Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Item H
4r5EA e� U 9cT�. • AGENDA STAFF REPORT %Toe" DATE November 14, 2016 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council THRU: Jill R. Ingram, City Manager FROM: Jim Basham, Director of Community Development SUBJECT: BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 17-05-02 TO RECEIVE GRANT FUNDS AND AUTHORIZE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MATRIX DESIGN GROUP, INC. FOR THE PREPARATION OF A,JOINT LAND USE STUDY SUMMARY OF REQUEST: That the City Council adopt the Resolution No. 6694 1. Approving Budget Amendment No. 17-05-02 to authorize the City Manager to accept the Joint Land Use grant in the amount of $290,000 and allow the expenditure of the same funds; and 2. Authorizing the City Manager to execute a Professional Services 'Agreement with Matrix Design Group, Inc. for the preparation of a Joint Land Use Study. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: The Department of Defense has a long and successful history of working together with communities throughout the nation to provide a more secure environment. In order to improve this endeavor, Congress authorized the Department of Defense to make available community planning assistance grants to state and local government to help integrate military installations and operations into local government long term planning programs. The Joint,Land Use Study (JLUS) program is a basic planning process designed to address on-going military operations and programs that may encroach upon or be incompatible with local community land use planning and provide recommendations to balance the interest of both community and military.needs. The JLUS is an excellent tool to bridge the partnership and maintain a positive relationship with local governments so that both entities may co-exist successfully. The City of Seal Beach took the lead as a project applicant and partnered with the City of Long Beach and Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach (NWSSB) • Agenda Item . H representatives to prepare a grant application for funding from the Office of Economic Adjustment(O EA) who oversees the JLUS program. The JLUS is the effective tool to discuss environmental degradation that resulted from the creation of the Anaheim. Bay Jetties and potential solutions to alleviate the City's continuous cost to replenish a natural resource. OEA determined that the Naval Base and the neighboring communities would be good candidates for a land use and compatibilitystudy and awarded a grant of $290,000. Budget Amendment No. 17-05-2 would allow the acceptance of the grant funds and to expend the funds. The Department of Defense will reimburse the City for all invoices pertaining to the Joint Land Use Study including the consultant so the project is..cosi neutral. A Request for Proposals was sent to five consultants with experience in this field to work with staff and NWSSB to prepare a JLUS. Staff received two proposals in response to this request. City staff partnered with Long Beach staff to interview both consultants and determined that Matrix Design Group, Inc. had the experience and expertise to conduct an analysis and prepare a JLUS that would be reflective 'of the community and its needs. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: There is no environmental impact'related to this item. LEGAL ANALYSIS: The City,Attorney has reviewed and approved the Resolution as to form. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The Office of Economic Adjustment awarded $290,000 for the preparation of a Joint Land Use Study that'will.be used to pay for all consultant costs. The grant requiresa 10% match to be provided by the participating cities. The 10% percent match will be provided through staff time spent by Seal Beach and Long Beach staff. Additionally, a budget amendment is required since the Federal Government will reimburse the City for all invoices pertaining to Joint Land Use Study. Budget.Amendment No. 17-05-02 to authorize the acceptance of the grant funds in the amount of 290,000 and expend the same funds for preparation of the Joint Land Use Study. Description Account Revised/Adopted Proposed Budget (diff) Budget Budget Amendment Joint Land Use Study 004-230-39501 $ - $ 290,000 $ 290,000 Joint' Land Use Study 004-230-41501 $ - $ 290,000 $ 290,000 Page'2 RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt Resolution No.6694 approving a Professional Services Agreement with Matrix Design Group, Inc. for preparation of'a Joint Land Use Study. SL BiIITTED. BY: NOTED AND APPROVED: lit IPAO ! f %as Ji f Basham,' CRT- . Ingram, City M-iter ctor of Community Development Prepared by: Crystal Landavazo, Senior Planner Attachment: A. Resolution No. 6694. B. Professional Services Agreement with Matrix Design, Inc. C. Matrix Design Group, Inc. Proposal Page 3 Attachment "A" RESOLUTION NUMBER 6694 A RESOLUTION OF THE SEAL BEACH CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MATRIX DESIGN GROUP, INC. FOR PREPARATION OF A JOINT LAND USE STUDY AND APPROVE BUDGEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 17-05-02 THE SEAL BEACH CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY RESOLVE: Section 1. The City Council hereby approves the professional services agreement between the City of Seal Beach and Matrix Design Group, Inc. for preparation of Joint Land Use Study for the City of Seal Beach in partnership with the City of Long Beach and Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach. Section 2. The Community Development Department issued a Request for Proposals from experienced consultants and completed a selection process to find the most qualified proposal. Section 3. The City of Seal Beach was awarded a grant of $290,000 from the Office of Economic Adjustment;to acquire the services of a consultant that would assist in preparation of a Joint Land Use Study. Section 4. The Council hereby directs the City Manager to execute the Agreement. Section 5: The City Council hereby approves Budget Amendment No. 17-05-02 authorizing the acceptance of the Joint Land Use grant funds in the amount of $290,000 'and expend the same funds for preparation of a Joint Land Use Study as follows: Description Account Revised/Adopted Proposed Budget(diff) Budget Budget Amendment Joint Land Use Study 004-230-39501 $ - $ 290,000 $ 290,000 Joint' Land Use Study 004-230-41501 $ - $ 290,000 $ 290,000 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Seal Beach City Council at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of November, 2016 by the following vote: AYES: Council Members: NOES: Council Members: ABSENT: Council Members: ABSTAIN: Council Members: • Sandra Massa-Lavitt, Mayor ATTEST: Robin L. Roberts, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA } COUNTY OF ORANGE } SS CITY OF SEAL BEACH } I, Robin Roberts, City Clerk of the City of Seal Beach, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is the original copy of'Resolution Number 6694 on file in the office of the City Clerk, passed, !approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of November, 2016. Robin L. Roberts, City Clerk Attachment "w.99 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT for Preparation of a Joint Land Use Study Between -0 SEA( .o S. •c F •g27 '\ ==\c = " C O j CPS City of Seal Beach 211 8th Street Seal Beach, CA 90740 Matrix Design Group, Inc. 7844 Madison Avenue, Suite 111 Fair Oaks, CA 95628 (916) 537-0026 This Professional Service Agreement ("the Agreement") is made as of October 24, 2016 (the "Effective Date"), by and between Matrix Design Group ("Consultant"), Inc., a Colorado corporation, and the City of Seal Beach ("City"), a California charter city, (collectively, "the Parties"). Page 1 of 15 RECITALS A. City desires certain professional services. B. Pursuant to the authority provided by its City Charter and Government Code § 37103, if applicable, Resolution No 6546, a Resolution of the: Seal Beach City Council Agreeing to be the Local Sponsor of and Participate in the Preparation of a Joint Land Use Study for the Naval Weapons Station, Seal Beach ("Resolution No. 6546"), and award No. EN1433-16-01 a grant awarded by the Office of Economic Adjustment of the U.S. Department of Defense ("OEA Award No. EN1433-16-01'), City desires to engage Consultant to provide Professional Services in the manner set forth herein and more fully described in Section 1.. C. Consultant represents that it is qualified and able to provide City with the services, contemplated by this Agreement in a good and professional manner, and it desires to perform such services as provided herein. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the Parties' performance of the promises, covenants, and conditions stated herein, the Parties hereto agree as follows. AGREEMENT 1.0 Scope of Services 1.1. Consultant shalt provide those services ("Services") set forth in the attached Exhibit A ("Proposal"). To the extent that there is any conflict between Exhibit A and this Agreement, this Agreement shall control. 1.2. Consultant shall perform all Services under this Agreement on a timely, regular basis and in a manner reasonably satisfactory to the City. 1.3. In performing this Agreement, Consultant shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, State, and local law. 1.4. As a material inducement to City to enter into this Agreement, Consultant hereby represents that it has the experience necessary to undertake the Services to be provided. In light of such status and experience, Consultant hereby covenants that it shall follow the customary professional standards in performing all Services. 1.5. By executing this Agreement, Consultant represents that, to the extent required by the standard of practice, Consultant (a) has investigated and considered the scope of Services to be performed, (b) has carefully considered how the Services should be performed, and (c) understands the facilities, Page 3of15 difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the Services under this Agreement. 2.0 Term This term of this Agreement shall commence as of 12:00 a.m. on the Effective Date and shall continue for a term of two years unless previously terminated as provided by this Agreement. 3.0 Consultant's Compensation City will pay Consultant in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit A for Services but in no event will the City pay more than $288,371 for all Services performed. Consultant will not be compensated for any work performed not specified in the Scope of Services as set forth in Exhibit A (Proposal) unless the • City Manager authorizes°such work in advance and in writing and such Services are authorized by OEA Award No. EN1433-16-01. Any such additional] work authorized by the City pursuant to this Section will be compensated in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit A. 4.0 Method of Payment Consultant shall submit to City monthly invoices for all Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. Such invoices shall be submitted within 15 days of the end:of the month during which the Services were rendered and shall describe in detail the Services rendered during the period, the days worked, number of hours worked, the hourly rates charged, and the Services performed for each day in the period. City will pay Consultant any undisputed amounts within 30 days of receiving Consultant's invoice. City will not withhold any applicable federal or state payroll and other required taxes, or other authorized deductions from payments made to Consultant. 5.0 Termination 5.1. This Agreement may be terminated by City, without cause, or by Consultant based on reasonable cause, upon giving the other party written notice thereof not less than 30 days prior to the date of termination. 5.2. Notwithstanding Subsection 5.1, this Agreement may be terminated by City upon 10 days' notice to Consultant if Consultant fails to provide satisfactory evidence of renewal or replacement of any liability insurance policy required by this Agreement at least 30 days before the expiration date of the previouspolicy(ies). 5.3. Notice of termination shall be given in accordance with Section 7.0. Page 4 of 'i 5 6.0 Party Representatives 6.1. The City Manager is the City's representative for purposes of this Agreement. 6.2. Celeste Werner, AICP is the Consultant's primary representative for purposes of this Agreement. It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability, and reputation of Celeste Werner were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, Celeste Werner shall'be responsible duringthe term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. Consultant may not change its representative without the prior written approval of City, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. 7.0 Notices 7.1. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed 48 hours after deposit in the United States Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the:party at the`following addresses: To City: City of Seal Beach 211 8th Street Seal Beach, California 90740 Attn: City Manager To Consultant: Matrix Design Group 7844 Madison Avenue, Suite 111 Fair Oaks, CA 95628 Attn: Celeste Werner, Project Manager 7.2. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service. 8.0 Personnel Consultant has or shall secure, at its own expense, all personnel required to perform the Services under this Agreement. Consultant and any person who performs Services shall possess the qualifications, permits, and licenses required by State and local law to perform such Services, including, without limitation, a City of Seal Beach business license as required by the Seal Beach Municipal Code. 9.0 Independent Contractor 9.1. Consultant is and shall at all times remain an independent contractor and not an employee of the City, and Consultant is not entitled to Page 5 of 15 participate in any pension plan, insurance, bonus or similar benefits that City provides for its employees. All Services provided pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed by Consultant or under its exclusive supervision, direction and control. Consultant will determine the means, methods, and details of performing the Services. Consultant shall be solely responsible for the satisfactory work performance of all personnel engaged in performing the Services and compliance with the customary professional standards. 9.2. Any additional personnel performing Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall also not be employees or agents of City and shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Consultant's personnel shall also not be entitled to participate in any pension plan, insurance, bonus or similar benefits that City provides for its employees. Consultant' shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall he solely responsible for all reports, withholdings, deductions and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: Social Security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers'compensation insurance. 9.3. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend (with legal counsel acceptable to City), indemnify and hold harmless City and City's elected officials, officers, employees, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, from any and all liability, damages, claims, costs and expenses of any nature to the extent arising from or caused by Consultant's personnel practices or any negligent or willful act or omission of Consultant related to or arising out of Consultant's obligations of this Section 9. In addition to any other remedies under this Agreement or law, City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of Consultant's failure or refusal to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section 9. Consultant's defense and indemnification obligations under this Section are in addition to Consultant's defense and indemnification obligations of Section 16. 10.0 Confidentiality; Publication of Documents 10.1. Consultant covenants that all data, documents, discussion, or other information developed or received by Consultant or provided for performance of this Agreement are deemed confidential. Except as necessary for performance of the Services under this Agreement, no copies, sketches, photographs, or graphs of materials, prepared pursuant to this Agreement, and no data, documents or other information developed or received by Consultant in the performance of this Agreement shall be released by Consultant to any other person or public without City's prior written authorization. City shall grant such authorization if applicable law requires disclosure. All City data shall be returned Page 6 of 15 • toCity upon the termination of this Agreement. Consultant's covenant under this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 10:2. All press releases and other information to be published in newspapers or magazines, will be approved and distributed solely by City, unless otherwise provided by written agreement between the Parties. Should Consultant receive any subpoena or other court order for production or disclosure of any records, Consultant shall immediately notify City and shall cooperate with City in responding to such subpoena or court order. 10.3 Consultant's covenants under this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 11.0 Subcontractors No portion of this Agreement shall be subcontracted without the prior written approval of City. Consultant is fully responsible to City for the performance of any and all subcontractors. 12.0 Ownership of Documents and Work Product 12.1. All final data, documents, plans, specifications, reports, information, data, exhibits, photographs, images, video files and media created or developed by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement ("Written Products") shall be and remain the property of City without restriction or limitation upon its, use, duplication or dissemination by City. All Written Products shall be considered "works made for hire," and all Written Products and intellectual property rights arising from their creation, including, but not limited to, all copyrights and other proprietary rights, shall be and remain the property of City without restriction or limitation upon their use, duplication or dissemination by City. Consultant shall not obtain or attempt to obtain copyright protection as to any Written Products. 12.2. Consultant hereby assigns to City all ownership and intellectual property rights to the Written Products that are not otherwise vested in City pursuant to the paragraph directly above this one. 12.3. Consultant covenants and represents that it has secured all necessary licenses, consents or approvals to use any instrumentality, thing or component as to which any intellectual property right exists, including computer software, Used in the rendering of the Services and the production of all Written Products produced under this Agreement, and that City has full legal title to and the right to reproduce the Written Products. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold City and City's elected and appointed officials; officers, employees, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, harmless from any loss, claim or liability in any way related to a claim that City's use of any of the Written Products is violating federal, state or local laws, or any contractual Page 7 of 15 • provisions, or any laws relating to trade names, licenses, franchises, copyrights, patents or other means of protecting intellectual property rights and/or interests in products or inventions. Consultant shall bear all costs arising from the use of patented, copyrighted, trade secret or trademarked documents, materials, equipment, devices or processes in connection with its provision of the Services and. Written Products produced under this Agreement. In the event the use of any of the Written Products or other deliverables hereunder by City is held to constitute an infringement and the use of any of the same is enjoined, Consultant, at its expense, shall: (1) secure for City the right to continue using the Written Products and other deliverables by suspension of any injunction, or by procuring a license or licenses for City; or (2) modify the Written Products and other deliverables so that they become non-infringing while remaining in compliance with the requirements of this Agreement. This covenant shall survive the termination of this Agreement. Consultant's defense and indemnification obligations under this Section 12.3 are in addition to Consultant's defense and indemnification obligations of-Section 16. 124. Upon expiration or termination of the Agreement, Consultant shall deliver to City all Written Products and other deliverables related to any Services performed pursuant to this Agreement without additional cost or expense to, City. If Consultant prepares a document on a computer, Consultant shall provide City with said document both in a printed format and in an electronic format that is acceptable to City. 13.0 Assignment Consultant shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement whether by assignment or novation, without the prior written consent of City: Any purported'assignment without such consent shall be void and without effect. 1'4.0 inspection and Audit of Records Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all Services and other matters covered under this Agreement, including but expressly not limited to, all Services performed, salaries, wages, invoices; time cards, cost control sheets, costs, expenses, receipts and other records maintained by Consultant. in connection with this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records on the Services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of all Services and work in connection therewith. All such records shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Upon 24-hours notice from City, Consultant shall provide City with free access during regular business hours to inspect any or all of such records at Consultant's offices, and the right to examine and audit the same and to make copies and transcripts as City deems necessary, and shall allow inspection of all program data, information, documents, records, proceedings and activities and all other matters related to the performance of the Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall retain all financial and program service records and all other records related to the Page 8 of 15 Services and performance of this Agreement for at least three (3) years after expiration, termination or final payment under this Agreement, whichever occurs later: City's rights under this Section 14.0 shall survive for three years after expiration, termination or final payment under this Agreement, whichever occurs later. 15.0 Insurance 15.1 Liability Insurance. Consultant shall procure and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement insurance against claims for bodily injury, death, and personal injury to persons or damages to property and professional negligence which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Services hereunder by Consultant, and its directors, officers, agents, representatives, employees and subcontractors. 15.2. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Unless otherwise approved by City, coverage shall be at least as broad as: Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001). Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the State of California; and Employer's Liability Insurance. Professional Liability insurance. Consultant shall provide to City the standard form issued by the carrier. 15.3. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: General Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence and in the aggregate for bodily 'injury and death, personal injury and property damage. Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreement or the general limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident and in the aggregate for bodily injury or disease;. and Workers' Compensation Insurance in the amount required by law. Page 9 of 15 • Professional Liability: $1,000,000 per claim/aggregate. 15,4. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Consultant shall inform City of any deductibles or self-insured retentions except with respect to professional liability insurance. 15.5. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 15.5.1. City, its elected and appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, designated volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, are to be covered as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of Consultant; products and completed operations of Consultant; premises owned, occupied or • used by Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Consultant. The coverage shall contain no limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its elected and appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, designated volunteers or agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials which are not also limitations applicable to the named insured. 15.5.2. For any claims related to this Agreement, Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects City, its elected and appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, designated volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, designated volunteers or agents serving as independent contractors in the role of'City officials shall be excess of Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 15.5.3. Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 15.5.4. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled except after 30 days' prior written notice by first class mail has been given to City, or 10 days' prior written notice by express overnight mail if cancellation is due to nonpayment of premiums. 15.5.5. Each insurance policy, except for the professional liability policy, shall expressly waive the insurer's right of subrogation against City and its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials. Page 10 of 15 15.5.6. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:Vlll unless waived in writing by City's Risk Manager. 15.5.7. Verification of Coverage. All insurance coverages shall be confirmed by execution of 'endorsements on forms approved by City. The endorsements are to be: signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf: All endorsements are to be received and approved by City before services commence. As an alternative to City forms, Consultant's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications. 16.0 Indemnification, Hold Harmless, and Duty to Defend 16.1. Indemnity for Professional Services. In connection with Consultant's professional services, and to the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend at its sole cost and expense, hold harmless and indemnify the City and the. City's elected and appointed officials, officers, employees. attorneys, agents, designated volunteers, successors, assigns, and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials (collectively "Indemnitees" in this Section 16), from and against any and all claims, demands, damages, causes of action, proceedings, judgments, injuries, liabilities, losses, penalties, liens, costs or expenses, in law or in equity, of any nature whatsoever, including without limitation the payment of all consequential damages and expert costs,and reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of defense and other reasonable costs and expenses (collectively, "Professional Claims" hereinafter) including but not limited to, the payment of all consequential damages, reasonable expert costs, attorneys' fees and other costs and expenses, including but not limited to Professional Claims relating to personal injury, bodily injury, death or property damage, whether actual, alleged or threatened, which arise out of, pertain to, or relate to in whole or in part the negligent or willful acts or omissions of Consultant or any of Consultant's directors, officers, employees, subcontractors, or agents (or any entity or individual for whom or that Consultant shall bear the legal liability) in connection with Consultant's performance of such professional services under this Agreement, except to the extent such loss or damage arises from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, as determined by final arbitration or court decision or by the agreement of the Parties. With respect to all such aforesaid suits, actions, or other legal, equitable or administrative proceedings or suits of every kind that may be brought or instituted against Indemnitees, Consultant shall defend Indemnitees (with legal counsel approved by City, whose approval;shall not be unreasonably withheld), at Consultant's own cost, expense and risk, and shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against Indemnitees. Consultant shall reimburse the City and the other Indemnitees for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing'the indemnity herein provided. Page 11 of 15 16.2 Indemnification for Other Than Professional Liability. Other than in the performance of professional services (as provided in Subsection 16.1) and to the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall, at its own cost and expense, defend, hold harmless and indemnify the City Indemnitees (as defined in Subsection 16.1) from any and all claims, demands, damages, causes of action, proceedings, judgments, injuries, liabilities, losses, penalties, costs, or expenses, in law or equity, of any nature whatsoever (collectively, "Other Claims" hereinafter), including but not limited to the payment of reasonable expert costs, attorneys' fees and other costs and expenses, including but not limited to Other Claims relating to personal injury, bodily injury, death, or property damage, in any manner arising out of or related to, in whole or in part, the acts or omissions of Consultant, its officers, directors, employees, agents, or servants (or any entity or individual that Consultant shall bear the legal liability) in connection with the performance of this Agreement, including the Indemnitees' active or passive negligence, except to the extent such loss or damage arises from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees, as determined by, final arbitration or court decision or by the agreement of the Parties. With respect to such aforesaid suits, actions, or other legal proceedings of every kind that may be brought or instituted against Indemnitees, Consultant shall defend Indemnitees, at Consultant's own cost, expense, and risk, and shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award, or decree that may be rendered against Indemnitees. Consultant shall reimburse City and the other Indemnitees for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. 16.3. Consultant's defense and indemnification obligations under this Section 16.0 or any other provisions of this Agreement shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by Consultant, the City or any of the. other Indemnitees as defined in'this Section. 16.4. All duties and other covenants of Consultant under this Section 16.0 shall survive termination of this Agreement. 17.0 Conflict of Interest 17.1. Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which may be affected by the Services, or which would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services. Consultant further covenants that, in performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest-shall be employed by it. Furthermore, Consultant shall avoid the appearance of having any interest, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services. Consultant shall not accept any employment or representation during the term of this Agreement which is or may likely make Consultant "financially interested" (as provided in California Government Code §§ 1090 and 87100) in any decision made by City on any matter in connection with which Consultant has been retained. Page 12 of 15 17.2. Consultant further warrants and maintains that it has not employed or retained any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Consultant, to solicit or obtain this Agreement. Nor has Consultant paid or agreed to pay any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Consultant, any fee, commission, gift, percentage, or any other consideration contingent upon the execution of this Agreement. Upon any breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right, at its sole and absolute discretion, to terminate this Agreement without further liability, or to deduct from any sums payable to Consultant hereunder the full amount or value of any such fee, commission, percentage or gift. 17.3. Consultant warrants and maintains that it has no knowledge that any officer or employee of City has any interest, whether contractual, noncontractual, financial, proprietary, or otherwise, in this transaction or in the business of Consultant, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of Consultant at any time during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall immediately make a complete, written disclosure of such interest to City, even if such interest would not be deemed a prohibited "conflict of interest" under applicable laws as described in this Subsection. 18.0 Equal Opportunity Consultant affirmatively represents that it is an equal opportunity employer. Consultant shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee, or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national Origin, handicap, ancestry, sex, sexual orientation, or age. Such non-discrimination includes, but is not limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff, or termination. 19.0 Labor Law Certification 19.1 By its signature to this Agreement, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code that require every employer to be insured against liability for Workers' Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services. 19.2 Consultant further certifies it is aware of the requirements of Chapter 9.75 of the Seal Beach Municipal Code and California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq. and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., (collectively "Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other. 'requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects, To the extent that.any of the Services to be performed under this Agreement constitute a public work or maintenance project to which prevailing wages apply pursuant to Page 13 of 15 the Prevailing Wage Laws, Consultant agrees to comply with the provisions of California Labor Code Sections 1771, 1774 and 1775 concerning the payment of prevailing rates of wages to workers and the penalties for failure to pay prevailing wages. Consultant shall, as a penalty to City, forfeit not more than two hundred dollars ($200) for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each worker paid less than the prevailing rates as determined by the Director of Industrial Relations for the work or craft in which the worker is employed for any public work or maintenance project done under the contract by Consultant or by any subcontractor. 20.0 Permits and Licenses Consultant, at its sole expense, shall obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement, appropriate licenses and certificates as may be required in connection with its performance of Services under this Agreement. 21.0 Time of the Essence Consultant certifies that it is aware that its services shall be paid with funds received by City pursuant to OEA Award No. EN1433-16-01, and that Consultant's services must be consistent with all terms and conditions of said grant: Consultant shall comply with all time deadlines, benchmarks and other schedules imposed by or pursuant to the terms of OEA Award No. EN1433-16- 01 , or other federal requirements imposed as conditions of said grant. 22.0 Entire Agreement • This.Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior oral or written negotiations, representations, understandings, or agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by a writing signed by both parties. 23.0 Severability The invalidity in whole or in part of any provisions of this Agreement shall not void or affect the validity of the other provisions of this Agreement. 24.0 Governing Law This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with'the laws of the State of California without regard to conflict of law principles, except that any rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not be applied in interpreting this Agreement. Any dispute that arises under or relates to this Agreement, shall be resolved in the superior court or federal court with geographic jurisdiction over the City. Page 14of15 25.0 No Third Party Rights No third party shall be deemed to have any rights hereunder against either party as a result of this Agreement. 26.0 Waiver No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other default or breach, whether of the same or other covenant or condition. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by a party shall give the other party any contractual rights by custom, estoppel, or otherwise. 27.0 Exhibits All exhibits referenced in this Agreement are hereby incorporated into the Agreement as if set forth in full herein. in the event of any material discrepancy between the terms of any exhibit so incorporated and the terms of this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall control. 28.0 Corporate Authority The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Parties warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said Parties and.that'bytheir execution, the Parties are formally bound to the provision of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto, through their respective authorized representatives have executed this Agreement as of the date and year first above written. Page 15 of 15 CITY OF SEAL BEACH Mat( " • Gr , Inc. By: _ e72air Jill R. Ingram, City Manager Name: • ■ a: . - Attest: Its: 1(lcE PRESIDENT- By: By: Robin L. Roberts, City Clerk Name: NO f 10. Approved as to Form: its: ✓I GB Piecic *3F By: Craig A. Steele, City Attorney EXHIBIT A PROPOSAL Error! Unknown document property name. Attachment "C" A Proposal to Prepare the Joint Land Use Study for the Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach Prepared for 5EA(' City of Seal Beach 211 8th Street Seal Beach, CA 90740 Prepared by 0Mati rix ,P Matrix Design Group 7844 Madison Avenue, Suite 111 Fair Oaks, CA 95628 Office: (916) 537-0026 August 12, 2016 - - � �'r-2C{iti`���.�,i' . t ;2' 11 iviatroorif • .nil `yy H .11f{I(N f0.1f 11I '4.2/kw' 1��11 - ,`ni-^ � rae ys�i� .- �1^�.'�e.Y�- -•y'!.r .. . 4 it • '� • .r ^rte --•a ya1 Table of Contents ., 1 Executive Summary 1-1 2 Scope of Work and Schedule 2-1 2.1 Project Understanding 2-1 2.2 Project Approach 2-3 2,3 Scope of Work 2-5 2.4 Project Schedule 2-17 3 Qualifications and Personnel 3-1 3.1 Matrix,Design Group, Inc 3-1 3.2 Why Choose Matrix? 3-1 3.3 Project Team Qualifications 3-7 3.4 Staff Qualifications 3-11 3.5 Resumes 3-13 Celeste Werner,AICP,'Poject Manager 3-14 Rick Rust,AICP,LISP, Deputy Project Manager 3-17 Mike Hrapla 3-19 Bren,Cox,AICP 3-21 Patrick Small,AICP 3-23 Michele Mora 3-25 Roberta Schlicher,PE 3-27 Chris Martin, GISP.. 3-29 3.6 Project Manager Contact Information 3-30 3.7 Staff Workload 3-30 4 Experience and References 4.1 4.1 Overview 4-1 4.2 Reference Projects 4-3 1, Naval Base Ventura County JLUS(CA) 4-3 2. Naval 'Air Station Corpus Christi JLUS(TX) 4-4 3. Naval Air Station Patuxent River(MD) 4-5 4. Aberdeen Proving Ground JLUS(MD) 4-6 5.. Malmstrom AFB JLUS/JLUS implementation (MT) 4-7 4.3 Other Relevant Projects 4-8 5 Fee Schedule 5.1 6 Cost Estimate 6.1 6.1 Proposed Cost 6-1 6.2 Cost Control 6.1 6.3 Commitment and Policies to Meet the Project Budget and Schedule 6-1 NWSSB Joint Land Use Study i Matrix Design Group Page I "-"MrT ^ � (4� ,� ; .� .„,e.,, u O It y{ ,Matnxrn �� r i. m Tables and Figures Table 3-1 Relevant JLUS Experience 3-9 Table 3-2 Relevant JLUS Experience 3-10 Table.3-3 Matrix Key Staff Availability and Office Location 3-30 Table 5-1 Rate Schedule 5-1 Table 5-2 Reproduction Rate Schedule 5-1 Table 6-1 Matrix Design Group, Inc. Proposed Budget . Separate Sealed Envelope Figure 2-1 Project Schedule . 2-18 Figure 3-1 Team Organization 3-8 Page ii NWSSB loint Land Use Study I Matrix Design Group • 7844 Madison Ave.,Suite 111 Matrix pp��, oal�@i ,Fair Oaks CA 95628 916.537.0026(p) DESIGN G.R D U P � 916.537.0027 In www.matrixdesigngrou p.com August 11,2016 City Clerk's Office City of Seal Beach 211 Eighth Street Seal Beach, CA 90740 RE: Proposal to Conduct a Joint Land Use Study for Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach Dear Selection Committee Members: In response to the Request for Proposals.(RFP) issued by the City of Seal Beach, we present our proposal to provide consulting services for preparation of the Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach (NWSSB)lointLand Use Study(JLUS(. As demonstrated in our proposal,we offer you a team of Matrix staff that specialize in the preparation of JLUSs and have the proven expertise and experience needed to complete the scope of work outlined in the REP. Our team offers the following advantages: 1. JLUS Experience. Matrix has a dedicated staff that specializes in JLUS / compatibility planning projects. The Management Team we have proposed for this project has personal experience on over 40 JLUS projects and nine JLUS implementation projects nationwide. This includes work on six 1LUSs in California (see below) and 12 JLUS projects for Navy installations: a Naval Base Ventura County a R-2508 ILUS(including NAWS a NAS Kingsville JLUS JLUS China Lake) a NSA Crane JLUS a NAF El Centro JLUS ■ NAS Meridian JLUS a NSA Panama City JLUS a NAS.Fallon JLUS a NAS Patuxent River JLUS a NSF Dahlgren JLUS a NASCorpus Christi JLUS o N8 Guam JLUS 2. California Expertise. When it comes to compatibility planning in California, Matrix is the recognized leader. To date, Matrix has been part of six JLUS efforts in California. These are: Naval Base Ventura County JLUS, NAF El Centro JLUS, Travis AFB JLUS, Camp Roberts.ILUS, Beale AFB JLUS, and the R-2508 JLUS (covering Edwards AFB, NAWS China Lake and Fort Irwin). Matrix also worked with the Governor's Office of Planning and Research to prepare the California Advisory Handbook for Community and Military Compatibility Planning, the state's long-time guide.to compatibility planning: https://ww w.opr.ca.gov/docs/Complete_Advisory_Handbook_2006.pdf Finally, Matrix brings a wide range of experience in the preparation of General Plan and environmental impact reports (EIR) within California. This experience provides us with great insight in developing compatibility solutions that work for local communities and resource management agencies. Anniston.Atlanta•Colorado Springs•Denver.Niceville•Parsons•Phoenix•Pueblo•Sacramento•Tamuning•Washington DC 3. Identifying Potential Issues. This project is expected to have a range of issues that will require an experienced firm to be able to identify,assess.and find workable solutions. Potential issues include: • Explosives anchorage inside Long Beach Breakwater/East San Pedro Bay; II Effects of on-going plans, such as the City of Long Beach/Army Corps' East San Pedro Bay Ecosystem Restoration Study; C Sensitive species concerns; to Adjacency of Seal Beach National Wildlife Refuge; s Competition for sea space; e Water quality; e Climate change; • Recreational use and physical security; and • Effects of changing regulations,such as air quality. Matrix has had experience in addressing similar issues on other JLUSs and can bring a unique outlook to each issue and finding workable solutions. In addition to these potential issues, Matrix uses a comprehensive set of 25 compatibility factors to make sure that all current and potential issues are identified and addressed. 4. Experience in Coastal Environments. Matrix has extensive experience in working in coastal environments and the unique issues, regulatory environments, and potential solutions that will need to be discussed. 5. Strategies that Work. A key to a successful.JLUS is developing a set of strategies designed to address existing and future potential'compatibility issues. Matrix works'closely with the committee members to identify alternative solutions,.provide the implications.of each solution, and work to develop consensus on a way forward that can be implemented. 6. Stakeholder Engagement and Publid Involvement. Our planners are all trained facilitators and routinely conduct workshops, charrettes,and public hearings as-part of the development of our JLUSs and community and military plans. All ofour JLUS projects have involved multiple jurisdictions combined with federal, state, and local agencies, and our team leaders have successfully facilitated a dialog that not only produced consensus-based solutions, but also established lasting and enhanced coordination, cooperation,and implementation. 7. OEA Experience. Matrix has conducted numerous projects under contracts funded by OEA grants. Our team understands the contractual processes and obligations associated with OEA funded projects and are adept at ensuring our clients fulfill all OEA requirements. We are very.excitedabout the prospect of providing consultant services to the City of Seal Beach and its JLUS partners. As a Vice'President and owner within Matrix Design Group, my signature below shall serve as the binding authorization of Matrix in this matter of business. If you have any questions or require additional information regarding the content of our submittal,'please do not hesitate to contact me at (916) 537-0026 or at celeste_werner @matrixdesigngroup.com. Sincerely, , (72V thyfilr Celeste-Tie Project Manager/Vice President \ . na,s„ +ripw+ N.� r :t _ - 'r+r.�, l s 4 t = atrix;r'II i i a• a ` . _.-u r. Scope;of Work and Schedule• 2.1 Project Understanding As regions develop and expand in response to growth and market demands, land use decisions can extend a community's development pattern closer to military installations and operational areas, which has the potential to result in compatibility issues. Other changes in nearby areas can impact compatibility as well,such as the development of wind energy resources or the protection of endangered species. Whatever the cause, the resulting conflicts can have negative impacts on community safety,economic development, and sustainment of military activities and readiness. Relative to military installations, this threat to sustainability is of great concern to both local jurisdictions and the Department of Defense. Pressures from incompatible development can create restrictions on use of installations, sea space, and training corridors. Defining and addressing compatibility concerns between military installations and local communities is essential to protecting military missions,the health of local and regional economies and industries,and the quality of life for residents. To achieve effective compatibility, local governments,agencies and organizations need to work ) collaboratively with the military to develop community-driven, cooperative,and strategic win-win actions that are desirable and implementable. These actions are intended to promote community development that is compatible with the military operations at Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach (NWSSB), and to reduce operational impacts on lands adjacent to, or affected by, NWSSB. + NWSSB and the Region 1 NWSSB is located.in Seal Beach,California, within the Los Angeles - pf I metropolitan area. NWSSB also has detachments located in Fallbrook '. i� ;It' and Norco; California. The installation at Seal Beach was originally 4.411- ' "rr commissioned in 1944, with an initial mission to store and load r4 " - : r 01. ammunition onto Pacific Fleet ships headed for war, as well as to service + #'`� Ytr a..'' I .4'4 anti-submarine nets used to protect fleet bases around the world. The IC n• r n• �)tJ,', � current mission of NWSSB is to provide infrastructure support to the Navy's ordnance mission through the storage and loading of ammunition. a- The base occupies over 5,200 acres(8.2 square miles)of land and includes over 200 buildings, half a million square feet of ammunition storage space, and the Seal Beach National Wildlife Refuge. Seat Be h L The Office of Economic Adjustment(OEA) awarded a grant to the City of + ,J o- 'm J *IA FE fIfFUUE � I Seal.Beach for the development of a Joint Land Use Study(JLUS). The aim r< OOUAFIT '� of the JLUS is to identify encroachment issues that are currently r�� r ; � � `�; i confronting the surrounding communities and impairing mission 4 ✓ 14 'ti- ;� ';,' 17 ��., objectives for the installation. i s."' r- a 5 • ti a 4: �+ '. er NWSSB Joint Land Use Study I Matrix Design Group ' Page 2-1 Matnx = �, r a JLUS Objectives A JLUS is intended to help guide future land use and resource decisions by local jurisdictions, state and federal agencies, special interest groups,and property owners in the JLUS Study Area. Our team has gained an extensive amount of directly related experience and has developed a comprehensive list of lessons learned from past JLUS efforts and military and community planning efforts across the country. Our approach for the NWSSB JLUS will be built upon the following objectives: El To develop planning policies that balance the growth of the community and manage potential conflicts around NWSSB while protecting the military mission. • To create an open dialogue between NWSSB leadership, community members and adjacent property owners, local governments,and other local, state and federal agencies in the NWSSB JLUS Study Area. • To protect the health,safety, and general welfare of the public. The NWSSB JLUS will be a community-driven process that is conducted in partnership with NWSSB in order to: • Increase community awareness of the NWSSB mission; • Identify and mitigate compatibility and encroachment challenges and issues that may impact training, operations, testing and power projection missions at NWSSB; • Promote community development that is compatible with the NWSSB mission; • Identify local-based solutions to manage encroachment and address compatibility issues; • Enhance the overall coordination and communication between NWSSB, local municipalities, local and state agencies and organizations, and the public; • Protect the public health, safety, and welfare of those living, working,or recreating near NWSSB and its operational areas. Study Area The Study Area for the NWSSB JLUS will be centered on NWSSB and include all areas(land and water)that are affected by the operational footprint of NWSSB. This are include areas exposed to noise, dust, hazardous materials, explosive safety, and so forth. The idea is to identify the geographic areas that have current or potential compatibility concerns and then to build strategies that apply to the areas of concern within the Study Area. Issue Identification Early in the JLUS process, Matrix will work with the Policy Committee,the Technical Committee, other JLUS stakeholders and the public to identify a comprehensive set of compatibility issues to be addressed in the.JLUS. These issues will be the basis of the analysis in the JLUS and will drive the development of strategies to address compatibility. Potential issues may include the following. • Explosives anchorage inside Long Beach Breakwater/ East San Pedro Bay; • Effects of on-going projects near NWSSB, such as City of Long Beach /Army Corps' East San Pedro Bay Ecosystem Restoration Study; Page 2-2 NWSSB Joint Land Use Study I Matrix Design Group Scope of Workand Schedule) 2 ® Sensitive species concerns relative to ,COMPATIBILITY FACTORS operations; v " .� vim '" ..-�; 'A0 r '�" s y ladlAYlSet Sptm°t ® Adjacency of Seal Beach National Wildlife AT, l°d' �/ ` 'LV'. 11dDun 'g '810- 881091L886eves , I LEG 4[e4sHLrtl18411,s Refuge; s �.. r m+ 'CA Wlyle , it -ct- t- t WU I 4646.1 '�� ,,14 • • Competition for sea space; COM", CoodewoolGMemnraeue MA rt `MateEnimearts'. tCR c 'hc. v No Itt tiro ff 'fi;4'1 • Water quality; °DSS:"DauISroobe/Ram a 'm (x"»(,It PT DatiCTIL aRAj %e,FP"` ' -ED " 9Frot m , RC • Climate change; + 7 . FSC FrrNmcy tcvmnEspchi + SA la!w �'xs ® Recreational use and physical security; and FSI. . r '1 f SNR •� . #iii htet re aea t g�( i3' VO Vtakiebinxnoi • Effects of changing regulations,such as air HA ;- " V .mbrSIbn" "•`' ,��' quality. IE .f tviNT, WQQ The Matrix approach to compatibility goes beyond a typical compatibility assessment, using a set of 25 compatibility factors to ensure all potential issues are Identified. While all of these may not occur in this JLUS Study Area, all of the factors that will he considered are shown on the graphic to the right. 2.2 Project Approach One of the most important elements of a JLUS is to create a community-based study that builds consensus and obtains buy-in from multiple agencies, organizations and the public(stakeholders) beginning on the first day of the project and lasting throughout the JLUS'process. The actions by which Matrix builds consensus and obtains buy-in involve. • Getting to know and understanding the affected communities; • Asking the right questions(based on previous experience); • • Pursuing and collecting relevant information—both directly supportive and background; • Encouraging extensive interactive involvement through the use of various engagement method's tailored to individuals' needs; • Conducting a rigorous analysis of the issues associated with encroachment; • Developing insightful solutions to mitigate or resolve encroachment issues; • Designing strategies to be straightforward and easily implemented; and • Providing new tools and refining existing tools to support harmonious civilian and military growth. These actions have been developed over time and over the course of many JLUS projects. Our project management team and.key staff routinely work on projects of varying complexity within our own communities and across the country. Our project approach is one that is open and transparent and relies on the combined strengths of the overall tearrr. Relying on the strengths of the overall team, Matrix sees itself as an extension of staff working in a complementary role to that of the City of Seal Beach. In this fashion,we strive to minimize the impact on staff in conducting this project. NVVSSB Joint Land Use Study j Matrix Design Group Page 2-3 M45iatnx. F -•• tf. c • II In addition, the Matrix approach includes providing easy=to- read, user-friendly documents that will not just simply remain \ on a shelf. Our in-house graphics team designs the custom A \- branding for each of our JLUS projects. This custom branding {. L."",,,` k in ois, ,..t- is then applied to all the JLUS publications. ,Our JLUSs are comprised of four separate reports: • Background Report JLUS Report, Executive Summary, and ti �-r; { the Project Overview. y L- ,". w otle,r.t.r —rat The Background Report will contain the technical evaluation tic ! { r of the issues identified for NWSSB and will contain the rP ' ' -• ' � ' k information described in the RFP as the Summary of Existing - Conditions. All supporting information is contained in the Background Report. The Background Report is composed of five-chapters: • Chapter 1—Introduction provides;an-overview of a1LUS, and the JLUS process,goals, objectives, and the Study Area are all defined in this chapter. • Chapter 2—Community Profile provides an overview of the communities and resource areas in the NWSSB Study Area: Topics include historical information, economic and population data,development trends such as housing and building permit trends, transportation networks, and resource protection areas. • Chapter 3—NWSSB Profile provides an overview of NWSSB including history, mission, military strategic importance, economic benefit to the region, and a discussion of all the military operational footprints. El Chapter 4—Existing Compatibility Tools provides an evaluation of the-relevant existing land use planning and other tools including memorandums of understanding, military planning documents, comprehensive plans, ordinances, and building code analysis. ■ Chapter 5—Compatibility Assessment provides a technical assessment of the compatibility issues identified for the NWSSBJLUS. This chapter is not an exhaustive technical report, but provides sufficient analysis and evaluation of the issues and looks atthe.planning tools that are being used or not being used to resolve the conflicts between the military and adjacent community and areas. The!LW Report is high-resolution graphic, smaller document that summarizes the Background Report and contains the Implementation Plan. This Implementation Plan is composed of various military influence or compatibility areas to which the:strategies would be applied. This report is a quick reference of the JLUS. This approach in presenting the entire process into two separate documents has proven successful among our clients. The Executive Summary provides a high-level overview of the JLUS documents. It will include a short summary of Chapters 1-5 of the JLUS and provide context to the compatibility issues identified and the actions developed to address those issues. This Executive Summary will be concise and easy to use as both a marketing piece and easy reference tool for decision-makers and local leaders-. Matrix has had recurring positive feedback with its,Executive Summaries in brochure format. Reasons for this include its graphics-intensive and colorful layout, and the use of easy- to-understand text summarizing the report's key elements and recommendations. The Project Overview is.a maximum 4-page summary that is suitable for use on the-OEA and other website as an accessible summary of the JLUS project. Page 2-4 NWSSB Joint Land Use Study Matrix Design Group • Scope'of Workiand Scl edule 2 �� reTh Creativity I Innovation in Planning Approaches Our core planning team proposed for this project has developed over 40 1LUSs A key to the success of our and nine JLUS Implementation programs across the United States and Guam. This projects is based on our vast, worldwide planning experience has afforded us the opportunity to learn and experienced approach develop methods for addressing a wide range of compatibility issues: We will To facilitating provide the knowledge, skills, and judgment needed to successfully complete this project and provide the City of Seal Beach and its partners with an outstanding multi-jurisdictional, JLUS upon which to base updates to existing policies and regulations that address stakeholder coordination and compatibility planning. building consensus towards a workable solution. We"use stakeholder and public participation methods that assist in maximizing participation and interest in the project. This encourages increased community response in important planning matters and enables participants to play an active role in the development of the JLUS. Our approach also engages-key stakeholders and public leaders from the very beginning of the project in order to obtain input into the development of study parameters, the overall assessment of issues, and ultimately the development of workable solutions and strategies. Our team is able to complete the NWSSB ILLS with the use of our creative approach to working with multiple jurisdictions and.engaging a broad audience of stakeholders in an efficient manner. Our streamlined approach and timeframe is also a result of our understanding and familiarity with project and reporting requirements associated with projects funded by the Office of Economic Adjustment((EA). ) 2.3 Scope of Work The following Scope of Work provides an overview of key tasks identified in the Scope of Work section in the NWSSB JLUS Request for Proposals (RFP) and our approach to meeting these requirements. Matrix accepts and understands all of the tasks and subtasks presented in the Scope of Work within the RFP and we will complete all of theitems identified by December 31, 2017. Detailed information about workproductand deliverables is described under each task. A summary of deliverables for a task are identified`at the end-of each task. A schedule is included at the end of this section to illustrate the organization of the work plan by month and provide a general overview of actions necessary to complete the NWSSB JI.US within the timeframe provided. TASK 1: PROJECTINITIATION AND ADMINISTRATION One of the most critical elements of the JLUS into cteate a community-based study that builds consensus and obtains buy-in from multiple agencies, organizations,stakeholders and the public. This task accomplishes two major items. First,Task I encompasses project initiation, which includes a kick-off meetingwith the JLUS committees to introduce them to the project team and give them an overview of the JLUS process and review responsibilities. Second, this task outlines project management and Work Plan activities that will run from project start until JLUS completion. Subtask 1.1. Work Plan Refinement and Project Definition The first step to initiating the JLUS project will be to review and refine, as needed, the JLUS Scope of Work with the City of Seal Beach Project Manager. This assessment will ensure there is no duplication of effort and identify areas where complementary project-activities can occur. The detailed project timeline and associated work plan tasks will also be confirmed. After the Work Plan is finalized, it will be presented to the Policy Committee (PC) and Technical Committee (TC) at the project kickoff meeting for their approval. NWSSB Joint Land Use Study I Matrix Design Group Page 2-5 - Matrix:0j Subtask 1:2 Project Coordination and Administration The Matrix Team will work with City of Seal Beach staff to provide-administrative support to accomplish the following: Given our understanding of CEA requirements, we will • Establishment of PC and TC membership; provide materials, such as • Maintain a database of JLUS PC and TC members and track meeting status reports, in a format that attendance; can be simply attached in the • Schedule and facilitate committee and public meetings; OEA reporting system, saving staff time on grant • Prepare meeting notices,agendas, minutes, handout materials, maps, administration. presentation and any other items to accomplish-the study objectives; • Provide status reports that detail work in progress,work accomplished, and funds expended; and • Provide written work products and verbal JLUS Committee briefings at the conclusion of each major phase of the study. Subtask 1.3 Stakeholder and Public Involvement The Matrix Team understands that the City of Seal-Beach Project Manager will coordinate all communication with federal,state,and local agencies and elected officials. The Matrix Team understands all information concerning the JLUS will be provided to City-of Seal Beach before committee review or pubic release. The Matrix Team further understands that at the completion Of the JLUS, all maps, data,and reports shall be the property of City of Seal Beach and will be provided M both paper and electronic formats. Our vision for-public involvement is a very open and thorough process that allows no single interest to dominate the public process. It-also ensures that all segments in the Study Area have access to frequent.and timely information, meaningful and convenient methods of participation,and timely access to draft documents in advance of public workshops. Matrix believes a key aspect to the initial outreach for the JLUS needs to include an education effort that clearly identifies the purpose of the JLUS effort. This will ensure meaningful feedback as the project move forward. Public Outreach Plan In order to be-successful and useful, a JLUS must be a community-based study that builds consensus and obtains buy-in from varied-interests and the public (stakeholders)throughout the process. The Matrix Team will work with City of Seal Beach and the PC/TC to prepare an involvement strategy that maximizes opportunities for stakeholders to be involved in compatibility assessment, to participate in identifying possible solutions, and to comment on and discuss the JLUS process and documents. The involvement strategy will address our proposed approach to: • reaching a diverse audience; • soliciting input on the JLUS; El providing project announcements; • providing opportunities to the public for issue identification,and development of solutions;and • providing opportunities for public comment. Page 2-6 NWSSB Joint Land Use Study 1 Matrix Design Group ,Scope of Woitk;and'Schedule; ••2, PTh The success of our team's approach to engaging and involving the stakeholders in all of our planning projects is a result ofa multi-faceted approach, including but not limited to: media outreach (e.g., press releases, public service announcements on local government television or radio stations, public information flyers); timely JLUS updates in the form of JLUS brochures;JLUS project website;and facilitated public meetings/workshops. JLUS Project Website As we•do with all of our JLUS projects, Matrix will develop and maintain a project website. The website will be used to providing meeting minutes, project deliverables, and other materials to be posted for public reference. JLUS FactSheets(Informational Brochures( Matrix will prepare:,three (3) informational brochures to be distributed to the committees and the public during the JLUS process. These informational brochures will also be made available via e-mail,the project Website, and at public meetings. • JLUS Overview. The first fact sheet will describe the purpose, • goals, and objectives of the JLUS program and methods to � '' jJ'AREL`GENT l,QE.,�re' provide input into the process. This fact sheet will also provide t'-\a;n 1 e 1 . Y an overview of the standard compatibility factors (such as land „- ,,. use, noise, etc.) that could occur in the Study Area. While not ������ � I.4M”` ��ati °m...• �,... ,... . all of the factors listed will apply to the NWSSB JLUS,this look at "--'- a». potential compatibility factors ensures the JLUS is E ry0{�'�J u. comprehensive in its approach. This can also be used to brief - -. .'�,^..,, interview participants and the general public. • JLUS Strategy Toolbox. This fact sheet.provides an overview of :2-77nartga, the strategy types that could be considered when addressing compatibility issues. This is helpful in discussing possible �t approaches to issues with the PC/TC and the public. • JLUS Project.Overview. The final fact-sheet will be prepared to provide a summary of the NWSSB JLUS. It can be used to provide public information on the plan as a handout at . meetings, as well as to the media in support of the JLUS. This w.oe . • brochure will be provided with the Final JLUS. Fact sheet #1 for the NAF El Centro JLUS Media Outreach To assist in achieving an informed public and good attendance at public meetings, it is to the project's advantage to be forthcoming to the media. Conveying the.project's purpose and need while providing timely and accurate information increases the chances that the information will be published or aired to enable general public awareness and assist in accomplishing buy-in and support for the project. Outreach to the media, in combination with outreach to the public, will help communicate and enhance the positive aspects of the project. The media should be used strategically to convey project information;therefore, it is beneficial to.establish good relations with the media early in the process to build trust and credibility.. Taking a proactive outreach approach to the media, keeping them informed of the project status, and having-a designated project point of contact will help achieve this credibility. Matrix will work with the City of Seal Beach JLUS Project Manager and the PC, as directed, to reach out to appropriate media contacts. These media contacts will provided by the City of Seal Beach JLUS Project Manager. NWSSB Joint Land Use Study I Matrix Design Group Page 2-7 . atnxr ( r)� y �f.f Sf x.),�. Siq . y a Kev Stakefioltlerinteniiews Matrix's approach todata collection will be augmented via a week-long"Tiger Team" effort to complement data provided or collected by request(see Task 2). During this site visit, Matrix will conduct up to 16 individual or small group interviews with identified community stakeholders (local elected officials, regional planning agencies, special district staffs, other-community and business leaders)as well as in-depth interviews with NWSSB leadership and staff. These interviews have proven to be a vital component-in truly understanding the issues and opportunities to be addressed in the JLUS. A key outcome of these interviews will be to obtain information from each interview about any existing or potential compatibility issues that should be discussed in the JLUS. A summary of all issues and opportunities (and any potential JLUS strategies) will be compiled after the'interviews are completed and will be presented to the City of Seal Beach. 'Coininittee Meetings Matrix will work with the City of Seal Beach JLUS Project Manager to ensure that membership on the PC and TC is representative of all affected stakeholders in the Study Area(Subtask 12). • Policy Committee The Matrix Team understands that the PC will be a critical component to the success of the JLUS process, providing key insights to the local and regional issues and assisting with refinement of all recommendations to fit local needs and capabilities. The responsibility of the PC will be to help establish the overall direction of the JLUS project; review and approve policy recommendations, review and approve draft and final written reports, and assist in establishing a process to,monitor implementation of adopted policies. The PC will be important in developing and maintaining relationships between key stakeholders, interested community members,and the Matrix Team. • Technical Committee The purpose of the TC is to provide the technical expertise,feedback,and real-world experience to the JLUS team and to serve as communications liaisons to their respective stakeholder groups on the PC. PC/IC meetings.will be-held throughout the course of the project on a regular basis based upon project milestones (see schedule at the end of this section for more information on timing). In the interest of time and resources, it is assumed that all meetings/workshops on-the same topic will be held on consecutive days during a given week with the committees. For example, our team may meet with the TC in the-morning and the PC in the afternoon. Meetings may also be conducted consecutively with other project activities, such as the stakeholder interviews and public meetings. Matrix recommends a total offive.(5)committee meeting sets during the development of the NWSSB JLUS. The recommended discussion topics at each workshop are listed below. Project Kick-Off(PC/TC Meeting#1) The project kick-off meeting will be held as joint meeting with the PC and TC to outline the JLUS process and goals, educate all stakeholders about the NWSSB JLUS and process, and identification of roles and responsibilities of participants. Additional topics to be discussed will include a discussion and finalization of the Study Area and committee inputs on compatibility issues to be addressed. The Matrix Team, working with the City of Seal Beach JLUS Project Manager and NWSSB, will coordinate an installation tour for the PC and TC members, including adjacent areas as appropriate, associated with the first meeting. The tour will provide committee members with a more comprehensive understanding of the military missions, challenges, and constraints imposed through incompatible development. Page 2-8 NWSSB Joint Land Use Study l Matrix Design Group Scope of Work and`Schedule;" 2 - - j 4 PC/TC Meeting#2 The second meeting conducted with the PC and TC will be held in conjunction with Task.2. This meeting will include a review of potential data gaps review issues identified to date and present draft findings. Any additional issues will.be added and summarized along with general .( •_ Yu • notes on issues,goals, and concerns identified to date. °a_ ' t!' t , fit PC/TC Meeting#3 s''r / I 1. The third meeting will be held in conjunction with Task 3. This meeting t 4, 1 will garner input-from the PC and TC on potential strategies. During these meetings, PC and TC members will split into smaller groups.to - 11 �I' discuss the proposed solutions. Two day ciiarrette held as part of Naval Base Ventura County JLUS with PC/TC Meeting#4 committee members The fourth meeting will be held to present.the Committee Draft JLUS and recommendations in conjunction with Task 4. The Matrix Team will develop the Draft JLUS for public release based on committee comments and revisions. The Matrix Team will provide information regarding the public comment period and solicit input from the PC and TC members. PC/TC Meeting#5 The fifth meeting will be held to.preserht.the Final JLUS Report in conjunction with Subtask 4.2. The Matrix Team will prepare the final report to include all comments and revisions as outlined in the previous tasks and as deemed ) appropriate to incorporate by the PC. Putill¢Meeting's As part of thispkoject, we are proposing three (3) public meetings to be conducted during the course of;the project (Project Initiation, Interim Findings and Preliminary Recommendations, and Final Recommendations). Ttie meetings will be held in.a location in the5tudy Area as-determined by City of Seal Beach in coordination with the PC and TC. In the interest of efficiency of time and resources, all attempts will be made to schedule PC/TC meetings and public meetings on consecutive days,when feasible. For example, the Matrix Team may meet with the TC in the morning and the PC-in the afternoon and the public workshop in the same evening. Public Meeting#1-Project Initiation- The first public meeting will explain the purpose and function of the JLUS, provide an overview of the military operations at NWSSB, introduce project participants,share the JLUS approach, and discuss the JLUS goals. The format of this.meeting.will include a presentation to the public followed by an interactive working session where attendees will be invited and encouraged to share their input-on potential JLUS. A user-friendly JLUS Overview/Compatibility Factors Brochure (JLUS.Brochure#1) will be distributed at this workshop to provide the public a tool in completing a compatibility issues exercise. Attendees will work in groups around large scale Study Area maps to complete a compatibility issues•worksheet as well as engage in intimate group discussions with the JLUS team. Participants will also be able to provide input through interactive audience response systems that allow for immediate response viewing and tracking. NWSSB Joint Land Use-Study I Matrix.Design Group Page 2-9 Matrix ` _- - . _ z,- _ .>•.. '.+._ ...,rte - - �_ -�. -. ., �.� ."'J Public Meeting#2—Interim Findings and Preliminary Recommendations The second public.meeting will he held in conjunction with Task 3. The purpose of this workshop will be to prioritize the compatibility issues and solicit input on resolution of conflicts and impacts. The•workshop r will provide a formal presentation and an interactive.exercise to ` *. 1� :Pak u prioritize the compatibility issues identified for the NWSSB JLUS. In `4nr' 4 conjunction with the exercise, Matrix will also discuss and facilitate ideas a ,ry kkk"' on how best to resolve community conflicts in small groups of public ; �� * . es• attendees. r 1F Public Workshop#3—Final Recommendations The Matrix Team will develop the Draft JLUS based on committee comments and revisions.The Draft JLUS will then be released for public Issue prioritization exercise review. The Matrix Team will hold the third public-workshop in conjunction with;.Subtask 4.1 to present the Draft JLUS and recommendations to attendees. The public and interested stakeholders in attendance will be encouraged,to provide feedback either during the meeting via comment cards or submission of comments via the project website:and'designated City of Seal Beach JLUS Project Manager. During the meeting,the Matrix Team will make direct contact with meeting attendees to solicit input verbal comments and answer questions. Task f Deliverables • Refined work plan, including final project schedule and milestones • Ongoing project management and administration • Routine status reports in form suitable for submittal to OEA • Ongoing project,coordination with JLUS Project Sponsor • RublicOutreach`Plan (Committee Draft and Final) m Project website(development and maintenance during project) • Key stakeholder interviews m Installation Tour(tied to first committee meeting) El Five(5)PGMeetings(one in charrette format) • Five(5)TC'Meetings(one in'charrette format) • Three(3)PubliclMeetings(including visioning session) • Meeting,logistic and;administrative support,presentation materials,.public outreach materials Page 2-10 NWSSB Joint Land Use Study l Matrix Design Group Scope of Work and Schedule r • TASK 2 REVIEW AND RESEARCH As:stated above,Matrix's approach to data collection will be kick-off as part of a one-week data collection trip(referred to as a."Tiger Team"). This on-site data collection effort-will complement data collected by Matrix or provided by request from a ll,US partner. Prior to the Tiger Team site visit, we will develop a request for information (RFI) package for each jurisdiction, agency, and identified stakeholder. This will he a list of data that would be.typically collected in support of a JLUS. Once the RFI packages are developed, Matrix will take the first effort to collect data that is available online or through other methods,and the'RFLwill show what we were able to find. The RFI will then be provided to JI.US partners for their assistance in providing:us any information we could not collect ourselves. Our desire is to collect relevant documents and data for review prior to meetings and interviews. Subtask 2.'1 Existing Conditions Assessment Once the data is collected from various entities; Matrix will compile it and review it for applicability to the JLUS. An entire chapterof the JLUS will be dedicated to a review.and discussion of relevant plans, programs, and documents that play a role incompatibility planning around NWSSB. In addition-to collecting and reviewing the data'items listed in the RFP,-the Matrix RFI-will include a comprehensivelist of required data. A sample-of additional data to be collected will include the following; • Baseline regional socioeconomic data, including data from United States Census(2000 and 2010),American Community Survey,SCAG data, Demographic Research Unit with CA Department of Finance, and other sources • Real estate-trend information for-Study Area • Base housing-data • Natural resources data, including•sensitive species data (federal and state listings) O Current land use data • Coastal-resource data o Navigational charts and known hazards E Regional transportation plans and current traffic conditions • Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy(CEDS) • NWSSB Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan (ICRMP) • NW.SS&Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan (INRMP) • Policies and regulations-that govern siting of on-shore and off-shore alternative energy projects;transmission lines, natural gas-storage and pipelines,and oil drilling A summary of the findings will he presented to the TC, PC, and public. Ongoinq.oafa'collection. Rased upon discussion and issues identified through PC and TC meetings and public input obtained, Matrix will identify any other data source-needs to support analysis of these issues. The City of Seal Beach JLUS Project Manager will serve as the point of contact and distribution for all data requested and-to be provided to the Matrix Team, or the data could be submitted directlyto the Matrix Team,depending on direction from the JLUS Project Manager. J NWSSB Joint Land Use Study I Matrix Design Group Page 2-11 Existing Policy;and Regulation Review As part of this task, Matrix will review and summarize copies of current development policies, ordinances, land development codes; military regulations;federal and state laws and regulations; building codes; subdivision ordinances;:and other items that address potential impact between study area land uses and NWSSB operations and uses. Based on the review of existing tools, we will identify which elements may control or reduce potential conflicts between landuses-and military operations or which could conflict with military operations. Sub/ask 22 GIS Base Map As'stated in theRFP,•the Matrix Team will be responsible for collecting and assembling the GIS dataset needed to support preparation of the NWSSB JLUS. The RP')contains a good list of GIS data that is relevant and useful to the analysis needed to support the JLUS process,.and Matrix will collect all information listed in the RFP(as available). When parcel'specific,digitized mapping data are not available, Matrix will prepare generalized maps of the features identified to the extent practicable, but it is assumed'that all data required will be available from JLUS partners and will be provided to Matrix at no cost. Matrix will generate,draft base maps to establish desired scale and layout for presentation-sized maps(posters)and report-sized maps to highlight areas of concern and other pertinent information. These will be provided to City of Seal Beach for review and concurrence. Following approval,these basemaps/templates will be used for all posters and report graphics. Mapping to be completed by Matrix in!support of the 1LUS will be used to.provide 1) background needed for everyone to have an equal understanding of existing conditions, trends, and military operations; and 2) to provide compatibility analysis. Maps in the first set can include existing;and future land use maps, zoning maps, population/demographic mapping, time sequence mapping, natural resource mapping, wind potential, development activity maps, and so;forth. These maps will also include military influence"footprints." That is,the areas that are affected by military operations in some way. These can include noise mapping, explosive safety quantity distance maps,vertical obstruction mapping, flight corridors, and so forth. Examples of this data includes: CI Urban growth and development areas O Wind/alternative energy potential • Explosive.Safety Quantity Distance zones • BASH relevancy areas. • Frequency interference relevance areas • Endangered species and critical habitat O Sensitive cultural and/or natural resource areas O Public lands • Existing land use • Proposed,/planned land use (municipal/regional/state/other public authority) • Aerial photography(current and historic) • Public water,sewer and other utilities(potable water supply wells) • Topography and land cover ® Property ownership/parcel lines ® Non-conforming uses.Of available) Page 2-12 NWSSB Joint Land Use Study 1 Matrix Design Group m• Scope"of Work?and Schedule. eTh Is 2 , Active and pending or approved,development la Proposed capital improvement plan/projects • Parks, open space and trails maps • Conservation areas/easements and public lands • Special resources areas, i.e. aquifer recharge zones,wetlands, wellhead protection zones,floodplains • Noise-contours for military operations • Sea lanes and navigation charts a Projected growth trends related to population forecasts(annexation history, development trends) • Communications data (line-of-Sight antennas, special frequency uses and sources) Maps in the second set bring all of this information together and analyze where there are compatibility issues and where compatibility issues may exist in future. Task 2 Deliverables • RFl packages " s Tiger Team data collection to Data collection of applicable materials a Coverages'I'mapping for NWSSB'operational'areas a Coverages,"mapping needed for compatibility,analysis • Present dbllectdd.data and mapping toahe,PC.'TC,,and public TASK 3 COMPATIBLITY AND DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL;ANALYSIS Compatibility, in relationship to military readiness, can be defined as the balance and/or compromise between community needs and interests and military needs and interests,The goal of compatibility planning is to promote an environment where both entities can coexist successfully. As identified in the RFP, all potential impacts as they relate to the following factors will be identified and addressed. • Areas of current land use conflict • Areas of future potential conflict • Areas where land use is compatible • Land-andsea mobility corridor conflicts • Conflicts relating to potential on- and off-shore development such as energy production, natural gas storage, or others:as applicable J NWSSB Joint Land Use Study l Matrix Design Group Page 2-13 r ( - �� Matnx - t ' :IL I - _ In addition to the items above, other factors will be documented and addressed as they become apparent through the stakeholder interview process, committee meetings, public meetings and data collection. These include, but are not limited to the following: •i Current and planned roadway and air mobility corridors • Noise I! Height restrictions, line-of sight:security concerns • Vehicle traffic • Impacts related to dust, smoke and light • Electromagnetic interference • Natural environment areas of concern or sensitivity • Water,water quality and wetlands protection • Historic,scenic and cultural resource and viewshed protection • Anti-terrorism/force protection In addition to issues identified in the RFP, our JLUS-approach goes beyond atypical compatibility assessment, using a set of 25 compatibility factors to ensure all potential issues are identified. While all of the factors will not occur in this JLUS Study Area,the use of these factors helps ensure all compatibility issues are identified. Please see page 2-3 for a list of the 25 compatibility factors. Civilian Land Use and'Development The review and assessment of existing'land uses and the identification of future land uses sets the baseline for understanding compatibility and the identification of potential conflicts. Existing and future land uses will be identified based on current jurisdictions' plans. Identification of Existing Land Use Concerns within Current Military Operational Areas Matrix will.perform:a full evaluation-of GIS data and all associated plans and reports in order to identify existing land uses and to determine their compatibility with the military footprint areas developed. This task is not limited to just the compatibility areas associated with obvious items(like-explosive safety), rather it is inclusive of identification of land use concerns associated with but not limited to operational areas that have effects or constrain land off- installation (land or water areas). This task will result in a more thorough evaluation of adopted comprehensive plans and transportation plans and will focus on potential conflicts and compatibility concerns with NWSSB's present and foreseeable mission and operations. Future Development Potential Analysis In order to determine potential growth scenarios and their impact on both military and civilian uses and activities, Matrix will review all available information pertaining to future growth, including population projections,approved development;planned development intensification or land use change, and planned or potential infrastructure expansions. Development projections will be based on existing general plans and specific plans, environmental or infrastructure constraints, local economic development officials' goals and plans, and through the insight gained from PC,TC, and other'stakehdlders. Future Land Use Impact Assessment As part of this task, Matrix will identify future land use on-and off-installation and identify the various potential advantages and disadvantages of each based upon existing and historical conditions, land use and transportation issues, airspace and noise impacts, and future development potential of the Study Area, and local comprehensive plans. Page 2-14 NWSSB Joint Land Use Study I Matrix Design Group i Scope of Wdrk`and Schedule; I 2 fTh Evaluate Potential New Missions Matrix will work hand:in-hand with NWSSB,and the TC to evaluate future potential regarding expansion, growth or mission-change potential of NWSSB and to assess this impact on surrounding communities. The purpose of this in the JLUS is to provide future flexibility for changes that have not been announced at this time This evaluation will become a useful tool for NWSSB.when considering potential new missions. Constraints.and Compatibility Maps Matrix will prepare land'use compatibility:maps to reflect existing and future land use conflicts, as well as inconsistencies in future land use plans and zoning designations. All results of potential growth will be mapped and documented and made available to the PC and TC for review and comment. Task 3 Deliverables m Mapping;compatibility conflict areas • Compatibility Analysis;Report ■ ArcGIS Online mapping to show co'mpatibility'areas m Present data and mapping to the PC and TC for review and comment m Present data and'mapping at public workshop 1 TASKt4 PREPAREJLUS REPORT 1 The objective.of this task is to develop the JLUS reports for committee and public review. This task will cover both draft and final versions of the JLUS Report. Conflict Resolution Strategies r- A"key'componerit of the JLUS.Report are the strategies(solutions) that are prepared to address the compatibility issues identified. Resolution of compatibility issues may be reached through the use of comprehensive plan updates and amendments as well'as through the use-of-new regulatory and non-regulatory solutions that encourage land use compatibility within the Study Area, including on the installation, by both civilian and military entities. As part of an,earlier task,all.local (cityand-bounty), state and federal policies,codes, ordinations, and regulations were reviewed to identify:.existing tools that may reduce:potential conflicts identified. Present and foreseeable NWSSB missions and/or operations will be taken into consideration when evaluating potential policy and regulatory tools that may apply to the Study Area jurisdictions. Enhancing Current Regulations, Procedures and-Policies Matrix will review current procedures and policies that enable interagency coordination with NWSSB, City of Seal Beach, and surrounding jurisdictions and agencies.. Using lessons learned and best practices, Matrix will determine how interagency coordination regarding land use development can be improved between NWSSB and the surrounding communities through agreements that can be drafted and implemented by all partners. New-Regulations/Policies Based on potential conflicts identified, Matrix will work closely with the PC and TC to identify potential new measures, both regulatory and non-regulatory, to encourage land use compatibility within the Study Area. Recommendations will abe offered for both military and civilian partners and may include the following new, modified, or updated versions of the following' NWSSB Joint Land Use Study i Matrix Design Group Page 2-15 Matrix t t x -wv • • Noise'attenuationand building code standards In Air space height changes (vertical obstructions) • land exchanges • Development incentive programs ® Agricultural preservation programs • Conservation easements • Transferable development rights program (TDRS) II Performance standards • Special overlay zones • Enhanced Development Review Procedures • Lighting controls.or Dark Sky Initiatives and/or ordinances to protect the continued viability of the military operations requiring dark skies'and no light trespass from surrounding artificially lighted areas • Active buffer areas (open space such as trails and public utilities) through the use of REPI land protection funding • Improved and enhanced transportation planning process through regional efforts Model Ordinances and Disclosures As part of this task, Matrix will provide,sample'ordinance language that has been successfully applied by other communities across the country as part of'their JLUS studies. Such examples will include alternative/renewable energy ordinances(including sample language addressing the.State's process in siting of renewable energy projects in relation to NWSSB), enhanced disclosure/disclaimer forms which could be used with property transfers within the identified impact areas and the legislation that Would be required prior to the use of such disclosure/disclaimers. Subtask 4.1 Draft JCUS Report Matrix will prepare a draft report of the LDS plan for review, comment and revision. The prepared comprehensive. Draft JLUS will be built upon the previous,tasks, including all deliverables identified as part of Tasks 1 through 6. The Draft JLUS will be aresultof the iterative and thorough planning and public involvement process recommended through this scope of work. The report will incorporate appropriate text, tables, maps and graphics prepared under previous tasks. A Draft Implementation Plan will also he included as part of the Draft JLUS Report and will recommend actions for federal, state, local,and non-governmental agencies. It is anticipated that the TC will advise Matrix on recommended revisions prior to review by the PC. Prior to releasing the report to the public via the project website, Matrix will submit the Draft JLUS to the PC for review. Upon approval from the TCand'City of Seal Beach staff, the Draft JLUS will be submitted to the PC for review/comment. Subtask''42 Final JLUS Report Matrix will collect and coordinate all comments received from the public, committee members, and City of Seal Beach staff on the Draft JLUS Report in order to develop the Final JLUS. Comments will be tracked and compiled in a comment tracker to ensure quality control and every agency and stakeholder can validate the comments they provided during the Draft..II US review.period. The PC will evaluate TC comments, provide direction to Matrix concerning modifications to the report,approve appropriate amendments, accept the Final ILUS Report and recommend adoption by each appropriate unit of government. Page 2-16 NWSSB Joint land Use Study Matrix Design Group :Scope of Work'and Schedule, Zs In previous siibtasks,the Final JLUS will be presented to the PC and delivered to City of Seal Beach. After making appropriate final modifications, Matrix will prepare and print the approved JLUS plan and provide City of Seal Beach with 5 hard color copies, as well as a CD containing an electronic copy of the final JLUS Report in MS-Word and PDF format for future reproduction and distribution: The Final JLUS Report will include an Executive Summary, recommendations,and an Implementation Plan. Project Overview Matrix will prepare:a four-page maximum.Project Overview fact sheet(Fact Sheet 3, Project Overview) to post on the project website and tube distributed to the public as requested. The Executive Summary will include the description of military operations,graphic display of Study Area and military operations footprint, identification of participants for both planning-and implementation,summary of compatible'use issues; and primary JLUS recommendation highlights. Task 4 Deliverables m Electronic copy of Committee Draft JLUS documents;(Background'Report,JLUS Report) o 20 full color hard!copies of DraffJLUS documentsl(Background Report-JLUS'Report) • 20 full color hard copies of Final JLUS documents(Background Report,JLUS Report) m 100 full color hard copies of the Project Overview/Executive Summary m Final'public presentations to participating jurisdictions 2.4 ProjectrSchedule As requested in the REP, Matrix will complete the NWSSB JLUS by December 31, 2017. The schedule on the next page (see Figure 2-1) provides the duration required to complete each task in the Scope of Work, as well as the dates for key meetings and deliverables. The schedule presented on Figure 2-1 will be discussed with the City of Seal Beach and committee members during project initiation and the committee kick-off-meeting. From this input, Matrix will make any refinements needed to reflect local needs and develop a final schedule to guide project completion. Based on our past work on other JLUS projects,we feel secure in our ability to meet the schedule presented on Figure 2.1. J NWSSB Joint Land Use Study Matrix Design Group Page 2-17 - - `; a :.f—P• 2016`.' _' -I'^ - ^' ..,sr 1201i7r'% t4 --1....-; , ^1 - 4 x. Figure 2-1 1 i .�. Project Schedule SEP, OCT , NOV" , DEC JAN FEB! IMAR APB MAY JUN Jul AUG SEP 4 OCT- NOV DEC •Task t pp {gp � Project Initiation and ® _ . E-+ } .S aV . ¢`-. A.. ... ;. t ;, . 1.. Administration FS -. • FS2 - FS 3 .. . Task 2: 1.° Review and Research .c t Task 3 Compatibility and Development Potential Analysis. - - 3 - - - '. Task 4. t ®,e - di lw 3` mc�.-: T ;;, l' PreparelLUSReport _ t _ :., t -` ., - 01 02` 0J' 04 46011' PC/RM PC/Rih •PC/lW-- FVF(14 PC/1CIiS co Stakeholder Meetings/ 1 to - ^ '� 1 j Public Involvement � f 174 e- , ; ahFd�I II S. 4 F. 4, c Sbkeholder, 'wro, .PW17;. PIMP3' lu ��a) removes c JLU5 Fact sheets r Documents $h (om Public 1&,... ,1 Stakeholder z Legislative v c a Committee Meeting 9Jcs Worksho !Interviews z 9 P r Body Hearings ! #• FS 1 XU50versiew D1 Committee Draft Background Report i . „ ES 2 1.05 StrategyTaolbox D 2 Committee Draft 3WS Report 1 Kick-Off ` 1. °-' fS3 AUSProles Overview -03 Public Draft Background&MIS Reports �,-" _- D 4 Final Background R MIS Reports, r, i. C Executive Summery ro OT) v` C I ^� y .-...• a n ' ^ %:. , ' . ,.. ^--, ..m. „.. 'ayi.' c• ,h � r , n . c ' r -Matrxr�>i - '.,,„ J ii --. i s.- ' Qualifications andPersonnel 31 Matrix Design Group, Inc. M • Established in 1999, Matrix Design Group,Inc.(Matrix) is an interdisciplinary planning a rix ,h4 and engineering firm thatt specializes in.professional technical services for local, state, ',.'�'� and federal governments;the Department of Defense (DOD); private sector entities; DE 5 fG N-GROUP and other agencies/organizations. Matrix's growing staff is currently over 130 persons AN [MPt OYL E-OWNED COMPANY strong, covering disciplines of community and military planning, urban design,open space planning, public engagement, infrastructure engineering, transportation engineering,environmental compliance, GIS analysis, and project management. From studies for-specific areas to comprehensive plans for a city or county, Matrix understands the challenges faced by communities and the complex interrelationships between issues. > 3.2 Why Choose Matrix? Committed to Making a Difference Our staff of experienced planners, engineers,;and resource specialists.is committed to making a difference and providing,personalized service that brings the right expertise and experience to fit the task. At Matrix,we know that planning-goes beyond the preparation of basic policies and maps--it is about listening to a client's needs, providing a range of innovative alternatives, and creating workable and feasible solutions specifically tailored to each client's unique situation. We always value our clients' needs and inputs. California Community Planning Experience Our team brings extensive experience in the development of comprehensive plans for cities and counties around the United-States. From rural counties to large-metropolitan areas, our planners have worked on the planning blueprints used-for growth management, as well as land use and'resoufce decisions made al local and regional levels. Our planners have the unique experience of integrating military compatibility into local general plans. For instance, Matrix developed two of the first Military Elements in California as part of the City of Oxnard General Plan and City of RidgecrestGeneral:Plan. These elements provide a comprehensive examination of the symbiotic relationship between a military installation and'its nearby communities. Other.General.Plan experience (for work conducted by planners proposed on this project), include: • City of San Luis Obispo a City of Half Moon Bay 0 Del Norte County ■ City of Oxnard o City of Indio 0 Inyo County e City of Ridgecrest a Crescent City • Lake County o City of Lincoln o City of La Quinta • San Diego County a City of Stockton a Siskiyou County 1 a Tulare County N W SSB.loint Land Use'Study l Matrix Design Group Page 3-1 I ti �Matnx M a P- r C0111.6rnia Planning E*perience The Mosi'ExpetiencedtCommuoliy, Military;and:CompatibilityiPlanning'Team in California i A decade ago, Matrix plannersiwere doing about 50%of their time on community plans California and 50%on military installation plans. This Planning Protects experience provided a perfect mix of C ulywn...iP,n experience for the development of ®i county Genna,Pian compatibility planning studies, such as JLUSs. rj Joint Land Use Study Military P6nn nq Our first compatibility project was to work . t . with the Governor's Office of Planning and ,^ C) Research on the development of the iitt Ora California Advisory Handbook for Community and Military Compatibility Planning. This handbook became the basis for , �.. compatibility planning in California, and is widely touted by OEA as a guide to be used in other states to direct their compatibility 4 planning activities. ® Since the handbook was published, a (s) Matrix staff has been a leader in ® *Q.L compatibility planning in both United States and"California. We have developed over 40 0.0 JLUS nationwide -six of which 0 U ore in California. 0 'l VIr 'JD 1, California.JLUS Experience The Matrix Team'is the most experienced staff in California relative to compatibility planning. The Matrix Team completed the California Advisory Handbook for Community and Military Compatibility Planning for the'State of California under a contract with the Governor's Office.of Planning and Research(OPR). In addition,the Matrix Team has developed the following California JLUS documents (north to south): • Beale AFB JLUS • R-2508 JLUS • Travis AFB JLUS (covers Edwards AFB, Fort Irwin, and • Camp Roberts JLUS NAWS China Lake in addition to airspace) s Naval Base Ventura County JLUS • NAF El Centro JLUS Page 3-2 NWSSB Joint Land Use Study I Matrix Design Group i Qualifications;and Personnel ;3 Compatibility Planning Experts Our staff has.a long history in compatibility planning. This experience,which is described in more detail later in this proposal, includes the following: The Matrix Management Team proposed for this JLUS a Joint Land Use Studies(JLUS). Matrix has developed over 40 JLUSs for stale has worked on every one of and local governments across the United States. Our experience includes the over 40 JLUS and nine work associated with Navy,Army,Air Force, and National Guard JLUS Implementation projects installations and ranges conducted by Matrix. This is • JLUS.Implementation. Matrix has conducted nine JLUS Implementation not just corporate Programs across the US. These follow-on projects were designed to experience, this is personal provide staff assistance in the preparation of the actual comprehensive experience. plans and amendments, zoning ordinances, building codes and other _ regulatory document revisions in a ready-to-adopt package. Matrix 1LUSProjetts Map Fmrdsil8 AFB ALUS , -- - ,-._ Malmstrom ARMS!Camp Rilea JLUS . ,, 1I}1t is Implementation - StanesRandi& ® Fort Narsison& (amp anti&JLUS [Kingsley Field JLUS '4 Idaho ILUSI h " limestone HiBsJLUSf I Fart lndiantown r ®s s 4 _ Gap ILUS it WAS Fallon MIS ( ap� - ddd 1 - '-� a fllsworMAFB1LU5 at7 ONatiAFB itiS Aberdeen Pmnng lrc. .•�"s ®t Beale AFBRU5 " j � �> _ s GroundlLUi h ® �$} NAS Patuxent � ,�,., Camp Williamsll - . I NSF Dahlgren AUS j- RiverltUS Travis AFB1LU5 .0 a t ® 'a— ®S. v &Implementation. NSA CraneALUS •.' a LamI AF — Wrgmra f,f . Ian ley AFB ,. ` jsMewrde g �'�seq R250B fnmplenlLUS?' Greenhefirainmg� 1LUS • �' 1LU5 Camp Roberts JLUS tr •Edwards AFB • Site 1LUS - —• Ei L ' 1,C�f' NAWSChma lake - Seymour: a ® 'y r Fort lrwm MR Commbu ntatIo S f I ldhnson AFB ® y)l Sheppard AFBIIUS� &Implementation 1WS Naval Base Ventura !, '9 Oyez AFBJLUS ' " '' t NAF EI CentrolLUS Y N.,.../ Northfarolina ConntyllUSS \ - ii SA t 'r RegionallLUS NASMendiaplLUS l. .®1 �. i — . 1BSA RanddphJLUS , t. x'r .Dobbins ARB1LU5 1%Andersen AFB- ® 041r KeesIerAFBJLUS 0 r Q 0 , Q . GuamJIBS. Del Rio Laughlin Q I Q!® -- Maxwell AFB ILUS� i--. AFB - _V iii X13 Camp Bulhs ilUS 'y, ei PAS forpusChristi JLUS} NSA Panama City 1 &Implementation Bey CAFBJLU*US I _�. L . Camp Swift1LU5 1BSAdadd'and1LU5 imple Implementation NASKingsville taJLUS Implementation +. implementation &Implementation J NWSSB Joint Lane.Use Study I Matrix Design Group Page 3-3 I • Matnx _ . tt.a a 1 . ,.. . a. Encroachment Action Plans(EAP). Matrix has worked with NAWS China Lake and the Naval Observatory (Flagstaff)on the development of EAPs. EAPs are designed to identify and assess compatibility challenges, determine the nature of these challenges on mission capabilities, identify regulatory and community frameworks that address or exacerbate compatibility challenges, and present implementation strategies to mitigate and prevent land use compatibility impacts. a Compatibility Handbook. Matrix completed the California Advisory Handbook for Community and Military Compatibility Planning for the State of California under a contract with the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR). This project provided our team members with the opportunity to work closely with the military, the Office of Economic Adjustment(OEA), local communities, Native American tribal governments, agencies, environmental organizations,and landowners/developers in defining and addressing encroachment/ compatibility. Designed to guide local and military planners in the treatment of compatibility issues, this handbook has been widely touted by OEA as a.guide to be used in other states to direct their compatibility planning activities. • Air Installations Compatible Use Zones(AICUZ)Studies. Our team has extensive experience in preparing AICUZ studies for Air Force and Navy facilities',across the United States. While these studies focus on only a few of the potential compatibility issues, these projects provide valuable insight into interactions between military installations and local communities!and the treatment of noise and safety issues. • Base Realignment and Closure (BRAG)Reuse Plans. Matrix is nationally known as a leader in BRAC planning and engineering studies.We understand the types of issues that close military installations and the economic impacts associated with these closures. We have successfully developed integrated solutions for communities that have faced these issues. Navy JLUS Experience While each JLUS is different based on local needs and issues, it does help to have a consultant with a 4`"p 9 5''� e " great working knowledge of Navy installations and their operations. Matrix has prepared JLUS projects " , involving the following 12 Navy installations: • Naval Base Ventura County • R-25081LUS(including a NAS Kingsville JLUS JLUS HAWS China Lake) • NSA Crane JLUS • NAF El Centro JLUS e NAS Meridian JLUS o NSA Panama City JLUS • NAS Fallon JLUS • NAS Patuxent River JLUS • NSF Dahlgren JLUS a NAS Corpus Christi JLLJS a NB Guam JLUS Public Participation Expertise ca, 1 Our planners.are all trained facilitators and routinely conduct.committee 1 and public forums and hearings as part of the development of - Lie community and military plans and JLUS. We have the experience and 4.,• ;NV., knowledge to translate technical information about military training and j 4 fr '?•? . 1t ryvg-sN I activities InYC7 easy to understand terms and In prrlVldeassessment Ynns '+.� ,l"�'aoF,•5'\'.• tailored for the general public. Our team.leaders have facilitated . _ successful discussions that not only produced consensus-based -� r.. ! ri solutions, but also established lasting and enhanced communication, r +• '�? 3/l coordination, and cooperation. �mK�`y.m .. �' Public workshop for NAF;EI Centro JLUS • Page 3-4 NWSSB Joint Land Use Study I Matrix Design Group Qualifications and.Personnel » 3, GIS Expertise Geographic information system (GIS).tools are a vital part of the Matrix planning toolbox,and are used -.� in every one of-our planning projects. Our experience includes collection and integration of GIS resources from dozens of sources to createan'integrated spatial database for analysis. But beyond understanding the-technology, Matrix brings expertise in the application of this tool to compatibility assessments. We are experts in the development,of information and tools that allow planners to use GIS to make better informed decisions in the future-concerning compatibility. We Know OEA Expectations • Matrix has conducted numerous projects under contracts funded by 0EA grants. For each of these projects, we have had the pleasure:of working closely with-OEA staff to produce high quality JLUS and JLUS Implementation documentsand other publications, such as the California Advisory Handbook for Community and Military Compatibility Planning. Our team understands the contractual processes and obligations associated with OEA funded projects and are adeptat fulfilling these requirements. Proven Track Record Feedback from Our clients confirms that-the members of the Matrix Team consistently provide quality work with a focus on client satisfaction,which we consider the ultimate measure of success: Our performance is reflected in the commendations, performance evaluations,and testimonials we have received. The following are quotes from past clients regarding our performance on similarprojects. One measure of our success'in"developing an outstanding JLUS program is illustrdted by the communities we work with adopting our JLUSs and implementing the solutions and recommendations they contain. Steve DeGeorge, Project Manager, Ventura County Transportation Commission "Matrix Design Group exceeded all expectations throughout a technically difficult and politically charged Joint Land Use Study(ILUS). This ILL'S included participation by thirty-three individual stakeholder groups contemplating the land use issues surrounding three separate military installations, with over eighty tenant commands, covering thousands of square miles ofland, sea and air operations. .... As the JLUS client and Contract Manager, (found Matrix Design Group easy to work with and conformed to all contract requirements. Deviations and amendments to the project schedule were client initiated to ensure stakeholder participation. Matrix Design Group complied with those requests suggesting participation methodologies that ensured success while not adding to project cost." Julia Lave Johnston, Deputy Director(former), Planning Policy, California, Governor's Office of Planning and Research "The California.Advisory Handbook for CommUnity and Military Compatibility Planning... has become a staple for joint community.and military planning efforts not only in California, but in other areas nationwide. Reale AFB {ILDS)and the R-2508 Complex(JLUS)(including Edwards AFB, Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, and Fort Irwin), [hovel provided the analysis and strategies necessary to address growth and balance the protection of the military's missions with the economic development needs of the surrounding jurisdictions. J NWSSB Joint Land Use-Study :Matrix Design Group Page 3-5 }/ y Matrix j� ac. t < r. Peter Bohm, Lt Col, USAF, Base Civil Engineer "The team's professionalism, ability to understand the Wing's needs, and flexibility in altering course as Wing leadership's vision changed were key factors in promoting a strong-government/contractor partnership. The documents-were extremely well written, clearly illustrated, and definitely conveyed the major themes and vision to the reader. The Matrix Team's thoroughness, attention to detail, and overall dedication provided:the Loughlin community with on outstanding tool to communicate and shape the future." Award-Winning Experience - - ,Matrix has received multiple national awards from the Federal Planning Division of the American Planning-Association (APA)for our work in compatibility planning. Three of our compatibility planning projects have been recognized by the American Planning Association (APA)for excellence. Notable is that two of these awards were given,in recognition of superior work in collaboration. These include: m 2015 APA.California, Central Coast.Section, Best Practices Award for Naval Base Ventura County JLUS. m 2013-APA Federal Planning Division, Outstanding Collaborative Planning Program Award for the NAS Corpus Christi JLUS. m 2012 APA Federal Planning Division, Outstanding Collaborative Planning Program Award for the implementation program designed for the Eglin AFB JLUS. m 2010 APA Federal Planning Division,Outstanding,Federal Planning Program Award for the implementation program'designed for the NAS Kingsville JLUS. E 2008 APA Federal Planning Division,Outstanding:Collaborative.Planning Project of Program for the preparation of the California Compatibility Handbook-/JLUS Program. GIS is a key tool used by Matrix-in the assessment of compatibility issues. GIS is used as a standard tool. in all of our JLUS projects. Matrix has been recognized for our outstanding application of GIS ,OQ1, technologies to planning processes by ESRI as part of their international awards program. P\���� ` ' JCJ• E The City of Oxnard General Map Atlas was recognized by ESRI as an outstanding application of GIS - to the field of planning. ESRI__ Our successes on'past JLUS projects are credited in large part to our'abilityto be flexible throughout the process, bringing lessons learned and best practices to each project, and working with our clients-aspartners-to solve their unique'issues. Approximately 80%of the Matrix Planning Group's total business is.devotedto services similar to those required for successful completion of the Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach(NWSSB)JLUS. Page 3-6 NWSSB Joint Land Use Study I Matrix Design Group Qualifications-andPersonnel._ 3.3 Project Team Qualifications Our strength in developing great plans is simple: the caliber of our people. In this proposal,the experience referenced is not just corporate experience, but it is the personal experience of the key staff that will be leading this effort, including work-on over 40 JLUS and nine JLUS implementation-programs throughout the country. Our compatibility planning staff members are passionate about their work. We believe that successful planning goes beyond the preparation of policies and maps—it is about listening to our client's needs, understanding the underlying conditions, providing-a range of innovative alternatives,and creating workable and feasible solutions specifically tailored to each client's unique situation. Matrix has.assembled a talented, interdisciplinary team which collectively has extensive experience in every compatibility issue and an in-depth understanding of JLUS processes and requirements to be addressed in the NWSSB JLUS. Collaboratively; we-will provide the'understanding of land use compatibility and analysis needed to successfully provide the City.of:Seal Beach and all of the JLUS-partners with an outstanding JLUS upon which to base updates to existing policies and-regulations that address compatibility planning. For this project,Celeste Werner,AICP will be the Project Managet and Rick Rust,AICP,LISP will be the Deputy Project Manager. •We use a.dual project managerrole in that both Celeste and Rick will be up-to-speed on all aspects of the project at all times, ensuring that questions can be answered when needed. The Matrix Project Management Team is rounded out by Mike Hrapla who will serve asthe Military Liaison. A retired Air Force Colonel, Mike has worked extensively with all branches of the military during roles he played with joint service Special Operations:Commands over his-career. This management team will coordinate closely with the project team identified on Figure 3-1,Team ) Organization. The-project team comprises an accomplished-core group of planners and technical specialists who have experience working together on many JLUS projects. This method ensures a well-coordinated approach by a team with a wealth of JLUS experience and up-to-date knowledge of evolving trends and state-of-the-art approaches to addressing compatibility issues. Table 3-2 and Table 3-2 detail our JLUSs and JLUS Implementation Projects, respectively, and identify the key Matrix staff members who worked on each projects. The tables also highlight which projects: l were located in California, and/or el included an assessment of coastal issues. It shOola ditiated that either Celeste-Werrier,'Rick Rust or Mike Hrapla was the Project Manager on alrof the projects listed on these tables, and each person played an active role as-a member of each project's Management'ream. Resumes for key staff members are provided in Section 3.5. NWSSB Joint Land Use Study i Matrix Design Group Page 3-7 1 i Matrix° , , . Figure 3-1 Team Organization Pre ectManager a SG " Si•A. JLUSPolicy(ommittee '„ I �R to. 7WSPartners Stakeholders iManagement Team Puklk JLUS TedinuaI Committee' _ .. Celesti Werner,AlCP PM1ett Manager Rick Rust,NCP,6tSP , Deputy FrvjectMaaager Mike Hrapla Military Liaison Community Involvement Com`paUbliityPlanniiig K .-_:r _W iii iiPl r. CelesteWerner,AICP radrSd Rick Rust,AICP,GISP,Ta#iead Mike Hrapla Celeste Werner,MCP Patrick Small,,AICP 'Mike/Ira.* Brea Cox;AICP' Patrick Small,AICP Bren Cox,AICP Midiele Mora 1 land Use Analysis 'Infrastructure , Environmental ; ' 615 Analysis and ' __ .PAiammrIg Resources Mapping Bren Co;AICP Mike Hrapla Roberta Schhdrer,PE Chris Martin,GISP Task Lead Task Lead Task Lead Tasklead r nl _ t • 1 Graphics , `Website Design • Desktop Publishing GIS73D Modeling ,Reproduction - ' �r.�'q--p yT'^.TF,t*+"�i.^+�-L '.. . •°`T___ T . . :v`4- .^F.+�.�°°.—r .s.� a+. In HouseSupportServices - Page 3-8 NWSSB Joint Land Use Study I Matrix Design Group 'Qualificattons)and:Personnel Matrix DESIGt'GRDUP . Table 3-1 it ° _ a A - Relevant JLUS Experience , i 3' - N — - — _- _— - - - ; E Pr nl rrL.penener -lti i Sr z < ,<y FZ'. JLUS Experience(ACUBIEAP,1,Hand books, 'i - @a Aberdeen Proving GioundlWS(MD), _ !:eaunty _•: 0: ,0 • _ 4pq - Beale AFB JENS•(CHa))�yaa�; Stan • 0 -0 _ - - V _. - Ca/wwa Coulomb AdvGay (dl Hemk Community _ - '.Stan • • . I• . ✓ 1' %.. 4' O )md MWLryComper 'ItY nNq 1UJ_ - - - _ - , . . . /� Camp Bulll5JWS(TX) City • • • 0 0 ! ✓ ✓ ✓ I g. Cerny OiinJWS(OR); . 'County' , • e, • e_ . (0 ._ _ . , ajw, Cemp,Roberts JLUS(CA) 'County • o • • • ! ! s,Cbmp 90,461.41* , . . OW. 4 it ..0- '0 - —r. i • , I ✓ !• CarnpWilliams1LUS IUD. City • • _0 • • ✓ if �ColumbusAFBJLUS(MSI, � - _ _ '�°"'ry!' _-�- . 'ems._._•. i � ,__ � ° 17- _ ' Del Rio/.Loughlin AFB JLUS(TX) City • • • V Dobbim Air Rase iva Base'JWS(GA)' Cab, •(. • • -O _ _ •, _ _✓ ,Ellsworth AFBJLUS(SD) Gry • • • • 0 • V r -... Faiichiild AFB 1WS(WA)! ;Count' •.-_. •,.. ; •. a __ `!' `_. .__,. FortW.H.HamsonJLUS(MT) County • • 0 • - _ ! ! F&tlndiaMOwn Gep1W5(Pk . ,_ 1 J -- 0 _ ' • .. Y '. iC. _•_ ^0 T7' ■ _ Greenlief Training Site JLUS(NE) Regional! • 0 0 • • • ✓ / `HamptonaangIey JLUS(VA)7 • "City, 1 4 I • . , 4. :"-_.: _ - _ - •_.. i _• Idaho JLUS(ID) 'State o 0 • • V ! ! . ,1 h 1W 85A-Rendolp51T%) . . . • _ _Caunry, 0 • • •; •_ •, Keesler AFB JLUS(MS) Regional. • s • 0 0 ✓ KrngfleyFeldJLUS(ONT - • Gb,. ,,,o- •`T . .0 _ ' •. . ,✓' .. -.v•7r Malmstrom AFBJLUS(MT) Comity • •. • o • V illa` NAF D CeilinaUS(CAI • Eiali • , 0•. • 'll ., , `,•. .!' j ID NAS Corpus Chnsh lLUS(TX) City • • • • • ! li NASfalloniWS(NVl _ - County' • 4'• • -.• (0,. ,• '' 1 I • '... NAS KingsvdleJLUS 1DO city • • • ! [ .110 N• AS Meridian7W5(MSF _ . County _ • •• i r• • • f• 1 ! I '' .. --_. fti N• ASPatuirentRiver ALUS(MD) Regional • • _ -0 •- • ! - - '0 Naval Base Guam 65/JWS(Guam) Rrlifwy 0 e, illa• .Naval Base Ventura County ILUSICA) .Regional e • • • • • ! a NAWS China Lake Enooadloent AStla Pan(W , . !aoey •; . • ✓ :1_, NSA Crane(IN) Regional • e • • • of ! NSA Panama City l Bay CduntylWS IF_1.) 1 COunry r/_. . r,. ' _y e - _. 7.. -. ' 0 N• SF Da hlgien!LUS(VA). 'County 0 •, • • • / - e. j•. "0- ' _0 / . _ •Wit AFB 111—SaT _ •- lard m 0 to ala 'R-2508 Complex JLUS(CA) Stan 0 • • ✓ it ✓ - 'SeymourJahnson AFBJWS(NC) - - _3r e" •. . .-.0. , .... �/ Sheppard AFBJLUS(TX) cry • • • • • Y -i� Stow FFBJhaId GirhFNuntKJWS(CT)! County • 0 • -•• . • ,:• /, �, ty • 0 _ V Coldornia Compalibilityprgeet 0..Coastal ADS NWSSB Joint Land,Use Study I Matrix Design Group Page 3-9 I s ;'*""...7""''."...44.. ....—.a-.- - -_•Matrixa°�"� x ;' Matrix i - rE ,'G_''ootisrgJo� d 0E5/GN•6Paa0 "� I; y Table 3-2 - _ oL•-•c•¢ •7 F -. RelevantiiUSExperience 7= 1 ; ' " -r. . - - b - l . '. AE s oa_'. Pcnr ctF riri;nce O J — E,,-L-,,I z tl ,2 Z'.,. JLUS lmplementatio`d - • - s f` Cninv BuIBs1tUSImdimentationcSdnAnto nio ; - — • County •"- • I •s e Coin,iehensntWith ondZonm U •ate Jdt ® -• ■®b✓ < Camp Williams iWSlmplementation(UT) sea se • • • • • .®■. Columbu.AFBJWSImplementetion(M5) _ state' ,O • • NIKE /tb. o9,5"ILUSlmplementation elgounty Genera/Mon Ca • • • all ondZonin OndinanttU•.ate lFU Joint Base San Antonio Regional!1LUSImplemenmtion lla. y • ro� �• ®®®® Kingsville 1LU51myylementation CaumJ. • • • • �®®® Cxsreral plan a Minn?Ordinance U.,are di) �. Camay • -•, e • • Malmseom ARI S impplementation- dry •• • • e • ■®�■ CasrodeCoun Growth ple () •ate(MT) 4; North Cerainelkgioral'JWS lmplemenfe6pn la State of-Texas Compatibility Legislation(TX) -• • • __-111®1111111 fie CoastalJLUS Our core group of planners is uniquely qualified for the Tole of cornpatibilily planning. Most of the key staff on our team has worked as a-staff planner for a city/county or as an engineer[planner for the military. This diverse team experience brings a unique understanding of how entities on both sides of the fence operate and are structured. We are able to relate to the day-to-day operations and decision-making processes that our clients work within. This experience:in preparing plans for"both sides of the fence" provides our planners with the forethought needed to: a Ask the right questions and collect the right information; a Provide an insightful analysis of the issues surrounding encroachment; o Provide a process that will encourage cooperation; and • Develop implementable strategies that support harmonious civilian and military growth. • Page 3-10 NWSSB ;oint Land Use Study I Matrix Design Group ^- .. Lam:"'. tQualificationsand Personnel 3 . 3.4 Staff'Qualifications In preparing a successful JLUS with extensive community involvement,we feel that our staff provides a unique set of experience that 1s perfectly tailored to meeting the needs of this project. For community planning,the proposed team is extremely experienced with comprehensive planning, land development regulations, and land use studies across the U.S., in addition to working directly with county and city managers,planning commissions, elected officials, governing bodies,and working with regional and state agencies. Additionally;each of our management and staff professionals brings to the project extensive experience in working with all branches of the military and local jurisdictions on similar projects across the country. Management Personnel Experience Celeste.Werner;AICP, Rick Rust,AICP,GISP,and Mike Hrapla serve as the Management Team for all of the JLUS projects conducted by Matrix. While their Our Project Management roles on each 1LUSvary depending on location and availability, all three are involved team's combined Army and in each JLUS project. community,planning experience, both through :Celeste Werner;.AICP will serve as the Project Manager and Community Involvement compatibiliTyistudies and :. - ToskLead on the NWSSB JLUS. Celeste brings over 30 years of military experience,will allow experience in compatibility planning as well as community I �+ • for increased efficiency in and.military planning In;addition to her work on over 401LUS n r 3 3 projects and nine JLUS implementation programs, Celeste has understanding local and .„ 'Sr previous experience as a city staff member andproject military needs and concerns. ) ' `_ ;la H manager on a wide:range of community comprehensive plan r \ and zoning/development code.projects. Celeste also brings - ' to the project vast experience in working with the public,task forces/working groups,and with military installation representatives. Sheds an expert in meeting facilitation and public involvement and is able to foster an environment of open communication and trust, conflict resolution, and successful solutions. Celeste will serve as the primary point of contact to'ensure that staff with the City of Seal Beach has access to the Matrix team'at.all times. Rick will also be up-to-speed to provide backup for any client needs. Years with Matrix: 10 years RickR_ust,,AICP,,GISP will serve as the Deputy Project Manager and Compatibility Planning Task Lead for the N VV JLUS. — - i Rick has more than 32 years,of experience in the preparation and management of compatibility 41 planning studies, general plans, public outreach, environmental compliance documents-(CEC1A cm. anu NEPA), and performing GIS analysis for both public and private sector clients throughout the country. During his career, Rick has completed projects at over 50 military installations J throughout the US and its territories and has worked on dozens of community general/ .'-j.i comprehensive-plans in California and the Southwest. His technical expertise has been essential '- ! in the development.of JLUS and planning documents prepared by Matrix. Years with Matrix: 10 V ears J NWSSB Joint Land•Use Study I Matrix Design Group Page 3-11 I Matrearr ,•, p. IDtSIGN,caouo. •^� ' .n Mike'Hraplacwill serve as Military Liaison and Infrastructure Planning Task Lead on the NWSSB JLUS. His strength is in establishing and guiding a collaborative approach to planning that creates community consensus x,. ry- l as an integral component of successful 1LUSs and JLUS implementation programs.As a retired Air Force Colonel and civil engineer, Mike provides the team with unique insights into the technical requirements of military units, activities, and facilities- He also provides expertise in the siting of K.. explosive ordnance facilities.and assessment of FSOD-requirements With more than 38 years of experience managing and preparing planning and engineering studies for both communities and the military, he understands the dynamics of urban communities and the value of creating implementablestrategies that'are widely accepted. Years with Matrix: 10 years Key Specialists /Task Leaders Bren Cox,AICP, has eight years of experience as.a community and compatibility planner. For the NWSSB JLUS, Bren will serve as the Land Use Analysis Task.Lead. During his time with Matrix, he has worked primarily on JLUSs, but has also been involved in community planning studies and projects,including comprehensive plans and updates, zoning ordinances,growth management plans, and downtown redevelopment plans. He has been an integral team member in completing,such projects at the federal, state, and local level throughout the United States and its territories. He also has knowledge and experience in incompatible development impacts and analysis, alter native energy impacts, military planning, and community coordination. PatSmall,AICP will provide key support in the development of the NWSSB. Pat has over 16 years of private and public sector community and military planning experience, including-eight years as a municipal Planning Director and Planning Division Manager and over six years working on planning projects at military installations. Having directlexperience on "both sides of the-table" provides Pat with critical insights into the culture.ot public sector environments. The combination of his private sector experience working for federal gayer nment and military Interests, and his public sector work,give Pat'the ability to craft approaches to plans, regulations and related processes that are both pragmatic and effective. While at Matrix, he has worked on several Pat has worked extensively in conflict resolution in order to develop suitable alternatives that accomplish mutual benefits for diverse stakeholders. Michele.Mora.will provide technical support, research, and analysis for the NWSSB JLUS. During her tenure with Matrix, Michele has workedon many JLUS projects located throughout The country. More recently, her experience has included honing legislative analysis skills for statewide alternative energy development permitting. She as a background in local government planning and served as a-project manager for a JLUS on the local government side. This experience; combined with her work on several JLUSs, JLUS Implementation projects, and compatibility planning projects while at Matrix, has given her the knowledge and expertise both from the client and consultant perspective. Roberta Schlicher, PE, an expert in environmental issues and compliance and coastal engineering, and will serve as the Environmental Resources Task Lead for the NWSSB. Roberta has extensive experience conducting environmental reviews throughout the country. As part of the comprehensive compatibility assessment, environmental issues are often raised for consideration in a JLUS. Roberta will guide the team through that specific environmental analysis. Chris Martin, GISP will be the GIS Analysis and Mapping Task.Lead and provide GIS expertise for the NWSSB JLUS. He has been the lead GIS Specialist and Manager for numerous Matrix JLUSand JLUS Implementation projects. Chris specializes in providing technical solutions for projects requiring the application of GIS, database management, data analysis, exhibit preparation, topographic analysis and terrain modeling, and environmental characterizations. Page 3-12 NWSSB Joint Land Use Study I Matrix Design Group 3 Qualifications and Personnel' • •Support Staff:Resources In addition to the team members detailed above, Matrix has experts in other fields related to the issues to be considered in developing the NWSSB JLUS. Answers to potential issues can be derived from experienced professionals from within the Matrix•Design Group organization. Matrix's workforce of over 130 proudly Includes Certified Planners, Civil and Professional Engineers,Structural Engineers,Transportation Engineers, Water Resource Engineers, Environmental Scientists, Project Managers, Construction Managers, Computer-Aided Design Technicians,and G15 Specialists. Matrix is fortunate to have a wide array of highly qualified and creative technical specialists in-house. Our technical staff also includes experts in document production,digital graphics:and illustration,web development, computer modeling, 3D visualization techniques,environmental analysis,and others. All of these individuals work in close collaboration with project management,-project planners, and with each other on JLUSs,JLUS Implementation projects, and other planning assignments,and as such,they have the skills and experience necessary to provide seamless, high quality,timely support throughout the project. Matrix is proud of the quality of its award-winning documents and with the`help-of-our Support team members, Matrix will provide the City of Seal Beach and its JLUS partners with an assortment of high quality, user-friendly project materials from project initiation through completion. 3.5 Resumes Resumes for the core members of the NWSSB JLUS project team are provided on the following pages. The resumes for our project management members are followed by key technical support staff that will assist in the development of the 1LU5: • Celeste Werner,AICP Page 3-14 Project Manager, Community Involvement Task Lead ✓ Rick Rust;AICP,GISP Page 3-17 Deputy Project Manager, Compatibility Planning Task Lead ® Mike.Hrapla - - , Page 3-19 Military.Liaison, Infrastructure Planning Task Lead ® Bren Cox,AICP - Page 3-21 Land Use Analysis Task Lead a Pat Small,AICP - Page 3-23 Alternative Energy Impact Assessment Task Lead • Michele Mora Page 3-25 Project Planner • Roberta'Schlicher,PE Page 3-27 Environmental Resources Task Lead • Chris Martin,GISP Page 3-29 GI5 Analysis and'Mapping Task Lead J NWSSB Joint'Land Use Study I Matrix Design Group Page 3-13 Matrix Mj F CELESTE WERNER, AICP -, " VICE PRESIDENT • t - PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY - 12 a • "J„ Over the.past 30 years,Celeste Werner has supported public,quasi-public,federal,military,and .r." - private and tribal clients at the local, national,and international level. She possesses proven skills in conflict resolution and public involvement facilitation,building consensus and trust amongst stakeholders. Her commitment and passion for planning is demonstrated by her hands-on-approach and proven ability to manage various components of complex projects \� simultaneously. - _ iwl Ms.Werner is a leader who integrates her team members,creates an environment for creative thinking,and fosters•communication'internal to the team as well as external with the client and AREAS OF EXPERTISE stakeholders. Examples of her successful management style have been captured in numerous • JLUS/Compatibility award winning,projects and recognitions she has received throughout her career. Planning RELEVANT EXPERIENCE • Community Planning • Military Master Planning Compatibility Planning/Joint Land Use.Studies and Encroachment • Economic Development Celeste,has served a critical role in the development and management of numerous JLUSand • Base Realignment and compatibility plans for both local communities and military installations across the country. Closure(BRAG) These studies addressed the sustainability of local communities and military installations, • Visioning Facilitation and seeking mutually beneficial strategies to mitigate encroachment impacts and ensuring that Public Involvement future development surrounding the installations will be compatible with both the military EDUCATION mission,and community needs. Ms.Werner's key compatibility projects include: Bachelor of Science,Urban • Aberdeen!Proving Ground JLUS • Bay County JLUS Planning&.Bachelor of Science, • Camp Bullis JLUS • Columbus AFB JLUS Landscape Architecture; • Camp Rilea JLUS and JLUS • Edwards AFB JLUS Arizona State University, Implementation • Hampton-Langley JLUS Del Rio JLUS School of Architecture(1985) • Camp Roberts JLUS • Idaho JLUS • Camp Swift JLUS • Kingsley Field JLUS PROFESSIONAL • CampWilliams JLUS and JLUS 6 Malmstrom AFB JLUS and JLUS AFFILIATIONS Implementation Implementation American Institute of Certified • Camp Rilea JLUS • Territory of Guam CSS Planners(AICP) • Fort Indiantown Gap JLUS • Fairchild AFB JLUS American Planning Association • Fort Irwin JLUS • IBSA-Randolph JLUS Federal Planners Division,APA • Fort Harrison JLUS • Sheppard AFB JLUS • Greenlief Training.Site JLUS • NAF El Centro JLUS Society of American Military • Stones:Ranch and Camp Niantic JLUS • R 2508 Complex JLUS Engineers • Beale AFB JLUS • NAS Corpus Christi JLUS Association of Defense Communities The Camp Williams JLUS in Utah,which was led by Ms.Werner,was prepared for a National International Association for Guard training site outside:of Salt Lake City, Utah. Camp Williams provides training amenities Public Participation for small arms ranges,artillery firing points,and vehicle maneuver areas,and aircraft operations. The study focused on land uses near the installation,which is in dose proximity to developed cities. Ms.Werner is also the project manager for the Camp Williams JLUS Implementation project,which is analyzing local communities'general plans and land use regulations to provide guidance on promoting compatibility between the communities and. Camp Williams. Ms.Werner conducted the successful Camp BullisJLUS and Implementation for the 27,993-acre Army training site located just northof San Antonio,Texas.Although the primary user of the installation is the US Army,it is also used by the Air Force, National Guard,and other agencies. The regional Military Transformation Task Force identified the need for adequate land use Page 3-14 NWSSB Joint Land Use Study l Matrix Design Group ' 'Qualifications and Personnel' PROFESSIONAL.HISTORY planning policies between the civilian community and military installations,and to manage the Matrix.Design Group;Inc.. growth and the conflict that could develop around Camp Bullis.The purpose of the plan was to Vice.President,Director of foster community growth,.and.to recognize the need to conduct multi-service medical training, Planning Services Air Force security forces training,and supporting aircraft missions by the military.The JLUS 2005.to Present strategies addressed urban,growth and development,expanding various training requirements, BRW-/uRs transportation corridors;and balancing extensive natural and threatened and endangered Vice:President, species-resources. Planning:Director 1994 to 2005 Ms.Werner was The Project Manager for the Malmstrom AFB JLUS and Implementation which addresses a seven county region of central,Montana impacted by the Missile Complex associated with Malmstrom AFB.This unique national asset required the development of universally-acceptable,strategies that Will posture the Base to accept a variety of potential missions in the future;including reactivating flight operations,to augment its reduced role of maintaining launch facilities. The primary outcome of this implementation effort was the development of a red,yellow,green mapping tool to identify locations where construction of alternative energy development would impact or-not impact military operations. Ms.Werner provided leadership and technical assistance in the Restricted Area 2508(R-2508) Complex JLUS.The R-2508 JLUS included approximately 20,000 square miles of airspace in the upper Mojave Desert Region,and theinstallations and ranges of Naval Air Weapons Station (NAWS)China Lake„Edwards.Air Force Base(AFB)and the National Training Center(NTC)at Fort Irwin.,The focus of the JLUS was-to ensure that land use decisions are logical and consistent. To achieve that the JLUS preparation process included all stakeholders that regulate or influence military operations and future development within the R 2508 Complex area The size of thestudy:area brought with it additional challenges associated with reaching consensus among a multitude of stakeholders. Ms.Werner has led several JLUS Implementation-efforts that have involved extensive stakeholder coordination and the technical expertise and insight into local planning regulations. Most recently completed was the Eglin Air Force Base J1U5 Implementation,which was awarded the 2012 Outstanding Collaborative-Planning Projector Program by the'American Planning Association Federal Planning Division. This project was selected as"an outstanding example of collaboration between.federal.and local agencies to manage the interface between community land uses-and military activities:” ThePlan-included the development of a series of Small Area Studies-across three counties and four cities, all working in partnership with Eglin AFB.The objective of the plan was to allow for appropriate future growth around-Eglin AFB, while maintaining compatibility with current and potential future flight operations and other mission requirements. Ms.Werner was the project manager for the Joint.Base San Antonio-Randolph(JBSA-R)JLUS.in Texas. JBSA-Ft isan important pilot training installation for the US Air Force. The JLUS was divided into three study areas around three installations:JBSA-R,JBSA-Seguin Auxiliary Airfield, and Stinson'Municipal Airport. The primary issues analyzed for this JLUS includerunway safety zones over populatedareas, noise contoursimpacting local communities,vertical obstruction hazards,and communication processes between local jurisdictions and the military. Ms.Werner had a leading role-in the Sheppard AFB(LDS in Texas.This JLUS was conducted in cooperation with the City of Wichita Falls as the primary sponsor,and in collaboration with Wichita County,Tillman County in Oklahoma,and several cities within the two counties. Sheppard AFB provides critical technical and flight training education courses for the US Air Force and hosts one of the busiest airfields in the Air Force. It shares its runway facilities with the local Wichita Falls Regional Airport. It also provides important economic, social,and security contributions to the local.communities. NWSSB Joint Land Use Study I Matrix Design Group Page 3-15 Al pF, r a :l,..I`A, u. - - Community Planning Ms.Werner has provided leadership to numerous comprehensive planning projects for all types of areas across the country:rural, suburban,urban,and areas with eclectic mixes of densities and uses,:assessing potential impacts of growth and applying successful guidance on the how-to growth strategies: She was also the Project Director of the California Advisory Handbook for Community and Military Compatibility Planning.The core of this handbook is a menu of tools and strategies that.stakeholders.(cities,.counties,.builders,and military personnel)can apply to achieve the'niaxirnization of collaboration,community prosperity,and military sustainability; and minimization of land use conflicts. Military Planning Ms.Werner has also prepared dozens of military planning.studies(i.e., master plans, compatibility plans land development,aviation planning,facility asset management, etc.)for the Navy,National Guard,Air Force,Army,.and Marine Corps.The following are just a few examples of her the military studies she has been involved with: Project Manager for the development of an Encroachment Action.Plan(EAP)for the NAWS China Lake..The EAP identified and assessed compatibility challenges,determined the nature and degrees'of these challenges on'.mission capabilities,recommended regulatory and community frameworks that support or exacerbate land use compatibility challenges,and presented implementation strategies to mitigate and prevent land use compatibility impacts. Project Plannerfor Enhanced Use Leasing(EUL)Cost Benefit Study.US Army Aberdeen Proving Ground(APG).Matrix.Design team members worked with Installation and tenant stakeholders to evaluate proposed concept/development plans and to come up with potential"in-kind" services to be exchanged for land outleases to selected developers. This evaluation included identification of potential revenue sources and an evaluation of cost-benefit comparisons between EUL actions versus traditional MILCON funding and a"no-build"scenario.Work also included development of EUL process protocols and implementation strategies for the EUL Program at-APG.and preparation of a Finance Plan framework to be used as a EUL Planning tool for the Installation. Page 3-16 NWSSB Joint Land Use Study J Matrix Design Group . 1 Qualcatons and Personnel',' 3 RICK RUST, AICP; GISP rat VICE PRESIDENT r ` PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY Mr.Rick Rust has more than 32 years of experience in the management and preparation of planning and environmental compliance documents. For communities,this experience -- ,f includes management and,preparation of JLUS, comprehensive plans,zoning ordinances, and \: master/specific plans for both public and private sector clients. His experience and expertise \k in military planning includes:the lmanagement and preparation of comprehensive plans, - facility master plans,space utilization,range:planning,safety assessments,engineering AREAS OF EXPERTISE evaluations, 1391s, MILCON projects,capital improvement plans,air installations compatible • JLUS/Compatibility use.zones(AICUZ)-plans,and NEPA compliance. During his career,Mr. Rust has conducted Planning projects at over 50 installations throughout the United States and its territories. For both • General and Specific Plans community and military planning,.Mr. Rust has extensive experience in executing effective • Military Master Planning and inclusive public participation programs and in applying GIS technologies to planning • Economic Development/ analysis and solutions. Corridor Planning • •Socioeconomic Analysis RELEVANT EXPERIENCE • GIS./GeoBase in Planning - • Public Participation Compatibility Planning /Joint Land Use Studies and Encroachment Mr. Rust has served as Technical Manager for all 1LUSs Matrix has developed as well as EDUCATION compatibility plansfor both local communities and military installations acrossithe country. Master of Urban and Regional These studies addressed the sustainability of local communities and military installations, Planning,California Polytechnic seeking mutually beneficial strategies to mitigate encroachment impacts and ensuring the University,1990 compatibility of future development, balancing both the military mission and community j Bachelor of Science, needs. Mr. Rust's key compatibility projects include the following: Environmental Sciences, • Aberdeen.Proving Ground JLUS • Bay County JLUS University of California,1983 a Camp Bullis JLUS • Columbus AFB JLUS PROFESSIONAL o CanipRileaJLUS and JLUS • Edwards AFB JLUS AFFILIATIONS Implementation '• Hampton-Langley JLUS Del Rio JLUS American Institute of Certified • Camp Roberts 11115 • Idaho JLUS Planners.(AICP) • Camp Swift JLUS '• Malmstrom AFB JLUS and JLUS • Camp Williams JLUS and JLUS Implementation PROFESSIONAL HISTORY Implementation • Territory of Guam CSS Matrix Design Group,Inc. • Camp RileaJLUS • Fairchild AFB JLUS Vice President • Fort lndiantown Gap JLUS • JBSA-Randolph JLUS 2004 to Present • Fort Irwin JLUS • Sheppard AFB JLUS BRW/DRS • Fort Harrison JLUS a NAF El Centro JLUS ' • Greenlief Training Site JLUS • R 2508 Complex JLUS Community.Planning Manager • Stones Ranch and Camp Niantic JLUS • NAS Corpus Christi JLUS 2000 to 2004 Jones&Stokes Mr. Rust was the project manager for the Naval Base Ventura'WS in Ventura County. Naval Associate Principal Base Ventura County(NBVC),comprised of Port Hueneme, Point.Mugu and San Nicholas 1996 to 2000 Island,is located 65-miles:north.of Los Angeles, CA, NBVC Port Hueneme is a small port facility Chambers Group with intense community development on three.sides. Point Mugu provides direct connectivity Planning and GIS Services to the Point Mugu Sea Range,a 36,000 square mile maritime range used extensively by the Manager Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division for weapons testing and research. Primary 1990 to 1996 concerns for compatibility;a"growing population, increased competition for shared sea lanes TRW and port areas;noise;overflight;frequency spectrum capacity; BASH;T&E species;shoreline Environmental Planner access protection;and impacts on ground transportation. ) 1985 to 1990 �/ City of Norco Mr. Rust was the project.manager for the Camp Roberts 1LUS outside San Luis Obispo,CA. 1983 to 1985 Camp Roberts hosts heavy and light maneuver training exercises by California National Guard, Army, Army Reserve,Marine-Corps,and Air Force units,as well as law enforcement agencies NWSSB Joint Land Use Study 1 Matrix Design Group Page 3-17 1 Matrix , . fi ' lr• t and other state and federal agencies. The major issues address in the.1LUS included those associated with•ive fire operations(noise and safety),airspace and safety for.unmanned aerial systems flown at Camp Roberts,community development near the borders of Camp Roberts, and nighttime lighting from nearby residential and commercial uses impacting night vision training. Mr. Rust managed the Camp Rilea;JLUS for a National Guard training site in Clatsop County. Oregon. The primary mission at Can Rilea is live-fire training. The installation is also used for helicopter operations,including by the US Coast Guard,and electrical pole training and maintenance courses. The.primary.issues addressed at Camp Rilea included noise from weapons firing and helicopter overfiight,public closure of the beach during live-fire exercises, natural resource'and wate •protection,and public access to the installation. As theProjectMahager for development of the California Advisory Handbook for Community and Military.Planning, Mr. Rust's management and planning expertise ensured the Handbook provide •guidance•to cities,counties,builders,and military personnel in encouraging. collaboration to reduce land use conflictsbetween local planning decisions and military activities.in California. Mr. Rust led the Beale AFB KW in California as Project Manager, The Beale AFB JLUS included assessment:of23;000 acres oflandas well as impacts associated with large aircraft based at.Beale AFB:whose mission in'reconnaissance support is strategic in the nation's line of defense: Beale_AFB is one of only threeinstallations in the U.S.equipped with Phased Array Warning System'(PAWS)used for detecting sea-launched ballistic and intercontinental missiles; The Beale AFB 1LUS primarily focused on preserving this valuable.mision of the AF at the installation by recommending strategies for compatible growth as the area grew. Land uses and'infrastructure extensions were assessedbased on the growth in the area. Community Planning. Mr. Rust has been the project manager or lead planner on dozens of comprehensive planning and zoning projects. For each of these,managing growth,promoting economic development opportunities;and ensuring the delivery of•adequate public services and facilities(i.e.,schools, parks water;sewer, police,fire, etc.)Were paramount. Mr. Rust has also developed several complete zoning ordinances and changes to building codes. This in-depth understanding of code requirements helps him to develop responsive code changes needed to fully implement JLUS,proposals._Work included the award winning Inyo County and City of Indio General Plan programs,as.well as several other community general plan, ordinance and zoning programs. For two.cities in California,the cities of Oxnard.(adjacent to Naval Base Ventura County)and Ridgecrest(adjacent to HAWS China Lake), Mr. Rust helped to develop comprehensive plan components designed to enhance compatibility planning. The Ridgecrest General Plan also fully implemented the policy changesproposed in the R-2508 Complex 1LUS. Military Planning Mr..Rust has prepared dozens of studies(e.g.,master plans,compatibility plans,land development,•aviation planning;and facility asset management) for the Air Force,Army,Navy, Marine Corps,and National Guard.His in-depth understanding of training andioperational requirements,range,operations,technology,flight characteristics,and base support needs makes him uniquely qualified•todiscuss•these items with military personnel for identifying both compatibility issues and potential solutions as part of a JLUS. • Page 3-18 NWSSB Joint Land Use Study I Matrix Design Group al€ . Qualifications and Personnel w`, 3 s . MICHAEL HRAPLA VICE PRESIDENT ♦A PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY • Michael Hrapla is Vice President in charge of Department of-Defense(DOD)Programs. His extensive background built over the past-39 years includes managing and directing small to very large planning,engineering,design,construction, housing and environmental operations and personnefatworldwide locations. Mr.Hrapla has served as the Principal-In-Charge on numerous large,complex,multi-discipline projects and Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity AREAS OF EXPERTISE (IMO.)projects. He brings unique experience and understanding to this role,with past • JLUS/Compatibility experience-as an Air Force Base CiviLEngineer,HQ Air Force Programmer,Air Mobility Command Planning, (AMC)Chief.of Operations,Air Combat Command(ACC)Assistant Command Engineer and • Strategic Planning former Air Force.-Special Operations Command(AFSOC)Command Engineer. Helhas a broad • Master Planning range`ofskills in contingency engineering;strategic planning,and military engineering including • Long Range Planning project development,concept design implementation,requirements development, military • Program Development housing,and weapon system beddown programs. Mike served as the Base Civil Engineer at • DOD.Facilities Plattsburgh AFB in New York. He experience in the environment and region'of the North • Design.and Construction Country of New York. • MILCON • Capital Investment RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Programs Compatibility Planning/Joint Land Use Studies and Encroachment • Client Management Mr. Hrapla has served:as-a Project Manager/Military Expert/Advisor on the development of EDUCATION numerous;JLUSs_ These studies sought to ensure the sustainability of both local communities Master of Science,Facilities and military installations,finding mutually beneficial strategies to mitigate encroachment ) Management,Air Force impacts,ensuring that future surrounding,public.and private development will be compatible Institute of Technology,-1977 with both the-military mission and the needs of the community,in support of the military's. Bachelor of,Science,'Civil presence and preserving the economic benefits associated with the military installation. Mr. Engineering; University of Hrapla's active involvement in the preparation of the JLUS studies includes. Pittsburgh,1974 a Aberdeen Proving Ground JLUS • Bay County JLUS PROFESSIONAL • Camp Bullis:JLUS' • Columbus AFB JLUS AFFILIATIONS • Camp Roberts JLUS it Hampton-Langley JLUS Del Rio JLUS • Camp Swift JLUS • Malmstrom AFB JLUS.and JLUS Society of American Military • Camp Williams JLUS and JLUS Implementation Engineers(Fellow) Implementation • Territory of Guam CSS PROFESSIONAL HISTORY u Fort indiantown.Gap JLUS a Fairchild AFB JLUS Matrix Design Group;Inc. -• Fort-Irwin JLUS • JBSA-Randolph JLUS Vice President • .Fort.Harrison JLUS a Sheppard AFB JLUS 2305-to Present. • Greenlief Training Site JLUS o NAF El Centro JLUS • Stones Ranch and Camp Niantic JLUS • R 2508 Complex JLUS URS a NAS Corpus Christi JLUS Vice President 2001 to 2005 Mr. Hrapla was the Project Manager for the Camp Bullis JLUS in San Antonio,Texas. Mr. Hrapla United States Air Force and the Matrix team worked'[with--the City of San Antonio and the counties of Bexar,Comal,and Colonel,Retired Kendall to address concerns over encroachment issues that impact the critical military medical 1974 to 2001 training area of Camp.Bullis.The regional!Military Transformation Task Force identified the need for adequate-land use planning policies between the civilian community and military installations,and to manage the growth and the conflict that could develop around Camp Bullis. The purpose of the-plan was to foster community growth,and to recognize the need to conduct multi-service medical training,,Air Force security forces training,and supporting aircraft J missions by the military.The JLUS strategies addressed urban growth and development, expanding various training requirements;transportation corridors,and balancing extensive natural and threatened and endangered species resources. NWS58Joint Land Use Study Matrix Design Group Page 3-19 Matrix °I: ::. .: • • -,r - Mr.Hrapla was the.Project Manager for the Fort Indiantown Gap JLUS.This project was conducted to address compatibility issues related to the mission conducted at this National Guard Training Center in Pennsylvania. Fort Indiantown Gap is one of the busiest National Guard trainingsites•in the country.As a result ofits location in two different counties and four municipalities,a key component of this JLUS was addressing compatibility issues on a regional level and the.needto enhanceawareness and understanding of military operations. Mr. Hrapla served as:Project Manager for the Fort Harrison and Limestone Hills JLUS,which was conducted with Lewisand Clark..County in Montana as the primary sponsor,and in collaboration with Broadwater County,and the Cities of Helena and Townsend.1Fort Harrison provides unique andirreplaceable assets for,the nation's military, including maneuver areas, training facilities,:srnall arms firing ranges,and helicopter training and exercise for active and Reserve Component-personnel from the Army,Air Force,Navy,and Marines. lealso provides important economic,social,and security contributions to the local communities. Mr.Hrapla:helped lead the Malmstrom AFBJLUS.and Implementation which addresses a seven county region of central Montana impacted by the Missile Complex associated with Malmstrom AFB'.This.unique national asset required the development of universally acceptable strategies that will posture:the Base to accept a variety of potential missions in the future, including reactivating flight operations,to augment its reduced role of maintaining launch facilities. The primary ddtcome'of this,implementation effort was the development of a red,yellow,green mapping tbol,td identify locations where construction of alternative energy development would impact or,not impact military operations. Mr.Hrapla was the Project Manager for the Aberdeen Proving Ground JLUS in Maryland. The APG JLUS was conducted to address the regional population growth pressures associated with APG's relativeproximity to the three.major metropolitan areas of Baltimore, Maryland; Washington, D.C.;and Philadelphia,Pennsylvania. The geographic extent of the overall JLUS Study Area was largely a result of sound travel and noise complaints associated With RDT&E missions,and.an overall shifting demographic and land use. Mr.Hrapla wasproject manager for the Naval Air Station Patuxent River(NAS PAX)JLUS.The WAS PAX JLUS Study Area encompasses.the areas surrounding the NAS PAX's main base,its outlying Field,Webster Field,and the areas influenced bymilitary operations, extending to nine counties across three_states. Key issues.addressed through this JLUS include the:effect of renewable energy(Wind turbines).on the frequency spectrum,vertical obstructions,noise contours.extending across the Chesapeake Bay,and the protection of natural resources. Mr. Hrapla wasthe project manager the Sheppard AFB JLUS.The Sheppard AFBiJLUSStudy Area encompassed the areas surrounding SheppardAFB•in Wichita Falls,Texas and its auxiliary airfield,Frederick.Regional Airport in Oklahoma. This JLUS is unique in that it extended across state lines. Sheppard AR provides a key technical school for the US Air Force and is also home to the Euro-NATO Joint let Pilot Training program. Key issues being addressed through this JLUS include vertical obstructions,noise contours,runway safety zones over residential communities, and lines of communication between the military and neighboring communities. Military Planning Mr.Hrapla has been involved.with numerous military planning projects. He has extensive military experience in evaluating•weapon system infrastructure support requirements and long- term planning and programming initiatives to address:new requirements, restructuring, expanding missions'capabilities and capacity,as well as revitalization and mitigation of mission impact issues: He servedas the Program Director for the Eglin Visioning Plan,the goal of which was to develop an overall strategic.vision for the future of Eglin AFB's main complex addressing the expanding roles and missions through 2040. Page 3-20 NWSSB Joint Land Use Study I Matrix Design Group r Qualtficattons;and Personnel �� n BREN'COX, AICP. PLANNER t, ` • PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY `•i, 1;1 i, Mr. Bren Cox has seven years of experience-as a community and compatibility planner. During his time with Matrix Design Grouphe has been exposed to a wide range of community and compatibility planning projects and has been an integral team member in completing such projects at the federal,state, and local level throughout the United States and its territories. He has also gained knowledge and Experience in environmental impacts and analysis,military planning,and community coordination. He has a keen eye for detail which has been vital to the development and AREAS OF EXPERTISE completion of quality documents. • JLUS/Compatibility Planning RELEVANT EXPERIENCE • Community Planning Compatibility Planning • General/ Since beginning with Matrix,Mr.Cox has contributed to several Joint Land Use Studies, Comprehensive/ Specific Planning EncroachmentAction-Plans,and Map Atlases. He has led and managed various components of • Growth writing and preparing`JLUS documents. His compatibility planning project experience includes: Management • Idaho JLUS a Camp Rilea JLUS Planning • Andersen AFB JLUS • Offutt AFB JLUS • Health!Planning • Columbus AFBJLUS • Camp Williams JLUS • Military Planning a Edwards AFB Map Atlas a NAF El Centro JLUS l EDUCATION • Fairchild AFB JLUS • NAS Corpus Christi JLUS / • Malmstrom AIR JLUS • NAS Panama City/Bay County JLUS Bachelor of Science, a Camp',RdbertsJLUS a Fort W. H. Harrison Urban Planning;Arizona a JBSA-Randolph JLUS • Fort Indiantown Gap State University,2007 • Sheppard AFB S Greenlief Training Site JLUSi PROFESSIONAL • Hampton-Langley JLUS AFFILIATIONS • Eglin JLUS Implementation American Institute of Mr.Cox was the lead planner for the Fort Harrison and Limestone Hills Training Area JLUS in Certified Planners 'central Montanan These two training areas,provide regional training for the Montana National American Planning Guard and other nearby state National Guard units,as well as local and federal law'ehforcement Association and specialty military;units. Some of the major issues addressed at the installations included noise, Arizona,Planning safety,wildland fires(both natural and caused from weapons firing),and vertical obstructions. He Association was instrumental in preparing for and assisting-in public participation and communication with JLUS committees. PROFESSIONAL. HISTORY Mr.Cox was the lead Plannerfpr the Oregon.National Guard training site at Camp Rilea. The Camp Matrix Design Group, Rilea JLUSanalyzed a variety of installation impacts arising from other entities using the Camp,such Inc as the US Coast Guard and a utility and light pole maintenance and training yard. The primary issues Community Planner addressed in the Camp Rilea JLUS included'noise from weapons firing and helicopter overflight, 2008 to Present public closure of the beach during live-fire exercises, natural resource and water protection,and public access to the installation. Mr.Cox.served a key role:in the Malmstrom AFB JLUSand Implementation. These projects addressed a seven county region of central Montana impacted by the Missile Complex associated with Malmstrom AFB.This unique national-asset required the development of universally acceptable strategies that will posture the Base to accept a variety of potential missions in the future,including reactivating flight operations,to augment its reduced role of maintaining launch _ ) facilities.. The primary outcome of this implementation effort was the development of.a red,yellow, green mapping tool to identify locations where construction of alternative energy development would impact or not impact military operations. NWSSB Joint Land Use Study I Matrix Design Group Page 3-21 Matrix =°11 Mr.Cox served as the lead.planner for the Idaho JLUS. This JLUS was unique in that it was one of the first JLUSsto address multiple military service bases. The study area and assessment included three counties and covered Mountain Home AFB and its associated range complex,the Army National Guard Orchard Training Area, and the Air National Guard facility at GoweniField. Gowen Field is a joint-use facility located-at Boise Airport in the City of Boise that used for civilian and commercial air-travel and military aircraft. This JLUS examined compatibility concerns between military activity and civilian..uses related to flight operations at Gowen Field and Mountain Home AFB,including safety zones,imaginary surfaces,vertical obstructions,and noise,and provided a set of recommendations to the.communities.and military branches involved to implement to address current and future concerns. The JLUS also provided a similar process for compatibility issues around Orchard Training Area. Community andGeneral Planning Mr.Cox has been-involved in many community planning studies and projects during his time with Matrix Design Group,including Growth Management Plans,General Plans and Updates,Zoning Ordinances and Land Use-Plans. Through these,he has gained experience and knowledge in areas such as land useiguidelines;.transportation systems;managing growth,infrastructure and public service needs including parks,water,sewer,health,and environmental resources. Military Eipansion and Installation Growth Mr.Cox has assisted the-Territory of'Guam in analyzing the impacts of the proposed military buildup through.several Task Orders as part of the Governor's Advisory Consulting Team(ACT).The scale and magnitude of the proposed Marine relocation from Okinawa to Guam represents a massive planning effort.Through the work on several..of the ACT Task Order, Mr.Cox has demonstrated knowledge in areas such as governmental/organizational structure,.healthcare,and compatibility sustainability planning.,The associated plans range from focused efforts to identify key direct and indirect gaps-infacilitiesand land-use Ihabwould be-impacted in preparation of a strategic plan to ensure the socioeconomic,and environmental vitality of Guam and the health of existing, new, and visiting populations. Page 3-22 NWSSB Joint Land Use Study Matrix Design Group . ..Qualificationsand Personnel 3 P?? . PATRICK SMALL, AICP { SENIOR PLANNER t .,; PROFESSIONAL'SUMMARY 7'k' . Mr. Patrick Small brings over 16 years of experience spanning county and local government, military, R ' and federal agency planning for the public and private sector throughout the country: He has worked l"" ;pi Y �p,;t, -for local governments,and with state agencies on land-use,environmental planning and site planning •n tiff 1f r initiatives,and has served as an expert witness on land use cases before the Florida Judicial Court. His background:includes-project management,facilitation,master planning,site analysis and design, program development,development review,and quality assurance/quality control.Through his AREAS OF EXPERTISE collective experiences,he has developed-a practical, holistic and collaborative approach to creative • Federal/Military problem solving based on a multidisciplinary planning process. Planning • Comprehensive/ RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Long-Range Planning Compatibility Planning • Land Development Since joining.Matrix/Patrick has contributed to several Joint Land Use Studies. His compatibility Regulations planning project experience includes: • Community ■ APG JLUS • Andrews AFBJLUS Implementation Planning and • Camp Swift JLUS • Naval Base Ventura County JLUS Visioning ■ Seymour Johnson AFB JLUS • NSF Dahlgren JLUS • Master Planning/ • Fort Indiantown Gap JLUS ■ NAS Fallon JLUS Site.Planning • Dobbins ARB JLUS • NAF El Centro JLUS • Public Participation • JBSA-Randolph JLUS • Sheppard AFB JLUS /Stakeholder a Lackland AFB JLUS Implementation • NSA Crane JLUS Facilitation a NAS Patuxent River JLUS ) • Project/Program Management Community Planning and Public Participation Mr.Small has extensive-experience in local community planning focused on long-range and current EDUCATION planning.initiatives: He prepared''ComprehensivePlans,authored land development ordinances,and Masters of conducted complex analysis on issues of regional significance. His experience includes leading public Environmental Design workshops, public outreach and facilitation,and presenting reports and studies to councils, (Planning and Urban commissions,state,agencies and their representatives. Mr.Small was responsible for:coordinating Design),.University'of strategic planning.and-growth plans with the State Department of Community Affairs, local plans with Calgary, 1999 state environmental agencies,and reporting out to the governor on compliance with legislative Bachelor of Science, mandates. His community project highlights include: Urban Studies, University of a Livable CommuniKeys Planning Program,Monroe.County,FL Minnesota, 1994 • Comprehensive Plan, Islamorada,Village of Islands,FL Bachelor of Arts,Urban • Upper Matecumbe Key Community Visioning Plan,Islamorada, FL Studies,University of Winnipeg, 1992 • North Plantation Key Revitalization Plan/Implementation Work Program, Islamorada, FL PROFESSIONAL Military Planning AFFILIATIONS Mr.Small has worked on and managed high-profile planning projects and studies throughout the American Institute of country for all branches of the military including the Air Force and the Air Force Reserves. Mr.Small's Certified Planners military planning experience-is rooted in master planning and Capital Improvement Plans, needs assessments,asset management,and facilities development. Mr.Small managed the:programming American Planning and design of facilities at Lackland Air Force Base and the preparation of master plans,facilities plans Association-National and programming,Capital Improvements Plans and managing real property data in GIS as part of the Capital Region encroachment assessment for US Marine Corps Camp Lejeune and US Marine;Corps Air Station JCherry Point in North Carolina. He has provided planning and conflict resolution training for US Marines stationing in Afghanistan at the request of the USMC.Specific examples include: NWSSB Joint Land Use Study 1 Matrix Design Group Page 3-23 Matrix v c PROFESSIONAL a Navy Annex Property Transfer Master Plan.including NEPA and Section 106 documentation for HISTORY conveyance of real property.from federal government to Arlington,VA m Acquisition of.Naval Reserve Center,St. Petersburg,FL Matrix Design Group, ® Crystal Park/Gateway/Navy Annex.Relocation to Naval Support Facility,Arlington,VA Inc' a Warrior Transition Unit Administration Center,Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Senior Planner Bethesda, MD 2074 to Prpseni IPP Technical Director 2012 to 2012 G51PT Planning Director 2006 to 2012 Village of Islamorada. Principal Planner 2000-to 2006 Page 3-24 NWSSB Jcent Land Use Study Matrix Design Group •• Qualifications;and Personnel ' 3, MICHELE MORA PLANNER is - ' PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY • Ms Michele.Mora has a-variety of experience in program management and development across , several platforms including county government, higher education,and healthcare planning. Michele's 12 years of experience includes collaborative team building while working in a BRAC f .g rowth community;providing assistance and developing P ro rams for transportation ortation • I implementation education,and economic development. / ._, , Ms. Mora served as the Project Manager for the Lackland AFB.JLUS for the County of Bexar in the State of Texas. This program involved the development of a JLUS with multiple stakeholders. This AREAS OF EXPERTISE study sought to be proactive in the sustainability of both local communities and the military 1LU5(Compatib+lity installation to-identify mutually beneficial strategies to mitigate encroachment impact. Michele Planning - • Base Realignmenrand also served as.aTechnical..AdvisoryCommittee.member in the Camp Bullis JLUS (TX). This JW5 Closure/Installations included development of 65 strategies designed to address compatibility among Camp Bullis,three Growth counties,and several incorporated cities. • Economic RELEVANT EXPERIENCE- Development Assessment/Planning Compatibility Planning • Military Liaison Michele's most recent experience with Matrix in the development of 1LUSs includes the following • Government and projects: Organizational • Camp Bullis JLUS'/Implementation • Columbus APB_ILLS/Implementation Structure • Camp Rilea ILLS a Ellsworth AFB JLUS • Legislative Analysis • Camp Roberts JLUS • NAF El Centro JLUS Program • Camp Swift'1LUS • Okaloosa SAS Implementation Development • Camp.Williams JLUS/implementation • Kingsley Field JLUS • Grant Writing JBSA-Randolph JLUS • JBSA-Lackland JLUS Implementation EDUCATION •• Fort lndiantown Gap JLUS • NAS Fallon JLUS Master of.Administration • Greenlief Training Site.JLUS o Naval Base Ventura County JLUS with concentration in. • Malmstrom AFB'JLUS/Implementation • Offutt AFB JLUS Communications, • North Carolina Regional JLUS • San Antonio Regional JLUS' University of the Incarnate Implementation Implementation Word,2008 • NAS Corpus Christ JLUS Bachelor of Healthcare Ms.Mora is served'as the lead planner for the Joint Base San Antonio-Randolph MB JLUS in Administration,Southwest Texas: This JLUS.included three:distinct study areas:JBSA-R,JBSA-Seguin Auxiliary Airfield, and Texas State University, Stinson Airfield.JBSA-R is located in northeastern Bexar County,characterized by two runways and , 2000 various support facilities and.buildings.The flying training mission provides the Air Force pilots and PROFESSIONAL instructors with Fundamental Fighter skills. Increased development in northeastern Bexar County HISTORY and western Guadalupe County in recent years has crowded the boundaries of the base in ways that can potentially adversely impact the base's mission. The designated safety zones associated Matrix Design Group,Inc. with the airfields have represented a challenge for municipalities to maintain effective Planner March 2011 to Present compatibility planning while balancing the needs of the community. Other issues address in the JLUS include noise and infrastructure extensions that encourage development in and near safety zones. County of Bexar Senior Economic Ms. Mora served as the lead planner for the Naval Air Facility El Centro JLUS. Naval Air Facility El Development Analyst/ Centro is situated within the Imperial Valley of southern California in Imperial County and Military-Liaison proximate to the Cities of El Centro and Imperial.In addition to the installation,the:'El Centro JLUS 2008 to2011 covers over 54,000.acres of ranges and 218,000 acres of restricted airspace used to conduct j various training and testing exercises. While encroachment issues have been limited in the past, ,J continued growth in the Imperial Valley has pressed the need for a comprehensive look at compatibility issues.The-El Centro ILLS is a proactive step in compatibility planning. Issues NWSSB Joint Land Use Study Matrix Design Group Page 3-25 -Matrix „ �- -� University of the assessed in this JLUS.include noise,safety, use of airspace,and the compatible growth of incarnate Word alternative energy in the region. Manager/Advisor 2002 to 2008 Community and General Planning Heart and Vascular Michele has.been a core team member on several planning projects in the County of Bexar,Texas. Institute of Texas For each of these,managing:growth, promoting economic development opportunities,and Administrator ensuring the delivery of adequate public services and facilities(i.e.,schools, parks,water,sewer, 2000 to 2002 police,fire,transportation,etc.)were paramount..Work included--Fort Sam Houston Growth Management Plan,San Antonio,TX,North and West Sector Plans,San Antonio,TX. Since starting with'Matrix, Michele has gained a wealth of experience in community planning through the design and:completion of JLUS implementation programs,comprehensive plans, and zoning ordinances. These programs have:included preparing adoption-ready comprehensive planning policies and proposed amendments to zoning ordinances of jurisdictions involved with JLUS projects. Alternative Energy Experience In her tenure with Matrix,Michele has performed numerous legislative analyses,both for state and local governments,to.facilitate enhancements of legislation and consequently, permitting of such.developmentprojects.The analyses and,enhancements have included various measures for land andtoff-shore alternative•energy development to enable military compatibility.Recent work included: NSA Crane JLUS,North Carolina Statewide JLUS,Seymour Johnson AFB.ICUs. Public Participation In addition to her vast experience in compatibility,.military expansion and community planning, Ms. Mora also-has extensive experience working.with the public.She is skilled at presenting important issues and information in various venues,such as workshops and legislative hearings,in a simple andunderstandable manner at public hearing. Page 3-26 NWSSB Joint Land Use Study Matrix Design Group I Qualifications)and Personnel'. _ ROBERTA SCHLICHER, PE VICE PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES t PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY 'f ti, '. t Ms.RobertaSchlicher is the Director of Environmental Services and a Vice President of Matrix +� Design Group, Inc. A registered Professional Engineer with over 31 years of experience in the q .'z - , ,r i public and private sectors, Roberta's emphasis has been in environmental investigation and '✓ itz�r - ' remediation;study and design of industrial water and wastewater treatment systems,and municipal,publiCworks. She isan experienced program and project manager for commercial industry,federal,state and local agencies. Roberta has broad knowledge of design, AREAS OF EXPERTISE commissioning,and operation of remediation systems;industrial treatment facilities for e CERCLA and RCRA water,wastewater-and air in including physical,chemical,and biological treatment trains; Investigation and Title II oversight and engineering serviced during construction programs;CERCLA and RCRA Remediation investigation and remediation;and civil and transportation engineering design and ■ Pollution Control Process implementation. Design a Civil and Transportation RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Engineering She has provided environmental services in US EPA Regions 2,5,6,8,and 9 as apart of master o Program Management plans,facilities plans,permitting, engineering studies, designs,operations and'''assessments. EDUCATION Example projects in select service areas include: MS/MSc,Civil.Engineering, Remedial.lnvestigation,Feasibility Study. Prepared 13 remedial investigation reports and nine Texas A&'M University,1982 feasibility studies,including public responsiveness summaries for Superfund sites in BS/BSc,Civil Engineering,Texas U.S.EPA Regions V and IX;and prepared 12 remedial action master plans and three quality A&M University,1980 assurance project plans for CERCLA sites in the Midwest.Served as quality assurance reviewer PROFESSIONAL for 10 additional feasibility studies for hazardous waste site remediation in U.S.EPA Regions AFFILIATIONS/ V,VIII,and IX,involving uncontrolled landfills,fire training areas,chemical disposal areas, drum disposal areas,and solvent recovery sites. Developed and implementedlnine REGISTRATIONS investigative study plans,quality assurance programs and sampling plans for field activities ProfessionafEngineer—Civil; and data evaluation.Experience in environmental sampling efforts include surface water, CO,UT,TX roundwater„stream sediment,surface and subsurface soil(auger and test itsam sampling),g ( g P P g), and Society of American Military landfill leachate sampling. Engineers(SAME) National Ordnance Contractors Environmental Remediation. Experienced in remedial actions under CERCLA and RCRA Association involving non-aqueous phase liquids,fuels,chemical contamination in groundwater,surface Water Environment Federation water;-sediment and soils,and munitions and munitions constituents. Managed design, construction,and-operation of innovative and conventional remedial technologies including American.Consulting Engineers in-situ bioventing,bioremediation, permeable reactive walls, and soil flushing: Council U.S.Army Corps of Engineers, Defense Logistics Agency(DLA), Huntsville, AL. Provided$26 million in services on 35 task orders for remediation for defense depots in the western US and tour CERCLA Sites. Executed and-completed investigations, demonstration tests,and remediation projects involving;contaminated groundwater, soils, and landfills. Managed groundwater injection studies using infiltration galleries,percolation ponds,chimney drains, and injection wells. Implemented a,22S gpm capacity expansion to the existing pump and treat system within three months to meet a stringent regulatory deadline,and optimized the system-in a 15-week startup and prove-out period, including demonstrating tour groundwater disposal-technologies. The optimum discharge technology resulted in$8.4M savings.Also implemented a 1,250 gpm pump and treat system for VOC and pesticide removal from groundwater.Implemented extraction,granular activated carbon(liquid-phase)treatment,air stripping,vapor phase carbon treatment and infiltration galleries. Used capture zone analysis j to justify a remedy change to natural attenuation for a portion of the plume saving approximately$11.7M. NWSSB Joint Land Use Study I Matrix Design Group Page 3-27 1 U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,Sacramento Division.Remedial Design and Regulatory Decision Documents. For Defense Distribution Depot,Ogden Utah, provided design of remediation facilities'for groundwater contaminant hotspots.The facility included a groundwater extraction trench and advanced oxidation treatment systems(ozone and peroxide)with discharge to the local sewerage authority.Also prepared an Explanation of Significant Ditterence(ESD)to the Record of Decision for the remedy and a ROD Amendment. Tooele Army Depot,UT. Groundwater Treatment System and Hazardous Waste Corrective Measures Implementation Plan. Lead.reviewengineer for predesign of an 11.5 mgd groundwater treatment system for an army depot. Designed extraction wells,a 1 million gallon storage.tank,and a.centralized air stripping facility for removal of VOCs and hexavalent chromium. Managed the preparation of a Corrective Measures Implementation Plan for the Bomb Washout Building at Tooele.Army Depot. Soils were contaminated with metals, dioxins/furans,explosive compounds,and unexploded ordnance.The remedy for the site involved clearance of UXO followed by excavation and on-site consolidation of contaminated soils under aliner and clean soil cover. Iowa Army Ammunition Plant, U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Omaha. Explosive waste incineration,HTRW Remediation Facility Design; Iowa Army Ammunition Plant, IA. Provided engineering design review for Needs Assessment and a detailed design for two explosives contaminated waste Evaluated air permitting requirements and assisted in obtaining the required permits. Page 3-28 NWSSB Joint Land Use Study I Matrix Design Group Qualifications and.Per-sonnel! e3• CHRIS MARTIN, GISP ,.GIS MANAGER I f PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY " i d - Mr. Martin has,13 years of professional experience in the GIS field.As a certified GIS Professional, Be has provided support in both the public and private sectors on diverse projects including .community planning,urban development,financial analysis,environmental planning,custom application design,database development,and asset management.Chris believes in the power of AREAS OF EXPERTISE GIS to provide information that enlightens the decision-making process.Through custom • GlSfor Community applications and database analysis,Chris prides himself on delivering the best product and Planning information possible to the client.Chris has been extensively trained in many of the latest 61S and • Database database software platforms. He is proficient in ESRI's ArcGlS software suite,SQL Server, MySQL, Development and and Microsoft Access. Management RELEVANT EXPERIENCE • G15 Modeling • Project Management Mr. Martin hasextensive experience harnessing GIS for various community and compatibility • GIS Application planning projects.These.projects involved multiple stakeholders,requiring the aggregation and Development standardization of disparate GIS datasets.Often,the GIS data were reorganized into a.database • Field Data Collection designed for improved data management.Throughout each project, a data inventory system was maintained to track the lineage and development of alPGIS and tabular data.Using•state-of-the-art EDUCATION 61S software.and processes,geographic analyses were performed at various levels of detail. B5,Environmental Science, Analyses included and use compatibility assessments using factors such as noise,vertical University of Denver,2003 obstructions-potential,safety zones,zoning analysis,infrastructure extension potential,natural BA,Geography,University resourceevaluations,.BASH analysis,and 3-D.spatial assessments. The resulting data were ) of Denver,2003 conveyed in-easy to-understand maps-and tables.Upon project completion,all organized data and MS,Geographic maps were delivered to the stakeholders.Some representative projects include: Information Science, • Camp.BullisJLUS and Implementation • NAS Patuxent River University of Denver,2006 • CampRileaJLUS • JLUS Andrews AFB JLUS Implementation PROFESSIONAL • Camp.Roberts JLUS • Naval Base Ventura CountyJLUS a Camp Swift JLUS o NSF Dahlgren JLUS HISTORY • Camp Williams JLUS and Implementation • NAS Fallon JLUS Matrix Design Group„Inc. • Fort:Harrison and Limestone Hills JLUS'. • NAF El Centro JLUS GIS Manager/GIS-Analyst • Fort lndiantown Gap ILUS • Sheppard AFB JLUS 2006 to Present • Malmstrom AFB JLUS and • NAS Corpus Christi JLUS GVR Metropolitan District Implementation GIS Specialist 2005 to 2006 Mr. Martin has a strong understanding of the various GIS data components associated with a JLUS Castlewood canyon State and how these datasets can be incorporated into a comprehensive community plan. Park Seasonal Park Ranger 2004 to 2004 National Park Service Intermountain Region GIS Support Office GIS Support 2002 to 2004 J NWSSB Joint Land Use Study Matrix Design Group Page 3-29 • Matrix =� . pp� r • ,oe SIGN,GROUP !( 16 Project.Manager Contact Information This project will be managed by Celeste Werner from our office in the Sacramento area. Contact information is as follows: Celeste.Werner,AICP,Vice President Office: 916.537.0026 Fax: 916.537.0027 E-mail: celeste_werner @matrixdesigng'oup.com 3.7 Staff Workload Matrix is available to start work on the NWSSB JLUS as soon as a contract'is awarded and executed. Matrix has evaluated projected workloads, including a look at projects that are nearing completion, in determining the staff proposed to work on this project. Table 3-3 provides:an estimated percent of available time for each key staff member to work on the NWSSB JLUS. Based on a review of staff availability against this project's schedule and staff needs, we are confident that appropriate capacity is and will be available to provide excellent service on this.project. Table•3-3. Matrix=Ke Staff Availebilit and Office Location %:of Project; l• OfficelLocation . —Matrix Staff _ _ Hours' AyailabJity': Celeste Werner,AICP(Project Manager) 12% 30% Sacramento, CA Rick Rust, AICP(Deputy Project 15% 30% Sacramento, CA Manager) Mike Hrapla 5% 30% Washington DC Bren Cox, AICP 17% 35% Phoenix, AZ Pat Small, 6% 25% Washington DC Michele Mora 6% 25% Phoenix, AZ Roberta Schlicher, PE 2% 20% Denver, CO Chris Martin 10% 25% Denver, CO Assistant Planner 20% Avg. 30% Sacramento, CA Phoenix, AZ Other Staff Categories 8% Avg. 30% Sacramento, CA Phoenix, AZ " %of Project Hours/s based on the total hours between contract award and December 2017, Availability is an annual figure. Numbers may not total 100%due to rounding. The level of involvement in this effort is detailed on theccost:estimate provided in a separately sealed envelope and enclosed with this proposal. Page 3-30 NWSSB Joint Land Use Study I Matrix Design Group rrs _ s r �.. � ' GA F � 4 { ' _ r nom — ' ` • (fir"'' .4°. 41J -.r,...jX.9t �.�. (t• • Y. Matnxu'�F1��{_ r ,�� J Yl '1 y E flltYf.N f (IY '•, ,I t Experience and References 4.1 Overview Matrix has a broad range of experience with compatibility planning projects, including Joint Land Use Studies (JLUS), JLUS Implementation Programs, Navy Encroachment Action Plans(EAP),Air Installations Compatible Use Zones (AICUZ) studies, and Compatibility Handbooks. In addition, our staff also provides extensive experience in the development of military installation planning and community planning projects. Many of the JLUS projects Matrix has worked on share similar encroachment issues to Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach (NWSSB), including: • growth and potential incompatible land use, • competition for sea space, • natural resource protection, • trespassing and shoreline security e siting issues with alternative energy facilities, and • protection from frequency spectrum encroachment. Understanding-the symbiotic relationship installations have with communities is vital to a successful JULS project. Matrix recognizes the economic impacts that installations bring to communities and how the external factors of urban growth and economic development can present encroachment challenges. Through each JLUS project, Matrix analyzes the impacts of urban growth, economic development initiatives, and associated infrastructure on mission capability to mitigate current, emerging, and potential encroachment. Matrix's expertise in evaluating these factors-is supplemented by knowledge and experience from successful cornmunity.planning projects developed for communities across the country, including a number of General Plans for California communities. As part of every JLUS project, Matrix evaluates,analyzes, and develops strategies that must be politically palatable, economically viable, and provide value to-both.communities and installations. Identifying and analyzing the economic cost/benefit of each strategy is part of the strategic process Matrix employs on every JLUS project to ensure strategies are uniquely tailored, achieve desired goals,and are,realistic. Matrix leverages fiscal impact analysis expertise from community planning projects and JLUS strategy development from past projects nationwide to provide optimized and reliable solution sets. Matrix has broad and focused experience in community planning and development having successfully executed community planning projects including full comprehensive plan:updates and authoring zoning and land development regulations and through the analysis and recommendations to update comprehensive plans and zoning codes as a component of JLUS projects, The Matrix Team also includes planning staff with first-hand experience working in city and local governments. NWSSB Joint Land Use Study I Matrix Design Group Page 4-1 Matrix • • - --� �- _ �•• Matrix also has first-handknowledge of military installation management and operations with.a team composition that includes retired military officers and staff who•have managed and executed military planning projects for all DOD branches—ranging from general plans, master plans,visioning plans, cost optimization plans,joint basing feasibility studies, and design projects. 4.2 Reference Projects The following pages provide an overview of five relevant projects and associated reference for each project. Matrix has worked on over 40 JLUS projects and ninedLuS implementation projects nationwide. Additional references for any project listed in Section 3 and at the endof this section can be provided upon request. to looking at experience, it is more than just what the firm has completed, it is about what the people proposed for this project havedone. The Management Team proposed for this project(Celeste Werner and Rick Rust) has worked on each of the projects listed on the following:pages and the more than 40 JLIJS projects listed in.Section 3 (see Tables 3-1 and 3-2). In keepirig with the statement above,we feel it is all about the people, and we propose to provide you our best. Summaries.of the five reference projects are provided on the following pages. These project are: 1. Naval Base Ventura County (CA) Page 4-3 2. Naval Air.Station Corpus Christi (TX) Page 4-4 3. Naval Air Station Patuxent River(MD) Page 4-S 4. Aberdeen Proving Ground JLUS(MD) • Page 4-6 5. Malrnstrorn AFB JLUS/JLUS Implementation (MT) Page 4-7 Page 4-2 NWSSB Joint Land.Use Study Matrix Design Group Experience,and References: ,, ,.s° na° �F 'l pi Naval Base Ventura County (NBVC) consists of three operating facilities ili 1.--- t totaling over 23,500 acres of land, 36,000 square miles of air space, and 9 , " over 180 nautical miles in the Pacific Ocean. The installation is situated on " _ _4 +.` y the Pacific coast in Ventura County, roughly 65 miles northwest of .`.0 J_ �`-� "�- mot:(l t+"„ - - . y downtown Los Angeles. The three facilities that make up the base are NBVC ,,i , _ Cr': f ;-—crt' -ll Point Mugu, NBVC Port Hueneme and NBVC San Nicolas Island. NBVC 14i '��+� r: provides a vast array of training and skills services, varying by facility. —'_ Asboth.NBVC and Ventura County continue.to grow, a Joint Land Use Study ° ' ,, was necessary to analyze compatibility between military and community t-- _ __, : " j development. As part of the JLUS, Matrix conducted an extensive public -_...:..,.. involvement plan to ensure maximum public input. This included a very _ broad committee structure that included representatives from four local ,*' °F " ( �,- « it jurisdictions,the military,state and local resource agencies, and � r - ._,:. , environmental organizations from the area. s,.t L. _ _ ` _- _ I The major themes of the NBVC 3LUS were related to flight and sea '} .( operations—noise and safety, protection and preservation of Client ( environmental resources including nearby wetlands and marshes, StevelDeGeorge;iClient'PM - i protection of the frequency spectrum for military testing and telemetry use, ) rP^lamming&Tee}nology Director . 1 early communication and coordination in planning activities, and off-shore Ventura Cou fy-7ransportat o - alternative energy development. Commission ,l ', Matrix's assessment resulted in over 100 conflict resolution strategies for 950b°Courity'Sguare Drive#`207 participating jurisdictions and organizations to implement to protect the ntura CA93003 I Ve . ' i NBVC mission from future encroachment and enable continued,compatible s'clegeqlige@goveritura.org (805)2642 1!593'ezt 103 ) community growth. - L Project Relevance: fTotal1Cost r • • Land use evaluation of existing and future land uses and zoning to C$222,452 determine compatibility with noise and safety zone military operational Stafflnvotved•, footprint IL Rick Rust, Project Manager • Competition for sea space, including commercial traffic :rte • Issues related to shared port facilities with commercial port �•i,._ CelestetWerner, Deputy.PM + - I • Implications and effects of new off-shore air pollution regulations ltY` Mike°Hraplaj:Milrtary,Laison ' • NBVC Port Hueneme truck operations and traffic implications U ^BreniCox, Planning Lead • Natural resource protection 40+ Michele Mora Planner , 1 • Trespassing and shoreline security ,t--- Roberta 5ctilicher, Environment tl • Siting issues with alternative energy facilities , • Protection from frequency spectrum encroachment It , • Alternative energy development potential assessment , • Explosive safety zones • Water quality concerns related to runoff from installation areas , Y J NWSSB Joint Land Use Study I Matrix Design Group Page 4-3 Matrix , , . 2:`NavaliAifStabon7Corpus Christi JLUS?('TX) ' '' ` M — _ (I 4 u_ :r NAS Corpus Christi is located along the southeast coast of Texas, within the •i � K' ,� .-;, city limits of Corpus Christi in Nueces County.The planning area for this C' ` '� r . r' JLUS encompasses NAS Corpus Christi's main base, including the main l ' >>-�i �� �. ,�, "44-1. } ''tt�ia• 1, airfield Truax Field, its two auxiliary landing fields(Cahanisc and Waldron), ( and the Corpus Christi International Airport The focus of this JLUS was on �' Q°� "1"="....„.-x. - ! a the assessment of compatibility around NAS Corpus Christi and .4." x,:. --_-:- ';', recommendations on how to address issues related to noise, alternative lit .. c `t.1 energy development, radar interference, and transportation issues that are r se t- ^:,, r,¢_` ! currently affecting military operations. - - _< Fotthe Corpus Christi JLUS, Matrix used comment cards,custom branding, ' ' one-on-one interviews and consistent coordination calls with the client and a-- ijk '- f'- the,military'to facilitate understanding of the project and its goals. i v-e r ti 4l k1w4- t - - e" r ; z r: The JLUS provided other compatibility tools, including energy development wt t ti pl ( Li if in '� guidelines and transportation corridor plans. In compliance with the City's I ( t� k j"( I ,,Il L�,.4 i pit objective for going green, Matrix produced a Smart Growth Plan to protect I r Ili t.4 r 4 ' "I the natural open spaces in the area As part of the JLUS, MatGix also ' (� I , i, developed updatedtomprehensive plan components that provide the City 1 1 — r- - ' with strategies for future community development that would be ( compatible with activities at neighboring NASCC. tCli intt I ,. I The major themes of the NASCC JLUS were related to flight operations and ,BobPayne AICP•Client'PM ;'Special Projects coordinator associated impacts-noise and,safety, alternative energy development, and Go(1qusJChriki,D.evelopment:Sei ices frequency spectrum issues related to alternative energy development in the 2406 Leopard!Street r areas of flight training. CorpuslChnsti;,Texas 76408+ Bd Payne @'c'stezas.com," ' Project Relevance: (361)826'3572' © Alternative energy development assessment-local regulatory .TotalTCost: standards versus state and federal regulations ':$22 5;000 ■ Assessment of existing policies that considered military compatibility • Land use evaluation of future land uses and zoning 3Staff Involved: I � ■ .Smart Growth Planning to ensure the protection of open spaces U :Celeste Werner, Projeet!Managere • Toning analysis to determine if uses with potential frequency spectrum riii 'MikeiHrapla, Deputy,IPPM interference or structures that can impede spectrum usage were 'i 'Rick Rust, Compatibility Leadt adequately regulated to protect the base's flying mission (AO' 6Bren Cox,'Plammng Lead I,y' 4® Michele,Mora Planner 1 h Page 4-4 NWSSB Joint Land Use Study I Matrix Design Group Experience and;References "'. ' 3. Naval Air,'Station Patuxent RiverdJLUSi(MD)' ,l_' n it -;' � '°' —' Naval Air Station Patuxent River(NAS PAX)is the center of excellence for i y I ,14:'v a naval aviation.The installation is home to the Naval Air Systems Command �. & '�� �' .�..`" �l a�py�'y (NAVAIR) Headquarters, the Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft;Divislon ."'c r y' .i..y x;14'1 d (NAWCAD),the Naval Test Wing Atlantic, the US Naval Test Pilot School, and 1! " °i' "'i, several Navy flight test squadrons.Webster Field is used primarily by Navy (Vs a � a i ( t r iy ,Pin ® 1,, aircraft from NAS for a variety of military training and testing purposes, `f ,t such as rotary-wing, glider, Unmanned Aerial Systems(UASs), remotely ly1 ' „. r,—"4 • .=Ili operated aircraft(ROAN), and fixed-wing operations. Webster Field also 411 ._ • _ 1 a serves as the operational site of the Maryland National Guard and Shadow ti- -,-'^^! UPS. I f f` ti %I The NAS PAX'WS was conducted as a collaborative planning effort that !ii -- —' ' ',I included project partners and stakeholders that included nine'counties and `� 1 '�" ,I threemunicipalities in Southern Maryland, as well as on Maryland's Eastern (. c •y„t�},, L Shore and Virginia's Northern Neck. e .! i 1 1� I I Jr h — The heart of the NAS PAX JLUS is the set of 79 recommended strategies that I� ,- � - ._ ,et i address compatibility issues throughout the study area Since the NAS PAX --- a -- -�: .a. —• JLUS is the result of a collaborative planning process, the strategies represent a true consensus plan;a realistic and coordinated approach to ' Client Reference: compatibility planning developed with the support of stakeholders involved / I George Clark Client;PM throughout the process. I Director i n-County CounciPforrSoutfierm Project Relevance: Maryland" 4 • Urban encroachment, including changing character of adjacent uses fl ® ,Box 745' h a Gate operations and queuing issues Hughesville',MD:20637' • s Commercial traffic IGCIa•rk@tccsmd_drg S Enhanced use Leasing development )(240)216'S571, .t • Extensive shoreline areas pose issues for shoreline and physical security I;7otal'CostE • 0 ■ Wide range of T&E species and associated management regulations I'$400 OOO Q ■ Water quality concerns related to runoff from installation areas �I Staff Involved d 1 kii; Mike Hrapla;rProjectManagerr ( ' Celeste Werneri beputOM II t!; 'Rick Rust,,,Compatibility Leld. jl ?I!`. iPat'Smallj Planning Lead t la'! ,8ren Cox Planner - '4`j ;Micliele;,tvlora,;Plartner;' . ,1 9 c , a NWSSB Joint Land Use Study 1 Matrix Design Group Page 4-5 . Matnx • :. T 4:.AberdeenProvr rGroudJLUS (MO i gn r Aberdeen Ground (APG) is located along the shore of the Chesapeake Bay in Maryland, approximately 20 miles northeast of 47.;;;77. ,', } I Baltimore.The installation occupies over 72,165 acres, including 31,740 I ..- Y _v. �' ,p-� I acres-of.water in the Chesapeake Bay and adjacent rivers. APG is home to i1 —_ 4''� ,' 19 major commands and supports more than 80 tenants andl20 satellite ii r G^ '{"�� ��''~'`. .' - i) and 17 private activities, making it a national strategic asset in the United 1 - — — " States Army(US Army) inventnry for research, development,testing, and ` ,_,_, ,"._—'v, � _; evaluation (RDT&E).missions.• v y`•%d�F ....%, i The installation provides facilities to perform RDT&E of Army materiel , t Y 'fl :' i -�° _ including laboratories for research investigations, state-of-the-art ranges, . ,q t . qty,I 'en ineerin test courses for tanks and other tracked vehicles and a broad J.-- zt :cite+.. ly,� sj�' ,r , array of research investigations.The installation also supports a wide variety Rf `- 7 �' ..„;'�r.,j + 'Irs ,), of training, including mechanical.maintenance.The installation also contains 1; —1:54 `r' 1 ` � two air facilities:Weide Army Aviation Support Activity and Phillips Army iE; a. --,.,y* 'L7�'. 'r`ro 'cs''Ji Airfield. r 1 ltClient Reference` ' r' The APG ILUS focused on enhancing communication between the base and the growing communities,surrounding the base. Key topics that were Kar`"nrHolt Clrent+P,M j analyzed and addressed through recommendations include noise (weapons l'(Dtreetor t usage and aircraft), frequency spectrum interference, incompatible land (rHarford County`Offtce of:.Econo`mic' )'Development j development near the installation, aircraft and weapons firing safety areas, •12021 Pulaski IIIi'ghway;Suite D and vertical obstructions. f HavreLDe Grace; MD 21078; project Relevance: tklholt@harfordcountymd:gov i(410JF638 3059: - , p Assessment of shoreline development potential E 0 Assessment of recreational and commercial use of coastal areas 1 Total.Cost: el Land use evaluation of-current and future land uses to determine '$388,09Di - compatibility with noise and safety zones II Developing sample comprehensive plan policies to address military StaffInvolved* compatibility 1"11 Mike Hrapla, P.roject;Manager' -• 0 Zoning analysis to determine If uses with potential frequency spectrum I ti' Celeste Werner Deputy1PM' interference or structures that can impede spectrum usage I'!. RrcktRust,Compatrbrlitylead . • Assessment of impacts from alternative energy development on military ;0 Pat Small Planning;Leadi missions I Seen,Cox, Planner, i" Michele Nlo4aj Planner iI Page 4-6 NWSSB Joint Land Use St.rdy I Matrix Design Group • . Experience;and References': 5. ,Malmstrom AFB JLUS'/JLUSIrnplementation (MT), ' , )I The communities surrounding Malmstrom Air Force Base(AFB), located in ! I�a north-central Montana, are a diverse mix of urban and rural residential and i , �� .� ., „1 commercial uses. As new and infill development moves closer to the Base _�',,, --.e"" f if an d,/or Missile Alert Facilities(MAFS) and Launch Facilities(LFs), a '' _ `y ,,..:2-1«:1I'I coordinated effort is needed to ensure that the growth throughout the )Tr_ t,, ey region allows the installation to maintain its strategic role in the nation's I %- r ,� . ,K " rr,� defense, as well as continue to be a vital member of the local community ( :. �_; "..,....= ,rvt-hj I and a major contributor to the regional economy. This unique set of -fi - -_ (') circumstances required the development of universally acceptable ,a- = " `-oi7 strategies that will posture the base to accept a variety of potential missions ' ,- r '' in the.future, including reactivating flight operations, to augment its 7 c. t _ x . ix. ,t' r reduced role of maintaining launch facilities. ,- ( ,Oc it ' �:s.- �,w- y �0.-"► !{II Matrix developed the ADS Implementation for Malrnstrom AFB. Matrix r r `Nt=�`7.4-•, ,,a, ..C-*Ir developed proposed amendments to the comprehensive plans and land use „ <9 u r {/tr s �" , r_, strategies of the City of Great Falls and the surrounding counties of ii . '+���J�_rIF 4Z-e fr y,.•1 Cascade, Chouteau, Fergus,Judith Basin, Lewis and Clark,Teton, and t r-�✓n;. + Wheatland Through the public involvement process, Matrix Was able to I net; ;17..1.: - '- -__..--__,, '-.� -. develop guidelines..that the City and counties can use to accommodate new growth and promote compatible economic development and transportation Client Reference solutions. Matrix also developed a red, yellow, green (RYG) map that provided the communities guidance in planning for alternative energy t1oe,Bnggs Client Contact Commissioner development. The red indicated alternative energy development would Cascade County have-a detrimental effect-on the Malmstrom AFB mission, the,green l3' Ave 5%2nd North #1=fl indicated alternative energy would not have an impact on the,mission, and ypGreat;Falls iMT+59407 I the yellow indicated areas where the impact needed to be reviewed on a f(406)_454-6815 - I case-by-case basis with the base. Matrix also provided adoption-ready I jbtiggs @eo.casaade.mt.us comprehensive plan policies and proposed amendments to local regulations • pTotal°Cost: . 1 which would enable military,compatibility in long-range planning. tILUS,-$174;940, Project Relevance: 1LU$'fmplementatron-$1'87,631, ‘, • Updated comprehensive plan policies for military compatibility r • Land use evaluation to determine compatibility with noise and safety Stafflllnvolved: zone.military operational footprint I ®r CelesteNerneli Project Manager • Zoning analysis to determine if uses with potential frequency spectrum 'III Mike Hrapla, DeputyiPM interference or structures that can impede spectrum usage fa' 'Riek4Rust;Gompatrbility'Leadi ' • In-depth analysis of alternative energy development in the area-local I :Bren Cox,.Planrnng,Lead regulatory-standards versus state and federal regulations., ill- ,Michele+Mora, Planner G 1 a NWSSB Joint Land Use Study I Matrix Design Group Page 4-7 a Matnxt:s i. 4.3 Other Relevant Projects The following pages provide an overview of the other relevant project experience that the Matrix Team will bring to the NWSSB JLUS. These correspond to the projects listed on Tables 3-1 and 3-2. I he five projects described earlier in this section are not repeated below. On the following pages, projects are color-uuJeJ by project type to assist I evievv, as fulluws. , JLUS/JLUS Implementation Projects Military Planning Projects Community Planning.Projects Compatibility Planning (JLUS) - - _ -Beale AFB JLLUS:(CA^), - — J „ _ -Located 40 miles north of Sacramento in Yuba County, Beale AFB is the home of the 9th Air Force Reconnaissance Wing. The 9th Wing uses U'-2 aircraft and ' . is scheduled to use the RQ 4A Global Hawk unmanned aircraft to provide high .altitude-reconnaissance. While the surrounding community does not presently impact operations at the 23,000-acre installation, recent population • r,• "�+ ; ,growth.in northern California may affect the installation in the future. The - r oveiarching.goal of the Beale AFB JLUS is to ensure that future public and ' r.& �fr9'r.*trw.• t.�. .I 'private development around Beale will be compatible with both the military �„ mission and the needs of the community. • .California Ativfsory Handbook For Co, UhityAnn Military°Compatibility, Planning ,(GA) • ;t The purposes of the Handbook are 1) to provide guidance to cities,counties, Y. t 'r„�y..ter'� ` , .. property owners, developers and the military to facilitate collaboration, and 2) . ,�€d � to provide menu of tools and strategies that help maintain compatibility � ":' r!° between community land uses and military activities.The Handbook presents AtuekK *� +. planning tools, best.practices and processes that allow local planners, builders, and the military to share information and communicate in a timely -4.fi �st"Y� .� and proactive way so all parties can make fully informed land use decisions. Page 4-8 NWSSB Joint Land Use Study I Matrix Design Group I Experience and References Camp BLillis )LUS (TX) m-7- ,` r. ■ Camp Bullis is a 27,993-acre Army training site located.just.north of San M1 1114"::•"' Antonio,Texas. Although the primary user of the installation is the U.S. Army, itrs also used by the Air Force, National Guard, and other agencies. Camp t5.. � .��� 5 2 _ _ -- ;, Bullis is the Army's premier training facility for combat medicine. Other types • It-- '• 4..�. - Of training activities that take place are small arms and large caliber live fire -tt _, be 'j;a! !exercises at 20 different ranges, night training with specialized night vision `',' 'r`F 4 '`I.r • S'F 'equipment, and air combat,drop zones. The major issues addressed in the #'» .0 - Camp Bullis JLUS include military noise impacts on surrounding communities, ,`,"� 7,71,, , }Iii '" .... tight and glare impacts on night training,threatened and endangered species, • ' V a ,fig 4C and safety associated with flight activity. :Camp ,Rilea ]LUS (0,,R0 , . Camp Rilea is located in Clatsop County at the northwest tip of Oregon. The �aAp r 4 • `l y,,: .Camp is operated by the Oregon National Guard as a training facility, and also • y ,�,xa hosts a radar control center for the Oregon Ai National Guard. The �, . � iS..$;t'i installation.offers a set of small arms firing ranges and grenade ranges. Camp - =sr.:- }AC' Rilea,also provides a mock"city" (called a MOUT site for Military Operations '• -'g-t 4 s. ' • qt,l in Urban Terrain)which is used by National Guard, active duty military units, 1 . y , ; • and local law enforcement agencies for urban training. Issues addressed in / - ^,' - this 1LUS,included encroachment of residential uses, impacts from noise, helicopter flights into the facility, and public access from local trails and the installations location along a public beach. tamp Roberts-hOS ,(,CM, 11-- -� l 'Matrix recently completedthisiLUS as acooperative planning effort between t " Camp Roberts and the surrounding jurisdictions of the City of El Paso de Robles and San Luis Obispo and Monterey Counties:The installation is a r --�^+ ,4 `: vvvvp�.c-f x strategic asset in the nation's defense and California's emergency response ,�..�_.. - d a capabilities. Camp Roberts hosts heavy and light maneuver training exercises is eff' y" by California,National Guard,Army, Army Reserve, Marine Corps, and Air ' .� e ,} .. - Force units, as.well as law enforcement agencies and other state and federal 1"' "' ' " - agencies. The goal of the JLUS is to ensure that both Camp Roberts and the surrounding civilian areas are compatible,taking into account the needs of the community and the military mission.The JLUS will ultimately identify mutually beneficial strategies for the military and local communities. NWSSB Joint Land) Use Study I Matrix Design Group Page 4-9 1 M ;atr 7 - , 5 1 . ;Carrfp,WWill la ms]LUS (IJTs) • Camp W.G.,Williams is located 26 miles south of Salt Lake City on the west w"-" ....v�.r slope of the Traverse Mountains.The site is a National Guard Training Site i_t ;; of operated by the Utah Army National Guard and offers terrain and n�: fe-Y�•�+' environments similar to those encountered by military forces today in r7T" r' 4;,,i,,. Operations Iraqi Freedom and.Enduring Freedom. Land uses within the Camp anti . T-` boundaries include small arms ranges,artillery firing points, and vehicle .»^ ^� -,7,41.;:,..7.t. maneuver:areas. Facilities inside the'Camp boundaries include a Utah '' -- �' a National Guard airfield used for aircraft operations, a heliport and other ` t °TJ: .,kZ •wry.-�. .rf?S't operational and industrialfacili ties. Training is specialized to include winter, desert, mountain,and amphibious training, primarily conducted within a 50- mile radius of the installation, . ° °Coluyribus AFB;'JLUS r(MSi) '='=i :v. Colurnbus.AEB was established in 1941 as the Air Corps Advanced Flying 4 , School, Columbus, MS and currently serves the 14th Flying Training Wing (14 _q r , FTW). Columbus AR's main mission is to conduct Specialized Undergraduate ,F f` " c-, .. Pilot Training(SUPT). Utilizing three parallel runways and 34,000 square miles + 7.. �J (do;ti F of airspace, Columbus AFB is one of the busiest training bases in the world. As i� I t I jni L f p I: a region with growing-economic development, the JLUS includes a r Y8 m . .1 r •compatibility review with a focus on issues potentially resultingfrom v, �' extensive Military Training Routes such as noise, light and glare, steam, �� transportation and infrastructure development in and around the base and auxiliary field. Del; Rlo;(Laugh'I nAFBIALUS,(TX)' Located within the Rio Grande River Valley Region of southwest Texas is the 1.�" 6.-vs:, b.' Cty of Del.Rio and Laughlin AFB.The air force base is the largest employer in to y'1 ,..;.1.4 Pt .3 t. e 4. the region,with over 1,700 civilian employees and 1,400 military personnel. ..-...;',...-1 _4/+„t :r„ ;� Laughlin,AFB is a premier Air Education and Training Command I(AETC) '�r i f s-,- � 'b1; installation and.provides unprecedented training to the U.S. and multi- ? ., i,vf..1 .-u national pilots This JLUS focused on several challenges within the current - - �`- ' environment, including military housing, development encroachment issues, transportation competition, and recreation preservation. Page 4-10 NWSSB Joint Land Use Study I Matrix Design Group I Experience and References'- - 4 ' .Ellsworth„AFBaLUS,(SD), �J r .._ .z�ac-yr;- ":r-.4.--.4-N,--- -....r „ , Ellsworth AFB, located outside Rapid City,South Dakota, is home to the 28th :40H-c---4, 4 •,4'i ” ,.,,'�`-.c. Bomb Wing, which.is one of only two B-16 bases in the world.The primary ._- -c '��,g� wi mission of the 28th Bomb Wing is to provide combat ready aircrews and B• *le :-.7..1: ?xy,,. ' ' aircraft for operations worldwide.The Wing also orovides support personnel >. �' dedicated to sustaining.those that live and work on the installation. This JLUS a t-( °+(m is a bit unique in that a previous 1LUS was completed in 1995 that had ' \'; .t.,!,....., . ',ca..I t; i �Z' that Matrix dperformed looked in'greater ndetail into the issues surrounding the base and its associated airspace that is vital to the 28th Bomb Wing's mission. ''Falrcl iId AFB•3LUS !(,WA) • • .Fairchild AFB,is located in Spokane County, Washington, less than 10 miles , west of the City of Spokane. It is an important asset to the local economy, • ,,,�j , ,, indirectly creating nearly 2,000 jobs with an economic impact of over$420 • ' )4S. r r � million annually.The three objectives accomplished by the Fairchild JLUS !till � fi+r \, included the identification of land use issues that could impact the operational utility of the base,development of actions that local communities • l}�A R "" r ii i.4' could use to reduce encroachment, and creation of an action plan that all ) $k 9-, , 4 I„...":71 „_.-"-r.,_ involved •entities could utilize to ensure compatible development between the .� _ --z Air Force and surrounding areas. fed.:,H,arrlson &LimestoanelHills LUS ,(;M1'•f-.1 ' - rs, t'ts d Fort William H. Harrison (Ft. Harrison) is located just west of the city limits of %.1::,i r�r im %,y,,- - . . Helena, the'capital city of Montana.The installation currently provides -;3. 'a -t r important maneuver areas, training facilities, small arms firing ranges, and -A-., ,.. 't %,,, 1 helicopter training and exercise for active and Reserve Component.personnel �, B``-- , from the Army, Air Force, Navy, and Marines. The associated Limestone Hills rjt= � .1-',7•''' '''',407:12--0°.:1..-..f...` ' Training Area (LHTA), located approximately 41 miles-southeast:of Ft. - 7,r- -- -- ; -f Harrison, includes the firing of tanks, Bradley Fighting Vehicles, mortars, ��• l+S_ c. l :, artillery, machine guns,aerial gunnery, small arms, explosive detonations, and w `, .t+` 1 small unit tactical operations.The primary concerns for compatibility includes _K , lT ,Tr , noise, helicopter overflight, future development potential, mineral rights and tr.,., mining claims on public lands, safety, and communication between the I: r;", _ s-. military and local communities. ru NWSSB Joint Land Use Study I Matrix Design Group Page -11 1 Matrix j 'Fort Ind iantown,Gap 1 ,14S (I'AA:), '-'7.-.141 l -_ - _ Fort Indiantown Gap (FTIG) is located in Annville amongst fertile farmland in .kci, ""V r�--�^-" ---- ,..r ,. Pennsylvania in historic Dutch county. FTIG is one of the busiest National `^,"""` �tyr,Yn "!' Guard training sites in the country, more than 100,000troo s each .7 ,k-_r_ ,— vt �.rr7Y g Y, g P I �'r4�eJ' .--ct"' ks ;e year The installation-serves as a pre-deployment training site for all branches + 3. of our military as they prepare for a variety of operating environments and Wf1.r r. eW.r '~tic preparing for our homeland defense mission. The installation now ' , , "r:'e . ;_-,.. :encompasses more than 17,000 acres of land,offering 140 training areas and L -" '"' facilities used by military forces, law enforcement agencies, and civilians alike. Due to the nearby growth of entertainment centers,such as casinos, light and safety are two of the 24 compatibility factors that are being evaluated during.. the JLUS process. Additional concerns include public access and safety, noise impacts to the community, installation security, and protection:of farmlands andnatural resources, among others. • 1 Greenly of Training Site JLUS (NE)f•• • w _ r " " ` .,, Greenlief Training Site provides unique and irreplaceable assets for both the "' .o ' s Nebraska National Guard and the nation's military. It has served as a training .s ,rj ju( r "y am site for the Nebraska Army National Guard since 1966.Greenlief Training Site t k�% I -Ar ' 2 is utilized for both annual and weekend training activities and serves as a . .: '' r. mobilization site for units being deployed. Greenlief Training Site also ,,w provides important economic,social, and security contributions to the local --- * 'y'.� 'communities. The Greenlief JLUS assessed the impacts of live fire training and .Y-+--.— „r "� =-,rte the,associated noise and other impacts on nearby communities;and rural and ?. ., ., I t• `. i i ". _ agricultural activities. ir Hampton Langl'ey1f5 JLUSt(VA")'. - , --,,-- Langley`AFB is home to the USAF Air Combat Command. It is located in close K s" . -y_' ,t,.t.'' \,"-. proximity to multiple jurisdictions, including the City of Hampton, the City of LL. 'r. \ -E b —�, Newport News,York County and the City of Poquoson. The major issues i �'1 _ , identified during this JLUS were noise from military aircraft, competition for• •. t ;• .-- ...s--:...; airspace, and.aircraft safety issues such as bird attractants and bird/aircraft i, "r''" F1`=,,....=: strike hazards (BASH). Since the majority of the land around Langley AFB is -nh'-•.- ' .. ., already developed, some with incompatible uses to military operations, this JLUS focused significantly on how to manage current issues, as well as provide steps to mitigate future concerns that could bring up new issues,such as vertical obstruction. Three military influence areas (MIAs)were developed during this JLUS process, which correspond to Safety/BASH, Noise, and Vertical Obstruction. Page 4]2 NWSSB Joint Land Use Study i Matrix Design Group Experience and References • 4 ;Ion TL_US (ID) .�- The Idaho JLUS is unique among other Joint Land Use Studies because it containstwodistinct study areas. One 120,000-acre study areatencompasses ' - Mountain Home Air Force Base(MHAFB) and Mountain Home Range Complex (MHRC). The other study area includes Gowen Field and Orchard Training t:. ' Area operated by the Idaho National Guard. Each study area has its own `« ms' " c - compatibility issues,stakeholders and military activities. The L:4 It , recommendations in the final study cater to each type of military use and ;-`,,;..; '.,,.y t3 how compatibility can best be managed by the entities involved. . ,7)3Sep.ga ndoipl AFB1J LOS: (lix),_ The Matrix Tearnisideveloping-the Joint Land Use Study(JLUS)for Randolph AFB TX that includes three distinct study areas: Randolph AFB, Seguin ' °yi6r_ - �`" +�° -� ' :Auxiliary.Airfield,:and Stinson Airfield. Randolph AFB is located in northeastern Bexar County,characterized by two runways and various a":� :_support facilities and buildings. The flying training mission provides the Air • ° , Force pilots and instructors with Fundamental Fighter skills. Increased `5'+c `sz:c+S *. :development •In northeastern Bexar County and western Guadalupe County in -17C'' ` recent years has crowded the boundaries of the base in ways that can ) _ z potentially adversely impact the base's mission. As a result,theidesignated safety zones associated with the airfields have represented a challenge for municipalities to maintain effective compatibility planning while balancing the needs of'the community. Other issues that will be included in this 1LUS include noise and infrastructure extensions that encourage development in and near,safety zones. NAPE PC:Jet-Aro 'i LUS,(CA), . f `` NAF El Centro is situated within the Imperial Valley of southern California in ����, Imperial County andproximateto the Cities of El Centro and Imperial. In addition to the installation, the El Centro JLUS covers over 54,0d0 acres of ^— • y ranges and 213,000 acres of restricted airspace used to conduct various . training and testing exercises. While encroachment issues have:been limited -1.''°` ■ in the past, continued growth in the Imperial Valley has pressedlthe need for a 'v_ F` y comprehensive look at compatibility issues. The El Centro JLUS is a proactive �—=h " ., 'T step incompatibility,planning. Issues assessed in this JLUS include noise, safety, use of airspace, and the compatible growth of alternative energy in the region. NWSSB Joint Land Use Study I Matrix Design Group Page 4-13 ,_.. .. ---^-.+--�-'-.— te. . -W-.�-.z.....-�.,•Matrix z • . NAS King - 'g v . • , t .--La, U The primary mission of NA5 Kingsville is to train tactical jet pilots for the Navy �,Uj 4„ and Marine Corps. NAS Kingsville is primarily surrounded by agricultural uses -= c- today; however,the installation faces compatibility challenges associated with " future development potential. These include: determining the potential ' , ,..=-..- .,s,),:,,,,,,=•° . mission expansion for NAS Kingsville; determining growth pressures, potential fr ' '2* rill., shortages of housing within the surrounding communities, and evaluating the cif`ar V Si'.�M" , impacts associated with alternative energy proposals(wind farms). Naval,Base,G'uam f-SS (Guam); . 4 , -7 :Asa territory of the U.S., Guam has been identified to host a significant - t• . component of U.S. armed forces for the region. Acting as the primary i a.> H+Y rte,' consultant on the Government of Guam's Advisory Consultant Team,The Matrix Team is creating the Compatibility/Sustainability Study,(CSS)which is 'R''`t ' 1.5' essentially identical to a JLUS conducted in the Continental United States. The a r .-'di" - study associated with this base includes current operations as well as the u. N ,. = t\ ' impact of the military build-up due to the relocation of troops from Okinawa. ' A--ice ' + In addition to land use and airspace issues, the study is examining the s yr . . placement of munitions and missile launch facilities associated with the Air `:r'�y -'.' ' ` * -i.. Missile Defense Task Force(AMDTF) proposed to be located on Guam.The °• ..1 scope of this JLUS effort encompasses all elements of the Marine, Air Force, and Army relocation as it relates to land use and compatibility for the island of Guam. NSA PaaGlEy / By County JL 5. tfp)' ,m I'°-F ' _ -r% The Bay County JLUS is different from many other JLUSs because it focuses on r water issues, as opposed to land or airspace. Naval Air Station (NAS) Panama 3.51/. .'_ it. , ,.✓�• City is the Navy's premier location for dive and littoral warfare training.This is '; .cY'� < due to open water training areas with beach contours and water depths that■ #r e e replicate over 80 percent of the world's littoral regions.Three of the major "t encroachment identified through the JLUS process were w - -,t competition for sea space, competition for frequency spectrum used for d ice ' -4*.,i � ." training and communication purposes, and interagency coordination among 'r /.A.. *i . entities involved with the area. Page 4-34 NWSSB Joint Land Use Study I Matrix.Design Group i Experience.and,R'eferences+ { .1 .NSF DahlgremJLUS (VAS), I A-ft'• '" __ NSF Dahlgren is located 25 miles east of Fredericksburg,Virginia and 53 miles t '' �} south of Washington, DC. NSF Dahlgren consists of 4,300 acres located on the 1,7 rte :;� °y V- N; Potomac River in King George County.The base supports eight major Joint `4- :- nt: �.; — Navy and other DOD commands that account for a wide range of operational — `1•� L "`� `— i military support missions, including research, development, test and •s 2 -5\31 evaluation (RDT&E)of weapon systems: Active ranges on NSF Dahlgren are —' ?Kt& ` .,,;Aka . used to test and evaluate weapons systems and ordnance.The JLUS study area encompasses the areas surrounding the military installation that are influenced by military operations and includes the counties of King George and Westmoreland in Virginia;the Town of Colonial Beach,Virginia; the counties of Charles and St. Mary's in Maryland; and, the NSF Dahlgren and Pumpkin Neck Annex. �Offutt AF6 JL�US'((^NE)' 4 • _ _ , - r r,„r- :h . - Offutt,AF81s the headquarters of the US Strategic Command and the Air Force Weather Agency, and home to the 55th Wing of the Air Combat;Command. ' .. The 55th Wing is the largest wing in the Air Combat Command and the second . ' x_ s largest wing in the Air Force. It operates on four continents and';:supports ,er - -�-*' r=.=`:�. . eight diverse flying missions, including intelligence, surveillance and n t . `5, ' reconnaissance; electronic attack; and command and control. The Offutt AFB p^M _ '---as..?Na .. . - 1LUSiincluded the coordination of multiple municipalities in the states of yea *r ,a �. �„r � Nebraska and lowa,and addressed issues associated with aircraft and their `' +t �: �' :k:.3x operations on nearby communities. 'I 'R25O8AIrspae Co �'ple :3 tall (GA II`'” , ' Restricted Area Airspace Complex(R-2508) includes approximately 20,000 1, :f' square miles of airspace in the upper Mojave Desert Region, as well as the 1 ' . :� `t x, . . . installations and ranges of Naval Air Weapons Station (NAWS) China Lake, Edwards.Air Force Base, and the National Training Center at Fort Irwin. The 1 ' �y 1, focus of the final.JLUS is to ensure that land use decisions are logical and . i sF pith,;e'f.; consistent. To achieve that, the JLUS preparation process included all t v "t,'< n .. stakeholders that regulate or influence military operations and future r<i/+ i '�1 development within the R 2508 Complex area.The size of the study area � � 1itl "'y,"�t� ,,, brought with it additional challenges associated with reaching consensus W A - amonga multitude of stakeholders. Edwards AFB and NAWS China Lake flight operations have potential impacts.on a large and urbanizing area. For NAWS China Lake, maintaining safe approach/ departure corridors was a concern. J NWSSB Joint Land Use Study I Matrix Design Group Page 4-15 1 Maui°,, _ Sh°eppard AFB JLUS ,(T)(), Sheppard AFB, TX encompasses approximately 5,719 acres of land and is ,• , . situated along prominent travel corridors such as the Interstate e4 corridor ..i s.�- ` that-enables access to its nearest major cities of Dallas, TX, and Oklahoma 42- .� g t~t_° City Sheppard AR is home to the Air Force's largest technical training wing in g�_ _ ^ i-te-r` ' ' me—CIA' ,,t ~ s ^•' and the worlds only internationally manned and managed flying training r ', .jE t program, The Base has four runways,one of which is used by the City of ' `!�"�' a • — Wichita Falls Municipal Airport and supports commercial and general aviation -- r.:+t-• -.— .--. activities. Sheppard AFB manages and operates an auxiliary airfield in Frederick, OK. This.JLUSfocused on airspace, including military training routes,transportation issues relative to proximate development around the base,and the growth of the alternative energy development industry relative to the airspace. JLUS Implementation Programs "Camp Bulht,3 Lt § Impleiientation Program (TXO 4 %"f"' .4' As the lead planning process for six other sector plans in the City of San t' 3 4.-4 Antonio, the North Sector Plan will guide compatible land use in the northern 1 a ,yl� `._' ' '%A... - portion of the City and its area of extraterritorial jurisdiction. The Plan will also + .'.rt,? ~ ` 4' provide the tools to implement the Camp Bullis JLUS, that, when approved by• , , --_:`.• .._�_ • the,Cif ,.T� y,-will promote compatible use.These tools include the development of _': "—`'� - - - �: recommendations for BASH and JAZB programs, compatible development•• guidel'ines, and rotary wing safety zones to protect existing and"',future mission S ' potential at Camp Bullis. Iaamp,`Wilhlams:JLUS I!mplemer tatlonPro_gram04. _ i - Building on Matrix's successful development of the Camp Williams JLUS,the yyi,., J,Jr'})y JLUS Implementation program is being conducted for Eagle Mounty City, UT �7 '74 x and its partners to implement the JLUS compatibility recommendations. The s ca. ✓ rf; i•� J JLUS Implementation includes a technical review of community general plans +' t,� ,afrk' \. and related policies, localland use regulations and design standards, and ' T n1 current and projected..growth patterns. As part of this process,'the i e boundaries of proposed compatibility areas are being reevaluated ,,�,y�,.,�^a may �,¢ geographic A P p V g 1 .E:- itA. . f'.�_-_ 1- and along with the development and refinement of potential regulatory and policy tools. Potential solutions being considered include revlsionsto general land use plans:and regulations, real estate disclosure and notifications, and other electronic tools that can he easily integrated into participating community's,planning processes and communication protocols; Page 4 46 NWSSB.Joint Land Use Study l Matrix Design Group I • . ' Experience and References 4 n LBS-'''Latkland)LUS"Implementation {TX) - t �t Located in the Bexar County,JBSA-Lackland's primary role is as a Training , ,;; ta':"e Wing. TRW The installation provides military training (BMT) as well as • , - ay djt P (TRW) P y g ( ) "�` , `m+"% r technical training.to prepare airmen for their initial roles in the Air Force 1', 1a"t•y.,r,—r'. Municipal growth has created light management issues that affect the Military .- i.,.. Working Dog Campus as well as the Training Annex where the Basic - ". • 1. ° Expeditionary Airman Skills Training(BEAST) and the Laclkland Small Arms " ° _q - ,, Firing Range are located. Without careful study and planning, continued growth in these areas will only worsen an already challenging situation.The Artificial Night Sky Brightness Over focus of this effort is the development of a comprehensive Ambient Light Lockland.AFB Pollution Assessment Report that assessed night training sensitivity areas and activities, measuring existing ambient lighting in order to create-a baseline for future evaluations, and proposing changes to local jurisdiction lighting requirements to reduce impacts on training and protect public safety. NAS Kingsville:JLUS'4inplemerita`tion Program.,(TX)i • The Kingsville JLUS.Implementation Program was the result of passage of the Ar :c, ..-1.,, Kingsville JLUS. Once a JLUS is approved, the next step is to identify ways to '•t.3t .,.- t flz_z L %M h.:. enact the recommendations in the JLUS document.The Kingsville JLUS ) •E, Implementation Program entailed working with local jurisdictions and / • ,, .j ,,, •, stakeholders to update planning documents to include actions and regulations I - a '.. } '•wer j3a that help reduce or control encroachment and compatibility issues between . ,*` : r the local communities and military operations. • ;Halm t;om AFB JLUS Im pile mentatlon = . fRed/Yellow%Green Mapping I(MT1): ; ' I - „,e; The Malmstrom AFB Red/Yellow/Green project is an implementation effort of ` \ le',. e the Malmstrom AFB JLUS,which was completed in 2012. The mapping effort -'? _ was based on a "Stoplight Strategy', meaning that areas denoted as green t j- ,a-fit° t , ("go'`) is an area where the Air Force has no concerns with potential impacts • `^'� '' '” ri,. of new development due to frequency, vertical obstructions, or manmade i, ''�•�'...,,.. ` x. structures,.yellow("caution') is an area the Air Force has indicated for � } i '`'+ ! " potential conflicts with the mission, depending on the specifics of the j „g0f, +:. r.' proposed development, and red ("stop") is an area where the Air Force has sa4 .1- •`t . "X 1...t..N —eb- indicated a high potential for conflicts with its mission, depending on the •t '^�ti-Sa_ ' specifics of the development project. Through stakeholder discussions, P'~Jrcp w uO turOQM4t{¢.y ruNe FR 'fQR er analysis of Air Force missions, and the relationship of the lands to the .oor .,tetnCCtGUr lr w,n�OCM r e_...11 �.-;..;... potential for-mission impacts, a red/yellow/green map was developed to '..,_ show-areas of varying levels potential concern. The second p'nase of this - project was to update Cascade County's Growth Policy Plan to incorporate the red/yellow/green mapping and conditions into the policy document. NWSSB Joint Land Use Study I Matrix Design Group Page 4-17 Matnxv Vi-Cdurity Small Area Studies;% JLUSJinplementation (FL) To limit encroachment generated by both military and civilian uses,the Eglin T/ Joint Land Use Study (JLUS)was prepared in 2009.A key recommendation of I ri C 0 V.,f'ty { the JLUS'identified the preparation of the Tri-County Small Area Studies (SAS). r ` -The-SAS will Sr irilr>._ E ��S UC�i..! focus within the Military Influence Area Ill (NAPA Ill)designated ;. area,Which includes the low level approach and cruise missile corridors as "," I well as the defined 0.5 to 1.0mile buffer area within portions of Santa Rosa, ,.: `Walton-and Okaloosa counties on the northern side of the Eglin Reservation. v „iy ' ' The SAS will evaluate compatible land uses and prepare specific policy and �� regulatory recommendations that respond to Eglin AFB and Hurlburt Field mission activities, range activities, and beddown of the 7th Special Forces - from Fort Bragg.The specific tools (i.e., new/amended comprehensive plans policies, zoning regulations and guidelines, etc.) will be prepared to protect the public's health, safety, and welfare;.recognize private land owners' current property rights; and maintain the continued viability of existing and future mission activities on Eglin. Page-4-18 NWSSB Joint Land Use Study I Matrix Design.Group ' • ,Experience and References; .'' 4 Military Planni'ngj �Military;Planning _�� • The Matrix planning staff proposed for this project has extensive experience lc•"° -�•-� in the preparation of plans and design documents for all US military services. • - From-installation-master plans to 1391 requirements packages,,Matrix has - been a,partner in improving the operational capabilities and quality of life on ti y �v Y installations nationwide. =.,`. Planning work has included: Fort Campbell_Airfield Joint Use Feasibility • Installation Master Plans Study • Real Property Master Plan • Basic Facility Requirements • Design Guidelines ,: e • Area Development Plans ' .,, ^ +✓ • Requirements Documents (1391) 4,. -1•-• n • Air Installations Compatible Use Zones (AICUZ)Studies �1 ��t;,_____ ""tip' • yi 4 77.. t .44*-r Florence Military Reserve Installation Design Guide J NWSSB Joint Land Use Study I Matrix Design Group Page 7,-19 i ' 1.,na?-rf ,n..r '. ; "•ter "717f—r— - - f r,.';r �',y , '_i r , Matrix ` ` r .. . Commuiiity Planning 4�ommunit +Planmin n Y� � t .�9 .. .. 1 The.Matrix planning staff proposed for this project has extensive experience in • /-. the preparation of plans for jurisdictions of all sizes. From rural counties to large �is1ct metropolitan areas, the Matrix staff has worked on a range of local planning tools, including: - I20. 11,•-. . Comprehensive Plans r, ;-,_ __---- -'- • Specific Plans./ Master Plans LAjN;D us EWs Ft, 2., Cl R cu�L.A.UG • Growth Management Plans gyp, ,D'. A r, E, u Zoning and Development Codes City of San Luis Obispo General Plan • Subdivision Planning and FIR • Building Code Updates • Real Estate Disclosure • Urban Design Guidelines - . • Housing Studies y�1 �, Transportation Studies -: �`,_'-,; For two communities, the City of Oxnard (Naval Base Ventura County) and the 7:watle€r.�ti, City of Ridgecrest(NAWS China Lake), our planners developed comprehensive 1r`--a' , plan elements that addressed compatibility planning directly. For other � � jurisdictions, our planners have-worked with local communities to modify zoning and building codes to enhance compatibility.This extensive experience adds City of Casa Grande Downtown value and depth to our professional experience and our knowledge and skills in Revitalization Plan managing encroachment concerns. Page 4-20 NWSSB Joint Land Use Study I Matrix Design Group ' b'- �. _• ;;,. Al ' �I' Matrix p 5 � d r °M OM GROUP .Pµ` , . N. • Fee-Schedule As requested in the City's RFP,Table-5-1 presents'the rate schedule that will be used in the performance of this contract. These rates are reflected in thereost estimate provided (see Section 6 and our separate, sealed cost estimate). Any additional requested services shall be provided on a time and material basis per the contracted labor rate and fee schedule represented on Table 5-1 and further defined in this section. Additional services that extend beyond the effective term of this agreement may be subject to a maximum rate increase of four percent per year. Table 54. Rate Schedule • °Staff Member, ^ CelesteWerder,AICP $226 Rick Rust, AICP,.GISP $192 Mike Hrapla $226 Patrick Small,AICP $125 ' Bren Ccx, AICP $85 Michele Mora $85 Roberta Schlicher, PE $192 Chris Martin i $85 Assistant Planner $75 Graphic Support $72 Word Processing'&Administrative Support $65 Rotes effective for effective project term in 2016/2017, Mileage costs for the project will be charged at$0.54/mile. Expected direct costs associated with the performance of this contract are detailed in our sealed cost-estimate. All direct costs will be charged at the cost incurred with no mark- up. Reproduction costs are shown on Table 5-2. Table 5-2.. ;Reproduction Rate Schedule Staff Membe4 .' s _ sr U nibCost Letter, Color $0.50 Letter, Black&White $0.15 Tabloid, Color $1.00 Tabs(set of 5) $5.00 Large Format Maps (D=Size) $15.00 Covers(front back) _ $5.00 Binding $2.00 CD/ DVD $1.00 Rotes effective for effective-project term in 2016/2017. N WSSB Joint Land Use Study Matrix Design Group Page 5-1 "t } �/ k� n I f� f��� �"y �'u v t o R � ,F�'6r � .e � ' � k�• F'd p �J m+ � �,...'P ••• .. v d�� Section!6 and ourseparate, sealed cost estimate provides a detailed cost estimate for the project by person using the rate schedules shown on Tables 5-1 and 5-2. Page 5-2 NWSSB Joint Land Use Study F Matrix Design Group 4 \ mss, 4-"L: _ ,l• . .n ` ..yew„ �. ,. f .� J,�.. N ' ale ,, Matrihnila to V.., * ` r",424:7.. ..r+� �. f ^O[514N 4gOVf f T rV di • 'r �.• • ��. • Cost'Estimate, , 6.1 Proposed Cost Matrix understands that this is a firm, fixed-price contract based on the scope of work outlined in the City's Request for Proposals(RFP)and detailed in Section•2 of this proposal. The cost estimate proposed for the project shows hours and costs for each person by task and a breakdown of direct costs by task. As requested in the RFP, the actual cost estimate is provided in a separate, sealed envelope included with our proposal package. The Matrix Team welcomes the opportunity to refine our schedule, scope of work, and resulting costs based on the needs of the City of Seal Beach and its JLUS partners. 6.2 Cost Control Matrix will perforr •the JLUS project on time,and within the firm-fixed price budget which includes all direct and indirect costs. Over the course of all of our JI.US projects, budget changes have only occurred due to the addition of tasks to the scope of services at the client's request and this has only occurred on a few projects. The majority of our projects finish within the budgets provided and agreed upon at the start of the JLUS process. With experience in.conducting 40 JLUS projects, our budgets are not as much estimates as a reflection of our knowledge of what it takes to develop an outstanding project. 6.3 Commitment and Policies to Meet the Project Budget and Schedule Matrix is committed to the assuranceof high quality deliverables and to meeting or exceeding our client's expectations. To ensure,quality deliverables and client satisfaction on this project, the Project Manager and Deputy Project Manage provide clear guidance on expectations to all staff working on the project prior to starting work on a task. During development of the JLUS, they also perform routine reviews of progress to ensure that products are on target and will be-completedper the agreed upon schedule. Any anomalies in the project progress are quickly identified and rectified.. Our project management setup:is based on client responsiveness. Both Celeste Werner (Project Manager) and Rick Rust (Deputy Project.Manager) will be intimately engaged in the project and up-to-date on progress at all times. They will ensure,that the City of Seal Beach and the JLUS partners are up-to-date on project progress and will have timely access to our team. During the project, both Celeste Werner and Rick Rust will be available to support any request from City staff, with Celeste Werner being the primary point of contact for this project. NWSSB Joint Land Use Study Matrix Design Group Page 6-1 ]tx y H. 'S� � �r i Y a' eat' • a � ' atria .......... � 4 • rod, 4 f S Please see the next page. Page 6-2 NWSSB Joint Land Use Study Matrix Design Group TASK 2 TASKe3 - Matrix _ _ till DESIGNGROUP e71' • v . C' V C '“i 2 Table 6-1: w `v o mr T o a�,. , w - ''° : • NWSSB JLUS e1 C".a 'era'{10 ,-1'1:",:e1 W �NdO C ',N...'''' G I-IA� N c e s 0.2't e s :€1" 0 11,p u . u d Hay'.. a .�� s e ] �v Cost Estimate x a m a S > - `m,:E E ....3 ,12,, m. o)c$ tr Xm _! y s o. ar! -OD 12 t:1 o a 'p aE II m j' :a = N' a m:.. . 1',E; .xi t• .o q: ry .r ).0; f! o, T ` .o a -,7,.:„-},._ o n b o :a46 0 25 • +o 'o m o; _�n.3.a _ an a Q _ ._,,7,16:_dv ,. yr UI F-.W.s_ .a-u.._ F�_ ' =V-tt --�_. :vv_.. Celeste Werner,Project Manager 12 32 120 20 8 :24 24 16 256 $ 226 $ :$7,856 Rick Rust,Deputy Project Manager 12 32 120 40 16 -40 40 16 316 $ 192 $ 60,672 Mike Hrapla,Military Advisor . 40 20 12 24 6 102 $ 226 $'- 23;052 Bren Cox,Senior Planner 4 54 40 60 8 80 80 40 366 $ 85 $ 31,110 1 Patrick Small, Senior Planner 16 24 24 40 16 120 $ 125 $ 15,000 Michele Mora,Senior Planner 16 24 24 60 16 140 $ 85 $ 11,900 Assistant Planner 24 160 100 120 24 428 $ 75 $ 32,100 Roberta Schlicher(Env,Coastal Engineering) 16 6 16 4 42 $ 192 $ 8,064 Chris Martin,GIS Analyst 8 36 80 40 40 8 212 $ 85 $ 18,020 Graphics Support 8 16 16 2 16 6 64 $ 72 $ 4,608. Word Processing&Admin Support 4 16 16 32 32 16 116 $ 65 $ 7,540 Total Hours 32 142 416 448 114 350 492 168 2162 Total Labor Costs $ 5,616 $ 19,582 $ 70,632 $ 48,224 $ 12,504 $ 39,708 $ 54,132 $ 19,524 $ 269,922 Total Direct Costs $ 475 $ 13,850 $ 2,402 $ 1,722 $ 18,449 Total Task Cost $ 6,091 $ 19,582 $ 84,482 $ 48,224 $ 12,504 $ 39,708 $ 56,534 $ 21,246 Percent of Total Budget- 2% 7% 29% 17% 4% 14% 20% 7% 100% • TOTAL BUDGET I $ 288,371 Notes: This is a firm,fixed-price,not to exceed budget. The distribution of costs between subtasksis an estimate and may vary some in execution,but will not change the total cost estimated All committee and public meetings are accounted for under Subtask 1.3, Kick-off meeting with staff in under Subtask 1.1. NWSSB JLUS 1 Matrix Design Group Cost Estimate(Sealed Bid) Page 1 • atria 1 .�: DESIGN GRO'UP I"S. Table'6-1: NWSSBJLUS Cost Estimate Direct Expenses e yHask/ Numberof" 'Carr Hotel perorem t . _ Ala Travel/;Trips' _ .Subtask Events :Airfare, (per day)t , (perday) . ' (perday) "' Noof People:` No Jails . Total Kick-Off Meeting 1.1 1 $200.00 $75.00 2 1 $ 475.00 Data Collection Trip 1.3 1 $200.00 $150.00 $150.00 $64.00 4 5 $ 5,830.00 Meetings(PC,TC,Public) 1.3 3 $200.00 $75.00 $150.00 $64.00 2 2 $ 4,218.00 Meetings PC&TC 1:3 2 $200.00 $75.00 $150.00 $64.00 2 2 $ 2,812.00 Subtotal-Travel $ 13,335.00 + . . . '., .,. . '• Tabs .. . Reproduction >_ __.::. Nttmbeis._ Pages'„.,, Cost/page -g- � x - -,' ,.,_. ,...Rmtlm�� ,_ .q of CDs ,Covers (set of S) � Total.,. '� Fact Sheet 1,JLUS Overview 1.3 100 . 4 $0.50 $ 200.00 Fact Sheet 2,Tools 1.3 100 4 $0.50 $ 200.00 Fact Sheet 3,Project Overview 1.3 100 4 $0.50 $ 200.00 Workshop Maps(Public#1) 1.3 6 1 $15.00 $ 90.00 Workshop Maps(Public#2) 1.3 20 1 $15.00 $ 300.00 Draft Background Report 4.1 20 150 $0.50 $2.00 1 $5.00 $5.00 $ 1,701.00 Draft JLUS 4.1 20 60 $0.50 $2.00 1 $5.00 $ 701.00 Final Background Report 4.2 20 $ 20.00 Final JLUS 4.2 20 60 $0.50 $2.00 1 55.00 $ 70100 Executive Summary Brochure 4.2 100 16 $0 50 1 $ 801.00 Project Overview 4.2 100 4 $0.50 $ 200.00 'Subtotal-Reproduction $ 5,114.00 TOTAL DIRECT EXPENSES $ 18,449.00 Travel 'Reproduction Sutitask 1.1 $ 475.00 $ - Subtaskl.2 $ - $ - Subtask1.3 $ 12,860.00 $ 990.00 Subtask2.1 $ - $ - Subtask2.2 $ - $ - Task 3 $ - $ - Subtask 4.1 $ - $ 2,402.00 Subtask 4.2 $ - $ 1,722.00 $ 13,335.00 $ 5,114.00 NWSSB JLUS..Matrix Design Group Cost Estimate(Sealed Bid) . Page 2