u f;v 40 4ti 1 8 3 5L IM 6 3 A 6 2 0 4 4ff94n1"fir 4,&,Q3, 1 , 1 1 g,4 604AII 1 613 �m�. j2j 4'14 .. � ��0 ? �J1�,' w.,.., r9ar"� _... �. 11 X 1111 f 7 fe�J 4y 4t 1�..l ..-.".l 0 A!IO2 �,�1 . W ., 1 1.A 1 At;Ook W I 480 200 1 4' 800 '...... 460 07 790 -..-101 1 2. 31012tH 2 99;tY 8142 91- $1, O 101.120 341 101m, I 80'3 4 .11"m HIM A2 f,.f4:reu�x411"�4' 04 20 1 3041 414;714 1808x011 441;72 70.147 ' 100100 164 2800011r 10 ¢.,I1k'1t4fa�dg,d',1 A 42.. as '� a1 11k... Z __21 131 17 ..� ,vgb,lAlM ,,.. ,,,�mm.,.,.� .� ,. . ,,..��,.,.. 1 41' 1 4�, „,.. » ,,,. „„ 4..4111""re`(AF,91.. m 1 1' 4 I 11 1.;LQ)S t4 Ael06,71�:� 10... 43 .07 7O . 1.�a 421 tir g d��.,,.-�.,,,,. 71 �..?...0,.-,�,- -«"�7-.�,w�.,.,.1�1: '......�.... 102 1"�7 611. 1 27 �:k'1 ti.1d'00 7 t4 1111"*V'� C1:1 Wo Ila1 0 8823410 18400 28 A2 pAt"f 814 776 71 4 �RN6x,' 4fv __-W 430 0 09 ” 2800 s0 _W_ 1 p�, 1'00 44051 1117 0---&”71 ...�r'W. ' - -� .....�.. 24 n d+1AtiN+W.%I" ,...1$5 1' 104",1047 "3A`„10250 C14'i'50 T,d., tdb'2!1,2 '.G+. 75 s'1.4�CNI14 _ 101$ 1a 97 `1 0.334 I Zkols 78,242 1..'21736 211 RA4WM{°$0 4 r 4 WNW 28- 0 1 4 IT 8,1 1 a 0 147 28. d0 KA W A.AsAA 210 0 1 1 _. �b 7 01716:. 1 1 1 1 2' 1 A 1.4 11 PVAI WiAQ4 11 01 114 0 NIM 1 $070 26,835 GL674 165,6331 9556' 11 6 fAW LX1 0 02_. 70 1 1 1,.-.2` 10. 4 MAN '� 31 9 t114ef J 88 24 8 AOS1a33 108fl _' 7 9 4 1 4 4V,11 a 7'7 Lft 01.1 A 1.nhnrS 1. .i 40 0 14 &F ,1�r"7 V A _ S:� 17 ,684'1 4 - 1 1 I 1 1 1 11 CXF 4 Oa 0172 Y 880 2 620 0 S 1 0'28 1 122 iY00 2 384 3201 19 008 048 Wit CRITA __..__. . 104 41 4w57 2 M 61646 _ 1x1.61.WA 349 2 o 14 V �4p 79041 �y,91 113 140242 "17dUQ'WdE,Nf Mf b x I`1 d�C"f '�a., ,.�.. ...,�.a... .�«�.,...,.,..,.h 41 91Nfi�1nf10.FdtfW all fre 60202 4,„�faa.1"14 "�+'l'QtS'1 Fri t0' � 10 47c7 04 _... +.418 10.010 2A,074 152,300 42 M.„.1,0 '4 1I 1 2 0 71150 282 453.�l lee. _. 2.790 11 702 41 4 7170 101'ti 0:8 44 ')ICA 170 4-22 —391— 0 8'214.5'4. 30.511 " 01x...:0 17 410 4m �0 10...041.4 ". 'MV ...a :_�.. .. .... .... .....�.-..31.:x...... 244 2'32 ,�40! 'G 416 ' 62.. 71 07,616, '248 1 �dp38 4'd 1".'4"A,f 1v1 m 1"1#d°# G71z�,�a,: �,....w...18. 2i:: 110 —9A: ;k 71 1 1.:a 0 ,? --W-0. ... 1 1 C 1'1,. . .,, , � � L "1� ..V m ,,,, � � 1 407 �a 7 p 1 1 a am, M 1141 00 4 04 1 0 8317+,50 0,434 14504 2189 87 S 241211 1. fa11'C1dht414,4t 1 3 4AA.. '1. ," 480 14.4151 tl2 1 33+7 7114 Doi 4 q�4 48'7 a..a „Y4bre4........,-..,._._.,...:.� ,.,�.:..,R„1 „�„, 1'0 1 2Y 4,02&M 0,350.15001 :➢'41'M'. 41. 12 #: 3 7 TOTAL 2,402 M2 211 aM 11 t1110S S 2S 721 The cosfs slated herelo are esfimaled casfs expressed as not to exceed amouafs 1 511b/ect fn the final system design. tlfAv IN115H -om NOVOMbOif 2014 Page 10 of 11 EXHIBIT D PARTICIPATING AGENCIES RESPONSIBLE AGENCY ADNIINISTRATOR ADDRESS PHONE# Irvine Valley College Police Chief 5500 Irvine Center Drive, Irvine CA 949/451-5201 Police Department 92618 Orange County Administrator Transportation 600 S. Main Street,Orange CA 92868 714/560-6282 Authority Saddleback College Police Chief 28000 Marguerite Parkway, Mission 949/582-4390 Police Department Viejo CA 92692 Santa Ana Unified police Chief 1601 E. Chestnut Avenue, Santa Ana CA 714/558-5536 School District Police 92701 Department US Ocean Safety(OC President 34127 Pacific Coast Highway, Dana 949/276-5050 Lifeguards) Point CA 92629 Page 11 of 11