Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSupplemental Received at MeetingS )S)J ,JL-9�01(0 Pabl►G Commer-S-ts 2(O r-r Cold Route 44: Daily Nutrition & Shopping Shuttle from LW to North SB From June to August 2015, hours per week increased from 34.0 to 41.25. This will increase program cost by over $18,000 /year May June July August Hours /day Mon Tues Wed Th Fri � : if z� 40.0 ll � $2,008 42.5 $2,008 NOW-703UNISO RIM SURE Route 45: Dial -a -Ride Hours/ Week 34.00 37.00 38.00 41.25 Increase /week 7.25 increase /year Cost /Week @$50.25/hr $1,709 $1,859 $1,910 $2,073 $364 X 50 Weeks $18,216 in July 2015, hours per day were increased from 8.0 to S.S. This will increase program cost by about $6,000 /year May June July August Hours /day Mon Tues Wed Th Fri Increase /week Increase /year Hours/ Cost /Week Week @$47.24/hr 40.0 $1,890 40.0 $1,890 42.5 $2,008 42.5 $2,008 NOW-703UNISO RIM Increase /week Increase /year Hours/ Cost /Week Week @$47.24/hr 40.0 $1,890 40.0 $1,890 42.5 $2,008 42.5 $2,008 2.5 $118 X 50 Weeks $5,905 RC�a�kko 3UH) l( cnt (b)rZ l �(YWt1 q W0rV. gCE SCE Customer Websites and Numbers Outage Information Report Electrical Hazards: 1- 800 - 611 -1911 Report a Downed Line: 911 Report Outages /Outage Questions: www.sce.com /outages or 1- 800 - 611 -1911 Business Customer Division: Assistance with an emergency situation or obtain current power outage information, call 1- 855 - 683 -9067 or email scepoc @sce.com. Claims: Customers can submit a claim by visiting www.sce.com /claims. Please email claims @sce.com or call 1- 800 - 655 -4555. Low Income and Energy Efficiency Programs Medical Baseline Customers: Customers with a documented medical condition requiring electricity - powered life support equipment: www.sce.com /Medical Baseline Energy Savings Assistance: Income - qualified customers: www.sce.com /ESAP Energy Assistance Fund: Assistance for customers facing financial hardship: www.sce.com/EAF Discounts on Electric Rates: Assistance for low- income households: www.sce.com /care: • California Alternate Rates for Energy (CARE): Customers can qualify if they or their household participates in at least one of the eligible public assistance programs listed on the SCE website above. • Family Electric Rate Assistance (FERA): Customers can qualify if they meet income guideline qualifications listed on the SCE website above. Energy Efficiency: Energy savings programs, rate assistance, rebates, and incentives: www.sce.com/RebatesandSavings In Your Neighborhood: Here's what to expect when SCE crews arrive in your neighborhood, including how to identify an authorized SCE electrical crew: on.sce.com /upgrades. 21 M O N' �v�� 3111-1116 ��Orr, P�bl« toor)C5 3/14/2016 HOW DID WE GET HERE... • 2oo6 — Assembly Bill 1881 was passed Required local agencies to adopt the State Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (State MWELO) or a local ordinance • 2010 — Ordinance No. 1588 was adopted Provides the water efficient landscaping requirements currently in effect • 2015 — Executive Order B -29-15 was signed Directed the Department of Water Resources (DWR) to update the State MWELO • Today — Proposed Ordinance No. 1655 adoption process Reformatted Orange County regional MWELO (OC Model) 1 STATE MODEL WATER EFFICIENTIA1 ORDINANCE (MWELO) • More Efficient Irrigation Systems • Incentive for Gray-water Usage • Improvements in onsite stormwater capture • Limiting the percentage of turf planted in landscapes • Reporting requirements by local agencies 4 OC MODEL Metropolitan Water District of Orange County (MWDOC) along with all 34 cities in Orange County generated the OC Model and guidelines The OC Model meets the needs in Orange County and is consistent with the State Code 3/14/2016 3 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 1655 • Reduces the threshold size from 2,500 sq. ft. to 500 sq. ft. for new landscape projects • Maintains the threshold size of 2,500 sq. ft. for rehabilitated landscape projects • Proposed City Regulations for implementation of this Ordinance. • This Ordinance will promote the design, installation, and maintenance of landscaping to conserve water. Z�r 'h r' NEXT STEPS 2"d reading of proposed Ordinance No. 1655 is scheduled for March 28, 2016 • Implementation begins 3o days after the date of its adoption 3/14/2016 THANK YOU... • QUESTIONS? 3/14/2016 rd .1 I I V OR 1 01&11) . Gibm &, j !' "b�r MAC COUNCIL COMMENTS Council Member Miller made the following statements: Regarding Agenda Item B of the March 14, 2016, City Council Meeting Agenda Package, I am herby reading my comments into the record regarding Agenda Item C of the February 22, 2016, City Council Meeting Minutes, if such comments are not made verbatim to Agenda Item C of Agenda Item B. The second paragraph of Agenda Item C of the February 22, 2016, City Council Meeting Minutes that begins with "Council Member Miller expressed disappointment" shall be replaced in its entirety with the following paragraph, "Council Member Miller expressed disappointment that staff was not presenting the item and stated concern that emergency purchases were not in compliance with City policy, i.e., the City Manager is allowed to make purchases up to $28,800 roughly, and if it is anything over that, the City Manager needs to bring it to the City Council. He referenced the over $300,000 expenditure for El Nino should have came to the Council for approval and referenced and provided the City Council with copies of Resolutions 5964 and 6503 and Municipal Code Section 3.25.020 as examples of the requirement to establishment of an emergency within a week (seven day). Council Member Deaton indicated the Council ask the City Manager in the future even if it is an emergency she should bring it to us (the Council). Mayor Massa -Lavitt and Mayor Pro Tern Varipapa agreed with Council Member Miller this should have came to the City Council for approval." 1(IO 3 ct Caya I (halt, r� �'-o n Gjaa( 11MQmly-r Council Member Miller also made the following statement for the record: At the February 22, 2016, City Council meeting it was shown that City Manager Ingram failed to get City Council approval for expenditures far exceeding her allowed expenditure threshold of approximately $28,800 for the City's El Nino effort as required by Resolution #6384 pursuant to City Charter Sections 420 and 10 10 and failed to establish a local emergency pursuant to Municipal Code Section 3.25.020. While Council Member Deaton indicated the City Council should ask the City Manager in the future even in an emergency to bring this type matter to the Council for approval, this matter was a significant violation of the City Charter. City Charter Section 1302. - Violations states in part - The violation of any provision of the City Charter shall be deemed a misdemeanor. Therefore, City Attorney Steele, pursuant to City Charter Section 704. - City Attorney, Power and Duties, you must bring a misdemeanor charge again City Manager Ingram for her violation of the City Charter.