HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Res 4004 1991-01-14
I
I
I
. '"
RESOLUTION NUMBER ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF. THE CITY
OF SEAL BEACH DENYING MINOR PLAN REVIEW 15-
90, A RE~UEST FOR REMODEL AND ADDITION TO A
NONCONFORMING FOUR (4) UNIT APARTMENT LOCATED
AT 601 OCEAN AVENUE, SEAL BEACH
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH DOES HEREBY RESOLVE,
DETERMINE AND FIND:
Section 1. On October 25, 1990, Mitchell Sheltraw filed
an application with the Department of Development Services for
Minor Plan Review 15-90, a request for remodel and addition to a
nonconforming four (4) unit apartment located at 601 Ocean
Avenue, Seal Beach.
Section 2.
Assessor's map book
approximately 5,500
The subject property, Orange County
199 block 032 parcel 20, contains
square feet of lot area.
Section 3. The SUbject property is legally nonconforming
due to density, parking and inadequate rear yard setback.
Section 4. The subject property provides four (4) of the
eight (S) required parking spaces (Sot).
Section 5. The applicant is proposing the addition of
approximately 1,019 square feet, including three (3) new stUdys.
Section 6. Section 2S-210 of The Code of the citv of
Seal Beach defines a bedroom as follows:
"Bedroom" means, for purposes of determining
required parking spaces, all rooms other than
a living room, kitchen, hall, pantry, closet
or bathroom."
Section 7. section 2S-2407.A.2.(i)(2) of The Code of the
City of Seal Beach prohibits an increase in the number of
bedrooms if a property is nonconforming due to density.
Section 8.
follows:
The surrounding land uses and zones are as
SOUTH
Single family residences in the
Residential Low Density zone, (RLD)
NORTH
WEST & EAST
a mixture of residential uses in the
Residential High Density zone, (RHO).
Section 9. On November 7 and November 28, 1990, the
Planning Commission of the City of Seal Beach, at meetings
thereof, considered Minor Plan Review 15-90.
Section 10. The Planning Commission made the following
findings on November 28, 1990 regarding Minor Plan Review 15-90:
The addition of three (3) studys to the subject
property constitutes the addition of three (3)
bedrooms, as defined in ~28-210 of the ~.
2. The addition of three (3) bedrooms will intensify
the use of the subject property.
L
3. In rental units there is a high correlation
between the number of bedrooms and the number of
OCcupants. An increase of three (3) bedrooms on
the SUbject property has a high probability of
increasing the number of tenants and thus,
Resolution Number ~~~
increasing demand for the already substandard
parking.
Section 11.
Commission was duly
December , 1990.
An appeal of the decision of the Planning
filed with the City by Mitch Sheltraw on
Section 12.
January 14, 1991.
The City Council noticed a public hearing on
I
Section 13. The City Council received into evidence the
Report of the Planning Commission, including the Staff Report
dated November 7, 1990, Planning Commission Resolution No. 1608,
the Minutes of the Planning Commission meetings of November 7 and
28, 1990, and the appeal filed by the appellant, Mitch Sheltraw.
In addition, the city Council considered all oral evidence
presented at the time of the public hearing.
Section 14. Based upon the evidence presented, the city
Council hereby finds:
l. The addition of three (3) studys to the subject
property constitutes the addition of three (3)
bedrooms, as defined in S28-210 of the Code.
2. The addition of three (3) bedrooms will intensify
the use of the subject property.
3.
The addition of three (3) bedrooms is not
permitted in accordance with provisions of
Section 28-2407.A.2(i) (2) of the Code of the City
of Seal Beach, since the required number of off-
street parking spaces are not to be provided.
I
In rental units there is a high correlation
between the number of bedrooms and the number of
occupants. An increase of three (3) bedrooms on
the subject property has a high probability of
increasing the number of tenants and thus,
increasing demand for the already substandard
parking.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City
of Seal Beach does hereby deny Minor Plan Review 1~-90. However
when the City Council lifts the moratorium on development of
projects within the provisions of Section 28-2407(2)(i) of the
Seal Beach Municipal Code, this applicant may immediately file a
new application to develop his property in accordance with the
then current development standards.
4.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPETED by the City Council of the City of
Seal Beach at a meeting thereof held on the 14th day of January,
1991, by the following vote'
ABSENT:
Councilmembers
I
AYES:
Councilmembers
NOES:
Councilmembers
~cL.. ~J)f, ~rp",....,)
~~
"ot .~~.~! ~;:.~
;~ .ofOIl'O~. C
jiJ/,+ 'o\"P
fI'k~ ~~{l
~ . 0
~O: g<cz
~,o':.o o:~iI
~'J': '.';'0 ",~I ~
~,~1-Q''''.~#t 27. ''''''''-~08
I~ ~ c ......~"C.to".::-
,,,,, OONt'f. ':7
\\''8iII..
Resolution Number ~~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS
CITY OF SEAL BEACH. )
I
I, Joanne M. Yeo, City Clerk of Seal Beach, California, do hereby
certify that the fO~~ resolution is the original copy of
Resolution Number n file in the office of the City Clerk,
pas I approved, and adopted by the City Council of t~~~ity of
Se 1 ach, at a regular meeting thereof held on the~~ay of
991.
I
I