Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Res 4595 1997-12-08 I I I Resolution Number RESOLUTION NUMBER 4~.$'" A RESOLUTION OF TIffi CITY COUNCIL OF TIffi CITY OF SEAL BEACH AUTHORIZING BUDGETARY AMENDMENTS FOR TIffi 1997/98 FISCAL YEAR TIffi CITY COUNCIL OF TIffi CITY OF SEAL BEACH DOES HEREBY RESOLVE: WHEREAS, the 1997/98 fiscal year budget requires budgetary amendments as follows: Park Improvement Fund 016-49880-070 Tennis Court Refurbishment +10,000 NOW, TIffiREFORE, BE IT RE~VED, that the c~:~the City of Seal Beach, at a meeting thereof held on the _ day of ,.. ~, 1997 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMB NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS . ST ATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS CITY OF SEAL BEACH ) I, Joanne M. Yeo, City Clerk of Seal Beach, is the original copy of Resolution Number passed, approved, ~ ~pted by the Ci ther Id on the f.!:. day of , do ereby certifY that the foregoing resolution on file in the office of the City Clerk, of Seal Beach, at a regular meeting 1997. RESOLUTION NO.~ ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH ADOPTING NEGATIVE DECLARATION 97-4, ADOPTING AMENDMENT 97-2 TO THE "CIRCULATION ELEMENT' OF THE SEAL BEACH .GIlli.EEAL PLAN, AND APPROVING THE SUMMARY VACATION OF THE SUBJECT STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 4 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA I THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH DOES HEREBY RESOLVE: WHEREAS, the California Government Code includes certain provisions regarding the content of the "Circulation Element" of the General Plan; and WHEREAS, this proposed amendment of the Circulation Element of the Seal Beach General 'Plan is an amendment which provides internal consistency with I Circulation Element Revision 97-1, approved by the City Council in October 1997. Circulation EJement Revision 97-1 was adopted to maintain consistency between the Circulation Element and the approved HeIlman Ranch Specific Plan. Circulation Element Revision 97-1 was necessary to delete roadways within Hellman Ranch designated for construction in the General Plan that will not be constructed when the Hellman Ranch Specific Plan project is constructed; and WHEREAS, Circulation Amendment 97-1 deleted the subject roadway from the Circulation Element as a future roadway, but left the roadway description in the "Capital Improvement Program" portion of the Circulation Element, resulting in an internal inconsistency within the Circulation Element; and '1 WHEREAS, the City is proposing to amend the Circulation Element to eliminate this internal inconsistency and vacate the subject future roadway right-of-way; and WHEREAS, staff has prepared and circulated an Initial Environmental Assessment and proposed Negative Declaration as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The comment period on Negative Declaration 97-4 ended on December 8, 1997. The City has received responses on the proposed Negative Declaration from: I 1) State of California, Department of Transportation, mSlrict 12, having no comments on the project; and 2) Southern California Association of Governments, project is not regionally significant and does not warrant clearinghouse comments: and Resolution Number L/..Sfb WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on December 3, 1997 to consider Negative Declaration 97-4, Circulation Element Amendment 97-2, and the subject street vacation; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission received into evidence the Staff Report of . December 3, 1997, along With all attachments thereto, and considered all public testimony presented; and I WHEREAS, The Planning Commission made the following findings and recommended adoption of Negative Declaration 97-4, Circulation Element Amendment 97-2, and the subject street vacation by the City Council on December 3, 1997: 1. The proposed Negative Declaration adequately discloses the potential environmental impacts of the proposed Circulation Element amendment and street vacation, and no substantial adverse environmental impacts will result upon the approval of the subject requests. 2. The proposed Circulation Element amendment will result in internal consistency within the Circulation Element. 3. The proposed Circulation Element amendment recognizes the future roadway is longer necessary due to the reduction in future traffic impacts from the Hellman Ranch property, which will comprise only 70 single-family residences. If in the future Boeing proposes additional facilities on their property which would require additional roadway access, a future environmental evaluation of those projects would identify if the anticipated traffic generation would require a public roadway or private driveway access. If this environmental evaluation were to determine that a public roadway is required, that would be a condition of approval of the proposed project. I 4. The proposed street vacation is consistent with the Circulation Element, as amended by Amendment 97-2 to the Circulation Element; and WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the City Council on December 8, 1997 to consider Negative Declaration 97-4, Circulation Element Amendment 97-2, and the subject street vacation; and WHEREAS, the City Council received into evidence the Staff Report of December 8, 1997, along with all attachments thereto, and considered all public testimony presented; and I WHEREAS, The City Council made the following findings regarding the adoption of Negative Declaration 97-4, Circulation Element Amendment 97-2, and the subject street vacation: 1. The proposed Negative Declaration adequately discloses the potential environmental impacts of the proposed Circulation Element amendment and street vacation, and no substantial adverse environmental impacts will result upon the approval of the subject requests. 2. The proposed Circulation Element amendment will result in internal consistency within the Circulation Element. Resolution Number~ 3. The proposed Circulation Element amendment recognizes the future roadway is longer necessary due to the reduction in future traffic impacts from the HeUman Ranch property, which wiU comprise only 70 single-family residences. If in the future Boeing proposes additional facilities on their property which would require additional roadway access, a future environmental evaluation of those projects would identify if the anticipated traffic generation would require a public roadway or private driveway access. If this environmental evaluation were to determine that a public roadway is required, that would be a conditio~ of approval of the proposed project. I 4. The proposed street vacation is consistent with the Circulation Element, as amended by Amendment 97-2 to the Circulation Element and with the provisions of Chapter 4 of the California Streets and Highways Code relating to "Summary Vacation"; and WHEREAS, in compliance with CEQA and local CEQA guidelines, staff has prepared the required "Response to Comments on Negative Declaration No. 97-4", including' all responses received by the City to December 8, 1997, for consideration by the City Council on December 8, 1997. The "Response to Comments on Negative Declaration No. 97-4" is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as "Exhibit B". NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby: 1. Adopts Negative D~laration 97-4. "Section Four: Implementation" , subsection titled "Capital Improvemenls Program", the last area of concern is deleted in its entirety. The deleted area of concern reads as foUows: I 2. Adopts Circulation Element Amendment 97-2 as set forth below: "FirM Skeet lJltteft:ften frelll Paeitie C811M Highway HI '.VestminMer Bl-m. " 3. Summarily vacates the subject vacant street right-of-way as shown on "Exhibit A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, in accordance with Chapter 4, ~~ 8333 and 8334 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, 4. Finds that from and after the date of recordation of this resolution, the street easement summarily vacated no longer constitutes a street, highway, or public service easement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that Circulation Element Amendment 97-2 will have a significant effect on the environment, involves no potential for adverse effect, either individually or cumulatively, on wildlife resources and win not have an adverse i!1lpact on fish and wildlife and directs the Director of Development Services to file the appropriate De Minimis Impact Finding for the California Department of Fish and Game Certificate of Fee Exemption. I Resolution Number~~~ I PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Ci~~}!nCil of the City of Seal Beach at ~~ on the ~ day of , 1997, by the following vote: AYFS: Counci1membeI ~ ./ ABSENT: Councilmembe 'Councilmembers~ p NOES: I STATE OF CAUFORNlA COUNTY OF ORANGE CITY OF SEAL BEACH } } } SS I, Joanne M. Yeo, City Clerk of Seal Beach, California, do ~ certify that the foregoing resolution is the original copy of Resolution Number ~ on file in the office of the City Clerk, passed, approved, and adopted by the ~~ouncil of the City Of~; at ~uIar meeting thereof held on the _ day of ~I_ V, 1997. .1 _./;"'Xtll!Ji(' ':''11 .... ./.:,...,. :'. L r ....... . I 1/ I r I~ 'I 1i _ R~.!'I.,:' .~~ :-: EXHIBIT B . ...~ . . - .; n~ ""'''THill 'TiR .Ar;::'ii":'4;'~~W i ! M,.,.4.'::, '. '-a ~ - ~~: . .. .'-+ MUi' ( . . . . '1 w,.tH....,., ...... '. jIi 11I&7.....,." ".~. .-t"t . " h . '. " .. .- 8S-U4S6~ .... _ T.'-..... .:.._. . ! '- ~ '. I t .. ..~ 11."'. CA', NU' . .. . . _": ,:":::r~.I"'''' .;:1'.'.:':.::."" _...:.::..:...._ :_.,,41!M."."':;I.....:.~_. ' ;. - ...... ..-. - . .. . ".... .!.- ... . t .. - --. . ... '-".'. .-r.----.....1........ ..... ". .....- -- .. .-. .. - ~ . .. ,...- .. ......... .. ..... .. I . -. .......... - .. . ... . . . ....., I. ... . . ";..A"!II:M"I ::::10',71' .' _. . 11""6'." :.M.I".=:' ~._. _. 1-:" ............_. . --.- - ... .----..-...... .1 --- "; .: n:.. .:;..:..::;.; ..':'..:.::-J:' :~'.. . ... : 04'...."....J..r. -_.:-~..... ---. .. .... ... .. 3 ~;.-II-;..;;;:.:-.~:;-....--i.-:..._.:.; j'-"::'." :J:~.:...;~.:... :.!: :: ".-. ...,.-. __...._.J_ _......_....___ -:-~=~_::..._~::. .. ..-... - a.., . l"'l- .. _.: ...::t-----:. - -.:.--.-- r--' '-'-r.\., 1 ~~ ----- .---... -::t.::= .,. ___..-....--\!.J ..~. ......-...-,-..- -:i..;~ ....,.-.- ::'.. :;A::....,..IA!!~~-z:._ -... =-:.::_~-~-; ~. -t - . :Jt:-.J --"~-,-,, l---t-..-J.':'""._- _ . -.. --...-.. ..-~;. -::. ~.- . ::1.......... . -' _. ---'-'-.:J: ............ -. .. - -'----.. ~. -, . - ::r.",'''',4.~-.''-, ..___.L."_.A -I"" .-.... -- ._"'..__..~.._. . : .:::: "(!)- ::'.f::-:~'=':'::::-.:..r__: '-1 _l.:=:;:~ -.=::- .. _..,1 -'- : .:..:...-~..:: ..fli .;:'r~:'.; __.. "'--_.' -. I ~. .--..--_:._---L - .~.-.---.." :..-::---1- .-. ~.-:-- --' ..."....-.- ~ . - '"\.---, ~-.r -' -..-.-:-.- ... 7'- -=:--.-"'2rT.e-lHrA--____,__ -",fj-.r--' '.-'-_'- -i---:-- if.; a.:a..... r~.---.- ~~;_.,__ - . :/I...N.IIO'.:,-__.._. ..... -'-t--.-.w ..""'..._~~' .., __.___ _. & ._.._._ .. ~j'.",4"'::"-" ..-.,' .~... -....--, . -.......- u.. _.-."~.. ...._. ..:.._!i:.:I7......._.~--..-..t:.: ' -- -..----.... ., - -_.. :;:...~:t~-~~~"i(!)':1:...:-l. .~;~::t:~ . += -::j~-i\-: -- -,.--- .- ".' I ,.--+- ~ ~ 1.-1!~7.:.....'.--~ - - -. - ~ - ::::i::.- ~ ~-''' ow- .....- ....r...~f. _.__-1____ . "'~\'-'tl _. .._- -M,."94\t.OO. e_.. - . .:.:..- _.~..~..~.. -__,...... -__.. -'-1-- .::. -_:=z.~.~...,~ . &-~-j=.:!J~.:--=l==--=\. '--::=:"'l:._- ---- ,---.",%':>>"50 -.--..]'. ,__"'_"'--:-'" -'-_. .'~....~_ -.-- &-T--'--~ _. --- -~--...I_-_.- __ ~ ~ ..__ .. . .. . I' ..:.....:'""......__ -i- _____ .~I. .: ::'.::.' :_'::-":(1)'.: .~:;7:'---:- '-f=:~':.~:::l':'::'::'~': __:=.-.~'-.l .::.:-::'R- ""'-:..:-,.~ __-~""'Q6.*1I.:JI"- ..J-___..,. .J: ~- :. ==-:f .:=-.=:=-., .1-"'--T--. . ,..-.-at.:4!IH,OO'" - -........ -..+,~---- ,-'...... . - __. ,_.z .. ._..~ _..., ..__...., . '-. ':2.~.#,., . .--...--..-..... ... ~-. '\I' ti" .- ... -..--- i-~ !-:. :::r~..H=__..._1-;. '-;:,~---=,:. - :c:-.I.-~..:V..:.;~y=.:.i ~', .t:_.....:~.:;....:.n...=-\~;=:r~~.:.~:..:t~:;:., --- ~ 3i~-"": -.-:.:!:- :::;p}f=:-:.l....'..::.=. ..... -- ...:... -. ~ -'.-.-.,- .,--r --..-J--...-t.. '+ -"-r. - -'4:/-.-4." .~--_. ~. .---- - - -..-- --- -':,~ ._~....-_..-..-.. 1'-_ ?~Zf,,~"ft.- ,___t:.~-:= -:i--.=:-:.::. .,'~.--,:, ;.;p,'~:;;~ .; i,~:=....:: ;;-~ -:,=:.1 ::L~,...4S: .-:1.._ .,..~'+...-.... ",.__~' ....._.._. _. .:T..:D~._-_._:;:--.=C:-~'~ _-:""'~ =::::e:- i..:..._:.'Y::;=:..,.. - =--. ,.- ,.-....-..--..1--...----,-..--- -..... . ~:.;, -- -:---l.~- .:'. .:::=;:' :....~.::!:::...::-....:.......::::..:..::.._- .....:. ;.- !. .=f 6_;= -::"-':":=-=-7- =:.:~ -.--:-:.:fS. ~~'--r"'-~::~:~':~ ........:.. 3'_ ._, .iI".~..,..~~rr.!-=.. _._ - ...~r.,.~ _-.__._.. ._.J__...... 'j-:r---. ~V-_. L ...iIf~=-/O.-. -_:~.: :.::.: '.:;...-:1-::::'1:.: J..=t::T':'':::~:'':: ~~.; -.. ... ;L~.":iN' --...' ---,. -: -...:t .. ._.,_.-J.__ ;'t!o: , -- ..-.....:If.. - ..1----.--..,.- .. ~ . '~_"-: :.:.qj.....,1 - .---......" .... ... '"\.-- -"-'i . ....,. 10 ,- .. ..... .....-.....-,.. -.....-.J.- -_.._...~-_. ~ .. 70::-:-: ~::;:::-~I~--:-:i1: - iJ._ -.,~;:T-':":='---- ..- ...... ,~..... ........... ,- ~ ,- ....-- ....:...- '\~ .. n",' .. .-:~~IIt.'.' . :"':'l - .. -- ..-- - 'F. ...._.:~..:;....:.:. . ------~- ''-.:-- '-..w. 'eH,1f/6 ..-11 . .... -- .-..- ;...:.: .. .. ": wou. 0I.1C.1t"'1OH"'~"'~ ~. aT'1'1r JIIu.ALlt!. unL'rY 1f!UIrJIIifII~.~ "-Po NO. ...II'A..~ LOCATIOfrf 4/11 """""'II/~orw~ An- .a.ItMO_TIltACTNO_ . -...... .. "ITIfG IIJU..J.U 11IT~'~ArJ"'.l.J (AI.IIY'II "'''''.J~~''' ~"I~"'J.J ai, ) ~_""GI_ ~"'TLC:LlCllEl:IIED-,^TI_"ICDIIDING .,.TI_IODII...:......_~rILr I Resolution Number ~9t., "ExmBIT B" RESPONSE TO COMMENTS NEGATIVE DECLATATION 97-4 I The format of the responses to all the comments is based on a letter and code number provided to each comment. Comments received from federal agencies are designated as "F" followed by a digit number. The first number refers to the number of the letter, as shown on the list of all commentors, immediately below. The second number refers to the number of each comment within the body of each individual letter. For example, the code "Sl-l" refers to the first comment within the first letter from a state agency commenting on the subject Research Design. The letter code for the types of letters is as follows: Letter F S R G L o I Responding Party StOle of California, Departmenl QfTr~nation,Dunid12,No~er21,1997 Commenl 81-1 Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Negative DacIaration 97-4 Circulation Element Amendment 97-2 Street Vacation. The proposal is to eliminate the proposed future principal roadway located between the Los A1amitos Flood Control Basin and the Boeing space and Defense facilities, west of Seal Beach Boulevard. Caltrans District 12 is a reviewing agency and has no commetn at this time. 1 81-2 Please continue to keep us informed of future developments which could potentially impact our State Transportation Facilities. If you have any questions, or need to contact us, please call Aileen Kennedy on (714) 724-2239. Southern California Association of Governments November 24, 1997 Conunentor Federal Agencies State Agencies Regional and Local Agencies Groups and Organizations Comments received after the close of the Public Comment Period Oral Comments received on the Negative Declaration Resoonse to Conunents 81-1 Comment noted, no response necessary, 81-2 Comment noted, no response necessary, Resolution NUmber#.5"?~ RI-I We have reviewed the above referenced document and determined that it is not regionally significant per Areawide Clearinghouse criteria. Therefore, the project does not warrant clearinghouse comments at this time. Should there be a change in the scope of the project, we would appreciate an opportunity to review and comment at that time. RI-2 A description of the project will be published in the December I, 1997 Intergovernmental Review Report for public review and comment. RI-3 . The project title and SCAO Clearinghouse number should be used in all correspondence with SCAO concerning this project. Correspondence should be sent to the attention of the Clearinghouse Coordinator you have any questions, please contact me at (213) 236-1917 or Bill Boyd at (213) 236- 1960. . * * * RI-I Comment noted, no response necessary. I Rl-2 Comment noted, no response necessary. RI-3 Comment noted, no response necessary, I I I I I PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, County of Orange I am a.citizen of the United States and a resident of the County afore- said; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or inter- ested in the above-entitled mailer. I am the principal clerk of the printer of the SEAL BEACH SUN, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published weekly in the City of Seal Beach, County of Orange and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior COUtt of the County of Orange, State of California, under the date of 2/24175, Case Number ~583; that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire Issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: \ \./~ "\ all in the year 19Jrr., I cetlify (or declare) under penally of perjury that the foregoing is true and COtrect, Dated at Seal Beach, California. this l:).~ day of '^~. .19 ~7 . -.q~o..~.n. '",\~ g.~n"~G . ,Slgnatl if: PUBLlCATI~N PROCE~j:.;:::r- i3Y: , Ttl~ SUN Nn%PM~~RS 216 Main Stlee! Seal Bp.:tcll, CA 90741) (310j430.7f.::,'; (714) 1~9-772tJ Resolution Nurnbe~~~~~ This space for f~r the County Clerk's Filing Stamp Proof of Publication of ............................ . ............................ . : ~~T&~I~~eM~wr ~W~t I' the City Council of the ell)' of Seal Beach WIll hold a publiC heanng on MondaV. December 8. 1997 at 7 00 . p m In the City Councrl Chambers.. ~ -211 Eighth Slreet, Seal Beaeti. . Cahfornla,'to conSIder the follOWing'" "em .' '_." . Negative Declarall06n 97-4 - . CIrculation Element Amendment ". 97-2 '. ' Street Vacation .... Request A request to amlind the Clrculatron Element of the General . Plan 10 elIminate a pro~ed'pnncrpa' ,. future roadway connecting We&tmlnsler , Avenue to Ai:lolfo Lopez Drrve The _..the","",_'"""""Y hght-ot~way has been prevIously' , dedlcaled 10 the Citv;:.but has never ~. '!l]een Inslalled Of used.. WiIt1 tl1e recent. - ~ of the Helman Ranch Sp9afic.1 i'F'Tan no road IS needed The property ~ ,~ -':19 located between the Los Alamdos' :... -F16od Control BaSin and \he,Boemg . J iSpace and Deleselacllitres' west ol~ .,~ Seal Beach Boulevard::. . -. .. ' , ~ Environmental Revrew A Negat\ve I Declaration has been prer.ared lor' thiS project and IS on fF a'at the Department 01 Development SeMCeS COde Sections GoVernment Code' - Sl!lctlon 85302(b) .' . . .. . , A'DDllcant Clly 01 SeClI Beactl- . C1INnec City Of Seal Beach-:-- . "At.t~e above time Clnd place aU.' Intere.sted persons may be l1eard I' so dEislred If you chal/enge the . I proposed actions In court, you may be Iimded to rEusing only lhase Issues you or someone else raised at the ' , jl\jJIlche8Mg_ln"",nobco . or 1M wntIen correspondence delIVered. . .to the City 01 Seal Beach'at, or poor' I to tllej!ub{1C heanng ~, DATED this 25lh day 01 N0\<8mber, . 1997 "",., . Joanne M Yea: ?!~Cle~ ~:_' _ w ,. \ I .1 I . !