Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Res 4730 1999-08-23 RESOLUTION NO. ~ I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH AMENDING THE HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN (HOUSING ELEMENT AMENDMENT 98-1, BIXBY OLD RANCH TOWNE CENTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE: Section 1. After a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission recommended denial of General Plan Amendment 98-1. On November 23, 1998, after conducting duly noticed public hearings, the City of Seal Beach adopted City Council Resolution No. 4660, certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report and adopting a statement of overriding considerations for the Old Ranch Towne Center project. Thereafter, the Council adopted Resolution No. 4664, amending the Housing Element of the General Plan as more particularly set forth in Section 7, below. On August 3, 1999, the Orange County Superior Court issued a writ in the matter of City of Los Alamitos, et al. v. City of Seal Beach ordering the City to vacate Resolution No. 4660 and any approvals relying on the Final ElR. On August 16, 1999, the City Council adopted Resolution 4726, vacating Resolution No. 4660 and any approvals relying on the Final ElR, subject to and pending further Court order. I Section 2. Pursuant to 14 Calif. Code of Regs. ~ 15025(a) and ~~ n.c and ill of the City's Loca1 CEQA Guidelines, staff prepared an Initial Study and a Draft Environmental Impact Report (DElR), to study the environmental impacts arising from the proposed Bixby Old Ranch Towne Center Development Plan and related General Plan amendments, including this amendment. The DElR was circulated for public review and comment from April 15, 1998 to May 29, 1998, in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's Loca1 CEQA Guidelines. Upon completion of the public review period, a Final Environmental Impact Report was reviewed by the Planning Commission at a public hearing held on September 9, October 21, and November 4, 1998. After the public hearing, the Planning Commission found, through the adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. 98-37 that the Bixby Old Ranch Towne Center Development Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is adequate under CEQA. After considering the Final EIR and public testimony thereto at a public hearing on November 9 and November 17, 1998, the City Council adopted City Council Resolution No. 4660, certifying the Final ElR and adopting a statement of overriding considerations. On August 23, 1999, the City Council conducted a public hearing to consider revisions to the EIR and a statement of overriding considerations pursuant to the August 3, 1999 writ issued by the Orange County Superior Court. The approval of this resolution is within the scope of the project analyzed in the Final EIR, as revised, and City Council Resolution No. 4728 is hereby incorporated by this reference. I Section 3. The City Council held properly noticed public hearings regarding Resolution No. 4664 on November 9 and November 17, 1998. The City Council held another public .hearing on August 23, 1999 to reconsider adopting this Resolution pursuant to the August 3 writ issued by the Orange County Superior Court Section 4. Based upon the foregoing, the City Council hereby finds, inter alia: (a) Based upon substantial evidence in the record of the City Council hearings regarding the application, and ill thr environmental documentation prepared in Resolution Number~ conjunction with this project, and pursuant to ~~ 28-2600 and 28-2602 of the City's Code, the City Council hereby finds that General Plan Amendment 98-1 (Housing Element) will be beneficial to the short term and long term land use goals of the City of Seal Beach. The City Council further finds that General Plan Amendment 98-1 (Housing Element) will promote the public health, safety and welfare. Therefore, the City Council finds that General Plan Amendment 98-1 will be in the public interest, and makes the following findings of fact: (b) General Plan Amendment 98-1 (Housing Element) will conform I land uses to those set forth within the General Plan for the subject area, and provide a comprehensive development which accomplishes the following goals of the City in achieving sustainable development on the subject property: 1. Preserves the existing golf course. 2. Dedicates the Old Ranch Tennis Club to the City for recreational purposes. 3. Creates a comprehensive development program for under- utilized and vacant properties. 4. Permits development that does not interfere with the operational capabilities of the Los Alamitos Armed Forces Reserve Center. 5. Provides development that is at least fiscally neutral and, more likely, fiscally beneficial to the City. 6. Adequately mitigates project-related traffic and noise impacts. 7. Responds to concerns from the unincorporated community of Rossmoor regarding noise, light and glare, and "cut-through traffic" impacts by prohibiting any development south of St. Cloud Drive and limiting exiting movements from the retail shopping center at St. Cloud Drive to right and left turn movements only. Exiting the shopping center across Seal Beach Boulevard at St. Cloud Drive into the Rossmoor community will be physically prohibited. (c) The project will allow for a reasonable range of land uses on the I subject property, recognizing the various site constraints discussed in the EIR, with the provision of various land uses to address the identified objectives of the City. (d) The Bixby Old Ranch Towne Center Development Plan and the necessary zoning changes will not be detrimental to the short term or long term goals or objectives of the City of Seal Beach and are in the interest of the public health, safety and welfare. The general plan amendments set forth herein achieves consistent with the General Plan, as amended concurrently with this approval. (e) The establishment of a Bixby Old Ranch Towne Center Concept Pl3n zoning overlay will ensure that the project will be developed over time consistent with the plans approved by the City Council. Section 5. Applicant seeks to establish the following uses, as revised by the City Council, as part of the Bixby Old Ranch Towne Center Development Plan: I Resolution NumbeR ~~O PROPOSED PROJECT LAND USES A 26.045 acres I B 13.567 acres C 157.29 acres Old Ranch Towne Center (includes commercial/retail uses and restaurant uses, includes a 10,000 square foot outdoor garden center) Old Ranch Business Hote~ Restaurant and Senior Care Facilities . Hotel . Restaurants (2) . Senior Assisted Living Facility . Senior Alzheimer's Care Facility . Senior Skilled Nursing Facility . Greenbelt Reconfiguration of Bixby Old Ranch Gotf Course and provision of a PubliclPrivate Driving Range (including sod fann) 15.649 Bixby Village acres . single family homes . 2.5 acre community park . Community Police Facility D I 6.735 Old Ranch Tennis Club acres (dedication of existing tennis club to the City for public recreation purposes and its conversion to public use) E TOTAL 219.286 acres 286,967 square feet maximum building area 104 rooms 15,000 square feet tota1 90 units 25 beds 45 beds 5.0 acres 157.29 acres 75 SFH 2.5 acres 0.16 acres 6.735 acres (a) The subject area is comprised of eight (8) parcels, comprising a total of approximately 219.286 acres. Presented below is a summary of current General Plan and Zoning land' use designations for the proposed Bixby Old Ranch Towne Center Plan area, as revised by the City Council: I Resolution Number 41 !Jo EXISTING AND PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING DESIGNA nONS Q-P, Quasi-Public, R-G, Recreation! 203.01 acres 196.31 acres 157.290 acres I Golf Course Golf RMD, Residential RMD, Residential None None 12.99 acres Medium Densit Medium Densit C-G, General C-2, General 15.3 acres 22.0 acres 34.612 acres Commercial Commercial PLU, Public Land Use PLU, Public Land 0.0 acres 0.0 acres 14.495 acres Use Total 218.31 acres 218.31 acres 219.286 acres (b) If the Bixby Old Ranch Towne Center Development Plan is adopted, the Housing Element, among other elements of the General Plan, will need to be amended as proposed herein so that the Bixby Old Ranch Towne Center Development Plan and the General Plan are consistent. In that the Bixby Old Ranch Towne Center Development Plan provides zoning restrictions for the project area, zoning would likewise be consistent with the General Plan. Section 6. Based upon substantial evidence in the record of the hearing, including the facts stated in ~ 5 of this resolution, and in the revised environmental documentation prepared in conjunction with this project as reflected in Table I, as revised, and pursuant to ~~ 28-2600 and 28-2602 of the City's Code, the City Council hereby finds: I (a) The proposed General Plan Amendments will conform land uses to those set forth within the Land Use Element for the subject area and provides a comprehensive development which accomplishes the following goals of the City in achieving sustainable development on the subject property: I. Preserves the existing golf course. 2. Dedicates the Old Ranch Tennis Club to the City for recreational purposes. 3. Creates a comprehensive development program for under- utilized and vacant properties. 4. Permits development that does not interfere with the operational capabilities of the Los Alamitos Armed Forces Reserve Center. 5. Provides development that is at least fiscally neutral and, more likely, fiscally beneficial to the City. 6. Adequately mitigates project-related traffic and noise impacts. 7. Responds to concerns from the unincorpora1ed community of Rossmoor regarding noise, light and glare, and "cut-through traffic" impacts by prohibiting any development south of St. Cloud Drive and limiting exiting movements from the retail shopping center at St. Cloud Drive to right and left turn movements only. Exiting the shopping center across Seal Beach Boulevard at St. Cloud Drive into the Rossmoor community will be physica1ty prohibited. I Resolution Number -W.31> (b) The proposed project will allow for a reasonable range of land uses on the subject property, recognizing the various site constraints discussed in the ElR rH. revised, with the provision of various land uses to address the identified objectives of the City. I (c) The proposed Bixby Otd Ranch Towne Center Plan, and the necessary General Plan Amendments will not be detrimental to the short term or long term goals or objectives of the City of Seal Beach and are in the interest of the public health, safety and welfare. The amendments are consistent with the General Plan, as amended. (d) Pursuant to Section 15168 of the CEQA Guidelines, a revised EIR has been prepared and has been certified by the City Council. This amendment is within the scope of the certified EIR, which adequately describes the general environmental setting of the project, its significant impacts, and the alternatives, and mitigation measures related to each significant environmental effect. No additional environmental documentation is needed. Section 7. amended as follows: Based on the foregoing, the Housing Element is hereby 1. Table 16 - Seal Beach Acreage by General Plan Land Use Designation is revised to read as follows: "TABLE 16 Seal Beach Acreal!e bv General Plan Land Use Desil!Dations Proposed! I Designation DevelQped Undeveloped Thtal Residential Low 670.6 0.0 670.5 Medium 652.5 639.S 0.0 652.5~ High 161.0 0.0 161.0 Commercial Limited Commercial 2.3 0.0 2.3 Professional Office 0.0 0.0 0.0 Service 55.8 0.0 55.8 General 162.5 -l49-:6 0.3 -l-&Q 162.8 -l49-:6 Industrial Light 126.2 0.0 126.2 Oil Extraction 28.2.... 0.0 28.2.... OI1"~;-Public Golf Course 264.8 ~ 0.0 264.8 ~ I Wetlands 32.8 0.0 32.8 fl.Ibli& City Parks 81.4 ~ 7.0 88.4 ~ City Schools 13.4 0.0 13.4 Flood Basin 34.7 0.0 34.7 Beaches 52.0 0.0 52.0 Police Station 1.5 0.0 1.5 Fire Stations 1.0 0.0 1.0 Resolution NUmber~ Civic Center 0.6 0.0 0.6 City Yard 3.0 0.0 3.0 P.E. R/W 8.2 0.0 8.2 Towne Center Greenbelt 12.4 0.0 12.4 Military 5.000.0 Jl..ll 5.000.0 TOTAL: 7,364.S 7.3 7,371.S", ..lII Portions of this m:reage moy be appropriate for residential redevelopment when oil prodUl:tion uses tenninate. Accordingly, the portion of the Hellman Ranch presently designated for oil production/fUture development has been included in the Housing Element as a potential area for residential uses (see p. 62) I 2. Table 17 - Vacant Site Analysis is revised to read as follows: "TABLE 17 Vacant Site Analvsis Name Acres General Plan! Zoninl! ~ "2. Bixby Old Ranch.' 20 C-2 and R-G (See note on following page) Speeifie Plmt . Ii . . <flfl eMi6ft tIfHl-General PIanIZoning amendments approved In 1999 that include a 13 acre residential component apeeted ift -l999 I · "ilthmtgh tlte l8ntllJK Element pFe!JeIfIly dealgNJU9 this 3ite./iN e81fUff€Mal aM rv:t!IWlti.8Ital ft.W!S, lite 8\wteflS 8/ me JJF8JJtl'fy htwe aeltetlllletl a 1fIImJJeF of -{Nt: RJ1Plieali8ft" p/llJlie /6FU1f111 18 reeeiW! pMhlie iltfHd as tt'J BfIIHniIte6 alllllMtl In 1999 the City IlJ1proved /I Concept p1JJn for the proposed development of the site which indudes the provision of /I maximum 0/75 residentiDl units, 71Ie 811'11_ ha'IE illtlietltlJtt t!1at tltcy Me e8IUitlcRlig JN8fJ89i1tg a mmnt e8mmeffiallreaidelflial fHVJieet 811 the site aNi .~ ilfllieateli t.L.:ey iIfIMtl 18 apply flJI' SjJeeiJie ..~1JIf. SJ1prt1lwl aNi the neeesstuy WJlf.e eJ~e8 aNi Ce1f.fYa/. ..~la1t tDfUYIIlmellls /87 SMelt. a pMjeet. 'Fha C61Ceept Plall. aIs6 JH'61itlv fe, co1lUlU!rciolIrestourantlrecreationoluses, instiJutionoluses /lnd open splice uses. The property is a4jacent to the Anned Forces Reserve Center. The Airport Land Use Commission hDs adopted /IIJ Aitport Environs Land Use Pl/ln (AELUP) which incotpora/es /In Air InstoJIation Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ) Study. The AELUP controls dIlveloprrunt 0/ properties a4jacent to the AFRC. .It M811hi alSfJ be Mtetl thtit (.'it U.S. ..inny CaFJ1S af Ettgilleel'S has ,eeelflly /NCptlFttlltllfle.- Beparmtent of ];)eft;.1IS€ stantlartls at JW& wing a1ttl helioopte ai1jieJ1l gNidelineN an ".1i7 .r1f5tallatian Campatible Use Z8IIe 6flCvz) 8twly" /tN the ,iRlle/l ."Brees ReseFve Celller at bes Alfl1flm ilt 1994. 11th plan itll!lllijies ele6T C8flt)S a1Ul aeeitlent fJfKeIIdtJl Mffi)S j6f' the ~~1'Iftetl .'VJFees Raerve Celttfl'. SNell Mila. IttIt indwle}JtJl'fitHts 8/ the BBeby propef'fy. While t :rite SltIIiy .w II8t bl!ell.f6mtal.Jy 8tl6pIed I1y tv DraItge C8NIIly . ii'fJ6rf baNJ fJse C6lfrmissitm. at tht: JNi:aenl Rlfte J its jiNlings a1Ul designati8ft8 shattltl be eBF<Z/fIl1y lIII8lyeed III tlte lime any pr-BfHJ9fJl jt'JI' ae;-elopmellt sf h61tSi11g 8ft the Bhfhy pf'BptJrfy is IIIItJer emvltJeratlBfl. It is p63J11J1e that the at}' 1fI6Y tletermllle at that time, th6t tlte Bhtby I ./ Resolution Number41& I ]JM]JCf'fy is Mt 8fJJ1ffl]Wiate for F~Clllial 8e-. ~18p1fteltt IHtsed .811 SfJ/cfy, liaise lI1Itl al.w cwJim1Uffl!1ftBl BBIIEiY'IIS. .'n Ihat tlte BiUy aite Is 8fIZ oftheJi:tv "Jaef6tllites ill the ~, aelr. a ietC1'lflinatitm INlY .-esult in lite liIwHi6n wiler-if: the t8tal MlISing 1Wtls itlenJiftetl ill Table }5 msy l3f.eeetl availabla Fes6wees aNl the etJIIUftlmlly'a alJilil}' 16 ltIliafy Ihis IteetllWlhin tlte eaNeJEt at 1M Csrenl .~l81t 1'eiJNuements set /fJ1th 1ft lite f:8,*"MfIfI8Il C8tle. .VeIletlteks" at t.u JN~aeIft lime, the City 'Rte .YC~ 11I11II1 will gride Ile~ellt Bf~s a4jaHIfI 11I..imteII Fones Re_e Csrter. TM .YaJZ ltas iIllYllifietJ the J161'ti61t 8/ SIM.'h 8BfJJy Ohl RtMelt fJIVJlJe'f'j fIfJ lIeillf _Me 8/1NJIh the areas ltle1flijiei as "CZear ZtHte. (all tftillWrer-e the aeeiaeltt patential is 18 .'tigh Ih6t }hr hmtllfSes an aeecptableJ antl fl. feeiJlMt "h8lelltial ZtMe 1" (an 11IM uwh kss awiYfl JHHett.i8l, .'Javilfg J1~si.~~y less Ffat,;t!il-/e laM 1M gllltlelines;. as a petetflial litt: /tH' ,esitlelflial ile-Idapmeltt aNi it is lite City's 88m &Nl 8bjeetive 18 ltti:.~ FaiaMtial tleveloplfWlt aJlt3tmetetl there, Mi'i'9Nffelllfll a1ff1 safely eanslFailtts ]Je1'lftining (see ]1. 64r. 3. The last paragraph of Section 4.1.2 is revised to read as follows: "Based upon their existing general plan designations and zoning, the vacant residential and non-residential sites listed in Table 17 have a capacity to pennit the development of up to ~ 145 detached and -we 100 multi-family dwelling units. Of these two vacant sites, _ both, representing the potential for up to ~ 145 detached dwelling units, are is already approved through an application for a speeifie filM lUfteJ'ldlllellt, development agreement and a vesting tentative tract "map. It should be noted that public facilities and services are available to all of these vacant 'sites. " 4. Table 19 - Land Use Designations is revised to read as foIlows: I I Resolution Number 1/1& Land Use Categorv UJW DENSITY Marina Hill College Park W. College Park E. Hellman Gold Coast Subtotal MED. DENSITY Bridgeport Old Town CPE Condos Bixby Village T P.isure World Subtotal mGH DENSITY Old Town Riverbeach Rossmoor Condo Surfside Subtotal * ** Minimum Lot Area Per Unit 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 1.OOQ 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2.500 2,178 1,350 960 JjJA "TABLE 19 Land Use Desilmations ActuallNet Allowable Density 8.018.0 8.018.0 8.0/8.0 4.4/8.0 8.0/8.0 13.6117.4 17.4/17.4 8.3/17.4 10.8/17.4 15.5/17.4 20.0120.0 20.5/32.3 26.5/45.4 38.61 N/A Total Net Acres Desil!:. 121 38.5 206 14.7 8.4 398.3 Potential No. of mIL Percent of Total City Acreage Minus Military I 969 307 1,649 70 ---lil 3,001 16.6% 12.9 176 84.5 1,470 7.2 60 12.0 7S 425.0 MQ3 541.6 ~ 8,389 ~ 22.8% 2;1. i 9t 186 10 13.3 6.8 216.1 1,144.4"' I.H;6.0* 3,720 205 352 ...1M 4,541 I 9.2% IS,8S'lIt'~ 15,931** 48.2'1t 48.6% 1hls figure represents net residential land, not including local public streets and parks This figure Includes existing units and alUlclpatedlbuiJdout of under- utiIiud residentially toned propenies. " 5. Subsection 5.2.1.2, Programs, subparagraph C. is revised to read as follows: "C. Program: Conduct publU: hearings to detennine the appropriateness and bentifits of redesiglUlting pomons of the Bixby Old Ranch Parcel for uses incbuling residential development, with a pomon of the site considered for higher densily housing qffordablB to lower income households, and other pomons designated for single family detached residential uses, to promote a more balanced housing inventory within the community. I Anlicipaled Impact: In 1995, 1998 and 1999, the City held numerous public hearings regarding the appropriateness and benefits of redesignating portions of the Bixby Old Ranch Parcel for uses including residential development, including some component of higher density affordable housing. Such hearings were the culmination of a lengthy fact-finding Resolution NUmber~;ro1t' I process, and included hearings on the merits of two separate development projects. In 1999, the City Council approved a 75-unit residential and park development on the northerly 13 acres of the Bixby property, to replace a large church/institutional use proposed by the property owner. As part of that development, the City, Redevelopment Agency, and the developer will ensure that at least 10% of the units developed will be affordable to persons who could not otherwise afford market rate residences. The City has detennined that church/institutional uses were inappropriate on the site due to traffic, noise and air quality impacts. A high density residential development would produce similar impacts on that site, making high density residential development at that location unacceptable and not appropriate. In addition, the benefits to the City that are expected to accrue from the approved Bixby Old Ranch Towne Center Development Plan would be significantly reduced if the developer was forced to construct high density, below market rate housing. Due, in part, to these impacts and due to concerns by the Orange County Airport Land Use Commission, the number of planned residential units has been reduced from in excess of 100 units to 75 units, and the houses will be located in the extreme northerly portion of the Bixby properties. The City has developed a program to utilize existing and future tax increment set-aside revenues generated from other areas of the City to provide affordable housing in the City. This program provides for funds to lower the costs of new homes for affordability, and it is anticipated that approximately 10% of the units constructed on this site will be made affordable to persons who cannot otherwise afford to purchase market-rate housing through participation in this program The pes!liBle redesigilMieR af BppftllHllllIlely 2Q &eres af the BHthy Old Rtmeh pareeI t6 resitlentiftl BIll! ether appr6l'ftate IMe lIsea, t6 permit the eeveleplllent ef IBW eensity h8llsiRg aR stich pareeI, iRellldiftg !he redesigll8ti811 ef IIppFelliIllBtel Y S Bf the 29 lleFeS t6 hi~ eeflsity feSieentiftl (2Q lIRilslaefe). If reElesigtlate8, the S IIefe pamaR af the Bill&}' Old Rtmeh site will lie eeveleped ellBRg the iRilial phase af the Biey Old ItfllU:h de-w"eltllnfteftt .w.Ath 2Q -lefj" 16"1; ine6me, 49 IwN ineeme ana 40 ffiMefttte ifte6me 88tl3ing Hnits. The development Me mmfttenanee of these hausing lInfts ift tlIese 1'f8P6fti6ftS anti ifteaRle aa~fie8 v. ill be eneetlmge8 lIRe faeilillllell tIlftllIgh lIjljliieaB811 af Pfegl'll.lIIS S.2.2.2(A} lIfIe S.2.2.2(B). " I Impact Area: Census Tract 1100.12. Responsible Agencies: Planning Department, Planning Commission, City Council. Rnandng: Department budget. I Schedule: The filiRg af IIfI An application for General Plan Amendment was filed is lIIllieipated in late 1999 1997, with concurrent filing and processing of a Speeifie PIBn IIIId zone change. k ia llfllie~ that the preees:HRg af these ajljliieatieRS ll8lIld require lIjl t6 18 111811thS. The preees:Jiftg af tentati.1t\ sltllei lisieR IIII11'S fur tIle prejeet etJtlld, at the teqllest ef the ajljliiellflt, either lie lIReefl8keft e8lletlffelltly 6R e8l11l11eneee Hp6ft the e6mpletieft sf preeessing sf the Ceneml Plan ~meBdffient, Speeifia Plllll lIRe mile alumge. The City acted in late 1999 to approve various General Plan amendments, zone changes, development agreement and tentative subdivision maps for commercial uses on 34.6 acres of land, a 75 lot single-family residential subdivision on 13 acres and a 2.5 acre neighborhood park, the redesign of the 157-acre Bixby Old Ranch Golf CQurse, and the provision of 6.4 acres of greenbelt buffer areas for tree preservation purposes, and the dedication of a 6.74 acre private tennis club to the City for use as a community Resolution Number 'I1f:x:J recreation facUity. The City anticipates the housing will be constructed within five years. " Staffis hereby directed to revise the Housing Element accordingly. . PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Seal Beach at a f1:~ thereqf held on the "a:?~;{ d.- day of ~aA r- , 1999, by the folIowing vote: I AYES: Councilmembe NOES: Counci1members ABSENT: Councilmembers ~r A T: I STATE OF CAUFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CITY OF SEAL BEACH } } } SS I, Joanne M. Yea, City Clerk of Seal Beach, California, do h~7. certify that the foregoing resolution is the original copy of Resolution Number ~ on file in the office of the City Clerk, passed, approved, and adopted by the 9ty Council of the City o(~. ".~ ""'""" thereofhcld 00 .. ..:liIft..<... my of /./AL, 1999. ~,.,.;;)l LJ Ci erk I I PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, County of Orange I 'I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county afore- said; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or inter- ested in the above-entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of the SEAL BEACH SUN, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published weekly in the Oily of Seal Beach, County of ;:..Orange and which newspaper has ;'been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Orange, State of California, under the date of 2/24/75. Case Number A82583; that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: I kUC; U ,('r 1<"2- all in the year 1999. I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury thai the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at Seal Beach, CA, thls~dayof NG...JJ"1999. A~ , ~ I Signature PUBLICATION PROCESSED I:3Y: THE SUN NEWSPAPERS 216 Main Street Seal Beach, CA 90740 (562) 430-7555 . (949) 759-7726 Resolution Number~;r~~ This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp Proof of Publication of NOTICE OF PUBUC HEARING - L CondOlonal U.. Pa,mllg8.fO _ - Million senior care fBCIllty NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN th8t In M Eucalyptus lree Permit 99.1 _ accordIInce wdh the August 3, 1998 Removar of eucalyptus trees wtlh- Writ d. Mendate '..ued by the In Areas -A- and .S. (commerclBJ Orlnge COUnty Superior Court, the deve!opmenl areas) City Council 01 the City of S..I . N geJi1:h will hold. public h..rlng on . Vesting Tenlatlve TrBet Map No. Monday, A~lIust 23, t999 at 7:00 '~7 - 75-101 reSldentlaJ subcfi.. p.m. tn the CIty Council Chambers, VI n 211 Eighth Sire'" SHllleoch, C.~ O. CclncMfonaJ U.. Penn, 99-S _ 011. ' ltom18 to: gremlse a1caf1ol sales at Sav.On 1 Cor8der RevISIOnS 10 the Bbcbv Old rug Ranch Towne Center FlnafEIR Prolect Overvl~w: The proposed (SCH 97091077) - Cel1lftc11lOn of lTIIXed-use proaect conslsls Of com. ~IR by City Council; Adopllon of merclal, reSldenllal. recreational,. SlaI8ment Of Overriding Conslder- t inslllullonal. and open space US8SI ....... and aa previously ap_ by the Clry f CoUncrJ m NOvtimber 1998. and as 2. RecorIIIder: described In the RevIsed EIR under A. General Plan Amendmenl 98-1 _ 0 COOSIderabon as pan of thIS pubhc Amendments to vanous element..' heanng. The EIR approval was of the General Plan 10 malnlan con- chaRenged by several perlles and IIsIency between the General Plan -I the City has t)een Inslrucled by the and !hi ....--t nrnIecl Ct:Mt 10 set ask:Ie, vacate, and VOId ....,.,u........ ,..-, Resolullon No 4660 approved on 1. Lmd Use Element Amendment November 23, 1998. cerllfylng Ihe 2 Open SpacefConser- Flnaf EIR for (fie proj8cl: the W-obce vabO~ecreabOn Element 01 Determination fried on Novem- 3 8k:yde Roule Element ber 24, 1998; and any and all 4 HouS!"!l Elemenl aclIons of any body Ihal rely In 5 Cln:ulallOn Element \\t1ofe or In part on the Bocby Ranch 6 Noise E1e.ment EIR incIudl"!9 Ih8 Seal Beach Plan- B. Zone 0Ian0e 98-1 -AmelldlTba nlng Commlillon to Zoning t.Jap 10 malnlaln canals- The Bile Is approximately 218 acres _ beiWaerolha Zoning Map IOld In alze. Tha """.' projacl oompo- Ihe General PWt: nenls Bf'8 as roIlows ll) 288,987 Y Club l!l!la.. Ge at square foot retail flfvM;)plng center 1. .lInnIs ~.. - ner (Development Areei-"A,-l; (2) 104 =='&2) 10 Pubic . room holel, 15.000 square feet of .. .. . restaurants, 160-bed senlOf asSIst- 2 ~nt Areas A and 8 - ad IlYIng f8CIlJty, 5 acres greenben -General Commarclal (C-2) (Devalopmanl Ar.. "B"). (3) 107- and Recreatlon-Golt (R-Glllo acre reconflgured private golf General Commercial (C-2 course and a prtvale/publlc ~ 3.llJMIopmanl Area"C - Geo- ranga (Davelopmanl Area "C"J;(4) araICortnn8tOla/{C-2) and ~_d'-anI1a/_ RecntaIIon-Golt (RoG) 10 lion and 2.5 acre commuruty D&rk ReaeBbon GoI1 (R-G) (Development Area .01' and (5) 4 DIIV8IopmenI Area .0. - Gener- irecllcatlOn of eXlsbng 6 735 Bixby sf CorrwnerclaJ 'C2) and Old Ranch Tennis Club Slt8tO CdY _l1on.Go~ 1R-G) 10 Ra.I- (Developmanl Area "E1 danIaI Mid"... o.n_ry (RMD) Code Sections: Section 28-2600 C. TenIIIIYe Parcel Map No. 97-165 _ Zone Chang.. - plWt8llzBllon of 13 fr1-8Cl8 corn- Section 28--2503-2504 _ Condlo men:IaI ",. bonal Use Permits o TentallveTraclMapNo.15787- Seclton28--1803-PlannedSign parcHzabon of 26 045-acr. com- Program mercIBI shopPing center SecUon 28--2317(4) _ H"9h1 E. DawIopmanl Aareemanl- Spec. Vanatlons llies duties ancfresponSlbllllles of Section 28-2751-mO _ DeveJ- ClIy Ini Bocby Ranch Company to opmenl Agreements ,"",,",_oomplallonlOldcom- pbanatWilh all rmllgallon I'1'I8BU8S Section 70-4 - Eucafyptus Tree and condI1lonS ParrmlJ F. SIIe Ptan Review 98--1 -Sne plan Chapter 21 - SubdNfslOns review for 28.045-acre shopping Appllclnt: Bacby Ranch Company _...deY8lopmanl . Kolohall DevaIOpmanl Company Mamon Senior living SeMCBS G. Condllonal Use PermIl98-18- drfve..through Window and 24-hour Owner: BIxby Ranch Company opel'8llOn fOr proposed drug store KltcheA Developmenl Company wllhn 2f1045-8C11l1 shopping cen- Mamon Senior LivIng Services lar Ai the above IJme and place all inter- H. ConcIIIonaI Us. Perm1l9B-17 - esled persons may be heard If so harM c:enler and outdoor garden desired It you challenge the proposed cern. actions In courI, you may be lll"niled tq nuSlng only dlose IS8U8II you or same- I. Site Plan ReYHrw 98-2 - freeway one else rillsed ..the publIC hearing Identilicalion IIgn described In this notice. or In wnIIen J HelAhl Varlallon 98-5 - arohllec- col'l'ltllPClndence dellvenld 10 the CIty . . lUraT IIIIIbJres 8boV8 35-fooI height of Seal Beach at, or prkJr 10, the pub- : limO - Ucl1aarlng, K Planned Sign Program 98.' _ DATEOThfs9lhdayofAugusl,l999 overallhopj>lng center sign pro. .IoaMa M..Ylio. CIty ClllllC:' . g'''' . , PubIIshad In Iha SJaI aeacli Sun'_.' naJ~,l..... .T' /1.,"