Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Res 3845 1989-04-17 RESOLU'l'IOlI No. .58~ I A RESOLtl'.rION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH, CER'l'IFYING THE FINAL PROGRAII ENVIRONllEll'rAL IIIPAC'l' REPOR'l' (1490) FOR 'l'HE ORANGE COUN'l'Y HAZARDOUS WASTE IlANAGEIIERT PLAN AND FEASIBLE IIITlGATION IlEASURES HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED AS REQUIRED BY THE CALIFORNIA ENVIROIOIENTAL QUALITY AC'l' The City COuncil of the City of Seal Beach does hereby resolve as follows: WHEREAS: The Oranqe county Hazardous Waste ManaqeJIent Plan is considered a .project. under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and WHEREAS: The County of oranqe served as the lead aqency in the preparation and review of the final ProqrlUll EIR 1490; and I WHEREAS: Final EIR 1490 for the oranqe COunty Hazardous Waste Kanaqement Plan was prepared pursuant to the requireJleJlts of CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the County CEQA procedures; and public review and coDllllent periods were provided for both the Notice of Preparation and the Draft EIR; and WHEREAS: In its consideration of the oranqe COunty Hazardous Waste Manaqement Plan, the city of Seal Beach serves in the role of a Responsible Aqency and IlUSt deterlline if the subject Proqram EIR has been adequately prepared in accordance with CEQA; and WHEREAS: The City Council finds that the Final ProqrlUll EIR 1490 was prepared in accordance with CEQA, the state Guidelines, and the city of Seal Beach procedures, and that findinqs have been adopted for each potential environmental effect, mitiqation Jleasure, and alternatives to the Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A and _de a part thereof. NOW, 'l'HEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City COuncil hereby certifies the final Program EIR 1490 as complete, adequate and in compliance with e requirements of CEQA d the State CEQA Guidelines. AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: I ?~~~6 Resolution Number 384$ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ] COtmTY OF ORANGE ] .CITY OF SEAL BEACH ] I I, Joanne M. Yeo, City Clerk of seal Beach, CA, do hereby certify that th~~f~egoing resolution is the original copy of Resolution IIwIber",-~_ on file in the Office of the city Clerk, passed, ~:ed' and adopted by the city council of the CiY'tl of Seal cb, at a regular aeeting thereof held on the / - day of I , 1989. '1 . I I I I I I, I Resolu.tion Number -'91s- EXHIBIT A IOAJD OF SUPERVISORS PDlDIRGS FOB. PID 490 1.0 0lWICB comrrr .""'&1lDOUS VASTB IWIAGIIIBN'1' PUR Program Environmental Impact Report (III) 490 evaluates the potential impacts on the environment of the proposed Oranee County Hazardous Vaste HBnale.ent Plan. The purpose of the Plan is to provide policy direction and country-vide proeram to .address current and future hazardous vaste aanageaent issues vhich have city and County responsibility. A particular focus of the Plan is to reduce Orange County's dependence on direct off-site disposal of hazardous vastes throu,h technoloeies including source reduction, resource recovery, recyclin" and treatment, and the siting of off~site permanent hazardous vaste aanagement (BVH) facilities. The III evaluates the follovin, components of the Planl o Proposed ,oals, objectives, policies, and programs to ensure the safe mana,ement of hazardous vastes vithin Oran,e County.. o General types of hazardous vaste treatment facilities contemplated by the Plan for location vithin Orange County. o Facility siting criteria established in the Plan for use by cities and county in considering future facility proposals for local permits. These components of the Plan are summarized in a ceneral listing belovo 1.1 GOALS, OBJBCrIVBS, POLICIES, l'llOGlWIS 1.1.1 Goal Stateaent Protect the health and vel fare of the public and quality of the environment, vhile preserving the economic vitality of Orange County throu,h a comprehensive countywide program to ensure the safe and efficient manarement of hazardous vaste. 1.1.2 Objectives (Abridged) Objective 1. Vaste Hanagement Technologies: Eliminate dependence on land disposal throUlh safe technologies. Objective 2. Vaste Hanagement Facilities: Provide for sufficient treatment and transfer facilities to manage Orange County's hazardous vaste. Objective 3. S..ll Quantity Generators/Households: Provide for safe and efficient collection, treatment, and disposal of hazardous vaste. Objective 4. Public Iducationl Provide for education of Oranee County industry, business, government, and citizens regarding proper hazardous vaste aanagemen t . Objective 5. Hazardous Vaste Inventory: Maintain information on type, volume, location, and aanacement of hazardous vastes. Objective 6. Local Regulation: Insure proper handling of hazardous vaste by business. Objective 7. Clean-up of Previous Disposal Sites: Assist agencies responsible for site clean-ups. Objective 8. Imerrency Incident Response. Provide for safe emergency incident response. Resolution Number ~~~Ji' 1.1.3 Policies (AbridKed) Poliey 1. Leral Complianee/Alency Coordinationl Insure that hazardous man.,ement aetivities oeeur in eomplianee vith lavs and regulations, and in eoordination vith .,eneies, industry, eitizens. Poliey 2. Publie Inforaation/Partieipation: Insure adequate public information/partieipation in hazardous vaste deeisions. Policy 3. Rerional Pair Sharel Utilize the relional fair share needs assessment and faeility sitinl eriteria. vaste I Poliey 4. Hazardous Vaste Hanarement Prioritiesl Eneourale technolo,ies that viII (a) Reduee, (b) Recover and reeyele, and (e) Treat hazardous vastes. 1.1.4 I.ple.entation Programs (&bridKed) Section &: luardous Vaste radli ty Siti. Prorram A-I. Rerional Hazardous Vaste Hanalement Plannin,: Continue eity/county partieipation in Southern California Hazardous Vaste Hanarement Authority efforts to provide eomprehensive hazardous vaste menarement on a re,ional basis. Prolram A-2. General Plan and Ordinanee Provisions for Pacility Sitinr and Permitti.: Development and adopt City and County renera~ plan and/or ordinance provisions vhich establish local land use polieies, sitinr criteria, and permit proe.ss for the sitin, of offsite hazardous vaste aan....ent faeilities. Prorram &-3. Site Identifieation Prorram: Conduet a site sereeninr and s.leetion process to id.ntify areas and sites appropriate for hazardous vaste aanarement faeilities vithin Oranre County. Section B. Spedalluardous Vaste I8nes I \ Prorram I-I. Vaste Reduetion and Onsite Treatmentl Continue to implement a prolram to promote the reduetion of hazardous vaste leneration and provide onsite alternatives to offsite treatment and disposal. Prorram 1-2. Small Quantity Generatorsl Develop a prorra. to address the hazardous vaste manarement needs of small quantity lenerators in the business see tor. Prorram 1-3. Household Hazardous Vas tel Develop and implement an onloinl prorram to assist the eolleetion and disposal of household hazardous vaste. Prorram 1-4. Information and Edueation: Establish and maintain an information elearinrhouse and edueation prorram to provide information on the chemieal properties, health effects, safe disposal .ethods and responsibilities, and alternative aanarement teehniques of hazardous vaste. Pro,ram 1-5. Reviev of Nev Land Uses for Hazardous Vaste Implieations: Ineorporate reviev of hazardous issues into eity and eounty planninr, environmental reviev, and land use permitti. proeesses for nev development, and business license prorra.. for nev issues. Prorram 1-6. Transportation of Hazardous Vaste: Continue to coordinate vith Pederal and State regulation of hazardous vaste transportation, and investigate additional loeal activities to address transport safety. Seetion C: lle8ulation and Infore_nt prorram C-l. Continue implementation and enforeement of local hazardous materials diselosure ordinances and AI 2185 to maintain 'up-to-date information about the types, quantities, and loeations of hazardous materials and vastes, and to plan related emergency ineident response aetivities. Establish onroinr prorram to share and standardize hazardous vaste data amo. arencies. I I I Resoluti6n Number ~i?~~ Program C-2. Regulation of Hazardous Vaste Manage..nt Practicess Continue to implement a county program of inspection, regulation, and anforc..ent of safe managemant practices for hazardous ..terials and vaste. Program C-3. Underground Storage Taskss Continue to ad.inister and enforce State regulations for hazardous substances stored in underground storage tanks. Program C-4. Vastewater Disposal: Sanitation districts, vater districts, sanitary districts, and special districts vill continue to administer and enforce vaste discharge permit requirements. Program C-5. Hazardous Materials Strike Forces Continue to provide a coordinate effort by regulation and enforcement agencies to identify, investigate, and prosecute hazardous vaste violators. ProgrUl C-6. Pest Managements The Agricultural Commissioner's department vill reviev all county agency/department Pest Kanagement Plans for compliance with state lavs and regulations. Section DI a_dial aDd IMIrpncy ActlODS Program 0-1. Remediation of Contaminated Sitesl Continue to assist state efforts for clean-up of uncontrolled contaminated sites previously used for hazardous waste disposal: Program 0-2. Emergency Incident Responses emergency response for spills, illegal dumping, hazardous materials and vaste. Continue to coordinate and provide and other incidents involving Program D-3. Groundvater Protections Implement a program to protect Iroundvater supplies by providing for the timely removal of contaminated vater from the aquifer. . Program D-4. Proposition 65 Public Notice of Hazardous Discharges: Inform the public of illegal and threatened illegal discharges of hazardous vaste that are likely to cause substantial injury to public health and safety. 1.1.5 ,lan Monitoring and Update Process An Annual Plan Monitoring Report vill be prepared to sum.arize the status of Plan implementation. A formal update of the Plan vill occur every three years. 1.2 TlPBS OF .&~&.nnus WASTE FACILITIIS The Orange County Hazardous Vaste Management Plan identifies the folloving leneral types of offsite hazardous vaste collection, treatment, and disposal facilities needed to handle the hazardous vaste .enerated in Orange County betveen nov and the year 2000: Aqueous Treatment - Metals/Neutralization Incineration Solvent Recovery Oil Recovery Stabilization Residuals Repository Transfer Station I 1.3 FACILITY SITIRG ClllTIRIA The Plan establishes tventy-one facility siting criteria as basic land use, environmental, transportation, and socioeconomic conditions which must be met if an offsite hazardous vaste facility is to be pe~itted to locate at a specific site vithin Orange County. The criteria are intended for use by facility developers in locating appropriate sites for facilities, and by communities and city/County land use authorities in evaluating facility proposals. The facility siting criteria pertain to the following topic areas: Resolution Number 59!!'" 1. I.alth and Saf.ty As.....ent 2. Distance from Population. 3. Floodplains 4. Earthquakes 5. Unstable Soils 6. Containlllent and Groundwater Konitori", 7. Vater Quality 8. Va.tewater 9. Ail' Quality Nonattail\llt!nt and PSD Ar.as 10. Vetland. 11. Animal and Plant Habitat. 12. Prime Arricultural Lands 13. Recreational, Cultural, and Ae.thetic Re.ource. 14. Mineral Resource Areas IS. Military Lands 16. Proximity to Vaste Generation Areas 17. Proximity to Access to Kajor Route. 18. Consistency with General Plan 19. Fi.cal Impact 20. Socioeconomic Impacts 21. Con.istency with Hazardous Va.te Management Plan I 2.0 BNVIROIlIIINTAL BrrBCrS AND KITIGATION IlBASURBS Con.istent with the requirement. of the California Bnvironmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guideline., EIR 490 di.cu.ses environmental effects of the Plan in proportion to their severity and probability of occurrenc.. BIR 490 identifies potentially significant adverse environmental effect. of the propo.ed Plan, and identifies mitigation .easures to reduce the potential adverse effects. The program BIR approach has been utilized for this document pel' CBQA because Plan implementation represent. a .eries of action. which can be collectively .valuated in general a. one project. As outlined above, these actions include implementing goals, objectives, policies, programs, and facility siting criteria, and identification of needed facilities. It i. noted that the plan does not propose .pecific facilities or locations, therefore only a generic evaluation has been provided for the potential impacts which could re.ult from typical facilities of the type and size identified. Subsequent plan implementation and facility siting activities mu.t be examined in light of the program BIR to determine whether additional environmental documentation must be prepared. I The California Bnvironmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Section IS092 of the State CEQA.Guidelines require that: No public agency .hall approve or carry out a project for which an EIR has been completed that identifies one or more significant environmental effects of the project unless the public .,ency makes one or more written findings for each of those .ignificant effect. accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each findinl. . The following findings are made by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange in accordance with CEQA requir...nts. The findings addre.s potential impacts that could re.ult from implementation of the OrBDIe County Hazardous Vaste Management Plan. For a detailed de.cription of the project, potential environ.entall impacts, and proposed mitigation measures, plea.e see BIR 490 on file at the County of Orange, Environmental Kanagement Arency, Environmental and Special Projects Division. A summary of the impact., .itigation .easures, and findings i. described below: I I \ ( I Resqlunlon Number -181.t' 2.1 GIOLOGY/SOILS 2.1.1 I.Dacts Two types of ,eolo,ic/soils impacts ..y result from construction of a hazardous vaste facility' o Direct loss of ,eolo,ic/soils resources due to construction of facility. Contamination of underlyins soil result in, from failure of structures containins hazardous materials due to reolo,ic/soils hazard.'. o The Plan criteria identified in the BII which may have an impact on ,eologyl soils include, Flood Plains (No.3), Barthquakes (No.4), Unstable Soils (No.5), and Mineral lesource Areas (No. 14). These criteria would minimize facility impacts associated with ,eololY and soils. The Plan policies and pro,rams identified in the BII which may have an impact . on ,eololY/soils include, Policy 1, Pro,ram A-2, Pro,ram ~-3, Pro,ram C-5, Program D-l, and Pro,ram 0-4. These pro,rams and policies were found to provide positive impacts with respect to ,eololY' 2.1.2 Miti..tion Measures The followin, miti,ation measures have been incorporated into the project to avoid or substantially lessen potential ,eolo,ic effects of the Plan, to the extent the Board of Supervisors has responsibility and jurisdiction over future Plan implementation activities and miti,ation measures. To the extent such activities and measures are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of city, state, and federal agencies, these agencies should also adopt these measures. o Conform with all regulations of the California Administrative Code, Titles 22 and 23, ragardin, sitins and construction of hazardous vaste facilities. Every future hazardous waste (BVH) facility shall qualify for the State Department of Health Services permit that is required before constructing a hazardous waste facility. This permit process includes sitin, requirements as vell as design, construction and operation requirements, which, if satisfied, mitirate most ,eolo,ic hazards. o Conform with the local city or county land use permittin, and environmental review process, as ~dified through Plan implementation to incorporate the BVH facility sitins criteria. Conform to the Uniform Buildin, Code and to the Oranre County (and comparable city) Gradin, and Bxcavation Code and follow the ruidelines in the Gradins Manual. (These measures would miti,ate most hazards relatin, to unstable or harmful soils.) o Design, construct and operate each BVH facility in such a sanner that containment of hazardous material will not fail due to ,round failure or ground shakins in the maximum credible earthquake that might affect the site. o At any future BVH facility, install monitorin, syste.. capable of detecting leakage of hazardous materials into underlyins soil. 2.1.3 Pindi... The County of Orange finds that if the above-listed miti,ations are implemented along with the Plan criteria, policies and pro,ra.., in order to minimize risks and impacts to ,eololY and soils associated with the development of BVH facilities, the potential impacts on ,eolo,ic or soil resources from Plan implementation vill not be significant. 2.2 II!D1lOLOGY Resolution Number M4!" 2.2.1 I.pacts Two types of vater resources impacts ..y result fro. the construction of hazardous vaste facilities. ( o Discharge of treated effluent to severs, and o COntamination from leaks or spills Plan criteria identified in the ElK which may have an impact on hydrology I include I Flood Plains (No.' 3), COntainment and Groundwater Monitoring (No.6), and Vater Quality (No.7). These criteria would minimi.e impacts associated with hydrology. Plan policies and progra.. identified in the IlK which ..y have impacts vhich relate to hydrology include: Policy 1, Program A-3, Program C-3, Program C-5, Program D-l, Program D-3, and Program D-4. These pro.r... and policies were found to provide positive impacts vith respect to hydrology. 2.2.2 Mitigation Measures , The folloving mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project to avoid or substantially lessen potential hydrologic effects of the Plan, to the extent the Board of Supervisors has responsibility and jurisdiction over Plan implementation activities and mitigation measures. To tbe extent such activities and measures are vi thin the responsibility and jurisdictipn of city, state, and federal .,encies, these .,encies should also adopt these miti.ation measures. o All BVK facilities should conform witb CEQA requirements which ..y require the preparation of project ElKs. CEOA documentation could examine specific Siting. design, and oparation issues for the proposed facility, address in. potential impacts to ground and surface vater. o Nev off-site BVK facilities should conform with city or County land use permitting and environmental review procedures, including facility siting criteria. I o New BVK facilities should conform with all regulations of the California Administrative Code, Titles 22 and 23, and vith the Toxic Pits Cleanup Act (AB 3566) regarding the siting, operation, monitoring and closing of ha.ardous vaste facilities. o Every BVM facility must quality for the State DePArtment of Health S..rvices permit that is required before construction of a ha.ardous waste facility. o For aqueous treatment facilities, promote treatment technologies and pro.rams vhich result in effluent water of the highest feasible quality so as to permit reuse of the effluent. 2.2.3 Findings The County of Orange finds that if the above-listed .iti..tions are i.plemented and Plan criteria, policies and pro.r... are adhered to, impacts to hydrologic resources are not significant. Further, implementation of the Plan ..y result in positive impacts in comparison to the "no project" alternative. 2.3 LARD USE 2.3.1 Il&p&cts I BVK facilities are considered to be compatible with light and heavy industrial land uses, and possibly vith a non-hazardous landfill, and undeveloped areas. The facility sitin. criteria that impact land use are Numbers 1, 2, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 18. Generally, the impacts of the sitin. criteria are positive in that the criteria restrIct where BVK facilities may locate, thus providing for land use compatibility. Policies and programs that impact land use are A-I, A-2, A-3, 1-5 and C-5. In general, the impacts of the policies and pro.raas are also positive because they also promote land us. compatibility. I I I Re...s.orti~tion Number ..3~ 2.3.2 litigation Measures The following miti,ation aeasures have been incorporated into the project to avoid or substantially lessen land use iapacts of RVM facilities, to the extent the Board of Supervisors has responsibility and jurisdiction over Plan implementation actiyities and aiti,ation aeasures. To the extent such activities and measures are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of city, state and federal Blencies, these Blencies should adopt these aeasures. "No aiti,ation measures are required for the sitin, criteria or the policies and pro'r.... o The Plan criteria, policies and pro,rams serve to ensure land use compatibility and the sensitive sitin, of HVH facilities. o Appropriate bufferin, and visual screens to reduce the visual impact of the hazardous facilities on adjacent land uses and increase land use compatibility should be incorporated into facility projects, per the aiti,ation .easures outlined in Section 4.6 Visual Resources and 4.11 luman Health Risks of the EIR. o If not already provided for in the applicable ,eneral plan and zoninl code, developers may be required to process a ,eneral plan ..endment and/or zone chBDIe prior to the development of a bazardous waste facility. 2.3.3 Pindiap The County of Oranle finds that so lonl as the mitilation measures listed above are implemented and sitinl criteria, policies, and prolrams are adhered to, impacts to land use are not sisnificant. Further, iaplementation of tbe Plan .ay result in positive impacts in comparison to the wno projectW alternative. 2.4 AD QUALITY 2.4.1 I.pacts Tbe followin, types of air quality impacts .ay result from construction and operation of hazardous waste facilities as described in the EIR: o Aqueous treatment facility (fusitive volatile or,anic coapounds (VOC) emissions) o Incinerator (nitroren oxides, VOC and reactive orlanic lases (ROG), combustion by-products, fu,itive emissions from bandlinl waste prior to incineration) o Solvent and oil recyc~inl facility (VOC, ROG, fu,itive emissions) o Residuals disposal facility (PKIO, VOC, ROG) o Transfer station (VOC, ROG) Plan criteria identified in tbe EIR which may bave an impact on air quality include: Air quality non-attainment areas (No.9), and Proximity to areas of waste reneration (No. 16). These criteria would minimize impacts associated with air quality. Plan policies and prolrams identified in tbe EIR which may have an impact on air quality include: Policy 1, Policy 4, Prolram B-1, Prolram B-2, Prolram B-3, Pro,ram C-l, Pro,ram C-3, Pro,ram C-4, Prolram C-5, Proar.. D-l, and Pro,ram D-2. These pro,rams and policies were found to provide positive impacts witb respect to air quality. Resolution Number ~~~ 2.4.2 litigation Measures The following mitilBtion measure. have been incorporated into tbe project to avoid or .ub.tantially le..en potential air quality effect. of the Plan, to the extent tbe Board of Supervi.or. bas re.pon.ibility and juri.diction over Plan implementation activities and miti,ation ..a.ure.. To the extent such activities I and measures are witbin tbe responsibility and jurisdiction of city, state, and federal Blencies, these Blencies sbould also adopt tbe.e mitilation measures. o The avK facilities identified in the Plan will be tbe subject of project-specific environmental i.pact reports or other CEQA documentation to be prepared upon individual RVM facility proposal.~ and hazardous waste facility permitting, by the California Department of lealth Services (DBS), and U.S. Environmental Protection Alency (EPA), and when applicable, the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQKD). o Such environmental review and re,ulatory processes will identify specific facility mitilation measures and requirements to minimize air quality impacts. (However, it is also possible that some facility types identified in the Plan will not be approved by tbe SCAQKD. As a result of the failure of the South Coast Air Basin to attain the priaary ozone standards, U.S. EPA imposed a construction ban effective September 1, 1988. The ban prohibits the construction of new major sources (i.e., sources permitted to emit 100 tons per year) of carbon monoxide or ROG (by telephone, Ron Ketcham, SQAQMD, September 6, 1988).) o Implementation of the Plan sitinl criteria, policies and prolrams will serve to help in protectinl air quality. The County of Oranle finds that if the above-listed miti,ations are implemented, SCAQMD implements and enforces its currently proposed emissions control strate,ie., and Plan criteria, policies and prolrams are adhered to, impacts to air quality are not expected to be silnificant. I 2.4.3 'IDdings 2.5 BOISE 2.5.1 lapacts Noise impacts may result from tbe construction and operation of hazardous waste facilities. o Short-term construction noise o Lonl-term operational noise The Plan criterion identified in the SIR which may have an impact on noise is Proximity to wa.te ,eneration areas (No. 16). This criterion would minimize impacts associated with noi.e. The plan policies and prorrams identified in the EIR which aay have a impact on noise include: Policy 3 and Pro,ram B-1. This prolram will have positive impacts. Policy 3 could result in the creation of larler facilities, thus noise impacts at .uch specific facilities could increase, however overall noise impacts within the County could be lessened. 2.5.2 litigation Ieaaures I The following mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project to avoid or substantially lessen potential noise effects of the Plan, to the extent the Board of Supervisors bas responsibility and jurisdiction over Plan implementation activities and mitilBtion measures. To the extent sucb'activities and measures are witbin the responsibility and jurisdiction of city, state, and federal alencies, such Blencies sbould also adopt tbese measuras. ~ o Limit construction activities to tbe bour. of 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. Kondays throulh Fridays, and 9 a.m. and 6 p... Saturday.. , I ( I I Re"St1l!uYion Number 38/.r' Prior to the issuance of ,rading permits for projects locsted close to noise sensitive uaes, require the applicant to submit a construction noise miti,ation plan for approval by the city or county. The plan shall depict construction equipment, and how the noise from this equipment will be mitirated durin, construction of the project. A preliminary report addressing transportation and operation noise should be developed durin, sitinl of tbe RVM facilities. The report should be prepared by an expert in the field of acoustics. o Concurrent witb the submittal of an application for a conditional use permit, or building permit, require the applicant to depict project-related noise sources on project plans, and propose mitilation measures which ensure that noise will not exceed the limits established by tbe County or City Noise Ordinance. Such sources may include, but are not limited. to the follow~ng: o o a. Truck pick-up and loadinl areas b. Kechanical and electrical equipment c. Outdoor speaker boxes and public address systems .' o Incorporate the followinl noise mitigation measures, as appropriate, into the desisn of new hi,hways and streets to ensure that new roadways will not result in future noise levels exceedin, County standards for existinl or planned uses. a. Alignment alternatives b. Barriers c. Lateral separation d. Vertical profile 2.5.3 'indilllls The County of Oranle finds that if the above-listed mitilations are implemented and Plan criteria, policies and pro,rams are adhered to, noise impacts will not be sisnificant. 2.6 VISUAL RISOUIlCES 2.6.1 lapacts Three criteria (13, 2, 15) have been identified in the Plan as havin, a potential effect on visual resources. Implementation of Criterion 13 (Recreational, Cultural, and Aesthetic Resources) would protect these resources from negative visual influences associated with BVK facilities. Criterion 2 (Distance from Populations) provides an adequate ..r,in of distance from nearby populations. An indirect benefit in providins this buffer is to .inimize the nelative visual effects of BVK facilities. \ I.plementation of Pro,ram A-2 (General Plan and Ordinance Provisions for 'acility Sitin, and Per.ittins) will serve to mini.ize potential visual i.pacts related to siting BVK facilities. 2.6.2 Kitiaation Measures The followin, .iti,ation measures have been incorporated into the project to avoid or substantially lessen potential visual effects of tbe Plan, to the extent tbe Board of Supervisors has responsibility and jurisdiction over Plan tmple.entation activities and mitilation .easures. To tbe extent such activities and measures are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of city, state, and federal alencies, such alencies should also adopt these miti,ation measures. o Avoid placin, hazardous waste facilities on locations which are easily viewed from adjacent vantages. These include, but are not li.ited to, hilltops/rid,elines, hillsides and other locations with high exposure. o Consider locatinl facilities in depressed areas or areas below surroundinl rrade in an effort to conceal the aajority of the facilities. Resolution Number Jell' o Construct berm features or wall .cr.eniftl or a combination of both to conceal facility features. U.. of this technique, in combination with the placement of facilities below rrade, provides added concealment. o Utilize land.cape .creenin, alon, tbe perimeter ed,e to screen facility features from surroundinl vantage.. Use of landscape mitigation should one or more of the followin, techniques: a. U.e non-ornamental plant ..terials such that attention i. not drawn fact li ties. follow I to the b. U.e plant materials of varyin, height. and at various distance. from the perimeter to de-emphasize the u.e of plant aaterial. for screening purposes. c. Selection of plant materials should recosnize tbe bulk and vertical scale of the facilities in an effort to dominate tbe views with land.caping rather than with hazardous wa.te facilities. d. Consider the u.e of dense ..s..s of .ucalyptus trees, particularly where tall and vertical scale .creeninl is warranted, a. well as extended perimeter .creeninl. Eucalyptus windrows are a familiar silht in Oranle County, and tberefore would not appear a. an unusual re.ource. o ' Con.ider de.isnin, tbe .ite plans for hazardous wa.te facilities which inter.ect roadways or public hiking trails at an an,le, thus avoidin, prolonged contract or visual exposure for an entire side of the facility. o Removal of visually prominent veretation ..y be required for site preparation, and .hould be replaced on a one-to-one basi., either on-.ite or immediately adjacent to tbe .ite. Direct ni,ht lightin, down and inward in order to minimize nirht rlare. I o 2.6.3 'indillllls The County of Oran,e finds that implementation of tb. above miti,ation measure. and sensitive .itinr of BVM facilities as promoted by the Plan sitinl criteria and policies and program will mitigate most of the ne,ative vi.ual affect. from future BVM facilities. A remaininl probable .ignificant vi.ual impact which is likely to occur, however, is associated most facilities which utilize tall .tack. or incinerators. This .ituation could be aglravated by po..ible vi.ible air emission. such as steam or .moke. Full mitigation of these nelative vi.ual effects i. improbable, and the de,ree of impact will depend on the location, .ettin" .ize, and type of HVM facility. Specific visual impacts and miti,ations would be further analyzed in .ub.equent CEQA documentation for .pecific facilities. 2.7 IIlIRGT 2.7.1 Iapacts EnerlY impacts are expected to be miniaal. Both Southern California Edison ani Southern California Gas (SCG) enerlY .ervices will not be adversely impacted by the in.tallation of the proposed facilities. No direct impacts were identified in the EIR related to .itin, criteria or policies and prorrama. 2.7.2 litigation ....ures The following miti,ation mea.ures have been incorporat.d into the project to le..en potential enerlY effect. of tbe Plan, to the extent the Board of Supervisors has responsibility and jurisdiction over Plan implementation activities and miti,ation measure.. To the extent .uch activities and measures are within the respon.ibility and juri.diction of city, .tate, and federal Blencies, the.e agencies should al.o adopt the.e mitilation measures. I I I Resolution Number ..18/f' , o Sufficiently determine quantitative enerlY requirements of new BVM facilities and acce.sibility to adequate .ource of enerlY supply. ' Vhere cost effective, facilitat~ the participation of indu.trie. in conservation programs .ucb a. corenerat~on (proce.s heat/steam/electrici ty), and reclaimin, waste product. (bio..s., solid waste, and wastewater), thereby reducin, overall enerlY u.Ble in tbe County and requirements for development and operation of tbe avK facilitie.. 2.7.3 'indiap o The County of Orang. finds that, witb mitigation mea.ures enerlY impacts relatin, to the,Plan are insisnificant. EnerlY require.ent. are accessible to adequate sources and cost.. 2.8 BIOLOGICAL IBSOUllCES 2.8.1 I.pacts Impacts of the BVM facilities themselves depend upon the location of the facilities and the type of facility to be sited. Facilities locatin, in developed areas will have little or no impact on biolo,ical resources. Facilities locating in undeveloped areas containinl .ensitive habitats or .pecie. may potentially have a ne,ative impact. Also, facilities requirin, larle amount. of space, .uch as a re.idual. disposal facility, could potentially have a negative impact on biological re.ource. if .ited in an area with sen.itive biolo,ical resources. Siting criteria No.. 8, 10, and 11 have been identified as impacting biological resource.. These criteria have ,enerally positive impacts on biolo,ical resources in that they restrict where a HVM facility may locate and what a facility may discharle. The followin, policies and pro,rams have been identified as impact in, biololical resources: Policy 1 and Prolrams A-2, A-3, C-4, and C-5. These policies and pro,rams ar~ identified a. haviDl a ,enerally po.itive impact on biolo,ical re.ources. 2.8.2 litigation Keasures The following mitigation measures pertaining to BVM facilities are incorporated into the project to avoid or substantially le.sen biololical impacts of the Plan, to the extent the Board of Supervisors has re.pon.ibility and jurisdiction over Plan implementation activities and mitilation measures. To the extent .uch activities and measures are within the re.ponsibility and juri.diction of city, State and federal agencie., the.e agencies should al.o adopt these mitigation measures. o The Plan criteria, policies and pro,ram. serve to protect sensitive biological resources in Oran,e County. These criteria, policies and programs will be incorporated into the planniDl and permittin, process for siting BVM facilities in Oranle County. o All proposed BVM facilities must comply with all applicable federal, State, and local level permittinl procedures and regulations which .erve to protect biological re.ource.. The potential for indirect biolo,ical impacts, such as from air or water pollution, should be minimized by BVM facility desilD.. The numerous regulations for hazardous waste facilities prohibit the emi..ion of significant quantities of air pollutant. and the di.charle of polluted water into any .urface water.. Adequate .pill control desisns and emergency response procedures prevent or minimize the unplanned release of pollutants. These regulations serve as miti,ation to biololical re.ource.. o 'or potential BVM facility .ite. in undeveloped areas, biololical surveys .hall be conducted to a.ses. the biolo,ical resources on the site and surroundinl area. The.e survey. .hould include an as.e.sment of the location and condition of native plant communities, wildlife value of all habitat., and potential for the occurrence of li.ted or candidate endBDIered or tbreatened .pecie., or species whicb are othervise considered .ilDificant pursuant to CEQA Guideline., Section 15380. o Resolution Number .3Bt/s o All potential 8VM facility sites shall be surveyed to determine whether any existin. drainBles, water bodies or wetlands are potentially affected. o Durins tbe preliminary desilft of tbe planned facility, a comprehensive evaluation of the effect of the facility on biolo,ical resources shall be made. Based on this evaluation, tbe facility desilft should be modified so that sisnificant biological impacts are avoided or mitigated. Specific mitigation measures shall be included in the environ.ental documentation for the facility. I Development of mitigation areas should include protection of these areas with appropriately desisned buffers or other measures. 2.8.3 'iDdilllls The County ~f Oranle finds that so lon, as the miti,ation measures, site selection criteria, policies and pro,rams are adhered to, impacts to biological resources are not silDificant. 2.9. CULTUlW. IBSOUllCES 2.9.1. lapacta Any archaeolo,ical or historical site located within a proposed facility location will potentially be directly or indirectly impacted by the proposed land disturbance. Direct impacts to cultural resources would result from ,rading, ve,etation removal, road construction, and under,round utility placement. Indirect impacts would occur as a result of erosion, soil compaction, and vandalism related to increased public access to the proposed facility location. For paleontolo,ical resources, several strati,raphic units of paleontological sensitivity could be affected by BVM facility development especially if facilities are located within the Santa Ana Bills or Santiago Bills. These areas have moderate to high sensitivity for scientific resources, therefore, ,rading in these locations could expose potentially significant fossil resources. Criteria 13 (Recreational, Cultural and Aesthetic Resources) will aid in miti,atins potential adverse impacts to cultural resources. Potential impacts will be mitigated by requiring the evaluation of cultural resources prior to the sitinl of collection facilities in these areas. I Implementation of Policy 1 (Legal Compliance and A1ency Coordination), Program A-2 (General Plan and Ordinance Provisions for Facility Siting and Permittin,), and Pro,r.. A-3 (Site Identification Pro,ram) renerally will have a positive impact on cultural resources by protecting and screening potential BVM sites for these resources. ( 2.9.2 litigation Measures The followinl miti,ation measures have been incorporated into. the project to avoid or substantially lessen potential cultural resource effects of the Plan, to the extent the Board of Supervisors has responsibility and jurisdiction over Plan implementation activities and mitiration measures. To the extent such activities and measures are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of city, State and federal Blencies, tbese agencies should also adopt these miti,ation measure~. o The Plan criterion, policies and prolrams outlined in this section serve to protect sensitive cultural resources in Oranle County. The criterion, policies and programs should be implemented in tbe sitin, of 8VM facilities in Oranle I County. All proposed 8VM facilities should be required to comply with all applicable federal, State, and local level permittins procedures which serve to protect cultural resources in Orange County. o o 'or potential 8VM facility sites in undeveloped areas, cultural surveys should be conducted to assess the cultural resources on the site and surroun~ing area. These surveys should include an assessment of tbe potential location of bistorical, archaeolo,ical, and paleontolorical resources. (I I ( I Resol;;'tion Number ~I'/~ o Durinl the preliminary desisn of the planned facility, a comprebensive .valuation of the effect of the facility on cultural r.sourc.. .hould be made. Ba.ed on this .valuation, the facility desilft should be modifi.d .0 that significant cultural impacts are avoid.d or miti.at.d. Specific .itigation m.asure. should be included in the environmental documentation for the facility. o If appropriate, based on the above miti.ations, cultural monitorin, should take place durin, con.truction and operation of tbe facility to en.ure that there are no .isnificant impact.. 2.9.3 'indiap The County of Oran,e finds that if the BVM facility .iting criteria, prolrams, and policies of the Plan are adhered to, along with the recommended miti.ations for facility development, implementation of tbe Plan will not re.ult in any .isnificant adverse impact. to cultural resource.. 2.10 TlAHSPOKTATIOII RISOUBCES 2.10.1 Illpacts The impacts of BVM facilities include a potential increase of approximately 8,000 annual trips; however, this impact i. considered insisnificant when combined with the build-out of the general plans of the County. Another impact is that travel route. for waste transportation could chanle as a re.ult of wa.te being treated in the County in.tead of outside the County. Tbe followinl criteria have been identified as having an impact on tran.portation re.ource.: 16 and 17. Generally, both criteria have a po.itiv. impact on transportation resources; how.ver, Criterion 17 could result in so.e ran.rators beinr located at some distance from BVM facilities if the ,.nerator i. located at a distance from a major travel corridor. The followinr pro,rams and policies bave been identified a. impactinl transportation re.ource.: Policies 1 and 4a and Pro,r... A-2, B-1, B-3, and 8-6. Generally, these pro,r... and policies will have a po.itive impact on tran.portation re.ources; however, the policies addre..inr .mall-quantity ,enerators and hou.ehold hazardous wa.te generators may re.ult in difficulties in locating sites near indu.trial centers witbout usin, minor routes. 2.10.2 litigatioD leasures Tbe followin, miti,ation ..asures pertaininr to BVM facilities and siting criteria have been incorporated into tbe proj.ct to avoid or .ub.tantially reduce transportation impacts of the Plan, to tbe extent tbe Board of Supervi.ors has re.ponsibility and juri.diction over Plan implementation activities and mitigation mea.ures. To the extent .uch activities and ..a.ur.s ar. within the re.ponsibility and juri.diction of city, .tate and federal Blencie., the.e ..encie. .hould also adopt these miti.ation measures. No mitiration .ea.ures are required for the policies and progr.... o The actual .ites for future hazardous wa.te man....ent facilities are unknown at this time. Criteria have be.n recommended in the Plan to h.lp in .electin, the.e sites; however, .pecific .it.. have not been id.ntifi.d and, therefore, issues .uch as individual facility trip ,.aeration, trip di.tribution, and re.ulting circulation impact. have not been addre..ed in this analysis. Implementation of the .itin, criteria i., however, r.commended as a mitigation mea.ure. o Prior to amendment of a city or County ,.n.ral plan land u.e .lement for a hazardous waste facility, a traffic and circulation .tudy shall be prepared for the proposed facility to as.e.. the potential .pecific circulation impacts of construction and operation. This study shall be r.view.d by the appropriate State, regional, and/or local agency, and only aft.r miti,ations are recommended to ..eliorate any identifi.d impacts shall the development approval process continue. 2.10.3 'indillllS Th. County of Orange find. that so long as tbe miti,ation ..asures as well as the .itinl criteria, policies and progr... are implemented, no .ignificant impacts to tran.portation resource. will, re.ult. Resolution Number J84.5" 2.11 IIIJIWf BBALD USIt 2.11.1 laDacts The followins buesn bealtb risks may potentially result from tb. establishment of hazardous waste facilities. o Pusitive emissions 0' Accidental spills and incidents Plan criteria identified In the IIR which may bave an impact on buman health are lealth and Safety (No.1), Distance from Populations (Mo. 2), Vater Quality (Mo. 7), and Vastewater (No.8). These criteria would .inimize impacts associated witb human health. I Plan policies and pro,rams identified in the ErR which may have an impact on human health include: Policy 1, Policy 2, Pro,ram A-3, Pro,ram B-1, Prolram B-2, Pro,ram H-3, Program B-4, Pro,ram B-5, Pro,ram C-l, pro,r..'C-3, Prolram C-4, Pro,ram C-5, Program 0.1, Pro,ram D-2, Pro,ram 0.3, and pro,ram D-4. These prolrams and policies were found to provide positive impacts. 2.11.2 litigation Measures The followins miti,ation measures have been incorporated into the project to avoid or substantially lessen potential human healtb effects of the Plan, to the extent the Board of Supervisors has responsibility and jurisdiction over Plan implementation activities and miti,ation measures. To the extent such activities and measures are within tbe responsibility and jurisdiction of city, state and federal alencies, these alencies should also adopt these mitl,ation Deasures. ,. Treating wastes to Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BDAT) stand.rds as I established by u.s. EPA and State DBS will minimize potential"health risks associated with hazardous waste. All wastes must be treated to BDAT standards prior to land disposal after May, 1990 under federal and State law. Each hazardous waste facility, whether it is a treatment facility, transfer station, or storage repository should be subjected to separate review and permitting prior to and durinl development. The types of BVM facilities identified in the Plan will be subject to project-specific environmental impact reports or other CEQA documentation and hazardous waste facility permittinl by tbe California Department of lealth Services and tbe South Coast Air Quality Kana,ement District (SCAOKD), wbere applicable. o BVM facilities should utilize best available technologies for hazardous waste treatment, storage, and handlinl. In addition, impacts at BiM facilities can be further minimized by employln, proper personnel training in accordance with Title 22 regulations. o o 2.11.3 'indillllS The County of Orange finds that implementation of the Plan elon, with the identified miti,ation measures will minimize potential human health risks to a level of insisnificance. The Plan provides public,avareness that additionally minimizes impacts associated with huaan bealth beyond tbe Wno projectW alternative. 2.12 1IBLI'IAR'l' PLAlIMIRG 2.12.1 IlIINlCts I: In order to adequately assess the impacts associated with Relevant Planning issues, actual BVM facility sites must be determined. All siting criteria, policies and pro,rams identified in the Plan serve to ensure consistency witb environmental resulation~.and/or plannins progr.... , ( . I I I '. Resolution Number .!Jt9/J .. 2.12.2 litigation Keasures Implementation of the Plan .iting criteria and policies and pro,rams serve a. the necessary relevant plannins miti,ation measure. in and of themselves. Therefore, no miU.ation measures have been propo.ed. 2.12.3 'indings The County of Oranse find. that Relevant Plannin, impacts have not been identified beyond those which are .iti,ated to . level of nonsisnificance through implementation of the Plan. 2.13 SOCIOECOIIOJlICS 2.13.1 lapacts Several potential effects on socioeconomic. have been identified as a result of BVH facilities. No .ignificant impact to employment will occur a. a re.ult of con.truction of BVM facilities becau.e BVM facilities do not require a large number of employees. The siting of BVM facilities near re.idential communities may have a potentially negative impact on public attitudes and perceptions and hence property values. Impacts to public revenues and expenditures may also occur a. a result of the BVM facilities. The following criteria have been identified a. impacting socioeconomics: 19 and 20. Generally, tbe.e criteria are con.idered to be positive and merely require more .pecific detailing of .ocioeconomic impacts. The followins policies and programs bave been identified as impactinl socioeconomics: B-2, B-4, C-2, C-5, 0.1, and D-4. Criteria B-2, B-4, and 0.1 are con.idered to have a potentially .ignificant impact in that they may require expenditure of public funds. Criteria C-2, C-5, and D-4 are considered to have neither a positive or ne,ative impact in that the program. are onroing and/or do not require the use of public funds. 2.13.2 Mitigation Measures No .pecific sites have been selected for BVM facilities and, therefore, no miti,ation measures are required for tbe facilities them.elves. The followinl miti,ation measures reflect the .itin, criteria and tbe policies and pro,rams. These measures are incorporated into the project to le..en socioeconomic impacts of the Plan, to the extend the Board of Supervisor. has responsibility and jurisdiction over Plan implementation activities and miti,ation ....ure.. To the extent these activities and mea.ures are within the re.pon.ibility of city, state, and federal arencies, tbese Bl8ncies .hould al.o adopt the.e miti.ation measures. o Implementation of the .itins criteria outlined in tbe Plan will serve to more clearly define the potential impact. ...ociated with sitinl and development of BVM facilitie.. Once such impacts have been clearly defined, .pecific .iti,ation mea.ure. .bould be developed at tbat time to minimize any .ocioeconomic impacts which have been identified. o Implementation of Program B-2 will result in the expenditure. of public funds. This impact may be minimized by reque.tin, that those private industries interested in carryin, out the pro,ram, fund and/or participate in the effort involved in re.earching and establi.hin, tbe prorram. Implementation of Program B-4 will re.ult in the expenditure of public funds. Thi. impact may be mini.~zed by encouraginl private industry to establish and carry out the program. The exchange of hazardous waste related data is viewed as economically valuable data to bu.ines. operation. and .uch businesses would likely be willing to pay a fee for this data which would offset operation of the informational system. o o Implementation of Pro,ram D-2 may result in a substantial expenditure of public funds. Thi. expenditure aay be offset by developinl a prolram to research the history of contaminated sites to more clearly define those parties financially responsible for the contamination, thereby, utilizinl private funds to the maximum extent possible to clean up site. and reducins the amount of State funds required to clean up conteminated site.. Resolution,Number ~~~~ 2.13.3 'indinrs The County of Oranle finds that vitb implementation of the mitication measures, siting criteria, policies and pro,rams, socioeconomic impacts will be miticated to a level of nonsilnificance with one exception. There is a potentially significant impact as a result of Pro,ram 0-1 (Remediation of Contaminated Sites). lowever, it sbould be noted, per CEQA, Section 15131, a statement of overridin, considerations would not be required should this potentially sisnificant impact, In fact, become ani actual sisnificant impact. This would be further analyzed in subsequent EIR documentation. 2.14 UTILITIES AND SBRVICES 2.14.1 lapacts The followin, types of utilities and service impacts may potentially result with estatilisbment of hazardous waste facilities. o Vater Supply and Removal o Vastewater Treatment o Solid Vaste Kanagement (minimal) o Policies and Sheriff's Department (minimal impacts) o 'ire Protection (minimal impacts) o Schools (miniaal impacts) Plan criteria identified in the EIR which may have an impact on utilities and services include: Dischar,e of Treated Effluent (No.3), Health and Safety (No.1), I and Distance from Populations (No.2). These criteria would minimize impacts associated with utilities and services. Tbe plan policies and prOlrams identified il tbe EIR wbich may have an impact on utilities and services include: Program B-4, Pro,ram C-5, and Program D-2. The prn,rRms and policies were found to provide positive impacts on utilities and services. 2.14.2 litigation leasures The follovin, miti,ation measures have been incorporated into the project to avoid or substantially lessen potential public service and facility effects of the Plan, to the extent the Board of Supervisors has responsibility and jurisdiction over Plan implementation activities and mitigation measures. To tbe extent such activities and measures are within tbe responsibility and jurisdiction of city, state, and federal agencies, these agencies should also adopt these miti,ation Masures. o Sufficiently determine quantitative water requirements of each facility as a part of the local permittin, process. Design hazardous waste facilities such that these facilities can meet potentially more stringent wastewater dischar,e requirements by the year 2000. o o BVM facility personnel should be sufficiently trained to handle hazardous waste/material response incidences and the facility located in an area to ensure proper response/support by County BVM teams to hazardous waste incidents. I o Tbe facilities should be located in areas with adequate sewer capacity to accommodate the expected wastewater dischar,e. 2.14.3 'iadinas The County of Orange finds that if the above-listed mitigation measures are implemented and Plan criteria, policies and procraas are adhered to, impacts to pUblic utility resources will not be sirnificant. I I .' I '_ ~, ~D . /,.- Resolution Number ~~ 3.0 ALTBIIRATIVIS The ElK analysis of the Plan u.ed the assumption as the project alternative that tbe Plan would be implemented throush the sitins of all identified BVM facilities as s.parate facilities witbin Orange County. In addition, the ElK evaluated the followin, three alternative. to the project, which are di.cussed below. o No-Project Alternative o Treatment Consolidation Alternative o -'air Share" Alternative 3.1 BO PROJBCT AL'1'IIIDTIVI Review of tbe No-Project Alternative evaluate. the environmental consequences of not i.plementins tbe Plan. Under tbi. alternative, it is assumed tbat generators of basardou. wa.te in Orange County would continue to be dependent on BVM facilities outside Orange County for wa.te treatment and di.po.al. BVM facilities could potentially be .ited in Orange County on a case-by-ca.e ba.i.. Continuing hazardous waste ,eneration witbout sufficient BVM facilities could leaa to lonl-term storBle of wa.te without detoxification, and increa.ed illegal di.po.al practices. Impact. of the No-Project Alternative compared witb the Project impacts are summarized as follow.: o Increa.ed ille,al di.po.al of wa.tes could further impact .oil re.ource., water resources, air quality, land use, biological resources, cultural resources, human health risks" and public utilitie.. o If BVM facilities are built outside tbe county, impact. associated with facility development would be .oved to location. outside the county (land use, vi.ual, health ri.k, air quality, water quality, reolo,ic, noi.e, biolo,ical, cultural resources). o Increase in cost. associated with lon,-di.tance tran.portation, waste treatment and disposal, emergency respon.e, and contamination clean-up could occur. 3.2 TlBA.TIIBIIT COIISOLIDATIOII AL'1'IIIDTIVI An alternative to .itinl .eparate BVM facilities for each type of collection, treatment, and di.po.al activity is the .itins of fewer, combined facilities with the capacity to conduct two or'more type. of treatment. I.pacts of the Treatment Consolidation Alternative could include the followinl: o Savings in time and resources throush the common u.e of .ervices such as administration, laboratory, and ..errency respon.e. o The risk and pollution level. a..ociated with a lar,er, combined facility could be greater than a .maller .insle-function facility, bowever overall countywide impacts for all nece..ary facilities could be reduced due to fewer sources of risk and pollution. Thi. could include lower overall i.pact. a..ociated with 180101Y, hydrololY, land use, air quality, noi.e, vi.ual, biolo,ical, cultural, tran.portation, human health, planniD(, .ocioecono.ic., and public utilities. 3.3 -'AD SIWlE- AL'1'IIIDTIVI This alternative enco.pa.... the concept of sitiD( rerional-.i.ed BVM facilities and to achieve a fair share allocation of facilities between different counties in .outhern California, based on the amount of ba.ardou. wa.te generated in each County. Due to the siting of fewer facilities compared witb tbe project alternative, the Fair Share Alternative could re.ult in reducad facility develop.ent impacts as.ociated with 18010fY, hydrololY, land use, air quality, noi.., vi.ual resource., biological ~esources, cultural r.source., buman bealtb risks, planniD(, socioeconomlcs, and public utili tie.. Tran.portation costs and risks could potentially be ,reater than if all needed facilities were .ited within Oran,e County. Resolution Number .Jet/J 4.0 hun.nvaIMG 0' III'I'IG&TIOM 1IU!lIIII.!11 As discus.ed in III 490, i.plementation of the Oranre County Hazardou. Vaste lanBIement Plan will priaarily be the r..pon.ibility of the tventy-eilht cities in Orange COunty and th. County of Oranre, along witb special di.trict., the californil ~-' Department of 8ea1tb Service., and the Soutbern California Hazardou. Vast. Managemel Authority in certain in.tance.. Impl.mentation of .iti,ation ....ur.. identified i III 490 i. also variously the r.sponsibility and jurisdiction of city, county, .tate and federal agenei... Re.pon.ibility for aonitorinl of compliance with EIR 490 mitilBtion mea.ures, .. required by As.embly Bill 3180, lie. vitb city end County BleDcie. responsible for implementation. I I ;>,.....:;.~~ ..~.I.;.;. . ..:" . , .' . '.~:.or ;.'1 I , ., I I .:,'.-..; . . "-.-;..'1"~ft~~:P~~.U':,'-.;:!t"'~"!i-:fo'.'q:~"~.' n._. .... ,. '. "" PROOF OF PUBLICATION . (2015.5 C.C.P.1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA. County of Orange i .m . citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I .m over the .ge of eighteen ye.rs, .nd not. party 10 or Interested In the .bove-entitled m.tter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of the SEAL BEACH JOURNAL .................................................... .................................................... a newspaper of general circulation. printed . WEEKLY and published .................................. In the City of .....~.~~L~~.~.~~..........._ County of Orange, .nd which news- paper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circul.tion by the Superior Court of the County of Or.nge, State of California. underthed.teof...~.:.~~ 19 .~.~. Case Number .AB~5.8J....; th.tthenotlce. of which the annexed Is a printed copy lset In type not 'smaller than flonparell). has been publiShed In each regular and entire issue of said newspaper .nd not In .ny supplement thereof on the following d.tes, to-wit: i ..........'I.:-.k..:.....Z.......................... all In the year 19.f.t.. I certify lor decl.re) under penalty of . perjury that the foregoing Is true and correct . SEAL BEACH Dated at ......................................... - California. thls4. ..day of(jl..ilwf.:7 ..;~<"_4..~-t.....:at..~.. Signature 0 F," c.,i.'.' .lIi.....II..,.... .., IN He.'H,,.m: CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER SERVICE BUREAU, INC. Leg.1 Advertising Cle.rlng House 120 Wea' Second Sk, Los Angeles, Calif. 90012 Te'ephone: 12131625.2541 ~...N ......... O. N. RaL PtHf.f ....lIc...... whe. .,...,... .1111 '.,m. Resolution ~~~~ .' This space Is ~or the County Clerk's Filing St.mp Proof of Publication of ~ #.7 ,.. ......~...~-:l..................t.~.....:..... .......................................................... P.ste Clipping of Notice SECURELY In This Space .,' IlCmCIClFPIIBUC__ ~lIO'iii B IEREBY GIVEN...1he -.~ CouncIl D11he CI\J II! .... '_ wi! _ . ...... ... an L......... t7, filii,. 7:CIO~.m. "!!I. ....l!Ir CourioII ~. 2n ~-.__ CIlI.... '~~~is ! __~ 'tTPUIl ~1Ilta.,_.._ i:5 "'.. - PIon'" "'FInIi...... EII_ ...._11__ ~ El"'..._'" .... IIopart =.___n .....ioItl CBM ........ IDr .. ....... ..... ~CIIr"'''''- '::Ai.. _ _... ......11_ Ir-..,bil_WID lIIIat..."'........ ,. ~IL!CnIghI . ,i(Ir8aIar"~ I.. ........ 1(81I1, t. ~n......_.......... it. .