HomeMy WebLinkAboutSupplemental Information Public r-
Questions on Proposed CIP
FY 16-17 OP Accomplishments and Project Status
Page.5: These listings of ongoing projects omit BG-0904, New Swimming Pool. However,the
Swimming Pool assigned balance (page 35, Proposed Budget) dropped by $54,500 in FY 16-17,
and we have a contract with Westbert & White Inc. from FY 13-14 to do site planning.
Was the.$54,500 paid to Westbert& White?
What is the current status of the site planning?
Beach and Pier
Page 18: PierRemodel (BP1002) The total proposed budget has dropped from $3,885,000 last
year to $3,730,000 this year.
Does this$155,000 drop reflect expenditures in FY 16-17 by the Tidelands, Water, and
Sewer Capital Funds or costs paid for by CPIIA?
Page 19:Local Coastal Plan (BP 1102) The:proposed funding does not reflect the $200,000
Coastal Commission grant that we were awarded last summer.
Is this an oversight?
Page 20: Rebuild of the Boardwalk Wall The write-up states that the project will reduce annual
permitting costs?
Please explain.
Buildings and Facilities
Page24: Countywide800 MHz Agreement When this agreement was presented to Council on
3/23/15; the payment for FY 17-18 was scheduled to be $155,633.
Why has this amount increased to$180,000?
Page26: Council Chambers A/V Upgrade The write-up states that $30,000 is just for design.
Are thereany cost estimates for the construction and integration phases of the project?
Page2S: Police Station Electric Vehicle Chargers
Are these for the exclusive use of police employees?
1
Would employees be charged for electricity? Would there be any net cost recovery for
the capital investment costs?
How can these be provided for police employees and not for those that work at City Hall?
Sewer System
Page38: Roof Repair at City Yard The roof was previously replaced in 2015 by Tecta America for
about $66,000.The Notice of Completion was accepted by Council on 3/9/15.
Did the previous replacement not include at least a two-year warranty?
When the roof and building remodel project (BG1403) was discussed and accepted by Council
on 11/10/14, staff acknowledged that the appropriate cost allocation was 50% General Fund,
25% Water, and 25%Sewer Funds.
Why is staff proposing to have all costs paid by the Sewer Fund?
Streets and Transportation
Page 48: Parking Management Plan The $677,000 carry-over funds derive from the Council's
approval last summer of the NuPark license plate reading system and related Parkeon parking
lot kiosks. After further review, that system was found to be non-acceptable and neither
contract was executed. Therefore, I would think that the $677,000 designation for this project
should be considered null and void rather than carried over from FY 16-17.
What is the cost estimate for the citation issuance replacement system and lot kiosks
that are now under consideration?
The "Funding Source" identified on this page is the Traffic Impact Fees. However, this does not
comport with page 9 which indicates General Fund.
Is this an error?
Page 52: Westminster Ave Median Improvements Theoretically,this project should be paid for
by the Boeing Gateway Pacific CFD Fund. However, on 5/8/17, the Council authorized the use of
$119,000 in M2 money to subsidize this project duet) a higher than expected bid. However, the 17/18
year-end Fund Balance for the CFD is now projected to be just over$63,000. If this is correct, then this
money should be available to contribute more for project ST 1509.
Is there any reason why.the "Transfer out"for ST 1509 cannot be increased from$122,000 to
$185,000 to reduce the hit to our M2 funds?
2