HomeMy WebLinkAboutSupplemental Information-Ltc�rn
Page 4 — City Council 1/11/2016
Pulled from the Consent Calendar for separate consideration. (Miller)
B. Demands on City Treasury — Ratification.
C. Monthly Investment Report — November 2015 — Receive and file.
Pulled from the Consent Calendar for separate consideration. (Miller)
D. Second Amendment to the City Manager's Employment Agreement — Adopt
Resolution 6616 and approve Amendment Number 2 to the City Manager's
Employment Agreement.
E. 2016 City Council Appointments as Representatives to Intergovernmental
Agencies - Adopt Resolution No. 6617 confirming City Council appointments as
representatives and alternates to Intergovernmental Agencies for 2016 and direct
the City Clerk to revise and post on the website the 2016 FPPC Form 806.
F. 2016 Calendar of Meeting Dates - Receive and file.
ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR
B. Demands on City Treasury — Ratification.
Council Member Gary Miller referenced the $68,786.10 ameaats— listed on page
eighteen of the Warrant Registry for El Nino Storm Event expenses. He stated
concerns that such expenditures are being made in conflict with the City Charter and
policies as theyL-it exceeds the $28,800 threshold that requires City Council approval.
He then asked that the record reflect his concerns that this violates Resolution No.
6384.
At the inquiry of Mayor Massa- Lavitt, City Manager Ingram clarified that purchases were
made on an emergency basis after review of El Nino Storm scenarios with staff and
consult with the City Attorney.
Council Member Miller reiterated his concerns of violating purchasing regulation
violations because there was not an immenent emergency on October 2.
City Attorney Steele stated that the matter was reviewed and an opinion was made that
that the purchases in question were part of an imminent emergency planning process
and therefore appropriately approved in December.
Council Member Miller stated he disagreed- with the City Attorney, there was not an
immenent emergency on Ocotber 2 and this could have been presented to the Council
at the October 12 Council meeting.
Miller moved, second by Deaton, to ratify the Warrant Listing.
C
i^ f
1
4�
v
Y
cu
N
L
a)
E
Y
0
E
E
0
o
N
.�
E
4
._ 0)
T
U
v
N
p
(D
n
LO
v
fl
-0
° N
O
O'
O
O
d
CA
N
N
U
Q
o
Z
U 3
V
U
c
fa
O
d
m a
m
m
cl•
m
U)
t
o°
0
0
0
0
0
0?
U
N
N
N
°
Q
N
N
SN2
a-
Q
N
Q°
N
N
+• U
N
z
Q
z
(D
(D
a�
r
a)
ai t
N
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
N p
a
0
=
O
(n
ccC
d
o
o )
00
0
d
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
N
=
Z
°
-11� 3
O
..
Ul
L
a
>
a
w
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(D
X
0
0
0
0
ll)
c0
�
�
O
L
+�
N
a m
y
o O
D
E
o
d
4
a
LL0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
�--
.-
O
r
O
CO
N
li
C
t a
w �
0
°
4�
O
(D
Q
w
la
a
e-
r
r
O
r
r
O
r
r
co
a)
G�i
oo
0 3
N
a) Y
U
\
i
(n
r
r
r
r
co
CD
FL
r
O r
a o.
N
C
R
>.
3 N
Q
•U
N
Cl)
IT
LO
(D
fl-
CO
m
O
N
CO
V
LO
CO
I�
W
O
�
O m
O
y
�a
O
0
r
N O
a
F-
z O
o3lI�
13 Pn
Of-4 C,- OMfY\Qn 1cAO(1
Exhibit 1
City of Seal Beach
Current Pant -Time Employees Pay Structure
July 1, 2014
Resolution No. x)=
Grade
Job Classifications
S
S 2
Step
Step 4
'. 6
1
Recreation Assistant
$9 A0
$9.45
2
$10.42
$10.94
2
$9.4
$9.92
$10.42
$10.94
$11.49
3
Office Aide
$9.92
$10.42
$10.94
$11.49
$12.06
4
Crossing Guard
$10.42
$10.94
$11.49
$12.06
$12.66
Maintenance Aide
Pool Lifeguard
Recreation Facility Leader
5
$10.94
$11.49
$12.06
$12.66
$13.30
6
Police Aide
$11.49
$12.06
$12.66
$13.30
$13.96
Swim Instructor
7
$12.06
$12.66
$13.30
$13.96
$14.66 i
8
Assistant Pool Manager
$12.66
$13.30
$13.96
1 $14.66
$15.39
Senior Recreation Facility Leader
9
Intern
$13.30
$13.96
$14.661
$15.39
$16.16
10
$13.96
$14.66
$15.39
$16.16
$16.97 '
11
Recreation Specialist
$14.66
$15.39
$16.16
$16.97
$17.82
Pool Manager
12
Recreation Coordinator
$15.39
$16.16
$16.97
$17.82
$18.71
j 13
$16.16
$16.97
$17.82
$18.71
$19.65
14
Account ClerkWater Meter Reader
$16.97
$17.82
$18.71
$19.65
$20.63
Aquatics Coordinator
15
Beach Lifeguard
$17.82
$18.71
$19.65
$20.63
$21.66
16
$18.71
j $19.65
$20.63
$21.66
$22.74
17
Junior Lifeguard Coordinator
$19.65
$20.63
$21.66
$22.74
$23.88
18
Equipment Operator
$20.63
$21.66
$22.74
$23.88
$25.07
19
Beach Operations Supervisor
$21.66
$22.74
$23.88
$25.07
$26.33
Rescue Boat Operator
20
$22.74
$23.88
$25.07
$26.33
$27.64:
21
$23.88 j
$25.07
$26.33
$27.64
$29.03
22
PT Executive Assistant
$25.07 !
$26.33
$27.64.
$29.03
$30.48
23
$26.33
$27.64
$29.03
$30.48
$32.00
24
$27.64
$29.03
$30.48
, $32.00
$33.60
25
$29.03
$30.48
$32.001
$33.60
1 $35.28
Robin Roberts I -de- r''` G
From: Seth Eaker <seth @blackmarbleconsulting.com>
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 12:46 PM
To: Robin Roberts
— --cc:- -__ - -_ _ --- ____.. Jill Ingram; Jim_6asham; Joseph Stilinovich; Debbie_Machen_ _ _ _._ _____
Subject: Support for Urgency Ordinance No. 1651
Clerk Roberts,
I wanted to personally affirm, as I did to my council representative, my
feelings regarding the Ordinance No. 1651. The most apparent reason for
the adoption of the Resolution and recommendation of the City Council to
approve the planned Urgency Ordinance regarding the land use for
cultivation of medical marijuana is the legal conflict between the Federal
and State law. By adoption, Seal Beach maintains land use control at he
local level and due to timing, the Urgency Ordinance is appropriately
being used. I support 1651 and subsequently recommended actions by
staff though my reasons are slightly different.
As I have testified in the past, while I am PRO legalization
of marijuana for medicinal use, the conflict of Federal vs. California law
sets up a lose /lose scenario both for business and government /police. The
legal battle is the same reason I provided for my support of the Municipal
Code section 5.70.025(c), and it continues to be my position, until such
time that there is no longer disagreement between State and Federal law.
The secondary issues are that subordinate to the fundamental conflict of
law, there are safety concerns to which guidelines have not been
established and should the legal condition be remedied, there is still the
question of zone placement. In the future, it may be appropriate to permit
such use in specific areas, such as Industrial or General Commercial, with
a CUP. These issues, such as noxious odors, "increased" crime and
electrical fires at that point could be addressed via proper land use
(zoning) change and conditions of use (CUP).
Please note that these comments are my recommendation as a resident
and business owner only, not from any agency, board or organization to
which I may have a position of leadership or directorship.
I would ask that this communication is shared with the Council and Staff
for tonight's meeting.
Sincerely,
Seth Eaker
Black Marble ConsultingTM - "Helping innovators transform their ideas into strategic documents."
Developing people, businesses, non- profits and community through engagement, innovation, crucial conversations and
advocacy. How do you grow and attain success?
www.blackmarbleconsultin -,.com
(215)869 -4471
FA
+em 1J
The City Manager is responsible for carrying out the policies and ordinances of the City Council,
for overseeing the day -to -day operations of the City, and for appointing of all department heads. The
City Clerk is an appointed position and is responsible for maintaining city records and overseeing
elections.
The City provides a full range of services for the citizens utilizing a mix of contracts with other
governmental entities or private companies. The City has its own Police Department but contracts for fire
and paramedic services through the Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA). The City also operates water
and sewer utilities but contracts for refuse and sanitation treatment services.
The Successor Agency to the Seal Beach Redevelopment Agency (Agency) is a component unit of the
City. Component units are legally separate entities for which the primary government is financially
accountable. The Seal Beach City Council Members, in separate session, serve as the governing body
of the Successor Agency and the City Manager serves as the Executive Director.
History of Seal Beach
The City has an area of 13.23 square miles and sits on the coast as the gateway to Orange County
between the cities of Long Beach and Huntington Beach. In 1901 J.C. Ord, a Civil War veteran known as
"the father of Seal Beach," hired a 30 —mule team to bring his small general store building from
Los Alamitos to Bay City where he set it down at the southwest corner of crossroads now known as
Main Street. J.C. Ord was the first Trustee, the first Mayor, Postmaster, and the first Judge. His store on
Main Street was the Post Office and Court House and the jail house when it was necessary.
The population in 1915 was 250 persons, including children. Bay City was renamed Seal Beach in 1916.
California Sea Lions, commonly called Seals, were a regular part of the scene along the coast and a
perfect name for the new town.
On January 16, 1916, it was reported in the newspaper, the POST, that Frank Burt, who had managed
the concessions at the recent Panama Pacific Exposition just closing in San Francisco, was coming to
Seal Beach. His purpose was to establish an amusement zone for fun and frolic in this small beach
village. The Jewel City Amusement Company was formed and a new 1,865- foot -long pier was
constructed in early summer 1916, and is the second longest wooden pier in California. The City became
a popular recreation destination in the area, and featured a beach side amusement park before
Disneyland was founded.
During World War II, the U.S. Navy purchased 5,256 acres of land and established the Naval Ammunition
and Net Depot for storage and loading of ammunition for the Pacific Fleet. The Seal Beach National
Wildlife Refuge was established in 1972.
In 1961, Leisure World was built on 541 acres of the Hellman Ranch property and was annexed in 1964.
The Rossmoor Business Center was remodeled and now called the Shops at Rossmoor and was
annexed by the City in 1962.
In 1964 -65, the College Park East and West construction took place.
In 1969, Surfside Colony was annexed into Seal Beach and the City population grew to 24,441 by 1970.
ECONOMIC CONDITIONS
Local economy. Although the focus of this Comprehensive Annual Financial Report is the financial
condition of the City at June 30, 2015, it may be best understood when it is considered from the broader
perspective of the specific environment within which the City operates.