HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Res 7230 2021-12-13RESOLUTION 7230
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL
BEACH AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO ENTER INTO SETTLEMENT
AGREEMENTS WITH MCKESSON CORPORATION, CARDINAL
HEALTH, INC., AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORPORATION, JOHNSON &
JOHNSON, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ORTHO-MCNEIL-
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., AND JANSSEN
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., AGREEING TO THE TERMS OF THE
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ALLOCATING SETTLEMENT
PROCEEDS, AUTHORIZING ENTRY INTO THE MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING WITH THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO TAKE ALL ACTIONS
NECESSARY TO IMPLEMENT THE SETTLEMENTS
WHEREAS, the United States is facing an ongoing public health crisis of opioid
abuse, addiction, overdose, and death. The State of California and California local
governments spend billions of dollars each year to address the direct consequences of
this crisis; and,
WHEREAS, since 2017, state and local governments in California and around the
United States have been pursuing litigation against certain manufacturers, distributors,
and retailers of opioid pharmaceuticals (the "Opioid Defendants") in an effort to hold the
Opioid Defendants financially responsible for the impact of the Opioid Epidemic on the
City of Seal Beach ("the City") and resources necessary to combat the opioid epidemic;
and,
WHEREAS, negotiations to settle claims against several of the Opioid Defendants,
specifically McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., AmerisourceBergen
Corporation, Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ortho -McNeil -Janssen
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Settling Defendants")
have been ongoing for several years; and,
WHEREAS, negotiations with the Settling Defendants have resulted in proposed
nationwide settlements of state and local government claims to settle the Litigation; and,
WHEREAS, the terms of the proposed nationwide settlements have been set forth
in the Distributors Master Settlement Agreement and the J&J Master Settlement
Agreement (collectively "Settlement Agreements") are available for review on-line at
https://nationalopioidsettlement.com/; and,
WHEREAS, copies of the Settlement Agreements as well as summary of the main
terms of the Settlement Agreements, the deadlines for submitting the Participation
Agreements to the Settlement Agreements and the MDL Court's Order setting deadlines
for any Plaintiff who declines to enter into the Settlement Agreements; and,
WHEREAS, the Settlement Agreements provide, among other things, for the
payment of a certain sum to settling government entities in California including to the
State of California and Participating Subdivisions upon occurrence of certain events as
defined in the Settlement Agreements ("California Opioid Funds"); and,
WHEREAS, California local governments as well as the attorneys representing
those local governments have engaged in extensive discussions with the State Attorney
General's Office ("AGO") as to how the California Opioid Funds will be allocated, which
has resulted in the Proposed California State -Subdivision Agreement Regarding
Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds- Distributor Settlement and the Proposed
California State -Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement
Funds- Janssen Settlement (collectively the "Allocation Agreements,") which are
agreements between all of the entities identified in the Allocation Agreements; and,
WHEREAS, copies of the State Allocation Agreements are available online at
https://oag.ca.gov/opioids; and,
WHEREAS, the Allocation Agreements propose to allocate the California Opioid
Funds as follows: 16% to a State Fund; 70% to local governments in an Abatement
Accounts Fund; and, 15% to litigating local governments in a Subdivision Fund. For the
avoidance of doubt, all funds allocated to California from the Settlements will be combined
pursuant to Allocation Agreements, and 15% of that total shall be allocated to the State
of California (the "State of California Allocation"), 70% to the California Abatement
Accounts Fund ("CA Abatement Accounts Fund Allocation"), and 15% to the California
Subdivision Fund ("CA Subdivision Fund Allocation"); and,
WHEREAS, the funds in the CA
Abatement Accounts Fund Allocation) will
developed in connection with the proposed
Abatement Accounts Fund (the California
be allocated based on an allocation model
negotiating class in the National Prescription
Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804). The percentage from the CA Abatement Accounts
Fund allocated to each eligible local government (any county or city above 10,000 in
.population) ("Eligible Local Government") is set forth in Appendix 1 to each Allocation
Agreement and provided to the Council with this Resolution. The City's share of the CA
Abatement Accounts Fund is a product of the total in the CA Abatement Accounts Fund
multiplied by the City's percentage set forth in Appendix 1 (the "Local Allocation"); and,
WHEREAS, any city that is an Eligible Local Government will be allocated its
Local Allocation share only when it becomes a Participating Subdivision by signing the
Participation Agreements to the Settlements. The Local Allocation share for a city that is
a Participating Subdivision will be paid to the county in which the city is located, rather
than to the city, so long as: (a) the county is a Participating Subdivision, and (b) the city
has not advised the Settlement Fund Administrator that it requests direct payment at
least 60 days prior to a Payment Date as defined in the Settlement Agreements.
2
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council hereby approves and authorizes the City Manager to settle
and release the City's claims against the Settling Defendants in exchange for the
consideration set forth in the Settlement Agreements and Allocation Agreements
including taking the following measures:
A. The execution on behalf of the City of the Participation Agreement to the
Distributors Settlement Agreement and any and all documents ancillary
thereto.
B. The execution on behalf of the City of the Participation Agreement to the
Janssen Settlement Agreement and any and all documents ancillary
thereto.
C. The execution on behalf of the City of the Proposed California State -
Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement
Funds -Distributor Settlement.
D. The execution on behalf of the City of the Proposed California State -
Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement
Funds- Janssen Settlement Allocation Agreements.
SECTION 2. The City Manager shall have authority to, and is directed to, take all actions
necessary on behalf of the City to implement and effectuate the agreements approved by
this Resolution in consultation with the City Attorney.
SECTION 3. All actions heretofore taken by the Council and other appropriate public
officers and agents of the City with respect to the matters contemplated under this
Resolution are hereby ratified, confirmed and approved.
SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
3
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED by the Seal Beach City Council at a regular
meeting held on the 13th day of December, 2021 by the following vote:
AYES: Council Members: Kalmick, Massa-Lavitt, Moore, Sustarsic, Varipapa
NOES: Council Members: None
ABSENT: Council Members: None
ABSTAIN: Council Members: None
APPROVED AS TO, FORM:
g A. Steele, City Attorney
ATTEST:
*-& fI-) � -
Joe Kalmick, Mayor
loria D. H4rgbr, CHIC, -G—ity Cle
4
STATE OF CALIFORNIA }
COUNTY OF ORANGE } SS
CITY OF SEAL BEACH }
I, Gloria Harper, City Clerk of the City of Seal Beach, do hereby certify that the foregoing
resolution is the original copy of Resolution 7230 on file in the office of the City Clerk,
passed approved , and adopted by the Seal Beach City Council at a regular meeting held
on t 3th a of December, 2021.
91ria D. Hardor, CMG,-effy Clerk
5