HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem N MEMORANDUM
April 12, 1999
TO: MAYOR YOST AND
MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: KEITH TILL,
CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: Fire Authority Equity Study
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION: Council to approve a motion recommending
the Orange County Fire Authority receive and file(table)the equity study, and approve
submittal of the attached letter.
BACKGROUND: Seal Beach joined the Orange County Fire Authority when it was
formed in 1995. Seal Beach was among seven cities that pay for their membership in the
Authority by writing an annual check($2.5 million this year)from the general fund. The
remaining 12 members are called structural firefund cities because their fees are paid
directly out of property taxes paid by their residents. The issue of equity was raised
because certain cities, Irvine the most notable,were determined to be providing
significantly more property tax income to the Authority than it cost to service the
community. The original joint powers agreement therefore provided that an equity study
would be performed within three years of the authority's formation.
The analysis of equity attempted to quantify the cost of services provided to each
community. Because no universally accepted model exists,the consultant developed a
formula evaluating calls for service, assessed value and population. Because of the very
high volume of paramedic calls to Leisure World, cost for service in Seal Beach was
determined to be as high as cities almost twice the population. The model of
measurement recommended by the Orange County city managers and the consultant
indicates Seal Beach underpays by approximately 5%. However,by general consensus, it
was agreed that any City within 10%+/-of the determined cost would be deemed to be at
equity. As such,no increase is proposed for Seal Beach. Details of this equity formula are
shown on page 40 of the report.
Six cities are deemed to be overpaying and are said to be due an equity adjustment.
However, it is unclear and subject to considerable debate whether and how such refunds
can legally be provided. Six cities are also deemed to be underpaying. For those cities
deemed to be underpaying,the alternatives would be to impose assessments or make
payments from the general fund(although it is unclear if payments can or should be made
Agenda Iters 47
from one city to another, or if such payment would be held in trust by the Authority).
Irvine,the largest donor of all member cities, has indicated a willingness to table the
equity plan. Meanwhile, several cities have indicated they would withdraw from the
Authority if they were forced to make equity payments. As such, it appears the most
viable means of preserving the Authority in its present configuration would be to table
the equity plan and find some other means of providing all members sufficient value for
their communities.
The Authority board of directors in January received the equity report and appointed a
committee to review further options. That committee is accepting comments from City
Councils in all member cities up to April 15. The committee will make a
recommendation to the board in May-June, with the board to consider the matter in June.
Implementation of any financial changes would not occur until fiscal year 2000/2001.
FISCAL IMPACT: There should be no impact to the City of Seal Beach in tabling the
equity plan because of the 10%+/- allowance. However, it has been suggested that failure
to implement the plan would result in imposition of a$13% capital improvements and
overhead cost fee, which the Council is recommended to vigorously oppose. Also likely
is a financial impact if the plan were implemented as proposed because of a reported
shortfall in "overhead expenses"that would be passed on to contract cities. The report
states the shortfall is about 9.5%, but it is unclear how much of this would be passed on
to Seal Beach. In any case, the recently approved salary and benefits package for
firefighters and other OCFA employees has already resulted in an estimated 3.5%
increase in costs for Seal Beach in FY 1999-00. That is a$90,000 increase for next year.
RECOMMENDATION: City Council to approve a motion to forward the attached letter
recommending the OCFA board of directors table the equity plan, and direct the City's
representative on the board to represent this position at future board meetings.