HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Res 4729 1999-08-23
RESOLUTION No.11:Z9
I
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH AMENDING THE
LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL
PLAN (LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT
98-1, BIXBY OLD RANCH TOWNE CENTER
DEVELOPMENT PLAN)
THE CITY COUNCil.. OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH DOES HEREBY
FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE:
Section 1. After a duly noticed public hearing the Planning Commission
recommended denial of General Plan Amendment 98-1. On November 23, 1998, after
conducting duly noticed public hearings, the City of Seal Beach adopted City Council
Resolution No. 4660, certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report and adopting a
statement of overriding considerations for the Old Ranch Towne Center project.
Thereafter, the Council adopted Resolution No. 4661, amending Land Use Element of the
General Plan as more particularly set forth in Section 7, below. On August 3, 1999, the
Orange County Superior Court issued a writ in the matter of City of Los Alamitos, et al.
v. City of Seal Beach ordering the City to vacate Resolution No. 4660 and any approvals
relying on the Final ElR. On August 16, 1999, the City Council adopted Resolution 4726,
vacating Resolution No. 4660 and any approvals relying on the Final ElR, subject to and
pending further Court order.
I
Section 2. Pursuant to 14 Calif. Code of Regs. G 15025(a) and U n.c and ill
of the City's Local CEQA Guidelines, staff prepared an Initial Study and a Draft
Environmental Impact Report (DEIR), to study the environmental impacts arising from the
proposed Bixby Old Ranch Towne Center Development Plan and related General Plan
amendments, including this amendment. The DEIR was circulated for public review and
comment from April 15, 1998 to May 29, 1998, in compliance with the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's Local CEQA Guidelines.
Upon completion of the public review period, a Final Environmental Impact Report was
reviewed by the Planning Commission at a public hearing held on September 9, October
21, and November 4, 1998. After the public hearing, the Planning Commission found,
through the adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. 98-37 that the Bixby Old
Ranch Towne Center Development Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (ElR) is
adequate under CEQA. After considering the Final EIR and public testimony thereto at a
public hearing on November 9 and November 17, 1998, the City Council adopted City
Council Resolution No. 4660, certifying the Final EIR and adopting a statement of
overriding considerations. On August 23, 1999, the City Council conducted a public
hearing to consider revisions to the EIR and a statement of overriding considerations
pursuant to the August 3, 1999 writ issued by the Orange County Superior Court. The
approval of this resolution is within the scope of the project analyzed in the Final ElR, as
revised, and City Council Resolution No. 4728 is hereby incorporated by this reference.
I
Section 3. The City Council held properly noticed public hearings regarding
Resolution No. 4661 on November 9 and November 17, 1998. The City Council held
another public hearing on August 23, 1999 to reconsider adopting this Resolution pursuant
to the August 3 writ issued by the Orange County Superior Court
Section 4.
Based upon the foregoing, the City Council hereby finds, inter alia:
(a) Based upon substantial evidence in the record of the City Council
hearings regarding the application, and in the environmental documentation prepared in
c:\My Docum_IRESOlLancl U,. AmOlldmenl9B-1 (Bixby~CCR.R..AdopLd""
ILWIOB-23-
Resolution NUmber~~~
conjunction with this project, and pursuant to n 28-2600 and 28-2602 of the City's
Code, the City Council hereby finds that General Plan Amendment 98-1 (Land Use
Element) will be beneficial to the short term and long term land use goals of the City of
Seal Beach. The City Council further finds that General Plan Amendment 98-1 (Land
Use Element) will promote the public health, safety and welfare. Therefore, the City
Council finds that General Plan Amendment 98-1 will be in the public interest, and
makes the following findings of fact:
(b) General Plan Amendment 98-1 (Land Use Element) will conform I
land uses to those set forth within the General Plan for the subject area, and provide a
comprehensive development which accomplishes the following goals of the City in
achieving sustainable development on the subject property:
1. Preserves the existing golf course.
2. Dedicates the Old Ranch Tennis Club to the City for
recreational purposes.
3. Creates a comprehensive development program for under-
utilized and vacant properties.
4. Permits development that does not interfere with the
operational capabilities of the Los Alamitos Armed Forces Reserve Center.
5. Provides development that is at least fiscal1y neutral and,
more likely, fiscally beneficial to the City.
6. Adequately mitigates project-related traffic and noise
impacts.
7. Responds to concerns from the unincorporated community
of Rossmoor regarding noise, light and glare, and "cut-through traffic" impacts by
prohibiting any development south of St. Cloud Drive and limiting exiting movements
from the retail shopping center at St. Cloud Drive to right and left turn movements only.
Exiting the shopping center across Seal Beach Boulevard at St. Cloud Drive into the
Rossmoor community will be physically prohibited.
(c) The project will allow for a reasonable range of land uses on the I
subject property, recognizing the various site constraints discussed in the E1R, with the
provision of various land uses to address the identified objectives of the City.
(d) The Bixby Old Ranch Towne Center Development Plan and the
necessary zoning changes will not be detrimental to the short term or long term goals or
objectives of the City of Seal Beach and are in the interest of the public health, safety and
welfare. The general plan amendments set forth herein achieves consistent with the
General Plan, as amended concurrently with this approval.
(e) The establishment of a Bixby Old Ranch Towne Center Concept
Plan zoning overlay will ensure that the project will be developed over time consistent
with the plans approved by the City Council.
Section S. Applicant seeks to establish the following uses as part of the Bixby
Old Ranch Towne Center Development Plan:
I
Resolution Number~j1~j1
PROPOSED PROJECT LAND USES
A
26.045
acres
I
B
13.567
acres
C
157.29
acres
D
15.649
acres
I
E
6.735
acres
TOTAL
219.286
acres
otd Ranch Towne Center
(includes commercial/retail uses and
restaurant uses, includes a 10,000 square
foot outdoor garden center)
Otd Ranch Business Hote~ Restaurant
and Senior Care Facilities
. Hotel
. Restaurants (2)
. Senior Assisted Living Facility
. Senior Alzheimer's Care Facility
. Senior Skilled Nursing Facility
. Greenbelt
Recontiguration of Bixby Old Ranch
Golf Course and provision of a
PubliclPrivate Driving Range (including
sod fann)
Bixby Village
. singte family homes
. 2.5 acre community park
· Community Police Facility
286,967 square feet
maximum building area
104 rooms
15,000 square feet total
90 units
25 beds
45 beds
5.0 acres
157.29 acres
75SFH
2.5 acres
0.1 6 acres
Old Ranch Tennis club 6.735 acres
(dedication of existing tennis club to the
City for public recreation purposes and its
conversion to public use)
(a) The subject area is comprised of eight (8) parcels, comprising a
total of approximately 219.286 acres. Presented below is a summary of current General
Plan and Zoning land use designations for the proposed Bixby Old Ranch Towne Center
Plan area, as revised by the City Council:
I
Resolution NUmber~
EXISTING AND PROPOSED
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONJNG DESIGNATIONS
Q-P, Quasi-Public, R-G, Recreation! 203.01 acres 196.31 acres 157.290 acres I
Gotf Course Golf
RMD, Residential RMD, Residential None None 12.99 acres
Medium Densit Medium Densit
CoG General C-2, General 15.3 acres 22.0 acres 34.612 acres
,
Commercial Commercial
PLU, Public Land Use PLU, Public Land 0.0 acres 0.0 acres 14.495 acres
Use
Total 218.31 acres 218.31 acres 219.286 acres
(b) If the Bixby Old Ranch Towne Center Development Plan is
adopted by the City Council, the Land Use Element, among other elements of the
General Plan, will need to be amended as proposed herein so that the Bixby Old Ranch
Towne Center Development Plan and the General Plan are consistent. In that the Bixby
Old Ranch Towne Center Development Plan provides zoning restrictions for the project
area, zoning would likewise be consistent with the General Plan.
Section 6. Based upon substantial evidence in the record of the hearing, I
including the facts stated in ~ 5 of this resolution, and in the environmental documentation
prepared in conjunction with this project as reflected in Table I, and pursuant to ~~ 28-
2600 and 28-2602 of the City's Code, the City Council hereby finds:
(a) The proposed Gentiral Plan Amendments will conform land uses to
those set forth within the Land Use Element for the subject area and provides a
comprehensive development which accomplishes the following goals of the City in
achieving sustainable development on the subject property:
l.
2.
recreational purposes.
3. Creates a comprehensive development program for under-
utilized and vacant properties.
4. Permits development that does not interfere with the
operational capabilities of the Los Alamitos Armed Forces Reserve Center.
5. Provides development that is at least fiscally neutral and,
more likely, fiscally beneficial to the City.
6. Adequately mitigates project-related traffic and noise
Preserves the existing golf course.
Dedicates the Old Ranch Tennis Club to the City for
impacts.
7. Responds to concerns from the unincorporated community I
of Rossmoor regarding noise, light and glare, and "cut-through traffic" impacts by
prohibiting any development south of St. Cloud Drive and limiting exiting movements
from the retail shopping center at St. Cloud Drive to right and left turn movements only.
Exiting the shopping center across Seal Beach Boulevard at St. Cloud Drive into the
Rossmoor community will be physically prohibited.
(b) The project will allow for a reasonable range of land uses on the
subject property, recognizing the various site constraints discussed in the ElK as revised,
with the provision of various land uses to address the identified objectives of the City.
Resolution Numbe~
(c) The Bixby Old Ranch Towne Center Plan, and the necessary
General Plan Amendments will not be detrimental to the short term or long term goals or
objectives of the City of Seal Beach and are in the interest of the public health, safety and
welfare. The amendments are consistent with the General Plan, as amended.
I
(d) Pursuant to Section 15168 of the CEQA Guidelines, a revised EIR
has been prepared and has been certified by the City Council. This amendment is within
the scope of the certified EIR, which adequately describes the general environmental
setting of the project, its significant impacts, and the alternatives, and mitigation measures
related to each significant environmental effect. No additional environmental
documentation is needed.
Section 7.
as follows:
Based on the foregoing, the Land Use Element is'hereby amended
1. Page 12 of the Land Use Element is revised to read as follows:
U5. COlLEGE PARK EAST PLANNING DlSTRlcr
5.1 Qty Parks
~
There is a lack of City park space in this district. What land use decisions
can be made to help rectify this situation?
Potential:
I
Due to the lack of available vacant land for park space, the only apparent
solution is to apply conscientious design methods to the present parks IIIItI
te the "1ePJ lilftited illeIII1t IMtI a"Jllilllille f1leather Liutlp~811 site) to create
desirable and usable park space. The dedication to the City of the Bixby
Old Ranch Tennis Club property for a recreation facility provides an
additional 6.74--acre recreational facility within this neighborhood. In
addition, the provision of an additional 2.S-acre neighborhood park in
coqjunction with the Bixby Village development exceeds the park
standards of the City.
$.2
l~ (7.85 ae~ JHII~l 8/ ItmtlltJealfil 811 ~ if1~, atljaee;lll6
tlte gtJ!f &jll,r3e.
l:iiJlt:t.
'.\!flat I&nd use a1temMi-tes are a"..ltilllllle fer thi3 pareel8f Illlld?
!'aleMn1:
I
Thi3 issue hu generated eenaitlemhle tlisetl9sisft in tile e8fftftumity as te a
pessible land use fer the pareel. The land use jl639illiltt1es Me either a Ci~
park, a kf;, density residential lise, a meditlfR den3ity resideHtialase, sr a
high density resitlentialuse. The 1ft8st feasible a1temtltF.'e ftJIpeltI'S te be a
IIItllIiltIft dellsity residentiBlde"Jelepment.
5.2HNoise generated by the Los Alomitos Nmwl .iir St8IitHt Anned
Forces Resetn Center and the San Diego Freeway.
~
Resolution Number~
What can be done to minimize the noise impact on adjacent lands?
Potential:
The resolution of the noise generated by the air stftIiell Armed
Forces Reserve Center rests with the lieeisiell' reaehed 611 the
future IIMl future operational cbaracteristirs of the Los Alamitos
tltr.al Air Slt\li8ft Armed Forces Reserve Center: Refer to the
Noise Flement for further discussion regarding noise impacts of
the Los Alamitos Armed Forces Reserve Center.
I
Specific design solutions such as extremely high cement block
fences elIft have aided in lowering the noise level perceived by the
residents adjacent to the San Diego Freeway. The StlIte Di.isiell ef
IIigh'NIlY' is i119li11lillg these at ether l6ettliell' ill Eetllherfl Califefllill te
all8te lleiMl. "
2. Page 15-16 of the Land Use Element is revised to read as follows:
"LAND USE TABLE
The following table depicts the existing and proposed land use acreage for
each land use category in the General Plan.
Proposed!
Designation DevelQ1led Undevelooed IQtl!!
Residential
Low 670.6 0.0 670.6
Medium 6S2.5 639.S 0.0 652.5~ I
High 161.0 0.0 161.0
Commerr.1S1J
Limited
Commercial 2.3 0.0 2.3
Professional
Office 0.0 0.0 0.0
Service 55.8 0.0 55.8
General 162.5 ~ 0.3 -l8:Q 162.8~
Industrial
Light 126.2 0.0 126.2
Oil Extraction 28.2 0.0 28.2
Ouasi-Public
Golf Course 264.8 :HM 0.0 264.8 :HM
Wetlands 32.8 0.0 32.8
~ I
City Parks 81.4~ 7.0 88.4~
City Schools 13.4 0.0 13.4
Flood Basin 34.7 0.0 34.7
Beaches 52.0 0.0 52.0
Police Station 1.5 0.0 1.5
Fire Stations 1.0 0.0 1.0
Civic Center 0.6 0.0 0.6
City Yard 3.0 0.0 3.0
P.E. R!W 8.2 0.0 8.2
Towne Center Greenbelt 12.4 0.0 12.4
I
I
I
Resolution Number~
lAND USE TABLE (Continued)
Designation
Proposed!
Devel~ UndevelQped .IUllI!
5.000.0 ..QJL 5.000.0
7,364.5 7.3 7,371.8"
Militaly
TOTAL:
3.
Pages 18 and 19 of the Land Use Element are revised to read as follows:
"3. MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS
(Minimum lot area of 2500 square feet per dwelling unit).
(Minimum lot area of 250 square feet per dwelling unit in District 1 south
of Pacific Coast Highway).
The medium density classification allows for a number of housing types;
single family housing in clusters, town house (i.e., a group of dwellings
with common walls), two family housing arrangements on single lots, and
other similar fonns of multiple family housing.
Existine Medium Density Rp.~idential
There are four five existing medium density areas in the City: Leisure
World, Stlbltl'llia, Bridgeport, the Old Ranch Condominiums, and the
residential neighborhood located in Old Town between the Coast
Highway, the Pacific Electric Right-of-Way, Seal Beach Boulevard, and
Twelfth Street. With the exception of the Old Town neighborhood,
!J'these residential neighborhoods ef StlbtH'bia BlIlI LeiStlPe Werltl are very
stable areas that are not subject to change during the life span of the Land
Use Element. The medium density residential neighborhood in the Coastal
Area is less stable, experiencing some replacement of older residential
units with new residences, generally on a one for one replacement. ftt
the present ti:1fte a tfMs.ilien fr6lft foiPly Ie'll densities 18 higher resMlenlitll
lIenees. This transition is due mainly to the combination of rising land
costs, older structures, and a tremendously inviting beach environment.
Pro.posed Medium Density Residential
At present, there are fellf areas is one area of proposed new medium
density residential development and one area experiencing some private
rehabilitation within an established medium density neighborhood. The
area tIIItIer experiencing private rehabilitation is the neighborhood in Old
Town the CeaM81 ^_ betintlell by die Paeifie Ce8st lligh,;ay, 8e&1. Beaeh
Belll.t7.'ftfd, the Paeifie Eleelrie Right Bf Way, and Twelfth Skeet. This
area is proposed to remain as medium density with a minimum lot area of
2500 square feet per dwelling unit. This lot area will facilitate the
consolidation of lots so that a combination of one and a half lots will allow
a duplex or two-unit structure. A small portion of this residential
neighborhood is designated as high density (standards discussed in
following section), the frontage lots along Electric A venue and Twelfth
Street.
The proposed Bixby Village residential area north of the 26-acre Bixby
Old Ranch Towne Center commercial center wiD consist of a
maximum of 75 residential lots on approximately 13 acres of land.
ThIs residential neighborhood bas been designed to be compatible with
Resolution Number~
the a(ijoining "Rossmoor Highlands" community in the City of Los
AJamitos. "
4. Pages 26 and 27 of the Land Use Element are revised to read as follows:
M4. GENERAL COMMERCIAL LAND USE
4.1 Existing General Commercial Uses
There are several areas that are classified MGeneral Commercial",
according to the current City ordinances. These are primarily areas of
auto service stations, located on major arterials. The Rossmoor Center,
by current zoning classification is considered a general use, but in actual
use it is a mixture of general and service uses. Because of the great
number of general commercial uses, the Rossmoor Center area, should
remain as a general commercial classification. In 1999, the City
approved General Commercial zoning designations for a total of 34.6
acres north of the San Diego Freeway on Seal Beach Boulevard; 26
acres located generally across from the Rossmoor Center and 8.5
acres located at the comer of Lampson A venue and Seal Beach
Boulevard. These areas of commercial development will relate weD
to the existing general commercial uses of Rossmoor Center, and also
have excellent access from Seal Beach Boulevard.
I
4.2 ."rtJJ1Mt!fl Cenelyl1 C6illlft6""eial banti l:Jses
A IhiRl area is ell either Me ef Seal Beaeh Belllevllfll 8i.reetly atijaeellt area
lI6rth ef die San Diege Ffoee',vay. I. benefit 16 be deft't'e8 frem the
JK8P6Sl1! 811 the 'J/est Me ef Seal Beaeh Betllevard is that it 'lIi!l telld 16
bllffer the Ressmllllf lleighbeffieed9 fMm the liaise genefllted frem a
pefli.eR ef the SM Diegll FIee;;ay.
I
'The feHrth area IJf6pMetl fef geneftll e8lflffiereial tlse is tl1e -.1le8Ilt &fell
Ieeated 8i.reetly IleJ'8SS ff8ftl Res9meer Center. Thi9 area ean relate ,;elIte
the eltiMiftg geneflll. eeIftftlereittl lie Ressmeef Center, and IIbll have
exeellellt aeeess &em Seal Beaeh Beule>'IlfIl."
5. Page 30 of the Land Use Element is revised to read as follows:
Ml. PARKS AND OPEN SPACE
1.1 Existing Parks and Open Space
The principal recreation and open space area for the City is the beachfront.
Because the beachfront is more of a regional recreation attraction, it does
not serve the immediate park and open space needs for the northern portion
of the community. The Coastal Area and Marina Hill are well served by
both the excellent beachfront and the fairly natural and un-improved Gum
Grove Park. The College Park West neighborhood is served by Edison
Park which is approximately 26 acres. The College Park East
neighborhood hll5 elll} fellf smllll eltistillg p&rHs, reslllting ill a perk
defieieney is served by four neighborhood parks and recently acquired
6.74-acre TemWi Club facility dedicated to the City by the Bixby Ranch
Company. These facUities provide a total of 12.84 acres of
neighborhood and special use parks within the neighborhood. In
addition, Arbor Park, comprising 13 acres, serves this neighborhood in
addition to providing recreational opportunities to the entire
community. Lastly, a 2.S-acre neighborhood park has been provided
to serve the recreation needs or the 75 lot Bixby Village residential
development. ..
I
Resolution Numbe~
Staff is hereby directed to revise the Land Use Element accordingly.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Co'JPcil of the City of Seal
Beach at ~J thepeld on the d2.34.~ day of
tI."" , 1999, by the following vote:
I
AYES:
Councilmem
NOES: Councilmembers
ABSENT: Councilmembers
MA/r
I
STATE OF CAUFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE
CITY OF SEAL BEACH
}
}
}
SS
I, Joanne M. Yeo, City Clerk of Seal Beach, California, do hereby <:ertify that the
foregoing resolution is the original copy of Resolution Number 4"~[ on file in
the office 0 the City Clerk, passed, approved, and adopted by the Ci Council of the
City of h, at a meeting thereof held on the a2;S~ day
of , 1999.
I
Resolution Number~
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2015.5 C.C.P.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
County of Orange
'1 am a citizen of the United Slates
and a resident of the county afore-
said; I am over Ihe age of eighteen
years, and not a party to or inter-
ested in the above-entitled malter.
I am the principal clerk of the printer
of the SEAL BEACH SUN, a
newspaper of general circulation,
printed and published week Iv in the
Oity of Seal Beach, County of
~'prange and which newspaper has
;been adjudged a newspaper of
general circulation by the Superior
Court of the County of Orange, Stale
of California, under the date of
2/24/75. Case Number A82583; that
Ihe notice of which Ihe annexed is a
printed copy (set in Iype not smaller
Ihan nonpareil), has been published
in each regular and entire issue of
said newspaper and not in any
supplement thereof on the following
dates, la-wit:
A-1IC; c.J .('q- I rz.-
allm the year 1999.
I certify (or declare) under penalty of
perjury that the foregoing IS Irue and
correct
Dated at Seal Beach, CA,
Ihls~dayof rvG....JJ.1,1999.
~
A~
,
Signature
PUBLICATION PROCESSED I:3Y:
THE SUN NEWSPAPERS
216 Main Streel
Seal Beach, CA 90740
(562) 430-7555 . (949) 759-7726
This space is for the County
Clerk's Filing Stamp
Proof of Publication of I
NOTICE OF PUBUC HEARING - L Condillonal Use Permit 98-15 - .
Marriott seruor care factllty
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that In M Eucalyptul Tree Permit 99-' _
KCOrdance with the Augwt 3, 19lt8 Removal or 8UcatyplUS trees wrlh.
Writ of Mandat. I..ued by Ih. In Areas -A- and joB- (comm8laaJ
Orlng. County Superior Court. the development areas)
City Council 01 th. City 0' S..I . N V
Seach will hold. public hllrlng on . Bstlng Tentallve Tract Map No.
Monday, August 23, 1999 "':00 ~797 - 75-loll'8IJdenllal .ubdf.
p.m. In the City Council Chambera, n
211 Elghlh SIreel, Seal Beach,Cal- ,O.CondIllooalUsePermIl99-5_OI'I'_ I
Ifomla 10: pre"".e alcohol saJe. a. Sav-On
1 ConSIder RIMSIons 10 the Bocbv Old Drug
Ranch Towne Cenler Fln.rEIR Project Overview: The proposed
(SCH 97D9107n _ CeftfficBtIon of mixed-use ploaect consists of com-
e'R by City CouncJ1: Adoption 01 merelal, residential, recreational..
Slatemenl Of Overrldlng COnSIder. t InSblutlOnal, and open ~oee ....
allOnS. and as previOUSly approved the City
Councllm November 199 ,and as
2 Reconsider f described In the RevIsed EIR under
A. General Plan Amendment 98-1 _ . conStderallon as pert of this pubHc
Amendmenls to various elements _I hearing The EIR approval was
of the General Ptan to maintain con- challenged by several panle. and
S1stency between the General Plan -, the Crty has been Inllruded by the
and the approved project Court 10 S8! aSIde, vacate, and VOId
ResolutIOn No 4660 Bpploved on
1 land Use Element Amendment November 23. 1998. certlfymg the
2. Open SP8C8/Conser- FmaI EIR lor the proiect; the NObc:e
VallOnJFtecrea1ton Elemenl of Determination filed on Novem-
3 Bicycle Route Elemenl bar 24. 1998; and any and all
4 Hou~ Elemenl acllons of any body that rely In
5 CirculatIOn Element whole or In part on the ~ Ranch
8 NOise Element EIR, mcludlng Ihe Seal BeaCh P\an..
B. Zone Ch 98-1-Ao,_d._41 "'"g CommiSSion.
10 .zcnn~ap 10 maintain con.... The site Is approxfrn8tefy 218 Beret
tency betw8en the ZoImg Map and In Blze. The maJor Pl'Olect compo.
the General Plan nents are as follOWS: (11, 286,987
1 Tennis Club Sde _ General square toot retail shopp ng center
Commercial (C-2) to Public (Development Area .A1; (2) 104 I
l.8nd Use teI..W f'OOI11 holel. 15,000 square feet: of
~~ A___ "A" d "B- =- reslaUrants, 180.be(t semor 811111-
2 ...vyo:o...pmentl'\ltna an ed ItvIng 1BC111ty, 5 acrel greenbeh
-General Commercial (C-2) (Development Area -B1: (3) 157-
and Recreallon-Go" (R-G) to acre recontlgurad private golf
General Commercl8l (Co2) course and 8 pnvate/publtc drM~
3, Development Area.C" - Ben- range (Development Area "C1, (4)
eral Commeraal (C~ and 75-t01 d81BChed restden1lal subdM-
Recreabon-Golf (r:.-G 10 lion and 25 acre community park
_on Golf iR-G" (OBY8lopm.nl Area "D"l: and (5)
4. DeveIopmen1 Area - Gener- dedicatiOn of existing 8 '35 Bixby
~~~rR~b~ Resl~ ad Ranch Tennis C!,ub slt8 to Cdy
dential Medium Oenarly (RMO) (Development Area E1. '
Po 1 M N .7 '65 Cod. Seellons: Section 28-2600
C. Ten1ahv8 rce .p o. - _ Zone Changes
~ parce1lz&tlon of 13.67<<re corn- Sadlon 28-2503-2504 _ Condl-
,.,ercaal Slle lIonar Use Permits
o TenlabveTract Map No 15787- Sedlon 28-1803-Planned SlQn
parcellzatlon of 26 045-acre com- Program
merclal shoppmg center Sedlon 28-2317(4) _ Height
E. [)evetopment Agreement - Spec.. Vanaltons
In.. duties and responllbHlhel of Seclfon 28--2751-2170 - Devet-
CIIy and BIXby Ranch Company 10 opmenl AgraemenlS
""'""' prqBCI compIBI1on and com-
~C8 -WIth aR mdlgabol'l measures Section 70-4 - EucBfyptus Tree
Bnd condlllOl18 Parml.s
PI R 98 1 S IB 'Chapter 21 . Subdivisions
F SlIe an eVI8W - - I pan
review for 26.045-acre shopping Ap~lcan1: BIXbV Ranch Company
center development Kitchell Devefopmenl Company
G. Conditional Use Permit 98-18 _ Marriott SenlDl' LMng SeMces
dl'lve-Ihrounh Window and 24-hour Owner: B!Xby Ranch COmpany
operatton fOr proposed drug BIora !<ItcheD Oevelopment Company
within 26 045-BCle shoPpm9 cen- Marriott Senior Uvlng Services
ter Ai 1I1e above lime and place a111n1er-
H. conditional Use Perm1198-17 - ~~ersons may b_ heard.I' so
hOrn. center and ouIdoor gatden . If you chaRengethe proposed
center actIonS In court, you may be IImlled to
raising only thos8 ISSUes yDIJ or 10m.
I. SrI_ Plan Revtew 98-2 - freeway one else rBlsed 8tthe public hearing
IdenllflCBlIon sign. descrlbed In this notice. or In wntI8n
J Height Variation 98-5 - archftec. col18s~ndence delivered 10 the City
, . 1uraI fealu.... above 35-foot hllghl of Seal Beach ai, or pnor 10, the pub- I
i limit. . Ie heanng.
K. Planned 5)gn Program 98-1 _ DAlED1'ht891h day of August, 1999
overall shopping centBf' IIgn pro- .lOam_ M..Yeo, City ClerIC . ...
gram , , PubIIshlIdIri1hitSoJ!IlolK:Iis.j;Joijr-'
n".~ Ifll'r:,I!iJ'/