HomeMy WebLinkAboutSupplemental Received at MeetingS )S)J ,JL-9�01(0 Pabl►G Commer-S-ts 2(O r-r Cold
Route 44: Daily Nutrition & Shopping Shuttle from LW to North SB
From June to August 2015, hours per week increased from 34.0 to 41.25. This will
increase program cost by over $18,000 /year
May
June
July
August
Hours /day
Mon Tues Wed Th Fri
�
: if z�
40.0
ll
�
$2,008
42.5
$2,008
NOW-703UNISO
RIM
SURE
Route 45: Dial -a -Ride
Hours/
Week
34.00
37.00
38.00
41.25
Increase /week 7.25
increase /year
Cost /Week
@$50.25/hr
$1,709
$1,859
$1,910
$2,073
$364
X 50 Weeks
$18,216
in July 2015, hours per day were increased from 8.0 to S.S. This will increase
program cost by about $6,000 /year
May
June
July
August
Hours /day
Mon Tues Wed Th Fri
Increase /week
Increase /year
Hours/ Cost /Week
Week @$47.24/hr
40.0
$1,890
40.0
$1,890
42.5
$2,008
42.5
$2,008
NOW-703UNISO
RIM
Increase /week
Increase /year
Hours/ Cost /Week
Week @$47.24/hr
40.0
$1,890
40.0
$1,890
42.5
$2,008
42.5
$2,008
2.5 $118
X 50 Weeks
$5,905
RC�a�kko 3UH) l( cnt (b)rZ l �(YWt1 q W0rV. gCE
SCE Customer Websites and Numbers
Outage Information
Report Electrical Hazards: 1- 800 - 611 -1911
Report a Downed Line: 911
Report Outages /Outage Questions: www.sce.com /outages or 1- 800 - 611 -1911
Business Customer Division: Assistance with an emergency situation or obtain
current power outage information, call 1- 855 - 683 -9067 or email scepoc @sce.com.
Claims: Customers can submit a claim by visiting www.sce.com /claims. Please email
claims @sce.com or call 1- 800 - 655 -4555.
Low Income and Energy Efficiency Programs
Medical Baseline Customers: Customers with a documented medical condition
requiring electricity - powered life support equipment:
www.sce.com /Medical Baseline
Energy Savings Assistance: Income - qualified customers: www.sce.com /ESAP
Energy Assistance Fund: Assistance for customers facing financial hardship:
www.sce.com/EAF
Discounts on Electric Rates: Assistance for low- income households:
www.sce.com /care:
• California Alternate Rates for Energy (CARE): Customers can qualify if they or their
household participates in at least one of the eligible public assistance programs listed on
the SCE website above.
• Family Electric Rate Assistance (FERA): Customers can qualify if they meet income
guideline qualifications listed on the SCE website above.
Energy Efficiency: Energy savings programs, rate assistance, rebates, and
incentives: www.sce.com/RebatesandSavings
In Your Neighborhood: Here's what to expect when SCE crews arrive in your
neighborhood, including how to identify an authorized SCE electrical crew:
on.sce.com /upgrades.
21 M O N'
�v�� 3111-1116 ��Orr, P�bl« toor)C5
3/14/2016
HOW DID WE GET HERE...
• 2oo6 — Assembly Bill 1881 was passed
Required local agencies to adopt the State Model Water
Efficient Landscape Ordinance (State MWELO) or a local
ordinance
• 2010 — Ordinance No. 1588 was adopted
Provides the water efficient landscaping requirements
currently in effect
• 2015 — Executive Order B -29-15 was signed
Directed the Department of Water Resources (DWR) to
update the State MWELO
• Today — Proposed Ordinance No. 1655 adoption process
Reformatted Orange County regional MWELO (OC Model)
1
STATE MODEL WATER EFFICIENTIA1
ORDINANCE (MWELO)
• More Efficient Irrigation Systems
• Incentive for Gray-water Usage
• Improvements in onsite stormwater capture
• Limiting the percentage of turf planted in landscapes
• Reporting requirements by local agencies
4
OC MODEL
Metropolitan Water District of Orange County (MWDOC) along
with all 34 cities in Orange County generated the OC Model and
guidelines
The OC Model meets the needs in Orange County and is consistent
with the State Code
3/14/2016
3
PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 1655
• Reduces the threshold size from 2,500 sq. ft. to 500 sq. ft. for new
landscape projects
• Maintains the threshold size of 2,500 sq. ft. for rehabilitated
landscape projects
• Proposed City Regulations for implementation of this Ordinance.
• This Ordinance will promote the design, installation, and
maintenance of landscaping to conserve water.
Z�r 'h
r'
NEXT STEPS
2"d reading of proposed Ordinance No. 1655 is scheduled for March
28, 2016
• Implementation begins 3o days after the date of its adoption
3/14/2016
THANK YOU...
• QUESTIONS?
3/14/2016
rd
.1 I I V OR 1 01&11) . Gibm &, j !' "b�r MAC
COUNCIL COMMENTS
Council Member Miller made the following statements:
Regarding Agenda Item B of the March 14, 2016, City Council Meeting Agenda
Package, I am herby reading my comments into the record regarding Agenda Item
C of the February 22, 2016, City Council Meeting Minutes, if such comments are
not made verbatim to Agenda Item C of Agenda Item B.
The second paragraph of Agenda Item C of the February 22, 2016, City Council
Meeting Minutes that begins with "Council Member Miller expressed
disappointment" shall be replaced in its entirety with the following paragraph,
"Council Member Miller expressed disappointment that staff was not presenting
the item and stated concern that emergency purchases were not in compliance with
City policy, i.e., the City Manager is allowed to make purchases up to $28,800
roughly, and if it is anything over that, the City Manager needs to bring it to the
City Council. He referenced the over $300,000 expenditure for El Nino should
have came to the Council for approval and referenced and provided the City
Council with copies of Resolutions 5964 and 6503 and Municipal Code Section
3.25.020 as examples of the requirement to establishment of an emergency within
a week (seven day). Council Member Deaton indicated the Council ask the City
Manager in the future even if it is an emergency she should bring it to us (the
Council). Mayor Massa -Lavitt and Mayor Pro Tern Varipapa agreed with Council
Member Miller this should have came to the City Council for approval."
1(IO 3 ct Caya I (halt, r� �'-o n Gjaa( 11MQmly-r
Council Member Miller also made the following statement for the record:
At the February 22, 2016, City Council meeting it was shown that City Manager
Ingram failed to get City Council approval for expenditures far exceeding her
allowed expenditure threshold of approximately $28,800 for the City's El Nino
effort as required by Resolution #6384 pursuant to City Charter Sections 420 and
10 10 and failed to establish a local emergency pursuant to Municipal Code Section
3.25.020. While Council Member Deaton indicated the City Council should ask
the City Manager in the future even in an emergency to bring this type matter to
the Council for approval, this matter was a significant violation of the City Charter.
City Charter Section 1302. - Violations states in part - The violation of any
provision of the City Charter shall be deemed a misdemeanor. Therefore, City
Attorney Steele, pursuant to City Charter Section 704. - City Attorney, Power and
Duties, you must bring a misdemeanor charge again City Manager Ingram for her
violation of the City Charter.