HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Res 4671 1998-12-14
RESOLUTION NUMBER 4' 1/
I
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH ADOPTING
NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 98-3,
RELATING TO GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT 98-2 AND ZONE CHANGE 98-
2, IN TIlE CITY OF SEAL BEACH,
CALIFORNIA (ANAHEIM BAY VILLAS)
TIlE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE:
Section 1. D. Bartlett Associates, on behalf of Ellen Musso, Et AI.
("Applicant") has submitted revised applications for a general plan amendment and zone
change for the Anaheim Bay Villas project proposed for property located at 321 Seal
Beach Boulevard, the City of Seal Beach. The Applicant has submitted the
aforementioned revised applications to allow the construction of eight (8) single family
detached residences on three parcels having twenty-six, foot frontages, three parcels
having twenty-nine foot frontages, and two parcels having thirty foot frontages.
I
Section 2. Pursuant to 14 Calif. Code of Regs. ~ 15025(a) and ~~ II.C
and III of the City's Local CEQA Guidelines, staff prepared an Initial Study and a
Negative Declaration, which was circulated for public review and comment from August
27, 1998 to September 17, 1998, in compliance with the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act and the City's Local CEQA Guidelines. The Negative
Declaration was reviewed by the Planning Commission at a public hearing held on
September 23, 1998 in relation to the original land use proposal and again on November
18, 1998 in relation to the revised land use proposal. The Negative Declaration was
reviewed by the City Council at a public hearing held on December 14, 1998 in relation
to the revised land use proposal.
Section 3. A duly noticed public hearing was held before the Planning
Commission on November 18, 1998 to consider the revised applications. At the public
hearing, the Planning Commission invited and considered any and all ,testimony offered
in favor or opposition to said revised applications.
Section 4. A duly noticed public hearing was held before the City
Council on December 14, 1998 to consider the revised applications. At the public
hearing, the City Council invited and considered any and all testimony offered in favor or
opposition to said revised applications.
Section 5. The record of the hearings before the Planning Commission
and City Council indicates the following:
I
(a) On June 25, 1998, D. Bartlett Associates, on behalf of Ellen
Musso, et ai, submitted general plan and zone change applications for 0.53 acres located
generally at 321 Seal Beach Boulevard.
(b) The subject property is comprised of nine (9) parcels, upon which
the applicant is proposing to construct eight (8) detached single family residences,
requiring a future subdivision of the subject property, on three parcels having twenty-six
foot frontages, three parcels having twenty-nine foot frontages, and two parcels having
thirty foot frontages.
Resolution NUmber~1'1
(c) The subject property is legally described as Lots 11, 13,15, 17, 19,
21,23,25, and 27 in Block 217 of Tract No. 10 as shown on a map thereof recorded in
Book 9 Page 10 of Miscellaneous Maps and Records of Orange County, California
(d) The surrounding land uses and zoning are as follows:
NORTH: Mini MartlBait Shop, at the southwest comer of
Pacific Coast Highway and Seal Reach Boulevard, C-2, General Commercial.
I
SOUTH: Single Family Residence on lot of approximately
2,587 sq. ft., C-2, General Commercial.
WEST:
Single Family Residential, RMD, Medium Density
Residential
EAST: Anaheim Bay and the Naval Weapons Center in the
Public Land UselRecreation (pLU/R) zone.
(e) Staff has prepared an Initial Study and proposed Negative
Declaration as required by the California Environmental Quality Act. Staff has received
three comment letters, with the County of Orange requesting the preparation of a "Water
Quality Management Plan". City staff is recommending inclusion of the preparation of
this plan as a condition of approval of any future subdivision requests filed for the subject
property. The other commenting agencies, the Southern California Association of
Governments and Caltrans District 12, expressed no concern with the proposal.
(t) No new information was brought forward at the public hearing
with regard to potential environmental impacts from the revised project that was not
addressed in the Initial Study, or addressed by the additional condition of approval
regarding the preparation ofa "Water Quality Management Plan".
I
Section 6. The City Council affirms that it independently reviewed
Negative Declaration No. 98-3 prior to acting on the applications and hereby finds as
follows:
(a) Negative Declaration No. 98-3 was prepared by staff and therefore
reflects the independent judgement of the City of Seal Beach; and
(b) There is no substantial evidence in the record, which would
support a fair argument that approval of the applications, with required mitigation
measures, might have a significant environmental impact.
Section 7. Based on the foregoing Sections 1 through 6, the City
Council hereby adopts Negative Declaration 98-3 in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED~e City coun~ City o~
Beach at a meeting thereof held on the A _ day of J..I L~
1998, by the following vote: .
AYES: Council members
1
NOES: Councilmembers
ABSENT: Council members
VACANCY: Councilmembers
Resolution Number~
'fJalJi~~~
Patricia E. Campbell
Mayor Pro- Tem
I
A~:7
~ I~"dffJ; ~
City eierk
U
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE
CITY OF SEAL BEACH
}
}
}
SS
I, Joanne M. Yea, City Clerk of Seal Beach, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing
resolution is the original copy of Resolution Number / ~ 7/ on file in the office of
the City Clerk, passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of e City of Seal Beach,
at a ~ ~ereof held on the i! day of
I .1998.
I
1
. ......_. _. I ~__I_""'II_..
(2015.5 C.C.P.) j~"',/
Resolution Number Jr~/J
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
County of Orange-.-_
I am a citizen of the United States
and a resident of the county afore-
said; I am over the age of eighteen
years, and not a party to or inter-
ested in the above-entitled matter.
1 am the principal clerk of the printer
of the SEAL BEACH SUN,.a
newspaper of general circulation,
printed. and published weekly in the
City of Seal Beach, County of
Orange and which newspaper !1as
Been adjudged a newspaper of
general circulation by the Superior
Court of the County of Orange, State
of California, under the date of
2/24/75. Case Number A82583; that
the notice of which the annexed is a
printed copy (set in type not smaller
\han nonpareil), has been published
in each regular. and entire issue of
said newspaper and not in any
supplement thereof on the following
dates, to-wit:
~ /tJ,I?f7/
all in the year 1998.
I certify (or declare) under penalty of
perjury that the foregoing is true and
correct.
Dated at Seal BeacQ, CA,
this/ ~ day of~~ ,~998.
~
. Si ture
PU3U::;ATION PR CESSED BY:
THE SUN NE\'/SPAPERS
216 ~,'2in Street
Seal.Beach, CA 90740
(562) 430-7555' (714) 759-7726
II..... ,,:):-'''""....''''' I'" ..........llw ...."''''........,
Clerk's Filing Stamp
ff'l k~'V \ .
l)Lft 1,J ~~ /7 ~ ~: 'l t--
Proof of Publication of
..........i..."...............................
I
.......;.......................................
---
PUBUC HEARING NOTICE
NOncE IS HEREBY GIVEN 'hot the CIIy
Council of the City of Seat Beach will hotel
I Public Heerlng on MondlY Declmber
. 14, 1198, .. 7:0Cf p.m, In the ~Ity Council
Ctiembera, 211 Eighth Street seel Beach,
Cerffomle, to con..'" the following nem:
GENERAl PLAN AMENDMENT 98-2
ZONE CHANGE 98-2
321 Seal Buch_
. Aequeet: To rm.nchlhe General Plan and
zOl1lng from General Commercial (C.2) 10
Medium DenSIty R8Sldenbal (RMD) 10 permit
the future Conslrucllon of elghl (8) single
famIly homes on parcels rangll1g In Width
from 25 feet 10 30 flel Three lols .re
proposed W11h . 25.1o?i wide Irantage, and
Ihe frve re~ lots are proposed to be 30-
feetll1W1Cfth
Envlronmenta. AlvJew: ThiS pro,ecl II
proposed Ie be granted . Mdlgate Negative
Dedarallon
Codl Sectlone: 28-700, 28-1400, 28-2500
- 28-2502, 28-2600
Appflclllt: D. &.Den end AIsocIaIes
Own...: EIen G. Musso, EI. AI.
AI. the above tme and D1ace 8H Inlerel!ded
persons may be heard If 10 dHlred H you
chall.. the proposed 8CbOns In court, you
may be limited to rBlSlng only thosa ....es
you or someone else rilsed at Ihe public
heanng desalbed In Ihls nobel, or in wrIlIen
~ dellve18d to l1e CIty of Seal
BeacI'i.., or prIOr to, the publIC hilling
DATEDThls3OlhdllyolNCMlmber,1988
Lee Whlllenbe!1l. DVocIor" "
DeveIopment-~
~ lithe Se8J Buch Sun 1:/110198.
I
I