HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem JSEA/_ 9F
�.k 9
AGENDA STAFF REPORT (V r s
, IFORN�P' /
DATE: January 23, 2017
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Jim Basham, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: EXTENSION OF INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 1662
AMENDING REGULATIONS FOR ACCESSORY DWELLING
UNITS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES IN THE CITY TO COMPLY
WITH NEW STATE LEGISLATION (ZONE TEXT
AMENDMENT NO. 16 -2)
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
That the City Council hold a public hearing and adopt the extension of Urgency
Ordinance No. 1662, amending regulations applicable to accessory dwelling units in
residential zones in the City to comply with new state legislation, for a 10 month and 15
day period to allow further review of the impacts of the new legislation on the City.
BACKGROUND:
On December 12, 2016, the City Council adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 1662, a 45-
day interim ordinance amending the Municipal Code to establish temporary zoning
regulations applicable to accessory dwelling units in residential zones, to comply with
new legislation including Assembly Bill 2299 (AB 2299) and Senate Bill (SB 1069). A
copy of Urgency Ordinance No. 1662 is enclosed with this staff report as Attachment B.
As previously outlined in the December 12, 2016 staff report, this new state legislation
was written with the intent to increase the housing supply in California by facilitating the
creation of new second dwelling units, by further limiting the ability of local jurisdictions
to regulate second dwelling units (now described as "accessory dwelling units" or
"ADUs "). Under AB 2299 and SB 1069, cities were required to adopt an ordinance that
complies with the new restrictions by January 1, 2017, or would be required to approve
all accessory dwelling units that meet certain very minimal state criteria.
ANALYSIS:
Urgency Ordinance No. 1662 includes interim regulations intended to update the
existing zoning provisions to ensure consistency with the limitations that have been
imposed on cities by the new legislation. Absent any additional action, Urgency
Ordinance No. 1662 will expire after 45 days, or on January 26, 2017. A duly noticed
public hearing will be held on January 23, 2017 before the City Council for consideration
Agenda Item J
of an extension of the urgency ordinance for an additional 10 months and 15 days
(through and including December 11, 2017).
Government Code Section 65858(d) states "Ten days prior to the expiration of that
interim ordinance or any extension, the legislative body shall issue a written report
describing the measures taken to alleviate the condition which led to the adoption of the
ordinance." This "ten -day" report was provided to the City Council on January 9, 2017.
Issuance of the "ten -day" report allows the City Council to hold a public hearing and
consider an extension to the moratorium at its January 23, 2017 meeting.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:
There is no environmental impact related to this item. Pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act ( "CEQA "), the Planning Department has determined that the
proposed amendments to accessory dwelling unit regulations is exempt from the
requirements of CEQA and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to CEQA Guidelines
Section 15282(h) which exempts the adoption of an ordinance regarding second units in
a single - family or multi - family residential zone.
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
The City Attorney has reviewed the attached ordinance and has approved as to form.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
There is no financial impact associated with this item.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council hold a public hearing and adopt the extension of Urgency
Ordinance No. 1662, amending regulations applicable to accessory dwelling units in
residential zones in the City to comply with new state legislation, for a 10 month and 15
day period to allow further review of the impacts of the new legislation on the City.
SFPMITTEP BY: NOTED AND APPROVED:
Jim Bas am Jill R. ram, City Mana er
9 9
Director f Community - Development,
Interim Director of Public Works
Attachments:
A. Urgency Ordinance No. 1662
Page 2
Attachment "A"
URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 1662
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH
APPROVING A 10 -MONTH 15 -DAY EXTENSION TO
DECEMBER 11, 2017 OF THE EXISTING INTERIM URGENCY
ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 11 OF THE SEAL BEACH
MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING ACCESSORY DWELLING
UNITS AND RELATED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND
DECLARING THE URGENCY AND IMMEDIATE
EFFECTIVENESS THEREOF PURSUANT TO SEAL BEACH
CITY CHARTER SECTION 412 AND GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 65858 (ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT 16 -2)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Prior Ordinance. On December 12, 2016, the City Council of the
City of Seal Beach ( "City ") adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 1662, a 45 -day interim
ordinance amending the Seal Beach Municipal Code to establish temporary zoning
regulations applicable to accessory dwelling units in residential zones, to comply with
new legislation including Assembly Bill 2299 (AB 2299) and Senate Bill (SB 1069). That
interim ordinance is scheduled to expire on January 26, 2017.
SECTION 2. Public Report. On January 9, 2017, the City Council approved
and provided for public review a report, effective January 16, 2017, regarding the status
of the steps taken by the City to evaluate and alleviate the conditions which led the City
to adopt Ordinance No. 1662, pursuant to Government Code Section 65858 0(d), which
report is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.
SECTION 3. Public Hearing. On January 23, 2017, the City Council held a duly
noticed public hearing regarding the proposed extension of Ordinance No. 1662 and the
temporary zoning regulations contained therein, and after taking all written and oral
testimony, closed the public hearing.
SECTION 4. Urgency Findings. The City Council makes the following findings
in connection with the adoption of this Ordinance extending the term of Ordinance No.
1662 and the interim zoning regulations contained therein:
(a) Effective January 1, 2017, Assembly Bill 2299 ( "AB 2299 ") and Senate Bill
1069 ( "SB 1069 ") amend Government Code Section 65852.2 to further limit the
standards cities may impose on second units (now termed "accessory dwelling units ").
(b) As amended, Government Code Section 65852.2 requires that the City's
zoning provisions regarding accessory dwelling units incorporate State - mandated
standards for certain types of accessory dwelling units.
(c) In addition, Government Code Section 65852.2, as amended, allows the
City to establish certain objective standards related to parking, height, setback, lot
1
coverage, landscaping, and certain architectural requirements, which must be applied
ministerially except where a property owner is seeking an exception to such standards.
(d) In the absence of a State - compliant Accessory Dwelling Unit ordinance on
January 1, 2017, the City's existing second unit standards may be considered null and
void pursuant to Government Code Section 65852.2(a)(4) and the City would be
required to approve any accessory dwelling unit meeting minimal state criteria.
(e) Lots in the RHD -20 District located in Old Town, cannot accommodate
accessory dwelling units because this zoning district contains substandard lots,
insufficient setbacks between neighboring lots, and is characterized by a lack of both
adequate on- street and off - street parking for existing primary dwelling units.
Government Code Section 65852.2, as amended, eliminates in some instances, off -
street parking requirements for accessory dwelling units and consequently would further
negatively impact the ability of property owners in Old Town to provide sufficient off -
street parking for the primary residence on -site, and would also result in increased
public safety impacts, in particularly those related to fire, traffic and access. Allowing
accessory dwelling units in Old Town would preclude the City from being able to provide
adequate fire protection services to residents of the subject site, as well as nearby
property owners, resulting from severely restricted access to the primary residence or to
detached accessory dwelling units from the public street. In addition, elimination of off -
street parking requirements for certain accessory dwelling units will increase a zoning
district already characterized by a severe shortage of on- street public parking for
residents within those zoning districts, particularly those who require their own vehicles
for transportation to jobs and for medical treatment. Section 65852.2, as amended,
provides that off street parking for accessory dwelling units shall be permitted in setback
areas in locations determined by the City or through tandem parking, unless specific
findings are made that parking in setback areas or tandem parking is not feasible based
on specific site or regional topographical or fire and life safety conditions. The lots in
other zoning districts are insufficient in size to allow parking in rear, side or front yard
setbacks, due to the parking requirements for the primary dwelling unit and restricted
driveway length and width, and limited distance between neighboring lots. Allowing
parking in rear, side and front yard setbacks in the City's other zoning districts is not
feasible, due to fire and other life safety concerns. The addition of accessory dwelling
units and the corresponding need for additional parking and /or relocation of existing
parking for the primary dwelling unit would result in restricted ingress and egress
between the public street and the primary dwelling unit and accessory dwelling unit, and
therefore setback parking is not allowed. The provisions set forth in this urgency
ordinance balance the requirements of Government Code Section 65852.2 with the
unique topographic, traffic, parking and fire issues characteristics of properties and
zoning districts within the City.
(f) The immediate preservation of the public health, safety and welfare
requires that the temporary zoning regulations previously enacted pursuant to
Ordinance No. 1662, remain in place pending development of permanent regulations,
so that during this interim period the City remains able to protect residents and
businesses from adverse fire and other public safety impacts resulting if accessory
2
dwelling units were otherwise allowed in these zoning districts areas and sites where
there is insufficient parking, setbacks and access. Therefore, this Ordinance is
necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety and welfare
and its urgency is hereby declared.
(g) During the 45 -day term of Ordinance No. 1662, City staff has begun a
review of the new legislation, its impact on the City's zoning provisions and the
experience of other cities with accessory dwelling units. The City's actions include an
evaluation of a technical assistance memorandum issued by the California Department
of Housing and Community Development ( "HCD ") and HUD webinar regarding
implementation of the new legislation, which provides the only state guidelines currently
available to cities to assist in the development and evaluation of accessory dwelling unit
ordinances pursuant to AB 2299 and SB 1069. The HUD memorandum addresses
matters including requirements with respect to minimum and maximum sizes of
accessory dwelling units, off - street parking, and other potential development standards
in light of the statutory purposes establishing accessory dwelling units as an essential
component of the state's housing supply. The City's research, review and analysis is
not yet complete, and the City Council finds that additional time is necessary for the City
to analyze the HUD memorandum and any other State - issued guidance and study the
potential land use, public services, public safety, parking, traffic and infrastructure
effects of allowing accessory dwelling units to be built on lots in the various areas of the
City. The Planning Commission and City Council require a reasonable period of time to
evaluate and establish the most appropriate permanent regulations for accessory
dwelling units, and sufficient time is also necessary to allow the residents an opportunity
to participate in the public hearing process for development of the updated regulations.
Unless the City extends the interim urgency ordinance, the City would be required to
either approve accessory dwelling units in locations and under standards that may have
severe negative impacts on the surrounding community or adopt permanent standards
without the benefit of an inquiry and study on the appropriate locations and standards
for accessory dwelling units in the City and in particular areas. In light of the need to
allow staff to complete its evaluation of options and to provide the City Council with a
long -term solution to issues, the City Council finds that while contemplated zoning and
permitting proposals are still being considered, there is a current and immediate threat
to public health, safety or welfare, and that a such, an additional extension of the interim
ordinance is necessary.
SECTION 5. CEOA Findings. The City Council hereby determines that this
Urgency Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act ( "CEQA ")
pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.17 and Title 14, Chapter 3, Section
15282(h) of the California Code of Regulations.
SECTION 6. Urgency Ordinance No. 1662 Extended to December 11, 2017.
Ordinance No. 1662 and the temporary zoning regulations enacted thereby will expire
and terminate on January 26, 2017 unless further extended on or before that date.
Therefore, Urgency Ordinance No. 1662 is hereby extended pursuant to Government
Code Section 65858 for 10 months and 15 days, through and including December 11,
2017, unless extended by the City Council at a regularly noticed public hearing pursuant
k7
to California Government Code Section 65858. After notice pursuant to Government
Code Section 65090 and public hearing, the City Council may approve a further
extension for up to an additional 12 months, if necessary. During the extended term of
the interim ordinance, all accessory dwelling units shall comply with any and all zoning
regulations set forth in Ordinance No. 1662.
SECTION 7. Effective Date; Term. This Ordinance is adopted as an urgency
ordinance for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety within
the meaning of Section 412 of the City Charter and Government Code Section 65858,
and therefore shall be passed immediately upon its introduction and shall become
effective immediately upon its adoption by a minimum 4/5 vote of the City Council. This
Ordinance shall expire on December 11, 2017, unless extended by the City Council at a
regularly noticed public hearing, pursuant to California Government Code Section
65858.
SECTION 8. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph,
sentence, clause or phrase of this Urgency Ordinance or any part thereof is for any
reason held to be invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portions of this Urgency Ordinance or any part hereof. The City Council of the City of
Seal Beach hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection,
subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that
any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or
phrases be declared invalid.
SECTION 9. Savings Clause. Neither the adoption of this Urgency Ordinance
nor the repeal or amendment by this Urgency Ordinance of any ordinance or part or
portion of any ordinance previously in effect in the City or within the territory comprising
the City, shall in any manner affect the prosecution for the violation of any ordinance,
which violation was committed prior to the effective date of this Urgency Ordinance, nor
be construed as a waiver of any license, fee or penalty or the penal provisions
applicable to any violation of such ordinances.
SECTION 10. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage
and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be
published and posted in the manner required by law.
4
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Seal
Beach at a meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of January, 2017.
ATTEST:
City Clerk, Robin L. Roberts
STATE OF CALIFORNIA }
COUNTY OF ORANGE } SS
CITY OF SEAL BEACH }
Mayor, Sandra Massa -Lavitt
APPROVED AS TO FORM
City Attorney, Craig Steele
I, Robin L. Roberts, City Clerk of the City of Seal Beach, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Urgency Ordinance was passed, approved and adopted by the City
Council at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of January, 2017 by the following vote:
AYES: Council Members
NOES: Council Members
ABSENT: Council Members
ABSTAIN: Council Members
and do hereby further certify that Urgency Ordinance Number 1662 has been published
pursuant to the Seal Beach City Charter and Resolution Number 2836.
City Clerk, Robin L. Roberts
5