Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet_12092020CITY OF SEAL BEACH ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CONTROL BOARD AGENDA SPECIAL MEETING Wednesday, 09 December 2020 — 6:00 PM ALL BOARD MEMBERS AND STAFF WILL PARTICIPATE VIA TELECONFERENCE District 1 — Gary Allen District 2 — Benjamin Wong District 3 — Rich Coles District 4 — Marla Smalewitz, Chair District 5 — Roger Bennett Department of Community Development Les Johnson, Director Steven Fowler, Senior Planner Marco Cuevas Jr., Assistant Planner ■ City Hall office hours are 8:00 a. m. to 5:00 p. m. Monday through Friday. Closed noon to 1:00 p.m. by appointment only at this time. ■ The City of Seal Beach complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act. If you need assistance to attend this meeting please telephone the City Clerk' s Office at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting at (562) 431-2527. ■ Copies of staff reports and/or written materials on each agenda item are available for public inspection in City libraries or on the City website at www.sealbeachca.gov. NOTICE REGARDING PUBLIC OBSERVATION AND PARTICIPATION IN THE SPECIAL ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CONTROL BOARD MEETING To comply with Governor Newsom's Executive Order N-29-20 and the Amended Order and Guidance of the Orange County Health Officer issued March 18, 2020 the City of Seal Beach hereby gives notice of the "means by which members of the public may observe the meeting and offer public comment" for the Environmental Quality Control Board meeting on December 9, 2020. Due to the need for social distancing and the prohibition on public gatherings set forth in the County Health Officer's Order, all participation in the above -referenced meeting will be by teleconference for the Members of the Board and staff. Because of the unique nature of the emergency there will NOT be a physical meeting location and all public participation will be electronic. PUBLIC COMMENT: Members of the public may submit comments on any item ON this Environmental Quality Control Board meeting agenda via email to the Community Development Director at LJohnson@sealbeachca.gov or via the comment icon through the online portal at https://www.sealbeachca.gov/Government/Agendas-Notices-Meeting-Videos/Council- Commission-Meetings . All email comments the Community Development Director receives before the start of the meeting will be posted on the City website and distributed to City Council. Email comments received after that time will be posted on the City's website and forwarded to the Board Members after the meeting. THIS NOTICE AND ELECTRONIC PARTICIPATION PROVISIONS SET FORTH IN THIS NOTICE ARE PROVIDED PURSUANT TO SECTION 3 OF EXECUTIVE ORDER N-29-20. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF AGENDA By Motion of the Environmental Quality Control Board, this is the time to notify the public of any changes to the agenda, re- arrange the order of the agenda, and provide an opportunity for any member of the Environmental Quality Control Board or staff to request an item be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS (VIA EMAIL ONLY) At this time members of the public may address the Board Members regarding the items on this Environmental Quality Control Board meeting. Pursuant to the Brown Act, the Council cannot discuss or take action on any items not on the agenda unless authorized by law. Those members of the public wishing to provide comment are asked to send comments via email to the Community Development Director at LJohnson@sealbeachca.gov or via the comment icon on the City website at https://www.sealbeachca.gov/Government/Agendas-Notices-Meeting-Videos/Council- Commission-Meetings before 5 pm on December 9, 2020. Comments provided via email will be posted on the City website for review by the public. Any documents for review should be sent to the Community Development Director prior to the meeting for distribution. CONSENT CALENDAR — None SCHEDULED MATTERS A. INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (IS/MND) PREPARED FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP 17-3) A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A GAS STATION WITH A 2,400 SQUARE FEET CONVENIENCE STORE WITHIN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) ZONED AREA - REVIEW OF DOCUMENT Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Environmental Quality Control Board accept and forward the Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) to the Planning Commission for the construction of a gas station and convenience store at 490 Pacific Coast Highway. STAFF CONCERNS BOARD CONCERNS ADJOURNMENT Adjourn the Environmental Quality Control Board to Wednesday, December 23, 2020 at 6:00 p.m. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CONTROL BOARD STAFF REPORT TO: Environmental Quality Control Board THRU: Les Johnson, Director of Community Development FROM: Steve Fowler, Senior Planner MEETING DATE: DECEMBER 9, 2020 SUBJECT: SCHEDULED ITEM - DISCUSSION INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (IS/MND) PREPARED FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP17-) A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A GAS STATION WITH A 2,400 SQUARE FOOT CONVENIENCE STORE WITHIN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) ZONED AREA - REVIEW OF DOCUMENT LOCATION: 490 Pacific Coast Highway RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Environmental Quality Control Board accept and forward the Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) with comments to the Planning Commission for the construction of a gas station with a convenience store. Environmental Quality Control Board December 9, 2020 DISCUSSION: The City of Seal Beach has received an application for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP 17- 3) to construct a gas station with a 2,400 square foot convenience store on a .62 -acre site (26,793 square feet) in the General Commercial zoned area. The proposed project consists of the construction of a gas station and convenience store on a pentagon shaped parcel. The site was previously a gas station that was demolished in 2011. The site has been an active environmental remediation area (with operating groundwater and soil vaper recovery systems) since 1986 in order to remove leaked gasoline from the soil that originated from the previous gas station. A variance application (VAR 18-2) has also been submitted as part of the project as the site does not meet the minimum frontage on a public street of 150 feet along 5t" Street. The proposed gas station is a project that is subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) 1970 (Public Resources Code, Section 21000 et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Section 15000 et seq.). An Initial Study has been prepared by a third -party consultant, HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc, to assess the short-term, long-term, and cumulative environmental impacts that could result from the proposed gas station and convenience store. The report has been prepared to comply with Section 15063 of the State CEQA Guidelines, which sets forth the required contents of an Initial Study. These requirements include: ■ A description of the project, including the project location. ■ Identification of the environmental setting. ■ Identification of environmental effects by use of a checklist, matrix, or other methods, provided entries on the checklist or other forms are briefly explained to indicate that there is some evidence to support the entries. ■ Discussion of ways to mitigate significant effects identified, if any. ■ Examination of whether the project is compatible with existing zoning, plans, and other applicable land use controls. ■ The name(s) of the person(s) who prepared or participated in the preparation of the Initial Study. Based on the findings of the Initial Study, the City has determined that this project would not result in significant environmental impacts with the incorporation of mitigation measures to address potential air quality, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, noise, and transportation impacts. Measures to reduce these impacts regarding the fore mentioned areas will be incorporated into the project conditions of approval. Accordingly, the City intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to Section 21080(c) of the Public Resources Code. A few of the areas that were identified as significant but with the proposed mitigation measures would be less than significant are the areas of cultural resource of possible Native American Artifacts, geology and soils preparation, hazards and hazardous 2 Environmental Quality Control Board December 9. 2020 materials, and transportation. The proposed mitigation for each area is summarized below. • The cultural resource section of the Initial Study identifies the possibility of locating Native American Artifacts; a proposed mitigation measure addresses this issue by providing that a qualified archaeologist and Native American monitor from both the Gabrielino (Gabrieleno) and Juaneno tribes shall conduct a Worker Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP) to present to city staff prior to any ground disturbing activities. The WEAP is a program that identifies environmental concerns and is in place to inform city staff, the grading contractor and any relevant subcontractors of information regarding the cultural and archaeological sensitivity of the project areas, as well as the requirements of the monitoring program. As proposed, the WEAP will be performed prior to grading and monitors will be on site during any ground disturbing activities. As noted above, staff will be provided a report following the conclusion of the monitoring program. • The geology and soils preparation for the construction of the project shall follow a geotechnical investigation prepared by the applicant. This report shall be submitted with the grading plans and all grading shall follow the recommendations of the report. • With respect the area of hazards and hazardous material, a construction worker health and safety work plan will be required. In addition, a Hazardous Materials Business Emergency P (HMBEP) that includes basic safety information and basic information on the location, type, quantity and health risks of hazardous materials stored, used or disposed of on-site will also be required. The HMBEP shall be submitted to Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA). • With regard to transportation and circulation, restriping of Pacific Coast Highway at Marvista Drive/ 51" Street will be required along with consideration given to adjusting the traffic signal phasing if deemed necessary. The project site is included on the list of Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites for the State Water Board's Geo Tracker database, but not on the hazardous materials facilities, hazardous waste properties, or hazardous disposal sites enumerated under Section 65962.5 of the California Government Code (Cortese List). The site has been an active environmental remediation area (with operating ground water and soil vaper recovery systems) since 1986 to remove leaked gasoline (hydrocarbons) from the previous gas station. Though most of the remediation work has been completed, the effort will continue with one monitoring well relocated on-site. The applicant will be required to provide a letter from the Orange County Health Care Agency prior to construction of the project. A thirty -day public review period is being held that began Monday November 23, 2020 and will conclude Wednesday December 23, 2020. During this period, the IS/MND is available for public review at the City of Seal Beach website http://www.sealbeachca.gov. At the time of this report, staff has not received any comments. All comments received regarding 3 Environmental Quality Control Board December 9, 2020 this project during the public review period will be shared with the consultant and included as part of the Initial study process prior to final review by the Planning Commission. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Environmental Quality Control Board accept and forward the Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) to the Planning Commission for the construction of a gas station and convenience store at 490 Pacific Coast Highway. Prepared by: Steve Fowler Les Johnson Steve Fowler Les Johnson Senior Planner Community Development Director ATTACHMENTS: 1. Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for Conditional Use Permit CUP 17- 3 and Variance 18-2 for the construction of a gas station and convenience store at 490 Pacific Coast Highway. 2 Environmental Quality Control Board December 9. 2020 ATTACHMENT 1 INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (IS/MND) FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A GAS STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE ON .62 ACRES OF LAND AT 490 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY 5 HELIX Environmental Planning 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration March 2020 1 ASE -06 Prepared for: A & S Engineering 28405 Sand Canyon Road, Suite "B" Canyon Country, CA 91387 Prepared by: HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. 7578 EI Cajon Boulevard La Mesa, CA 91942 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Prepared for: A & S Engineering 28405 Sand Canyon Road, Suite "B" Canyon Country, CA 91387 Prepared by: HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. 7578 EI Cajon Boulevard La Mesa, CA 91942 March 2020 1 ASE -06 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 INITIAL STUDY INFORMATION SHEET........................................................................................ 1 1.2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED..............................................................3 1.3 DETERMINATION.......................................................................................................................4 1.4 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS...........................................................................5 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST.............................................................................. 6 I. AESTHETICS................................................................................................................................6 II. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES.............................................................................. 8 III. AIR QUALITY.............................................................................................................................. 9 IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES......................................................................................................... 20 V. CULTURAL RESOURCES............................................................................................................ 22 VI. ENERGY....................................................................................................................................22 VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS............................................................................................................... 26 VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS................................................................................................31 IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS................................................................................ 36 X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY........................................................................................ 42 XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING......................................................................................................46 XII. MINERAL RESOURCES..............................................................................................................47 XIII. NOISE.......................................................................................................................................47 XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING...................................................................................................51 XV. PUBLIC SERVICES..................................................................................................................... 51 XVI. RECREATION............................................................................................................................ 52 XVII. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC............................................................................................ 53 XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES................................................................................................59 XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS............................................................................................61 XX. WILDFIRE.................................................................................................................................61 XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.............................................................................65 3.0 REFERENCES............................................................................................................................. 67 TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont. LIST OF APPENDICES A Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Data Outputs B HRA Model Inputs and Assumptions C Cultural Resources Survey D HVAC Specifications E Traffic Impact Study LIST OF FIGURES No. Title Follows Page 1 Regional Location............................................................................................................................. 2 2 Aerial Photograph............................................................................................................................ 2 3 Site Plan........................................................................................................................................... 2 4 Grading and Drainage Plan.............................................................................................................. 2 5 Water Quality Management Plan.................................................................................................... 2 6 Landscape Plan.................................................................................................................................2 7 Site Photographs.............................................................................................................................. 6 LIST OF TABLES No. Title Page 1 South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status....................................................................................... 11 2 Air Quality Monitoring Data........................................................................................................... 12 3 Maximum Daily Construction Emissions........................................................................................ 14 4 Maximum Daily Operational Emissions.........................................................................................15 5 Maximum Localized Daily Construction Emissions........................................................................ 17 6 Global Warming Potentials and Atmospheric Lifetimes................................................................ 30 7 Estimated Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions..................................................................... 33 8 Total Estimated Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions.............................................................. 34 9 City of Seal Beach Intersection Traffic Impact Criteria.................................................................. 53 10 Intersection Operations — Existing Plus Project............................................................................. 54 11 Roadway Operations — Existing Plus Project.................................................................................. 55 12 Intersection Operations — Opening Year 2019 Plus Project.......................................................... 55 13 Roadway Operations — Opening Year 2019 Plus Project............................................................... 56 14 Intersection Operations — Future Build -out 2039 Plus Project ...................................................... 57 15 Roadway Operations — Future Build -out 2039 Plus Project.......................................................... 57 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project 1.0 INTRODUCTION The following Initial Study addresses the environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of the 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project (project). This Initial Study has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code 21000-21189) and the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Sections 15000-15387). 1.1 INITIAL STUDY INFORMATION SHEET Project title: 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project Lead agency name and address: City of Seal Beach, 211 8th Street, Seal Beach, CA 90740 Contact person and phone number: Contact: Steven Fowler, Assistant Planner Phone: 562-431-2527 4. Project Location The 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project (project) is located at the northwest corner of Pacific Coast Highway and 5t" Street in the city of Seal Beach (see Figure 1, Regional Location, and Figure 2, Aerial Photograph). The project site is 26,793 square feet in area and is located at Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) 043-301-02. Project sponsor's name and address: A & S Engineering, 28405 Sand Canyon Road, Suite "B", Canyon Country, CA 91387 6. General Plan designation: General Commercial Zone (CG) 7. Zoning designation: General Commercial 8. Description of project: The project proposes to develop a vacant lot with a 16 -pump gas station with a 2,400 square -foot convenience store (see Figure 3, Site Plan). The gas station would be in operation 24 hours a day. The site was previously a gas station that was demolished in 2011, and gravel was placed over the vacant lot. The site has been an active environmental remediation area (with operating groundwater and soil vaper recovery systems) since 1986 to remove leaked gasoline (hydrocarbons) from the previous gas station. 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project The environmental remediation area would remain on site with one monitoring well relocated. A 4,052 - square foot steel canopy would be installed above the gas pumps. The project would have 19,797 square feet of paved areas with 16 parking spaces. Ingress and egress to the site would be provided via four unsignalized driveways: two driveways along Pacific Coast Highway and two driveways along Stn Street. In addition, underground storage fuel tanks would be installed in the southern portion of the project site. Additional improvements would include a monument sign; trash enclosure; and air and water units for vehicles. The project site is in a General Commercial Zone (CG) per the City of Seal Beach (City) Zoning Maps (City 2010). Per Section 11.2.10.010 of the Municipal Code, automobile service stations are allowed in CG zones subject to the approval of a conditional use permit (City 2018a). The project would also require approval of a variance as the project site does not meet minimum street frontage requirements per the City's Municipal Code. The variance would also allow the proposed improvements to be efficiently configured on the project site. Site drainage is shown on Figure 4, Grading and Drainage, and Figure 5, Water Quality Management Plan. The site would contain two bioretention basins, with one at the western edge of the project site, behind the convenience store, and one at the eastern edge of the site, adjacent to the sidewalk along Pacific Coast Highway. Perforated storm drain pipes would lead to the basins, and from the basins through a biofiltration unit to a catch basin in the southwestern corner of the project site. The catch basin would lead into a culvert that would connect with the existing storm drain system on 5th Street. Landscaping would include various plants and shrubs, with low precipitation drip irrigation (see Figure 6, Landscape Plan). Trees would be placed to provide shielding between the convenience store and the adjacent residences to the west. Construction is anticipated to begin in June 2020 and last approximately six months. Site preparation activities would begin in June to be followed by grading in July. Cut and fill materials would be balanced on site. Building construction would begin in August 2020. 9. Surrounding land uses and setting: Adjacent to the project site are single-family residences to the west and southwest, a commercial development (strip mall) to the north, commercial developments across 5t" Street to the south, and single- family residences across Pacific Coast Highway to the east. 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) • National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity (Construction General Permit). California Deaartment of Industrial Relations • Construction Activity Permit HELIX Regional Location Environmental Planning Figure 1 0 200 Feet Source: Aerial (Nearmap, 2018) HELIX Aerial Photograph Environmental Planning Figure 2 � N S r \ o J I \-E—ING K' yet 20 0 20 40 PARCEL 2 euaDIIC� rc 0.846 ACRES AG PAEAI 3 WONS GRAPHIC SCALE CONCRETE PAVEMENT E)GE OF AC. P-Me. `aC. PAYiWEm� O \436Oi5�A 217 E \ ELEcmICAL 1U_ N-4 O 0 17 TYP. Y 1s 13 yoc' TYR. 6 12 11 TTP -N-MNK ENCLOSURE En:CTR 1fi M / \\U. coxcMETE suT w P.v.c. Iasm . �� / °. m \\ cuv RISERS. m EDGE OF °f 0.CV PAVEIENT l O WANR \\ �.�. tt°f\• GM1y \ wAGTE WxGISTE PAvsMENT ca+cxETE PANRATEm ,: "a „ O 12 \\ 6 I® 2E a O \\\ \\ PARCEL 1\, W ry \ ® v a NANZ TO TYP. 6 FD, MON. CENTERLINE O. 455 S.F. INTERSECTION AT PACIFlC �� L�4c �\6 6 Op 1� � .O6A COAST HWY. & 5Hi ST. l a e5o � q0�3 SCOPE OF WORK (D CONSTRUCT N:w 2.45e son rano MART ,a,QP elAb3p6L �.l O CMSIAUCT IEw U. %FT CPN[PY Mr. 6 MPDS NEW AC. PANINC. L2AN. �A tV/w oa NEW WDEIMAaxO TANN. NEW GNOPY-111. NEW PUNIER. p`C" p i OOQ D 5p i0 E Q\0 0 NEW WNCRETE PAMNO V, $ 80 Q NEW 6' FLATTER tl1AB. NEW MONUMENT SW. NEW SHELL IOW. NEW E' CONCRETE HIED WAIIO POST (rn_ Gr 24) NEW AR/WATER UNIT 1© FHSNG NOW 1TOPoNO WELL TO fSNAN k E) / / PROLE RE, RELOCATE ENIrnxG MONITORING WELL / 105 NEW TRAM LNCLOSURE PIX CITY REQUIREMENTS DRSNG ENWAONMEN1Al AREA TO REMAIN PROPOSE) YARD LII A' IB CAHAS DIRECT -AL ACCESS r0 TIE WMP IINOs Ano wE vERla6s AT I Wxrs. / A Y / 19 INSTALL NEW ENCLOSURE PER SHEET TE2 ® RFLOCARO ORINE— HELIX Environmental PlanI Source: A & S Engineering, 2018 Site Plan Figure 3 HELIX Environmental Planning I \ \ I I \ \ I \ \ Oyu Nacim (oast Hlenwav f roiect LEGEND: soEwuN PCC PAVEMENT E:WPVEMENT ®P�AVEMENi REFIACEMENi N WATERLINE N T za• 0 29 av so• SCALE: 1 -20 - Source: Waber Consultants, 2018 Gradina and Drainaae Plan Figure 4 I \ I I \ I \ I I 0 EJ - o -� I _ ENCLOSU�RE ❑ XISNNG REMEDIATION SYSTEM TO REMAIN.' R=1T AO'®o \ L- .IT PROP ED RENCH A O DS .. ® AREA • 1 '. TOTAL 1S53]3F a ® PERVIOUS MIS, \ /' FILTERRA UNIT 323E DS® \ AREA IMPERVIOUS (H5116,4125F TOTAL 4,421 215F PERVIOUS (LS) 935 S1 d-17° B' IMPERVIOUS(HS) 3,486 AREA 3 TOTPL 3,500 SF ETENTI0 INNS PERVIOU3IL3)1,065 SF FLOGARD \ \ Povmnom= 2, 18 SF IMPERVIOUS IHS) 2,435 SF ° CATCH BASIN ME xm T.18 SF _ 5 FF1100 ] OP03ED PERFORATED 9TOfj DRAI PIPE ® � qy � � //C Oyu NaclnC coast Hlgnway f roject OPOSEO A 9 / PPUFAP ",.. . . FILTERRAUNIT \ PRO w14F°0.09023CFSF6 1..... C SIN PROPOSED 3103 R=300.00' PARNWAYCULVERT G=3°1T29' � N 20' 0 20' 40' 60' / SCALE: 1"=20' Source: Waber Consultants, 2018 HELIX Water Quality Management Plan Environmental Planning Figure 5 LEGEND: PROPOSED \ PERVIOUS AREA PROPOSED BIORETENTION \ \ -DRAINAGE PROPOSED RAIN UNIT DRAINAGG E BOUNDARY O -NO DUMPING. SIGN DIRECTION OF FLOW \ \ Ds DOWNsPow T n v PROPOSED PERFORATED O STORM DRAIN PIPE 9N \ BIORETENTION BASIN Q Q6.23 SF \ xm=19, SF n+ y9 \ 1 Oyu NaclnC coast Hlgnway f roject OPOSEO A 9 / PPUFAP ",.. . . FILTERRAUNIT \ PRO w14F°0.09023CFSF6 1..... C SIN PROPOSED 3103 R=300.00' PARNWAYCULVERT G=3°1T29' � N 20' 0 20' 40' 60' / SCALE: 1"=20' Source: Waber Consultants, 2018 HELIX Water Quality Management Plan Environmental Planning Figure 5 Oyu Nacim LOast Hlgnway f roject I TREELEGEND CONCEPTUAL PLANT PALETTE i A- " t It c.o.ea,""rmi.y� / / N 1/16'= i'4" Source: Waber Consultants, 2018 HELIX Landscape Plan Environmental Planning Figure 6 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project California Board of Equalization • Underground Storage Tank Registration Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA) Environmental Health Department • Permit to Operate • Underground Storage Tank Monitoring Plan • Underground Storage Tank Leak Response Plan • California Environmental Reporting System South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) • Authority to Construct • Permit to Operate 11. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the Project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1? If so, is there a plan for consultation that includes, for example, the determination of significance of impacts to tribal cultural resources, procedures regarding confidentiality, etc.? The City is currently in the process of tribal outreach efforts, and formal consultation will be conducted with any tribes requesting it pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1. As such, any tribal input regarding the Project and associated impacts to cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources will be incorporated in the Final CEQA document, as applicable. 1.2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that may require mitigation to reduce the impact from "Potentially Significant Impact" to "Less than Significant" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Agriculture and Forestry Resources ❑ Air Quality ❑ Biological Resources Cultural Resources ❑ Energy 0 Geology/Soils ❑ Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards/Hazardous Materials ❑ Hydrology/Water Quality ❑ Land Use/Planning ❑ Mineral Resources 0 Noise ❑ Population/Housing ❑ Public Services ❑ Recreation Transportation 0 Tribal Cultural Resources ❑ Utilities/Service Systems ❑ Wildfire ■ Mandatory Findings of Significance 3 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project 1.3 DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: ❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 1 find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potential impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Signature Printed Name Date For 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project 1.4 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4. "Less Than Significant with Mitigation" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from "Earlier Analyses," as described in (5) below, may be cross-referenced). 5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program environmental impact report (EIR), or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a. Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b. Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c. Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less Than Significant with Mitigation," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8. The explanation of each issue should identify: a. The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b. The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significant. 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST I. AESTHETICS AESTHETICS: Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, Significant with Significant No would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact Impact a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ within a state scenic highway? c) In non -urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? No Impact. The City General Plan does not designate any locations within the city as a scenic vista. The General Plan does identify "view parks" as smaller passive parks designed to take advantage of a significant view, such as those located on coastal bluffs that focus upon ocean or bay views. The General Plan does not identify what specific parks these might be. The nearest parks to the project are Marina Community Park (approximately 0.2 mile to the east) and Zoeter Field (approximately 0.3 mile to the south). These parks are closer to the ocean than the project, and development of the project would not affect views from these parks. In addition, due to the relatively level terrain around the project site, the project site and surrounding area (see Figure 7, Site Photographs, for general views of the project site) does not have views of the ocean, San Gabriel River, or Alamitos Bay, and development of the project site would not shield views from users of Pacific Coast Highway or other nearby roadways of the ocean. Therefore, no impacts to a scenic vista would occur. b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? Less Than Significant Impact. The project site is located along State Route 1, also known as the Pacific Coast Highway, which is designated as an eligible state scenic highway by Caltrans (Caltrans 2011). No portion of the Pacific Coast Highway is officially designated as a state scenic highway by Caltrans in Orange County (Caltrans 2011). However, the County of Orange General Plan Transportation Element contains a Scenic Highway Plan (County of Orange 2012), which identifies the Pacific Coast Highway as a "Viewscape Corridor." A Viewscape Corridor, as defined by the County, is a route that traverses a corridor within which unique or unusual scenic resources and aesthetic values are found. This designation is intended to minimize the impact of development upon the scenic resources along the 0 P'P7..-. Looking South from Western Project Edge Oyu Nacim coast H Looking East from Western Project Edge Looking North from Western Project Edge vrolect Source: HELIX, 2018 HELIX Site Photographs Environmental Planning Figure 7 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project route; however, the County of Orange General Plan encourages new development to be consistent with surrounding land uses. The proposed project is located on the site of a former gas station and would be consistent with the surrounding commercial land uses (see Figure 7). Therefore, a less than significant impact to a scenic highway would occur. c) In non -urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experiences from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project involves the development of a gas station on an existing lot, covered with gravel and environmental remediation equipment, in an urban area (see Figure 7). The previous use on site was also a gas station, which had been in operation for decades until May 2011. The stretch of Pacific Coast Highway that the project is on is highly developed, with a mixture of commercial uses to the north and south and residences across Pacific Coast Highway to the east. The area does not contain parks or other aesthetic resources, as the area is a developed commercial and residential district based around a major thoroughfare (Pacific Coast Highway), and the project is located inland from both the ocean and San Gabriel River (see Figure 2 for an aerial perspective). In addition, trees would be placed to provide shielding between the convenience store and the adjacent residences to the west (see Figure 6). Given the urbanized, developed nature of the area, the lack of visual quality of the current site and area, and the previous use of the site as a gas station, the project would be consistent with the surrounding land uses and visual character. In addition, the project would be consistent with the applicable development standards (with approval of the requested variance) and as such the project would not conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings. d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would include exterior lighting for the fuel canopy station, parking lot, and convenience store. Due to the use of the site as a gas station, it is anticipated lighting would be used 24 hours a day. Per Section 11.4.05.055 of the City Municipal Code, for extended hour businesses, on-site screening would be installed and maintained to minimize light and glare on adjoining residential properties and dwelling units (City 2018a). In addition, per Section 11.4.10.020.A, where the light source is visible from outside the property boundary, shielding would be required to reduce glare to the greatest degree practicable to prevent light trespass onto an adjacent private property (City 2018a). In addition, the nearby lighting environment would have lighting sources in operation for 24 hours a day given the main thoroughfare character of Pacific Coast Highway, including freestanding streetlights, light fixtures on buildings, traffic signals, and vehicle headlights. Therefore, with compliance with City standards and coherence with surrounding lighting, impacts would be less than significant. 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project II. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES Less Than AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES: Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact Impact a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a EJ ❑ ❑ ■ Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section I 2220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(8))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ to non -forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non- forest use? a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? No Impact. According to mapping available from the California Department of Conservation Important Farmland Finder (California Department of Conservation 2018) the project site is mapped within an area defined as "Urban and Built -Up Land," and does not support agricultural uses. The project site does not contain lands mapped by the California Department of Conservation as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (California Department of Conservation 2018). Therefore, no impacts would occur. b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? No Impact. The proposed project is not located in area that is under Williamson Act contract (County of Orange 2012). According to the City General Plan, the project site has a land use designation of General Commercial (CG) and does not support agricultural uses; therefore, no impacts would occur. c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))?? No Impact. The project area is not zoned as forest land or timberland, and no related impacts would occur. 0 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? No Impact. The proposed project is not within or near forest land. No trees are located on site. Accordingly, project construction and operation would not convert forest land to non -forest use, and no impact would occur. e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? No Impact. The project site does not support agricultural or forestry uses, and implementation of the proposed project would not involve changes in the existing environment that would result in conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use. Therefore, no impacts would occur. III. AIR QUALITY AIR QUALITY: Where available, the significance criteria established by the Less Than applicable air quality management or air pollution control Potentially Significant Less Than district may be relied upon to make the following Significant with Significant No determinations. Would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact Impact a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ air quality plan? b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors 0 ❑ adversely affecting a substantial number of people)? Environmental Setting The project site is in the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB), which consists of all or part of four counties: Los Angeles, San Bernardino, Riverside, and Orange. The distinctive climate of the SCAB is determined by its terrain and geographic location. The SCAB is a coastal plain with connecting broad valleys and low hills. It is bound by the Pacific Ocean to the southwest and high mountains around the rest of its perimeter. The general region lies in the semi-permanent high-pressure zone of the eastern Pacific, resulting in a mild climate tempered by cool sea breezes with light, average wind speeds. The vertical dispersion of air pollutants in the SCAB is hampered by the presence of persistent temperature inversions. High pressure systems, such as the semi-permanent high-pressure zone in which the SCAB is located, are characterized by an upper layer of dry air that warms as it descends, restricting the mobility of cooler marine -influenced air near the ground surface, and resulting in the formation of subsidence inversions. Such inversions restrict the vertical dispersion of air pollutants 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project released into the marine layer and, together with strong sunlight, can produce worst-case conditions for the formation of photochemical smog. The basin -wide occurrence of inversions at 3,500 feet above mean sea level or less averages 191 days per year (SCAQMD 1993). Ambient air quality is described in terms of compliance with state and national standards, and the levels of air pollutant concentrations considered safe, to protect the public health and welfare. These standards are designed to protect people most sensitive to respiratory distress, such as asthmatics, the elderly, very young children, people already weakened by other disease or illness, and persons engaged in strenuous work or exercise. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for seven air pollution constituents. As permitted by the Clean Air Act, California has adopted more stringent air emissions standards, the California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS), and expanded the number of regulated air constituents. The California Air Resources Board (CARB) is required to designate areas of the state as attainment, nonattainment, or unclassified for any state standard. An "attainment" designation for an area signifies that pollutant concentrations do not violate the standard for that pollutant in that area. A "nonattainment" designation indicates that a pollutant concentration violated the standard at least once. The project is located in Orange County. Air quality in Orange County is regulated by the SCAQMD. As a regional agency, the SCAQMD works directly with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), County transportation commissions, and local governments and cooperates actively with all federal and state government agencies. The SCAQMD develops rules and regulations; establishes permitting requirements for stationary sources; inspects emissions sources; and enforces such measures through educational programs or fines, when necessary. The SCAQMD is directly responsible for reducing emissions from stationary (area and point), mobile, and indirect sources. It has responded to this requirement by preparing a sequence of Air Quality Management Plans (AQMP). On March 3, 2017, the SCAQMD adopted the 2016 AQMP (SCAQMD 2017a), which is a regional and multi -agency effort (SCAQMD, CARB, SCAG, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [USEPA]). The 2016 AQMP represents a comprehensive analysis of emissions, meteorology, atmospheric chemistry, regional growth projections, and the impact of existing control measures. The plan seeks to achieve multiple goals in partnership with other entities promoting reductions in criteria pollutants, greenhouse gases (GHGs), and toxic risk, as well as efficiencies in energy use, transportation, and goods movement. The AQMP, in combination with those from all other California nonattainment areas with serious (or worse) air quality problems, is submitted to CARB, which develops the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). The SIP relies on the same information from SCAG to develop emission inventories and emission reduction strategies that are included in the attainment demonstration for the air basin. The current federal and state attainment status for the SCAB is presented in Table 1, South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status. 10 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project Table 1 SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN ATTAINMENT STATUS Criteria Pollutant Federal Designation State Designation 03 (1 -hour) (No federal standard) Nonattainment 03 (8 -hour) Extreme Nonattainment Nonattainment CO Attainment (Maintenance) Attainment PM10 Attainment (Maintenance) Nonattainment PM2.5 Serious Nonattainment Nonattainment NO2 Attainment Attainment SO2 Attainment Attainment Lead Attainment Attainment Sulfates (No federal standard) Attainment Hydrogen Sulfide (No federal standard) Attainment Visibility (No federal standard) Attainment Source: SCAQMD 2016a With respect to federal air quality standards, the EPA classifies the SCAB as in attainment for respirable particulate matter (PM1o), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and lead, and in nonattainment for 8 -hour ozone (03) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5). Under state designation, the SCAB is currently in attainment for CO, NO2, SO2, and lead; and in nonattainment for 1 -hour and 8 - hour ozone, PM1o,and PM2.5. Air Quality Monitoring The SCAQMD maintains monitoring stations to measure ambient concentrations of pollutants in the SCAB. The nearest monitoring station, approximately five miles northwest of the project site, is the South Long Beach monitoring station which monitors PMloand PM2.5. The Long Beach Hudson (2425 Webster Street) monitoring station, approximately 7.5 miles northwest of the project site, was used for ozone and NO2. Table 2, Air Quality Monitoring Data, presents a summary of the ambient pollutant concentrations monitored at the air quality monitoring stations during the last three years (2015 through 2017) for which the SCAQMD has reported data. 11 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project Table 2 AIR QUALITY MONITORING DATA Pollutant Standards 1 2015 2016 2017 Ozone (O -A — Lona Beach Hudson Maximum concentration 1 -hour period (ppm) 0.087 0.079 0.082 Maximum concentration 8 -hour period (ppm) 0.066 0.059 0.068 Days above 1 -hour state standard (>0.09 ppm) 0 0 0 Days above 8 -hour state/federal standard (>0.070 ppm) 0 0 0 Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) — Long Beach Hudson Maximum 1 -hour concentration (ppm) 0.1018 0.0756 0.0895 Days above state 1 -hour standard (0.18 ppm) 0 0 0 Days above federal 1 -hour standard (0.100 ppm) 1 0 0 Suspended Particulates (PMIo) —South Long Beach Maximum 24-hour concentration (µg/m3) 62.0 56.0 70.9 Estimated days above state standard (>50 Itg/m3) 12.7 Estimated days above federal standard (>150 pg/m3) 0 0 Suspended Particulates (PM2,5) —South Long Beach Maximum 24-hour concentration (µg/m3) 48.3 28.9 56.3 Days above federal standard (>35 pg/m3) 4 0 5 Source: CARB 2018a ppm = parts per million * insufficient data available to determine the value The 1- and 8 -hour ozone standards were not exceeded in the sample years. It was estimated that the federal NO2 standard was exceeded once in 2015. The state PMlo standard was exceeded 12.7 times in 2015 and the federal PM10 standard was not exceeded in the three sample years. Data for PM2.5 showed several exceedances in 2015 and 2017 and no exceedances in 2016. Sensitive Receptors Some land uses are considered more sensitive to air pollution than others due to the types of population groups or activities involved and are referred to as sensitive receptors. Examples of these sensitive receptors are residences, schools, hospitals, and daycare centers. CARB and the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) have identified the following groups of individuals as the most likely to be affected by air pollution: the elderly over 65, children under 14, infants (including in utero in the third trimester of pregnancy), and persons with cardiovascular and chronic respiratory diseases such as asthma, emphysema, and bronchitis (CARB 2005, OEHHA 2015). Residential areas are considered sensitive receptors to air pollution because residents (including children and the elderly) tend to be at home for extended periods of time, resulting in sustained exposure to any pollutants present. Children and infants are considered more susceptible to health effects of air pollution due to their immature immune systems, developing organs, and higher breathing rates. As such, schools are also considered sensitive receptors, as children are present for extended durations and engage in regular outdoor activities. The closest existing sensitive receptor to the project site is a single-family residence approximately 50 feet southwest. Additional single-family residences are located across Galleon Way to the west and 12 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project across the Pacific Coast Highway to the east and southeast. The closest school is the J.H. McGaugh Elementary School approximately 3,300 feet (0.63 mile) to the east. Evaluation of Air Quality While the final determination of whether or not a project has a significant effect is within the purview of the lead agency pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064(b), SCAQMD recommends that its air pollution thresholds be used to determine the significance of project emissions. The criteria pollutant thresholds and various assessment recommendations are discussed under the checklist questions below. a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Less Than Significant Impact. SCAG is the regional planning agency for Los Angeles, Orange, Ventura, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Imperial Counties, and addresses regional issues relating to transportation, economy, community development, and environment. With regard to air quality planning, SCAG has prepared the RTP/SCS, a long-range transportation plan that uses growth forecasts to project trends out over a 20 -year period to identify regional transportation strategies to address mobility needs. These growth forecasts form the basis for the land use and transportation control portions of the AQMP. These documents are utilized in the preparation of the air quality forecasts and consistency analysis included in the AQMP. Both the RTP/SCS and AQMP are based, in part, on projections originating with County and City General Plans.' The two principal criteria for determining conformance to the AQMP are: 1. Whether the project would result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations; cause or contribute to new violations; or delay timely attainment of air quality standards and 2. Whether the project would exceed the assumptions in the AQMP. With respect to the first criterion, the analyses presented below demonstrate that the project would not generate short-term or long-term emissions that could potentially cause an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations; cause or contribute to new violations; or delay timely attainment of air quality standards. With respect to the second criterion, the proposed project would be consistent with the City of Seal Beach General Plan zoning designation of General Commercial with a conditional use permit. Additionally, the proposed project, a fueling facility and market, would not substantially increase population or employment in the area. Because the project is consistent with the two principal criteria identified above, pursuant to SCAQMD guidelines, the proposed project is considered consistent with the region's AQMP. As such, proposed project -related emissions are accounted for in the AQMP, which is crafted to bring the basin into SCAG serves as the federally designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) of six of the ten counties in Southern California, serving Imperial County, Los Angeles County, Orange County, Riverside County, San Bernardino County, and Ventura County. 13 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project attainment for all criteria pollutants. Accordingly, the proposed project would be consistent with the projections in the AQMP, thus resulting in a less than significant impact. b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? Less Than Significant Impact. In accordance with CECIA Guidelines Section 15064(h)(3), the SCAQMD's approach for assessing cumulative impacts is based on the AQMP forecasts of attainment of ambient air quality standards in accordance with the requirements of the federal and State Clean Air Acts. If a project is not consistent with the AQMP, which is intended to bring the SCAB into attainment for all criteria pollutants, that project can be considered cumulatively considerable. Additionally, if the mass regional emissions calculated for a project exceed the applicable SCAQMD daily significance thresholds that are designed to assist the region in attaining the applicable state and national ambient air quality standards, that project can be considered cumulatively considerable. As demonstrated above, the project would be consistent with the AQMP. The analysis that follows analyzes the project's emissions in comparison with the SCAQMD daily significance thresholds. Construction Emissions The project's construction emissions were estimated using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CaIEEMod). CaIEEMod contains OFFROAD2011 emission factors and EMFAC2014 emission factors from CARB's models for off-road equipment and on -road vehicles, respectively. Project -specific input was based on general information provided in the Project Description, assumptions provided by A & S Engineering, and default model settings to estimate reasonably conservative conditions. Project construction is assumed to begin in June 2020 and be completed by December 2020. Construction activities include site preparation, grading, construction of structures, and paving and coating of the site. During site preparation, approximately 80 cubic yards of debris and cleared vegetation would be exported. Overall construction is expected to last approximately six months. Construction design features include: fugitive dust control measures such as the use of an on-site water truck to wet down active grading areas and roads at least twice daily per SCAQMD Rule 403; providing 12 percent moisture content to unpaved roads; limiting vehicle speeds to 15 miles per hour; and using low VOC paint during architectural coating. Additional details of phasing, selection of construction equipment, and other input parameters, including CalEEMod data, are included in Appendix A. The results of the calculations for project construction are shown in Table 3, Maximum Daily Construction Emissions. The data are presented as the maximum anticipated daily emissions for comparison with the SCAQMD thresholds. 14 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project Table 3 MAXIMUM DAILY CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS Pollutant Emissions (pounds per day) rnase ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Site Preparation 1 11 5 <0.5 1 <0.5 Grading 1 8 8 <0.5 1 1 Building Construction 1 9 8 <0.5 1 <0.5 Paving 1 7 8 <0.5 1 <0.5 Architectural Coating 3 2 2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Maximum Daily Emissions' 3 11 8 <0.5 1 1 SCAQMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant Impact? No No No No No No Source: CalEEMod (output data is provided in Appendix A) 1 Maximum daily emissions of ROG occur during the architectural coating phase; maximum daily emissions of NOx and S02 occur during site preparation activities; and maximum daily emissions of CO, PM10, and PM2.5 occur during grading activities. Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding. As shown in Table 3, emissions of all criteria pollutants related to project construction would be below SCAQMD significance thresholds. Therefore, direct impacts from criteria pollutants generated during construction would be less than significant. Nonetheless, to ensure that construction -related air pollutant emission would be minimized, mitigation measure AQ -1 and AQ -2, below, are provided to ensure that impacts would remain less than significant. Operational Emissions Operational impacts were estimated using CaIEEMod. Operational sources of emissions include area, energy, and transportation sources. Operational emissions from area sources include the use of consumer products, engine emissions from landscape maintenance equipment, and VOC emissions from repainting of buildings. Operational emissions from mobile source emissions are associated with project - related vehicle trip generation and trip length. Project generated trips were estimated by the project specific Traffic Impact Study (TIS; Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc 2017). CaIEEMod default vehicle speeds, trip purpose, and distance were used. Operational emission calculations and model outputs are provided in Appendix A. Table 4, Maximum Daily Operational Emissions, presents the summary of operational emissions for the project. Table 4 MAXIMUM DAILY OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS Pollutant Emissions (pounds per day) �_d Mgvr y ROG NOx CO SO2 PMlo PMz.s Area <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Energy <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Mobile 3 8 17 <0.5 3 1 Total Daily Emissions 3 8 17 <0.5 3 1 SCAQMD Thresholds 55 55 550 150 150 55 Significant Impact? No No No No No No Source: CalEEMod (output data is provided in Appendix A); Thresholds (SCAQMD 2015) 15 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project As shown in Table 4, project emissions of all criteria pollutants during operation would be below the daily thresholds. Therefore, operation of the project would not be considered a significant impact on air quality. Impacts would be less than significant. c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Construction Activities Criteria Pollutants The localized effects from the on-site portion of daily construction emissions were evaluated at sensitive receptor locations potentially impacted by the project according to the SCAQMD's LST method. Consistent with the LST guidelines, when quantifying mass emissions for localized analysis, only emissions that occur on site are considered. Emissions related to off-site delivery, haul truck activity and construction worker trips are not considered in the evaluation of construction -related localized impacts, as these do not contribute to emissions generated on a project site. The project site is within Source Receptor Area (SRA) 18, North Coastal Orange County. Sensitive receptors are residences in the immediate vicinity of the project site, to the north, west and east. The project would utilize one grader during site preparation activities and one rubber -tired dozer during grading activities, which would disturb approximately 0.5 acres per 8 -hour day during each phase (SCAQMD 2009a). Therefore, the LSTs being applied to the project are based on SRA 18, receptors located within 25 meters, and a disturbed area not to exceed 1 acre. As shown in Table 5, Maximum Localized Daily Construction Emissions, localized emissions for all criteria pollutants would remain below their respective SCAQMD LSTs. Impacts would be less than significant. Table 5 MAXIMUM LOCALIZED DAILY CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS Pollutant Emissions (pounds per day) rnaae NOx CO PMI0 PM2.5 Site Preparation 8 4 1 <0.5 Grading 8 8 1 1 Building Construction 9 7 1 <0.5 Paving 7 7 <0.5 <0.5 Architectural Coating 2 2 <0.5 <0.5 Maximum Daily Emissions' 9 8 1 1 SCAQMD LST Thresholds 92 647 4 3 Significant Impact? No No No No Source: CalEEMod (output data is provided in Appendix A); Thresholds (SCAQMD 2009b) 1 Maximum on site daily emissions of NOx occur during Building activities; maximum on site daily emissions of CO, PMlo, and PM2,5 occur during Grading activities Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding Toxic Air Contaminants The greatest potential for toxic air contaminant (TAC) emissions during construction would be related to diesel particulate matter associated with heavy equipment operations during earth -moving activities. 16 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project The SCAQMD does not consider diesel -related cancer risks from construction equipment to be an issue due to the short-term nature of construction activities. Construction activities associated with the proposed project would be sporadic, transitory, and short term in nature (i.e., less than six months). The assessment of cancer risk is typically based on a 30 -year exposure period. Because exposure to diesel exhaust would be well below the 30 -year exposure period, construction of the proposed project is not anticipated to result in an elevated cancer risk to exposed persons. As such, project -related TAC emission impacts during construction would be less than significant. Operational Activities CO Hotspots A CO hotspot is an area of localized CO pollution that is caused by severe vehicle congestion on major roadways, typically near intersections. If a project increases average delay at signalized intersections operating at Level of Service (LOS) E or F or causes an intersection that would operate at LOS D or better without the project to operate at LOS E or F with the project, a quantitative screening is required. The project site is located at the intersection of 5th Street and Pacific Coast Highway. The TIS (Kimley- Horn and Associates, Inc 2017) prepared for the project evaluated six intersections and five roadway segments. According to the TIS, all study intersections and roadways would operate at LOS D or better. Although one intersection, Pacific Coast Highway at Marvista Drive/5th Street, would experience a significant impact based on the City of Seal Beach guidelines, it would operate at LOS D and would therefore not have the potential to cause a CO hotspot. Thus, sensitive receptors would not be exposed to project -generated local CO emissions. Impacts would be less than significant. Toxic Air Contaminants The project includes a 16 -station retail fueling facility that would involve the delivery and dispensing of gasoline. Activities at gasoline dispensing facilities can release TACs into the air, including the organic compounds benzene, toluene, and xylene. Benzene is a potent carcinogen and is one of the highest risk air pollutants regulated by CARB. The only identified pathway of exposure for air quality health risks from benzene is inhalation. Toluene and xylenes are not considered carcinogens, but they can contribute to chronic health conditions. The new fuel facility would require an authority to construct and a permit to operate from the SCAQMD, which will review the facility design and location for compliance with SCAQMD standards for criteria pollutants and air quality. All tanks and dispensers would be equipped with the latest Phase I and Phase II Enhanced Vapor Recovery (EVR) air pollution control equipment technology per SCAQMD Rule 461. The Phase I EVR equipment controls the vapors in the return path from the tanks back to the tanker truck during offloading filling operations. The Phase II EVR equipment, which also includes "in -station diagnostics," controls and monitors the vapors in the return path from the vehicles back to the tanks. While gasoline dispensing facilities account for a small part of total benzene emissions in the state, near - source exposures from large facilities (more than 3.6 million gallons per year throughput) can be significant (CARB 2005). Per the project applicant, a conservative (highest anticipated) estimate of the project's gasoline throughput would be 6 million gallons per year. Therefore, potential health risks to nearby sensitive receptors from the emission of toxic chemicals during operations at the proposed fueling facility were analyzed in accordance with the SCAQMD's Risk Assessment Procedures for Rules 17 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project 1401, 1401.1 and 212 (SCAQMD 2017b)), the California Air Pollution Control Officers' (CAPCOA) Gasoline Service Station Industrywide Risk Assessment Guidelines (CAPCOA 1997), and the OEHHA Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments (OEHHA 2015). According to the SCAQMD (2017) procedures, benzene is the most important substance driving the risk in the gasoline service stations. Therefore, only the localized concentrations of benzene, and the associated increase in cancer risk, were analyzed in the health risk assessment (HRA). Localized concentrations of benzene were modeled using Lakes AERMOD View version 9.6.1. The Lakes program utilizes the EPA AERMOD gaussian air dispersion model. The emissions of benzene were modeled in accordance with SCAQMD (2017) gasoline dispensing station risk assessment procedure. The locations of all sources of benzene were set at the center of the gas station pump canopy indicated on the project site plan. The modeling inputs and assumptions are included in Appendix B, HRA Model Assumptions and Results. Health risks resulting from localized concentration of benzene were estimated using the CARB Hotspots Analysis and Reporting Program (HARP), Air Dispersion Modeling and Risk Tool (ADMRT) version 18159. For the residential cancer risk, an exposure duration of 30 years was selected in accordance with the OEHHA (2015) guidelines. The model conservatively assumes that residents would be standing and breathing at the point of the property line closest to the gas station every day between 17 to 21 hours per day (depending on the age group) for 30 years. For off-site worker cancer risk, an exposure duration of 25 years was selected with an assumption of 8 hours per day of exposure, in accordance with the OEHHA guidelines. The resulting estimated health risk from exposure to benzene would be an increased cancer risk of 6.0 in 1 million for the maximum exposed individual resident, and 0.6 in 1 million for the maximum exposed individual off-site worker. This increased risk is less than the SCAQMD (2015) threshold of 10 in 1 million. As described above, this is a highly conservative value due to the modeling assumption of a resident standing at the property line for 17 to 21 hours per day for 30 years, and because a high fuel throughput was assumed for the project compared to similar gas stations. The modeling input files, output files, and the cancer risk isopleths are included in Appendix B, HRA Model Assumptions and Results. Cancer burden is an estimate of the number of cancer cases expected from a 70 -year exposure to project operational TAC emissions (OEHHA 2015). The cancer burden is calculated by multiplying the number of people exposed by the cancer risk of the maximum individual exposed resident (from a 70 - year exposure), which is 7.1 x 10-6. For this project, the number of people exposed would be the number of people living in the residences within the 1 in 1 million increased cancer risk isopleth (risk contour). There are 84 single-family residences within or touching this isopleth. While the number of people living at these residences is unknown, even assuming 10 people per household, the cancer burden would be 0.006, less than SCAQMD (2015) threshold of 0.5. Therefore, the impact of TAC emissions resulting from long-term operation of the gasoline dispensing station would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. While there would be other toxic substances, such as cleaning agents in use on site, compliance with State and federal handling regulations would ensure that emissions remain below the level of significance. The use of such substances such as cleaning agents is regulated by the 1990 Federal Clean Air Act Amendments as well as California -adopted regulations for the chemical composition of consumer products. As such, project -related TAC emission impacts during operation would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. 18 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors adversely affecting a substantial number of people)? Less Than Significant Impact. Although some components of asphalt and diesel emissions are considered TACs, construction activities would not generate significant odor impacts due to the short- term duration of exposure. The CARB's Air Quality and Land Use Handbook includes a list of the most common sources of odor complaints received by local air districts. Typical sources of odor complaints include facilities such as sewage treatment plants, landfills, recycling facilities, petroleum refineries, and livestock operations. The proposed project would not include these uses. The fueling station would emit odors during operation in the form of diesel exhaust from vehicles and operation of the fueling pumps. The increase in odor emission, however, would be minimal as vehicle exhaust is already prevalent in the area due to its proximity to Pacific Coast Highway and other major roadways. Additionally, solid waste generated by the proposed on-site uses would be collected by a contracted waste hauler, ensuring that any odors resulting from on-site waste would be managed and collected in a manner to prevent the proliferation of odors. Operational odor impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures Although project -related emissions would be well below SCAQMD thresholds, and thus project -related impacts would be less than significant, the project would implement the following construction measures to ensure compliance with SCAQMD regulations pertaining to controlling fugitive dust during construction activities. AQ -1 During site preparation and grading construction phases, all haul trucks transporting soil to or from the project site shall be covered to prevent fugitive dust emissions. AQ -2 During project construction, the following measures shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City of Seal Beach. Construction equipment maintenance records and data sheets of equipment design specifications (including the emission control tier of the equipment) shall be kept on-site during construction and subject to inspection by the City. a) Construction equipment shall be properly maintained according to manufacturer specifications. b) All contractors shall turn off all construction equipment and delivery vehicles when not in use, or limit on-site idling for no more than 5 minutes in any one hour. c) On-site electrical hook ups to a power grid shall be provided for electric construction tools, including saws, drills, and compressors, where feasible, to reduce the need for diesel -powered electric generators. d) The project shall demonstrate compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 403 concerning fugitive dust and provide appropriate documentation to the City. e) Traffic speeds on all unpaved portions of the project site shall be reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. f) Sweep streets at the end of the day if visible soil is carried onto adjacent public paved roads (recommend water sweepers with reclaimed water). g) Use street sweepers that comply with SCAQMD Rules 1186 and 1186.1. 19 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Less Than BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact Impact a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ Department of Fish and Wildlife or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? No Impact. The project site is located on a previously developed vacant lot, now covered with gravel and environmental remediation equipment, surrounded by urban development (as shown on Figure 2). The site is entirely covered with gravel and there are no vegetated areas onsite. According to the City of General Plan Open Space/Recreation/Conservation Element, sensitive natural communities are primarily located in open space and undeveloped areas of the City, and no special status species would be anticipated on site (City 2003). The proposed project would, therefore, not have a substantial adverse effect on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special -status species in local or regional plans or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 20 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? No Impact. The project site is located on a previously developed vacant lot surrounded by urban development. The site is entirely covered with gravel, and according to the City General Plan Open Space/Recreation/Conservation Element, no riparian habitat or sensitive natural communities are present (City 2003). The proposed project would, therefore, not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in any local or regional plans, policies or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Therefore, no impacts to riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities would occur. c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal wetlands, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? No Impact. The project site is located on a previously developed vacant lot surrounded by urban development. The site is entirely covered with gravel, and according to the City General Plan Open Space/Recreation/Conservation Element, no wetlands are present (City 2003). Therefore, no impacts to wetlands would occur. d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? No Impact. The project site is located on a previously developed vacant lot surrounded by urban development. According to the City General Plan Open Space/Recreation/Conservation Element, it does not serve as a wildlife corridor or nursery site (City 2003). Therefore, no impacts would occur. e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? No Impact. The project site does not contain sensitive or protected biological resources. Therefore, the project would not conflict with any policies or ordinances pertaining to biological resources. f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? No Impact. The proposed project site and immediate surrounding areas are not part of any habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. The Seal Beach National Wildlife Refuge is located approximately 1.2 miles to the east and the refuge's Comprehensive Conservation Plan (CCP) is implemented to preserve biological resources within the refuge (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2012). The proposed project would not impact the refuge, and no impacts would occur. 21 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project V. CULTURAL RESOURCES Less Than CULTURAL RESOURCES: Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact Impact a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to §15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an ❑ ❑ archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ❑ ❑ ❑ outside of formal cemeteries? A Cultural Resources Survey was prepared for the project (HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. [HELIX] 2018; Appendix Q. The results of the survey are presented below. a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to §15064.5? No Impact. As part of the Cultural Resources Survey, HELIX conducted a one -mile radius records search at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) on August 29, 2018 (HELIX 2018). SCCIC is the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) repository for Orange and Los Angeles Counties. The records search included archaeological and historical resources. One historic resource is located within a quarter mile of the project site, the historic Seal Beach Red Car (P-30-162293), a 1925 service car for the Pacific Electric Railway that shutdown in the 1950s, located approximately 800 feet to the south. As no resources are recorded within or adjacent to the project site, and as the project would have no adverse effects on the Seal Beach Red Car, no impacts to historical resources would occur. b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? Less Than Significant with Mitigation. The Cultural Resources Survey included a records search and literature review, Sacred Lands File search, Native American outreach, a review of historic aerial photographs and maps, and a pedestrian survey to determine the cultural resource sensitivity of the project area (HELIX 2018). The records search conducted at the South -Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) on August 29, 2018 indicated that 65 previous cultural resources studies have been conducted within a mile of the project area. Two of these are mapped as including the project site, but one did not include field survey, and it is unclear as to whether the other surveyed the project site, which was already developed by that time. The records search results also indicated that a total of 21 cultural resources have been previously recorded within a mile of the project area, two of which (CA -ORA -001473 and P-30-162293) are located within a quarter mile of the project site. These consist of a prehistoric shell deposit (CA -ORA -001473) and the historic Seal Beach Red Car, No. 1734 (P-30-162293), discussed under Item V.a. Although only one prehistoric resource is recorded within a quarter mile, the general area is rich in terms of cultural resources -- a series of archaeological sites on the nearby Hellman Ranch has been identified as significant, sometimes called Puvungna East, and a Gabrielino village was identified in the area of the 22 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project historic Anaheim Landing. This village site would have encompassed the Hellman Ranch sites as well as the project area. In addition, the Native American Heritage Commission noted that cultural resources on the Sacred Land File are known in the area. A pedestrian survey of the project site was conducted in September 2018 by the HELIX field director and a tribal monitor from the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians, Kizh Nation. The ground surface of the survey area was covered with pea gravel and rock, obscuring the ground surface, but marine shell was found in soils that might have been brought to the surface during fencing or post placement; these soils did not appear to be fill. As previously noted, the project area was formerly developed as a gas station, including underground tanks, and large amounts of soil were removed due to soil contamination (further discussed under Section VIII). Therefore, the project site has been the subject of a great deal of past subsurface disturbance, and intact cultural deposits are considered unlikely. Although the potential for intact subsurface deposits within the project site is low given the degree of past disturbance, the general area is culturally sensitive, with habitation sites and human burials known in the vicinity. Therefore, there is potential for project construction to encounter cultural resources, and impacts are assessed as potentially significant. Mitigation measures CUL -1 through CUL -4 would be implemented to reduce impacts to a less -than -significant level. c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Less Than Significant with Mitigation. As discussed in Item V.b, the presence of cultural resources, including human remains, is not anticipated due to the disturbed nature of the project site, but the potential to encounter unknown human remains during ground -disturbing activities exists. Therefore, impacts would be potentially significant. Mitigation measure CUL -4 would be implemented to reduce impacts to a less -than -significant level. Mitigation Measures CUL -1 Pre -Construction Worker Environmental Awareness Program. Prior to the commencement of any ground -disturbing activities for the project, a qualified archaeologist and Native American monitors from both Gabrielino (Gabrieleno) and Juaneno tribes shall conduct a Worker Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP) to present to City staff, the grading contractor, and any relevant subcontractors information regarding the cultural and archaeological sensitivity of the project area, as well as the requirements of the monitoring program. The WEAP can be presented at a pre -grading meeting or separately. If the WEAP is held separately, the qualified archaeologist and Native American monitors shall be present for a pre -grading meeting with the grading contractor to discuss project schedule, safety requirements, and monitoring protocols. CUL -2 Construction Monitoring for Cultural Resources Ground -disturbing activities during construction shall be monitored by a qualified archaeologist and Native American monitors from both Gabrielino (Gabrieleno) and Juaneno tribes. These activities include removal of existing gravel and other surface materials, grading, trenching, excavation, etc. If cultural material is encountered during monitoring, both the archaeologist and the Native American monitors would have the authority to temporarily halt or redirect activity in the area of the find while the cultural material is documented and a decision is made regarding the significance/eligibility of the find and whether additional excavation, analysis, or other mitigation measures are required. Determinations of significance will be made in consultation among the archaeological Principal Investigator, the Monitor Tribes, and City staff. If it is determined that the potential for 23 VI. 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project subsurface cultural material is too low to warrant fulltime monitoring, monitoring can be reduced to part-time or spot-checking, or can be discontinued. Such a decision would be made in consultation among the Native American monitors/Monitoring Tribes, the Principal Investigator, and City staff. CUL -3 Monitoring Program Report. Following the conclusion of monitoring, a report shall be prepared documenting the methods and results of the monitoring program and submitted to the City and the SCCIC. CUL -4 Procedure for Encountering Human Remains. In the event that human remains are discovered, the County Coroner shall be contacted. If the remains are determined to be of Native American origin, the Most Likely Descendant, as identified by the NAHC, shall be contacted in order to determine proper treatment and disposition of the remains. All requirements of Health & Safety Code Section 7050.5 and Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 shall be followed. ENERGY ENERGY: Less Than Would the project: Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ energy resources, during project construction or operation? b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ energy or energy efficiency? a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? Less Than Significant Impact. Construction -Related Energy Consumption Energy used for construction would primarily consist of fuels in the form of diesel and gasoline. Fuel consumed by construction equipment would be the primary energy resource expended over the course of construction and would include the transportation of construction materials and construction worker commutes. Heavy-duty construction equipment associated with construction activities, haul trucks involved in the removal of construction and demolition materials, and smaller support equipment (such as lighting, air compressors, and pumps) would consume petroleum-based fuel. Construction workers would travel to and from the project site throughout the duration of construction, presumably in gasoline -powered vehicles. Calculations of energy use for the project are based on the same assumptions used to calculate air quality criteria pollutant and GHG emissions. Table 6, Construction Energy Use, includes an estimation of energy usage from construction equipment. See Appendix A for additional construction energy usage data. 24 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project Table 6 CONSTRUCTION ENERGY USE Phase Total kBtu Off -Road Construction Energy Use Grading 7,575 Site Preparation 12,919 Building Construction 912,458 Paving 34,994 Architectural Coating 4,927 Subtotal 972,872 On -Road Construction Energy Use Worker Vehicles and Haul Trucks 1 45,966 Construction Total Source: HELIX 2019d (construction energy usage data provided in Appendix A) kBtu = kilo -British thermal unit While construction activities would consume petroleum-based fuels, consumption of such resources would be temporary and would cease upon the completion of construction. The petroleum consumed during project construction would also be typical of similar construction projects and would not require the use of new petroleum resources beyond what are typically consumed in California. Based on these considerations, construction of the project would not result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources. Long -Term Operational Energy Consumption The project will be served by Southern California Edison. No extensions of energy infrastructure and no new energy supplies beyond existing facilities are required to support the project. The project is an infill location in an area that is mostly developed. Operational energy consumption includes natural gas used for space and water heating. Electricity may also be used for space and water heating, well as lighting and space cooling. Vehicles traveling to and from the site will use transportation fuels such as gasoline and diesel. Energy use (in kilo -British thermal units [kBtu]) associated with gasoline, diesel, natural gas, and electricity usage for operation of the project is provided in Table 7, Operational Energy Use. See Appendix A for operational energy usage data. Table 7 OPERATIONAL ENERGY USE Energy Type Quantity kBtu Gasoline (gallons) 52,540 6,514,987 Diesel (gallons) 8,455 1,175,293 Natural Gas (kBtu) 4,800 4,800 Electricity (KWh) 32,670 111,474 Total 7,806,554 Source: HELIX 2019d (operational energy usage data provided in Appendix A) kBtu = kilo -British thermal unit; KWh = kilowatt-hour The project would be required to meet the mandatory energy standards of CALGreen and the California Energy Code (Title 24, Part 6 of the CCR) and would benefit from the efficiencies associated with these 25 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project regulations as they relate to ventilating, and air conditioning mechanical systems, and lighting. Compliance with California energy efficiency regulations on new construction ensures that the buildings would not result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy sources. b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? No Impact. The project would be built and operated in accordance with existing, applicable regulations, which include, but are not limited to, the California Green Building Standards Code and CARB regulations. Construction equipment and operation equipment would be maintained to allow for continuous energy-efficient operations. The project would therefore not conflict with any state or local plan for energy efficiency, and no impacts would occur. VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS GEOLOGY AND SOILS: Less Than Would the project: Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42? ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ iii. Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ iv. Landslides? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ direct or indirect risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ resource or site or unique geologic feature? I 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42? Less Than Significant Impact. The nearest active fault to the project site is the Newport -Inglewood -Rose Canyon Fault, which is approximately two miles to the northeast (City 2003). No active, potentially active, or inactive faults occur within the project site and the site does not lie within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Hazard Zone as defined by the State of California in the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Hazard Zoning Act (City 2003). Therefore, fault rupture on-site is unlikely, and impacts would be less than significant. ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? Less Than Significant with Mitigation. An earthquake along the Newport -Inglewood -Rose Canyon Fault could result in severe ground shaking at the project site. Ground shaking can affect the integrity of project structures; therefore, the proposed project would potentially be subject to moderate to severe ground shaking hazards from earthquake events. Accordingly, ground shaking could potentially result in significant impacts to the proposed project structures, including the underground fuel tanks and the convenience store. This impact would be mitigated through implementation of mitigation measure GEO-1. iii. Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? Less Than Significant with Mitigation. According to the California Geological Survey Seismic Hazard Zones Map, the project site falls within an area that has the potential for seismically induced liquefaction occurrences (California Geological Survey 2016). Therefore, the project structures may be at risk for liquefaction (including the underground fuel tanks and the convenience store), and impacts would be potentially significant. This impact would be mitigated through implementation of mitigation measure GEO-1. iv. Landslides? No Impact. The project site is characterized by level terrain. Additionally, according to the California Geological Survey, the project site is not located within an area of high susceptibility to seismically induced landslides (California Geological Survey 2016). Therefore, no impacts would occur. b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would not result in long-term, operational impacts associated with soil erosion or loss of topsoil as the site would be developed and paved and would not contain a substantial amount of exposed soil. In addition, although the project would increase the amount of impervious surfaces on the site, the project's bioretention basins are large enough to ensure that there would be no net increase in off-site runoff compared to existing conditions (Waber Consultants, Inc. 2018). 27 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project Potential short-term erosion and sedimentation impacts from grading and construction activities would be addressed through compliance with applicable regulations as specified by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), including compliance with NPDES and the adoption and implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) during construction would reduce impacts to short-term erosion and sedimentation from the construction; BMPs may include the use of gravel bag barriers, silt fences, street sweeping, solid waste management, water conservation practices, and spill prevention and control. Therefore, impacts related to soil erosion and the loss of topsoil would be less than significant. c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? Less Than Significant with Mitigation. According to the California Geological Survey Seismic Hazard Zones Map, the project site falls within an area that has the potential for seismically induced liquefaction occurrences (California Geological Survey 2016). Due to the location of the project in area with unstable soils, potentially significant impacts to the project structures could occur, including the underground fuel tanks and the convenience store. Implementation of mitigation measure GEO-1 would reduce potential impacts related to unstable soils to a less -than -significant level. d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? Less Than Significant with Mitigation. As described under Item Vll.b, the proposed project may be located on unstable soil, which could be at risk for expansion. Therefore, project structures may be at risk of expansive soil, and impacts would be potentially significant. Implementation of mitigation measure GEO-1 would reduce potential impacts related to unstable soils to a less -than -significant level. e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? No Impact. As was done for the site when it was previously developed as a gas station, the proposed project would be connected to local wastewater disposal utilities and would not require septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. Therefore, no impacts would occur. f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Less Than Significant Impact. The City General Plan does not identify areas within the City that may be sensitive for paleontological resources (City 2003). Figure VI -9 of the County of Orange General Plan designates areas of paleontological sensitivity within the County, and no areas within Seal Beach are identified (County 2005). Therefore, encountering unique paleontological resources is not anticipated, and impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures The following mitigation measure would mitigate the potentially significant impacts identified under this section to less than significant levels. 28 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project GEO-1 Site-specific Geotechnical Investigation. A site-specific geotechnical investigation shall be completed prior to final site design approval by the City to identify site-specific criteria related to considerations such as grading, excavation, fill, and structure/facility design. All applicable results and recommendations from the geotechnical investigation will be incorporated into the project design and construction documents to address identified potential geologic and soil hazards, including but not necessarily limited to: (1) seismic hazards including ground rupture, ground acceleration (ground shaking), soil liquefaction (and related issues such as dynamic settlement and lateral spreading), landslides/slope instability, and seiche effects; and (2) non- seismic hazards including manufactured slope instability, subsidence/compressible soils, expansive or corrosive soils, and trench/excavation instability. The final project design and construction documents will also encompass applicable standard design and construction practices from established regulatory/industry sources including the California Building Code (CBC), International Building Code (IBC), California Geological Survey (CGS), Greenbook standards, as well as the results/recommendations of geotechnical review and field observations/testing to be conducted during project excavation, grading and construction activities (with all related requirements to be included in applicable engineering/design drawings and construction contract specifications). A summary of the types of remedial measures typically associated with identified potential seismic hazards, pursuant to applicable regulatory and industry standards, is provided below. The remedial measures identified/recommended as part of the described site-specific geotechnical investigation will take priority over the more general types of standard regulatory/industry measures provided herein. Ground Rupture: (1) Locate (or relocate) structures away from known active (or potentially active) faults and outside of associated CGS Earthquake Fault Zones; and (2) require appropriate (typically 50 -foot) building exclusion buffers (setbacks) on either side of applicable fault traces. Ground Acceleration (Ground Shaking): (1) Incorporate applicable seismic loading factors (e.g., IBC/CBC/CGS criteria) into project structure design; (2) use remedial grading techniques where appropriate (e.g., removing/replacing and/or reconditioning unsuitable soils); and (3) use properly engineered fill per applicable industry/regulatory standards (e.g., IBC/CBC/CGS), including criteria such as appropriate fill composition, placement methodology, compaction levels, and moisture content. Liquefaction and Related Effects: (1) Remove unsuitable soils and replace with engineered fill (as previously described), per applicable regulatory/industry standards (e.g., IBC/CBC/CGS); (2) employ measures such as deep soil mixing (i.e., introducing cement to consolidate loose soils) or use of subsurface structures (e.g., stone columns or piles) to provide support (i.e., by extending structures into competent underlying units); (3) use appropriate surface drainage and/or subdrains in applicable areas to avoid or reduce near - surface saturation; and (4) design for potential settlement of liquefiable materials through means such as use of post -tensioned foundations and/or flexible couplings for utility connections. • Landslides/Slope Instability: (1) Construct properly drained shear keys and/or replace susceptible deposits with manufactured buttress fills where appropriate; (2) employ applicable slope laybacks (i.e., shallower slopes) and/or structural setbacks; (3) incorporate 29 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project structures such as retaining walls and stability fills where appropriate to provide support; (4) provide protective walls or other barriers in areas susceptible to landslides; and (S) implement proper slope drainage and landscaping where applicable per established regulatory/industry standards (e.g., IBC/CBC/CGS). Manufactured Slope Instability: (1) Limit slope grades to 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) or other applicable ratios based on site-specific conditions and the results of slope stability analyses (if recommended as part of the geotechnical analyses); (2) employ similar strategies regarding slope laybacks, structure setbacks and support/ protective structures as outlined above under the discussion of Landslides/Slope Instability; (3) provide appropriate short - and long-term drainage control, such as slope drains and/or brow ditches to avoid/minimize runoff on slopes; and (4) utilize native and/or drought -tolerant landscaping varieties, as well as "smart" irrigation systems (e.g., appropriate water schedules and rain/pressure-sensitive sensors/ shutoff devices) to minimize irrigation and associated runoff. Subsidence/Compression: (1) Use standard efforts such as over -excavation and recompaction or replacement of unsuitable materials with engineered fill, and enhanced foundation design in applicable areas (e.g., post -tensioned or mat slab foundations); (2) use engineered fill, subdrains, surcharging (i.e., loading prior to construction to induce settlement) and/or settlement monitoring (e.g., through the use of settlement monuments) in appropriate areas; (3) implement groundwater withdrawal monitoring/restrictions per established legal/regulatory/industry standards (if applicable). • Collapsible Soils: (1) Over -excavation and recompaction or replacement of unsuitable materials with engineered fill; (2) deep soil mixing, use of subsurface structures to provide support, and proper surface drainage/subdrains (as described above under Liquefaction); and (3) surcharging (as described above under Subsidence/Compression). • Expansive Soils: (1) Replace and/or mix expansive materials with non -expansive fill; and (2) cap expansive soils in place with an appropriate thickness of non -expansive fill per established regulatory/industry standards (e.g., IBC/CBC). • Corrosive Soils: (1) Remove unsuitable deposits and replace with non -corrosive fill; (2) use corrosion -resistant construction materials (e.g., corrosion -resistant concrete and coated or non-metallic facilities); or (3) install cathodic protection devices (e.g., use of a more easily corroded "sacrificial metal" to serve as an anode and draw current away from the structure to be protected) per established regulatory/industry standards (e.g., IBC/CBC). • Trench/Excavation Instability: (1) Limit trench and other excavation depths and side slope grades to the minimum feasible levels; (2) provide shoring and/or other protective systems (e.g., benching and shielding) for applicable trenches/ excavations, pursuant to associated regulatory standards (e.g., Occupational Safety and Health Administration [OSHA] and Cal - OSHA); (3) restrict heavy equipment/vehicle access and material/soil stockpiles near trenches/excavations; and (4) inspect trenches/excavations and related conditions/facilities at the start of each shift and after precipitation (or other water intrusion) events. 30 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ATMOSPHERIC LIFETIME GLOBAL WARMING POTENTIAL GREENHOUSE GAS Less Than (100 -year time horizon) Carbon Dioxide (CO2) GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS: Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact Impact a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ greenhouse gases? Environmental Setting Climate change refers to any significant change in measures of climate, such as average temperature, precipitation, or wind patterns over a period of time. Climate change may result from human activities that change the composition of the atmosphere and alter the surface and features of the land. Significant changes in global climate patterns have recently been associated with global warming, which is an average increase in the temperature of the atmosphere near the Earth's surface; this is attributed to an accumulation of GHG emissions in the atmosphere. GHGs trap heat in the atmosphere which, in turn, increases the Earth's surface temperature. The emission of GHGs through fossil fuel combustion in conjunction with other human activities appears to be closely associated with global warming. GHGs, as defined under California's Assembly Bill (AB) 32, include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N20), hydrofluorocarbons (HFC), perfluorocarbons (PFC), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). General discussions on climate change often include water vapor, ozone, and aerosols in the GHG category. Water vapor and atmospheric ozone are not gases that are formed directly in the construction or operation of development projects, nor can they be controlled in these projects. Aerosols are not gases. While these elements have a role in climate change, they are not considered by either regulatory bodies, such as CARB, as gases to be reported or analyzed for control. Therefore, no further discussion of water vapor, ozone, or aerosols is provided. GHGs vary widely in the power of their climatic effects; therefore, climate scientists have established a unit called global warming potential (GWP). The GWP of a gas is a measure of both potency and lifespan in the atmosphere as compared to CO2. For example, since CH4 and N20 are approximately 25 and 298 times more powerful than CO2, respectively, in their ability to trap heat in the atmosphere, they have GWPs of 25 and 298, respectively (CO2 has a GWP of 1). Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) is a quantity that enables all GHG emissions to be considered as a group despite their varying GWP. The GWP of each GHG is multiplied by the prevalence of that gas to produce CO2e. The atmospheric lifetime and GWP of selected GHGs are summarized in Table 6, Global Warming Potentials and Atmospheric Lifetimes. Table 6 GLOBAL WARMING POTENTIALS AND ATMOSPHERIC LIFETIMES 31 ATMOSPHERIC LIFETIME GLOBAL WARMING POTENTIAL GREENHOUSE GAS (years) (100 -year time horizon) Carbon Dioxide (CO2) 50.0-200.0 1 31 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project Methane (CH4) 12.0 25 Nitrous Oxide (N20) 114.0 298 HFC -134a 14 1,430 PFC: Tetrafluoromethane (CF4) 50,000.0 7,390 PFC: Hexafluoroethane (C2F6) 10,000.0 12,200 Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) 3,200.0 22,800 HFC: hydrofluorocarbons; PFC: perfluorocarbons Source: IPCC 2007 Regulatory Framework Relating to Greenhouse Gas Emissions AB 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, recognizes that California is a source of substantial amounts of GHG emissions. The statute states that: Global warming poses a serious threat to the economic wellbeing, public health, natural resources, and the environment of California. The potential adverse impacts of global warming include the exacerbation of air quality problems, a reduction in the quality and supply of water to the state from the Sierra snowpack, a rise in sea levels resulting in the displacement of thousands of coastal businesses and residences, damage to marine ecosystems and the natural environment, and an increase in the incidences of infectious diseases, asthma, and other human health-related problems. In order to help avert these potential consequences, AB 32 established a State goal of reducing GHG emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2020. In addition, AB 32 required CARB develop a Scoping Plan to help the state achieve the targeted GHG reductions. In 2015, Executive Order (EO) B-30-15 established a California GHG emission reduction target of 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. California is on track to meet or exceed the target of reducing GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020, as established in AB 32. As a follow-up to AB 32 and in response to EO -B-30-15, Senate Bill (SB) 32 was passed by the California legislature in 2016 to codify the EO's California GHG emission reduction target of 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. On December 11, 2008, the CARB adopted the Scoping Plan (CARB 2008) as directed by AB 32. The Scoping Plan proposes a set of actions designed to reduce overall GHG emissions in California to the levels required by AB 32. Measures applicable to development projects include those related to energy - efficiency building and appliance standards, the use of renewable sources for electricity generation, regional transportation targets, and green building strategy. Relative to transportation, the Scoping Plan includes nine measures or recommended actions related to reducing VMT and vehicle GHGs through fuel and efficiency measures. These measures would be implemented statewide rather than on a project -by -project basis. In response to EO B-30-15 and SB 32, all state agencies with jurisdiction over sources of GHG emissions were directed to implement measures to achieve reductions of GHG emissions to meet the 2030 and 2050 targets. CARB prepared a second update to the Scoping Plan to reflect the 2030 target set by EO B-30-15 and codified by SB 32. The 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update, Proposed Strategy for Achieving California's 2030 Greenhouse Gas Target, was adopted in December 2017. The Scoping Plan Update establishes a proposed framework for California to meet a 40 percent reduction in GHGs by 2030 compared to 1990 levels (CARB 2017). California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 6 32 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24 Part 6: California's Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings were first established in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to reduce California's energy consumption. Energy-efficient buildings require less electricity, natural gas, and other fuels. Electricity production from fossil fuels and on-site fuel combustion (typically for water heating) results in GHG emissions. The Title 24 standards are updated approximately every three years to allow consideration and possible incorporation of new energy efficiency technologies and methods. The latest update to the Title 24 standards occurred in 2016 and went into effect on January 1, 2017. The 2016 update to the Building Energy Efficiency Standards focuses on several key areas to improve the energy efficiency of newly constructed buildings and additions and alterations to existing buildings. The most significant efficiency improvements to the residential standards include improvements for attics, walls, water heating, and lighting. The Energy Efficiency Standards are divided into three basic sets. First, there is a basic set of mandatory requirements that apply to all buildings. Second, there is a set of performance standards — the energy budgets — that vary by climate zone (of which there are 16 in California) and building type; thus, the Energy Efficiency Standards are tailored to local conditions. Finally, the third set constitutes an alternative to the performance standards, which is a set of prescriptive packages that are basically a recipe or a checklist compliance approach. The next update to Title 24 will occur in 2019 and go into effect on January 1, 2020. The 2019 Standards will continue to improve the energy efficiency of new buildings and alterations to existing buildings. California Green Building Standards Code The California Green (CALGreen) Building Standards Code (CCR Title 24, Part 11) is a code with mandatory requirements for new residential and nonresidential buildings (including industrial buildings) throughout California. The code is Part 11 of the California Building Standards Code in Title 24 of the CCR (California Building Standards Commission 2017). The current 2016 Standards for new construction of, and additions and alterations to, residential and nonresidential buildings went into effect on January 1, 2017. The 2019 Standards, which will go into effect January 2020, will continue to improve upon the current 2016 Standards. The development of CALGreen is intended to (1) cause a reduction in GHG emissions from buildings; (2) promote environmentally responsible, cost-effective, healthier places to live and work; (3) reduce energy and water consumption; and (4) respond to the directives by the Governor. In short, the code is established to reduce construction waste; make buildings more efficient in the use of materials and energy; and reduce environmental impact during and after construction. CALGreen contains requirements for storm water control during construction; construction waste reduction; indoor water use reduction; material selection; natural resource conservation; site irrigation conservation; and more. The code provides for design options allowing the designer to determine how best to achieve compliance for a given site or building condition. The code also requires building commissioning, which is a process for the verification that all building systems, like heating and cooling equipment and lighting systems, are functioning at their maximum efficiency. SCAQMD There are no established City thresholds applicable to the project to determine the quantity of GHG emissions that may have a significant effect on the environment. CARB, the SCAQMD, and various cities and agencies have proposed, or adopted on an interim basis, thresholds of significance that require the 33 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project implementation of GHG emission reduction measures. For the proposed project, which is located in the SCAB, the most appropriate screening threshold for determining GHG emissions is the SCAQMD proposed Tier 3 screening threshold, which applies to commercial/residential projects(SCAQMD 2008); therefore, for the purposes of this analysis, a significant impact would occur if the proposed project would exceed the SCAQMD proposed Tier 3 screening threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e per year. a) Generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Less Than Significant Impact. Construction GHG Emissions Project construction GHG emissions were estimated using the CalEEMod model as described in Item Ill.b. Project -specific input was based on general information provided in the Project Description and default model settings to estimate reasonably conservative conditions. Additional details of phasing, selection of construction equipment, and other input parameters, including CalEEMod data, are included in Appendix A. Emissions of GHGs related to the construction of the project would be temporary. As shown in Table 8, Estimated Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions, total GHG emissions associated with construction of the project are estimated at 59 MT CO2e. For construction emissions, SCAQMD guidance recommends that the emissions be amortized (i.e., averaged) over 30 years and added to operational emissions (SCAQMD 2008). Averaged over 30 years, the proposed construction activities would contribute approximately 2 MT CO2e emissions per year. Table 7 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Phase Emissions (MT CO2e) Site Preparation 1 Grading 1 Building Construction 53 Paving 3 Architectural Coating 1 TOTAL S9 Amortized Construction Emission' 2 Source: CalEEMod (output data is provided in Appendix A); 1 Construction emissions are amortized over 30 years in accordance with SCAQMD guidance Operational GHG Emissions Operational sources of GHG emissions include: (1) area sources; (2) energy use; (3) vehicle use; (4) solid waste generation; and (5) water conveyance and treatment. Area sources include emissions from landscaping equipment. Energy sources include electricity consumption from lighting, heating, and cooling. Operational emissions from mobile source emissions are associated with project -related vehicle trip generation and trip length. Based on the TIS prepared for the project, the project would generate 2,300 average daily trips (Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc 2017). Solid waste generated by the project 34 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project would also contribute to GHG emissions due to treatment and disposal. A 25 percent operational solid waste diversion rate was applied to the project to account for 75 percent diversion rate consistent with AB 341 standards. Water -related GHG emissions would be generated from the conveyance and treatment of water. In accordance with 2016 CALGreen requirements, a 20 percent reduction in potable water use and wastewater generation was incorporated into the project design. Table 8, Total Estimated Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions, displays the total annual emissions for the project, including amortized construction emissions. Appendix A contains the CaIEEMod output files for the project. As shown in Table 8, the project would result in annual GHG emissions of 664 MT CO2e. This value would not exceed the SCAQMD 3,000 MT CO2e per year significance threshold, and therefore, the impacts would be less than significant. Table 8 TOTAL ESTIMATED OPERATIONAL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Emission Sources Emissions (MT COZe) Area Sources <0.5 Energy Sources 10 Vehicular (Mobile) Sources 649 Solid Waste Sources 3 Water Sources 1 Operational Subtotal 662 Construction (Annualized over 30 years) 2 TOTAL OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS 664 SCAQMD Thresholds 3,000 Significant Impact? No Source: CalEEMod (output data is provided in Appendix A); Thresholds (SCAQMD 2008) Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Less Than Significant Impact. There are numerous State plans, policies, and regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. The principal overall State plan and policy is AB 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. The quantitative goal of AB 32 is to reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. SB 32 would require further reductions of 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. Because the project's operational year is 2020, the project aims to make progress toward achieving the goals set by SB 32. Statewide plans and regulations such as GHG emissions standards for vehicles (AB 1493), the Low Carbon Fuel Standard, and regulations requiring an increasing fraction of electricity to be generated from renewable sources are being implemented at the statewide level; as such, compliance at the project level is not addressed. Therefore, the proposed project does not conflict with those plans and regulations. As previously discussed, this analysis applies a screening threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e per year to comply with the reduction goals of AB 32. The proposed project's increase in GHG emissions would not exceed 35 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project the significance threshold. In addition, the City does not have plans, policies, standards, or regulations related to climate change and GHG emissions. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. This would represent a less than significant impact. IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Less Than HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact Impact a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ evacuation plan? g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ fires? a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Less Than Significant with Mitigation. Construction During the temporary, short-term construction period, there is the possibility of accidental release of hazardous substances such as spilling of hydraulic fluid or diesel fuel associated with construction 36 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project equipment maintenance. The level of risk associated with the accidental release of these hazardous substances is not considered significant due to the small volume and low concentration of these hazardous materials. The construction contractor would be required to use standard construction controls and safety procedures to avoid or minimize the potential for accidental release of such substances into the environment. As described under Item IX.d, the site is listed as a potentially hazardous site due to a previous site use as a gas station, where the underground storage tanks and piping for that gas station leaked gasoline (hydrocarbons) into the soil and groundwater. After over 30 years of cleanup efforts, the groundwater plume has decreased in concentration to near non -detect levels and below the required maximum concentrations levels and is stable and meets the Low -Threat Underground Storage Tank Case Closure Policy (LTCP) criteria (Stantec 2018). As directed by the OCHCA, operation of the equipment will continue until shut down is approved by the OCHCA. The forecasted date for closure on the Geotracker website is March 2020 (SWRQB 2018). The existing operating groundwater and soil vapor recovery systems and testing systems would remain on site during and after project construction, with one environmental well relocated (see Figure 3 for environmental area and monitoring well locations). However, through project excavation, including excavation for the project's underground storage tanks, soil and groundwater with elevated hydrocarbon concentrations may be encountered, which could result in a significant hazard to construction workers and people near the construction site through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions to the environment. Therefore, impacts from project construction would be potentially significant. These impacts would be mitigated with mitigation measures HAZ-1 and HAZ-2. Operation Operation of the project proposes a gas station that would involve the routine use and storage of hazardous materials, which includes storage of gasoline in the project's underground storage tanks, as well as delivery of gasoline and subsequent refilling of the tanks. Gasoline is considered a hazardous waste, and therefore the installation and operation of underground storage tanks are regulated by a variety of state and local agencies. The USEPA has designed technical regulations for underground storage tanks to prevent releases from the tanks, last updated in 2015 (USEPA 2015). In addition, California's Underground Storage Tank Act is contained in Chapter 6.7 of the California Health and Safety Code and Title 23 of the California Code of Regulations. The program was developed to ensure that the facilities meet regulatory requirements for design, monitoring, maintenance, and emergency response in operating or owning underground storage tanks. This act requires an underground storage tank monitoring and response program. OCHCA's Environmental Health Division is the Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for Orange County responsible for enforcing the Underground Storage Tank Act. As the CUPA, the OCHCA Environmental Health Division is required to regulate hazardous materials business plans and chemical inventory, hazardous waste and tiered permitting, underground storage tanks, and risk management plans. For project approval for OCHCA Environmental Health Division for the underground storage tanks, the project would be required to submit an Underground Storage Tank Response Plan and Monitoring Plan (OCHCA 2018), in addition to a Hazardous Materials Business Plan (HMBEP). The HMBEP is required to contain basic information on the location, type, quantity and health risks of hazardous materials stored, used, or disposed of onsite. The plan also contains an emergency response plan which describes the procedures for mitigating a hazardous release, procedures, and equipment for minimizing the potential 37 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project damage of a hazardous materials release, and provisions for immediate notification of the OCHCA Environmental Health Division and other emergency response personnel such as the local Fire Agency having jurisdiction. Implementation of the emergency response plan facilitates rapid response in the event of an accidental spill or release, thereby reducing potential adverse impacts. Furthermore, the OCHCA Environmental Health Division is required to conduct ongoing routine inspections to ensure compliance with existing laws and regulations; to identify safety hazards that could cause or contribute to an accidental spill or release; and to suggest preventative measures to minimize the risk of a spill or release of hazardous substances. The threshold for having to prepare a HMBEP is if the site would have at least 55 gallons of a liquid hazardous waste. For operation, the project would comply with the OCHCA Environmental Health Division (CUPA) underground storage tank requirements, would obtain a Permit to Operate, and would prepare an Underground Storage Tank Response Plan and Monitoring Plan prior to project operation. In addition, the underground storage tanks would be designed in accordance with USEPA and OCHCA Environmental Health Division underground storage tank design standards prior to project construction. However, given the project's use as a gas station with underground storage tanks, there would be potential for spillage of gasoline during either routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials or reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment, including from the project's underground storage tanks into the soil and groundwater. Therefore, impacts would be potentially significant from operation of the project from its use of hazardous materials. These impacts would be mitigated with mitigation measure HAZ-3. As discussed under Item Ill.d, the project would result in airborne emissions of benzene (a hydrocarbon). An HRA was performed to determine the potential cancer risks from those emissions. The project's emissions would be less than the applicable cancer risk thresholds and impacts from the release of airborne hazardous materials during routine operation would be less than significant. In accordance with Table V111.1 of the Technical Guidance Document for preparing Water Quality Management Plans (WQMPs; Orange County Public Works 2013), infiltration is prohibited for fueling stations due to potentially hazardous waste spillage into the groundwater. As discussed under Item Ka, the project would install bioretention basins and other low -impact design stormwater collection that would not allow for infiltration into the groundwater due to the potential presence of contaminants. All runoff would be collected before infiltration to avoid further spread of hazardous materials. c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Less Than Significant with Mitigation. The nearest school to the project site is J. H. McGaugh Elementary School, which is located greater than 0.25 mile from the project site at a distance of 0.6 mile to the east. Although the project is located more than 0.25 mile from the nearest school, as described under Items IX.a, b, and d, there is a potential for the release of hazardous materials during construction and operation. Therefore, impacts would be potentially significant. These impacts would be mitigated through mitigation measures HAZ-1 and HAZ-2 for construction and HAZ-3 for operation. 38 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? Less Than Significant with Mitigation. The project site appears in SWRCB's GeoTracker database of potentially hazardous sites under site Arco #6066 (SWRCB 2018; all background information below provided by Stantec 2017). The project is located on the site of a former gas station that released gasoline (hydrocarbons) into the soil and groundwater from leaking underground storage tanks, with the leaking problem first being discovered in 1986. Cleanup began in late 1986 and early 1987 under the supervision of the OCHCA Environmental Health Division and the Santa Ana RWQCB, with removal of the underground storage tanks, installation of new tanks, and removal of groundwater and soil in the project area. Groundwater monitoring wells were installed to monitor the pollutant concentrations. Over the next thirteen years, monitoring would continue, including gathering soil samples in addition to the groundwater monitoring. Due to the continued presence of hydrocarbons, an Interim Remedial Action Plan (TRAP) was implemented in 2000 to perform temporary dual phase extraction (DPE) to remove hydrocarbons for the soil and groundwater. This work continued through 2003 with implementation of a new IRAP and continued DPE. With concentrations still at elevated levels after this extraction work, it was discovered in 2003 that the piping system under the gas station was leaking, and tests confirmed gasoline leaked from these pipes was comprised of both old and new gasoline. All piping was replaced in 2004, including dispensers and sumps for the underground storage tanks. Extensive soil remediation occurred at this time, with 554 tons of impacted soil removed. Sampling showed that the majority of impacted soil had been successfully excavated (Stantec 2017). Elevated hydrocarbon concentrations remained in some areas, and vacuum truck activities continued for cleanup. Soil vapor probes were installed in 2008 and 2009 to monitor the southwest area of the site. Per the results of these probes, soil vapor extraction (SVE) wells were installed. Extensive monitoring of both groundwater and soils continued. With further extensive testing in 2010, hydrocarbon plumes in groundwater were more clearly defined in the northwest and west portions of the site, extending off site into the intersection area of Galleon Way and Schooner Way, and a second plume beneath the central and eastern portion of the site. In 2010 testing, it was determined the highest hydrocarbon concentrations were reported in soil samples collected from 5, 8, and 10 feet below ground surface. The gas station and underground storage tanks were removed in May 2011. Further remediation via soil removal occurred in 2011 and 2012, with nearly 18,000 tons of impacted soil removed. In addition, approximately 7.5 million gallons of groundwater were extracted. SVE wells and groundwater monitoring wells remained on site. Concentrations of hydrocarbons were greatly reduced during these activities. Testing continued through to 2016, when it was determined that additional soil excavation would take place, with nearly 6,000 tons removed. Approximately 4,300 tons were taken to Soil Safe of California and treated for thermal desorption. Soil testing after this removal showed that the hydrocarbon (benzene) concentrations were below the OCHCA benzene cleanup goal of 0.5 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) benzene in all bottom soil samples collected (Stantec 2017). According to the 2018 Third Quarter Monitoring Report (Stantec 2018), the treatment systems consisting of SVE and groundwater extraction has effectively reduced on- and off-site hydrocarbon concentrations in unsaturated soil and in groundwater. The groundwater plume has decreased in 39 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project concentration to near non -detect levels and below the required maximum concentrations levels and is stable and meets the LTCP criteria (Stantec 2018). As directed by the OCHCA, operation of the equipment will continue until shut down is approved by the OCHCA. The forecasted date for closure on the Geotracker website is March 2020 (SWRQB 2018). The existing operating groundwater and soil vapor recovery systems and testing systems would remain on site during and after project construction, with one environmental well relocated (see Figure 3 for environmental area and monitoring well locations). Although the concentrations are considered below the required maximum concentration levels per Stantec's latest monitoring report, as described under Item IX.a, through project excavation, including excavation for the project's underground storage tanks, soil and groundwater with elevated hydrocarbon concentrations may be encountered, which could result in a significant hazard to construction workers and people near the construction site through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions to the environment. Therefore, impacts from project construction would be potentially significant. These impacts would be mitigated with mitigation measures HAZ-1 and HAZ-2. For operation, the project would comply with the OCHCA Environmental Health Division (CUPA) underground storage tank requirements, would obtain a Permit to Operate, and would prepare an Underground Storage Tank Response Plan and Monitoring Plan prior to project operation. In addition, the underground storage tanks would be designed in accordance with USEPA and OCHCA Environmental Health Division underground storage tank design standards prior to project construction. However, given the project's proposed use as a gas station, there would be potential for spillage of gasoline during either routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials or reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment, including from the project's underground storage tanks to soil and groundwater, which could exacerbate the existing conditions of the listed hazardous waste site. Therefore, impacts would be potentially significant from operation of the project. These impacts would be mitigated with mitigation measure HAZ-3. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? No Impact. The project site is located within the Airport Environs Land Use Plan height restriction area for the Los Alamitos Joint Forces Training Base (Orange County Airport Land Use Commission 2016), which is located approximately 3.5 miles to the northeast. The height restriction for the project at this distance would be approximately 400 feet, which the project would be well below. Therefore, no impacts would occur. f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? No Impact. The project site does not contain emergency facilities, nor does it serve as an emergency evacuation route. During construction, no road closures would be necessary (Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc 2017). During operation, the project would have four driveways for access, and an alleyway lane runs behind the project site. In addition, a fire hydrant is located on the sidewalk in front of the project on Pacific Coast Highway for fire -related issues. Upon completion of construction, emergency access to the site and surrounding areas would not be affected by the project. Therefore, no impacts would occur. 40 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires? Less Than Significant with Mitigation. The project site is not located within a fire hazard zone, as defined by the Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ) map prepared by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CALFIRE). The project site is in a developed area and not adjacent to wildland areas. Therefore, the project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk involving wildland fires. The project may be at risk of urban fires due to the flammable materials (gasoline) stored on site. The local fire agency is the Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA), which serves 23 Orange County cities, including Seal Beach. Due to the fire risk, impacts would be potentially significant. This impact would be mitigated with mitigation measure HAZ-3 through submittal of the emergency response plan section of the HMBEP to the OCFA. Mitigation Measures HAZ-1 Construction Worker Health and Safety Work Plan. Prior to construction, the project applicant shall have a project -specific health and safety work plan prepared and distributed to the construction workers to address the potential exposure to hazardous materials associated with working with or near hydrocarbon contamination in soil and groundwater. This work plan shall comply with all OCHCA Environmental Health Division work plan requirements to address physical hazards, site security, management of soil and water, and monitoring equipment. A description of engineering controls and measures that would be put in place to prevent and/or reduce the risks posed to site workers, public and the environment in the unlikely event of excavating contaminated soil from the project construction area shall be provided in the work plan and submitted to the OCHCA Environmental Health Division for approval. These engineering controls and measures shall include, but not be limited to the following: • Written notifications shall be posted on the perimeter fencing in advance of start of excavation to notify the general public of the nature and duration of work activities. The postings shall also include emergency contact names and telephone numbers. • Site workers shall be required to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) including gloves, dust masks or respirators, hard hats, steel toed boots, protective clothing, eye shield and ear plugs or ear muffs. • All excavated soil shall be underlain and covered by plastic or Visqueen, if stored on site, to prevent or reduce off -gassing into the atmosphere and to protect the stockpile from erosion due to storm runoff. If on-site temporary storage becomes necessary, the stockpiles shall be placed downwind of any sensitive receptors in the area. • All work shall stop if ambient air concentrations exceed acceptable thresholds as approved by the OCHCA Environmental Health Division, and excavation shall be backfilled with inert soil or other material until concentration drop back to normal. • Exposure to dust and potential inhalation hazards shall be controlled by lightly spraying the excavated materials with clean water as they are stockpiled on site or as they are transferred to trucks for shipment offsite. A dust monitor shall be used on site to measure airborne dust during activities that are expected to generate dust. If dust levels exceed 41 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project permissible exposure levels as set by OSHA standards, additional measures for dust control such as the use of industrial non-toxic dust suppressants shall be implemented. • Runoff around the excavation site shall be controlled by placing fiber rolls or other similar types of erosion and runoff control means to direct surface runoff and to protect the nearby downstream storm drains. • Vehicular and pedestrian traffic shall be directed away from the construction zone prior to and during excavation and follow-on activities in accordance with a traffic plan approved by the City of Seal Beach and in coordination with the project applicant. HAZ-2 Excavation Monitoring. All excavation activities shall be actively monitored by a Registered Environmental Assessor for the potential presence of hydrocarbon contaminated soils. In the event of encountering hydrocarbon contaminated soils, these soils shall be properly tested, managed, and disposed of at a licensed facility in accordance with OCHCA requirements. HAZ-3 Hazardous Materials Business Emergency Plan. The project applicant shall complete a HMBEP. The HMBEP shall contain the following: • Basic information on the location, type, quantity and health risks of hazardous materials stored, used, or disposed of onsite. • An emergency response plan that describes the procedures for mitigating a hazardous release, procedures, and equipment for minimizing the potential damage of a hazardous materials release, and provisions for immediate notification of the OCHCA Environmental Health Division and other emergency response personnel such as the OCFA. • The HMBEP shall be submitted to the OCHCA Environmental Health Division, who would review the plan; monitor for compliance with existing laws and regulations; identify safety hazards that could cause or contribute to an accidental spill or release; and suggest preventative measures to minimize the risk of a spill or release of hazardous substances. X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Less Than HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact Impact a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ground water quality? b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: 42 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality? Less Than Significant Impact. The project location is under the jurisdiction of the Santa Ana RWQCB for issues related to water quality. The RWQCB has adopted a Water Quality Control Plan (WQCP; Santa Ana RWQCB 2016) and a Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP; Orange County Stormwater Program 2007), which is implemented by the Orange County Flood Control District, the County of Orange, and the City. Both the WQCP and the DAMP are prepared in compliance with the NPDES storm water program. The DAMP utilizes control techniques and BMPs to minimize potential impacts to water quality. Project construction would entail paving, building construction, utility installation, and landscaping installation, which could potentially result in water quality pollutants including silt, debris, chemicals, paint, and other solvents. Construction would be completed in compliance with applicable regulations as specified by the RWQCB, including compliance with NPDES and the adoption and implementation of a SWPPP. Implementation of BMPs during construction would reduce impacts of storm water discharged from the construction site. Such practices may include the use of gravel bag barriers, silt fences, street sweeping, solid waste management, water conservation practices, and spill prevention and control. Operational impacts of the project to water quality may include runoff containing sediments, nutrients, trash, oils, and pesticides. To prevent these impacts, the City requires the adoption and implementation of a WQMP to ensure that operational runoff would not impact water quality. A WQMP was prepared for the project by Waber Consultants, Inc. (2018). Measures provided within the WQMP include the use of bioretention basins, filtration, and catch basins on site (see Figures 4 and 5). In addition, to prevent groundwater infiltration into the existing, previously contaminated groundwater, and in accordance with Table VIII.1 of the Technical Guidance Document for preparing WQMPs (Orange County Public Works 2013), which prohibits groundwater infiltration at fueling stations, no infiltration on site would occur. 43 Less Than HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact Impact i. result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or offsite; ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ii. substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ or offsite; iii. create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater ❑ ❑ 0 El drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or iv. impede or redirect flood flows? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk or release of ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ pollutants due to project inundation? e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ plan? a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality? Less Than Significant Impact. The project location is under the jurisdiction of the Santa Ana RWQCB for issues related to water quality. The RWQCB has adopted a Water Quality Control Plan (WQCP; Santa Ana RWQCB 2016) and a Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP; Orange County Stormwater Program 2007), which is implemented by the Orange County Flood Control District, the County of Orange, and the City. Both the WQCP and the DAMP are prepared in compliance with the NPDES storm water program. The DAMP utilizes control techniques and BMPs to minimize potential impacts to water quality. Project construction would entail paving, building construction, utility installation, and landscaping installation, which could potentially result in water quality pollutants including silt, debris, chemicals, paint, and other solvents. Construction would be completed in compliance with applicable regulations as specified by the RWQCB, including compliance with NPDES and the adoption and implementation of a SWPPP. Implementation of BMPs during construction would reduce impacts of storm water discharged from the construction site. Such practices may include the use of gravel bag barriers, silt fences, street sweeping, solid waste management, water conservation practices, and spill prevention and control. Operational impacts of the project to water quality may include runoff containing sediments, nutrients, trash, oils, and pesticides. To prevent these impacts, the City requires the adoption and implementation of a WQMP to ensure that operational runoff would not impact water quality. A WQMP was prepared for the project by Waber Consultants, Inc. (2018). Measures provided within the WQMP include the use of bioretention basins, filtration, and catch basins on site (see Figures 4 and 5). In addition, to prevent groundwater infiltration into the existing, previously contaminated groundwater, and in accordance with Table VIII.1 of the Technical Guidance Document for preparing WQMPs (Orange County Public Works 2013), which prohibits groundwater infiltration at fueling stations, no infiltration on site would occur. 43 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project With compliance with these construction and operation water quality control measures, the impacts of the project to water quality would be less than significant. b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? Less Than Significant Impact. The project does not propose the use of groundwater but would result in an increase in impervious surfaces. To prevent groundwater infiltration into the existing, previously contaminated groundwater, and in accordance with Table VIII.1 of the Technical Guidance Document for preparing WQMPs (Orange County Public Works 2013), which prohibits groundwater infiltration at fueling stations, the site would implement bioretention basins and other low impact storm water design that would ensure that site runoff would be collected and not infiltrate into the groundwater. Therefore, no infiltration on site would occur. Although this would decrease groundwater recharge, the groundwater basin underneath the site is not used for beneficial uses, and by decreasing recharge, it would decrease the potential travel of contaminants further down the basin. Therefore, impacts to groundwater supplies would be less than significant. c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site; Less Than Significant Impact. Implementation of the proposed project would result in modifications to the existing drainage pattern of the site through the development of impervious paved areas and structures. A WQMP was prepared for the project by Waber Consultants, Inc. (2018). Measures provided within the WQMP include the use of bioretention basins, filtration, and catch basins on site (see Figures 4 and 5) so that the site runoff would conform with applicable standards. There are no streams or rivers within the vicinity of the project site. Alterations to the on-site drainage pattern would not result in long-term erosion or siltation as there would be a limited amount of exposed soil from which erosion or siltation could occur. During construction, the project would comply with applicable NPDES requirements through implementation of a SWPPP and BMPs to avoid short-term erosion and siltation. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. ii. substantially increase the rate or amount of surface or runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite; Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would alter the existing drainage pattern of the site by increasing the area of impervious surfaces, and thus increasing the amount of surface runoff it generates. However, this runoff would be accommodated on-site by water quality BMPs required as part of the project -specific WQMP, as described in detail under Item Ka above, which would result in no net increase in the rate or volume of stormwater discharged from the project site to the local storm drain system. Therefore, the project would not result in any increased flooding potential compared to existing conditions, and impacts related to on- or off-site flooding would be less than significant. iii. create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources or polluted runoff; or 44 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project Less Than Significant Impact. The additional runoff associated with the addition of new impervious surface area on-site would be accommodated on-site by the required WQMP BMPs, which would minimize the potential for pollutants to be discharged from the site and would also result in no net increase in the rate or volume of stormwater discharged from the project site to the local storm drain system. As such, the project would not exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources or polluted runoff, and impacts would be less than significant. iv. impede or redirect flood flows? Less Than Significant Impact. The project site is located in an urbanized area with relatively flat topography and is surrounded by paved streets, which include curbs, gutters, and catch basins to direct drainage to the local storm drain system. As such, substantial flood flows in the immediate area are not expected. The project would, as noted previously, contain all additional project -related stormwater flows on-site through implementation of applicable BMPs, and construction and operation of the proposed fuel islands and retail structure on the site would not notably affect the flow of stormwater in the surrounding area, including on the surrounding streets. As such, the project would have little potential to impede or redirect flood flows in the area, and impacts would be less than significant. d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk or release of pollutants due to project inundation? Less Than Significant Impact. The project site is located less than a mile from the Pacific Ocean. However, according to the City General Plan Safety Element, seismically induced seiches are not considered a potential hazard in the city (City 2003). Additionally, the tsunami hazard is considered low for elevations above the beach area. The proposed project is approximately 10 feet above sea level in a completely urbanized area of the city. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? Less Than Significant Impact. As described above under Item X.a, through conformance with applicable regulatory standards and implementation of BMPs, the project would not substantially degrade water quality, and therefore the project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable water quality control plan. With regard to sustainable groundwater management plans, as noted above in item X.b., the project would not have the potential to adversely affect groundwater supplies or the management of groundwater basins in the area, given the ongoing remediation activities on-site, which are intended to address, at least in part, potential groundwater contamination from past uses on the property. As such, the project would not result in any conflicts with or affect implementation of such plans, and impacts would be less than significant. 45 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING Less Than LAND USE AND PLANNING: Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact Impact a) Physically divide an established community? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? a) Physically divide an established community? No Impact. The proposed project includes the construction and operation of a gas station on an existing undeveloped lot in an urban area. The project site has a City General Plan zoning designation of General Commercial (CG) and is consistent and compatible with surrounding land uses, which include commercial uses to the north and south and single-family residential to the east (across Pacific Coast Highway) and west (see Figure 2). The project does not propose construction of any roadway, flood control channel, or other structure that would physically divide any portion of the community. As such, implementation of the proposed project would not physically divide an established community, and no impacts would occur. b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? No Impact. The project site is located within the City of Seal Beach Old Town/Surfside Planning Area (City 2003) and has a zoning designation of General Commercial (CG). Per Section 11.2.10.010 of the Municipal Code, automobile service stations are allowed in CG zones subject to the approval of a conditional use permit. Therefore, with approval of a conditional use permit, the proposed gas station would be compatible with the land use designation, and the project would be compatible with surrounding commercial land uses on the Pacific Coast Highway. It should be noted that due to the dimensions of the project site, the project also requires approval of a variance of standards to allow the proposed structure, pump islands, and other improvements to be efficiently configured on the property. In addition, the previous site use was a gas station as early as 1986, when records on the underground storage tanks are first discussed in the site's remediation documents (Stantec 2017). The gas station components and underground storage tanks were removed in May 2011 (Stantec 2017). Therefore, the project use would be consistent with existing uses at the same location. Overall, the project would not conflict with other ordinances or policies, as described the other sections of this Initial Study. Therefore, the proposed project would not cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with an applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation, and no impacts would occur. 46 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project XII. MINERAL RESOURCES Less Than NOISE: Potentially Less Than Less Than MINERAL RESOURCES: Potentially Significant Less Than No Would the project result in: Significant with Significant No Would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact Impact a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? No Impact. The project site is not located within a known and/or designated mineral resources area identified by the City General Plan, as the only mineral resources identified include oil extraction sites in the Seal Beach National Wildlife Refuge area (approximately 1.5 miles to the southeast) and the Hellman property, located approximately one mile to the north (City 2003). Therefore, no decrease of natural resources is anticipated because of the project. b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? No Impact. The project site is located within a fully urbanized area of the city and is surrounded by commercial and residential uses. As described under Item Xll.b., no mineral resource areas exist in the immediate vicinity, with the nearest oil extraction sites located approximately one mile from the project site (City 2003). The City General Plan does not identify the site as mineral resource site and given its developed nature adjacent to residential and commercial land uses, it would not be envisioned that the site would be used for oil extraction in the future (City 2003). Therefore, development would not result in the loss of a known mineral resource and no impacts would occur. XIII. NOISE 47 Less Than NOISE: Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Would the project result in: Impact Mitigation Impact Impact a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ groundborne noise levels? 47 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase and ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation. Construction Noise Impacts Construction noise impacts from general construction activities of the project would include noise generated from construction equipment involved in minor grading and building of the project structures. The loudest pieces of equipment from this type of construction would be an excavator and ad dump truck used during fuel storage tank installation. According to the Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM; U.S. Department of Transportation 2008), at 70 feet (the approximate average distance of operating construction equipment to the nearest off-site noise sensitive land use [NSLU], the single- family residence to the west), an excavator would generate a noise level of 76.8 A -weighted decibels (dBA) one-hour average sound level (LEQ). While nearby residences would experience elevated noise levels from construction activities, the duration would be short-term (with storage tank excavation occurring for less than one week and the overall project lasting a total of approximately six months), and according to Table 3 of the City General Plan Noise Element, noise levels already exceed 60 Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) at the nearest residences (City 2003). An existing, approximately 6 -foot high concrete wall separates the proposed project and the nearest residential properties to the west; this wall would further attenuate noise levels. In addition, Section 7.15.025 of the City Municipal Code states that any construction within the City shall only be completed between the hours of 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. Monday through Friday, and from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. on Saturday. Construction activities would comply with the applicable hours. Therefore, noise impacts from general construction activities would be less than significant. As indicated above, the City noise ordinance does not require project noise control for normal weekday daytime construction. However, a typical construction noise control goal for short-term noise is to limit impacts to 75 dBA LEQ; to achieve this, as required by Mitigation Measure NOISE -1 below, a 10 -foot -tall temporary noise control barrier would be provided within 100 -feet of tank excavation activities to shield nearby residential properties from a line of site view, which would reduce noise levels to less than 75 dBA LEQ. The noise control barrier should be solid with no cracks or gaps and be constructed with either %-inch thick (or thicker) plywood, noise control blankets, or other purpose -designed acoustic barrier materials. All equipment should have sound -control devices that are no less effective than those provided on the original equipment. All stationary construction equipment should be positioned as far as feasible from the residential property line and no equipment should be left idling on the site. 48 Less Than NOISE: Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Would the project result in: Impact Mitigation Impact Impact c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase and ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation. Construction Noise Impacts Construction noise impacts from general construction activities of the project would include noise generated from construction equipment involved in minor grading and building of the project structures. The loudest pieces of equipment from this type of construction would be an excavator and ad dump truck used during fuel storage tank installation. According to the Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM; U.S. Department of Transportation 2008), at 70 feet (the approximate average distance of operating construction equipment to the nearest off-site noise sensitive land use [NSLU], the single- family residence to the west), an excavator would generate a noise level of 76.8 A -weighted decibels (dBA) one-hour average sound level (LEQ). While nearby residences would experience elevated noise levels from construction activities, the duration would be short-term (with storage tank excavation occurring for less than one week and the overall project lasting a total of approximately six months), and according to Table 3 of the City General Plan Noise Element, noise levels already exceed 60 Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) at the nearest residences (City 2003). An existing, approximately 6 -foot high concrete wall separates the proposed project and the nearest residential properties to the west; this wall would further attenuate noise levels. In addition, Section 7.15.025 of the City Municipal Code states that any construction within the City shall only be completed between the hours of 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. Monday through Friday, and from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. on Saturday. Construction activities would comply with the applicable hours. Therefore, noise impacts from general construction activities would be less than significant. As indicated above, the City noise ordinance does not require project noise control for normal weekday daytime construction. However, a typical construction noise control goal for short-term noise is to limit impacts to 75 dBA LEQ; to achieve this, as required by Mitigation Measure NOISE -1 below, a 10 -foot -tall temporary noise control barrier would be provided within 100 -feet of tank excavation activities to shield nearby residential properties from a line of site view, which would reduce noise levels to less than 75 dBA LEQ. The noise control barrier should be solid with no cracks or gaps and be constructed with either %-inch thick (or thicker) plywood, noise control blankets, or other purpose -designed acoustic barrier materials. All equipment should have sound -control devices that are no less effective than those provided on the original equipment. All stationary construction equipment should be positioned as far as feasible from the residential property line and no equipment should be left idling on the site. 48 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project Implementation of Mitigation Measure NOISE -1 would ensure that construction noise effects are minimized and impacts would be less than significant. Operational Noise Impacts Traffic Noise According to the TIS prepared for the proposed project by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (2017), the project would generate 140 a.m. peak hour trips and 157 p.m. peak hour trips. At the Pacific Coast Highway/Marvista Drive intersection, traffic volumes during the evening peak hour through the intersection during the opening year (2019) scenario without the project would be 3,444 trips. A doubling of ADT would cause a doubling in noise (a 3 dBA increase), which is often noticeable to residents and will be perceived by residents as "increasing significantly" (City 2003). Therefore, for this analysis, a significant increase would be considered a 3 dBA increase. The project would only increase traffic by approximately 5 percent, much less than a doubling in noise. Therefore, project traffic noise impacts would be less than significant. Other Noise Sources Section 7.15.015 of the City's Municipal Code states that exterior noise levels at residential properties shall not exceed 55 dBA from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and 50 dBA from 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. and at commercial properties shall not exceed 65 dBA at any time (City 2018a). The main source of operational noise from the proposed project would be from the project's heating, ventilation, air conditioning (HVAC) system, and refrigeration units (the proposed project does not include loud noise sources that are sometimes included with a gas station and convenience store, such as car wash or drive through). The HVAC and refrigeration systems would be located approximately 50 feet from the nearest residential property line to the west. A typical commercial HVAC system is a 10 -ton Carrier Centurion Model 50 PG03-12 with a sound rating of 80 dBA sound power (Appendix D, HVAC Specifications) with most refrigeration units at a similar level, which would result in a noise level of approximately 48 dBA LEQ and up to approximately 53 dBA LEQ if up to three HVAC or refrigeration units are operating at the same time, at a distance of 50 feet. In addition, an existing, approximately 6 -foot concrete wall separates the proposed project and the nearest residential properties to the west and a rooftop parapet wall to shield a line of site view of the equipment; this parapet wall would further attenuate noise levels described above to less than 43 dBA at a five-foot elevation. Therefore, the proposed project's operational noise would less than the most restrictive 50 dBA nighttime threshold, and impacts would be less than significant. The project would result in a permanent increase in ambient noise levels from project operation, as well as from traffic generated by the project. As discussed in Item Xlll.a., operational noise generated by the project would conform to the City Municipal Code standards. In addition, the noise level increases along roadways in the project vicinity as a result of project -generated traffic would be well below the significance threshold of a doubling of roadway noise. Therefore, impacts related to a permanent increase in ambient noise levels would be less than significant. b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Less Than Significant Impact. Groundborne vibration is a concern for projects that require heavy construction activity such as blasting, pile -driving, and operating heavy earth -moving equipment. Groundborne vibration can result in a range of impacts, from minor annoyances to people to major 49 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project shaking that damages buildings. Typically, groundborne vibration generated by man-made sources attenuates rapidly with distance from the source of vibration. Sensitive receptors for vibration include structures (especially older masonry structures), people (especially residents, the elderly and sick), and vibration -sensitive equipment. Construction activities known to generate excessive ground -borne vibration, such as pile driving, would not be conducted as part of the project. A possible source of vibration during general project construction activities would be a vibratory roller, which may be used within approximately 100 feet of the nearest off-site residence. A vibratory roller would create approximately 0.210 inch per second peak particle velocity (PPV) at a distance of 25 feet (Caltrans 2013). A 0.210 inch per second PPV vibration level would equal 0.021 inch per second PPV at a distance of 200 feet.Z This would be lower than what is considered a "strongly perceptible" impact for humans of 0.1 inches per second PPV, and the structural damage impact to older residential structures of 0.5 inches per second PPV. Therefore, although a vibratory roller may be perceptible to nearby human receptors, temporary impacts associated with the roller (and other potential equipment) would be less than significant. The proposed gas station land use does not include equipment that would generate substantial vibration during its day-to-day operation, as operations would generally include general visitors to the gas station and convenience store, and periodic re -fueling of the underground tanks. Therefore, no operational vibration impacts would occur. c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact. The nearest airport to the project site is the Los Alamitos Joint Forces Training Base, located approximately 3.5 miles to the northeast. Therefore, as the project is located greater than two miles from an airport, airport noise would not create substantial noise at the project site, and no impacts would occur. Mitigation Measures NOISE -1 During construction activities a 10 -foot -tall temporary noise control barrier shall be provided within 100 -feet of tank excavation activities to shield nearby residential properties from a line of site view, which would reduce noise levels to less than 75 dBA LEQ. The noise control barrier shall be solid with no cracks or gaps and be constructed with either %-inch thick (or thicker) plywood, noise control blankets, or other purpose -designed acoustic barrier materials. In addition, all equipment shall have sound -control devices that are no less effective than those provided on the original equipment, stationary construction equipment shall be positioned as far as feasible from the residential property line, and no equipment shall be left idling on the site. z Equipment PPV = Reference PPV * (25/D )n (in/sec), where Reference PPV is PPV at 25 feet, D is distance from equipment to the receiver in feet, and n = 1.1 (the value related to the attenuation rate through the ground); formula from Caltrans 2013. 50 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING Less Than PUBLIC SERVICES: Potentially Less Than Less Than POPULATION AND HOUSING: Potentially Significant Less Than No Would the project: Significant with Significant No Would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact Impact a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ elsewhere? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Less Than Significant Impact. The project entails the development of a commercial gas station expected to serve the existing population and transient visitors. No residential uses or other land uses associated with directly or indirectly impacting population growth are included with the project. Therefore, the project would not induce substantial direct or indirect population growth. b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact. No residential uses are located on the project site, and no existing housing would be displaced because of the project. No impacts associated with displacing housing or people would occur. XV. PUBLIC SERVICES 51 Less Than PUBLIC SERVICES: Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ b) Police protection? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ c) Schools? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ d) Parks? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ 51 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project a) Fire protection? b) Police protection? Less Than Significant Impact. Although the proposed gas station would generate an increase in the number of on-site visitors beyond existing conditions (a vacant lot), a substantial increase in the number of calls for fire or police services is not anticipated. In addition, demand for the gas station would be similar to the demand for the previous gas station on the site (removed in 2011). The project site is located in a developed area currently served by fire and police protection services, and project implementation would not require the construction of new or the expansion of existing fire and police facilities. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. c) Schools? d) Parks? e) Other public facilities? No Impact. The proposed project would not result in an increase in population, and there would be no increased demand on schools, parks, or other public facilities. XVI. RECREATION RECREATION: Would the project: Less Than Less Than Significant with Mitigation PUBLIC SERVICES: Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact Impact e) Other public facilities? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ a) Fire protection? b) Police protection? Less Than Significant Impact. Although the proposed gas station would generate an increase in the number of on-site visitors beyond existing conditions (a vacant lot), a substantial increase in the number of calls for fire or police services is not anticipated. In addition, demand for the gas station would be similar to the demand for the previous gas station on the site (removed in 2011). The project site is located in a developed area currently served by fire and police protection services, and project implementation would not require the construction of new or the expansion of existing fire and police facilities. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. c) Schools? d) Parks? e) Other public facilities? No Impact. The proposed project would not result in an increase in population, and there would be no increased demand on schools, parks, or other public facilities. XVI. RECREATION RECREATION: Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? No Impact. The proposed project does not include housing and would therefore not generate residents who would require parks or other recreational facilities; no impacts would occur to such facilities. 52 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? No Impact. The proposed project neither includes recreational facilities nor requires the construction or expansion of recreational facilities. Therefore, no impacts would occur. XVII. TRANSPORTATION Less Than TRANSPORTATION: Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact Impact a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? d) Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? Less Than Significant with Mitigation. A TIS was prepared for the proposed project by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc (2017; Appendix E). The study is summarized below. Intersection operating conditions are typically described in terms of LOS. LOS is a scale used to indicate the quality of traffic flow at intersections, with a range of LOS A (free flow, little congestion) to LOS F (forced flow, extreme congestion). Based on the County of Orange criteria, if intersections are operating at LOS D or better, impacts are not considered significant. However, according to City guidelines, a significant impact at an intersection would occur when the addition of project -related trips causes the volume -to -capacity ratio (V/C) at an intersection to increase by the thresholds specified on Table 9, City of Seal Beach Intersection Traffic Impact Criteria, below. LOS D is considered satisfactory for roadway segments. Table 9 CITY OF SEAL BEACH INTERSECTION TRAFFIC IMPACT CRITERIA Existing WC WC Difference 0.00-0.69 0.06 0.70-0.79 0.04 0.80-0.89 0.02 0.90+ 0.01 V/C = vehicle to capacity ratio Source: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc 2017 53 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project According to the TIS, after applying pass -by reductions, the development is projected to generate a net of 2,300 daily trips, 140 morning peak hour trips, and 157 evening peak hour trips. The TIS assumed the majority of project traffic would be distributed on Pacific Coast Highway. Existing Plus Project The project -related peak hour trips were added to the existing peak hour volumes to evaluate Existing Plus Project conditions. Existing Plus Project intersection results are shown in Table 10, Intersection Operations — Existing Plus Project. Although the intersections operate at an acceptable LOS D or better in all study scenarios, the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway at Marvista Drive/5t" Street would experience a significant impact per the City's significance thresholds due to project traffic. This impact would be mitigated to less than significant with mitigation measure TRA -1. Table 10 INTERSECTION OPERATIONS - EXISTING PLUS PROJECT V/C = vehicle to capacity ratio; LOS = Level of Service Source: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc (2017) Existing Plus Project roadway segment results are shown in Table 11, Roadway Operations — Existing Plus Project Conditions. No roadway segments would operate below LOS D with the proposed project; therefore, impacts would be less than significant. 54 Existing Existing Plus Project Impact AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Increase Significant Intersection V/C LOS V/C LOS WC LOS V/C LOS AM PM Impact Pacific Coast Highway at 1st Street 0.711 C 0.681 B 0.719 C 0.68 B 0.008 0.008 No Pacific Coast Highway at Marvista Drive/5th Street 0.745 C 0.698 B 0.807 D 0.767 C 0.062 0.069 Yes Pacific Coast Highway at Bolsa Avenue/Main 0.687 B 0.643 B 0.695 B 0.652 B 0.008 0.009 No Street Pacific Coast Highway at Balboa Drive/12th Street 0.729 C 0.685 B 0.736 C 0.694 B 0.007 0.009 No 1st Street at Marina Drive 0.251 A 0.319 A 0.253 A 0.321 A 0.002 0.002 No V/C = vehicle to capacity ratio; LOS = Level of Service Source: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc (2017) Existing Plus Project roadway segment results are shown in Table 11, Roadway Operations — Existing Plus Project Conditions. No roadway segments would operate below LOS D with the proposed project; therefore, impacts would be less than significant. 54 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project Table 11 ROADWAY OPERATIONS - EXISTING PLUS PROJECT NB = Northbound; SB= Southbound; EB = Eastbound; WB = Westbound; pc/mi/In = passenger cars per mile per lane; LOS = Level of Service Source: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc (2017) Opening Year 2019 The project -related peak hour trips were added to the Opening Year 2019 peak hour volumes to evaluate Opening Year 2019 Plus Project conditions. These results are shown in Table 12, Intersection Operations - Opening Year 2019 Plus Project. As shown in the table, the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway at Marvista Drive/5th Street would experience a significant impact per the City's significance thresholds due to project traffic. This impact would be mitigated to less than significant with mitigation measure TRA -1. Table 12 INTERSECTION OPERATIONS - OPENING YEAR 2019 PLUS PROJECT Opening Year 2019 Existing Conditions Existing Plus Project AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak Roadway Segment Roadway Classification Direction Density (pc/mi/In) LOS Density (pc/mi/In) LOS Density (pc/mi/In) LOS Density (pc/mi/In) LOS Pacific Coast Highway: AM PM NB 24.4 C 21.1 C 25.0 C 21.7 C 1st Street to Marvista 4 -Lane Divided 0.744 C 0.730 C 0.752 C Drive/5th Street C SB 25.0 C 23.1 C 25.5 C 23.7 C Pacific Coast Highway: EB 25.3 C 22.7 C 25.7 C 23.0 C Marvista Drive/5th Street to Bolsa Avenue/Main 4 -Lane Divided WB 24.2 C 21.4 C 24.5 C 21.8 C Street 0.834 D 0.807 D 0.062 0.069 Yes Marvista Drive/5th Street Pacific Coast Highway: EB 24.3 C 20.6 C 24.7 C 21.0 C Bolsa Avenue/Main Street to Balboa Drive/12th 4 -Lane Divided WB 23.8 C 21.1 C 24.2 C 21.6 C Street C 0.698 B 0.731 C 0.706 C 0.008 0.008 No Pacific Coast Highway: EB 24.7 C 20.5 C 25.1 C 20.9 C Balboa Drive/12th Street 4 -Lane Divided to Seal Beach Boulevard WB 23.1 C 20.3 C 23.4 C 20.7 C 5th Street: Pacific Coast Highway to Marina Drive Undivided NB 1.9 A 2.5 A 2.5 A 3.2 A SB 1.0 A 2.4 A 1.7 A 3.2 A NB = Northbound; SB= Southbound; EB = Eastbound; WB = Westbound; pc/mi/In = passenger cars per mile per lane; LOS = Level of Service Source: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc (2017) Opening Year 2019 The project -related peak hour trips were added to the Opening Year 2019 peak hour volumes to evaluate Opening Year 2019 Plus Project conditions. These results are shown in Table 12, Intersection Operations - Opening Year 2019 Plus Project. As shown in the table, the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway at Marvista Drive/5th Street would experience a significant impact per the City's significance thresholds due to project traffic. This impact would be mitigated to less than significant with mitigation measure TRA -1. Table 12 INTERSECTION OPERATIONS - OPENING YEAR 2019 PLUS PROJECT V/C = vehicle to capacity ratio; LOS = Level of Service Source: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (2017) 55 Opening Year 2019 Opening Year 2019 Plus Project Impact AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Increase Significant Intersection V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS AM PM Impact Pacific Coast Highway at 0.744 C 0.730 C 0.752 C 0.738 C 0.008 0.008 No 1st Street Pacific Coast Highway at 0.772 C 0.738 C 0.834 D 0.807 D 0.062 0.069 Yes Marvista Drive/5th Street Pacific Coast Highway at Bolsa Avenue/Main 0.723 C 0.698 B 0.731 C 0.706 C 0.008 0.008 No Street Pacific Coast Highway at Balboa Drive/12th Street 0.755 C 0.721 C 0.762 C 0.730 C 0.007 0.009 No 1st Street at Marina Drive 0.252 1 A 1 0.328 A 0.254 A 0.331 A 0.002 0.003 No V/C = vehicle to capacity ratio; LOS = Level of Service Source: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (2017) 55 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project Opening Year 2019 Plus Project roadway segment results are shown in Table 13, Roadway Operations - Opening Year 2019 Plus Project. No roadway segments would operate below LOS D with the proposed project; therefore, impacts would be less than significant. Table 13 ROADWAY OPERATIONS - OPENING YEAR 2019 PLUS PROJECT NB = Northbound; 5B= Southbound; EB = Eastbound; WB = Westbound; pc/mi/In = passenger cars per mile per lane; LOS = Level of Service Source: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (2017) Future Build -out 2039 The project -related peak hour trips were added to the Future Build -out 2039 peak hour volumes to evaluate Future Build -out 2039 Plus Project conditions. Future Build -out 2039 Plus Project intersection results are shown in Table 14, Intersection Operations - Future Build -out 2039 Plus Project. As shown in the table, the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway at Marvista Drive/5t" Street would experience a significant impact per the City's significance thresholds due to project traffic. This impact would be mitigated to less than significant with mitigation measure TRA -1. 56 Opening Year 2019 Opening Year 2019 Plus Project AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak Roadway Roadway Segment Direction Density Density Density Density Classification (pc/mi/In) LOS (pc/mi/In) LOS (pc/mi/In) LOS (pc/mi/In) LOS Pacific Coast Highway: NB 25.5 C 22.6 C 26.1 D 23.2 C 1st Street to Marvista Drive/5th 4 -Lane Divided Street SB 26.1 D 24.8 C 26.7 D 25.4 C Pacific Coast Highway: EB 26.6 D 24.4 C 26.9 D 24.8 C Marvista Drive/5th Street to 4 -Lane Divided Bolsa Avenue/Main Street WB 25.4 C 23.1 C 25.7 C 23.5 C Pacific Coast Highway: EB 25.3 C 21.9 C 25.7 C 22.3 C Bolsa Avenue/Main Street to 4 -Lane Divided Balboa Drive/12th Street WB 24.9 C 22.7 C 25.3 C 23.1 C Pacific Coast Highway: EB 25.8 C 21.8 C 26.1 D 22.2 C Balboa Drive/12th Street to Seal 4 -Lane Divided Beach Boulevard WB 24.1 C 21.9 C 24.5 C 22.3 C 5th Street: NB 1.9 A 2.6 A 2.6 A 3.3 A Pacific Coast Highway to Marina 4 -Lane Undivided Drive SB 1.1 A 2.5 A 1.7 A 3.2 A NB = Northbound; 5B= Southbound; EB = Eastbound; WB = Westbound; pc/mi/In = passenger cars per mile per lane; LOS = Level of Service Source: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (2017) Future Build -out 2039 The project -related peak hour trips were added to the Future Build -out 2039 peak hour volumes to evaluate Future Build -out 2039 Plus Project conditions. Future Build -out 2039 Plus Project intersection results are shown in Table 14, Intersection Operations - Future Build -out 2039 Plus Project. As shown in the table, the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway at Marvista Drive/5t" Street would experience a significant impact per the City's significance thresholds due to project traffic. This impact would be mitigated to less than significant with mitigation measure TRA -1. 56 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project Table 14 INTERSECTION OPERATIONS - FUTURE BUILD -OUT 2039 PLUS PROJECT Intersection Future Build -out 2039 Future Build -out 2039 Plus Project Impact AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Increase AM PM Significant Impact V/C LOS WC LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS Pacific Coast Highway at 1st Street 0.782 C 0.748 C 0.790 C 0.757 C 0.008 0.009 No Pacific Coast Highway at Marvista Drive/5th Street 0.820 D 0.768 C 0.882 D 0.836 D 0.062 0.068 Yes Pacific Coast Highway at Bolsa Avenue/Main Street 0.755 C 0.706 C 0.763 C 0.715 C 0.008 0.009 No Pacific Coast Highway at Balboa Drive/12th Street 0.801 D 0.753 C 0.809 D 0.762 C 0.008 0.009 No 1st Street at Marina Drive 0.263 1 A 1 0.344 A 0.265 A 0.347 A 0.002 0.003 No V/C = vehicle to capacity ratio; LOS = Level of Service Source: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc (2017) Future Build -out 2039 Plus Project roadway segment results are shown in Table 15, Roadway Operations - Future Build -out 2039 Plus Project. No roadway segments would operate below LOS D with the proposed project; therefore, impacts would be less than significant. Table 15 ROADWAY OPERATIONS - FUTURE BUILD -OUT 2039 PLUS PROJECT NB = Northbound; SB= Southbound; EB = Eastbound; WB = Westbound; pc/mi/In = passenger cars per mile per lane; LOS = Level of Service Source: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc (2017) As relates to alternative transportation programs, plans, ordinances or policies, the project is not expected to result in substantial adverse effects to alternative transportation facilities or activities. Specifically, during construction, no road closures would be required (Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc 2017) and therefore no bike lanes or public transit would be made inaccessible. Relocation of driveways 57 Future Build -out 2039 Future Build -out 2039 Plus Project Conditions Roadway AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak Roadway Segment Direction Classification Density Density Density Density (pc/mi/In) LOS (pc/mi/In) LOS (pc/mi/In) LOS (pc/mi/In) LOS Pacific Coast Highway: NB 27.2 D 23.5 C 27.8 D 24.1 C 1st Street to Marvista Drive/5th 4 -Lane Divided Street SB 27.9 D 25.8 C 28.4 D 26.4 D Pacific Coast Highway: EB 28.3 D 25.3 C 28.6 D 25.7 C Marvista Drive/5th Street to 4 -Lane Divided Bolsa Avenue/Main Street WB 27.0 D 23.9 C 27.3 D 24.3 C Pacific Coast Highway: EB 27.1 D 22.9 C 27.5 D 23.3 C Bolsa Avenue/Main Street to 4 -Lane Divided Balboa Drive/12th Street WB 26.6 D 23.6 C 26.9 D 24.0 C Pacific Coast Highway: EB 27.6 D 22.8 C 28.0 D 23.2 C Balboa Drive/12th Street to Seal 4 -Lane Divided Beach Boulevard WB 25.7 C 22.7 C 26.1 D 23.1 C 5th Street: N13 2.1 A 2.8 A 2.7 A 3.5 A Pacific Coast Highway to Marina Undivided ed SB 1.0 A 2.4 A 1.7 A 3.2 A Drive NB = Northbound; SB= Southbound; EB = Eastbound; WB = Westbound; pc/mi/In = passenger cars per mile per lane; LOS = Level of Service Source: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc (2017) As relates to alternative transportation programs, plans, ordinances or policies, the project is not expected to result in substantial adverse effects to alternative transportation facilities or activities. Specifically, during construction, no road closures would be required (Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc 2017) and therefore no bike lanes or public transit would be made inaccessible. Relocation of driveways 57 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project may temporarily restrict access to sidewalks for pedestrians; however, this work would be temporary and full access would be restored once the driveways are relocated. Once construction is complete, the project would have no potential to affect alternative transportation programs or facilities compared to existing conditions. Therefore, impacts in this regard would be less than significant. b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? Less Than Significant Impact. SB 743 was approved by the California legislature in September 2013. SB 743 requires changes to CEQA, specifically directing the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to develop alternative metrics to the use of vehicular "level of service" (LOS) for evaluating transportation projects. OPR has updated guidelines for CEQA and written a technical advisory for evaluating transportation impacts in CEQA and has set a deadline of July 2020 for local agencies to update their CEQA transportation procedures. OPR has recommended that VMT replace LOS as the primary measure of transportation impacts. The City of Seal Beach has until July 2020 to update their traffic impact study guidelines to comply with SB 743. Since Seal Beach guidelines are not in place, the traffic impact study has not conducted a quantitative VMT analysis. Rather, this letter refers to the guidance provided by the OPR within the Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA document. The Technical Advisory establishes that, for local -serving urban commercial uses, impact should be established based on the net increase in VMT. However, the document further establishes that local - serving commercial uses, such as a gas station and convenience market in this case, can be determined to result in an overall VMT reduction. Local -serving commercial uses, particularly in urban areas, primarily serve pre-existing needs and as a result do not generate new trips because there are existing demands. As a result, local -serving commercial uses can be presumed to reduce trip lengths when a new site is proposed. For instance, a customer may travel to the new development because of a closer proximity from other gas stations in the area and is therefore not a new trip. These customers will access the proposed site because it is closer to their origin, or because the site is more convenient than similar sites in the vicinity. This results in an existing trip on the roadway network becoming shorter, rather than a new trip being added to the roadway network. In accordance with the Technical Advisory, it is appropriate that the proposed gas station and convenience market be presumed to result in a VMT reduction and support the goals of SB 743. As such, impacts in this regard would be less than significant. c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would not include design features or incompatible features that would affect traffic safety. The project would include four unsignalized driveways. The northern driveway along Pacific Coast Highway would be shared with the existing retail development to the north. The western driveway on 5th Street is also shared with the existing development. The two driveways on Pacific Coast Highway are restricted to right-in/right-out movements due to the raised median along Pacific Coast Highway; therefore, no left -turns would occur on to Pacific Coast Highway. The two driveways on 5th Street are full -movement. Fuel trucks along Pacific Coast Highway would access the site by traveling southbound and making a right -turn movement at 5th Street, and by using the eastern driveway along 5th Street to maneuver into position. From there, a fuel truck can circulate counterclockwise to exit via the western driveway on 5th Street and return to Pacific Coast Highway at 58 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project the signalized intersection. Likewise, a delivery truck to the convenience store component can utilize this same path. Therefore, these larger trucks would not inhibit traffic on Pacific Coast Highway during deliveries or exit. Therefore, due to design of the project's driveways, substantial hazards would not occur, and impacts would be less than significant. d) Result in inadequate emergency access? No Impact. During construction, no road closures would be required (Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc 2017). The project would have four driveways for access, including an alleyway lane behind the project site. In addition, a fire hydrant would remain accessible on the sidewalk in front of the project on Pacific Coast Highway if needed for emergencies. Based on the fact that the project would not require road closures during construction and that the site would include several ingress points that are at least 25 feet wide, it is not anticipated that the project would result in inadequate emergency access. Mitigation Measures A potentially significant impact was identified to the Pacific Coast Highway at Marvista Drive/51h Street intersection under all three scenarios. The following mitigation measure would be implemented to reduce impacts to this intersection to a less than significant level. TRA -1 Marvista Drive/5th Street Intersection Restriping. Prior to opening day of the proposed project, to increase the left -turn capacity of the intersection, the eastbound approach at the Pacific Coast Highway at Marvista Drive/5th Street intersection shall be restriped by the City to provide a left -turn lane, a shared left -through lane, and a right -turn lane. The applicant shall pay a fee to the City to perform the work. If determined necessary through City of Seal Beach coordination with Caltrans, the traffic signal shall be adjusted to provide split phasing in the east -west direction. XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: i. Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical ❑ ❑ ❑ resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or a 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant No Impact Impact ii. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section ❑ ❑ 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)? A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe? Less Than Significant with Mitigation. Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs) are sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe that are either included or determined to be eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) or included in a local register of historical resources, as defined in subdivision (k) of Public Resources Code Section 5020.1, or determined to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. As discussed in Item V.b, the presence of cultural resources, including TCRs, is not anticipated due to the disturbed nature of the project site, but the potential to encounter resources during ground -disturbing activities exists due to the sensitive cultural resource sites identified in the surrounding area. Therefore, impacts would be potentially significant. Mitigation measures CUL -1 through CUL -4 would be implemented to reduce impacts to TCRs to a less -than - significant level. 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Less Than UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact Impact a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, or telecommunications facilities, ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ during normal, dry and multiple dry years? c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and ❑ ❑ ❑ reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? Less Than Significant Impact. Sewage transmission and collection facilities would be installed as part of the project to accommodate the project's wastewater and would connect to the existing sewer system. As described above under Item XIX.a., the project's generation of wastewater would be accommodated by the existing capacity of the OCSD collection system. The City provides water to a population of 23,706 throughout its service area, as of 2015 (City 2016a). The City receives its water from two main sources: 1) the Lower Santa Ana River Groundwater basin, which is managed by Orange County Water District (OCWD); and 2) imported water from the Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC) (City 2016a). Groundwater is pumped from three active wells located throughout the City, and imported water is treated at the Diemer Filtration Plant and delivered to the City via imported water connections. According to the 2015 Urban Water Management Plan for the City, projected water demand would be 3,488 acre-feet per year (AFY) in 2020 up to 3,774 AFY in 2040. As described under Item XIX.a, the project would use 177,000 gallons of water per year, or 0.54 AFY. Projected water use from land use designations in the City, including for the project land use, are incorporated into the Urban Water Management Plan. As shown in Table 3-4 of the Urban Water Management Plan, the City would be able to accommodate all projected water demand, including the proposed project. 61 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project The project site is served by the public sewer system. Wastewater generated by the proposed project would be discharged into the local sewer main and conveyed for treatment at the Orange County Sanitation District's (OCSD's) reclamation plants. OCSD, under contract with Seal Beach, collects and treats wastewater at regional facilities. According to the 2015 Urban Water Management Plan for the City, OCSD's collection system eventually feeds into OCSD Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley and Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach (City 2016a). OCSD Plant No. 1 has a treatment capacity of 320 million gallons per day (MGD) and OCSD Plant No. 2 has a treatment capacity of 312 MGD (City 2016a). Based on the CaIEEMod default estimates for water use, the gas station and convenience store would use approximately 177,000 gallons of water annually (Appendix A) for indoor uses such as restrooms. Conservatively assuming that all indoor water use would end as wastewater, the project is estimated to generate approximately 485 gallons per day (gpd). This volume is well within the remaining treatment capacity of the OCSD plants. With regard to storm drain facilities, as noted above in Item X.c.iii., the project would include the construction of bioretention basins, storm drains, filters, and a catch basin to accommodate storm water resulting from the increase in on-site runoff (see Figures 4 and 5). As such, the project would not require the construction or expansion of additional, off-site storm water drainage facilities. No additional improvements are anticipated to either water lines, sewer lines, storm drains, or treatment facilities to serve the proposed project, as the project represents a very small use in the context of all development served. Standard connection fees would address any incremental impacts of the proposed project. Therefore, the project would result in less than significant impacts from construction or expansion of water, wastewater, stormwater, or related treatment facilities. b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? Less Than Significant Impact. See Item XIX.b. The project's water use would be accommodated by the City's water sources, and impacts would be less than significant. c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Less Than Significant Impact. See Item XIX.a. The amount of wastewater generated by the project would be well within the remaining treatment capacity of OCSD, and impacts would be less than significant. d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? Less Than Significant Impact. Republic Services provides exclusive waste and recycling collection services for residential and commercial uses in the City of Seal Beach (Republic Services 2018). Republic Services operates landfills in Gardena and Anaheim (CalRecycle 2018a and 2018b). The Gardena facility has a max permitted throughput of 2,225 tons per day (CalRecycle 2018a); the Anaheim facility has a maximum permitted throughout of 6,000 tons per day (CalRecycle 2018b). For project operation, CalRecycle lists various waste generation factors for commercial uses; the most conservative commercial waste generation listed 13 pounds per 1,000 square foot per day (CalRecycle 2018c). With a 2,438 square foot mart and 4,052 square foot gas station area, it is assumed that the project would generate approximately 84 pounds per day. The addition of 84 pounds per day (0.04 tons) 62 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project of solid waste would not be anticipated to exceed the solid waste capacity of Republic Services facilities given the tiny fraction the waste represents of the capacity of the facilities. In addition, per AB 341 standards, a 75 percent diversion rate for operational waste would be achieved. Project construction would be short-term over approximately six months and given the above stated max permitted throughput of the landfills above, solid waste from construction of a project with a gas station and convenience store would not be substantial that the permitted capacity would be exceeded. Therefore, impacts to the capacity of landfills would be less than significant. e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? No Impact. See Item XIX.f, above. The proposed project, during both construction and operation, would not exceed the capacity of local landfills, and, in addition, the project would comply with AB 341. Therefore, no impacts to applicable, federal, state, and local statutes and regulations would occur. XX. WILDFIRE WILDFIRE: Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified Significant with Significant No as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact Impact a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 or emergency evacuation plan? b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 result of runoff, post -fire slope instability, or drainage changes? a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? No Impact. The project site is located in an urbanized area with flat topography in close proximity to the Pacific Ocean, and no areas containing substantial amounts of natural vegetation or hillside areas susceptible to wildfire risks are located near the property. While a portion of the Los Cerritos Wetlands is located east of the project site and contains some natural vegetation areas, these wetlands are tidally influenced lowland areas that are not typically susceptible to wildfire hazards. In addition, no portion of the City is located within a designated Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones (VHFHSZ) as determined by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Cal Fire, 2007). Furthermore, as discussed 63 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project above in Item IM., the project site does not contain emergency facilities, nor does it serve as an emergency evacuation route. During construction, no road closures would be necessary (Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc 2017). During operation, the project would have four driveways for access, and an alleyway lane runs behind the project site. In addition, a fire hydrant is located on the sidewalk in front of the project on Pacific Coast Highway for fire -related issues. Upon completion of construction, emergency access to the site and surrounding areas would not be affected by the project. Therefore, no impacts would occur. b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? No Impact. Although the proposed project would involve the sale of vehicle fuels, which are themselves highly flammable, given the lack of natural vegetation sources or hillside areas in the immediate vicinity, the potential for the project to contribute to wildfire risks is considered remote. As such, the project would not exacerbate wildfire risks or expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire due to scope, prevailing winds, or other factors. No impact would occur. c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? No Impact. The project would involve the development of a new gas station on a properly previously occupied by a similar use. The project site is served by all necessary utilities and is surrounded by public streets and urban development on all sides. Therefore, the project would not require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment. No impact would occur. d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post -fire slope instability, or drainage changes? No Impact. The project site is located in an urbanized area characterized by existing development and flat topography. Given the flat, urbanized nature of the project area, the potential for the project to result directly in or otherwise contribute to significant risks to people or structures, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post -fire slope instability, or drainage changes is considered remote. No impact would occur. 64 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Less Than Significant with Mitigation. The project would have no impacts on biological resources. The project may result in potentially significant impacts to unknown archaeological and tribal resources. However, potential degradation of the quality of the environment would be reduced to below a level of significance through implementation of mitigation measures CUL -1 through CUL -4, as identified in Section V. b) Have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? Less Than Significant Impact. Cumulative projects in the area, as identified by the project TIS, include Tentative Tract Map 17425, a development of 30 single-family residential units approximately 1750 feet to the south, and the 2nd + PCH Project, which is demolition of an existing hotel and construction of retail and restaurant uses approximately one mile to the north. In addition, the Bay Theater Restoration Project, located at 340 Main Street, would occur approximately 1,200 feet southeast of the proposed project. However, the Bay Theater Restoration Project would only include restoration of a closed theater. These future projects within the surrounding area would be required to comply with applicable 65 Less Than MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact Impact a) Have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a ❑ ❑ ❑ plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when ❑ ❑ E ❑ viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Have environmental effects which would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ indirectly? a) Have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Less Than Significant with Mitigation. The project would have no impacts on biological resources. The project may result in potentially significant impacts to unknown archaeological and tribal resources. However, potential degradation of the quality of the environment would be reduced to below a level of significance through implementation of mitigation measures CUL -1 through CUL -4, as identified in Section V. b) Have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? Less Than Significant Impact. Cumulative projects in the area, as identified by the project TIS, include Tentative Tract Map 17425, a development of 30 single-family residential units approximately 1750 feet to the south, and the 2nd + PCH Project, which is demolition of an existing hotel and construction of retail and restaurant uses approximately one mile to the north. In addition, the Bay Theater Restoration Project, located at 340 Main Street, would occur approximately 1,200 feet southeast of the proposed project. However, the Bay Theater Restoration Project would only include restoration of a closed theater. These future projects within the surrounding area would be required to comply with applicable 65 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project local, state, and federal regulations to reduce potential impacts to less than significant in compliance with CEQA, or to the extent possible. In addition, as discussed under Item Ill.c, cumulative impacts from air quality emissions would not be cumulatively considerable from the project. Therefore, the project is not anticipated to contribute to cumulatively considerable environmental impacts. c) Have environmental effects which would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Less Than Significant with Mitigation. The proposed project would cause an increase in ambient noise levels during construction and occasional operational maintenance. However, impacts would be temporary and in compliance with local ordinances, and noise levels would be reduced through implementation of project design features. The temporarily increased noise levels would not cause substantial adverse impacts on human beings. The project would result in airborne emissions of benzene (a hydrocarbon). An HRA was performed to determine the potential cancer risks from those emissions. The project's emissions would be less than the applicable cancer risk thresholds and impacts from the release of airborne hazardous materials during routine operation would be less than significant. Risks may occur to humans due to the potential for seismic ground shaking, liquefaction, unstable soil, and/or expansive soil to affect project structures, including the underground storage tanks. These impacts would be mitigated through mitigation measure GEO-1. Risks may also occur to humans from hazardous materials associated with the project from construction that may encounter existing hydrocarbon contamination in the soil and groundwater, and from project operation that may result in similar contamination through leaking from the project's underground storage tanks or from general spillage of gasoline above ground. These impacts would be mitigation through mitigation measures HAZ-1 through HAZ-3. 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project 3.0 REFERENCES California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) 1997 Gasoline Service Station Industrywide Risk Assessment Guidelines. Available at: https://www.arb.ca.gov/ab2588/rrap-iwra/GaslWRA.pdf California Air Resources Board (CARB) 2018a iADAM: Air Quality Data Statistics. Available: https://www.arb.ca.gov/adam. Accessed September 2018. 2017 The 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update. January. Available: https://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/2030sp pp final.pdf. 2014 First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan: Building on the Framework. May. Available at: http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/2013 update/first update climate change sco ping plan.pdf. 2008 Climate Change Scoping Plan — A Framework for Change. December. 2005 Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective. Available at: https://www.arb.ca.gov/ch/handbook.pdf California Building Standards Commission 2017 CALGreen (CCR Title 24, Part 11). Available: http://www.bsc.ca.gov/Home/CALGreen.aspx. California Department of Conservation (CDC) 2018 California Important Farmland Finder. Available from: https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Cal Fire) 2007 Fire Hazards Severity Zones Maps. Available from: https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/divisions/wildfire-prevention-planning-engineering/wildland- hazards-building-codes/fire-hazard-severity-zones-maps/ California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) 2013 Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual. Available from: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/env/noise/pub/TCVGM Sep13 FINAL.pdf. 2011 California Scenic Highway Mapping System. September 7. Available at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/16_livability/scenic_highways/index.htm California Geological Survey 2016 Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation, Seal Beach Quadrangle. Available at: http://gmw.conservation.ca.gov/SH P/EZRI M/Maps/SEAL_BEACH_EZRI M.pdf CalRecycle 67 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project 2018a CVT Regional Material Recovery and TS (30 -AB -0335). Available at: https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/swfacilities/Directory/30-AB-0335/ 2018b Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates. Accessed October 8, 2018. Available at: https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/wastecharacterization/general/rates 2018c American Waste Transfer Station (19 -AA -0001). Available at: https://www2.ca I recycle.ca.gov/swfaci I iti es/D i recto ry/19-AA-0001/ Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) 2018 FEMA Flood Map Service Center, #06059CO226J. Accessed on October 9, 2018. Available at: https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search?AddressQuery=490%20pch%2C%20seal%20beach %2C%20ca#searchresultsanchor HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. 2018 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project, Seal Beach, Orange County, California, Cultural Resources Survey. October. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007 Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Summary for Policymakers. Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. February. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2017 Traffic Impact Study for the 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project in the City of Seal Beach. December. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) 2015 Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments. Available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/air/crnr/notice-adoption-air-toxics-hot- spots-program-guidance-manual-preparation-health-risk-0 Orange, County of 2012 County of Orange General Plan. Available at: https://www.ocgov.com/gov/pw/cd/planning/generalplan2005.asp Orange County Health Care Agency 2018 UST Forms. Accessed on October 10, 2018. Available at: http://www.occupainfo.com/programs/ustforms Orange County Airport Land Use Commission 2016 Airport Environs Land Use Plan for Joint Forces Training Base, Los Alamitos. Orange County Public Works 2013 Technical Guidance Document for the Preparation of Conceptual/Preliminary And/Or Project Water Quality Management Plans (WQMPs). Orange County Stormwater Program 68 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project 2007 Drainage Area Management Plan. Available at: https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/santaana/water_issues/programs/stormwater/docs/o cperm it/2007/2007_da m p. pdf Orange County Transportation Authority 2017 2017 Orange County Congestion Management Program. October. Available at: http://www.octa.net/pdf/2017%20Final/`20CMP.pdf Republic Services 2018 City of Seal Beach (Trash & Recycle Services). Accessed on October 8, 2018. Available at: http://Iocal.republicservices.com/site/los-angeles-ca/seal-beach Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) 2016 Water Quality Control Plan. Available at: https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/santaana/water issues/programs/basin plan/ Seal Beach, City of 2018a Seal Beach Municipal Code. Last revised September. Available at: http://www.qcode.us/codes/sealbeach/main.php 2018b Environmental Documents Under Review. Available at: http://www.sealbeachca.gov/Departments/Community-Development/Planning- Development/Environmental-Documents-Under-Review. Accessed October 8, 2018. 2016a City of Seal Beach 2015 Urban Water Management Plan, Final. June. 2016b LA Fitness Health Club Initial Study. December. 2010 Zoning Map (Old Town & Bridgeport). June. 2003 City of Seal Beach General Plan. December. Available at: http://www.seaIbeachca.gov/Departments/Community-Development/Planning- Development/General-Plan South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) 2017a 2016 Air Quality Management Plan. Available at: http://www.agmd.gov/home/library/clean-air-plans/air-quality-mgt-plan/final-2016- aqmp. 2017b Risk Assessment Procedure for Rules 1401, 1401.1 and 212. Available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/permitting/rule-1401-risk- assessment/riskassessproc-v8-l.pdf?sfvrsn=l2. 2016 National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) Attainment Status for South Coast Air Basin. Available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/clean-air-plans/air-quality-management- plans/naaqs-caaqs-feb2016.pdf. 90 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project Stantec 2015 SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds. Available: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality- significance-thresholds.pdf 2009a Fact Sheet for Applying Cal EEMod to Localized Significance Thresholds. Available: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/cega/handbook/localized-significance- thresholds/caleemod-guidance.pdf. Accessed September 2018 2009b Mass Rate Localized Significance Thresholds Look -up Tables. Available from: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/cega/handbook/localized-significance- thresholds/appendix-c-mass-rate-Ist-look-up-tables.odf?sfvrsn=2. 2008 Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules and Plans. December. 2007 Emission Inventory and Risk Assessment guidelines for Gasoline Dispensing Stations. January. Available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/planning/risk- assessment/gas station hra.pdf. 1993 CEQA Air Quality Handbook. 2018 Third Quarter 2018 Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring and Remediation System Operations Status Report. Available at: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo report/6174820184/T0605900 �7?.PnF 2017 Third Quarter 2017 Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring and Remediation System Operations Status Report. Available at: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo report/5834724128/T0605900 372. PDF State Water Resources Control Board 2018 Geotracker Database, Arco #6066. Available from: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile report.asp?global id=T0605900372. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) 2015 Revisions Underground Storage Tank Regulations. July 15. Available at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-07-15/pdf/2015-15914.pdf U.S. Department of Transportation 2008 Roadway Construction Noise Model. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2012 Seal Beach National Wildlife Refuge. December 20. Available at: https://www.fws.gov/refuge/Seal Beach/what we do/conservation.html 70 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project Waber Consultants, Inc 2018 County of Orange/Santa Ana Region Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). April. 71 Appendix A Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Data Outputs CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 30 Date: 9/4/2018 2:10 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Annual ASE -061 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach Orange County, Annual 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Convenience Market With Gas Pumps 2.40 + 1000sgft ; 0.06 2,400.00 i 0 ------------------------------ _------------------------------ _------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------- Parking Lot 13.00 Space 0.12 5,200.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 30 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2020 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 702.44 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20 Intensity 0.006 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 30 Date: 9/4/2018 2:10 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Annual Project Characteristics - Land Use - Construction Phase - Grading - Architectural Coating - Low VOC coating Vehicle Trips - Per Traffic Impact Study (Kimley Horn 2017) Area Coating - Low VOC coating Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Water Mitigation - Per CalGreen Waste Mitigation - Per AB -341 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 30 Date: 9/4/2018 2:10 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Annual Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblArchitecturalCoating EF_ Nonresidential Exterior } 100.00 50.00 1 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_ Nonresidential Interior 100.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF Parking 100.00 50.00 ------------------g---------Y ------------------------------{-----------------------------t------------------------- tblAreaCoatin Area EF_ Nonresidential Exterior 1 100 50 -------------------g---------Y ------------------------------{-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblAreaCoatin Area EF_ Nonresidential Interior 1 100 50 ------------- ---ting--------- : ------------- -Parking---------{-------------100-------------t------------50------------ tblAreaCo Area 1 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpaved Road MoistureContent 0 12 ----------------------------- Y------------------------------ {-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblConstDustMitigation WaterU n paved RoadVehicleSpeed 1 0 15 i tblConstruction Phase PhaseEndDate 6/19/2020 7/31/2020 r i tblConstruction Phase PhaseEndDate 6/5/2020 7/17/2020 r i tblConstruction Phase PhaseEndDate 1/17/2020 2/4/2020 r tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate r 6/12/2020 7/24/2020 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate r 1/15/2020 1/1/2020 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate r 6/13/2020 7/25/2020 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate r 1/18/2020 3/1/2020 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate r 1/16/2020 2/1/2020 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate r 6/6/2020 7/18/2020 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate r 1/15/2020 1/1/2020 tblGrading Material Exported } 0.00 80.00 tblVehicleTrips ST TR } 1,448.33 958.33 tblVehicleTrips SU TR } 1,182.08 958.33 :------------------------------ ---------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------ -------------------------- WD TR 845.60 958.33 2.0 Emissions Summary CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 30 Date: 9/4/2018 2:10 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Annual 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Year tons/yr MT/yr 2020 •i 0.0539 0.4843 0.4097 6.6000e- 3.7300e- 0.0281 0.0318 1.1700e- 0.0259 0.0270 0.0000 i 58.0825 58.0825 0.0174 0.0000 58.5184 i i i i i � 004 003 003 0.0539 Maximum 0.0539 0.4843 0.4097 6.6000e- 3.7300e- 0.0281 0.0318 1.1700e- 0.0259 0.0270 0.0000 58.0825 58.7774 58.5183 0.0000 58.5184 11 004 003 004 003 004 003 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Year tons/yr MT/yr 2020 •i 0.0539 i 0.4843 0.4097 i 6.6000e- 3.1700e- i 0.0281 i 0.0312 i 9.3000e- i 0.0259 0.0268 0.0000 i 58.0824 i 58.0824 i 0.0174 0.0000 i 58.5183 •� 004 003 004 Maximum 0.0539 0.4843 0.4097 6.6000e- 3.1700e- 0.0281 0.0312 9.3000e- 0.0259 0.0268 0.0000 58.0824 58.0824 0.0174 0.0000 58.5183 004 003 004 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.01 0.00 1.76 20.51 0.00 0.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 30 Date: 9/4/2018 2:10 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Annual Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 1-1-2020 3-31-2020 0.1258 0.1258 2 4-1-2020 6-30-2020 0.3198 0.3198 3 7-1-2020 9-30-2020 0.0909 0.0909 I I Highest 0.3198 0.3198 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Area •i 9.6200e- 0.0000 2.000Oe- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 3.8000e- 3.8000e- 0.0000 0.0000 4.1000e- i i i i i i i i '� 003 004 004 004 i 004 Energy •i 3.000Oe- i 2.4000e- i 2.000Oe- i 0.0000 2.000Oe- i 2.000Oe- i i 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 i 9.5841 i 9.5841 i 3.9000e- 8.000Oe- 9.6190 � 004 005 005 005 004 004 005 005 005 i � i � � i � i - - ---------------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------------- ----------------------- ------------- -------------- ------- Mobile •1 0.4416 i 1.3937 i 3.1088 i 7.0200e- 0.5206 8.0600e- i 0.5287 i 0.1394 i 7.5400e- 0.1470 0.0000 1 647.5290 647.5290 i 0.0399 0.0000 T 648.5267 003 003 003 Waste •i i i i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 1.4636 i 0.0000 i 1.4636 i 0.0865 i 0.0000 � 3.6259 Water •i i i i � � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0564 i 1.1232 i 1.1796 i 5.8400e- 1.5000e- 1.3692 003 004 i Total 0.4513 1.3939 3.1092 7.0200e- 0.5206 8.0800e- 0.5287 0.1394 7.5600e- 0.1470 1.5200 658.2367 659.7567 0.1326 2.3000e- 663.1412 11 003 003 003 004 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 30 Date: 9/4/2018 2:10 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Area •i 9.6200e- 0.0000 2.000Oe- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 3.8000e- 3.8000e- 0.0000 0.0000 4.1000e- i i i i '� 003 004 004 004 004 � � .� � i I i i Energy •i 3.000Oe- 2.4000e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- � 0.0000 i 9.5841 9.5841 3.9000e- 8.000Oe- 9.6190 i � i � � i � i i 005 004 004 005 005 005 005 . 004 005 i Mobile •i 0.4416 i 1.3937 � 3.1088 i 7.0200e- � 0.5206 � 8.0600e- i 0.5287 � 0.1394 i 7.5400e- 0.1470 � 0.0000 i 647.5290 � 647.5290 i 0.0399 � 0.0000 � 648.5267 003 003 003 i 0.00 Waste •1 i � i � � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.0977 i 0.0000 1.0977 i 0.0649 0.0000 2.7194 24.81 0.03 Water •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0451 i 0.8986 0.9437 4.6700e- 1.2000e- 1.0954 i � i � � i i 003 004 i 13.04 Total 0.4513 1.3939 3.1092 7.0200e- 0.5206 8.0800e- 0.5287 0.1394 7.5600e- 0.1470 1.1428 658.0121 659.1548 0.1098 2.000Oe- 661.9609 003 003 003 004 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.81 0.03 0.09 17.18 13.04 0.18 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 30 Date: 9/4/2018 2:10 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Annual Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 ;Site Preparation +Site Preparation 11/1/2020 :1/1/2020 5: 1 +i 2 :Grading +Grading ;2/1/2020 :2/4/2020 5: 2: +i 3 •Building Construction +Building Construction 13/1/2020 :7/17/2020 5: 100: +i 4 •Paving +Paving 17/18/2020 :7/24/2020 5: 5: +i 5 •Architectural Coating :Architectural Coating 7/25/2020 7/31/2020 5. 5. Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0.5 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0.12 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 3,600; Non -Residential Outdoor: 1,200; Striped Parking Area: 312 (Architectural Coating — sgft) OffRoad Equipment CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 30 ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Annual Date: 9/4/2018 2:10 PM Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount I Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor Architectural Coating 'Air Compressors ; 1 1 6.001 78• 0.48 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- 20.00;LD_Mix Paving 'Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 4 6.001 9• 0.56 --------------------------- i ------------------------------------------------- ----------- - - 14.70; Grading 'Concrete/Industrial Saws ; 1 1 8.001 81, 0.73 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- --------i 1.001 Building Construction 'Cranes 1 1 1 4.001 231, 0.29 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- -------------; 7; Building Construction 'Forklifts 1 21 6.001 89• 0.20 - - - - - - - --- 6.90; i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- -'-- - - - - -- IHHDT Site Preparation 'Graders 1 11 8.001 187• 0.41 --------------------------- �- - - -------------------------- ----------- 1 • Paving +Pavers 1 11 7.001 130• 0.42 ------------------------------------------ - - - - ----------- HHDT Paving 'Rollers 1 11 7.001 80• 0.38 ---------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------i ------ - - - - --------------- ----------- Grading 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 11 1.001 247• 0.40 ------------------------------------------ �- - - - - ----------- Building Construction +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 21 8.001 97• 0.37 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Grading +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 21 6.001 97• 0.37 • 1 �-------------------------- ------- ----------- Paving +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 11 7.001 _------------------ 97• 0.37 ---------------------------- --------------------------*-----------------f------------ r------------- -------- Site Preparation •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 • 8.00• 97• 0.37 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count I Number I Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Site Preparation A 2; 5.00; 0.001 10.00; 14.70; 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix 1HDT_Mix IHHDT �- Grading 4; - i------------ 10.00: 0.001 , 0.00: - - 14.70; 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix *- IHHDT ----------------° Building Construction ------------- ;----------------- 5; - 3.00- --------i 1.001 0.00 ---------' --------- 14.70; ------------------------ 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix ----------' iHDT_Mix -------- IHHDT �- --------- - - - - -- ° Paving -------------; 7; i------------ 18.00: --------i 0.001 , 0.00: ---------' - - - �- 14.70; - - - - - - - --- 6.90; --------------- - - - - -- 20.00;LD_Mix ----- - - - - iHDT_Mix -'-- - - - - -- IHHDT i f ; Architectural Coating ; 1 • 1.00• 0.00• 0.00• 14.70• 6.90, 20.00,LD_Mix •HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 30 Date: 9/4/2018 2:10 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Annual Water Exposed Area Water Unpaved Roads Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads 3.2 Site Preparation - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Fugitive Dust •I 1 I 1 1 2.7000e- 1 0.0000 12.7000e- 1 3.000Oe- I 0.0000 � 3.000Oe- � 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 004 I I 004 I 005 I 005 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I Off -Road •1 3.4000e- 4.2200e- 12.0500e- 0.0000 1.7000e- 11.5000e- 1.5000e- � 0.0000 I 0.4280 0.4280 I 0.0000 0.4314 1 1 1 1 11.7000e- I 1 11.4000e- �1 004 I 003 I 003 I I 1 004 I 004 I 1 004 004 . 1 1 I 004 I 1 Total 3.4000e- 4.2200e- 2.0500e- 0.0000 2.7000e- 1.7000e- 4.4000e- 3.000Oe- 1.5000e- 1.8000e- 0.0000 0.4280 0.4280 1.4000e- 0.0000 0.4314 004 003 003 004 004 004 005 004 004 004 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 30 Date: 9/4/2018 2:10 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Annual 3.2 Site Preparation - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 4.000Oe- i 1.4200e- i 3.6000e- 0.0000 i 9.000Oe- 0.0000 9.000Oe- i 2.000Oe- 0.0000 3.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.3845 � 0.3845 4.000Oe- i 0.0000 i 0.3855 i i i 004 004 005 005 005 003 004 005 005 005 005 . 005 i Off -Road •i 3.4000e- 4.2200e- 2.05OOe- 0.0000 1.7000e- 1.7000e- 1.5000e- 1.5000e- 0.0000 i 0.4280 0.4280 1.4000e- 0.0000 i 0.4314 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 3.4000e- Worker •i 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- i 8.000Oe- 0.0000 i 3.000Oe- 0.0000 3.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.0238 0.0238 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0238 2.0500e- 005 005 005 005 005 005 005 i Total 5.000Oe- 1.4300e- 4.4000e- 0.0000 1.2000e- 0.0000 1.2000e- 3.000Oe- 0.0000 4.000Oe- 0.0000 0.4082 0.4082 4.000Oe- 0.0000 0.4093 11 005 003 004 004 004 004 005 004 005 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •i i i 1.2000e- 0.0000 1.2000e- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i i 004 004 005 005 Off -Road •i 3.4000e- 4.2200e- 2.05OOe- 0.0000 1.7000e- 1.7000e- 1.5000e- 1.5000e- 0.0000 i 0.4280 0.4280 1.4000e- 0.0000 i 0.4314 i i i 004 003 003 004 004 004 004 . 004 i Total 3.4000e- 4.2200e- 2.0500e- 0.0000 1.2000e- 1.7000e- 2.9000e- 1.000Oe- 1.5000e- 1.6000e- 0.0000 0.4280 0.4280 1.4000e- 0.0000 0.4314 004 003 003 004 004 004 005 004 004 004 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 30 Date: 9/4/2018 2:10 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Annual 3.2 Site Preparation - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.3 Grading - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 4.00OOe- i 1.4200e- i 3.6000e- 0.0000 i 9.00OOe- 0.0000 9.00OOe- i 2.00OOe- 0.0000 3.00OOe- 0.0000 i 0.3845 � 0.3845 4.00OOe- i 0.0000 i 0.3855 i i 004 004 004 004 005 003 004 005 005 005 005 . 005 i Off -Road •i 8.7000e- 7.8700e- 7.6200e- 1.00OOe- 4.7000e- 4.7000e- 4.5000e- 4.5OOOe- 0.0000 i 1.0408 1.0408 2.00OOe- 0.0000 i 1.0457 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 8.7000e- Worker •i 1.00OOe- i 1.00OOe- i 8.00OOe- 0.0000 i 3.00OOe- 0.0000 3.00OOe- i 1.00OOe- 0.0000 1.00OOe- 0.0000 i 0.0238 0.0238 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0238 7.6200e- 005 005 005 005 005 005 005 i Total 5.00OOe- 1.4300e- 4.4000e- 0.0000 1.2000e- 0.0000 1.2000e- 3.00OOe- 0.0000 4.00OOe- 0.0000 0.4082 0.4082 4.00OOe- 0.0000 0.4093 11 005 003 004 004 004 004 005 004 005 005 3.3 Grading - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •i 7.5OOOe- 0.0000 7.5000e- i 4.1000e- 0.0000 4.1000e- 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 004 004 004 004 Off -Road •i 8.7000e- 7.8700e- 7.6200e- 1.00OOe- 4.7000e- 4.7000e- 4.5000e- 4.5OOOe- 0.0000 i 1.0408 1.0408 2.00OOe- 0.0000 i 1.0457 i i i 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 . 004 i Total 8.7000e- 7.8700e- 7.6200e- 1.00OOe- 7.5000e- 4.7000e- 1.2200e- 4.1000e- 4.5000e- 8.6000e- 0.0000 1.0408 1.0408 2.00OOe- 0.0000 1.0457 004 003 003 005 004 004 003 004 004 004 004 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 30 Date: 9/4/2018 2:10 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Annual 3.3 Grading - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 004 004 004 004 --------------------------------------------'------------------------ --+ ----� ------ -------'----00- ----00 000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 . 004 i Worker •i 4.000Oe- i 3.000Oe- i 3.1000e- 0.0000 i 1.1000e- 0.0000 1.1000e- i 3.000Oe- 0.0000 3.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.0950 0.0950 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0951 8.7000e- 005 005 004 004 004 005 005 i 7.6200e- Total 4.000Oe- 3.000Oe- 3.1000e- 0.0000 1.1000e- 0.0000 1.1000e- 3.000Oe- 0.0000 3.000Oe- 0.0000 0.0950 0.0950 0.0000 0.0000 0.0951 005 005 005 004 004 004 004 004 005 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •i i i i i 3.4000e- i 0.0000 3.4000e- 1.9000e- i 0.0000 1.9000e- 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 004 004 004 004 Off -Road •i 8.7000e- i 7.8700e- i 7.6200e- i 1.000Oe- i i 4.7000e- i 4.7000e- 4.5000e- 4.5000e- 0.0000 i 1.0408 i 1.0408 2.000Oe- i 0.0000 i 1.0457 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 . 004 i Total 8.7000e- 7.8700e- 7.6200e- 1.000Oe- 3.4000e- 4.7000e- 8.1000e- 1.9000e- 4.5000e- 6.4000e- 0.0000 1.0408 1.0408 2.000Oe- 0.0000 1.0457 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 004 004 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 30 Date: 9/4/2018 2:10 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Annual 3.3 Grading - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.4 Building Construction - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 004 --------------------------------------------'------------------------ --+ ----� ------ -------'----00- ----00 000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0431 0.4426 Worker •i 4.00OOe- i 3.00OOe- i 3.1000e- 0.0000 i 1.1000e- 0.0000 1.1000e- i 3.00OOe- 0.0000 3.00OOe- 0.0000 i 0.0950 0.0950 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0951 5.7000e- 005 005 004 004 004 005 005 i 0.0261 Total 4.00OOe- 3.00OOe- 3.1000e- 0.0000 1.1000e- 0.0000 1.1000e- 3.00OOe- 0.0000 3.00OOe- 0.0000 0.0950 0.0950 0.0000 0.0000 0.0951 005 005 004 004 004 005 005 3.4 Building Construction - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 0.0431 i 0.4426 0.3694 i 5.7000e- 0.0261 i 0.0261 0.0240 0.0240 0.0000 i 50.0302 i 50.0302 0.0162 i 0.0000 i 50.4348 004 Total 0.0431 0.4426 0.3694 5.7000e- 0.0261 0.0261 0.0240 0.0240 0.0000 50.0302 50.0302 0.0162 0.0000 50.4348 004 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 30 Date: 9/4/2018 2:10 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Annual 3.4 Building Construction - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 004 Vendor •i 1.6000e- 5.3000e- 1.4400e- 1.000Oe- 3.1000e- 3.000Oe- 3.4000e- 9.000Oe- 3.000Oe- 1.2000e- � 0.0000 i 1.2171 1.2171 1.000Oe- 0.0000 i 1.2197 i i � i � � i � i 004 003 003 005 004 005 004 005 005 004 004 i Worker •i 5.8000e- 4.1000e- 4.6500e- 2.000Oe- 1.6500e- 1.000Oe- 1.6600e- 4.4000e- 1.000Oe- 4.5000e- 0.0000 i 1.4252 1.4252 3.000Oe- 0.0000 i 1.4261 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 i � � 005 5.7000e- Total 7.4000e- 5.7100e- 6.0900e- 3.000Oe- 1.9600e- 4.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 5.3000e- 4.000Oe- 5.7000e- 0.0000 2.6424 2.6424 1.3000e- 0.0000 2.6457 004 003 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 0.0431 i 0.4426 0.3694 i 5.7000e- 0.0261 i 0.0261 0.0240 0.0240 0.0000 i 50.0302 i 50.0302 0.0162 i 0.0000 i 50.4347 004 Total 0.0431 0.4426 0.3694 5.7000e- 0.0261 0.0261 0.0240 0.0240 0.0000 50.0302 50.0302 0.0162 0.0000 50.4347 004 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 30 Date: 9/4/2018 2:10 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Annual 3.4 Building Construction - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.5 Paving - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 003 005 004 004 004 004 . 004 i Vendor •i 1.6000e- 5.3000e- 1.4400e- 1.00OOe- 3.1000e- 3.00OOe- 3.4000e- 9.00OOe- 3.00OOe- 1.2000e- � 0.0000 i 1.2171 1.2171 1.00OOe- 0.0000 i 1.2197 i i � i � � i � i 004 003 003 005 004 005 004 005 005 004 004 i Worker •i 5.8000e- 4.1000e- 4.6500e- 2.00OOe- 1.6500e- 1.00OOe- 1.6600e- 4.4000e- 1.00OOe- 4.5000e- 0.0000 i 1.4252 1.4252 3.00OOe- 0.0000 i 1.4261 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 i � � 005 0.0181 Total 7.4000e- 5.7100e- 6.0900e- 3.00OOe- 1.9600e- 4.00OOe- 2.00OOe- 5.3000e- 4.00OOe- 5.7000e- 0.0000 2.6424 2.6424 1.3000e- 0.0000 2.6457 004 003 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 004 3.5 Paving - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 1.9300e- i 0.0181 i 0.0178 3.00OOe- i i 9.9000e- 9.9000e- 9.2000e- 9.2000e- 0.0000 i 2.3482 i 2.3482 6.8000e- i 0.0000 i 2.3653 003 005 004 004 004 004 . 004 i Paving �i 1.6000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 004 Total 2.0900e- 0.0181 0.0178 3.00OOe- 9.9000e- 9.9000e- 9.2000e- 9.2000e- 0.0000 2.3482 2.3482 6.8000e- 0.0000 2.3653 11 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 30 Date: 9/4/2018 2:10 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Annual 3.5 Paving - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 003 005 004 004 004 004 . 004 i Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 004 Total Worker •i 1.8000e- i 1.2000e- i 1.3900e- 0.0000 i 4.9000e- 0.0000 5.000Oe- i 1.3000e- 0.0000 1.3000e- 0.0000 i 0.4276 0.4276 1.000Oe- i 0.0000 i 0.4278 0.0181 004 004 003 004 004 004 004 005 Total 1.8000e- 1.2000e- 1.3900e- 0.0000 4.9000e- 0.0000 5.000Oe- 1.3000e- 0.0000 1.3000e- 0.0000 0.4276 0.4276 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.4278 11 004 004 003 004 004 004 004 004 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 1.9300e- i 0.0181 i 0.0178 3.000Oe- i i 9.9000e- 9.9000e- 9.2000e- 9.2000e- 0.0000 i 2.3482 i 2.3482 6.8000e- i 0.0000 i 2.3653 003 005 004 004 004 004 . 004 i Paving �i 1.6000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 004 Total 2.0900e- 0.0181 0.0178 3.000Oe- 9.9000e- 9.9000e- 9.2000e- 9.2000e- 0.0000 2.3482 2.3482 6.8000e- 0.0000 2.3653 11 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 30 Date: 9/4/2018 2:10 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Annual 3.5 Paving - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 003 i i i i i i i • i i i i Off -Road •i 6.1000e- 4.2100e- 4.5800e- 1.00OOe- 2.8000e- 2.8000e- 2.8000e- 2.8000e- 0.0000 i 0.6383 0.6383 5.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.6396 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 6.5300e- Worker •i 1.8000e- i 1.2000e- i 1.3900e- 0.0000 i 4.9000e- 0.0000 5.00OOe- i 1.3000e- 0.0000 1.3000e- 0.0000 i 0.4276 0.4276 1.00OOe- i 0.0000 i 0.4278 4.5800e- 004 004 003 004 004 004 004 005 Total 1.8000e- 1.2000e- 1.3900e- 0.0000 4.9000e- 0.0000 5.00OOe- 1.3000e- 0.0000 1.3000e- 0.0000 0.4276 0.4276 1.00OOe- 0.0000 0.4278 11 004 004 003 004 004 004 004 005 004 005 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating •i 5.9200e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 003 i i i i i i i • i i i i Off -Road •i 6.1000e- 4.2100e- 4.5800e- 1.00OOe- 2.8000e- 2.8000e- 2.8000e- 2.8000e- 0.0000 i 0.6383 0.6383 5.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.6396 i i i 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 . 005 i Total 6.5300e- 4.2100e- 4.5800e- 1.00OOe- 2.8000e- 2.8000e- 2.8000e- 2.8000e- 0.0000 0.6383 0.6383 5.00OOe- 0.0000 0.6396 003 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 30 Date: 9/4/2018 2:10 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Annual 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 003 i i i i i i i • i i i i Off -Road •i 6.1000e- 4.2100e- 4.5800e- 1.000Oe- 2.8000e- 2.8000e- 2.8000e- 2.8000e- 0.0000 i 0.6383 0.6383 5.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.6396 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 6.5300e- Worker •i 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- i 8.000Oe- 0.0000 i 3.000Oe- 0.0000 3.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.0238 0.0238 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0238 4.5800e- 005 005 005 005 005 005 005 i Total 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 8.000Oe- 0.0000 3.000Oe- 0.0000 3.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.0238 0.0238 0.0000 0.0000 0.0238 11 005 005 005 004 005 005 005 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating •i 5.9200e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 003 i i i i i i i • i i i i Off -Road •i 6.1000e- 4.2100e- 4.5800e- 1.000Oe- 2.8000e- 2.8000e- 2.8000e- 2.8000e- 0.0000 i 0.6383 0.6383 5.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.6396 i i i 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 . 005 i Total 6.5300e- 4.2100e- 4.5800e- 1.000Oe- 2.8000e- 2.8000e- 2.8000e- 2.8000e- 0.0000 0.6383 0.6383 5.000Oe- 0.0000 0.6396 003 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 30 Date: 9/4/2018 2:10 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Annual 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 1.00OOe- i 1.00OOe- i 8.00OOe- 0.0000 i 3.00OOe- 0.0000 3.00OOe- i 1.00OOe- 0.0000 1.00OOe- 0.0000 i 0.0238 0.0238 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0238 005 005 005 005 005 005 005 i Total 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 8.00OOe- 0.0000 3.00OOe- 0.0000 3.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 0.0000 1.00OOe- 0.0000 0.0238 0.0238 0.0000 0.0000 0.0238 11 005 005 005 005 005 005 005 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 30 Date: 9/4/2018 2:10 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Annual 4.2 Trip Summary Information ROG NOx I CO I SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e Category 2,299.99 tons/yr 1,372,807 1,372,807 MT/yr Mitigated •i 0.4416 i 1.3937 i 3.1088 i 7.0200e- 0.5206 i 8.0600e- 0.5287 i 0.1394 i 7.5400e- 0.1470 0.0000 i 647.5290 647.5290 � 0.0399 i 0.0000 648.5267 •� 003 003 003 Unmitigated 0.4416 1.3937 3.1088 7.0200e- - 0.5206 8.0600e- • 0.5287 - 0.1394 7.5400e- 0.1470 0.0000 647.5290 647.5290 0.0399 0.0000 648.5267 003 003 003 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Diverted Pass -by Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Convenience Market With Gas Pumps ......................................----------- Parking Lot ; 2,299.99 ; 0.00 2,299.99 2299.99 -------------------- -----------------------:-------------------------- 0.00 0.00 1,372,807 1,372,807 Total 2,299.99 2,299.99 2,299.99 1,372,807 1,372,807 4.3 Trip Type Information 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY SBUS I MH Convenience Market With Gas 0.555968} 0.043848; 0.210359; 0.116378; 0.016765; 0.005795; 0.025008; 0.016160; 0.001677; 0.001586; 0.004867; 0.000586: 0.001002 --- - - - - - -Pumps - - - - - - - - -+- - - - - -- F - - - - - - ---- - - - - ---- - - - - ---- - - - - ---- - - - - ---- - - - - ---- - - - - ---- - - - - ---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - iE- - - - - -- Parking Lot 0.555968. 0.043848, 0.210359, 0.116378, 0.016765, 0.005795, 0.025008, 0.016160, 0.001677, 0.001586, 0.004867, 0.000586, 0.001002 Miles Trip % Trip Purpose % Land Use H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW Primary Diverted Pass -by Convenience Market With Gas 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.80 80.20 19.00 14 21 65 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY SBUS I MH Convenience Market With Gas 0.555968} 0.043848; 0.210359; 0.116378; 0.016765; 0.005795; 0.025008; 0.016160; 0.001677; 0.001586; 0.004867; 0.000586: 0.001002 --- - - - - - -Pumps - - - - - - - - -+- - - - - -- F - - - - - - ---- - - - - ---- - - - - ---- - - - - ---- - - - - ---- - - - - ---- - - - - ---- - - - - ---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - iE- - - - - -- Parking Lot 0.555968. 0.043848, 0.210359, 0.116378, 0.016765, 0.005795, 0.025008, 0.016160, 0.001677, 0.001586, 0.004867, 0.000586, 0.001002 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 30 Date: 9/4/2018 2:10 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Annual 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Electricity 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.3280 9.3280 3.9000e- 8.0000e- i 9.3613 �i i i i Mitigated ,� i � i i . i i i 004 005 i Electricity i i i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 9.3280 i 9.3280 3.9000e- i 8.000Oe- i 9.3613 Unmitigated ,� . i 004 005 i NaturalGas •i 3.000Oe- 2.4000e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 0.0000i 0.2562 1 0.2562 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.2577 i i i Mitigated ;� 005 004 004 i 005 005 i 005 005 i NaturalGas •• 3.000Oe- 2.4000e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- - 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 0.2562 0.2562 0.0000 0.0000 0.2577 Unmitigated 005 004 004 005 005 005 005 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 30 Date: 9/4/2018 2:10 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Convenience 4800 }i 3.000Oe- 2.4000e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- r 0.0000 1 0.2562 0.2562 0.0000 0.0000 0.2577 Market With Gas 005 004 004 005 005 005 i 005 Pumps ------ - - - - - - - - - - -�I..............1-------------- J.............. J-------------- 1-------------- J-------------- 3-------------- J.............. J--------------- ------- 4.......I..............J.------------- J --------------J -------------- } - - - - - - . Parking Lot i 0 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � � 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � Total 3.000Oe- 2.4000e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 0.0000 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 0.2562 0.2562 0.0000 0.0000 0.2577 0.2577 005 004 004 004 005 005 005 005 005 005 Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use I PM10 I PM10 I Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Total Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr i 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe0-77 Convenience 4800 3.000Oe- 2.4000e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 0000 i 0.2562 i 0.2562 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.2577 Market With Gas 005 ' 004 ' 004 ' ' ' 005 ' 005 ' ' 005 i 005 !i i i i i i i i i Pumps •i i i i i i i i i r i i i i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -;I..............J--------------J--------------J--------------J--------------J--------------J--------------J--------------J--------------L - - - - - - - 4 - - - - - - -f--------------J--------------J--------------J--------------+ - - - - - - - i Parking Lot 0 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � � 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Total 3.000Oe- 2.4000e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 0.2562 0.2562 0.0000 0.0000 0.2577 11 005 004 004 005 005 005 005 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 30 Date: 9/4/2018 2:10 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Annual 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated Mitigated Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Use I I Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Convenience 27456 }i 8.7481 3.60OOe- 7.00OOe- 8.7794 Market With Gas i 004 005 Pumps I�I -i i 4l--------------J--------------J--------------+ ------ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i Parking Lot 1820 •i 0.5799 i 2.00OOe- i 0.0000 0.5820 ;i 005 Total 9.3280 3.8000e- 7.00OOe- 9.3613 11 004 005 Mitigated 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Use I I Land Use kWh/yr i MT/yr Convenience 27456 pi 8.7481 i 3.60OOe- i 7.00OOe- 8.7794 Market With Gas i 004 005 Pumps •� i - - - - - - - 41--------------J--------------J--------------+ - - - - - - - Parking Lot 1820 •i 0.5799 i 2.00OOe- 0.0000 0.5820 005 Total 9.3280 3.8000e- 7.00OOe- 9.3613 11 004 005 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 30 Date: 9/4/2018 2:10 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Annual 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e Category tans/yr PM10 PM10 MT/yr PM2.5 Mitigated •i 9.6200e- i 0.0000 2.000Oe- i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ■ 0.0000 i 3.8000e- 3.8000e- i 0.0000 0.0000 4.1000e- •� 003 004 MT/yr Architectural �� 5.9000e- 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating ,� 004 ■ i i 004 004 i 004 ----------- %i -- ------ ---- -- --- - --- - ------ ---- - -- -- - ----------- i - - - - - - - j -- ------ - - - - - - - _ -- - - - - - i -- - - - -- ---- ----- ----- ----- -- *------- Unmitigated •� 9.6200e- 0.0000 2.000Oe- 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.8000e- 3.8000e- 0.0000 0.0000 4.1 000e- 003 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 004 004 004 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Subcategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural �� 5.9000e- 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating ,� 004 ■ i i Consumer �� 9.0100e- 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Products 003 i ----------- %i -- ------ ---- -- --- - --- - ------ ---- - -- -- - ----------- i - - - - - - - j -- ------ - - - - - - - _ -- - - - - - i -- - - - -- ---- ----- ----- ----- -- *------- Landscaping �� 2.000Oe- i 0.0000 2.000Oe- i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.8000e- 3.8000e- i 0.0000 0.0000 4.1000e- i 005 004 004 004 i 004 Total 9.6200e- 0.0000 2.000Oe- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.8000e- 3.8000e- 0.0000 0.0000 4.1000e- 003 004 004 004 004 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 30 Date: 9/4/2018 2:10 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Annual 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Apply Water Conservation Strategy ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Subcategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural •i 5.9000e- 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating 004 Consumer •1 9.0100e- 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products '� 003 i Landscaping •i 2.000Oe- i 0.0000 2.000Oe- i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 3.8000e- 3.8000e- i 0.0000 0.0000 4.1000e- '� 005 004 004 004 004 .� � � � � � i i � � i � � i Total 9.6200e- 0.0000 2.000Oe- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.8000e- 3.8000e-0.0000 0.0000 4.1000e- 003 004 004 004 004 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Apply Water Conservation Strategy CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 30 Date: 9/4/2018 2:10 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Annual 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Total CO2 C N20 CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated •1 0.9437 i 4.6700e- 1.2000e- 1 1.0954 003 004 i - - - - - - - - - - - % --------------4--------------- ---------------* - - - - - - - Unmitigated 1.1796 5.8400e- 1.5000e- 1.3692 Land Use 003 004 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e door Use I I Land Use Mgal 11 MT/yr Convenience X0.177774 / ;i 1.1796 i 5.8400e- i 1.5000e- 1.3692 Market With Gas i 0.108958 ;i 003 004 Pumps i s� - - - - - - - - - - - - ---------------- ----------- Parking Lot 0/0 -i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 1.1796 5.8400e- 1.5000e- 1.3692 11 003 j 004 j CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 30 Date: 9/4/2018 2:10 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Annual 7.2 Water by Land Use Mitigated 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Institute Recycling and Composting Services Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e door Use Land Use Mgal MT/yr Convenience X3.142219 / }i 0.9437 4.6700e- 1.2000e- 1.0954 Market With Gas 10.08716661: 003 004 Pumps 1 ;i - - - - - - - - Parking Lot - - - - - - if-------------- -------------- --------------4- - - - - - - - i 0/0 •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 0.9437 4.6700e- 1.2000e- 1.0954 003 004 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Institute Recycling and Composting Services CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 30 Date: 9/4/2018 2:10 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Annual CategoryNear 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Total CO2 C N20 CO2e CO2e MT/yr Mitigated •i 1.0977 0.0649 0.0000 1 2.7194 - - - - - - - - - - % --------------+------------------------------ - - - - - - - Unmitigated 1.4636 0.0865 0.0000 3.6259 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed I Land Use tons MT/yr Convenience 7.21 }i 1.4636 i 0.0865 i 0.0000 3.6259 Market With Gas Pumps i s� J____________ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ ___1____________ Parking Lot 0 .i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.4636 0.0865 0.0000 3.6259 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 30 Date: 9/4/2018 2:10 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Annual 8.2 Waste by Land Use Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumas and Emeraencv Generators IEquipment Type I Number I Hours/Day I Hours/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type I Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed Land Use tons MT/yr Convenience 1 5.4075 }i 1.0977 0.0649 0.0000 2.7194 Market With Gas i Pumps I - - - - - - - - - - - - - if-------------- -------------- --------------4- - - - - - - - Parking Lot i 0 •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 1.0977 0.0649 0.0000 2.7194 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumas and Emeraencv Generators IEquipment Type I Number I Hours/Day I Hours/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type I Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 30 Date: 9/4/2018 2:10 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Annual CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 24 Date: 9/4/2018 1:54 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Winter ASE -061 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach Orange County, Winter 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Convenience Market With Gas Pumps 2.40 + 1000sgft ; 0.06 2,400.00 i 0 ------------------------------ _------------------------------ _------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------- Parking Lot 13.00 Space 0.12 5,200.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 30 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2020 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 702.44 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20 Intensity 0.006 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 24 Date: 9/4/2018 1:54 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Winter Project Characteristics - Land Use - Construction Phase - Grading - Architectural Coating - Low VOC coating Vehicle Trips - Per Traffic Impact Study (Kimley Horn 2017) Area Coating - Low VOC coating Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Water Mitigation - Per CalGreen Waste Mitigation - Per AB -341 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 24 Date: 9/4/2018 1:54 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Winter Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblArchitecturalCoating EF_ Nonresidential Exterior } 100.00 50.00 1 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_ Nonresidential Interior 100.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF Parking 100.00 50.00 ------------------g---------Y ------------------------------{-----------------------------t------------------------- tblAreaCoatin Area EF_ Nonresidential Exterior 1 100 50 -------------------g---------Y ------------------------------{-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblAreaCoatin Area EF_ Nonresidential Interior 1 100 50 ------------- ---ting--------- : ------------- -Parking---------{-------------100-------------t------------50------------ tblAreaCo Area 1 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpaved Road MoistureContent 0 12 ----------------------------- Y------------------------------ {-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblConstDustMitigation WaterU n paved RoadVehicleSpeed 1 0 15 i tblConstruction Phase PhaseEndDate 6/19/2020 7/31/2020 r i tblConstruction Phase PhaseEndDate 6/5/2020 7/17/2020 r i tblConstruction Phase PhaseEndDate 1/17/2020 2/4/2020 r tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate r 6/12/2020 7/24/2020 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate r 1/15/2020 1/1/2020 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate r 6/13/2020 7/25/2020 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate r 1/18/2020 3/1/2020 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate r 1/16/2020 2/1/2020 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate r 6/6/2020 7/18/2020 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate r 1/15/2020 1/1/2020 tblGrading Material Exported } 0.00 80.00 tblVehicleTrips ST TR } 1,448.33 958.33 tblVehicleTrips SU TR } 1,182.08 958.33 :------------------------------ ---------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------ -------------------------- WD TR 845.60 958.33 2.0 Emissions Summary CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 24 Date: 9/4/2018 1:54 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Winter 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Year Ib/day Ib/day 2020 •i 2.6159 11.2283 7.9251 0.0178 0.8645 0.5232 1.3325 0.4434 0.4813 0.8898 0.0000 i 1,835.248 1,835.248 0.3969 0.0000 1,845.169 i i i i i 2 i 2 i i 4 45.32 Maximum 2.6159 11.2283 7.9251 0.0178 0.8645 0.5232 1.3325 0.4434 0.4813 0.8898 0.0000 1,835.248 1,835.248 0.3969 0.0000 1,845.169 11 2 2 4 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Year Ib/day Ib/day 2020 2.6159 11.2283 7.9251 0.0178 0.4727 0.5232 i 0.9185 0.2158 i 0.4813 0.6622 0.0000 1,835.248 1,835.248 0.3969 0.0000 i 1,845.169 i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i 2 2 i 4 45.32 Maximum 2.6159 11.2283 7.9251 0.0178 0.4727 0.5232 0.9185 0.2158 0.4813 0.6622 0.0000 1,835.248 1,835.248 0.39690.0000 1,845.169 11 2 2 4 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.32 0.00 31.07 51.32 0.00 25.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 24 Date: 9/4/2018 1:54 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Winter 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I Category Ib/day Ib/day Area •i 0.0528 i 1.00OOe- i 1.5800e- i 0.0000 1.00OOe- i 1.00OOe- i i 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 3.3700e- 3.3700e- i 1.00OOe- 3.6000e- '� 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 i 003 Energy •i 1.4000e- i 1.2900e- i 1.0800e- i 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- i 1.00OOe- i i 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- i 1.5471 i 1.5471 i 3.00OOe- 3.00OOe- 1.5563 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 005 i ---- ---- - I - - ------ ---- -- --- - --- - ------ ---- - -- -- ---------- -- ----- ---- -------------_---- --------- -------�-------�----- --- ------- Mobile •1 2.5453 i 7.5525 i 17.2390 i 0.0380 � 2.9118 � 0.0448 i 2.9566 i 0.7786 i 0.0419 0.8205 � i 3,857.983 3,857.983 i 0.2467 3,864.151 3 i 3 i i Total 2.5982 7.5538 17.2416 0.0380 2.9118 0.0449 2.9567 0.7786 0.0420 0.8206 0.0420 3,859.533 3,859.533 0.2468 3.00OOe- 3,865.711 11 3,865.711 8 8 8 005 1 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Area �� 0.0528 i 1.00OOe- 1.5800e- i 0.0000 1.00OOe- i 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- � 3.3700e- 3.3700e- i 1.00OOe- 3.6000e- i 005 003 005 005 005 005 , 003 003 005 i 003 Energy 1.4000e- 1.2900e- 1.0800e- 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 1.5471 1.5471 3.00OOe- 3.00OOe- i 1.5563 �� i i i � i i 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 005 i Mobile �� 2.5453 i 7.5525 � 17.2390 i 0.0380 � 2.9118 � 0.0448 i 2.9566 � 0.7786 i 0.0419 0.8205 � i 3,857.983 3,857.983 i 0.2467 3,864.151 i i i i i i i i 3 i 3 i i 1 Total 2.5982 7.5538 17.2416 0.0380 2.9118 0.0449 2.9567 0.7786 0.0420 0.8206 3,859.533 3,859.533 0.2468 3.00OOe- 3,865.711 8 8 005 1 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 24 Date: 9/4/2018 1:54 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Winter 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e !2/1/2020 :2/4/2020 5 2� A PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 100: A i 4 :Paving +Paving !7/18/2020 Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Site Preparation +Site Preparation ! 1/1/2020 :1/1/2020 5: 1 A i _ 2 •Grading +Grading !2/1/2020 :2/4/2020 5 2� A i 3 •Building Construction +Building Construction !3/1/2020 :7/17/2020 : 5 100: A i 4 :Paving +Paving !7/18/2020 :7/24/2020 5 5� + i 5 -Architectural Coating :Architectural Coating 7/25/2020 7/31/2020 5, 5. Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0.5 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0.12 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 3,600; Non -Residential Outdoor: 1,200; Striped Parking Area: 312 (Architectural Coating — sgft) OffRoad Equipment CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 24 ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Winter Date: 9/4/2018 1:54 PM Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount I Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor Architectural Coating 'Air Compressors ; 1 1 6.001 78• 0.48 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- 20.00;LD_Mix Paving 'Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 4 6.001 9• 0.56 --------------------------- i ------------------------------------------------- ----------- - - 14.70; Grading 'Concrete/Industrial Saws ; 1 1 8.001 81, 0.73 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- --------i 1.001 Building Construction 'Cranes 1 1 1 4.001 231, 0.29 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- -------------; 7; Building Construction 'Forklifts 1 21 6.001 89• 0.20 - - - - - - - --- 6.90; i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- -'-- - - - - -- IHHDT Site Preparation 'Graders 1 11 8.001 187• 0.41 --------------------------- �- - - -------------------------- ----------- 1 • Paving +Pavers 1 11 7.001 130• 0.42 ------------------------------------------ - - - - ----------- HHDT Paving 'Rollers 1 11 7.001 80• 0.38 ---------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------i ------ - - - - --------------- ----------- Grading 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 11 1.001 247• 0.40 ------------------------------------------ �- - - - - ----------- Building Construction +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 21 8.001 97• 0.37 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Grading +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 21 6.001 97• 0.37 • 1 �-------------------------- ------- ----------- Paving +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 11 7.001 _------------------ 97• 0.37 ---------------------------- --------------------------*-----------------f------------ r------------- -------- Site Preparation •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 • 8.00• 97• 0.37 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count I Number I Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Site Preparation A 2; 5.00; 0.001 10.00; 14.70; 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix 1HDT_Mix IHHDT �- Grading 4; - i------------ 10.00: 0.001 , 0.00: - - 14.70; 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix *- IHHDT ----------------° Building Construction ------------- ;----------------- 5; - 3.00- --------i 1.001 0.00 ---------' --------- 14.70; ------------------------ 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix ----------' iHDT_Mix -------- IHHDT �- --------- - - - - -- ° Paving -------------; 7; i------------ 18.00: --------i 0.001 , 0.00: ---------' - - - �- 14.70; - - - - - - - --- 6.90; --------------- - - - - -- 20.00;LD_Mix ----- - - - - iHDT_Mix -'-- - - - - -- IHHDT i f ; Architectural Coating ; 1 • 1.00• 0.00• 0.00• 14.70• 6.90, 20.00,LD_Mix •HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 24 Date: 9/4/2018 1:54 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Winter Water Exposed Area Water Unpaved Roads Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads 3.2 Site Preparation - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust •I 0.5393 0.0000 0.5393 0.0586 0.0000 0.0586 0.0000 0.0000 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 1 I I Off -Road •1 0.6853 1 8.4307 I 4.0942 19.7400e- I I 0.3353 I 0.3353 I I 0.3085 0.3085 � :-9-4-3.4872 1 943.4872 I 0.3051 1 i 951.1158 003 I I I I 1 1 1 I I Total 0.6853 8.4307 4.0942 9.7400e- 0.5393 0.3353 0.8746 0.0586 0.3085 0.3671 943.4872 943.4872 0.3051 951.1158 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 24 Date: 9/4/2018 1:54 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Winter 3.2 Site Preparation - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0774 i 2.7843 i 0.7315 7.5400e- i 0.1741 9.0700e- 0.1832 i 0.0477 8.6700e- 0.0563 840.1799 840.1799 � 0.0905 i i 842.4431 003 003 003 i %--------------------------------------------'-------------------------------------� -------------'--------------� 000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i i 0.0000 003 i i i i i • i i i i Worker 0.0217 0.0133 0.1513 5.2000e- 0.0559 3.7000e- 0.0563 0.0148 3.4000e- 0.0152 51.5811 51.5811 1.1800e- i 51.6105 i i i i i 004 004 004 003 i 8.4307 Total 0.0991 2.7976 0.8828 8.0600e- 0.2300 9.4400e- 0.2394 0.0625 9.0100e- 0.0715 0.3051 891.7610 891.7610 0.0917 894.0536 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust •i i i i i 0.2427 i 0.0000 i 0.2427 0.0264 0.0000 0.0264 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.6853 i 8.4307 i 4.0942 9.7400e- 0.3353 0.3353 0.3085 0.3085 0.0000 i 943.4872 943.4872 0.3051 i i 951.1158 003 i i i i i • i i i i Total 0.6853 8.4307 4.0942 9.7400e- 0.2427 0.3353 0.5780 0.0264 0.3085 0.3349 0.0000 943.4872 943.4872 0.3051 951.1158 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 24 Date: 9/4/2018 1:54 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Winter 3.2 Site Preparation - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.3 Grading - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0774 i 2.7843 i 0.7315 7.5400e- i 0.1741 9.0700e- 0.1832 i 0.0477 8.6700e- 0.0563 i 840.1799 � 840.1799 � 0.0905 i i 842.4431 � 003 003 003 i %--------------------------------------------'-------------------------------------� -------------'--------------� Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i i 0.0000 000 2 i 2 i i i 8 Worker •i 0.0217 0.0133 0.1513 5.2000e- 0.0559 3.7000e- 0.0563 0.0148 3.4000e- 0.0152 51.5811 51.5811 1.1800e- i 51.6105 i i i i i 004 004 004 003 i 7.8729 Total 0.0991 2.7976 0.8828 8.0600e- 0.2300 9.4400e- 0.2394 0.0625 9.0100e- 0.0715 0.2169 891.7610 891.7610 0.0917 894.0536 003 003 003 2 8 3.3 Grading - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust •1 0.7528 0.0000 0.7528 0.4138 i 0.0000 0.4138 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.8674 i 7.8729 i 7.6226 � 0.0120 i � 0.4672 � 0.4672 i � 0.4457 � 0.4457 � i 1,147.235 � 1,147.235 � 0.2169 i i 1,152.657 2 i 2 i i i 8 Total 0.8674 7.8729 7.6226 0.0120 0.7528 0.4672 1.2200 0.4138 0.4457 0.8595 1,147.235 1,147.235 0.2169 1,152.657 2 2 8 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 24 Date: 9/4/2018 1:54 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Winter 3.3 Grading - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.8674 i 7.8729 i 7.6226 0.0120 0.4672 0.4672 0.4457 0.4457 0.0000 i 1,147.235 1,147.235 0.2169 i i 1,152.657 '� Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total Worker •i 0.0434 i 0.0266 i 0.3025 1.0300e- i 0.1118 7.4000e- 0.1125 i 0.0296 6.8000e- 0.0303 103.1621 � 103.1621 2.3500e- i i 103.2210 003 004 004 003 i 7.6226 Total 0.0434 0.0266 0.3025 1.0300e- 0.1118 7.4000e- 0.1125 0.0296 6.8000e- 0.0303 103.1621 103.1621 2.3500e- 103.2210 003 004 2 004 8 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust •1 0.3387 0.0000 0.3387 i 0.1862 0.0000 0.1862 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.8674 i 7.8729 i 7.6226 0.0120 0.4672 0.4672 0.4457 0.4457 0.0000 i 1,147.235 1,147.235 0.2169 i i 1,152.657 '� i i i i i i i i • 2 i 2 i i i 8 Total 0.8674 7.8729 7.6226 0.0120 0.3387 0.4672 0.8059 0.1862 0.4457 0.6319 0.0000 1,147.235 7147.235 0.2169 1,152.657 2 2 8 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 24 Date: 9/4/2018 1:54 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Winter 3.3 Grading - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.4 Building Construction - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 � Total 0.8617 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 7.3875 0.0114 Worker •i 0.0434 i 0.0266 i 0.3025 1.0300e- i 0.1118 7.4000e- 0.1125 i 0.0296 6.8000e- 0.0303 103.1621 103.1621 2.3500e- i i 103.2210 003 004 004 003 i 0.5224 Total 0.0434 0.0266 0.3025 1.0300e- 0.1118 7.4000e- 0.1125 0.0296 6.8000e- 0.0303 103.1621 103.1621 2.3500e- j 103.2210 j 003 1 004 2 004 003 3.4 Building Construction - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road •i 0.8617 8.8523 7.3875 0.0114 0.5224 0.5224 0.4806 0.4806 1,102.978 1,102.978 0.3567 i 1,111.896 i i i i i 1 i 1 i i i 2 Total 0.8617 8.8523 7.3875 0.0114 0.5224 0.5224 0.4806 0.4806 1,102.978 1,102.978 0.3567 1,111.896 j j j j 1 1 2 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 24 Date: 9/4/2018 1:54 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Winter 3.4 Building Construction - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 1 i 1 i i i 2 Vendor •i 3.3400e- 0.1041 0.0301 2.4000e- 6.3900e- 5.5000e- 6.9400e- 1.8400e- 5.3000e- 2.3700e- F-26.4466 26.4466 2.3000e- i 26.5042 i i i i i 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 003 i Worker •i 0.0130 7.9800e- 0.0908 3.1000e- 0.0335 2.2000e- 0.0338 8.8900e- 2.000Oe- 9.1000e- 30.9486 30.9486 7.1000e- i 30.9663 i i i i i 003 004 004 003 004 003 004 i 0.0114 Total 0.0164 0.1121 0.1209 5.5000e- 0.0399 7.7000e- 0.0407 0.0107 7.3000e- 0.0115 1,111.896 57.3952 57.3952 3.0107 57.4705 004 004 1 1 004 2 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road •i 0.8617 i 8.8523 7.3875 i 0.0114 i i 0.5224 0.5224 0.4806 0.4806 0.0000 i 1,102.978 1,102.978 0.3567 i i 1,111.896 1 i 1 i i i 2 Total 0.8617 8.8523 7.3875 0.0114 0.5224 0.5224 0.4806 0.4806 0.0000 1,102.978 1,102.978 0.3567 1,111.896 1 1 2 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 24 Date: 9/4/2018 1:54 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Winter 3.4 Building Construction - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.5 Paving - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i i i i i i 6 i 6 i i i 3 Vendor •i 3.3400e- 0.1041 0.0301 2.4000e- 6.3900e- 5.5000e- 6.9400e- 1.8400e- 5.3000e- 2.3700e- F-26.4466 26.4466 2.3000e- i 26.5042 i i i i i 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 003 i Worker •i 0.0130 7.9800e- 0.0908 3.1000e- 0.0335 2.2000e- 0.0338 8.8900e- 2.000Oe- 9.1000e- 30.9486 30.9486 7.1000e- i 30.9663 i i i i i 003 004 004 003 004 003 004 i Total Total 0.0164 0.1121 0.1209 5.5000e- 0.0399 7.7000e- 0.0407 0.0107 7.3000e- 0.0115 1,035.392 57.3952 57.3952 3.0107 1,042.932 57.4705 004 004 004 6 6 003 3 3.5 Paving - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road •i 0.7716 7.2266 7.1128 0.0113 0.3950 0.3950 0.3669 0.3669 1,035.392 1,035.392 0.3016 i 1,042.932 i i i i i i 6 i 6 i i i 3 Paving •1 0.0629 i i i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.8344 7.2266 7.1128 0.0113 0.3950 0.3950 0.3669 0.3669 1,035.392 1,035.392 0.3016 1,042.932 11 6 6 3 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 24 Date: 9/4/2018 1:54 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Winter 3.5 Paving - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i i i i 6 i 6 i i i 3 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 F-0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total Worker •i 0.0782 i 0.0479 i 0.5446 � 1.8600e- i 0.2012 � 1.3300e- � 0.2025 i 0.0534 � 1.2300e- 0.0546 � i 185.6918 185.6918 4.2400e- i i 185.7977 003 003 003 003 i 7.1128 Total 0.0782 0.0479 0.5446 1.8600e- 0.2012 1.3300e- 0.2025 0.0534 1.2300e-0.0546 0.3016 185.6918 185.6918 4.2400e- 185.7977 003 003 6 003 3 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road •i 0.7716 i 7.2266 i 7.1128 0.0113 0.3950 0.3950 0.3669 0.3669 0.0000 i 1,035.392 1,035.392 0.3016 i i 1,042.932 i i i i 6 i 6 i i i 3 Paving -i 0.0629 i i i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.8344 7.2266 7.1128 0.0113 0.3950 0.3950 0.3669 0.3669 0.0000 1,035.392 1,035.392 0.3016 1,042.932 11 6 6 3 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 24 Date: 9/4/2018 1:54 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Winter 3.5 Paving - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 003 Worker •i 0.0782 i 0.0479 i 0.5446 1.8600e- i 0.2012 1.3300e- 0.2025 i 0.0534 1.2300e- 0.0546 185.6918 185.6918 4.2400e- i i 185.7977 003 003 003003 i 1.6838 Total 0.0782 0.0479 0.5446 1.8600e- 0.2012 1.3300e- 0.2025 0.0534 1.2300e- 0.0546 0.0218 185.6918 185.6918 4.2400e- 185.7977 003 003 003 003 003 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating •i 2.3694 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.2422 i 1.6838 i 1.8314 2.9700e- 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 i i 281.9928 003 Total 2.6116 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.9928 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 24 Date: 9/4/2018 1:54 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Winter 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ��-----------------------'---------------------'-------------------------------------� -------------'--------------- Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.2422 i 1.6838 i 1.8314 2.9700e- 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.0000 i 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 i i 281.9928 003 Worker •i 4.3400e- 2.6600e- 0.0303 1.000Oe- 0.0112 7.000Oe- 0.0113 2.9600e- 7.000Oe- 3.0300e- 10.3162 10.3162 2.4000e- i 10.3221 i i i i i 003 003 004 005 003 005 003 004 i 2.6116 Total 4.3400e- 2.6600e- 0.0303 1.000Oe- 0.0112 7.000Oe- 0.0113 2.9600e- 7.000Oe- 3.0300e- 281.4481 10.3162 10.3162 2.4000e- 10.3221 11 003 003 004 005 003 005 003 004 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating •i 2.3694 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.2422 i 1.6838 i 1.8314 2.9700e- 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.0000 i 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 i i 281.9928 003 Total 2.6116 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.9928 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 24 Date: 9/4/2018 1:54 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Winter 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � ------------------------'---------------------'-------------------------------------� -------------'--------------- Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 4.3400e- 2.6600e- 0.0303 1.00OOe- 0.0112 7.00OOe- 0.0113 2.9600e- 7.00OOe- 3.0300e- 10.3162 10.3162 2.4000e- i 10.3221 i i i i i 003 003 004 005 003 005 003 004 i Total 4.3400e- 2.6600e- 0.0303 1.00OOe- 0.0112 7.00OOe- 0.0113 2.9600e- 7.00OOe- 3.0300e- 10.3162 10.3162 2.4000e- 10.3221 11 003 003 004 005 003 005 003 004 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 24 Date: 9/4/2018 1:54 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Winter 4.2 Trip Summary Information ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day 2,299.99 2,299.99 1,372,807 1,372,807 Ib/day Mitigated 2.5453 7.5525 17.2390 0.0380 2.9118 0.0448 2.9566 0.7786 0.0419 0.8205 3,857.983 3,857.983 0.2467 i 3,864.151 i � i i i i i i 3 i 3 i i i 1 Unmitigated 2.5453 7.5525 17.2390 0.0380 2.9118 0.0448 2.9566 0.7786 0.0419 0.8205 3,857.983 - 3,857.983 - 0.2467 3,864.151 3 3 1 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Diverted Pass -by Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Convenience Market With Gas Pumps .................................................... Parking Lot ; 2,299.99 ; 0.00 2,299.99 2299.99 -------------------- -----------------------:-------------------------- 0.00 0.00 1,372,807 1,372,807 Total 2,299.99 2,299.99 2,299.99 1,372,807 1,372,807 4.3 Trip Type Information 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY SBUS I MH Convenience Market With Gas 0.555968} 0.043848: 0.210359: 0.116378: 0.016765: 0.005795: 0.025008: 0.016160: 0.001677: 0.001586: 0.004867: 0.000586: 0.001002 --- - - - - - -Pumps - - - - - - - - -+- - - - - -- F - - - - - - ---- - - - - ---- - - - - ---- - - - - ---- - - - - ---- - - - - ---- - - - - ---- - - - - ---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - iE- - - - - -- Parking Lot 0.555968' 0.043848, 0.210359, 0.116378, 0.016765, 0.005795, 0.025008, 0.016160, 0.001677, 0.001586, 0.004867, 0.000586, 0.001002 Miles Trip % Trip Purpose % Land Use H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW Primary Diverted Pass -by Convenience Market With Gas 16.60 8.40 6.90 r 0.80 80.20 19.00 14 21 65 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY SBUS I MH Convenience Market With Gas 0.555968} 0.043848: 0.210359: 0.116378: 0.016765: 0.005795: 0.025008: 0.016160: 0.001677: 0.001586: 0.004867: 0.000586: 0.001002 --- - - - - - -Pumps - - - - - - - - -+- - - - - -- F - - - - - - ---- - - - - ---- - - - - ---- - - - - ---- - - - - ---- - - - - ---- - - - - ---- - - - - ---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - iE- - - - - -- Parking Lot 0.555968' 0.043848, 0.210359, 0.116378, 0.016765, 0.005795, 0.025008, 0.016160, 0.001677, 0.001586, 0.004867, 0.000586, 0.001002 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 24 Date: 9/4/2018 1:54 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Winter 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total I Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Natural(' ,q.,; �i 1.4000e- i 1.2900e- 1.0800e- i 1.000Oe- i i 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- � i 1.5471 1.5471 3.000Oe- i 3.000Oe- i 1.5563 Mitigated ,� 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 . i005 005 - - - - - - - - - - 3 -------------- i--------------- --------------- }--------------+----------------------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------* - - - - - - -�---- - - ----------------- } ---- - +-- - ----+ - - - - NaturalGas •• 1.4000e- 1.2900e- - 1.0800e- 1.000Oe- - 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- - 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.5471 1.5471 3.000Oe- - 3.000Oe- 1.5563 Unmitigated 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 005 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 24 Date: 9/4/2018 1:54 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Winter 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Total I I Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day Convenience 13.1507 }i 1.4000e- 1.2900e- 1.0800e- 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 7-71.5471 1.5471 i 1.5471 3.000Oe- 3.000Oe- 1.5563 Market With Gas 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 i 004 } i 005 005 Pumps ........... ------ 4I -------------- 1-------------- J.............. J-------------- 1-------------- J-------------- 3-------------- J.............. J--------------- - - - - - - - { ....... f..............J..............J-------------- -------------- i ...... . Parking Lot i 0 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � � i Total 1.4000e- 1.2900e- 1.0800e- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.5471 1.5471 3.000Oe- 3.000Oe- 1.5563 1.5563 004 003 003 005 005 004 004 004 004 004 004 005 005 005 Mitigated 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use I PM10 I PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day Convenience 10.0131507 pi 1.4000e- i 1.2900e- i 1.0800e- i 1.000Oe- i i 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- i i 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 7-71.5471 1.5471 i 1.5471 i 3.000Oe- i 3.000Oe- 1.5563 Market With Gas 1 004 ' 003 ' 003 ' 005 ' ' 004 ' 004 ' ' 004 } ' ' ' ' � � � � � � � � i 004 } i � � 005 � 005 ; Pumps i -i i i i i i i i i w i - - - - - - - - - - -i - - - - - - ��-------------- J-------------- J-------------- J-------------- J-------------- J-------------- J-------------- J-------------- J -------------- -L - - - - - - - i - - - - - - -f--------------J--------------J----------------------------+ - - - - - - - Parking Lot 0 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i Total 1.4000e- 1.2900e- 1.0800e- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.5471 1.5471 3.000Oe- 3.000Oe- 1.5563 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 005 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 24 Date: 9/4/2018 1:54 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Winter 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 I PM10 Total I Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e Category Ib/day PM10 PM10 Ib/day PM2.5 Mitigated •i 0.0528 i 1.000Oe- 1.5800e- i 0.0000 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- ■ i 3.3700e- 3.3700e- i 1.000Oe- 3.6000e- •� 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 i 003 i � � i � i Products Unmitigated 0.0528 1.000Oe- 1.5800e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- - 1.0000e- 1.0000e- 1.000Oe- 3.3700e- 3.3700e- - 1.0000e- - 3.6000e- 1.5800e- 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Subcategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural �� 3.2500e- 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � i � 0.0000 0.0000 Coating ,� 003 ■ i i Consumer •i 0.0494 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i � � i � i Products -------- ---- ----------- --r------�-------�-------J,-------*------ Landscaping �� 1.5000e- i 1.000Oe- 1.5800e- i 0.0000 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- � i 3.3700e- 3.3700e- i 1.000Oe- 3.6000e- 004 005 003 005 005 005 005 ■ 003 003 005 i 003 Total 0.0528 1.000Oe- 1.5800e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe-700, 0Oe- 3.3700e- 3.3700e- 1.000Oe- 3.6000e- 005 003 005 005 00505 003 003 005 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 24 Date: 9/4/2018 1:54 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Winter 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Apply Water Conservation Strategy 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Institute Recycling and Composting Services 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Subcategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural •i 3.2500e- 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i � 0.0000 0.0000 • Coating 003 Consumer •1 0.0494 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Landscaping •i 1.5000e- i 1.00OOe- � 1.5800e- i 0.0000 i � 1.00OOe- i 1.00OOe- � i 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- i 3.3700e- � 3.3700e- i 1.00OOe- � � 3.6000e- �� i 004 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003 Total 0.0528 1.00OOe- 1.5800e- 0.0000 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 3.3700e- 3.3700e- 1.00OOe- 3.8000e. 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Apply Water Conservation Strategy 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Institute Recycling and Composting Services 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 24 Date: 9/4/2018 1:54 PM ASE -06 1 490 Pacific Coast Highway - Seal Beach - Orange County, Winter 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emeraencv Generators IEquipment Type I Number I Hours/Day I Hours/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type I Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation Construction Energy Use Notes: 1. Equipment types and horsepower from CalEEMod defaults. 2. Equipment count and hours from CalEEMod for the AQ/GHG report. 3. Fuel consumption factors from CARB OFFROAD2017-ORION Web Database, for San Diego county, aggregate model years for 2020. https://www.arb.ca.gov/orion/ 4. 1 Gallon of diesel= 139,000 Btu Gallons Diesel Off -Road Construction Equipment Energy Use Gallons Gas KBtu 7,124.78 Phase Trip Type (Fleet Mix) Phase Equipment Fuel HP Equipment Count Hours/Day Work Days Gallons /Hour Gallons /Day Total Gallons Total KBtu Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws Diesel 81 1 8.0 1 3.40135 27.211 27.2 3,782 Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel 247 1 1.0 1 5.04717 5.047 5.0 702 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Diesel 97 2 6.0 1 1.85320 22.238 22.2 3,091 Site Preparation Graders Diesel 187 1 8.0 2 3.95548 31.644 63.3 8,797 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Diesel 97 1 8.0 2 1.85320 14.826 29.7 4,122 Building Construction Cranes Diesel 2311 1 4.0 1001 3.44094 13.764 1,376.4 191,317 Forklifts Diesel 89 2 6.0 100 1.85245 22.229 2,222.9 308,989 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Diesel 97 2 8.0 100 1.85320 29.651 2,965.1 412,153 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers Diesel 9 4 6.0 5 0.28834 6.920 34.6 4,809 Pavers Diesel 130 1 7.0 5 2.79827 19.588 97.9 13,614 Rollers Diesel 80 1 7.0 5 1.55296 10.871 54.4 7,555 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Diesel 97 1 7.0 5 1.85320 12.972 64.9 9,016 Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel 78 1 6.0 5 1.18142 7.089 35.4 4,927 Total 6,999.1 972,872 Notes: 1. Equipment types and horsepower from CalEEMod defaults. 2. Equipment count and hours from CalEEMod for the AQ/GHG report. 3. Fuel consumption factors from CARB OFFROAD2017-ORION Web Database, for San Diego county, aggregate model years for 2020. https://www.arb.ca.gov/orion/ 4. 1 Gallon of diesel= 139,000 Btu Notes: 1. Fleet mix and trip distances from CalEEMod defaults. 2. Fuel consumption factors weighted average for fleet mix from CARB EMFAC2107, for San Diego, aggregate model years for 2020, aggregate speeds. https://www.arb.ca.gov/emfac/2017/. 3. 1 Gallon of diesel = 139 KBtu; 1 gallon of gasoline =124 KBtu Construction Total Gallons Diesel On -Road Construction Energy Use Gallons Gas KBtu 7,124.78 Phase Trip Type (Fleet Mix) Trips Distance (miles) Work Days gallons Total VMT diesel/VMT Total diesel gallons gallons gas/VMT Total gasoline gallons Total KBtu Grading Worker (LDA, LDTS, LDT2) 10 14.7 1 147 0.000222523 0.03 0.036148348 5.31 663 Site Preparation Worker (LDA, LDTI, LDT2) 5 14.7 2 147 0.000222523 0.03 0.036148345 5.31 663 Site Preparation Hauling (HHDT) 10 20 2.00 200 0.161758496 32.35 0.000279275 0.06 4,504 Building Construction Worker (LDA, LDTI, LDT2) 3 14.7 100 4410 0.000222523 0.98 0.036148345 159.41 19,904 Building Construction Vendor(HHDT, MHDT) 1 6.9 100 690 0.133316243 91.99 0.013349803 9.21 13,929 Paving Worker (LDA, LDTI, LDT2) 1S 14.7 5 1323 0.000222523 0.29 0.036148345 47.82 5,971 Architectural Coating Worker (LDA, LDTI, LDT2) 1 14.7 5 73.5 0.000222523 0.02 0.036148345 2.66 1 332 Totall 6,9911 1 125.70 1 1 229.791 45,966 Notes: 1. Fleet mix and trip distances from CalEEMod defaults. 2. Fuel consumption factors weighted average for fleet mix from CARB EMFAC2107, for San Diego, aggregate model years for 2020, aggregate speeds. https://www.arb.ca.gov/emfac/2017/. 3. 1 Gallon of diesel = 139 KBtu; 1 gallon of gasoline =124 KBtu Construction Total Gallons Diesel Gallons Gas KBtu 7,124.78 229.79 1,018,838 Operational Energy Use On -Road Operational Energy Use Annual VMT Fleet Mix Gallons Total Diesel Diesel/VMT Gallons Gal/l�o�ns Gas/SMT Total Gas Gallons Total KBtu LDA LDTI LDT2 MDV LHDl LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH 1,372,807 56% 4% 21% 12% 2% 1% 3% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.006159 8,455.34 0.038272 52540.221 7,690,280 Facility Electricity and Natural Gas Type Source KWhr KBtu Natural Gas Market 4,800 Electricity Market 27,456 93,684 Parking Lot 1,820 6,210 4,800 Subtotal 29,276 99,894 111,474 Total 29,276 109,694 Notes: 1. VMT, Electricity, Natural Gas, and Water use from project CaIEEMod. 2. Fuel consumption factors weighted average for fleet mix from CA RB EMFAC2107, for San Diego, aggregate model years for 2020, aggregate speeds. haps://.w .arb.u.gov/emfac/2017/. 3. Water electricity intensity factors from Cal EEMod default for San Diego County. 2. Fuel consumption factors for generator from CARB OFFROAD2017- ORION Web Database, for San Diego county, aggregate model years for 2020. haps://www.arb.ca.gov/orion/. S. 1 Gallon of diesel= 139 KBtu; 1 gallon of gasoline= 124 KBtu; 1 KWhr = 3.412142 KBtu. Project Operation Total Facility Water Energy Use KBtu Gasoline (Gal) 52,540 Water Use(Mgal) Electricity Intensity Factors(KWhr/Mgal) 1,175,293 Natural Gas (K1 4,800 4,800 Electricity(KW 32,670 111,474 Treat 7,806,554 Sone Indoor Outdoor Supply Treat Water Distribute Wastewater KWhr KEW Market 0.1777741 0.108958 9,7271 1111 1,2721 1,911 3,394 11,580 01 0.000000 9,7271 1111 1,2721 1,911 0 0 Total 3,394 11,580 Notes: 1. VMT, Electricity, Natural Gas, and Water use from project CaIEEMod. 2. Fuel consumption factors weighted average for fleet mix from CA RB EMFAC2107, for San Diego, aggregate model years for 2020, aggregate speeds. haps://.w .arb.u.gov/emfac/2017/. 3. Water electricity intensity factors from Cal EEMod default for San Diego County. 2. Fuel consumption factors for generator from CARB OFFROAD2017- ORION Web Database, for San Diego county, aggregate model years for 2020. haps://www.arb.ca.gov/orion/. S. 1 Gallon of diesel= 139 KBtu; 1 gallon of gasoline= 124 KBtu; 1 KWhr = 3.412142 KBtu. Project Operation Total Energy Type Quantity KBtu Gasoline (Gal) 52,540 6,514,987 Diesel (Gal) 8,455 1,175,293 Natural Gas (K1 4,800 4,800 Electricity(KW 32,670 111,474 Total 7,806,554 Appendix B HRA Model Results ASE -06 Seal Beach Gas Station HRA Model Inputs and Assumptions Guiding Documents: • SCAQMD Risk Assessment Procedures for Rules 1401, 1401.1 and 212 (2017) • CAPCOA Gasoline Service Station Industrywide Risk Assessment Guidelines (1997) • OEHHA Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments (2015) Modeling Tools: • Air Dispersion — Lakes AERMOD View version 9.6.1 • Health Risks — CARB Hotspots Analysis and Reporting Program (HARP), Air Dispersion Modeling and Risk Tool (ADMRT) version 18159 Gasoline Throughput: 500,000 gallons per month (6 million gallons per year) maximum throughput per the project applicant. Sources: The emissions of benzene were modeled in accordance with SCAQMD (2017) gasoline dispensing station risk assessment procedure which breaks the emissions into five sources: • Loading — Loading emissions occur when a cargo tank truck unloads gasoline to the storage tanks at the gasoline station. Storage tank vapors are emitted from the vent pipe during the initial fuel transfer period. Loading is modeled as a point source. • Breathing — Gasoline vapors are emitted from the storage tank vent pipe due to temperature and pressure changes within the storage tank vapor space. Breathing is modeled as a point source. • Refueling — During the refueling process, gasoline vapors are emitted at the vehicle/nozzle interface. Refueling is modeled as a volume source. • Spillage — Spillage emissions occur from spills during vehicle fueling. Spillage is modeled as a volume source. • Hose Permeation — Emissions occur when liquid gasoline or gasoline vapors diffuse through the dispensing hose outer surface to the atmosphere. Hose permeation is modeled as a volume source. The locations of all sources were set at the center of the gas station pump canopy indicated on the project site plan. All recommended values from the SCAQMD guidance were used, except the actual square footage of the gas pump canopy for the project was used for the size of the volume sources. The source modeling assumes that 80 percent of the daily emissions would occur from 6 a.m. to 8 p.m. and 20 percent of the daily emissions would occur from 8 p.m. to 6 a.m. The benzene emissions factor for each source is shown in Table 1, Benzene Emissions, and the source parameters are shown in Table 2, Source Modeling Parameters. ASE -06 Seal Beach Gas Station HRA Model Inputs and Assumptions Table 1 BENZENE EMISSIONS Process Emission Factor (pounds/1000gallons) Average Hourly Emissions' (pounds/hour) Loading 0.000683 4.6749E-04 Breathing 0.000109 7.4606E-05 Refueling 0.001460 9.9932E-04 Spillage 0.001700 1.1636E-03 Hose Permeation 0.000041 2.8063E-05 Source: SCAQMD Risk Assessment Procedure for Rules 1401, 1401.1 and 212 (2017). Notes: Average hourly emissions assume a throughput of 6 million gallons per year. Table 2 SOURCE MODLING PARAMTERS Source: SQAQMD Risk Assessment Procedure for Rules 1401, 1401.1 and 212 (2017); CAPCOA Gasoline Service Station Industrywide Risk Assessment Guidelines (1997). Notes: 'Assumes the vent pipe is fitted with a rain cap and the initial gas exit vertical velocity is near zero; m = meters; m/s = meters per second; K = degrees Kelvin; - = not applicable Meteorological Data The SCAQMD provides pre-processed meteorological data suitable for use with AERMOD. The available data set most representative of conditions in the project vicinity was from the Long Beach Airport station, approximately 5 miles northwest of the project site. The Long Beach Airport set includes 5 years of data collected from 2012 to 2016. Urban dispersion coefficients were selected in the model to reflect the developed nature of the project vicinity. Terrain Data CARB provides digital elevation model (DEM) files suitable for use in AERMAP (a terrain preprocessing program for AERMOD). Elevation files with 10 -meter resolution from the United States Geological Survey quadrangle maps for Los Alamitos and Seal Beach were used in the model to cover the analysis area. Receptors To develop risk isopleths, and ensure the area of maximum impact was captured, receptors were placed in a cartesian grid 600 meters by 600 meters, centered on the project site with a grid spacing of 15 meters and a receptor height (flagpole height) of 1.2 meters above the ground. Additional discrete receptors were placed at the residential property line of the 10 closest identified sensitive receptors and at the 2 closest off-site worker buildings. 2 Point Source Parameters Volume Source Parameters Release Stack Gas Gas Volume Volume Process Height Diameter Temperature Velocity' (m) Side (m) Height (m) (m) (K) (m/s) Loading 3.7 0.05 289 0.01 - - Breathing 3.7 0.05 289 0.01 - - Refuelin 1 - - - 19.4 5 Spillage 0 - - - 19.4 5 Hose Permeation 1 - - - 19.4 5 Source: SQAQMD Risk Assessment Procedure for Rules 1401, 1401.1 and 212 (2017); CAPCOA Gasoline Service Station Industrywide Risk Assessment Guidelines (1997). Notes: 'Assumes the vent pipe is fitted with a rain cap and the initial gas exit vertical velocity is near zero; m = meters; m/s = meters per second; K = degrees Kelvin; - = not applicable Meteorological Data The SCAQMD provides pre-processed meteorological data suitable for use with AERMOD. The available data set most representative of conditions in the project vicinity was from the Long Beach Airport station, approximately 5 miles northwest of the project site. The Long Beach Airport set includes 5 years of data collected from 2012 to 2016. Urban dispersion coefficients were selected in the model to reflect the developed nature of the project vicinity. Terrain Data CARB provides digital elevation model (DEM) files suitable for use in AERMAP (a terrain preprocessing program for AERMOD). Elevation files with 10 -meter resolution from the United States Geological Survey quadrangle maps for Los Alamitos and Seal Beach were used in the model to cover the analysis area. Receptors To develop risk isopleths, and ensure the area of maximum impact was captured, receptors were placed in a cartesian grid 600 meters by 600 meters, centered on the project site with a grid spacing of 15 meters and a receptor height (flagpole height) of 1.2 meters above the ground. Additional discrete receptors were placed at the residential property line of the 10 closest identified sensitive receptors and at the 2 closest off-site worker buildings. 2 ASE -06 Seal Beach Gas Station HRA Model Inputs and Assumptions Health Risk Modeling Scenario: • Residential cancer risk — 30 -year exposure starting at infants in utero in the third trimester of pregnancy; pathway inhalation only; intake rate OEHHA derived method. • Off-site worker cancer risk — 25 -year exposure starting at age 16; pathway inhalation only; intake rate OEHHA derived method. • Cancer burden — 70 -year exposure starting at infants in utero in the third trimester of pregnancy; pathway inhalation only; intake rate OEHHA derived method. AERMOD Dispersion Options Titles C:\Users\martinr\Desktop\490PCH\49OPCH.isc Dispersion Options Dispersion Coefficient Regulatory Default ❑ Non -Default Options Population: Urban Name (Optional): Roughness Length: Averaging Time Options Output Type th Concentration ❑ IJ Total Deposition (Dry & Wet) Terrain Height Options IJ Dry Deposition 4 IJ Wet Deposition ❑ Flat Elevated SO: Meters Plume Depletion Dry Removal RE: Meters Wet Removal `i■ Output Warnings TG: Meters No Output Warnings Non-fatal Warnings for Non -sequential Met Data Pollutant / Averaginq Time / Terrain Options Pollutant Type Exponential Decay OTHER -BENZENE Elplik>bife)WAihudeivill be used Averaging Time Options Hours 1EI ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Iii ❑ ❑ Terrain Height Options 1 2 3 4 6 8 12 24 ❑ Flat Elevated SO: Meters Month Period ❑ Annual RE: Meters `i■ TG: Meters Flagpole Receptors U Yes ❑ No Default Height = 1.20 m Project File: C:\Users\martinr\Desktop\490PCH HRA\490PCH.isc AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software CO - 1 10/5/2018 AERMOD Met Input Data Surface Met Data Filename: MET and DEM Files\KLGB v9.SFC Format Type: Default AERMET format Profile Met Data Filename: MET and DEM Files\KLGB_v9.PFL Format Type: Default AERMET format Wind Speed Wind Direction UWind Speeds are Vector Mean (Not Scalar Means) Rotation Adjustment [deg]: Potential Temperature Profile Base Elevation above MSL (for Primary Met Tower): 22.00 IN Meteorological Station Data Stations Station No. Year X Coordinate [m] Y Coordinate [m] Station Name Surface Upper Air 8.23 2012 2012 3.09 E 10.8 Data Period Data Period to Process Start Date: 1/1/2012 Start Hour: 1 End Date: 12/31/2016 End Hour: 24 Wind Speed Categories Stability Category Wind Speed [m/s] Stability Category Wind Speed [m/s] A 1.54 D 8.23 B 3.09 E 10.8 C 5.14 F No Upper Bound Project File: C:\Users\martinr\Desktop\490PCH HRA\490PCH.isc AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software ME - 1 10/5/2018 AERMOD Tabular Printed Outputs Short Term Averaging Period RECTABLE Highest Values Table MAXTABLE Maximum Values Table DAYTABLE Daily Values Table 1st 2nd rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 1 a ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ No 8 IE ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ No Contour Plot Files (PLOTFILE) Path for PLOTFILES: 490PCH.AD Averaging Period Source Group ID High Value File Name 1 ALL 1st 01H1GALL.PLT 8 ALL 1st 08H1GALL.PLT Period ALL N/A PE00GALL.PLT Project File: C:\Users\martinr\Desktop\490PCH HRA\490PCH.isc AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software OU - 1 10/5/2018 F-11 :11 N TA s] 11 Receptor Networks Note: Terrain Elavations and Flagpole Heights for Network Grids are in Page RE2 - 1 (If applicable) Generated Discrete Receptors for Multi -Tier (Risk) Grid and Receptor Locations for Fenceline Grid are in Page RE3 - 1 (If applicable) Uniform Cartesian Grid Receptor Network ID Grid Origin X Coordinate [m] Grid Origin Y Coordinate [m] No. of X -Axis Receptors No. of Y -Axis Receptors Spacing for X -Axis [m] Spacing for Y -Axis [m] UCART1 397280.50 3734333.50 40 40 15.00 15.00 Discrete Receptors Discrete Cartesian Receptors Record Number X -Coordinate [m] Y -Coordinate [m] Group Name (Optional) Terrain Elevations Flagpole Heights [m] (Optional) 1 397532.30 3734599.10 FENCEPRI 2.23 1.20 2 397623.20 3734629.60 FENCEPRI 2.92 1.20 3 397616.50 3734644.60 FENCEPRI 2.96 1.20 4 397611.00 3734660.20 FENCEPRI 2.80 1.20 5 397605.60 3734675.40 FENCEPRI 2.92 1.20 6 397507.90 3734659.90 FENCEPRI 2.13 1.20 7 397511.70 3734622.10 2.21 1.20 8 397638.70 3734602.20 3.03 1.20 9 397653.30 3734572.80 2.74 1.20 10 397645.30 3734585.90 2.92 1.20 11 397555.00 3734657.00 2.44 1.20 12 397604.00 3734583.00 2.74 1.20 Plant Boundary Receptors Cartesian Plant Boundary Primary Record Number X -Coordinate [m] Y -Coordinate [m] Group Name (Optional) Terrain Elevations Flagpole Heights [m] (Optional) 1 397561.00 3734595.00 FENCEPRI 2.44 2 397594.00 3734612.00 FENCEPRI 2.74 3 397581.00 3734647.00 FENCEPRI 2.74 4 397565.00 3734649.00 FENCEPRI 2.61 5 397539.00 3734642.00 FENCEPRI 2.44 6 397538.00 3734616.00 FENCEPRI 2.44 Project File: C:\Users\martinr\Desktop\490PCH HRA\490PCH.isc AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software RE1 - 1 10/5/2018 I_1 :I N LTA s] 11 Receptor Groups Record Number Group ID Group Description 1 FENCEPRI Cartesian plant boundary Primary Receptors 2 FENCEINT Cartesian plant boundary Intermediate Receptors Project File: C:\Users\martinr\Desktop\490PCH HRA\490PCH.isc AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software RE1 -2 10/5/2018 AERMOD Point Sources Volume Sources Base Release Emission Gas Exit Gas Exit Stack Inside Source Source X Coordinate Y Coordinate Elevation Height Rate Temp. Velocity Diameter Type ID [m] Im] (Optional) [m] Ig/s] [K] [m/s] [m] POINT STCK1 397573.00 3734626.00 2.74 3.70 0.00006 289.00 0.01 0.05 19.40 Surface -Based Loading 2.33 Spillage POINT STCK2 397573.00 3734626.00 2.74 3.70 9.40E-6 289.00 0.01 0.05 1.00 0.00013 Breathing Surface -Based 4.51 1.16 Refueling Volume Sources Project File: C:\Users\martinr\Desktop\490PCH HRA\490PCH.isc AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software S01-1 10/5/2018 Base Release Emission Length Building Initial Initial Source Source X Coordinate Y Coordinate Elevation Height Rate of Side Height Lateral Vertical Type ID [m] Iml (Optional) [m] [g/s] [m] [m] Dim. [m] Dim. [m] VOLUME V01_1 397573.00 3734626.00 2.74 0.00 0.00015 19.40 Surface -Based 4.51 2.33 Spillage VOLUME VOL2 397573.00 3734626.00 2.74 1.00 0.00013 19.40 Surface -Based 4.51 1.16 Refueling VOLUME VOL3 397573.00 3734626.00 2.74 1.00 3.54E-6 19.40 Surface -Based 4.51 1.16 Hose Permeation Project File: C:\Users\martinr\Desktop\490PCH HRA\490PCH.isc AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software S01-1 10/5/2018 AERMOD Building Downwash Information Source ID: STCK1 Heights [m] (10 to 360 deg) 10-60 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.49 5.49 70-120 deg 5.49 5.49 5.49 5.49 5.49 0.00 130-180 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 190-240 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250-300 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.49 0.00 310-360 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Widths [m] (10 to 360 deg) 10-60 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 23.65 22.75 70-120 deg 21.52 22.98 23.74 23.78 23.10 0.00 130-180 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 190-240 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250-300 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 23.10 0.00 310-360 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lengths [m] (10 to 360 deg) 10-60 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.03 13.87 70-120 deg 11.04 14.55 17.61 20.14 22.05 0.00 130-180 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 190-240 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250-300 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.05 0.00 310-360 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Along Flow [m] (10 to 360 deg) 10-60 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -29.44 -29.65 70-120 deg -29.34 -31.47 -32.65 -32.83 -32.02 0.00 130-180 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 190-240 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250-300 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.97 0.00 310-360 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Across Flow [m] (10 to 360 deg) 10-60 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.16 8.35 70-120 deg 4.27 0.07 -4.13 -8.21 -12.04 0.00 130-180 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 190-240 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250-300 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.04 0.00 310-360 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 source ID: STCK2 leights [m] (10 to 360 deg) 10-60 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.49 5.49 Project File: C:\Users\martinr\Desktop\490PCH HRA\490PCH.isc AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software S02-1 10/5/2018 AERMOD 70-120 deg 5.49 5.49 5.49 5.49 5.49 0.00 130-180 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 190-240 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250-300 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.49 0.00 310-360 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Widths [m] (10 to 360 deg) 10-60 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 23.65 22.75 70-120 deg 21.52 22.98 23.74 23.78 23.10 0.00 130-180 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 190-240 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250-300 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 23.10 0.00 310-360 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lengths [m] (10 to 360 deg) 10-60 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.03 13.87 70-120 deg 11.04 14.55 17.61 20.14 22.05 0.00 130-180 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 190-240 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250-300 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.05 0.00 310-360 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Along Flow [m] (10 to 360 deg) 10-60 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -29.44 -29.65 70-120 deg -29.34 -31.47 -32.65 -32.83 -32.02 0.00 130-180 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 190-240 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250-300 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.97 0.00 310-360 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Across Flow [m] (10 to 360 deg) 10-60 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.16 8.35 70-120 deg 4.27 0.07 -4.13 -8.21 -12.04 0.00 130-180 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 190-240 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250-300 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.04 0.00 310-360 deg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Emission Rate Units for Output For Concentration Unit Factor: 1E6 Emission Unit Label: GRAMS/SEC Concentration Unit Label: MICROGRAMS/M'*3 Project File: C:\Users\martinr\Desktop\490PCH HRA\490PCH.isc AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software S02-2 10/5/2018 /_1=I:]J9Is] 11 Variable Emissions Hourly Emission Rate Variation Scenario: Scenario 2 Source ID: 1 to 6 7 to 12 13 to 18 19 to 24 Source ID: STCK1 STCK2 0.48 1.37 1.37 1.37 0.48 1.37 1.37 1.37 0.48 1.37 1.37 0.48 0.48 1.37 1.37 0.48 0.48 1.37 1.37 0.48 0.48 1.37 1.37 0.48 1 to 6 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 7 to 12 1.37 1.37 1.37 1.37 1.37 1.37 13 to 18 1.37 1.37 1.37 1.37 1.37 1.37 19 to 24 1.37 1.37 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 Source ID: VOL1 1 to 6 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 7 to 12 1.37 1.37 1.37 1.37 1.37 1.37 13 to 18 1.37 1.37 1.37 1.37 1.37 1.37 19 to 24 1.37 1.37 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 Source ID: VOL2 1 to 6 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 7 to 12 1.37 1.37 1.37 1.37 1.37 1.37 13 to 18 1.37 1.37 1.37 1.37 1.37 1.37 19 to 24 1.37 1.37 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 Project File: C:\Users\martinr\Desktop\490PCH HRA\490PCH.isc AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software S02-3 10/5/2018 C:\Users\martinr\Desktop\490PCH\490PCH. isc BENZENE - Concentration - Source Group: ALL Averaging Period Rank Peak Units X (m) Y ZELEV ZFLAG (m) (m) (m) 3734603.50 2.50 1.20 ZHILL (m) Peak Date, Start Hour 1 -HR 1ST 5.03553 ug/m^3 397580.50 2.50 10/3/2013, 7 8 -HR 1ST 1.98525 ug/m^3 397581.00 3734647.00 2.74 1.20 2.74 2/5/2013, 24 PERIOD 0.45917 ug/m^3 397594.00 3734612.00 2.74 1.20 2.74 Project File: C:\Users\martinr\Desktop\490PCH HRA\490PCH.isc AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software RS - 1 of 1 10/5/2018 C:\Users\martinr\Desktop\490PCH\49OPCH.isc BENZENE - Concentration - Source Group: ALL Averaging Period Rank Peak Units Receptor ID X (m) Y (m) ZELEV (m) ZFLAG (m) ZHILL (m) Peak Date, Start Hour 1 -HR 1ST 1.88851 ug/m^3 424GaIW 397532.30 3734599.10 2.23 1.20 2.23 9/19/2013, 7 1 -HR 1ST 1.56605 ug/m^3 43OCoaD 397623.20 3734629.60 2.92 1.20 2.92 10/27/2016, 7 1 -HR 1ST 1.71515 ug/m^3 42OCoaD 397616.50 3734644.60 2.96 1.20 2.96 10/8/2013, 20 1 -HR 1ST 1.56212 ug/m^3 41OCoaD 397611.00 3734660.20 2.80 1.20 2.80 1/22/2013,17 1 -HR 1ST 1.25813 ug/m^3 40OCoaD 397605.60 3734675.40 2.92 1.20 2.92 1/30/2013,17 1 -HR 1ST 1.04251 ug/m"3 434SchW 397507.90 3734659.90 2.13 1.20 2.13 11/3/2014,19 1 -HR 1ST 1.39319 ug/m^3 425GaIW 397511.70 3734622.10 2.21 1.20 2.21 9/25/2014, 7 1 -HR 1ST 1.33725 ug/m^3 5OOCoaD 397638.70 3734602.20 3.03 1.20 3.03 1/18/2014,20 1 -HR 1ST 0.74800 ug/m^3 52OCoaD 397653.30 3734572.80 2.74 1.20 2.74 9/27/2016, 7 1 -HR 1ST 0.98559 ug/m"3 51OCoaD 397645.30 3734585.90 2.92 1.20 2.92 4/14/2016, 20 8 -HR 1ST 0.73834 ug/m^3 424GaIW 397532.30 3734599.10 2.23 1.20 2.23 12/16/2012, 24 8 -HR 1ST 0.63163 ug/m"3 43OCoaD 397623.20 3734629.60 2.92 1.20 2.92 11/8/2012,24 8 -HR 8 -HR 1ST 0.67407 Ug/m^3 420CoaD 397616.50 397611.00 3734644.60 2.96 2.80 1.20 1.20 2.96 2.80 3/5/2013, 24 9/20/2016, 24 1ST 0.48430 ug/m^3 410CoaD 3734660.20 8 -HR 1ST 0.59460 ug/m^3 4OOCoaD 397605.60 3734675.40 2.92 1.20 2.92 2/5/2013, 24 8 -HR 1ST 0.31603 Ug/m^3 434SchW 397507.90 3734659.90 2.13 1.20 2.13 1/20/2016, 8 8 -HR 1ST 0.46497 ug/m^3 425GaIW 397511.70 3734622.10 2.21 1.20 2.21 12/11/2014, 8 8 -HR 1ST 0.43925 ug/m^3 50OCoaD 397638.70 3734602.20 3.03 1.20 3.03 2/15/2013, 24 8 -HR 1ST 0.35461 ug/m^3 52OCoaD 397653.30 3734572.80 2.74 1.20 2.74 2/15/2014, 24 8 -HR 1ST 0.41417 ug/m^3 51OCoaD 397645.30 3734585.90 2.92 1.20 2.92 1/5/2014, 24 Project File: C:\Users\martinr\Desktop\490PCH HRA\490PCH.isc AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software RS - 1 of 3 10/5/2018 C:\Users\martinr\Desktop\490PCH\490PCH. isc BENZENE - Concentration - Source Group: ALL Averaging Period Rank Peak Units Receptor ID X (m) Y (m) ZELEV (m) ZFLAG (m) ZHILL (m) Peak Date, Start Hour PERIOD 0.06001 ug/m"3 424GaIW 397532.30 3734599.10 2.23 1.20 2.23 PERIOD 0.06218 ug/m^3 430CoaD 397623.20 3734629.60 2.92 1.20 2.92 PERIOD 0.05652 ug/m"3 420CoaD 397616.50 3734644.60 2.96 1.20 2.96 PERIOD 0.05479 ug/m^3 410CoaD 397611.00 3734660.20 2.80 1.20 2.80 PERIOD 0.05176 ug/m^3 400CoaD 397605.60 3734675.40 2.92 1.20 2.92 PERIOD 0.03335 ug/m^3 434SchW 397507.90 3734659.90 2.13 1.20 2.13 PERIOD 0.04604 ug/m^3 425GaIW 397511.70 3734622.10 2.21 1.20 2.21 PERIOD 0.07460 ug/m^3 500CoaD 397638.70 3734602.20 3.03 1.20 3.03 PERIOD 0.05918 ug/m^3 520CoaD 397653.30 3734572.80 2.74 1.20 2.74 PERIOD 0.07162 ug/m^3 510CoaD 397645.30 3734585.90 2.92 1.20 2.92 PERIOD 5.72580 424GaIW 397532.30 3734599.10 -99.00 -99.00 -99.00 PERIOD 5.93290 430CoaD 397623.20 3734629.60 -99.00 -99.00 -99.00 PERIOD 5.39280 420CoaD 397616.50 3734644.60 -99.00 -99.00 -99.00 PERIOD 5.22780 410CoaD 397611.00 3734660.20 -99.00 -99.00 -99.00 PERIOD PERIOD 4.93860 3.18210 400CoaD 434SchW 397605.60 397507.90 3734675.40 -99.00 -99.00 -99.00 -99.00 -99.00 3734659.90 -99.00 PERIOD 4.39290 425GaIW 397511.70 3734622.10 -99.00 -99.00 -99.00 PERIOD 7.11790 500CoaD 397638.70 3734602.20 -99.00 -99.00 -99.00 PERIOD 5.64660 520CoaD 397653.30 3734572.80 -99.00 -99.00 -99.00 PERIOD 6.83360 510CoaD 397645.30 3734585.90 -99.00 -99.00 -99.00 PERIOD 4.82400 424GaIW 397532.30 3734599.10 -99.00 -99.00 -99.00 Project File: C:\Users\martinr\Desktop\490PCH HRA\490PCH.isc AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software RS - 2 of 3 10/5/2018 C:\Users\martinr\Desktop\490PCH\490PCH. isc BENZENE - Concentration - Source Group: ALL Averaging Period Rank Peak Units Receptor ID X (m) Y (m) ZELEV (m) ZFLAG (m) ZHILL (m) Peak Date, Start Hour PERIOD 4.99850 430CoaD 397623.20 3734629.60 -99.00 -99.00 -99.00 PERIOD 4.54350 420CoaD 397616.50 3734644.60 -99.00 -99.00 -99.00 PERIOD 4.40440 410CoaD 397611.00 3734660.20 -99.00 -99.00 -99.00 PERIOD 4.16080 400CoaD 397605.60 3734675.40 -99.00 -99.00 -99.00 PERIOD 2.68090 434SchW 397507.90 3734659.90 -99.00 -99.00 -99.00 PERIOD 3.70100 425GaIW 397511.70 3734622.10 -99.00 -99.00 -99.00 PERIOD 5.99690 500CoaD 397638.70 3734602.20 -99.00 -99.00 -99.00 PERIOD 4.75730 520CoaD 397653.30 3734572.80 -99.00 -99.00 -99.00 PERIOD 5.75730 510CoaD 397645.30 3734585.90 -99.00 -99.00 -99.00 PERIOD 0.33763 424GaIW 397532.30 3734599.10 -99.00 -99.00 -99.00 PERIOD 0.34984 430CoaD 397623.20 3734629.60 -99.00 -99.00 -99.00 PERIOD 0.31799 420CoaD 397616.50 3734644.60 -99.00 -99.00 -99.00 PERIOD 0.30826 410CoaD 397611.00 3734660.20 -99.00 -99.00 -99.00 PERIOD 0.29121 400CoaD 397605.60 3734675.40 -99.00 -99.00 -99.00 PERIOD PERIOD 0.18763 0.25903 434SchW 425GaIW 397507.90 397511.70 3734659.90 -99.00 -99.00 -99.00 -99.00 -99.00 3734622.10 -99.00 PERIOD 0.41972 500CoaD 397638.70 3734602.20 -99.00 -99.00 -99.00 PERIOD 0.33296 520CoaD 397653.30 3734572.80 -99.00 -99.00 -99.00 PERIOD 0.40295 510CoaD 397645.30 3734585.90 -99.00 -99.00 -99.00 Project File: C:\Users\martinr\Desktop\490PCH HRA\490PCH.isc AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software RS - 3 of 3 10/5/2018 ProjectSummaryReport HARP Project Summary Report 10/5/2018 1:42:28 PM ***PROJECT INFORMATION*** HARP Version: 18159 Project Name: 490PCH Project Output Directory: C:\Users\martinr\Desktop\490PCH HRA\490PCH ADMRT HARP Database: NA ***FACILITY INFORMATION*** Origin X (m):397573 Y (m):3734626 Zone:11 No. of Sources:0 No. of Buildings:0 ***EMISSION INVENTORY*** No. of Pollutants:0 No. of Background Pollutants:0 Emissions ScrID StkID ProID PolID PolAbbrev Multi Annual Ems MaxHr Ems MWAF (lbs/yr) (lbs/hr) Background PolID PolAbbrev Conc (ug/m^3) MWAF Ground level concentration files (\glc\) ***POLLUTANT HEALTH INFORMATION*** Health Database: C:\HARP2\Tables\HEALTH17320.mdb Health Table Version: HEALTH18232 Official: True PolID PolAbbrev InhCancer OralCancer AcuteREL InhChronicREL OralChronicREL InhChronic8HRREL 71432 Benzene 0.1 3 ***LIST OF RISK ASSESSMENT FILES*** Page 1 27 3 ProjectSummaryReport Health risk analysis files (\hra\) Pop CancerCancerRisk.csv Pop CancerCancerRiskSumByRec.csv Pop CancerGLCList.csv Pop CancerHRAInput.hra Pop CancerOutput.txt Pop CancerPathwayRec.csv Pop CancerPolDB.csv ProjectSummaryReport.txt Residential Cancer Risk.plt Residential CancerCancerRisk.csv Residential CancerCancerRiskSumByRec.csv Residential CancerGLCList.csv Residential CancerHRAInput.hra Residential CancerOutput.txt Residential CancerPathwayRec.csv Residential CancerPolDB.csv Worker Cancer Risk.plt Worker CancerCancerRisk.csv Worker CancerCancerRiskSumByRec.csv Worker CancerGLCList.csv Worker CancerHRAInput.hra Worker CancerOutput.txt Worker CancerPathwayRec.csv Worker CancerPolDB.csv Spatial averaging files (\sa\) Page 2 Residential Cancer0utput HARP2 - HRACalc (dated 17023) 10/5/2018 1:31:42 PM - Output Log GLCs loaded successfully Pollutants loaded successfully Pathway receptors set to 0 ********************************** RISK SCENARIO SETTINGS Receptor Type: Resident Scenario: Cancer Calculation Method: Derived ********************************** EXPOSURE DURATION PARAMETERS FOR CANCER Start Age: -0.25 Total Exposure Duration: 30 Exposure Duration Bin Distribution 3rd Trimester Bin: 0.25 0<2 Years Bin: 2 2<9 Years Bin: 0 2<16 Years Bin: 14 16<30 Years Bin: 14 16 to 70 Years Bin: 0 ********************************** PATHWAYS ENABLED NOTE: Inhalation is always enabled and used for all assessments. The remaining pathways are only used for cancer and noncancer chronic assessments. Inhalation: True Soil: False Dermal: False Mother's milk: False Water: False Fish: False Homegrown crops: False Beef: False Dairy: False Pig: False Chicken: False Egg: False ********************************** INHALATION Page 1 Residential CancerOutput Daily breathing rate: LongTerm24HR **Worker Adjustment Factors** Worker adjustment factors enabled: NO **Fraction at time at home** 3rd Trimester to 16 years: OFF 16 years to 70 years: OFF ********************************** TIER 2 SETTINGS Tier2 not used. ********************************** Calculating cancer risk Cancer risk breakdown by pollutant and receptor saved to: C:\Users\martinr\Desktop\490PCH HRA\490PCH ADMRT\hra\Residential CancerCancerRisk.csv Cancer risk total by receptor saved to: C:\Users\martinr\Desktop\490PCH HRA\490PCH ADMRT\hra\Residential CancerCancerRiskSumByRec.csv HRA ran successfully Page 2 *HARP - HRACalc v17023 10/5/2018 1:31:42 PM - Cancer Risk - Input File: C:\Users\martinr\Desktop\490PCH HRA\490PCH ADM RT\hra\Residential CancerHRAlnput.hra REC GRP NETID X Y RISK—SUM SCENARIO 1601 ALL 397532.3 3734599 4.82E-06 30YrCancerDerived Inh 1602 ALL 397623.2 3734630 5.00E-06 30YrCancerDerived Inh 1603 ALL 397616.5 3734645 4.54E-06 30YrCancerDerived Inh 1604 ALL 397611 3734660 4.40E-06 30YrCancerDerived Inh 1605 ALL 397605.6 3734675 4.16E-06 30YrCancerDerived Inh 1606 ALL 397507.9 3734660 2.68E-06 30YrCancerDerived Inh 1607 ALL 397511.7 3734622 3.70E-06 30YrCancerDerived Inh 1608 ALL 397638.7 3734602 6.00E-06 30YrCancerDerived Inh 1609 ALL 397653.3 3734573 4.76E-06 30YrCancerDerived Inh 1610 ALL 397645.3 3734586 5.76E-06 30YrCancerDerived Inh PROJECT TITLE: 490 PCH Shell Station Residential Cancer Risk Isopleths C ,..` C> C LO .. r� A � r7 F o C rn M A M . o �• � �. M A C C3 .r' � M 44a ,.• C> . a E .� M ' k . C> IF r y 397200 397300 397400 397500 397600 397700 397800 397900 398400 UTM East [m] PLOT FILE OF PERIOD VALUES FOR SOURCE GROUP: ALL 1.0 2.0 5-0 10.0 15.0 COMMENTS: SOURCES: COMPANY NAME: Increased residential cancer risk 5 HELIX Environmenal Planning isopleths shown in chances per 1 RECEPTORS: million. 1618 SCALE: 1:6,292 OUTPUT TYPE: Risk 0 0.2 km MAX: DATE: PROJECT NO.: 10/5/2018 ASE -06 AERMOD View - Lakes Environmental Software Worker Cancer0utput HARP2 - HRACalc (dated 17023) 10/5/2018 1:34:17 PM - Output Log GLCs loaded successfully Pollutants loaded successfully Pathway receptors set to 0 ********************************** RISK SCENARIO SETTINGS Receptor Type: Worker Scenario: Cancer Calculation Method: Derived ********************************** EXPOSURE DURATION PARAMETERS FOR CANCER Start Age: 16 Total Exposure Duration: 25 Exposure Duration Bin Distribution 3rd Trimester Bin: 0 0<2 Years Bin: 0 2<9 Years Bin: 0 2<16 Years Bin: 0 16<30 Years Bin: 0 16 to 70 Years Bin: 25 ********************************** PATHWAYS ENABLED NOTE: Inhalation is always enabled and used for all assessments. The remaining pathways are only used for cancer and noncancer chronic assessments. Inhalation: True Soil: True Dermal: True Mother's milk: False Water: False Fish: False Homegrown crops: False Beef: False Dairy: False Pig: False Chicken: False Egg: False ********************************** INHALATION Page 1 Worker CancerOutput Daily breathing rate: Moderate8HR **Worker Adjustment Factors** Worker adjustment factors enabled: NO **Fraction at time at home** 3rd Trimester to 16 years: OFF 16 years to 70 years: OFF ********************************** SOIL & DERMAL PATHWAY SETTINGS Deposition rate (m/s): 0.05 Soil mixing depth (m): 0.01 Dermal climate: Mixed ********************************** TIER 2 SETTINGS Tier2 not used. ********************************** Calculating cancer risk Cancer risk breakdown by pollutant and receptor saved to: C:\Users\martinr\Desktop\490PCH HRA\490PCH ADMRT\hra\Worker CancerCancerRisk.csv Cancer risk total by receptor saved to: C:\Users\martinr\Desktop\490PCH HRA\490PCH ADMRT\hra\Worker CancerCancerRiskSumByRec.csv HRA ran successfully Page 2 *HARP - HRACalc v17023 10/5/2018 1:34:17 PM - Cancer Risk - Input File: C:\Users\martinr\Desktop\490PCH HRA\490PCH ADMRT\hra\Worker CancerHRAlnput.hra REC GRP 1617 ALL 1618 ALL NETID X Y RISK—SUM SCENARIO 397539 3734642 6.13E-07 25YrCancerDerived InhSoilDerm 397538 3734616 6.42E-07 25YrCancerDerived InhSoilDerm PROJECT TITLE: 490 PCH Shell Station Off -Site Worker Cancer Risk Isopleths 0 0 0 LO n r� 0 rn M . m 0 0 c A: M J' 4 — C t• �✓ M1 � M t� mF 2 C3 M M - C3 AERMOD View - Lakes Environmental Software • � 3 P Y yg,�� � �� M o F ' � •_ r � r 397200 397300 397400 397500 397600 397700 397800 397900 398000 UTM East [m] PLOT FILE OF PERIOD VALUES FOR SOURCE GROUP: ALL UgJMA� 0.10 0.40 0.70 1.00 COMMENTS: SOURCES: COMPANY NAME: Increased worker cancer risk 5 HELIX Environmenal Planning isopleths shown in chances per 1 RECEPTORS: million. 1618 SCALE: 1:6,292 OUTPUT TYPE: Risk 0 0.2 km MAX: DATE: PROJECT NO.: 10/5/2018 ASE -06 AERMOD View - Lakes Environmental Software Pop Cancer0utput HARP2 - HRACalc (dated 17023) 10/5/2018 1:38:36 PM - Output Log GLCs loaded successfully Pollutants loaded successfully Pathway receptors set to 0 ********************************** RISK SCENARIO SETTINGS Receptor Type: Population Scenario: Cancer Calculation Method: Derived ********************************** EXPOSURE DURATION PARAMETERS FOR CANCER Start Age: -0.25 Total Exposure Duration: 70 Exposure Duration Bin Distribution 3rd Trimester Bin: 0.25 0<2 Years Bin: 2 2<9 Years Bin: 0 2<16 Years Bin: 14 16<30 Years Bin: 0 16 to 70 Years Bin: 54 ********************************** PATHWAYS ENABLED NOTE: Inhalation is always enabled and used for all assessments. The remaining pathways are only used for cancer and noncancer chronic assessments. Inhalation: True Soil: False Dermal: False Mother's milk: False Water: False Fish: False Homegrown crops: False Beef: False Dairy: False Pig: False Chicken: False Egg: False ********************************** INHALATION Page 1 Pop CancerOutput Daily breathing rate: LongTerm24HR **Worker Adjustment Factors** Worker adjustment factors enabled: NO **Fraction at time at home** 3rd Trimester to 16 years: OFF 16 years to 70 years: OFF ********************************** TIER 2 SETTINGS Tier2 not used. ********************************** Calculating cancer risk Cancer risk breakdown by pollutant and receptor saved to: C:\Users\martinr\Desktop\490PCH HRA\490PCH ADMRT\hra\Pop CancerCancerRisk.csv Cancer risk total by receptor saved to: C:\Users\martinr\Desktop\490PCH HRA\490PCH ADMRT\hra\Pop CancerCancerRiskSumByRec.csv HRA ran successfully Page 2 *HARP - HRACalc v17023 10/5/2018 1:38:36 PM - Cancer Risk - Input File: C:\Users\martinr\Desktop\490PCH HRA\490PCH ADMRT\hra\Pop CancerHRAlnput.hra REC GRP NETID X Y RISK—SUM SCENARIO 1601 ALL 397532.3 3734599 5.73E-06 70YrCancerDerived Inh 1602 ALL 397623.2 3734630 5.93E-06 70YrCancerDerived Inh 1603 ALL 397616.5 3734645 5.39E-06 70YrCancerDerived Inh 1604 ALL 397611 3734660 5.23E-06 70YrCancerDerived Inh 1605 ALL 397605.6 3734675 4.94E-06 70YrCancerDerived Inh 1606 ALL 397507.9 3734660 3.18E-06 70YrCancerDerived Inh 1607 ALL 397511.7 3734622 4.39E-06 70YrCancerDerived Inh 1608 ALL 397638.7 3734602 7.12E-06 70YrCancerDerived Inh 1609 ALL 397653.3 3734573 5.65E-06 70YrCancerDerived Inh 1610 ALL 397645.3 3734586 6.83E-06 70YrCancerDerived Inh PROJECT TITLE: 490 PCH Shell Station Population Cancer Risk Isopleths C 0 C LO n r� 0 C rn M n M 0 c 7 M A M P C> C M� M1 � M Z a O M M it] U 1 C7 4 4 � C> 5 M ? � 'k . C> Cl) 397200 397300 397400 397500 397600 397700 397800 397900 398000 UTM East [m] PLOT FILE OF PERIOD VALUES FOR SOURCE GROUP: ALL 1.0 50.0 COMMENTS: SOURCES: COMPANYNAME: Increased population cancer risk 5 HELIX Environmenal Planning isopleths shown in chances per 1 RECEPTORS: million. 1618 SCALE: 1:6,292 OUTPUT TYPE: Risk 0 0.2 km MAX: DATE: PROJECT NO.: 10/5/2018 ASE -06 AERMOD View - Lakes Environmental Software Appendix C Cultural Resources Survey HELIX Environmental Planning 490 Pacific Coast Highway Mary bins -Wade Director of Cultural Resources Project Cultural Resources Survey October 2018 1 ASE -06 Submitted to: City of Seal Beach 211 Eighth Street Seal Beach, CA 90740 Prepared for. A&S Engineering, Inc. 28405 Sand Canyon Road, Suite "B" Canyon County, CA 91387 Prepared by: HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. 7578 EI Cajon Boulevard La Mesa, CA 91942 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project Cultural Resources Survey Submitted to: City of Seal Beach 211 Eighth Street Seal Beach, CA 90740 Prepared for: A&S Engineering, Inc. 28405 Sand Canyon Road, Suite "B" Canyon County, CA 91387 Prepared by: HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. 7578 EI Cajon Boulevard La Mesa, CA 91942 October 2018 1 ASE -06 National Archaeological Database Information Authors: Mary Robbins -Wade, M.A., RPA, and Dominique Diaz de Leon, B.A. Firm: HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. Client/Project: A&S Engineering, Inc. 28405 Sand Canyon Road, Suite "B", Canyon County, CA 91387/ 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project Report Date: October 2018 Report Title: Cultural Resources Survey for the 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project, Seal Beach, Orange County, California Submitted to: City of Seal Beach, 211 Eighth Street, Seal Beach, CA 90740 Type of Study: Cultural resources survey New Sites: None Updated Sites: None USGS Quad: Seal Beach 7.5 -minute quadrangle Acreage: <1 acre Key Words: Orange County, Seal Beach, coastal; negative cultural resources survey; culturally sensitive area; Assessor Parcel Number 043-301-02; Township 5 South, Range 12 West, unsectioned This page intentionally left blank TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................................. ES -1 1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Project Location..................................................................................................................1 1.2 Project Description.............................................................................................................1 1.3 Regulatory Framework.......................................................................................................1 1.3.1 National Historic Preservation Act(NHPA)............................................................2 1.3.2 California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)........................................................2 1.3.3 City of Seal Beach...................................................................................................3 1.3.4 Native American Heritage Values..........................................................................4 1.4 Project Personnel................................................................................................................4 2.0 PROJECT SETTING.............................................................................................................................5 2.1 Natural Setting....................................................................................................................5 2.2 Cultural Setting...................................................................................................................5 2.2.1 Prehistoric Period..................................................................................................5 2.2.2 Ethnohistory...........................................................................................................7 2.2.3 Historical Background............................................................................................8 2.2.4 Project Vicinity.....................................................................................................11 3.0 ARCHIVAL RESEARCH AND NATIVE AMERICAN CONTACT PROGRAM...........................................12 3.1 Records Search..................................................................................................................12 3.1.1 Previous Surveys..................................................................................................12 3.1.2 Previously Recorded Resources...........................................................................18 3.2 Other Archival Research...................................................................................................21 3.3 Native American Contact Program...................................................................................22 4.0 SURVEY METHODS AND RESULTS..................................................................................................22 5.0 SUMMARY OF EFFECTS AND MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS............................................25 6.0 REFERENCES...................................................................................................................................27 LIST OF APPENDICES A Resumes B Records Search Results (Confidential, bound separately) C Native American Correspondence (Confidential, bound separately) TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont. LIST OF FIGURES No. Title Follows Page 1 Regional Location.............................................................................................................................2 2 USGS Topography............................................................................................................................ 2 3 Aerial Photograph............................................................................................................................ 2 4 Site Plan........................................................................................................................................... 2 LIST OF PLATES No. Title Follows Page 1 Overview of project site, showing gravel and rock on surface ...................................................... 23 2 Overview of project site, showing existing monitoring well.......................................................... 24 3 Close view of existing soils and the observed shell....................................................................... 24 LIST OF TABLES No. Title Page 1 Previous Studies within One Mile of The Project Area..................................................................13 2 Previously Recorded Resources within One Mile of Project Area .................................................19 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AB Assembly Bill CCR California Code of Regulations CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CHRIS California Historical Resources Information System CFR Code of Federal Regulations CRHR California Register of Historical Resources CRM Cultural Resources Management HELIX HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. NAHC Native American Heritage Commission NHPA National Historic Preservation Act NRHP National Register of Historic Places OHP Office of Historic Preservation PRC Public Resources Code SLF Sacred Lands File SCCIC South Central Coastal Information Center TCP Traditional Cultural Properties TCR Tribal Cultural Resources USGS U.S. Geological Survey This page intentionally left blank iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. (HELIX) was contracted to provide cultural resources services for the 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project (project) in the City of Seal Beach (City), in northwestern Orange County, California. The project consists of development of the currently vacant lot with a 16 -pump gas station and a 2,400 square -foot convenience store. A cultural resources study including a records search and literature review, Sacred Lands File search, Native American outreach, a review of historic aerial photographs and maps, and a pedestrian survey was conducted for the project. This report details the methods and results of the cultural resources study and has been prepared to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). The records search conducted at the South -Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) on August 29, 2018 indicated that 65 previous cultural resources studies have been conducted within a mile of the project area. Two of these are mapped as including the project site, but one did not include field survey, and it is unclear as to whether the other surveyed the project site, which was already developed by that time. The records search results also indicated that a total of 21 cultural resources have been previously recorded within a mile of the project area, two of which (CA -ORA -001473 and P-30-162293) are located within a quarter mile of the project site. These consist of a prehistoric shell deposit (CA -ORA -001473) and the historic Seal Beach Red Car, No. 1734 (P-30-162293). Although only one prehistoric resource is recorded within a quarter mile, the general area is rich in terms of cultural resources, and the Native American Heritage Commission noted that cultural resources on the Sacred Land File are known in the area. A pedestrian survey of the project site was conducted in September 2018 by the HELIX field director and a tribal monitor from the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians, Kizh Nation. The ground surface of the survey area was covered with pea gravel and rock, obscuring the ground surface, but marine shell was found in soils that might have been brought to the surface during fencing or post placement; these soils did not appear to be fill. As previously noted, the project area was formerly developed as a gas station, including underground tanks, and large amounts of soil were removed, due to soil contamination. Thus, the project site has been the subject of a great deal of past subsurface disturbance, and intact cultural deposits are considered unlikely. Although the potential for intact subsurface deposits within the project site is low, given the degree of past disturbance, the general area is culturally sensitive, with habitation sites and human burials known in the vicinity. Based on this, it is recommended that ground -disturbing activity for the project be monitored by a qualified archaeologist and Native American monitors from both the Gabrielino (Gabrieleno) and Juaneno tribes. If cultural material is encountered during monitoring, both the archaeologist and the Native American monitors would have the authority to temporarily halt or redirect activity in the area of the find while the cultural material is documented, and a decision is made regarding the significance/eligibility of the find and whether additional excavation, analysis, or other mitigation measures are required. Determinations of significance will be made in consultation among the archaeological Principal Investigator, Native American monitors, and City staff. In addition, should the project limits change to incorporate new areas of proposed disturbance, a cultural resources survey of these areas will be required. HELIX Environmental Planning ES -1 This page intentionally left blank HELIX Environmental Planning ES -2 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project I October 2018 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PROJECT LOCATION The 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project (project) is located in the City of Seal Beach (City) in far northwestern Orange County, California (Figure 1, Regional Location). The project is located immediately west of California State Route 1 (SR-1)/Pacific Coast Highway, a short distance south of the San Gabriel River and the Los Angeles County line, west of Seal Beach Boulevard and north of San Pedro Bay. The project site is bordered by SR-1/Pacific Coast Highway on the east and 5t" Street on the south (Figures 2 and 3, USGS Topography and Aerial Photograph, respectively). The project parcel, Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) 043-301-02, is located in an unsectioned portion of Township 5 South, Range 12 West on the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Seal Beach, CA 7.5 -minute quadrangle (Figure 2). 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project proposes to develop a vacant lot with a 16 -pump gas station and a 2,400 square -foot convenience store (Figure 4, Site Plan). The project site was previously a gas station that was demolished in 2011, and gravel was placed over the vacant lot with an environmental cleanup area. The environmental cleanup area has operating groundwater and soil vapor recovery systems for previously released gasoline into the soil from the former gas station and would remain on site with one monitoring well relocated. A 4,052 -square foot steel canopy would be installed above the gas pumps. The project would have 19,797 square feet of paved areas with 13 parking spaces. Ingress and egress to the site would be provided via four unsignalized driveways: two driveways along Pacific Coast Highway and two driveways along 5t" Street. In addition, underground storage fuel tanks would be installed in the southern portion of the project site. The ongoing environmental cleanup measures have included removal of contaminated soils. During 2016, a total of 5,881 tons of soil was excavated from the project site and disposed of at State -licensed facilities (Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. 2018). Other episodes of soil removal occurred in 2004 and 2011/2012 and covered the vast majority of the project site (Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. 2018:Figure 2). Fill soils were used to restore the project site to its original topography. HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. (HELIX) conducted a cultural resources survey that included a records search and literature review, a Sacred Lands File search, a field survey by a HELIX archaeologist and a Native American monitor from the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians, Kizh Nation, as well as tribal outreach and completion of this report. 1.3 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK Cultural resources are defined as buildings, sites, structures, or objects, each of which may have historical, architectural, archaeological, cultural, and/or scientific importance. Significant resources are those resources that have been found eligible to the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) or National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), as applicable. HELIX Environmental Planning 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project I October 2018 1.3.1 National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) Federal regulations that would be applicable to the project if there is a federal nexus, such as funding or permits from a federal agency, consist of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and its implementing regulations (16 United States Code 470 et seq., 36 CFR Part 800). Section 106 of the NHPA requires Federal agencies to take into account the effects of their undertakings on "historic properties", that is, properties (either historic or archaeological) that are eligible for the NRHP. To be eligible for the NRHP, a historic property must be significant at the local, state, or national level under one or more of the following four criteria: A. Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; B. Associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; C. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; and/or D. Has yielded or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. 1.3.2 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code (PRC) 21084.1 and CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 14 Section 15064.5 discuss significant cultural resources as "historical resources" and define them as: • Resource(s) listed or determined eligible by the State Historical Resources Commission for listing in the CRHR (14 CCR Section 15064.5[a][1]) • Resource(s) either listed in the NRHP or in a "local register of historical resources" or identified as significant in a historical resource survey meeting the requirements of Section 5024.1(8) of the PRC, unless "the preponderance of evidence demonstrates that it is not historically or culturally significant" (14 CCR Section 15064.5[a][2]) Resources determined by the Lead Agency to meet the criteria for listing on the CRHR (14 CCR Section 15064.5[a][3]) For listing in the CRHR, a historical resource must be significant at the local, state, or national level under one or more of the following four criteria: A. It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history, or the cultural heritage of California or the United States; B. It is associated with the lives of persons important to local, California, or national history; C. It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master or possesses high artistic values; HELIX Environmental Planning Shell 490 PCH HELIX Regional Location Environmental Planning Figure 1 Shell 490 PCH •• ��- .. � • AilDSia s, • ,' i o� = Powrrplan t i y Radia T_ - I • U --�- 0 POW .�.�..a—_ o F Q� •7 M 'rls - �!;. mak,. _ 2'' , • 'L+a c W€$IMlgyST€R irk O I*�' 4 ►�'��+�t'dF_=- 'y AVE diii r jq t0S AFsmrtos r 0 R Larding Basi J 4 2i •�rr 40 v n a till Rv'� 'ti `� ���_ � � rs� �t A3w3 f 4- .°° � —a -=ate .-- - v � ■ `� {I a Alrrrrrito5 12 Bad dir�g.. ^Hili LONG BEA Imo. _ Yy . •' _� . r.4` o��4T1fn to '�. err` >A ■'� Lights o SEAL BEACH H of � l ' e14 r r `••`Ugh yUsh 5urf�itle •�ti r i 0 2,000 Feet HELIX Environmental Planning Source: Seal Beach 7.5' Quad (USGS) USGS Topography Figure 2 Shell 490 PCH 0 200 Feet Source: Aerial (Nearmap, 2018) HELIX Aerial Photograph Environmental Planning Figure 3 � N S r \ o J I \-E—ING K' yet 20 0 20 40 PARCEL 2 euaDIIC� rc 0.846 ACRES AG PAEAI 3 WONS GRAPHIC SCALE CONCRETE PAVEMENT E)GE OF AC. P-Me. `aC. PAYiWEm� O \436Oi5�A 217 E \ ELEcmICAL 1U_ N-4 O 0 17 TYP. Y 1s 13 yoc' TYR. 6 12 11 TTP -N-MNK ENCLOSURE En:CTR 1fi M / \\U. coxcMETE suT w P.v.c. Iasm . �� / °. m \\ cuv RISERS. m EDGE OF °f 0.CV PAVEIENT l O WANR \\ �.�. tt°f\• GM1y \ wAGTE WxGISTE PAvsMENT ca+cxETE PANRATEm ,: "a „ O 12 \\ 6 I® 2E a O \\\ \\ PARCEL 1\, W ry \ ® v a NANZ TO TYP. 6 FD, MON. CENTERLINE O. 455 S.F. INTERSECTION AT PACIFlC �� L�4c �\6 6 Op 1� � .O6A COAST HWY. & 5Hi ST. l a e5o � q0�3 SCOPE OF WORK (D CONSTRUCT N:w 2.45e son rano MART ,a,QP elAb3p6L �.l O CMSIAUCT IEw U. %FT CPN[PY Mr. 6 MPDS NEW AC. PANINC. L2AN. �A tV/w oa NEW WDEIMAaxO TANN. NEW GNOPY-111. NEW PUNIER. p`C" p i OOQ D 5p i0 E Q\0 0 NEW WNCRETE PAMNO V, $ 80 Q NEW 6' FLATTER tl1AB. NEW MONUMENT SW. NEW SHELL IOW. NEW E' CONCRETE HIED WAIIO POST (rn_ Gr 24) NEW AR/WATER UNIT 1© FHSNG NOW 1TOPoNO WELL TO fSNAN k E) / / PROLE RE, RELOCATE ENIrnxG MONITORING WELL / 105 NEW TRAM LNCLOSURE PIX CITY REQUIREMENTS DRSNG ENWAONMEN1Al AREA TO REMAIN PROPOSE) YARD LII A' IB CAHAS DIRECT -AL ACCESS r0 TIE WMP IINOs Ano wE vERla6s AT I Wxrs. / A Y / 19 INSTALL NEW ENCLOSURE PER SHEET TE2 ® RFLOCARO ORINE— HELIX Environmental PlanI Source: A & S Engineering, 2018 Site Plan Figure 4 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project I October 2018 D. It has yielded or has the potential to yield information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California, or the nation. Under 14 CCR Section 15064.5(a)(4), a resource may also be considered a "historical resource" for the purposes of CEQA at the discretion of the lead agency. All resources that are eligible for listing in the NRHP or CRHR must have integrity, which is the authenticity of a historical resource's physical identity evidenced by the survival of characteristics that existed during the resource's period of significance. Resources, therefore, must retain enough of their historic character or appearance to be recognizable as historical resources and to convey the reasons for their significance. Integrity is evaluated with regard to the retention of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. In an archaeological deposit, integrity is assessed with reference to the preservation of material constituents and their culturally and historically meaningful spatial relationships. A resource must also be judged with reference to the particular criteria under which it is proposed for nomination. Under Section 106 of the NHPA, actions that alter any of the characteristics that qualify a property for eligibility for listing in the NRHP "in a manner that would diminish the integrity of the property's location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, or association" (36 CFR 800.5[a]) constitute an adverse effect to the historic property. California State Assembly Bill (AB) 52 revised PRC Section 21074 to include Tribal Cultural Resources as an area of CEQA environmental impact analysis. Further, per new PRC Section 21080.3, a CEQA lead agency must consult with any California Native American tribe that requests consultation and that is traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of a proposed project to identify resources of cultural or spiritual value to the tribe, even if such resources are already eligible as historical resources as a result of cultural resources studies. 1.3.3 City of Seal Beach The City's General Plan recognizes the importance of cultural resources and includes a Cultural Resources Element. The Goal specified in the Cultural Resources Element of the General Plan is to "Preserve and protect historical, archaeological, and paleontological resources". The Cultural Resources Element lays out the various regulatory requirements that must be adhered to, including CEQA, NHPA, and NAGPRA, as well as local guidance on the preservation of historic resources. Goals outlined within the plan include preserving and protecting historical, archaeological, and paleontological resources within City limits. The City's goals include: Policy 1: Balance the benefits of development with the project's potential impacts to existing cultural resources; Policy 2: Identify, designate, and protect sites and buildings of historic importance; Policy 3: Coordinate cultural resource programs and development project review with affected resource agencies and Native American representatives; Policy 4: Identify funding programs to assist private and public property owners in the preservation of buildings and sites of historic importance; HELIX Environmental Planning 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project I October 2018 Policy 5: Assess development proposals for potential impacts to significant archaeological resources pursuant to the cultural resources requirements of the CEQA. Require a study by a professional archaeologist for all development proposals located in areas known to be sensitive for cultural resources. In keeping with Policy 5, the current study is conducted to meet the requirements of CEQA, with a Registered Professional Archaeologist (RPA) as the Principal Investigator (PI). 1.3.4 Native American Heritage Values Federal and state laws mandate that consideration be given to the concerns of contemporary Native Americans with regard to potentially ancestral human remains, associated funerary objects, and items of cultural patrimony. Consequently, an important element in assessing the significance of the study site has been to evaluate the likelihood that these classes of items are present in areas that would be affected by the proposed project. Potentially relevant to prehistoric archaeological sites is the category termed Traditional Cultural Properties (TCPs) in discussions of cultural resource management (CRM) performed under federal auspices and Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs) under CEQA. According to Patricia L. Parker and Thomas F. King (1998), "Traditional" in this context refers to those beliefs, customs, and practices of a living community of people that have been passed down through the generations, usually orally or through practice. The traditional cultural significance of a historic property, then, is significance derived from the role the property plays in a community's historically rooted beliefs, customs, and practices. Cultural resources can include TCPs/TCRs, such as gathering areas, landmarks, and ethnographic locations, in addition to archaeological districts. Generally, a TCP or TCR may consist of a single site, or group of associated archaeological sites (district or traditional cultural landscape), or an area of cultural/ ethnographic importance. In California, the Traditional Tribal Cultural Places Bill of 2004 requires local governments to consult with Native American Tribes during the project planning process, specifically before adopting or amending a General Plan or a Specific Plan, or when designating land as open space for the purpose of protecting Native American cultural places. The intent of this legislation is to encourage consultation and assist in the preservation of Native American places of prehistoric, archaeological, cultural, spiritual, and ceremonial importance. AB 52, effective July 1, 2015, introduced the TCR as a class of cultural resource and introduced additional considerations relating to Native American consultation into CEQA. As a general concept, a TCR is similar to the federally defined TCP; however, it incorporates consideration of local and state significance and required mitigation under CEQA. A TCR may be considered significant if included in a local or state register of historical resources; or determined by the lead agency to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in PRC §5024.1; or is a geographically defined cultural landscape that meets one or more of these criteria; or is a historical resource described in PRC §21084.1, a unique archaeological resource described in PRC §21083.2; or is a non -unique archaeological resource if it conforms with the above criteria. 1.4 PROJECT PERSONNEL A cultural resources survey was conducted by HELIX in 2018 to assess whether the project would have any effects on cultural resources. Mary Robbins -Wade, M.A., RPA, served as the PI and is the primary author of this technical report. Julie Roy, B.A., conducted the field survey. Dominique Diaz de Leon, B.A., HELIX Environmental Planning 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project I October 2018 served as report contributor. Resumes of key HELIX personnel are included as Appendix A. Mathew Teutimez, a Native American observer from the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians, Kizh Nation, participated in the survey. This report addresses the methods and results of the cultural resources survey, which included a records search and literature review, Sacred Land File search, Native American outreach, background research, and a pedestrian field survey. 2.0 PROJECT SETTING 2.1 NATURAL SETTING The climate of Orange County is characterized as a semi -arid environment with low humidity and rainfall. Almost all rainfall occurs in the winter, with an average rainfall around 14 inches per year. The coolest month is December, and the hottest is August with occasional temperatures rising to over 100 degrees (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [NOAA] 2014). Average temperatures in Seal Beach range from 702 Fahrenheit (F) in summer to 552 F in winter (City of Seal Beach, n.d.). The project site is located in the coastal area approximately one-half mile from San Pedro Bay in the Pacific Ocean. Seal Beach National Wildlife Refuge is located to the east of the project area, with the Seal Beach coastline to its west and southwest, and the San Gabriel River less than one-half mile to its north. The source of the river is in the San Gabriel Mountains. After leaving the mountains, the San Gabriel divides into two branches near Whittier Narrows. The branch to the west is the Rio Hondo, which flows southwest to its junction with the Los Angeles River approximately six miles from the ocean. The eastern branch continues as the San Gabriel River and discharges into Alamitos Bay six miles east of the mouth of the Los Angeles River. The San Gabriel drains an area of 698 square miles, exclusive of the area tributary to the Rio Hondo. Geologically, the project area is underlain by River Terrace deposits (Jennings 1962). The soil type mapped for the project area is Marina loamy sand, 2 to 9 percent slopes (Natural Resources Conservation Service 2018). The Marina Series is made up of somewhat excessively drained, very deep loamy coarse sands derived from weakly consolidated to noncoherent ferruginous eolian sand and supports a vegetation of chiefly chamise, sumac, black sagebrush, flattop buckwheat, and annual grasses and forbs (Bowman 1973). Plant species naturally occurring in the project area and vicinity prior to development are known to have been used by native populations for food, medicine, tools, ceremonial and other uses (Bean and Shipek 1978; Hedges and Beresford 1986; White 1963). Many of the animal species living within these communities (such as rabbits, deer, small mammals, and birds) would have been used by native inhabitants. Rabbits and rodents were very important to the prehistoric diet; deer were somewhat less significant for food, but were an important source of leather, bone, and antler. 2.2 CULTURAL SETTING 2.2.1 Prehistoric Period Proposed dates for the earliest human occupation in California vary from around 20,000 years ago to 10,000 years ago. Several researchers have argued for the presence of Pleistocene humans in California much earlier than this (Carter 1957, 1978, 1980; Minshall 1976); however, these sites identified as "early man" are all controversial. The material from the sites is generally considered nonartifactual, and the investigative methodology is often questioned (Moratto 1984). The most widely recognized timeline for HELIX Environmental Planning 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project I October 2018 the prehistory of Southern California was proposed by Wallace (1955) and divides the region's prehistory into four main periods, or "horizons": Early, Milling Stone (Archaic Period), Intermediate, and Late horizons. The best example of Early Prehistoric Period archaeological evidence in Southern California is in the San Dieguito complex of San Diego County, dating to over 9,000 years ago (Warren 1967; Warren et al. 2004). The San Dieguito Tradition is thought by most researchers to have an emphasis on big game hunting and coastal resources (Warren 1967). The material culture of the San Dieguito complex consists primarily of scrapers, scraper planes, choppers, large blades, and large projectile points. In some areas of California, the Early Prehistoric Period is often referred to as the Paleo-Indian period and is associated with the last Ice Age occurring during the Terminal Pleistocene (pre -10,000 years ago) and the Early Holocene, beginning circa 10,000 years ago (Erlandson 1994, 1997). The Millingstone Horizon, or Archaic Period, dates from 7,000-8,600 to 1,300-3,000 years ago and is generally consistent with the Oak Grove complex of Santa Barbara, the Topanga complex of Los Angeles, and the La Jolla complex of San Diego (Warren et al. 2004). The Millingstone Horizon is also referred to as the Encinitas Tradition (Warren 1968). The Encinitas tradition is generally "recognized by millingstone assemblages in shell middens, often near sloughs and lagoons" (Moratto 1984:147). According to Wallace, "a changeover from hunting to the collection of seed foods is clearly reflected in the archaeological record for the period between 6000 and 3000 B.C. The importance of seeds in the diet of the prehistoric peoples can be seen in the numbers of food -grinding implements present at their settlements" (Wallace 1978:28). Basin metates, manos, discoidals, a small number of Pinto series and Elko series points, and flexed burials are also characteristic. Most of the archaeological evidence for Archaic Period occupation in southern California is derived from sites located in near -coastal valleys, and around estuaries that are present along the San Diego coast (Warren et al. 2004). Dates for the Intermediate Horizon vary by locale but can generally be dated to between 2,000 BC and AD 500 (Elsasser 1978). The Intermediate Horizon is consistent with the Hunting Culture of Santa Barbara County and is characterized by the presence of Pinto style points, named after the Pinto Basin in Riverside County, an increased use of the mortar and pestle, and the consumption of fleshier foods such as acorns as opposed to small, hard seeds (Stickel 1978). This change resulted in the adoption of a more sedentary lifestyle as seen in the presence of seasonal campsites (Van Horn 1980). The Late Prehistoric period in southern California is characterized by the incursion of Uto-Aztecan - speaking people who occupied large portions of the Great Basin and an area stretching from southern Arizona and northwest and central Mexico into Nevada, Oregon, and Idaho (Miller 1986). The expansion of the Takic group into southern California is unrefined, but several scholars have hypothesized as to when and how the so-called "Uto-Aztecan wedge" occurred. Sutton (2009) argues that the Takic group expanded into southern California from the San Joaquin Valley about 3,500 years ago. Moratto (1984) also proposes that Takic expansion into the Southern Coast region correlates to the end of the Early Period (Late Archaic) ca. 3,200 to 3,500 years ago, while Golla (2007) suggests an expansion of Uto- Aztecan speakers into southern California at approximately 2,000 years ago. While the exact chronology of Takic-speaking groups' immigration to southern California remains uncertain, the beginning of the Late Prehistoric Period is marked by evidence of a number of new tool technologies and subsistence shifts in the archaeological record and is characterized by higher population densities and intensification of social, political, and technological systems. The changes include the production of pottery and the use of the bow and arrow for hunting instead of atlatl and dart, a reduction of shellfish gathering in some HELIX Environmental Planning 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project I October 2018 areas, an increase in the storage of foodstuffs such as acorns, and new traits such as the cremation of the dead (Gallegos 2002; McDonald and Eighmey 2004). Native American population figures in the region substantially increased toward the end of the Late Prehistoric Period. After AD 1600, a change occurred in settlement and subsistence patterns, and land use intensified region, which was reflected into the ethnohistoric period (Bean et al. 1991; Wilke 1974, 1978). 2.2.2 Ethnohistory The project area is within what is considered to be the traditional territory of the Gabrielino people (also spelled Gabrieleno or Gabrieleno; some Gabrielino people refer to themselves as Tongva). Aliso Creek in southern Orange County is generally considered to be the traditional territorial divide between the Gabrielino-Tongva and the Juaneno-Acjachemen peoples (Bean and Shipek 1978; Bean and Smith 1978; Kroeber 1976 [19251), but the vicinity of the project area is considered culturally important by the Juaneno-Acjachemen as well as the Gabrielino-Tongva. A representative of the Juaneno Band of Mission Indians - Acjachemen Nation indicated that the project area is definitely within the Tribe's territory. 2.2.2.1 Gabrielino The Gabrielino traditionally occupied most of present-day Los Angeles and Orange Counties, extending along the coast from the southern portion of the Santa Monica Mountains to the northern portion of the Santa Ana Mountains and east along the watersheds of the Los Angeles, San Gabriel, and Santa Ana Rivers (Bean and Smith 1978). Additionally, the Gabrielino occupied several off -shore islands, including San Clemente, Santa Catalina, and San Nicolas. The name Gabrielino stems from one of the two major Spanish missions established in the Gabrielino territory, the San Gabriel Mission. The Gabrielino were among the most powerful and populous ethnic nationalities in California's prehistory, however the population was decimated by disease just before the Spanish arrived in earnest to establish Mission San Gabriel in 1771. The population and culture were further diminished after forced relocation to the missions; thus, ethnographic data is extremely limited (Bean and Smith 1978: 538). At the time of Spanish explorer Juan Rodriguez Cabrillo's entrance into Gabrielino territory, it is estimated that their population may have reached nearly 5,000 people (Bean and Smith 1978; Shipley 1978). They were semi -nomadic and subsisted on a hunter -gatherer lifestyle in the rich landscape abundant in coastal resources, as well as acorns, pine nuts, and small game. The Gabrielino settlements were situated near water courses; permanent villages were always established "in the fertile lowlands along rivers and streams" (Bean and Smith 1978: 540). Both primary and subsistence villages were occupied continuously, with smaller gathering camps being intermittently occupied, depending on the season and resource. Gabrielino people maintained a rich material culture of varied and technical tools. They created wooden planked canoes, called Wats, which allowed them to populate and exploit the resources of the Southern Channel Islands (Welch 2006:3-4). Among these resources was steatite, a type of soapstone that was carved into vessels and ornaments and traded with neighboring tribes. The Gabrielino also created rock art and produced ceramic vessels. They used asphaltum, which occurs naturally in the area, both as a waterproof seal and as an adhesive to attach shell decorations to items. Other tools included portable mortars and metates, scrapers, knives, drills, paddles, wooden spoons and bowls, bone saws, needles, fishhooks, awls, slings, clubs, and baskets (Bean and Smith 1978). Their pre - contact and contact period burial practices included cremation and flexed burials (Moratto 1984). HELIX Environmental Planning 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project I October 2018 The social structure and organization appear to have been typical of other indigenous groups in southern California. There was a hierarchy with three tiers composed of the ruling class and economically elite, the middle class, and the working class; class divisions were sharply observed, and wealth was considered familial and personal. Men and women both adorned their bodies with personalized tattoos, and private land was identified by marking boundary trees with these personal emblems. Little clothing was worn except in inclement weather, but flowers, shells, steatite ornaments, and bone pins were worn as decoration. Houses were constructed out of plant fibers in dome shapes that were large enough to house multiple families. Other structures were constructed for ceremonial purposes, including sweathouses, menstrual huts, and cultic enclosures called yuvo'r (Bean and Smith 1978: 542). Rock and sand art were important in both life cycle ceremonies, such as coming of age parties and weddings, and supernatural ceremonies, such as those performed by shamans. Shamans were also responsible for memorizing heirloom stories and songs and composing new ones to commemorate important events (Welch 2006: 6). Upon death, an individual was usually buried, sometimes cremated and then buried, with their most prized possessions. Often a dog was buried above the body (Bean and Smith 1978: 538-547). 2.2.2.2 Juaneno-Acjachemen The language, culture, and territory of the Juaneno people and their neighbors to the south and east, the Luiseno, are so closely related that the two have sometimes been considered to be a single ethnic nationality (Bean and Shipek 1978; White 1963). However, Luiseno and Juaneno individuals consider themselves to be separate tribes, and Cameron (1987:319-321) noted archaeological differences between the two peoples. Other ethnographers, such as Kroeber (1976 [1925]) recognize the two tribes as separate. The name "Juaneno" was applied by the Spanish to the people indigenous to the area of Mission San Juan Capistrano, from whence the name comes and is often used today, although tribal members prefer to identify themselves as Acjachemen (Juaneno Band of Mission Indians 2016). They spoke Juaneno, a Takic language of the Uto-Aztecan language family closely related to Luiseno, Cahuilla, and Cupeno (The Regents of the University of California 2016). A thorough account of Juaneno life and especially ritual thought and practice was recorded in Chinigchinich by Father Geronimo Boscana, a Spanish Friar who lived at Mission San Juan Capistrano and wrote his account sometime between the Mission's founding in 1776 and his death in 1831 (Boscana 1947 [1846]; Robinson 1947 [1846]). Subsequent examination of the linguistic evidence in this record suggests that it was heavily influenced by the Gabrielino to the north; however, whether this influence was due to precontact cultural transmission or author error is unknown (Kroeber 1976 [1925]: 636). 2.2.3 Historical Background 2.2.3.1 Spanish Period Mission San Gabriel Arcangel was established by Father Junipero Serra in 1771. It was originally located near Whittier Narrows on the San Gabriel River but was flooded in 1776 and rebuilt in San Gabriel, where it stands today. Agriculture and animal husbandry were the main pursuits of the Mission, and Gabrielino-Tongva neophytes were forced to labor in these activities to make the Mission self-sufficient (McCawley 2006). Indian revolts were common at missions throughout the late 1770s; the most notable Gabrielino-Tongva revolt was led by Toypurina, a chief's daughter, against Mission San Gabriel in 1785. It was unsuccessful (Bean and Smith 1978: 540-541). Throughout the Spanish Period, the influence of the Spanish progressively spread further from the coast and into the inland areas of southern California as Missions San Luis Rey and San Gabriel extended their influence into the surrounding regions and used HELIX Environmental Planning 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project I October 2018 the lands for grazing cattle and other animals. Mexico won its independence from Spain in 1821, bringing an end to the Spanish Period in California. 2.2.3.2 Mexican Period Although Mexico gained its independence from Spain in 1821, Spanish patterns of culture and influence remained for a time. The missions continued to operate as they had in the past, and laws governing the distribution of land were also retained in the 1820s. Following secularization of the missions in 1834, large ranchos were granted to prominent and well-connected individuals, ushering in the Rancho Era, with the society making a transition from one dominated by the church and the military to a more civilian population, with people living on ranchos or in pueblos. With the numerous new ranchos in private hands, cattle ranching expanded and prevailed over agricultural activities. Seal Beach is within the former Mexican land grant, Rancho Los Alamitos, one of five ranchos that resulted from the partitioning of the large Spanish land grant, Rancho Los Nietos, discussed in more detail below. 2.2.3.3 American Period American governance began in 1848, when Mexico signed the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, ceding California to the United States at the conclusion of the Mexican -American War. A great influx of settlers to California occurred during the American Period, resulting from several factors, including the discovery of gold in the state in 1848, the end of the Civil War, and the availability of free land through passage of the Homestead Act. The increase in American and European populations quickly overwhelmed many of the Spanish and Mexican cultural traditions, and greatly increased the rate of population decline among Native American communities. While the American system required that the newly acquired land be surveyed prior to settlement, the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo bound the United States to honor the land claims of Mexican citizens who were granted ownership of ranchos by the Mexican government. The Land Act of 1851 established a board of commissioners to review land grant claims, and land patents for the land grants were issued throughout the following years. Under Spanish and Mexican ownership, what is now Orange County was dominated economically by cattle and sheep herding and by agriculture. Initially southern California was divided into only two counties: Los Angeles and San Diego. In 1853, San Bernardino County was added, placing what is now Riverside County primarily within San Diego County and partially within San Bernardino County. Orange County divided from Los Angeles County in 1889. Oil was first successfully extracted in the 1890s and became another important resource for Orange County throughout the first half of the 1900s. However, agriculture remained the primary economic resource throughout the American period, with Orange County producing up to one-sixth of the nation's Valencia oranges by the 1930s (Orange County Historical Society 2016). Increasing populations led to the development of the county's first master planned communities in the late 1950s and 1960s. The San Gabriel River, located just north of the project site, was channelized as part of the massive Los Angeles County Drainage Area flood control program. Prior to river channelization efforts and dam construction, floods ravaged the Los Angeles Basin, bringing rock, gravel, and debris in addition to floodwaters. The earliest recorded incident occurred in the winter of 1771, when the San Gabriel River overflowed its banks. The earliest record of flooding on the Los Angeles River was in 1811. In 1815, the Los Angeles HELIX Environmental Planning 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project I October 2018 River changed its course, destroying the plaza and agricultural fields of Los Angeles Pueblo. In 1825, the river changed course again, approximating its present channel. Other major floods occurred in 1832, 1842, and 1859. During the winter of 1861-1862, a record-breaking flood devastated the state. Great rafts of drift wood flowed down the Arroyo Seco and formed dams in the Los Angeles River that forced the swelling current to cut new channels. The deposited driftwood provided fuel for the residents of Los Angeles for several years. The winter of 1867-1868 also saw major flooding. The San Gabriel River cut a new channel and emptied into Alamitos Bay. Formerly, the mouth of the San Gabriel River had been in San Pedro Bay. Other floods occurred in 1876, 1879, 1884, 1886, 1887, 1889, and 1890. In 1891, the San Gabriel again changed course, causing the Rio Hondo and Lexington Wash to become its major channels. Prior to the late 1880s, floods, although causing extensive damage, did not create a general demand for preventive measures. Limited development and subsequent low property values did not warrant the cost of a large-scale flood control project. Between the late 1880s and 1920, accelerated development and growth in both rural and urban areas occurred throughout the Los Angeles Basin. Los Angeles County's population jumped from 101,454 in 1890 to 504,131 by 1910. By the end of the first decade of the twentieth century, growth of the metropolitan, industrial, and agricultural districts in the area had reached a point where floods were a serious problem and threatened the continued existence and further development of Los Angeles. Floods had become more frequent and destructive during the early years of the twentieth century as a result of increased development, which stripped the terrain of its natural vegetation, thereby increasing the velocity and destructiveness of flood waters. The winter of 1910-11 saw devastating floods along the San Gabriel River that destroyed bridges and inundated fertile farm land with sterile sand and silt [site record for Santa Fe Dam/Flood Control Basin. The Los Angeles County Flood Control District was created by an act of the California State Legislature in June 1915, its purpose being "to provide for the control and conservation of flood, storm, and other waste waters and to conserve such waters for beneficial and useful purposes." "By December 1933, works of the Los Angeles County Flood Control District that had either been completed or were in progress included 16 reservoirs; 412 miles of regulated mountain and foothill watersheds; spreading grounds on Thompson Creek, Pacoima Wash, San Antonio Wash, and the San Gabriel River; and 132 miles of permanently improved drainage channels" (site record for Santa Fe Dam/Flood Control Basin). Although additional channel improvements were still needed throughout the Los Angeles Basin, the public voted down bond issues in 1926 and in the early 1930s; an appeal to the federal government for funds was also denied. Unfortunately, on New Year's Day 1934, floodwaters carrying tons of mud, rock, and debris inundated the communities of Glendale, Montrose, and La Crescenta, leaving 41 people dead and millions of dollars in property damage. Federal legislation in the mid- to late -1930s led to the Los Angeles County Drainage Area project undertaken by the US Army Corps of Engineers. Another flood in 1938, which left 100 people dead and $35 million in damages, spurred on the flood control efforts; all the previously installed flood control facilities functioned properly, saving lives and preventing damage. A comprehensive plan for the Los Angeles County Drainage Area was completed in 1940. For the Los Angeles River drainage, the project included Hansen, Sepulveda, and Lopez flood control basins; construction of debris basins at the mouth of 17 tributary canyons; improvement of 49.07 miles of main channel, and 53.42 miles of tributary channels; and the reconstruction of 109 bridges. For the San Gabriel River drainage, similar works were approved, including Santa Fe and Whittier Narrows flood control basins, debris basins on seven tributaries to the Rio Hondo; improvement of 35.6 miles of main channel and 69.16 miles of tributary channels on the San Gabriel, as well as an additional 9.76 miles of main channel and 35.23 miles of tributary channels on the Rio Hondo; and the reconstruction of HELIX Environmental Planning 10 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project I October 2018 207 bridges. Improvements were also projected for Ballona Creek, consisting of debris basins in two tributary canyons, 2.3 miles of main channel improvement, 23.67 miles of tributary channel improvement, and reconstruction of 126 bridges [site record for Santa Fe Dam/Flood Control Basin]. 2.2.4 Project Vicinity The Gabrielino villages of Ahwaanga, Motuucheyngna, and Puvungna were located along the coast of Long Beach (Tongva People, n.d.); sites associated with Puvungna are located in Seal Beach as well. An archaeological site on the campus of California State University Long Beach (CA -LAN -234) was placed on the NRHP as the archaeological representation of the village; two other sites located just east of the campus, on the grounds of Rancho Los Alamitos (the site of the ranch house) were also placed on the NRHP. Puvungna is sacred to the Gabrielino and Acjachemen people as a place where Chinigchinich emerged and instructed the people. "Cindy Alvitre, an American Indian studies lecturer who is also of Tongva heritage, said that to followers of indigenous religions Puvungna's significance was comparable to that of cities like Mecca, Jerusalem or Bethlehem. 'A lot happened here in the creation narratives, and obviously the land changed with the Spanish colonization,' she said" (Edwards 2017). Lillian Robles, an Acjachemen elder, noted that the name means "gathering place" and explained that "'When Wiyot died, all of the creations gathered at Puvungna to mourn him and await his return. He had promised to return in three days. Instead, the being Chinigchinich emerged. Chinigchinich then created our people, the Native Americans, in the physical form we have today' (Robles)" (Rigby 2012:71). Approximately 100 burials were excavated at Puvungna over several decades and were reburied in cooperation with Gabrielino-Tongva, Juaneno-Acjachemen and Chumash representatives in 2016. Hellman Ranch has been called by some Puvungna East and also includes habitation remains and human burials. The Gabrielino-Tongva community called Montuuchey (Motuucheyngna or EI Piojo) is geographically associated with the historic Anaheim Landing. For the most part, archaeological resources within Seal Beach have been identified on Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach, at Hellman Ranch, and potentially within the Boeing property. These significant cultural areas are in relative proximity to the current project area. Seal Beach is within the former Mexican land grant, Rancho Los Alamitos, one of five ranchos that resulted from the partitioning of the large Spanish land grant, Rancho Los Nietos. Rancho Los Nietos was granted to Jose Manuel Nieto by Governor Pedro Fages in 1784 and "took in all the land between the San Gabriel and Santa Ana rivers, from the foothills to the sea" (Orange County Recorder, n.d.). Upon Nieto's death, his children petitioned to have the original land grant divided, and Rancho Los Alamitos was one of the five resulting partitions, as declared by Governor Jose Figueroa in 1834. The others were Ranchos Las Bolsas, Los Coyotes, Santa Gertrudes, and Los Cerritos. Rancho Los Alamitos was acquired in 1844 by Abel Stearns, one of the leading merchants and rancho owners of the time. The ranch supplied much of the beef for immigrants coming to California for the gold rush, and when California joined the Union in 1850, Rancho Los Alamitos was the headquarters of the largest cattle ranch in the United States at that time. However, vast numbers of cattle were lost to severe floods and droughts throughout the early 1860s, and the rancho was foreclosed in 1865 (Rancho Los Alamitos, n.d.). In 1881, it was purchased by a group that included John William Bixby and Isaias Hellman. They developed a small portion of the ranch as the town site of Alamitos, which was later subsumed by Long Beach; farm lots were leased farther from the beach. In 1867, the founders of the colony of Anaheim utilized Anaheim Landing on San Pedro Bay as a port to off-load their goods. In 1901, John Ord became the first year-round permanent resident of the town, which was informally called Bay City. The town became a stop on the Pacific Electric Railway Company's HELIX Environmental Planning 11 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project I October 2018 Red Car line in 1904. While its popularity as a port diminished, its popularity as a recreation area grew, and in the early 1900s, Seal Beach moved from being a port city to a resort town. In 1903, the City was subdivided and renamed Bay City. A pier, roller coaster, bath house, and dancing pavilion were constructed along the waterfront and in 1915, Bay City was incorporated and renamed again, as Seal Beach. Through the 1920s, the resort community flourished and continued to grow until the onset of the Great Depression. The pier suffered damage during a 1939 hurricane and was rebuilt. World War II saw an influx of military presence in the region and the Navy base was built within the city limits. This brought a second construction boom and the town continued to expand into the 1950s. Few undeveloped areas remain in Seal Beach (City of Seal Beach, n.d.; Grobaty 2017; Kaiser 1995; Orange County Register 2005). Known historic resources in Seal Beach include Anaheim Landing, the NRHP-listed "Old City Hall," and locally listed historic structures, including the Krenwinckle House and the Proctor House. 3.0 ARCHIVAL RESEARCH AND NATIVE AMERICAN CONTACT PROGRAM 3.1 RECORDS SEARCH HELIX conducted a one -mile radius records search at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) on August 29, 2018. SCCIC is the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) repository for Orange and Los Angeles Counties. The records search included archaeological and historical resources, locations and citations for previous cultural resources studies, and a review of the state Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) historic properties directory. The records search summary and map are included as Appendix B (Confidential Appendices, bound separately). 3.1.1 Previous Surveys The records search results identified 65 cultural resources studies within a one -mile radius of the project, two of which cover the project survey area (Table 1, Previous Studies within One Mile of the Project Area). One of the studies mapped at SCCIC as including the project area is a cultural resources survey of the Los Angeles -Long Beach Harbor areas (Weinman and Stickel 1978). It is difficult to discern from the report whether the current project area was actually subject to a field survey, but the project site was already developed by the time of that survey. The second report is a research design for evaluating coastal archaeological sites in northern Orange County and did not include fieldwork (Mason 1987). Thus, the current project site does not appear to have been surveyed for cultural resources in the past. HELIX Environmental Planning 12 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project I October 2018 Table 1 PREVIOUS STUDIES WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE PROJECT AREA Report No. (LA-#) Report Title Author, Date Report Type Archaeological Reconnaissance Report of Munz Lake Plantation Sites Archaeological 01272 South of Lake Hughes on the Lake Reponen, 1969 Reconnaissance Hughes Truck Trail Cultural Resources Cultural Resources Evaluation of the 01581 BKK Landfill Proposal, Los Angeles Bissell, 1986 County, California Assessment Archaeological Investigations of the Archaeological 02114 Proposed California Shores Property, McKenna, 1990 Long Beach, California. Investigations Los Angeles -Long Beach Harbor Areas Weinman and Cultural Resources 02399 Cultural Resource Survey. Stickel, 1978 Survey The Los Angeles Basin and Vicinity: A Archaeological 03583 Gazetteer and Compilation of Bucknam, 1974 Archaeological Site Information Investigation Report of Initial Archaeological Study Archaeological 04034 at Trancas Canyon Road, Malibu, King, 1998 California Investigation Cultural Resources Assessment for McLean Strudwick 04157 the Marketplace Restaurant and and McCawley, Cultural Resources Retail Site, City of Long Beach, Los Assessment Angeles County, CA. 1997 A Deeply -Buried Human Skull and 04266 Recent Stratigraphy at the Present Brooks, 1960 Archaeological Mouth of the San Gabriel River, Seal Investigation Beach, California Cultural Resource Survey of the Bixby Strudwick, Cultural Resources 05890 Ranch Parcel Near Alamitos Bay, Los McCawley, McLean, Angeles County, California and Strum, 1996 Survey Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment: Los Alamitos Pump Cultural Resources 06107 Station Project in Long Beach, Los Shepard, 2003 Angeles County, and Seal Beach, Assessment Orange County, California A Phase I Cultural Resource Survey for Cultural Resources 08994 Property at 47th East and Avenue S, Hudlow, 2004 City of Palmdale, California Survey Cultural Resources Assessment for 10483 the Alamitos Bay Marina Fulton, 2009 Cultural Resources Rehabilitation Project, City of Long Assessment Beach, Los Angeles County, California Los Angeles -Long Beach Harbor Areas Cultural Resources 10527 Regional Cultural History, Los Angeles Weinman, 1978 County, California Assessment 11137 LOP Facsimile Transmittal SPL -2009- Trinh 2009 Cultural Resources 00807-PHT Assessment HELIX Environmental Planning 13 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project I October 2018 Table 1(cont.) PREVIOUS STUDIES WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE PROJECT AREA Report No. Report Title Author, Date Report Type (LA-#) Cultural Resources Study of the Wilmington Oil and Gas Field, Los Chasteen Clark 12808 Angeles County, California in Support Hanes and Mirro, Cultural Resources of Analysis of Oil and Gas Well Assessment Stimulation Treatments in California 2014 Environmental Impact Report Cultural Resources Overview: The City Cultural Resources 12960 of Long Beach Southeast Area Specific McKenna, 2016 Plan, Los Angeles County, California Assessment Report No. (OR-#) Report Title Author, Date Report Type Archaeological Survey Report: The 9 Acre L.A. Dept. of Water and Power Archaeological 00481 Property Located at the Corner of 1st Van Horn, 1979 and Ocean Ave. in the City of Seal Survey Beach Archaeological Survey Report: The Archaeological 00493 Hellman Property in Seal Beach Anonymous, 1980 Survey 00619 Field Assessment of CA -ORA -322; Frierman, 1981 Field Assessment Naval Weapons Station, Seal Beach Archaeological Test Report on the 00639 Hellman Property Located in Seal Anonymous, 1981 Archaeological Test Beach 00930 Survey of the Seal Beach Area, Orange Motkin, 1988 Archaeological County, California Survey 01049 Landing Hill Redwine, 1958 Unknown 01272 A Baseline Archaeological Study for Stickel, 1991 Archaeological the City of Seal Beach California Study Cultural Resources Survey Report for De and Cultural Resources 01290 the Unocal Property at 99 Marina Drive, Seal Beach, California 1 Massonon,, 1993 Survey Archaeological Testing and Significance Assessment of CA -ORA- Archaeological 01296 1335, a Prehistoric Site Located on Brown, 1993 the Rancho Mission Viejo, Orange Testing County, California Historical Review and Archaeological Historical and 01301 Report for the Unocal On -shore Kelsey and Archaeological Facility at 99 Marina Drive in Seal Magalousis, 1993 Beach California in Two Parts Assessment Addendum to Cultural Resources Survey Report for the Unocal Property De Barros and Cultural Resources 01348 at 99 Marina Drive Seal Beach, Mason, 1993 Survey: Addendum California The 20+ Acre Site of Proposed New 01414 Residential Housing on the Naval Van Horn, 1981 Unknown Weapons Station, Seal Beach HELIX Environmental Planning 14 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project I October 2018 Table 1(cont.) PREVIOUS STUDIES WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE PROJECT AREA Report No. Report Title Author, Date Report Type (OR-#) Archaeological Resources Protection Plan for Installation Restoration Sites Mason and Archaeological 01482 4,8,9, SWMU 56 at Naval Weapons Carbone, 1996 Resources Station, Seal Beach, Orange County, Protection Plan California Cultural Resource Assessment of the Whitney -Desautels, Cultural Resource 01581 Hellman Ranch, Seal Beach 1997 Assessment Archaeological, Historical, and Architectural Phase 1 Overview Archaeological, Survey, Phase II Evaluation Survey and Clevenger, Historical, and 01599 Historic and Archaeological Resource Crawford, and Architectural Protection (HARP) Plan of Naval Pigniolo, 1993 Weapons Station, Seal Beach, Survey California A Research Design and Investigation Program for Test Level Evaluations of 01608 Archaeological Sites Located on the Stickel, 1996 Research Design Hellman Ranch, City of Seal Beach, California A Research Design for the Evaluation York Cleland and 01609 of Archaeological Sites Within the Baksh, 1997 Research Design Hellman Ranch Specific Plan Area An Archaeological Site Survey of the Archaeological 01610 Hellman Ranch, City of Seal Beach, Stickel, 1996 California Survey A Research Design for the Evaluation York Cleland and 01643 of Archaeological Sites Within the Baksh, 1997 Research Design Hellman Ranch Specific Plan Area A Research Design and Investigation Program for Test Level Evaluations of 01816 Archaeological Sites Located on the Stickel, 1996 Research Design Hellman Ranch, City of Seal Beach, California A Research Design for the Evaluation York and Cleland 01858 of Archaeological Sites Within the Research Design Hellman Ranch Specific Plan Area 1997 Historic Properties Overview and Historic 01897 Evaluations on the Naval Weapons Unknown, 1997 Station, Seal Beach Assessment Phase I - Overview Survey and Phase II -Archaeological, Historical, and Clevenger and Archaeological 01958 Architectural Eligibility Study of Crawford, 1995 Survey Cultural Resources on the Naval Weapons Station, Seal Beach HELIX Environmental Planning 15 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project I October 2018 Table 1(cont.) PREVIOUS STUDIES WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE PROJECT AREA Report No. (OR-#) Report Title Author, Date Report Type Archaeological Resource Protection Plan for the Background Study Mason and Cerreto, Archaeological 01960 Sampling Areas at Naval Weapons Resource Station, Seal Beach, Orange County, 1995 Protection Plan California Historic and Final Historic and Archaeological Resources Protection (HARP) Plan for Clevenger and Archaeological 01969 the Naval Weapons Station, Seal Crawford, 1997 Resources Beach Protection Archaeological Resources Protection Plan for the Site Inspection Work Plan Archaeological at the Research, Testing, and Berryman and 01989 Evaluation Area, Naval Weapons Pettus, 1995 Resources Station, Seal Beach, Orange County, Protection Plan California Research Design for Evaluation of 02033 Coastal Archaeological Sites in Mason, 1987 Research Design Northern Orange County, California Archaeological Monitoring at Installation Restoration (IR) Site 73, Archaeological 02070 Naval Weapon Station (NAVWPNSTA), Bissell, 2000 Seal Beach, California (CH2M Hill Monitoring Prime Contract No. N6871 -96-D-2299) Archaeological Services at Naval Weapons Station (NAVWPNSTA), Seal Beach, California (CH2M Hill Prime 02072 Contract No. N6871 -96-d-2299), Bissell, 2000 Archaeological Relative to Sampling at Installation Services Restoration (IR) Sites 12, 16, 25, 37, 38, 42, 44/45, AOC 6, SWMU 24, 56, 57, OSR, an Archaeological Resources Protection Plan for Installation Restoration Sites Mason and Cerreto, Archaeological 02284 5, 8, 12, 16, 21, 40, 44, and 46 at Resources Naval Weapons Station, Seal Beach 1995 Protection Plan Orange County, CA Cultural Resource Assessment AT & T Cultural Resource 02604 Wireless Services Facility No. 13001A Duke, 2002 Orange County, California Assessment Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment: Los Alamitos Pump Cultural Resource 02774 Station Project in Long Beach, Los Shepard, 2003 Angeles County, and Seal Beach, Assessment Orange County, California HELIX Environmental Planning 16 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project I October 2018 Table 1(cont.) PREVIOUS STUDIES WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE PROJECT AREA Report No. (OR-#) Report Title Author, Date Report Type Historic Resources Evaluation Report Seal Beach Bike Trail Project City of Tang and Tibbet, Historic Resources 03172 Seal Beach, Orange County 12 -ORA -1 2004 Evaluation PM 31.11/32.72 -KP 50.07/52.66 EA OC 3700 Historic and Preliminary Draft Final Historic and 03174 Archaeological Resources Protection Unknown, 1995 Archaeological (HARP) Plan for the Naval Weapons Resources Station, Seal Beach Protection Plan National Register of Historic Places Evaluation of Cold War -era Buildings National Register 03175 and Structures Naval Weapons Unknown, 1999 of Historic Places Station, Seal Beach, Orange County, Evaluation California Final Archaeological Data Recovery Report for a Portion of Prehistoric Archaeological 03379 Archaeological Site CA -ORA -322/1118 Chatters, 2003 Data Recovery to Mitigate Impacts of Soil Removal Report Remediation Mitigation Plan for Significant Cultural York, Cleland, 03391 Resource Discoveries Hellman Ranch Willey, and Gross, Mitigation Plan Specific Plan Area Seal Beach, California 2003 Negative Archaeological Monitoring Report for the 400 Marina Drive Negative 03562 Development Project, City of Seal Strauss, 2009 Archaeological Beach, CA Monitoring Due -diligence Historical Due -diligence Archaeological Resources Review, City Historical 03735 of Seal Beach Sewer Capital Tang, 2008 Archaeological Improvement Projects, City of Seal Beach, Orange County, California Resources Review Negative Archaeological Monitoring Report for the Hellman Ranch Tank Negative 03762 Farm Replacement Project, City of Ehringer, 2009 Archaeological Seal Beach, California Monitoring Identification and Evaluation of Historic Properties City of Seal Beach Sewer Capital Improvement Projects Tang and Hogan, Historic Properties 03821 (Southern Portion/Downtown Area) 2009 Assessment City of Seal Beach, Orange County, California Piecing Together the Prehistory of Cleland, York, and Cultural 03828 Landing Hill: A Place Remembered Willey, 2007 Assessment Subject: Phase I Archaeological Study Archaeological 04031 Report for Alumni Center at the Padon, 2011 Study University of California Irvine Campus HELIX Environmental Planning 17 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project I October 2018 Table 1(cont.) PREVIOUS STUDIES WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE PROJECT AREA Report No. Report Title Author, Date Report Type (OR-#) The Los Angeles Basin and Vicinity: A Archaeological 04034 Gazetteer and Compilation of Bucknam, 1974 Archaeological Site Information Assessment Los Angeles -Long Beach Harbor Areas Weinman and Cultural Resource 04035 Cultural Resource Survey (Also listed Stickel, 1978 Survey as LA -2399) Seal Beach Railroad Right of Way 04047 Property, Seal Beach Blvd. - 17th Lehman, 2007 Unknown Street - 16th Street - Electric Ave., Seal Beach, CA Cultural Resources Records Search and Archaeological Survey Results for Cultural Resources 04105 the proposed Clear Wireless, LLC, Site Wlodarski, 2010 Records Search CA-ORC-5863A (OG03XCO29C) located and Archaeological at 2118th Street, Seal Beach, Orange Survey County, California 90740 Sprinkler System Replacement at CA - 04143 ORA -322/1118, Reference #5758 Ser. Baillie, 2004 Unknown N45W/0153 Re-evaluation of the National Register Eligibility Status of Naval Weapons Reevaluation of 04307 Station Seal Beach, Orange County Baillie, 2003 the National and Naval Weapons Station Seal Register Eligibility Beach, Detachment Fallbrook, San Status Diego County 3.1.2 Previously Recorded Resources The SCCIC has a record of 21 previously recorded cultural resources within a mile radius of the project (Table 2, Previously Recorded Resources within One Mile of the Project Area), including 12 prehistoric sites, eight historic resources, and one multicomponent site. No resources have been recorded within or immediately adjacent to the project site. Two resources are located within a quarter mile of the project site; these consist of a prehistoric shell deposit (CA -ORA -1473 [P-30-001473]), apparently related to other sites on the Hellman Ranch property, and the historic Seal Beach Red Car, No. 1734 (P-30-162293). In general, the prehistoric resources consist of shell midden and shell scatter sites, some of which include flaked stone and ground stone artifacts and midden soil, suggesting they represent habitation areas, some of them possibly seasonal. One site was recorded as a Native American trail. The historic resources include the Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach historic district and buildings within it; Seal Beach City Hall; Seal Beach Red Car; a single-family residence; a pump station; a landfill; and the site of Anaheim Landing. The multicomponent site includes a prehistoric habitation area and a complex of historic features, including a windmill, well, rock foundation, and domestic refuse. HELIX Environmental Planning 18 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project I October 2018 Table 2 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED RESOURCES WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE PROJECT AREA Resource Resource Number Number Age Description Recorder, Date (P-#) (Trinomial) Light shell midden with sparse lithic P-19-000271 CA -LAN -271 Prehistoric Site debitage and one ground stone artifact Dixon, 1959 CA -LAN -1821 (hammerstone). P-19-001821 Prehistoric Site Shell midden. McKenna, 1990 Salvage Landfill #2. Consists of Fulton and Fulton, P-19 004781 CA -LAN -4781H Historic Site newspaper, plastic, metal, etc. 2017 Utility structure consisting of a flood P-19-186926 __ Historic control pump station directly associated Shepard, 2003 Structure with the Los Alamitos Retarding Basin. Constructed in 1957. Shell midden and lithic scatter suggesting an early occupation and P-30-000256 CA -ORA -256 Prehistoric Site seasonal campsite. Site was re -surveyed McKinney, 1969; by Stickel and his team in 1996; Hellman Stickel 1996 Ranch. Surface lithic scatter consisting of two hand stones, two milling stone P-30-000257 CA -ORA -257 Prehistoric Site fragments and two small worked McKinney, 1969; fragments. Site was re -surveyed by Stickel, 1996 Stickel and his team in 1996; Hellman Ranch. One possible feature with six associated "stones" with burnt shell and bone. Eighty-two surface artifacts consisting of P-30-000258 CA -ORA -258 Prehistoric Site ground stone, lithics, hammerstone, No recorder given, groove axe, milling slab. Site was re- 1969; Stickel, 1996 surveyed by Stickel and his team in 1996; Hellman Ranch. Thirty-two artifacts both surface and subsurface consisting of ground stone, hammerstone, and lithics. Dark midden McKinney, 1969; P-30-000259 CA -ORA -259 Prehistoric Site soil marks the site. Site was re -surveyed Stickel, 1996 by Stickel and his team in 1996; Hellman Ranch. One of a series of seasonal camp sites marked mainly by a dense shell midden and a scatter of ground stone fragments. This site was perhaps utilized to conduct McKinney, 1969; P-30-000260 CA -ORA -260 Prehistoric Site ceremonial activities and may have been Flaherty and related to the Puvunga complex of sites. Stickel, 1996 Site was re -surveyed by Stickel and his team in 1996; Hellman Ranch. HELIX Environmental Planning 19 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project I October 2018 Table 2 (cont.) PREVIOUSLY RECORDED RESOURCES WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE PROJECT AREA Resource Resource Number Number Age Description Recorder, Date (P-#) (Trinomial) Prehistoric: Habitation site with dense Colegrove and shell scatter, lithic scatter, one pottery Desautels, 1971; Multi- fragment. Historic: Standing windmill Bissell, 1988; CA -ORA -322/ Pigniolo, James, P-30-000322 1118 Component with a brick lined well and associated Campbell and Site water tank footings, a stacked rock Mealey, 1992; foundation and associated domestic refuse. James, 1996; Bissell, 2000 Originally recorded as a possible Aboriginal trail with associated cores but after McCoy and Phillips in 1980 Oxendine, 1979; P-30-000832 CA -ORA -832 Prehistoric Site examined the site, they reported finding only naturally fractured chert fragments. Becker, 1994 Cooley and Cottrell concurred with McCoy and Phillips findings in 1980. P-30-000850 CA -ORA -850 Prehistoric Site Shell scatter. This site was re -surveyed Colquehon, n.d.; by Stickel and his team in 1996. Stickel, 1996 P-30-000851 CA -ORA -851 Prehistoric Site Shell midden. This site was re -surveyed Colquehon, n.d.; by Stickel and his team in 1996. Stickel, 1996 Shell midden that formed part of a much larger site which may have been related Flaherty and P-30-001473 CA -ORA -1473 Prehistoric Site to the Puvunga complex of sites; Stickel, 1996 Hellman Ranch. P-30-001544 -- Prehistoric Site Shell scatter and one ground stone. Underwood, 2000 Old Seal Beach City Hall is a civic building constructed in 1929 in the Mediterranean Revival architectural Thomas, 1982; Historic style which exhibits a strong Spanish Johnson, 2010; P-30-156069 __ influence. It was placed on the National Building Register in 1983. The new city hall Brunzell and Van administrative building was constructed Renssaier, 2015 in 1969 and is attached to the old city hall. Anaheim Landing. Recorded as a California State Historical Landmark (No. 219). Anaheim Landing was established P-30-162271 -- Historic Site as a port of entry for the Santa Ana Reinhardt, 1959; Valley by the Anaheim Landing Co. soon Arbuckle, 1980 after the founding of the mother colony at Anaheim in 1857. Seal Beach Red Car. The Red Car, No. 1734 was "...built in 1925 by the Pacific Historic Electric Railway, as part of the Red Car No recorder given, P-30-162293 __ Structure system that served Southern California 1985 through the 1950s, it was originally used as a service car." HELIX Environmental Planning 20 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project I October 2018 Table 2 (cont.) PREVIOUSLY RECORDED RESOURCES WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE PROJECT AREA Resource Resource Number Number Age Description Recorder, Date (P-#) (Trinomial) Ranch -style dwelling and single-family P-30-176903 __ Historic property with no significant association McElroy, 2000 Building or design, or as a rare example of its type. Naval Weapons Station, Seal Beach Historic officer's quarters consisting of three Bunse and Rogers, P-30-179841 __ Building buildings: 212, 217, and 218, designed 1998 by Edward H. Fickett, A.LA (Los Angeles) and built in 1964. Naval Weapons Station, Seal Beach historic district with 185 contributing elements (buildings) and 247 non - P -30-179859 __ Historic contributing elements (buildings and Crawford, 1995 District structures). Buildings mainly constructed in the Modern Movement architectural style with some Colonial Revival. Period of significance is 1940-1946. 3.2 OTHER ARCHIVAL RESEARCH Various archival sources were also consulted, including historic topographic maps and aerial imagery (NETR Online 2018) to identify historic structures and land use in the area. These include historic aerials available at historicaerials.com (NETR Online 2018) and historic USGS topographic maps: the 1901 and 1904 Southern California Sheet No. 1 (1:250,000 scale); the 1896 and 1943 Las Bolsas 15 -minute quadrangles (1:62,500 scale); the 1935 Seal Beach topographic map (1:31,680 scale); and the 1950, 1965, 1972, 1974, and 1981 Seal Beach 7.5 -minute (1:24,000 scale) topographic maps. On the 1896 Las Bolsas map, as well as the 1901 and 1904 topographic maps, the project site is shown as a marshy area adjacent to the San Gabriel River, which meanders before emptying into Alamitos Bay. In the 1935 Seal Beach map (1:31,680 scale) and the 1941 and 1943 Las Bolsas 15 -minute maps, the river is channelized, and the area south of the railway tracks (1935) and Bolsa Avenue (1941 and 1943) is developed. The project site and the surrounding area remain undeveloped on these maps. No buildings appear within or adjacent to the project area in any of the maps prior to 1965, although there are roads shown in the vicinity on all the historic topographic maps. By 1965, 5th Street, located immediately adjacent to and south of the project site, as well as residential development immediately adjacent to and north and west of the project site appears. In the 1974 Seal Beach topographic map, a building or structure appears within the project site. Historic aerial photographs were examined from the years 1952, 1963, 1972, 1994, and 2012. No buildings or structures besides main roads are visible in the vicinity of the project on the aerial images from 1952 and 1963, with 5th Street appearing on the 1963 aerial. By 1972, residential development appears immediately adjacent to the north and west of the project area, as well as within the project area. Industrial uses can be seen in relative proximity to the project area but not within or immediately adjacent to it, and further commercial development south of 5th Street appears on the 1994 aerial. By HELIX Environmental Planning 21 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project I October 2018 2012, the building or structure seen within the project area is no longer visible, revealing an empty and flat area (NETR Online 2018). This is in keeping with the known history of the project site having supported a gas station in the past, which was demolished in 2011. 3.3 NATIVE AMERICAN CONTACT PROGRAM HELIX contacted the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) on August 29, 2018 for a Sacred Lands File search and list of Native American contacts for the project area. The NAHC indicated in a response dated September 4, 2018 that Native American cultural sites are present and to contact the Juaneno Band of Mission Indians. Letters were sent on September 24, 2018 to the eight tribal contacts provided by the NAHC, including four Juaneno contacts, two Gabrielino-Tongva contacts, one contact for Gabrieleno-Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, and one contact for the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians, Kizh Nation. As of October 9, 2018, no responses have been received, except as noted below. When responses are received, they will be forwarded to City staff and to the applicant. Native American correspondence is included as Appendix C (Confidential Appendices, bound separately). As previously noted, a tribal cultural monitor from the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians, Kizh Nation participated in the field survey. His recommendations regarding monitoring during construction are included in the recommended mitigation measures. Per the recommendation of the NAHC, the PI spoke with Joyce Perry, the tribal manager of the Juaneno Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen Nation. (She was one of the contacts provided by the NAHC and an individual with whom the PI has worked in the past.) Via email and phone conversation, Ms. Perry reiterated that the area of the project is part of the Tribe's territory, and they wish to be included in the monitoring program. She indicated, "Puvungna is core to our culture" and noted that she was "one of many plaintiffs that fought to save our village" in lawsuits against California State University Long Beach over the destruction of that significant site (see Appendix C, Confidential Appendices). Given the former marshy environment of the project site (as noted above), Ms. Perry suggested that the area may have been a traditional cultural property, such as a location where people went to in order to gather plants and other important resources, with the habitation sites being located outside the marshy area. This fits with the pattern of known cultural resources in the vicinity, such as the Hellman Ranch/ Landing Hill sites. Ms. Perry reiterated the importance of this area to the Juaneno-Acjachemen people and the Tribe's desire to consult on this project and to be kept updated on project progress, as well as being included in construction monitoring. 4.0 SURVEY METHODS AND RESULTS A pedestrian survey of the project site was conducted on September 14, 2018 by HELIX field director Julie Roy, with tribal monitor Mathew Teutimez from the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians, Kizh Nation. The survey area was covered with pea gravel and large (up to 4 -inch) rock. The outskirts of the project site, located north of the northern fenced tank area and inside the exterior fencing, consisted of sand and soils containing marine shell (Argopecten, Chione, Protothaca, oyster, moon snail and a possible Pismo clam). One possible quartzite flake was observed, however, due to the highly disturbed nature of the project property it was not confirmed as to whether the item was an artifact or a piece broken by machinery. The soils in which the shell was highly concentrated were medium brown in coloration and may have been redeposited onto the project site from elsewhere or brought up to the HELIX Environmental Planning 22 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project I October 2018 surface during fencing or post placement; these soils did not appear to be fill, suggesting subsurface cultural material may be present. As previously noted, the project area was formerly developed as a gas station, including underground tanks, and thousands of tons of soil have been removed, due to contamination. Thus, the project site has been the subject of a great deal of past subsurface disturbance, and intact cultural deposits are considered unlikely. Views of the project site are shown in Plates 1 through 3. As discussed in Chapter 3.1.2, Previously Recorded Resources, no resources have been recorded within or adjacent to the project site. The two resources recorded within a quarter mile consist of the historic Seal Beach Red Car, No. 1734 (P-30-162293) and a prehistoric shell deposit (CA -ORA -001473) that is one of the Hellman Ranch sites and "possibly associated with the Puvunga complex of sites" (site record, on file at SCCIC). Other sites on the Hellman Ranch property are located between one-fourth mile and over one mile from the project area. Plate 1. Overview of project site, showing gravel and rock on surface. HELIX Environmental Planning 23 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project I October 2018 Plate 2. Overview of project site, showing existing monitoring well. Plate 3. Close view of existing soils and the observed shell. HELIX Environmental Planning 24 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project I October 2018 5.0 SUMMARY OF EFFECTS AND MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS A study was undertaken to identify cultural resources that are present in the 490 Pacific Coast Highway project area and to determine the effects of the project on historical resources/historic properties. The cultural resources survey did not identify any cultural resources within the project area, but some marine shell was observed that may be cultural in origin. The ground surface is covered with gravel, obscuring ground visibility; however, the project site has been subject to extreme disturbance from development of a previous gas station, including underground tanks, and the removal of thousands of tons of soil for remediation. Based on this, the potential for intact subsurface cultural resources is considered to be low, although there may be pockets of buried cultural material. The project is expected to no effects to historical resources per CEQA and no effects to historic properties per the NHPA. Although there are no archaeological sites recorded within or in the immediate vicinity of the project site, the general area is quite sensitive in terms of cultural resources. A series of archaeological sites on the nearby Hellman Ranch has been identified as significant, sometimes called Puvungna East, and a Gabrielino village was identified in the area of the historic Anaheim Landing. This village site would have encompassed the Hellman Ranch sites as well as the project area. In addition, the NAHC indicated that Native American cultural resources listed on the Sacred Lands File are present in the area, and Native American informants have reiterated the cultural significance of the area in which the project is located. Based on these factors, it is recommended that ground -disturbing activity for the project be monitored by a qualified archaeologist and Native American monitors from both Gabrielino (Gabrieleno) and Juaneno tribes, as described below. In addition, should the project limits change to incorporate new areas of proposed disturbance, a cultural resources survey of these areas will be required. The following measures are recommended: CUL -1 Prior to the commencement of any ground -disturbing activities for the project, a qualified archaeologist and Native American monitors from both Gabrielino (Gabrieleno) and Juaneno tribes shall conduct a Worker Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP) to present to City staff, the grading contractor, and any relevant subcontractors information regarding the cultural and archaeological sensitivity of the project area, as well as the requirements of the monitoring program. The WEAP can be presented at a pre -grading meeting or separately. If the WEAP is held separately, the qualified archaeologist and Native American monitors shall be present for a pre -grading meeting with the grading contractor to discuss project schedule, safety requirements, and monitoring protocols. CUL -2 Ground -disturbing activities during construction shall be monitored by a qualified archaeologist and Native American monitors from both Gabrielino (Gabrieleno) and Juaneno tribes. These activities include removal of existing gravel and other surface materials, grading, trenching, excavation, etc. If cultural material is encountered during monitoring, both the archaeologist and the Native American monitors would have the authority to temporarily halt or redirect activity in the area of the find while the cultural material is documented and a decision is made regarding the significance/eligibility of the find and whether additional excavation, analysis, or other mitigation measures are required. Determinations of significance will be made in consultation among the archaeological Principal Investigator, the Monitor Tribes, and City staff. HELIX Environmental Planning 25 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project I October 2018 If it is determined that the potential for subsurface cultural material is too low to warrant fulltime monitoring, monitoring can be reduced to part-time or spot-checking, or can be discontinued. Such a decision would be made in consultation among the Native American monitors/Monitoring Tribes, the Principal Investigator, and City staff. CUL -3 Following the conclusion of monitoring, a report shall be prepared documenting the methods and results of the monitoring program and submitted to the City and the SCCIC. CUL -4 In the event that human remains are discovered, the County Coroner shall be contacted. If the remains are determined to be of Native American origin, the Most Likely Descendant, as identified by the NAHC, shall be contacted in order to determine proper treatment and disposition of the remains. All requirements of Health & Safety Code Section 7050.5 and Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 shall be followed. HELIX Environmental Planning 26 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project I October 2018 6.0 REFERENCES Bean, Lowell John, and Florence C. Shipek 1978 Luiseno. In California, edited by Robert F. Heizer, pp. 550-563. Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 8. William C. Sturtevant, general editor. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Bean, Lowell John and Charles R. Smith 1978 Gabrielino. In California, edited by Robert F. Heizer, pp. 538-549. Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, William C. Sturtevant, general editor, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Bean, Lowell J., Sylvia B. Vane, and Jackson Young 1991 The Cahuilla Landscape: The Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains. BaIlena Press, Menlo Park, CA. Boscana, Geronimo 1947 Chinigchinich. A Historical Account of the Origin, Customs, and Traditions of the Indians at the Missionary Establishment of St. Juan Capistrano, Alta -California. Translated by Alfred Robinson. Biobooks, Oakland. Originally published in 1846. Bowman, Roy H. 1973 Soil Survey of the San Diego Area, California. US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service and Forest Service. Cameron, Constance 1987 Archaeological Investigations on the Rancho San Clemente, Orange County, California. Archaeological Research Facility California State University, Fullerton. Carter, George F. 1957 Pleistocene Man at San Diego. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore. 1978 An American Lower Paleolithic. Anthropological Journal of Canada 16:2-38. 1980 Earlier Than You Think: A Personal View of Man in America. Texas A&M University Press, College Station. City of Seal Beach n.d. About the City of Seal Beach. Electronic document available at http://www.seaIbeachca.gov/About. Accessed on October 7, 2018. Edwards, Andrew 2017 Ceremony memorializes reburial of indigenous people's remains at Cal State Long Beach. Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, published September 22, 2016, updated September 1, 2017. Electronic document available at https://www.presstelegram.com/2016/09/22/ceremony-memorializes-reburial-of- indigenous-peoples-remains-at-cal-state-long-beach/. Accessed on October 8, 2018. HELIX Environmental Planning 27 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project I October 2018 Elsasser, A.B. 1978 Development of Regional Prehistoric Cultures. In California, edited by Robert F. Heizer, pp. 37-57. Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, William C. Sturtevant, general editor. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Erlandson, Jon M. 1994 Early Hunter -Gatherers of the California Coast. New York, Plenum Press. 1997 The Middle Holocene along the California Coast. In Archaeology of the California Coast during the Middle Holocene, edited by J.M. Erlandson and M.A. Glassow. pp. 61-72. Perspectives in California Archaeology, Vol. 4, J.E. Arnold, series editor. Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles. Gallegos, Dennis R. 2002 Southern California in Transition. In Catalysts to Complexity: Late Holocene Societies of the Southern California Coast, edited by J. M. Erlandson and T. L. Jones, pp. 27-40. Perspectives in California Archaeology, Vol. 6, J. E. Arnold, series editor. Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles. Golla, Victor 2007 Linguistic Prehistory. In California Prehistory: Colonization, Culture, and Complexity, edited by T. L. Jones, and K. A. Klar, pp. 71-82. AltaMira Press, New York. Grobaty, Tim 2017 Seal Beach: Seals brought a new name to Bay City 100 years ago. Press -Telegram, published July 15, 2013, updated September 1, 2017. Electronic document available at https://www.presstelegram.com/2013/07/15/seal-beach-seals-brought-a-new-name- to-bay-city-100-years-ago/. Accessed on October 7, 2018. Hedges, Ken, and Christina Beresford 1986 Santa Ysabel Ethnobotany. San Diego Museum of Man Ethnic Technology Notes No. 20. Jennings, Charles W. 1962 California Geological Survey, Geologic Atlas of California Map No. 007, 1:250,000 scale. Electronic document available at http://www.guake.ca.gov/gmaps/GAM/longbeach/longbeach.html. Accessed on September 28, 2018. Juaneno Band of Mission Indians 2016 The Tribe. luaneno Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen Nation. Electronic document available at http://www.juaneno.com/, accessed on June 23, 2016. Kaiser, Dennis 1995 Seal Beach History. Sun Newspaper, Vol. 29, No. 26, October 26, 1995. Electronic document available at http://www.kastner.us/seal beach history.html. Accessed on October 7, 2018. HELIX Environmental Planning 28 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project I October 2018 Kroeber, A.L. 1976 Handbook of California Indians. Dover, New York. Originally published 1925 as Bulletin 78 of the Bureau of American Ethnology of the Smithsonian Institution. Mason, Roger 1987 Research Design for Evaluation of Coastal Archaeological Sites in Northern Orange County, California. Scientific Resource Surveys, Inc. Report on file at South Central Coastal Information Center, California State University Fullerton. McCawley, William 2006 The FirstAngelinos: The Gabrielino Indians of Los Angeles. Malki Museum Press and Ballena Press, Banning and Novato, CA. Found in "Mission San Gabriel Arcangel" Wikipedia. Electronic document available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Mission San Gabriel Arc%C3%Aingel. Accessed June 1, 2015. McDonald, Meg, and James D. Eighmey 2004 Late Period Prehistory in San Diego. In Prehistoric and Historic Archaeology of Metropolitan San Diego: A Historic Properties Background Study. Prepared for the Metropolitan Wastewater Department, City of San Diego. ASM Affiliates, Encinitas, CA. Miller, Wick R. 1986 Numic Languages. In Great Basin, edited by W. L. D'Azevedo, pp. 98-112. Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 11. William C. Sturtevant, general editor. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Minshall, Herbert L. 1976 The Broken Stones. Copley Books, San Diego. Moratto, Michael J. 1984 California Archaeology. Academic Press, Orlando. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) 2014 Electronic document available at http://forecast.weather.gov/MapClick.php?zoneid=CAZ048#.VGlzkPOtA1U. Natural Resources Conservation Service 2018 Web Soil Survey. Electronic document available at https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx. NETR Online 2018 Historic Aerials. Nationwide Environmental Title Research, LLC. Electronic document available at: http://www.historicaerials.com. Orange County Historical Society 2016 A Brief History of Orange County California. Electronic document available at http://www.orangecountvhistory.org/history-brief.html, accessed on June 28, 2016. HELIX Environmental Planning 29 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project I October 2018 Orange County Recorder n.d. Spanish and Mexican Ranchos of Orange County. Orange County Recorder Archives. Electronic document available at https://web.archive.org/web/20070812214402/http://www.ocrecorder.com/Archives/f orms/Spanish%20and%20Mexican%20Ranchos.pdf. Accessed on October 7, 2018. Orange County Register 2005 History of Seal Beach. Electronic document available at https://www.ocregister.com/2005/10/05/history-of-seal-beach/. Accessed on October 7, 2018. Parker, Patricia L. and Thomas F. King 1998 Guidelines for Evaluating and Documenting Traditional Cultural Properties. National Park Service, Washington, D.C. Rancho Los Alamitos n.d. The Rancho Los Alamitos; Ownership and Occupancy. Electronic document available at https://www.rancholosalamitos.com/aboutus/ownership.html. Accessed on October 7, 2018. Rigby, Julia Edith 2012 A Celebration of Ceremony Among the Juaneno Band of Mission Indians, Acjachemen Nation. Scripps Senior Theses. Paper 78. Electronic document available at https://scholarship.claremont.edu/scripps theses/78/. Accessed on October 8, 2018. Robinson, Alfred 1947 Life in California. Biobooks, Oakland. Originally published in 1846. Shipley, William F. 1978 Native Languages of California. In California, edited by Robert F. Heizer, pp. 80-90. Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, William C. Sturtevant, general editor, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Stickel, E. Gary 1978 Los Angeles -Long Beach Harbor Areas Prehistory and Early History, Los Angeles County, California. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District. Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. 2018 Third Quarter 2018 Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring and Remediation System Operations Status Report, Tesoro Refining & Marketing Company LLC, Tesoro No. 97610-6066, 490 Pacific Coast Highway, Seal Beach California. OCHCA Case No. 86UT206. Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., Long Beach, CA. Report submitted to Orange County Health Care Agency, Santa Ana, CA. Sutton, Mark Q. 2009 People and Language: Defining the Takic Expansion into Southern California. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly 41(2&3):31-93. HELIX Environmental Planning 30 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project I October 2018 The Regents of the University of California 2016 Juaneno. Survey of California and Other Indian Languages. Linguistics Department. University of California Berkeley. Electronic document available at http://Iinguistics.berkeley.edu/survey/languages/4uaneno.php. Accessed on June 23, 2016. Tongva People n.d. Tongva People. A dynamic study of the Villages and Locations of the Gabrielino-Tongva Indians. Electronic document available at http://www.tongvapeople.org/ Van Horn, David M. 1980 Archaeological Survey Report: The 2,575 -Acre Tres Hermanos Ranch in San Bernardino and Los Angeles Counties, California. Archaeological Associates, Costa Mesa. Report on file at the South Central Coastal Information Center. California State University, Fullerton. Wallace, William J. 1955 A Suggested Chronology for Southern California Coastal Archaeology. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 11:214-230. 1978 Post -Pleistocene Archeology, 9000 to 2000 B.C. In California, edited by Robert F. Heizer, pp. 25-36. Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8. William C. Sturtevant, general editor. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Warren, Claude N. 1967 The San Dieguito Complex: A Review and Hypothesis. American Antiquity 32:168-185. 1968 Cultural Tradition and Ecological Adaptation on the Southern California Coast. In Archaic Prehistory in the Western United States, edited by C. Irwin -Williams, pp. 1-14. Eastern New Mexico Contributions in Anthropology 1(3). Portales, New Mexico. Warren, C.N., G. Siegler, and F. Dittmer 2004 Paleoindian and Early Archaic Periods. In Prehistoric and Historic Archaeology of Metropolitan San Diego: A Historic Properties Background Study. Prepared for the Metropolitan Wastewater Department, City of San Diego. ASM Affiliates, Encinitas, California. Weinman, Lois J., and E. Gary Stickel 1978 Los Angeles -Long Beach Harbor Areas Prehistory and Early History, Los Angeles County, California. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District. Report on file at South Central Coastal Information Center, California State University Fullerton. Welch, Rosanne 2006 A Brief History of the Tongva Tribe: The Native Inhabitants of the Lands of the Puente Hills Preserve. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Department of History, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, California. HELIX Environmental Planning 31 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project I October 2018 White, Raymond C. 1963 Luiseno Social Organization. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 48(2):91-194. Wilke, Philip 1974 Settlement and Subsistence at Perris Reservoir: A Summary of Archaeological Investigations. In Perris Reservoir Archaeology, edited by J.F. O'Connell, P.J. Wilke, T.F. King, and C.L. Mix, pp. 20-30. California Department of Parks and Recreation Reports No. 14. Sacramento. HELIX Environmental Planning 32 Appendix A Resumes Mary Robbins -Wade, RPA Director of Cultural Resources FSI/- ironmental Planning E a / \/ Summary of Qu l;f;ca-tions Ms. Robbins -Wade has over 35 years of experience in both archaeological research Education and general environmental studies. She oversees the management of all of HELIX's Master of Arts, archaeological, historic, and interpretive projects; prepares and administers budgets Anthropology, San and contracts; designs research programs; supervises personnel; and writes reports. Diego State Ms. Robbins -Wade has managed or participated in hundreds of projects under the University, California, California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as well as numerous archaeological 1990 studies under various federal jurisdictions, addressing Section 106 compliance and Bachelor of Arts, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) issues. She has an excellent relationship Anthropology, with the local Native American community and the Native American Heritage University of Commission (NAHC). Ms. Robbins -Wade has worked in Southern California California, Santa archaeology for most of her robust career. Her clients regularly include numerous Barbara, 1981 government agencies, including the counties of San Diego, Imperial, Riverside, Orange, and Los Angeles and the cities of San Diego, Vista, Oceanside, Chula Vista, Carlsbad, La Mesa, Poway, Santee, Escondido, and others. She has conducted Registrations/ studies for many water districts/water agencies, Caltrans, SANDAL, U.S. Navy, Certifications SDG&E, UC San Diego, San Diego Community College District, various non -profits, Register of and a variety of other entities. Although Ms. Robbins -Wade has extensive experience Professional with public sector projects, most of her work has been for private developers. She has Archaeologists managed projects from monitoring of single-family home remodels to survey and data #10294,1991 recovery programs for Specific Plan areas, large residential developments, and a County of San Diego, variety of commercial projects. Work for public projects has ranged from constraints Approved CEQA studies for pipeline alternatives to survey, testing, and monitoring programs for public Consultant forArchaeological projects, such as parks, roadways, and various utilities. Ms. Robbins -Wade has also Resources managed a range of monitoring projects in the public sector, including the installation Orange County of a manhole in Old Town State Historic Park, an emergency pipeline repair in a Approved culturally sensitive area, monitoring improvements to Highway 76 along the San Luis Archaeologist, 2016 Rey River, and lengthy monitoring programs for sewer/water/storm water projects. Riverside County Approved Cultural Selected Project Experience Resources Moulton Niguel Water District Regional Lift Force Main Replacement (2017 - Consultant, 2017 2018).Cultural Resources Task Lead for the replacement of a regional lift station NCTD, Roadway force main operated by Moulton Niguel Water District (MNWD). The project Worker ID #CO2943, comprises an approximately 9,200 linear foot alignment within Laguna Niguel 2015 Regional Park in Orange County, in an area that is quite sensitive in terms of cultural resources. HELIX is supporting Tetra Tech throughout the preliminary design, Professional environmental review (CEQA), and final design, including permitting with applicable Affiliations state and federal regulatory agencies. The cultural resources survey will inform Society for American project design, in order to avoid or minimize potential impacts to cultural resources. Archaeology Overseeing background research and constraints analysis, Native American Mary Robbins -Wade, RPA Director of Cultural Resources coordination, cultural resources survey, coordination with MNWD and Tetra Tech, and report preparation. Work performed for MNWD, as a subconsultant to Tetra Tech. Moulton Niguel Water Dis Pipeline Align (2017 - 2018).Cultural Resources Task Lead for the replacement of existing potable water (PW) and recycled water (RW) pipelines by Moulton Niguel Water District (MNWD). The study area is situated within the Mission Viejo Country Club on the east side of the 1-5 and MNWD's Wastewater Plant 3A in the western portions. The general area is sensitive for cultural resources. Overseeing background research and constraints analysis, Native American coordination, cultural resources survey, coordination with MNWD and Tetra Tech, and report preparation. Work pas a subconsultant to GHD, with MNWD as the lead agency. Orange County Sanitation District Newhope-Placentia TSR, No. 2-72 B (2016). Cultural Resources Task Leader/Principal Investigator for the cultural resources study for this sewer replacement project in Anaheim. The cultural resources study included a records search/literature review, field visit, Native American outreach, and preparation of a report. Work performed as a subconsultant to Lee & Ro, Inc., with Orange County Sanitation District as the lead agency. Santa Margarita Water District 3A Water Reclamation Plant Tertiary Treatment Expansion (2016). Cultural Resources Task Leader/Principal Investigator for the cultural resources study for proposed improvements to an existing water reclamation facility in Mission Viejo. The cultural resources study included a records search/literature review, Native American Heritage Commission correspondence, preparation of a report, and assisting the District with Native American outreach. Euclid and Broadway Project (2016). Project Manager/Principal Investigator for the cultural resources study for the redevelopment of a commercial property into residential uses in the City of Anaheim. The cultural resources study included a records search and literature review, historic evaluation, Native American outreach, field visit, and preparation of a report. Work performed for KB Home. Orange County Sanitation District Newhope-Placentia Trunk Sewer Replacement, No. 2-72A (2015 - 2016). Cultural Resources Task Leader/Principal Investigator for the cultural resources study for this sewer replacement project in Fullerton and Anaheim. The cultural resources study included a records search/literature review, field visit, Native American outreach, and preparation of a report. Work performed as a subconsultant to Lee & Ro, Inc., with Orange County Sanitation District as the lead agency. 28th Street between Island Avenue and Clay Avenue Archaeological Monitoring (2014 - 2018).Project Manager/Principal Investigator for a utilities undergrounding project in a historic neighborhood of East San Diego. Responsible for project management; coordination of archaeological and Native American monitors; coordination with forensic anthropologist, Native American representative/Most Likely Descendent, and City staff regarding treatment of possible 2 fit tal Planning Em Mary Robbins -Wade, RPA Director of Cultural Resources human remains; oversaw identification of artifacts and cultural features, report preparation, and resource documentation. Work performed for the City of San Diego. 30th St Pipeline Replacement (2014 - 2015).Project Manager/Principal Investigator for a 3.4 -mile City of San Diego pipeline replacement project that traverses several historic neighborhoods in North Park, South Park, Golden Hill, and Southeastern San Diego. Oversaw background research and report preparation. Work performed for Rick Engineering. Balboa Station Specific Plan Area First Screencheck PEIR (2016 - 2017).Cultural Resources Task Manager for a Specific Plan that would provide the policy framework to establish transit -oriented development and multi -modal improvements within the Specific Plan area. One of the main objectives of the Specific Plan is to improve access to existing and future transit facilities. Oversaw background research, Native American outreach, cultural resources survey, and technical report in support of the PEIR. Work performed for RRM Design Group, with City of San Diego as the lead agency. Buena Sanitation District Green Oak Sewer Replacement Project (2016 - 2017).Project Manager/Principal Investigator for a cultural resources testing program in conjunction with a proposed sewer replacement project for the City of Vista. Oversaw background research, fieldwork, site record update, Native American coordination, and report preparation. Work performed for Harris & Associates, Inc. EI Camino Real Road Widening -Archaeological Monitoring (2015 - 2016).Project Manager/Principal Investigator for an archaeological monitoring project for the City of Carlsbad in a culturally sensitive area. Project requires close coordination with Native American representatives, City staff, construction crews, and another cultural resources firm to ensure that there are no impacts to significant cultural resources. Work performed for the City of Carlsbad. Heritage Bluffs II (2014 - 2015).Project Manager/Principal Investigator for a cultural resources survey of approximately 170 acres and testing program at two archaeological sites, for a proposed residential development in the City of San Diego. Worked with project applicant and Red Tail on project design that would avoid impacts to a site area with cultural features and cremated human remains. Much of the work was completed prior to coming to HELIX, between 2007 and 2014. Work performed for Project Design Consultants. Lake Wohlford Dam (2015 - 2015).Project Manager/Principal Investigator for a cultural resources survey for proposed dam replacement for the City of Escondido. Oversaw background research; field survey; recording eight previously undocumented sites and five isolates, as well as updating 14 previously recorded sites; report preparation; and Native American outreach. Provided input for location of 3 HE tal Planning Em Mary Robbins -Wade, RPA Director of Cultural Resources staging areas and access routes. Coordinating with City, engineering consultant, and environmental consultant. Work performed for AECOM. Lilac Hills Ranch (2014 - 2017).Project Manager/Principal Investigator of a cultural resources survey and testing program for an approximately 608 -acre mixed-use development in the Valley Center area. Oversaw background research, field survey, testing, recording of archaeological sites and historic structures, and report preparation. Responsible for development of the research design and data recovery program, preparation of the preservation plan, and Native American outreach and coordination. The proposed Specific Plan includes residential and commercial use, Town Center, park and private recreation areas, senior center, school site, waste recycling facility, wastewater reclamation facility, active orchards, and other supporting infrastructure. The project also included recording historic structures, development of a research design and data recovery program for a significant archaeological site, and coordination with the Native American community and the client to develop a preservation plan for a significant cultural resource. The project changed over time, so additional survey areas were included, and a variety of off-site improvement alternatives were addressed. Work performed for Accretive Investments, Inc. with County of San Diego as the lead agency. Southwest Sewer Realignment Project - Monitoring Services (2016 - 2018).Project Manager/Principal Investigator for cultural resources monitoring during construction of a sewer realignment project in western Escondido, adjacent to an ethnohistoric village site. The project is located in an area that is sensitive to both the Kumeyaay and Luiseno people, requiring close coordination with Native American monitors from both groups. Oversaw monitoring program; responsible for Native American outreach/ coordination, site record updates to reflect the finding of additional bedrock milling features, and report preparation. Work performed for the City of Escondido SR -76 East Mitigation Monitoring - Cultural Monitoring (2015 - 2018).Project Manager/Principal Investigator for a cultural resources monitoring project for roadway improvements at the SR -76/1-15 Interchange and on SR -76 along the San Luis Rey River in the Bonsall area of San Diego County. The area along the San Luis Rey River is quite sensitive in terms of cultural resources. Overseeing field monitoring, report preparation, and monitor coordination with Caltrans field staff. Responsible for Native American coordination and coordination with Caltrans cultural resources staff. Work is being conducted for Caltrans and SANDAL. 4 fit tal Planning Em Julie Roy Archaeological Field Director HELIX Environmental Planning Summary of Qualifications Ms. Roy has over 20 years of experience as an archaeologist, field lead, and Education supervisor on more than 130 projects throughout California, Nevada, Arizona, and Associate of Science, Guam. Conducted archaeological studies for a wide variety of development and Psychology, San resource management projects including work on military installations, energy and Diego City College, transmission projects, commercial and residential developments, historic archaeology San Diego, CA, 2000 projects, and water projects. Competent in all areas of archaeology and efficient in Bachelor of Arts, report preparation for a range of cultural resource studies including monitoring Anthropological projects and archaeological Phase I, II, and III studies. Ms. Roy is proficient in Archaeology, laboratory activities including artifact preparation, cataloging, identification, and University of illustration. Accomplished in the initiation, coordination and completion of field California San Diego, assignments including survey, site testing, dry and wet screening, and data recovery 2002 projects. She is also knowledgeable in the preparation of proposals and report writing Master of Arts, MA in and research, client, contractor and subcontractor correspondence, laboratory, Progress, University computer software including Microsoft, Adobe, GIS/ArcView, CADD, GPS and total- of Leicester, England, station operations, as well as in the illustration of archaeological features, artifacts, and burials. Ms. Roy is established as a qualified archaeological monitor for the City and the County of San Diego. Her experience includes working closely with representatives of San Diego County Parks and Recreation for the past 10 years and she has received accolades from numerous county representatives for her work at park facilities. For the past 4 four years, she has served as the monitoring coordinator for the San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E) Fire Resource Mitigation Initiative (FIRM) project, where she regularly provided effective communication between field monitors, construction managers/foremen, and Principal Investigators for construction projects and assisted in scheduling and tracking of project progress. Selected Project Experience Bouquet Canyon Road Project (2018 - 2018). Field Director for cultural resources survey for a proposed residential development project in the City of Santa Clarita in Los Angeles County. Duties included conducting a pedestrian survey, coordination with a Native American monitor, and completion of site forms. Work performed for Integral Communities. City of Santa Clarita is the lead agency. Padre Dam Municipal Water District East County Advanced Water Purification Program Year 2 (2018 - 2018).Field Director for cultural resources survey of the East County Advanced Water Purification project, which proposes to increase the region's supply of potable water. Duties included conducting a pedestrian survey, coordination with a Native American monitor, completion of site forms, and assistance in the preparation of a technical report. Work performed for Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, Inc., with Padre Dam Municipal Water District as the 2015 Registrations/ Certifications Professional Affiliations Society for California Archaeology Society for American Archaeology Association of Environmental Professionals Julie Roy Archaeological Field Director lead agency and Helix Water District, the County of San Diego, and the City of EI Cajon as participating agencies. Kelly Drive and Park Drive Road Diet and Multi -Use Trail Project (2018 - 2018).Field Director for the Multi -Use Trail project that proposes to create a balanced multi -modal transportation network, providing trail linkage from EI Camino Real to Agua Hedionda Lagoon in coordination with the City of Carlsbad Trails system. Duties included field direction of a testing program and preparation assistance of a survey and assessment report. Work performed GHD, Inc., with the City of Carlsbad as the lead agency. Previous Project Experience Hellman Ranch Housing Project (2003 - 2005). Field/Laboratory Crew Member on this project, which focused on data recovery for a major prehistoric site. Duties included archaeological grading monitoring, data recovery excavation, water screening, and artifact sorting, Native American burial excavation, repatriation, and the excavation of a large cremation feature. In addition, Ms. Roy prepared artifact and feature illustrations for the project. The site included numerous prehistoric activity areas within the 12 -acre archaeological site that was situated within one -mile of the Pacific Ocean. Archaeological monitoring was conducted until all subsurface activities ceased. The guidelines for Phase III recovery were set down by court recommended mitigation in accordance with State laws and the California Coastal Commission. Work performed for the City of Seal Beach. Crystal Cove Historic District (2001 - 2003). Archaeological Monitor for the monitoring and detailed documentation of a variety of historic structures within Crystal Cove State Park located in Orange County California. The project was focused on historic registry building documentation to architectural standards and protection. Work performed for California State Parks. Archaeological Survey and Testing, US Navy, Naval Weapon Station, Seal Beach - Fallbrook Annex (2005). Archaeologist on this project that included an archaeological survey and testing projects to determine the effects of road use and new road construction on previously recorded sites, in compliance with NEPA. Testing included the excavation of shovel test pits in previously recorded archaeological sites and additional archaeological survey located at the Fallbrook Naval Weapons Station. Archaeological Survey and Data Recovery, Pacific Highlands Ranch (2006). Archaeologist for an archaeological survey and data recovery excavations at a variety of prehistoric sites for a proposed commercial development in Del Mar, California. The archaeological survey and data recovery program were conducted in compliance with CEQA. 2 HELIX Envi�anmenlaf Planning Appendix D HVAC Specifications 50PG03-14 Ultra High Efficiency Single Package Electric Cooling with Optional Electric Heat Commercial Rooftop Units with PuronO Carrier (R -410A) Refrigerant, Optional EnergyX-'m (Energy Recovery Ventilator) turnto - - 'e 2 to 12.5 Nominal Tons Product Data CENTURION FA DEALER DESIGN AWARDS ma9.��ne editors'Choice TOP 10+0 PRODUCTS 20,05, 1) Peron the environmentally sound refrigerant AHRI* CAPACITY RATINGS 50PG03-14 UNIT 50PG NOMINAL CAPACITY Tons NET COOLING CAPACITY (Btuh) TOTAL POWER (kW) SEER EERt SOUND RATING (dB) IEER 03 2.0 24,000 2.1 14.1 11.5 75 - 04 3.0 35,800 3.1 14.1 11.7 73 - 05 4.0 47,500 4.0 15.0 12.2 72 - 06 5.0 58,500 4.9 14.8 12.2 78 - 07 6.0 69,000 5.8 - 12.2 78 13.0 08 7.5 88,000 7.0 - 12.7 80 13.5 09 8.5 102,000 8.4 - 12.4 80 13.4 12 10.0 119,000 9.9 - 12.2 80 13.0 14 12.5 150,000 13.2 - 11.5 83 11.6 LEGEND EER - Energy Efficiency Ratio SEER - Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio *Air Conditioning, Heating and Refrigeration Institute. t AHRI does not require EER ratings for units with capacity below 65,000 Btu h. NOTES: 1. Tested in accordance with AHRI Standards 210-94 (sizes 03-12), 360-93 (size 14). 2. Ratings are net values, reflecting the effects of circulating fan heat. 3. Ratings are based on: Cooling Standard: 80°F db, 67°F wb indoor entering -air temperature and 95°F db air entering outdoor unit. IPLV Standard: 80°F db, 67°F wb indoor entering -air temperature and 80°F db outdoor entering -air temperature. 4. All 50PG units are in compliance with Energy StarO and ASHRAE 90.1 2010 Energy Standard for minimum SEER and EER requirements. 5. Units are rated in accordance with AHRI sound standards 270 or 370. 6. Per AHRI, Integrated Energy Efficiency Ratio (IEER) became effective beginning January 1, 2010. Integrated Part -Load Value (IPLV) was super- seded by IEER on January 1, 2010. IEER is intended to be a measure of merit for the part load performance of the unit. Each building may have different part load performance due to local occupancy schedules, building construction, building location and ventilation requirements. For specific building energy analysis, an hour -by -hour analysis program should be used. Use of the AHRI Certified TM Mark indicates a manufacturer's participation in the program For verification of certification for individual products, go to www.ahridirectory.org. Appendix E Traffic Impact Study Traffic Impact Study For: 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project In the City of Seal Beach Prepared for: A & S Engineering, Inc. December, 2017 Kimley))) Horn TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR 490 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY PROJECT IN THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH Prepared for: A & S Engineering, Inc. Prepared by. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 765 The City Drive, Suite 200 Orange, California 92868 December, 2017 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR 490 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY PROJECT IN THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................................................................1 AREADEVELOPMENT...........................................................................................................................................................................1 PROJECTDESCRIPTION........................................................................................................................................................................1 ANALYSIS SCENARIOS AND METHODOLOGY............................................................................................................................4 AnalysisScenarios..............................................................................................................................................................................4 ANALYSISMETHODOLOGY.................................................................................................................................................................6 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Methodology.......................................................................................................6 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Methodology..................................................................................................................7 TrafficImpact Criteria......................................................................................................................................................................8 EXISTINGSTREET SYSTEM.................................................................................................................................................................8 RoadwaySystem.................................................................................................................................................................................8 ExistingTransit Services..............................................................................................................................................................10 AccidentHistory Assessment.....................................................................................................................................................11 ExistingTraffic Volumes..............................................................................................................................................................11 PROJECTTRAFFIC.................................................................................................................................................................................15 TripGeneration................................................................................................................................................................................15 TripDistribution and Assignment...........................................................................................................................................15 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS..................................................................................................................................... 20 Intersection Analysis - Existing Plus Project Conditions..................................................................................20 Roadway Segment Analysis - Existing Plus Project Conditions.................................................................... 20 FUTURECONDITIONS.........................................................................................................................................................................20 Opening Year 2019 Without Project......................................................................................................................................20 Intersection Analysis - Opening Year 2019 Without Project Conditions.................................................28 Roadway Segment Analysis - Opening Year 2019 Without Project Conditions .................................... 28 Opening Year 2019 With Project Conditions.....................................................................................................................28 Intersection Analysis - Opening Year 2019 With Project Conditions........................................................ 28 Roadway Segment Analysis - Opening Year 2019 With Project Conditions...........................................28 Future Build -Out 2039 Without Project...............................................................................................................................28 Intersection Analysis - Future Build -Out 2039 Without Project Conditions..........................................34 Roadway Segment Analysis - Future Build -Out 2039 Without Project Conditions ............................ 34 Future Build -Out 2039 With Project Conditions..............................................................................................................34 Intersection Analysis - Future Build -Out 2039 With Project Conditions.................................................34 Roadway Segment Analysis - Future Build -Out 2039 With Project Conditions .................................... 34 MITIGATIONMEASURES...................................................................................................................................................................41 SITE PARKING AND CIRCULATION..............................................................................................................................................41 TRUCKSERVICE IMPACTS................................................................................................................................................................42 CONSTRUCTION PERIOD IMPACTS............................................................................................................................................. 42 FINDINGSAND CONCLUSIONS.......................................................................................................................................................42 APPENDICES Appendix A Approved Scope of Study Appendix B SWITRS Accident Data Appendix C Traffic Data Collection Sheets Appendix D Intersection Analysis Worksheets Appendix E Roadway Analysis Worksheets Appendix F OCTAM Plots LIST OF FIGURES Figure1- Vicinity Map..........................................................................................................................................................................2 Figure2 - Project Site Plan..................................................................................................................................................................3 Figure3 - Study Area.............................................................................................................................................................................5 Figure4 -Roadway Network..............................................................................................................................................................9 Figure 5 - Existing Lane Configuration and Traffic Control.............................................................................................12 Figure6 - Existing Traffic Volumes.............................................................................................................................................13 Figure 7 - Trip Distribution Assumptions................................................................................................................................18 Figure 8 - Project -Related Traffic Volumes.............................................................................................................................19 Figure 9 - Existing Plus Project Traffic Volumes...................................................................................................................21 30 Figure 10 - Cumulative Project Locations................................................................................................................................25 Figure 11 - Cumulative Projects Traffic Volumes.................................................................................................................26 Figure 12 - Opening Year 2019 Without Project Traffic Volumes................................................................................27 Figure 13 - Opening Year 2019 With Project Traffic Volumes....................................................................................... 31 Figure 14 - Future Build -Out 2039 Without Project Traffic Volumes........................................................................35 39 Figure 15 - Future Build -Out 2039 With Project Traffic Volumes...............................................................................38 Figure 16 - Delivery Truck Circulation......................................................................................................................................43 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 - Summary of Intersection Operations - Existing Conditions.......................................................................14 Table 2 - Summary of Roadway Operations - Existing Conditions..............................................................................16 Table 3 - Summary of Project Trip Generation......................................................................................................................17 Table 4 - Summary of Intersection Operations - Existing Plus Project.....................................................................22 Table 5 - Summary of Roadway Operations - Existing Plus Project...........................................................................23 Table 6 - Summary of Cumulative Projects..............................................................................................................................24 Table 7 - Summary of Intersection Operations - Opening Year 2019 Without Project.....................................29 Table 8 - Summary of Roadway Operations - Opening Year 2019 Without Project ........................................... 30 Table 9 - Summary of Intersection Operations - Opening Year 2019 With Project............................................32 Table 10 - Summary of Roadway Operations - Opening Year 2019 With Project...............................................33 Table 11- Summary of Intersection Operations - Future Build -Out 2039 Without Project ..........................36 Table 12 - Summary of Roadway Operations - Future Build -Out 2039 Without Project ................................. 37 Table 13 - Summary of Intersection Operations - Future Build -Out 2039 With Project .................................. 39 Table 14 - Summary of Roadway Operations - Future Build -Out 2039 With Project........................................40 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This traffic impact study has been prepared to evaluate the project -related traffic impacts associated with the proposed development of a gas station and convenience store located at 490 Pacific Coast Highway in the City of Seal Beach, California. The project is estimated to generate 3,286 daily trips, 200 morning peak hour trips, and 224 evening peak hour trips. After applying pass -by reductions, the development is projected to generate a net of 2,300 daily trips, 140 morning peak hour trips, and 157 evening peak hour trips. Existing traffic volumes for study intersections were collected in November 2017. Existing volumes, along with existing lane geometrics and traffic control at each intersection, were used in conducting peak hour Level of Service (LOS) analyses. Under Existing Conditions, all the study intersections and roadways are currently operating at LOS C or better. Near-term future traffic forecasts have been developed to evaluate Cumulative Conditions for the anticipated project opening year. The Opening Year is estimated to be Year 2019. The Opening Year 2019 scenario includes a 1% annual growth rate over a two-year period to 2019, applied to Existing traffic volumes. Additionally, traffic from cumulative projects located in the City of Seal Beach and inthe City of Long Beach were added to the study area. This scenario was analyzed both with and without the project, and all study intersections and roadways will operate at LOS D or better. To derive the Future Build -Out 2039 volumes, the Orange County Transportation Analysis Model (OCTAM) was used as a basis to develop an annual growth rate to apply to Existing traffic volumes. Based on the growth anticipated between Existing and Build -Out years shown in the model, a growth rate of 0.5 percent per year was applied over a 22 -year period to grow Existing traffic volumes to the Future Build - Out 2039 scenario. This scenario was analyzed both with and without the project, and all study intersections and roadways will operate at LOS D or better. The intersection of Pacific Coast Highway at Marvista Drive/5th Street, which is controlled by Caltrans, will experience a significant impact based on the City of Seal Beach guidelines. Although the intersection operates at an acceptable Level of Service D or better in all study scenarios, the project impact exceeds the threshold established in the City's guidelines. However, it should be noted that the intersection will operate at a LOS B based on the HCM delay methodology used by Caltrans, and the project does not cause an impact per Caltrans guidelines. The following measure would mitigate the impact from a City perspective: - Restripe the eastbound approach to provide a left -turn lane, a shared left -through lane, and a right -turn lane. The traffic signal will need to be modified to provide split phasing in the east - west direction. It is recommended that the necessity of such an improvement be coordinated between Caltrans and the City of Seal Beach staff. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR 490 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY PROJECT IN THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH INTRODUCTION This traffic impact study has been prepared to evaluate the project -related traffic impacts associated with the proposed development of a gas station and convenience store located at 490 Pacific Coast Highway in the City of Seal Beach, California. The project site is located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway and Marvista Drive/5th Street. The study assesses the project impact by providing an analysis of existing and future conditions, with and without project traffic. This Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) document follows the assumptions established during discussions with the City of Seal Beach staff and the approved Scope of Study Form. The approved Scope of Study form is provided in Appendix A. This report has been prepared in accordance with the City of Seal Beach Traffic Impact Study Guidelines, dated March 2010. AREA DEVELOPMENT There are existing retail and residential developments in the vicinity of the project site. The project site is bounded to the north by a retail plaza, to the east by Pacific Coast Highway, to the south by 5th Street, and to the west by residential housing. Currently, the project site is fenced -off and vacant; however, the vacant lot shares access with an existing and operational retail plaza. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project will be developed on the northwest corner of Pacific Coast Highway and Marvista Drive/5th Street in the City of Seal Beach. The project site location is shown in its regional setting on Figure 1. The proposed project will include the development of a 16 -pump gas station with a 2,400 square -foot building consisting of a convenience store. Ingress and egress to the site will be provided via four unsignalized driveways: two driveways along Pacific Coast Highway and two driveways along 5th Street. The project site plan is shown on Figure 2. The project site is in a General Commercial Zone (CG) per the City of Seal Beach Municipal Code. Per Section 11.2.10.010 of the Municipal Code, automobile service stations are allowed in CG zones subject to the approval of a conditional use permit. 490 Pacific Coast Highway - 1 - Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Study - DRAFT - December, 2017 I' �l N ,�iipElsigg D Cresivinw Av$ .i �} a Catalloa Ave Project Site p�a�,stanve m BRIDOEP0LL �'� v itwond A.ue 9aflast Point u, �' a m e �,gFathom AV, Gl �p per W.i-h,gline Dr RoisaAvt 9nfsaA,. ani .y p r oasfy heal Beach y L r Seal ,� Beach Pier � Playground P FIGURE 1 N VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE KfiMM\IA\ / Morn FIGURE 2 PROJECT SITE PLAN -3- 5TH STREET N NOT TO SCALE Kimlev,>)Horn ANALYSIS SCENARIOS AND METHODOLOGY Analysis Scenarios Based on the City's guidelines, this traffic study provides an evaluation of project -related impacts for the following analysis scenarios: • Existing Conditions • Existing Plus Project • Opening Year 2019 Without Project • Opening Year 2019 With Project • Future Build -Out 2039 Without Project • Future Build -Out 2039 Cumulative Base With Project Any mitigation measures for the future conditions will be identified, if necessary. The study area was determined with input from City Staff through the scoping process. A copy of the approved Scope of Study is provided in Appendix A. The following study intersections were identified for evaluation: 1. Pacific Coast Highway at 1St Street* 2. Pacific Coast Highway at Marvista Drive/5th Street* 3. Pacific Coast Highway at Bolsa Avenue/Main Street* 4. Pacific Coast Highway at Balboa Drive/12th Street* 5. 1St Street at Marina Drive 6. 5th Street at Marina Drive *Caltrans Intersection Moreover, the following roadway segments were identified for evaluation: 1. Pacific Coast Highway between 1St Street and Marvista Drive/5th Street 2. Pacific Coast Highway between Marvista Drive/5th Street and Bolsa Avenue/Main Street 3. Pacific Coast Highway between Bolsa Avenue/Main Street and Balboa Drive/12th Street 4. Pacific Coast Highway between Balboa Drive/12th Street and Seal Beach Boulevard S. 5th Street between Pacific Coast Highway and Marina Drive The location of the study intersections and segments are shown on Figure 3. 490 Pacific Coast Highway - 4 - Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Study - DRAFT - December, 2017 FIGURE 3 STUDY AREA -5- NOT TO SCALE LEGEND: OStudy Intersection Study Roadway Kimlev >> Horn ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Methodology Peak hour operating conditions at signalized intersections are evaluated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology, in accordance with the City of Seal Beach guidelines. The ICU methodology provides a comparison of the number of vehicles passing through an intersection to the theoretical hourly vehicular capacity of that intersection during a given hour. The ICU calculation assumes a per -lane capacity of 1,700 vehicles per hour (vph) for each through and right -turn lane, and a capacity of 1,600 vph for each left -turn and shared lane. A separate "unofficial' de facto right -turn lane is assumed where there is no separately striped right -turn lane, if the width of the outside through lane is 19 feet or more, and parking is prohibited during the peak period. A clearance factor of 0.10 (10%) of the total intersection capacity is included in the ICU calculation to account for the effect of the yellow and all -red phases of the signal cycle. The ICU calculation returns a volume -to -capacity (V/C) ratio thattranslates into a corresponding Level of Service (LOS) measure, ranging from LOS A, representing uncongested, free-flowing conditions; to LOS F, representing over -capacity conditions. A summary description of each Level of Service and the corresponding V/C ratio is provided on the chart on the following page. LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS: ICU METHODOLOGY Level of ICU Value Description Service A 0.00-0.60 EXCELLENT - No vehicle waits longer than one red light and no approach phase is fully used. B 0.61-0.70 VERY GOOD - An occasional approach phase is fully utilized; many drivers begin to feel somewhat restricted within groups of vehicles. C 0.71-0.80 GOOD - Occasionally drivers may have to wait through more than one red light; back-ups may develop behind turning vehicles. FAIR - Delays may be substantial during portions of the rush hours, but D 0.81-0.90 enough lower volume periods occur to permit clearing of developing lines, preventing excessive back-ups. POOR - Represents the most vehicles that the intersection approaches can E 0.91 - 1.00 accommodate; may be long lines of waiting vehicles through several signal cycles. FAILURE - Back-ups from nearby locations or on cross streets may F > 1.00 restrict or prevent movement of vehicles out of the intersection approaches. Long delays with continuously increasing queue lengths. 490 Pacific Coast Highway - 6 - Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Study - DRAFT - December, 2017 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Methodology Peak hour operating conditions at the unsignalized project driveway intersections and at intersections that are under Caltrans' jurisdiction are analyzed using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) delay methodology in accordance with the Caltrans Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies. Pacific Coast Highway is a Caltrans facility; therefore, all intersections along Pacific Coast Highway will also be analyzed using the HCM methodology. For signalized intersections, the HCM methodology estimates the average delay (in average seconds per vehicle) for each of the movements through the intersection, taking into account a number of factors, including number of lanes, volume of traffic, and signal timing and phasing. For unsignalized intersections, the HCM methodology analysis determines the average delay for each vehicle making any movement from the stop -controlled minor street, as well as leftturns from the major street. Delay values are calculated based on the relationship between the traffic on the major street and the availability of acceptable gaps in the traffic stream through which conflicting traffic movements can be made. The HCM delay values translate to Level of Service designations, also ranging from LOS A to LOS F. A summary of the delay ranges for each Level of Service is provided in the following chart. HCM-BASED LEVEL OF SERVICE AND DELAY RANGES FOR SIGNALIZED AND UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level of Service Signalized Intersection (Average delay per vehicle, in seconds) 1 Unsignalized Intersections (Average delay per vehicle, in seconds) 2 A <10 0-10 B >10-20 >10-15 C >20-35 >15-25 D >35-55 >25-35 E >55-80 >35-50 F >80 >50 1 Source: Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2010), Exhibit 18-4. 2 Source: Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2010), Exhibits 19-1 and 20-2. For roadway segments between intersections, Level of Service is calculated using the HCM Methodology, per the City's Traffic Impact Study Guidelines, via the Highway Capacity Software (HCS). Basic input data for conducting the roadway segment analysis include roadway lane geometry and peak hour volumes. For purposes of this study, LOS D is considered satisfactory on all study area roadway segments. 490 Pacific Coast Highway - 7 - Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Study - DRAFT - December, 2017 Traffic Impact Criteria A significant impact at a study intersection, according to the City of Seal Beach guidelines, will occur when the addition of project -related trips causes the volume -to -capacity ratio (V/C) at an intersection to increase by the thresholds indicated on the table below. Mitigation measures must be identified for intersections that show significant project impact based on the thresholds in the table below. Existing V/C V/C Difference 0.00-0.69 0.06 0.70-0.79 0.04 0.80-0.89 0.02 0.90+ 0.01 For Caltrans intersections, Level of Service standards and impact criteria specified by Caltrans will apply. The Caltrans Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies states that "Caltrans endeavors to maintain a target Level of Service at the transition between LOS C and LOS D on State highway facilities. If an existing State highway facility is operating at less than the target LOS, the existing Level of Service is to be maintained." EXISTING STREET SYSTEM Roadway System Regional access to the project site is provided by Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1), which is oriented in an east -west direction through the City of Seal Beach and runs directly adjacent to the project site. Pacific Coast Highway serves as the main thoroughfare that connects the various beach cities in Orange County. Local access to the project vicinity is provided by several roadways. Roadway classifications were taken from the City of Seal Beach General Plan Circulation Element. These roadway classifications are shown on Figure 4. Pacific Coast Highway(SR-11 is a four -lane divided roadway with two lanes in each direction and raised median. There are existing bike lanes to the north of 5th Street. On -street parking is allowed to the south of 5th Street. Pacific Coast Highway has a right-of-way width of 100 feet and a curb -to -curb wdith of 84 feet in the study area. The posted speed limit is 40 miles per hour. Moreover, Pacific Coast Highway is identified as a City truck route. The street traverses the City of Seal Beach in the east -west direction and is classified as a Primary Arterial in the City of Seal Beach Circulation Element. 1st Street is a four -lane divided roadway with two lanes in each direction and raised median. On -street parking is allowed in both directions.1st Street has a right-of-way width of 100 feet and a curb -to -curb wdith of 80 feet in the study area. The posted speed limit is 30 miles per hour. The street traverses the 490 Pacific Coast Highway - 8 - Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Study - DRAFT - December, 2017 1-405 Freeway 1-605,.Fr, Horvord Lane, Drive" t .1 Monterey Road ,Drive Avvlon'`dn otalina Avenue", Basa j """ 40 ff c, ni tre7 " •.p 71 FIGURE 4 ROADWAY NETWORK t ' Rdstmoor Cent4r W, �ndleberry Avenue st. Jai L.1.�: • - �► - — 0*wood Street ()5 — Cl7rsh Pic r r U S..N:��I,.Weopans. Stslki�rt Lemon d,, �J * — = Seal Beach CiCy Lin = Major (120' Right f It 'ital g,, Primary (100' Right R-Woy) =�M='-secondory (80' Righh f Way) — = Principal N NOT TO SCALE Kimley »Horn , City of Seal Beach in the north -south direction and is classified as a Primary Arterial in the City of Seal Beach Circulation Element. 5th Street is a four -lane undivided roadway with two lanes in each direction in the project vicinity. On - street parking is allowed in both directions. 5th Street has a right-of-way width of 76 feet and a curb -to - curb width of 64 feet in the study area. The posted speed limit is 30 miles per hour. The street traverses the City of Seal Beach in the north -south direction and is classified as a Principal Arterial in the City of Seal Beach Circulation Element. Main Street is a two-lane undivided roadway with one lane in each direction. Main Street serves as the primary access to the City's downtown area to the south of Pacific Coast Highway, and continues south to the beach and the pier. There is diagonal on -street parking on both sides of the street. The posted speed limit is 30 miles per hour. Main Street is identified as a Secondary Arterial in the City of Seal Beach Circulation Element, with 80 feet of right-of-way width and 54 feet of curb -to -curb width. 12th Street is a two-lane undivided roadway with one lane in each direction. On -street parking is allowed on both sides of the street. 12th Street has a right-of-way width of 60 feet and a curb -to -curb width of 40 feet. The posted speed limit is 25 miles per hour. The street traverses the City of Seal Beach in the north - south direction and is classified as a Principal Arterial in the City of Seal Beach Circulation Element. Marina Drive is a two-lane undivided roadway with one lane in each direction. There is an existing bike lane adjacent to the travel lane, and adequate roadway width between the bike lane and curb for on - street parking in both directions. Marina Drive has a right-of-way width of 86 feet and a curb -to -curb width of 46 feet. The street traverses the City of Seal Beach in the east -west direction and is classified as a Secondary Arterial in the City of Seal Beach Circulation Element. Existing Transit Services There are three bus routes that run along Pacific Coast Highway: OCTA Route 1, Long Beach Transit Route 131, and Long Beach Transit Route 171. These routes run along the coast, between Long Beach and Seal Beach. OCTA Route 1 extends further south to San Clemente. 490 Pacific Coast Highway _10- Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Study - DRAFT - December, 2017 Accident History Assessment As required by the City of Seal Beach, analysis of intersections and roadways having five or more reported accidents within the most recent 12 -month period are to be analyzed and mitigated, if necessary. The figure of five accidents is a generalized figure used by the City. Accident data was obtained from the California Highway Patrol Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) for 2016 and 2017. Accident report data from SWITRS is included in Appendix B. Location 2016 2017 Pacific Coast Highway at 1st Street 3 4 Pacific Coast Highway at Marvista Drive/51h Street 3 4 Pacific Coast Highway at Bolsa Avenue/Main Street 4 5 Pacific Coast Highway at Balboa Drive/121h Street 3 0 1st Street at Marina Drive 0 0 51h Street at Marina Drive 0 2 One study intersection, Pacific Coast Highway at Bolsa Avenue/Main Street, experienced five accidents in 2017. Based on an assessment of the accident reports, more than half of these five accidents are a result of parties driving at unsafe speeds along Pacific Coast Highway, either causing sideswipes or rear -end collisions. Existing Traffic Volumes Existing morning peak period (7:00 to 9:00 AM) and evening peak period (4:00 to 6:00 PM) turning movement counts were collected for all study intersections. The counts were completed in November 2017, when area schools were in session. The existing lane configurations and traffic control at the study intersections are shown in Figure 5. Existing peak hour turning movement volumes at the study intersections are shown in Figure 6. Peak hour intersection traffic count worksheets are provided in Appendix C. Intersection Analysis - Existing Conditions Existing intersection operations were evaluated using the ICU and HCM methodologies described earlier. The results of the analysis are summarized on Table 1. Intersection analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix D. Review of Table 1 indicates that all study intersections currently operate at an acceptable Level of Service C or better during both peak hours. 490 Pacific Coast Highway _11- Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Study - DRAFT - December, 2017 1. PCH at 1 st Street 2. PCH at Marvista Drive/5th Street 3. PCH at Bolsa Avenue/Main Street �J1 Iy 11� �Jl Iy -a 11� / D o g J�� 1st St •Iff 5th St Marvista Dr •1ff- PCH •�f - r 4. PCH at Balboa Drive/12th Street 5. 1st Street at Marina Drive 6. 5th Street at Marina Drive W /I/Il v PCH • Marina Dr • I Marina Dr N NOT TO SCALE FIGURE 5 EXISTING LANE CONFIGURATION AND TRAFFIC CONTROL 1ZKim LEGEND: OStudy Intersection Traffic Signal F Stop Sign OVL Right—Turn Overlap D Defacto Right Turn Morn FIGURE 6 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES -13- 1. PCH at 1 st Street 2. PCH at Marvista 3. PCH at Bolsa Drive/5th Street Avenue/Main Street o v� ,o a —68(44) '2 � ro X7(23) _ Q of �I j +-16(19) "I� j +-1534(1270) y X2(0) 1( y j1 x10(10) y %. x41(92) 165(143)--X90(1I� I 13) 12(24) I� 71 ,.1 ,., I,..� 91(112)—XIs; 1622(1374) T ,.I ,T I,.,� 52(37)---gn my n 0 25(33)— v m !a M^ �o is N 59(101)— N M 0 ana 4. PCH at Balboa 5. 1st Street at Marina 6. 5th Street at Marina Drive/12th Street Drive Drive aNa vma "�_ o r-62(66) av�N n a " X60(60) I�I M +-5589(1378) I "� +-109(181) 1 "II� j� +-114(165) 1 W,21(27) y x8(7) 1L 1 j1 x11(32) 36(43) 1655(1350) R T h 9(24) 75(143)— R 12(27)—AR 78(127) T ITh 11(47) n a a m mn a inn 24(80) N o io inn an 6(8)--.A'v0 rn urn n� N NOT TO SCALE 01 LEGEND: OX Study Intersection XX(yy) AM(PM) Peak Hour Turning Movement Volume Kimlev) Horn TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF INTERSECTION OPERATION EXISTING CONDITIONS AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Int. # Intersection Control Delay/ICU LOS Delay/ICU LOS Pacific Coast Highway at S 0.711 v/c C 0.681 v/c B 1 S 14.2 sec/veh B 13.0 sec/veh B 1st Street Pacific Coast Highway at S 0.745 v/c C 0.698 v/c B 2 Marvista Drive/5th Street S 11.9 sec/veh B 14.5 sec/veh B Pacific Coast Highway at S 0.687 v/c B 0.643 v/c B 3 Bolsa Avenue/Main Street S 18.6 sec/veh B 20.6 sec/veh C Pacific Coast Highway at S 0.729 v/c C 0.685 v/c B 4 Balboa Drive/12th Street S 18.5 sec/veh B 20.2 sec/veh C 5 1st Street at Marina Drive S 0.251 v/c A 0.319 v/c A 6 5th Street at Marina Drive AWSC 8.1 sec/veh A 9.0 sec/veh A S = Signalized, AWSC = All -Way Stop Control Intersection operation is expressed in average seconds of delay per vehicle (sec/veh) during the peak hour for the HCM Methodology and is expressed in volume -to -capacity (v/c) ratio for the ICU Methodology. LOS shown in Bold indicates unacceptable Level of Service. 490 Pacific Coast Highway -14- Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Study Roadway Segment Analysis - Existing Conditions The study roadway segments were analyzed in accordance with the analysis methodology described earlier in this report. Analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix E. The Existing Conditions analysis results and Level of Service for the study roadway segments are presented in Table 2. As review of this table shows, all study roadway segments are currently operating at LOS C or better under Existing Conditions. PROJECT TRAFFIC Trip Generation The trips expected to be generated by the project were calculated using trip generation rates published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition (2017). Trip rates are based on ITE Land Use Category 945 - Gas Station with Convenience Market. It is recognized that not all inbound and outbound trips to the proposed projectwill be "new" trips on the roadway system in the vicinity of the proposed project. Some trips to the project site will consist of "pass -by" trips -- motorists who are already traveling on the surrounding roadways from one place to another. Common pass -by trips for a gas station or donut shop would be individuals who stop at the project site on the way to work or school. For the proposed site components, a pass -by rate of 30% was applied to the morning peak hour and evening peak hour. This pass -by rate was determined through consultation with City Staff, and the trip generation assumptions were approved in the Scope of Study. Daily, morning peak hour, and evening peak hour trip generation estimates are summarized on Table 3. The project is estimated to generate 3,286 daily trips, 200 morning peak hour trips, and 224 evening peak hour trips. After applying pass -by reductions, the development is projected to generate a net of 2,300 daily trips, 140 morning peak hour trips, and 157 evening peak hour trips. Trip Distribution and Assignment Project trip distribution and assignment assumptions for the proposed project were developed with approval from the City Staff. The distribution and assignment assumptions took into account existing traffic patterns and likely paths of travel within the vicinity. Trip distribution assumptions are shown on Figure 7. Based on the proposed project trip distribution, project trips were assigned through the study intersections. The resulting project -related traffic volumes at each study intersection and roadway are shown on Figure 8. Pass -by trips were added to the study intersection of Pacific Coast Highway and Marvista Drive/5th Street due to the intersection's proximity to the project site. However, pass -by trips are considered part of the existing traffic stream and are therefore not added to the other study intersections. 490 Pacific Coast Highway -is- Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Study - DRAFT - December, 2017 TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF ROADWAY OPERATIONS EXISTING CONDITIONS AM Peak PM Peak Roadway Segment Roadway Direction Speed Density Speed Density LOS /h) pc/mi/In) LOS Classification mi/h) (pc/mi/In) mi Pacific Coast Highway: 1st Street to Marvista Drive/5th Street 4 Lane Divided NB 45 24.4 C 45 21.1 C SB 45 25.0 C 45 23.1 C Pacific Coast Highway: Marvista Drive/5th Street to Bolsa Avenue/Main Street 4 Lane Divided EB 45 25.3 C 45 22.7 C WB 45 24.2 C 45 21.4 C Pacific Coast Highway: Bolsa Avenue/Main Street to Balboa Drive/12th Street 4 Lane Divided EB 45 24.3 C 45 20.6 C WB 45 23.8 C 45 21.1 C Pacific Coast Highway: Balboa Drive/12th Street to Seal Beach Boulevard 4 Lane Divided EB 45 24.7 C 45 20.5 C WB 45 23.1 C 45 20.3 C 5th Street: Pacific Coast Highway to Marina Drive 4 Lane Undivided NB 30 1.9 A 30 2.5 A SB 30 1.0 A 30 2.4 A 490 Pacific Coast Highway -16- Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Study 490 Pacific Coast Highway -17- Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Study TABLE 3 SUMMARY OF PROJECT TRIP GENERATION Trip Generation Rates 1 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ITE F In I Out Total In Out Total Land Use Code Unit Daily Fueling Gasoline Station w/ Convenience Market 945 205.360 6.360 6.110 12.47 7.135 6.855 13.99 Position Trip Generation Estimates AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Quantity Unit Daily In Out Total In Out Total Gasoline Station w/ Convenience Market 16 Fueling Position 3,286 102 98 200 114 110 224 - Pass-by Trips (30%) z -986 -31 -29 -60 -34 -33 -67 Total Proposed Project Trips 2,300 71 69 140 80 77 157 1 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition Z Source: City of Seal Beach staff 490 Pacific Coast Highway -17- Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Study 5° 35% LEGEND: FIGURE 7 XX% Trip Distribution TRIP DISTRIBUTION ASSUMPTIONS NOT TO SCALE 18Kimley >> Horn FIGURE 8 PROJECT -RELATED TRAFFIC -19- 1. PCH at 1 st Street * 2. PCH at Marvista 3. PCH at Bolsa Drive/5th Street Avenue/Main Street N n � n = rp O m D in I m I +-4(4) m +-25(28) y 1st St 5th St i Marvista Dr PCH T 39(43)— I� I� 3(4)--), ,., N 24(27) v O N v O a - U7 4. PCH at Balboa 5. 1st Street at Marina 6. 5th Street at Marina Drive/12th Street Drive Drive W v g v o in a� v, +-25(28) +—3(4) � i PCH Marina Dr Marina Dr 4(4)� 24(27) � 4(4)--jo a f N NOT TO SCALE 01 LEGEND: OStudy Intersection XX(yy) AM(PM) Peak Hour Turning Movement Volume * Trips at this intersection also include pass -by trips Kimlev) Horn EXISTING PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS The Existing Plus Project analysis scenario is a hypothetical scenario that assumes completion of the project and full absorption of the project traffic on the surrounding street network at the current time, with no other changes in traffic conditions. Intersection Analysis - Existing Plus Project Conditions The project -related peak hour trips were added to the existing peak hour volumes to evaluate Existing Plus Project conditions. Existing Plus Project traffic volumes are shown on Figure 9. Intersection Level of Service worksheets are provided in Appendix D. Existing Plus Project intersection results are shown on Table 4. As this table indicates, with the addition of project traffic, all study intersections would continue to operate at an acceptable Level of Service D or better. While these intersections are still acceptable, the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway at Marvista Drive/5th Street would experience a significant impact per the City's significance thresholds, which indicate a V/C increase of more than 0.04 is considered significant. Roadway Segment Analysis - Existing Plus Project Conditions The study roadway segments were analyzed in accordance with the analysis methodology described earlier in this report. Analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix E. The Existing Plus Project analysis results and Level of Service for the study roadway segments are presented in Table S. As shown in this table, all study roadway segments would operate at LOS C or better. FUTURE CONDITIONS Opening Year 2019 Without Project Near-term future traffic forecasts have been developed to evaluate Cumulative Conditions for the anticipated project opening year. The Opening Year is estimated to be Year 2019. The surrounding transportation network, intersection lane configurations, and traffic control are assumed to be the same as existing. Near -Term traffic forecast volumes were developed using the "build-up" process, starting with existing traffic volumes, and adding a background growth factor and traffic from cumulative projects. Per concurrence with City Staff, an ambient growth of 1% per year was applied to Existing traffic volumes at the study intersections to develop Opening Year 2019 Without Project traffic. Information about cumulative projects (approved and pending projects) was obtained from the City of Seal Beach Community Development Department and the City of Long Beach. Two cumulative projects near the project site were identified. The cumulative projects are listed on Table 6, along with approved/proposed land uses, and estimated peak hour trips. The cumulative projects locations are shown on Figure 10. Cumulative project turning movement volumes at the study intersections are shown on Figure 11. Opening Year 2019 Without Project traffic volumes are show on Figure 12. 490 Pacific Coast Highway -20- Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Study - DRAFT - December, 2017 FIGURE 9 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES -21- 1. PCH at 1 st Street 2. PCH at Marvista 3. PCH at Bolsa Drive/5th Street Avenue/Main Street a i �2 � a m z0-- �_II X1(1) �I X68(44) Z5-7(23) —7(23) P� f j� IL y �I X2(0) IC �L �I x120( 0))L ]I x45(92)298) 165(143)--X129(156)--MI� I 15(28) I� 71 ,.1 ,., I,..� 91(112)—XI� 1646(1401) T ,.I ,T I,.,� 52(37) n m 25(33)—,jr'!a 59(101) N K � n o^ N a n a 4. PCH at Balboa 5. 1st Street at Marina 6. 5th Street at Marina Drive/12th Street Drive Drive v�a'� amc:i �_ o r-62(66) a^N o m" --60(60) NI M +-1614(1406) I "� +-112(185) j +-114(165) 1 x21(27) x8(7) j1 x11(32) 36(43) 1679(1377) R T ^^^ 9(24)--16(31)—AR 79(147) ^^^ 78(127) R T ^^^ 11(47) < v m mn a�nn 24(80) N io inn an 6(8)—*A rnn a� N NOT TO SCALE 01 LEGEND: OX Study Intersection XX(yy) AM(PM) Peak Hour Turning Movement Volume Kimlev) Horn 490 Pacific Coast Highway -22- Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Study TABLE 4 SUMMARY OF INTERSECTION OPERATIONS EXISTING PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS Existing Existing Plus Project Impact AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Increase Significant Int. # Intersection Control Delay / ICU LOS Delay / ICU LOS Delay / ICU LOS Delay / ICU LOS AM PM Impact Pacific Coast Highway at S 0.711 v/c C 0.681 v/c B 0.719 v/c C 0.689 v/c B 0.008 0.008 No 1 1st Street S 14.2 sec/veh B 13.0 sec/veh B 14.5 sec/veh B 13.2 sec/veh B 0.3 0.2 No Pacific Coast Highway at S 0.745 v/c C 0.698 v/c B 0.807 v/c D 0.767 v/c C 0.062 0.069 Yes 2 Marvista Drive/Sth Street S 11.9 sec/veh B 14.5 sec/veh B 17.6 sec/veh B 20.7 sec/veh C 5.7 6.2 No Pacific Coast Highway at S 0.687 v/c B 0.643 v/c B 0.695 v/c B 0.652 v/c B 0.008 0.009 No 3 Bolsa Avenue/Main Street S 18.6 sec/veh B 20.6 sec/veh C 18.9 sec/veh B 20.9 sec/veh C 0.3 0.3 No Pacific Coast Highway at S 0.729 v/c C 0.685 v/c B 0.736 v/c C 0.694 v/c B 0.007 0.009 No 4 Balboa Drive/12th Street S 18.5 sec/veh B 20.2 sec/veh C 18.7 sec/veh B 20.4 sec/veh C 0.2 0.2 No 5 1st Street at Marina Drive S 0.251 v/c A 0.319 v/c A 0.253 v/c A 0.321 v/c A 0.002 0.002 No 6 5th Street at Marina Drive AWSC 8.1 sec/veh A 9.0 sec/veh A 8.2 sec/veh A 9.2 sec/veh A 0.1 0.2 No S = Signalized, AWSC = All -Way Stop Control Intersection operation is expressed in average seconds of delay per vehicle (sec/veh) during the peak hour for the HCM Methodology and is expressed in volume -to -capacity (v/c) ratio for the ICU Methodology. LOS shown in Bold indicates unacceptable Level of Service. 490 Pacific Coast Highway -22- Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Study 490 Pacific Coast Highway -23- Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Study TABLE 5 SUMMARY OF ROADWAY OPERATIONS EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Existing Conditions Existing Plus Project Roadway Segment Roadway Direction AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak Classification Speed Density Speed Density Speed Density Speed Density (mi/h) (pc/mi/]n) LOS (mi/h) (pc/mi/]n) LOS (mi/h) (pc/mi/]n) LOS (mi/h) (pc/mi/]n) LOS Pacific Coast Highway: NB 45 24.4 C 45 21.1 C 45 25.0 C 45 21.7 C 1st Street to Marvista Drive/5th Street 4-Lane Divided SB 45 25.0 C 45 23.1 C 45 25.5 C 45 23.7 C Pacific Coast Highway: EB 45 25.3 C 45 22.7 C 45 25.7 C 45 23.0 C Marvista Drive/5th Street to Bolsa Avenue/Main Street 4-Lane Divided WB 45 24.2 C 45 21.4 C 45 24.5 C 45 21.8 C Pacific Coast Highway: EB 45 24.3 C 45 20.6 C 45 24.7 C 45 21.0 C Bolsa Avenue/Main Street to Balboa Drive/12th Street 4-Lane Divided WB 45 23.8 C 45 21.1 C 45 24.2 C 45 21.6 C Pacific Coast Highway: EB 45 24.7 C 45 20.5 C 45 25.1 C 45 20.9 C Balboa Drive/12th Street to Seal Beach Boulevard 4-Lane Divided WB 45 23.1 C 45 20.3 C 45 23.4 C 45 20.7 C 5th Street: NB 30 1.9 A 30 2.5 A 30 2.5 A 30 3.2 A Pacific Coast Highway to Marina Drive 4-Lane Undivided SB 30 1.0 A 30 2.4 A 30 1.7 1 A 30 3.2 A 490 Pacific Coast Highway -23- Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Study 490 Pacific Coast Highway -24- Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Study TABLE 6 SUMMARY OF CUMULATIVE PROJECTS Project Trips AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Proj. Project Name Project Address Land Use No. In__L Out In Out City of Seal Beach Tentative Tract Map 30-Unit Single Family 1 1 1st Street and Marina Drive 6 17 19 11 17425 Residential City of Long Beach Demolition of Existing 2 2nd + PCH Project2 6400 E. Pacific Coast Highway Hotel, Construction of Retail 236 176 426 366 and Restaurant Uses Total Trips 242 1 193 1 445 377 i Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, 10th Edition 2 Source: 2nd + PCH Traffic Impact Analysis (Linscott, Law & Greenspan), 2017 490 Pacific Coast Highway -24- Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Study FIGURE 11 CUMULATIVE PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES -26- 1. PCH at 1 st Street 2. PCH at Marvista 3. PCH at Bolsa Drive/5th Street Avenue/Main Street r M A m � +-43(78) 11(10) 11(21) Is; 38(64) ,., m m m n 4(8)71 0 4. PCH at Balboa 5. 1st Street at Marina 6. 5th Street at Marina Drive/12th Street Drive Drive � N F43(78)I F1(4) F3(9) Y —2(5) 3(2)— T 38(64) 33(2)--),% ^ M C d 8(5) --*M N NOT TO SCALE 01 LEGEND: OStudy Intersection XX(yy) AM(PM) Peak Hour Turning Movement Volume Kimlev) Horn 1. PCH at 1 st Street 2. PCH at Marvista 3. PCH at Bolsa Drive/5th Street Avenue/Main Street n �p m N N _ "R X1(1) a X69(45) Z m —7(23) Q of �I j +-16(19) "I' j +-1608(1373) y X2(0) 1( y j1 x10(10) y jm x42(94) 179(156)—X 92(115) 12(24) 104(135) 1692(1465) T r 53(38)---S 26(34) n N 64(111)—, m N if1 r N � nna 4. PCH at Balboa 5. 1st Street at Marina 6. 5th Street at Marina Drive/12th Street Drive Drive � � N N < M Y N M fv ono X5(18) v n m � X63(67) X61(61) NI +-1664(1484) I M I L+-119(177) 1 X21(28) y r 10(12)9) v ai X11(33) 37(44) 1726(1441) 12(26)-12(28)— 80(148) % T ^ 88(135) r T ^ 11(48)--,,°�' a v 24(82)---.AZo iO 6(8)---,, 1O n °! FIGURE 12 OPENING YEAR 2019 WITHOUT PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES -27- N NOT TO SCALE 01 LEGEND: OX Study Intersection XX(yy) AM(PM) Peak Hour Turning Movement Volume Kimlev) Horn Intersection Analysis -Opening Year 2019 Without Project Conditions The study intersections were analyzed with the ambient growth. Intersection Level of Service worksheets are provided in Appendix D. The Opening Year 2019 Without Project analysis results and Level of Service for the study intersections are presented in Table 7. Review of this table shows that, with the addition of ambient growth and cumulative project traffic, all study intersections would continue to operate at LOS C or better during both peak periods. Roadway SegmentAnalysis - Opening Year 2019 Without Project Conditions The study roadway segments were analyzed in accordance with the analysis methodology described earlier in this report. Analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix E. The Opening Year 2019 Without Project analysis results and Level of Service for the study roadway segments are presented in Table 8. As shown in this table, all study roadway segments would operate at LOS C or better. Opening Year 2019 With Project Conditions Project -related traffic was added to the Opening Year 2019 Without Project traffic volumes. Opening Year 2019 With Project traffic volumes at study intersections are shown in Figure 13. Intersection Analysis - Opening Year 2019 With Project Conditions The study intersections were analyzed in accordance with the analysis methodology described earlier in this report. Intersection Level of Service worksheets are provided in Appendix D. The Opening Year 2019 With Project analysis results and Level of Service for the study intersections are presented in Table 9. Review of this table shows that, with the addition of project traffic, all study intersections would continue to operate at LOS D or better during both peak periods. While these intersections are still acceptable, the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway at Marvista Drive/5th Street would experience a significant impact per the City's significance thresholds, which indicate a V/C increase of more than 0.04 is considered significant. Roadway Segment Analysis - Opening Year 2019 With Project Conditions The study roadway segments were analyzed in accordance with the analysis methodology described earlier in this report. Analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix E. The Opening Year 2019 With Project analysis results and Level of Service for the study roadway segments are presented in Table 10. As shown in this table, all study roadway segments would operate at LOS D or better under Opening Year 2019 With Project Conditions. Future Build -Out 2039 Without Project To derive the Future Build -Out 2039 Without Project intersection turning movement volumes, the Orange County Transportation Analysis Model (OCTAM) was used as a basis to develop an annual growth rate to apply to Existing traffic volumes. Based on the growth anticipated between Existing and Build -Out years shown in the model, a growth rate of 0.5 percent per year was applied over a 22 -year period to grow Existing traffic volumes to the Future Build -Out 2039 Without Project scenario. The OCTAM plots are provided in Appendix E. The resulting traffic volumes for Future Build -Out 2035 490 Pacific Coast Highway -28- Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Study - DRAFT - December, 2017 TABLE 7 SUMMARY OF INTERSECTION OPERATION OPENING YEAR 2019 WITHOUT PROJECT AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Int. # Intersection Control Delay/ICU LOS Delay/ICU LOS Pacific Coast Highway at S 0.744 v/c C 0.730 v/c C 1 S 15.8 sec/veh B 14.8 sec/veh B 1st Street Pacific Coast Highway at S 0.772 v/c C 0.738 v/c C 2 Marvista Drive/5th Street S 12.6 sec/veh B 15.3 sec/veh B Pacific Coast Highway at S 0.723 v/c C 0.698 v/c B 3 Bolsa Avenue/Main Street S 20.0 sec/veh B 22.3 sec/veh C Pacific Coast Highway at S 0.755 v/c C 0.721 v/c C 4 Balboa Drive/12th Street S 19.2 sec/veh B 21.2 sec/veh C 5 1st Street at Marina Drive S 0.252 v/c A 0.328 v/c A 6 5th Street at Marina Drive AWSC 8.2 sec/veh A 9.2 sec/veh A S = Signalized, AWSC = All -Way Stop Control Intersection operation is expressed in average seconds of delay per vehicle (sec/veh) during the peak hour for the HCM Methodology and is expressed in volume -to -capacity (v/c) ratio for the ICU Methodology. LOS shown in Bold indicates unacceptable Level of Service. 490 Pacific Coast Highway -29- Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Study TABLE 8 SUMMARY OF ROADWAY OPERATIONS OPENING YEAR 2019 WITHOUT PROJECT AM Peak PM Peak Roadway Segment Roadway Direction Speed Density Speed Density Classification mi /h) (pc/mi/In) (mi LOS /� � LOS h (pc/mi/In Pacific Coast Highway: 1st Street to Marvista Drive/5th Street 4 Lane Divided NB 45 25.5 C 45 22.6 C SB 45 26.1 D 45 24.8 C Pacific Coast Highway: Marvista Drive/5th Street to Bolsa Avenue/Main Street 4 Lane Divided EB 45 26.6 D 45 24.4 C WB 45 25.4 C 45 23.1 C Pacific Coast Highway: Bolsa Avenue/Main Street to Balboa Drive/12th Street 4 Lane Divided EB 45 25.3 C 45 21.9 C WB 45 24.9 C 45 22.7 C Pacific Coast Highway: Balboa Drive/12th Street to Seal Beach Boulevard 4 -Lane Divided EB 45 25.8 C 45 21.8 C WB 45 24.1 C 45 21.9 C 5th Street: Pacific Coast Highway to Marina Drive 4 Lane Undivided NB 30 1.9 A 30 2.6 A SB 30 1.1 A 30 2.5 A 490 Pacific Coast Highway -30- Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Study 1. PCH at 1 st Street 2. PCH at Marvista 3. PCH at Bolsa Drive/5th Street Avenue/Main Street M N �o "R X1(1) a m —69(45) °^ m X7(23) i Q of �I j +-20(23) "I' j +-1633(1401) y y X2(0) 1( y j1 x10(10) y j1 x42(94) 179(156) I� I 131(158) 15(28) I� 71 I,..� 104(135)--XIs; 1716(1492) T I,.,� 53(38)---S0 26(34) ,.1 ,., N 64(111) ,.I ,T m N m r o oD r a n^ N � n n a 4. PCH at Balboa 5. 1st Street at Marina 6. 5th Street at Marina Drive/12th Street Drive Drive � � N N < M a M fv ono X5(18) v n m � X63(67) o rn rn X61(61) +-1689(1512) 21 +-119(177) 1( �Y e-21(28) y x10(12) j1 X11(33) 37(44) 1750(1468) 12(26) 84(152) _ % _ ^ 16(32) 88(135) . . r ^ 11(48)— n a a 24(82) 0 m M 6(8) -*A FIGURE 13 OPENING YEAR 2019 WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES -31- N NOT TO SCALE 01 LEGEND: OX Study Intersection XX(yy) AM(PM) Peak Hour Turning Movement Volume Kimlev) Horn 490 Pacific Coast Highway -32- Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Study TABLE 9 SUMMARY OF INTERSECTION OPERATIONS OPENING YEAR 2019 WITH PROJECT Opening Year 2019 Without Project Opening Year 2019 With Project Impact AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Increase Significant Int. # Intersection Control Delay / ICU LOS Delay / ICU LOS Delay / ICU LOS Delay / ICU LOS AM PM Impact Pacific Coast Highway at S 0.744 v/c C 0.730 v/c C 0.752 v/c C 0.738 v/c C 0.008 0.008 No 1 1st Street S 15.8 sec/veh B 14.8 sec/veh B 16.2 sec/veh B 15.1 sec/veh B 0.4 0.3 No Pacific Coast Highway at S 0.772 v/c C 0.738 v/c C 0.834 v/c D 0.807 v/c D 0.062 0.069 Yes 2 Marvista Drive/5th Street S 12.6 sec/veh B 15.3 sec/veh B 18.7 sec/veh B 22.1 sec/veh C 6.1 6.8 No Pacific Coast Highway at S 0.723 v/c C 0.698 v/c B 0.731 v/c C 0.706 v/c C 0.008 0.008 No 3 Bolsa Avenue/Main Street S 20.0 sec/veh B 22.3 sec/veh C 20.3 sec/veh C 22.6 sec/veh C 0.3 0.3 No Pacific Coast Highway at S 0.755 v/c C 0.721 v/c C 0.762 v/c C 0.730 v/c C 0.007 0.009 No 4 Balboa Drive/12th Street S 19.2 sec/veh B 21.2 sec/veh C 19.5 sec/veh B 21.5 sec/veh C 0.3 0.3 No 5 1st Street at Marina Drive S 0.252 1 v/c A 1 0.328 v/c I A 1 0.254 v/c A 0.331 v/c A 0.002 0.003 No 6 1 5th Street at Marina Drive AWSC 1 8.2 sec/veh A 1 9.2 sec/veh A 1 8.3 sec/veh A 1 9.4 sec/veh A 1 0.1 0.2 No S = Signalized, AWSC = All-Way Stop Control Intersection operation is expressed in average seconds of delay per vehicle (sec/veh) during the peak hour for the HCM Methodology and is expressed in volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratio for the ICU Methodology. LOS shown in Bold indicates unacceptable Level of Service. 490 Pacific Coast Highway -32- Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Study 490 Pacific Coast Highway -33- Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Study TABLE 10 SUMMARY OF ROADWAY OPERATIONS OPENING YEAR 2019 WITH PROJECT Opening Year 2019 Without Project Opening Year 2019 With Project Roadway Segment Roadway Direction AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak Classification Speed Density Speed Density Speed Density Speed Density (mi/h) (pc/mi/In) LOS h, (h) (pc/mi/In) LOS (mi/h) (pc/mi/In) LOS (mi/h) (pc/mi/In) LOS Pacific Coast Highway: NB 45 25.5 C 45 22.6 C 45 26.1 D 45 23.2 C 1st Street to Marvista Drive/5th Street 4 -Lane Divided SB 45 26.1 D 45 24.8 C 45 26.7 D 45 25.4 C Pacific Coast Highway: EB 45 26.6 D 45 24.4 C 45 26.9 D 45 24.8 C Marvista Drive/5th Street to Bolsa Avenue/Main Street 4 -Lane Divided WB 45 25.4 C 45 23.1 C 45 25.7 C 45 23.5 C Pacific Coast Highway: EB 45 25.3 C 45 21.9 C 45 25.7 C 45 22.3 C Bolsa Avenue/Main Street to Balboa Drive/12th Street 4 -Lane Divided WB 45 24.9 C 45 22.7 C 45 25.3 C 45 23.1 C Pacific Coast Highway: EB 45 25.8 C 45 21.8 C 45 26.1 D 45 22.2 C Balboa Drive/12th Street to Seal Beach Boulevard 4 -Lane Divided WB 45 24.1 C 45 21.9 C 45 24.5 C 45 22.3 C 5th Street: NB 30 1.9 130 2.6 A 30 2.6 A 30 3.3 A Pacific Coast Highway to Marina Drive 4 -Lane Undivided SB 30 1.1 A 1 30 2.5 A 30 1.7 A 30 3.2 A 490 Pacific Coast Highway -33- Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Study Without Project scenario are shown on Figure 14. Lane geometrics for the study intersections are assumed to be the same as Existing Conditions, previously shown on Figure S. There are no improvements to this area indicated in the City's Circulation Element. Intersection Analysis - Future Build -Out 2039 Without Project Conditions Intersection Level of Service worksheets are provided in Appendix D. Future Build -Out 2039 Without Project peak hour intersection operations are summarized on Table 11. Review of this table shows that all study intersections would operate at LOS D or better during both peak periods under the Future Build -Out 2039 Without Project Conditions. Roadway SegmentAnalysis - Future Build -Out 2039 Without Project Conditions The study roadway segments were analyzed in accordance with the analysis methodology described earlier in this report. Analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix E. The Future Build -Out 2039 Without Project analysis results and Level of Service for the study roadway segments are presented in Table 12. As shown in this table, all study roadway segments would operate at LOS D or better under Future Build -Out 2039 Without Project Conditions. Future Build -Out 2039 With Project Conditions Project -related traffic was added to the Future Build -Out 2039 Without Project traffic volumes. Future Build -out 2039 With Project peak hour turning movement volumes at study intersections and daily volumes on study roadways are shown on Figure 15. Intersection Analysis - Future Build -Out 2039 With Project Conditions Future Build -Out 2039 With Project peak hour intersection operations are summarized on Table 13, shown previously. With the addition of project traffic, all study intersections will continue to operate at LOS D or better. The intersection of Pacific Coast Highway at Marvista Drive/Sth Street would experience a significant impact per the City's significance thresholds, which indicate a V/C increase of more than 0.04 is considered significant. Roadway SegmentAnalysis -Future Build -Out 2039 With Project Conditions The study roadway segments were analyzed in accordance with the analysis methodology described earlier in this report. The Future Build -Out 2039 With Project analysis results and Level of Service for the study roadway segments are presented in Table 14. As shown in this table, all study roadway segments would operate at LOS D or better under Future Build -Out 2039 With Project Conditions. 490 Pacific Coast Highway -34- Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Study - DRAFT - December, 2017 1. PCH at 1 st Street 2. PCH at Marvista 3. PCH at Bolsa Drive/5th Street Avenue/Main Street a io �_ o1 X1(1) n aI —76(49) N X8(26) +-11(21) j j +-1712(1417) y —2(0) 1( i j1 x11(11) j1 x46(103) 184(160) 100(126) 13(27) 102(125) 1810(1533) T r 58(41)— 28(37)-,n 66(113)---1 N fp � ^ O M r 4. PCH at Balboa 5. 1st Street at Marina 6. 5th Street at Marina Drive/12th Street Drive Drive vna N m a X6(20) 1O rna m m n X69(74) av�i rtOvn `�' �_ X67(67) NI +-1773(1538) I "� +-122(202) 1 "II� +-127(184) 1 —23(30) y x9(8) 1L 1 —12(36) 40(48) 1847(1506) 10(27)-13(30)_ 84(160) % T ^ 87(142) � T r^ 12(52) m 0 v 27(89)---.A7(9)-, f M N FIGURE 14 FUTURE BUILD -OUT 2039 WITHOUT PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES -35- N NOT TO SCALE 01 LEGEND: OStudy Intersection XX(yy) AM(PM) Peak Hour Turning Movement Volume Kimlev) Horn TABLE 11 SUMMARY OF INTERSECTION OPERATION FUTURE BUILD -OUT 2039 WITHOUT PROJECT AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Int. # Intersection Control Delay/ICU LOS Delay/ICU LOS Pacific Coast Highway at S 0.782 v/c C 0.748 v/c C 1 S 18.2 sec/veh B 15.7 sec/veh B 1st Street Pacific Coast Highway at S 0.820 v/c D 0.768 v/c C 2 Marvista Drive/5th Street S 15.0 sec/veh B 17.1 sec/veh B Pacific Coast Highway at S 0.755 v/c C 0.706 v/c C 3 Bolsa Avenue/Main Street S 21.8 sec/veh C 23.1 sec/veh C Pacific Coast Highway at S 0.801 v/c D 0.753 v/c C 4 Balboa Drive/12th Street S 21.2 sec/veh C 22.3 sec/veh C 5 1st Street at Marina Drive S 0.263 v/c A 0.344 v/c A 6 5th Street at Marina Drive AWSC 8.3 sec/veh A 9.5 sec/veh A S = Signalized, AWSC = All -Way Stop Control Intersection operation is expressed in average seconds of delay per vehicle (sec/veh) during the peak hour for the HCM Methodology and is expressed in volume -to -capacity (v/c) ratio for the ICU Methodology. LOS shown in Bold indicates unacceptable Level of Service. 490 Pacific Coast Highway -36- Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Study TABLE 12 SUMMARY OF ROADWAY OPERATIONS FUTURE BUILD-OUT 2039 WITHOUT PROJECT AM Peak PM Peak Roadway Segment Roadway Direction Speed Density Speed Density Classification mi /h) (pc/mi/In) (mi LOS /� � LOS h (pc/mi/In Pacific Coast Highway: 1st Street to Marvista Drive/5th Street 4 Lane Divided NB 45 27.2 D 45 23.5 C SB 45 27.9 D 45 25.8 C Pacific Coast Highway: Marvista Drive/5th Street to Bolsa Avenue/Main Street 4 Lane Divided EB 45 28.3 D 45 25.3 C WB 45 27.0 D 45 23.9 C Pacific Coast Highway: Bolsa Avenue/Main Street to Balboa Drive/12th Street 4-Lane Divided EB 45 27.1 D 45 22.9 C WB 45 26.6 D 45 23.6 C Pacific Coast Highway: Balboa Drive/12th Street to Seal Beach Boulevard 4-Lane Divided EB 45 27.6 D 45 22.8 C WB 45 25.7 C 45 22.7 C 5th Street: Pacific Coast Highway to Marina Drive 4-Lane Undivided NB 30 2.1 A 30 2.8 A SB 30 1.2 A 30 2.7 A 490 Pacific Coast Highway -37- Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Study 1. PCH at 1 st Street 2. PCH at Marvista 3. PCH at Bolsa Drive/5th Street Avenue/Main Street N N io m o X1(1) O V t0 a m —76(49) I� N X8(26) 1 f I j +-22(25) j j +-1737(1445) X2(0) 1( y j1 x11(11) j1 x 46(103) 184(160)--X I 139(169) 16(31) I,..� 102(125)--XI� 1834(1560) T I,.,� 58(4l) ---S28(37) ,.1 ,., 66(113)---1 ,.I ,T N 511 00 � N 0 M r M 4. PCH at Balboa 5. 1st Street at Marina 6. 5th Street at Marina Drive/12th Street Drive Drive vna N m a X6(20) 1O rna m m n X69(74)" anM iv � X67(67) NI +-1798(1566) I +-125(206) 'IaI +-127(184) 1 X23(30) y x9(8) 11.X12(36) 40(48) 1871(1533) 10(27)-17(34) 88(164) % T ^ 87(142) � T r^ 12(52) m o a 27(89) n w � 7(9)71 � a N FIGURE 15 FUTURE BUILD -OUT 2039 WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES ENT N NOT TO SCALE 01 LEGEND: 17�O Study Intersection XX(yy) AM(PM) Peak Hour Turning Movement Volume Kimlev) Horn 490 Pacific Coast Highway -39- Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Study TABLE 13 SUMMARY OF INTERSECTION OPERATIONS FUTURE BUILD -OUT 2039 WITH PROJECT Future Build -Out Without Project Future Build -Out With Project Impact AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Increase Significant Int. # Intersection Control Delay / ICU LOS Delay / ICU LOS Delay / ICU LOS Delay / ICU LOS AM PM Impact Pacific Coast Highway at S 0.782 v/c C 0.748 v/c C 0.790 v/c C 0.757 v/c C 0.008 0.009 No 1 1st Street S 18.2 sec/veh B 15.7 sec/veh B 18.8 sec/veh B 16.1 sec/veh B 0.6 0.4 No Pacific Coast Highway at S 0.820 v/c D 0.768 v/c C 0.882 v/c D 0.836 v/c D 0.062 0.068 Yes 2 Marvista Drive/5th Street S 15.0 sec/veh B 17.1 sec/veh B 22.4 sec/veh C 24.6 sec/veh C 7.4 7.5 No Pacific Coast Highway at S 0.755 v/c C 0.706 v/c C 0.763 v/c C 0.715 v/c C 0.008 0.009 No 3 Bolsa Avenue/Main Street S 21.8 sec/veh C 23.1 sec/veh C 22.2 sec/veh C 23.4 sec/veh C 0.4 0.3 No Pacific Coast Highway at S 0.801 v/c D 0.753 v/c C 0.809 v/c D 0.762 v/c C 0.008 0.009 No 4 Balboa Drive/12th Street S 21.2 sec/veh C 22.3 sec/veh C 21.6 sec/veh C 22.7 sec/veh C 0.4 0.4 No 5 1st Street at Marina Drive S 0.263 v/c A 0.344 v/c A 0.265 v/c A 0.347 v/c A 0.002 0.003 No 6 5th Street at Marina Drive AWSC 8.3 sec/veh A 9.5 sec/veh A 8.4 sec/veh A 9.7 sec/veh A 0.1 0.2 No S = Signalized, AWSC = All -Way Stop Control Intersection operation is expressed in average seconds of delay per vehicle (sec/veh) during the peak hour for the HCM Methodology and is expressed in volume -to -capacity (v/c) ratio for the ICU Methodology. LOS shown in Bold indicates unacceptable Level of Service. 490 Pacific Coast Highway -39- Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Study 490 Pacific Coast Highway -40- Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Study TABLE 14 SUMMARY OF ROADWAY OPERATIONS FUTURE BUILD -OUT 2039 WITH PROJECT Future Build -Out Without Project Future Build -Out With Project Roadway AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak Roadway Segment Classification Direction Speed Density ]Speed Density Speed Density Speed Density (mi/h) (pc/mi/In) LOS (mi/h) (pc/mi An) LOS (mi/h) (pc/mi/ln) LOS (mi/h) (pc/mi/In) LOS Pacific Coast Highway: NB 45 27.2 D 45 23.5 C 45 27.8 D 45 24.1 C 1st Street to Marvista Drive/5th Street 4 -Lane Divided SB 45 27.9 D 45 25.8 C 45 28.4 D 45 26.4 D Pacific Coast Highway: EB 45 28.3 D 45 25.3 C 45 28.6 D 45 25.7 C Marvista Drive/5th Street to Bolsa Avenue/Main Street 4 -Lane Divided WB 45 27.0 D 45 23.9 C 45 27.3 D 45 24.3 C Pacific Coast Highway: EB 45 27.1 D 45 22.9 C 45 27.5 D 45 23.3 C Bolsa Avenue/Main Street to Balboa Drive/12th Street 4 -Lane Divided WB 45 26.6 D 45 23.6 C 45 26.9 D 45 24.0 C Pacific Coast Highway: EB 45 27.6 D 45 22.8 C 45 28.0 D 45 23.2 C Balboa Drive/12th Street to Seal Beach Boulevard 4 -Lane Divided WB 45 25.7 C 45 22.7 C 45 26.1 D 45 23.1 C 5th Street: NB 30 2.1 A 30 2.8 A 30 2.7 A 30 3.5 A Pacific Coast Highway to Marina Drive 4 -Lane Undivided SB 30 1.2 A 30 2.7 __±_]l 30 1.8 A L 30 3.5 A 490 Pacific Coast Highway -40- Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Study MITIGATION MEASURES The intersection of Pacific Coast Highway at Marvista Drive/5th Street will experience a significant impact based on the City of Seal Beach guidelines. Although the intersection operates at an acceptable Level of Service D or better in all study scenarios, the project impact exceeds the threshold established in the City's guidelines. However, it should be noted that the intersection will operate at a LOS B based on the delay methodology used by Caltrans, and the project does not cause an impact per Caltrans guidelines. The following measure would mitigate the impact from a City perspective: - Restripe the eastbound approach to provide a left -turn lane, a shared left -through lane, and a right -turn lane. The traffic signal will need to be modified to provide split phasing in the east - west direction. While this improvement would increase the left -turn capacity of the intersection for a critical movement and mitigate the project impact, the introduction of split phasing on the minor approach may not be preferred from an operational standpoint. It is recommended that the necessity of such an improvement be coordinated between Caltrans and the City of Seal Beach staff. SITE PARKING AND CIRCULATION The required on-site parking is established via Section 11.4.20.015 of the City of Seal Beach Municipal Code. The City code indicates that an Automobile Service Station shall require 1 space per 300 square feet of any convenience store plus 1 space per service bay if repair occurs on-site (in addition to spaces at pumps, queuing areas for pumps, and areas for self-service water and air areas). Based on the proposed site plan, the project will include a 2,438 -square -foot convenience store and 16 fueling positions. The requirement would be 9 parking spaces for the site. The project will provide 13 parking spaces, including 1 ADA space, and therefore satisfies the City code, with a surplus of 4 parking spaces. The project will feature four unsignalized driveways - two along Pacific Coast Highway and two along 5th Street. The northern driveway along Pacific Coast Highway will be shared with the existing retail development to the north. Likewise, the western driveway on 5th Street is also shared with the existing development. The two driveways on Pacific Coast Highway are restricted to right-in/right-out movements due to the raised median along Pacific Coast Highway. The two driveways on 5th Street are full -movement. Patrons can use any driveway to access the site, but will need to egress off 5th Street and make an eastbound left -turn maneuver if they intend to travel northbound on Pacific Coast Highway due to the raised median. 490 Pacific Coast Highway -41- Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Study - DRAFT - December, 2017 TRUCK SERVICE IMPACTS Truck deliveries are anticipated to originate from Pacific Coast Highway, a designated truck route. As shown on Figure 16, the underground fuel storage tanks are located at the southwest quadrant of the site. A fuel truck along Pacific Coast Highway would access the site by traveling southbound and making a right -turn movement at 5th Street, and by using the eastern driveway along 5th Street to maneuver into position. From there, a fuel truck can circulate counterclockwise to exit via the western driveway on 5th Street, and return to Pacific Coast Highway. Likewise, a delivery truck to the convenience store component can utilize this same path without causing major disruptions to operations atthe fuel pumps. If a delivery truck approaches from Pacific Coast Highway to the south, the truck can proceed to make a northbound left -turn at 5th Street, and use the same driveway ingress and egress circulation to return to Pacific Coast Highway. CONSTRUCTION PERIOD IMPACTS The proposed site will utilize existing driveways and is not anticipated to cause any lane closures along Pacific Coast Highway or 5th Street during construction. As such, all lanes on arterial roads will remain open during construction and no construction issues are expected off-site. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS This traffic impact study has been prepared to evaluate the project -related traffic impacts associated with the proposed development of a gas station and convenience store located at 490 Pacific Coast Highway in the City of Seal Beach, California. The project is estimated to generate 3,286 daily trips, 200 morning peak hour trips, and 224 evening peak hour trips. After applying pass -by reductions, the development is projected to generate a net of 2,300 daily trips, 140 morning peak hour trips, and 157 evening peak hour trips. Existing traffic volumes for study intersections were collected in November 2017. Existing volumes, along with existing lane geometrics and traffic control at each intersection, were used in conducting peak hour Level of Service (LOS) analyses. Under Existing Conditions, all the study intersections and roadways are currently operating at LOS C or better. Near-term future traffic forecasts have been developed to evaluate Cumulative Conditions for the anticipated project opening year. The Opening Year is estimated to be Year 2019. The Opening Year 2019 scenario includes a 1% annual growth rate over a two-year period to 2019, applied to Existing traffic volumes. Additionally, traffic from cumulative projects located in the City of Seal Beach and in the City of Long Beach were added to the study area. This scenario was analyzed both with and without the project, and all study intersections and roadways will operate at LOS D or better. To derive the Future Build -Out 2039 volumes, the Orange County Transportation Analysis Model 490 Pacific Coast Highway -42- Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Study - DRAFT - December, 2017 FIGURE 16 DELIVERY TRUCK CIRCULATION -43- N NOT TO SCALE Kimlevl Horn (OCTAM) was used as a basis to develop an annual growth rate to apply to Existingtraffic volumes. Based on the growth anticipated between Existing and Build -Out years shown in the model, a growth rate of 0.5 percent per year was applied over a 22 -year period to grow Existing traffic volumes to the Future Build - Out 2039 scenario. This scenario was analyzed both with and without the project, and all study intersections and roadways will operate at LOS D or better. The intersection of Pacific Coast Highway at Marvista Drive/5th Street, which is controlled by Caltrans, will experience a significant impact based on the City of Seal Beach guidelines. Although the intersection operates at an acceptable Level of Service D or better in all study scenarios, the project impact exceeds the threshold established in the City's guidelines. However, it should be noted that the intersection will operate at a LOS B based on the HCM delay methodology used by Caltrans, and the project does not cause an impact per Caltrans guidelines. The following measure would mitigate the impact from a City perspective: - Restripe the eastbound approach to provide a left -turn lane, a shared left -through lane, and a right -turn lane. The traffic signal will need to be modified to provide split phasing in the east - west direction. While this improvement would increase the left -turn capacity of the intersection for a critical movement and mitigate the project impact, the introduction of split phasing on the minor approach may not be preferred from an operational standpoint. It is recommended that the necessity of such an improvement be coordinated between Caltrans and the City of Seal Beach staff. 490 Pacific Coast Highway -44- Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Study - DRAFT - December, 2017 APPENDIX A APPROVED SCOPE OF STUDY FORM Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 490 Pacific Coast Highway Traffic Impact Study Scope of Work CUP 17-3 Scope of Work The traffic impact analysis for the proposed gas station at 490 Pacific Coast Highway will satisfy the City of Seal Beach's Traffic Impact Study Guidelines, dated March 2010. The project proposes the development of a gas station with 16 fueling positions and a convenience market. Study Area The following study intersections and roadways are proposed. Traffic counts will be conducted at the following intersections and roadway segments. Intersections will be counted on a typical weekday, during the morning and evening peak hours. Study Intersections 1. Pacific Coast Highway and 12th Street/Balboa Drive 2. Pacific Coast Highway and Main Street 3. Pacific Coast Highway and Marvista Drive/51h Street 4. Pacific Coast Highway and 1s' Street 5. 5th Street and Marina Drive 6. 1s' Street and Marina Drive Roadways 1. 5th Street Between Pacific Coast Highway and Marina Drive 2. Pacific Coast Highway between 15t Street and 5th Street 3. Pacific Coast Highway Between 5th Street and Main street 4. Pacific Coast Highway Between Main and 12th St 5. Pacific Coast Highway Between 12th and Seal Beach Blvd Page 1 11/3/17 Crestview 0 Ave Vamdos Boyo �a syn PA ' o Ga`figa,0- sv Q Ave ve Sa �1b, �dy PROJECTSITE 6a� � � e gritiwood Ave � 0a 'Fid h CarS3` ij Pc,f tr5 V Fathom Ave l Clipper Way C"401 / -Dr Marina Dr (:>r Bolsa Ave Balsa Ave Pit d'4ce y o- y vi �i Mary'�,yyP y 1 D c9 Pavilions® ! p P a °i 0 o 'O 0 1; The Red Car Museum y tf r r � � Zoeter Fiefd '41 Aa OQm c� ri r� r a asr y .T, u Page 1 11/3/17 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Study Scope of Work The following scenarios will be studied, per City Guidelines: • Existing • Opening Year 2019 With and Without Project • General Plan Target Year 2039 With and Without Project 490 Pacific Coast Highway CUP 17-3 For the Opening Year scenario, we will grow volumes at 1% per year to the opening year, and will take into consideration cumulative projects from the City of Long Beach and the City of Seal Beach within the vicinity of the project site. For the General Plan analysis, OCTAM base and build -out model volumes will be used to factor existing count volumes. Trip Generation Forecast The following trip generation forecasts, based on the latest ITE Trip Generation rates, will be utilized for the purpose of addressing project -related traffic. Trip Distribution Assumptions (SEE PAGE 3) Analysis Assumptions Intersection analysis at the study intersections will be conducted per the ICU methodology according to the City guidelines. Roadway analysis will be conducted at the study roadways based on the HCM methodology. On -Site Parking and Circulation The traffic study will discuss proposed circulation, and will assess access points, turn prohibitions, etc. Additionally, the site's interaction with the existing circulation of the adjacent shopping center will be discussed. Truck Service Impact Fuel and supply truck circulation will be evaluated. Truck turns will be shown on the site to determine any site circulation constraints. Construction Period Impacts Page 2 11/3/17 TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF PROJECT TRIP GENERATION Trip Generation Rates AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ITE Daily In Out Total In Out I Total Land Use Code Unit Fueling Gasoline Station w/ Convenience Market 945 205.360 6.360 6.110 12.47 7.135 6.855 13.99 Position Trip Generation Estimates AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily In Out Total In Out Total Land Use Quantity Unit Gasoline Station w/ Convenience Market 16 Fueling Position 3,286 102 98 200 114 110 224 - Pass -by Trips (30%)' -127 -31 -29 -60 -34 -33 -67 Total Proposed Project Trips 3,159 71 69 140 80 77 157 1 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition 2 Source: City of Seal Beach staff Trip Distribution Assumptions (SEE PAGE 3) Analysis Assumptions Intersection analysis at the study intersections will be conducted per the ICU methodology according to the City guidelines. Roadway analysis will be conducted at the study roadways based on the HCM methodology. On -Site Parking and Circulation The traffic study will discuss proposed circulation, and will assess access points, turn prohibitions, etc. Additionally, the site's interaction with the existing circulation of the adjacent shopping center will be discussed. Truck Service Impact Fuel and supply truck circulation will be evaluated. Truck turns will be shown on the site to determine any site circulation constraints. Construction Period Impacts Page 2 11/3/17 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 490 Pacific Coast Highway Traffic Impact Study Scope of Work CUP 17-3 Unusual construction circumstances, if any, will be noted in the study. As requested by the City Engineer, any high -accident locations will be identified based on accident data provided by the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS). Trip Distribution Assumptions The following trip distribution percentages will be used for trip assignment in the traffic study: to 6ay0 r7 9 P CrIppe• Way r 5% rine r y 20% 35% O1._" Cres[vierti�i:e Q a oe P e Sun e yr -j AV e a a��[�A Marvista Ave n 5% Qrritvrood AVO � m a C�srffrr2 p[ Bolsa Ave Balsa Ave ,Y n �i Mazly v .7 Pavilions m w The Red Car Museum A 5 Zae[er Field F 35% r y r Page 3 11/3/17 APPENDIX B SWITRS ACCIDENT DATA STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL REPORT 8 - TOTAL COLLISIONS 01/01/2016 thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 191 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 rimary Rd 1 POWER SPUR Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd ST CLOUD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 001 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 362 Collision Date 20160916 Time 1544 Day FRI rimary Collision Factor R -O -W PED Violation 21950A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20161007 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With PED Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action X-WLK AT Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 49 F W HNBD RGTTURN E A 0700 INFIN 2013 A - N - M G 2 PED 89 M W HNBD PROC ST N N 6000 - N - P - PED COMP PN 89 M 1 0 P Primary Rd 10TH ST Distance (ft) 335 Direction S Secondary Rd RT 1 NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 241 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 251 Collision Date 20160926 Time 1958 Day MON Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20161108 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With PKD MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 64 M W HNBD RGT TURN N A 0000 HYUND 2016 - - - - G - 2 PRKD 998 - HNBD PARKED N A 0000 MERCE 2013 - - - Primary Rd 13TH ST Distance (ft) 50 Direction N Secondary Rd OCEAN AV NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 241 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 368 Collision Date 20161202 Time 1753 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor OTHER IMPROP DRV Violation Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170110 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With PKD MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F OTHR 998 - IMP UNK IMP UNK PROC ST N A 0100 FORD 2001 - - 0 - - - 2 PRKD 998 - PARKED S A 0100 FIAT 2015 - - N - - - 3 PRKD 998 - PARKED S A 0100 MITSU 2009 - - N - - - Primary Rd 17TH ST Distance (ft) 254 Direction N Secondary Rd ELECTRIC AV NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 241 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 251 Collision Date 20161117 Time 1836 Day THU Primary Collision Factor STRTNGIBCKNG Violation 22106 Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20161207 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With PKD MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type RampAnt Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 64 M W HNBD BACKING S A 0000 HONDA2007 - - A 22350 - G - 2 PRKD 998 - PARKED A 0000 FORD 2002 - - - - - 3 PRKD 998 - PARKED A 0000 HONDA2010 - - - - - Page 1 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112016thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases Total Count. 191 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 Primary Rd 1ST ST Distance (ft) 14 Direction S Secondary Rd OCEAN AV NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 365 Collision Date 20160212 Time 0313 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor DRVR ALC IDRG Violation 23152A Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20160315 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 30 F H HBD-UI U-TURN S A 0000 CHEVR2006 - - A 22107 - G rimary Rd 6TH ST Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd OCEAN AV NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 317 Collision Date 20161016 Time 1538 Day SUN rimary Collision Factor R -O -W AUTO Violation 21802A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20161220 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Patty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 20 M H HNBD STOPPED S A 0000 HONDA2006 - - N - M - PASS 21 F 3 0 G 2 DRVR 27 F A HNBD PROC ST - A 0000 HONDA2010 - N - M - PASS 27 M 3 0 G rimary Rd 7TH ST Distance (ft) 150 Direction S Secondary Rd ELECTRIC NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist Beat PATRO Type 0 CalTrans Badge 314 Collision Date 20160626 Time 1729 Day SUN rimary Collision Factor DRVR ALC IDRG Violation 23152A Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20160830 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With NON-CLSN Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 57 M W HBD-UNK PROC ST S A 0000 FIAT 2012 - - - - G - 2 PRKD 998 - S - 0000 VOLKS 2011 - - N - - - 3 PRKD 998 - null S 0000 CHEVR 2014 - - - - - - Primary Rd ALLEY Distance (ft) 0 Direction N Secondary Rd MAIN ST 308 NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist 3020 Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 429 Collision Date 20160110 Time 1227 Day SUN rimary Collision Factor DRVR ALCIDRG Violation 23152A Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20160324 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Darty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 57 F W HBD-UI RGT TURN E D 2200 CHEVR 2006 - - A 22107 - M Primary Rd ALLEY Distance (ft) 7 Direction S Secondary Rd RT 1 NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 940 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 251 Collision Date 20160807 Time 1705 Day SUN Primary Collision Factor NOT STATED Violation Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20161215 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 48 M W HNBD LFT TURN N A 0000 CHEVR2015 - - - - G - Page 2 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/01/2016 thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 191 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 rimary Rd ANDERSON Distance (ft) 161 Direction S Secondary Rd RT 1 NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 31.111 Side of Hwy S ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 241 Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 251 Collision Date 20161025 Time 2147 Day TUE rimary Collision Factor STOP SGNISIG Violation 22450A Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170227 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type I Ramp/Int 6 Party Info Victim Info Darty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 19 M W HBD-UI PROC ST W A 0000 MITSU 2002 - - A 22350 - rimary Rd BALBOA DR Distance (ft) 0 Direction SecondaryRd COASTLINE DR NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 368 Collision Date 20160306 Time 0422 Day SUN rimary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type HEAD-ON Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20160413 Weather1 RAINING Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 34 M W HNBD PROC ST S A 0100 HONDA2011 - 3 E - M G Primary Rd BAYSIDE DR Distance (ft) 132 Direction S Secondary Rd CORAL PL VCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 431 Collision Date 20160429 Time 0003 Day FRI rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20160601 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond 1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With PKD MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 DRVR 29 F W FATG PROC ST N - 0000 TOYOT 2001 A F - G - 2 PRKD 998 - PARKED - - 0000 TOYOT 2013 - - - Primary Rd BOLSA Distance (ft) 30 Direction W SecondaryRd SILVER SHOALS NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat PATRO Type 0 CalTrans Badge 314 Collision Date 20160626 Time 2256 Day SUN Primary Collision Factor DRVR ALCIDRG Violation 23152A Collision Type OVERTURNED Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20160817 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With NON-CLSN Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 28 M W HBD-UNK PROC ST N - 0000 HARLE 1990 - 2 A - W -T DRVR SEVERE 28 IM 1 1 Primary Rd BOLSA AV Distance (ft) 17 Direction W SecondaryRd ISLAND VIEW DR NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH .,,l., 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20160422 Time 1404 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Awayr Y Process Date 20160531 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 19 F W HNBD PROCST E A 0100 KIA 2014 - 3 N - M G 2 DRVR 69 F W HNBD STOPPED E A 0100 HONDA2007 3 N - M G Page 3 This report is accepted subject to the Tenns of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112016thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases Total Count. 191 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 Primary Rd CANDLEBERRY AV Distance (ft) 752 Direction E Secondary Rd FUCHSIA ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist 3 Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 313 Collision Date 20160716 Time 0400 Day SAT Primary Collision Factor DRVR ALC IDRG Violation 23152A Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20160816 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With PKD MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 25 M A HBD-UI PROC ST E A 0000 HONDA2013 - - N - G DRVR COMP PN 25 M 1 0 G - 2 PRKD 998 - null - - 0000 CHEVR 2010 - - - Primary Rd CENTRAL AV Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd 7TH ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist Beat 002 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 362 Collision Date 20160115 Time 2025 Day FRI rimary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20160325 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With PKD MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntr1 Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 57 M W HNBD RGT TURN W 0700 CHEVR 2015 - 3 N - M G 2 PRKD 998 - HNBD —A _ PARKED - D 2200 TOYOT 2002 - 3 N - - - rimary Rd CENTRAL AV Distance (ft) 33 Direction E Secondary Rd 7TH ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20160905 Time 1524 Day MON rimary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20161011 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With PKD MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type RampAnt Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 21 M H HBD-UNK UNSTURN W A 0100 HONDA2010 1 N - M G 2 PRKD 998 - PARKED W D 2200 TOYOT 2002 - - - - J rimary Rd COASTLINE DR Distance (ft) 122 Direction W Secondary Rd MARVISTA AV NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist 7 Beat 007 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 174 Collision Date 20160612 Time 2310 Day SUN rimary Collision Factor DRVR ALCIDRG Violation 23152A Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20160721 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With PKD MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 25 M W HBD-UI LFT TURN S A 0100 FORD 2013 A 22350 - G - 2 PRKD 998 - PARKED - A 0100 LEXUS 2004 N - - - 3 PRKD 998 - PARKED - A 0100 INFIN 2013 N - - - rimaryRd COLLEGE PARK DR Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd COLLEGE PARK NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20161102 Time 1122 Day WED rimary Collision Factor NOT DRIVER Violation Collision Type OTHER Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20161212 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntr1 Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected OTHR COMP PN 3 F 0 0 - 1 OTHR 998 - HNBD OTHER W A 0100 HYUND 2002 - 3 0 - - - Page 4 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/01/2016 thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 191 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 rimary Rd ELDORADO Distance (ft) 265 Direction N Secondary Rd CANOE BROOK NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 001Type 0 CalTrans Badge 362 Collision Date 20160114 Time 1556 Day THU rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type OVERTURNED Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20160317 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DUSK/DAWNPedAction Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 72 F W HNBD FATG PROC ST S A 0100 HONDA2003 - 3 A N L G rimary Rd ELECTRIC AV Distance (ft) 78 Direction E Secondary Rd 12TH ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist 4 Beat 007 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 174 Collision Date 20160610 Time 2114 Day FRI rimary Collision Factor DRVR ALCIDRG Violation 23152A Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20160817 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 18 M H DRUG RAN OFF RD E A 0000 HONDA 1994 - - A 22107 - B - DRVR COMP PN 18 M 1 0 B Primary Rd ELECTRIC AV Distance (ft) 158 Direction W Secondary Rd MAIN ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 304 Collision Date 20160721 Time 1206 Day THU rimary Collision Factor STRTNGIBCKNG Violation 22106 Collision Type OTHER Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20161010 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 52 F W HNBD BACKING E A 0000 VOLVO 2006 F - M - 2 DRVR 46 M W HNBD RGT TURN S A 0000 TOYOT 2016 N - M - I PASS 8 M 6 0 G Primary Rd FORRESTAL LN Distance (ft) 444 Direction E Secondary Rd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 241 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 251 Collision Date 20161204 Time 1908 Day SUN Primary Collision Fact UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170110 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 25 M W HBD-UI PROC ST E A 0000 INFIN 2004 - - A 20002 - G - PrimaryRd GOLDEN RAIN Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd CANOE BROOK NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 001 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 362 Collision Date 20160229 Time 0114 Day MON Primary Collision Factor OTHER IMPROP DRV Violation Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20160413 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With PKD MV Lighting DARK - NO Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 56 M W HBD-UI PROC ST S A 0100 TOYOT 2008 - 3 N - M G 2 PRKD 998 - HNBD PARKED S A 0100 NISSA 2009 3 N - - - Page 5 This report is accepted subject to the Tenns of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112016thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases Total Count. 191 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 Primary Rd HEATHER ST Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd HEATHER ST 3960 NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20160422 Time 0847 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor STRTNGIBCKNG Violation 22106 Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20160531 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 46 M H HNBD BACKING E 1 1100 ISUZU 2005 - 3 N - M G rimary Rd LAMPSON Distance (ft) 108 Direction E Secondary Rd BASSWOOD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 361 Collision Date 20160708 Time 1336 Day FRI rimary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20160816 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With BICYCLE Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Patty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 F DRVR 49 M H HNBD RGT TURN E D 0000 CHEVR 1992 - - - - G 2 BICY 59 F W HNBD RAN OFF RD E L 0000 - - - - - BICY 0TH VIS 59 - 9 3 - rimary Rd LAMPSON Distance (ft) 1164 Direction E SecondaryRd OLD RANCH PLZ NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist 3020 Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 429 Collision Date 20160112 Time 0722 Day TUE rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20160323 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 25 M W HNBD PROCST W A 0100 MAZDA2012 A - F - M G� 2 DRVR 29 M H HNBD PROC ST W F 2600 OTHER 2002 A - N - M G Primary Rd LAMPSON AV Distance (ft) 74 Direction W Secondary Rd BASSWOOD ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 432 Collision Date 20161017 Time 0715 Day MON Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20161208 Weather1 RAINING Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DUSK/DAWNPedAction Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type RampAnt Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 F DRVR 16 M A HNBD LFT TURN W A 0700 CHEVR 2004 - 3 N - M G Primary Rd LAMPSON AV Distance (ft) 0 Direction SecondaryRd CANDLEBERRY NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 001 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 362 Collision Date 20160115 Time 1110 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor STOP SGNISIG Violation 21453A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20160323 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 21 M H HNBD PROC ST - 1 1100 ISUZU 2014 - 1 A 23123 - M G PASS 9 M 0 M G PASS 8 M 0 M G 2 DRVR 78 F W HNBD LFT TURN A 0100 LEXUS 2005 - 3 N - M G Page 6 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112016thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 191 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 Primary Rd LAMPSON AV Distance (ft) 238 Direction W Secondary Rd CANDLEBERRY AVNCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 141 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 251 Collision Date 20160520 Time 1456 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor UNKNOWN Violation Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20160719 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 DRVR 60 F A IMP UNK IMP UNK PROC ST E A 0000 TOYOT 2009 - - - - G—I—DRVR SEVERE 60 F = 0 L - rimary Rd LAMPSON AV Distance (ft) 1174 Direction W SecondaryRd HEATHER NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist Beat 141 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 251 Collision Date 20160527 Time 0657 Day FRI rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20160719 Weather1 CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Patty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 F DRVR 22 F H HNBD PROC ST W A 0000 VOLKS 2002 - - - - L - Primary Rd LAMPSON AV Distance (ft) 0 Direction SecondaryRd HEATHER AV NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist 20 Beat 006 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 174 Collision Date 20160123 Time 1617 Day SAT Primary Collision Factor R -O -W AUTO Violation 21801A Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20160322 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntr1 Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 43 M W HNBD U-TURN W A 0000 JEEP 2013 - - N - G 2 DRVR 69 F W HNBD PROC ST E A 0000 SUBAR 2015 - - N - G - DRVR COMP PN 69 F 1 0 G - rimary Rd LAMPSON AV Distance (ft) 38 Direction E Secondary Rd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat ROVER Type 0 CalTrans Badge 178 Collision Date 20160809 Time 1807 Day TUE Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20161010 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With BICYCLE Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 F DRVR 53 M W HNBD RGT TURN E - 0000 - - - N - W - DRVR 0TH VIS 53 M 1 1 2 DRVR 30 M 0 HNBD RGT TURN E 0000 _ AUDI 2013 - N - G - Primary Rd MAIN ST Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd CENTRAL AV NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 362 Collision Date 20160307 Time 1219 Day MON Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20160412 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With BICYCLE Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 68 F W HNBD PARKING - A 0700 CHEVR2012 3 N M G 2 BICY 69 M 0 HNBD PROC ST - L 0400 - 3 A 21755 N BICY 0TH VIS 69 1 1 P Page 7 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112016thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 191 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 Primary Rd MAIN ST Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd MAIN ST 215 NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20160720 Time 1132 Day WED Primary Collision Factor STRTNGIBCKNG Violation 22106 Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20160909 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 47 M W HNBD BACKING E A 0700 TOYOT 1997 - 3 N - M C 2 DRVR 55 M W HNBD STOPPED S 1 0900 FREIG 2005 - 3 N - M G Primary Rd MAIN ST Distance (ft) 400 Direction S SecondaryRd PACIFIC COAST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 298 Collision Date 20161223 Time 1251 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor UNKNOWN Violation Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170127 Weather1 CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntri Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 DRVR 27 F W HNBD LFT TURN N A 0000 KIA 2012 - - N - G - PASS 58 F 0 2 DRVR 30 M W HNBD RGT TURN S A 0000 VOLKS 2012 - - N - G - PASS 30 M 3 0 G PASS 28 F 5 10 G rimary Rd MAIN ST Distance (ft) 238 Direction W Secondary Rd RT 1 NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 33.191 Side of Hwy S ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist 2 Beat 007 Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 174 Collision Date 20160821 Time 1943 Day SUN rimary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170218 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With BICYCLE Lighting DUSK/DAWNPedAction Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type I RampAnt 6 Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected IF DRVR 58 M H HNBD RGT TURN N A 0000 TOYOT 2011 - N - G - PASS 25 M 4 0 PASS 60 M 6 0 2 BICY 51 M H HNBD PROC ST N 0000 - - N - - _FPASS COMP PN 9 M 4 0 Primary Rd MARINA DR Distance (ft) 5 Direction S Secondary Rd RT 1 NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 33.281 Side of Hwy S City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat ROVER Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 178 Collision Date 20160229 Time 1746 Day MON Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170216 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DUSK/DAWNPed Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type I Ramp/Int 6 Party Info Victim Info Patty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 F DRVR 48 M W HNBD PROC ST N 1 0000 OTHER 2008 - - N - G 2 DRVR 51 F W HNBD STOPPED N A 0000 INFIN 2015 - N - G - tDRVR COMP PN 51 - 1 0 G Primary Rd N BOUND SEAL Distance (ft) 273 Direction S Secondary Rd PACIFIC COAST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal BWz%CH BL County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 300 Collision Date 20161003 Time 0240 Day MON Primary Collision Factor DRVR ALC IDRG Violation 23152A Collision Type HEAD-ON Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20161219 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 29 F HBD-UI PROC ST N A 0000 HYUND 2014 - - A 22350 - G - Page 8 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112016thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 191 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 Primary Rd NORTH GATE RD Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd NORTH GATE RD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20160714 Time 1637 Day THU Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20160816 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 75 M W HNBD PROCST W A 0000 FORD 2012 - - N - G - 2 DRVR 62 M W HNBD LFT TURN W A 0000 CHEVR 2006 - - N - G - rimary Rd OCEAN ALLEY Distance (ft) 122 Direction N Secondary Rd OCEAN AV NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat ROVER Type 0 CalTrans Badge 178 Collision Date 20161019 Time 2329 Day WED Primary Collision Factor DRVR ALCIDRG Violation 23152A Collision Type OTHER Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20161208 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With PKD MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntri Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 37 F H HBD-UI BACKING E A 0000 CHRYS 2001 - - N - G - 2 PRKD 998 - _ _ PARKED E A 0000 INFIN 2005 - - N - - - rimary Rd OCEAN AV Distance (ft) 102 Direction E Secondary Rd DOLPHIN NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat PATRO Type 0 CalTrans Badge 314 Collision Date 20161227 Time 0330 Day TUE rimary Collision Factor DRVR ALCIDRG Violation 23152A Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170317 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With PKD MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type RampAnt Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 30 M H HBD-UI PROC ST E A 0000 TOYOT 2009 - A 22350 -G - 2 PRKD 998 - _ PARKED E A 0000 TOYOT 2005 - - - - - 3 PRKD 998 - PARKED E A 0000 BMW 2008 - - - rimary Rd OLD RANCH PKY Distance (ft) 0 Direction SecondaryRd OLD RANCH PKWYNCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist Beat 001 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 362 Collision Date 20161126 Time 1622 Day SAT rimary Collision Factor R -O -W AUTO Violation 21801A Collision Type HEAD-ON Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170118 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DUSK/DAWNPedAction Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 F DRVR 57 M B HNBD LFT TURN W A 0000 MERCE 2013 - - N - M - 2 DRVR 37 F H HNBD PROC ST E A 0000 HONDA2007 - - N - M - rimary Rd PACIFIC COAST Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd 12TH ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 33.021 Side of Hwy N City Seal BbW County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 002 Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 362 Collision Date 20160120 Time 0743 Day WED Primary Collision Factor R -O -W PED Violation 21950A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170211 Weather1 CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With BICYCLE Lighting DUSK/DAWNPedAction Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type I Ramp/Int 5 Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 19 F H HNBD LFT TURN W A 0100 HONDA2002 - 3 N - M G 2 BICY 6 F W HNBD PROC ST - L 0400 - - 3 N - - BICY COMP PN 6 F 1 0 P W Page 9 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112016thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 191 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 rimary Rd PACIFIC COAST Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd 12TH ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 30.01 Side of Hwy N ity Seal BKW County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 362 Collision Date 20160322 Time 1200 Day TUE rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170211 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type H Ramp/Int - Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected IF DRVR 86 F W HNBD PROC ST N A 0100 TOYOT 2002 2 N - M C 2 DRVR 49 M W HNBD STOPPED - A 0100 HYUND 2016 3 N - M G Primary Rd PACIFIC COAST Distance (ft) 187 Direction W Secondary Rd 12TH ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 33.06 Side of Hwy S City Seal BLW County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 298 Collision Date 20161230 Time 0938 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170302 Weather1 RAINING Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntr1 Dev FNCTNG Loc Type H Ramp/Int - Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 30 F W HNBD SLOWING E C 0000 YAMAH2014 - - N - - W I DRVR OTH VIS 30 F 1 0 rimary Rd PACIFIC COAST Distance (ft) 122 Direction W Secondary Rd 16TH ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 32.8 Side of Hwy S ity Seal BliPf County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 423 Collision Date 20161231 Time 1346 Day SAT rimary Collision Factor R -O -W AUTO Violation 21801A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Process Date 20170306 Weather1 CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type H Ramp/Int - Party Info Victim Info Patty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected IF DRVR 58 F A HNBD LFT TURN S A 0000 TOYOT 2013 - - A 22107 - G - 2 DRVR 61 M W HNBD PROC ST E A 0000 TOYOT 2014 - N - G - PASS 17 F 0 G Primary Rd PACIFIC COAST Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd 1 ST ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 3.63 Side of Hwy S City Seal BbW County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 002 Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 362 Collision Date 20160202 Time 0727 Day TUE Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170218 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With Lighting DUSK/DAWNPed Action Cntrl Dev Loc Type H Ramp/Int - Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 22 F 0 HNBD PROC ST N A 0100 TOYOT 2008 - 3 N - L A 2 DRVR 67 F W HNBD STOPPED S A 0700 ACURA2004 - 3 N - M G rimary Rd PACIFIC COAST Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd 1ST ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 33.621 Side of Hwy S ity Seal BLAIPf County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 298 Collision Date 20161231 Time 1244 Day SAT rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 3 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170329 Weather1 CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type I RampAnt 5 Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected IF DRVR 55 M W HBD-UNK PROC ST E A 0000 TOYOT 2006 - A - G - DRVR COMP PN 55 M 1 0 G - 2 DRVR 46 M W HNBD PROC ST W A 0000 PORSC 2006 N G DRVR COMP PN 46 M 1 0 G 3 DRVR 57 F W HNBD LFT TURN E A 0000 TOYOT 2004 - N - G PASS COMP PN 84 M 3 0 G - PASS 56 M 4 0 G - Page 10 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112016thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 191 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 Primary Rd PACIFIC COAST Distance (ft) 140 Direction W Secondary Rd ANDERSON NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 31.14 Side of Hwy S City Seal BKW County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 298 Collision Date 20161216 Time 0853 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type HEAD-ON Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170302 Weatherl CLOUDY Weather2 RAINING Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type H Ramp/Int - Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 F DRVR 22 M H HNBD PROC ST E A 0000 TOYOT 2007 - - N - - G DRVR COMP PN 22 M 1 0 - G Primary Rd PACIFIC COAST Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd KITTS HWY NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 32.4 Side of Hwy N City Seal 131W County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 422 Collision Date 20160724 Time 0355 Day SUN Primary Collision Factor DRVR ALC IDRG Violation 23152A Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170303 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type H Ramp/Int - Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 25 M H HBD-UI PROC ST N A 0000 VOLKS 2015 - - A 22350 F G M r PASS SEVERE 20 M = 0 G rimary Rd PACIFIC COAST Distance (ft) 48 Direction E Secondary Rd MAIN ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 33.18 Side of Hwy S ity Seal BLAIPf County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 257 Collision Date 20160103 Time 1839 Day SUN rimary Collision Factor DRVR ALC IDRG Violation 23152A Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 2 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170216 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type H Ramp/Int - Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 22 F W HBD-UI PROC ST - A 0100 HONDA2001 3 A 23152 - L G DRVR COMP PN 22 F 1 0 L G 2 DRVR 58 M W HNBD PROC ST 1 1200 OTHER 2001 3 N P G PASS COMP PN 67 F 9 0 P - Primary Rd PACIFIC COAST Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd MAIN ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 33.191 Side of Hwy S City Seal BRW County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 368 Collision Date 20160109 Time 1932 Day SAT Primary Collision Factor R -O -W PED Violation 21950A Collision Type AUTO/PED Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170216 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 CLOUDY Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With PED Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action X-WLK AT Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type I Ramp/Int 5 Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 29 F W HNBD LFT TURN S A 0100 FORD 2015 - 3 - - M G 2 PED 34 M W HBD-UI PROC ST N N 6000 - - 3 - - - - PED COMP PN 04 M _ 9 3 - - Primary Rd PACIFIC COAST Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd MAIN ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile .033 Side of Hwy S City Seal BbW County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 257 Collision Date 20160622 Time 1003 Day WED Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170214 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type I Ramp/Int 5 Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 59 M W HNBD PROC ST S D 2200 FORD 2002 - 3 N M G 2 DRVR 32 M W HNBD STOPPED S A 0100 FORD 2016 - 3 J M G Page 11 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112016thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 191 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 Primary Rd PACIFIC COAST Distance (ft) 78 Direction W Secondary Rd MAIN ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 33.2 Side of Hwy S City Seal BKW County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 298 Collision Date 20161119 Time 0725 Day SAT Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170304 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type H Ramp/Int - Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 28 M W HBD-UI PROC ST E - 0000 TOYOT 1997 A - N - G - DRVR OTH VIS 53 F 1 0 G - 2 DRVR 28 M H HNBD STOPPED E - 0000 TOYOT 1988 D - - G - 3 DRVR 50 F HNBD STOPPED E 0000 TOYOT 2006 - G - rimary Rd PACIFIC COAST Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd MARINA DR NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 33.281 Side of Hwy N City Seal Bb -W County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 422 Collision Date 20161008 Time 0532 Day SAT Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type HEAD-ON Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170227 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type I Ramp/Int 5 Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 20 M H HNBD OPPOS LN W A 0000 HONDA1995 - - A rimary Rd PACIFIC COAST Distance (ft) 38 Direction N Secondary Rd RT 1 NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 32.721 Side of Hwy N ity Seal BbIPf County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 431 Collision Date 20160516 Time 1147 Day MON rimary Collision Factor R -O -W AUTO Violation 21800A Collision Type HEAD-ON Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170213 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl CONS ZONE Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntd Dev NT FNCT Loc Type I Ramp/Int 5 Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 31 F W HNBD PROC ST N A 0000 TOYOT 2012 - - N - G 2 DRVR 76 F H HNBD _ PROC ST S A 0000 HONDA2008 - - N - G Primary Rd PACIFIC COAST Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 32.73 Side of Hwy S City Seal Bb%W County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 362 Collision Date 20160314 Time 1623 Day MON Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170211 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type H Ramp/Int - Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 19 M H HNBD PROC ST S A 0100 AUDI 2003 3 N - L G 1 2 DRVR 48 M H HNBD STOPPED S A 0100 HONDA2001 3 N - M G Primary Rd PACIFIC COAST Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 32.73 Side of Hwy S City Seal BKAtPf County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 362 Collision Date 20160314 Time 0806 Day MON Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170216 Weather1 RAINING Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type H Ramp/Int - Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 32 M W HNBD PROC ST - A 0700 JEEP 1994 - 3 N - M G I PASS 9 IF 4 0 IM G 2 DRVR 59 M W HNBD STOPPED - A 0100 VOLKS - 3 N - M G DRVR COMP PN 159 M 11 0 IM G Page 12 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112016thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 191 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 rimary Rd PACIFIC COAST Distance (ft) 600 Direction S Secondary Rd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 32.61 Side of Hwy N ity Seal BKW County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 002 Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 362 Collision Date 20160321 Time 1729 Day MON rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Process Date 20170216 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With Lighting DUSKIDAWNPedAction Cntrl Dev Loc Type H Ramp/Int - Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected IF DRVR 38 M 0 HNBD PROC ST N A 0700 TOYOT 2005 - 3 N - L G PASS 11 M 6 0 M G 2 DRVR 24 F 0 HNBD STOPPED - A 0700 BMW 2006 - 3 N - L G PASS COMP PN 18 F 3 0 L G PASS 12 M 4 0 M G PASS 12 M 3 0 M G 3 DRVR 41 M W HNBD STOPPED - A 0100 AUDI 2011 3 N - M G Primary Rd PCH Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 32.721 Side of Hwy N City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat OOS Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 152 Collision Date 20160508 Time 0652 Day SUN Primary Collision Factor UNKNOWN Violation Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170213 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type I RampAnt 5 Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 DRVR 25 M W HNBD PROC ST E A 0100 TOYOT 2007 3 N - L G 2 DRVR 65 F W HNBD PROC ST N - 0000 GMC 2002 3 N - L G rimary Rd ROSSMOOR Distance (ft) 60 Direction W Secondary Rd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal BAITER W)County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 298 Collision Date 20161021 Time 1446 Day FRI rimary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type HEAD-ON Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20161207 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 F DRVR 89 F W HNBD RGT TURN W A 0000 TOYOT 2001 - - N - H - DRVR OTH VIS 89 F 1 0 H - 2 DRVR 54 F B HNBD PROC ST E A 0000 CADIL 2012 - N - G - rimary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 20 Direction S Secondary Rd 10TH NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 33.14 Side of Hwy S ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 246 Collision Date 20160714 Time 1116 Day THU rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170303 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type H Ramp/Int - Party Info Victim Info Darty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 18 M A HNBD PROC ST E D 2200 NISSA 2015 - - N - L - PASS 18 M 0 L PASS 18 M 0 L PASS 17 M 0 L 2 DRVR 36 M H HNBD SLOWING N A 0100 ACURA2014 - - N - L DRVR COMP PN 36 M 1 0 L Page 13 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112016thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases Total Count. 191 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 Primary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 172 Direction S Secondary Rd 10TH ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 30.33 Side of Hwy S City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 246 Collision Date 20161129 Time 0720 Day TUE Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170222 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type H Ramp/Int - Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 39 M W HNBD PROCST S A 0100 NISSA 2015 - 3 N - L G 2 DRVR 29 M W HNBD STOPPED S A 0700 JEEP 1996 3 N - M G 3 DRVR 31 F W HNBD STOPPED S A 0100 TOYOT 2012 3 N - M G Primary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd 13TH ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 32.971 Side of Hwy N City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist 6 Beat 007 Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 174 Collision Date 20161021 Time 1839 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170216 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DUSKIDAWNPed Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type I Ramp/Int 5 Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 17 F W HNBD SLOWING N A 0000 NISSA 2010 - - N - G - DRVR COMP PN 44 F 1 0 G 2 DRVR 44 F W HNBD STOPPED N A 0000 DODGE2013 - N - G rimary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 40 Direction E Secondary Rd 14TH ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 32.91 Side of Hwy S ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 361 Collision Date 20160804 Time 1512 Day THU rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170218 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type H Ramp/Int - Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 27 M W PROC ST E A 0000 HYUND 2010 - - - - G 2 DRVR 26 M W SLOWING E A 0000 SU BAR 2016 - - - G 3 DRVR 83 M W SLOWING E A 0000 GMC 2002 - - - - G rimary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 33 Direction E Secondary Rd 14TH ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 32.91 Side of Hwy N ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat PATRO Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 314 Collision Date 20161126 Time 1915 Day SAT rimary Collision Factor R -O -W AUTO Violation 21804A Collision Type Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 2 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170215 4leather1 RAINING Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type H Ramp/Int - Party Info Victim Info Patty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 53 M W HBD-NUI ENTTRAF N A 0000 HONDA2016 - - H - G I PASS 45 F 3 0 - G 1 2 DRVR 34 F 0 HNBD PROC ST E A 0000 TOYOT 2013 - N - G L DRVR 0TH VIS 34 F 1 0 - G PASS 0TH VIS 32 M 3 0 - G rimary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd 15TH ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 30.601 Side of Hwy N ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 246 Collision Date 20161227 Time 1556 Day TUE rimary Collision Factor R -O -W AUTO Violation 21801A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170306 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type I RampAnt 5 Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 63 M W HNBD LFT TURN N A 0100 FORD 2008 3 N - M G 2 DRVR 34 M W HNBD PROC ST E A 0100 FORD 2011 3 N - M G' PASS_ F 4 0 P G Page 14 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112016thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 191 PASS 0 F Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 rimary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd 16TH ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 32.821 Side of Hwy S City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat ROVER Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 178 Collision Date 20160209 Time 1809 Day TUE rimary Collision Factor R -O -W AUTO Violation 21801A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170216 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DUSK/DAWNPedAction Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type I Ramp/Int 5 Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 24 F W HNBD LFT TURN N A 0000 HONDA2001 - - N G PASS 5 M 4 0 - Q PASS 0 F 6 0 - Q 2 DRVR 42 F W HNBD PROC ST S A 0000 FORD 2014 - N - G PN 42 F 1 0 G 3 DRVR 78 M _ W HNBD PROCST S A 0000 LAND 2001 A - G [DRVR7COMP rimary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 42 Direction W Secondary Rd 16TH ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 32.83 Side of Hwy S ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 365 Collision Date 20160330 Time 1757 Day WED rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170216 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type H Ramp/Int - Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 73 M W HNBD PROCST S A 0000 CADIL 2011 - - N G - 2 DRVR 32 M 0 HNBD SLOWING S A 0000 HONDA2008 - N - G - DRVR COMP PN 31 M 1 0 G 3 DRVR 21 M W HNBD STOPPED S A 0000 JEEP 1995 - N - G - 4 DRVR 36 F W HNBD STOPPED S A 0000 DODGE 2015 - N - G - Primary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 80 Direction N Secondary Rd 16TH ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 32.84 Side of Hwy S City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat ROVER Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 178 Collision Date 20160810 Time 1817 Day WED Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170218 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type H Ramp/Int - Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 45 M W HNBD PROCST S - 0000 CHEVR2011 A - N - L - 2 DRVR 44 M 0 HNBD STOPPED S - 0000 MERCE2016 A - N - G - I DRVR POMP PN 44 M 1 0 G Primary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 32 Direction W SecondaryRd 1ST ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 24.56 Side of Hwy S City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat ROVER Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 178 Collision Date 20160713 Time 2245 Day WED Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170218 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type H Ramp/Int - Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 33 M 0 HNBD PROCST S A 0000 HONDA2015 - - N - L - 2 DRVR 18 M H HNBD STOPPED S D 0000 TOYOT 2014 - - N - G - PASS 16 F 3 0 G PASS gO F 4 0 G Page 15 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112016thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 191 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 rimary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd 5TH ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 33.421 Side of Hwy N ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 368 Collision Date 20160305 Time 1904 Day SAT rimary Collision Factor STOP SGNISIG Violation 21453A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 2 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170216 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type I Ramp/Int 5 Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 F DRVR 39 F A HNBD PROC ST N A 0100 NISSA 2016 - - - - L G DRVR COMP PN 39 F 1 10 L G 2 DRVR 78 F W HNBD LFT TURN S A 0100 LEXUS 2006 3 - - L G DRVR COMP PN 78 F 1 0 L G Primary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 482 Direction N Secondary Rd 5TH ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 33.51 Side of Hwy S City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 241 Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 368 Collision Date 20161208 Time 1856 Day THU Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170302 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntr1 Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type H Ramp/Int - Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 38 F H HNBD PROC ST S A 0100 VOLVO 2012 - 3 M - M G DRVR COMP PN 38 F 1 0 IM G 2 DRVR 62 M W HNBD STOPPED S A 0100 INFIN 2013 - 3 N - M G rimary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 58 Direction S Secondary Rd 5TH ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 30.13 Side of Hwy S ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 207 Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 368 Collision Date 20161223 Time 2100 Day FRI rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170306 Weatherl RAINING Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Condl OTHER Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With PKD MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type H RampAnt - Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 47 F W HNBD PROC ST S A 0100 HONDA2008 - 3 N - L G 2 PRKD 998 - PARKED S A 0100 AUDI 2011 - - N - - - Primary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd 8TH ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 33.251 Side of Hwy S ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat OOS Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 317 Collision Date 20160608 Time 1320 Day WED rimary Collision Factor R -O -W AUTO Violation 21801A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 3 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170222 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type I Ramp/Int 5 Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 31 F W HNBD LFT TURN S - 0000 FORD 2008 A - A - - - DRVR COMP PN 31 F 1 0 PASS COMP PN 6 F 6 0 2 DRVR 20 F W HNBD PROC ST E - 0000 NISSA 2002 A - A 22350 - - - DRVR COMP PN 0 F 1 13 - rimary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd 8TH ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 33.251 Side of Hwy S ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 257 Collision Date 20160804 Time 1513 Day THU rimary Collision Factor R -O -W AUTO Violation 21801A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170222 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntr1 Dev FNCTNG Loc Type I Ramp/Int 5 Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 62 M W HNBD STOPPED N A 0700 TOYOT 2014 - 3 N - M G 2 DRVR 44 F W HNBD PROC ST E A 0100 KIA 2008 - 3 N - M G L DRVR COM4 F 1 0 M G Page 16 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/01/2016 thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases Total Count. 191 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 rimary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 24 Direction E Secondary Rd 8TH ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 30.281 Side of Hwy S ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 298 Collision Date 20161118 Time 1313 Day FRI rimary Collision Factor UNKNOWN Violation Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170222 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type I Ramp/Int 5 Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 DRVR 23 F HNBD LFT TURN S A 0000 HONDA2010 - N - G - PASS 1 M 6 3 G - PASS F 4 3 G - 2 DRVR 68 F HNBD PROC ST E A 0000 JAGUA 2006 - N - G - Primary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 280 Direction N Secondary Rd ANDERSON ST NCIG 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 31.16 Side of Hwy S ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist bear SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 246 Collision Date 20160303 Time 1442 Day THU rimary Collision Factor R -O -W AUTO Violation 21804A Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170211 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type H Ramp/Int - Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 76 fill W HNBD U-TURN E A 0100 NISSA 2015 3 N - M G 2 DRVR 45 M W HNBD PROC ST S D 2200 TOYOT 2005 3 N - M G rimary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 683 Direction N SecondaryRd ANDERSON ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 31.24 Side of Hwy N ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 431 Collision Date 20160716 Time 2026 Day SAT rimary Collision Factor R -O -W AUTO Violation 21801A Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170218 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type H Ramp/Int - Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 59 M W HNBD LFT TURN - A 0000 HONDA2015 - N - G - 2 DRVR 22 M W HNBD PROC ST - A 0000 NISSA 2003 - N - G - PASS 0 M 2 0 G Primary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 291 Direction N Secondary Rd ANDERSON ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 31.17 Side of Hwy S ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat ROVER Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 178 Collision Date 20161018 Time 2203 Day TUE rimary Collision Factor R -O -W AUTO Violation 21801 B Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170216 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type H Ramp/Int - Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 998 F W HNBD PROC ST E A 0000 FORD 1998 - - N - G - 2 DRVR 40 M _ H HBD-NUI MERGING E A 0000 FORD 1995 - - N - G - DRVR COMP PN 40 M 1 0 G - rimary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 0 Direction SecondaryRd ANDERSON ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 31.12 Side of Hwy N ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 246 Collision Date 20161120 Time 1338 Day SUN rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type OTHER Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170304 Weatherl RAINING Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type H Ramp/Int - Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 34 M W HNBD PROC ST N C 0200 TRIUM 2009 - 3 N - P W PASS OTH VIS 27 F 0 1 P Page 17 This report is accepted subject to the Tenns of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112016thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases Total Count. 191 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 rimary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd BALBOA NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 33.021 Side of Hwy N ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 002 Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 362 Collision Date 20160724 Time 1046 Day SUN rimary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170218 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With BICYCLE Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type I Ramp/Int 5 Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 69 F W HNBD RGTTURN - A 0100 INFIN 2008 3 N - M G 2 BICY 31 M 0 HNBD PROC ST - L 0400 - 3 N - - - BICY COMP PN 01 1 1 P W Primary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 305 Direction S Secondary Rd BOLSA AV NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 33.141 Side of Hwy N City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 246 Collision Date 20161110 Time 1716 Day THU rimary Collision Factor R -O -W AUTO Violation 21801A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170304 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With BICYCLE Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntr1 Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type I Ramp/Int 5 Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 24 F W HNBD LFT TURN E A 0100 HONDA2003 - 3 N - M G 2 BICY 47 M W HNBD PROC ST N L 0400 - 3 N - - - I BICY OTH VIS 47 IM 0 1 - - rimary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 20 Direction E Secondary Rd MAIN ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 3.18 Side of Hwy S ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 257 Collision Date 20160622 Time 1033 Day WED rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170214 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type H RampAnt - Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 29 M W HNBD PROC ST S A 0100 TOYOT 2003 - 3 N - M G 2 DRVR 71 M B HNBD STOPPED S A 0100 LEXUS 2013 - 3 N - M G I PASS 54 F --70----TM— G rimary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 21 Direction E SecondaryRd MARINER NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 31.43 Side of Hwy N ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat PATRO Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 314 Collision Date 20160320 Time 2357 Day SUN rimary Collision Factor R -O -W AUTO Violation 21801A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 3 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170216 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type H Ramp/Int - Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 27 M W HBD-NUI LFT TURN S A 0000_ BMW 2008 - - - - G - DRVR PEVERE 7 M 11 0 PASS COMP PN 7 M 0 2 DRVR 54 M B HBD-UI PROC ST W A 0000 FORD 2016 - - A 23152 - G - DRVR COMP PN 53 M 1 0 G Primary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 631 Direction S Secondary Rd MARINER DR NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 31.29 Side of Hwy N ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist 12 Beat 007 Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 174 Collision Date 20160925 Time 2249 Day SUN rimary Collision Factor R -O -W AUTO Violation 21804A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 4 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170302 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntr1 Dev FNCTNG Loc Type H Ramp/Int - Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 27 F W HNBD LFT TURN W A 0000 VOLKS 2013 - - N - G DRVR OTH VIS 27 F 1 0 L PASS 29 M 0 G PASS COMP PN 29 M 0 G PASS OTH VIS 28 F 6 0 G Page 18 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112016thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases 2 DRVR 23 F W HNBD Total Count: 191 PROC ST N A 0000 FORD 2010 - N - G - DRVR OTH VIS 23 F 1 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 0 L - rimary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 9 Direction N Secondary Rd MARINER DR NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 31.45 Side of Hwy S City Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 246 Collision Date 20161121 Time 0911 Day MON rimary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170216 Weatherl CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type H Ramp/Int - Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 70 M W HNBD U-TURN S G 2531 INFIN - 3 N - M G 2 DRVR 22 F W HNBD PROC ST S A 0100 TOYOT 1997 - 3 A 22350 - M G Primary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 50 Direction S Secondary Rd MARVISTA AV NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 33.41 Side of Hwy N City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist 6 Beat 007 Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 174 Collision Date 20160828 Time 1800 Day SUN Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170121 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DUSK/DAWNPed Action Cntrl Dev Loc Type H RampAnt - Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 25 F W HNBD CHANG LN N A 0000 KIA 2009 - - N - G - 2 DRVR 19 M B HNBD PROC ST N A 0000 FORD 2010 - - N - G - PASS 7 M 4 0 G PASS 8 M 6 0 G rimary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 0 Direction SecondaryRd PACIFIC COAST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 31.28 Side of Hwy N ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 206 Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 368 Collision Date 20160309 Time 1818 Day WED rimary Collision Factor PED VIOL Violation 21954A Collision Type AUTO/PED Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170211 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With PED Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action NOT IN X- Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type H Ramp/Int - Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F PED 38 F W HBD-UNK OTHER E N 6000 - - 3 - - - 2 DRVR 60 F W HNBD PROC ST N A 0100 MERCE 2009 - 3 _- - - M G Primary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 827 Direction N Secondary Rd PHILLIPS ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 31.73 Side of Hwy N City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat OOS Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 191 Collision Date 20160723 Time 0906 Day SAT Primary Collision Factor NOT DRIVER Violation Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170223 Weatherl CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl OBSTR ON RD Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type H Ramp/Int - Party Info Victim Info Patty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 BICY 47 F HNBD PROC ST N - 0000 - - - E - - - BICY COMP PN 47 F 3 - Primary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 200 Direction E Secondary Rd PHILLIPS ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 31.53 Side of Hwy S City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 298 Collision Date 20161118 Time 0555 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor NOT STATED Violation Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170215 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type H Ramp/Int - Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 DRVR 39 M H HNBD RAN OFF RD E A 0000 TOYOT 1994 - - N - G - I PASS 3 M 4 3 G - Page 19 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112016thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 191 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 Primary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 1337 Direction S Secondary Rd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 32.47 Side of Hwy N City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 365 Collision Date 20160204 Time 2221 Day THU Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170211 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - NO Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type H Ramp/Int - Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 68 F W HNBD CHANG LN N A 0000 FORD 2010 - - N - G 2 DRVR 51 F W HBD-UI PROC ST N D 0000 DODGE 1997 - - A 23152 - G Primary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 57 Direction S Secondary Rd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 32.71 Side of Hwy N City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat ROVER Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 178 Collision Date 20160217 Time 1912 Day WED Primary Collision Factor LANE CHANGE Violation 21658A Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170211 Weather1 RAINING Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntri Dev FNCTNG Loc Type H RampAnt - Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 71 M A HNBD CHANG LN N A 0000 LEXUS 2014 - - N - G 2 DRVR 51 M W HNBD _ _ PROC ST N A 0000 CHRYS 2002 - - N - G rimary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 958 Direction S Secondary Rd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 32.54 Side of Hwy N ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 246 Collision Date 20160402 Time 1604 Day SAT rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 2 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170218 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type H RampAnt - Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 16 F W HNBD SLOWING N A 0100 VOLVO 1985 3 N - P G DRVR COMP PN 16 F 11 0 P G 2 DRVR 48 M 0 HNBD STOPPED N A 0100 VOLKS 2013 - 3 N - M G PASS 45 F 3 0 M G PASS 9 F 4 0 P G PASS 11 F 5 0 P G PASS 13 F 6 0 P G 3 DRVR 34 F W HNBD STOPPED N A 0100 CHEVR 2012 3 N - M G DRVR COMP PN 34 F 1 0 M G 4 DRVR 37 M A HNBD STOPPED N A 0100 VOLKS 2013 3 N - M G Primary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 57 Direction E Secondary Rd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 32.7 Side of Hwy S City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist 06 Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 313 Collision Date 20160507 Time 0859 Day SAT Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type HEAD-ON Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170211 Weather1 RAINING Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type H RampAnt - Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 33 F H HNBD PROC ST S A 0000 FORD 1999 - - N - G - I Primary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 183 Direction W Secondary Rd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 32.76 Side of Hwy S ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 361 Collision Date 20160528 Time 1302 Day SAT rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170218 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type H RampAnt - Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 22 F W HNBD PROC ST E A 0000 MINI 2012 - - - - G - I Page 20 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112016thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases 2 DRVR 71 F W HNBD 3 DRVR 45 M W HNBD STOPPED E A STOPPED E D Total Count: 191 0000 LEXUS 2007 - - G - 0000 FORD 2003 - - G DRVR COMP PN 44 M 1 PASS 45 F 3 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 3 G - 3 G - Primary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 60 Direction W Secondary Rd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 32.73 Side of Hwy S City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 361 Collision Date 20160730 Time 1536 Day SAT Primary Collision Factor UNKNOWN Violation Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170218 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type H Ramp/Int - Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 DRVR 53 M W PROC ST E A 0000 MAZDA 2015 - - - - G - 2 DRVR 40 F W PROC ST E A 0000 MERCE 2012 - - - G Primary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 1100 Direction S Secondary Rd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 32.51 Side of Hwy N City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 246 Collision Date 20160801 Time 1732 Day MON Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170218 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type H Ramp/Int - Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 32 F W HNBD SLOWING N A 0700 FORD 2014 - 3 N - M G 2 DRVR 19 F 0 HNBD STOPPED N A 0700 TOYOT 2005 3 N - M G Primary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 1574 Direction S Secondary Rd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 32.42 Side of Hwy N City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat ROVER Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 178 Collision Date 20161108 Time 1916 Day TUE Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170304 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type H Ramp/Int - Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 28 F H HNBD PROCST N - 0000 JEEP 2008 - - - - G 2 DRVR 28 M W HNBD STOPPED N - 0000 HONDA2016 - - - - G DRVR COMP PN 28 M 1 0 G - 3 DRVR 38 F B HNBD STOPPED - - 0000 HONDA2010 - - - - G 4 DRVR 68 F _ W HNBD STOPPED N 0000 LEXUS2008 - - - - G Primary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 120 Direction W Secondary Rd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 32.7 Side of Hwy N City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 298 Collision Date 20161111 Time 1006 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170304 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type H Ramp/Int - Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 55 F A HNBD PASSING E A 0000 TOYOT2009 - - N - G - 2 DRVR 23 M W HNBD STOPPED E A 0000 NISSA 2005 - - N - G - Page 21 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112016thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases Total Count. 191 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 710 Direction N Secondary Rd BOLSA AV NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20160329 Time 0613 Day TUE Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20160412 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 33 F W HNBD PROC ST S A 0700 JEEP 2005 - 3 N - M G DRVR COMP PN 33 F = 0 M G rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 566 Direction S SecondaryRd BRADBURY NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 429 Collision Date 20160228 Time 1849 Day SUN rimary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20160412 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Patty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 76 M W HNBD LFT TURN N A 0000 MERCE 1983 - - N - G - 2 DRVR 32 F W HNBD PROC ST S A 0000 BMW 2013 - N - G - DRVR COMP PN 32 F 1 3 G - 3 DRVR 52 F W HNBD STOPPED E A 0000 CHEVR 2002 - N - G - rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 1320 Direction S Secondary Rd BRADBURY NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat OON Type 0 CalTrans Badge 152 Collision Date 20160928 Time 1443 Day WED rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20161007 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type RampAnt Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 44 M W HNBD SLOWING S A 0100 FORD 2012 - 3 A 22350 F M G 2 DRVR 16 F HNBD STOPPED S A 0100 HONDA2008 3 N L G 3 DRVR 78 M HNBD STOPPED S A 0800 CHRYS 2001 3 N M G Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 435 Direction S SecondaryRd BRADBURY NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 241 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 251 Collision Date 20161219 Time 2034 Day MON Primary Collision Factor R -O -W AUTO Violation 21804A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170110 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 19 M H HNBD LFT TURN E A 0000 NISSA 2008 - - - - G - 2 DRVR 18 M W HNBD PROC ST S A 0000 HONDA2007 - - - - L - rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 120 Direction S SecondaryRd BRADBURY RD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist Beat 106 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 251 Collision Date 20160622 Time 1123 Day WED rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20160722 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntr1 Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 42 F W HNBD PROC ST S - 0000 FORD 1998 - - - - G - 2 DRVR 36 F H HNBD RGT TURN S - 0000 FORD 2008- 3 DRVR 27 M _ H HNBD STOPPED - 0000 BMW 2002 Page 22 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112016thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 191 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 65 Direction S SecondaryRd BRADBURY RD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat OON Type 0 CalTrans Badge 191 Collision Date 20160729 Time 1737 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20161010 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 F DRVR 22 F W LFT TURN N A 0000 DODGE 2013 - - - - G - 2 DRVR 76 M W PROC ST N A 0000 LEXUS 2011 - - - - G - rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd GOLDEN RAIN NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 362 Collision Date 20160120 Time 1352 Day WED Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20160317 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 17 M W HNBD PROC ST - A TOYOT 2009 - 3 N - M G 2 DRVR 998 F W HNBD —G STOPPED - A 0700 JEEP 2014 - 3 N - M G rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 50 Direction N Secondary Rd GOLDEN RAIN NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 361 Collision Date 20160715 Time 1201 Day FRI rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20160930 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type RampAnt Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 48 F B SLOWING S A 0000 FORD 2001 - - - G - 2 DRVR 44 M W STOPPED S A 0000 TOYOT 2008 - - - G - rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 27 Direction S Secondary Rd LAMPSON AV NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 141 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 251 Collision Date 20160715 Time 1424 Day FRI rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20160816 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Darty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 72 M W HNBD PROC ST W A 0000 FORD 1980 - - - - G - rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 560 Direction S Secondary Rd LANDING NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist BeatType 0 CalTrans Badge 361 Collision Date 20160303 Time 1806 Day THU rimary Collision Factor HAZ PARKING Violation 22515A Collision Type AUTO/PED Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20160418 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With PED Lighting DUSK/DAWNPed Action IN RD, Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F PED 53 F W IMP UNK IMP LINK STOPPED - - 0000 - - - - - - - PED COMP PN 54 F 3 - 2 OTHR 998 - BACKING S B 0000 LEXUS 1994 - - - - - - Page 23 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112016thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases Total Count. 191 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 10 Direction S Secondary Rd LANDING AV NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 317 Collision Date 20161016 Time 1724 Day SUN rimary Collision Factor LANE CHANGE Violation 21658A Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20161208 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With PKID MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 33 M H HNBD PROCST S A 0000 DODGE2005 - - A 23123 - M� 2 PRKD 998 - HNBD PARKED W A 0000 DODGE 1994 - - N - Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 452 Direction S Secondary Rd N GATE RD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 16-2030 Collision Date 20160927 Time 0845 Day TUE Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20161007 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntr1 Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 65 M W HNBD PROCST S A 0100 TOYOT 2015 - 3 N - L G Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 500 Direction N Secondary Rd N GATE RD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20161206 Time 1507 Day TUE Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170110 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 51 M W IMP UNK IMP UNK PROCST S A 0700 CHEVR 1999 - 3 N - M G 2 DRVR 24 F W HNBD STOPPED S A 0100 TOYOT 2000 - 3 N - M G 3 DRVR 47 F W HNBD STOPPED S A 0700 HONDA2015 - 3 N - M G Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 55 Direction N Secondary Rd NORTH GATE RD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20160304 Time 1224 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20160315 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 65 F W HNBD PROC ST S A 0100 TOYOT 2014 3 N - M G 2 DRVR 48 F W HNBD STOPPED S A 0700 HYUND 2014 3 N - M G rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 545 Direction N SecondaryRd NORTH GATE RD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 432 Collision Date 20161011 Time 0628 Day TUE rimary Collision Factor TOO CLOSE Violation 21703 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20161208 Weatherl CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DUSKIDAWNPedAction Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 24 F W HNBD PROCST S A 0100 BMW 2003 - 3 A 22350 2 DRVR 42 F H HNBD STOPPED S A 0100 TOYOT 2014 3 N - M G 3 DRVR 49 M H HNBD STOPPED S A 0100 HONDA2016 3 N - M G Page 24 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112016thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases Total Count. 191 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 300 Direction N Secondary Rd NORTH GATE RD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20161209 Time 2500 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170110 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 79 F W IMP UNK IMP UNK PROC ST S A 0100 NISSA 2002 - 3 N - -BE 2 DRVR 62 F W IMP UNK IMP UNK STOPPED S A 0100 TOYOT 2014 - 3 N - - B DRVR COMP PN 62 F 1 0 - B 3 DRVR 77 M W IMP UNK IMP UNK STOPPED S A 0100 MERCE 2011 - 3 N - - B Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 300 Direction N Secondary Rd NORTHGATE NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat OON Type 0 CalTrans Badge 152 Collision Date 20160707 Time 1039 Day THU Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20161025 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 65 F W HNBD SLOWING S A 0000 NISSA 2003 - - F - G - DRVR OTHVIS 165 - 1 0 L 2 DRVR 61 M W HNBD STOPPED S A 0000 CADIL 2016 - N - G - rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 325 Direction N Secondary Rd NORTHGATE BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 001 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 362 Collision Date 20160120 Time 1242 Day WED rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20160317 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 39 F W HNBD PROC ST - A 0100 HONDA2009 3 N - M G 2 DRVR 54 F W HNBD STOPPED A 0700 CHEVR 2004 3 N - M G Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 122 Direction S Secondary Rd NORTHGATE RD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 362 Collision Date 20160107 Time 0651 Day THU Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20160324 Weather1 CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With PKID MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 29 M H HNBD LFT TURN - A 0100 NISSA 2008 - 3 N - M G7 PASS 19 M0 M G PASS 9 M 5 0 M G PASS 25 M 0 M G 2 PRKD 998 - _ HNBD PARKED S 1 2000 OTHER 2007 3 N - - - I Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 462 Direction N Secondary Rd NORTHGATE RD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 007 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 430 Collision Date 20160116 Time 1533 Day SAT Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20160323 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With NON-CLSN Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type RampAnt Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 28 M W HNBD PROC ST S C 0200 KAWA 2011 3 N - P W DRVR OTH VIS 28 M 1 1 P W 2 DRVR 57 M H HNBD STOPPED S D 2200 CHEVR 1997 3 N - M G PASS 30 M 0 M G Page 25 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112016thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 191 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 203 Direction N Secondary Rd NORTHGATE RD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 405 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 22.518 Side of Hwy S City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat ROVER Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 178 Collision Date 20160525 Time 2024 Day WED Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170204 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type R Ramp/Int 4 Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 F DRVR 74 F W HNBD PROC ST S A 0000 SUBAR 2009 - - N - G- DRVR COMP PN 74 F 1 0 G - 2 DRVR 42 M H HNBD STOPPED S A 0000 JEEP 2007 - N - G - PASS 10 F 0 G - PASS 13 F 0 G - PASS 5 M 0 Q - 3 DRVR 43 M A HNBD STOPPED S A 0000 TOYOT 2011 - N - G Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 400 Direction S Secondary Rd OLD RANCH NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 405 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 22.386 Side of Hwy N City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat OON Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 152 Collision Date 20160629 Time 1109 Day WED Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 2 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170204 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type R RampAnt 4 Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 43 F W HNBD CHANG LN N A 0100 TOYOT 2004 3 F - L G DRVR 0TH VIS 03 1 0 IL G 2 DRVR 39 M W HNBD SLOWING N A 0100 TOYOT 2000 3 N - M G DRVR COMP PN 9 M 1 0 IM G Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 45 Direction N SecondaryRd OLD RANCH PKWYNCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat OON Type 0 CalTrans Badge 191 Collision Date 20160118 Time 1428 Day MON Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20160317 Weather1 CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 F DRVR 58 M 0 HNBD PROC ST S A 0000 TOYOT 2000 - - - - - - 2 DRVR 90 F W HNBD STOPPED S A 0000 DODGE2014 - - - - Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 0 Direction SecondaryRd OLD RANCH PKWYNCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 405 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 22.558 Side of Hwy N City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat ROVER Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 178 Collision Date 20160215 Time 2059 Day MON rimary Collision Factor R -O -W AUTO Violation 21800D Collision Type HEAD-ON Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170211 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntri Dev NT FNCT Loc Type R Ramp/Int 4 Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 26 F W HNBD PROC ST N A 0000 HONDA2013 - - N - G 2 DRVR 24 F W HNBD _ _ LFT TURN S A 0000 CHEVR 2014 - - H - G rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd OLD RANCH PKWYNCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 405 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 22.558 Side of Hwy N ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat ROVER Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 178 Collision Date 20161012 Time 2228 Day WED rimary Collision Factor R -O -W AUTO Violation 21453C Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170227 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type R RampAnt 4 Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 22 F W HNBD LFT TURN S A 0000 HONDA2016 - - N - G 2 DRVR 23 F W HNBD LFT TURN W A 0000 NISSA 2006 - - N - G Page 26 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112016thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases Total Count. 191 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 120 Direction S Secondary Rd OLD RANCH PKWYNC/C 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20161123 Time 1056 Day WED rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20161213 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 78 M H HNBD PROCST S D 2200 FORD 1999 - 3 N - M G 2 DRVR 49 F W HNBD STOPPED S A 0700 FORD 2008 - 3 N - M G I DRVR COMP PN 49 IF 1 10 IM G Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd OLD RANCH PKY NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 365 Collision Date 20160123 Time 0234 Day SAT Primary Collision Factor STOP SGNISIG Violation 21453A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 2 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20160322 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntr1 Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 29 M W HNBD PROC ST N A 0000 MERCE 2016 - - A 14601 F G - DRVR COMP PN 27 M 1 0 2 DRVR 54 M W HNBD PROC ST E A 0000 TOYOT 2014 - - N - G - DRVR COMP PN 54 M 1 0 rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 89 Direction N Secondary Rd OLD RANCH PKY NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 405 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 22.386 Side of Hwy N ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist 17 Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 313 Collision Date 20160501 Time 1105 Day SUN rimary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 3 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170204 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type R RampAnt 4 Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 19 F W HNBD PROC ST S A 0000 HONDA2008 - - N - G - 2 DRVR 55 F W HNBD PROC ST S A 0000 ACURA 2003 - - N - G - DRVR OTH VIS 55 F 1 0 3 DRVR 55 F W HNBD STOPPED S A 0000 FORD 2015 - - N - G - DRVR COMP PN 55 F 11 0 G PASS COMP PN 69 F 3 0 G rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 82 Direction N Secondary Rd OLD RANCH PKY NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 431 Collision Date 20160509 Time 0624 Day MON rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20160719 Weather1 CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 F DRVR 21 F H HNBD PROC ST S A 0000 CHRYS 2005 - - N - G - DRVR 0TH VIS 21 F 1 0 G 2 DRVR 32 M A HNBD STOPPED S A 0000 HONDA2013 - N - G rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 220 Direction N SecondaryRd OLD RANCH PKY NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20160824 Time 0833 Day WED rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20161010 Weather1 CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 33 F W HNBD PROC ST S A 0100 TOYOT 2016 - 3 N - L G DRVR COMP PN 33 F 1 0 L C 2 DRVR 42 F 0 HNBD STOPPED N A 0700 KIA 2011 - 3 N - M G Page 27 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112016thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 191 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd OLD RANCH RD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist NA Beat ONA Type 0 CalTrans Badge 317 Collision Date 20160630 Time 2311 Day THU Primary Collision Factor UNKNOWN Violation 21435A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20160816 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 30 F W HNBD PROCST N A 0000 MAZDA2012 - - F - - - 2 DRVR 22 M W HNBD LFT TURN E A 0000 TOYOT 2013 - N - - - I PASS 02 M 0 IG - rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 379 Direction N SecondaryRd PACIFIC COAST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 300 Collision Date 20160918 Time 1523 Day SUN Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type HEAD-ON Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20161108 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntri Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 32 M 0 HBD-UI PROCST N A 0000 HONDA2015 - - A 2315:G= - Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 245 Direction S Secondary Rd PLYMOUTH NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat OON Type 0 CalTrans Badge 191 Collision Date 20160912 Time 1147 Day MON Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20161007 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 33 F HNBD PROC ST N A 0000 VOLKS 2005 - - A 21703 - B 2 DRVR 76 M HNBD PROC ST N A 0000 TOYOT 2005 - - - - G rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 12 Direction N Secondary Rd PLYMOUTH DR NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 178 Collision Date 20160518 Time 1702 Day WED rimary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20160719 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type RampAnt Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 32 F W HNBD PROCST N A 0000 HONDA2010 - - N - G - 2 DRVR 33 F W HNBD RGT TURN N A 0000 KIA 2015 - - N - G - Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd PLYMOUTH DR NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20161123 Time 0923 Day WED Primary Collision Factor UNKNOWN Violation Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20161207 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 DRVR 87 F HNBD PROCST N A 0100 PONTI 1992 3 N - M G 2 DRVR 46 F W HNBD LFT TURN E A 0700 SUBAR 2016 3 N - M G Page 28 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112016thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 191 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd PLYMOUTH DR NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20161129 Time 1427 Day TUE Primary Collision Factor STOP SGNISIG Violation 21453A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20161207 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 85 M W HNBD PROCST N A 0700 BUICK 2011 - 3 N - L G 2 DRVR 82 M A HNBD PROC ST W A 0700 LEXUS 2000 - 3 N - M G Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 40 Direction N Secondary Rd PLYMOUTH DR NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 257 Collision Date 20161215 Time 0849 Day THU Primary Collision Factor R -O -W AUTO Violation 21804A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170111 Weatherl CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntri Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected PASS 29 F 0 M G 1F DRVR 33 M W HNBD LFT TURN W A 0700 TOYOT 2004 - 3 N - M G 2 DRVR 53 M W HNBD _ PROC ST N A 0100 NISSA 2006 - 3 N - M G rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 30 Direction N Secondary Rd RD C NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat ROVER Type 0 CalTrans Badge 178 Collision Date 20160703 Time 1845 Day SUN rimary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20160816 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type RampAnt Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 F DRVR 50 F B HNBD RGT TURN S A 0000 MERCE 2000 - - N - G - 2 DRVR 53 F W HNBD PROC ST S A 0000 MERCE 2008 - - N - G - rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 450 Direction S Secondary Rd ROAD C NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat OOS Type 0 CalTrans Badge 191 Collision Date 20160912 Time 1703 Day MON rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20161007 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 22 F HNBD PROC ST N A 0000 HYUND 2014 A 21658 - G - 2 DRVR 60 M HNBD PROC ST N A 0000 HONDA2012 - - G Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 126 Direction S Secondary Rd RT 1 NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 32.721 Side of Hwy S ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist Beat PATRO Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 314 Collision Date 20160327 Time 0233 Day SUN rimary Collision Factor DRVR ALC IDRG Violation 23152A Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170211 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type I Ramp/Int 6 Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 F DRVR 30 M H HBD-UI PROC ST S A 0000 FIAT 2012 - - - - G - 2 DRVR 21 M W PROC ST S A 0000 TOYOT 2006 - - - - G 3 PRKD 998 - null S 0000 DODGE 2009 - - - - 4 PRKD 998 - null S 0000 LINCO 2003 - - - - 5 PRKD 998 - null S 0000 JEEP 2014 - - - Page 29 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112016thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 191 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 350 Direction N Secondary Rd RT 1 NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat OOS Type 0 CalTrans Badge 152 Collision Date 20160614 Time 1412 Day TUE Primary Collision Factor NOT DRIVER Violation Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 3 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20160829 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 DRVR 76 M W HNBD PROC ST S A 0000 CHEVR 2002 - - N - G FDRVR OTH VIS 77 M 1 0 G - 2 DRVR 26 F W HNBD STOPPED S A 0000 FORD 2008 - N - G DRVR COMP PN 26 F 1 0 G - PASS COMP PN 998 0 G - 3 DRVR 38 F _ W HNBD STOPPED S A 0000 MAZDA2010 - N - G 4 DRVR 60 F _ W HNBD STOPPED S A 0000 DODGE 2006 - N - G Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 87 Direction N Secondary Rd RT 1 NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 32.721 Side of Hwy N City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 246 Collision Date 20160814 Time 1732 Day SUN Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170121 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type I RampAnt 6 Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 28 M W HBD-UI PROC ST S A 0700 GMC 2012 3 A 23152 - M - PASS 25 M R0 M G 2 DRVR 42 F A HNBD PROC ST S A 0700 TOYOT 2015 3 N - M G PASS 43 M _ 13 0 M G PASS 11 F 4 0_ M G PASS 10 F 5 0 M G _ PASS 35 F _ 6 0 M G Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 48 Direction N Secondary Rd RT 1 NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 32.721 Side of Hwy N City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 246 Collision Date 20160830 Time 1251 Day TUE Primary Collision Factor TOO CLOSE Violation 21703 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170121 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type I Ramp/Int 6 Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 77 F H HNBD PROCST S A 0800 HONDA2012 3 N - M G PASS 10 M 9 0 P Q PASS 8 M 9 0 P Q 2 DRVR 26 F A HNBD STOPPED S A 0100 ACURA2014 3 N - M G PASS 3 M 6 0 P Q Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 107 Direction N Secondary Rd RT 1 NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 32.721 Side of Hwy N City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 246 Collision Date 20161130 Time 1047 Day WED Primary Collision Factor NOT DRIVER Violation Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 4 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170215 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type I Ramp/Int 6 Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 DRVR 60 F W IMP UNK IMP UNK PROC ST S A 0700 FORD 2011 3 N - L G DRVR COMP PN 60 F 1 0 L G 2 DRVR 32 F 0 HNBD STOPPED S A 0100 HONDA2009 3 N - L G DRVR COMP PN 32 IM 1 0 L G 3 DRVR 60 M W HNBD STOPPED S A 0700 JEEP 2012 3 N - M G DRVR COMP PN 60 M 1 10 M G 4 DRVR 60 M W HNBD SLOWING S A 0100 HONDA2014 3 N - M G DRVR COMP PN 60 M 1 0 M G Page 30 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112016thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases Total Count. 191 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd RT 405 NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 405 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 22.558 Side of Hwy N City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 006 Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 368 Collision Date 20160424 Time 2121 Day SUN Primary Collision Factor UNKNOWN Violation Collision Type OVERTURNED Severity FATAL #Killed 1 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20160729 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With NON-CLSN Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type R Ramp/Int 4 Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 DRVR 62 M W IMP UNK IMP UNK PROC ST N C 0200 HARLE 2012 - - L - P W DRVR KILLED 62 M 1 P W rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd RT 405 NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 405 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 22.558 Side of Hwy N ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist Beat OON Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 191 Collision Date 20160731 Time 1245 Day SUN rimary Collision Factor STOP SGNISIG Violation 21453A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170223 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type R Ramp/Int 4 Party Info Victim Info Patty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 998 - IMP UNK IMP UNK LFT TURN - A 0000 - - - A 20002 - - 2 DRVR 21 F W HNBD PROC ST N A 0000 TOYOT 2012 - - - - G Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd RT 405 NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 368 Collision Date 20160922 Time 0357 Day THU Primary Collision Factor UNKNOWN Violation Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 2 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20161007 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 DRVR 55 M W HNBD PROC ST N A 0100 NISSA 2008 - 3 - - L G I DRVR COMP PN 55 M ZI 0 CG 2 DRVR 52 M W HNBD LFT TURN W A 0100 FORD 2016 - 3 - - L G DRVR COMP PN 52 M 11 0 L IG Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 0 Direction SecondaryRd SAINT ANDREWS NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 423 Collision Date 20161211 Time 1447 Day SUN Primary Collision Factor STOP SGNISIG Violation 21453A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Process Date 20170110 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type RampAnt Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 46 M A HNBD PROCST S A 0000 HONDA2007 - N - G - I PASS 10 M 6 0 G - PASS 75 M 3 0 G 2 DRVR 54 M 0 HNBD LFT TURN E A 0000 TOYOT 2007 N - G rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 207 Direction S Secondary Rd SAINT ANDREWS NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat ROVER Type 0 CalTrans Badge 178 Collision Date 20160322 Time 2002 Day TUE rimary Collision Factor OTHER EQPMNT Violation 24002A Collision Type OTHER Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20160413 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 F DRVR 50 M W HNBD PROC ST S A 0000 CHEVR 2001 - - N - G - 2 DRVR 58 M W HNBD PROC ST S D 0000 NISSA 2015 - - N - G - Page 31 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112016thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 191 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 60 Direction E Secondary Rd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 32.71 Side of Hwy S City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 298 Collision Date 20161104 Time 0917 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170304 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type H Ramp/Int - Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 67 M W HNBD LFT TURN S C 0200 HARLE 2017 - 3 N - M W DRVR COMP PN 67 M W - Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 342 Direction N Secondary Rd TOWN CENTER DR NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat OON Type 0 CalTrans Badge 152 Collision Date 20160921 Time 1241 Day WED Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 2 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20161007 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Patty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 90 M W HNBD LFT TURN S - 0000 ACURA2007 A - F - L_ DRVR OTH VIS 90 1 0 L 2 DRVR 90 M W HNBD PROC ST S - 0000 VOLKS 1996 A - N - L - DRVR 0TH VIS 90 1 0 L Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 0 Direction SecondaryRd TOWNE CENTER NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 257 Collision Date 20160409 Time 2024 Day SAT Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20160531 Weather1 CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - NO Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 92 M W HBD-NUI LFT TURN W A 0100 HONDA2008 - 3 A 21461 - M BE] 2 DRVR 35 F 0 HNBD LFT TURN W D 2200 FORD 2014 - 3 N - M G Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 145 Direction S SecondaryRd TOWNE CENTER NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist 19 Beat 006 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 174 Collision Date 20161104 Time 1942 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor DRVR ALC IDRG Violation 23152A Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20161208 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DUSK/DAWNPedAction Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type RampAnt Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 52 M W HBD-UI PROC ST S A 0000 SUBAR 2014 - F - L - 2 DRVR 39 M W HNBD STOPPED S A 0000 TOYOT 2006 - N - G PASS 11 F 9 0 G 3 DRVR 48 F W HNBD STOPPED S A 0000 TOYOT 2014 - N - G DRVR COMP PN 48 F 1 0 G PASS 82 F 3 0 G - PASS 14 F 4 0 G - PASS 93 F 6 0 G - PASS 14 M 7 0 G - 4 DRVR 45 F W HNBD STOPPED S A 0000 INFIN 2013 - N - G PASS 9 M 4 0 G - Page 32 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112016thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 191 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd TOWNE CENTER NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20160310 Time 1545 Day THU Primary Collision Factor UNKNOWN Violation Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20160413 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 DRVR 86 F W PHYS PROC ST S A 0100 TOYOT 2001 3 N - M G 2 DRVR 42 F W HNBD PROC ST E A 0700 CHEVR 2007 3 N - M G I PASS F37—�o 0 P Q PASS 6 F _ P Q Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 86 Direction S Secondary Rd WESTMINSTER AV NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 365 Collision Date 20160304 Time 2110 Day FRI rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20160317 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 52 F W HNBD PROC ST N A 0000 MAZDA2007 - - N - - G DRVR COMP PN 52 F 1 0 G rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 235 Direction S Secondary Rd WESTMINSTER AV NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20160305 Time 1340 Day SAT rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20160315 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type RampAnt Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 71 M W HNBD PROC ST S A 0100 TOYOT 1995 - 3 N - M G Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 0 Direction SecondaryRd WESTMINSTER AV NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 001 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 362 Collision Date 20160725 Time 1340 Day MON Primary Collision Factor DRVR ALCIDRG Violation 23152A Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20160822 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type RampAnt Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 65 F W DRUG PROCST E A 0700 HONDA2003 3 A 22350 - M G 2 DRVR 43 F W HNBD STOPPED A 0100 TOYOT 2014 3 N M G 3 DRVR 61 M W HNBD STOPPED D 2200 CHEVR 2004 3 N - M G PASS 25 M 3 0 M G Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd WESTMINSTER AV NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20160829 Time 0827 Day MON Primary Collision Factor STOP SGNISIG Violation 21453A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20161012 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 F DRVR 18 F A HNBD PROC ST W A 0100 TOYOT 2003 - 3 N - M G 2 DRVR 28 M W HNBD PROC ST S 1 1100 FORD 2010 3 N - M G Page 33 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/01/2016 thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 191 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 158 Direction S Secondary Rd WESTMINSTER AV NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20161121 Time 0832 Day MON rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20161208 Weather1 CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 33 M H HNBD PROC ST S D 2200 TOYOT 1994 - 3 N - P G 2 DRVR 22 F W HNBD PROC ST S A 0100 SUBAR 2014 3 N M G Primary Ra SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 170 Direction N SecondaryRd WESTMINSTER AV NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 298 Collision Date 20161223 Time 1009 Day FRI rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170110 Weather1 CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected IF DRVR 22 M W HNBD PROC ST N A 0000 PORSC 2001 - - K - G - rimary Rd THUNDERBIRD DR Distance (ft) 0 Direction SecondaryRd THUNDERBIRD DR NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20161227 Time 1258 Day TUE Primary Collision Factor DRVR ALC IDRG Violation 23152E Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170317 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 66 M W DRUG OTHER S A 0100 HYUND 2014 - 3 N - M B PrimaryRd WESTMINSTER Distance (ft) 388 Direction W SecondaryRd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist 3020 Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 429 Collision Date 20160117 Time 1755 Day SUN Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20160317 Weather1 CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 74 F H HNBD LFT TURN E A 0100 HONDA2006 3 N - L G 2 DRVR 21 M W HBD-NUI PROC ST W A 0100 MAZDA2012 3 N - L G I PASS 22 M 6 0 IP G PASS 2 M 0 P G PASS 5 M 0 IL G PrimaryRd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 4593 Direction W SecondaryRd BOLSA CHICA RD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 106 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 251 Collision Date 20160519 Time 1147 Day THU Primary Collision Factor NOT DRIVER Violation Collision Type OTHER Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20160719 Weather1 CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With NON-CLSN Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety EquiJ ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 DRVR 56 M W HNBD PROC ST E C 0000 OTHER 1999 - - - - W DRVR 0TH VIS 56 M 1 1 Page 34 This report is accepted subject to the Tenns of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112016thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 191 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 rimary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 1285 Direction W Secondary Rd BOLSA CHICA RD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat ROVER Type 0 CalTrans Badge 178 Collision Date 20160616 Time 1816 Day THU rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20160720 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 F DRVR 22 F H HNBD PROC ST E - 0000 TOYOT 2000 - - N - L - PASS 20 F P 0 G - 2 DRVR 38 M H HNBD STOPPED E - 0000 NISSA 2006 - N - G - PASS 4 F 0 0 - PASS 7 F 5 0 G - PASS 1 F 0 Q - 3 DRVR 26 M _ W HNBD STOPPED E 0000 TOYOT 2016 - N - G 4 DRVR 35 M _ W HNBD PROC ST E 0000 MERCE 2005 N G Primary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 2289 Direction W Secondary Rd BOLSA CHICA RD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 304 Collision Date 20160721 Time 1510 Day THU Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20161010 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 58 F W HNBD CHANG LN E A 0000 SMART2010 - - - - M - 2 DRVR 37 M W HNBD PROC ST E A 0000 HONDA2004 - - A 22350 - M rimary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 203 Direction W Secondary Rd BOLSA CHICA RD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 361 Collision Date 20160820 Time 1113 Day SAT rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type HEAD-ON Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20161129 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 34 M W IMP UNK IMP UNK RAN OFF RD E A 0000 JEEP 1997 - - - - G - 2 DRVR 49 M H null E 0000 GMC 2015 - - - G Primary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 3615 Direction W Secondary Rd BOLSA CHICA RD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist 14 Beat 007 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 174 Collision Date 20160820 Time 1738 Day SAT Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20161010 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DUSK/DAWNPed Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 19 M H-HNBD SLOWING E A 0000 TOYOT 2005 - - N - G - 2 DRVR 69 M W HNBD SLOWING E A 0000 CHRYS 2016 - - N - G - I PASS 35 F 6 0 G PASS 31 M 3 0 G PASS 55 F 4 0 G Page 35 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112016thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases Total Count. 191 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 rimary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 580 Direction W Secondary Rd BOLSA CHICA RD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20161003 Time 0801 Day MON rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20161207 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 50 F B HNBD SLOWING E A 0700 LEXUS 1999 - 3 N - M G 2 DRVR 55 F W HNBD STOPPED E A 0700 BMW 2011 - 3 N - M G I DRVR COMP PN 55 IF 1 10 IM G Primary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 1014 Direction W Secondary Rd BOLSA CHICA RD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 432 Collision Date 20161012 Time 0725 Day WED Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20161208 Weatherl CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntr1 Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 28 M W HNBD PROC ST W A 0700 JEEP 2004 - 3 N - M G 2 DRVR 58 F W HNBD PROC ST W A 0100 SUBAR 2011 - 3 N - M G rimaryRd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 52 Direction W Secondary Rd EDISON POLE NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 241 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 368 Collision Date 20161203 Time 2301 Day SAT rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170110 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type RampAnt Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 25 M W HNBD PROC ST E A 0100 TOYOT 2006 - - - - M G 2 DRVR 28 M H HNBD PROC ST E A 0100 HONDA2010 - - - - M G I PASS 1 00 F 0 0 M G Primary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 222 Direction W Secondary Rd KITTS NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat PATRO Type 0 CalTrans Badge 314 Collision Date 20160524 Time 1817 Day TUE rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 2 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20160719 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 21 M 0 HNBD PROC ST W A 0000 FORD 2002 - - N - G - DRVR COMP PN 21 M 1 0 2 DRVR 33 M 0 HNBD STOPPED W A 0000 HONDA2006 - - N - G - DRVR COMP PN 33 M 11 0 3 DRVR 26 M 0 HNBD STOPPED W A 0000 HONDA2015 - - N - G - rimary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 233 Direction W Secondary Rd KITTS HWY NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist 11 Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 313 Collision Date 20160502 Time 1159 Day MON rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20160719 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntr1 Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 90 M W HNBD PROC ST E A 0000 LINCO 2012 - - F - G - DRVR 0TH VIS 90 M 1 0 G 2 DRVR 22 M H HNBD STOPPED E A 0000 TOYOT 2003 - - N - G Page 36 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112016thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases Total Count. 191 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 rimary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd KITTS RD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist Beat 141 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 251 Collision Date 20160713 Time 1619 Day WED rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20160816 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 19 M W HNBD PROCST W A 0000 FORD 2001 - - G - G - 2 DRVR 43 M 0 HNBD STOPPED W A 0000 VOLKS 2015 - - - - G - 3 DRVR 38 F W HNBD STOPPED W A 0000 FORD 2016 - - - - G - rimary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 108 Direction W Secondary Rd KITTS RD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20160714 Time 1416 Day THU rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 2 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20160816 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 20 M 0 HNBD PROC ST E A 0000 TOYOT 2005 - - N - L 2 DRVR 82 M W HNBD SLOWING E A 0000 HYUND 2016 - - N - M DRVR COMP PN 82 M 1 0 M PASS COMP PN 66 F 3 0 M Primary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 70 Direction W Secondary Rd KITTS RD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 361 Collision Date 20160910 Time 1708 Day SAT Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 2 Tow Away? N Process Date 20161007 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 63 F W HNBD PROC ST E 0000 TOYOT 2011 A - - - G - 2 DRVR 23 M W HNBD STOPPED E 0000 FORD 2002 A - - - G —*-DRVR COMP PN 24 M _ 1 0 G PASS COMP PN 14 M 3 0 G 3 DRVR 26 M W HNBD STOPPED W 0000 NISSA 2006 A — - G - rimary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 25 Direction W Secondary Rd KITTS RD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist Beat OOS Type 0 CalTrans Badge 152 Collision Date 20160921 Time 0957 Day WED rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20161007 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 45 M W HNBD PROC ST E - 0000 TOYOT 2008 A - A 23123 - L 2 DRVR 43 M W HNBD STOPPED E - 0000 TOYOT 2014 A F - G - I DRVR COMP PN 43 - 1 0 G Primary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 700 Direction E Secondary Rd ROAD B NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat ROVER Type 0 CalTrans Badge 178 Collision Date 20160308 Time 1810 Day TUE Primary Collision Factor R -O -W AUTO Violation 21801A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20160412 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 86 M W HNBD LFT TURN N A 0000 HONDA2008 - - N - L I Page 37 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112016thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases 2 DRVR 50 F A HNBD Total Count. 191 PROC ST E A 0000 SATUR 2004 - N - - L I DRVR COMP PN 50 F 1 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 0 G rimary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 500 Direction E Secondary Rd ROAD B NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 361 Collision Date 20161104 Time 0936 Day FRI rimary Collision Factor NOT STATED Violation Collision Type OVERTURNED Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20161212 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface Rdwy Cond 1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With NON-CLSN Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 BICY 70 M W HNBD PROC ST W L 0400 - - - - - - BICY COMP PN 70 M 9 0 - W rimary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 368 Direction W Secondary Rd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist 11 Beat ROVER Type 0 CalTrans Badge 368 Collision Date 20160226 Time 1758 Day FRI rimary Collision Factor R -O -W AUTO Violation 21801A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 2 Tow Away? N Process Date 20160315 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 F DRVR 92 M W HNBD LFT TURN E M 9500 OTHER 2015 - 3 - - M B_L DRVR 0TH VIS 92 M 1 0 M B 2 DRVR 41 M W HNBD PROC ST W A 0100 CHEVR 2006 3 - - M G PASS 0TH VIS 63 F 3 0 M B Primary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 776 Direction W Secondary Rd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 001 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 362 Collision Date 20160301 Time 1537 Day TUE Primary Collision Factor STRTNGIBCKNG Violation 22106 Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20160323 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type RampAnt Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 67 M W HBD-NUI PARKING N D 2200 CHEVR 2003 - 3 N - M G DRVR OTH VIS 67 M 1 0 IM G 2 PRKD 998 - HNBD PARKED N A 0800 TOYOT 2004 3 N - - - 3 DRVR 33 M W HNBD PROC ST - A 0100 NISSA 2001 3 N - L G Primary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 500 Direction E Secondary Rd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 317 Collision Date 20160406 Time 0655 Day WED Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20160531 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Patty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 23 F W HNBD PROC ST W A 0000 HYUND 2004 - - N - G = 2 DRVR_ 40 F W HNBD STOPPED W A 0000 AUDI 2015 - - N - G - PASS M 3 0 G PASS 14 F 9 3 - Ell] rimary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 43 Direction W Secondary Rd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 431 Collision Date 20160706 Time 1607 Day WED Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20160816 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type RampAnt Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 33 F H HNBD STOPPED E D 0000 CHEVR2001 - N - G - 2 DRVR 49 F A HNBD STOPPED E A 0000 AUDI 2003 - N - G - I DRVR COMP PN 49 F 1 0 G Page 38 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112016thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 191 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 rimary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 353 Direction E Secondary Rd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20160727 Time 1555 Day WED rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20160819 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 23 M W HNBD PROCST W A 0800 NISSA 2015 3 N - M G 2 DRVR 70 M W HNBD STOPPED W A 0100 MERCE 2001 3 N - M G DRVR COMP PN 70 M M G 3 DRVR 32 F H HNBD STOPPED W D 2200 FORD 1997 3 N - M G PASS 37 F �0 _ 0 M G Primary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 956 Direction W Secondary Rd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 361 Collision Date 20160826 Time 1005 Day FRI rimary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20161013 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 83 F A HNBD RGTTURN S A 0000 FORD 1998 - - - - G - 2 DRVR 45 M W HNBD PROCST E A 0000 HONDA1997 - - - - G - rimary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 255 Direction W SecondaryRd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20160926 Time 0713 Day MON rimary Collision Factor R -O -W AUTO Violation 21804A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20161011 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 29 F W HNBD RGTTURN N A 0700 JEEP 2015 3 N - M G 2 DRVR 56 M W HNBD PROCST E I 1100 FORD 2013 3 N - M G rimary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 680 Direction E Secondary Rd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 432 Collision Date 20161017 Time 0743 Day MON rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20161223 Weather1 RAINING Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DUSK/DAWNPedAction Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 28 M W HNBD PROC ST W J 4800 NISSA 2015 - 3 N - M G 2 DRVR 39 M A HNBD STOPPED E A 0100 MAZDA2005 - 3 N - M G Primary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 400 Direction W Secondary Rd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 361 Collision Date 20161216 Time 1600 Day FRI rimary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170110 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRSIFCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 86 F W HNBD LFT TURN N A 0000 HYUND 2013 - - - - - G 2 DRVR 46 M W HBD-UI PROCST W D 0000 TOYOT 2006 - - A 23152 - - G DRVR COMP PN 46 M 2 3 - G Page 39 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112016thru 12/31/2016 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 191 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 Primary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 241 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 368 Collision Date 20161216 Time 2108 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor DRVR ALC IDRG Violation 23152A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 5 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170322 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 24 M W HBD-UI PROCST W A 0100 VOLVO 1998 - - A 21453 - M G 2 DRVR 38 M W HNBD PROC ST N A 0100 BMW 2003 - - - - L G DRVR OTH VIS 38 M 1 0 L G 3 DRVR 54 F W HNBD PROC ST S A 0100 JEEP 2014 - - - L G DRVR COMP PN 54 F 1 0 L G _ PASS COMP PN 13 F 4 0 L G PASS COMP PN 13 F 6 0 L G 4 DRVR 16 F W HNBD PROC ST S A 0100 JEEP 2014 L G DRVR COMP PN 16 F 1 0 L G Primary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 955 Direction W SecondaryRd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist 10 Beat 241 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 368 Collision Date 20161222 Time 1841 Day THU Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170111 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 43 F A HNBD LFT TURN N A 0100 FORD 2005 - 3 - - L G 2 DRVR 78 M W HNBD PROC ST E A 0100 LEXUS 2014 - 3 - - L G Primary Rd WESTMINSTER BL Distance (ft) 7920 Direction E Secondary Rd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 001 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 236 Collision Date 20161108 Time 1714 Day TUE Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20161213 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 78 M A HNBD STOPPED W - 0000 HONDA2000 - - N - M =G 2 DRVR 38 F W HNBD STOPPED W - 0000 HONDA2004 - - N - M - DRVR COMP PN 38 F 1 0 - M Page 40 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL REPORT 8 - TOTAL COLLISIONS 01/01/2017 thru 11/01/2017 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 111 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 rimary Rd 10TH ST ALY Distance (ft) 1320 Direction N Secondary Rd OCEAN NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat OOS Type 0 CalTrans Badge 152 Collision Date 20170831 Time 0915 Day THU rimary Collision Factor NOT STATED Violation Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20171011 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With PKD MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 56 M W HNBD PROC ST N D 0000 FREIG 2013 - - F - G - 2 PRKD 998 - PARKED - A 0000 JEEP 2017 N - - - Primary Rd 12TH ST Distance (ft) 100 Direction S Secondary Rd SEAL WY NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 361 Collision Date 20170806 Time 1850 Day SUN Primary Collision Factor DRVR ALC IDRG Violation 23152A Collision Type HEAD-ON Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20171011 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 21 F H HBD-UI PROC ST - A 0000 TOYOT 2007 - - - - - = =_ Primary Rd 1 ST ST Distance (ft) 425 Direction N SecondaryRd MARINA DR NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 365 Collision Date 20170920 Time 1456 Day WED Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20171024 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With PKD MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 63 F W HBD-NUI PROC ST N A 0000 VOLKS 2004 - N - G - 2 PRKD 998 - PARKED - D 0000 FORD 2002 - N - - - Primary Rd 5TH ST Distance (ft) 19 Direction N Secondary Rd OCEAN AV NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist 03 Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 313 Collision Date 20170805 Time 2308 Day SAT Primary Collision Factor STRTNGIBCKNG Violation 22106 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170913 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Patty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 26 M B HNBD BACKING N A 0000 MERCE2017 - N - G - 2 PRKD 998 - HNBD PARKED - A 0000 AUDI 2013 - - N - - - 3 PRKD 998 - null - 0000 DODGE 2008 - - - - - - 4 PRKD 998 - null - 0000 TOYOT 2007 - - - - - - 5 PRKD 998 - null 0000 TOYOT 2007 - Page 1 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112017thru 11/01/2017 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 111 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 rimary Rd ADOLFO LOPEZ Distance (ft) 1200 Direction W Secondary Rd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 298 Collision Date 20170303 Time 1533 Day FRI rimary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170316 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With PKID MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 43 M H HNBD U-TURN W -_ 0000 FREIG 2015 - - N - G 2 PRKD 998 - PARKED E - 0000 SUBAR 1999 A - N - Primary Rd ANCHOR WY Distance (ft) 33 Direction E Secondary Rd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 207 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 368 Collision Date 20170203 Time 2355 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor DRVR ALC IDRG Violation 23152A Collision Type HEAD-ON Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170315 Weatherl CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntr1 Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected IF DRVR 23 M H HBD-UI RGT TURN E A 0000 NISSA 2015 - - A 22350 - G - DRVR 0TH VIS 23 M 1 0 PrimaryRd BIRCHWOOD Distance (ft) 137 Direction E Secondary Rd SOUTHERN NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist 20 Beat 006 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 174 Collision Date 20170804 Time 1755 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor R -O -W AUTO Violation 21801A Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170911 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DUSK/DAWNPed Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 19 F W HNBD U-TURN N A 0000 ACURA2005 - - N - G - 2 DRVR 27 M W HNBD PROC ST W A 0000 OLDSM 2002 - - N - G - DRVR COMP PN 7 M 1 0 G - PASS 18 F 3 0 G - rimary Rd CENTRAL AV Distance (ft) 34 Direction E Secondary Rd 7TH ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 313 Collision Date 20170522 Time 1257 Day MON rimary Collision Factor STRTNGIBCKNG Violation 22106 Collision Type OTHER Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170712 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 79 M W HNBD BACKING W A 0000 FERRA2016 N - G - 2 DRVR 40 M W HNBD STOPPED W A 0000 NISSA 2009 N - G - rimary Rd CENTRAL AV Distance (ft) 34 Direction W Secondary Rd MAIN ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 300 Collision Date 20170406 Time 1358 Day THU rimary Collision Factor STRTNGIBCKNG Violation 22106 Collision Type OTHER Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170612 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 28 F 0 HNBD BACKING W A 0000 VOLKS 2016 - - N - G - 2 DRVR 68 M 0 HNBD SLOWING E A 0000 JEEP 2013 - - N - - - Page 2 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/01/2017 thru 11/01/2017 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 111 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 rimary Rd LAMPSON AV Distance (ft) 135 Direction E Secondary Rd BASSWOOD ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20170613 Time 1726 Day TUE rimary Collision Factor UNKNOWN Violation Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170711 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 DRVR 21 M W HNBD PROC ST E A 0000 GMC 2011 - N - M 2 DRVR 65 M W HNBD RGT TURN S A 0000 TOYOT 2014 N - M - Primary Ra LAMPSON AV Distance (ft) 1580 Direction E SecondaryRd CANDLEBERRY AVNCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach uuuoty Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist 3020 Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 437 Collision Date 20170728 Time 0240 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor DRVR ALCIDRG Violation 23152A Collision Type OTHER Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170912 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntr1 Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 F DRVR 18 M 0 HBD-UI PROC ST E A 0000 VOLKS 2016 - - N - G - rimary Rd LAMPSON AV Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd HEATHER AV NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 241 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 251 Collision Date 20170315 Time 2037 Day WED Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170412 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 16 M HNBD LFT TURN W A 0000 HONDA2015 - - - - G - Primary Rd LAMPSON AV Distance (ft) 36 Direction W SecondaryRd OLD RANCH NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist clear NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20170316 Time 1547 Day THU Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170412 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 78 F H HNBD PROC ST W A 0100 CHEVR 2009 - 3 N - B G] Primary Rd LAMPSON AV Distance (ft) 36 Direction E SecondaryRd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 241 y,- 0 CalTrans Badge 251 Collision Date 20170213 Time 1941 Day MON Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 TowAway, Y Process Date 20170322 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 47 F W HNBD PROCST W A 0000 JEEP 2009 - - - G 2 DRVR 59 F W HNBD STOPPED W A 0000 TOYOT 2007 - G Page 3 This report is accepted subject to the Tenns of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112017thru 11/01/2017 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 111 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 rimary Rd MAIN ST Distance (ft) 198 Direction S Secondary Rd ELECTRIC AV NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist 02 Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 313 Collision Date 20170805 Time 2056 Day SAT rimary Collision Factor STRTNGIBCKNG Violation 22106 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170912 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 54 M W HNBD BACKING S A 0000 FORD 2017 - - N - G 2 PRKD 998 - HNBD PARKED - A 0000 DODGE2006 - N - Primary Rd MAIN ST Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd MAIN ST 208 REAR NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20170214 Time 1102 Day TUE rimary Collision Factor STRTNGIBCKNG Violation 22106 Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 2 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170316 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntr1 Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 72 M W HNBD BACKING W A 0700 MERCE 2009 - 3 N - L H DRVR 0TH VIS 72 M 1 IM H 2 OTHR 998 - HNBD OTHER - - 0000 - - 3 N - - - OTHR OTH VIS 22 IF 3 rimary Rd MARINA DR Distance (ft) 135 Direction E Secondary Rd 1 ST ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20170901 Time 0753 Day FRI rimary Collision Factor OTHER HAZ Violation 22517 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20171010 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With BICYCLE Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type RampAnt Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 48 F W HNBD PARKED W A 0100 HONDA2012 - 3 N - M G 2 BICY 22 F W HNBD PROC ST W L 0400 - - 3 N - - - BICY COMP PN 2 F 9 0 - - rimary Rd MARINE DR Distance (ft) 57 Direction W Secondary Rd CARAVEL WY NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist 03 Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 313 Collision Date 20170903 Time 1856 Day SUN rimary Collision Factor DRVR ALC IDRG Violation 23152 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20171024 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With PKD MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 23 F H HBD-UI PROC ST E A 0000 BLUEB 2010 - N - G - PASS COMP PN 23 F 3 2 PRKD 998 - PARKED - A 0000 HYUND 2012 - - - - - 3 PRKD 998 - PARKED - A 0000 GMC 2006 - - - - - rimary Rd N GATE RD Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 206 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 368 Collision Date 20170804 Time 0234 Day FRI rimary Collision Factor DRVR ALCIDRG Violation 23152E Collision Type HEAD-ON Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170911 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntr1 Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 33 M H DRUG PROC ST S A 0000 VOLKS 2014 - - A 12500 - H - I DRVR SEVERE 33 M 1 0 H Page 4 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112017thru 11/01/2017 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 111 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 rimary Rd NORTH GATE RD Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd NORTH GATE RD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 298 Collision Date 20170203 Time 1113 Day FRI rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type HEAD-ON Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170322 Weather1 RAINING Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 26 M W HNBD PROCST E D 0000 DODGE2007 - - F - G rimary Rd NORTHWOOD RD Distance (ft) 94 Direction W Secondary Rd EDISON POLE NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist Beat 206 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 368 Collision Date 20170421 Time 2020 Day FRI rimary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170608 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With PKD MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 91 M W IMP UNK IMP UNK PROC ST W A 0000 FORD 2010 - - - - G - DRVR 0TH VIS 91 M 1 0 G 2 PRKD 998 - PARKED W A 0000 LEXUS 2002 - - - rimary Rd OCEAN AV Distance (ft) 77 Direction W Secondary Rd 7TH ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist Beat 206 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 251 Collision Date 20170202 Time 0335 Day THU rimary Collision Factor WRONG SIDE Violation 21651 Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170322 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With PKD MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 55 M W HNBD OPPOS LN E A 0000 HYUND 2010 - - - - G - 2 PRKD 998 - PARKED A 0000 HONDA2005 - - - - - - 3 PRKD 998 - PARKED A 0000 HONDA2011 - - - - - - Primary Rd OCEAN AV Distance (ft) 109 Direction E Secondary Rd 7TH ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 3020 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 365 Collision Date 20170717 Time 0759 Day MON rimary Collision Factor DRVR ALCIDRG Violation 23152F Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170810 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With PKD MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 48 M W DRUG PROC ST W - 0000 NISSA 2017 - - N - G - 2 PRKD 998 - PARKED - - 0000 TOYOT 2005 A - N - - - 3 PRKD 998 - PARKED - - 0000 HONDA2003 A N - - - rimary Rd OCEAN AV Distance (ft) 3 Direction N Secondary Rd ELECTRIC AV NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 365 Collision Date 20170126 Time 0528 Day THU rimary Collision Factor R -O -W PED Violation 21950A Collision Type AUTO/PED Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170321 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond 1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With PED Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action X-WLK AT Cntr1 Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 52 M W HNBD PROC ST N - 0000 CHEVR 1980 - 3 F - G - 2 PED 72 M W HBD-UNK OTHER N 6000 - - N - - - PED COM NPP 62 M 9 3 - - Page 5 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112017thru 11/01/2017 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 111 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 Primary Rd PACIFIC COAST Distance (ft) 0 Direction SecondaryRd 10TH ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal BKW County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 423 Collision Date 20170811 Time 1618 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170925 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With BICYCLE Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 22 M H HNBD LFT TURN S A 0000 HONDA2011 - - E - G 2 BICY 54 M A HNBD PROC ST S L 0000 - - E - - - I BICY COMP PN 54 M 3 - Primary Rd PACIFIC COAST Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd 1 ST ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal BLW County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 423 Collision Date 20170706 Time 0607 Day THU Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Process Date 20170810 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntri Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 31 F H HNBD PROC ST E A 0000 NISSA 2003 - - N - G - 2 DRVR 63 M W HNBD _ _ SLOWING E A 0000 HONDA2015 - - N - G - rimary Rd PACIFIC COAST Distance (ft) 185 Direction E Secondary Rd BOLSA AV NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal BL4ilY County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 423 Collision Date 20170713 Time 1210 Day THU rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Process Date 20170810 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved WithPKD MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type RampAnt Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 65 M W HNBD PROC ST W - 0000 CHEVR 2005 D N - G - 2 PRKD 998 - HNBD PARKED W - 0000 INTER 2009 - N - - - rimary Rd PACIFIC COAST Distance (ft) 105 Direction S Secondary Rd EDISON POLE NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal BLW County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 206 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 435 Collision Date 20170712 Time 2156 Day WED rimary Collision Factor DRVR ALCIDRG Violation 23152A Collision Type OVERTURNED Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170811 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 61 M H HBD-UI PROC ST S C 0000 HARLE 2009 - - N - - W I DRVR OTH VIS 61 M 11 1 Primary Rd PACIFIC COAST Distance (ft) 80 Direction E Secondary Rd MAIN ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal B696W County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 298 Collision Date 20170615 Time 1318 Day THU Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170713 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type RampAnt Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 25 M H HNBD PROC ST E 0000 HARLE 2017 C N - M W DRVR 0TH VIS 25 M 1 0 W - 2 DRVR 25 M H HNBD SLOWING E 0000 CHEVR 2011 D _ N - G - Page 6 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/01/2017 thru 11/01/2017 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 111 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 rimary Rd PACIFIC COAST Distance (ft) 100 Direction E Secondary Rd SOUTHERN NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal BbI �f County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 298 Collision Date 20170422 Time 0739 Day SAT rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170609 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 22 F H HNBD RAN OFF RD W A 0000 KIA 2007 - N - G ----F PASS 25 F 3 0 G - 2 DRVR 24 F H HNBD PROC ST N A 0000 VOLKS 2005 N - G DRVR COMP PN 24 F 1 0 G - Primary Ra RT 1 Distance (ft) 139 Direction E Secondary Rd 14TH ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 313 Collision Date 20170618 Time 1859 Day SUN rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170810 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DUSK/DAWNPed Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 18 M W HNBD PROC ST W A 0000 JEEP 2001 - - N - G - 2 DRVR 47 M W HNBD PROC ST W A 0000 BMW 2012 - - N - G - PASS 7 F 3 3 G - PASS 14 M 6 3 G - rimary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 70 Direction S Secondary Rd 14TH ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist 6 Beat 007 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 174 Collision Date 20170723 Time 2213 Day SUN rimary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20171024 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type RampAnt Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 21 M W FATG PROC ST N A 0000 FORD 2005 - - N - G - DRVR COMP PN 21 M 1 0 Primary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 14 Direction Secondary Rd 15TH ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20170928 Time 2002 Day THU Primary Collision Factor DRVR ALCIDRG Violation 23152A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20171104 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected IF DRVR 60 M W HBD-UI LFT TURN N D 2200 TOYOT 2005 - 3 A 21801 - M G 2 DRVR 44 F A HNBD PROC ST E A 0700 LEXUS 2014 - 3 N - M G PASS M 5 0 P Q 3 PRKD 998 - PARKED N A 0100 FORD 1992 - - - - Primary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 196 Direction S SecondaryRd 1ST ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 33.58 Side of Hwy S City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 246 Collision Date 20170222 Time 0854 Day WED Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170630 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type H Ramp/Int - Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 22 M W HNBD PROC ST S A 0100 FORD 2009 - 3 N M G 1 2 DRVR 29 M W HNBD STOPPED S A 0100 HONDA2008 - 3 N M G I PASS 7 F 3 0 M G Page 7 This report is accepted subject to the Tenns of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SW ITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/01/2017 thru 11/01/2017 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 111 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 rimary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 60 Direction S Secondary Rd 1 ST ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20170604 Time 1700 Day SUN rimary Collision Factor STRTNGIBCKNG Violation 22106 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170720 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safetv Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 37 F B HNBD PROC ST N A 0100 VOLKS 2013 2 N - M G 2 DRVR 59 M W HNBD STOPPED N A 0100 PORSC 1970 3 N P G Primary Ra RT 1 Distance (ft) 0 Direction SecondaryRd 1ST ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20170607 Time 1322 Day WED Primary Collision Factor STOP SGNISIG Violation 21453A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 2 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170713 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action CntriDev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 62 F W HNBD PROC ST S A 0700 AUDI 2017 - 3 N - M G 2 DRVR 48 F W HNBD LFT TURN E D 2200 TOYOT 2004 - 3 N - M G DRVR COMP PN 48 F 1 0 M G PASS COMP PN 78 F 3 0 M G rimary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 351 Direction W Secondary Rd 5TH ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 365 Collision Date 20170625 Time 1244 Day SUN rimary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170713 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With BICYCLE Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 37 M W HNBD RGTTURN E - 0000 DODGE2015 - N - G - 2 BICY 45 M W HNBD PROC ST E - 0000 - N - - - I BICY COMP PN 45 M 1 0 G - rimary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd 5TH ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist 6 Beat 006 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 174 Collision Date 20170710 Time 0507 Day MON rimary Collision Factor FELL ASLEEP Violation Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170918 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DUSK/DAWNPedAction Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 DRVR 32 F H FATG RAN OFF RD S A 0000 PONTI 2008 - - F - G - DRVR COMP PN 32 IF 1 10 G rimary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd 8TH ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist Beat —,r 0 CalTrans Badge 300 Collision Date 20170415 Time 0850 Day SAT rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170612 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 53 F HNBD PROC ST E D 0000 INTER 2016 - - N - G - 2 DRVR 78 M 0 HNBD STOPPED E A 0000 TOYOT 2004 - - N - G Page 8 This report is accepted subject to the Tenns of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/01/2017 thru 11/01/2017 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 111 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 rimary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd BOLSA AV NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 33.19 Side of Hwy N ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 246 Collision Date 20170321 Time 0544 Day TUE rimary Collision Factor STOP SGNISIG Violation 21453A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170627 Weatherl RAINING Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type I Ramp/Int 5 Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safetv Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 39 M W HNBD PROC ST N A 0100 TOYOT 2009 - 3 N - M G 2 DRVR 68 M W HNBD LFT TURN E A 0700 JEEP 2016 3 N L G LDRVR 0TH VIS 68 M 1 0 L G Primary Ra RT 1 Distance (ft) 0 Direction SecondaryRd MAIN ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 24.721 Side of Hwy N City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist 2 Beat 007 Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 174 Collision Date 20170129 Time 2138 Day SUN rimary Collision Factor STOP SGNISIG Violation 21453A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170627 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type I Ramp/Int 5 Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 72 F W HNBD PROC ST E A 0000 KIA 2010 - - N - G - 2 DRVR 49 M H HNBD PROC ST S A 0000 NISSA 1997 - - N - G - I PASS COMP PN 47 M 4 0 G - PASS 42 M 3 0 G - rimary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 24 Direction E Secondary Rd MAIN ST EAST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 365 Collision Date 20170806 Time 1339 Day SUN rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170921 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 60 M W HNBD PROC ST W A 0000 HONDA1994 - N - G - 2 DRVR 31 F W HNBD STOPPED W A 0000 NISSA 2015 - N - G - PASS 4 M 3 0 G Primary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd MAR VISTA NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist bear 206 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 368 Collision Date 20170428 Time 0230 Day FRI rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170711 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 27 F W FATG PROC ST N A 0000 HONDA2000 - - - - G - rimary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 0 Direction SecondaryRd MARINA AV NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat —,r 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20170520 Time 1830 Day SAT rimary Collision Factor UNKNOWN Violation Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170609 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 DRVR 49 F W IMP UNK IMP UNK CHANG LN S A 0100 HONDA2014 - 3 N - RA -13 2 DRVR 25 M H IMP UNK IMP UNK PROC ST S A 0100 KIA 2013 - 3 N - M B Page 9 This report is accepted subject to the Tenns of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112017thru 11/01/2017 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 111 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 Primary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 308 Direction S Secondary Rd PHILLIPS RANCH NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist 6 Beat 007 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 174 Collision Date 20170623 Time 2054 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor DRVR ALC IDRG Violation 23152B Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 3 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170713 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 27 M B HBD-UI PROC ST S - 0000 TOYOT 2016 D A 22350 - G —T PASS COMP PN 56 M 3 0 G - PASS COMP PN 55 F 6 0 G - PASS COMP PN 49 F 4 0 G - 2 DRVR 49 M H HNBD PROC ST S 0000 TOYOT 2016 - N - G - rimary Rd RT 1 Distance (ft) 250 Direction S Secondary Rd PHILLIPS ST NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route 1 Postmile Prefix - Postmile 31.52 Side of Hwy N ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans 12 Badge 246 Collision Date 20170201 Time 1111 Day WED rimary Collision Factor NOT DRIVER Violation Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170630 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type H RampAnt - Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 DRVR 73 M W PHYS PROC ST N A 0700 TOYOT 2011 - 3 N - M PrimaryRd SAINT ANDREWS Distance (ft) 26 Direction S Secondary Rd GOLDEN RAIN RD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal B&Rh County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20170717 Time 1537 Day MON Primary Collision Factor DRVR ALC IDRG Violation 23152A Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170810 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 62 M W HBD-UI PROC ST N D 2200 GMC 2001 3 A - M B 2 DRVR 89 F W HNBD STOPPED N A 0700 BUICK 2007 3 N - M G Primary Rd SAINT ANDREWS Distance (ft) 210 Direction S Secondary Rd OAKMONT NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal B&Ah County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 436 Collision Date 20170430 Time 0957 Day SUN Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type HEAD-ON Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170628 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 F DRVR 24 M HNBD PROC ST S A 0000 LEXUS 2002 - - A22350 F Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 0 Direction S Secondary Rd ADOLFO LOPEZ NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 298 Collision Date 20170128 Time 1333 Day SAT Primary Collision Factor UNKNOWN Violation Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170321 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 DRVR 62 F W HNBD PROC ST S D 0000 TOYOT 2006 - - N - G - 2 DRVR 43 M 0 HNBD PROC ST S A 0000 NISSA 2005 - - N - G - DRVR COMP PN 43 M 1 0 G Page 10 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112017thru 11/01/2017 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 111 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 231 Direction S Secondary Rd ADOLFO LOPEZ NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat PATRO Type 0 CalTrans Badge 314 Collision Date 20170609 Time 2219 Day FRI rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170710 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 28 M H PROC ST N A 0000 FORD 2004 - - N - G PASS 28 M 6 0 G - PASS 27 M 3 0 G - PASS 27 M 4 0 G - 2 DRVR 21 M H PROC ST N A 0000 TOYOT 2013 - _ N - G DRVR COMP PN 21 M 1 0 G - 3 DRVR 53 F W PROC ST N A 0000 JEEP 2014 - N - G PASS 54 M 3 0 G - Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 840 Direction N Secondary Rd APOLLO DR NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20170620 Time 1114 Day TUE Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170710 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type RampAnt Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 87 F W HNBD PROC ST N A 0100 SUZUK 2012 - 3 N - L G I DRVR COMP PN 7 F 1 0 IL G Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 5 Direction S Secondary Rd APOLLO DR NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 365 Collision Date 20170709 Time 1549 Day SUN Primary Collision Factor STOP SGNISIG Violation 21453A Collision Type HEAD-ON Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170810 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With NON-CLSN Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 20 M W HNBD PROC ST S A 0000 ACURA2007 A 22350_- G - 2 DRVR 31 M W HNBD LFT TURN W A 0000 FORD 2011 - N - G - rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 468 Direction N Secondary Rd BOLSA AV NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20170315 Time 1600 Day WED rimary Collision Factor NOT DRIVER Violation Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 2 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170411 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 DRVR 60 F B PHYS PROC ST S A 0100 CHEVR 2007 - 3 N - L G DRVR 0TH VIS 60 F 1 0 L G PASS COMP PN 28 F 3 0 L G rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd GOLDEN RAIN NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 001 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 362 Collision Date 20170123 Time 0613 Day MON rimary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170322 Weatherl RAINING Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info rty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 ri Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected FDRVR 60 F H HNBD LFT TURN N - 0000 NISSA 2006 - D N - M Page 11 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112017thru 11/01/2017 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 111 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 34 Direction N Secondary Rd GOLDEN RAIN RD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 432 Collision Date 20170102 Time 1830 Day MON Primary Collision Factor STRTNGIBCKNG Violation 22106 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170321 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DUSK/DAWNPedAction Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 DRVR 19 M W HNBD STOPPED S A 0000 NISSA 2010 - - N - G M DRVR COMP PN 19 M 1 0 G - 2F DRVR 58 M 0 IMP UNK IMP UNK BACKING - A 0000 TOYOT 2009 - -.I N - B J1 Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 231 Direction S Secondary Rd GOLDEN RAIN RD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 206 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 251 Collision Date 20170209 Time 0321 Day THU Primary Collision Factor OTHER IMPROP DRV Violation Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170322 Weather1 FOG Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntri Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 86 M W HNBD RAN OFF RD S A 0000 TOYOT 2015 - - - - G - rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 31 Direction N Secondary Rd GOLDEN RAIN RD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 365 Collision Date 20170214 Time 1933 Day TUE Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170421 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DUSK/DAWNPed Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 86 F W HNBD PROC ST S A 0000 SUBAR 2007 - - N - G - I DRVR COMP PN 86 F 1 0 G 2 DRVR 24 F W HNBD STOPPED S A 0000 TOYOT 2007 - - N - G rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 40 Direction N Secondary Rd GOLDEN RAIN RD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist 22 Beat 006 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 174 Collision Date 20170312 Time 1800 Day SUN rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170412 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DUSK/DAWNPed Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type RampAnt Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 17 F W HNBD PROCST S A 0000 FORD 2014 - - F - G - I PASS 17 F 3 0 G - PASS 16 F 4 0 G PASS 15 M 6 0 G 2 DRVR 53 F H HNBD STOPPED S A 0000 TOYOT 2000 - N - G - PASS 19 F 3 0 G - PASS 18 M 4 0 G - Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 103 Direction S Secondary Rd GOLDEN RAIN RD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20170503 Time 0536 Day WED Primary Collision Factor DRVR ALC IDRG Violation 23152A Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170609 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DUSK/DAWNPed Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 29 F H HBD-UI PROC ST N A 0100 NISSA 2011 - 1 A 23123 - L G 2 DRVR 27 M W HNBD PROC ST N D 2200 FORD 2006 - 3 N - M G 3 DRVR 30 F W HNBD STOPPED N A 0700 TOYOT 2013 - 3 N - M G Page 12 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112017thru 11/01/2017 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 111 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 150 Direction N SecondaryRd HERON POINTE NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20170509 Time 0811 Day TUE Primary Collision Factor NOT STATED Violation Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170613 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 F DRVR 22 M W HNBD PROC ST S D 2200 CHEVR 2015 - 3 N - M G PASS 5 M 3 M G 2 DRVR 53 F W HNBD OTHER S A 0700 TOYOT 2014 - 3 N - M G DRVR COMP PN 53 F 1 0 M G Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 7 Direction S Secondary Rd MARLIN AV NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20170529 Time 1211 Day MON Primary Collision Factor R -O -W AUTO Violation 21801A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170713 Weatherl CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With BICYCLE Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntr1 Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 24 F W HNBD LFT TURN E A 0100 FORD 2017 - 3 N - M G 2 BICY 52 M W HNBD _ _ LFT TURN N L 0400 - 3 N - - - BICY 0TH VIS 52 M rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 226 Direction N Secondary Rd MARLIN AV NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 207 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 368 Collision Date 20170602 Time 0114 Day FRI rimary Collision Factor FELL ASLEEP Violation Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170710 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type RampAnt Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 DRVR 20 M A FATG PROC ST S E 0000 TOYOT 2005 - - - - G- DRVR COMP PN 20 M 1 0 G 2 DRVR 40 M H HNBD PROC ST S A 0000 CHEVR 2000 - - - G - rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 166 Direction S Secondary Rd N GATE RD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 300 Collision Date 20170508 Time 0630 Day MON rimary Collision Factor DRVR ALCIDRG Violation 23152E Collision Type HEAD-ON Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170609 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Darty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 18 F 0 HBD-UI PROC ST S A 0000 MERCE 2017 - - A 22350 - G= - rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 1077 Direction N Secondary Rd NORTH GATE NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 429 Collision Date 20170819 Time 1128 Day SAT rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170911 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 81 F W HNBD PROC ST N A 0000 HONDA2015 - - - - G - 2 DRVR 998 F A SLOWING N A 0000 BMW - - - - - - Page 13 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112017thru 11/01/2017 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 111 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 853 Direction N Secondary Rd NORTH GATE RD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 365 Collision Date 20170507 Time 0113 Day SUN rimary Collision Factor DRVR ALC IDRG Violation 23152A Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170608 Weather1 RAINING Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 23 M H HBD-UI PROCST S A 0000 HONDA2014 - - A 22350 - G 2 DRVR 50 F W HNBD PROCST S A 0000 TOYOT 2006 - N - G - I DRVR 0TH VIS 40 IF 1 0 G - rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 30 Direction S Secondary Rd NORTHGATE LN NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat OON Type 0 CalTrans Badge 152 Collision Date 20170620 Time 1352 Day TUE Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 2 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170713 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntr1 Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 58 M W HNBD PROCST N A 0100 CHEVR2017 - 3 F - M G 2 DRVR 31 M H HNBD STOPPED N A 0100 CHRYS 2017 - 3 N - M G I PASS COMP PN 27 F 3 0 M G PASS COMP PN 15 F 0 M - rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 470 Direction N Secondary Rd NORTHGATE RD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 241 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 251 Collision Date 20170315 Time 2242 Day WED rimary Collision Factor LANE CHANGE Violation 21658A Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170415 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 24 M W HNBD SLOWING S A 0000 JEEP 2016 - M - G 2 DRVR 29 M W HNBD STOPPED S A 0000 FORD 2015 M - G - 3 DRVR 35 F H HNBD SLOWING S A 0000 HYUND 2012 - M - G - rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 300 Direction S Secondary Rd NORTHGATE RD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 361 Collision Date 20170809 Time 2235 Day WED rimary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170911 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With PED Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action IN RD, Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 59 M W HNBD PROC ST S A 0000 CHEVR 2014 - - - - 2 PED 44 M H HNBD - 0000 - - - - - PED COMP PN 45 M 9 3 - rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 64 Direction N Secondary Rd NORTHGATE RD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 365 Collision Date 20170825 Time 1359 Day FRI rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20171011 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 31 M H HNBD PROCST S F 0000 DODGE 2002 - - M - G - 2 DRVR 53 F W HNBD STOPPED S A 0000 HYUND 2016 - - N - G - 3 DRVR 28 M _ W HNBD STOPPED S A 0000 FORD 2017 - - N - G Page 14 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112017thru 11/01/2017 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 111 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 28 Direction N Secondary Rd OLD RANCH PKWYNC/C 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20170118 Time 1400 Day WED rimary Collision Factor OTHER HAZ Violation 21461A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170321 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With BICYCLE Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected IF BICY 69 M W HNBD PROC ST N L 0400 - 3 A 21650 - - - I BICY COMP PN 69 M 9 1 - W 2 DRVR 52 F W HNBD PROC ST E A 0100 TOYOT 2007 3 N - M G Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 0 Direction SecondaryRd OLD RANCH PKWYNCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 298 Collision Date 20170204 Time 1056 Day SAT Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170322 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected IF DRVR 63 F A HNBD RGT TURN N A 0000 TOYOT 2004 - - N - G - PASS 87 F 3 3 PASS 61 F _ 6 3 G 2 DRVR 51 M _ W HNBD PROC ST N A 0000 CHRYS 2013 - - N - G - PASS 79 F 3 3 G _ PASS 40 F 6 3 G Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 149 Direction N Secondary Rd OLD RANCH PKWYNCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 298 Collision Date 20170325 Time 1558 Day SAT Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170411 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 DRVR 14 M A HNBD PROC ST S C 0000 HONDA2017 - - N - W - DRVR COMP PN 14 M --71-0 2 DRVR 36 F W HNBD STOPPED S A 0000 TOYOT 2012 - - N - G - rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd OLD RANCH PKY NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist Beat 241 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 251 Collision Date 20170524 Time 2203 Day WED rimary Collision Factor STOP SGNISIG Violation 21453A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170608 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 F DRVR 54 F A HNBD PROC ST N - 0000 HYUND 2013 - - A - G� 2 DRVR 32 F W HNBD LFT TURN S - 0000 TOYOT 2008 - A - G Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 255 Direction N Secondary Rd OLD RANCH PKY NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 300 Collision Date 20170918 Time 1542 Day MON Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20171024 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With MV ON OTHER RD Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 47 F 0 HNBD STOPPED S A 0000 ACURA2011 - - M - G - PASS 14 F 2 3 G 2 DRVR 70 M STOPPED S A 0000 HUMM 2004 - - N - G - Page 15 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112017thru 11/01/2017 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 111 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 62 Direction S Secondary Rd PLYMOUTH NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 241 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 251 Collision Date 20170130 Time 1831 Day MON Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170321 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 44 M W HNBD PROCST N A 0000 FORD 2009 - - - - G - 2 DRVR 46 F W HNBD STOPPED N A 0000 ACURA2004 - - - - G - I DRVR COMP PN 46 IF 1 0 IG - rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd PLYMOUTH NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 361 Collision Date 20170929 Time 1942 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor UNKNOWN Violation Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20171024 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntri Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 DRVR 19 F W HNBD PROC ST N A 0000 CHEVR 2001 - - - - G - 2 DRVR 19 M 0 HNBD _ _ U-TURN E E 0000 CHEVR 2002 - - - - G - rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 310 Direction N Secondary Rd PLYMOUTH DR NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20170328 Time 0852 Day TUE rimary Collision Factor TOO CLOSE Violation 21703 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 3 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170411 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type RampAnt Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 F DRVR 48 F A HNBD PROC ST S A 0800 TOYOT 2005 3 N - M G 2 DRVR 58 F W HNBD SLOWING S A 0100 MERCE 2010 - 3 N - M G ' DRVR COMP PN 58 F 0 M G PASS COMP PN 57 M _ 13 0 M G 3 DRVR 57 F W HNBD SLOWING S A 0100 MAZDA2012 3 N - M G DRVR COMP PN 57 F 1 0 M G Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 48 Direction N Secondary Rd ROAD C NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 365 Collision Date 20170920 Time 1109 Day WED Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 2 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20171010 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Patty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 F DRVR 34 M W HNBD PROC ST S D_ 2200 CHEVR 2015 - 3 N - L DRVR 0TH VIS 34 M 1 0 G 2 DRVR 85 F W HNBD STOPPED S - 0000 HONDA2008 A - N - M DRVR 0TH VIS 85 F 1 0 G rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd ROSSMOOR NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 437 Collision Date 20170818 Time 2235 Day FRI rimary Collision Factor STOP SGNISIG Violation 21453A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170911 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 54 M W HNBD PROC ST S M 0000 FORD 1998 - - N - G- DRVR SEVERE 54 1 0 G 2 DRVR 23 M W HNBD LFT TURN N A 0000 HONDA1990 - - N - G - Page 16 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112017thru 11/01/2017 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 111 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 5 Direction N Secondary Rd RT 1 NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 365 Collision Date 20170510 Time 2308 Day WED rimary Collision Factor UNKNOWN Violation 23153E Collision Type OTHER Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170609 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With BICYCLE Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 29 F H DRUG PROCST S - 0000 HONDA2017 A - A 21453 - G 2 BICY 21 M W HNBD PROC ST E - 0000 - - N - - - I BICY SEVERE g1l M 3 - Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 6 Direction N Secondary Rd RT 405 NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 365 Collision Date 20170723 Time 1610 Day SUN Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170814 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With BICYCLE Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 DRVR 60 M A HNBD RGT TURN N A 0000 MITSU 2008 - - N - G - 2F BICY 46 M W HNBD PROC ST N L 0000 - - N - - - I BICY POMP PN 6 M 0 - F rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 50 Direction N SecondaryRd SAINT ANDREWS NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 298 Collision Date 20170217 Time 1544 Day FRI rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170322 Weatherl RAINING Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT FNCT Loc Type RampAnt Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 31 F W HNBD PROC ST S D 0000 FORD 2015 - - N - G - 2 DRVR 63 F W HNBD STOPPED S A 0000 FORD 2006 - - N - G - rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 0 Direction SecondaryRd SAINT ANDREWS NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 423 Collision Date 20170802 Time 0711 Day WED rimary Collision Factor R -O -W AUTO Violation 21453C Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170912 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected IF DRVR 45 F B HNBD LFT TURN N A 0000 SATUR 2004 A 22350 - G - 2 DRVR 16 M W HNBD PROC ST S A 0000 JEEP 1998 N - G - PASS 16 F _ 3 0 G PASS 16 M 6 0 G rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 354 Direction S SecondaryRd SAINT ANDREWS NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20170222 Time 1502 Day WED rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170316 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRSIFCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 48 F W HNBD SLOWING S A 0800 HONDA2010 - 3 N - L G I PASS 9 F 3 0 L G PASS 12 F 4 0 P G PASS 12 F 5 0 P G 2 DRVR 40 M W HNBD PROC ST S A 0700 CHEVR 1989 - 3 N - P G DRVR COMP PN 40 M _ 1 0 P G Page 17 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112017thru 11/01/2017 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 111 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 70 Direction N Secondary Rd SAINT ANDREWS NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20170815 Time 1214 Day TUE Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170912 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 18 M H HNBD PROCST S A 0100 HONDA1997 - 3 N - L G 2 DRVR 16 F W HNBD STOPPED S A 0100 FORD 2017 - 3 N - M G 3 DRVR 39 M A HNBD STOPPED S A 0100 HYUND2017 - 3 N - M G PASS 39 F 4 0 M G _ PASS 5 M 4 0 P Q PASS 2 F 6 0 P Q Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd SAINT CLOUD DR NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 298 Collision Date 20170224 Time 0820 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor UNKNOWN Violation Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170316 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type RampAnt Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 DRVR 52 M A HNBD PROC ST S A 0000 CHEVR 2016 - N - G - 2 DRVR 69 F W HNBD LFT TURN E A 0000 HYUND 2012 N - G DRVR COMP PN 69 F 1 0 G - Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 257 Direction N SecondaryRd SAINT CLOUD DR NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20170306 Time 1705 Day MON Primary Collision Factor TOO CLOSE Violation 21703 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170411 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 58 M W HNBD SLOWING S A 0000 TOYOT2014 - - N - G 2 DRVR 31 F H HNBD STOPPED S A 0000 TOYOT 1999 - N - G - DRVR OTH VIS 31 F 1 0 G - PASS 12 F 3 0 G - 3 DRVR 36 F _ H HNBD STOPPED S A 0000 HONDA2008 - N - G - Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 0 Direction SecondaryRd TOWN CENTER DR NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 317 Collision Date 20170701 Time 1100 Day SAT Primary Collision Factor R -O -W AUTO Violation 21800D Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170807 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT FNCT Loc Type RampAnt Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 93 F W HNBD PROCST S A 0000 DODGE 1996 - - N - M 2 DRVR 58 M W HNBD PARKED W A 0000 MERCE 2016 - - N - M Page 18 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112017thru 11/01/2017 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 111 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 404 Direction N Secondary Rd TOWNE CENTER NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 241 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 251 Collision Date 20170201 Time 2011 Day WED Primary Collision Factor WRONG SIDE Violation 21651 Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170322 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 82 M W HNBD CHANG LN N A 0000 FORD 2010 - - - - G rimary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 403 Direction N SecondaryRd TOWNE CENTER NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist Beat 241 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 251 Collision Date 20170105 Time 2024 Day THU rimary Collision Factor NOT DRIVER Violation Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170322 Weather1 CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Patty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 DRVR 70 M W HNBD PROC ST N A 0000 DODGE 1999 - - - - L G Primary Rd SEAL BEACH BL Distance (ft) 60 Direction S SecondaryRd WESTMINSTER BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 298 Collision Date 20170203 Time 1247 Day FRI rimary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170322 Weather1 RAINING Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntri Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 35 M H HNBD CHANG LN N D 0000 GMC 2015 - - N - G - PASS 34 M 3 3 G 2 DRVR 25 M 0 HNBD RAN OFF RD N A 0000 CHEVR 2008 - - N - G Primary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 32 Direction E Secondary Rd APOLLO DR NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20170614 Time 1537 Day WED Primary Collision Factor STOP SGNISIG Violation 21453A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170711 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 27 M W HNBD PROC ST E D 2200 FORD 2008 3 N - M G 2 DRVR 59 F W HNBD LFT TURN N A 0700 LEXUS 2011 3 N - L G DRVR COMP PN 59 F 1 0 L G Primary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 2112 Direction W SecondaryRd BOLSA CHICA AV NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20170307 Time 1356 Day TUE Primary Collision Factor DRVR ALC IDRG Violation 23152A Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170412 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 21 F W HBD-UI PROC ST W A 0100 HONDA2010 3 A 22350 - L G I PASS 1 F 4 0 IL G 2 DRVR 39 M W HNBD PROC ST W A 0800 CHRYS 2003 3 N - M G I PASS 7 M P 0 IM G Page 19 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112017thru 11/01/2017 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 111 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 rimary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 42 Direction S Secondary Rd BOLSA CHICA RD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 300 Collision Date 20170318 Time 0941 Day SAT rimary Collision Factor WRONG SIDE Violation 21651A Collision Type HEAD-ON Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170526 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 F DRVR 54 M HBD-UI RGT TURN S A 0000 TOYOT 2016 - - A 22107 - B 2 DRVR 69 M HNBD STOPPED E A 0000 HYUND 2016 - - - G Primary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 670 Direction W Secondary Rd BOLSA CHICA RD NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20170824 Time 1734 Day THU Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 2 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20171016 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntr1 Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected DRVR COMP PN 46 M 1 0 L G 1F DRVR 46 M W HNBD PROC ST E A 0100 TOYOT 2009 _-3 N - L G 2 DRVR 40 M H HNBD STOPPED E D 2200 CHEVR 2014 3 N - M G DRVR COMP PN 40 M 1 0 M G 3 DRVR 73 M W HNBD STOPPED E A 0100 CHEVR 2014 - 3 _ N M G Primary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 20 Direction W Secondary Rd KITTS NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat OOS Type 0 CalTrans Badge 152 Collision Date 20170809 Time 0754 Day WED Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170912 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 63 M HNBD PROC ST E 0000 DODGE 1991 - 3 F - G - _ 2 DRVR 51 M HNBD STOPPED - - 0000 AUDI 2015 A - N - G rimary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 18 Direction E Secondary Rd KITTS HWY NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 206 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 368 Collision Date 20170629 Time 2057 Day THU rimary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170811 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F_ DRVR 27 M A HNBD RGT TURN W - 0000 HYUND 2017 A - - - G - 2 DRVR 48 F W HNBD PROC ST W - 0000 OTHER 2014 - C - - M W I DRVR 0TH VIS 48 F 1 0 W - rimary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd KITTS HWY NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 300 Collision Date 20170912 Time 1035 Day TUE rimary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20171010 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntr1 Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected I DRVR COMP PN 2 F 1 0 G 1F DRVR 72 F W HNBD PROC ST E - 0000 TOYOT 2009 A - - - G - 2 DRVR 52 F W HNBD STOPPED E - 0000 NISSA 2018 A - - - G - Page 20 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112017thru 11/01/2017 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 111 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 Primary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd ROAD B NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20170529 Time 1141 Day MON Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170713 Weatherl CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 79 M A HNBD SLOWING E A 0100 HYUND2006 3 N - M G PASS 1 11 F 3 3 M G 2 DRVR 46 F W HNBD STOPPED E A 0700 GMC 2015 3 N - M G DRVR COMP PN 46 F 1 0 M G Primary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd ROAD B NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat OOS Type 0 CalTrans Badge 152 Collision Date 20170607 Time 0636 Day WED Primary Collision Factor STOP SGNISIG Violation 21453A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170710 Weatherl CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntri Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 31 F H DRUG PROC ST E A 0100 KIA 2014 - 3 F - L G 1 2 DRVR 32 M W HNBD _ _ LFT TURN W A 0100 SUBAR 2013 - 3 N - L G I DRVR COMP PN 32 M 1 0 L G rimary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 24 Direction E Secondary Rd ROAD B NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUT Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20170628 Time 1011 Day WED rimary Collision Factor UNKNOWN Violation Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170719 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type RampAnt Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 DRVR 35 M H HNBD LFT TURN S A 0100 MINI 2004 3 N - L G 2 DRVR 87 M W HNBD PROC ST E D 2200 TOYOT 2004 - 2 N - L G DRVR COMP PN 07 M 1 0 L G Primary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 60 Direction W Secondary Rd ROAD B NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20170831 Time 1359 Day THU rimary Collision Factor NOT STATED Violation Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20171011 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 34 F W HNBD SLOWING E A 0100 HONDA1999 3 K - L G 2 DRVR 32 M H HNBD STOPPED E A 0100 HONDA2016 3 N - M G Primary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 4046 Direction E Secondary Rd SAINT KITTS NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 429 Collision Date 20170721 Time 1125 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170817 Weatherl CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 28 M H HNBD PROC ST W D 0000 DODGE 2005 - - - - G - DRVR COMP PN 29 M 1 0 G 2 DRVR 36 F A HNBD STOPPED W A 0000 HONDA2013 - - - - G - PASS 42 M 3 0 PASS 1 M 4 0 PASS 2 F 6 0 PASS 4 F 7 0 Page 21 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112017thru 11/01/2017 Include State Highways cases 3 DRVR 58 M H HNBD STOPPED W Total Count: 111 D 0000 TOYOT 2005 - - - G - I Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 rimary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 48 Direction E Secondary Rd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat NORTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 365 Collision Date 20170101 Time 0027 Day SUN rimary Collision Factor DRVR ALCIDRG Violation 23152A Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170322 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 F DRVR 22 M H HBD-UI PROC ST W A 0000 TOYOT 2016 - - A 22350 - G 2 DRVR 77 F W HNBD STOPPED W A 0000 CADIL 2008 - N - G PrimaryRd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 82 Direction W Secondary Rd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat SOUTH Type 0 CalTrans Badge 246 Collision Date 20170222 Time 1130 Day WED Primary Collision Factor DRVR ALCIDRG Violation 23152A Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 4 Tow Away? Process Date 20170316 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type RampAnt Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 34 M W HBD-UI PROC ST E D 2200 TOYOT 1999 3 A 22350 - L B I DRVR COMP PN 34 M 1 0 L B 2 DRVR 79 F W HNBD STOPPED W D 2200 FORD 2006 3 N M G DRVR COMP PN 79 M _ 1 0 M G 3 DRVR 79 M W HNBD STOPPED W A 0100 HYUND 2009 3 N M G DRVR COMP PN 79 M _ 1 0 M G _ PASS COMP PN 73 F 3 0 M G 4 DRVR 27 F B HNBD STOPPED W A 0100 AUDI 2015 3 N - M G Primary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 0 Direction Secondary Rd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat 241 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 251 Collision Date 20170227 Time 1952 Day MON Primary Collision Factor STOP SGNISIG Violation 21453A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170316 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 36 F HNBD PROC ST N A 0000 INFIN 2014 - - - - G - 2 DRVR 55 M HNBD PROC ST E A 0000 HYUND 2013 - - - G PASS COMP PN 44 F 4 0 G - PASS 38 M 3 0 G - Primary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 30 Direction W Secondary Rd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 361 Collision Date 20170317 Time 1720 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? N Process Date 20170415 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 26 F W HNBD PROC ST E A 0000 TOYOT 2005 - - - - G - 2 DRVR 31 F HNBD STOPPED E A 0000 VOLKS 2012 - - - - G - Page 22 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. 01/0112017thru 11/01/2017 Include State Highways cases Total Count: 111 Jurisdiction(s): Seal Beach Report Run On: 11/10/2017 Primary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 2156 Direction E Secondary Rd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? Y Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 300 Collision Date 20170415 Time 0729 Day SAT Primary Collision Factor UNKNOWN Violation 27155A Collision Type Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170711 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info arty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 33 M HNBD PROCST E A 0000 KIA 2004 - - N - G rimary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 398 Direction W Secondary Rd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist WOC Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 257 Collision Date 20170504 Time 1537 Day THU rimary Collision Factor R -O -W AUTO Violation 21804A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170608 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Patty Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1 F DRVR 19 F A HNBD LFT TURN S A 0100 TOYOT 2004 - 3 N M G 2 DRVR 42 F W HNBD PROC ST W - 0000 HONDA2010 3 N - L G I DRVR OTH VIS 42 F 1 0 L G rimary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 0 Direction SecondaryRd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy ity Seal Beach County OrangePopulation 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 436 Collision Date 20170519 Time 0717 Day FRI rimary Collision Factor STOP SGNISIG Violation 21453A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 2 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170608 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 it and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equi ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 21 F H HBD-UI PROC ST N A 0000 HONDA2012 - - A 23153 - G DRVR OTH VIS 21 F 1 0 G PASS COMP PN 21 F 0 G 2 DRVR 32 M _ A HNBD PROCST E A 0000 HONDA1990 - - - - G - 3 DRVR 61 M _ W HNBD PROC ST E A 0000 NISSA 2015 - - - G Primary Rd WESTMINSTER AV Distance (ft) 48 Direction W Secondary Rd SEAL BEACH BL NCIC 3020 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy City Seal Beach County Orange Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 298 Collision Date 20170616 Time 0722 Day FRI Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20170711 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Condl NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int Party Info Victim Info Party Type Age Sex Race Sobrietyl Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info 0AF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquf ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected 1F DRVR 44 M H HNBD PROCST E A 0000 ACURA2006 - - E - G - 2 DRVR 29 M H HNBD STOPPED E A 0000 INFIN 2013 - - N - G - Page 23 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete. APPENDIX C TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION SHEETS National Data & Surveying Services Intersection Turning Movement Count Location: Pacific Coast Hwy & Balboa Dr/12th St City: Seal Beach Project ID: 17-01249-001 Control: Signalized Date: 11/14/2017 Total NS/EW Streets: Pacific Coast Hwy Pacific Coast Hwy Balboa Dr/12th St Balboa Dr/12th St NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 1 2 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 7:00 AM 4 311 1 1 4 466 9 1 16 7 8 0 7 3 4 0 842 7 7:15 AM 2 389 2 1 5 469 6 1 15 8 11 0 11 2 1 0 923 7:30 AM 3 402 1 2 18 425 1 0 11 36 6 0 9 4 5 0 923 7:45 AM 9 398 0 0 8 349 4 1 10 10 8 0 12 12 20 0 841 8:00 AM 4 400 2 0 3 412 0 0 13 2 12 0 7 8 3 0 866 8:15 AM 8 354 4 0 1 431 5 1 9 3 6 0 10 5 2 0 839 8:30 AM 11 277 4 6 5 316 5 1 19 16 11 0 14 3 6 0 694 8:45 AM 4 308 2 1 3 316 5 0 12 8 13 0 7 5 5 0 689 317 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTALVOLUMES: 45 2839 16 11 47 3184 35 5 105 90 75 0 77 42 46 0 6617 APPROACH Ws: 1.55% 97.53% 0.55% 0.38% 1.44% 97.34% 1.07% 0.15% 38.89% 33.33% 27.78% 0.00% 46.67% 25.45% 27.88% 0.00% 1.63% PEAK HR : 0.33% 07:15 AM - 08:15 AM 93.59% 3.17% 1.23% 47.10% 30.65% 22.26% 0.00% 35.04% 47.24% 17.72% 0.00% TOTAL PEAK HR VOL: 18 1589 5 3 34 1655 11 2 49 56 37 0 39 26 29 0 3553 PEAK HR FACTOR: 0.500 0.9880.625 0.375 0.472 0.882 0.458 0.500 0.817 0.389 0.771 0.000 0.813 0.542 0.363 0.000 0 3157 PEAK HR FACTOR: 0.990 0.899 0.643 0.500 0.885 0.920 0.839 0.679 0.670 0.703 0.875 0.000 0.534 0.842 0.625 0.962 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 1 2 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 4:00 PM 4 310 4 3 6 336 19 3 18 9 5 0 12 16 9 0 754 7 4:15 PM 5 298 8 2 14 324 6 2 19 17 5 0 10 14 3 0 727 4:30 PM 4 303 3 2 10 329 7 6 12 12 7 0 12 12 4 0 723 4:45 PM 6 323 4 0 3 320 11 5 20 12 10 0 14 14 4 0 746 5:00 PM 8 295 3 1 6 315 11 4 16 16 12 0 12 19 3 0 721 5:15 PM 7 383 4 0 9 351 13 4 25 15 11 0 12 16 10 0 860 5:30 PM 4 354 4 1 1 367 14 7 21 6 10 0 11 16 5 0 821 5:45 PM 6 346 7 0 8 317 9 4 15 8 9 0 6 13 7 0 755 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES: 44 2612 37 9 57 2659 90 35 146 95 69 0 89 120 45 0 6107 APPROACH%'s: 1.63% 96.67% 1.37% 0.33% 2.01% 93.59% 3.17% 1.23% 47.10% 30.65% 22.26% 0.00% 35.04% 47.24% 17.72% 0.00% PEAK HR : 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL: 25 1378 18 2 24 1350 47 19 77 45 42 0 41 64 25 0 3157 PEAK HR FACTOR: 0.781 0.899 0.643 0.500 0.667 0.920 0.839 0.679 0.770 0.703 0.875 0.000 0.854 0.842 0.625 0.000 0.903 0.925 0.604 0.855 0.918 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services Pacific Coast Hwy & Balboa Dr/12th St Peak Hour Turning Movement Count ID: 17-01249-001 Pacific Coast Hwy Day: Tuesday City: Seal Beach _ Date: 11/14/2017 07:15 AM - 08:15 AM D O = NONE Y Q a 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM AM NOON PM AM 11 1655 34 2 NOON 0 0 0 PM 47 1350 24 19 .J♦4U 1 2 1 0 � t N i 55 0 136 a 0 0 0 0 C 1 r 41 77 0 49 0 0 0 0 Q 0 56 0 45 ♦ 1 m 18 1589 5 AM 37 I 0 142 '!W 0 IAM NOON PM Total Vehicles (AM) L S t ♦< —1 F Total Vehicles (NOON) 1 «I ♦ 1.. L t .0O -1 F Total Vehicles (PM) 1 «1 ♦ ly L 1t .0O -1 F PM NOON AM 1669 0 1499 4 AM 1 07:00 AM - 09:00 AM NOON NONE PM 1 04:00 PM - 06:00 PM SO' "moi PM NOON AM 1 25 I 0 29 1 ♦ 64 0 26 1 r 41 0 39 0 0 0 0 SO' "moi Pacific Coast Hwy e� 0 1 2 0 n V 4n +,Il t r* 1435 2 25 1378 18 PM 0 Q 0 Q 0 NOON 1734 3 18 1589 5 AM Pacific Coast Hwy e� o� Pedestrians (Crosswalks) O Po Q� a O Q O Q a o2 9� O O �O Z O O Z O O O� PM 0 ♦ ♦ O PM NOON 0 0 NOON AM Q 0 AM AM Q 0 AM NOON 0 * - ♦ 0 NOON PM 0 ♦ ♦ 0 PM �O OO O O O F�O JW 0 2 2 0 a P� O tion ooe Q PM NOON AM 0 O C z 1 M 71 O 0 Cn Total Vehicles (AM) ♦ L*141 t z r —1«,t�►F Total Vehicles (NOON) —1 Lt z- * r* Ir I F Total Vehicles (PM) J L t z- * r* Ir 1 F National Data & Surveying Services Intersection Turning Movement Count Location: Pacific Coast Hwy & Main St City: Seal Beach Project ID: 17-01249-002 Control: Signalized Date: 11/14/2017 Total NS/EW Streets: Pacific Coast Hwy Pacific Coast Hwy Main St Main St NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 1 2 0 0 1 2 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 7:00 AM 4 373 0 0 1 463 10 0 9 4 11 0 2 7 17 0 910 7 7:15 AM 10 341 0 0 14 433 14 1 15 7 11 0 2 3 20 0 871 7:30 AM 8 395 1 0 36 459 10 0 14 11 13 0 1 6 23 0 977 7:45 AM 12 409 4 1 22 325 16 1 5 9 15 0 8 12 40 0 879 8:00 AM 10 389 2 0 17 405 19 0 9 7 7 0 5 16 33 0 919 8:15 AM 16 311 0 0 14 408 20 0 11 10 13 0 9 14 29 0 855 8:30 AM 15 306 1 2 14 296 14 2 14 4 10 0 4 9 22 0 713 8:45 AM 20 304 3 0 13 294 21 2 13 6 11 0 7 11 18 0 723 44 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTALVOLUMES: 95 2828 11 3 140 3083 124 6 90 58 91 0 38 78 202 0 6847 APPROACH Ws: : 3.23 % 96.29% 0.37% 0.10% 4.18% 91.95% 3.70% 0.18% 37.66% 24.27% 38.08% 0.00% 233 24.53% 63.52% 0.00% 2 PEAK HR : 98 07:15 AM - 08:15 AM 0 42 98 293 0 6490 APPROACH %'s : 6.07% .11.95% 0.15% 7.64% TOTAL PEAK HR VOL: 40 1534 7 1 89 1622 59 2 43 34 46 0 16 37 116 0 3646 PEAK HR FACTOR: 0.833 0.9380.438 0.250 0.618 0.883 0.776 0.500 0.717 0.773 0.767 0.000 0.500 0.578 0.725 0.000 PEAK HR VOL: 90 1270 23 0.928 111 1374 0.877 1 70 50 0.809 0 21 0.704 159 0.933 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 1 2 0 0 1 2 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 4:00 PM 14 267 0 1 33 314 26 0 13 10 25 0 6 18 31 0 758 4:15 PM 18 303 3 1 26 315 20 0 20 14 15 0 6 9 30 0 780 4:30 PM 14 288 2 0 33 320 29 0 25 15 16 0 4 16 37 0 799 4:45 PM 27 294 6 1 18 343 20 0 12 7 16 0 2 10 33 0 789 5:00 PM 16 286 5 0 31 321 27 0 31 18 26 0 4 11 49 0 825 5:15 PM 26 371 9 1 29 343 27 1 12 15 10 0 9 11 33 0 897 5:30 PM 21 319 3 0 33 367 27 0 15 10 17 0 6 11 44 0 873 5:45 PM 23 298 1 0 30 292 22 1 22 9 18 0 5 12 36 0 769 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES: 159 2426 29 4 233 2615 198 2 150 98 143 0 42 98 293 0 6490 APPROACH %'s : 6.07% 92.67% 1.11% 0.15% 7.64% 85.79% 6.50% 0.07% 38.36% 25.06% 36.57% 0.00% 9.70% 22.63% 67.67% 0.00% PEAK HR : 04:45 PM - 05:45 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL: 90 1270 23 2 111 1374 101 1 70 50 69 0 21 43 159 0 3384 PEAK HR FACTOR: 0.833 0.856 0.639 0.500 0.841 0.936 0.935 0.250 0.565 0.694 0.663 0.000 0.583 0.977 0.811 0.000 0.851 0.929 0.630 0.671 0.943 ID: 17-01249-002 City: Seal Beach Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services Pacific Coast Hwy & Main St Peak Hour Turning Movement Count Pacific Coast Hwy 07:15 AM - 08:15 AM AM 59 1622 89 2 D O = NONE Y Q NOON 0 0 0 0 a 04:45 PM - 05:45 PM PM 101 1374 111 1 136 0 234 a AM NOON PM 1 2 1 0 4.0 U)� 0 0 0 � 0.E- (9 . 43 0 70 � 1 34 0 50 ♦ 1 46 0 69 � 1-1 F1 L-1 F1 L-1 F IAM NOON PM Total Vehicles (AM) S L ♦ O Total Vehicles (NOON) 1 L ♦ O ztit�r Total Vehicles (PM) J «1 ♦ ly 1 L ♦ O PM NOON AM 1695 0 1500 4 Day: Tuesday Date: 11/14/2017 AM I 07:00 AM - 09:00 AM NOON NONE71 PM I 04:00 PM - 06:00 PM PM NOON AM 1 +... .> 0 1 2 0 159 0 116 1 ♦ 43 0 37 1 r 21 0 16 0 � 0 0 0 184 0 130 Pacific Coast HwyJW 0 0 0 2 2 0 e� 0 1 2 0 n V O Q O Q a o2 9� 1466 2 90 1270 23 PM O 0 0 0 0 NOON 1685 1 40 1534 7 AM Pacific Coast HwyJW 0 0 0 2 2 0 e� o� Pedestrians (Crosswalks) O Po Q� a O Q O Q a o2 9� O O �O Z O O Z O O O� PM Q ♦ ♦ O PM NOON Q Q NOON AM Q � Q AM AM Q 0 AM NOON Q * ♦ Q NOON PM Q ♦ ♦ Q PM �O O O O O O a P� �O O tioo ooe Q PM NOON AM O C z 1 M O y N rt -1 F-1 L Total Vehicles (AM) 141 L ♦ z r Total Vehicles (NOON) � t ♦ I F z-1 * r-1 L * Ir Total Vehicles (PM) � L 1 F z-1 * r* Ir National Data & Surveying Services Intersection Turning Movement Count Location: Pacific Coast Hwy & Marvista Dr/5th St City: Seal Beach Project ID: 17-01249-003 Control: Signalized Date: 11/14/2017 Total NS/EW Streets: Pacific Coast Hwy Pacific Coast Hwy Marvista Dr/5th St Marvista Dr/5th St NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 NL NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 7:00 AM 1 360 0 0 3 447 11 0 20 2 11 0 0 3 19 0 877 7:15 AM 3 373 1 0 5 464 6 0 22 3 1 0 4 5 17 0 904 7:30 AM 0 409 0 0 4 453 10 0 20 5 9 0 3 5 16 0 934 7:45 AM 7 408 0 0 2 328 16 0 28 2 4 0 3 3 16 0 817 8:00 AM 4 360 1 0 5 406 10 0 30 4 5 0 0 3 12 0 840 8:15 AM 5 344 1 0 3 419 16 2 34 0 8 0 2 1 18 0 853 8:30 AM 1 311 0 0 3 284 15 0 33 3 9 0 3 2 19 0 683 8:45 AM 3 298 0 0 5 321 14 1 23 3 5 0 2 2 19 0 696 WL NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTALVOLUMES: 24 2863 3 0 30 3122 98 3 210 22 52 0 17 24 136 0 6604 APPROACH Ws: 0.83% 99.07% 0.10% 0.00% 0.92% 95.97% 3.01% 0.09% 73.94% 7.75% 18.31% 0.00% 9.60% 13.56% 76.84% 0.00% PEAK HR : PEAK HR VOL: 07:00 AM - 08:00 AM 1319 5 2 68 1431 113 4 112 24 33 1 10 19 44 0 TOTAL PEAK HR VOL: 11 1550 1 0 14 1692 43 0 90 12 25 0 10 16 68 0 3532 PEAK HR FACTOR: 0.393 0.947 0.250 0.000 0.700 0.912 0.672 0.000 0.804 0.600 0.568 0.000 0.625 0.800 0.895 0.000 0.941 0.921 0.934 0.904 0.945 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 4:00 PM 5 279 2 1 17 334 22 2 23 5 5 0 3 7 6 0 711 7 4:15 PM 6 262 2 0 13 315 28 0 23 4 8 0 3 5 14 0 683 4:30 PM 10 331 1 0 19 344 19 3 22 6 5 0 2 0 15 0 777 4:45 PM 5 268 2 0 13 347 33 3 23 2 6 0 3 5 7 0 717 5:00 PM 8 356 2 0 23 350 28 1 35 7 9 1 1 6 18 0 845 5:15 PM 8 375 0 1 13 360 23 0 20 7 6 0 1 4 6 0 824 5:30 PM 8 320 1 1 19 374 29 0 34 8 12 0 5 4 13 0 828 5:45 PM 5 307 0 1 13 315 24 1 25 4 4 0 1 3 6 0 709 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES: 55 2498 10 4 130 2739 206 10 205 43 55 1 19 34 85 0 6094 APPROACH Ws: 2.14% 97.31% 0.39% 0.16% 4.21% 88.78% 6.68% 0.32% 67.43% 14.14% 18.09% 0.33% 13.77% 24.64% 61.59% 0.00% PEAK HR '.04:45 PM - 05:45 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL: 29 1319 5 2 68 1431 113 4 112 24 33 1 10 19 44 0 3214 PEAK HR FACTOR: 0.906 0.879 0.625 0.500 0.739 0.957 0.856 0.333 0.800 0.750 0.688 0.250 0.500 0.792 0.611 0.000 0.882 0.957 0.787 0.730 0.951 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services Pacific Coast Hwy & Marvista Dr/5th St Peak Hour Turning Movement Count ID: 17-01249-003 Pacific Coast Hwy Day: Tuesday City: Seal Beach _ Date: 11/14/2017 07:00 AM - 08:00 AM AM 43 1692 14 0 D O = NONE Y Q NOON � 0 0 0 a 04:45 PM - 05:45 PM PM 113 1431 684 4 U) a 70 0 162 a AM NOON PM t LO 0 0 1 0 N 90 0 112 1 M 12 0 24 ♦ 1 _ 25 I 0 133 '!W1 IAM NOON PM Total Vehicles (AM) L S L —1 F ♦ O Total Vehicles (NOON) J «I ♦ L► L L .0, O -1 F Total Vehicles (PM) J 41 ♦ ly L 1 L .0 O-1 F PM NOON AM 1708 0 1479 4 AM I 07:00 AM - 09:00 AM NOON NONE71 PM I 04:00 PM - 06:00 PM PM NOON AM 0 +... 44 0 68 14- 19 0 16 0 r 10 0 10 0 � 0 0 0 .> 97 0 27 0 1 2 0 n V O Q O Q a o2 9� 1476 2 0 2 1 0 AM NOON PM t LO 0 0 1 0 N 90 0 112 1 M 12 0 24 ♦ 1 _ 25 I 0 133 '!W1 IAM NOON PM Total Vehicles (AM) L S L —1 F ♦ O Total Vehicles (NOON) J «I ♦ L► L L .0, O -1 F Total Vehicles (PM) J 41 ♦ ly L 1 L .0 O-1 F PM NOON AM 1708 0 1479 4 AM I 07:00 AM - 09:00 AM NOON NONE71 PM I 04:00 PM - 06:00 PM PM NOON AM 0 +... 44 0 68 14- 19 0 16 0 r 10 0 10 0 � 0 0 0 .> 97 0 27 Pacific Coast HwyJW 0 0 0 2 2 0 e� 0 1 2 0 n V O Q O Q a o2 9� 1476 2 29 1319 5 PM O Q 0 Q 0 NOON 1727 0 11 1550 1 AM Pacific Coast HwyJW 0 0 0 2 2 0 e� o� Pedestrians (Crosswalks) O Po Q� a O Q O Q a o2 9� O O �O Z O O Z O O O� PM Q ♦ ♦ O PM NOON Q Q NOON AM Q � Q AM AM Q 0 AM NOON Q * ♦ Q NOON PM Q ♦ ♦ Q PM �O O O O O O a P� �O O tioo ooe Q PM NOON AM O C z 1 M O y N iv v S-1 F-1 L Total Vehicles (AM) 141 t z r Total Vehicles (NOON) t I F z-1 * r-1 L * Ir Total Vehicles (PM) � L 1 F z-1 * r* Ir National Data & Surveying Services Intersection Turning Movement Count Location: Pacific Coast Hwy & 1st St City: Seal Beach Project ID: 17-01249-004 Control: Signalized Date: 11/14/2017 Total NS/EW Streets: Pacific Coast Hwy Pacific Coast Hwy 1st St 1st St NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 NL NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 7:00 AM 3 365 0 0 0 455 12 0 39 0 8 0 1 0 1 0 884 7:15 AM 5 436 0 0 0 473 12 0 41 0 8 0 1 0 0 0 976 7:30 AM 4 402 0 2 0 440 12 0 60 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 948 7:45 AM 5 468 0 0 0 330 14 0 25 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 850 8:00 AM 5 383 0 0 0 423 8 0 38 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 866 8:15 AM 5 407 2 0 0 417 12 0 25 0 12 0 0 0 1 0 881 8:30 AM 6 329 1 3 0 301 13 2 36 0 12 1 0 0 1 0 705 8:45 AM 6 350 0 0 0 320 21 0 23 0 12 1 0 0 0 0 733 WL NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTALVOLUMES: 39 3140 3 5 0 3159 104 2 287 0 97 2 2 0 3 0 6843 APPROACH Ws: 1.22% 98.53% 0.09% 0.16% 0.00% 96.75% 3.19% 0.06% 74.35% 0.00% 25.13% 0.52% 40.00% 0.00% 60.00% 0.00% PEAK HR : PEAK HR VOL: 07:00 AM - 08:00 AM 1458 0 2 0 1518 125 5 142 0 37 1 0 0 1 0 TOTAL PEAK HR VOL: 17 1671 0 2 0 1698 50 0 165 0 52 0 2 0 1 0 3658 PEAK HR FACTOR: 0.850 0.893 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.897 0.893 0.000 0.688 0.000 0.464 0.000 0.500 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.693 0.901 0.616 0.375 0.937 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 4:00 PM 7 297 1 0 0 338 14 1 36 1 9 1 1 0 2 0 708 7 4:15 PM 13 317 0 0 0 360 26 1 23 1 9 0 1 0 2 0 753 4:30 PM 9 347 0 1 0 371 19 1 23 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 782 4:45 PM 5 281 1 0 0 379 39 1 34 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 752 5:00 PM 10 372 0 0 0 392 33 1 40 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 852 5:15 PM 7 354 0 1 0 365 28 1 47 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 821 5:30 PM 9 388 0 0 0 428 34 1 27 0 8 1 0 0 0 0 896 5:45 PM 7 344 0 1 0 333 30 2 28 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 753 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES: 67 2700 2 3 0 2966 223 9 258 2 78 2 2 0 5 0 6317 APPROACH Ws: 2.42% 97.40% 0.07% 0.11% 0.00% 92.75% 6.97% 0.28% 75.88% 0.59% 22.94% 0.59% 28.57% 0.00% 71.43% 0.00% PEAK HR : 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL: 33 1458 0 2 0 1518 125 5 142 0 37 1 0 0 1 0 3322 PEAK HR FACTOR: 0.825 0.939 0.000 0.500 0.000 0.887 0.919 0.625 0.755 0.000 0.514 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.940 0.690 0.692 0.250 0.927 ID: 17-01249-004 City: Seal Beach Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services Pacific Coast Hwy & 1st St Peak Hour Turning Movement Count Pacific Coast Hwy 07:00 AM - 08:00 AM AM 50 1698 0 0 D O = NONE Y Q NOON 0 0 0 0 a 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM PM 125 1518 0 AM NOON PM 0 2 1 0 67 0 159 a 0 0 0 1 0 165 0 142 2 0 0 0 —11,1 52 0 37 '!W0 IAM NOON PM Total Vehicles (AM) L S t ♦ < i «, t �► r Total Vehicles (NOON) 1 «I ♦ 1.. L t ♦ O -1 F Total Vehicles (PM) 1 «1 ♦ ly L 1 t .0 <-1 F 4> PM NOON AM 1837 0 1606 4 Day: Tuesday Date: 11/14/2017 AM 1 07:00 AM - 09:00 AM NOON NONE PM I 04:00 PM - 06:00 PM PM NOON AM 0 1 0 1 1 ♦ 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 .> 0 I 0 I 0 0 1 2 0 n V 4n 5 t r* 1557 2 33 1458 0 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 165 0 142 2 0 0 0 —11,1 52 0 37 '!W0 IAM NOON PM Total Vehicles (AM) L S t ♦ < i «, t �► r Total Vehicles (NOON) 1 «I ♦ 1.. L t ♦ O -1 F Total Vehicles (PM) 1 «1 ♦ ly L 1 t .0 <-1 F 4> PM NOON AM 1837 0 1606 4 Day: Tuesday Date: 11/14/2017 AM 1 07:00 AM - 09:00 AM NOON NONE PM I 04:00 PM - 06:00 PM PM NOON AM 0 1 0 1 1 ♦ 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 .> 0 I 0 I 0 Pacific Coast Hwy e� 0 1 2 0 n V 4n I*i t r* 1557 2 33 1458 0 PM 0 0 0 0 0 NOON 1754 2 17 1671 0 AM Pacific Coast Hwy e� o� Pedestrians (Crosswalks) O Po Q� a O Q O Q a o2 9� O O �O Z O O Z O O O� PM 0 ♦ ♦ O PM NOON 0 0 NOON AM Q 0 AM AM Q 0 AM NOON 0 * - ♦ 0 NOON PM 0 ♦ ♦ 0 PM �O OO O O O F�O JW 0 2 2 0 a P� O tion ooe Q PM NOON AM 0 O C z 1 M 71 O 0 Cn Total Vehicles (AM) ♦ L*141 t -1 F i«,♦ter Total Vehicles (NOON) —1 Lt z- * r* Ir I F Total Vehicles (PM) J L t z- * r* Ir 1 F National Data & Surveying Services Intersection Turning Movement Count Location: 5th St &Marina Or City: Seal Beach Project ID: 17-01249-005 Control: 4 -Way Stop Date: 11/14/2017 Total NS/EW Streets: 5th St 5th St Marina Dr Marina Or NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 7:00 AM 1 4 1 0 3 6 2 0 3 13 0 0 1 17 8 0 59 7 7:15 AM 0 11 4 0 4 8 4 0 0 25 0 0 1 19 7 0 83 7:30 AM 0 10 5 0 2 9 2 0 3 27 0 0 4 16 4 1 83 7:45 AM 1 8 4 0 6 11 5 0 0 21 0 0 1 28 13 0 98 8:00 AM 0 8 7 0 5 4 2 0 6 26 3 0 4 24 19 0 108 8:15 AM 0 12 4 0 3 7 9 0 2 16 1 0 3 32 10 0 99 8:30 AM 0 7 2 0 5 12 1 0 4 15 2 0 3 30 18 0 99 8:45 AM 1 7 3 0 5 4 4 0 2 24 0 0 0 37 11 0 98 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTALVOLUMES: 3 67 30 0 33 61 29 0 20 167 6 0 17 203 90 1 727 APPROACH Ws: 3.00% 67.00% 30.00% 0.00% 26.83% 49.59% 23.58% 0.00% 10.36% 86.53% 3.11% 0.00% 5.47% 65.27% 28.94% 0.32% PEAK HR : 07:45 AM - 08:45 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL: 1 35 17 0 19 34 17 0 12 78 6 0 11 114 60 0 404 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.250 0.7290.607 0.000 0.792 0.708 0.472 0.000 0.500 0.750 0.500 0.000 0.688 0.891 0.789 0.000 0.828 0.795 0.686 0.907 0.935 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 4:00 PM 1 7 6 0 10 12 8 0 7 25 2 0 5 29 11 0 123 4:15 PM 7 1 8 4 1 9 10 8 0 5 32 1 0 3 34 11 0 127 4:30 PM 1 4 3 0 3 8 12 0 7 29 4 0 9 43 14 0 137 4:45 PM 2 7 7 0 8 20 6 0 6 33 1 0 11 37 13 0 151 5:00 PM 1 11 5 1 13 12 9 0 6 28 0 0 8 47 15 0 156 5:15 PM 1 8 4 0 8 11 13 0 8 37 3 0 4 38 18 0 153 5:30 PM 2 8 4 0 7 11 8 0 9 22 0 0 6 39 21 0 137 5:45 PM 0 4 5 0 4 16 7 0 1 23 1 0 5 36 20 0 122 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES: 9 57 38 2 62 100 71 0 49 229 12 0 51 303 123 0 1106 APPROACH%'s: 8.49% 53.77% 35.85% 1.89% 26.61% 42.92% 30.47% 0.00% 16.90% 78.97% 4.14% 0.00% 10.69% 63.52% 25.79% 0.00% PEAK HR : 04:30 PM - 05:30 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL: 5 30 19 1 32 51 40 0 27 127 8 0 32 165 60 0 597 PEAK HR FACTOR: 0.625 0.682 0.679 0.250 0.615 0.638 0.769 0.000 0.844 0.858 0.500 0.000 0.727 0.878 0.833 0.000 0.764 0.904 0.644 0.918 0.957 ID: 17-01249-005 City: Seal Beach 07:45 AM - 08:45 AM D O = NONE Y Q a 04:30 PM - 05:30 PM AM NOON PM Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services 5th St & Marina Dr Peak Hour Turning Movement Count 5th St AM 17 34 19 0 NOON 0 0 0 0 PM 40 51 32 0 .J ♦ 4 U 1 1 0 0 132 I 0 1210 a L to • 0 0 0 0 � 12 0 27 1 0 78 0 127 ♦ 1 IAM NOON PM Total Vehicles (AM) L S t —1 F ♦ O Total Vehicles (NOON) 1 «I ♦ 1.. L t ♦ O ztitro F Total Vehicles (PM) 141 ♦ 14 L 1t ♦ O -1 F i�, t Irr PM IID9I610I AM 107 0 Day: Tuesday Date: 11/14/2017 AM 1 07:00 AM - 09:00 AM NOON NONE PM I 04:00 PM - 06:00 PM 0 r 32 0 11 OC 0 0 0 => 178 I 0 1114 PM NOON AM 0 +, 60 0 60 1 4- 165 0 114 0 r 32 0 11 OC 0 0 0 => 178 I 0 1114 5th St c� 0 0 1 0 n V O Z Q O Q Z a o2 9� 92 1 5 30 19 PM 0 0 0 NOON 51 �0-0 0 1 35 17 AM 5th St c� o� Pedestrians (Crosswalks) O �o Q� a O Z Q O Q Z a o2 9� O O �O O O O O O� PM 0 ♦ ♦ O PM NOON 0 0 NOON AM 0 0 AM AM Q 0 AM NOON 0 * - ♦ 0 NOON PM 0 ♦ ♦ 0 PM �O OO O O O F�O JW 0 2 2 0 a P� O tion ooe Q PM NOON AM n O C z 1 M 71 O 0 Cn K Total Vehicles (AM) 1 141 ♦ L* t z r —1«,t�►F Total Vehicles (NOON) —1 Lt z-*r►r I F Total Vehicles (PM) —1 L ? t z-*r►r 1 F National Data & Surveying Services Intersection Turning Movement Count Location: 1st St &Marina Or City: Seal Beach Project ID: 17-01249-006 Control: Signalized Date: 11/14/2017 Total NS/EW Streets: 1st St 1st St Marina Dr Marina Or NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 1 2 1 0 1 1.5 0.5 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 7:00 AM 8 12 2 0 6 3 1 0 1 6 3 0 2 16 9 0 69 7 7:15 AM 11 8 1 0 6 4 0 0 1 14 1 0 1 20 17 0 84 7:30 AM 14 12 1 0 2 8 2 0 3 23 7 0 3 16 15 0 106 7:45 AM 12 5 1 0 3 7 7 0 3 13 10 0 4 24 12 0 101 8:00 AM 6 6 4 0 8 2 2 1 1 13 3 0 2 22 15 1 86 8:15 AM 11 7 1 0 7 2 5 0 4 19 7 0 1 31 14 0 109 8:30 AM 22 16 1 0 2 6 3 2 1 14 8 0 4 23 21 0 123 8:45 AM 7 6 1 0 9 7 6 1 3 29 6 0 0 33 12 0 120 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTALVOLUMES: 91 72 12 0 43 39 26 4 17 131 45 0 17 185 115 1 798 APPROACH Ws: : 52.00 % 41.14% 6.86% 0.00% 38.39% 34.82% 23.21% 3.57% 8.81% 67.88% 23.32% 0.00% 5.35% 58.18% 36.16% 0.31% PEAK HR : 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL: 46 35 7 0 26 17 16 4 9 75 24 0 7 109 62 1 438 PEAK HR FACTOR: 0.523 0.5470.438 0.000 0.722 0.607 0.667 0.500 0.563 0.647 0.750 0.000 0.438 0.826 0.738 0.250 0.564 0.685 0.711 0.932 0.890 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 1 2 1 0 1 1.5 0.5 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 4:00 PM 11 13 8 0 7 6 5 2 7 36 17 1 2 32 21 0 168 7 4:15 PM 11 8 1 0 8 5 3 2 4 57 15 0 3 27 17 0 161 4:30 PM 9 6 3 0 7 4 4 0 6 41 19 0 3 48 8 0 158 4:45 PM 12 13 2 0 8 11 2 0 4 35 20 0 3 33 13 0 156 5:00 PM 17 22 4 0 16 7 5 2 2 24 17 0 1 51 14 0 182 5:15 PM 28 16 1 0 6 6 3 3 12 43 24 0 0 49 31 0 222 5:30 PM 8 10 2 0 4 8 0 0 3 32 10 0 2 33 21 0 133 5:45 PM 7 5 3 0 4 5 6 0 3 30 11 0 2 42 13 0 131 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES: 103 93 24 0 60 52 28 9 41 298 133 1 16 315 138 0 1311 APPROACH %'s: 46.82% 42.27% 10.91% 0.00% 40.27% 34.90% 18.79% 6.04% 8.67% 63.00% 28.12% 0.21% 3.41% 67.16% 29.42% 0.00% PEAK HR : 04:30 PM - 05:30 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL: 66 57 10 0 37 28 14 5 24 143 80 0 7 181 66 0 718 PEAK HR FACTOR: 0.589 0.648 0.625 0.000 0.578 0.636 0.700 0.417 0.500 0.831 0.833 0.000 0.583 0.887 0.532 0.000 0.739 0.700 0.782 0.794 0.809 ID: 17-01249-006 City: Seal Beach 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM D O = NONE Y Q a 04:30 PM - 05:30 PM AM NOON PM Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services 1st St & Marina Dr Peak Hour Turning Movement Count 1st St AM 16 17 26 4 NOON 0 0 0 0 PM 14 28 37 5 4j ♦ 4 U 0.5 1.5 1 0 171 I 0 1261 a L 0 0 0 0 � 9 0 24 1 75 0 143 ♦ 1 IAM NOON PM Total Vehicles (AM) L S t ♦ O —1 F Total Vehicles (NOON) J «I ♦ L► L t ♦ O ztitrr F Total Vehicles (PM) 141 ♦ 14 L 1t <4>-1 F t r►r PM NOON AM 110 0 152 4 Day: Tuesday Date: 11/14/2017 AM 1 07:00 AM - 09:00 AM NOON NONE PM I 04:00 PM - 06:00 PM 1 r 7 0 7 0 0 0 1 30 ' 1 `1,9 w PM NOON AM 0 +, 66 0 62 1 ♦ 181 0 109 1 r 7 0 7 0 0 0 1 30 ' 1 `1,9 w 1st St c� 0 1 2 1 n V 4n +,11 f 1+ O O �O Z O O Z O O 115 0 66 57 10 PM 0 0 0 0 0 NOON 48 0 46 35 7 AM 1st St c� o� Pedestrians (Crosswalks) O �o Q� a O Q O Q a o2 9� O O �O Z O O Z O O O� PM 0 ♦ ♦ O PM NOON 0 0 NOON AM 0 0 AM AM Q 0 AM NOON 0 * - ♦ 0 NOON PM 0 ♦ ♦ 0 PM �O OO O O O F�O JW 0 2 2 0 a P� O tion ooe Q PM NOON AM 0 O C z 1 M 71 O 0 Cn K Total Vehicles (AM) 1 141 ♦ L* t z r —1 F Total Vehicles (NOON) —1 Lt z-*rr I F Total Vehicles (PM) —1 L ? t z-trr 1 F /:1»11►111 K14c INTERSECTION ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS EX AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:23:54 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scenario Report Scenario: Command: Volume: Geometry: Impact Fee: Trip Generation: Trip Distribution: Paths: Routes: Configuration: EX AM EX AM EX AM EXISTING Default Impact Fee None None Default Path Default Route EX EX AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:23:55 Page 2-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C # 1 Pacific Coast Highway at 1st S C xxxxx 0.711 C xxxxx 0.711 + 0.000 V/C # 2 Pacific Coast Highway at Marvi C xxxxx 0.745 C xxxxx 0.745 + 0.000 V/C # 3 Pacific Coast Highway at Bolsa B xxxxx 0.687 B xxxxx 0.687 + 0.000 V/C # 4 Pacific Coast Highway at Balbo C xxxxx 0.729 C xxxxx 0.729 + 0.000 V/C # 5 1st Street at Marina Drive A xxxxx 0.251 A xxxxx 0.251 + 0.000 V/C # 6 5th Street at Marina Drive A 8.1 0.217 A 8.1 0.217 + 0.000 V/C Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ EX AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:23:55 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Pacific Coast Highway at Ist Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.711 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 51 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************* Street Name: Pacific Coast Highway 1st Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 19 1671 0 0 1698 50 165 0 52 2 0 1 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 19 1671 0 0 1698 50 165 0 52 2 0 1 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 19 1671 0 0 1698 50 165 0 52 2 0 1 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 19 1671 0 0 1698 50 165 0 52 2 0 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 19 1671 0 0 1698 50 165 0 52 2 0 1 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 19 1671 0 0 1698 50 165 0 52 2 0 1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 0.97 1.00 0.94 0.97 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.94 0.06 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.67 0.00 0.33 Final Sat.: 1600 3300 0 1600 3208 92 3200 0 1600 1133 0 567 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.55 0.05 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** EX AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:23:55 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Pacific Coast Highway at Marvista Dr/5th Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.745 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 56 Level Of Service: C ****************************************************************************** Street Name: Pacific Coast Highway Marvista Drive/5th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 11 1550 1 14 1692 43 90 12 25 10 16 68 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 11 1550 1 14 1692 43 90 12 25 10 16 68 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 11 1550 1 14 1692 43 90 12 25 10 16 68 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 11 1550 1 14 1692 43 90 12 25 10 16 68 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 11 1550 1 14 1692 43 90 12 25 10 16 68 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 11 1550 1 14 1692 43 90 12 25 10 16 68 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 0.97 0.94 0.94 0.97 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.95 0.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.38 0.62 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3298 2 1600 3221 79 1600 1700 1700 654 1046 1700 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.47 0.48 0.01 0.53 0.54 0.06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.04 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ EX AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:23:55 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Pacific Coast Highway at Bolsa Avenue/Main Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.687 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 48 Level Of Service: B ****************************************************************************** Street Name: Bolsa Avenue/Main Street Pacific Coast Highway Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Ovl Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 43 34 46 16 37 116 91 1622 59 41 1534 7 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 43 34 46 16 37 116 91 1622 59 41 1534 7 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 43 34 46 16 37 116 91 1622 59 41 1534 7 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 43 34 46 16 37 116 91 1622 59 41 1534 7 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 43 34 46 16 37 116 91 1622 59 41 1534 7 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 43 34 46 16 37 116 91 1622 59 41 1534 7 OvlAdjVol: 19 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.97 0.94 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 Final Sat.: 1600 1700 1700 1600 1700 1700 1600 3400 1700 1600 3285 15 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.07 0.06 0.48 0.03 0.03 0.47 0.48 OvlAdjV/S: 0.01 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** EX AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:23:55 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Pacific Coast Highway at Balboa Drive/12th Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.729 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 54 Level Of Service: C ****************************************************************************** Street Name: Balboa Drive/12th Street Pacific Coast Highway Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 49 56 37 39 26 29 36 1655 11 21 1589 5 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 49 56 37 39 26 29 36 1655 11 21 1589 5 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 49 56 37 39 26 29 36 1655 11 21 1589 5 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 49 56 37 39 26 29 36 1655 11 21 1589 5 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 49 56 37 39 26 29 36 1655 11 21 1589 5 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 49 56 37 39 26 29 36 1655 11 21 1589 5 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.97 0.94 Lanes: 0.35 0.39 0.26 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 Final Sat.: 587 670 443 1600 1700 1700 1600 3400 1700 1600 3290 10 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.08 0.08 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.49 0.01 0.01 0.48 0.50 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ EX AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:23:55 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 lst Street at Marina Drive Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.251 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 24 Level Of Service: A Street Name: 1st Street Marina Drive Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 46 35 7 30 17 16 9 75 24 8 109 62 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 46 35 7 30 17 16 9 75 24 8 109 62 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 46 35 7 30 17 16 9 75 24 8 109 62 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 46 35 7 30 17 16 9 75 24 8 109 62 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 46 35 7 30 17 16 9 75 24 8 109 62 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 46 35 7 30 17 16 9 75 24 8 109 62 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.76 0.24 1.00 0.64 0.36 Final Sat.: 1600 3400 1700 1600 3400 1700 1600 1212 388 1600 1020 580 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.06 0.01 0.11 0.11 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** EX AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:23:55 Page 8-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 5th Street at Marina Drive Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.217 Loss Time (sec): 0 Average Delay (sec/veh): 8.1 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************* Street Name: 5th Street Marina Drive Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 1 35 17 19 34 17 12 78 6 11 114 60 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 1 35 17 19 34 17 12 78 6 11 114 60 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 1 35 17 19 34 17 12 78 6 11 114 60 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 1 35 17 19 34 17 12 78 6 11 114 60 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 1 35 17 19 34 17 12 78 6 11 114 60 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 1 35 17 19 34 17 12 78 6 11 114 60 Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.02 0.66 0.32 0.36 0.64 1.00 0.13 0.81 0.06 0.06 0.62 0.32 Final Sat.: 14 500 243 232 415 769 100 649 50 51 526 277 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.02 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.22 0.22 0.22 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 7.8 7.8 7.8 8.5 8.5 7.2 7.9 7.9 7.9 8.2 8.2 8.2 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 7.8 7.8 7.8 8.5 8.5 7.2 7.9 7.9 7.9 8.2 8.2 8.2 LOS by Move: A A A A A A A A A A A A Approach Del: 7.8 8.2 7.9 8.2 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 7.8 8.2 7.9 8.2 LOS by Appr: A A A A AllWayAvgQ: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. **************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ EX PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:23:56 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scenario Report Scenario: Command: Volume: Geometry: Impact Fee: Trip Generation: Trip Distribution: Paths: Routes: Configuration: EX PM EX PM EX PM EXISTING Default Impact Fee None None Default Path Default Route EX EX PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:23:56 Page 2-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C # 1 Pacific Coast Highway at 1st S B xxxxx 0.681 B xxxxx 0.681 + 0.000 V/C # 2 Pacific Coast Highway at Marvi B xxxxx 0.698 B xxxxx 0.698 + 0.000 V/C # 3 Pacific Coast Highway at Bolsa B xxxxx 0.643 B xxxxx 0.643 + 0.000 V/C # 4 Pacific Coast Highway at Balbo B xxxxx 0.685 B xxxxx 0.685 + 0.000 V/C # 5 1st Street at Marina Drive A xxxxx 0.319 A xxxxx 0.319 + 0.000 V/C # 6 5th Street at Marina Drive A 9.0 0.326 A 9.0 0.326 + 0.000 V/C Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ EX PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:23:56 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Pacific Coast Highway at Ist Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.681 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 48 Level Of Service: B Street Name: Pacific Coast Highway 1st Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 35 1458 0 5 1518 125 143 0 37 0 0 1 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 35 1458 0 5 1518 125 143 0 37 0 0 1 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 35 1458 0 5 1518 125 143 0 37 0 0 1 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 35 1458 0 5 1518 125 143 0 37 0 0 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 35 1458 0 5 1518 125 143 0 37 0 0 1 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 35 1458 0 5 1518 125 143 0 37 0 0 1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 0.97 1.00 0.94 0.97 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.85 0.15 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3300 0 1600 3057 243 3200 0 1600 0 0 1700 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.51 0.04 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** EX PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:23:56 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Pacific Coast Highway at Marvista Dr/5th Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.698 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 50 Level Of Service: B ****************************************************************************** Street Name: Pacific Coast Highway Marvista Drive/5th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 31 1319 5 72 1431 113 113 24 33 10 19 44 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 31 1319 5 72 1431 113 113 24 33 10 19 44 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 31 1319 5 72 1431 113 113 24 33 10 19 44 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 31 1319 5 72 1431 113 113 24 33 10 19 44 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 31 1319 5 72 1431 113 113 24 33 10 19 44 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 31 1319 5 72 1431 113 113 24 33 10 19 44 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 0.97 0.94 0.94 0.97 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.85 0.15 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.34 0.66 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3288 12 1600 3066 234 1600 1700 1700 586 1114 1700 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.40 0.41 0.05 0.47 0.48 0.07 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.03 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ EX PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:23:56 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Pacific Coast Highway at Bolsa Avenue/Main Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.643 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 44 Level Of Service: B ****************************************************************************** Street Name: Bolsa Avenue/Main Street Pacific Coast Highway Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Ovl Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 70 50 69 21 43 159 112 1374 101 92 1270 23 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 70 50 69 21 43 159 112 1374 101 92 1270 23 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 70 50 69 21 43 159 112 1374 101 92 1270 23 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 70 50 69 21 43 159 112 1374 101 92 1270 23 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 70 50 69 21 43 159 112 1374 101 92 1270 23 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 70 50 69 21 43 159 112 1374 101 92 1270 23 OvlAdjVol: 40 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.97 0.94 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.96 0.04 Final Sat.: 1600 1700 1700 1600 1700 1700 1600 3400 1700 1600 3243 57 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.01 0.03 0.09 0.07 0.40 0.06 0.06 0.39 0.40 OvlAdjV/S: 0.02 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** EX PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:23:56 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Pacific Coast Highway at Balboa Drive/12th Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.685 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 48 Level Of Service: B ****************************************************************************** Street Name: Balboa Drive/12th Street Pacific Coast Highway Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 77 45 42 41 64 25 43 1350 47 27 1378 18 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 77 45 42 41 64 25 43 1350 47 27 1378 18 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 77 45 42 41 64 25 43 1350 47 27 1378 18 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 77 45 42 41 64 25 43 1350 47 27 1378 18 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 77 45 42 41 64 25 43 1350 47 27 1378 18 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 77 45 42 41 64 25 43 1350 47 27 1378 18 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.97 0.94 Lanes: 0.47 0.27 0.26 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.97 0.03 Final Sat.: 798 466 435 1600 1700 1700 1600 3400 1700 1600 3259 41 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.03 0.04 0.01 0.03 0.40 0.03 0.02 0.42 0.44 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ EX PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:23:56 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 lst Street at Marina Drive Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.319 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 26 Level Of Service: A Street Name: 1st Street Marina Drive Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 66 57 10 42 28 14 24 143 80 7 181 66 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 66 57 10 42 28 14 24 143 80 7 181 66 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 66 57 10 42 28 14 24 143 80 7 181 66 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 66 57 10 42 28 14 24 143 80 7 181 66 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 66 57 10 42 28 14 24 143 80 7 181 66 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 66 57 10 42 28 14 24 143 80 7 181 66 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.64 0.36 1.00 0.73 0.27 Final Sat.: 1600 3400 1700 1600 3400 1700 1600 1026 574 1600 1172 428 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.15 0.15 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** EX PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:23:56 Page 8-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 5th Street at Marina Drive Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.326 Loss Time (sec): 0 Average Delay (sec/veh): 9.0 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************* Street Name: 5th Street Marina Drive Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 6 30 19 32 51 40 27 127 8 32 165 60 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 6 30 19 32 51 40 27 127 8 32 165 60 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 6 30 19 32 51 40 27 127 8 32 165 60 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 6 30 19 32 51 40 27 127 8 32 165 60 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 6 30 19 32 51 40 27 127 8 32 165 60 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 6 30 19 32 51 40 27 127 8 32 165 60 Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.11 0.54 0.35 0.39 0.61 1.00 0.17 0.78 0.05 0.12 0.65 0.23 Final Sat.: 74 368 233 231 367 702 125 586 37 98 506 184 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.14 0.14 0.06 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.33 0.33 0.33 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 8.3 8.3 8.3 9.2 9.2 7.7 8.9 8.9 8.9 9.5 9.5 9.5 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 8.3 8.3 8.3 9.2 9.2 7.7 8.9 8.9 8.9 9.5 9.5 9.5 LOS by Move: A A A A A A A A A A A A Approach Del: 8.3 8.7 8.9 9.5 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 8.3 8.7 8.9 9.5 LOS by Appr: A A A A AllWayAvgQ: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. **************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ EX WP AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:23:58 Page 1-1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scenario Report Scenario: EX WP AM Command: EX WP AM Volume: EX AM Geometry: EXISTING Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: Project AM Trip Distribution: Project Paths: Default Path Routes: Default Route Configuration: EX EX WP AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:23:58 Page 2-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trip Generation Report Forecast for PROJECT AM Zone Rate Rate Trips Trips Total o Of # Subzone Amount Units In Out In Out Trips Total ------------------------------------- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- 1 PROJECT 1.00 PROJECT 71.00 69.00 71 69 140 70.0 Zone 1 Subtotal ............................. 71 69 140 70.0 2 Pass -By 1.00 Pass -By 31.00 29.00 31 29 60 30.0 Zone 2 Subtotal ............................. 31 29 60 30.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL.................................................. 102 98 200 100.0 Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ EX WP AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:23:58 Page 3-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trip Distribution Report Percent Of Trips PROJECT To Gates 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Zone----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1 35.0 5.0 20.0 5.0 35.0 0.0 0.0 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 EX WP AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:23:58 Page 4-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C # 1 Pacific Coast Highway at 1st S C xxxxx 0.711 C xxxxx 0.719 + 0.008 V/C # 2 Pacific Coast Highway at Marvi C xxxxx 0.745 D xxxxx 0.807 + 0.062 V/C # 3 Pacific Coast Highway at Bolsa B xxxxx 0.687 B xxxxx 0.695 + 0.008 V/C # 4 Pacific Coast Highway at Balbo C xxxxx 0.729 C xxxxx 0.736 + 0.008 V/C # 5 1st Street at Marina Drive A xxxxx 0.251 A xxxxx 0.253 + 0.002 V/C # 6 5th Street at Marina Drive A 8.1 0.217 A 8.2 0.223 + 0.006 V/C Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ EX WP AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:23:58 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Pacific Coast Highway at Ist Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.719 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 53 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************* Street Name: Pacific Coast Highway 1st Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 19 1671 0 0 1698 50 165 0 52 2 0 1 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 19 1671 0 0 1698 50 165 0 52 2 0 1 Added Vol: 0 24 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 19 1695 0 0 1723 50 165 0 52 2 0 1 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 19 1695 0 0 1723 50 165 0 52 2 0 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 19 1695 0 0 1723 50 165 0 52 2 0 1 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 19 1695 0 0 1723 50 165 0 52 2 0 1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 0.97 1.00 0.94 0.97 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.94 0.06 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.67 0.00 0.33 Final Sat.: 1600 3300 0 1600 3210 90 3200 0 1600 1133 0 567 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.55 0.05 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** EX WP AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:23:59 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Pacific Coast Highway at Marvista Dr/5th Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.807 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 68 Level Of Service: D ****************************************************************************** Street Name: Pacific Coast Highway Marvista Drive/5th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 11 1550 1 14 1692 43 90 12 25 10 16 68 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 11 1550 1 14 1692 43 90 12 25 10 16 68 Added Vol: 40 0 0 0 39 0 39 3 0 0 4 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 51 1550 1 14 1731 43 129 15 25 10 20 68 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 51 1550 1 14 1731 43 129 15 25 10 20 68 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 51 1550 1 14 1731 43 129 15 25 10 20 68 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 51 1550 1 14 1731 43 129 15 25 10 20 68 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 0.97 0.94 0.94 0.97 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.95 0.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.67 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3298 2 1600 3222 78 1600 1700 1700 567 1133 1700 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.47 0.48 0.01 0.54 0.55 0.08 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.04 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ EX WP AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:23:59 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Pacific Coast Highway at Bolsa Avenue/Main Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.695 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 49 Level Of Service: B ****************************************************************************** Street Name: Bolsa Avenue/Main Street Pacific Coast Highway Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Ovl Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 43 34 46 16 37 116 91 1622 59 41 1534 7 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 43 34 46 16 37 116 91 1622 59 41 1534 7 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 25 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 43 34 46 16 37 116 91 1646 59 41 1559 7 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 43 34 46 16 37 116 91 1646 59 41 1559 7 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 43 34 46 16 37 116 91 1646 59 41 1559 7 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 43 34 46 16 37 116 91 1646 59 41 1559 7 OvlAdjVol: 19 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.97 0.94 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 Final Sat.: 1600 1700 1700 1600 1700 1700 1600 3400 1700 1600 3286 14 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.07 0.06 0.48 0.03 0.03 0.47 0.49 OvlAdjV/S: 0.01 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** EX WP AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:23:59 Page 8-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Pacific Coast Highway at Balboa Drive/12th Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.736 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 55 Level Of Service: C ****************************************************************************** Street Name: Balboa Drive/12th Street Pacific Coast Highway Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 49 56 37 39 26 29 36 1655 11 21 1589 5 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 49 56 37 39 26 29 36 1655 11 21 1589 5 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 25 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 49 56 37 39 26 29 36 1679 11 21 1614 5 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 49 56 37 39 26 29 36 1679 11 21 1614 5 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 49 56 37 39 26 29 36 1679 11 21 1614 5 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 49 56 37 39 26 29 36 1679 11 21 1614 5 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.97 0.94 Lanes: 0.35 0.39 0.26 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 Final Sat.: 587 670 443 1600 1700 1700 1600 3400 1700 1600 3290 10 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.08 0.08 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.49 0.01 0.01 0.49 0.51 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ EX WP AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:23:59 Page 9-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 lst Street at Marina Drive Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.253 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 24 Level Of Service: A Street Name: 1st Street Marina Drive Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 46 35 7 30 17 16 9 75 24 8 109 62 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 46 35 7 30 17 16 9 75 24 8 109 62 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 46 35 7 30 17 16 9 79 24 8 112 62 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 46 35 7 30 17 16 9 79 24 8 112 62 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 46 35 7 30 17 16 9 79 24 8 112 62 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 46 35 7 30 17 16 9 79 24 8 112 62 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.77 0.23 1.00 0.64 0.36 Final Sat.: 1600 3400 1700 1600 3400 1700 1600 1227 373 1600 1030 570 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.06 0.01 0.11 0.11 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** EX WP AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:23:59 Page 10-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 5th Street at Marina Drive Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.223 Loss Time (sec): 0 Average Delay (sec/veh): 8.2 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************* Street Name: 5th Street Marina Drive Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 1 35 17 19 34 17 12 78 6 11 114 60 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 1 35 17 19 34 17 12 78 6 11 114 60 Added Vol: 0 14 0 0 14 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 1 49 17 19 48 20 16 78 6 11 114 60 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 1 49 17 19 48 20 16 78 6 11 114 60 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 1 49 17 19 48 20 16 78 6 11 114 60 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 1 49 17 19 48 20 16 78 6 11 114 60 Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.01 0.74 0.25 0.28 0.72 1.00 0.16 0.78 0.06 0.06 0.62 0.32 Final Sat.: 11 544 189 184 464 762 125 608 47 49 512 270 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.22 0.22 0.22 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.6 8.6 7.3 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.3 8.3 8.3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.6 8.6 7.3 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.3 8.3 8.3 LOS by Move: A A A A A A A A A A A A Approach Del: 8.0 8.3 8.1 8.3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 8.0 8.3 8.1 8.3 LOS by Appr: A A A A AllWayAvgQ: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. **************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ EX WP PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:01 Page 1-1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scenario Report Scenario: EX WP PM Command: EX WP PM Volume: EX PM Geometry: EXISTING Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: Project PM Trip Distribution: Project Paths: Default Path Routes: Default Route Configuration: EX EX WP PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:01 Page 2-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trip Generation Report Forecast for PROJECT PM Zone Rate Rate Trips Trips Total o Of # Subzone Amount Units In Out In Out Trips Total ---- ------------ ------- -------------- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- 1 PROJECT 1.00 PROJECT 80.00 77.00 80 77 157 70.1 Zone 1 Subtotal ............................. 80 77 157 70.1 2 Pass -By 1.00 Pass -By 34.00 33.00 34 33 67 29.9 Zone 2 Subtotal ............................. 34 33 67 29.9 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL.................................................. 114 110 224 100.0 Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ EX WP PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:01 Page 3-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trip Distribution Report Percent Of Trips PROJECT To Gates 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Zone----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1 35.0 5.0 20.0 5.0 35.0 0.0 0.0 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 EX WP PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:01 Page 4-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C # 1 Pacific Coast Highway at 1st S B xxxxx 0.681 B xxxxx 0.689 + 0.009 V/C # 2 Pacific Coast Highway at Marvi B xxxxx 0.698 C xxxxx 0.767 + 0.068 V/C # 3 Pacific Coast Highway at Bolsa B xxxxx 0.643 B xxxxx 0.652 + 0.009 V/C # 4 Pacific Coast Highway at Balbo B xxxxx 0.685 B xxxxx 0.694 + 0.009 V/C # 5 1st Street at Marina Drive A xxxxx 0.319 A xxxxx 0.321 + 0.003 V/C # 6 5th Street at Marina Drive A 9.0 0.326 A 9.2 0.335 + 0.009 V/C Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ EX WP PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:01 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Pacific Coast Highway at Ist Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.689 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 49 Level Of Service: B Street Name: Pacific Coast Highway 1st Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 35 1458 0 5 1518 125 143 0 37 0 0 1 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 35 1458 0 5 1518 125 143 0 37 0 0 1 Added Vol: 0 27 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 35 1485 0 5 1546 125 143 0 37 0 0 1 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 35 1485 0 5 1546 125 143 0 37 0 0 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 35 1485 0 5 1546 125 143 0 37 0 0 1 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 35 1485 0 5 1546 125 143 0 37 0 0 1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 0.97 1.00 0.94 0.97 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.85 0.15 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3300 0 1600 3061 239 3200 0 1600 0 0 1700 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.52 0.04 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** EX WP PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:01 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Pacific Coast Highway at Marvista Dr/5th Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.767 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 60 Level Of Service: C ****************************************************************************** Street Name: Pacific Coast Highway Marvista Drive/5th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 31 1319 5 72 1431 113 113 24 33 10 19 44 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 31 1319 5 72 1431 113 113 24 33 10 19 44 Added Vol: 45 0 0 0 43 0 43 4 0 0 4 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 76 1319 5 72 1474 113 156 28 33 10 23 44 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 76 1319 5 72 1474 113 156 28 33 10 23 44 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 76 1319 5 72 1474 113 156 28 33 10 23 44 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 76 1319 5 72 1474 113 156 28 33 10 23 44 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 0.97 0.94 0.94 0.97 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.86 0.14 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.30 0.70 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3288 12 1600 3072 228 1600 1700 1700 515 1185 1700 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.40 0.41 0.05 0.48 0.50 0.10 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.03 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ EX WP PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:01 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Pacific Coast Highway at Bolsa Avenue/Main Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.652 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 45 Level Of Service: B ****************************************************************************** Street Name: Bolsa Avenue/Main Street Pacific Coast Highway Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Ovl Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 70 50 69 21 43 159 112 1374 101 92 1270 23 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 70 50 69 21 43 159 112 1374 101 92 1270 23 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 28 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 70 50 69 21 43 159 112 1401 101 92 1298 23 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 70 50 69 21 43 159 112 1401 101 92 1298 23 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 70 50 69 21 43 159 112 1401 101 92 1298 23 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 70 50 69 21 43 159 112 1401 101 92 1298 23 OvlAdjVol: 40 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.97 0.94 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.97 0.03 Final Sat.: 1600 1700 1700 1600 1700 1700 1600 3400 1700 1600 3244 56 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.01 0.03 0.09 0.07 0.41 0.06 0.06 0.40 0.41 OvlAdjV/S: 0.02 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** EX WP PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:01 Page 8-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Pacific Coast Highway at Balboa Drive/12th Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.694 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 49 Level Of Service: B ****************************************************************************** Street Name: Balboa Drive/12th Street Pacific Coast Highway Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 77 45 42 41 64 25 43 1350 47 27 1378 18 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 77 45 42 41 64 25 43 1350 47 27 1378 18 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 28 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 77 45 42 41 64 25 43 1377 47 27 1406 18 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 77 45 42 41 64 25 43 1377 47 27 1406 18 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 77 45 42 41 64 25 43 1377 47 27 1406 18 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 77 45 42 41 64 25 43 1377 47 27 1406 18 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.97 0.94 Lanes: 0.47 0.27 0.26 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.97 0.03 Final Sat.: 798 466 435 1600 1700 1700 1600 3400 1700 1600 3260 40 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.03 0.04 0.01 0.03 0.41 0.03 0.02 0.43 0.45 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ EX WP PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:01 Page 9-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 lst Street at Marina Drive Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.321 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 26 Level Of Service: A Street Name: 1st Street Marina Drive Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 66 57 10 42 28 14 24 143 80 7 181 66 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 66 57 10 42 28 14 24 143 80 7 181 66 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 66 57 10 42 28 14 24 147 80 7 185 66 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 66 57 10 42 28 14 24 147 80 7 185 66 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 66 57 10 42 28 14 24 147 80 7 185 66 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 66 57 10 42 28 14 24 147 80 7 185 66 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.65 0.35 1.00 0.74 0.26 Final Sat.: 1600 3400 1700 1600 3400 1700 1600 1036 564 1600 1179 421 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.16 0.16 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** EX WP PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:01 Page 10-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 5th Street at Marina Drive Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.335 Loss Time (sec): 0 Average Delay (sec/veh): 9.2 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************* Street Name: 5th Street Marina Drive Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 6 30 19 32 51 40 27 127 8 32 165 60 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 6 30 19 32 51 40 27 127 8 32 165 60 Added Vol: 0 16 0 0 15 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 6 46 19 32 66 44 31 127 8 32 165 60 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 6 46 19 32 66 44 31 127 8 32 165 60 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 6 46 19 32 66 44 31 127 8 32 165 60 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 6 46 19 32 66 44 31 127 8 32 165 60 Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.08 0.65 0.27 0.33 0.67 1.00 0.19 0.76 0.05 0.12 0.65 0.23 Final Sat.: 56 429 177 195 401 696 136 555 35 96 493 179 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.16 0.16 0.06 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.33 0.33 0.33 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 8.6 8.6 8.6 9.4 9.4 7.8 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.7 9.7 9.7 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 8.6 8.6 8.6 9.4 9.4 7.8 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.7 9.7 9.7 LOS by Move: A A A A A A A A A A A A Approach Del: 8.6 8.9 9.1 9.7 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 8.6 8.9 9.1 9.7 LOS by Appr: A A A A AllWayAvgQ: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.5 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. **************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ OY AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:03 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scenario Report Scenario: Command: Volume: Geometry: Impact Fee: Trip Generation: Trip Distribution: Paths: Routes: Configuration: OY AM OY AM OY AM EXISTING Default Impact Fee None None Default Path Default Route OY OY AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:03 Page 2-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C # 1 Pacific Coast Highway at 1st S C xxxxx 0.724 C xxxxx 0.744 + 0.020 V/C # 2 Pacific Coast Highway at Marvi C xxxxx 0.758 C xxxxx 0.772 + 0.014 V/C # 3 Pacific Coast Highway at Bolsa B xxxxx 0.699 C xxxxx 0.723 + 0.024 V/C # 4 Pacific Coast Highway at Balbo C xxxxx 0.741 C xxxxx 0.755 + 0.013 V/C # 5 1st Street at Marina Drive A xxxxx 0.249 A xxxxx 0.252 + 0.003 V/C # 6 5th Street at Marina Drive A 8.1 0.222 A 8.2 0.226 + 0.004 V/C Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ OY AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:03 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Pacific Coast Highway at Ist Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.744 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 56 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************* Street Name: Pacific Coast Highway 1st Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 19 1671 0 0 1698 50 165 0 52 2 0 1 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 19 1704 0 0 1732 51 168 0 53 2 0 1 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cumulative 0 52 0 0 49 5 11 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 19 1756 0 0 1781 56 179 0 53 2 0 1 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 19 1756 0 0 1781 56 179 0 53 2 0 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 19 1756 0 0 1781 56 179 0 53 2 0 1 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 19 1756 0 0 1781 56 179 0 53 2 0 1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 0.97 1.00 0.94 0.97 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.94 0.06 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.67 0.00 0.33 Final Sat.: 1600 3300 0 1600 3202 98 3200 0 1600 1133 0 567 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.57 0.06 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** OY AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:03 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Pacific Coast Highway at Marvista Dr/5th Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.772 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 61 Level Of Service: C ****************************************************************************** Street Name: Pacific Coast Highway Marvista Drive/5th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 11 1550 1 14 1692 43 90 12 25 10 16 68 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 11 1581 1 14 1726 44 92 12 26 10 16 69 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cumulative 0 46 0 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 11 1627 1 14 1771 44 92 12 26 10 16 69 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 11 1627 1 14 1771 44 92 12 26 10 16 69 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 11 1627 1 14 1771 44 92 12 26 10 16 69 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 11 1627 1 14 1771 44 92 12 26 10 16 69 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 0.97 0.94 0.94 0.97 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.95 0.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.38 0.62 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3298 2 1600 3223 77 1600 1700 1700 654 1046 1700 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.49 0.51 0.01 0.55 0.57 0.06 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.04 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ OY AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:03 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Pacific Coast Highway at Bolsa Avenue/Main Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.723 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 53 Level Of Service: C ****************************************************************************** Street Name: Bolsa Avenue/Main Street Pacific Coast Highway Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Ovl Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 43 34 46 16 37 116 91 1622 59 41 1534 7 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 44 35 47 16 38 118 93 1654 60 42 1565 7 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cumulative 6 0 0 0 0 0 11 38 4 0 43 0 Initial Fut: 50 35 47 16 38 118 104 1692 64 42 1608 7 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 50 35 47 16 38 118 104 1692 64 42 1608 7 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 50 35 47 16 38 118 104 1692 64 42 1608 7 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 50 35 47 16 38 118 104 1692 64 42 1608 7 OvlAdjVol: 8 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.97 0.94 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 Final Sat.: 1600 1700 1700 1600 1700 1700 1600 3400 1700 1600 3286 14 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.07 0.06 0.50 0.04 0.03 0.49 0.50 OvlAdjV/S: 0.00 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** OY AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:03 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Pacific Coast Highway at Balboa Drive/12th Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.755 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 58 Level Of Service: C ****************************************************************************** Street Name: Balboa Drive/12th Street Pacific Coast Highway Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 49 56 37 39 26 29 36 1655 11 21 1589 5 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 50 57 38 40 27 30 37 1688 11 21 1621 5 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cumulative 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 0 0 43 0 Initial Fut: 50 57 38 40 27 30 37 1726 11 21 1664 5 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 50 57 38 40 27 30 37 1726 11 21 1664 5 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 50 57 38 40 27 30 37 1726 11 21 1664 5 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 50 57 38 40 27 30 37 1726 11 21 1664 5 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.97 0.94 Lanes: 0.35 0.39 0.26 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 Final Sat.: 587 670 443 1600 1700 1700 1600 3400 1700 1600 3290 10 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.09 0.09 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.51 0.01 0.01 0.51 0.52 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ OY AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:03 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 lst Street at Marina Drive Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.252 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 24 Level Of Service: A Street Name: 1st Street Marina Drive Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 46 35 7 30 17 16 9 75 24 8 109 62 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 47 36 7 31 17 16 9 77 24 8 111 63 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 4 4 0 2 1 3 3 0 2 1 0 Initial Fut: 47 40 11 31 19 17 12 80 24 10 112 63 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 47 40 11 31 19 17 12 80 24 10 112 63 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 47 40 11 31 19 17 12 80 24 10 112 63 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 47 40 11 31 19 17 12 80 24 10 112 63 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.76 0.24 1.00 0.64 0.36 Final Sat.: 1600 3400 1700 1600 3400 1700 1600 1223 377 1600 1023 577 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.06 0.01 0.11 0.11 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** OY AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:03 Page 8-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 5th Street at Marina Drive Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.226 Loss Time (sec): 0 Average Delay (sec/veh): 8.2 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************* Street Name: 5th Street Marina Drive Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 1 35 17 19 34 17 12 78 6 11 114 60 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 1 36 17 19 35 17 12 80 6 11 116 61 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 3 0 Initial Fut: 1 36 17 19 35 17 12 88 6 11 119 61 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 1 36 17 19 35 17 12 88 6 11 119 61 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 1 36 17 19 35 17 12 88 6 11 119 61 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 1 36 17 19 35 17 12 88 6 11 119 61 Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.02 0.66 0.32 0.36 0.64 1.00 0.11 0.83 0.06 0.06 0.62 0.32 Final Sat.: 14 494 240 229 411 759 92 658 46 50 528 271 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.02 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.23 0.23 0.23 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 7.9 7.9 7.9 8.5 8.5 7.3 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.3 8.3 8.3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 7.9 7.9 7.9 8.5 8.5 7.3 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.3 8.3 8.3 LOS by Move: A A A A A A A A A A A A Approach Del: 7.9 8.2 8.0 8.3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 7.9 8.2 8.0 8.3 LOS by Appr: A A A A AllWayAvgQ: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. **************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ OY PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:06 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scenario Report Scenario: Command: Volume: Geometry: Impact Fee: Trip Generation: Trip Distribution: Paths: Routes: Configuration: OY PM OY PM OY PM EXISTING Default Impact Fee None None Default Path Default Route OY OY PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:06 Page 2-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C # 1 Pacific Coast Highway at 1st S B xxxxx 0.692 C xxxxx 0.730 + 0.038 V/C # 2 Pacific Coast Highway at Marvi C xxxxx 0.710 C xxxxx 0.738 + 0.028 V/C # 3 Pacific Coast Highway at Bolsa B xxxxx 0.654 B xxxxx 0.698 + 0.044 V/C # 4 Pacific Coast Highway at Balbo B xxxxx 0.697 C xxxxx 0.721 + 0.024 V/C # 5 1st Street at Marina Drive A xxxxx 0.323 A xxxxx 0.328 + 0.005 V/C # 6 5th Street at Marina Drive A 9.1 0.333 A 9.2 0.346 + 0.013 V/C Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ OY PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:06 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Pacific Coast Highway at Ist Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.730 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 54 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************* Street Name: Pacific Coast Highway 1st Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 35 1458 0 5 1518 125 143 0 37 0 0 1 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 36 1487 0 5 1548 128 146 0 38 0 0 1 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cumulative 0 88 0 0 97 13 10 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 36 1575 0 5 1645 141 156 0 38 0 0 1 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 36 1575 0 5 1645 141 156 0 38 0 0 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 36 1575 0 5 1645 141 156 0 38 0 0 1 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 36 1575 0 5 1645 141 156 0 38 0 0 1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 0.97 1.00 0.94 0.97 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.84 0.16 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3300 0 1600 3048 252 3200 0 1600 0 0 1700 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.56 0.05 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** OY PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:06 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Pacific Coast Highway at Marvista Dr/5th Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.738 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 55 Level Of Service: C ****************************************************************************** Street Name: Pacific Coast Highway Marvista Drive/5th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 31 1319 5 72 1431 113 113 24 33 10 19 44 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 32 1345 5 73 1460 115 115 24 34 10 19 45 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cumulative 0 78 0 0 89 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 32 1423 5 73 1549 115 115 24 34 10 19 45 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 32 1423 5 73 1549 115 115 24 34 10 19 45 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 32 1423 5 73 1549 115 115 24 34 10 19 45 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 32 1423 5 73 1549 115 115 24 34 10 19 45 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 0.97 0.94 0.94 0.97 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.86 0.14 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.34 0.66 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3289 11 1600 3078 222 1600 1700 1700 586 1114 1700 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.43 0.45 0.05 0.50 0.52 0.07 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.03 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ OY PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:06 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Pacific Coast Highway at Bolsa Avenue/Main Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.698 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 50 Level Of Service: B ****************************************************************************** Street Name: Bolsa Avenue/Main Street Pacific Coast Highway Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Ovl Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 70 50 69 21 43 159 112 1374 101 92 1270 23 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 71 51 70 21 44 162 114 1401 103 94 1295 23 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cumulative 10 0 0 0 0 0 21 64 8 0 78 0 Initial Fut: 81 51 70 21 44 162 135 1465 111 94 1373 23 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 81 51 70 21 44 162 135 1465 111 94 1373 23 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 81 51 70 21 44 162 135 1465 111 94 1373 23 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 81 51 70 21 44 162 135 1465 111 94 1373 23 OvlAdjVol: 18 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.97 0.94 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.97 0.03 Final Sat.: 1600 1700 1700 1600 1700 1700 1600 3400 1700 1600 3246 54 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.03 0.04 0.01 0.03 0.10 0.08 0.43 0.07 0.06 0.42 0.44 OvlAdjV/S: 0.01 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** OY PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:06 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Pacific Coast Highway at Balboa Drive/12th Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.721 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 53 Level Of Service: C ****************************************************************************** Street Name: Balboa Drive/12th Street Pacific Coast Highway Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 77 45 42 41 64 25 43 1350 47 27 1378 18 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 79 46 43 42 65 26 44 1377 48 28 1406 18 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cumulative 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 78 0 Initial Fut: 79 46 43 42 65 26 44 1441 48 28 1484 18 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 79 46 43 42 65 26 44 1441 48 28 1484 18 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 79 46 43 42 65 26 44 1441 48 28 1484 18 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 79 46 43 42 65 26 44 1441 48 28 1484 18 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.97 0.94 Lanes: 0.47 0.27 0.26 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.98 0.02 Final Sat.: 798 466 435 1600 1700 1700 1600 3400 1700 1600 3261 39 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.42 0.03 0.02 0.45 0.47 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ OY PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:06 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 lst Street at Marina Drive Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.328 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 26 Level Of Service: A Street Name: 1st Street Marina Drive Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 66 57 10 42 28 14 24 143 80 7 181 66 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 67 58 10 43 29 14 24 146 82 7 185 67 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cumulative 0 3 3 0 5 4 2 2 0 5 4 0 Initial Fut: 67 61 13 43 34 18 26 148 82 12 189 67 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 67 61 13 43 34 18 26 148 82 12 189 67 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 67 61 13 43 34 18 26 148 82 12 189 67 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 67 61 13 43 34 18 26 148 82 12 189 67 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.64 0.36 1.00 0.74 0.26 Final Sat.: 1600 3400 1700 1600 3400 1700 1600 1031 569 1600 1179 421 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.14 0.14 0.01 0.16 0.16 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** OY PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:06 Page 8-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 5th Street at Marina Drive Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.346 Loss Time (sec): 0 Average Delay (sec/veh): 9.2 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************* Street Name: 5th Street Marina Drive Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 6 30 19 32 51 40 27 127 8 32 165 60 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 6 31 19 33 52 41 28 130 8 33 168 61 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 9 0 Initial Fut: 6 31 19 33 52 41 28 135 8 33 177 61 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 6 31 19 33 52 41 28 135 8 33 177 61 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 6 31 19 33 52 41 28 135 8 33 177 61 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 6 31 19 33 52 41 28 135 8 33 177 61 Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.11 0.54 0.35 0.39 0.61 1.00 0.16 0.79 0.05 0.12 0.65 0.23 Final Sat.: 72 362 229 228 363 692 120 586 36 94 512 177 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.14 0.14 0.06 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.35 0.35 0.35 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 8.4 8.4 8.4 9.3 9.3 7.8 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.7 9.7 9.7 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 8.4 8.4 8.4 9.3 9.3 7.8 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.7 9.7 9.7 LOS by Move: A A A A A A A A A A A A Approach Del: 8.4 8.8 9.0 9.7 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 8.4 8.8 9.0 9.7 LOS by Appr: A A A A AllWayAvgQ: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.5 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. **************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ OY WP AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:08 Page 1-1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scenario Report Scenario: OY WP AM Command: OY WP AM Volume: OY AM Geometry: EXISTING Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: Project AM Trip Distribution: Project Paths: Default Path Routes: Default Route Configuration: OY OY WP AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:08 Page 2-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trip Generation Report Forecast for PROJECT AM Zone Rate Rate Trips Trips Total o Of # Subzone Amount Units In Out In Out Trips Total ------------------------------------- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- 1 PROJECT 1.00 PROJECT 71.00 69.00 71 69 140 70.0 Zone 1 Subtotal ............................. 71 69 140 70.0 2 Pass -By 1.00 Pass -By 31.00 29.00 31 29 60 30.0 Zone 2 Subtotal ............................. 31 29 60 30.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL.................................................. 102 98 200 100.0 Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ OY WP AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:08 Page 3-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trip Distribution Report Percent Of Trips PROJECT To Gates 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Zone----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1 35.0 5.0 20.0 5.0 35.0 0.0 0.0 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 OY WP AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:08 Page 4-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C # 1 Pacific Coast Highway at 1st S C xxxxx 0.724 C xxxxx 0.752 + 0.028 V/C # 2 Pacific Coast Highway at Marvi C xxxxx 0.758 D xxxxx 0.834 + 0.076 V/C # 3 Pacific Coast Highway at Bolsa B xxxxx 0.699 C xxxxx 0.731 + 0.032 V/C # 4 Pacific Coast Highway at Balbo C xxxxx 0.741 C xxxxx 0.762 + 0.021 V/C # 5 1st Street at Marina Drive A xxxxx 0.249 A xxxxx 0.254 + 0.005 V/C # 6 5th Street at Marina Drive A 8.1 0.222 A 8.3 0.232 + 0.010 V/C Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ OY WP AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:08 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Pacific Coast Highway at Ist Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.752 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 57 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************* Street Name: Pacific Coast Highway 1st Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 19 1671 0 0 1698 50 165 0 52 2 0 1 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 19 1704 0 0 1732 51 168 0 53 2 0 1 Added Vol: 0 24 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cumulative 0 52 0 0 49 5 11 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 19 1780 0 0 1806 56 179 0 53 2 0 1 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 19 1780 0 0 1806 56 179 0 53 2 0 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 19 1780 0 0 1806 56 179 0 53 2 0 1 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 19 1780 0 0 1806 56 179 0 53 2 0 1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 0.97 1.00 0.94 0.97 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.94 0.06 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.67 0.00 0.33 Final Sat.: 1600 3300 0 1600 3204 96 3200 0 1600 1133 0 567 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.58 0.06 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** OY WP AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:08 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Pacific Coast Highway at Marvista Dr/5th Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.834 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 75 Level Of Service: D ****************************************************************************** Street Name: Pacific Coast Highway Marvista Drive/5th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 11 1550 1 14 1692 43 90 12 25 10 16 68 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 11 1581 1 14 1726 44 92 12 26 10 16 69 Added Vol: 40 0 0 0 39 0 39 3 0 0 4 0 Cumulative 0 46 0 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 51 1627 1 14 1810 44 131 15 26 10 20 69 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 51 1627 1 14 1810 44 131 15 26 10 20 69 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 51 1627 1 14 1810 44 131 15 26 10 20 69 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 51 1627 1 14 1810 44 131 15 26 10 20 69 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 0.97 0.94 0.94 0.97 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.95 0.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.67 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3298 2 1600 3224 76 1600 1700 1700 568 1132 1700 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.49 0.51 0.01 0.56 0.58 0.08 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.04 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ OY WP AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:08 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Pacific Coast Highway at Bolsa Avenue/Main Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.731 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 54 Level Of Service: C ****************************************************************************** Street Name: Bolsa Avenue/Main Street Pacific Coast Highway Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Ovl Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 43 34 46 16 37 116 91 1622 59 41 1534 7 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 44 35 47 16 38 118 93 1654 60 42 1565 7 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 25 0 Cumulative 6 0 0 0 0 0 11 38 4 0 43 0 Initial Fut: 50 35 47 16 38 118 104 1716 64 42 1633 7 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 50 35 47 16 38 118 104 1716 64 42 1633 7 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 50 35 47 16 38 118 104 1716 64 42 1633 7 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 50 35 47 16 38 118 104 1716 64 42 1633 7 OvlAdjVol: 8 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.97 0.94 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 Final Sat.: 1600 1700 1700 1600 1700 1700 1600 3400 1700 1600 3286 14 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.07 0.06 0.50 0.04 0.03 0.50 0.51 OvlAdjV/S: 0.00 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** OY WP AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:08 Page 8-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Pacific Coast Highway at Balboa Drive/12th Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.762 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 59 Level Of Service: C ****************************************************************************** Street Name: Balboa Drive/12th Street Pacific Coast Highway Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 49 56 37 39 26 29 36 1655 11 21 1589 5 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 50 57 38 40 27 30 37 1688 11 21 1621 5 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 25 0 Cumulative 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 0 0 43 0 Initial Fut: 50 57 38 40 27 30 37 1750 11 21 1689 5 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 50 57 38 40 27 30 37 1750 11 21 1689 5 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 50 57 38 40 27 30 37 1750 11 21 1689 5 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 50 57 38 40 27 30 37 1750 11 21 1689 5 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.97 0.94 Lanes: 0.35 0.39 0.26 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 Final Sat.: 587 670 443 1600 1700 1700 1600 3400 1700 1600 3290 10 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.09 0.09 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.51 0.01 0.01 0.51 0.53 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ OY WP AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:08 Page 9-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 lst Street at Marina Drive Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.254 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 24 Level Of Service: A Street Name: 1st Street Marina Drive Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 46 35 7 30 17 16 9 75 24 8 109 62 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 47 36 7 31 17 16 9 77 24 8 111 63 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 PasserByVol: 0 4 4 0 2 1 3 3 0 2 1 0 Initial Fut: 47 40 11 31 19 17 12 84 24 10 115 63 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 47 40 11 31 19 17 12 84 24 10 115 63 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 47 40 11 31 19 17 12 84 24 10 115 63 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 47 40 11 31 19 17 12 84 24 10 115 63 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.77 0.23 1.00 0.65 0.35 Final Sat.: 1600 3400 1700 1600 3400 1700 1600 1237 363 1600 1033 567 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.07 0.01 0.11 0.11 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** OY WP AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:08 Page 10-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 5th Street at Marina Drive Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.232 Loss Time (sec): 0 Average Delay (sec/veh): 8.3 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************* Street Name: 5th Street Marina Drive Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 1 35 17 19 34 17 12 78 6 11 114 60 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 1 36 17 19 35 17 12 80 6 11 116 61 Added Vol: 0 14 0 0 14 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 3 0 Initial Fut: 1 50 17 19 49 20 16 88 6 11 119 61 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 1 50 17 19 49 20 16 88 6 11 119 61 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 1 50 17 19 49 20 16 88 6 11 119 61 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 1 50 17 19 49 20 16 88 6 11 119 61 Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.01 0.74 0.25 0.28 0.72 1.00 0.15 0.80 0.05 0.06 0.62 0.32 Final Sat.: 11 537 187 183 459 753 115 618 43 48 515 264 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.11 0.11 0.03 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.23 0.23 0.23 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.6 8.6 7.3 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.4 8.4 8.4 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.6 8.6 7.3 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.4 8.4 8.4 LOS by Move: A A A A A A A A A A A A Approach Del: 8.1 8.3 8.2 8.4 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 8.1 8.3 8.2 8.4 LOS by Appr: A A A A Al1WayAvgQ: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. **************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ OY WP PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:10 Page 1-1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scenario Report Scenario: OY WP PM Command: OY WP PM Volume: OY PM Geometry: EXISTING Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: Project PM Trip Distribution: Project Paths: Default Path Routes: Default Route Configuration: OY OY WP PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:10 Page 2-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trip Generation Report Forecast for PROJECT PM Zone Rate Rate Trips Trips Total o Of # Subzone Amount Units In Out In Out Trips Total ---- ------------ ------- -------------- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- 1 PROJECT 1.00 PROJECT 80.00 77.00 80 77 157 70.1 Zone 1 Subtotal ............................. 80 77 157 70.1 2 Pass -By 1.00 Pass -By 34.00 33.00 34 33 67 29.9 Zone 2 Subtotal ............................. 34 33 67 29.9 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL.................................................. 114 110 224 100.0 Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ OY WP PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:10 Page 3-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trip Distribution Report Percent Of Trips PROJECT To Gates 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Zone----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1 35.0 5.0 20.0 5.0 35.0 0.0 0.0 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 OY WP PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:11 Page 4-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C # 1 Pacific Coast Highway at 1st S B xxxxx 0.692 C xxxxx 0.738 + 0.046 V/C # 2 Pacific Coast Highway at Marvi C xxxxx 0.710 D xxxxx 0.807 + 0.096 V/C # 3 Pacific Coast Highway at Bolsa B xxxxx 0.654 C xxxxx 0.706 + 0.052 V/C # 4 Pacific Coast Highway at Balbo B xxxxx 0.697 C xxxxx 0.730 + 0.033 V/C # 5 1st Street at Marina Drive A xxxxx 0.323 A xxxxx 0.331 + 0.008 V/C # 6 5th Street at Marina Drive A 9.1 0.333 A 9.4 0.355 + 0.022 V/C Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ OY WP PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:11 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Pacific Coast Highway at Ist Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.738 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 55 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************* Street Name: Pacific Coast Highway 1st Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 35 1458 0 5 1518 125 143 0 37 0 0 1 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 36 1487 0 5 1548 128 146 0 38 0 0 1 Added Vol: 0 27 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cumulative 0 88 0 0 97 13 10 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 36 1602 0 5 1673 141 156 0 38 0 0 1 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 36 1602 0 5 1673 141 156 0 38 0 0 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 36 1602 0 5 1673 141 156 0 38 0 0 1 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 36 1602 0 5 1673 141 156 0 38 0 0 1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 0.97 1.00 0.94 0.97 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.85 0.15 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3300 0 1600 3052 248 3200 0 1600 0 0 1700 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.57 0.05 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** OY WP PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:11 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Pacific Coast Highway at Marvista Dr/5th Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.807 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 68 Level Of Service: D ****************************************************************************** Street Name: Pacific Coast Highway Marvista Drive/5th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 31 1319 5 72 1431 113 113 24 33 10 19 44 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 32 1345 5 73 1460 115 115 24 34 10 19 45 Added Vol: 45 0 0 0 43 0 43 4 0 0 4 0 Cumulative 0 78 0 0 89 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 77 1423 5 73 1592 115 158 28 34 10 23 45 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 77 1423 5 73 1592 115 158 28 34 10 23 45 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 77 1423 5 73 1592 115 158 28 34 10 23 45 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 77 1423 5 73 1592 115 158 28 34 10 23 45 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 0.97 0.94 0.94 0.97 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.86 0.14 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.30 0.70 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3289 11 1600 3084 216 1600 1700 1700 516 1184 1700 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.43 0.45 0.05 0.52 0.53 0.10 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.03 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ OY WP PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:11 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Pacific Coast Highway at Bolsa Avenue/Main Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.706 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 51 Level Of Service: C ****************************************************************************** Street Name: Bolsa Avenue/Main Street Pacific Coast Highway Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Ovl Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 70 50 69 21 43 159 112 1374 101 92 1270 23 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 71 51 70 21 44 162 114 1401 103 94 1295 23 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 28 0 Cumulative 10 0 0 0 0 0 21 64 8 0 78 0 Initial Fut: 81 51 70 21 44 162 135 1492 111 94 1401 23 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 81 51 70 21 44 162 135 1492 111 94 1401 23 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 81 51 70 21 44 162 135 1492 111 94 1401 23 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 81 51 70 21 44 162 135 1492 111 94 1401 23 OvlAdjVol: 18 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.97 0.94 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.97 0.03 Final Sat.: 1600 1700 1700 1600 1700 1700 1600 3400 1700 1600 3247 53 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.03 0.04 0.01 0.03 0.10 0.08 0.44 0.07 0.06 0.43 0.45 OvlAdjV/S: 0.01 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** OY WP PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:11 Page 8-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Pacific Coast Highway at Balboa Drive/12th Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.730 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 54 Level Of Service: C ****************************************************************************** Street Name: Balboa Drive/12th Street Pacific Coast Highway Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 77 45 42 41 64 25 43 1350 47 27 1378 18 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 79 46 43 42 65 26 44 1377 48 28 1406 18 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 28 0 Cumulative 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 78 0 Initial Fut: 79 46 43 42 65 26 44 1468 48 28 1512 18 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 79 46 43 42 65 26 44 1468 48 28 1512 18 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 79 46 43 42 65 26 44 1468 48 28 1512 18 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 79 46 43 42 65 26 44 1468 48 28 1512 18 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.97 0.94 Lanes: 0.47 0.27 0.26 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.98 0.02 Final Sat.: 798 466 435 1600 1700 1700 1600 3400 1700 1600 3262 38 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.43 0.03 0.02 0.46 0.48 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ OY WP PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:11 Page 9-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 lst Street at Marina Drive Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.331 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 26 Level Of Service: A Street Name: 1st Street Marina Drive Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 66 57 10 42 28 14 24 143 80 7 181 66 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 67 58 10 43 29 14 24 146 82 7 185 67 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 Cumulative 0 3 3 0 5 4 2 2 0 5 4 0 Initial Fut: 67 61 13 43 34 18 26 152 82 12 193 67 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 67 61 13 43 34 18 26 152 82 12 193 67 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 67 61 13 43 34 18 26 152 82 12 193 67 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 67 61 13 43 34 18 26 152 82 12 193 67 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.65 0.35 1.00 0.74 0.26 Final Sat.: 1600 3400 1700 1600 3400 1700 1600 1041 559 1600 1186 414 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.15 0.15 0.01 0.16 0.16 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** OY WP PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:11 Page 10-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 5th Street at Marina Drive Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.355 Loss Time (sec): 0 Average Delay (sec/veh): 9.4 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************* Street Name: 5th Street Marina Drive Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 6 30 19 32 51 40 27 127 8 32 165 60 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 6 31 19 33 52 41 28 130 8 33 168 61 Added Vol: 0 16 0 0 15 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 9 0 Initial Fut: 6 47 19 33 67 45 32 135 8 33 177 61 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 6 47 19 33 67 45 32 135 8 33 177 61 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 6 47 19 33 67 45 32 135 8 33 177 61 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 6 47 19 33 67 45 32 135 8 33 177 61 Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.08 0.65 0.27 0.33 0.67 1.00 0.18 0.77 0.05 0.12 0.65 0.23 Final Sat.: 55 421 175 193 396 685 131 557 34 92 499 172 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.17 0.17 0.07 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.36 0.36 0.36 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 8.7 8.7 8.7 9.5 9.5 7.9 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.9 9.9 9.9 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 8.7 8.7 8.7 9.5 9.5 7.9 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.9 9.9 9.9 LOS by Move: A A A A A A A A A A A A Approach Del: 8.7 9.0 9.2 9.9 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 8.7 9.0 9.2 9.9 LOS by Appr: A A A A Al1WayAvgQ: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.5 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. **************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ BO AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:13 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scenario Report Scenario: Command: Volume: Geometry: Impact Fee: Trip Generation: Trip Distribution: Paths: Routes: Configuration: BO AM BO AM BO AM EXISTING Default Impact Fee None None Default Path Default Route BO BO AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:13 Page 2-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C # 1 Pacific Coast Highway at 1st S C xxxxx 0.782 C xxxxx 0.782 + 0.000 V/C # 2 Pacific Coast Highway at Marvi D xxxxx 0.820 D xxxxx 0.820 + 0.000 V/C # 3 Pacific Coast Highway at Bolsa C xxxxx 0.755 C xxxxx 0.755 + 0.000 V/C # 4 Pacific Coast Highway at Balbo D xxxxx 0.801 D xxxxx 0.801 + 0.000 V/C # 5 1st Street at Marina Drive A xxxxx 0.263 A xxxxx 0.263 + 0.000 V/C # 6 5th Street at Marina Drive A 8.3 0.246 A 8.3 0.246 + 0.000 V/C Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ BO AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:13 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Pacific Coast Highway at Ist Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.782 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 63 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************* Street Name: Pacific Coast Highway 1st Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 19 1671 0 0 1698 50 165 0 52 2 0 1 Growth Adj: 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 Initial Bse: 21 1865 0 0 1895 56 184 0 58 2 0 1 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 21 1865 0 0 1895 56 184 0 58 2 0 1 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 21 1865 0 0 1895 56 184 0 58 2 0 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 21 1865 0 0 1895 56 184 0 58 2 0 1 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 21 1865 0 0 1895 56 184 0 58 2 0 1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 0.97 1.00 0.94 0.97 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.94 0.06 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.67 0.00 0.33 Final Sat.: 1600 3300 0 1600 3208 92 3200 0 1600 1133 0 567 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.61 0.06 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** BO AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:13 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Pacific Coast Highway at Marvista Dr/5th Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.820 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 71 Level Of Service: D ****************************************************************************** Street Name: Pacific Coast Highway Marvista Drive/5th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 11 1550 1 14 1692 43 90 12 25 10 16 68 Growth Adj: 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 Initial Bse: 12 1730 1 16 1888 48 100 13 28 11 18 76 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 12 1730 1 16 1888 48 100 13 28 11 18 76 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 12 1730 1 16 1888 48 100 13 28 11 18 76 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 12 1730 1 16 1888 48 100 13 28 11 18 76 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 12 1730 1 16 1888 48 100 13 28 11 18 76 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 0.97 0.94 0.94 0.97 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.95 0.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.38 0.62 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3298 2 1600 3221 79 1600 1700 1700 654 1046 1700 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.52 0.54 0.01 0.59 0.61 0.06 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.04 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ BO AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:13 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Pacific Coast Highway at Bolsa Avenue/Main Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.755 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 58 Level Of Service: C ****************************************************************************** Street Name: Bolsa Avenue/Main Street Pacific Coast Highway Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Ovl Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 43 34 46 16 37 116 91 1622 59 41 1534 7 Growth Adj: 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 Initial Bse: 48 38 51 18 41 129 102 1810 66 46 1712 8 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 48 38 51 18 41 129 102 1810 66 46 1712 8 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 48 38 51 18 41 129 102 1810 66 46 1712 8 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 48 38 51 18 41 129 102 1810 66 46 1712 8 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 48 38 51 18 41 129 102 1810 66 46 1712 8 OvlAdjVol: 22 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.97 0.94 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 Final Sat.: 1600 1700 1700 1600 1700 1700 1600 3400 1700 1600 3285 15 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.06 0.53 0.04 0.03 0.52 0.54 OvlAdjV/S: 0.01 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** BO AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:13 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Pacific Coast Highway at Balboa Drive/12th Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.801 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 67 Level Of Service: D ****************************************************************************** Street Name: Balboa Drive/12th Street Pacific Coast Highway Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 49 56 37 39 26 29 36 1655 11 21 1589 5 Growth Adj: 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 Initial Bse: 55 62 41 44 29 32 40 1847 12 23 1773 6 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 55 62 41 44 29 32 40 1847 12 23 1773 6 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 55 62 41 44 29 32 40 1847 12 23 1773 6 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 55 62 41 44 29 32 40 1847 12 23 1773 6 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 55 62 41 44 29 32 40 1847 12 23 1773 6 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.97 0.94 Lanes: 0.35 0.39 0.26 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 Final Sat.: 587 670 443 1600 1700 1700 1600 3400 1700 1600 3290 10 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.09 0.09 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.54 0.01 0.01 0.54 0.56 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ BO AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:13 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 lst Street at Marina Drive Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.263 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 24 Level Of Service: A Street Name: 1st Street Marina Drive Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 46 35 7 30 17 16 9 75 24 8 109 62 Growth Adj: 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 Initial Bse: 51 39 8 33 19 18 10 84 27 9 122 69 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 51 39 8 33 19 18 10 84 27 9 122 69 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 51 39 8 33 19 18 10 84 27 9 122 69 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 51 39 8 33 19 18 10 84 27 9 122 69 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 51 39 8 33 19 18 10 84 27 9 122 69 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.76 0.24 1.00 0.64 0.36 Final Sat.: 1600 3400 1700 1600 3400 1700 1600 1212 388 1600 1020 580 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.07 0.01 0.12 0.12 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** BO AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:13 Page 8-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 5th Street at Marina Drive Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.246 Loss Time (sec): 0 Average Delay (sec/veh): 8.3 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************* Street Name: 5th Street Marina Drive Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 1 35 17 19 34 17 12 78 6 11 114 60 Growth Adj: 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 Initial Bse: 1 39 19 21 38 19 13 87 7 12 127 67 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 1 39 19 21 38 19 13 87 7 12 127 67 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 1 39 19 21 38 19 13 87 7 12 127 67 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 1 39 19 21 38 19 13 87 7 12 127 67 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 1 39 19 21 38 19 13 87 7 12 127 67 Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.02 0.66 0.32 0.36 0.64 1.00 0.13 0.81 0.06 0.06 0.62 0.32 Final Sat.: 14 488 237 227 407 750 98 638 49 50 518 273 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.03 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.25 0.25 0.25 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 7.9 7.9 7.9 8.6 8.6 7.3 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.5 8.5 8.5 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 7.9 7.9 7.9 8.6 8.6 7.3 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.5 8.5 8.5 LOS by Move: A A A A A A A A A A A A Approach Del: 7.9 8.3 8.1 8.5 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 7.9 8.3 8.1 8.5 LOS by Appr: A A A A AllWayAvgQ: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. **************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ BO PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:15 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scenario Report Scenario: Command: Volume: Geometry: Impact Fee: Trip Generation: Trip Distribution: Paths: Routes: Configuration: BO PM BO PM BO PM EXISTING Default Impact Fee None None Default Path Default Route BO BO PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:15 Page 2-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C # 1 Pacific Coast Highway at 1st S C xxxxx 0.748 C xxxxx 0.748 + 0.000 V/C # 2 Pacific Coast Highway at Marvi C xxxxx 0.768 C xxxxx 0.768 + 0.000 V/C # 3 Pacific Coast Highway at Bolsa C xxxxx 0.706 C xxxxx 0.706 + 0.000 V/C # 4 Pacific Coast Highway at Balbo C xxxxx 0.753 C xxxxx 0.753 + 0.000 V/C # 5 1st Street at Marina Drive A xxxxx 0.344 A xxxxx 0.344 + 0.000 V/C # 6 5th Street at Marina Drive A 9.5 0.371 A 9.5 0.371 + 0.000 V/C Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ BO PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:15 Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Pacific Coast Highway at Ist Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.748 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 57 Level Of Service: C Street Name: Pacific Coast Highway 1st Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 35 1458 0 5 1518 125 143 0 37 0 0 1 Growth Adj: 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 Initial Bse: 39 1627 0 6 1694 139 160 0 41 0 0 1 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 39 1627 0 6 1694 139 160 0 41 0 0 1 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 39 1627 0 6 1694 139 160 0 41 0 0 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 39 1627 0 6 1694 139 160 0 41 0 0 1 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 39 1627 0 6 1694 139 160 0 41 0 0 1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 0.97 1.00 0.94 0.97 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.85 0.15 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3300 0 1600 3057 243 3200 0 1600 0 0 1700 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.57 0.05 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** BO PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:15 Page 4-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Pacific Coast Highway at Marvista Dr/5th Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.768 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 60 Level Of Service: C ****************************************************************************** Street Name: Pacific Coast Highway Marvista Drive/5th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 31 1319 5 72 1431 113 113 24 33 10 19 44 Growth Adj: 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 Initial Bse: 35 1472 6 80 1597 126 126 27 37 11 21 49 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 35 1472 6 80 1597 126 126 27 37 11 21 49 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 35 1472 6 80 1597 126 126 27 37 11 21 49 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 35 1472 6 80 1597 126 126 27 37 11 21 49 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 35 1472 6 80 1597 126 126 27 37 11 21 49 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 0.97 0.94 0.94 0.97 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.85 0.15 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.34 0.66 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3288 12 1600 3066 234 1600 1700 1700 586 1114 1700 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.45 0.46 0.05 0.52 0.54 0.08 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.03 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ BO PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:15 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Pacific Coast Highway at Bolsa Avenue/Main Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.706 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 51 Level Of Service: C ****************************************************************************** Street Name: Bolsa Avenue/Main Street Pacific Coast Highway Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Ovl Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 70 50 69 21 43 159 112 1374 101 92 1270 23 Growth Adj: 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 Initial Bse: 78 56 77 23 48 177 125 1533 113 103 1417 26 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 78 56 77 23 48 177 125 1533 113 103 1417 26 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 78 56 77 23 48 177 125 1533 113 103 1417 26 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 78 56 77 23 48 177 125 1533 113 103 1417 26 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 78 56 77 23 48 177 125 1533 113 103 1417 26 OvlAdjVol: 45 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.97 0.94 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.96 0.04 Final Sat.: 1600 1700 1700 1600 1700 1700 1600 3400 1700 1600 3243 57 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.03 0.05 0.01 0.03 0.10 0.08 0.45 0.07 0.06 0.44 0.45 OvlAdjV/S: 0.03 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** BO PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:15 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Pacific Coast Highway at Balboa Drive/12th Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.753 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 58 Level Of Service: C ****************************************************************************** Street Name: Balboa Drive/12th Street Pacific Coast Highway Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 77 45 42 41 64 25 43 1350 47 27 1378 18 Growth Adj: 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 Initial Bse: 86 50 47 46 71 28 48 1506 52 30 1538 20 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 86 50 47 46 71 28 48 1506 52 30 1538 20 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 86 50 47 46 71 28 48 1506 52 30 1538 20 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 86 50 47 46 71 28 48 1506 52 30 1538 20 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 86 50 47 46 71 28 48 1506 52 30 1538 20 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.97 0.94 Lanes: 0.47 0.27 0.26 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.97 0.03 Final Sat.: 798 466 435 1600 1700 1700 1600 3400 1700 1600 3259 41 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.11 0.11 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.44 0.03 0.02 0.47 0.49 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ BO PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:15 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 lst Street at Marina Drive Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.344 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 26 Level Of Service: A Street Name: 1st Street Marina Drive Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 66 57 10 42 28 14 24 143 80 7 181 66 Growth Adj: 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 Initial Bse: 74 64 11 47 31 16 27 160 89 8 202 74 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 74 64 11 47 31 16 27 160 89 8 202 74 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 74 64 11 47 31 16 27 160 89 8 202 74 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 74 64 11 47 31 16 27 160 89 8 202 74 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 74 64 11 47 31 16 27 160 89 8 202 74 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.64 0.36 1.00 0.73 0.27 Final Sat.: 1600 3400 1700 1600 3400 1700 1600 1026 574 1600 1172 428 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.17 0.17 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** BO PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:15 Page 8-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 5th Street at Marina Drive Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.371 Loss Time (sec): 0 Average Delay (sec/veh): 9.5 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************* Street Name: 5th Street Marina Drive Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 6 30 19 32 51 40 27 127 8 32 165 60 Growth Adj: 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 Initial Bse: 7 33 21 36 57 45 30 142 9 36 184 67 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 7 33 21 36 57 45 30 142 9 36 184 67 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 7 33 21 36 57 45 30 142 9 36 184 67 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 7 33 21 36 57 45 30 142 9 36 184 67 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 7 33 21 36 57 45 30 142 9 36 184 67 Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.11 0.54 0.35 0.39 0.61 1.00 0.17 0.78 0.05 0.12 0.65 0.23 Final Sat.: 71 354 224 224 357 680 121 571 36 96 496 180 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.16 0.16 0.07 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.37 0.37 0.37 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.5 9.5 7.9 9.2 9.2 9.2 10.0 10.0 10.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.5 9.5 7.9 9.2 9.2 9.2 10.0 10.0 10.0 LOS by Move: A A A A A A A A A B B B Approach Del: 8.5 9.0 9.2 10.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 8.5 9.0 9.2 10.0 LOS by Appr: A A A B AllWayAvgQ: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.5 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. **************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ BO WP AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:17 Page 1-1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scenario Report Scenario: BO WP AM Command: BO WP AM Volume: BO AM Geometry: EXISTING Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: Project AM Trip Distribution: Project Paths: Default Path Routes: Default Route Configuration: BO BO WP AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:17 Page 2-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trip Generation Report Forecast for PROJECT AM Zone Rate Rate Trips Trips Total o Of # Subzone Amount Units In Out In Out Trips Total ------------------------------------- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- 1 PROJECT 1.00 PROJECT 71.00 69.00 71 69 140 70.0 Zone 1 Subtotal ............................. 71 69 140 70.0 2 Pass -By 1.00 Pass -By 31.00 29.00 31 29 60 30.0 Zone 2 Subtotal ............................. 31 29 60 30.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL.................................................. 102 98 200 100.0 Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ BO WP AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:17 Page 3-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trip Distribution Report Percent Of Trips PROJECT To Gates 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Zone----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1 35.0 5.0 20.0 5.0 35.0 0.0 0.0 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 BO WP AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:17 Page 4-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C # 1 Pacific Coast Highway at 1st S C xxxxx 0.782 C xxxxx 0.790 + 0.008 V/C # 2 Pacific Coast Highway at Marvi D xxxxx 0.820 D xxxxx 0.882 + 0.062 V/C # 3 Pacific Coast Highway at Bolsa C xxxxx 0.755 C xxxxx 0.763 + 0.008 V/C # 4 Pacific Coast Highway at Balbo D xxxxx 0.801 D xxxxx 0.809 + 0.008 V/C # 5 1st Street at Marina Drive A xxxxx 0.263 A xxxxx 0.265 + 0.002 V/C # 6 5th Street at Marina Drive A 8.3 0.246 A 8.4 0.252 + 0.007 V/C Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ BO WP AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:17 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Pacific Coast Highway at Ist Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.790 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 65 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************* Street Name: Pacific Coast Highway 1st Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 19 1671 0 0 1698 50 165 0 52 2 0 1 Growth Adj: 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 Initial Bse: 21 1865 0 0 1895 56 184 0 58 2 0 1 Added Vol: 0 24 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 21 1889 0 0 1920 56 184 0 58 2 0 1 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 21 1889 0 0 1920 56 184 0 58 2 0 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 21 1889 0 0 1920 56 184 0 58 2 0 1 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 21 1889 0 0 1920 56 184 0 58 2 0 1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 0.97 1.00 0.94 0.97 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.94 0.06 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.67 0.00 0.33 Final Sat.: 1600 3300 0 1600 3210 90 3200 0 1600 1133 0 567 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.62 0.06 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** BO WP AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:17 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Pacific Coast Highway at Marvista Dr/5th Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.882 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 92 Level Of Service: D ****************************************************************************** Street Name: Pacific Coast Highway Marvista Drive/5th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 11 1550 1 14 1692 43 90 12 25 10 16 68 Growth Adj: 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 Initial Bse: 12 1730 1 16 1888 48 100 13 28 11 18 76 Added Vol: 40 0 0 0 39 0 39 3 0 0 4 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 52 1730 1 16 1927 48 139 16 28 11 22 76 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 52 1730 1 16 1927 48 139 16 28 11 22 76 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 52 1730 1 16 1927 48 139 16 28 11 22 76 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 52 1730 1 16 1927 48 139 16 28 11 22 76 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 0.97 0.94 0.94 0.97 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.95 0.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.34 0.66 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3298 2 1600 3222 78 1600 1700 1700 575 1125 1700 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.52 0.54 0.01 0.60 0.62 0.09 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.04 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ BO WP AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:17 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Pacific Coast Highway at Bolsa Avenue/Main Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.763 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 59 Level Of Service: C ****************************************************************************** Street Name: Bolsa Avenue/Main Street Pacific Coast Highway Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Ovl Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 43 34 46 16 37 116 91 1622 59 41 1534 7 Growth Adj: 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 Initial Bse: 48 38 51 18 41 129 102 1810 66 46 1712 8 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 25 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 48 38 51 18 41 129 102 1834 66 46 1737 8 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 48 38 51 18 41 129 102 1834 66 46 1737 8 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 48 38 51 18 41 129 102 1834 66 46 1737 8 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 48 38 51 18 41 129 102 1834 66 46 1737 8 OvlAdjVol: 22 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.97 0.94 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 Final Sat.: 1600 1700 1700 1600 1700 1700 1600 3400 1700 1600 3286 14 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.06 0.54 0.04 0.03 0.53 0.55 OvlAdjV/S: 0.01 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** BO WP AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:17 Page 8-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Pacific Coast Highway at Balboa Drive/12th Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.809 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 69 Level Of Service: D ****************************************************************************** Street Name: Balboa Drive/12th Street Pacific Coast Highway Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 49 56 37 39 26 29 36 1655 11 21 1589 5 Growth Adj: 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 Initial Bse: 55 62 41 44 29 32 40 1847 12 23 1773 6 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 25 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 55 62 41 44 29 32 40 1871 12 23 1798 6 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 55 62 41 44 29 32 40 1871 12 23 1798 6 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 55 62 41 44 29 32 40 1871 12 23 1798 6 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 55 62 41 44 29 32 40 1871 12 23 1798 6 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.97 0.94 Lanes: 0.35 0.39 0.26 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 Final Sat.: 587 670 443 1600 1700 1700 1600 3400 1700 1600 3290 10 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.09 0.09 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.55 0.01 0.01 0.55 0.56 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ BO WP AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:17 Page 9-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 lst Street at Marina Drive Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.265 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 24 Level Of Service: A Street Name: 1st Street Marina Drive Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 46 35 7 30 17 16 9 75 24 8 109 62 Growth Adj: 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 Initial Bse: 51 39 8 33 19 18 10 84 27 9 122 69 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 51 39 8 33 19 18 10 88 27 9 125 69 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 51 39 8 33 19 18 10 88 27 9 125 69 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 51 39 8 33 19 18 10 88 27 9 125 69 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 51 39 8 33 19 18 10 88 27 9 125 69 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.77 0.23 1.00 0.64 0.36 Final Sat.: 1600 3400 1700 1600 3400 1700 1600 1226 374 1600 1029 571 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.07 0.01 0.12 0.12 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** BO WP AM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:17 Page 10-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 5th Street at Marina Drive Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.252 Loss Time (sec): 0 Average Delay (sec/veh): 8.4 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************* Street Name: 5th Street Marina Drive Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 1 35 17 19 34 17 12 78 6 11 114 60 Growth Adj: 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 Initial Bse: 1 39 19 21 38 19 13 87 7 12 127 67 Added Vol: 0 14 0 0 14 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 1 53 19 21 52 22 17 87 7 12 127 67 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 1 53 19 21 52 22 17 87 7 12 127 67 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 1 53 19 21 52 22 17 87 7 12 127 67 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 1 53 19 21 52 22 17 87 7 12 127 67 Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.01 0.73 0.26 0.29 0.71 1.00 0.16 0.78 0.06 0.06 0.62 0.32 Final Sat.: 11 527 188 184 450 744 120 599 46 49 505 266 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.12 0.12 0.03 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.25 0.25 0.25 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.8 8.8 7.4 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.6 8.6 8.6 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.8 8.8 7.4 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.6 8.6 8.6 LOS by Move: A A A A A A A A A A A A Approach Del: 8.1 8.4 8.3 8.6 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 8.1 8.4 8.3 8.6 LOS by Appr: A A A A Al1WayAvgQ: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. **************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ BO WP PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:19 Page 1-1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scenario Report Scenario: BO WP PM Command: BO WP PM Volume: BO PM Geometry: EXISTING Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: Project PM Trip Distribution: Project Paths: Default Path Routes: Default Route Configuration: BO BO WP PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:19 Page 2-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trip Generation Report Forecast for PROJECT PM Zone Rate Rate Trips Trips Total o Of # Subzone Amount Units In Out In Out Trips Total ---- ------------ ------- -------------- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- 1 PROJECT 1.00 PROJECT 80.00 77.00 80 77 157 70.1 Zone 1 Subtotal ............................. 80 77 157 70.1 2 Pass -By 1.00 Pass -By 34.00 33.00 34 33 67 29.9 Zone 2 Subtotal ............................. 34 33 67 29.9 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL.................................................. 114 110 224 100.0 Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ BO WP PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:19 Page 3-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trip Distribution Report Percent Of Trips PROJECT To Gates 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Zone----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1 35.0 5.0 20.0 5.0 35.0 0.0 0.0 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 BO WP PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:20 Page 4-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C # 1 Pacific Coast Highway at 1st S C xxxxx 0.748 C xxxxx 0.757 + 0.009 V/C # 2 Pacific Coast Highway at Marvi C xxxxx 0.768 D xxxxx 0.836 + 0.068 V/C # 3 Pacific Coast Highway at Bolsa C xxxxx 0.706 C xxxxx 0.715 + 0.009 V/C # 4 Pacific Coast Highway at Balbo C xxxxx 0.753 C xxxxx 0.762 + 0.009 V/C # 5 1st Street at Marina Drive A xxxxx 0.344 A xxxxx 0.347 + 0.003 V/C # 6 5th Street at Marina Drive A 9.5 0.371 A 9.7 0.382 + 0.010 V/C Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ BO WP PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:20 Page 5-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Pacific Coast Highway at Ist Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.757 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 58 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************* Street Name: Pacific Coast Highway 1st Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 35 1458 0 5 1518 125 143 0 37 0 0 1 Growth Adj: 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 Initial Bse: 39 1627 0 6 1694 139 160 0 41 0 0 1 Added Vol: 0 27 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 39 1654 0 6 1722 139 160 0 41 0 0 1 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 39 1654 0 6 1722 139 160 0 41 0 0 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 39 1654 0 6 1722 139 160 0 41 0 0 1 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 39 1654 0 6 1722 139 160 0 41 0 0 1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 0.97 1.00 0.94 0.97 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.85 0.15 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3300 0 1600 3060 240 3200 0 1600 0 0 1700 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.58 0.05 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** BO WP PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:20 Page 6-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Pacific Coast Highway at Marvista Dr/5th Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.836 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 76 Level Of Service: D ****************************************************************************** Street Name: Pacific Coast Highway Marvista Drive/5th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 31 1319 5 72 1431 113 113 24 33 10 19 44 Growth Adj: 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 Initial Bse: 35 1472 6 80 1597 126 126 27 37 11 21 49 Added Vol: 45 0 0 0 43 0 43 4 0 0 4 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 80 1472 6 80 1640 126 169 31 37 11 25 49 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 80 1472 6 80 1640 126 169 31 37 11 25 49 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 80 1472 6 80 1640 126 169 31 37 11 25 49 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 80 1472 6 80 1640 126 169 31 37 11 25 49 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 0.97 0.94 0.94 0.97 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.86 0.14 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.31 0.69 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3288 12 1600 3072 228 1600 1700 1700 522 1178 1700 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.45 0.46 0.05 0.53 0.55 0.11 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.03 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ BO WP PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:20 Page 7-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Pacific Coast Highway at Bolsa Avenue/Main Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.715 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 52 Level Of Service: C ****************************************************************************** Street Name: Bolsa Avenue/Main Street Pacific Coast Highway Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Ovl Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 70 50 69 21 43 159 112 1374 101 92 1270 23 Growth Adj: 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 Initial Bse: 78 56 77 23 48 177 125 1533 113 103 1417 26 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 28 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 78 56 77 23 48 177 125 1560 113 103 1445 26 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 78 56 77 23 48 177 125 1560 113 103 1445 26 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 78 56 77 23 48 177 125 1560 113 103 1445 26 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 78 56 77 23 48 177 125 1560 113 103 1445 26 OvlAdjVol: 45 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.97 0.94 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.97 0.03 Final Sat.: 1600 1700 1700 1600 1700 1700 1600 3400 1700 1600 3244 56 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.03 0.05 0.01 0.03 0.10 0.08 0.46 0.07 0.06 0.45 0.46 OvlAdjV/S: 0.03 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** BO WP PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:20 Page 8-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Pacific Coast Highway at Balboa Drive/12th Street Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.762 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 59 Level Of Service: C ****************************************************************************** Street Name: Balboa Drive/12th Street Pacific Coast Highway Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 77 45 42 41 64 25 43 1350 47 27 1378 18 Growth Adj: 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 Initial Bse: 86 50 47 46 71 28 48 1506 52 30 1538 20 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 28 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 86 50 47 46 71 28 48 1533 52 30 1566 20 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 86 50 47 46 71 28 48 1533 52 30 1566 20 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 86 50 47 46 71 28 48 1533 52 30 1566 20 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 86 50 47 46 71 28 48 1533 52 30 1566 20 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.97 0.94 Lanes: 0.47 0.27 0.26 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.97 0.03 Final Sat.: 798 466 435 1600 1700 1700 1600 3400 1700 1600 3259 41 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.11 0.11 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.45 0.03 0.02 0.48 0.50 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ BO WP PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:20 Page 9-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 lst Street at Marina Drive Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.347 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 27 Level Of Service: A Street Name: 1st Street Marina Drive Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 66 57 10 42 28 14 24 143 80 7 181 66 Growth Adj: 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 Initial Bse: 74 64 11 47 31 16 27 160 89 8 202 74 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 74 64 11 47 31 16 27 164 89 8 206 74 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 74 64 11 47 31 16 27 164 89 8 206 74 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 74 64 11 47 31 16 27 164 89 8 206 74 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 74 64 11 47 31 16 27 164 89 8 206 74 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.65 0.35 1.00 0.74 0.26 Final Sat.: 1600 3400 1700 1600 3400 1700 1600 1035 565 1600 1179 421 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.17 0.17 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** BO WP PM Thu Dec 14, 2017 17:24:20 Page 10-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 5th Street at Marina Drive Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.382 Loss Time (sec): 0 Average Delay (sec/veh): 9.7 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************* Street Name: 5th Street Marina Drive Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 6 30 19 32 51 40 27 127 8 32 165 60 Growth Adj: 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 Initial Bse: 7 33 21 36 57 45 30 142 9 36 184 67 Added Vol: 0 16 0 0 15 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 7 49 21 36 72 49 34 142 9 36 184 67 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 7 49 21 36 72 49 34 142 9 36 184 67 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 7 49 21 36 72 49 34 142 9 36 184 67 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 7 49 21 36 72 49 34 142 9 36 184 67 Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.09 0.64 0.27 0.33 0.67 1.00 0.18 0.77 0.05 0.12 0.65 0.23 Final Sat.: 55 407 175 192 387 673 131 543 34 94 482 175 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.19 0.19 0.07 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.38 0.38 0.38 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 8.8 8.8 8.8 9.8 9.8 8.0 9.5 9.5 9.5 10.3 10.3 10.3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 8.8 8.8 8.8 9.8 9.8 8.0 9.5 9.5 9.5 10.3 10.3 10.3 LOS by Move: A A A A A A A A A B B B Approach Del: 8.8 9.2 9.5 10.3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 8.8 9.2 9.5 10.3 LOS by Appr: A A A B Al1WayAvgQ: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.6 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. **************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ I Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K -H, PHOENIX, AZ HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Pacific Coast Highway & 1st Street Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s 1� 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 t 5.0 61.0 t 5.1 Traffic Volume (vehlh) 165 0 52 2 0 1 19 1671 0 0 1698 50 Future Volume (veh/h) 165 0 52 2 0 1 19 1671 0 0 1698 50 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 179 0 57 2 0 1 21 1816 0 0 1846 54 Adj No. of Lanes 2 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 277 0 128 5 0 2 40 2442 0 38 2420 70 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.69 Sat Flow, vehlh 3442 0 1583 1137 0 569 1774 3632 0 1774 3512 102 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 179 0 57 3 0 0 21 1816 0 0 926 974 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1721 0 1583 1706 0 0 1774 1770 0 1774 1770 1845 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.5 0.0 3.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.0 28.9 0.0 0.0 30.2 30.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.5 0.0 3.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.0 28.9 0.0 0.0 30.2 30.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.67 0.33 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.06 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 277 0 128 7 0 0 40 2442 0 38 1219 1271 V/C Ratio(X) 0.65 0.00 0.45 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.74 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.77 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 701 0 322 347 0 0 102 2442 0 100 1219 1271 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 39.4 0.0 38.8 43.9 0.0 0.0 42.7 8.7 0.0 0.0 9.0 9.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.5 0.0 2.4 38.4 0.0 0.0 9.9 2.1 0.0 0.0 4.5 4.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 2.2 0.0 1.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.6 14.6 0.0 0.0 15.9 17.0 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 41.9 0.0 41.2 82.3 0.0 0.0 52.7 10.8 0.0 0.0 13.5 13.5 LnGrp LOS D D F D B B B Approach Vol, veh/h 236 3 1837 1900 Approach Delay, s/veh 41.7 82.3 11.3 13.5 Approach LOS D F B B Timer Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.4 65.5 11.6 6.5 65.4 4.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 61.0 18.0 5.1 60.9 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 0.0 30.9 6.5 3.0 32.8 2.2 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.0 17.7 0.7 0.0 17.5 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 14.2 HCM 2010 LOS B Existing AM Synchro 9 Report Page 1 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2: Pacific Coast Highway & 5th Street/Marvista Drive Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s t r* 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 t 5.5 80.5 t 5.1 Traffic Volume (vehlh) 90 12 25 10 16 68 11 1550 1 14 1692 43 Future Volume (veh/h) 90 12 25 10 16 68 11 1550 1 14 1692 43 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 98 13 27 11 17 74 12 1685 1 15 1839 47 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 195 200 170 47 38 126 25 2719 2 31 2655 68 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.01 0.75 0.75 0.02 0.75 0.75 Sat Flow, vehlh 1300 1863 1583 90 356 1177 1774 3630 2 1774 3527 90 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 98 13 27 102 0 0 12 821 865 15 919 967 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1300 1863 1583 1622 0 0 1774 1770 1862 1774 1770 1847 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.5 0.7 1.7 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.7 23.3 23.3 0.9 28.7 29.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.9 0.7 1.7 6.3 0.0 0.0 0.7 23.3 23.3 0.9 28.7 29.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.11 0.73 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.05 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 195 200 170 211 0 0 25 1326 1395 31 1332 1391 V/C Ratio(X) 0.50 0.06 0.16 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.62 0.62 0.48 0.69 0.70 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 303 355 302 344 0 0 84 1326 1395 91 1332 1391 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.9 43.1 43.5 45.6 0.0 0.0 52.6 6.3 6.3 52.3 6.8 6.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.0 0.1 0.4 1.7 0.0 0.0 13.8 2.2 2.1 10.8 2.9 2.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 2.9 0.4 0.7 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 12.0 12.6 0.5 14.9 15.6 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 48.9 43.2 44.0 47.3 0.0 0.0 66.4 8.5 8.4 63.1 9.8 9.8 LnGrp LOS D D D D E A A E A A Approach Vol, veh/h 138 102 1698 1901 Approach Delay, s/veh 47.4 47.3 8.8 10.2 Approach LOS D D A B Timer Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.4 85.0 16.0 6.0 85.4 16.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.5 80.5 20.5 5.1 80.9 20.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 2.9 25.3 10.9 2.7 31.2 8.3 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.0 19.0 0.7 0.0 23.4 0.8 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 11.9 HCM 2010 LOS B Existing AM Synchro 9 Report Page 2 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 3: Main Street/Bolsa Avenue & Pacific Coast Highway Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s tt r* 4.5 t 4.5 4.5 t r* 8.6 t r* Traffic Volume (vehlh) 91 1622 59 41 1534 7 43 34 46 16 37 116 Future Volume (veh/h) 91 1622 59 41 1534 7 43 34 46 16 37 116 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 99 1763 64 45 1667 8 47 37 50 17 40 126 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 126 2170 971 100 2161 10 285 356 302 302 356 415 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.61 0.61 0.06 0.60 0.60 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow, vehlh 1774 3539 1583 1774 3612 17 1215 1863 1583 1305 1863 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 99 1763 64 45 816 859 47 37 50 17 40 126 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1860 1215 1863 1583 1305 1863 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.3 37.2 1.6 2.4 33.3 33.4 3.2 1.6 2.6 1.1 1.7 6.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.3 37.2 1.6 2.4 33.3 33.4 4.9 1.6 2.6 2.6 1.7 6.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 126 2170 971 100 1059 1113 285 356 302 302 356 415 V/C Ratio(X) 0.78 0.81 0.07 0.45 0.77 0.77 0.17 0.10 0.17 0.06 0.11 0.30 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 247 2901 1298 158 1361 1430 285 356 302 302 356 415 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 44.2 14.4 7.5 44.2 14.5 14.5 34.4 32.3 32.7 33.4 32.4 28.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 10.1 1.4 0.0 3.1 2.1 2.0 1.2 0.6 1.2 0.4 0.6 1.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 3.0 18.3 0.7 1.2 16.7 17.6 1.2 0.9 1.2 0.4 1.0 2.9 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 54.4 15.8 7.6 47.4 16.6 16.5 35.7 32.9 33.9 33.8 33.0 30.5 LnGrp LOS D B A D B B D C C C C C Approach Vol, veh/h 1926 1720 134 183 Approach Delay, s/veh 17.5 17.4 34.3 31.4 Approach LOS B B C C Timer Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.0 10.0 63.9 23.0 11.4 62.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.5 8.6 79.4 18.5 13.5 74.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 6.9 4.4 39.2 8.2 7.3 35.4 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.9 3.4 20.2 0.9 0.1 17.0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 18.6 HCM 2010 LOS B Existing AM Synchro 9 Report Page 3 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 4: 12th Street/Balboa Drive & Pacific Coast Highway Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s tt r* 4.5 t 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.5 5.9 t r* Traffic Volume (vehlh) 36 1655 11 21 1589 5 49 56 37 39 26 29 Future Volume (veh/h) 36 1655 11 21 1589 5 49 56 37 39 26 29 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 39 1799 12 23 1727 5 53 61 40 42 28 32 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 112 2210 989 42 2119 6 144 159 89 331 395 336 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.62 0.62 0.02 0.59 0.59 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 Sat Flow, vehlh 1774 3539 1583 1774 3620 10 443 752 419 1288 1863 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 39 1799 12 23 844 888 154 0 0 42 28 32 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1861 1615 0 0 1288 1863 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.0 37.5 0.3 1.2 36.6 36.6 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 1.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.0 37.5 0.3 1.2 36.6 36.6 7.7 0.0 0.0 3.1 1.2 1.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.01 0.34 0.26 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 112 2210 989 42 1036 1089 392 0 0 331 395 336 V/C Ratio(X) 0.35 0.81 0.01 0.54 0.81 0.82 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.07 0.10 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 138 2933 1312 108 1437 1511 392 0 0 331 395 336 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 43.4 13.9 6.9 46.7 15.9 15.9 32.9 0.0 0.0 31.2 30.5 30.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.9 1.4 0.0 10.4 2.6 2.5 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.3 0.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.1 18.4 0.1 0.7 18.3 19.3 3.9 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.6 0.7 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 45.2 15.2 6.9 57.1 18.5 18.4 35.9 0.0 0.0 32.0 30.8 31.2 LnGrp LOS D B A E B B D C C C Approach Vol, veh/h 1850 1755 154 102 Approach Delay, s/veh 15.8 19.0 35.9 31.4 Approach LOS B B D C Timer Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 25.0 6.8 64.9 25.0 10.6 61.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.5 5.9 80.1 20.5 7.5 78.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 9.7 3.2 39.5 5.1 4.0 38.6 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.9 0.0 20.8 1.1 3.0 18.0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 18.5 HCM 2010 LOS B Existing AM Synchro 9 Report Page 4 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Pacific Coast Highway & 1st Street Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s 1� 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 t 5.0 61.0 t 5.1 Traffic Volume (vehlh) 143 0 37 0 0 1 35 1458 0 5 1518 125 Future Volume (veh/h) 143 0 37 0 0 1 35 1458 0 5 1518 125 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 155 0 40 0 0 1 38 1585 0 5 1650 136 Adj No. of Lanes 2 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 248 0 114 0 0 2 61 2442 0 59 2283 186 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.69 0.00 0.03 0.69 0.69 Sat Flow, veh/h 3442 0 1583 0 0 1583 1774 3632 0 1774 3314 271 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 155 0 40 0 0 1 38 1585 0 5 874 912 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1721 0 1583 0 0 1583 1774 1770 0 1774 1770 1815 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.9 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.9 22.2 0.0 0.2 26.8 27.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.9 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.9 22.2 0.0 0.2 26.8 27.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.15 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 248 0 114 0 0 2 61 2442 0 59 1219 1250 V/C Ratio(X) 0.63 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.62 0.65 0.00 0.08 0.72 0.73 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 701 0 322 0 0 322 102 2442 0 100 1219 1250 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 39.9 0.0 39.1 0.0 0.0 44.1 42.1 7.7 0.0 41.4 8.5 8.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.6 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 106.2 10.0 1.4 0.0 0.6 3.6 3.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.9 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.1 11.0 0.0 0.1 14.1 15.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 42.5 0.0 40.9 0.0 0.0 150.3 52.2 9.1 0.0 42.1 12.1 12.4 LnGrp LOS D D F D A D B B Approach Vol, veh/h 195 1 1623 1791 Approach Delay, s/veh 42.1 150.3 10.1 12.3 Approach LOS D F B B Timer Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.4 65.5 10.9 7.5 65.4 4.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 61.0 18.0 5.1 60.9 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 2.2 24.2 5.9 3.9 29.8 2.1 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.0 16.1 0.5 0.0 17.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 13.0 HCM 2010 LOS B Existing PM Synchro 9 Report Page 1 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2: Pacific Coast Highway & 5th Street/Marvista Drive Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s t r* 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 t 12.5 71.5 t 6.7 Traffic Volume (vehlh) 113 24 33 10 19 44 31 1319 5 72 1431 113 Future Volume (veh/h) 113 24 33 10 19 44 31 1319 5 72 1431 113 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 123 26 36 11 21 48 34 1434 5 78 1555 123 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 223 209 178 51 61 111 53 2444 9 150 2429 191 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.03 0.68 0.68 0.08 0.73 0.73 Sat Flow, vehlh 1326 1863 1583 113 544 986 1774 3618 13 1774 3325 261 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 123 26 36 80 0 0 34 701 738 78 823 855 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1326 1863 1583 1644 0 0 1774 1770 1861 1774 1770 1817 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.4 1.3 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 22.5 22.6 4.5 24.8 25.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.1 1.3 2.2 4.7 0.0 0.0 2.0 22.5 22.6 4.5 24.8 25.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.14 0.60 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.14 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 223 209 178 223 0 0 53 1196 1257 150 1293 1327 V/C Ratio(X) 0.55 0.12 0.20 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.59 0.59 0.52 0.64 0.64 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 356 396 337 384 0 0 112 1196 1257 210 1293 1327 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 45.6 42.3 42.7 43.8 0.0 0.0 50.8 9.2 9.2 46.4 7.2 7.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.1 0.3 0.6 1.0 0.0 0.0 12.2 2.1 2.0 2.8 2.4 2.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 3.6 0.7 1.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 1.2 11.6 12.2 2.3 12.7 13.5 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 47.8 42.6 43.2 44.8 0.0 0.0 63.0 11.3 11.2 49.1 9.6 9.7 LnGrp LOS D D D D E B B D A A Approach Vol, veh/h 185 80 1473 1756 Approach Delay, s/veh 46.1 44.8 12.5 11.4 Approach LOS D D B B Timer Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.5 76.0 16.4 7.7 81.8 16.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 12.5 71.5 22.5 6.7 77.3 22.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 6.5 24.6 11.1 4.0 27.4 6.7 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.1 13.4 0.8 0.1 18.5 0.9 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 14.5 HCM 2010 LOS B Existing PM Synchro 9 Report Page 2 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 3: Main Street/Bolsa Avenue & Pacific Coast Highway Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s tt r* 4.5 t 4.5 4.5 t r* 14.5 t r* Traffic Volume (vehlh) 112 1374 101 92 1270 23 70 50 69 21 43 159 Future Volume (veh/h) 112 1374 101 92 1270 23 70 50 69 21 43 159 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 122 1493 110 100 1380 25 76 54 75 23 47 173 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 154 1876 839 209 1996 36 293 387 329 308 387 467 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.53 0.53 0.12 0.56 0.56 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 Sat Flow, vehlh 1774 3539 1583 1774 3557 64 1156 1863 1583 1256 1863 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 122 1493 110 100 686 719 76 54 75 23 47 173 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1851 1156 1863 1583 1256 1863 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.3 32.2 3.3 4.9 26.1 26.1 5.4 2.2 3.7 1.4 1.9 8.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.3 32.2 3.3 4.9 26.1 26.1 7.3 2.2 3.7 3.6 1.9 8.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 154 1876 839 209 993 1039 293 387 329 308 387 467 V/C Ratio(X) 0.79 0.80 0.13 0.48 0.69 0.69 0.26 0.14 0.23 0.07 0.12 0.37 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 331 2736 1224 274 1311 1372 293 387 329 308 387 467 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 42.0 17.9 11.1 38.7 14.7 14.8 33.1 30.3 30.9 31.8 30.2 26.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 8.8 1.1 0.1 1.7 1.0 1.0 2.1 0.8 1.6 0.5 0.6 2.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 3.5 15.8 1.5 2.5 12.9 13.5 1.9 1.2 1.8 0.5 1.1 3.8 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 50.8 19.0 11.2 40.3 15.8 15.7 35.3 31.0 32.5 32.3 30.8 28.4 LnGrp LOS D B B D B B D C C C C C Approach Vol, veh/h 1725 1505 205 243 Approach Delay, s/veh 20.7 17.4 33.1 29.3 Approach LOS C B C C Timer Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 24.0 15.6 54.2 24.0 12.6 57.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.5 14.5 72.5 19.5 17.5 69.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 9.3 6.9 34.2 10.1 8.3 28.1 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 1.3 5.0 15.6 1.3 0.2 13.0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 20.6 HCM 2010 LOS C Existing PM Synchro 9 Report Page 3 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 4: 12th Street/Balboa Drive & Pacific Coast Highway Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s tt r* 4.5 t 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.5 6.5 t r* Traffic Volume (vehlh) 43 1350 47 27 1378 18 77 45 42 41 64 25 Future Volume (veh/h) 43 1350 47 27 1378 18 77 45 42 41 64 25 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 47 1467 51 29 1498 20 84 49 46 45 70 27 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 111 1954 874 50 1853 25 229 132 105 413 511 434 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.55 0.55 0.03 0.52 0.52 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 Sat Flow, vehlh 1774 3539 1583 1774 3576 48 626 483 383 1295 1863 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 47 1467 51 29 741 777 179 0 0 45 70 27 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1854 1492 0 0 1295 1863 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.4 29.5 1.4 1.5 32.2 32.3 6.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 1.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.4 29.5 1.4 1.5 32.2 32.3 9.1 0.0 0.0 2.9 2.6 1.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 0.47 0.26 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 111 1954 874 50 917 961 466 0 0 413 511 434 V/C Ratio(X) 0.43 0.75 0.06 0.58 0.81 0.81 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.14 0.06 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 181 2836 1269 124 1361 1426 466 0 0 413 511 434 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 42.0 15.9 9.6 44.6 18.6 18.6 27.7 0.0 0.0 25.5 25.4 24.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.6 0.7 0.0 10.0 2.3 2.2 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.6 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.2 14.4 0.6 0.9 16.2 17.0 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.9 1.4 0.5 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 44.6 16.6 9.7 54.6 20.9 20.8 30.1 0.0 0.0 26.1 26.0 25.2 LnGrp LOS D B A D C C C C C C Approach Vol, veh/h 1565 1547 179 142 Approach Delay, s/veh 17.2 21.5 30.1 25.9 Approach LOS B C C C Timer Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 30.0 7.1 55.8 30.0 10.3 52.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.5 6.5 74.5 25.5 9.5 71.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 11.1 3.5 31.5 4.9 4.4 34.3 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 1.4 0.0 15.6 1.6 3.9 13.9 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 20.2 HCM 2010 LOS C Existing PM Synchro 9 Report Page 4 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Pacific Coast Highway & 1st Street Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s 1� 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 t 5.0 61.0 t 5.1 Traffic Volume (vehlh) 165 0 52 2 0 1 19 1695 0 0 1723 50 Future Volume (veh/h) 165 0 52 2 0 1 19 1695 0 0 1723 50 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 179 0 57 2 0 1 21 1842 0 0 1873 54 Adj No. of Lanes 2 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 277 0 128 5 0 2 40 2442 0 38 2421 69 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.69 Sat Flow, vehlh 3442 0 1583 1137 0 569 1774 3632 0 1774 3514 101 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 179 0 57 3 0 0 21 1842 0 0 939 988 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1721 0 1583 1706 0 0 1774 1770 0 1774 1770 1845 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.5 0.0 3.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.0 29.7 0.0 0.0 31.1 31.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.5 0.0 3.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.0 29.7 0.0 0.0 31.1 31.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.67 0.33 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.05 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 277 0 128 7 0 0 40 2442 0 38 1219 1271 V/C Ratio(X) 0.65 0.00 0.45 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.78 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 701 0 322 347 0 0 102 2442 0 100 1219 1271 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 39.4 0.0 38.8 43.9 0.0 0.0 42.7 8.9 0.0 0.0 9.1 9.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.5 0.0 2.4 38.4 0.0 0.0 9.9 2.2 0.0 0.0 4.7 4.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 2.2 0.0 1.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.6 15.1 0.0 0.0 16.5 17.6 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 41.9 0.0 41.2 82.3 0.0 0.0 52.7 11.1 0.0 0.0 13.8 13.9 LnGrp LOS D D F D B B B Approach Vol, veh/h 236 3 1863 1927 Approach Delay, s/veh 41.7 82.3 11.5 13.9 Approach LOS D F B B Timer Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.4 65.5 11.6 6.5 65.4 4.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 61.0 18.0 5.1 60.9 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 0.0 31.7 6.5 3.0 33.7 2.2 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.0 17.7 0.7 0.0 17.4 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 14.5 HCM 2010 LOS B Existing WP AM Synchro 9 Report Page 1 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2: Pacific Coast Highway & 5th Street/Marvista Drive Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s t r* 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 t 5.5 80.5 t 5.1 Traffic Volume (vehlh) 129 15 25 10 20 68 51 1550 1 14 1731 43 Future Volume (veh/h) 129 15 25 10 20 68 51 1550 1 14 1731 43 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 140 16 27 11 22 74 55 1685 1 15 1882 47 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 228 261 221 46 59 158 71 2539 2 77 2481 62 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.04 0.70 0.70 0.04 0.70 0.70 Sat Flow, vehlh 1294 1863 1583 80 424 1130 1774 3630 2 1774 3529 88 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 140 16 27 107 0 0 55 821 865 15 940 989 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1294 1863 1583 1634 0 0 1774 1770 1862 1774 1770 1847 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.7 0.9 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.5 30.0 30.0 0.9 38.7 39.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.6 0.9 1.7 6.8 0.0 0.0 3.5 30.0 30.0 0.9 38.7 39.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.10 0.69 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.05 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 228 261 221 263 0 0 71 1238 1303 77 1244 1299 V/C Ratio(X) 0.61 0.06 0.12 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.66 0.66 0.20 0.76 0.76 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 278 332 282 324 0 0 79 1238 1303 85 1244 1299 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 48.8 42.9 43.3 45.5 0.0 0.0 54.7 9.7 9.7 53.1 10.8 10.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.8 0.1 0.2 1.0 0.0 0.0 35.1 2.8 2.7 1.2 4.3 4.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 4.5 0.4 0.8 3.2 0.0 0.0 2.4 15.3 16.1 0.5 20.0 21.3 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 51.5 43.0 43.6 46.5 0.0 0.0 89.8 12.5 12.4 54.3 15.1 15.2 LnGrp LOS D D D D F B B D B B Approach Vol, veh/h 183 107 1741 1944 Approach Delay, s/veh 49.6 46.5 14.9 15.5 Approach LOS D D B B Timer Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.5 85.0 20.6 9.1 85.4 20.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.5 80.5 20.5 5.1 80.9 20.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 2.9 32.0 15.6 5.5 41.4 8.8 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.0 18.3 0.5 0.0 21.8 0.9 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 17.6 HCM 2010 LOS B Existing WP AM Synchro 9 Report Page 2 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 3: Main Street/Bolsa Avenue & Pacific Coast Highway Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s tt r* 4.5 t 4.5 4.5 t r* 8.6 t r* Traffic Volume (vehlh) 91 1646 59 41 1559 7 43 34 46 16 37 116 Future Volume (veh/h) 91 1646 59 41 1559 7 43 34 46 16 37 116 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 99 1789 64 45 1695 8 47 37 50 17 40 126 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 126 2187 979 100 2179 10 280 351 298 297 351 411 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.62 0.62 0.06 0.60 0.60 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow, vehlh 1774 3539 1583 1774 3612 17 1215 1863 1583 1305 1863 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 99 1789 64 45 830 873 47 37 50 17 40 126 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1860 1215 1863 1583 1305 1863 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.4 38.4 1.6 2.4 34.4 34.5 3.3 1.6 2.6 1.1 1.8 6.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.4 38.4 1.6 2.4 34.4 34.5 5.0 1.6 2.6 2.7 1.8 6.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 126 2187 979 100 1068 1122 280 351 298 297 351 411 V/C Ratio(X) 0.78 0.82 0.07 0.45 0.78 0.78 0.17 0.11 0.17 0.06 0.11 0.31 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 244 2860 1279 155 1342 1410 280 351 298 297 351 411 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 44.9 14.5 7.5 44.9 14.6 14.6 35.2 33.0 33.4 34.1 33.1 29.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 10.2 1.5 0.0 3.2 2.3 2.2 1.3 0.6 1.2 0.4 0.7 1.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 3.0 19.1 0.7 1.3 17.3 18.2 1.2 0.9 1.2 0.4 1.0 3.0 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 55.1 16.0 7.5 48.0 16.9 16.8 36.5 33.6 34.6 34.5 33.7 31.2 LnGrp LOS E B A D B B D C C C C C Approach Vol, veh/h 1952 1748 134 183 Approach Delay, s/veh 17.7 17.6 35.0 32.1 Approach LOS B B D C Timer Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.0 10.0 65.2 23.0 11.5 63.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.5 8.6 79.4 18.5 13.5 74.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 7.0 4.4 40.4 8.3 7.4 36.5 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.9 3.4 20.4 0.9 0.1 17.3 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 18.9 HCM 2010 LOS B Existing WP AM Synchro 9 Report Page 3 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 4: 12th Street/Balboa Drive & Pacific Coast Highway Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s tt r* 4.5 t 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.5 5.9 t r* Traffic Volume (vehlh) 36 1679 11 21 1614 5 49 56 37 39 26 29 Future Volume (veh/h) 36 1679 11 21 1614 5 49 56 37 39 26 29 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 39 1825 12 23 1754 5 53 61 40 42 28 32 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 110 2227 996 42 2141 6 142 157 88 325 390 331 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.63 0.63 0.02 0.59 0.59 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 Sat Flow, vehlh 1774 3539 1583 1774 3620 10 443 752 419 1288 1863 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 39 1825 12 23 857 902 154 0 0 42 28 32 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1861 1615 0 0 1288 1863 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.1 38.7 0.3 1.3 37.6 37.7 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 1.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.1 38.7 0.3 1.3 37.6 37.7 7.8 0.0 0.0 3.2 1.2 1.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.01 0.34 0.26 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 110 2227 996 42 1046 1100 387 0 0 325 390 331 V/C Ratio(X) 0.36 0.82 0.01 0.55 0.82 0.82 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.07 0.10 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 136 2893 1294 107 1418 1491 387 0 0 325 390 331 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 44.1 13.9 6.8 47.3 15.9 15.9 33.6 0.0 0.0 31.9 31.1 31.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.0 1.5 0.0 10.6 2.9 2.7 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.4 0.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.1 19.2 0.1 0.7 18.9 19.9 4.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.6 0.8 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 46.1 15.4 6.8 57.9 18.7 18.6 36.7 0.0 0.0 32.7 31.5 31.9 LnGrp LOS D B A E B B D C C C Approach Vol, veh/h 1876 1782 154 102 Approach Delay, s/veh 16.0 19.2 36.7 32.1 Approach LOS B B D C Timer Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 25.0 6.8 66.2 25.0 10.5 62.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.5 5.9 80.1 20.5 7.5 78.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 9.8 3.3 40.7 5.2 4.1 39.7 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.9 0.0 21.0 1.1 3.0 18.3 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 18.7 HCM 2010 LOS B Existing WP AM Synchro 9 Report Page 4 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Pacific Coast Highway & 1st Street Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s 1� 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 t 5.0 61.0 t 5.1 Traffic Volume (vehlh) 143 0 37 0 0 1 35 1485 0 5 1546 125 Future Volume (veh/h) 143 0 37 0 0 1 35 1485 0 5 1546 125 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 155 0 40 0 0 1 38 1614 0 5 1680 136 Adj No. of Lanes 2 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 248 0 114 0 0 2 61 2442 0 59 2286 183 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.69 0.00 0.03 0.69 0.69 Sat Flow, veh/h 3442 0 1583 0 0 1583 1774 3632 0 1774 3319 266 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 155 0 40 0 0 1 38 1614 0 5 888 928 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1721 0 1583 0 0 1583 1774 1770 0 1774 1770 1816 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.9 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.9 23.0 0.0 0.2 27.7 28.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.9 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.9 23.0 0.0 0.2 27.7 28.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.15 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 248 0 114 0 0 2 61 2442 0 59 1219 1251 V/C Ratio(X) 0.63 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.62 0.66 0.00 0.08 0.73 0.74 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 701 0 322 0 0 322 102 2442 0 100 1219 1251 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 39.9 0.0 39.1 0.0 0.0 44.1 42.1 7.8 0.0 41.4 8.6 8.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.6 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 106.2 10.0 1.4 0.0 0.6 3.8 4.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.9 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.1 11.5 0.0 0.1 14.6 15.6 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 42.5 0.0 40.9 0.0 0.0 150.3 52.2 9.2 0.0 42.1 12.4 12.8 LnGrp LOS D D F D A D B B Approach Vol, veh/h 195 1 1652 1821 Approach Delay, s/veh 42.1 150.3 10.2 12.7 Approach LOS D F B B Timer Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.4 65.5 10.9 7.5 65.4 4.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 61.0 18.0 5.1 60.9 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 2.2 25.0 5.9 3.9 30.8 2.1 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.0 16.4 0.5 0.0 17.1 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 13.2 HCM 2010 LOS B Existing WP PM Synchro 9 Report Page 1 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2: Pacific Coast Highway & 5th Street/Marvista Drive Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s t r* 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 t 12.5 71.5 t 6.7 Traffic Volume (vehlh) 156 28 33 10 23 44 76 1319 5 72 1474 113 Future Volume (veh/h) 156 28 33 10 23 44 76 1319 5 72 1474 113 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 170 30 36 11 25 48 83 1434 5 78 1602 123 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 260 276 234 50 90 140 104 2260 8 194 2252 172 Arrive On Green 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.06 0.62 0.62 0.11 0.68 0.68 Sat Flow, vehlh 1322 1863 1583 101 609 946 1774 3618 13 1774 3334 254 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 170 30 36 84 0 0 83 701 738 78 845 880 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1322 1863 1583 1655 0 0 1774 1770 1861 1774 1770 1818 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.2 1.6 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.3 28.2 28.2 4.7 33.9 34.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 14.2 1.6 2.3 5.1 0.0 0.0 5.3 28.2 28.2 4.7 33.9 34.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.13 0.57 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.14 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 260 276 234 281 0 0 104 1106 1163 194 1195 1228 V/C Ratio(X) 0.65 0.11 0.15 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.63 0.63 0.40 0.71 0.72 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 324 366 311 359 0 0 104 1106 1163 194 1195 1228 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 47.6 42.2 42.5 43.7 0.0 0.0 53.2 13.3 13.3 47.5 11.5 11.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.3 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.0 0.0 34.2 2.8 2.6 1.3 3.5 3.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 5.5 0.8 1.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 3.6 14.5 15.2 2.4 17.6 18.6 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 50.8 42.4 42.8 44.3 0.0 0.0 87.4 16.1 16.0 48.8 15.1 15.3 LnGrp LOS D D D D F B B D B B Approach Vol, veh/h 236 84 1522 1803 Approach Delay, s/veh 48.5 44.3 19.9 16.6 Approach LOS D D B B Timer Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 17.0 76.0 21.4 11.2 81.8 21.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 12.5 71.5 22.5 6.7 77.3 22.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 6.7 30.2 16.2 7.3 36.9 7.1 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.2 13.0 0.7 0.0 18.1 1.1 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 20.7 HCM 2010 LOS C Existing WP PM Synchro 9 Report Page 2 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 3: Main Street/Bolsa Avenue & Pacific Coast Highway Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s tt r* 4.5 t 4.5 4.5 t r* 14.5 t r* Traffic Volume (vehlh) 112 1401 101 92 1298 23 70 50 69 21 43 159 Future Volume (veh/h) 112 1401 101 92 1298 23 70 50 69 21 43 159 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 122 1523 110 100 1411 25 76 54 75 23 47 173 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 154 1900 850 209 2020 36 288 380 323 302 380 461 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.54 0.54 0.12 0.57 0.57 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow, vehlh 1774 3539 1583 1774 3558 63 1156 1863 1583 1256 1863 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 122 1523 110 100 701 735 76 54 75 23 47 173 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1852 1156 1863 1583 1256 1863 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.4 33.4 3.3 5.0 27.1 27.2 5.5 2.3 3.8 1.5 2.0 8.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.4 33.4 3.3 5.0 27.1 27.2 7.5 2.3 3.8 3.7 2.0 8.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 154 1900 850 209 1005 1051 288 380 323 302 380 461 V/C Ratio(X) 0.79 0.80 0.13 0.48 0.70 0.70 0.26 0.14 0.23 0.08 0.12 0.38 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 325 2687 1202 269 1288 1348 288 380 323 302 380 461 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 42.8 18.0 11.0 39.4 14.8 14.8 34.1 31.1 31.7 32.7 31.0 27.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 8.9 1.2 0.1 1.7 1.2 1.1 2.2 0.8 1.7 0.5 0.7 2.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 3.5 16.6 1.5 2.6 13.4 14.0 1.9 1.3 1.8 0.5 1.1 3.9 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 51.6 19.2 11.1 41.1 15.9 15.9 36.3 31.9 33.4 33.2 31.7 29.3 LnGrp LOS D B B D B B D C C C C C Approach Vol, veh/h 1755 1536 205 243 Approach Delay, s/veh 20.9 17.6 34.1 30.1 Approach LOS C B C C Timer Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 24.0 15.7 55.7 24.0 12.8 58.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.5 14.5 72.5 19.5 17.5 69.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 9.5 7.0 35.4 10.3 8.4 29.2 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 1.3 5.1 15.8 1.2 0.2 13.4 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 20.9 HCM 2010 LOS C Existing WP PM Synchro 9 Report Page 3 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 4: 12th Street/Balboa Drive & Pacific Coast Highway Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s tt r* 4.5 t 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.5 6.5 t r* Traffic Volume (vehlh) 43 1377 47 27 1406 18 77 45 42 41 64 25 Future Volume (veh/h) 43 1377 47 27 1406 18 77 45 42 41 64 25 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 47 1497 51 29 1528 20 84 49 46 45 70 27 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 110 1980 886 50 1879 25 224 130 103 404 502 427 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.56 0.56 0.03 0.53 0.53 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 Sat Flow, vehlh 1774 3539 1583 1774 3577 47 624 482 383 1295 1863 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 47 1497 51 29 755 793 179 0 0 45 70 27 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1854 1488 0 0 1295 1863 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.4 30.5 1.4 1.5 33.4 33.5 6.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7 1.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.4 30.5 1.4 1.5 33.4 33.5 9.4 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.7 1.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 0.47 0.26 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 110 1980 886 50 930 974 457 0 0 404 502 427 V/C Ratio(X) 0.43 0.76 0.06 0.58 0.81 0.81 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.14 0.06 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 178 2788 1247 122 1338 1402 457 0 0 404 502 427 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 42.7 15.9 9.5 45.4 18.6 18.6 28.6 0.0 0.0 26.3 26.2 25.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.6 0.8 0.0 10.2 2.6 2.5 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.3 15.0 0.6 0.9 16.8 17.6 4.2 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.5 0.6 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 45.3 16.7 9.5 55.6 21.2 21.1 31.1 0.0 0.0 26.9 26.8 25.9 LnGrp LOS D B A E C C C C C C Approach Vol, veh/h 1595 1577 179 142 Approach Delay, s/veh 17.3 21.8 31.1 26.7 Approach LOS B C C C Timer Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 30.0 7.2 57.4 30.0 10.4 54.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.5 6.5 74.5 25.5 9.5 71.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 11.4 3.5 32.5 5.0 4.4 35.5 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 1.4 0.0 16.0 1.6 3.9 14.2 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 20.4 HCM 2010 LOS C Existing WP PM Synchro 9 Report Page 4 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Pacific Coast Highway & 1st Street Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s 1� 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 t 5.0 61.0 t 5.1 Traffic Volume (vehlh) 179 0 53 2 0 1 19 1756 0 0 1781 56 Future Volume (veh/h) 179 0 53 2 0 1 19 1756 0 0 1781 56 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 195 0 58 2 0 1 21 1909 0 0 1936 61 Adj No. of Lanes 2 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 294 0 135 5 0 2 40 2429 0 38 2400 75 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.69 Sat Flow, vehlh 3442 0 1583 1137 0 569 1774 3632 0 1774 3503 110 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 195 0 58 3 0 0 21 1909 0 0 973 1024 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1721 0 1583 1706 0 0 1774 1770 0 1774 1770 1843 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.9 0.0 3.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.0 32.6 0.0 0.0 34.2 35.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.9 0.0 3.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.0 32.6 0.0 0.0 34.2 35.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.67 0.33 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.06 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 294 0 135 7 0 0 40 2429 0 38 1213 1263 V/C Ratio(X) 0.66 0.00 0.43 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.79 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.81 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 697 0 321 345 0 0 102 2429 0 100 1213 1263 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 39.4 0.0 38.6 44.2 0.0 0.0 42.9 9.5 0.0 0.0 9.8 9.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.6 0.0 2.1 38.4 0.0 0.0 10.0 2.6 0.0 0.0 5.7 5.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 2.4 0.0 1.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.6 16.5 0.0 0.0 18.1 19.4 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 42.0 0.0 40.7 82.6 0.0 0.0 52.9 12.1 0.0 0.0 15.4 15.6 LnGrp LOS D D F D B B B Approach Vol, veh/h 253 3 1930 1997 Approach Delay, s/veh 41.7 82.6 12.6 15.5 Approach LOS D F B B Timer Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.4 65.5 12.1 6.5 65.4 4.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 61.0 18.0 5.1 60.9 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 0.0 34.6 6.9 3.0 37.0 2.2 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.0 17.3 0.7 0.0 16.7 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 15.8 HCM 2010 LOS B Opening Year AM Synchro 9 Report Page 1 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2: Pacific Coast Highway & 5th Street/Marvista Drive Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s t r* 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 t 5.5 80.5 t 5.1 Traffic Volume (vehlh) 92 12 26 10 16 69 11 1627 1 14 1771 44 Future Volume (veh/h) 92 12 26 10 16 69 11 1627 1 14 1771 44 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 100 13 28 11 17 75 12 1768 1 15 1925 48 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 197 204 173 47 39 129 25 2713 2 31 2651 66 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.01 0.75 0.75 0.02 0.75 0.75 Sat Flow, vehlh 1299 1863 1583 88 353 1181 1774 3630 2 1774 3529 88 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 100 13 28 103 0 0 12 862 907 15 961 1012 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1299 1863 1583 1622 0 0 1774 1770 1862 1774 1770 1847 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.7 0.7 1.7 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.7 25.8 25.8 0.9 31.9 32.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.1 0.7 1.7 6.4 0.0 0.0 0.7 25.8 25.8 0.9 31.9 32.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.11 0.73 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.05 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 197 204 173 215 0 0 25 1323 1392 31 1329 1388 V/C Ratio(X) 0.51 0.06 0.16 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.65 0.65 0.48 0.72 0.73 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 302 355 301 344 0 0 84 1323 1392 91 1329 1388 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.9 43.0 43.5 45.5 0.0 0.0 52.7 6.7 6.7 52.4 7.3 7.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.0 0.1 0.4 1.7 0.0 0.0 13.8 2.5 2.4 10.8 3.4 3.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 3.0 0.4 0.8 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 13.4 14.0 0.5 16.5 17.6 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 48.9 43.1 43.9 47.2 0.0 0.0 66.5 9.2 9.1 63.2 10.7 10.8 LnGrp LOS D D D D E A A E B B Approach Vol, veh/h 141 103 1781 1988 Approach Delay, s/veh 47.4 47.2 9.5 11.2 Approach LOS D D A B Timer Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.4 85.0 16.3 6.0 85.4 16.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.5 80.5 20.5 5.1 80.9 20.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 2.9 27.8 11.1 2.7 34.5 8.4 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.0 20.8 0.7 0.0 24.8 0.8 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 12.6 HCM 2010 LOS B Opening Year AM Synchro 9 Report Page 2 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 3: Main Street/Bolsa Avenue & Pacific Coast Highway Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s tt r* 4.5 t 4.5 4.5 t r* 8.6 t r* Traffic Volume (vehlh) 104 1692 64 42 1608 7 50 35 47 16 38 118 Future Volume (veh/h) 104 1692 64 42 1608 7 50 35 47 16 38 118 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 113 1839 70 46 1748 8 54 38 51 17 41 128 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 142 2218 992 101 2181 10 271 341 290 287 341 416 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.63 0.63 0.06 0.60 0.60 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 Sat Flow, vehlh 1774 3539 1583 1774 3613 17 1211 1863 1583 1303 1863 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 113 1839 70 46 856 900 54 38 51 17 41 128 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1860 1211 1863 1583 1303 1863 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.3 40.8 1.7 2.5 37.5 37.6 3.9 1.7 2.7 1.1 1.9 6.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.3 40.8 1.7 2.5 37.5 37.6 5.8 1.7 2.7 2.8 1.9 6.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 142 2218 992 101 1068 1123 271 341 290 287 341 416 V/C Ratio(X) 0.80 0.83 0.07 0.46 0.80 0.80 0.20 0.11 0.18 0.06 0.12 0.31 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 237 2780 1243 151 1304 1370 271 341 290 287 341 416 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 45.7 14.7 7.4 46.2 15.4 15.4 36.9 34.4 34.9 35.6 34.5 29.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 9.8 1.8 0.0 3.2 3.0 2.9 1.7 0.7 1.3 0.4 0.7 1.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 3.5 20.2 0.8 1.3 19.0 19.9 1.4 0.9 1.3 0.4 1.0 3.1 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 55.5 16.5 7.4 49.4 18.4 18.3 38.6 35.1 36.2 36.0 35.2 31.8 LnGrp LOS E B A D B B D D D D D C Approach Vol, veh/h 2022 1802 143 186 Approach Delay, s/veh 18.3 19.1 36.8 32.9 Approach LOS B B D C Timer Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.0 10.2 67.9 23.0 12.6 65.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.5 8.6 79.4 18.5 13.5 74.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 7.8 4.5 42.8 8.6 8.3 39.6 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.9 3.4 20.5 0.9 0.1 17.6 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 20.0 HCM 2010 LOS B Opening Year AM Synchro 9 Report Page 3 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 4: 12th Street/Balboa Drive & Pacific Coast Highway Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s tt r* 4.5 t 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.5 5.9 t r* Traffic Volume (vehlh) 37 1726 11 21 1664 5 50 57 38 40 27 30 Future Volume (veh/h) 37 1726 11 21 1664 5 50 57 38 40 27 30 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 40 1876 12 23 1809 5 54 62 41 43 29 33 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 104 2259 1011 42 2184 6 138 153 86 313 380 323 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.64 0.64 0.02 0.60 0.60 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow, vehlh 1774 3539 1583 1774 3621 10 442 750 421 1286 1863 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 40 1876 12 23 884 930 157 0 0 43 29 33 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1861 1613 0 0 1286 1863 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.2 41.0 0.3 1.3 39.8 39.9 4.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 1.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.2 41.0 0.3 1.3 39.8 39.9 8.3 0.0 0.0 3.5 1.3 1.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.01 0.34 0.26 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 104 2259 1011 42 1067 1122 377 0 0 313 380 323 V/C Ratio(X) 0.38 0.83 0.01 0.55 0.83 0.83 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.08 0.10 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 132 2819 1261 104 1381 1453 377 0 0 313 380 323 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 45.6 14.0 6.6 48.6 15.8 15.8 35.1 0.0 0.0 33.3 32.4 32.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.3 1.8 0.0 10.8 3.4 3.2 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.4 0.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.1 20.4 0.1 0.8 20.2 21.2 4.2 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.7 0.8 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 47.9 15.8 6.6 59.4 19.2 19.1 38.4 0.0 0.0 34.2 32.8 33.2 LnGrp LOS D B A E B B D C C C Approach Vol, veh/h 1928 1837 157 105 Approach Delay, s/veh 16.4 19.6 38.4 33.5 Approach LOS B B D C Timer Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 25.0 6.9 68.7 25.0 10.4 65.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.5 5.9 80.1 20.5 7.5 78.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 10.3 3.3 43.0 5.5 4.2 41.9 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.9 0.0 21.2 1.1 2.9 18.8 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 19.2 HCM 2010 LOS B Opening Year AM Synchro 9 Report Page 4 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Pacific Coast Highway & 1st Street Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s 1� 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 t 5.0 61.0 t 5.1 Traffic Volume (vehlh) 156 0 38 0 0 1 36 1575 0 5 1645 141 Future Volume (veh/h) 156 0 38 0 0 1 36 1575 0 5 1645 141 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 170 0 41 0 0 1 39 1712 0 5 1788 153 Adj No. of Lanes 2 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 264 0 121 0 0 2 62 2428 0 60 2263 191 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.69 0.00 0.03 0.68 0.68 Sat Flow, veh/h 3442 0 1583 0 0 1583 1774 3632 0 1774 3304 279 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 170 0 41 0 0 1 39 1712 0 5 946 995 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1721 0 1583 0 0 1583 1774 1770 0 1774 1770 1814 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.3 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.9 26.2 0.0 0.2 32.2 34.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.3 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.9 26.2 0.0 0.2 32.2 34.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.15 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 264 0 121 0 0 2 62 2428 0 60 1212 1242 V/C Ratio(X) 0.64 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.63 0.71 0.00 0.08 0.78 0.80 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 697 0 320 0 0 320 102 2428 0 100 1212 1242 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 39.9 0.0 38.9 0.0 0.0 44.4 42.4 8.5 0.0 41.6 9.5 9.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.6 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 106.2 10.2 1.8 0.0 0.6 5.0 5.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 2.1 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.1 13.2 0.0 0.1 17.2 18.8 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 42.5 0.0 40.5 0.0 0.0 150.6 52.6 10.2 0.0 42.2 14.5 15.3 LnGrp LOS D D F D B D B B Approach Vol, veh/h 211 1 1751 1946 Approach Delay, s/veh 42.1 150.6 11.2 15.0 Approach LOS D F B B Timer Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.5 65.5 11.3 7.6 65.4 4.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 61.0 18.0 5.1 60.9 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 2.2 28.2 6.3 3.9 36.1 2.1 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.0 17.1 0.6 0.0 16.6 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 14.8 HCM 2010 LOS B Opening Year PM Synchro 9 Report Page 1 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2: Pacific Coast Highway & 5th Street/Marvista Drive Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s t r* 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 t 12.5 71.5 t 6.7 Traffic Volume (vehlh) 115 24 34 10 19 45 32 1423 5 73 1549 115 Future Volume (veh/h) 115 24 34 10 19 45 32 1423 5 73 1549 115 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 125 26 37 11 21 49 35 1547 5 79 1684 125 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 225 213 181 51 61 114 54 2437 8 151 2435 179 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.03 0.67 0.67 0.08 0.73 0.73 Sat Flow, vehlh 1325 1863 1583 111 538 994 1774 3619 12 1774 3343 246 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 125 26 37 81 0 0 35 756 796 79 884 925 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1325 1863 1583 1643 0 0 1774 1770 1861 1774 1770 1819 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.6 1.3 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 25.9 25.9 4.5 28.8 29.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.3 1.3 2.2 4.8 0.0 0.0 2.1 25.9 25.9 4.5 28.8 29.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.14 0.60 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.14 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 225 213 181 226 0 0 54 1192 1253 151 1289 1325 V/C Ratio(X) 0.56 0.12 0.20 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.63 0.63 0.52 0.69 0.70 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 354 395 336 383 0 0 112 1192 1253 209 1289 1325 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 45.7 42.2 42.6 43.7 0.0 0.0 50.9 9.9 9.9 46.5 7.8 8.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.2 0.3 0.6 1.0 0.0 0.0 12.5 2.6 2.5 2.8 3.0 3.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 3.7 0.7 1.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 1.2 13.3 13.9 2.3 14.8 15.8 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 47.8 42.5 43.2 44.7 0.0 0.0 63.4 12.5 12.3 49.3 10.8 11.0 LnGrp LOS D D D D E B B D B B Approach Vol, veh/h 188 81 1587 1888 Approach Delay, s/veh 46.2 44.7 13.5 12.5 Approach LOS D D B B Timer Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.5 76.0 16.6 7.7 81.8 16.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 12.5 71.5 22.5 6.7 77.3 22.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 6.5 27.9 11.3 4.1 31.8 6.8 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.1 15.1 0.8 0.1 20.8 1.0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 15.3 HCM 2010 LOS B Opening Year PM Synchro 9 Report Page 2 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 3: Main Street/Bolsa Avenue & Pacific Coast Highway Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s tt r* 4.5 t 4.5 4.5 t r* 14.5 t r* Traffic Volume (vehlh) 135 1465 111 94 1373 23 81 51 70 21 44 162 Future Volume (veh/h) 135 1465 111 94 1373 23 81 51 70 21 44 162 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 147 1592 121 102 1492 25 88 55 76 23 48 176 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 180 1950 873 209 2020 34 273 365 310 287 365 471 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.55 0.55 0.12 0.57 0.57 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow, vehlh 1774 3539 1583 1774 3562 60 1152 1863 1583 1254 1863 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 147 1592 121 102 741 776 88 55 76 23 48 176 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1852 1152 1863 1583 1254 1863 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.1 36.6 3.7 5.4 31.0 31.1 6.8 2.4 4.0 1.5 2.1 8.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.1 36.6 3.7 5.4 31.0 31.1 8.9 2.4 4.0 4.0 2.1 8.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 180 1950 873 209 1004 1051 273 365 310 287 365 471 V/C Ratio(X) 0.82 0.82 0.14 0.49 0.74 0.74 0.32 0.15 0.25 0.08 0.13 0.37 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 312 2576 1153 258 1235 1293 273 365 310 287 365 471 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 43.8 18.2 10.9 41.1 16.0 16.1 36.7 33.2 33.8 34.8 33.1 27.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 8.7 1.6 0.1 1.8 1.8 1.8 3.1 0.9 1.9 0.5 0.7 2.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 4.4 18.1 1.6 2.7 15.5 16.3 2.4 1.3 1.9 0.6 1.2 4.1 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 52.5 19.9 10.9 42.9 17.9 17.8 39.8 34.1 35.7 35.4 33.8 29.9 LnGrp LOS D B B D B B D C D D C C Approach Vol, veh/h 1860 1619 219 247 Approach Delay, s/veh 21.9 19.4 37.0 31.2 Approach LOS C B D C Timer Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 24.0 16.2 59.4 24.0 14.6 61.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.5 14.5 72.5 19.5 17.5 69.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 10.9 7.4 38.6 10.8 10.1 33.1 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 1.3 5.1 16.3 1.3 0.2 14.3 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 22.3 HCM 2010 LOS C Opening Year PM Synchro 9 Report Page 3 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 4: 12th Street/Balboa Drive & Pacific Coast Highway Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s tt r* 4.5 t 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.5 6.5 t r* Traffic Volume (vehlh) 44 1441 48 28 1484 18 79 46 43 42 65 26 Future Volume (veh/h) 44 1441 48 28 1484 18 79 46 43 42 65 26 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 48 1566 52 30 1613 20 86 50 47 46 71 28 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 111 2047 916 50 1948 24 212 123 97 378 479 407 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.58 0.58 0.03 0.54 0.54 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 Sat Flow, vehlh 1774 3539 1583 1774 3580 44 618 477 378 1293 1863 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 48 1566 52 30 796 837 183 0 0 46 71 28 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1855 1473 0 0 1293 1863 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.6 33.2 1.4 1.7 37.0 37.1 7.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 1.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.6 33.2 1.4 1.7 37.0 37.1 10.6 0.0 0.0 3.4 2.9 1.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.02 0.47 0.26 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 111 2047 916 50 963 1009 432 0 0 378 479 407 V/C Ratio(X) 0.43 0.76 0.06 0.60 0.83 0.83 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.15 0.07 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 170 2658 1189 116 1276 1337 432 0 0 378 479 407 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 44.8 15.8 9.1 47.6 18.7 18.8 31.3 0.0 0.0 28.6 28.5 27.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.6 1.0 0.0 10.8 3.5 3.4 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.3 16.4 0.6 1.0 18.9 19.8 4.6 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.6 0.6 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 47.4 16.8 9.1 58.4 22.2 22.2 34.3 0.0 0.0 29.3 29.1 28.2 LnGrp LOS D B A E C C C C C C Approach Vol, veh/h 1666 1663 183 145 Approach Delay, s/veh 17.5 22.9 34.3 29.0 Approach LOS B C C C Timer Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 30.0 7.3 61.9 30.0 10.7 58.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.5 6.5 74.5 25.5 9.5 71.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 12.6 3.7 35.2 5.4 4.6 39.1 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 1.4 0.0 16.8 1.7 3.9 14.8 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 21.2 HCM 2010 LOS C Opening Year PM Synchro 9 Report Page 4 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Pacific Coast Highway & 1st Street Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s 1� 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 t 5.0 61.0 t 5.1 Traffic Volume (vehlh) 179 0 53 2 0 1 19 1780 0 0 1806 56 Future Volume (veh/h) 179 0 53 2 0 1 19 1780 0 0 1806 56 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 195 0 58 2 0 1 21 1935 0 0 1963 61 Adj No. of Lanes 2 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 294 0 135 5 0 2 40 2429 0 38 2402 74 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.69 Sat Flow, vehlh 3442 0 1583 1137 0 569 1774 3632 0 1774 3505 108 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 195 0 58 3 0 0 21 1935 0 0 986 1038 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1721 0 1583 1706 0 0 1774 1770 0 1774 1770 1844 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.9 0.0 3.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.0 33.6 0.0 0.0 35.2 36.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.9 0.0 3.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.0 33.6 0.0 0.0 35.2 36.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.67 0.33 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.06 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 294 0 135 7 0 0 40 2429 0 38 1213 1263 V/C Ratio(X) 0.66 0.00 0.43 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.82 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 697 0 321 345 0 0 102 2429 0 100 1213 1263 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 39.4 0.0 38.6 44.2 0.0 0.0 42.9 9.6 0.0 0.0 9.9 10.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.6 0.0 2.1 38.4 0.0 0.0 10.0 2.8 0.0 0.0 6.0 6.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 2.4 0.0 1.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.6 17.1 0.0 0.0 18.7 20.0 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 42.0 0.0 40.7 82.6 0.0 0.0 52.9 12.5 0.0 0.0 16.0 16.2 LnGrp LOS D D F D B B B Approach Vol, veh/h 253 3 1956 2024 Approach Delay, s/veh 41.7 82.6 12.9 16.1 Approach LOS D F B B Timer Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.4 65.5 12.1 6.5 65.4 4.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 61.0 18.0 5.1 60.9 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 0.0 35.6 6.9 3.0 38.0 2.2 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.0 17.1 0.7 0.0 16.4 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 16.2 HCM 2010 LOS B OY WP AM Synchro 9 Report Page 1 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2: Pacific Coast Highway & 5th Street/Marvista Drive Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s t r* 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 t 5.5 80.5 t 5.1 Traffic Volume (vehlh) 131 15 26 10 20 69 51 1627 1 14 1810 44 Future Volume (veh/h) 131 15 26 10 20 69 51 1627 1 14 1810 44 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 142 16 28 11 22 75 55 1768 1 15 1967 48 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 230 264 225 46 60 161 71 2533 1 77 2477 60 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.04 0.70 0.70 0.04 0.70 0.70 Sat Flow, vehlh 1293 1863 1583 79 420 1134 1774 3630 2 1774 3531 86 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 142 16 28 108 0 0 55 862 907 15 982 1033 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1293 1863 1583 1633 0 0 1774 1770 1862 1774 1770 1848 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.0 0.9 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.5 33.1 33.1 0.9 42.9 43.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.8 0.9 1.8 6.9 0.0 0.0 3.5 33.1 33.1 0.9 42.9 43.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.10 0.69 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.05 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 230 264 225 266 0 0 71 1235 1300 77 1241 1296 V/C Ratio(X) 0.62 0.06 0.12 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.70 0.70 0.20 0.79 0.80 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 276 331 281 324 0 0 78 1235 1300 85 1241 1296 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 48.8 42.8 43.2 45.4 0.0 0.0 54.9 10.3 10.3 53.2 11.6 11.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.0 0.1 0.2 1.0 0.0 0.0 35.2 3.3 3.1 1.2 5.2 5.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 4.6 0.4 0.8 3.2 0.0 0.0 2.4 17.2 18.0 0.5 22.5 24.0 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 51.8 42.9 43.5 46.4 0.0 0.0 90.1 13.6 13.4 54.5 16.8 16.9 LnGrp LOS D D D D F B B D B B Approach Vol, veh/h 186 108 1824 2030 Approach Delay, s/veh 49.8 46.4 15.8 17.1 Approach LOS D D B B Timer Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.5 85.0 20.9 9.1 85.4 20.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.5 80.5 20.5 5.1 80.9 20.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 2.9 35.1 15.8 5.5 45.7 8.9 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.0 19.7 0.5 0.0 22.0 1.0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 18.7 HCM 2010 LOS B OY WP AM Synchro 9 Report Page 2 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 3: Main Street/Bolsa Avenue & Pacific Coast Highway Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s tt r* 4.5 t 4.5 4.5 t r* 8.6 t r* Traffic Volume (vehlh) 104 1716 64 42 1633 7 50 35 47 16 38 118 Future Volume (veh/h) 104 1716 64 42 1633 7 50 35 47 16 38 118 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 113 1865 70 46 1775 8 54 38 51 17 41 128 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 142 2233 999 101 2196 10 267 336 286 283 336 412 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.63 0.63 0.06 0.61 0.61 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 Sat Flow, vehlh 1774 3539 1583 1774 3613 16 1211 1863 1583 1303 1863 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 113 1865 70 46 869 914 54 38 51 17 41 128 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1860 1211 1863 1583 1303 1863 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.4 42.1 1.7 2.6 38.7 38.8 4.0 1.7 2.8 1.1 1.9 6.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.4 42.1 1.7 2.6 38.7 38.8 5.9 1.7 2.8 2.9 1.9 6.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 142 2233 999 101 1076 1131 267 336 286 283 336 412 V/C Ratio(X) 0.80 0.84 0.07 0.46 0.81 0.81 0.20 0.11 0.18 0.06 0.12 0.31 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 234 2743 1227 149 1287 1353 267 336 286 283 336 412 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.3 14.7 7.3 46.8 15.5 15.5 37.6 35.1 35.5 36.3 35.2 30.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 9.8 2.0 0.0 3.2 3.3 3.2 1.7 0.7 1.4 0.4 0.7 2.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 3.5 21.1 0.8 1.4 19.8 20.8 1.5 1.0 1.3 0.4 1.0 3.1 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 56.2 16.7 7.3 50.0 18.8 18.7 39.3 35.8 36.9 36.7 35.9 32.4 LnGrp LOS E B A D B B D D D D D C Approach Vol, veh/h 2048 1829 143 186 Approach Delay, s/veh 18.6 19.5 37.5 33.6 Approach LOS B B D C Timer Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.0 10.3 69.1 23.0 12.7 66.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.5 8.6 79.4 18.5 13.5 74.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 7.9 4.6 44.1 8.7 8.4 40.8 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.9 3.4 20.5 0.9 0.1 17.7 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 20.3 HCM 2010 LOS C OY WP AM Synchro 9 Report Page 3 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 4: 12th Street/Balboa Drive & Pacific Coast Highway Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s tt r* 4.5 t 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.5 5.9 t r* Traffic Volume (vehlh) 37 1750 11 21 1689 5 50 57 38 40 27 30 Future Volume (veh/h) 37 1750 11 21 1689 5 50 57 38 40 27 30 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 40 1902 12 23 1836 5 54 62 41 43 29 33 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 102 2274 1017 42 2204 6 137 151 85 308 375 319 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.64 0.64 0.02 0.61 0.61 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow, vehlh 1774 3539 1583 1774 3621 10 442 750 421 1286 1863 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 40 1902 12 23 897 944 157 0 0 43 29 33 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1861 1613 0 0 1286 1863 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.2 42.3 0.3 1.3 41.0 41.0 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 1.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.2 42.3 0.3 1.3 41.0 41.0 8.5 0.0 0.0 3.6 1.3 1.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.01 0.34 0.26 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 102 2274 1017 42 1077 1133 372 0 0 308 375 319 V/C Ratio(X) 0.39 0.84 0.01 0.55 0.83 0.83 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.08 0.10 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 131 2784 1246 103 1364 1435 372 0 0 308 375 319 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.3 14.1 6.6 49.2 15.8 15.8 35.7 0.0 0.0 33.9 33.0 33.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.4 2.0 0.0 10.9 3.7 3.5 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.4 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.2 21.0 0.1 0.8 20.8 21.8 4.2 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.7 0.8 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 48.7 16.0 6.6 60.1 19.5 19.3 39.2 0.0 0.0 34.9 33.4 33.8 LnGrp LOS D B A E B B D C C C Approach Vol, veh/h 1954 1864 157 105 Approach Delay, s/veh 16.6 19.9 39.2 34.1 Approach LOS B B D C Timer Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 25.0 6.9 69.9 25.0 10.4 66.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.5 5.9 80.1 20.5 7.5 78.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 10.5 3.3 44.3 5.6 4.2 43.0 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.9 0.0 21.2 1.1 2.9 18.9 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 19.5 HCM 2010 LOS B OY WP AM Synchro 9 Report Page 4 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Pacific Coast Highway & 1st Street Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s 1� 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 t 5.0 61.0 t 5.1 Traffic Volume (vehlh) 156 0 38 0 0 1 36 1602 0 5 1673 141 Future Volume (veh/h) 156 0 38 0 0 1 36 1602 0 5 1673 141 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 170 0 41 0 0 1 39 1741 0 5 1818 153 Adj No. of Lanes 2 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 264 0 121 0 0 2 62 2428 0 60 2266 188 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.69 0.00 0.03 0.68 0.68 Sat Flow, veh/h 3442 0 1583 0 0 1583 1774 3632 0 1774 3309 275 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 170 0 41 0 0 1 39 1741 0 5 960 1011 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1721 0 1583 0 0 1583 1774 1770 0 1774 1770 1814 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.3 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.9 27.0 0.0 0.2 33.3 35.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.3 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.9 27.0 0.0 0.2 33.3 35.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.15 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 264 0 121 0 0 2 62 2428 0 60 1212 1242 V/C Ratio(X) 0.64 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.63 0.72 0.00 0.08 0.79 0.81 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 697 0 320 0 0 320 102 2428 0 100 1212 1242 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 39.9 0.0 38.9 0.0 0.0 44.4 42.4 8.6 0.0 41.6 9.7 10.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.6 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 106.2 10.2 1.9 0.0 0.6 5.4 5.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 2.1 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.1 13.7 0.0 0.1 17.8 19.4 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 42.5 0.0 40.5 0.0 0.0 150.6 52.6 10.5 0.0 42.2 15.0 15.9 LnGrp LOS D D F D B D B B Approach Vol, veh/h 211 1 1780 1976 Approach Delay, s/veh 42.1 150.6 11.4 15.5 Approach LOS D F B B Timer Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.5 65.5 11.3 7.6 65.4 4.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 61.0 18.0 5.1 60.9 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 2.2 29.0 6.3 3.9 37.3 2.1 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.0 17.3 0.6 0.0 16.4 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 15.1 HCM 2010 LOS B OY WP PM Synchro 9 Report Page 1 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2: Pacific Coast Highway & 5th Street/Marvista Drive Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s t r* 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 t 12.5 71.5 t 6.7 Traffic Volume (vehlh) 158 28 34 10 23 45 77 1423 5 73 1592 115 Future Volume (veh/h) 158 28 34 10 23 45 77 1423 5 73 1592 115 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 172 30 37 11 25 49 84 1547 5 79 1730 125 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 262 279 237 50 90 143 104 2256 7 193 2258 162 Arrive On Green 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.06 0.62 0.62 0.11 0.67 0.67 Sat Flow, vehlh 1320 1863 1583 99 601 954 1774 3619 12 1774 3350 240 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 172 30 37 85 0 0 84 756 796 79 906 949 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1320 1863 1583 1655 0 0 1774 1770 1861 1774 1770 1820 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.4 1.6 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.4 32.2 32.3 4.8 39.2 40.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 14.5 1.6 2.3 5.2 0.0 0.0 5.4 32.2 32.3 4.8 39.2 40.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.13 0.58 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.13 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 262 279 237 284 0 0 104 1103 1160 193 1193 1227 V/C Ratio(X) 0.66 0.11 0.16 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.69 0.69 0.41 0.76 0.77 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 323 365 311 358 0 0 104 1103 1160 193 1193 1227 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 47.6 42.1 42.4 43.6 0.0 0.0 53.4 14.2 14.2 47.7 12.5 12.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.5 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.0 0.0 36.6 3.5 3.3 1.4 4.6 4.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 5.6 0.8 1.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 3.7 16.6 17.4 2.4 20.4 21.9 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 51.1 42.3 42.7 44.2 0.0 0.0 89.9 17.7 17.5 49.0 17.1 17.5 LnGrp LOS D D D D F B B D B B Approach Vol, veh/h 239 85 1636 1934 Approach Delay, s/veh 48.7 44.2 21.3 18.6 Approach LOS D D C B Timer Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 17.0 76.0 21.7 11.2 81.8 21.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 12.5 71.5 22.5 6.7 77.3 22.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 6.8 34.3 16.5 7.4 42.8 7.2 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.2 14.4 0.7 0.0 19.1 1.1 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 22.1 HCM 2010 LOS C OY WP PM Synchro 9 Report Page 2 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 3: Main Street/Bolsa Avenue & Pacific Coast Highway Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s tt r* 4.5 t 4.5 4.5 t r* 14.5 t r* Traffic Volume (vehlh) 135 1492 111 94 1401 23 81 51 70 21 44 162 Future Volume (veh/h) 135 1492 111 94 1401 23 81 51 70 21 44 162 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 147 1622 121 102 1523 25 88 55 76 23 48 176 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 180 1971 882 208 2041 33 268 359 305 282 359 465 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.56 0.56 0.12 0.57 0.57 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow, vehlh 1774 3539 1583 1774 3564 58 1152 1863 1583 1254 1863 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 147 1622 121 102 756 792 88 55 76 23 48 176 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1852 1152 1863 1583 1254 1863 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.2 37.9 3.7 5.5 32.2 32.3 6.9 2.5 4.1 1.6 2.2 8.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.2 37.9 3.7 5.5 32.2 32.3 9.1 2.5 4.1 4.1 2.2 8.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 180 1971 882 208 1014 1061 268 359 305 282 359 465 V/C Ratio(X) 0.82 0.82 0.14 0.49 0.75 0.75 0.33 0.15 0.25 0.08 0.13 0.38 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 307 2535 1134 254 1215 1272 268 359 305 282 359 465 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 44.6 18.3 10.8 41.9 16.1 16.1 37.6 34.0 34.7 35.7 33.9 28.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 8.8 1.8 0.1 1.8 2.1 2.0 3.2 0.9 1.9 0.6 0.8 2.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 4.5 19.0 1.6 2.8 16.1 16.9 2.4 1.4 2.0 0.6 1.2 4.2 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 53.4 20.2 10.8 43.7 18.2 18.2 40.9 34.9 36.6 36.3 34.6 30.7 LnGrp LOS D C B D B B D C D D C C Approach Vol, veh/h 1890 1650 219 247 Approach Delay, s/veh 22.1 19.8 37.9 32.0 Approach LOS C B D C Timer Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 24.0 16.4 60.9 24.0 14.7 62.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.5 14.5 72.5 19.5 17.5 69.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 11.1 7.5 39.9 10.9 10.2 34.3 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 1.2 5.1 16.4 1.2 0.2 14.6 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 22.6 HCM 2010 LOS C OY WP PM Synchro 9 Report Page 3 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 4: 12th Street/Balboa Drive & Pacific Coast Highway Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s tt r* 4.5 t 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.5 6.5 t r* Traffic Volume (vehlh) 44 1468 48 28 1512 18 79 46 43 42 65 26 Future Volume (veh/h) 44 1468 48 28 1512 18 79 46 43 42 65 26 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 48 1596 52 30 1643 20 86 50 47 46 71 28 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 111 2069 926 50 1971 24 209 120 96 370 471 401 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.58 0.58 0.03 0.55 0.55 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 Sat Flow, vehlh 1774 3539 1583 1774 3581 44 617 476 377 1293 1863 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 48 1596 52 30 811 852 183 0 0 46 71 28 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1855 1470 0 0 1293 1863 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.6 34.4 1.4 1.7 38.3 38.5 7.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 1.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.6 34.4 1.4 1.7 38.3 38.5 10.9 0.0 0.0 3.5 3.0 1.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.02 0.47 0.26 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 111 2069 926 50 974 1021 425 0 0 370 471 401 V/C Ratio(X) 0.43 0.77 0.06 0.60 0.83 0.83 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.15 0.07 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 167 2617 1171 114 1256 1316 425 0 0 370 471 401 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 45.5 15.8 9.0 48.4 18.8 18.8 32.2 0.0 0.0 29.4 29.2 28.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.7 1.1 0.0 11.0 3.9 3.8 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.4 16.9 0.6 1.0 19.5 20.5 4.7 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.6 0.6 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 48.2 16.9 9.0 59.4 22.7 22.6 35.4 0.0 0.0 30.1 29.9 28.9 LnGrp LOS D B A E C C D C C C Approach Vol, veh/h 1696 1693 183 145 Approach Delay, s/veh 17.6 23.3 35.4 29.8 Approach LOS B C D C Timer Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 30.0 7.3 63.4 30.0 10.8 60.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.5 6.5 74.5 25.5 9.5 71.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 12.9 3.7 36.4 5.5 4.6 40.5 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 1.4 0.0 17.1 1.7 3.9 15.0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 21.5 HCM 2010 LOS C OY WP PM Synchro 9 Report Page 4 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Pacific Coast Highway & 1st Street Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s 1� 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 t 5.0 61.0 t 5.1 Traffic Volume (vehlh) 184 0 58 2 0 1 21 1865 0 0 1895 56 Future Volume (veh/h) 184 0 58 2 0 1 21 1865 0 0 1895 56 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 200 0 63 2 0 1 23 2027 0 0 2060 61 Adj No. of Lanes 2 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 300 0 138 5 0 2 43 2420 0 41 2397 71 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.68 Sat Flow, vehlh 3442 0 1583 1137 0 569 1774 3632 0 1774 3511 103 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 200 0 63 3 0 0 23 2027 0 0 1033 1088 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1721 0 1583 1706 0 0 1774 1770 0 1774 1770 1844 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.0 0.0 3.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.1 37.8 0.0 0.0 39.7 40.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.0 0.0 3.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.1 37.8 0.0 0.0 39.7 40.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.67 0.33 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.06 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 300 0 138 7 0 0 43 2420 0 41 1208 1259 V/C Ratio(X) 0.67 0.00 0.46 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.84 0.00 0.00 0.86 0.86 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 694 0 319 344 0 0 101 2420 0 99 1208 1259 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 39.5 0.0 38.7 44.3 0.0 0.0 43.0 10.4 0.0 0.0 10.8 10.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.5 0.0 2.3 38.4 0.0 0.0 9.8 3.7 0.0 0.0 7.9 8.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 2.5 0.0 1.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.7 19.2 0.0 0.0 21.6 23.0 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 42.0 0.0 41.0 82.7 0.0 0.0 52.8 14.1 0.0 0.0 18.7 19.0 LnGrp LOS D D F D B B B Approach Vol, veh/h 263 3 2050 2121 Approach Delay, s/veh 41.8 82.7 14.5 18.8 Approach LOS D F B B Timer Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.6 65.5 12.3 6.7 65.4 4.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 61.0 18.0 5.1 60.9 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 0.0 39.8 7.0 3.1 42.7 2.2 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.0 15.7 0.8 0.0 14.4 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 18.2 HCM 2010 LOS B BO AM Synchro 9 Report Page 1 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2: Pacific Coast Highway & 5th Street/Marvista Drive Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s t r* 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 t 5.5 80.5 t 5.1 Traffic Volume (vehlh) 100 13 28 11 18 76 12 1730 1 16 1888 48 Future Volume (veh/h) 100 13 28 11 18 76 12 1730 1 16 1888 48 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 109 14 30 12 20 83 13 1880 1 17 2052 52 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 204 229 195 47 45 144 26 2669 1 33 2607 66 Arrive On Green 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.01 0.74 0.74 0.02 0.74 0.74 Sat Flow, vehlh 1286 1863 1583 86 366 1172 1774 3630 2 1774 3528 89 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 109 14 30 115 0 0 13 916 965 17 1025 1079 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1286 1863 1583 1624 0 0 1774 1770 1862 1774 1770 1847 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.5 0.7 1.9 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.8 31.1 31.1 1.0 39.3 40.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.8 0.7 1.9 7.2 0.0 0.0 0.8 31.1 31.1 1.0 39.3 40.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.10 0.72 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.05 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 204 229 195 236 0 0 26 1301 1369 33 1308 1365 V/C Ratio(X) 0.54 0.06 0.15 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.70 0.70 0.52 0.78 0.79 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 287 349 296 339 0 0 83 1301 1369 89 1308 1365 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 47.2 42.4 42.9 45.3 0.0 0.0 53.5 8.0 8.0 53.2 8.9 9.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.2 0.1 0.4 1.6 0.0 0.0 13.4 3.2 3.1 11.9 4.8 4.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 3.3 0.4 0.8 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.5 16.2 17.0 0.6 20.5 21.9 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 49.3 42.5 43.3 46.8 0.0 0.0 66.9 11.2 11.0 65.2 13.6 13.7 LnGrp LOS D D D D E B B E B B Approach Vol, veh/h 153 115 1894 2121 Approach Delay, s/veh 47.5 46.8 11.5 14.1 Approach LOS D D B B Timer Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.5 85.0 17.9 6.1 85.4 17.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.5 80.5 20.5 5.1 80.9 20.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 3.0 33.1 12.8 2.8 42.2 9.2 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.0 22.7 0.7 0.0 25.0 0.9 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 15.0 HCM 2010 LOS B BO AM Synchro 9 Report Page 2 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 3: Main Street/Bolsa Avenue & Pacific Coast Highway Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s tt r* 4.5 t 4.5 4.5 t r* 8.6 t r* Traffic Volume (vehlh) 102 1810 66 46 1712 8 48 38 51 18 41 129 Future Volume (veh/h) 102 1810 66 46 1712 8 48 38 51 18 41 129 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 111 1967 72 50 1861 9 52 41 55 20 45 140 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 138 2282 1021 104 2258 11 247 320 272 265 320 395 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.64 0.64 0.06 0.63 0.63 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 Sat Flow, vehlh 1774 3539 1583 1774 3612 17 1194 1863 1583 1294 1863 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 111 1967 72 50 911 959 52 41 55 20 45 140 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1860 1194 1863 1583 1294 1863 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.6 47.9 1.8 2.9 42.9 43.0 4.2 2.0 3.2 1.4 2.2 7.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.6 47.9 1.8 2.9 42.9 43.0 6.4 2.0 3.2 3.4 2.2 7.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 138 2282 1021 104 1106 1163 247 320 272 265 320 395 V/C Ratio(X) 0.80 0.86 0.07 0.48 0.82 0.82 0.21 0.13 0.20 0.08 0.14 0.35 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 222 2606 1166 141 1222 1285 247 320 272 265 320 395 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 48.9 15.3 7.1 49.2 15.6 15.6 40.6 37.8 38.3 39.3 37.9 33.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 10.2 2.9 0.0 3.5 4.3 4.2 1.9 0.8 1.7 0.6 0.9 2.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 3.7 23.9 0.8 1.5 22.1 23.2 1.5 1.1 1.5 0.6 1.2 3.7 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 59.1 18.2 7.2 52.7 19.9 19.8 42.6 38.7 40.0 39.9 38.9 35.8 LnGrp LOS E B A D B B D D D D D D Approach Vol, veh/h 2150 1920 148 205 Approach Delay, s/veh 19.9 20.7 40.5 36.9 Approach LOS B C D D Timer Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.0 10.8 74.1 23.0 12.9 71.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.5 8.6 79.4 18.5 13.5 74.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 8.4 4.9 49.9 9.9 8.6 45.0 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 1.0 3.2 19.6 0.9 0.1 17.7 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 21.8 HCM 2010 LOS C BO AM Synchro 9 Report Page 3 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 4: 12th Street/Balboa Drive & Pacific Coast Highway Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s tt r* 4.5 t 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.5 5.9 t r* Traffic Volume (vehlh) 40 1847 12 23 1773 6 55 62 41 44 29 32 Future Volume (veh/h) 40 1847 12 23 1773 6 55 62 41 44 29 32 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 43 2008 13 25 1927 7 60 67 45 48 32 35 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 103 2327 1041 43 2257 8 132 141 81 279 357 303 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.66 0.66 0.02 0.62 0.62 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow, vehlh 1774 3539 1583 1774 3617 13 449 738 421 1276 1863 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 43 2008 13 25 942 992 172 0 0 48 32 35 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1860 1608 0 0 1276 1863 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.5 48.0 0.3 1.5 45.8 45.9 6.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 2.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.5 48.0 0.3 1.5 45.8 45.9 10.1 0.0 0.0 4.7 1.5 2.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.01 0.35 0.26 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 103 2327 1041 43 1104 1161 354 0 0 279 357 303 V/C Ratio(X) 0.42 0.86 0.01 0.58 0.85 0.85 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.09 0.12 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 124 2651 1186 98 1299 1365 354 0 0 279 357 303 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 48.6 14.5 6.3 51.6 16.2 16.2 38.9 0.0 0.0 36.8 35.6 35.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.7 2.9 0.0 11.4 5.0 4.8 4.7 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.5 0.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.3 24.1 0.1 0.9 23.8 25.0 5.1 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.8 0.9 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 51.3 17.4 6.3 63.0 21.2 21.0 43.6 0.0 0.0 38.2 36.0 36.5 LnGrp LOS D B A E C C D D D D Approach Vol, veh/h 2064 1959 172 115 Approach Delay, s/veh 18.0 21.6 43.6 37.1 Approach LOS B C D D Timer Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 25.0 7.1 74.8 25.0 10.7 71.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.5 5.9 80.1 20.5 7.5 78.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 12.1 3.5 50.0 6.7 4.5 47.9 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.9 0.0 20.3 1.2 2.7 18.8 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 21.2 HCM 2010 LOS C BO AM Synchro 9 Report Page 4 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Pacific Coast Highway & 1st Street Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s 1� 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 t 5.0 61.0 t 5.1 Traffic Volume (vehlh) 160 0 41 0 0 1 39 1627 0 6 1694 139 Future Volume (veh/h) 160 0 41 0 0 1 39 1627 0 6 1694 139 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 174 0 45 0 0 1 42 1768 0 7 1841 151 Adj No. of Lanes 2 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 269 0 124 0 0 2 64 2420 0 62 2264 183 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.68 0.00 0.04 0.68 0.68 Sat Flow, veh/h 3442 0 1583 0 0 1583 1774 3632 0 1774 3317 268 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 174 0 45 0 0 1 42 1768 0 7 970 1022 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1721 0 1583 0 0 1583 1774 1770 0 1774 1770 1815 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.4 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 2.1 28.2 0.0 0.3 34.4 36.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.4 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 2.1 28.2 0.0 0.3 34.4 36.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.15 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 269 0 124 0 0 2 64 2420 0 62 1208 1239 V/C Ratio(X) 0.65 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.65 0.73 0.00 0.11 0.80 0.82 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 694 0 319 0 0 319 101 2420 0 99 1208 1239 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 39.9 0.0 39.0 0.0 0.0 44.5 42.4 8.9 0.0 41.7 10.0 10.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.6 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 106.3 10.7 2.0 0.0 0.8 5.7 6.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 2.2 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.2 14.2 0.0 0.2 18.4 20.1 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 42.6 0.0 40.8 0.0 0.0 150.8 53.1 10.9 0.0 42.5 15.7 16.6 LnGrp LOS D D F D B D B B Approach Vol, veh/h 219 1 1810 1999 Approach Delay, s/veh 42.2 150.8 11.9 16.2 Approach LOS D F B B Timer Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.6 65.5 11.5 7.7 65.4 4.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 61.0 18.0 5.1 60.9 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 2.3 30.2 6.4 4.1 38.4 2.1 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.0 17.3 0.6 0.0 16.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 15.7 HCM 2010 LOS B BO PM Synchro 9 Report Page 1 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2: Pacific Coast Highway & 5th Street/Marvista Drive Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s t r* 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 t 12.5 71.5 t 6.7 Traffic Volume (vehlh) 126 27 37 11 21 49 35 1472 6 80 1597 126 Future Volume (veh/h) 126 27 37 11 21 49 35 1472 6 80 1597 126 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 137 29 40 12 23 53 38 1600 7 87 1736 137 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 235 236 201 52 69 126 56 2395 10 151 2384 186 Arrive On Green 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.03 0.66 0.66 0.09 0.72 0.72 Sat Flow, vehlh 1318 1863 1583 111 542 990 1774 3614 16 1774 3327 260 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 137 29 40 88 0 0 38 783 824 87 914 959 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1318 1863 1583 1643 0 0 1774 1770 1860 1774 1770 1817 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.7 1.5 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 28.9 28.9 5.1 32.7 34.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.9 1.5 2.4 5.2 0.0 0.0 2.3 28.9 28.9 5.1 32.7 34.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.14 0.60 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.14 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 235 236 201 246 0 0 56 1173 1233 151 1268 1302 V/C Ratio(X) 0.58 0.12 0.20 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.67 0.67 0.58 0.72 0.74 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 342 388 330 377 0 0 110 1173 1233 206 1268 1302 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 45.8 41.8 42.2 43.4 0.0 0.0 51.7 11.0 11.0 47.5 9.0 9.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.3 0.2 0.5 0.9 0.0 0.0 13.5 3.0 2.9 3.4 3.6 3.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 4.1 0.8 1.1 2.5 0.0 0.0 1.3 14.9 15.6 2.6 17.0 18.1 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 48.1 42.0 42.7 44.3 0.0 0.0 65.2 14.0 13.9 50.9 12.5 12.9 LnGrp LOS D D D D E B B D B B Approach Vol, veh/h 206 88 1645 1960 Approach Delay, s/veh 46.2 44.3 15.2 14.4 Approach LOS D D B B Timer Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.7 76.0 18.2 7.9 81.8 18.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 12.5 71.5 22.5 6.7 77.3 22.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 7.1 30.9 12.9 4.3 36.2 7.2 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.1 15.8 0.8 0.1 21.3 1.0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 17.1 HCM 2010 LOS B BO PM Synchro 9 Report Page 2 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 3: Main Street/Bolsa Avenue & Pacific Coast Highway Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s tt r* 4.5 t 4.5 4.5 t r* 14.5 t r* Traffic Volume (vehlh) 125 1533 113 103 1417 26 78 56 77 23 48 177 Future Volume (veh/h) 125 1533 113 103 1417 26 78 56 77 23 48 177 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 136 1666 123 112 1540 28 85 61 84 25 52 192 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 167 1996 893 211 2094 38 255 349 297 267 349 446 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.56 0.56 0.12 0.59 0.59 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow, vehlh 1774 3539 1583 1774 3556 65 1131 1863 1583 1238 1863 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 136 1666 123 112 765 803 85 61 84 25 52 192 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1851 1131 1863 1583 1238 1863 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.8 40.4 3.8 6.2 32.6 32.8 7.1 2.9 4.7 1.8 2.4 10.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.8 40.4 3.8 6.2 32.6 32.8 9.5 2.9 4.7 4.7 2.4 10.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 167 1996 893 211 1042 1090 255 349 297 267 349 446 V/C Ratio(X) 0.81 0.83 0.14 0.53 0.73 0.74 0.33 0.17 0.28 0.09 0.15 0.43 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 298 2464 1102 247 1181 1236 255 349 297 267 349 446 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.3 18.7 10.7 43.1 15.5 15.5 39.4 35.6 36.3 37.5 35.4 30.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 9.1 2.2 0.1 2.1 2.1 2.0 3.5 1.1 2.4 0.7 0.9 3.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 4.3 20.0 1.7 3.1 16.3 17.1 2.5 1.6 2.3 0.7 1.3 4.9 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 55.4 20.9 10.8 45.2 17.6 17.6 42.9 36.6 38.7 38.2 36.3 33.6 LnGrp LOS E C B D B B D D D D D C Approach Vol, veh/h 1925 1680 230 269 Approach Delay, s/veh 22.7 19.4 39.7 34.6 Approach LOS C B D C Timer Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 24.0 16.9 63.2 24.0 14.3 65.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.5 14.5 72.5 19.5 17.5 69.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 11.5 8.2 42.4 12.3 9.8 34.8 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 1.3 4.7 16.4 1.2 0.2 14.9 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 23.1 HCM 2010 LOS C BO PM Synchro 9 Report Page 3 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 4: 12th Street/Balboa Drive & Pacific Coast Highway Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s tt r* 4.5 t 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.5 6.5 t r* Traffic Volume (vehlh) 48 1506 52 30 1538 20 86 50 47 46 71 28 Future Volume (veh/h) 48 1506 52 30 1538 20 86 50 47 46 71 28 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 52 1637 57 33 1672 22 93 54 51 50 77 30 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 115 2093 936 53 1989 26 201 116 92 351 462 392 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.59 0.59 0.03 0.56 0.56 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 Sat Flow, vehlh 1774 3539 1583 1774 3577 47 604 468 372 1284 1863 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 52 1637 57 33 826 868 198 0 0 50 77 30 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1854 1444 0 0 1284 1863 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.9 36.2 1.6 1.9 40.0 40.2 9.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 1.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.9 36.2 1.6 1.9 40.0 40.2 12.7 0.0 0.0 4.2 3.3 1.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 0.47 0.26 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 115 2093 936 53 984 1031 409 0 0 351 462 392 V/C Ratio(X) 0.45 0.78 0.06 0.63 0.84 0.84 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.17 0.08 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 164 2563 1146 112 1230 1289 409 0 0 351 462 392 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.3 16.0 8.9 49.4 19.0 19.1 34.0 0.0 0.0 30.7 30.4 29.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.7 1.3 0.0 11.6 4.4 4.3 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.8 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.5 17.9 0.7 1.1 20.5 21.7 5.4 0.0 0.0 1.2 1.8 0.7 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 49.1 17.3 8.9 61.0 23.4 23.3 38.0 0.0 0.0 31.5 31.1 30.0 LnGrp LOS D B A E C C D C C C Approach Vol, veh/h 1746 1727 198 157 Approach Delay, s/veh 18.0 24.1 38.0 31.1 Approach LOS B C D C Timer Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 30.0 7.6 65.3 30.0 11.2 61.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.5 6.5 74.5 25.5 9.5 71.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 14.7 3.9 38.2 6.2 4.9 42.2 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 1.4 0.0 17.4 1.8 3.7 15.0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 22.3 HCM 2010 LOS C BO PM Synchro 9 Report Page 4 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Pacific Coast Highway & 1st Street Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s 1� 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 t 5.0 61.0 t 5.1 Traffic Volume (vehlh) 184 0 58 2 0 1 21 1889 0 0 1920 56 Future Volume (veh/h) 184 0 58 2 0 1 21 1889 0 0 1920 56 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 200 0 63 2 0 1 23 2053 0 0 2087 61 Adj No. of Lanes 2 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 300 0 138 5 0 2 43 2420 0 41 2398 70 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.68 Sat Flow, vehlh 3442 0 1583 1137 0 569 1774 3632 0 1774 3512 102 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 200 0 63 3 0 0 23 2053 0 0 1046 1102 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1721 0 1583 1706 0 0 1774 1770 0 1774 1770 1845 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.0 0.0 3.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.1 39.0 0.0 0.0 41.0 42.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.0 0.0 3.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.1 39.0 0.0 0.0 41.0 42.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.67 0.33 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.06 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 300 0 138 7 0 0 43 2420 0 41 1208 1259 V/C Ratio(X) 0.67 0.00 0.46 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.87 0.87 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 694 0 319 344 0 0 101 2420 0 99 1208 1259 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 39.5 0.0 38.7 44.3 0.0 0.0 43.0 10.6 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.5 0.0 2.3 38.4 0.0 0.0 9.8 3.9 0.0 0.0 8.5 8.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 2.5 0.0 1.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.7 20.1 0.0 0.0 22.6 24.1 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 42.0 0.0 41.0 82.7 0.0 0.0 52.8 14.6 0.0 0.0 19.5 19.8 LnGrp LOS D D F D B B B Approach Vol, veh/h 263 3 2076 2148 Approach Delay, s/veh 41.8 82.7 15.0 19.6 Approach LOS D F B B Timer Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.6 65.5 12.3 6.7 65.4 4.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 61.0 18.0 5.1 60.9 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 0.0 41.0 7.0 3.1 44.0 2.2 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.0 15.2 0.8 0.0 13.7 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 18.8 HCM 2010 LOS B BO WP AM Synchro 9 Report Page 1 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2: Pacific Coast Highway & 5th Street/Marvista Drive Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s t r* 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 t 5.5 80.5 t 5.1 Traffic Volume (vehlh) 139 16 28 11 22 76 52 1730 1 16 1927 48 Future Volume (veh/h) 139 16 28 11 22 76 52 1730 1 16 1927 48 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 151 17 30 12 24 83 57 1880 1 17 2095 52 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 235 287 244 46 64 175 73 2492 1 79 2435 60 Arrive On Green 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.04 0.69 0.69 0.04 0.69 0.69 Sat Flow, vehlh 1281 1863 1583 79 414 1138 1774 3630 2 1774 3530 87 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 151 17 30 119 0 0 57 916 965 17 1046 1101 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1281 1863 1583 1632 0 0 1774 1770 1862 1774 1770 1847 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.0 0.9 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.7 39.5 39.5 1.1 52.6 53.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 15.7 0.9 1.9 7.7 0.0 0.0 3.7 39.5 39.5 1.1 52.6 53.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.10 0.70 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.05 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 235 287 244 285 0 0 73 1215 1278 79 1221 1274 V/C Ratio(X) 0.64 0.06 0.12 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.75 0.75 0.21 0.86 0.86 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 262 326 277 318 0 0 77 1215 1278 83 1221 1274 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 49.2 42.4 42.8 45.2 0.0 0.0 55.7 12.0 12.0 54.0 13.8 14.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.5 0.1 0.2 1.0 0.0 0.0 37.2 4.4 4.2 1.3 7.9 7.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 5.1 0.5 0.9 3.6 0.0 0.0 2.6 20.6 21.6 0.6 27.9 29.7 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 53.7 42.5 43.0 46.2 0.0 0.0 92.9 16.3 16.1 55.4 21.7 21.9 LnGrp LOS D D D D F B B E C C Approach Vol, veh/h 198 119 1938 2164 Approach Delay, s/veh 51.1 46.2 18.5 22.1 Approach LOS D D B C Timer Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.7 85.0 22.5 9.3 85.4 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.5 80.5 20.5 5.1 80.9 20.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 3.1 41.5 17.7 5.7 55.7 9.7 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.0 20.7 0.4 0.0 19.0 1.0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 22.4 HCM 2010 LOS C BO WP AM Synchro 9 Report Page 2 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 3: Main Street/Bolsa Avenue & Pacific Coast Highway Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s tt r* 4.5 t 4.5 4.5 t r* 8.6 t r* Traffic Volume (vehlh) 102 1834 66 46 1737 8 48 38 51 18 41 129 Future Volume (veh/h) 102 1834 66 46 1737 8 48 38 51 18 41 129 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 111 1993 72 50 1888 9 52 41 55 20 45 140 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 138 2294 1026 103 2270 11 244 316 269 262 316 392 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.65 0.65 0.06 0.63 0.63 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 Sat Flow, vehlh 1774 3539 1583 1774 3612 17 1194 1863 1583 1294 1863 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 111 1993 72 50 924 973 52 41 55 20 45 140 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1860 1194 1863 1583 1294 1863 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.7 49.4 1.8 3.0 44.3 44.4 4.2 2.0 3.3 1.5 2.2 8.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.7 49.4 1.8 3.0 44.3 44.4 6.5 2.0 3.3 3.5 2.2 8.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 138 2294 1026 103 1112 1169 244 316 269 262 316 392 V/C Ratio(X) 0.80 0.87 0.07 0.48 0.83 0.83 0.21 0.13 0.20 0.08 0.14 0.36 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 220 2578 1153 140 1209 1271 244 316 269 262 316 392 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 49.4 15.4 7.1 49.7 15.7 15.8 41.3 38.4 38.9 39.9 38.5 33.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 10.6 3.2 0.0 3.5 4.7 4.6 2.0 0.8 1.7 0.6 0.9 2.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 3.7 24.8 0.8 1.6 22.8 23.9 1.5 1.1 1.6 0.6 1.2 3.7 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 60.0 18.6 7.1 53.2 20.5 20.3 43.2 39.3 40.6 40.5 39.4 36.4 LnGrp LOS E B A D C C D D D D D D Approach Vol, veh/h 2176 1947 148 205 Approach Delay, s/veh 20.3 21.2 41.2 37.4 Approach LOS C C D D Timer Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.0 10.8 75.2 23.0 13.0 73.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.5 8.6 79.4 18.5 13.5 74.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 8.5 5.0 51.4 10.0 8.7 46.4 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 1.0 3.2 19.2 0.9 0.1 17.5 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 22.2 HCM 2010 LOS C BO WP AM Synchro 9 Report Page 3 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 4: 12th Street/Balboa Drive & Pacific Coast Highway Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s tt r* 4.5 t 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.5 5.9 t r* Traffic Volume (vehlh) 40 1871 12 23 1798 6 55 62 41 44 29 32 Future Volume (veh/h) 40 1871 12 23 1798 6 55 62 41 44 29 32 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 43 2034 13 25 1954 7 60 67 45 48 32 35 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 101 2339 1046 43 2273 8 130 140 80 275 353 300 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.66 0.66 0.02 0.63 0.63 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow, vehlh 1774 3539 1583 1774 3617 13 449 738 421 1276 1863 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 43 2034 13 25 955 1006 172 0 0 48 32 35 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1860 1608 0 0 1276 1863 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.5 49.5 0.3 1.5 47.1 47.2 6.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 2.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.5 49.5 0.3 1.5 47.1 47.2 10.2 0.0 0.0 4.8 1.5 2.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.01 0.35 0.26 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 101 2339 1046 43 1112 1169 350 0 0 275 353 300 V/C Ratio(X) 0.43 0.87 0.01 0.58 0.86 0.86 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.09 0.12 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 123 2624 1174 97 1286 1352 350 0 0 275 353 300 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 49.3 14.6 6.3 52.2 16.2 16.2 39.5 0.0 0.0 37.4 36.1 36.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.8 3.2 0.0 11.5 5.4 5.2 4.9 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.5 0.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.3 24.8 0.1 0.9 24.5 25.7 5.1 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.8 0.9 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 52.1 17.8 6.3 63.7 21.6 21.5 44.3 0.0 0.0 38.8 36.6 37.1 LnGrp LOS D B A E C C D D D D Approach Vol, veh/h 2090 1986 172 115 Approach Delay, s/veh 18.4 22.1 44.3 37.7 Approach LOS B C D D Timer Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 25.0 7.1 75.9 25.0 10.6 72.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.5 5.9 80.1 20.5 7.5 78.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 12.2 3.5 51.5 6.8 4.5 49.2 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.9 0.0 19.9 1.2 2.7 18.7 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 21.6 HCM 2010 LOS C BO WP AM Synchro 9 Report Page 4 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Pacific Coast Highway & 1st Street Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s 1� 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 t 5.0 61.0 t 5.1 Traffic Volume (vehlh) 160 0 41 0 0 1 39 1654 0 6 1722 139 Future Volume (veh/h) 160 0 41 0 0 1 39 1654 0 6 1722 139 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 174 0 45 0 0 1 42 1798 0 7 1872 151 Adj No. of Lanes 2 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 269 0 124 0 0 2 64 2420 0 62 2267 180 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.68 0.00 0.04 0.68 0.68 Sat Flow, veh/h 3442 0 1583 0 0 1583 1774 3632 0 1774 3321 264 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 174 0 45 0 0 1 42 1798 0 7 986 1037 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1721 0 1583 0 0 1583 1774 1770 0 1774 1770 1816 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.4 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 2.1 29.1 0.0 0.3 35.6 37.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.4 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 2.1 29.1 0.0 0.3 35.6 37.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.15 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 269 0 124 0 0 2 64 2420 0 62 1208 1240 V/C Ratio(X) 0.65 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.65 0.74 0.00 0.11 0.82 0.84 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 694 0 319 0 0 319 101 2420 0 99 1208 1240 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 39.9 0.0 39.0 0.0 0.0 44.5 42.4 9.1 0.0 41.7 10.1 10.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.6 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 106.3 10.7 2.1 0.0 0.8 6.2 6.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 2.2 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.2 14.7 0.0 0.2 19.0 20.8 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 42.6 0.0 40.8 0.0 0.0 150.8 53.1 11.2 0.0 42.5 16.3 17.3 LnGrp LOS D D F D B D B B Approach Vol, veh/h 219 1 1840 2030 Approach Delay, s/veh 42.2 150.8 12.1 16.9 Approach LOS D F B B Timer Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.6 65.5 11.5 7.7 65.4 4.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 61.0 18.0 5.1 60.9 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 2.3 31.1 6.4 4.1 39.7 2.1 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.0 17.4 0.6 0.0 15.5 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 16.1 HCM 2010 LOS B BO WP PM Synchro 9 Report Page 1 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2: Pacific Coast Highway & 5th Street/Marvista Drive Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s t r* 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 t 12.5 71.5 t 6.7 Traffic Volume (vehlh) 169 31 37 11 25 49 80 1472 6 80 1640 126 Future Volume (veh/h) 169 31 37 11 25 49 80 1472 6 80 1640 126 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 184 34 40 12 27 53 87 1600 7 87 1783 137 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 271 301 256 51 97 154 102 2221 10 191 2216 168 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.06 0.61 0.61 0.11 0.66 0.66 Sat Flow, vehlh 1313 1863 1583 102 599 952 1774 3614 16 1774 3335 253 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 184 34 40 92 0 0 87 783 824 87 936 984 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1313 1863 1583 1653 0 0 1774 1770 1860 1774 1770 1818 Q Serve(g_s), s 10.6 1.8 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.7 35.6 35.6 5.4 43.8 46.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 16.2 1.8 2.5 5.6 0.0 0.0 5.7 35.6 35.6 5.4 43.8 46.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.13 0.58 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.14 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 271 301 256 302 0 0 102 1088 1143 191 1176 1208 V/C Ratio(X) 0.68 0.11 0.16 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.85 0.72 0.72 0.46 0.80 0.81 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 312 360 306 353 0 0 102 1088 1143 191 1176 1208 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 47.8 41.6 41.9 43.2 0.0 0.0 54.3 15.5 15.5 48.7 13.9 14.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.8 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.0 0.0 45.9 4.1 3.9 1.7 5.6 6.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 6.1 0.9 1.1 2.7 0.0 0.0 4.1 18.4 19.3 2.7 22.9 25.0 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 52.6 41.8 42.2 43.8 0.0 0.0 100.2 19.6 19.4 50.4 19.5 20.4 LnGrp LOS D D D D F B B D B C Approach Vol, veh/h 258 92 1694 2007 Approach Delay, s/veh 49.6 43.8 23.7 21.3 Approach LOS D D C C Timer Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 17.0 76.0 23.3 11.2 81.8 23.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 12.5 71.5 22.5 6.7 77.3 22.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 7.4 37.6 18.2 7.7 48.0 7.6 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.2 14.7 0.6 0.0 18.2 1.2 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 24.6 HCM 2010 LOS C BO WP PM Synchro 9 Report Page 2 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 3: Main Street/Bolsa Avenue & Pacific Coast Highway Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s tt r* 4.5 t 4.5 4.5 t r* 14.5 t r* Traffic Volume (vehlh) 125 1560 113 103 1445 26 78 56 77 23 48 177 Future Volume (veh/h) 125 1560 113 103 1445 26 78 56 77 23 48 177 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 136 1696 123 112 1571 28 85 61 84 25 52 192 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 167 2015 901 210 2112 38 250 344 292 262 344 441 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.57 0.57 0.12 0.59 0.59 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 Sat Flow, vehlh 1774 3539 1583 1774 3558 63 1131 1863 1583 1238 1863 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 136 1696 123 112 780 819 85 61 84 25 52 192 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1852 1131 1863 1583 1238 1863 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.9 41.9 3.8 6.3 33.9 34.0 7.2 2.9 4.8 1.8 2.5 10.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.9 41.9 3.8 6.3 33.9 34.0 9.7 2.9 4.8 4.8 2.5 10.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 167 2015 901 210 1050 1099 250 344 292 262 344 441 V/C Ratio(X) 0.82 0.84 0.14 0.53 0.74 0.74 0.34 0.18 0.29 0.10 0.15 0.44 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 294 2429 1086 243 1164 1218 250 344 292 262 344 441 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 47.0 18.8 10.6 43.8 15.6 15.6 40.2 36.3 37.1 38.3 36.1 31.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 9.2 2.4 0.1 2.1 2.3 2.3 3.6 1.1 2.5 0.7 0.9 3.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 4.3 20.9 1.7 3.2 17.2 18.0 2.5 1.6 2.3 0.7 1.4 5.0 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 56.2 21.2 10.7 45.9 18.0 17.9 43.8 37.4 39.6 39.0 37.1 34.4 LnGrp LOS E C B D B B D D D D D C Approach Vol, veh/h 1955 1711 230 269 Approach Delay, s/veh 23.0 19.8 40.6 35.3 Approach LOS C B D D Timer Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 24.0 17.0 64.6 24.0 14.4 67.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.5 14.5 72.5 19.5 17.5 69.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 11.7 8.3 43.9 12.5 9.9 36.0 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 1.3 4.7 16.3 1.2 0.2 15.1 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 23.4 HCM 2010 LOS C BO WP PM Synchro 9 Report Page 3 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 4: 12th Street/Balboa Drive & Pacific Coast Highway Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Change Period (Y+Rc), s tt r* 4.5 t 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.5 6.5 t r* Traffic Volume (vehlh) 48 1533 52 30 1566 20 86 50 47 46 71 28 Future Volume (veh/h) 48 1533 52 30 1566 20 86 50 47 46 71 28 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 52 1666 57 33 1702 22 93 54 51 50 77 30 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 115 2113 945 52 2009 26 198 114 91 344 455 387 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.60 0.60 0.03 0.56 0.56 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, vehlh 1774 3539 1583 1774 3578 46 602 467 371 1284 1863 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 52 1666 57 33 841 883 198 0 0 50 77 30 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1855 1440 0 0 1284 1863 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.9 37.4 1.6 1.9 41.4 41.6 9.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 1.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.9 37.4 1.6 1.9 41.4 41.6 13.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 3.4 1.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.02 0.47 0.26 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 115 2113 945 52 994 1042 403 0 0 344 455 387 V/C Ratio(X) 0.45 0.79 0.06 0.63 0.85 0.85 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.17 0.08 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 161 2526 1130 110 1212 1270 403 0 0 344 455 387 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 47.0 16.0 8.8 50.1 19.1 19.2 34.8 0.0 0.0 31.4 31.1 30.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.8 1.5 0.0 11.8 4.8 4.7 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.8 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.5 18.5 0.7 1.1 21.4 22.5 5.5 0.0 0.0 1.2 1.9 0.7 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 49.8 17.5 8.8 61.9 23.9 23.9 39.1 0.0 0.0 32.3 31.9 30.8 LnGrp LOS D B A E C C D C C C Approach Vol, veh/h 1775 1757 198 157 Approach Delay, s/veh 18.2 24.6 39.1 31.8 Approach LOS B C D C Timer Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 30.0 7.6 66.8 30.0 11.3 63.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.5 6.5 74.5 25.5 9.5 71.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 15.0 3.9 39.4 6.3 4.9 43.6 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 1.4 0.0 17.6 1.8 3.7 15.0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 22.7 HCM 2010 LOS C BO WP PM Synchro 9 Report Page 4 APPENDIX E ROADWAY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Northbound PCH Between 1st and 5th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1708 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 944 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.50 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 24.4 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:07:25 AM 1 EX AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Southbound PCH Between 1st and 5th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1749 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 967 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.51 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 25.0 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:07:41 AM 1 EX AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Northbound PCH Between 1st and 5th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1476 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 816 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.43 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 21.1 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:08:16 AM 1 EX PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Southbound PCH Between 1st and 5th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1616 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 894 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.47 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 23.1 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:08:04 AM 1 EX PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing WP AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Northbound PCH Between 1st and 5th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1747 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 966 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.51 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 25.0 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:08:36 AM 1 EXWP AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing WP AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Southbound PCH Between 1st and 5th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1788 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 988 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.52 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 25.5 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:08:48 AM 1 EXWP AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing WP PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Northbound PCH Between 1st and 5th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1519 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 840 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.44 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 21.7 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:09:41 AM 1 EXWP PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing WP PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Southbound PCH Between 1st and 5th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1659 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 917 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.48 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 23.7 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:09:23 AM 1 EXWP PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Northbound PCH Between 1st and 5th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1788 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 988 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.52 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 25.5 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:10:03 AM 1 OY AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Southbound PCH Between 1st and 5th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1829 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 1011 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.53 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 26.1 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) D Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:10:21 AM 1 OY AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Northbound PCH Between 1st and 5th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1583 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 875 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.46 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 22.6 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:11:12 AM 1 OY PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Southbound PCH Between 1st and 5th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1737 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 960 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.51 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 24.8 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright 0 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:10:55 AM 1 OY PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report Project InformationAm �� mm Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Northbound PCH Between 1st and 5th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 6.00 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1827 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 1010 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.53 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 26.1 Level of Service (LOS) D Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 5.0 Access Point Density Adjustment (fA) Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HC57TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:11:33 AM 1 OYWP AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report Project InformationAm �� mm Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Southbound PCH Between 1st and 5th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 6.00 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1868 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 1032 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.54 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 26.7 Level of Service (LOS) D Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 5.0 Access Point Density Adjustment (fA) Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HC57TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:11:54 AM 1 OYWP AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report Project InformationAm �� mm Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Northbound PCH Between 1st and 5th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 6.00 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1626 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 899 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.47 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 23.2 Level of Service (LOS) C Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 5.0 Access Point Density Adjustment (fA) Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HC57TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:13:15 AM 1 OYWP PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report Project InformationAm �� mm Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Southbound PCH Between 1st and 5th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 6.00 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1780 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 984 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.52 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 25.4 Level of Service (LOS) C Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 5.0 Access Point Density Adjustment (fA) Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HC57TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:12:58 AM 1 OYWP PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Build -Out AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Northbound PCH Between 1st and 5th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1906 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 1054 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.55 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 27.2 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) D Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:03:00 AM 1130 AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Build -Out AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Southbound PCH Between 1st and 5th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1952 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 1079 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.57 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 27.9 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) D Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright 0 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:03:56 AM 1130 AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Build -Out PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Northbound PCH Between 1st and 5th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1647 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 910 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.48 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 23.5 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:04:49 AM 1130 PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Build -Out PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Southbound PCH Between 1st and 5th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1803 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 997 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.52 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 25.8 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:05:06 AM 1130 PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Build -Out WP AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Northbound PCH Between 1st and 5th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1945 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 1076 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.57 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 27.8 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) D Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright 0 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:05:38 AM 1 BOWP AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Build -Out WP AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Southbound PCH Between 1st and 5th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1991 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 1100 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.58 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 28.4 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) D Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright 0 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:06:11 AM 1 BOWP AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Build -Out WP PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Northbound PCH Between 1st and 5th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1690 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 934 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.49 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 24.1 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:06:54 AM 1 BOWP PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Build -Out WP PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Southbound PCH Between 1st and 5th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1846 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 1020 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.54 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 26.4 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) D Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright 0 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:06:38 AM 1 BOWP PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Eastbound PCH Between 5th and Main Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1772 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 980 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.52 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 25.3 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:18:01 AM 2 EX AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Westbound PCH Between 5th and Main Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1693 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 936 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.49 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 24.2 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:17:45 AM 2 EX AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Eastbound PCH Between 5th and Main Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1587 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 878 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.46 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 22.7 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:18:21 AM 2 EX PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Westbound PCH Between 5th and Main Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1499 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 828 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.44 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 21.4 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:18:32 AM 2 EX PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing WP AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Eastbound PCH Between 5th and Main Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1796 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 993 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.52 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 25.7 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:19:14 AM 2 EXWP AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing WP AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Westbound PCH Between 5th and Main Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1718 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 950 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.50 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 24.5 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:18:55 AM 2 EXWP AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing WP PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Eastbound PCH Between 5th and Main Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1614 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 892 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.47 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 23.0 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:19:54 AM 2 EXWP PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing WP PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Westbound PCH Between 5th and Main Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1527 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 844 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.44 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 21.8 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:20:07 AM 2 EXWP PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Eastbound PCH Between 5th and Main Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1860 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 1028 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.54 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 26.6 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) D Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:20:47 AM 2 OY AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Westbound PCH Between 5th and Main Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1776 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 982 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.52 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 25.4 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright 0 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:20:35 AM 2 OY AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Eastbound PCH Between 5th and Main Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1711 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 946 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.50 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 24.4 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:21:12 AM 2 OY PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Westbound PCH Between 5th and Main Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1616 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 894 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.47 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 23.1 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:21:27 AM 2 OY PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report Project Information Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Eastbound PCH Between 5th and Main Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 6.00 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1884 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 1042 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.55 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 26.9 Level of Service (LOS) D Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 5.0 Access Point Density Adjustment (fA) Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HC57TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:22:11 AM 2 OYWP AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report Project Information Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Westbound PCH Between 5th and Main Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 6.00 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1801 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 996 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.52 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 25.7 Level of Service (LOS) C Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 5.0 Access Point Density Adjustment (fA) Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HC57TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:21:53 AM 2 OYWP AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report Project Information Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Eastbound PCH Between 5th and Main Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 6.00 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1738 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 961 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.51 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 24.8 Level of Service (LOS) C Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 5.0 Access Point Density Adjustment (fA) Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HC57TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:22:39 AM 2 OYWP PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report Project Information Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Westbound PCH Between 5th and Main Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 6.00 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1644 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 909 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.48 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 23.5 Level of Service (LOS) C Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 5.0 Access Point Density Adjustment (fA) Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HC57TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:22:53 AM 2 OYWP PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Build -Out AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Eastbound PCH Between 5th and Main Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1978 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 1094 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.58 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 28.3 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) D Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:15:15 AM 2 130 AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Build -Out AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Westbound PCH Between 5th and Main Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1889 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 1044 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.55 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 27.0 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) D Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright 0 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:14:33 AM 2 130 AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Build -Out PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Eastbound PCH Between 5th and Main Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1771 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 979 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.52 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 25.3 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:15:41 AM 2 130 PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Build -Out PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Westbound PCH Between 5th and Main Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1672 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 924 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.49 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 23.9 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:16:03 AM 2 130 PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Build -Out WP AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Eastbound PCH Between 5th and Main Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 2002 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 1107 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.58 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 28.6 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) D Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright 0 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:16:37 AM 2 BOWP AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Build -Out WP AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Westbound PCH Between 5th and Main Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1914 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 1058 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.56 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 27.3 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) D Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright 0 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:16:21 AM 2 BOWP AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Build -Out WP PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Eastbound PCH Between 5th and Main Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1798 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 994 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.52 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 25.7 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:16:56 AM 2 BOWP PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Build -Out WP PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Westbound PCH Between 5th and Main Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1700 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 940 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.49 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 24.3 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:17:09 AM 2 BOWP PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Eastbound PCH Between Main and 12th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1702 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 941 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.50 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 24.3 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:45:27 AM 3 EX AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Westbound PCH Between Main and 12th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1667 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 922 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.49 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 23.8 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:44:45 AM 3 EX AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Eastbound PCH Between Main and 12th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1440 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 796 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.42 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 20.6 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:45:50 AM 3 EX PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Westbound PCH Between Main and 12th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1480 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 818 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.43 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 21.1 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:46:04 AM 3 EX PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing WP AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Eastbound PCH Between Main and 12th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1726 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 954 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.50 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 24.7 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:46:38 AM 3 EXWP AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing WP AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Westbound PCH Between Main and 12th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1692 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 936 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.49 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 24.2 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:46:20 AM 3 EXWP AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing WP PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Eastbound PCH Between Main and 12th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1467 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 811 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.43 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 21.0 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:47:01 AM 3 EXWP PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing WP PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Westbound PCH Between Main and 12th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1508 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 834 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.44 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 21.6 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:47:14 AM 3 EXWP PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Eastbound PCH Between Main and 12th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1774 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 981 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.52 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 25.3 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:47:52 AM 3 OY AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Westbound PCH Between Main and 12th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1744 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 964 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.51 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 24.9 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:47:39 AM 3 OY AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Eastbound PCH Between Main and 12th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1533 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 848 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.45 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 21.9 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/201712:01:11 PM 3 OY PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Westbound PCH Between Main and 12th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1589 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 878 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.46 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 22.7 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/201712:00:56 PM 3 OY PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report Project Information Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Eastbound PCH Between Main and 12th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 6.00 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1798 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 994 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.52 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In Level of Service (LOS) 25.7 C Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 5.0 Access Point Density Adjustment (fA) Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HC57TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 12:01:41 PM 3 OYWP AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report Project Information Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Westbound PCH Between Main and 12th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 6.00 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1769 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 978 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.51 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In Level of Service (LOS) 25.3 C Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 5.0 Access Point Density Adjustment (fA) Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HC57TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 12:01:57 PM 3 OYWP AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report Project Information Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Eastbound PCH Between Main and 12th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 6.00 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1560 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 862 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.45 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 22.3 Level of Service (LOS) C Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 5.0 Access Point Density Adjustment (fA) Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HC57TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:41:44 AM 3 OYWP PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report Project Information Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Westbound PCH Between Main and 12th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 6.00 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1617 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 894 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.47 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 23.1 Level of Service (LOS) C Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 5.0 Access Point Density Adjustment (fA) Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HC57TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:42:36 AM 3 OYWP PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Build -Out AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Eastbound PCH Between Main and 12th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1899 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 1050 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.55 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 27.1 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) D Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:39:51 AM 3 130 AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Build -Out AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Westbound PCH Between Main and 12th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1860 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 1028 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.54 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 26.6 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) D Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright 0 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:39:38 AM 3 130 AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Build -Out PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Eastbound PCH Between Main and 12th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1606 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 888 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.47 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 22.9 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:40:09 AM 3 130 PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Build -Out PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Westbound PCH Between Main and 12th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1652 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 914 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.48 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 23.6 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:40:51 AM 3 130 PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Build -Out WP AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Eastbound PCH Between Main and 12th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1923 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 1063 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.56 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 27.5 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) D Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:41:24 AM 3 BOWP AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Build -Out WP AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Westbound PCH Between Main and 12th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1885 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 1042 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.55 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 26.9 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) D Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright 0 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:41:08 AM 3 BOWP AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Build -Out WP PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Eastbound PCH Between Main and 12th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1633 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 903 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.48 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 23.3 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/201712:00:07 PM 3 BOWP PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Build -Out WP PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Westbound PCH Between Main and 12th Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1680 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 929 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.49 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 24.0 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/201712:00:24 PM 3 BOWP PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Eastbound PCH Between 12th and Seal Beach Blvd Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1731 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 957 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.50 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 24.7 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:52:12 AM 4 EX AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Westbound PCH Between 12th and Seal Beach Blvd Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1615 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 893 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.47 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 23.1 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:52:27 AM 4 EX AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Eastbound PCH Between 12th and Seal Beach Blvd Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1433 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 792 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.42 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 20.5 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:53:00 AM 4 EX PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Westbound PCH Between 12th and Seal Beach Blvd Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1423 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 786 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.41 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 20.3 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:52:46 AM 4 EX PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing WP AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Eastbound PCH Between 12th and Seal Beach Blvd Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1755 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 970 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.51 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 25.1 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:53:23 AM 4 EXWP AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing WP AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Westbound PCH Between 12th and Seal Beach Blvd Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1640 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 906 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.48 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 23.4 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:53:35 AM 4 EXWP AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing WP PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Eastbound PCH Between 12th and Seal Beach Blvd Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1460 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 807 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.42 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 20.9 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:54:15 AM 4 EXWP PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing WP PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Westbound PCH Between 12th and Seal Beach Blvd Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1451 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 802 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.42 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 20.7 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:53:59 AM 4 EXWP PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Eastbound PCH Between 12th and Seal Beach Blvd Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1804 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 998 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.53 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 25.8 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:54:36 AM 4 OY AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Westbound PCH Between 12th and Seal Beach Blvd Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1690 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 934 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.49 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 24.1 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:54:48 AM 4 OY AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Eastbound PCH Between 12th and Seal Beach Blvd Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1526 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 844 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.44 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 21.8 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:55:43 AM 4 OY PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Westbound PCH Between 12th and Seal Beach Blvd Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1530 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 846 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.45 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 21.9 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:55:09 AM 4 OY PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report Project Information Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Eastbound PCH Between 12th and Seal Beach Blvd Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 6.00 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1828 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 1010 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.53 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 26.1 Level of Service (LOS) D Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 5.0 Access Point Density Adjustment (fA) Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HC57TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:56:04 AM 4 OYWP AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report Project Information Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Westbound PCH Between 12th and Seal Beach Blvd Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 6.00 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1715 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 948 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.50 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 24.5 Level of Service (LOS) C Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 5.0 Access Point Density Adjustment (fA) Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HC57TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:56:16 AM 4 OYWP AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report Project Information Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Eastbound PCH Between 12th and Seal Beach Blvd Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 6.00 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1553 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHV) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 858 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.45 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 22.2 Level of Service (LOS) C Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 5.0 Access Point Density Adjustment (fA) Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HC57TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:56:52 AM 4 OYWP PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report Project Information Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Westbound PCH Between 12th and Seal Beach Blvd Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 6.00 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1558 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHV) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 862 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.45 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 22.3 Level of Service (LOS) C Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 5.0 Access Point Density Adjustment (fA) Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HC57TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:56:39 AM 4 OYWP PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Build -Out AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Eastbound PCH Between 12th and Seal Beach Blvd Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1932 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 1068 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.56 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 27.6 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) D Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:49:31 AM 4 130 AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Build -Out AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Westbound PCH Between 12th and Seal Beach Blvd Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1802 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 996 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.52 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 25.7 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright 0 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:49:52 AM 4 130 AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Build -Out PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Eastbound PCH Between 12th and Seal Beach Blvd Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1599 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 884 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.47 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 22.8 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:50:36 AM 4 130 PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report Project Information Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency BUILD -OUT PM Analysis Year Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Northbound 5th St Between Marina and PCH Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Undivided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 37.1 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 190 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 105 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.06 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 37.1 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 2.8 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 1.6 Level of Service (LOS) A Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright 0 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 2:45:17 PM 5 130 PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Build -Out PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Westbound PCH Between 12th and Seal Beach Blvd Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1588 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 878 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.46 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 22.7 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:50:23 AM 4 130 PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Build -Out WP AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Eastbound PCH Between 12th and Seal Beach Blvd Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1956 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 1082 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.57 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 28.0 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) D Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:51:01 AM 4 BOWP AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Build -Out WP AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Westbound PCH Between 12th and Seal Beach Blvd Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1827 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 1010 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.53 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 26.1 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) D Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:51:13 AM 4 BOWP AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Build -Out WP PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Eastbound PCH Between 12th and Seal Beach Blvd Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1626 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 899 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.47 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 23.2 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright 0 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:51:53 AM 4 BOWP PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Build -Out WP PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Westbound PCH Between 12th and Seal Beach Blvd Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Divided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 38.7 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 1616 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 894 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.47 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 38.7 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 23.1 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) C Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright 0 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 11:51:38 AM 4 BOWP PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Northbound 5th St Between Marina and PCH Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Undivided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 37.1 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 127 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 70 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.04 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 37.1 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 1.9 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 1.6 Level of Service (LOS) A Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 2:32:34 PM 5 EX AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Southbound 5th St Between Marina and PCH Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Undivided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 37.1 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 70 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 38 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.02 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 37.1 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 1.0 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 1.6 Level of Service (LOS) A Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 2:32:48 PM 5 EX AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Northbound 5th St Between Marina and PCH Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Undivided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 37.1 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 170 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 94 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.05 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 37.1 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 2.5 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 1.6 Level of Service (LOS) A Access Point Density Adjustment JA)5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 2:33:39 PM 5 EX PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Southbound 5th St Between Marina and PCH Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Undivided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 37.1 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 163 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 90 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.05 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 37.1 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 2.4 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 1.6 Level of Service (LOS) A Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 2:33:19 PM 5 EX PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing With Project AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Northbound 5th St Between Marina and PCH Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free-Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free-Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right-Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left-Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Undivided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free-Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 37.1 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 169 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 94 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single-Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor-Trailers (TT), % - Volume-to-Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.05 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 37.1 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 2.5 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 1.6 Level of Service (LOS) A Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 2:34:00 PM 5 EXWP AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing With Project AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Southbound 5th St Between Marina and PCH Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Undivided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 37.1 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 114 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 63 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.03 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 37.1 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 1.7 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 1.6 Level of Service (LOS) A Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 2:34:19 PM 5 EXWP AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing With Project PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Northbound 5th St Between Marina and PCH Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Undivided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 37.1 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 217 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 120 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.06 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 37.1 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 3.2 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 1.6 Level of Service (LOS) A Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 2:34:57 PM 5 EXWP PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year Existing With Project PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Southbound 5th St Between Marina and PCH Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Undivided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 37.1 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 212 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 117 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.06 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 37.1 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 3.2 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 1.6 Level of Service (LOS) A Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 2:34:40 PM 5 EXWP PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Northbound 5th St Between Marina and PCH Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Undivided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 37.1 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 130 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 72 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.04 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 37.1 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 1.9 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 1.6 Level of Service (LOS) A Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright 0 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 2:35:22 PM 5 OY AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Southbound 5th St Between Marina and PCH Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Undivided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 37.1 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 71 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 40 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.02 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 37.1 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 1.1 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 1.6 Level of Service (LOS) A Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright 0 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 2:35:38 PM 5 OY AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Northbound 5th St Between Marina and PCH Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Undivided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 37.1 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 173 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 96 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.05 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 37.1 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 2.6 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 1.6 Level of Service (LOS) A Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright 0 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 2:36:27 PM 5 OY PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report L=M" Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Southbound 5th St Between Marina and PCH Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Undivided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 37.1 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 166 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 92 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.05 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 37.1 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 2.5 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 1.6 Level of Service (LOS) A Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright 0 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 2:36:10 PM 5 OY PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report Project InformationAm �� mm Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Northbound 5th St Between Marina and PCH Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Undivided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 6.00 37.1 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 172 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 95 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.05 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 37.1 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 2.6 Level of Service (LOS) A Median Type Adjustment (fm) 1.6 5.0 Access Point Density Adjustment (fA) Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HC57TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 2:36:54 PM 5 OYWP AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report Project InformationAm �� mm Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT AM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Southbound 5th St Between Marina and PCH Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Undivided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 6.00 37.1 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 115 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 64 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.03 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 37.1 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 1.7 Level of Service (LOS) A Median Type Adjustment (fm) 1.6 5.0 Access Point Density Adjustment (fA) Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HC57TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 2:37:07 PM 5 OYWP AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report Project InformationAm �� mm. Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT PM Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed 490 Pacific Coast Highway Jurisdiction Project Description Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Northbound 5th St Between Marina and PCH Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Undivided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 6.00 37.1 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 220 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHV) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 122 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.06 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 37.1 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 3.3 Level of Service (LOS) A Median Type Adjustment (fm) 1.6 5.0 Access Point Density Adjustment (fA) Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HC57TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 2:38:32 PM 5 OYWP PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report Project InformationAm �� mm Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency KHA Analysis Year OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT PM Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Southbound 5th St Between Marina and PCH Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Undivided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 6.00 37.1 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 215 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 119 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.06 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 37.1 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 3.2 Level of Service (LOS) A Median Type Adjustment (fm) 1.6 5.0 Access Point Density Adjustment (fA) Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HC57TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 2:37:42 PM 5 OYWP PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report Project Information Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency BUILD -OUT AM Analysis Year Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Northbound 5th St Between Marina and PCH Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Undivided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 37.1 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 141 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 78 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.04 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 37.1 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 2.1 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 1.6 Level of Service (LOS) A Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright 0 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 2:27:15 PM 5 130 AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report Project Information Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency BUILD -OUT AM Analysis Year Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Southbound 5th St Between Marina and PCH Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Undivided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 37.1 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 78 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 43 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.02 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 37.1 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 1.2 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 1.6 Level of Service (LOS) A Access Point Density Adjustment JA) 5.0 Copyright 0 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 2:31:08 PM 5 130 AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report Project Information Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency BUILD -OUT PM Analysis Year Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Southbound 5th St Between Marina and PCH Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Undivided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft 6.00 Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 37.1 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 182 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHv) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 100 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.05 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 37.1 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 2.7 Median Type Adjustment (fm) 1.6 Level of Service (LOS) A Access Point Density Adjustment JA)5.0 Copyright 0 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 2:28:45 PM 5 130 PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report Project Information Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency BUILD -OUT WITH PROJECT AM Analysis Year Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Northbound 5th St Between Marina and PCH Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Undivided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 6.00 37.1 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 183 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHV) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 101 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.05 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 37.1 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 2.7 Level of Service (LOS) A Median Type Adjustment (fm) 1.6 5.0 Access Point Density Adjustment (fA) Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HC57TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 2:30:30 PM 5 BOWP AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report Project Information Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency BUILD -OUT WITH PROJECT AM Analysis Year Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Southbound 5th St Between Marina and PCH Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Undivided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 6.00 37.1 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 122 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHV) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 68 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.04 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 37.1 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 1.8 Level of Service (LOS) A Median Type Adjustment (fm) 1.6 5.0 Access Point Density Adjustment (fA) Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HC57TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 2:29:32 PM 5 BOWP AM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report Project InformationNIL AM Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency BUILD -OUT WITH PROJECT PM Analysis Year Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 1 Geometric Data Direction 1 Description Northbound 5th St Between Marina and PCH Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Undivided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 6.00 37.1 Direction 1 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 1 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 237 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHV) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 131 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.07 Direction 1 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 37.1 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 3.5 Level of Service (LOS) A Median Type Adjustment (fm) 1.6 5.0 Access Point Density Adjustment (fA) Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HC57TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 2:31:58 PM 5 BOWP PM.xuf HCS7 Multilane Highway Report Project InformationNIL AM Analyst TC Date 12/4/2017 Agency BUILD -OUT WITH PROJECT PM Analysis Year Jurisdiction Seal Beach Time Period Analyzed Project Description 490 Pacific Coast Highway Direction 2 Geometric Data Direction 2 Description Southbound 5th St Between Marina and PCH Number of Lanes (N), In 2 Terrain Type Level Segment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % - Measured or Base Free -Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi - Base Free -Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 45.0 Right -Side Lateral Clearance (LCR), ft 6 Lane Width, ft 12 Left -Side Lateral Clearance (LCL), ft 0 Median Type Undivided Total Lateral Clearance (TLC), ft Access Point Density, pts/mi 20.0 Free -Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 6.00 37.1 Direction 2 Adjustment Factors Driver Population All Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 1.000 Driver Population SAF 1.000 Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 1.000 Driver Population CAF 1.000 Direction 2 Demand and Capacity Volume (V), veh/h 231 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHV) 0.952 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.95 Flow Rate (vp), pc/h/In 128 Total Trucks, % 5.00 Capacity (c), pc/h/In 1900 Single -Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cads), pc/h/In 1900 Tractor -Trailers (TT), % - Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.07 Direction 2 Speed and Density Lane Width Adjustment (few) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 37.1 Total Lateral Clearance Adj. (fTLC) 1.3 Density (D), pc/mi/In 3.5 Level of Service (LOS) A Median Type Adjustment (fm) 1.6 5.0 Access Point Density Adjustment (fA) Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HC57TM Multilane Version 7.3 Generated: 12/15/2017 2:31:44 PM 5 BOWP PM.xuf APPENDIX F OCTAM PLOTS 15 30 3853 4114 9549 9,83 35550 34895 9 ,y0 41122 39835 44766 w o 64695 43517 62642 2910 46499 671 671 6f 42559 1QAr72 �� 3SS0 2p56 3561 00 V- V- 00 m a 45j8 N GO A 4542 10469 10469 10410 20547 10375 10375 10348 130, O9 221 211 1255 p 22886 09 W N ti��` ,�hA 22621 ss ✓s 2664 2450 9 CD h 00 w y01� 0�1 yC�` C In u^i 1607 0 1371 1491 6>>3 O cv r, v 6 �`° 0 129oh°j 2$ 6808^� 487 ✓ w 6�j3� a ✓� o 6408 615 1502 1439 5888 1,1486tgr'r, 1561 a IN M I 1135 ^�� w w I6I 9 Cv co 0^� I53I8 ^tip r r V c cC �Ob 'r9 637 638 r90S 9�v� mon l]� (Licensed to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.) �o � 2581 sem, � 2533 21333 22897 21928 25750 23237 25679 V V W 14 14 00 tO tO Vr O N 10703 10237 Q rsoo 30 4550 4580 10703 10237 Oti ti� do til 3518 3178 � �0' l 00 n Ln ko O Ln p 1846 1882 O �F vo ti )� X89 O 1979 �y c6 2003 w ,3j9 65366' 3871 2975 493 13901 s 3030 s ,0 I�6359 480 1244 ^D `O `° 1 r6O� X60 Ar 111 a 6859 1 ��0 ti°j 6,83 ^O r r � h 00 ti 1;I F 1161' ,yDO 770 830 10367 10155 357 3515 mon l]� (Licensed to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.) Kimley»>Horn January 7, 2020 Ahmad Ghaderi A & S Engineering, Inc. 28405 Sand Canyon Rd., Suite "B" Canyon Country, CA 91387 Subject: Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Assessment - 490 Pacific Coast Highway Project Dear Mr. Ghaderi: This letter documents a Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) assessment for a proposed gas station and convenience market project located at 490 Pacific Coast Highway in the City of Seal Beach. With the passage of SB 743, VMT has become an important indicator for determining if a new development will result in a "significant transportation impact" as required bythe California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). SB 743 was approved by the California legislature in September 2013. SB 743 requires changes to CEQA, specifically directing the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to develop alternative metrics to the use of vehicular "level of service" (LOS) for evaluating transportation projects. OPR has updated guidelines for CEQA and written a technical advisory for evaluating transportation impacts in CEQA and has set a deadline of July 2020 for local agencies to update their CEQA transportation procedures. OPR has recommended that VMT replace LOS as the primary measure of transportation impacts. The City of Seal Beach has until July 2020 to update their traffic impact study guidelines to comply with SB 743. Since Seal Beach guidelines are not in place, the traffic impact study has not conducted a quantitative VMT analysis. Rather, this letter refers to the guidance provided by the OPR within the Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA document. The Technical Advisory establishes that, for local -serving urban commercial uses, impact should be established based on the net increase in VMT. However, the document further establishes that local - serving commercial uses, such as a gas station and convenience market in this case, can be determined to result in an overall VMT reduction. Local -serving commercial uses, particularly in urban areas, primarily serve pre-existing needs and as a result do not generate new trips because there are existing demands. As a result, local -serving commercial uses can be presumed to reduce trip lengths when a new site is proposed. For instance, a customer may travel to the new development because of a closer proximity from other gas stations in the area and is therefore not a new trip. These customers will access the proposed site because it is closer to their origin, or because the site is more convenient than similar sites in the vicinity. This results in an existing trip on the roadway network becoming shorter, rather than a new trip being added to the roadway network. In accordance with the Technical Advisory, it is appropriate that the proposed gas station and convenience market be presumed to result in a VMT reduction and support the goals of SB 743.