The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPC PKT 11-2-2015 CITY OF SEAL BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Monday, November 2, 2015 — 7:00 p.m. City Council Chambers 211 Eighth Street Seal Beach. CA 90740 O t - s s = - ti 4 \c'ql� N�P= -,•,F R_ District 1 — Deb Machen — Vice Chair District 2 — Esther Cummings — Chair District 3 — Michael Thomas District 4 — Patty Campbell District 5 — Mariann Klinger Department of Community Development Jim Basham, Director Crystal Landavazo, Senior Planner Steven Fowler, Assistant Planner Amy Greyson, Assistant City Attorney • City Hall office hours are 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. Closed noon to 1:00 p.m. • The City of Seal Beach complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act. If you need assistance to attend this meeting please telephone the City Clerk's Office at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting at (562) 431-2527. • Planning Commission meetings are broadcast live on Seal Beach TV3 and on the City's website (www.sealbeachca.gov). Check the SBTV3 schedule for rebroadcast of meeting — meetings are available on-demand on the website. • DVDs of Planning Commission meetings may be purchased from Seal Beach TV3 at a cost of $15 per DVD. Telephone: (562) 596-1404. J Copies of staff reports and/or written materials on each agenda item are available for public inspection in City libraries or on the City website at: http://sealbeachca.suiteonemedia.com/web/home.aspx PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET The following is a brief explanation of the Planning Commission agenda structure: AGENDA APPROVAL: The Planning Commission may wish to change the order of the items on the agenda. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Anyone wishing to address the Planning Commission on tonight's agenda may do so during this time period. The Planning Commission may also allow the public to address any other matters within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Planning Commission. No action can be taken by the Planning Commission on these communications on this date, unless agendized. CONSENT CALENDAR: Consent Calendar items are considered routine items that normally do not require separate consideration. The Planning Commission may make one motion for approval of all the items listed on the Consent Calendar. SCHEDULED MATTERS: These items are considered by the Planning Commission separately and require separate motions. These transactions are considered administrative and public testimony is not heard. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: Public Hearings allow citizens the opportunity to speak in favor of or against agendized items. More detailed information is found in the actual agenda attached. If you have documents to distribute, you should have enough copies for all Planning Commissioners, City staff, and the public. Please give one to the secretary for the City files. The documents become part of the public record and will not be returned. DIRECTOR'S REPORT: Updates and reports from the Director of Community Development (Planning and Building Divisions) are presented for information to the Planning Commission and the public. COMMISSION CONCERNS: Items of concern are presented by the Planning Commissioners and discussed with staff. All proceedings are recorded. City of Seal Beach Planning Commission •Agenda • November 2, 2015 CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF AGENDA By Motion of the Planning Commission this is the time to notify the public of any changes to the agenda, re-arrange the order of the agenda, and provide an opportunity for any member of the Planning Commission or staff to request an item be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS At this time members of the public may address the Planning Commission regarding any items within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Commission. Pursuant to the Brown Act, the Commission cannot discuss or take action on any items not on the agenda unless authorized by law. Those members of the public wishing to speak are asked to come forward to the microphone and state their name for the record. All speakers will be limited to a period of 5 minutes. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Approve Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of October 5, 2015. SCHEDULED MATTERS NEW BUSINESS PUBLIC HEARING 2. Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 15-8 1041 Pacific Coast Highway Applicant: Joseph Barbara Property Owner: Columbia Regency Retail Partners, LLC Request: Conditional Use Permit 15-8 requesting to allow a restaurant to serve beer and wine with a Type 41 (On-Sale Beer and Wine) alcohol license within the General Commercial (GC) zoning area. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue CUP 15-8 to the meeting of November 16, 2015, as requested by the applicant on October 27, 2015. City of Seal Beach Planning Commission •Agenda • November 2. 2015 3. Variance (VAR) 15-1 & Minor Use Permit (MUP) 15-13 131 14th Street Applicant: Bruce Boehm Request: Variance (VAR 15-1) to permit a reduction of the required front yard setback on a rectangular shaped lot and request for Minor Use Permit (MUP15-13) to allow the enlargement of two front entry doors and reconfiguration of the front exterior stairway at an existing multi-unit residential property that is nonconforming due to parking, density and front yard setback located within the Residential High Density (RHD-20) zoning Recommendation: After conducting the Public Hearing, staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 15-25, DENYING Variance 15-1 and Minor Use Permit 15-13. DIRECTOR'S REPORT COMMISSION CONCERNS ADJOURNMENT Adjourn the Planning Commission to Monday, November 16, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. 2015 Agenda Forecast Nov 16 CUP 15-8 Request for ABC License Dec 7 CUP 15-5 Replace existing carwash on an existing service station site /e� 5EA(@ ITEM NUMBER F� `� _ 1 PLANNING COMMISSION \ I c'ljzoR av STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Director of Community Development MEETING DATE: November 2, 2015 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MINUTES RECOMMENDATION: Approve the minutes for the Planning Commission meeting held on October 5, 2015. Prepared by: A •• .ved by: ciV-4.) IC-Iry Tina Knapp im Basham Executive Assistant i'irector of Community Development Attachment: 1. Minutes City of Seal Beach — Planning Commission October 5, 2015 Vice Chair Cummings called the regular meeting of the Planning Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers and Commissioner Machen led the Salute to the Flag. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners: Machen, Cummings, Thomas, Campbell, Klinger Staff Present: Jim Basham, Director of Community Development Amy Greyson, Assistant City Attorney Crystal Landavazo, Senior Planner Steven Fowler, Assistant Planner Tina Knapp, Acting City Clerk Vice Chair Cummings thanked Steve Sloan for his service on the Planning Commission. APPROVAL OF AGENDA With no objections, Vice Chair Cummings so ordered the approval of the agenda, as presented. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Vice Chair Cummings opened oral communications. There being no speakers, Vice Chair Cummings declared oral communications closed. CONSENT CALENDAR Vice Chair Cummings indicated that revised minutes are on the dais for consideration. The Assistant City Attorney advised that, due to new appointments to the Planning Commission, the best course of action was to accept and file the minutes of September 8, 2015. Vice Chair Cummings so ordered that the meeting minutes of September 8, 2015 be accepted and filed. 1 . Approve the Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of September 8, 2015. SCHEDULED MATTERS 2. Reorganization of Planning Commission — Election of new Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson for 2015. Vice Chair Cummings conducted the selection of a new Chair asking for nominations: Campbell nominated Esther Cummings, second by Machen. There were no other nominations. The Vice Chair closed nominations. Page 2 — Planning Commission 10/5/15 AYES: Machen, Cummings, Thomas, Campbell, Klinger NOES: None Motion carried Chair Cummings conducted the selection of Vice Chair asking for nominations: Thomas nominated Deb Machen, second by Chair Cummings. There were no other nominations. The Chair closed nominations. AYES: Machen, Cummings, Thomas, Campbell, Klinger NOES: None Motion carried NEW BUSINESS 3. Minor Use Permit (MUP) 15-14 1413 Ocean Avenue Applicant: Ken Greenberg Property Owner: Ken Greenberg Request: Minor Use Permit 15-14 requesting to allow removal of an interior wall and replace existing garage doors within a three-car garage that is located on a property that is nonconforming due to density, setbacks, and parking in the RHD-20 (Residential High Density) zoning area. Recommendation:After reviewing the application, staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 15-23. approving Minor Use Permit 15-14 with Conditions. Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report on this item. Campbell moved. second by Klinger, to adopt Resolution No. 15-23, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH APPROVING MINOR USE PERMIT 15-14 TO ALLOW REMOVAL OF AN INTERIOR WALL WITHIN A DETACHED THREE-CAR GARAGE LOCATED ON A PROPERTY THAT IS NONCONFORMING DUE TO SETBACKS, DENISTY, AND PARKING IN THE RHD-20 (RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY-20) ZONE AT 1413 OCEAN AVENUE." AYES: Machen, Cummings, Thomas, Campbell, Klinger NOES. None Motion carried The Assistant City Attorney advised that the adoption of Resolution No. 15-23 approving MUP 15-14 is the final decision of the Planning Commission. There is a 10-day appeal period to the City Council and the appeal period begins October 6, 2015. Page 3 — Planning Commission 10/5/15 PUBLIC HEARING 4. Partial Street Vacation Southwest Corner of First Street and Marina Drive Intersection Applicant: City of Seal Beach Request: Review to make findings that the proposed partial street vacation of a portion of First Street at the southwest intersection of Marina Drive and First Street and located in the SPR-DWP (Specific Plan Regulation) zoning area is in conformity with the City's adopted General Plan. Recommendation: After conducting the Public Hearing, staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 15- 24, making a finding of conformity with the City's adopted General Plan. Jim Basham, Director of Community Development, introduced this item and provided a review of activity pertaining to this property. Michael Ho, City Engineer, provided the staff report for this item. Chair Cummings opened the public hearing. There being no speakers, Chair Cummings closed the public hearing. Machen moved, second by Campbell, to adopt Resolution No. 15-24, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE SEAL BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED VACATION OF A PORTION OF FIRST STREET LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE FIRST STREET AND MARINA DRIVE INTERSECTION IS IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CITY'S ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN." AYES: Machen, Cummings, Thomas, Campbell, Klinger NOES: None Motion carried The Assistant City Attorney advised that there is no appeal period relative to this item. DIRECTOR'S REPORT Director of Community Development Jim Basham indicated that a flash drive was provided on the dais for each Commissioner and it contains a variety of useful information, such as materials related to the Brown Act. Director Basham also indicated that information about the Planning Officials Forum is on the dais and invited two Commissioners, especially the two newest Commissioners, to attend the forum. It was determined that Vice Chair Machen and Commissioner Klinger would attend the forum. COMMISSION CONCERNS Chair Cummings spoke about the status of the Leisure World globe. Page 4 — Planning Commission 10/5/15 ADJOURNMENT With no objections, Chair Cummings adjourned the Planning Commission meeting at 7:30 p.m. Acting City Clerk Approved: Vice Chair Attest: Acting City Clerk PLANNING COMMISSION NUM ER Z STAFF REPORT 2 .• �'�cgI/FORN�P_= TO: Planning Commission FROM: Director of Community Development MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 2, 2015 SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 15-8 REQUESTING TO ALLOW A RESTAURANT TO SERVE BEER AND WINE WITH A TYPE 41 (ON-SALE BEER AND WINE) ALCOHOL LICENSE WITHIN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) ZONING AREA. LOCATION: 1041 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY APPLICANT: Joseph Barbara RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission CONTINUE CUP 15-8 to the meeting of November 16, 2015, as requested by the applicant on October 27, 2015. '��.�F-s�A�•eeq, PLANNING COMMISSION .. mac; ITEM NUMBER ;Ci—' = STAFF REPORT 3 i\c:14,F061:"-- TO: Planning Commission FROM: Director of Community Development MEETING DATE: November 2, 2015 SUBJECT: NEW BUSINESS REQUEST FOR VARIANCE (VAR 15-1) TO PERMIT A REDUCTION OF THE REQUIRED FRONT YARD SETBACK ON A RECTANGULAR SHAPED LOT AND REQUEST FOR MINOR USE PERMIT (MUP15-13) TO ALLOW THE ENLARGEMENT OF TWO FRONT ENTRY DOORS AND RECONFIGURATION OF THE FRONT EXTERIOR STAIRWAY AT AN EXISTING MULTI-UNIT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY THAT IS NONCONFORMING DUE TO PARKING, DENSITY AND FRONT YARD SETBACK LOCATED WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY (RHD-20) ZONING LOCATION: 131 14th STREET APPLICANT: BRUCE BOEHM RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 15-25, DENYING Variance 15-1 and Minor Use Permit 15-13. Variance 15-1 & MUP 15-13 131 14th Street ENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY ZONE: RHD-20 (RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY — 20) SITE DESCRIPTION: Assessor's Parcel Number: 199-018-33 Lot Area: 2,937.5 sq. ft. Surrounding Properties: North: Residential South: Residential East: Residential West: Residential ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: This project is determined to be a Class 1 (Conversion of small structures) Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15301 of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.) for the permitting of the encroachment of an reconfigured exterior stair case into the front yard setback, and the enlargement of a front entry door, involving negligible or no expansion beyond the existing use. LEGAL NOTIFICATION: The legal notice of this hearing was published in the Seal Beach Sun Newspaper on October 22, 2015 and mailed to property owners and occupants within a 500' radius of the subject property on October 22, 2015, with affidavits of publishing and mailing on file. VICINITY MAP: AERIAL MAP: City of al Brach 1 , b . a _ .� {ram�iftha��,11!7 :t� � 1, s9 S- 44111NA144 i 444, r. it' AO/ ; 4• Page 2 of 4 Variance 15-1 & MUP 15-13 131 14th Street ANALYSIS The subject site is a rectangular shaped 2,937 sq. ft. parcel located on the west side of 14th Street between Electric Avenue and Ocean Avenue within the RHD-20 (Residential High Density — 20) zone. The parcel is currently developed with a two-story residential duplex at the front of the property and a separate two-story residential structure with an attached two-car garage at the rear of the property. The subject site is surrounded by residential uses to the north, south, east and west. The applicant submitted a request for a Variance and Minor Use Permit to reduce the required minimum front yard setback in order to replace an existing nonconforming staircase and replace exterior doors of the existing two-story duplex located at the front of the subject property. The property currently has 3 units and 2 parking spaces. The Seal Beach Municipal Code, Table 11 .2.05.015, states that RHD-20 zoned properties are allowed one residential unit per every 2,178 sq. ft. of land area. The subject property is approximately 2,937.5 sq. ft. The Seal Beach Municipal Code, Table 11.4.20.015.A.1, requires 2 off-street parking spaces per dwelling unit. The site contains two garage spaces which make the site deficient by 4 parking spaces based on the existing need of 6 garage spaces for 3 units. The property is considered nonconforming due to density and parking. In addition, the Seal Beach Municipal Code (SBMC §11.2.05.015) provides minimum setback requirements for residential dwellings. In the RHD-20 zone the minimum front yard setback is 6 ft. with a 12 ft. average. The front building on the subject property maintains the 12 ft. average except for the existing nonconforming stair case which has only a 1 ft. setback from the front property line including the concrete landing. The existing staircase is considered nonconforming because it 1 ft. from the front property line. The applicant is proposing to widen two front doors, on the front building, from 30" to 36" and to reconstruct the existing nonconforming staircase located within the required minimum front yard setback. In order to reconstruct the staircase the applicant is requesting approval of a Variance to encroach into the required 6 feet minimum setback. The applicant requests to reconstruct a new staircase that will be approximately 4 ft. away from the front property line. The Minor Use Permit request for replacement of exterior doors and structural alteration to a nonconforming residence is contingent on the approval of the Variance because the applicant's proposal encroaches within the required minimum front yard setback. Staff believes compliance with the residential development standards would not create a hardship for the property and there are no unique characteristics or circumstances applicable to the property such as unique size, configuration or topography that would warrant a variance.. Existing development on the subject site would allow the proposed staircase to comply with applicable development standards in order to provide access to the second floor unit without encroaching into the minimum front yard setback. The applicant submitted a design that would comply with the setback requirements but the applicant is seeking approval for an alternate design that does not meet minimum setback requirements and requires approval of a Variance. To demonstrate this, sheet A1 .0 of the attached project architectural plans show the existing staircase, the proposed L-shaped staircase design that requires approval of a Variance, and the U- shaped staircase design that meets all setback requirements. Page 3 of 4 Variance 15-1 & MUP 15-13 131 14th Street The Seal Beach Municipal Code (SBMC §11 .5.20.005.C) gives the Planning Commission authority to grant a Variance subject to such conditions as will assure that the adjustment thereby authorized shall not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone district in which the property is situated. Staff believes a variance is not warranted in this circumstance. The application of the residential setback requirements would not create an undue hardship because the lot's size and shape is similar to other lots in the vicinity. The required setbacks would not deprive the applicant of the ability to enjoy the same privileges as other property owners within the same vicinity and under the same zone as there are other design options that can be utilized that do not require a variance. There are no unique circumstances applicable to the property. The request to reduce the minimum front yard setback from 6 feet to 4 feet is a request for a special privilege that is inconsistent with other properties in the RHD-20 zone because most properties in the RHD-20 zone provide at least the minimum front yard setback of 6 feet. The applicant's request is inconsistent with the RHD-20 zone in which it is located because the proposal includes relocating a nonconforming stairway to an area that will continue to encroach into the minimum front yard setback. After conducting the public hearing and receiving testimony, staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 15-25 denying VAR 15-1 and denying Minor Use Permit 15-13 to permit the reduction of the required minimum front yard setback, enlargement of two front entry doors, and reconfiguration of the front exterior stairway on a rectangular shaped lot in the RHD-20 zone. Prepared by: ()/ Steve Fowler Ji lirBasham Assistant Planner—Community Development D ector of Community Development Attachments: 1 . Resolution No. 15-25 — A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Seal Beach, denying Variance 15-1, to permit a reduction of the required rear yard setback on rectangular shaped lot and denying Minor Use Permit 15-13 to permit the reduction of the required minimum front yard setback and the enlargement of two front entry doors and reconfigure the front exterior stairway in the RHD-20 (Residential High Density — 20) zone. 2. Project Architectural Plans Page 4 of 4 RESOLUTION NO. 15-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE SEAL BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING VARIANCE 15-1 AND MINOR USE PERMIT (MUP15-13) TO PERMIT A REDUCTION OF THE REQUIRED MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK ON A RECTANGULAR SHAPED LOT, ENLARGEMENT OF TWO FRONT ENTRY DOORS AND RECONFIGURATION OF THE FRONT EXTERIOR STAIRWAY AT AN EXISTING MULTI-UNIT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY THAT IS NONCONFORMING DUE TO PARKING, DENSITY AND FRONT YARD SETBACK LOCATED WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY (RHD-20) ZONING THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH DOES HEREBY FIND AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Bruce Boehm ("the applicant"), submitted an application to the City of Seal Beach Department of Community Development for Variance (VAR) 15-1 to encroach 2 feet into the required minimum front yard setback on a rectangular shaped lot and Minor Use Permit (MUP) 15-13 to relocate a staircase and widen two front entry doors from 30 inches to 36 inches at 131 14th Street within the RHD-20 (Residential High Density — 20) zone. Section 2. This project is determined to be a Class 1 (Conversion of small structures) Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15301 of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.) for the permitting of the encroachment of an reconfigured exterior stair case into the front yard setback, and the enlargement of a front entry door, involving negligible or no expansion beyond the existing use. Section 3. A duly noticed meeting was held before the Planning Commission on November 2, 2015 to consider the application for VAR 15-1 and MUP 15-13. At this meeting, the Planning Commission received and considered all evidence presented, both written and oral, regarding the subject application. The record of the public hearing indicates the following: A. The subject site consists of a 2,937.5 sq. ft. parcel developed with a two- story residential duplex and a separate two-story residential structure with an attached two- car garage at the rear of the property. The subject site is located on the west side of 14th Street between Electric Avenue and Ocean Avenue. The subject site is surrounded by residential uses on the north, south. east, and west. The subject property is located in the RHD-20 (Residential High Density — 20) zone. B. The subject site is a rectangular shaped lot with no unique size or configuration when compared to the surrounding properties in the RHD-20 zone. Most of the surrounding properties consist of lots that range from 25 to 50 feet in width and 110 to 117 feet in length and abut an alley at the rear as does the subject site. C. The Seal Beach Municipal Code (SBMC §11.2.05.015) requires all properties in the RHD-20 zone to provide a minimum front yard setback of 6 feet with a 12 foot average. -1 of 3- Resolution 15-25 131 1er Street D. The applicant is proposing to widen two front doors from 30 inches to 36 inches and to reconstruct the existing nonconforming staircase located within the minimum front yard setback by relocating the new staircase to within 4 feet of the front property line instead of the required 6 foot minimum. Section 4. Based upon the facts contained in the record, including those stated in the preceding Section of this resolution and pursuant to Chapter 11.5.20 of the Code of the City of Seal Beach, the Planning Commission makes the following findings: A. The variance does not conform in all significant respect with the General Plan and with any ordinances adopted by the City Council. The General Plan Land Use Map designates the subject property as Residential High Density and the subject site is not consistent with the residential density for the area. The density requirements in the RHD-20 zone permit one residential unit on the subject site, and the site currently contains 3 units. Also the site requires 2 off-street parking spaces per dwelling unit. The site contains two garage spaces which make the site deficient by 4 parking spaces based on the existing need of 6 garage spaces for 3 units. The applicant's proposal to relocate the stair case does not comply with the minimum front yard setback requirement set by SBMC §11.2.05.015. B. There are no special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, and application of the Zoning Code does not deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zoning district classification. Residential properties in the RHD-20 zone have a typical lot depth of 110-117 feet and are abutted by an alley at the rear of the property. Typical lots in the RHD-20 maintain an average front yard setback of 12 feet and a minimum front yard setback of 6 feet. The subject site has no unique characteristics such as size, configuration or topography that make this lot different than others in the same zoned area. Application of the Zoning Code development standards would not deprive the subject property of a staircase to access the existing second floor unit. The applicant has an alternate configuration to replace the exterior staircase that would meet the required front yard setback but has instead chosen to request a Variance to encroach two feet into the required minimum front yard setback. C. The variance does constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone district in which such property is situated. The applicant is requesting a reduction in the required minimum front yard setback from 6 feet to 4 feet in order to relocate a staircase that would encroach into the minimum front yard setback by 2 feet. This would not be consistent with the minimum front yard setback applicable to surrounding residential properties in the RHD-20 zone. The applicant is seeking a special privilege or reduction beyond what is applicable to surrounding properties in the RHD-20 zone. The applicant has provided an alternate staircase design that would comply with the required front yard setback but has instead chosen to seek a Variance from the front yard setback requirements. This is a request for a special privilege because there are no physical characteristics that would prevent relocating the staircase to meet current code requirements. D. Authorization of the variance does not substantially meet the intent and purpose of the zoning district in which the property is located but will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of persons living or working in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the City. The subject site is located in the RHD-20 zone which is developed with a mix of single family and multi-family residences. The applicant is proposing to relocate the -2 of 3- Resolution 15-25 131 14"' Street staircase within the minimum front yard setback area. This will not be consistent with surrounding properties. The applicant's proposal will not comply with all development standards required by the Seal Beach Municipal Code. Section 5. Based upon the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby denies Variance 15-1 and Minor Use Permit 15-13 as the findings for the Variance and Minor Use Permit cannot be made. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Seal Beach Planning Commission at a meeting thereof held on November 2, 2015, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners NOES: Commissioners ABSENT: Commissioners ABSTAIN: Commissioners Esther Cummings, ATTEST: Chairperson Jim Basham Planning Commission Secretary -3 of 3- 8u180∎1.33MY8I1:Y1183,80(LIE SNV1d 21001d 4 r� 30N3Q1532J Wtt309 S3i0N 1V?J3N39 Z 4 4 S3N01 IN01I vlva13roa.+ o S p NV1d auS N N 3 i .Aa�ya•�ae3a :�oj 30V1d3zVJIVd3�J NIVls 0 0 83NOr 1801 30 NOISSIN83d 1/3114/8 03SS3Ndx3 3141 100NI IN 3lO44„80 1113d NI 1031Odd 83810 ANV 803 0393141f JO 0200008,08 38 10N AV8 ON8 N01830 Sara 1101 30 A/83d08d 381 38V SNYld 383111 0 B e of f11 i r> a x Z J A r-j- .1,,,,E, 0 ,,.. , E I. 1 14 _ t' I 11 1 y 1 a P 1 I. 11, it A 11 21 I I J 9Y9 I 6 eI 'L m 4 _, , 1 ii, i • 1 , o._ W I it i 3 • A . T- ,! 1 0- - ' - B w ;:,:,,,,E, ! : 1 xI z I:4 1 IJ S w W If ,, II i' Z O CO Z 0 p 4 U J J IL IR 0 LL 0 ----- — .. t,„ a z. 0- >- N 4) W h w w a •M, _U • � 4 $ a ti 1111 s - ile $ i 1 71 lk 1 pel Ads 11 P 4l�k R g i 4 1rk Mil II! i 11 tliii 1°1 11 021 si„ 6111 CO W g3 Y 3 0g4 W CC g �y � Lu 8�3 �8i O � € C7 '\ 11.5 kV.Z.11.1.....,....4..0.1 WV%V 1"...M.11..011,111,■la CirLOS VO 1-0113g 70'36 IS H.I.VI ICI e "7 ac:IS3N -3043 SNV-14.1 NIV.I.5 S3N011N0 taI WI1 1 L 1.1i Q ....0 VNIIONC N 1401c30 'JOJ 379'1=13N/NIV.13N NIY.LS 'ritC1'1101 10 NOISM13,1 RILIRIY,03SS3eidX3 314.1 11101-141M TOM Ki awl Ni 1.73rObld 11-4110 ANY ki01 Q33113 a tiO 03011000:13ki 39 ION AYR ON NO1S3053NOrIVOI ill AltradOtid 3141 RN SnlVid 353141 ---- l? !., i i 1 .A I i ,_,----'- 111 IMM-..■-- -I= .--1 IlE1=711 II '' an IIMMII Mini' .-=.111 II !I IIII . ..___, 1 --.-_ _•,_ No.1:1 =-; ---- -- 't 1 I ...-_._—. --.- -- - .:, -._=...--•--_l_ 1, t • g i •1 I 1 i I i i I . i -.--.- Otil ( ....1 .., II II . . \ (i'llt( Cinli t t ; 1 '4 — -—- —--—--—--- 1 .W.h 1 A-.I 4 1 .0-,t. [ I .4-.. a'h '- .". r t 77 _iiii. r , ; 7 11113111E , -1, , iK 1 1115 :\I I I I 4 if T 10 . cil JO II _i A ' .4 I.' : ],_ 5 ir 1 I •i , i 1— 1 nli ' Of 1 a , ___.... : E 1 2 2 2 .-. 4 • -. .-- _ -.."'"F.„dr-_•.: .. . ,. ' • ir ' ilW,•;.- •-- .i A .-,,,.. . . ... ,.... .. .le .4r-lid( : - 6: 1 . -„ 1 .