HomeMy WebLinkAboutsupplemental - letter from Sue Corbin I commend you on your clever violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments during your
retaliatory actions against my Free Speech, as well as your skillful implementation of strategic
litigation against my public participation.
I would remind you retaliatory, strategic litigation against public participation, SLAPP suits
Against my Free Speech, Right of Assembly, Right of Equal Protection, are not welcome in
California,even if they involve purported violation of codes or municipal laws.
If you persist,I fully intend to prosecute you with every legal avenue available to me for actions
which exceed your authority and constitute an abuse of power under color of authority,your
failure to supervise the actions of others under your authority,and the abuse of power absent
a constitutional policy.
One of my continued public concerns with the chairman of the Seal Beach City Council and other
council members acting in concert with hired officials to deny constitutional rights without a
clear policy showing.
I endeavored publicly to find out who is responsible for the constitutional policies, as well as
the constitutional training,which of the policies are written,which are unwritten,who is
authorized to give the written policies who is authorized to give the unwritten policies? These
are a few of the policy questions I have for you that remain unanswered. If you persist at the
retaliatory actions against my First and Fourteenth Amendments,I intend to have the Seal
Beach City Constitutional Policies questions answered.
Recent U.S. Supreme Court decision,Giles v. Edmondson Oil Co. states what is acting under
color of law for purposes of a constitutional violation. "Conduct allegedly causing the depriva-
tion of a constitutional right protected against infringement by a state(city)must fairly be
attributable to the state(city). In determining the question of fair attribution of the party
charged with the deprivation must fairly be said to be a state(city)actor,either because he
is a state(city)official,has acted with together with or obtained significant aid from a
state(city) official,or his conduct is otherwise chargeable to the state(city)."
I fully intend to have those responsible for the constitutional policies questions to be fully
accountable under the law for the answers. Such as,the history of retaliatory conduct by Seal
Beach public officials against it citizens using purported codes as unconstitutional weapon
to apparently suppress First Amendment rights while participating in a wrongful scheme
to deny Equal Protection under the Fourteenth Amendment. With your wrongful continued
persistence,a federal action,U.S. Code 1983 action,may be necessary to answer constitutional
questions, such as, failure to train for constitutional policies.
It would appear,with the current wrongful conduct,that I am becoming the latest victim
of whistleblower retaliation.
Sue Corbin v � /
P. O.Box 145
Seal Beach,CA 90740
1
LEITER 70 BE READ INK) M EEES BY CHAIRMAN OF 13CAARD, PER 1}S RUES (F CRIER & CHARIER
10 .4
November 22, 1999 RECEJVEO 111
NOV 2 2 199
CITY CLERK
City of Seal Beach CITY OF
SEAL BEACH
City Council Members
All Department Heads 9.1e111.41P
General Partners, City Attorney
cc: State Attorney General, Civil Rights Division
State Justice Department, add to existing cases