HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem Rkl
May 10, 1999
STAFF REPORT
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Attention: Keith R. Till, City Manager
From: Lee Whittenberg, Director of Development Services
Subject: ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1419 re: ZONING
TEXT AMENDMENT 96-1 - Decks along Crestview and
Catalina Avenues and Surf Place
"' %,COMMENDATION
Adopt Ordinance No. 1419, An Ordinance of the City of
Seal Beach Amending Section 28-401 of the Code of the City of Seal Beach to Conditionally
Allow Deck Structures in Rear -Yard Setbacks on Properties in the Residential Low Density
Zone District, which abut the Hellman Ranch or Gum Grove Park as revised based on
previous City Council direction. Refer issue of height limitations for retaining walls in subject
area to Planning Commission for Zone Tent Amendment consideration.
DISCUSSION
Overview of proposed Ordinance No. 1419:
lWinor Plan Review for Pre-erisrine non -Permitted structures:
As introduced and as requested for amendments by the City Council on April 26, Ordinance
No. 1419 (See Attachment 1) would require owners of existing, non -permitted decks within
the rear yard setback to apply for a minor plan review to allow those decks to remain within
12 months of the adoption of the ordinance. The minor plan review process is a consent
calendar item on the Planning Commission agenda, and requires notification to owners and
occupants within 100 feet of the subject property. The City can condition its approval of any
request to ensure health, safety and public welfare concerns are properly addressed.
AGENDA ITEM R
C.Wy DmnamslZTA1ZTA 961 CC Adoplim aufrR"mdmLW 5-05-99
J
City Council StafReleort re: Ordinance No. 1419
Rear Yard Setback Standards for Decks along
Crestview and Catalina Avenues and Sur(Place
May 10, 1999
Enforcement Process for Pre-existing non -permitted structures:
Upon adoption of Ordinance No. 1419, if properties with non -permitted structures within the
rear yard setback area do not apply for the appropriate minor plan review approval within the
stipulated 12 -month time period, a notice of code violation would be filed with the County
Recorder's office or other appropriate enforcement actions initiated.
Conditional Use Permit required for nnv deck structures —12 S -foot height limitation •
In addition, the City Council determined to allow future applications for additional decks to be
processed through the conditional use permit (CUP) process, subject to a height limitation of
12.5 feet. The CUP process involves a public hearing before the Planning Commission, and
requires notice to owners and occupants within 300 feet of the subject property. As with the
minor plan reviews, the City can condition its approval of any request to ensure health, safety
and public welfare concerns are properly addressed.
Height limimtion for retainine ivalls for Properties subject to ZTA 96-1 •
In response to City Council discussion regarding the height of retaining walls, staff has
reviewed the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance and the Building Code, and finds no
applicable height limitations regarding retaining walls. Provided below are sections of the
Zoning Ordinance and Building Code regarding retaining walls:
Zoning Ordinance•
"ection 28-2316 Fences Walls, Hedges and Screen Planting .
2. General Fence Provisions
(D) Retaining Walls. Where a retaining wall is located either on a property
line or within the lot, a fence, wall, hedge or screen planting may be placed on the
retaining wall. The height of such fence, wall or screen planting shall be six (6)
feet or less in height measured from the highest elevation of land contiguous to the
fence, wall or screen planting but in no case shall be greater than eight (8) feet as
measured from either side of the fence."
SAffGommeM. As staff and the City Attorney understand this section, the height limitations
refer to a "fence, wall, hedge or screen planting" on top of the retaining wall. This section
does not limit the height of a retaining wall, it limits the height of a "fence, wall, hedge or
screen planting" on top of the retaining wall to 6 feet as measured from the highest elevation of
land contiguous to the fence, and in no case greater than 8 feet from either side of the fence.
The Zoning Ordinance does not include any limitations regarding the permitted height of a
retaining wall.
ZTA 96-1 CC Adoption Staff Report 2
City Council StaffReporl re.' Ordinance No. 1419
Rear Yard Setback Standards for Decks along
Crestview and Catalina Avenues and Surf Place
May 10, 1999
Building Cade:
"SEC77ON 221— W
Walls shall be defined as follows:
Retaining Wall is a wall designed to resist the lateral displacement of soil or other
materials."
"SEC77ON 1609 — SPECIAL DESIGN
1609.2 Retaining Walls. Retraining walls shall be designed to resist the lateral
pressure of the retained material in accordance with accepted engineering practice.
Walls retaining drained earth may be designed for pressure equivalent to that exerted by
a fluid weighing not less than 30 pounds per cubic foot (4.7lkN/m3) and having a depth
equal to that of the retained earth. Any surcharge shall be in addition to the equivalent
fluid pressure.
Retaining walls shall be designed to resist sliding by at least 1.5 times the lateral force
and overturning by at least 1,5 times the overturning movement."
Staff Comment. As staff and the City Attorney understand these sections, the Building Code
does not limit the height of retaining walls. The Building Code requires retaining walls to be
designed "to resist the lateral pressure of the retained material in accordance with accepted
engineering practice."
"Accepted Engineering Practice" Plans for Retaining Walls
In reviewing the issue of "accepted engineering practice with the City Engineer, it was
indicated the City would utilize the standard plans for retaining walls provided in the following
documents:
• Standard Plans, California Department of Transportation
• Standard Plans for Public Works Construction, American Public Works Association,
Southern California Chapter
These documents provide a number of standard plans for retaining wails, ranging in height
from 4 to 36 feet. In reviewing all of the above information, staff is of the opinion there are no
currently established City standards to limit the height of a retaining wall, other than the
limitations of the "standard plans" set forth in the Caltrans and APWA publications.
ZTA 96-1 CC Adoption Staff Report
City Council Sla ffReport re: Ordinance No. 1419
Rear Yard Setback Standardifor Decks along
Crestview and Catalina Avenues and Surf Place
May 10, 1999
iiy't Imposed Height Limitation on Retainine Walls,•
If the City Council desires to establish a height limitation for retaining walls, staff and the City
Attorney would recommend an amendment to Section 28-2316.2(B) to establish that height
limit. As the Planning Commission has not considered this issue in its consideration of ZTA
96-1, it would be appropriate for the City Council to refer this issue to the Planning
Commission for appropriate public hearings.
FISCAL IMPACT
Minor. Allocation of staff resources to prepare appropriate
Zone Text Amendment application, and processing of
application for public hearings before Planning Commission and City Council. Future costs of
processing minor plan review or conditional use permit requests will be bome by project
applicants.
Whi enberg
Director of Development Services
Attachments: (1)
NOTED AND APPROIVED
Keith R. Till
City Manager
Attachment 1: ORDINANCE 1419, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEAL
BEACH AMENDING SECTION 28401 OF THE CODE OF
THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH TO CONDITIONALLY ALLOW
DECK STRUCTURES IN REAR -YARD SETBACKS IN
PROPERTIES IN THE RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY ZONE,
DISTRICT V, WHICH ABUT THE HELLMAN RANCH OR
GUM GROVE PARK (ZTA 96-1)
ZTA 96-1 CC Adoption Staff Report