HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Res 4353 1994-11-14
I
I
I
RESOLUTION NUMBER -'1:35"3
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH
REGARDING THE ADOPTION OF THE FINAL DRAFT
NONDISPOSAL FACILITY ELEMENT
WHEREAS, the State of California amended the California Integrated
Waste Management Act of 1989 to require cities and
counties to develop Nondisposal Facility Elements (NDFE);
WHEREAS, a nondisposal facility is defined as any solid waste
facility required to obtain a solid waste facilities
pennit and recovers for reuse or recycling at least 5*0*1
of the materials it receives;
WHEREAS, the City has worked with the County of Orange to identify
and describe all new and existing nondisposal facilities
needed to implement the City's Source Reduction and
Recycling Element;
WHEREAS, the Orange County Waste Commission, acting as the
County's Local Task Force, has reviewed the City'S
Preliminary Draft NDFE and provided no cOllUllent due to the
fact that the NDFE meets all of the state's requirements;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Seal Beach that the Final Draft Nondisposal Facility Element is
approved.
Counci~~9di; the
the --L+=:-- day
te:
City of
of
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBE
COUNCILMEMBERS
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS
~ ~~"J/~
"C.;-
ATTEST:
/!
~~~''\\,\\\\,
ffOf SEAL ...l~1
- ........ ~4 'I
:: 4",.~ .0"'0"0... .0. C 1,.
,;; () ...~..(; 1#0... ~ YJ\
~ .~.
~..!. ;"'-
~ 0: : <~
~_~o Q.:~f
,,, ..tI'''o ~"'~:~H'
7,I.'f,.Q....8,1t :7. ,-~...~;
'f'~ 'I" C" ......... Co-.\;.:-
11\,,00 Nt'" .,~
\\\\\.,"'~-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE
CITY OF SEAL BEACH
SS
I, Joanne M. Yeo, City Clerk of Seal Beach, California, do hereby
certify that the fo~~~g resolution is the original copy of
Resolution Number ~ on file in the office of the City
Clerk, passe proved, and adopted by the City Council of the
C~~~f Seal h a regular meeting thereof held on the
~y of , 1994.
/ /-"
Resolution Number
i35"~
CITY OF SEAL BEACH
I
FINAL DRAFT
NONDISPOSAL
I
FACILITY ELEMENT
Submitted by:
City of Seal Beach
Administration Department
211 8th Street
Seal Beach, CA 90740
October, 1994
I
I
I
I
Resolution Number ~
CITY OF SEAL BEACH
NONDISPOSAL FACILITY ELEMENT
TlIBLE OP CO~'r.LMlTS
BACKGROUND .
METHODOLOGY.
NONDISPOSAL FACILITY ELEMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE
FIGURE 1
TABLE 1.
TABLE 2.
APPENDIX A
PAGES
1
1
1-2
2
3
4-9
10-19
20-28
Resolution Number ~~
CITY OF SEAL BEACH
NONDISPOSAL PACILITY ELEMENT
BACKGROUND
In 1989, the California legislature enacted the Integrated Waste I
Management Act (Act) which required each city and county to develop
and execute a plan to divert 25t of their solid waste by 1995 and
50t by the year 2000. The plan is called the Source Reduction and
Recycling Element (SRRE).
Since the enactment of the Act, there were numerous legislative and
regulatory changes to clarify tne methods of reporting achieved
waste reduction. One of these regulatory changes involves
requiring each city and county to prepare and adopt a Nondisposal
Facility Element (NOFE). The NOFE describes all existing
nondisposal facilities and any planned new or expanded nondisposal
facilities that will be needed to implement the city or county's
SRRE.
As defined in the California Public Resources Code (PRC Section
40151), a nondisposal facility is any solid waste facility required
to obtain a state solid waste facility permit from the California
Integrated Waste Management Board except a disposal facility or a
transformation facility. The general facilities that fall into the
category of "nondisposal" include transfer stations, material
recovery facilities (MRFs), and composting facilities.
METHODOLOGY
The City of Seal Beach was assisted in the development of this I
document by the County of Orange, utilizing a county-wide survey
process. The methodology for this coordinated effort is attached
as Appendix A. Although accounting for all nondisposed waste is
difficult, the City believes that the cooperative effort of all
Orange County cities, haulers, facility operators and the county
greatly improved the validity of the information provided in this
report.
NONDISPOSAL FACILITY ELEMENT
The City of Seal Beach has developed this NOFE to identify the
transfer stations, MRF's and composting facilities necessary to
implement the selected program alternatives from the City's SRRE
for both the short-term (1991-1995) and medium-term (1996-2000).
Figure 1 is a map of the existing, expanding and proposed
nondisposal facilities within Orange County. There are no existing
or planned nondisposal facilities or transfer stations located
within the City of Seal Beach.
CITY OF SEAL BEACH - NONOISPOSAL FACILITY ELEMENT
The City's SRRE defines the chosen programs to accomplish the
disposal reduction goals. Table 1 briefly describes the City's
existing and proposed programs, including an implementation
schedule and the hauler. Additionally, this Table describes the
facility type, facility location, and average daily tonnage
processed and recovered.
As the County of Orange compiled information from all cities and
the unincorporated areas of the County, this NOFE also includes
information regarding the current and future waste processing needs
and capacities of the nondisposal facilities presently utilized by
the City of Seal Beach (see Table 2).
I
I
I
I
~esolution Number
L/~5~
The current Seal Beach nondisposal facilities have adequate
capacity to process the various waste streams collected under the
City's current waste management programs. The one nondisposal
facility yet to be determined is a composting facility. The City
will work with it's haulers to determine the composting facilities
best suited, at the time of implementation.
BNVIRONMIENTAL COMPLIANCE
As indicated by PRC Section 41735(a) , the adoption or amendment of
this element is not subject to environmental review under the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). However, the
development of individual nondisposal facilities may be subject to
environmental review under CEQA during the permitting process.
The NDFE and any amendments are required to be appended to the
City's SRRE when it is included in the Countywide Integrated Waste
Management Plan. The NDFE will be incorporated into the City's
SRRE at the time of the first 5 year revision.
Resolution Number ~~~
01 I
1 ~ OIl
.f!l~ i ~~
Htt tf!~
Q 'ii~ I !I~~f
~ c.h:z ~ ::~
~@ @)
I
~
~
~
~
...
~
N
III ~ j -0
i~i 'l: J.g ~I!i
J~il~ l~"'.l! ..<~
I!>I~~~ t~i li!~
I "''I! _G"''':S Nfi
o 20 ."~:J: =01
@) @ e e
f
,.
-.
1
I-
. s
, ==
IIL1ir
~".f:ll
0=18
'8.-
"'lira_f
!"C-l!
:II i I"
l!.li~~
j
o
!
'Is
I
I
II
i
I
-
.
..
rI.l
...
_8
. .
foo,t>
I:::
:I
o
to)
I'D
I:::
f
o
I
.r:
..
.
..
IQ
'0
....
...
'C
..
1:1
..
..
e
a....
...
.. .
eIlI:II:
.
1:::...
1:::1.
o~
fooo
...~
=1:1I:
.
eldll
I'D
f
..
~
-<
..
EI:::
.0
z;:
.
.....
...0
=..:1
-
"dlI
r:
ell
I:::
...-
..1:1
=~~
"iie'"
. =
"'a..-
~
'OdlI8
.
.. 'C to)
e:..
fooal
~
'C..
....
-.
.eel
Jll:::
..0
rI.l;:
dlI;
E"
tl
fE
a..-
~
ii
~ ~ ~~
I'D ~ 8
~ ~
~ > ..
.. ill '" !l
l,jr;
ell 1! 1! ~ U
.51~~~
~ ~ i d
ral Ill: -< ....
6
'3 8~
rI.l Ii
i -.:-<
!-!! ~<
';~~~
g....N~
j~aj
rn...........-lICI)
~
.- 13
'Q ~
~61
~"fj 'B co
llii:rI.l Cllc
"iil ~ .5.-
Il ~j
-8
IllS ~ 5
UIf] COu;
~co~~a
fi:Et! 1fL:
'C ~ G .- II
!~~ ~ ~
.
. .
",
,'.
Resolution Number
#3~
~ ...
:E ~
'" ...
~ ! ~
~ fa 8
il e -
~ ~
I'D ~
.0\0\
= 0 0 ~....
o is .!o!
foo .. ., ~ tl
:] 1 fa~
~ ~ i !
ral Ill: -< ....
"iil ...
'j rn
'" EII'I
~ 6-
1"~8~
~~ail5
~ ~~E
.... UZ.il
>~;;j"!
u~=-<
~ J
~ ~'B
f.1 !~Ii
~ en Db 00
"iil ~ .s.li
Il ~J!
~ ~ Ii.
!~~ J jJ
11:E '.f ~l
~ f &i ~iSJ!
.
. .
~ ...
'C ill
... 'C ~
'" ...
C lr!
'W 51 51 11'I
ell U .
. ~ ~ ~
= U e
o ~ ~
... - '"
-
.
I::: 11'I N
o 0 iii
;: -
:c
'C
. ..
'-' '"
~I
is
i!
~....
~ 11
~ i ~
2 > d
Ill: -< ....
Resolution Number ~~~
,I:
"
..
..
lQ
-
..
..
rI.l
'IS
... t-
.. 0
-
i .
E-< t-
I:
:I
0
U
:.,
I::l
I!
0
'0
'is-
N
I
oa
I
..
"
e
D....
..
.....
llIICIC
..
I::lt'
1:...
o~
E-<o
~~
=C1C
..
QtIIJ
:.,
I!
...
~
-<
...
EI:
..0
Z-
..
~~
=..:1
-
"tIIJ
~
llII
I:
~-
...
-"'11-
-"
f:ie"
.. =
1&0 D.-
SJ.
'lStllJe
..
!:'iU
i-o'i
...
z
oa...
.....
i!
...
,1:1:
~!
tllJi
s'"
~!
,e.!
~ ~ ........
"0_ -8-8
"iil"il5 "il511l
~~ --~g~
tt~l. ttt~1
~~ 1:....
:":I~! :~I~I~
i 11 ri~ 10.::; rilO
E-<.... fi 3l:g I~
1]1 i1~ ~I ki i1~
~ fi'~~ ~,~
1;11 ClG-<....... ClG-<....
-<!;j:
"UIO
1i nl'~
... rI.l
~u..
!.5"S
f-< ~:g ~
A ,- z 00
- c:
U-'D
c: :>'C'l c:
'i1 ~- i:I
ClGClG!:;:I:
~
l I
i'lt
!{/) ~
:g~ "i
~~ :i
1 ool}"fV'l ~
"O~.IE-5 ~ ~ u
li_ 8 ....~c
..'" III S>-
"D'g -8 !l~ ".
:5 9t~ ij:S.S ~l
!8~fe. ~!! !is
.
.
.
on
CJ\
Cl\
..... ~ ~
~\.l -8 -8
- "il5
... ~ ~ ~I
llIIiI&O
= I! I'! on
I: .. il
S ~ ~ B
I!!
o ~ i ~
t~
> ~
<....
ii
I:
o
-
..
=6
oa
.. In L:
"'" rl ~
I~!
I
I
I
I
-
.
II
rI.l
...
o
I~
E-<,t-
e:
g
tJ
I'D
e:
f
o
I
.a::
"
.
II
lQ
10
'<>-
....
~
'1:1
II
'"
'"
II
"
f
Doll
-
II.
0Illll:
.
as'
:=.~
......0
;..,~
=lll:
.
el~
II
01)
f
II
~
-<
II
Ee:
.0
z;:
.
;..,"
_0
=.J
'i~
f&o
01)
e:
;..,-
_la
=t--
"0:;'
. a;. =
f&oDo-
~
'S~ ;
.
lI'1:1tJ
c.1I
~'i
II
z
'1:111
11-
-.
.gel
lie:
'50
rI.l;:
~~
Ell
~l
fe
Do-
Resoluti~n-NUmber ~~
~~
~"C) ~~ ~~
:!2~ "C~
~ ~ .....~~~ .....).9~
tt~ ttt~1 .ttta;1
fA ~ ~ B e: II II g .. ..
_ I! S~~B -~~B
it Ii 1~9ii J1~ h
:] l! fo~ ~.. ij fo~ ~.. ij fo~
~8~~l3 ~ft~~l3 ~ft~~l3
r:r:ld:&!-<.... ...i~-<.... Nilll:-<....
-a ...
.C rI.l
!l EIf'l
~ 6-
I.~!l~
~~:~
~o .
I- ~z.!!j
~J9!
~
.- rl
'Q ~
~ sl
f.E'i
IHJ
01)
"SI.5 110
.. ;a B ".S
I Poi i~~ I.~
tJ &:!l a Iii 'is .~ t
] 110 Ie :jJ.!!l III III ~
.9.5~ .I II ijl
!ll !ll ~Q~
.
.
.
,olution Nutnber
...
....
...
I
...
\
e
~~
.~
..
\~
t"~
~l
..
~d15
.
t
~
IJ:.
~
~
-.
#J
"S
... lO'
~O
~.
to' ...
~
a
.
t
o
~
..
i~
-
~"i
~5
'==
~d15
~
,
-- ~~
.ii '0'0
l~ ..ll...
~...~~ "'Yo~""
~ , , 0'\ ~ \ \ ~~
~~~, -,ilSllI\
f~ u.. ~ \..1 "1\ .. ..
~ i "'\ ~\ ~ ~ e r\ ~ \
t"_ I . , ~ $ ~ \.. 1 ~ \
\\\1\\ i \L
g
.::\"-
. b\ ~
'6 fJ) '6
l'~
t"11I%
~~cn
<...-
i~~
1 ~
"l \
i\ ,
1U) ~
:a ~ "'i
ri~ .~
'it" ~
.
-0
..~
';ilS
"t~
~~
ff.l::!
dI5~
ell
t
...
,
_
\\ ~
II \ ~i
%"'i l'~ u .
ail .& 11
. .
.
>C
"0'
on
\
t
CIo<~
~c!1
..
at.'
0"
~~
...~
::;...
CIl
pollS
~
~
~
i
."
.t3
i
-a
:A
..
6~
..i
~'"
to-'
::;,.;1
-
~ollS
\ilot
"0
It'
o
.
~ to-
~
a
~
t
o
,
...O,utiOO .""".r ~
-- ~~
~~ "'0"'0
.no!' :l~o!'
1t'~ ii''''\
~~~, -a~~'
\\ {\\ ~ ~ \ -\ ~\ ~ ..
..., .. 1 \ 'i 1).. '\ H
ii' ~ t\ 1 '\ fl n
:.." 1 .. -<, "J ~ -< ,
~. ~
~ ~
8\~
~fI) .
11\
~~a
l~~
't~
-a!
1~
:A!
ollS~
el
~
~!
1 ~
l~\
11A ,
l:a ~
.111
OlD
\\ \1
:2\ ~ li
i~ \ i )i":t
~\~ 11 I!
. ..
Resolution Number ~~:3
ii
..
l'I.l
'0
...~
:E C
. .
...~
I:
::I
o
t)
I'D
I:
f
o
.I:
II
.
..
III
'"
'c;-
'"
]
~
"Cl
..
=
..
II
e
A...
..
...
OIlllll:
.
I:t'
c:..
o~
"'0
..~
=llII:
.
QcIIJ
..
OIl
f
..
~
-<
..
Ec:
.0
z=
.
..Co/
..0
=~
CicIIJ
~
OIl
I:
~1
=~""-
Cie~
. =
~A.:S
'OcIIJ;
.
.. "Cl t)
Do..
~'i
.;.
"Cl..
....
-.
.aCl
..
.l:C:
~!
cllJi
E"
,1
eE
A.-
1;- >. >. >.
~~tf! ,...~~tf!
~~~I :~~~I
~~ = ~~
ssw J:!SS!l
i'd>! -i'di'dl!
~~ Ii 1,.Hi
;,;s.:~~'!'Js.:~~
~~~idg iid
_&:llii:-<... <'l 0::<...
7iI ...
"Ii ~
Rl _:::! VI
~ 0-
1.~8S!
~=iii
'i~"E~
i! i"- 0 E
!- il Z 'il
>~;;;~
u~=<
~
.- rI
'Q =i
!1; i.
~ IS ~
~.iI "8
~l'I.l Db~
_.. c:.-
'j'; '13 g
~~ ~&:
IlO
]).5
~ ~ Iii rI
c:: i.-
'as ~ .~~
.13 gj C! IIll'lJ
b~ Ii ti ijl
Rll ! !O~
. ..
I
>.1;-
~ :!2 tf!
l ! ~I
OIl 1lIl
I! ~ ..
" - S
i'd ii I!
0\ ~ VI
0\ ~ ~
g~~ti
~~&<""
'i
.~e!
=s
~.:
Ii
~!S
c
~..
og .
.- !l
z.8~
I
~
:=
~ ~
'::l
l~
~~
8
.~ ~ Iii .
- ~ sri
~ - llb'S:!
B ~ .~t
lfj 1l al~
~J G ul
1 }].",~
>- _ ;I;O_
I
. ..
Table 2 "Resolution Number
.'
Stanton Transfer Station
(CR Transfer)
,&33
Sh<<t J 0/3
I
Location Address: 11232 Knott Avenue
Slanton, California 90680
Host Jurisdiction: City of Slanton
Type of Facility Existing material recDVeJ)' facility and transfer staliOll with a
maximum permitted daily capacity of 1~ tons per day operaling
7 days per week.
Facility Capacity & Average Dally Capacity: EDstlng Proposed
Processing (tons/day) (tons/day)
Capabilities .
Municipal Solid Waste 1.800 same
Facility Diversion Diversion Rate: 1'94 1"5 2000
Rate or Expected Existing Proposed Proposed
Diversion Rate
(Material Recovery Municipal Solid Z7%* Z1%* Z1%*
Rate) Waste
.
*Assumed; facility has not verified.
Table 2
I Stanton Transfer Station
(CR Transfer)
Shut 2 o/J
Participating Jurisdiction Existing Average EDstlng
Jurisdictions & Dally Use Recovery Rate
Average Dally (tonsIday)
Facility Use Buena Park 291 25%
Cc>sta Mesa 115 2S%
Cypress 4 100%
Dana Point 21 86%
Garden Grove 29 0%
La Palma SO 26%
Laguna Hills 1.4 98%
Laguna Nigue1 Z1 100%
NcwportBeach 135 2S%
San aemente 20 90%
I San Juan Capistrano IS 80%
Santa Ana 269 18%
Seal Beach 9 100%
Slanton 100 25%
Westminster 52 0%
County 54 26%
TOfAL 1.192 Z1%*
*weighte4 average
Resolution Number ~~~
Table 2
Stanton Transfer Station
(CR Transfer)
Participating
Jurisdictions &:
Average Dally
Facility Use
(Future Use)
Jurisdiction
1995
Future Additional
Average Dally Use
(tons/day)
ShulJojJ I
1995
Future Recovery
Rate (for
additional use)
Buena ParIc (1995) '1:1-- ..
La Palma (1995) SO 26%
Stanton (1995) 98.. ..
TaI"AL(l995) 175 ..
:woo 2000
Jurls81ctlon Future Additional Future Recovery
Average Dally Use Rate (for
(tons/day) additional use)
Buena ParIc (2000) 95.. ..
Costa Mesa (2000) 22.. .. I
La Palma (2000) SO 50%
Newport Beach (2000) 15 ...
StaD~ (2000) 31.. ..
TaI"AL(2OOO) 213 ..
.*'focal projected tonnage to be pnxused aDd recovery rare are
unknown. Future average daily uso figllRllq...&ulS total
projected recoveJ)' tonnage.
...Additiooal recoveJ)' from 1995 and existing average daily
tonnage in addition to daily uso in the year 2000 exceeds daily uso
in the year 2000.
I
Table 2 Resolution Number ~S3
CVT Transfer - Material Recovery Facility
Shee' J 0/3
I
.
Location Address: 1131 North Blue Own Street
AlIlIheim, California 92815
Host Jurisdiction: City of Anaheim
Type of Faelllty Existing material recovery facility and transfer sfaliOll with a
maximum pennitted daily capacity of 4,168 tons per day, operating
7 days per week. The facility is planned to be expanded in the
future under a revised permit to a maximum permitted daily capacity
of 8,000 to 10,000 tons per day, operatin~ 7 days per week.
Facility Capacity &: Average Dally Capacity: July "4
Processing Existing Proposed"
Capabilities (tonsIday) (tonsIday)
Mixed Waste Processing 400 2_700
Commingled Recyclables 600 600
Source Sepuated YanI Waste SOO SOO
NonprOO"Ssetf (Transfemd) 2.668 368
TOI'AL 4.168 4.168
Faelllty Diversion Diversion Rate: 1"4 1"5 2000
Rate or Expected Existing Proposed Proposed
Diversion Rate
(Material Recovery All Waste SlreamS 20% 25% SO%
Rate)
I
Table 2
CVT Transfer - Material Recovery Facility
SlIM 20/3
Partlelpatlng Jurisdiction Existing Average Existing
Jurisdictions &: (Orange County Dally Use Recovery Rate
Average Dally only) (tonsIday)
Facility Use Anaheim 1.127 14%
Brea 164 17%
Ccsta Mesa S SO%
Cypress 39 82%
Garden Grove 442 18%
Irvine 10 SO%
La Habra 32 (;1%
Los A1amiUlS 6 83%
Mission Viejo 19 SO%
I Newport Beach 18 44%
Placentia 141 21%
Seal Beach 11 91%
Tustin I 36%
Vma Park 26 25%
Wea1minster 96 14%
YOJba Uncia 191 22%
County 27 22%
TOI'AL 2355 19%.
.weighted average
Resolution Number ~~~
Table 2
CVT Transfer - Material Recovery Facility
Shut .3013
Partlc:lpatlng Jurisdiction 1995 1995
Jurisdictions &: Future Additional Future Recovery
Average Daily Average Dally Use Rate (for
Facility Use (tons/day) additional use)
(Future Use) I
Anaheim (1995) 121 100%
Brea (1995) 20 100%
C~ress (1995) 89 26%
Fullerton (7/94) 586 25%
Fullerton (1995) 234** --
La Habra (1995) 19*- --
Los Alamitos (1995) 25 50%
Seal Beach (1995) 22 50%
TOfAL(I995) 1.116 --
Jurisdiction 2000 2000
Future Additional Future Recovery
Average Dally Use Rate (for
(tons/day) additional use)
Anaheim (2000) 74 100%
Brea (2000) 19 100%
Cypress (2000) 17 ---
I
Fullerton (2000) '1:1*- --
La Habra (2000) 51" --
Seal Beach (2000) 7 81%
W-illllUlr' (2000) 41 0%
Yorba Linda (2000) 61 100%
TOfAL(2000) 298 -*
**Total projected. Inn;"'&#: to be pl~""tsed and RlCOVCIY mte are
IUIknown. Future average cIaily use figure represents total
projec:flld RlCOVCIY _nso PI"
-**Additiooal. recovery from 1995 8Dd existing average daily
tnnnagein addiuon to cIaily use in the year2000~ cIaily use
in the year 2000.
I
Resolution Number ~~
Table 2
Rainbow TransferJRecycllng, Inc.
Sheet J 0/2
I
Location Address: 17121 Nichols Street
Huntington Beach, California 92647
Host Jurisdiction: City of Huntington Beach
Type or Facility Existing material recovery facility and transfer station with a
maximum permitted daily capacity of 2,800 tons per day operating
6 days per week.
Facility Capacity &: Average Daily Capacity: Existing Proposed
Processing (tons/day) (tons/day)
Capabilities MlUlicipal Solid Waste 1.500 2_800
Facility Diversion Diversion Rate: 1'94 1995 2000
Rate or Expected Existing Proposed Proposed
Diversion Rate
(Material Recovery 'Mixed Solid Waste 1()"14 % +25 % +40%
Rate)
Participating Jurisdidlon Existing Average Existing
Jurlsdldions &: Daily Use Recovery Rate
Average Daily (tonsIday)
Facility Use Carircs (L.A. Co.) 3 8%
Costa Mesa 30 10%
Fountain Valley 210 10%
Garden Orove 25 4%
Huntington Beach 815 12%
Irvine 35 99&
Laguna Beach 1 5%
Newport Beach 2S 12%
. Santa Ana 15 7%
Seal Beach 14 7%
Weslminst.er '217 6%
County 48 12%
Tar AL 1.437 10%-
-weighted average
I
I
Resolution
Number /.:l5::J
Table 2
Rainbow TransferlRecycling, Inc.
SMe/2oj2
Participating
Jurisdictions &
Average Dally
Facility Use
(Future Use)
Jurisdiction
1995
Future Additional
Average Dally Use
(tons/day)
1995
Future Recovery
Rate (for
additional use)
36** ** I
155** **
14 25%
205 **
Fountain Valley
( 1995)
HlDltington Beach
( 1995)
Seal Beach (1995)
TOTAL (1995)
.
2000
Future Additional
Average Daily Use
(lons/day)
2000
Future Recovery
Rate (for
additional use)
Jurisdiction
FolIDtain Valley 49** **
(2000)
Huntington Beach 153** **
(2000)
Seal Beach (2000) 14 SO%
TOTAL (2000) 216 **
I
**T0ClIi projected tnn""8I" to be I".xessed and recovery rate are
unknown. Futureavenae daily use figure rqnesents total
projected recovery tnn""8f'
I
Resolution Number ~~
Table 2
Bel-Art Transfer Station
,
SIrul /oj J
,
Location Address: 2501 E. 86th Street
Long Beach, California 90805
Host Jurisdiction: City of Long Beach
Type of Facility Existing material nlCOVeJ)' facility and transfer station with a
maximum permitted daily capacity of 1,500 tons per day, operating
6 days per week.
Facility Capacity & Average Daily Capacity: Existing Proposed
Processing (tons/day) (tons/day)
Capabilities All Waste Streams 1500 same
.
TOfAL 1500 same
Facility Diversion Diversion Rate: 1994 1995 2000
Rate or Expected Existing Proposed Proposed
Diversion Rate
(Material Recovery Ail Waste Streams 8% 8% 8%
Rate)
Participating The City of Long Beach reports that private customers from the
Jurisdictions & cities of Bellflower, Carson, Lakewood, Long Beach, Paramount,
Average Daily San Pedro, Signal Hill, and Tonance utilize this facility. A small
Facility Use portion of waste from the cities of Los Alamitos and Seal Beach is
also sent to this facility.
JurlsCIletlon Existing Average Existing
Daily Use Recovery Rate
(tons/day)
Los Alamitos 2 8%
Seal Beach 9 8%
TOfAL 11 8%*
.weighted average
'I
I
I
Resolution Number
~63
Table 2
Falcon Refuse Center, Inc.
Sheet] oJ]
Location Address: 3031 East I Street
Wilmington, California 90744
Host Jurisdiction: City of Los Angeles
Type of Facility Existing material recoYeJY facility and transfer station with a
permitted daily capacity or 1,850 tons per day operating 6 days per
week.
Facility Capaelty & A vel'llge Dally Capacity: Existing Proposed
Processing (tons/day) (tonsIday)
Capabilities Municipal Solid Waste 1.200 same
.
TarAL 1.200 same
Facility Diversion Diversion Rate: 1"4 1"5 2000
Rate or Expected Existing Proposed Proposed
Diversion Rate
(Material Recovery Municipal Solid Waste S% 5% 5%
Rate)
Partlelpatlng Jurisdiction- ExistIng Average Existing
JurisdIctions & Dally Use Recovery Rate
Average Dally (tonsIday)
Facility Use Seal Beach 9 5%
-Orange County jurisdictions only; remaining waste stream is from
Los Angeles County.
I
I
I
'Resolution Number 4'.:15.3
APPENDIX A
Methodology for Developing t:he NondispoBal Pacilit:y
Blement:s for Orange Count:y Jurisdict:ioas
Introduction
I
The objective of the Nondisposal Facility Element (NDFE) is to
identify the utilization of transfer stations, materials recovery
facilities (MRF's), and composting facilities necessary to
implement the programs selected for implementation in a city or
county's Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) for both the
short-term (1991 to 1995) and medium-term (1996 to 2000) planning
periods. For Orange County, a countywide approach was used to
development the NDFE data for the County Unincorporated Area and
for each of the Cities. The NDFE data tables were developed based
on information that was available to the Cities and County at the
time the NDFE was prepared.
countvwide Survev
A countywide survey was conducted of City and County
representatives, waste haulers, and nondisposal facility
owners/operators to develop a data base of current and future
proposed utilization of various existing, expanding, and future
proposed nondisposal facilities. The NDFE survey was discussed at
the City/County Workshop on January 5, 1994, and the survey was
conducted during the period January through March 1994. The survey
data was collected specifically for the development of the NDFEs
and not for determining compliance with the diversion goals of AB
939. The City and County representatives, waste haulers and
nondisposal facility owners/operators surveyed are listed on the
following pages.
I
NDFE Data Table Develonment
Two sets of NDFE data tables were complied: 1) a table for the
County Unincorporated Area and for each of the Cities that
describes the utilization of existing, expanding, and proposed
nondisposal facilities required to implement the County's and each
City'S SRRE as well as identification of future nondisposal
facility capacity needs; and 2) a series of tables that describe
each of the existing, expanding and known proposed nondisposal
facilities utilized by the County and Cities. These tables were
complied based on the existing conditions as surveyed, the future
programs specified in City and County representative surveys, and
the programs and projected diversion tonnage identified in the
County and each City's BRRE. Because City and County
representatives, waste haulers, and nondisposal facility operators
provided data for varying reporting periods, the total of the
existing average daily use by jurisdictions may not match the
average daily capacity reported by the nondisposal facility
operator.
I
Descript:ion of Dat:a and Process Used t:o Develop Table 1,
Programs and Pacilit:y Needs for Hcadisposal Pacilit:y Blement:s
COLUMNS
Proaram and Scheduled Imnlementation Date.
This column lists existing programs identified on hauler,
nondisposal facility, and city surveys, as well as programs
identified in each jurisdiction's BRRE that would, or may, require
use of a nondisposal facility for program implementation. Where
possible, program names from the BRRE were associated with existing
programs identified on hauler, nondisposal facility, and city
surveys.
Resolution
Number 4!153
Scheduled implementation dates were derived from the hauler,
nondisposal facility, and city surveys and from each jurisdiction's
SRRE. Existing programs were identified as such and notations were
made as appropriate regarding program expansion dates. While
scheduled program implementation dates may have in practice been
changed by the city, the new dates would only have been reflected
in this column if the city provided the new dates in their
comments.
The hauler identification was primarily based on information I
provided on hauler, nondisposal and city surveys. In cases where
the expanding or proposed program could potentially be provided by
more than one hauler, the data for a program was typically combined
because information was not available to allocated the relative
portion for each hauler.
TvDe of Facilitv Needed and processinq Canabilitv.
This column lists the type of nondisposal facility that would
likely be required to implement each program identified in the
first column, including material recover facilities, transfer
stations, and compost facilities. Processing capability was
determined from the types of materials collected and the collection
method (Le. commingled recyclables, mixed ,solid waste, source
separated yard waste), and the corresponding processing method
(Le. composting), In cases where it was unclear what processing
capability was required, question marks were either inserted in
place or the -processing capability- or following a possible
-processing capability- as determined from the information
provided. A common example of this is proposed yard waste programs
where it could not be determined from the information provided
whether the intent was to mulch or compost the yard waste
materials.
Facilitv Name and Location. I
The facility name and location data in this column was primarily
based on facilities identified on hauler, nondisposal facility, and
city surveys and in some cases as identified in the SRREs. In
cases where a proposed program would require the use of a
nondisposal facility and a specific facility has not been
identified, question marks were inserted in the first set of data
tables that were distributed to the cities for review and comment.
If a specific facility name was provided in city comments, or if
the city requested that a notation be made that the facility will
be identified at a future date, these changes were made.
Averaae Dailv Tonnaae Processed and Recoverv Rate.
This column presents the average daily tonnage of materials
processed for each program at a particular facility, the average
daily tonnage of materials recovered for this program, and the
corresponding average recovery rate of materials from this program.
The -. of days/week- refers to the number of days per week that the
facility processes materials from a particular program.
Data in this column was presented for one or a combination of the
following:
Existinq Tonnaqe. This data was based on information provided
on hauler, nondisposal facility, and city surveys.
1995 and 2000 (taraet vear). This data was primarily based on
information provided in each city's SRRE. If the program is
an existing program, the additional tonnage required to be
processed and recovered in order to meet the proj ected
diversion target for that particular program for 1995 was
calculated; the results of these calculated; the results of
these calculations was provided in this column under the
heading -1995 (additional tonnage) -. If the program is not an
existing program is not an existing program, the tonnage
required to be processed and recovered in order to meet the
projected diversion target for that particular program for
1995 was calculated; the results of these calculation was
provided in this column under the heading -1995.-
I
I
I
I
J'Resolutipn.Number ~
In some cases, the diverted tonnage reported for the existing
program either program either met or exceeded the projected
diversion tonnage for 1995; In these cases, no additional
tonnage for 1995' was listed; however, additional diversion
tonnage may be required to meet the projected diversion target
for that particular program for the year 2000. If the
calculations indicated that additional tonnage is required to
be processed and recovered in order to meet the proj ected
diversion target for that particular program for the year
2000, the additional tonnage data was provided in this column
under the heading "2000 (additional tonnage)."
For some cities, this data is incomplete to varying degrees. For
some cities, entire programs may not be addressed in Table 1
because the info~ation was not available from the SRRE, was not
provided on city surveys, and/or was not provided during the
cOllUllent period.
For some programs, there are blanks and/or question marks relative
to the average daily tons of material processed because the
information was not available from the SRRE, was not provided on
city, hauler, or nondisposal facility surveys, and/or was not
provided during the cOllUllent period.
Description of Data and Process Used to Develop Pacility
Tables for Nondisposa1 Facility Elements
COL1JMHS
Location.
Data on the facility location was obtained from information
provided on nondisposal facility surveys.
TvDe of Facilitv.
This portion of the table describes whether the facility is a
material recovery facility, transfer station, and/or compost
facility, the facility's maximum permitted daily capacity, solid
waste facility permit status, and any expansion plans. Data on the
type of facility and other information provided was obtained from
information provided on nondisposal facility surveys, and follow-up
research with nondisposal facility owners/operators.
Facilitv Diversion Rate or Exoected Diversion Rate (Material
Recoverv Rate) .
This portion of the table describes the facility'S existing (1994)
and expected (1995 and 2000) diversion rate, or material recovery
rate for all waste streams received and processed at the facility.
Data on the facility's diversion rate or expected diversion rate
was obtained from information provided on nondisposal facility
surveys, and follow-up research with nondisposal facility
owners/operators, unless otherwise noted.
partici.natin:o Jurisdictions and Averaae Dailv Facilitv Use (or
Futqre Averaae Dailv Facilitv Use).
This portion of the table summarizes the information listed on
Table 1 in the "Average Daily Tonnage Processed & Recovery RateR
column for the County and each city. The data is subdivided into
existing, 1995 future additional, and 2000 future additional
average daily use. The data presented for 1995 and 2000 future
conditions are in addition to the existing conditions data or the
1995 conditions data preceding it. For some cities, existing
conditions may be noted, but not the 1995 or 2000 conditions; this
is likely the result of insufficient information as described under
Table 1, Average Daily Tonnage Processed & Recovery Rate, above.
For some cities, existing conditions and 2000 conditions may be
noted, but not the 1995 conditions; this is likely the result of
the existing program meeting or exceeding the projected 1995
conditions, but not the 2000 conditions, The same reason may apply
if existing conditions meet or exceed the projected 2000
conditions.
~esolution Number
~5"3
City/County Representatives
Ms. Jamie Herbon
City of Seal Beach
211 Eighth Street
Seal Beach, CA 90740
Ms, Carol Jacobs
Office of the Public Services
P.O. Box 1200
Costa Mesa, CA 92628-1200
Mr. Gary Dysart
City of Dana Point
32282 Golden Lantern
Dana Point, CA 92629
Ms. Cindy Asher
City of Irvine
One Civic Center Plaza
Irvine, CA 92713
Ms. Marla Anderson
City of Placentia
401 E. Chapman
Placentia, CA 92670
Ms, Denise Landstedt
City of Garden Grove
11391 Acacia Parkway
Garden Grove, CA 92642
Mr. George Buell
City of Fullerton
303 W. Commonwealth
Fullerton, CA 90630
Mr. Don Vestal
City of Westminster
8200 Westminster Blvd
Westminster, CA 92683
Ms. Jamie Herbon
City of Los Alamitos
3191 Katella Avenue
Los Alamitos, CA 90720
Mr. Glen Yasui
City of Yorba Linda
4845 Casa Lema
Yorba Linda, CA 93686
Mr. Fred Maley
City of Villa Park
17855 S. Santiago Blvd,
Villa Park, CA 92667
Mr. Danian Hopp
City of Mission Viejo
26522 La Alameda Ste. 160
Mission Viejo, CA 92691
Mr. Will Hayes
City of Santa Ana
P,O. Box 1988 M-22
Santa Ana, CA 92701
Mr. Bob Woodings
City of Lake Forest
23778 Mercury Road
Lake Forest, CA 92630
Mr. Douglas Dumhart
City of San Juan Capistrano
32400 paseo Adelante
San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
Mr. Ken Montgomery
City of Laguna Niguel
27821 La Paz Road
Laguna Niguel, CA 92656
Ms. Linda Daily
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Ms. Nanci R. Gee
City of Orange
300 E. Chapman
Orange, CA 92666
I
Ms. Carolyn Solomon
City of Laguna Beach
505 Forest Avenue
Laguna Beach, CA 92651
Mr. Richard Maurer
City of La Habra
201 E. La Habra Blvd
La Habra, CA 90631
Mr. Michael Morgan
City of San Clemente
390 Avenida Pico
San Clemente, CA 95814
Mr. Doug Brodowski
City of Buena Park
6650 Beach Boulevard
Buena Park, CA 90620
Mr. Fred Wickman
City of Stanton
10660 Western Avenue
Stanton, CA 90680
I
Ms. Jamie Herbon
City of Cypress
5275 Orange Avenue
Cypress, CA 90630
Ms. Jamie Herbon
City of La Palma
7822 Walker Street
La Palma, CA 90623
Mr. John Oliver
City of Brea
1 Civic Center Drive
Brea, CA 92621
I
Ms. Katie Pitcher
City of Tustin
300 Centenial Way
Tustin, CA 92680
Mr. Rod Hallock
City of Anaheim
200 S. Anaheim Boulevard
Anaheim, CA 92803
".. .
" ResolutJ.on
Number ~5":3
City/County Representatives
Ms. Susan Lynn
City of Fountain Valley
10200 Slater Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
I.
Mr. David E. Niederhaus
City of Newport Beach
P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, CA 92625
Mr. Quang Nguyen
Environmental Health Division
County of Orange
2009 E, Edinger Ave.
Santa Ana, CA 92705
Mr. Charles Schumacker
Environmental Mgmt. Agency
County of Orange
400 Civic Center West
Santa Ana, CA 92702
Ms. Marci Schwartz
City of Laguna Hills
25201 Paseo de Alicia Ste. 150
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
Ms. Sue Gordon
Integrated Waste Management Bd
County of Orange
320 N. Flower St. Ste 400
Santa Ana, CA 92703
Ms. Patricia Henshaw
Environmental Health Division
County of Orange
2009 E. Edinger Ave.
Santa Ana, CA 92705
Waste Haulers
I
Solag Disposal
P.O. Box 1100
San Juan Capistrano, CA 92693
Ware Disposal Co., Inc.
P.O. Box 8206
Newport Beach, CA 92658
Rainbow Disposal Company
17121 Nichols
Huntington Beach, CA 92647
Stanton Disposal
P.O. Box 125
Stanton, CA 90680
National Refuse Services
5 Bayport
Irvine, CA 92714
I
Briggeman Disposal Services
P.O. Box 3237
Los Alamitos, CA 90720
Waste Management of
Orange County Inc.
16122 Construction Circle East
Irvine, CA 92714
City of Newport Beach
P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Western Waste
P.O. Box 214
Irvine, CA 92714
A-Trojan Disposal
5600 Alhambra Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90032
Park Disposal
P.O. Box 8206
Buena Park, CA 90621
South Coast Refuse
2021 Business Center Dr. Ste 114
Irvine, CA 92715
Federal Disposal Service
P.O. Box 18556
Irvine, CA 92713
Anaheim Disposal
P.O. Box 309
Anaheim, CA 92805
Sunset Environmental Inc.
16182 Construction Circle West
Irvine, CA 92714
Haul Away Containers
11292 Western Avenue
Stanton, CA 90680
ORCO Disposal
c/o Stanton Disposal
P,O, Box 125
Stanton, CA 90680
Five Star Rubbish
P.O. Box 9278
Newport Beach, CA 92658
Document Disintegration
572 W. 84th St.
Gardena, CA 90248
Yorba Linda Disposal
1131 North Blue Gum St.
Anaheim, CA 92815
Resolutio Number ~~~
Waste Haulers
Garden Grove Disposal
1131 North Blue Gum St.
Anaheim, CA 92815
Great Western Reclamation
1800 S. Grand Avenue
Santa Ana, CA 92705
Orange Disposal Services Inc.
1931 N. Batavia Street
Orange, CA 92665
Brea Disposal
1131 North Blue Gum St.
Anaheim, CA 92815
Costa Mesa Disposal Inc.
2051 Placentia Avenue
Costa Mesa, CA 92627
Perdomo & Sons Inc.
P.O. Box 33185
Los Angeles, CA 90033
MG Disposal
201 S. Balcom
Fullerton, CA 92633
villa Park Disposal
1131 North Blue Gum St.
Anaheim, CA 92815
'1
Garden Grove Sanitary District
11400 Stanford Ave. Ste. A
Garden Grove, CA 92640
Placentia Disposal
1131 North Blue Gum St.
Anaheim, CA 92815
Midway City Sanitary Dist.
14451 Cedarwood Street
Westminster, CA 92683
Noadisposal Pacility Owner/Operators
Blue Ribbon Organics
c/o Blue Ribbon Nursery
1425 N. Santiago
Orange, CA 92669
Golden Coast Sawdust
Products Inc.
7975 Irvine Blvd.
Irvine, CA 92718
Bio-Gro Systems
19600 Fairchild Ste, 240
Irvine, CA 92715
Solag Disposal Inc.
P.O. Box 1100
San Juan Capistrano, CA 92693
Leisure World
P.O. Box 2220
Laguna Hills, CA 92654
BFI Organics
7982 Irvine Blvd.
Irvine, CA 92718
Wrecoa Industries Inc.
33159 - D Camino Capistrano
San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
Rainbow Disposal
17121 Nichols
Huntington Beach, CA 92647
CVT Transfer - Material
Recovery Facility
1131 Blue Gum
Anaheim, CA 92815
I
La pata Green Waste
31726 Rancho Viejo Rd
Suite 118
San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
. Aguinaga Farms
7992 Irvine Blvd
Irvine, CA 92718
Recyc
114 Business Center Drive
Cor~)Da, CA 91720
CR Transfer
11232 Knott Avenue
Stanton, CA 90680
City of Newport Beach
592 Superior Avenue
Newport Beach, CA 92658
Orange Disposal
1931 N. Batavia Street
Orange, CA 92667
Sunset Environmental
16122 Construction Circle Drive
Irvine, CA 92714
I
I
I
I
Resolution Number ~.6:J
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2015.5 C.C.P.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
Cou'nty of Orange
This space for for the County Clerk's
Filing Stamp
I am a citizen of the United States
and a resident of the County afore-
said; I am over the age of eighteen
years, and not a party to or Inter-
ested in the above-entitled matter.
I am the principal clerk of the printer
of the SEAL BEACH SUN, a newspaper
of general circulation, printed and
published weekly In the City of SUI
Beach, County of Orange and which
newspaper has been adjudged a
newspaper of general circulation by
the Superior Court of the County of
Orange, State of California, under the
date of 2124n5. Case Number A82583:
that the notice of which the annexed
is a printed copy (set in type not
smaller than nonpareil), has been
published In each regular and entire
Issue of said newspaper and not in
any supplement thereof on the
following dates, to-wit:
IO(Q"l
all In the year 19J1.4...
I certify (or declare) under penalty of
perjury that the foregoing Is true and
correct.
Proof of Publication of
. .~T~c;.,? .9.r. . ~~W~ .~.~t.~C4
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
\I
NOTICE OF
PIIIUC HEARING
II011CE . _BY ClM!N IIIal
.. cIly "'&.IlIuch will conduct I
publiC hll~ng an MandlY.
_r 14111. 1884 It7:ODr..m
In CIty CauIlCll CIlomboIl, 21 -8ItI
BIreeI. Seal "'ch. 10 CDnIId.r a
Flnll Drllt Nandllpa..1 Flclllty
EII..-. A __I Foell" 10
cIoIInod II lIlY IDIId _ foc1ll1y
_Irod to _In I lalld II_I
permit and recavera lor reUN or
_11_.......... "'..
_1_.A_"'..
Flnol Droit Nanclllpaoll' Flctllty
_10 1..11obI1 lor _ II
CIty HoII. CI1y CIa.... 0IIIc0. 211 -
.., _. _Ilooch, CIIIID_
Any Intlreltld peraon may file
written comments wtth lie S..,
_ CJIy CIa'" or JIIIY pravtdl
or.1 comment. at the publiC
"'dog. '111I cay CauncII will govo
__ to d IUch aammonII
In_"___"
-- . "'" dIoIIongO""",
In court. thl chllllnae may be
_ to onlY ...... 11 .. pUblic
__Intlllo_.ond
mUI' fll commenced wllhln the
olIlu11 .. IImnollDno pnJvldod .n
_1-13.... Cly COdI.
. DAlED 11110 2IlII cloy '" OcIabor.
IIlll4
_U.VID.CIlyClorlc
Cllyal__
Pub.Sun'" ~___ICW71l14
PUBLICATION SSED BY:
THE SUN NEWSPAPERS
216 Main Street
P,O, Box 755
Seal B.ach, CA 80740
(310)430-7555