Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Res 4742 1999-08-23 , , RESOLUTION NUMBER ~ 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCil.. OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH APPROVING PLANNED SIGN PROGRAM 98-1, PERMITTING BUILDING, MONUMENT AND TEMPORARY SIGNS IN CONJUNCTION WITH A 26.04S-ACRE SHOPPING CENTER ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD AND ST. CLOUD DRIVE (BIXBY OLD RANCH TOWNE CENTER) THE CITY COUNCil.. OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE: I Section 1. The Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing regarding Sign Program 98-1 on December 9, 1998, and approved the project through the adoption of Planning Commission Resolution 98-49. On August 3, 1999, the Orange County Superior Court issued a writ in the matter of City of Los A1amitos, et aI. v. City of Seal Beach ordering the City to vBCate Resolution No. 4660 and any approvals relying on the Final ElR. On August 16, 1999, the City Council adopted Resolution 4726, vacating Resolution No. 4660 and any approvals retying on the Final Em, subject to and pending further Court order. Section 2. Pursuant to 14 Calif. Code of Regs. ~ 15025(a) and ~~ D.C and ill of the City's Local CEQA Guidelines, staff prepared an Initial Study and a Draft Environmental Impact Report (OEIR), to study the environmental impacts arising from the proposed Bixby Old Ranch Towne Center Development Plan and related General Plan amendments, including this amendment. The DEIR was circulated for public review and comment from April 15, 1998 to May 29, 1998, in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's Local CEQA Guidelines. Upon completion of the public review period, a Final Environmental Impact Report was reviewed by the Planning Commission Bt a public hearing held on September . 9, October 21, and November 4, 1998. After the public hearing, the Planning Commission found, through the adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. 98-37 that the Bixby Old Ranch Towne Center Development Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is adequate under CEQA. After considering the Final EIR and public testimony thereto at a public hearing on November 9 and November 17, 1998, the City Council adopted City Council Resolution No. 4660, certifying the Final EIR and adopting a statement of overriding considerations. On August 23, 1999, the City Councit conducted a public hearing to consider revisions to the EIR and a statement of overriding considerations pursuant to the August 3, 1999 writ issued by the Orange County Superior Court. The approval of this resolution is within the scope of the project analyzed in the Final Em, as revised, and City Council Resolution No. 4728 is hereby incorporated by this reference. I Section 3. Pursuant to the August 3 Writ, the City Council held a public hearing on August 23, 1999 to consider approving this conditionBI use permit. Section 4. The record of the Planning Commission hearing of December 9, 1998 indicates the following: Re~olution Number II'1Ji~ a. On October 19, 1998, Kitchell Development Company (the "Applicant") filed an application with the Department of Development Services for various land use entitlements to develop the Bixby Old Ranch Towne Center 26.045-acre commercial shopping center site. b. Specifically, the applicant has submitted a "Sign Program" for the Bixby Old Ranch Towne Center shopping center. This sign program sets forth design intent and theme, a modification procedure, a discussion of sign types for both retailers (Retail A, B, C, D and E), and for the shop and pad building tenants (Shops 1 and 2 and Pads A and B), and monument signs. I c. The Code permits 1 ~ square feet of signage per lineal foot of building fronting on, or visible from, a street (speed limit over 35 mph) and 1 square foot of signage per lineal foot of building fronting on a parking lot. Based on these figures the Bixby Old Ranch Towne Center shopping center could provide the following signage: Mnimum Permitted Signage North South East West RETAIL A 330.00 150.00 440.00 653.50 RETAIL B 0.00 70.00 200.00 300.00 RETAIL C- 0.00 0.00 96.00 144.00 RETAILD 0.00 207.00 277.00 415.50 RETAILE 107.00 107.00 145.00 217.50 SHOP 1 140.00 140.00 210.00 315.00 SHOP 2 140.00 140.00 210.00 315.00 PAD A 83.00 83.00 60.00 90.00 PADB 87.00 87.00 74.00 111. 00 Total Allowed 6144.50 sf d. The Applicant is proposing shopping center signage as follows: I Proposed Sign Areas North South East West RETAIL A 330.00 150.00 0.00 600.00 RETAILB 0.00 70.00 0.00 300.00 RETAILC 0.00 0.00 0.00 144.00 RETAILD ' 0.00 207.00 0.00 415.50 RETAILE 107.00 107.00 145.00 217.50 SHOP 1 140.00 140.00 210.00 315.00 SHOP 2 140.00 140.00 210.00 315.00 PAD A 83.00 83.00 60.00 90.00 PADB 87.00 87.00 74.00 111.00 Total Proposed 5078.00 sf e. The subject shopping center is located on a 26.045-acre site. The site is proposed to provide a maximum of 286,967 square feet of floor area. The site currently proposed to have a total of 5,078 square feet of signs, which is 82.6% of the total signage permitted by the Code of the Citv of Seal Beach. f. Section 28-1803.1 sets forth the general intent of the utilization of a planned sign program as follows: I "Generally. In accordance with the provisions of this article, signs may be authorized in commercial and industrial districts as a port of a planned sign program notwithstanding that such signs do not conform to all specific regulations applicable in general to ground sign. wall sign, and other signs allowed pursuant to this article. A planned sign program is a voluntary, optional alternative to the general sign .1fI~iifOPi.ttion Number!Lt!ii? regulations, intended to encourage the maximum incentive latitude in orfkr to achieve variety and good design. The planned sign program option shall not be used to circumvent the objectives of this article." g. The proposed signing is consistent with the intent of this article and the General PIal!. as this request is for considerably less signage than is allowed by the Code. The total area of the proposed signs 5,078 square feet, is 82.6 % of the total sign area allowed for this shopping center. I h. The proposed shopping center is similar in nature to Rossmoor Center, across Seal Beach Boulevard, which has a planned sign program that allows several large pylon signs, in addition to the main tenant identification signs on each of the buildings within the center. In addition, the proposed signage at the Bixby Old Ranch Towne Center: is only 82.6% of the maximum allowable signage under the provisions of the Code. i. The subject shopping center property contains approximately 24.844 acres of net useable area and is located north ofSt. Cloud Drive on the east side of Seal Beach Boulevard. The property has approximately 1,307 feet of frontage on Seal Beach Boulevard, and is approximately 975 feet in depth. j. The subject property is legally described as Tentative Tract Map No. 15767, and is currently located in the General Commercial (C-2) zone. k. Surrounding land uses and zoning llJ'e as follows: I IJ North - Bixby Village residential development in the Residential Medium Density (RMD) Zone. IJ South - Bixby Old Ranch Golf Course in the Recreation-Golf (R-G) Zone. IJ East - Bixby Village residential development in the Residential Medium Density (RMD) Zone and Bixby Old Ranch Golf Course in the Recreation-Golf(R-G) Zone. IJ West -Across Seal Beach Boulevard, in the General Commercial (C-2) zone is the Rossmoor Center shopping center development, in the'City of Seal Beach. I. The "Mitigation Monitoring Program" establishes a number of specific action measures which have been proposed to reduce the identified environmental impacts of the shopping center development to a level of insignificance in relation to this development application. The applicable mitigation measures are conditions of approval for Site Plan Review 98-1, Revision # 2 (92 mitigation measures), and are incorporated herein by reference. m. The buildings on which signage is proposed adjacent to Seal Beach Boulevard are located approximately 20 to 115 feet off of Seal Beach Boulevard, with the rear.retail structures being located approximately 580 feet from Seal Beach Boulevard. Approximately 43% of the proposed signage will be located on the buildings located to the rear of the shopping center, approximately 580 feet from Seal Beach Boulevard. Approximately 20"/0 of the proposed signage will be on the west facing sides of those structures closest to Seal Beach Boulevard, within 20 to 115 feet ofthe roadway right-of- way. . I n. The Applicant has proposed two types of monument signs for the shopping center. Monument signs are proposed at each entrance of the shopping center, and vary somewhat in design at each location. All ofthe monument signs are of a similar design and provide similar design themes to the commercial structures themselves, with a cultured stone base, stucco finish on the main sign panel, a stucco cornice to match the buildings, and cut out free standing letters identifying the "Old Ranch Town Center". Section 5. Based upon the facts contained in the record, including those stated in ~4 of this resolution and pursuant to ~~ 28-1803 and 28-1804 of the City's Code, the Resolution Number '/"7~;l, City Council hereby adopts the findings of the Planning Commission and m~es the following findings: a. Planned Sign Program 98-1 is consistent with the provisions of the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan which permits commercial uses on the subject property. The use is also consistent with the remaining elements of the City's General Plan as the policies of those elements are consistent with, and reflected in, the Land Use Element. Accordingly, the proposed use is consistent with the General Plan. b. The proposed signing is consistent witb tbe intent of. this article I and the general plan as this request is for considerable less signage than is allowed by the ~. . c. The signs included in this plaMed sign program meet the minimum design standards for signs within the City. d. Approval does not constitute a grant of specific privilege or allow substantially greater visibility than the standard provisions allow. The Bixby Old Ranch Towne Center commercial center is the second largest commercial center within the City, with a maximum floor area of286,967 square feet. The proposed signage is 82.6% of the maximum allowable signage under the provisions oftbe~. . Section 6. Based upon the foregoing, the City Council hereby approves Planned Sign Program No. 98-1, subject to the following conditions: 1. Planned Sign Program 98-1 is approved to permit a planned sign program for the Bixby Old Ranch Towne Center shopping center in accordance with the program submitted by Kitchell Development, dated October 15, 1998. 2. All construction shall be .in substantial compliance with the plans approved through Planned Sign Program 98-1. 3. This Planned Sign Program shall not become effective for any purpose unless an "Acceptance of Conditions" form has been signed by the applicant in the presence of the Director of Development Services, or notarized and returned to the Planning Department; and until the ten (10) day appeal period has elapsed. I PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Seal Beach at a . ng the f held on the i>l~~ day of , 1999, by the following vote: . ABSENT: AYES: NOES: I Resolution NUmber~"~~ STATE OF CAliFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CITY OF SEAL BEACH } } SS } . I I, Joanne M. Yea, City Clerk of Seal Beach, California, do hiJ!l.~fy that the foregoing resolution is the original copy of Resolution Number ~ on file in the office of the City Clerk, passed, approved, and adopted by the Cit! ..c;ouycil of the City of ~ at a]J-ular meeting thereof held on the ;2!J4"., day of ~JA, 1999., ' ~h,:Jh ( #0 I I Resolution NUmber~?,~ PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, County of Orange '1 am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county afore- said; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or inter- ested in the above-entitled malter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of the SEAL BEACH SUN. a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published weeklv in the Oity of Seal Beach, County of ;:;.Orange and which newspaper has fbeen adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Orange, State of California, under the date of 2/24/75. Case Number A82583; that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit. kUC; c.J ,('q- 1<7..- all in the year 1999, ,~ I certify (or declare) under penalty of pequry that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at Seal Beach, CA, thls~day of NC:.J J:.,--, 1999. ~ A~ / Signature PUBLICATION PROCESSED I?Y: THE SUN NEWSPAPERS 216 Main Street Seal Beach, CA 90740 (562) 430-7555 . (949) 759-7726 This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp , Proof of Publication of NonCE OF PUBUC HEARING - L Cond,"on.' Us. Porm1l99-15 _ - Mamon senior care facility NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN Ih.. In M Eucalyptul Tree Permll 99-1 _ 8CCOrd8nce with the Augu" 3, 19lK1 RemovBl of eucalyptus trees WIth. Writ of Mlnde.e I..ued by the In Areas "A- and .S. (commercial Orange County Superior Cou,\ the development areas) City Council of the City of ~..I . N V Belch will hold. public hel,ln, on .stl~ Tenlallve Tract Map No MondlY, Augult 23, 1999 It:oo ~5797 - 75-lot mldentlal 8ubdl- p.m. In the CRy Council Ch.mberl, stan 211 Eighth Street, Sui Be.ch, C.... O. Conditional Use Permft 99-5 _ Off- ' ltomll to: gr.""" alCOhol sales at Say-On 1 Conslder R8VlsIl::n; 10 the Bocby Old I1IQ Ranch Towne Center Flnar EIR Project Overview: The proposed (SCH 97091077) - CertJficBbon of mlJced-use proIBct consists of com- E:IR by City CounCil; Adoption of merclal, reslerentlal, recreatIonal,. Siatement Of Oyerndlng COnsider. t Insllh.lllonal. and open ~ace uses atIons and as previOUSly approved the CIty , f Council In November 199 ,and as 2 ReconSIder' descnbed In the Revised EIR W1der A. General Plan Amendmenl98.1 _ " consideralion as part of this pubbc Amendments to various elements "' heanng The elR approval was of the General ptan 10 maintain con- challenged by several parties and s1stency between lhe General Plan "I the Dty has been Instructed by the and the approved prOject Court 10 seI aside, vacal8. and void Resolullon No 4660 approved on 1 land Use Element Amendment N~ 23. 1998, certifying the 2 Open SpacelConser. Final EIR for the project, the Nobce vallon/Recreatlon Element of D8IermlnatlC)n filed on Novem. 3 Bicycle Route Element ber 24, 1998, and any and all 4 Housmg Element actions 01 any body that rely In 5 Circulation Element whole or In part on the BIxby Ranch 6 Noise Bement EIR, Including the Seal Beach Plan- S Zone Q\an 98-1 -Amendrnenls nlng CommiSSIOn to ZOning rap to maintain con.5- The site I' approxmaleJy 218 acres tency between the ZonIng Map and In SIze. The fnalor project compo- the General Plan' nents are as loIlows' (1) 286,967 CI b 5 Ge aI square foot retail shopping center 1. TenniS u de- ner (Development Area "A.)' (2) 10' eommo_ (C-2)" Public ' LIWld U.. taU' room holel, 15.000 square leel 01 A___ "A" d "B. " restaurants, ISO-bed serUor asslst- 2 Devetopment,...._ an - ed INI~ facility 5 acres greenbelt - General Commercial fe-2) (Development Are. -S-), (3) 157- and Recreallon-GoIf (R-G) 10 acre reconflgured private golf General Commercial (C.2) course and a pnvate/publlc d~ 3. Development Area "f:' - Gen- range (Development Area "C1. (4) eral Commercial (C-2) and 15-101 detached r8S1d8nhB1 subdM- Recreallon-GoH (I:t-G) 10 sIOn and 2 5 acre community park Recreation GoII (R..Q) (Development Area -D1 ai'ld (5) 4 Development Area .D- - Gen.,- dedication of elClsbng 8 '35 Bixby 01 CommSfCG'oI (C-g:2)c:/.ysnd n_ , Old Ranch TenniS ChJb SIIe to City Recreation- 0" tf - 10 naS. (Development Area -e," cfenbal Medium n (RMD) Cad. SltCtkms: Section 28-2600 C TenIBIlY8 Parcel Map No 97.165 _ Zone Changes - pan:e1lzallon or 13 87-aae com- SectIon 28.2503-2504 _ Cond!- meraal sile 1I0nal Use Permits O. TentBlIveTractMapNo 15767- S8CbOn 28-1803-ptanned Sfgn parcf!lrzaUon of 26 045-acre com- Program merdal shopping center Section 28-2317(4) _ Hetghl E Development Aareement- Spec- VarlatIons lfies duties ana responSIbilities of SectIOn 2B-2751-2nO - Oevel- City and BIXby Ranch Comp~ 10 opment Agreements snsuro oroIsd compIsIIon and com- plrance WIth an mlhgallon measures Section 71>-4 - Eucalyptus Tree and conditions Permits _ 98 1 5'" I Chapter 21 - SubdlVlstons F.SII8PIan . - pan review tor 26 04S-BCl8 shopping Appnesnl: Bixby Ranch ~ center development kdchen Development Company Marrlon Senior !.Moo Services G. Condlllonal Use Permit 98-18- lIrlYe,...ugh wmdaw and24-hour Owner: BIxby Rsnch Company operallon for proposed drug 1tOr8 Kitchell Development COmpany WIthin 28..045-acre shopping cen. MBlTlon SenlOlLMng SeMCBS ler Ai the above lime and place aR Inter- H. Condllional Use Permit 98-17 - =:larsons may be heard I' so home center and outdoor garden If you challenge the proposed center acUons ... coull, you may be limited to IlIISlnD only those Issues yotJ or s0ma- l. $lie Plan RevIew 98-2 - freeway one e111 raised at the public heanng Idenliflcalfon sign descnbed In thas notice, or In wnften J Height VanBllon 98-5 _ archllec>- correspondence delivered to the City ," . turaI fNlurel above 35.foot height of Seal Beach at, or prior 10. the pub- 1 Omit. - Ilc hearing: , K Planned Sign Progrem 98.1 _ DATEDThls9thdayolAugU~.I999 overall shopping csntor sign pro- JOanna M.-Voo, ClIy ClerIC. .," gram , I'ubIIihOd In 1he Seal Beocti lliii 'JoiI'. naI._ './'&.99 ' I I I