Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGMT - Psomas (Environmental Impact Report Amendment 1)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT Amendment No. 1 for Environmental Impact Report Between City of Seal Beach 211 - 8th Street Seal Beach, CA 90740 Psomas 5 Hutton Centre Drive Suite 300 Santa Ana, CA 92707 This Amendment No. 1, dated July 22, 2024, amends that certain agreement (Agreement) made as of July 25, 2022 by and between the City of Seal Beach (City), a California charter city, and Psomas (Consultant), a California Corporation (collectively, "the Parties"). RECITALS A. City and Consultant are parties to the Agreement, pursuant to which Consultant provides services for preparation of an Environmental Impact Report associated with a proposed development project located at the Old Ranch Country Club. B. City and Consultant wish to amend the Agreement for Consultant to continue providing such services through the end of fiscal year 2024-2025. AMENDMENT NO. 1 NOW, THEREFORE and in consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual covenants and promises herein set forth, the parties agree to amend the Agreement as follows: Section 1. Section 2.0 (Term) of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: The term of this Agreement shall commence August 1, 2022 and shall remain in full force and effect until June 30, 2025, unless sooner terminated as provided in Section 5.0 of this Agreement. Section 2. All references to the term "Agreement" throughout Sections 1.0 through 35.0 inclusive, of the Agreement are hereby modified to include the this Amendment No. 1, dated July 22, 2024, as if all of those terms are fully set forth therein. Section 3. Except as expressly modified or supplemented by this Amendment No. 1, all other provisions of the Agreement shall remain unaltered and in full force and effect. Section 4. The person executing this Amendment No. 1 on behalf of Consultant warrants that he or she is fully authorized to execute this Amendment No. 1 on behalf of said Party, and that by his or her execution, Consultant is formally bound to the provisions of this Amendment No. 1. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto, through their respective authorized representatives have executed this Agreement as of the date and year first above written. 2of3 CITY OF SEAL BEACH By: Jill R. Ingram, City Manager CONSULTANT: Psomas, a California Corporation By: W.Y Name: Chad M. wilson Approved as to Form: By:�&-6 Nicl}olas Ghirelli, City Attorney Secretary Alia Hokuki Its: Vice President (Please note, two signatures required for corporations pursuant to California Corporations Code Section 393 from each of the following categories: (i) the chairperson of the board, the president or any vice president, and (ii) the secretary, any assistant secretary, the chief financial officer or any assistant treasurer of such corporation.) ACORbr CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE �� FDATE(MM/DD/YYYY) 3/19/2024 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER Greyling Ins. Brokerage/EPICPHONE 3780 Mansell Road, Suite 370 Alpharetta GA 30022 CONTACT NME: Sharon Brubaker FAx No, E: • 770.756.6599 ac No): 770.756.6599 nnDELSS: re lin certs re lin .com INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # POLICY EXP MM/DD INSURERA: National Union Fire Ins Co of Piftsburq 19445 A INSURED Psomas INSURER B: Travelers Property Casualty Co of Amer 25674 INSURERC: 865 South Figueroa Street INSURERD: Suite 3200 Los Angeles CA 90017 INSURERE: INSURER F : MED EXP (Any one person) $ 25,000 GUVtKAGt5 CERTIFICATE NUMBER, 49n9R.r,713 RFVICInN IJIIIIARGIT THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL SUER POLICYNUMBER POLICY EFF MMIDD POLICY EXP MM/DD LIMITS A X COMMERCIALGENERALLIABILIY CLAIMS -MADE OCCUR GL5268212 4/1/2024 4/1/2025 EACH OCCURRENCE $2,000,000 DAMAGE TRENTED PREMISES Ea occurrence $ 500,000 MED EXP (Any one person) $ 25,000 PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ 2,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY [�] JECT [_] LOC GENERALAGGREGATE $4,000,000 PRODUCTS -COMP/OPAGG $4,000,000 $ OTHER: A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY CA4489706 4/1/2024 4/1/2025 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ 2,000,000 Ea accident X ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ IAUTOS OWNED SCHEDULED AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ( BODILY INJURY Per accident) $ X HIRED X NON -OWNED ONLY AUTOS ONLY PROPERTY DAMAGE $ Per accident $ B X UMBRELLALIAB X OCCUR CUP7X223161 4/1/2024 4/1/2025 EACH OCCURRENCE $1,000,000 AGGREGATE $1,000,000 EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS -MADE DED X RETENTION $ in nnn $ A A WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS'LMILITY YIN WC015893764(AOS) WC015893765(CA) 4/1/2024 4/1/2024 4/1/2025 4/1/2025 X I STATUTE OERH E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ 2,000,000 ANYPROPRIETOR/PARTNERIEXECUTIVE F —N] OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLU DED7 NIA E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ 2,000,000 (Mandatory In NH) If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ 2,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) 3SEA000800, Project Name: Old Ranch Country Club. City of Seal BeachCity, its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, designated volunteers and those City agents acting as independent contractors in the role of City officials are named as Additional Insureds on the above referenced liability policies with the exception of workers compensation where required by written contract. Should any of the above described policies be cancelled by the issuing insurer before the expiration date thereof, we Will endeavor to provide 30 days' written notice (except 10 days for nonpayment of premium) to the Certificate Holder. The above referenced liability policies With the exception of workers compensation and professional liability are primary & non-contributory where required by written contract. Waiver of Subrogation in favor of Additional Insured(s) where required by written contract & allowed by law. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION City of Seal Beach 211 Eighth Street Seal Beach CA 90740-0000 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE r ©1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2016103) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE FDATE(MM/DD/YYYY) 9/28/2024 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(les) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER Assu red Partners Design Professionals Insurance Services, LLC 3697 Mt. Diablo Blvd Suite 230 Lafayette CA 94549 Y License#: 6003745 CONTACT NONE Lisa Shimizu -Fookes N Ext : 714-427-3482 FAX AIC No): E-MAIL ADDRESS: CertsDesiqnPro@,AssuredPartners.com INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # INSURERA: XL Specialty Insurance Co. 37885 INSURED PSOMASO-01 PSOMAS 865 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 3200 Los Angeles CA 90017 INSURER B : INSURERC: INSURER D: INSURER E : INSURER F : VVYLI\I1\iGJ \.CRI ivi"F IC mijmmS K'F gti-{1\al.K OC\/IClfl\I \IIITC-. 104 4 1 N '?Of 1 kig i oaf 100 DN61i')O1 R0,61 ET a6f0 61100 W(M 011M 0006 41 E00 1 N 1 OU )61 ET OO 0ab00 aONEO iINT 100 E)NN?q DOT 40 )OOR f31 006 6Nl E 4 01 1 1360)00 abs T 0T 840606161016 IVT 'M604 A0 NO a YNbl T f3fl NT F41001 OfWr=6061 r.401 01 DWI I N e 000 1 04 f011 At*al 0 bar, 00 4 1 LOO NT diaq DOT 18)66100 X61 ET a6f0 aOCW 000 or, 1011 DNbti',01 l')01 fT 830/'1 00T 0,6 q 1 Ea00i'1 1 N 1366 100 1 01 61 0 OEfCr=1461 13611f004401 NOIEf0DN61r�u166611 IOF4e6b8r08EO0006TOlfEf0009D8Q'?01,616 INSR LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL SUBR POLICY NUMBER MM/DDY EFF MM POLI YY LIMITS COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY fb3 61 46P F R"Ll 0¢fONffE1I 00f0 G 01064 01 dl ±,/Y n"h+ 0 0011 N0¢bii ¢0E 4MI G a 00MG001 ofial 0064 ¢oD001 001 as D&&(; 6Uf ❑ rya ❑ FIF41 Caw¢6¢oi11 tiU¢I u a D1 NOP -fl 16N6Drrfma0 O a 00I as AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY Vol 'r34'/o' UU U d70) cur- - O Rog aEl N NE 600 1 fOooELoo ¢EI F41N6br qqEl NI 04 00 OF46Nt boo aE1 NI rQ= ¢El Nl Nbb= OFiOC�1 S. d)AV A®t:+ 0 ONO�br, 4MI g d).W/ wog O DI IN u¢ ¢uu O UMBRELLA LIAB rwe o¢f0 N"r=l 106*0 O EXCESS LIAB 1'b3�61 rb¢00 ¢0111 oo¢I 0 0 000 1 1101061,960 n WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y / N w�aOidIEu Er�❑N/A pLI N Op 1 i Rl EI 0 01 0b0¢f0¢fUObI a =604lJ¢1 060M Ub0(Yvroo O (Mandatory in NH)N0If00001 *6A -6'/a -'may 42140 out f1 IDI h9bFi0N0o1 ¢1401 %t© oab04 0¢I 06E)Fidfg664 O A Professional Liab & Poll. Liab Claims -Made Farm Retro Date: 10/15/1947 Y DPR5033899 10/15/2024 10/15/2025 Per Claim $2,000,000 Aggregate Limit $2,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, maybe attached if more space is required) Additional Insured Status is not available on Professional Liability Policy. 3SEA000800, Old Ranch Country Club Specific Plan EIR Seal Beach, CA. vGl� 1 IriVl1 a G "W"WGm VA14%,r-LLA t RAY 3U uav imouce of L anceiiaunn City of Seal Beach Attn: David Greene 211 Eighth Street Seal Beach CA 90740 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. ©1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2016/03) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD Policy Number: DPR5033899 2. The specific nature and extent of the injury or damage that has been sustained; and 3. How the INSURED first became aware of such CIRCUMSTANCE(S), then any CLAIM(S) that may subsequently be made against the INSURED arising out of such reported CIRCUMSTANCE(S) shall be deemed to have been made on the date first written notice of the CIRCUMSTANCE(S) was received by the Company. This right conferred upon the INSURED in this Paragraph shall terminate at the end of the POLICY PERIOD and shall not exist during the Automatic Extended Reporting Period or Optional Extended Reporting Period. XI. OTHER CONDITIONS A. Cancellation This Policy may be canceled by the NAMED INSURED by surrender thereof to the Company or any of its authorized agents or by mailing to the Company written notice stating when thereafter the cancellation shall be effective. This Policy may be canceled by the Company by mailing to the NAMED INSURED, at the address stated in Item 1. of the Declarations, written notice stating when, not less than thirty (30) days thereafter (or ten (10) days thereafter for non-payment of premium), such cancellation shall be effective. The mailing of notice as aforesaid shall be sufficient proof of notice. The time of surrender or the effective date and hour of cancellation stated in the notice shall become the end of the POLICY PERIOD. Delivery of such written notice either by the NAMED INSURED or by the Company shall be equivalent to mailing. If this Policy is canceled, earned premium shall be computed in accordance with the Company's guidelines with respect to cancellation. Premium adjustment may be made either at the time cancellation is effected or as soon as practicable after cancellation becomes effective, but payment or tender of unearned premium is not a condition of cancellation. B. Action Against The Company No action may be brought against the Company unless, as a condition precedent thereto, there shall have been full compliance with all of the terms of this Policy, nor until the amount of the INSURED'S obligation to pay shall have been finally determined either by judgment against the INSURED in a contested proceeding after final judgment has been rendered and any appeal decided, or by written agreement of the INSURED, the claimant and the Company. No person or organization shall have any right under this Policy to join the Company as a party to any action against the INSURED to determine the INSURED'S liability, nor shall the INSURED or the INSURED'S legal representative join the Company in such action. Bankruptcy or insolvency of the INSURED or the INSURED'S estate shall not relieve the Company of any of its obligations hereunder. C. Assignment This Policy may not be assigned or transferred without written consent of the Company. D. Subrogation In the event of any payment under this Policy, the Company shall be subrogated to all the INSURED'S rights of recovery therefor against any person or organization, and the INSURED shall execute and deliver instruments and papers and do whatever else is necessary to secure such rights. The INSURED shall do nothing after a CLAIM(S) to prejudice such rights. However, it is agreed that the Company waives its rights of subrogation under this Policy against clients of the INSURED as respects any CLAIM(S) arising from PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, or CONTRACTING SERVICES under the client's contract requiring waiver of subrogation, but only to the extent required by written contract. LDD 0501116 Page 15 of 16 09/13/2024 6:34:31 PM © 2016 X.L. America, Inc. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied without permission. This endorsement, effective 12:01 a.m., 10/15/2024 forms a part of Policy No. DPR5033899 Issued to PSOMAS by XL Specialty Insurance Company. THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. NOTICE OF POLICY CANCELLATION — BLANKET NOTICE TO DESIGNATED ENTITIES This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: PROFESSIONAL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND NETWORK SECURITY LIABILITY POLICY — ARCHITECTS, CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS Section XI. OTHER CONDITIONS, Paragraph A. Cancellation is amended by the addition of the following: In the event that the Company cancels or non -renews this Policy during the POLICY PERIOD, the Company agrees to provide thirty (30) days' prior written notice of cancellation or non -renewal of this Policy to any entity with whom the NAMED INSURED agreed in a written contract or agreement would be provided with notice of cancellation or non -renewal of this Policy, provided that: 1. The Company receives, at least thirty (30) days prior to the date of cancellation or non -renewal, a written request from the NAMED INSURED to provide notice of cancellation to entities designated by the NAMED INSURED to receive such notice; and 2. The written request includes the name, address and email of each person or entity designated by the NAMED INSURED to receive such notice. The Company will assume that the list provided to the company by the NAMED INSURED is a complete and accurate list. This endorsement does not apply to non -renewal of the Policy at the end of the POLICY PERIOD or cancellation of the Policy for non-payment of premium to a premium finance company authorized to cancel the Policy. Furthermore, nothing contained in this endorsement shall be construed to provide any rights under the Policy to the entities receiving notice of cancellation pursuant to this endorsement, nor shall this endorsement amend or alter the effective date of cancellation stated in the cancellation notice issued to the NAMED INSURED. All other terms and conditions of the Policy remain unchanged. LDD 465 0620 Page 1 of 1 09/13/2024 6:34:31 PM © 2020 X.L. America, Inc. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied without permission. March 23, 2023 Alia Hokuki, AICP Senior Project Manager PSOMAS 5 Hutton Centre Drive, Ste. 300 Santa Ana, CA 92707 Subject: Tree Survey and Arborist Report - Scope and Budget Augment for Old Ranch Country Club, Seal Beach, California Dear Ms. Hokuki: The City of Seal Beach authorizes the Scope and Budget Augment as described in the Scope of Work and Fee Estimate that your office prepared (October 19, 2022) and is attached to this letter (Attachment A). Please contact our Planning Manager, Shaun Temple, with any questions that you may have related to this approval letter at (562) 431-2527, ext. 1316 or at stemple@sealbeachca.gov. Sincerely, 2 `&1 Wn Jill Ingram' City Manager City of Seal Beach Attachment A - Scope of Work and Fee Estimate Old Ranch Country Chub Windrow Assessment ATTACHMENT A SCOPE OF WORK AND FEE ESTIMATE EUCALYPTUS WINDROW PRESERVATION PLAN OLD RANCH COUNTRY CLUB October 19, 2022 TASK 1 EUCALYPTUS WINDROW PRESERVATION PLAN $9,450.00 A Psomas Certified Arborist will assess eucalyptus trees that comprise a windrow located along the southern edge of the driving range at the Old Ranch Country Club. The survey area for the assessment will include all trees that occur in an approximate two -acre area between the driving range and Lampson Avenue. The field assessment will include an inspection from the ground of tree conditions to determine which trees have health issues that would require their removal or if there are actions that can be taken to improve their health. All mature eucalyptus trees (those with a trunk diameter of at least 12 inches) will be physically tagged so that their ongoing health can be tracked over time. Trees that should be removed will be marked with colored flagging. Upon conclusion of the field assessment, Psomas will prepare a Windrow Preservation Plan which will (1) summarize the current condition of the windrow trees; (2) identify unhealthy trees that should be removed; (3) determine the impact of a new road that will be adjacent to the windrow; (4) estimate new trees/shrubs that should be planted; (5) provide recommendations for ongoing tree management including irrigation, pruning, etc.; and (6) describe an ongoing monitoring schedule to identify any needed maintenance actions. The plan will include a map to indicate the location of mature eucalyptus trees in the windrow as well as mature trees recommended for removal. Photos will be included to illustrate any conditions described in the preservation plan. Please note that the assessment will consist of observations from the ground and that collection of plant tissue or soil samples for laboratory testing is not included in this proposal. If soil nutrient deficiencies or insect infestations are suspected to be significantly affecting tree health, Psomas will provide a change order request for this additional analysis. n:wnJ.taWn_(s.m e.. r=EADOo dMriw.tN. cffnaSmW rmw..nsax ae Rand M101M dmA-I Scope of 6York and Fees PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT for Environmental Impact Report between City of Seal Beach 211 - 8th Street Seal Beach, CA 90740 E- L Psomas 5 Hutton Centre Drive Suite 300 Santa Ana, CA 92707 This Professional Service Agreement ("the Agreement') is made as of July 25, 2022 (the "Effective Date"), by and between Psomas ("Consultant'), a California corporation, and the City of Seal Beach ("City"), a California charter city, (collectively, "the Parties"). RECITALS A. City desires certain professional environmental consulting services for preparation of an Environmental Impact Report in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for a proposed development project located at the Old Ranch Country Club. B. Pursuant to the authority provided by its City Charter and Seal Beach Municipal Code § 3.20.025(C), City desires to engage Consultant to provide professional environmental consulting services in the manner set forth herein and more fully described in Section 1.0. A. Consultant represents that the principal members of its firm are fully qualified by virtue of their training, experience, and expertise to perform the services contemplated by this Agreement in a good and professional manner; and it desires to perform such services as provided herein. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the Parties' performance of the promises, covenants, and conditions stated herein, the Parties hereto agree as follows. AGREEMENT 1.0 Scope of Services 1.1 Consultant shall provide those environmental consulting services (collectively "Services") for preparation of an Environmenal Impact Report and related CEQA documentation as set forth in Consultant's Proposal dated April 25, 2022 attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference. To the extent that there is any conflict between Exhibit A and this Agreement, this Agreement shall control. 1.2 Consultant shall perform all Services under this Agreement in accordance with the standard of care generally exercised by like professionals under similar circumstances and in a manner reasonably satisfactory to City. 1.3 In performing this Agreement, Consultant shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local law. 1.4 As a material inducement to City to enter into this Agreement, Consultant hereby represents that it has the experience necessary to undertake the Services to be provided. In light of such status and experience, Consultant hereby covenants that it shall follow the customary professional standards in performing all Services. The City relies upon the skill of Consultant, and Consultant's staff, if any, to do and perform the Services in a skillful, competent, and professional manner, and Consultant and Consultant's staff, shall perform the Services in such manner. Page 2 of 23 Consultant shall, at all times, meet or exceed any and all applicable professional standards of care. 1.5 Consultant will not be compensated for any work performed not specified in the Scope of Services unless the City authorizes such work in advance and in writing. The City Manager may authorize extra work to fund unforeseen conditions in an amount not to exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the contract price set forth in Section 3.1. Payment for additional work in excess of this amount requires prior City Council authorization. 2.0 Term The term of this Agreement shall commence on August 1, 2022 and shall remain in full force and effect until July 31, 2024, unless sooner terminated as provided in Section 5.0 of this Agreement. 3.0 Consultant's Compensation 3.1 City will pay Consultant in accordance with the hourly rate and fees shown on the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit A for all Services and expenses incurred in the performance of this Agreement, but in no event will the City pay more than the total not -to -exceed amount of $238,393 for the Term, except as otherwise authorized pursuant to Section 3.2 hereunder. 3.2 Any additional work authorized by the City pursuant to Section 1.6 will be compensated in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit A. 4.0 Method of Payment 4.1. Consultant shall submit to City monthly invoices for all Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. Such invoices shall be submitted within 15 days of the end of the month during which the Services were rendered and shall describe in detail the Services rendered during the period, the days worked, number of hours worked, the hourly rates charged, and the Services performed for each day in the period. City will pay Consultant within 30 days of receiving Consultant's invoice. City will not withhold any applicable federal or state payroll and other required taxes, or other authorized deductions from payments made to Consultant. 4.2. Upon 24-hour notice from City, Consultant shall allow City or City's agents or representatives to inspect at Consultant's offices during reasonable business hours all records, invoices, time cards, cost control sheets and other records maintained by Consultant in connection with this Agreement. City's rights under this Section 4.2 shall survive for three (3) years following the termination of this Agreement. Page 3 of 23 5.0 Termination 5.1. This Agreement may be terminated by City, without cause, or by Consultant based on reasonable cause, upon giving the other party written notice thereof not less than 30 days prior to the date of termination. 5.2. This Agreement may be terminated by City upon 10 days' notice to Consultant if Consultant fails to provide reasonably satisfactory evidence of renewal or replacement of comprehensive general liability insurance as required by this Agreement at least 20 days before the expiration date of the previous policy. 6.0 Party Representatives 6.1. The City Manager is the City's representative for purposes of this Agreement. 6.2. Jim Hunter is the Consultant's primary representative for purposes of this Agreement. Jim Hunter shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the Services hereunder. Consultant may not change its representative without the prior written approval of City, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. 7.0 Notices 7.1. _ All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed 48 hours after deposit in the United States Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at the following addresses: To City: City of Seal Beach 211 8t" Street Seal Beach, CA 90740 Attn: City Manager To Consultant: Psomas 5 Hutton Centre Drive Suite 300 Santa Ana, CA 92707 Attn: Jim Hunter 7.2 Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service. Page 4 of 23 8.0 Permits and Licenses Consultant and all of Consultant's employees and other personnel shall obtain and maintain during the Agreement term all necessary licenses, permits and certificates required by law for the provision of the Services under this Agreement, including a business license as required by the Seal Beach Municipal Code. 9.0 Independent Contractor 9.1 Consultant is an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. All work or other Services provided pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed by Consultant or by Consultant's employees or other personnel under Consultant's supervision, and Consultant and all of Consultant's personnel shall possess the qualifications, permits, and licenses required by State and local law to perform such Services, including, without limitation, a City of Seal Beach business license as required by the Seal Beach Municipal Code. Consultant will determine the means, methods, and details by which Consultant's personnel will perform the Services. Consultant shall be solely responsible for the satisfactory work performance of all personnel engaged in performing the Services and compliance with the customary professional standards. 9:2 All of Consultant's employees and other personnel performing any of the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall also not be employees of City and shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Consultant and Consultant's personnel shall not supervise any of City's employees; and City's employees shall not supervise Consultant's personnel. Consultant's personnel shall not wear or display any City uniform, badge, identification number, or other information identifying such individual as an employee of City; and Consultant's personnel shall not use any City e-mail address or City telephone number in the performance of any of the Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall acquire and maintain at its sole cost and expense such vehicles, equipment and supplies as Consultant's personnel require to perform any of the Services required by this Agreement. Consultant shall perform all Services off of City premises at locations of Consultant's choice, except as otherwise may from time to time be necessary in order for Consultant's personnel to receive projects from City, review plans on file at City, pick up or deliver any work product related to Consultant's performance of any Services under this Agreement, or as may be necessary to inspect or visit City locations and/or private property to perform such Services. City may make a computer available to Consultant from time to time for Consultant's personnel to obtain information about or to check on the status of projects pertaining to the Services under this Agreement. 11 9.3 Consultant shall be responsible for and pay all wages, salaries, benefits and other amounts due to Consultant's personnel in connection with their performance of any Services under this Agreement and as required by law. Page 5 of 23 Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: Social Security taxes, other retirement or pension benefits, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers' compensation insurance. Notwithstanding any other agency, State, or federal policy, rule, regulation, statute or ordinance to the contrary, Consultant and any of its officers, employees, agents, and subcontractors providing any of the Services under this Agreement shall not become entitled to, and hereby waive any claims to, any wages, salaries, compensation, benefit or any incident of employment by City, including but not limited to, eligibility to enroll in, or reinstate to membership in, the California Public Employees Retirement System ("PERS") as an employee of City, and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contributions or employee contributions for PERS benefits. 10.0 PERS Compliance and Indemnification 10.1. General Requirements. The Parties acknowledge that City is a local agency member of PERS, and as such has certain pension reporting and contribution obligations to PERS on behalf of qualifying employees. Consultant agrees that, in providing its employees and any other personnel to City to perform any work or other Services under this Agreement, Consultant shall assure compliance with the Public Employees' Retirement Law ("PERL"), commencing at Government Code § 20000, as amended by the Public Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2013 ("PEPRA"),. and the regulations of PERS. Without limitation to the foregoing, Consultant shall assure compliance with regard to personnel who have active or inactive membership in PERS and to those who are retired annuitants and in performing this Agreement shall not assign or utilize any of its personnel in a manner that will cause City to be in violation of the PERL, PEPRA or any other applicable retirement laws and regulations. 10.2 Indemnification. Consultant shall defend (with legal counsel approved by City, whose approval shall not be unreasonably withheld), indemnify and hold harmless City, and its City and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, from any and all liability, damages, claims, costs and expenses of any nature to the extent arising from, caused by, or relating to Consultant's violation of any provisions of this Section 9.0. This duty of indemnification is in addition to Consultant's duty to defend, indemnify and hold harmless as set forth in any other provision of this Agreement. "11.0 Confidentiality 11.1. Consultant covenants that all data, reports, documents, surveys, studies, drawings, plans, maps, models, photographs, images, video files, media, discussion, or other information (collectively "Data & Documents") developed or received by Consultant or provided for performance of this Agreement are deemed Page 6 of 23 confidential and shall not be disclosed by Consultant without prior written authorization by City. City shall grant such authorization if applicable law requires disclosure. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, or subcontractors shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested in writing by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the Services performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary," provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. 11.2 Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder. City may, but has no obligation to, represent Consultant or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct or rewrite the response. 11.3 Consultant's covenants under this Section shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement. 12.0 Ownership of Documents and Work Product 12.1. All Data & Documents shall be and remain the property of City without restriction or limitation upon its use, duplication or dissemination by City. All Data & Documents shall be considered "works made for hire," and all Data & Documents and any and all intellectual property rights arising from their creation, including, but not limited to, all copyrights and other proprietary rights, shall be and remain the property of City without restriction or limitation upon their use, duplication or dissemination by City. Consultant shall not obtain or attempt to obtain copyright protection as to any Data & Documents. 12.2. Consultant hereby assigns to City all ownership and any and all intellectual property rights to the Data & Documents that are not otherwise vested in City pursuant to the paragraph directly above this one. 12.3. Consultant warrants and represents that it has secured all necessary licenses, consents or approvals to use any instrumentality, thing or component as to which any intellectual property right exists, including computer software, used in the rendering of the Services and the production of all Written Products produced under this Agreement, and that City has full legal title to and the right to reproduce Page 7 of 23 the Data & Documents. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold City, and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, harmless from any loss, claim or liability in any way related to a claim that City's use of any of the Data & Documents is violating federal, state or local laws, or any contractual provisions, or any laws relating to trade names, licenses, franchises, copyrights, patents or other means of protecting intellectual property rights and/or interests in products or inventions. Consultant shall bear all costs arising from the use of patented, copyrighted, trade secret or trademarked documents, materials, equipment, devices or processes in connection with its provision of the Services and Data & Documents produced under this Agreement. In the event the use of any of the Written Products or other deliverables hereunder by City is held to constitute an infringement and the use of any of the same is enjoined, Consultant, at its expense, shall: (1) secure for City the right to continue using the Data & Documents and other deliverables by suspension of any injunction, or by procuring a license or licenses for City; or (2) modify the Data & Documents and other deliverables so that they become non -infringing while remaining in compliance with the requirements of this Agreement. These covenants shall survive the expiration and/or termination of this Agreement. 12.4. Upon expiration or termination of the Agreement, Consultant shall deliver to City all Data & Documents and other deliverables related to any Services performed pursuant to this Agreement without additional cost or expense to City. If Consultant prepares a document on a computer, Consultant shall provide City with said document both in a printed format and in an electronic format that is acceptable to City. 13.0 Subcontractors No portion of this Agreement shall be subcontracted without the prior written approval of the City. Consultant is fully responsible to City for the performance of any and all subcontractors. 14.0 Prohibition Against Assignment or Delegation Consultant shall not assign any of its rights or delegate any of its duties under this Agreement, either in whole or in part, without City's prior written consent. Any purported assignment or delegation in violation of this Section shall be void and without effect, and shall entitle City to terminate this Agreement. As used in this Section, "assignment" and "delegation" means any sale, gift, pledge, hypothecation, encumbrance or other transfer of all or any portion of the rights, obligations, or liabilities in or arising from this Agreement to any person or entity, whether by operation of law or otherwise, and regardless of the legal form of the transaction in which the attempted transfer occurs. 15.0 Inspection and Audit of Records Page 8 of 23 Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all Services and other matters covered under this Agreement, including but expressly not limited to, all Services performed, salaries, wages, invoices, time cards, cost control sheets, costs, expenses, receipts and other records with respect to this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records on the Services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of all Services in connection therewith. All such records shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. At all times during regular business hours, Consultant shall provide City with free access to such records, and the right to examine and audit the same and to make copies and transcripts as City deems necessary, and shall allow inspection of all program data, information, documents, proceedings and activities and all other matters related to the performance of the Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall retain all financial and program service records and all other records related to the Services and performance of this Agreement for at least three (3) years after expiration, termination or final payment under this Agreement, whichever occurs later. City's rights under this Section 13.0 shall survive for three (3) years after expiration, termination or final payment under this Agreement, whichever occurs later. 16.0 Safety Requirements All work performed under this Agreement shall be performed in such a manner as to provide safety to the public and to meet or exceed the safety standards outlined by CAL OSHA and other applicable local, state and federal laws, industry safety orders and/or health orders. Consultant's obligations shall include but are not limited to, the requirement to comply with all applicable COVID-19 social distancing requirements, daily monitoring and recordkeeping requirements when Consultant's employees come onsite, and other applicable provisions of any applicable industry safety standards and/or health orders issued by the County of Orange, City of Seal Beach, and/or any other federal, state or local agency with jurisdiction over the City and/or Consultant, during Consultant's performance of the Project. The City may issue restraint or cease and desist orders to Consultant when unsafe or harmful acts are observed or reported relative to the performance of the Services. Consultant shall maintain its work sites free of hazards to persons and property resulting from its operations. Consultant shall immediately report to the City any hazardous condition noted by Consultant. ` 17.0 Insurance 17.1. General Reguirements. Consultant shall not commence work under this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that Consultant has secured all insurance required under this Section. 17.2. Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, procure, maintain and keep in full force and effect for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or Page 9 of 23 damages to property that may arise from or in connection with the performance of this Agreement, as follows: 17.2.1. Commercial General Liability Insurance: Consultant shall maintain limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage; and if Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreement/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit: Coverage shall be at least as broad as the latest version of Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001). If Consultant is a limited liability company, the commercial general liability coverage shall be amended so that Consultant and its managers, affiliates, employees, agents and other persons necessary or incidental to its operation are insureds; 17.2.2. Automobile Liability Insurance: Consultant shall maintain limits no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. Coverage shall be at least as broad as Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form number CA 0001, code 1 (any auto); 17.2.3. Workers' Compensation Insurance in the amount required by law; and Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident and in the aggregate for bodily injury or disease; 17.2.4. Professional Liability (or Errors and Omissions) Liability, within minimum limits of $1,000,000 per claim/aggregate. If a "claims made" policy is provided, then the policy shall be endorsed to provide an extended reporting period of not less than three years. 17.3. Acceptability of Insurers. The Insurance policies required under this Section shall be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating no less than A:VIII, licensed to do business in California, and satisfactory to the City. 17.4. Additional Insured. 17.4.1. For general liability insurance, City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, designated volunteers and those City agents acting as independent contractors in the role of City officials shall be covered as additional insureds with respect to the services or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work. 17.4.2. For automobile liability, City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, designated volunteers and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, shall be covered as additional insureds with respect to the ownership, operation, Page 10 of 23 maintenance, use, loading or unloading of any auto owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant or for which the Consultant is responsible. 17.4.3. These additional insured provisions shall also apply to any excess/umbrella liability policies. 17.5. Cancellations or Modifications to Coverage. The insurance policies shall contain the following provisions, or Consultant shall provide endorsements on forms supplied or approved, by City to state: (1) coverage shall not be canceled except after 30 days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to City, ten (10) days if cancellation is due to non-payment of premium; (2) any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies, including breaches of warranties, shall not affect coverage provided to City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, designated volunteers, and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials; 17.6. Primary and Non -Contributing. Coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, designated volunteers designated volunteers and.agents serving as independent contractors in `the role of City officials, or if excess, shall stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the Consultant's scheduled underlying coverage and that any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents. designated volunteers designated volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not be called upon to contribute with it; 17.7. Separation of Insureds. All insurance required by this Section (except workers' compensation and professional liability) shall contain standard separation of insureds provisions and shall not contain any special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, designated volunteers and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials. 17.8. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self- insured retentions shall be declared to and approved by City. Consultant guarantees that, at the option of City, either: (1) the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, designated volunteers and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials; or (2) Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigation costs, claims and administrative and defense expenses. 17.9. Waiver of Subrogation. Each insurance policy required by this Agreement shall expressly waive the insurer's right of subrogation against City and Page 11 of 23 its elected and appointed officials, officers,. employees, agents, designated volunteers and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials. Consultant hereby waives all rights of subrogation against City. 17.10. City Remedy for Noncompliance. If Consultant does not maintain the policies of insurance required under this Section in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement, or in the event any of Consultant's policies do not comply with the requirements under this Section, City may either immediately terminate this Agreement or,r if insurance is available at a reasonable cost, City may, but has no duty to, take out the necessary insurance and pay, at Consultant's expense, the premium thereon. Consultant shall promptly reimburse City for any premium paid by City or City may withhold amounts sufficient to pay the premiums from payments due to Consultant. 17.11. Evidence of Insurance. Prior to the performance of Services under this Agreement, Consultant shall furnish City with original certificates of insurance and all original endorsements evidencing and effecting the coverages required under this Section on forms satisfactory to and approved by City. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf, and shall be on forms provided by City if requested. Consultant may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies to City. Consultant shall maintain current endorsements on file with City's Risk Manager. All certificates and endorsements shall be received and approved by the City before work commences. City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. Consultant shall also provide proof to City that insurance policies expiring during the term of this Agreement have been renewed or replaced with other policies providing at least the same coverage. Consultant shall furnish such proof at least two weeks prior to the expiration of the coverages. 17.12. Indemnity Requirements Not Limiting. Procurement of insurance by Consultant shall not be construed as a limitation of Consultant's liability or as full performance of .Consultant's duty to indemnify City under Section 18.0. 17.13. Broader Coverage/Higher Limits. If Consultant maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums required above, City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to City. 17.14. Subcontractor Insurance Requirements. Consultant shall require each of its subcontractors that perform Services under this Agreement to maintain insurance coverage that meets all of the requirements of this Section. 18.0 Indemnification, Hold Harmless, and Duty to Defend Page 12 of 23 18.1. Indemnity for Design Professional Services. 18.1.1. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, indemnify and hold harmless City and its elected and appointed officials, officers, attorneys, agents, employees, designated volunteers, successors, assigns and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials (collectively "Indemnitees" in this Section 18.0), from and against any and all third -party damages, costs, expenses, liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, proceedings, judgments, penalties, bid protests, stop notices, liens and losses of any nature whatsoever, including but not limited to fees of attorneys, accountants and other professionals and all costs associated therewith, and reimbursement of reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of defense (collectively "Claims"), in law or in equity, to the extent caused by, in whole or in part, the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officers, directors, agents, servants, employees, subcontractors, contractors or their officers, agents, servants or employees (or any entity or individual that Consultant shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of design professional services under this Agreement by a "design professional," as the term is- defined under California Civil Code § 2782.8(c). Notwithstanding the foregoing and as required by Civil Code § 2782.8(a), in no event shall the cost to defend the Indemnitees that is charged to Consultant exceed Consultant's proportionate percentage of fault. 18.1.2. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless City in accordance with Sections 9.0 and 10.0. 18.2. Other Indemnitees. 18.2.1 , Other than in the performance of design professional services, and to the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, protect, defend, hold harmless and indemnify the Indemnitees from and against any and all third -party damages, costs, expenses, liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, proceedings, judgments, penalties, bid protests, stop notices, liens and losses of any nature whatsoever, including but not limited to fees of accountants, attorneys and other professionals, and all costs associated therewith, and payment of all consequential damages (collectively "Liabilities"), in law or equity, whether actual, alleged or threatened, to the extent caused by the negligent or reckless acts or omissions of Consultant, its officers, directors, agents, servants, employees, subcontractors, materialmen, suppliers, or contractors, or their officers, agents, servants or employees (or any entity or individual that Consultant' shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of this Agreement, including the Indemnitees' active or passive negligence, except for Liabilities arising from the negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees, as determined by final arbitration or court decision or by the agreement of the Parties. Consultant shall defend the Indemnitees in any action or actions filed in connection with any Liabilities, and shall pay all costs and expenses, including all reasonable attorneys' Page 13 of 23 fees and experts' costs actually incurred in connection with such defense. Consultant shall defend the Indemnitees in any action or actions filed in connection with any Liabilities with counsel of the Indemnitees' choice, and shall pay all costs and expenses, including all attorneys' fees and experts' costs actually incurred in connection with such defense. Consultant shall reimburse the Indemnitees for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by the Indemnitees in connection therewith. 18.2.2 Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless City in accordance with Sections 9.0 and 10.0. 18.3. Subcontractor Indemnification. Consultant shall obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those in this Section 18.0 from each and every subcontractor or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. If Consultant fails to obtain such indemnities, Consultant shall be fully responsible and indemnify, hold harmless and defend the Indemnitees from and against any and all Claims in law or equity, to the extent caused by the negligent or reckless acts or omissions of, its officers, directors, agents, servants, employees, subcontractors, materialmen, contractors or their officers, agents, servants or the legal liability thereof) in the performance of this Agreement, except for Claims or Liabilities arising from the active negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees, as determined by final arbitration or court decision or by the agreement of the Parties. 18.4. Workers' Compensation Acts Not Limiting. Consultant's indemnification obligations under this Section, or any other provision of this Agreement, shall not be limited by the provisions of any workers' compensation act or similar act. Consultant expressly waives its statutory immunity under such statutes or laws as to City, its elected and appointed officers, officials, agents, employees, designated volunteers and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials. 18.5. Insurance Requirements Not Limiting. City does not, and shall not, waive any rights that it may possess against Consultant because of the acceptance by City, or the deposit with City, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement. The indemnities and obligations in this Section shall apply regardless of whether or not any insurance policies are determined to be applicable to the Claims or Liabilities asserted against City or any of the other Indemnitees. 18.6. Survival of Terms. Consultant's covenants under this Section 18.0 shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. Page 14 of 23 19.0 Non -Discrimination Equal Employment Opportunity Consultant affirmatively represents that it is an equal opportunity employer. In the performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee, or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, 'or any other basis prohibited by law. Consultant will take affirmative action to ensure that subcontractors and applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, religious creed, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information or sexual orientation, or any other basis prohibited by law. 20.0 Labor Certification By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code that require every employer to be insured against liability for Workers' Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services. 21.0 Prevailing Wage and Payroll Records If this Agreement calls- for services that, in whole or in part, constitute "public works" as defined in the California Labor Code, Consultant shall comply in all respects with all applicable provisions of the California Labor Code, including those set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. 22.0 Entire Agreement This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the Parties with respect"to the r subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings, or agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by a writing signed by both Parties. 23.0 Severability The invalidity in whole or in part of any provisions of this Agreement shall not void or affect the validity of the other provisions of this Agreement. 24.0 Governing Law and Venue This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, except that any rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not be applied in Page 15 of 23 interpreting this Agreement. Any dispute that arises under or relates to this Agreement (whether contract, tort or both) shall be resolved in a superior court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Seal Beach. 25.0 No Third Party Beneficiaries This Agreement is made solely for the benefit of the Parties to this Agreement and their respective successors and assigns, and no other person or entity shall be deemed to have any rights hereunder against either party by virtue of this Agreement. 26.0 Waiver No delay or omission to exercise any right, power or remedy accruing to City under this Agreement shall impair any right, power or remedy of City, nor shall it be construed as a waiver of, or consent to, any breach or default. No waiver of any breach, any failure of a condition, or any right or remedy under this Agreement shall be (1) effective unless it is in writing and signed by the Party making the waiver, (2) deemed to be a waiver of, or consent to, any other breach, failure of a condition, or right or remedy, or (3) deemed to constitute a continuing waiver unless the writing expressly so states. 27.0 Prohibited Interests; Conflict of Interest 27.1. Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which may be affected by the Services, or which would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services. Consultant further covenants that, in performance of this Agreement, no person having -any such interest shall be employed by it. Furthermore, Consultant shall avoid the appearance of having any interest, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services. Consultant shall not accept any employment or representation during the term of this Agreement which is or may likely make Consultant "financially interested" (as provided in California Government Code §§ 1090 and 87100) in. any decision made by City on any matter in connection with which Consultant has been retained. 27.2. Consultant further warrants and maintains that it has not employed or retained any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Consultant, to solicit or obtain this Agreement. Nor has Consultant paid or agreed to pay any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Consultant, any fee, commission, gift, percentage, or any other consideration contingent upon the execution of this Agreement. Upon any breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right, at its sole and absolute discretion, to terminate this Agreement without further liability, or to deduct from any sums payable to Consultant hereunder the full amount or value of any such fee, commission, percentage or gift. Page 16 of 23 27.3. Consultant warrants and maintains that it has no knowledge that any officer or employee of City has any interest, whether contractual, non - contractual, financial, proprietary, or otherwise, in this transaction or in the business of Consultant, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of Consultant at any time during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall immediately make a complete, written disclosure of such interest to City, even if such interest would not be deemed a prohibited "conflict of interest" under applicable laws as described in this Section. 28.0 Final Payment Acceptance Constitutes Release The acceptance by Consultant of the final payment made under this Agreement shall operate as and be a release of City from all claims and liabilities for compensation to Consultant for anything done, furnished or relating to Consultant's work or services. Acceptance of payment shall be any negotiation of City's check or the failure to make a written extra compensation claim within ten calendar days of the receipt of that check. However, approval or payment by City shall not constitute, nor be deemed, a release of the responsibility and liability of Consultant, its employees, subcontractors and agents for the accuracy and competency of the information provided and/or work performed.; nor shall such approval or payment be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility or liability by City for any defect or error in the work prepared by Consultant, its employees, subcontractors and agents. 29.0 Corrections In addition to the indemnification obligations set forth above, Consultant shall correct, at its expense, all errors in the work which may be disclosed during City's review of Consultant's report or plans. Should Consultant fail to make such correction in a reasonably timely manner, such correction may be made by City, and the cost thereof shall be charged to Consultant. In addition to all other available remedies, City may deduct the cost of such correction from any retention amount held by City or may withhold payment otherwise owed Consultant under this Agreement up to the amount of the cost of correction. 30.0 Non -Appropriation of Funds Payments to be made to Consultant by City for any Services performed within the current fiscal year are within the current fiscal budget and within an available, unexhausted fund. In the event that City does not appropriate sufficient funds for payment of Consultant's Services beyond the current fiscal year, this Agreement shall cover payment for Consultant's Services only to the conclusion of the last fiscal year in which City appropriates sufficient funds and shall automatically terminate at the conclusion of such fiscal year. 31.0 Mutual Cooperation Page 17 of 23 31.1. City's Cooperation. City shall provide Consultant with all pertinent Data, documents and other requested information as is reasonably available for Consultant's proper performance of the Services required under this Agreement. 31.2. Consultant's Cooperation. In the event any claim or action is brought against City relating to Consultant's performance of Services rendered under this Agreement, Consultant shall render any reasonable assistance that City requires. 32.0 Time of the Essence Time is of the essence in respect to all provisions of this Agreement that specify a time for performance; provided, however, that the foregoing shall not be construed to limit or deprive a Party of the benefits of any grace or use period allowed in this Agreement. 33.0 Attorneys' Fees If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party all of its attorneys' fees and other costs incurred in connection therewith. 34.0 Exhibits All exhibits referenced in this Agreement are hereby incorporated into the Agreement as if set forth in full herein. In the event of any material discrepancy between the terms of any exhibit so incorporated and the terms of this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall control. 35.0 Corporate Authority The person executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants that he or she is duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said party and that by his or her execution, the Consultant is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement. Page 18 of 23 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto, through their respective authorized representatives have executed this Agreement as of the date and year first above written. CITY OF SEAL BEACH By: dl R. Ingram, City Manager Attest: in Approved as to Fo LIM ig A. Steele, City Attorney CONSULTANT: Psomas, a California corporation By: A > ' 4's—'— Name:_ J m Hunter Its: By: AA M Name: Cha Wilson Its: Vice President and Secretary (Please note, two signatures required #or corporations pursuant to California Corporations Code Section 313 from each of the following categories: (i) the chairperson of the board, the president or any vice president, and (ii) the secretary, any assistant secretary, the chief financial officer or any assistant treasurer of such corporation.) Page 19 of 23 EXHIBIT A CONSULTANT'S PROPOSAL DATED APRIL 24, 2022 (Attached) EXHIBIT B TERMS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH CALIFORNIA LABOR LAW REQUIREMENTS 1. This Agreement calls for services that, in whole or in part, constitute "public works" as defined in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 1720) of the California Labor Code ("Chapter 1"). Further, Consultant acknowledges that this Agreement is subject to (a) Chapter 1 and (b) the rules and regulations established by the Department of Industrial Relations ("DIR') implementing such statutes. Therefore, as to those Services that are "public works", Consultant shall comply with and be bound by all the terms, rules and regulations described in 1(a) and 1(b) as though set forth in full herein. 2. California law requires the inclusion of specific Labor Code provisions in certain contracts. The inclusion of such specific provisions below, whether or not required by California law, does not alter the meaning or scope of Section 1 above. 3. Consultant shall be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations in accordance with California Labor Code Section 1725.5, and has provided proof of registration to City prior to the Effective Date of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform work with any subcontractor that is not registered with DIR pursuant to Section 1725.5. Consultant and subcontractors shall maintain their registration with the DIR in effect throughout the duration of this Agreement. If Consultant or any subcontractor ceases to be registered with DIR at any time during the duration of the project, Consultant shall immediately notify City. , 4. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.4, Consultant's Services are subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by DIR. Consultant shall post job site notices, as prescribed by DIR regulations. 5. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1773.2, copies of the prevailing rate of per diem wages for each craft, classification, or type of worker needed to perform the Agreement are on file at City Hall and will be made available to any interested party on request. Consultant acknowledges receipt of a copy of the DIR determination of -such prevailing rate of per diem wages, and Consultant shall post such rates at each job site covered by this Agreement. 6. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1774 and 1775 concerning the payment of prevailing rates of wages to workers and the penalties for failure to pay prevailing wages. Consultant shall, as a penalty to City, forfeit $200.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each worker paid less than the prevailing rates as determined by the DIR for the work or craft in which the worker is employed for any public work done pursuant to this Agreement by Consultant or by any subcontractor. 7. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Section 1776, which requires Consultant and each subcontractor to: keep accurate payroll records and verify such records in writing under penalty of perjury, as specified in Section 1776; certify and make such payroll records available for inspection as provided by Section 1776; and inform City of the location of the records. 8. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1777.5, 1777.6 and 1777.7 and California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 200 et seq. concerning the employment- of apprentices on public works projects. Consultant shall be responsible for compliance with these aforementioned Sections for all apprenticeable occupations. Prior to commencing work under this Agreement, Consultant shall provide City with a copy of the information submitted to any applicable apprenticeship program. Within 60 days after concluding work pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant and each of its subcontractors shall submit to City a verified statement of the journeyman and apprentice hours performed under this Agreement. 9. Consultant shall not perform work with any Subcontractor that has been debarred or suspended pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1777.1 or any other federal or state law providing for the debarment of contractors from public works. Consultant and subcontractors shall not be debarred or suspended throughout the duration of this Contract pursuant to Labor Code Section 1777.1 or any other federal or state law providing for the debarment of contractors from public works. If Consultant or any subcontractor becomes debarred or suspended during the duration of the project, Consultant shall immediately notify City. 10. Consultant acknowledges that eight hours labor constitutes a legal day's work. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by Labor Code Section 1810. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Section 1813 concerning penalties for workers who work excess hours. Consultant shall, as a penalty to City, forfeit $25.00 for each worker employed in the performance of this Agreement by Consultant or by any subcontractor for each calendar day during which such worker is required or permitted to work more than eight hours in any one calendar day and 40 hours in any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1815, work performed by employees of Consultant in excess of eight hours per day, and 40 hours during any one week shall be permitted upon public work upon compensation for all hours worked in excess of eight hours per day at not less than one and one-half times the basic rate of pay. 11. California Labor Code Sections 1860 and 3700 provide that every employer will be required to secure the payment of compensation to its employees. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1861, Consultant hereby certifies as follows: "I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract." 12. For every subcontractor who will perform work on the project, Consultant shall be responsible for such subcontractor's compliance with Chapter 1 and Labor Code Sections 1860 and 3700, and Consultant shall include in the written contract between it and each subcontractor a copy of those statutory provisions and a requirement that each subcontractor shall comply with those statutory provisions. Consultant shall be required to take all actions necessary to enforce such contractual provisions and ensure subcontractor's compliance, including without limitation, conducting a periodic review of the certified payroll records of the subcontractor and upon becoming aware of the failure of the subcontractor to pay his or her workers the specified prevailing rate of wages. Consultant shall diligently take corrective action to halt or rectify any failure. 13. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend (at Consultant's expense with counsel reasonably acceptable to City) City, its officials, officers, employees, agents and independent contractors serving in the role of City officials, and volunteers from and against any demand or claim for damages, compensation, fines, penalties or other amounts arising out of or incidental to any acts or omissions listed above by any person or entity (including Consultant, its subcontractors, and each of their officials, officers, employees and agents) in connection with any work undertaken or in connection with the Agreement, including without limitation the payment of all consequential damages, attorneys' fees, and other related costs and expenses. All duties of Consultant under this Section shall survive the termination of the Agreement. OLD RANCH COUNTRY CLUB ,� SPECIFIC PLAN EIR pill NEW.- M&.11wom UIWA . "o t 0:. pill NEW.- M&.11wom UIWA April 25, 2022 Art Bashmakian, AICP Project Manager CITY OF SEAL BEACH Community Development Department 2118th Street Seal Beach, CA 90740 Balancing the Natural and Built Environment splanner@sealbeachca.gov Subject: Proposal for the Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Dear Mr. Bashmakian: Psomas is in receipt of the City of Seal Beach's (City's) Request for Proposal (RFP) for preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed Old Ranch Country Club Specific Plan (Project or proposed Project). Psomas has reviewed the RFP and has prepared the attached proposal for your consideration. Dedicated to balancing the natural and built environments, Psomas serves public and private clients in markets which include site development, transportation, water, and energy, with the following core services offered: ► Environmental Services ► Civil Engineering ► Construction Management ► Land Surveying and GIS The cornerstone of our business approach is to focus on our clients' long-term needs and to provide quality service and guidance to meet those needs. Our key attribute is our multidisciplinary team of experts. Psomas' professional staff of industry leaders produces cost-effective and award-winning projects for our clients through a value-added approach, incorporating innovation, creativity, sustainability, and cutting-edge technical expertise. The technical experts of the Psomas Environmental Planning and Resource Management Team have successfully provided California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documentation to public and private sector clients. Psomas' experience in preparing CEQA and NEPA documentation ranges from straightforward categorical exemptions (CEs) to complex Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs) for large, controversial projects. Psomas provides strategic consulting to clients based on their project needs. In addition, our services include the preparation and peer review of documents in the following topical areas: ► Air Quality Analyses, Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions, and Health Risk Assessments ► Energy Analysis ► Noise and Vibration Technical Studies Cultural Resources and Paleontological Resources 5 Hutton Centre Drive Suite 300 Santa Ana, CA 92707 Tel 714.751.7373 www.Psomas.com Art Bashmakian, AICP April 25, 2022 Page 2 of 3 Tribal Cultural Resources Assessments and AB 52 and SB 18 Consultation ► Biological Resources Technical Studies and Arborist Surveys ► Regulatory Permitting and Resource Agency Jurisdictional Delineations ► Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Services ► Shade. and Shadow Analysis ► Civil Engineering, Utility Capacity Studies, Hydrology and Drainage Analyses ► Transportation/Traffic Engineering and Parking Studies ► Scoping Meeting and Community Meeting Facilitation From our experience with numerous redevelopment, infill and major land development projects for cities and regional agencies throughout Southern California, we have learned the most important attributes a consultant can offer a lead agency are experience, responsiveness, and flexibility. As your consultant, we will act as an extension of your staff and, thus, it is important to be sensitive to community concerns and knowledgeable of the local regulations and City policies. When you select the Psomas Team, you can expect the following benefits: Experienced Project Manager. Much of the responsibility for the success of the environmental process depends on the Project Manager's ability to engender the confidence of the City by providing consistently dependable, accurate, and responsive client service. Alia Hokuki, AICP, a Senior Project Manager, will serve as the main point of contact to the City and Project Team and the day-to-day Project Manager with the responsibility of ensuring work is in compliance with CEQA, on schedule, within budget, and to the satisfaction of the City, the Applicant, and the Project Team. ARA expertise and experience includes managing a variety of project types, including residential, assisted and senior living, mixed-use, institutional (healthcare and education), commercial, and infrastructure projects. She has led teams on numerous land development infill/redevelopment projects in coastal cities of Southern California. She has worked on multiple CEQA documents for Specific Plans; her most recent relevant experience includes the Harbor Pointe Senior Living Project EIR for the City of Newport Beach, the West Alton Project EIR (residential with affordable units and senior apartments as an alternative) for the County of Orange, the Magnolia Tank Farm Specific Plan Program EIR for the City of Huntington Beach, and leading preparation of technical studies for assisted living projects for Oakmont Senior Living client. Jim Hunter, will be the Principal -in -Charge for the proposed Project. Jim has 35 years of experience providing strategic land use entitlement, environmental, and regulatory compliance services to private industry, municipal, and utility clients in Southern California. Responsive Staff. Alia will be supported by a team of highly skilled environmental planners and technical specialists who are experts in their respective fields and will provide project solutions for the City. The Psomas Team is well rounded and ready to provide the City with high quality environmental and planning services. The Psomas Team has a broad range of expertise and a deep bench of technical staff who can be assigned to the project, as needed. We understand the Applicant has prepared multiple technical studies/reports, including Biological Resources, Arborist (assessment of Eucalyptus Windows), Geotechnical, Hydrology, Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), and a Traffic Study, which will be peer reviewed by our technical staff and used in preparing the EIR document. Art Bashmakian, AICP April 25, 2022 Page 3 of 3 We appreciate the opportunity to propose on this interesting and important project, and we look forward to collaborating with the City and the Applicant on a successful CEQA EIR,process. As a Vice President, Jim Hunter, is authorized to sign the City of Seal Beach's Professional Services Agreement for Psomas. As Project Manager for this contract, Alia will be the primary contact person responsible for day-to-day management for the environmental services pursuant to the City's RFP. Please contact Alia by phone at 714.481.8065 or by email at Alia.Hokuki@Psomas.com should you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, PSOMAS i Hunter Alia Hokuki, AICP Vice President Senior Project Manager I TABLE OF CONTENTS Project Team Project Team Organizational Chart, Resumes. , Statements 1 ,2 ,3 Overview Problem/Tasks, 15 General Approach Work Plan Project Schedule Relevant Projects and References EIR Examples 17 20 ,34 36 Submitted separately Cost Submitted in a separate, sealed envelope Psomas engenders the confidence of our clients by providing consistently dependable, accurate, and responsive client service. Psomas Project Team Much of the responsibility for success of the CEQA process depends on the Project Manager's ability to engender the confidence of our clients by providing consistently dependable, accurate, and responsive client service. To meet the expectations of the City of Seal Beach and the needs of the Project, Psomas has assembled a highly qualified team, led by Alia Hokuki, AICP, as Project Manager, who will provide high quality and legally - defensible environmental documentation in compliance with CEQA, on schedule, within budget, and to the satisfaction of the City and the Project Applicant. Alia will be supported by Jim Hunter, as Principal -in -Charge. Alia Hokuki and Jim Hunter are committed to providing client -centered services that can streamline the project development process while offering creative solutions. In staffing our team, we have assigned highly qualified technical experts and experienced environmental planning staff who have proven track records in successfully delivering environmental impact analyses, associated technical studies, and related services. All key team members shown on the Organization Chart are assigned for the duration of this contract. Alia Hokuki, AICP I Project Manager and Primary Contact -� — Alia Hokuki, AICP, is a Senior Project Manager with 26 years of experience in the environmental and policy planning field with a focus on environmental impact assessments for public and private sector clients. Alia's project experience is diverse, with a strength in land use and land development. In the last five years, her focus has been on land development projects, including a program EIR for the Magnolia Tank Farm Specific Plan Project and an IS/ MND for Gisler Residential Project in the City of Huntington Beach; an EIR for the Harbor Pointe Senior Living Project and an Addendum for the Ritz-Carlton Residences Project in the City of Newport Beach; an IS/ND for the Street Lights Fullerton Project in the City of Fullerton; a project EIR for the West Alton Parcel Development Plan, in the County of Orange within the City of Irvine, and an IS/MND for Walnut Grove Specific Plan Project in the City of West Covina. Alia's work over the past several years has spanned multiple agencies and she has managed several environmental projects in Orange and Los Angeles counties. Alia will be the day-to-day Project Manager and primary contact. She will coordinate with the City, the Applicant, and Project Team (as approved by the City) with the responsibility to ensure the work is completed on time and within budget. Alia will facilitate communication with the City's Project Manager, Project Team, and applicable agencies, as appropriate. She will oversee preparation of the EIR and will prepare critical sections of the document. Alia will attend all project meetings as well as public hearings. Organization Chart Psomas recognizes that the success of a project depends heavily on staff capabilities, effective project management, and communication. We assure you that.the appropriate talent and physical resources are committed to every project. The resumes of Psomas' key personnel are presented on the following pages. Tin Cheung * Air Quality; GHG,and Noise Manager PSOMAS { Michael. Deseo Senior GIS Specialist Jennie Ramirez ! GIS Specialist jPSOMAS * Key Staff Art Bashmakian, AicP Senior Planner Alia Hokuki,,AicP PSOMAS Megan Larum * Assistant Project Manager Sean Noonan, AicP Senior. Environmental Planner Jillian Neary Senior Environmental Planner Janet Powell Environmental Analyst PSONfAS j Jim Hunter PSOMAS Steve Norton * Senior Biologist PSOMAS Charles Cisneros,, MS, RPA* Senior Archaeologist Megan Larum. Cultural' Resources. Analyst PSOMAS. EDUCATION 1996/Masters of Urban Planning//University of California, Irvine 1991/BA/Development Studies/University of California, Los Angeles CERTIFICATIONS American Institute of Certified Planners/No. 112796/American Planning Association/112796 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS American Planning Association Association of Environmental Professionals Society of American Military Engineers FuturePort EXPERIENCE With Psomas for 8 years; with other firms for 18 years Alia Hokuki, AICP * Project Manager Alia Hokuki, AICP, serves as a Senior Project Manager of Environmental Planning projects. She has 26 years of experience in environmental and policy planning field with a focus on environmental impact assessments for public and private sector clients. Alia's expertise includes the preparation and management of environmental compliance documents pursuant to CEQA and NEPA. She has managed a variety of projects, including high density residential; senior living facilities; mixed-use; urban infill and redevelopment; commercial and retail developments; institutional (education and healthcare); and infrastructure projects. She has extensive knowledge of CEQA, NEPA, and planning and zoning law. Experience Harbor Pointe Senior Living Project Environmental Impact Report - Newport Beach, CA: Project Manager for preparation of an EIR for the Harbor Pointe Senior Living Project, which will consist of demolition of an existing 8,800 SF restaurant, and development of a three-story, approximately 85,000 SF assisted living facility (101 assisted living and congregate care units), associated ancillary uses, and subsurface parking. Key issues were the massing of the building; compatibility with surrounding land uses; aesthetics, including shade and shadow; and construction noise. Addressing community concerns was also a key element of the project. i Magnolia Tank Farm Specific Plan Program Environmental Impact Report - Huntington Beach, CA: Project Manager for the redevelopment of a 29 -acre site (within the coastal zone) with a mixed-use development consisting of a 230,000 -SF lodge that includes a maximum of 175 guest rooms and guesthouse -style, budget -oriented, family/group overnight accommodations with 4o beds, and ancillary resident- and visitor -serving retail and dining; up to 250 -unit for -sale residential village; 2.8 acres of Coastal Conservation area adjacent to Magnolia Marsh; and 2.6 acres of park. In addition, the Specific Plan designates the area adjacent to Magnolia Street as Open Space Park along the project site's entire eastern boundary. Gisler Residential Project IS/MND - Huntington Beach, CA: Project Manager for this project which involves construction of an 85 -unit single- family detached residential development on an approximately 13.9 -acre site with a density of 6.1 dwelling units per gross acre. The site is located at 21141 Strathmoor Lane and is surrounded by single-family residential to the north, east and west, and Gisler Park to the south. The Project site is currently developed with a'school campus and associated site improvements, which would be demolished to accommodate the Project. Duties included main contact for the City, providing consultation on approach and strategy, author of critical sections of the IS/MND, providing QA/QC, coordinating with project team, managing contract and invoicing. West Alton Parcel Development Plan EIR - Irvine, CA: Project Manager for the West Alton Parcel Development Plan Project located in the City of Irvine. The project proposes development of multi -family residential units across Alia Hokuki, AICP two Planning Areas, separated by the West Alton Wildlife Movement Corridor, with (Continued) an average density of 30 dwelling units per acre. Each Planning Area will include opportunities for future residential uses. The project will require approvals by the County of Orange, as the CEQA lead agency, as well as a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change through the City of Irvine Street Lights Fullerton Project IS/ND - City of Fullerton, CA: Project Manager for an IS/ND for the proposed Street Lights Fullerton Project, located at 229 East Orangethorpe Avenue, within an existing shopping center (Fullerton Town Center), in the City of Fullerton. The Project involves'construction of an.in-fill mixed-use Project consisting of a 329 -unit, five -story residential building wrapping a 560 -space six -story parking structure; approximately 6,500 SF of retail on the ground floor; approximately 80,500 SF of open space including three outdoor courtyards, a pool, and outdoor gathering spaces on an approximately 4.47 -acre site. The existing commercial/retail uses and associated surface parking lots would be demolished to accommodate the proposed Project. Addendum to the Queen of the Valley Hospital Specific Plan Program EIR: Phase 1- Medical Office Building, Parking Structure, Emergency Department/Intensive Care Unit - West Covina, CA: Project Manager for the addendum to the final PEIR. The project implements Phase 1 expansion of the Hospital. Phase 1 includes a 58,868 -SF MOB; a 4 -level, 398-sapce parking structure; and a 2 -story, 58,901 -SF ED/ICU and associated 235 on-site parking spaces to accommodate the patients' visitors. Cohen Property Specific Plan Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 4 - Orange, CA: Project Manager for the preparation of an IS/MND for a residential project .that involves demolition of the existing shopping center, surface parking, and site improvements and construction of 32 single-family detached, two story dwelling units; internal drive aisles; and common open space areas on the 2.9 -acre site. The project would provide 19,535 SF of common open space (17,972 SF of landscaping and 1,563 SF of open space at the center of the site) and 22,090 SF of allowable private open space for a total of 41,625 SF of usable open space. EI Toro, 100 -Acre Parcel Development Plan Program Environmental Impact Report - Irvine, CA: Project Manager for this project located in the City of Irvine at the southern edge of the former Marine Corps Air Station El Toro adjacent to the Orange County Great Park. The project proposes a mixed-use, low -impact development, which proposes 2,103 residential units, 1.8 MSF of office uses, 220,000 SF of retail, and a 242 -room hotel. The project will maximize the benefit from its proximity to the Irvine Station, which includes a Metrolink Station and bus facilities. The project will require approvals by the County of Orange as the CEQA lead agency. In addition, the City of Irvine may consider a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change. Walnut Grove Specific Plan IS/MND - West Covina, CA:, Project Manager for the preparation of an IS/MND for a residential project that involves demolition of the existing vacant school and associated improvements and construction of a 158 -unit development on an approximately 9.14 -acre site. The project consists of two different types of residences: 66 units of detached single-family in a cluster configuration and 92 attached multi -family units. The project also provides a 0.27 -acre neighborhood park use and open space amenities including bench seating areas and trash receptacles; picnic areas; children's tot -lot area; open turf area; and connecting walkways. EDUCATION 1984/BS/Environmental Planning and Management/ University of California, Davis PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Association of Environmental Professionals EXPERIENCE With Psomas for 6 years; with other firms for 30 years dim Hunter * Principal -in -Charge Jim Hunter has 36 years of experience providing strategic land use entitlement, environmental, and regulatory compliance to regional infrastructure, municipal agency, and utility clients across Southern California. He has managed the growth of consulting offices of engineers, planners, and scientists to deliver seamless client -centric solutions. Key experiences include leading high performing teams in the areas of CEQA and NEPA review and permitting; preconstruction planning; and construction compliance monitoring for major land development and capital infrastructure across Southern California. His experience includes Principal -in -Charge and Contract Manager for multiple - On -Call contracts including Los Angeles County Public Works Water Resources Branch, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Planning Services, and project specific work for a variety of complex projects. Experience Ranch Hills Community Environmental Impact Report - Orange County, CA: Principal -in -Charge and Project Manager for the preparation of an EIR for the project located on County of Orange property. The Project proposes a Zone Change, Use Permit, and Vesting Tentative Tract Map to allow the replacement of the existing private recreational club that was established in 1958 with the development of 17 buildings, consisting of 34 single-family townhome units and 3 single-family detached units. University of California, Riverside, On -Call Non -Project Specific Environmental Consulting Services - Riverside, CA: Contract Manager for Psomas' on-call contract with the University of California, Riverside for environmental consulting services. Recent work includes regulatory services for the Botanic Garden Basin Maintenance Project, tree surveys, and the Student Success Center IS/MND. University of California, Los Angeles Capital Programs On -Call Contracts 2015 to 2020 - Los Angeles, CA: Contract Manager for the current On -Call Contract through March 2020 with the University of California, Los Angeles for environmental services for Capital Programs improvements. Current Psomas work includes pre -construction nesting bird and raptor surveys for the Southwest Campus Apartments and Hilgard Faculty Housing IS/MND. North Business Park Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report - Westlake, CA: Team Leader for the Program EIR for the proposed North Business Park Specific Plan. The proposed Specific Plan would promote the revitalization of underutilized properties and the intensification and adaptive reuse of existing developments within a Zoo -acre planning area north of the Ventura Freeway, west of Lindero Canyon Road, and south of Thousand Oaks Boulevard. The Specific Plan proposes mixed use developments in three districts, two business park districts, two design districts, and an office district Megan Larum * Assistant Project Manager Megan Larum is an Assistant Project Manager with 12 years of experience in environmental documentation and analysis consistent with CEQA and NEPA. She has experience in cultural resources management and has participated in Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) requests, records searches, and Phase I Cultural Resources Assessments. Experience The Affinity Project - Pasadena, CA: Environmental Planner for this project, which involves demolishing six of nine existing structures and redeveloping the 3.3 -acre project site located between 465 and 557 South Arroyo Parkway. An existing Whole Foods grocery store and two historic structures on the site would be retained and integrated into the project. The project consists of a 147,500 -SF, seven -story medical office building with ground floor commercial uses; and a 184 -500 -SF, eight - story assisted living facility that also includes 90 independent living units. Five levels of subterranean parking would be constructed. Street Lights Fullerton Development IS/MND;- Fullerton, CA: Environmental Planner for an IS/MND for the proposed Street Lights Fullerton Project, located at 229 East Orangethorpe Avenue, within an existing shopping center (Fullerton Town Center), in the City of Fullerton. The Project involves construction of an in -fill mixed-use Project consisting of a 329 -unit, 5 -story residential building wrapping a 560 -space 6 -story parking structure; approximately 6,500 SF of retail on the ground floor; approximately 80,500 SF of open space including 3 outdoor courtyards, a pool, and outdoor gathering spaces on an approximately 4.47=acre site. The existing commercial/retail uses and associated surface parking lots would be demolished to accommodate the proposed Project. Among other discretionary actions, a General Plan Amendment and a Zone Change to allow for the mixed-use nature of the Project, are required. Harbor Pointe Senior Living Project Environmental Impact Report - Newport EDUCATION Beach, CA: Environmental Planner for preparation of an EIR for the Harbor Pointe 2006/BS/Environmental Senior Living Project, which will consist of demolition of an existing 8,800 SF Policy Analysis and Planning/University of restaurant, and development of a three, story, approximately 85,000 SF assisted living California,Davis facility (101 assisted living and congregate care units), associated ancillary uses, and subsurface parking. Key issues were the massing of the building; compatibility with PROFESSIONAL surrounding land uses; aesthetics, including shade and shadow; and construction AFFILIATIONS noise. Addressing community concerns was also a key element of the project. Association of Environmental Gisler Residential Project IS/MND - Huntington Beach, CA: Environmental Professionals Planner for this project which involves constructionof an 85 -unit single-family EXPERIENCE detached residential development on an approximately 13.9 -acre site with a density of 6.1 dwelling units per gross acre. The site is located at 21141 Strathmoor Lane and With Psomas for 10 years; with other firms for 2 years is surrounded by single-family residential to the north, east and west, and Gisler Park to the south. The Project site is currently developed with a school campus and associated site improvements, which would be demolished to accommodate the Project. Duties included main contact for the City, providing consultation on approach and strategy, author of critical sections of the IS/MND, providing QA/QC, coordinating with project team, managing contract and invoicing. The Affinity Project - Pasadena, CA: Environmental Planner for this project, which involves demolishing six of nine existing structures and redeveloping the 3.3 -acre project site located between 465 and 557 South Arroyo Parkway. An existing Whole Foods grocery store and two historic structures on the site would be retained and integrated into the project. The project consists of a 147,500 -SF, seven -story medical office building with ground floor commercial uses; and a 184 -500 -SF, eight - story assisted living facility that also includes 90 independent living units. Five levels of subterranean parking would be constructed. Street Lights Fullerton Development IS/MND;- Fullerton, CA: Environmental Planner for an IS/MND for the proposed Street Lights Fullerton Project, located at 229 East Orangethorpe Avenue, within an existing shopping center (Fullerton Town Center), in the City of Fullerton. The Project involves construction of an in -fill mixed-use Project consisting of a 329 -unit, 5 -story residential building wrapping a 560 -space 6 -story parking structure; approximately 6,500 SF of retail on the ground floor; approximately 80,500 SF of open space including 3 outdoor courtyards, a pool, and outdoor gathering spaces on an approximately 4.47=acre site. The existing commercial/retail uses and associated surface parking lots would be demolished to accommodate the proposed Project. Among other discretionary actions, a General Plan Amendment and a Zone Change to allow for the mixed-use nature of the Project, are required. EDUCATION 2014/MS/Urban and Regional Planning/ California State Polytechnic University, Pomona 2011/MA/Geography/ California State University, Fullerton 2006/BA/History/University of California, Santa Barbara CERTIFICATIONS American Institute of Certified Planners/ American Planning Association/027853 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS American Institute of Certified Planners American Planning Association Association of Environmental Professionals EXPERIENCE With Psomas for 3 years; with other firms for 8 years Sean Noonan, AICP Senior Environmental Planner Sean Noonan has 11 years of environmental planning experience and has managed the CEQA, NEPA, and regulatory permitting processes for numerous roadways, highways, residential, commercial, and industrial projects throughout California. Sean has served as Environmental Project Manager for several projects, charged with developing technical studies, writing CEQA and NEPA environmental documents, processing projects through Caltrans Local Assistance and Division of Environmental Planning, obtaining regulatory permits, and maintaining environmental compliance through final design and project construction. Experience North Business Park Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report - Westlake, CA: Environmental Planner for the Program EIR for the proposed North Business Park Specific Plan. The Specific Plan would promote the revitalization of underutilized properties and the intensification and adaptive reuse of existing developments within a Zoo -acre planning area north of Interstate 101. The Specific Plan proposes mixed use developments in three districts, two business park districts, two design districts, and an office district that would accommodate the development of 1,017 new dwelling units and over 1. 6 million square feet of existing and future non-residential uses within a 129 -acre Focus Area, along with infrastructure improvements throughout the planning area. Carlsbad Veterans Park, Master Planning and Environmental Permitting Phase - Carlsbad, CA: Environmental Planner for providing professional services for new 91.5 -acre park. The developable area of the site was only 48 acres due to the presence of native vegetation preserves. The program for the project included active and passive recreation amenities, an open space interpretive area, public art, trails, utilities, parking, restrooms, and maintenance facilities. Psomas provided civil engineering, environmental, and surveying services for the Project Master Planning Phase and environmental permitting to result in final design concepts. More specifically, civil engineering master planning support services included development of project constraints, concept grading and utilities plans, CEQA level hydrology and stormwater management reports, traffic impact analysis, and hillside management plans. Huntington Plaza Mixed -Use Project - Arcadia, CA: Environmental Planner for this project, which consists of 139 residential units and 10,200 SF of groundfloor commercial uses. Given the location of this project in downtown Arcadia, this project involved a high level of coordination with the City and Applicant to develop a comprehensive description of haw the project would be constructed, including details such as staging, contractor parking, excavation and temporary shoring methods, and utility relocation. Psomas also prepared technical analyses in support of this project. EDUCATION 1997/BA/Geology/Indiana University -Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN CERTIFICATIONS Certificate of Completion for LEED for New Construction Technical Review Workshop/U.S. Green Building Council/ Certificate of Completion for Low Impact Development Seminar/ American Council of Engineering Companies/ EXPERIENCE With Psomas for 17 years; with other firms for 6years Jillian Neary Senior Environmental Planner Jillian Neary is a Project Manager with 23 years of experience in environmental analysis and land use investigation, including 20 years in the preparation of environmental compliance documents pursuant to CEQA, NEPA, and associated State and federal regulations. She has completed documentation for both private- and public -sector clients throughout Southern California and on a wide range of projects, including tract map and master planned communities, infill development and redevelopment, General Plan updates, commercial and industrial developments, recreation projects, and flood control and water supply projects. Experience South Pasadena General Plan/Downtown Specific Plan Update & 2021- 2029 Housing Element Program (EIR) - South Pasadena, CA: Project Manager for this Program EIR which involves a comprehensive update to both the 1998 South Pasadena General Plan and the 1996 Mission Street Specific Plan (MSSP). The proposed General Plan Update will serve as a long-term policy guide for decision-making regarding the appropriate physical development, resource conservation, and character of the City and establishes an overall development capacity for the City through the year 2040. Integra Perris Distribution Center EIR - Perris, CA: Environmental Planner for the preparation of an Addendum for this project, which involves the expansion of the Integra Perris Distribution Center (IPDC) to include an approximately 10.2 -acre parcel located immediately southwest of the IPDC site. The expansion would allow for the construction of a 273,000 -square -foot warehouse building, attached to the west end of the existing IPDC building. University of California, Riverside, Student Recreation Center Expansion Project IS/MND - Riverside, CA: Assistant Project Manager for this project, which involved a new 71,147 -gross -square -foot Student Recreation Center building and partial renovation of an existing Student Recreation Center building. Additionally, the IS/ND addressed improvements to the outdoor Recreation Complex, including construction of an outdoor swimming pool/spa and deck area, a new sand volleyball court, and new tennis courts. Jillian served as the primary author of the IS/MND, performed site reconnaissance, and prepared all required notices and the Final MND. City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update Program Environmental Impact Report - Rancho Cucamonga, CA: Environmental Planner for this project, which involved an update to the 2001 General Plan, providing guidance for future development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and its Sphere of Influence over the next 15 to 20 years. Adoption of the proposed General Plan Update allows for an increase in development potential throughout the City and the addition of transit -supported, mixed-use development along the City's main transportation corridors. Jillian prepared the hydrology, climate change, air quality, and utilities analyses, including outreach to affected utility agencies. EDUCATION 1984/BA/Economics/ Syracuse University CERTIFICATIONS California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Practice Certification/University of California, San Diego/ CertifiedProfessional Services Marketer/Society for Marketing Professional Services/ PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Association for Environmental Professionals, Orange County (OCAEP) TRAINING AEP Essentials Workshop Association for Environmental Professionals EXPERIENCE With Psomas for 12 years; with other firms for 0 years ,anet Powell Environmental Analyst Janet Powell has 12 years of experience with Psomas' Environmental Services Group in various roles including environmental analyst, project coordinator, technical editor, and environmental proposal writer/marketer. Janet has earned a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Practice Certification from the University of California, San Diego, and has extensive knowledge of CEQA and regulatory requirements. In her role as an environmental analyst, she has worked on a variety of project types including residential, healthcare mixed- use, commercial, infrastructure (public works), and transportation. Experience Gisler Residential Project IS/MND - Huntington Beach, CA: Environmental Analyst for the Gisler Residential Project IS/MND. The Project involves construction of an 85 -unit single-family detached residential development on an approximately 13.9 -acre site with a density of 6.1 dwelling units per gross acre. The site is located at 21141 Strathmoor Lane and is surrounded by single- family residential to the north, east and west, and Gisler Park to the south. The Project site is currently developed with a school campus and associated site improvements, which would be demolished to accommodate the Project. Janet prepared Agriculture and Forestry Resources; Hydrology and Water Quality; Mineral Resources; Recreation, Public Services, and Wildfire. Stanton Town Center Specific Plan IS/MND - Stanton, CA: Environmental Analyst for an IS/MND for the City of Stanton as a subconsultant to KTGY. The City envisions an updated Specific Plan with a concept to identify potential development opportunities in light of the needs of the community. As part of the plan, the goal is to improve and maintain existing commercial and industrial areas, enhance Beach Boulevard, redevelop the City's Main Street, and allow for commercial/retail, mixed-use, and residential projects that would provide approximately 1,50o new single- and multi -family units. Janet prepared Agriculture and Forestry Resources; Biological Resources; Geology and Soils, Hydrology and Water Quality; Mineral Resources; Public Services; Recreation; and Utilities and Service Systems. Street Lights Fullerton Development IS/MND - Fullerton, CA: Environmental Analyst for an IS/MND for the proposed Street Lights Fullerton Project, located at 229 East Orangethorpe Avenue, within an existing shopping center (Fullerton Town Center), in the City of Fullerton. The Project involves construction of an in -fill mixed-use Project consisting of a 329 -unit, five - story residential building wrapping a 560 -space six -story parking structure; approximately 6,500 SF of retail on the ground floor; approximately 80,500 SF of open space including three outdoor courtyards, a pool, and outdoor gathering spaces on an approximately 4.47 -acre site. The existing commercial/retail uses and associated surface parking lots would be demolished to accommodate the proposed Project. EDUCATION 1993/BA/Geography and Environmental Studies/ University of California, Santa Barbara CERTIFICATIONS Dust Control Supervisor/ South Coast Air Quality Management District/ SC2102-010331-1.0351 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Association of Environmental Professionals EXPERIENCE With Psomas for 5 years; with other firms for 23 years Tin Cheung * Air Quality, CHG, and Noise Manager Tin Cheung has 28 years of experience conducting air quality, climate change, noise, and vibration studies for CEQA and NEPA compliance. His experience includes preparing air pollutant emissions inventories, dispersion modeling, climate change, and health risk assessments using a variety of computer data models. He is also proficient in conducting noise and vibration studies for stationary and mobile sources. His project experience includes analyses of large-scale infrastructure, residential, commercial, industrial, educational, energy, and recreational uses. He has extensive knowledge of impact assessment methods established by USEPA, the California Air Resources Board (CARB), and local air quality management districts. Tin has also performed third -party reviews for technical adequacy and CEQA compliance in support of legal efforts. Experience Eastern Municipal Water District, Murrieta Road Transmission Pipeline Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Menifee, CA: Air Quality and Noise Manager for the IS/MND to construct and operate a 36- to 42 -inch -diameter water transmission line from the Perris II Desalter Complex (Desalter) in the City of Menifee approximately 1.33 miles south, mostly in the Murrieta Road right-of-way, to La Piedra Road, where the proposed pipeline will connect to an existing 36 -inch -diameter water main in La Piedra Road. Los Angeles International Airport Runway Safety Area Construction Emissions Analysis - Los Angeles County, CA: Air Quality Lead for, this project. Tin was responsible for conducting the regional emissions inventory, localized criteria hotspot analysis,. and HRA for 350 construction subphases related, to Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) runway length requirements; runway repaving; and demolition/reconstruction of ground support equipment facilities. University of California, Los Angeles, Long Range Development Plan Amendment (2017) and Student. Housing Projects Subsequent EIR - Los Angeles, CA: Air Quality and Noise Manager for the preparation of the SEIR for UCLA's LRDP Amendment and Student Housing Projects. The project involved an amendment to the existing LRDP, which would add 1,500,000 GSF designated for student housing to meet the housing guarantees identified in the Student Housing Master Plan 2016-2026. Inglewood Oil Field Specific Plan Project Environmental Impact Report - Culver City, CA: Air Qualitynand Noise Manager for the preparation of an EIR for a Specific Plan that sets forth, safeguards and regulations on oil and gas extraction activities in Culver City. The project site is adjacent to the Newport -Inglewood Fault and contains an Alquist-Priolo Fault splay. Up to 30 new wells would be allowed as well as associated storage tanks and pipelines, with requirements and restrictions to ensure the health and safety of the surrounding residential, recreational, and commercial land uses. EDUCATION 2008/MS/European Archaeology/University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom 2004/BA/Anthropology/ California State University, Los Angeles CERTIFICATIONS Registered Professional Archaeologist/ Register of Professional Archaeologists/1512280 Orange County Certified Archaeologist/Orange County Riverside County Certified Archaeologist/Riverside County EXPERIENCE With Psomas for 5 years; with other firms for 13 years Charles Cisneros, Ms, RPA * Senior Archaeologist Charles Cisneros is a registered professional archaeologist with 18 years of experience in archaeological assessment and field experience in California and Nevada. He has directed numerous field projects in support of compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and Sections 106 and 110 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). Charles has managed a wide range of projects involving archaeological survey, testing, data recovery, monitoring, and laboratory analysis. His training and background meet the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards for prehistoric and historic archaeology and he is a California Energy Commission approved archaeologist for desert archaeology. Experience Mt. San Antonio College, 2018 Educational and Facilities Master Plan Environmental Impact Report - Walnut, CA: Senior Archaeologist for implementation of the 2018 Educational and Facilities Master Plan, which serves as Mt. SAC's long-range development plan, over a to -year horizon period. The plan was evaluated in the EIR at a program level with the expectation that additional analyses may be required as specific projects are proposed. Charles was the cultural resources lead. UCR Student Success Center Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Riverside, CA: Senior Archaeologist for the preparation of an IS/MND's Student Success Center, a new 3- to 4- story facility with a maximum building capacity of 80,000 gross square feet (GSF), and approximately 1,070 general assignment classroom seats. The IS/MND was tiered from UCR 2005 Long -Range Development Plan EIR and the 2005 Long -Range Development Plan Amendment 2 EIR. Charles Cisneros was responsible for task management and provided senior oversight and support to the IS/MND analysis for cultural resources. Perris Circle Industrial Building 3 Project, Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Perris, CA: Senior Archaeologist to support the IS/ MND for this project, that ties from the Perris Valley Commerce Center Specific Plan EIR. The project involves construction and operation of a 210,900-sf industrial warehouse, office uses, and employee recreational spaces on a 9.9 - acre site. Charles prepared the Phase I Cultural and Paleontological Resource Inventory and led Native American outreach. City of Los Angeles, Glendale -Hyperion Complex of Bridges Improvement Project - Los Angeles, CA: Senior Archaeologist for the Project Report and Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) for rehabilitation of this complex of six bridges. Improvements include widening the Glendale Boulevard bridges; realigning the I-5 northbound off- and on -ramps and Los Angeles River bike path; adding a median barrier on the Hyperion Avenue Viaduct, traffic signals, utility relocation, drainage system improvements, and improving pedestrian facilities including the Red Car pedestrian bridge and the Sunnynook pedestrian loop trail. EDUCATION 2001/BS/Environmental Biology and Management/ University of California, Davis CERTIFICATIONS Scientific Collecting Permit/SC-007207/ California Department of Fish and Wildlife/SC- 007207 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS The Wildlife Society, Western Section Western Bat Working Group EXPERIENCE With Psomas for 12 years; with other firms for 10 years Steve Norton * Senior Biologist Steve Norton is a Senior Project Manager and Senior Biologist with 22 years of experience conducting biological studies on wildlife, plants, and ecological processes throughout California. His technical experience includes biological resource assessments, natural plant communities mapping, regional conservation plan consistency analyses, biological resource policy compliance management, and technical writing for CEQA/NEPA compliance. Steve has experience with a wide variety of projects, including commercial and residential development, transportation, regional and municipal infrastructure, and extensive electrical utility infrastructure. Steve has conducted protocol -level presence/absence surveys in occupied habitat for various special status species, including the desert tortoise, arroyo toad, burrowing owl, California spotted owl, least Bell's vireo, and a score of annual and perennial plant species. Experience 1-15 Express Lanes Project — Eastvale and Jurupa Valley, CA: Biological Resources Manager for this project which will add a toll lane to I-15 in both north- and south -bound directions in northwestern Riverside county. Psomas is conducting bi-weekly monitoring, visits at the portion of the project that extends over the Santa Ana River. Services include documenting and monitoring the occupancy status of artificial bat roosts installed as mitigation and participating in the monthly bat roost emergence surveys. Eastern Municipal Water District, Wellhead Treatment Facility Constraints Analysis and IS/MND (Well. 56) — Perris, CA: Biologist for an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration and related technical analyses to evaluate the impacts of the construction of a wellhead treatment facility for the purpose of removal of perfluorcoctonoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS). A constraints analysis was prepared to evaluate several potentiallocations for the proposed wellhead treatment facilities. The site options were reduced to five feasible alternatives and Psomas prepared the CEQA documentation to fully evaluate each alternative. City of Anaheim, Groundwater Treatment Plants Phase B and Groundwater Supply Wells IS/MND and CEQA-Plus Documentation — Anaheim, CA: Biologist for the preparation of an IS/MND and supplemental CEQA-Plus Documentation for the installation of ion -exchange groundwater treatment systems at the five locations in the City of Anaheim. The ion - exchange systems are intended to remove perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) from groundwater. Two new groundwater supply wells would be installed at one location and additional wells would be rehabilitated due to age. Psomas prepared a mitigated negative declaration for this project and completed additional technical studies to comply with CEQA- Plus guidelines pursuant to the Clean Water State Revolving Fund requirements. EDUCATION 2011/MA/Urban and Regional Planning/ California State Polytechnic University, Pomona 2005/BA/Political Science and Public Policy/University of California, San Diego CERTIFICATIONS GIS Certificate of Performance/San Diego Mesa College, 2013/ EXPERIENCE Michael Deseo Senior GIS Analyst Michael Deseo is a Senior Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Analyst with 10 years of experience in GIS. He has assisted in the preparation and completion of mapping projects for public agencies, private sector companies, and non-profit organizations. His set of skills includes spatial and geostatistical analyses; surface modeling and interpolation; three-dimensional (3D) modeling with shade and shadow analysis; batch geocoding; digitizing; data collection; data editing; and high-quality cartographic design. Michael creates and edits map documents and graphic exhibits using a variety of software including ArcGIS, Adobe Photoshop, and Adobe Illustrator. Experience Tesoro del Valle, Supplemental Environmental Impact Report - Valencia, CA: GIS Analyst for the development of Phases A, B, and C of the Tesoro del Valle residential project north of Santa Clarita in unincorporated Los Angeles•County. The project involves the continued development of the Tesoro del Valle project that was originally approved for development in 1999 and proposes development of up to 820 residential units and ancillary recreational uses. A Supplemental EIR is being prepared to update the analysis and address changes to the project. Michael assisted in the preparation of maps and graphics in support for the SEIR. With Psomas for 7 years; Environmental Support Services for the San Diego Creek Project Site with other firms for 3 years - Irvine, CA: GIS Technician for the San Diego Creek Reach II Operations and Maintenance Project. The project site consisted of approximately 1.25 miles along San Diego Creek from the I-405 Freeway to Campus Drive. The project involved vegetation clearing of the soft -bottom channel of San Diego Creek to help with flood control. Michael created field maps for data collection, biological resource locations, and map graphics. Magnolia Tank Farm Specific Plan Program Environmental Impact Report - Huntington Beach, CA: GIS Analyst for the redevelopment of a 29 - acre site (within the coastal zone) with a mixed-use development consisting of a 230,000 -SF lodge that includes a maximum of 175 guest rooms and guesthouse - style, budget -oriented, family/group overnight accommodations with 40 beds, and ancillary resident- and visitor -serving retail and dining; up to 250 -unit for -sale residential village; 2.8 acres of Coastal Conservation area adjacent to Magnolia Marsh; and 2.6 acres of park. Also, the area adjacent to Magnolia Street is designated as Open Space Park. Harbor Pointe Senior Living Project Environmental Impact Report - Newport Beach, CA:•GIS Analyst for preparation of an EIR for the Harbor Pointe Senior Living Project, which will consist of demolition of an existing 8,800 SF restaurant, and development of a three-story, approximately 85,000 SF assisted living facility (101 assisted living and congregate care units), associated ancillary uses, and subsurface parking. Michael assisted in the shade and shadow analysis and numerous high-quality maps and graphics in support of the document. EDUCATION Bennie Ramirez 2021/MS/Geographic - City of Los Angeles, CA: GIS Technician for the project approval and Information Science/ GIS Specialist California State University, a multi -modal corridor that is safe and accessible for people walking, biking, Long Beach Jennie Ramirez is a Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Specialist with 2016/BA/Philosophy and five years of experience in GIS. Jennie received her Masters degree in GIS Geography/California State from California State University, Long Beach. Her recent project experience University, Long Beach Univer includes utilizing ArcGIS, Adobe Illustrator and ArcGIS Collector to create and Applied 2020/AGeographic Information edit map documents and graphic exhibits for various client projects that meet Systems/Rio Hondo cartographic and data collection needs. Her set of skills include data collection, College, Whittier digitizing, managing data, spatial analysis and cartographic design. 2013/AA/General Studies/ Rio Hondo College, Whittier previous -Experience CERTIFICATIONS Eastern Avenue Multi -Modal Transportation Improvement Project Geographic Information - City of Los Angeles, CA: GIS Technician for the project approval and Systems/Rio Hondo College environmental document phase to re -envision 1.5 miles of Eastern Avenue as a multi -modal corridor that is safe and accessible for people walking, biking, EXPERIENCE taking .transit, and driving to employment centers, education facilities, With Psomas for 1 years; with other firms for 4 years health care facilities, parks, and recreational centers. The project involves a robust community engagement process and will have features that include new signalized intersections, lighting upgrades, pedestrian safety crossing improvements, bicycle infrastructure, landscape elements, and upgrades to transit stops. Jennie is responsible for cartographic map and graphic exhibits using GIS and vector editing software, for use in reports and documentation. Arroyo Seco Water Reuse Project - City of Pasadena, CA: GIS Technician for this project which involves GIS mapping and graphic production support of environmental documentation. Jennie is responsible for GIS data creation and database management, digitizing biological resources and jurisdictional features, and the creation of field maps for data collection. Jennie is also responsible for the preparation of maps and site photographs to accompany various reports. Pacoima Reservoir Restoration Biological Resources Surveys/Reports, Los Angeles County Public Works - Los Angeles County, CA: GIS' Technician for this project. Psomas is responsible for conducting biological resources surveys and preparing the associated reports. The surveys are based on the initial phase area above the dam and include additional new areas at the northern extent of the project area. Jennie is responsible for mapping and graphic production support for a variety of biological reports, using GIS mapping and vector editing software. Jennie is also responsible for the preparation of field maps to support data collection, GPS post -processing, digitizing biological resources, and conducting overlay and spatial analysis in the GIS. Alton Parkway Off Site Services, OC Public Works - Orange. County, CA: GIS Technician for this project which involves GIS mapping and graphic production support of environmental documentation. Jennie is responsible for GIS mapping and geospatial data management, including digitizing, analyzing and calculating biological resources. She prepares maps and graphics to accompany a variety of reports and documents. Jennie is also responsible for the preparation of field maps and formulating transects for field surveys. 0 Overview of Task As with many jurisdictions, the City of Seal Beach is faced with the need to balance the development of a variety of housing types for all income levels with the concern of the community regarding the pace and density of new development. Maintaining and enhancing the existing quality and providing an adequate housing supply for existing and future residents is critical for the continued economic vitality of the City. Similar to a number of neighboring cities, Seal Beach is virtually built out. Recognizing the need for additional housing in light – -- – -- -- of the City's Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) "It has been my requirement of 1,243 units, the recently adopted Housing Element identifies 11 sites that need to be rezoned to accommodate a total of 1,543 units. The existing pleasure working commercial uses with a zoning designation of Commercial are proposed to be with Psomas on rezoned as Mixed -Use zone, which would allow commercial as well as residential uses with a density of up to at least 40 units per acre. In addition, and apart several challenging from the identified sites, certain sites within the City would be permitted a projects. Theyhave higher density that would result in an increased number of units. been veryresponsive Existing housing in Seal Beach consists of a mix of single-family and multi- family units with a large number of the population being long-time residents. and met all submittal Many of the residents are seniors who have spent most of their lives in the City and would appreciate options to remain in this coastal community known for deadlines. Their its hometown appeal. commitment to client Psomas understands the redevelopment of the Old Ranch Country Club service and high would assist in meeting the City's regional housing needs goals and provide a beneficial addition to the community by providing an independent/assisted quality is evident living facility, a senior housing complex, and associated facilities that would in CEQA documents cater to the needs of the residents of the proposed community. that theyproduce. Project Understanding In my opinion, they Considering the City's housing needs, as discussed above, the existing Old Ranch Country Club site and the development as proposed would provide an set the gold standard opportunity to meet some housing needs of the senior segment of the City's for environmental population. Psomas understands the owners (Applicant) of the Old Ranch Country Club (ORCC Club), located at 3901 Lampson Avenue, seek to prepare a consultants. Psomas Specific Plan for the existing and future uses of the existing Club. The Club is surrounded by Lampson Avenue that curves along the eastern, southern, and staffare good people southwestern boundaries of the site; Seal Beach Boulevard to the west; existing to work with." commercial development to the northwest; and the Joint Forces Training Base (JFTB) —Los Alamitos to the north. James Campbell The site is currently developed with a 30,000 SF clubhouse, 12,000 SF of meeting Special Projects Manager space, an 18 hole golf course, wedding venue, pool, maintenance area, a 2 -way CEO Real Estate County ofOrange Executive Office driving range, and surface parking with 394 spaces. The site currently has a Zoning designation of Recreation/Golf (RG). The Specific Plan proposes development of new and expansion of existing facilities, which would include a 103 -unit, 3 -level (83,415 SF) independent/ assisted living facility; a new 4,250 SF relocated maintenance building; a 51 - unit (96,955 SF), 3 -level senior housing complex including 25,340 SF of medical office; a reconfigured driving range from 2 -way to a 2 -level 1 -way driving range; 3 -level parking structure with 591 stalls with 4 tennis courts on the top level; clubhouse pool and related accessory features (21,000 SF); 3 -level clubhouse addition of 109,015 SF consisting of overnight accommodations of 150 rooms with pool, restaurant, and bar/lounge. Additionally, the Project would include new connecting drive aisles/streets, surface parking areas, and landscaping. Other improvements related to recontouring of the golf course and changes pertaining to the flood plain easement and drainage reconfiguration would also occur. Environmental. Analysis Approach Psomas proposes to prepare a Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) inaccordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code 21000-21177) and the.State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulation, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Section 15000-15387). A PEIR would be the appropriate CEQA document due to the potential for significant environmental impacts. Additionally, a program -level as opposed to a project -level EIR is appropriate.for the Old Ranch Country Club Specific Plan Project, as it will accommodate tiering future projects to streamline the entitlement process. The PEIR will "focus out" the topical issues and environmental checklist questions that may not be applicable and, thus, not require detailed evaluation in the PEIR. However, if detailed, sufficient project -level information is available for all components of the Project at this time, a project -level EIR can be considered as the appropriate CEQA document. The approach will be further discussed in detail at the kick-off meeting. For purposes of this proposed, the CEQA document is referenced as a Program, Environmental Impact Report (PEIR). A detailed discussion of the scope of work is included under Work Plan on page 20 of the proposal. Psomas believes in a holistic approach toward project management and client satisfaction, in addition to meeting the requirements of the technical scope of services. General Approach Regardless of the type and size of a project, Psomas believes in a holistic approach toward project management and client satisfaction, in addition to meeting the requirements of the technical scope of services. One of the components of this approach is developing and maintaining a collaborative client relationship. Psomas is committed to fostering trust -based client relationships that will last well beyond any single project. Building upon the notion of this relationship is establishing aline of communication thatfacilitates data sharing, project information updates, and schedule and cost maintenance. We will rely on the expertise and knowledge of City staff as much as they will rely on our capabilities in managing the environmental documentation process. In light of this approach, Psomas envisions a synergistic working relationship with the City that would enable the process to progress efficiently, while facilitating exchange of ideas; knowledge gathering; transfer of information; and partnering on the common objective of completing successful environmental documents, on time, and within budget. Additionally, and more specifically, we embrace the following steps in our process: ► Establish a communication protocol with City staff and technical leads, and other key team members, to ensure project -critical information is efficiently and accurately conveyed across the team ► Ensure roles/responsibilities are clear for efficient management of assignments andquality control of services and deliverables P. Utilize experienced staff with extensive relevant experience who will do the job right the first time ► Agree on initial project schedule and budget with City staff and a protocol for updating status on both during all project phases ► Determine key project description details with the City and Applicant early to facilitate accurate and consistent peer reviews and analyses ► Verify that technical approach/scope of services as conveyed in the proposal still meets City expectations following completion,of project description ► Collaborate up front with the City on standard templates for project deliverables Implementation Plan Important to the successful delivery of a project is implementing our scope of work, schedule, and cost controls in compliance with the requirements and to the satisfaction of the City. Completing projects successfully will strengthen the City's trust in Psomas. Therefore, the longevity of our relationship will depend on successful implementation of the scope of work on schedule and within budget. In order to avoid potential issues, the Project Manager will be responsible for closely monitoring the status of these three key components. Implementation Strategies Best Practices The environmental documentation needs of every project are unique and depend on the type and size of the project, existing conditions, potential impacts, and public controversy, among other factors. However, regardless of the type and size of projects, best practices espoused by our project team will facilitate the environmental process on future projects. ► Technical Solutions: one of the strengths of the Psomas Team is taking the time in the beginning of the project to develop a thorough project description that correctly reflects details of project construction and operation. Upon completion and approval by the City, the project description will be shared with the Psomas technical leads. Based on our experience, a solid and stable project description can serve to avoid later revisions to the environmental document analyses and related technical studies. Project Controls Scope of Work. The scope of work for most projects influences the budget and schedule. Upon project kick-off, the scope of work will be further discussed with the City and project team and better defined. As the scope of work will direct __ . ----- __-- — - - the action items for all tasks proposed, it is imperative that it be kept updated The environmental and any changes in approach and direction are reflected in the scope of work., The scope of work will be communicated with the City at regular intervals documentation needs to facilitate solutions to potential issues, as applicable, before they become of every project are impediments to completing the project. unique and depend on Schedule. An agreed-upon master schedule will be used to monitor progress on key milestones and deliverables. The schedule will be updated, as needed, and the type and size of distributed to the project team. As the project status is updated in the master schedule, an appropriate corrective plan of action will be developed to address the project, existing variances, with the goal of getting the tasks back on schedule. Additionally, conditions, potential in order to ensure the project schedule is maintained, we have established workload management systems, monitoring techniques, and internal staffing impacts, and public arrangements to assist in meeting project schedule. Psomas also uses Microsoft controversy, among Project, as appropriate, to track how key milestones and deliverables relate. The mechanisms in place and the diligence of our Project Manager will ensure the other factors. project stays on schedule. Budget. The budget is another key component that will be closely monitored and, controlled by the Project Manager. Assigned hours and costs for each task will be communicated with.the Psomas Team to ensure that hours allocated for those tasks are aligned with performance. Psomas uses a comprehensive system (Deltek Vision) for tracking and reporting employee time and project costs. The Project Manager has real-time information regarding total authorized budget, costs expended to date, current expenditures, and the remaining balance. Access to accurate, complete data will allow our Project Manager to alert the City to potential budget implications if issues arise. Implementation Strategies Best Practices The environmental documentation needs of every project are unique and depend on the type and size of the project, existing conditions, potential impacts, and public controversy, among other factors. However, regardless of the type and size of projects, best practices espoused by our project team will facilitate the environmental process on future projects. ► Technical Solutions: one of the strengths of the Psomas Team is taking the time in the beginning of the project to develop a thorough project description that correctly reflects details of project construction and operation. Upon completion and approval by the City, the project description will be shared with the Psomas technical leads. Based on our experience, a solid and stable project description can serve to avoid later revisions to the environmental document analyses and related technical studies. Additionally, the Project Manager will closely monitor the content of technical studies/analyses to keep the City apprised of the progress and any issues that may arise. If potential constraints and impacts are Psomas has a identified, Psomas will alert the City to avoid impacts and required mitigation, whenever feasible. company -wide Furthermore, one of the key roles of the Project Manager will be quality assurance/ to provide ongoing guidance and strategic consultation to the City regarding new regulations affecting proposed projects. Problem - quality control solving and creative discussions help to streamline the process for the committee that environmental documents. "Pride ► In -House Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC): Psomas is is called committed to providing high quality technical documents that engender in Performance" client satisfaction, meet the needs of the project, and withstand legal scrutiny. Therefore, conducting in-house QA/QC reviews concurrent with the goal of with the preparation of written technical documents is a critical part of maintaining the our delivery of technically sound and legally defensible environmental documents. In fact, Psomas has a company -wide quality assurance/ culture of `quality" quality control committee that is called "Pride in Performance" with the throughout the firm. goal of maintaining the culture of "quality" throughout the firm. Alia Hokuki, our Project Manager, is the Environmental Planning group's Alia Hokuki, our representative to the committee. Project Manager, is Our QA/QC process begins with the assignment of staff members with the appropriate technical expertise and experience. All work products the Environmental are prepared with the oversight and review of an assigned technical lead. Planninggroups Upon completion of the first internal draft, it is reviewed by the Project Manager for consistency with the project description, compliance with representative to our approved scope of work, and technical accuracy. Upon revisions, it the committee. is sent to our in-house technical editor for review of grammar, proper nomenclature, references, and methodological consistency. The last step --- -- is a thorough and complete word processing review. Only then is the document submitted to the City for review. "You [Alia] are the best, most responsive, and take -charge PM I have ever worked with. You are excellent at reminding the whole team that we need to stay on schedule. You remain verypleasant and professional even in the most stressful times. What more could anyone ask for? " Ricky Ramos Principal Planner City of Huntington Beach Work Plan Psomas proposes to prepare a Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code 21000-21177) and the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulation, Title 14, Division 5, Chapter 3, Section 15000-15387). A PEIR would be the appropriate CEQA document due to the potential for significant environmental impacts. Additionally, a program -level as opposed to a project -level EIR is appropriate a Specific Plan Project, as it will accommodate tiering future projects to streamline the entitlement process. The PEIR will "focus out" the topical issues and environmental checklist questions that may not be applicable and, thus, not require detailed evaluation in the PEIR. However, as indicated previously, if sufficient level of detail is available for the project and its components, a project -level EIR would be appropriate. This issue will be further discussed at the kick-off meeting. TASK 1- PROJECT INITIATION Subtask 1.1 Kick -Off Meeting Psomas will attend a kick-off meeting with the City, the Applicant, and the Project team, as appropriate. This meeting will provide an opportunity to discuss the approach to preparing the environmental document; further define the scope of work; identify and discuss the key community issues and concerns, as applicable; and identify information needs. The Project schedule will be discussed, and key milestones defined. It is assumed that available Project information, as applicable, would be provided at this meeting. Subtask 7.7 Deliverables ► Attendance at the kick-off meeting Subtask 1.2 Data Collection and Site Visit Psomas will prepare a Data Needs Request to obtain data related to Project construction and operational activities' that are needed for the technical analyses (e.g., Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas [GHG] Emissions, Energy, and Noise) contained in the PEIR topical sections. Psomas will review existing City documents, including but not limited to the City of Seal Beach General Plan (2003); Seal Beach Municipal Code and Zoning (Title 11); and other pertinent City documents. Additionally, Psomas will conduct a site visit to assist in the description of the environmental setting and to photographically document the site and surrounding area. Subtask 7.2 Deliverables Electronic Copy (email) of Data Needs Request Subtask 1.3 Project Description Psomas will prepare a Project description, appropriate for a PEIR and a Project of this nature. The Project description will include, but not be limited to, Project objectives; site plan and other plans (e.g., circulation plan, grading plan, open space plan, landscape plan, utilities plan), as available; infrastructure and wet and dry utilities; and any other features unique to the Project that are integral to the analysis of the environmental impacts. Upon completion, Psomas will provide the Project description to the City and Applicant for review.. Psomas will revise the Project description to address the comments received and, upon approval by the City, provide it to the technical team for preparation of the studies/analyses. Subtask 1.3 Deliverables ► Electronic Copies (email) of Draft and Final Project Description TASK 2 - PEER REVIEW OF APPLICANT -PREPARED STUDIES/REPORTS We understand that the Applicant's consultants have prepared studies/reports, including Biological Resources, Arborist (Assessment of Eucalyptus Windrow), Geotechnical, and Traffic. Upon Project kick-off and receipt of the said studies/ reports, Psomas' Project Manager and technical experts will conduct peer reviews of the studies/reports for adequacy and compliance with CEQA. Upon review of the studies/reports, a memorandum will be prepared and submitted to City staff summarizing the comments and recommendations of the Project Manager and technical experts on each study/report. The findings of the final studies/reports—if comments and recommendations result in revising the studies/report—will be incorporated into the topical sections of the PEIR. If additional studies/reports are prepared by the Applicant at a later date and provided to Psomas for peer review and incorporation into the PEIR, a budget augment will be required for the additional peer review. Subtask 2 Deliverables ► Electronic Copies (PDF and MS Word) of Peer Review Memorandum TASK 3 - INITIAL STUDY/NOTICE OF PREPARATION AND SCOPING MEETING Subtask 3.1 Initial Study/Notice of Preparation Psomas will prepare an Administrative Draft Initial Study/Notice of Preparation (IS/NOP) for review by the City and Applicant. If it can be adequately documented that there would be no Project impact on a topic, that topic will be "focused out" of the PEIR. For other topical issues, there may be specific checklist questions that would have no impact and could be focused out. Psomas will also prepare the NOP, which will provide an overview of the Project; Project objectives; alternatives to be evaluated; and expected required permits. The NOP will also serve as a Scoping Meeting notice. Upon completion, the Draft IS/NOP will be submitted to the City and Applicant. Psomas will revise the IS/NOP to address the comments received and prepare a Public Review Draft IS/ NOP for approval prior to the 30 -day public review. Psomas will revise and distribute the IS/NOP based on the City's distribution list. Psomas will also prepare a Notice of Completion (NOC) and Notice of Availability (NOA) of the NOP. The IS/NOP and the NOC will be filed with the County Clerk and posted on the State Clearinghouse (SCH) website. It should be noted, as preparation of a EIR has been determined, the City may decide not to prepare an IS and only circulate the NOP for 30 days. This would reduce the schedule and cost accordingly. Subtask 3.1 Deliverables ► Electronic Copies (email) of the Administrative Draft and Public Review Draft IS/NOPs ► Electronic Copies (CDs) of IS/NOP for Public Review Subtask 3.2 Public Scoping Meeting Psomas will attend one (i) EIR Scoping Meeting during the 3o -day public review of the IS/NOP. It is assumed the City will organize the Scoping Meeting at a venue of their choice. If requested by the City, Psomas will describe the environmental process in preparing the PEIR. This scope of work assumes that Psomas will prepare Scoping Meeting materials (i.e.; handouts, sign -in sheets, comment cards/sheets). If requested, Psomas can prepare a PowerPoint presentation for the Scoping Meeting. Subsequently, Psomas will document the meeting and prepare a summary of the meeting for inclusion in the PEIR. Subtask 3.2 Deliverables ► Electronic• Copies (email) .of Scoping Meeting Materials ► Electronic Copy of the PowerPoint Presentation ► Electronic Copies (CDs) of IS/NOP for Public Review ► Attendance at Scoping Meeting TASK 4 - DRAFT PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Subtask 4.1 Administrative Draft Program Environmental Impact Report Psomas will prepare an Administrative Draft PEIR in accordance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and pertinent case law. The analysis will be based upon the IS/NOP comments received; community and agency input at the Scoping Meeting; technical evaluation of the proposed Project; and pertinent data. Psomas' approach to preparing PEIR sections is provided below. ► Executive Summary: Psomas will summarize the Project location, Project description, areas of controversy and issues to be resolved, summary of impacts, mitigation measures, and alternatives. ► Introduction: The Introduction will include Project background and history; the purpose of the PEIR; the environmental issues assessed in the PEIR; the environmental review process; and organization of the PEIR. This section will also summarize the scoping process and include a general overview of the existing environmental setting of the site and the surrounding area. ► Project Description: Psomas will,prepare an in-depth and detailed Project description based on Project information in coordination with the City and Applicant. This section will include Project location, Project objectives, intended uses of the PEIR, discretionary actions, Project components and characteristics. ► Environmental Analysis: Each topical PEIR section will contain a discussion of existing conditions; the regulatory framework; applicable Project design features (if proposed) and regulatory requirements; significant environmental effects; and mitigation measures, if required. • Aesthetics. The analysis in the PEIR will qualitatively assess the potential visual changes that could occur in the future in comparison with the existing views of the site. The site has been developed into a golf course, a clubhouse, and associated uses and is surrounded by existing single-family residential, commercial, and retail land uses beyond the abutting roadways in addition to the Los Alamitos. The existing visual character of the sites and surrounding areas and visibility of the sites will be described and documented through ground level photographs. Photographs of the site will be taken from different vantage points and incorporated into the discussion and analysis. The potential impacts emanating from the changed light and glare associated with the proposed Project will also be analyzed in the PEIR, especially in relation to the surrounding land uses that may be sensitive to light. If impacts are identified, mitigation measures will be proposed to reduce the impacts. ■ Agricultural and Forest Resources. The site has been developed and is surrounded by existing residential, commercial, and retail land uses. The Project site is not being used, nor anticipated to be used, or zoned for agricultural purposes; it is not subject to a Williamson Act contract; and it does not contain Prime Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance. Additionally, no forest land occurs on the Project site or in the surrounding area. Air Quality. Psomas will develop air quality analysis based on a review of the Project plans, traffic study, and related Project data. Psomas will prepare a Data Needs Request for the Project team to provide general data relative to construction phasing, building energy use, stationary sources, and Project features related to air quality for the level of information available for the Specific Plan. Based on the information provided, Psomas will draft reasonable worst-case scenarios for anticipated construction activities (i.e., type of construction, construction start and completion dates) and long-term operations to be used as the basis of the air quality modeling. Psomas will conduct the air quality analysis consistent with the SCAQMD's recommended methods for CEQA analyses and will evaluate the Project's contribution to regional emissions to the air basin, as well as localized concentrations to uses proximate to the Project site. For the regional emissions analysis, Psomas will calculate the Project's construction and operational criteria pollutant regional (mass) emissions using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod). Model results will be compared with the SCAQMD's CEQA regional emissions thresholds to determine the Project's potential impacts to the air basin's regional emissions. For the analysis of potential impacts to the local area proximate to the Project site, the SCAQMD requires that project -related construction emissions be evaluated against the localized significance thresholds (LSTs). LSTs are used to determine whether sensitive uses near the Project site are exposed to air pollution that exceeds the ambient air quality standards (AAQS). For the operations phase of the Project, it is expected that a qualitative analysis will demonstrate that the Project would not generate traffic congestion at a major intersection at a magnitude that would cause a local carbon monoxide (CO) "hotspot". Thus, no dispersion modeling is included in this scope of work for CO analysis. Project area exposure to construction phase toxic air contaminants (TACs) and odors will also be addressed qualitatively. Additionally, the analysis will include an evaluation of Project conformity with the Air Quality Management Plan for the South Coast Air Basin. The Project site is located proximate to the Joint Forces Training Base Los Alamitos (jFTB). Aircraft and ancillary facilities operating from this facility may result in criteria and toxic air pollutant exposure to the Project site. The Interstate 405 freeway is also located directly to the south of the Project site. Vehicle exhaust from the freeway would also contribute to air pollutant exposure at the Project site. Depending on the intensity and duration of project related construction activities and the proximity of these activities to existing residential uses, a Health Risk Assessment (HRA) may be necessary to address these environmental impacts. As an optional task, Psomas can conduct a HRA for the exposure of the Project site to both freeway and aircraft emissions, as well as the health risk associated with the Project's construction activities. The cost for the HRA is dependent on a broad array of factors and will be provided, if requested by the City. CEQA generally requires an analysis of potential project related impacts to the environment and not the effects of the environment on the Project site. It is noted that, upon Project initiation, we propose to have a discussion with the City regarding the most appropriate air quality approach. It is important to minimize any potential public comments in regard to technical adequacy of the analysis. The findings of the analysis will be provided as a section within the PEIR, and the model results will be included as an appendix. ■ Biological Resources. The proposed project site is within a highly developed area of the City of Seal Beach. The 154 -acre site is developed with a golf course and associated uses. Based on review of the aerial photograph, there are rows of Eucalyptus Windrow throughout the golf course. A Biological Resources and Arborist Study have been prepared by the Applicant's consultants, which will be provided to Psomas for a peer review and use in the PEIR. It is assumed that a literature review has been conducted as part of the Biological Resources Study to determine which species have been identified as special status by State, federal, and local resources agencies and organizations and have a potential to occur within the vicinity. It is also assumed that the Biological Resources Study analyzes the potential impacts to nesting birds and raptors during Project construction and include mitigation measures to avoid significant impacts pertaining to nesting birds and raptors. Upon, review of the said studies, the findings will be summarized in the Biological Resources section of the PEIR document, and the studies will be included as appendices in the PEIR. The scope of work does not include focused surveys or a jurisdictional delineation. ■ Cultural Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources. Psomas will submit a request to the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) at the South -Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) to conduct a records search for the Project site, including a half mile search radius surrounding the Project site. The SCCIC currently estimates two (2) to three (3) months from the date of request to receive the results of the records search. Additionally, Psomas will request the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) conduct a search of the Sacred Lands File (SLF) database for the Project site. Psomas will provide tribal consultation support as needed to the Lead Agency to fulfill the agency -to -agency consultation requirements for both Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52) and Senate Bill is (SB 18). AB 52 requires a Lead Agency/City to provide formal notification to tribal representatives that are traditionally and culturally affiliated to the geographic area where a project is located. This task assumes preparation of up to eight (8) letters on the City's letterhead; one (1) round of review by the City; and up to four (4) hours of telephone consultation in concert with the City, as needed, to consult with the Tribes. The tribal representatives have 30 days to request consultation upon receiving the AB 52 notification letter. Psomas can provide further support related to tribal consultation, such as additional meetings, minutes, or additional site visits, subject to a scope and budget augment. In addition to AB 52, the Project must comply with SB 18 requirements for a Specific Plan. Psomas will provide support to the City to fulfill the agency -to -agency consultation requirements under SB 18. This includes assisting with the California Native American Tribal consultation; preparing 12 notification letters sent from Psomas on behalf of the City; one (1) round of review by the City; preparing a contact log documenting outreach to the Tribes, and up to three (3) hours of telephone consultation in concert with the City, as needed, to consult with the Tribes. The Tribal representatives have 90 days to request consultation upon receipt of the SB is notification letter. Psomas can provide further support related to SB 18 consultation, such as additional meetings, minutes, or additional site visits, subject to a budget augment. The results of the records searches and tribal consultations will be compiled and described in the Cultural Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources sections of the PEIR. If potential significant' impacts to resources are identified, Psomas will recommend mitigation measures to address those impacts. It should be noted that this scope of work does not include a cultural resources pedestrian field survey. If requested by the City, a field survey will be conducted subject to a budget augment. Energy. Psomas will develop an energy analysis for the Project, which will include a discussion of regulatory setting, energy demands, Project energy efficiency measures, impact assessment, and any necessary mitigation measures. The regulatory setting will include a discussion of the local, State and federal policies and regulations that apply to the Project. The discussion of Project related energy demands include quantification of anticipated energy consumption from the operations phases. Construction phase energy demand is due to diesel and gasoline consumption during the development of the Project. The operations phase of the Project would consume energy. related to lighting and heating needs as well as vehicle trips. Potential impacts will be assessed relative to Project consistency with those policies and measures related to energy efficiency and conservation within the City of Seal Beach's General Plan and the State of California Energy Efficiency Standards. Mitigation measures, if needed, will be discussed relative to any measures needed to reduce significant energy impacts. Geology and Soils. We understand a Geotechnical Study has been prepared by the Applicant's consultant, which will be provided to Psomas for use in the PEIR. Psomas will review the study and incorporate the summary of the findings in the Geology and Soils section of the EIR and include the study as an appendix in the PEIR. If impacts are identified, mitigation measures will be proposed to reduce the impacts. Additionally, Psomas will request a paleontological resources records search and literature review for the Project site from the Vertebrate Paleontology Section of the Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History. The Natural History Museum provides a letter summarizing information on geological formations and known paleontological localities (if any) near the Project site, and a determination of the paleontological sensitivity of the geologic units underlying the site. The findings will be summarized in the Geology and Soils section of the PEIR. Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Psomas will prepare a greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions analysis. The quantitative Project analysis will use the data and scenarios, developed for the air quality analysis and assumptions for the Project's anticipated electricity, natural gas, and water usage. Psomas will calculate construction and operational GHG emissions concurrently with the air quality emissions using CalEEMod. Psomas will compare the change in GHG emissions with criteria that have been recommended by the SCAQMD or a threshold determined in coordination with City staff. Psomas will also determine whether implementation of the Project would conflict with applicable State, and regional policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing air pollutant and GHG emissions. The proposed Specific Plan will be evaluated for consistency against the goals and policies established within the City of Seal Beach's General Plan. Mitigation measures'that reduce construction and operations phase impacts will be identified, as necessary. If regional and/or local construction or operations phase emissions exceed the SCAQMD thresholds of significance, Psomas will work with the City to determine feasible mitigation measures. The findings will be provided as a section within the PEIR, and the model results will be included as an appendix. Hazards and Hazardous Materials. Psomas will contract with Environmental Data Resources (EDR) to complete a radius search of hazardous materials databases. Psomas will summarize the findings of the report in the hazards and hazardous materials section of the PEIR and qualitatively address other potential impacts pertaining to hazards, including impacts related to chemical transport, storage, and handling; airport hazards, as applicable; emergency response and emergency evacuation plans; and wildland fires. The analysis will also include a detailed discussion of proximity to the Joint Forces Training Base -Los Alamitos and potential impacts pertaining to safety concerns. If impacts are identified, mitigation measures will be proposed to reduce the impacts. The report will be included as an appendix in the PEIR. For demolition of existing structures, a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) may be required and prepared by the Applicant's consultant and prepared to Psomas for use in the PEIR. A Hydrology Study and Water Quality. It is assumed that hydrology in addition to a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) will be provided by the Applicant's civil engineers. The information/reports will be reviewed, and the findings will be summarized in the Hydrology and Water Quality section of the PEIR. Additionally, the issues pertaining to recontouring of the golf course to accommodate a change in the flood plain easement of the site and recon -figuration of the drainage basin that serves residential community of College Park East will be discussed and analyzed. If impacts are identified, mitigation measures will be proposed to reduce the impacts. Land Use and Planning. Psomas will describe the existing condition of the site and the surrounding land uses based on a site visit (Task 1.2) and review of the relevant available documents and information and analyze the Project's compatibility with the surrounding uses. Consistency with planning documents relevant to the proposed Project, including the Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP) (August 17, 2017), will be discussed. Psomas will also evaluate the proposed Project's consistency with relevant local and regional planning policies, including, but not limited to, the City of Seal Beach General Plan policies; Southern California Association of Governments' (SCAG's) regional planning policies; and other relevant policy documents. If impacts are identified, mitigation measures will be proposed to reduce the impacts. Mineral Resources. The Project site is development and is within an urbanized portion of the City of Seal Beach. There are no areas within the site containing known mineral resources appropriate for mineral extraction. Psomas will address the lack of mineral resources on the site. ■ Noise. Psomas will analyze temporary noise and vibration impacts from construction activities and will also review the Project plans, design, and traffic impact analysis to evaluate operational noise impacts to sensitive receptors. To characterize the existing noise environment, four (4) long-term (24-hour) noise measurements will be taken within the project area to document existing noise level exposure at the Project site from the primary noise sources in the area (I-405 freeway, Seal Beach Boulevard, and JFTB). Noise contours will also be taken from the Installation Compatible Use Zone (ICUZ) and AELUP. Project related impacts will be assessed for the construction and operations phases of the Project. Construction noise and vibration will be assessed based on values provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). Operations phase noise sources would include noise generated by Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) units, parking lot activities, recreational uses, and vehicular trips accessing the Project site and local roadways. The analysis will compare noise impacts with the standards in the City's General Plan and Noise Ordinances. Increases in traffic noise on local roadways will also be quantified using the Federal Highway Administration's RD -77-108 traffic noise model. The assessment of potential, impacts to proposed noise sensitive Project uses will consider consistency with the State of California's Title 25 interior residential noise limits, the City's exterior noise/land use compatibility guidelines, AELUP and Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) guidance, and CEQA court decisions that affect aircraft noise exposure (Berkeley Keep Jets Over the Bay Committee v. Board of Port Commissioners of the City of Oakland). Mitigation measures that reduce construction and operations phase impacts from the Project will be identified, as necessary. Project site noise exposure and any needed mitigation will be consistent with the City's Noise Element of the General Plan and the AELUP. If regional and/or local construction emissions exceed the noise thresholds of significance, Psomas will work with the City to determine feasible mitigation measures. The results will be provided as a section in the PEIR and will include summaries of noise terminology, applicable noise regulations, ambient noise environment, and increases in existing noise levels. The supporting calculations will be included as an appendix. Population and Housing. The Population and Housing section of the PEIR will evaluate and analyze the direct and indirect effects of the proposed Project pertaining to population, housing, and employment. The analysis will also take into account the population, housing, and employment projections for the Project area using the latest demographic data and address the forecasted growth and Project's consistency with regional and location growth assumptions. If impacts are identified, mitigation measures will be proposed to reduce the impacts. Public Services and Recreation. Implementation of the proposed Project would generate increased demand for public services, such as fire and police protection services, and parks. Since the Project includes senior and assisted living residents, an increased demand for schools is not anticipated. The potential effects associated with implementation of the proposed Project are related to the provision of adequate service levels and the need to upgrade and/or provide additional facilities to serve the proposed Project. Psomas will coordinate with the service providers to identify existing public service facilities and capacities and determine whether the proposed Project can be adequately serviced without any increase in personnel or expansion of existing resources, including facilities. If impacts are identified, mitigation measures will be proposed to reduce the impacts. ■ Transportation. We understand a Traffic Study has been prepared by the Applicant's consultant, which will be provided to Psomas for use in the PEIR. Psomas will review the study and incorporate the summary of the findings in the Transportation section of the PEIR and include the study as an appendix in the PEIR. If impacts are identified, mitigation measures will be proposed to reduce the impacts. ■ Utilities and Service Systems. Implementation of the proposed Project would generate increased demand for wet and dry utility services (e.g., water, wastewater treatment, solid waste disposal, electricity, gas, telephone, and cable). The potential effects associated with implementation of the proposed Project are related to the availability of adequate supply to meet the increased demand of the proposed Project. Psomas will coordinate with applicable utility providers to obtain the necessary information regarding existing capacity, supply, and future demand from the proposed Project. It is assumed that information regarding water and sewer will be provided by the Applicant's civil engineers and will be used in the analysis of potential impacts. It is assumed that preparation of a Water Supply Assessment (WSA) would not be required. ■ Wildfire. Psomas will discuss the Project's location relative to the Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map (California Department of Forestry and Fire Prevention-CalFire) and assess the Project's potential impacts related to proximity to a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ). ► Cumulative Impacts: In addition to the analysis of potential short- and long-term Project -specific impacts, Psomas will conduct a cumulative impact analysis based on the provisions of Section 15130(b)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Psomas will coordinate with City staff to obtain a list of related projects. The evaluation method will vary depending on the technical issue to be addressed. For each technical section, the cumulative study area will be defined and used for the assessment of the Project's contribution to cumulative impacts. ► Alternatives: Psomas will provide an assessment of alternatives to the proposed Project. These alternatives will be based on the requirements of CEQA and discussions with City staff. This scope of work assumes that up to three (3) development alternatives and a No Project Alternative will be evaluated. Required CEQA Topics: Other CEQA-required sections include long-term impacts; significant irreversible environmental changes; significant unavoidable adverse impacts, as applicable; growth -inducing impacts; references; agencies and persons consulted; and preparers and contributors. Upon completion, Psomas will submit the Administrative Draft PEIR and technical appendices for review and comment by the City and Applicant. Subtask 4.1 Deliverables ► Electronic Copy (email) of the Administrative Draft PEIR Subtask 4.2 Public Review Draft Program Environmental Impact Report Upon receipt of comments from the City and Applicant, Psomas will review the comments, revise the document accordingly, and prepare the Public Review Draft PEIR for a final review before distribution. This task assumes that no new technical analyses or new quantitative analyses will be required. If conflicting or unclear comments are received, Psomas will coordinate with the City and .Applicant to resolve any issues. Subtask 4.2 Deliverables ► Electronic Copy (email) of Public Review Draft PEIR Subtask 4.3 Draft Program Environmental impact Report This scope of work assumes that only minor editorial revisions to the text of the Public Review Draft will be required, and no substantive revisions to any technical analyses will be necessary. Psomas will revise the document, as necessary, and prepare the Draft PEIR. Psomas will also prepare a NOC and a Notice of Availability (NOA) for City's review and approval prior to distribution. Psomas will distribute the Draft PEIR (CDs), including Technical Appendices along with the NOA, for a 45 -day public review period, using a distribution list to be provided by the City. Additionally, Psomas will mail out copies of the NOA to the surrounding property owners (radius to be determined by the City and mailing labels to be provided by the Applicant). Psomas will electronically submit the Draft PEIR, the NOC, and NOA to the SCH, as they no longer accept hard copies, and will file the NOC and NOA with the County Clerk. Subtask 4.3 Deliverables ► Electronic Copy (email) of the Draft PEIR ► Up to Five (5) Hard Copies of the Draft PEIR ► Electronic Copies of the Draft PEIR, NOC and NOA to the SCH ► Electronic Copies (CDs) of the Draft PEIR for Distribution to Agencies ► Hard Copies of the NOA for Distribution to Surrounding Property Owners ► Filing the NOC and NOA at the County Clerk TASK 5 - FINAL PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Subtask 5.1 Administrative Draft Final PEIR and Response to Comments Following the 45 -day public review period, Psomas will review the comments received and meet with the City to discuss the approach. Psomas, with assistance from the Project team, will prepare responses to comments that raise significant environmental issues. Revisions to the Draft PEIR that result from the comments will be identified in a Revisions and Clarifications Section (Errata) of the Responses to Comments (RTC). It is assumed that Psomas will spend approximately 4o hours of technical staff time on this task. If it is determined that additional effort will be necessary, or if late comment letters are received that raise significant issues, a budget augment may be required. Subtask 5.1 Deliverables ► Electronic Copy (PDF) of Administrative Final PEIR and RTC Subtask 5.2 Public Review Final Program Environmental Impact Report and RTC Following the City's review of the Administrative Final PEIR and RTC, Psomas will revise the responses and compile the Final PEIR and RTC and coordinate with the Project team on the revisions. The revised Final PEIR will be submitted for a final review by the City prior to mailing responses to public agencies at least 10 days prior to a decision on the Final PEIR, as required by CEQA. Additionally, Psomas will prepare the Notice of Determination (NOD) to be signed by the City upon certification of the Final PEIR and action on the Project. Psomas will file the NOD with the County Clerk and the SCH. The cost estimate does not include the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) filing fees and County Clerk processing fee. It is assumed the Applicant will provide a check for payment of these fees at the time the NOD is filed. Subtask 5.2 Deliverables ► Electronic Copy (email) of Final PEIR and RTC ► Electronic Copies (CDs) of the Final EIR and RTC for Distribution to Commenting Agencies ► Electronic Copies (email) of the Draft and Final NOD r Filing, the NOD at the County Clerk ► Posting the Final PEIR and NOD at the SCH Subtask 5.3 'Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 'Through the course of PEIR preparation, if mitigation measures are identified, in compliance with Section 21081.6 of the California Public Resources Code, Psomas will prepare a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) as part of the Administrative Final PEIR and RTC document. The will be prepared in matrix format and will provide the timing and responsibility for each mitigation measure. The MMRP can be provided as stand-alone document and will be submitted for review with the Administrative Draft PEIR. Per the City's RFP, the PEIR will be included in the Draft MMRP. It should be noted that, later during the public hearings, if the Planning Commission or City Council modify the Project and/or recommend standard conditions of approval/ mitigation measures for the proposed Project, Psomas will revise the MMRP. However, substantial modifications to the MMRP are not assumed in the scope of work and fees for the Project. Subtask 5.3 Deliverables ► Electronic Copy (email) of the Draft and Final MMRP Subtask 5.4 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations As part of the Final PEIR, Psomas will prepare the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations, if applicable, for the Project pursuant to Sections 21081 and 21081.6 of the California Public Resources Code. The draft and final version of the Findings will be submitted to the City for review and approval. Subtask 5.4 Deliverables ► Electronic Copies (email) of the Draft and Final Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Consideration (if applicable) TASK 6 - PROSECT MANAGEMENT, MEETINGS, AND PUBLIC HEARINGS Subtask 6.1 Project Management Psomas will be responsible for managing the CEQA process for the City. This includes ongoing coordination with the City, the Applicant, and Project team to ensure compliance with the scope of work and schedule and to ensure that information is disseminated, as necessary. Subtask 6.1 Deliverables ► Project Management and Coordination throughout the Life of the Project Subtask 6.2 Project Meetings and Conference Calls This task includes attendance at two (2) coordination meetings, as necessary, `As the process for with the City, the Applicant, and the Project team (in addition to the Project EIRs becomes more kick-off meeting and Scoping Meeting). This scope of work also assumes four (4) conference calls. The Project Manager will attend/participate in challenging and all meetings and conference calls (four (4) hours for a meeting, including complex with time, Preparation and travel time and one (1) hour for a conference call). We Alia's dedication understand that meetings may be in person or virtual at the discretion of it takes a person of City staff. Additional meetings/conference calls will be billed on a time-and- Alia's tenacity to materialsbasis, based on hourly rates and subject to prior approval. move the document Subtask 6.2 Deliverables through the process. o -Two (2) Meetings with the City, the Applicant, and Project team ► Four (4) Conference Calls with the City, the Applicant, and Project team We.(ShopoffRealty) are verypleased with Subtask 6.3 Public Hearings Alia's dedication Psomas will attend up to three (3) public hearings (i.e., Airport Land Use Commission, Planning Commission, and City Council). Psomas will be available and efforts helping to provide advice. and input to the City and address questions regarding CEQA; us through this the environmental review process; and the findings of the PEIR analyses, as appropriate. This task assumes public hearings will be attended by the complex process." Project Manager and up to two (2) Psomas technical staff. The supporting staff in attendance will be based on the issues that arise out of the public review process. Additional public hearing attendance will be billed on a time and James O'Malley Vice President, Development materials basis, based on hourly rates and subject to prior approval. ShopoffRealty Investments, LP Subtask 6.3 Deliverables ► Three (3) Public Hearings (i.e., Airport Land Use Commission, Planning Commission, and City Council) PROSECT SCHEDULE This scope of work assumes an approximate 12 -month schedule, upon receipt of final information for the Project description. The 12 -month schedule for the preparation of the document does not include the approval process for the PEIR. Psomas will work diligently and coordinate closely with the City and Project Team to ensure the PEIR is completed efficiently, on time, and within budget. All time -saving approaches will be utilized to accelerate the schedule. However, Psomas will ensure that time -saving approaches will not jeopardize the quality of the document. 1.1 Kick -Off Meeting (virtual or in-person) Week 1 1 Day 1.2 Data Collection and Site Visit Weeks 1 and 2 2 weeks 1.3 Prepare Project Description Weeks 3 and 4 2 weeks City review of the Draft Project Description Week 5 1 week Finalize Project Description Week 6 1 week 3 weeks Applicant -Task. 2 - Peer Review of The following studies/reports have been prepared and will be Weeks 7 through 9 provided to Psomas: ► Biological Resources ► Arborist (assessment of Eucalyptus Windrow) ► Geotechnical Study ► Hydrology Report ► Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) ► Traffic Study Prepare Peer Review Memoranda Week 10 2 days City Review of Memoranda Week 10 3 days Finalize Studies/Reports per Psomas Comments, if any I Weeks 11 and 12 2 weeks Task 3 - Initial Study/Notice of Preparation (IS/NOP) and Scoping Meeting 3.1 Prepare Administrative IS/NOP, Notice of Completion Weeks 11 through 13 3 weeks (NOC), and Notice of Availability (NOA) City Review of the Administrative IS/NOP, NOC, and NOA Weeks 14 and 15 2 weeks Prepare Pre -Print IS/NOP, Notice of Completion (NOC), and Weeks 16 and 17 2 weeks Notice of Availability (NOA) City Review of the Pre -Print IS/,NOP, NOC, and NOA Week 18 1 week Finalize IS/NOP for Public Review, NOC, and NOA Week 19 1 week IS/NOP 30 -day Public Review Period Weeks 20 through 23 30 days 3.2 Conduct Public Scoping Meeting During week 20 or 21 1 day Task Proposed ScheduleDuration Task 4 - Draft Program Environmental Impact Report (Draft PEIR) 4.1 Prepare Administrative Draft PEIR Weeks 20 through 26 7 weeks City Review of Administrative Draft PEIR Weeks 27 through 29 3 weeks 4.2 Prepare Public Review Draft PEIR Weeks 30 through 32 3 weeks City Review of Public Review Draft PEIR Weeks 33 and 34 2 weeks 4.3 Prepare Draft PEIR, NOC, and NOA Weeks 35 and 36 2 weeks City Review of Draft PEIR, NOC, and NOA Week 37 3 days Prepare Draft PEIR for public review Week 37 2 days Draft PEIR Public Review-Mandatory 45 days Weeks 38 through 43 45 days ProgramTask S: Final ..Report 5.1 - Prepare Administrative Final PEIR and Response to Weeks 43 through 45 3 weeks Comments (RTC)/Revisions/Clarifications City Review of Administrative Final PEIR and Responses Weeks 46 through 48 3 weeks to Comments (RTC)/Revisions/Clarifications 5.2 - Prepare Public Review Final PEIR, RTC/ Revisions/ Weeks 49 and 50 2 weeks Clarifications, and NOD City Review of Public Review Final PEIR, RTC/ Revi-sions/ Week 51 1 week Clarifications, and NOD Prepare Final PEIR, RTC/Revisions/Clarifications, and NOD Week 52 1 week and distribute to commenting agencies 5.3, 5.4 - Prepare Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Weeks 46 and 48 3 weeks Considerations Prepare Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP)/Prepare Notice of Determination (NOD) City Review of Findings of Fact and Statement of Weeks 49 and 50 2 weeks Overriding Considerations City Review of MMRP/City Review of NOD Finalize Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Week 51 2 weeks Considerations Finalize MMRP File. NOD Upon certification of 1 day the Final EIR Task 6* Project Management, Meetings/Conference Calls, and 63 Project Management Public Kearings Duration of the Project 6.2 Project Meetings (two meetings, not including the Kick- TBD Off meeting) and Conference Calls 6.3 Public Hearings (Airport Land Use Commission, Planning TBD Commission, and City Council) Relevant Projects and References Highlighted here are descriptions of Psomas' experience in successfully providing similar services. Each project includes a reference who can attest to Psomas' quality of services, capabilities, and competence in managing complex projects. Magnolia Tank Farm Specific Plan Program Environmental Impact Report Huntington Beach, CA I City of Huntington Beach RELEVANCE TO THIS PROJECT ► Coastal City ► Residential/Hotel Project ► Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report ► Peer Review of Applicant -Prepared Studies REFERENCE City of Huntington Beach Ricky Ramos Senior Planner, Department of Community Development 714.536.5624 rramos@surfcity-hb.org PSOMAS PROJECT DATES 06/2017 -12/2019 Magnolia. Tank,Fartn Project Site Psomas prepared a Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) pursuant to CEQA for the Magnolia Tank Farm Project. Psomas worked closely with the City in preparation of the NOP, draft and final EIRs, and Responses to Comments. In addition, Psomas conducted a Scoping Meeting and a Planning Commission Study Session. The project site is located within the Coastal Zone, adjacent to Magnolia Marsh in the City of Huntington Beach. The project site previously contained three oil storage tanks that were demolished in 2017. The Draft PEIR evaluated two development alternatives at an equal level of consideration. The alternatives were identified as the proposed project (mixed-use) and Alternative i (residential). Under the proposed project, the Specific Plan will establish a land use plan and develop standards and guidelines to allow for creation of the proposed mixed- use development comprised of a 211,000 SF lodge/guest house accommodations with a maximum of 215 rooms, including 175 guest rooms and family/group overnight accommodations with 40 rooms; 19,000 SF of ancillary and visitor - serving retail and dining; and up to 250 for -sale residential units (at 15 dwelling units per acre). Additionally, the proposed project includes 2.8 acres of Coastal Conservation area adjacent to Magnolia Marsh and 2.8 acres of park. Alternative 1 would eliminate the lodge, guesthouse, and retail components, and would include a residential development at a maximum of 250 residential units (at 11 dwelling units per acre). All other components, including park and open space described above under the proposed project, would remain the same. Harbor Pointe Senior Living Project Environmental .Impact Report Newport Beach, CA I City of Newport Beach RELEVANCE TO THIS PROJECT ► Coastal City ► Senior Assisted Living ► Environmental Impact Report ► Peer Review of Applicant -Prepared Studies REFERENCE City of Newport Beach Benjamin Zdeba Senior Planner 949.644.3253 bzdeba@newportbeachca. gov PSOMAS PROJECT DATES 03/2016 - 2/2019 HarborPointe Senior Living. Facility Psomas prepared the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Harbor Pointe Senior Living Project, which is an in -fill senior assisted living and memory care community. The project will involve demolition and removal of the existing approximate 8,800 SF restaurant and associated parking, and construction of an approximately 85,000 SF, three-story assisted living facility, including 101 convalescent and congregate care units (120 beds), ancillary uses, and subsurface parking. The proposed facility would include living rooms, grill, bistro, dining rooms, fitness room, spa/salon, theater, library, medication rooms, and support uses such as offices, lab, mail room, laundry, and housekeeping. Outdoor amenities such as interior courtyards, a walkway around the structure, and a roof garden on the third level are also proposed. The key issues are the massing of the building; compatibility with -- surrounding land uses; aesthetics, including shade and shadow; _ \ and construction,noise. Addressing community concerns is also a key element of the project. Psomas worked corroboratively with the City of Newport Beach in preparation of the document and conducted a scoping meeting. Psomas presented at the study sessions and public hearings. Harbor Pointe Conceptual Plan West Alton Parcel Development Plan Environmental Impact Report Irvine, CA I Lowe Enterprises, Inc. I Orange County RELEVANCE TO THIS PROJECT ► Environmental Impact Report ► In-Fill/Redevelopment ► Peer Review of Multiple Applicant - Prepared Studies REFERENCE County of Orange James Campbell Special Projects Manager CEO Real Estate 714.227.1011 James.campbell@ocgov. com TSUMMARY ,=Z. r. j Project Site Plan PSOMAS PROJECT DATES Psomas prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the West Alton 06/2016 - 6/2018 Parcel Development Plan located on County of orange -owned property within the City of Irvine. The project site is located in Planning Area 51, which generally encompasses the former Marine Corps Air Station El Toro (MCAS El Toro). The project site is 44.16 acres, including the Wildlife Movement Corridor and Orange County Flood Control District drainage outlet structures, which together occupy 11.84 acres. The project proposes an 803 -unit, in -fill, multi -family residential development across two planning areas, with 573 units in Planning Area 1 and 230 units in Planning Area 2. of the total, 112 units (14 percent) will be committed to affordable housing and 8 units (1 percent) will be dedicated as transitional units. The development is proposed with an average density of 25 dwelling units per acre. Each Planning Area will include a network of parks and open spaces that will provide recreational opportunities for future residential and a defensible space for wildfires. The West Alton Parcel Development Plan includes development standards and/or design guidelines that will establish parameters for all future development on the 1 project site. •7 Project Entry Cross -Section Gisler Residential Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Huntington Beach, CA I City of Huntington Beach RELEVANCE TO THIS PROSECT ► Environmental Impact Report ► In-Fill/Redevelopment ► Peer Review of Multiple Applicant - Prepared Studies REFERENCE City of Huntington Beach Ricky Ramos Senior Planner, Department of Community Development 714.536.5624 rramos@surfcity-hb.org PSOMAS PROJECT DATES 2/2021 - 6/2022 GislerResidentla[ProjguSite Plan The project involves construction of an 85 -unit single-family detached residential development on an approximately 13.9 -acre site with a density of 6.1 dwelling units per gross acre. The site is located at 21141 Strathmoor Lane and is surrounded by single-family residential to the north, east and west, and Gisler Park to the south. The project site is currently developed with a school campus and associated site improvements, which would be demolished to accommodate the project. The project includes a hierarchy of plant materials including trees, vines, shrubs, and turf throughout the project site. A 0.23 -acre passive open space area is provided in the southeast corner of the site and will be planted with turf and vertical trees at its perimeters. Additionally, the project includes improvements to the Gisler Park to the south. The improvements include, but are not limited to, the replacement of the existing concrete pathway that runs throughout the linear park and the replacement of existing tot lot play area. The proposed residential units will be in compliance with the strict Building Efficiency Standards — Title 24 mandated in the 2019 code update. The Ritz Carlton Residences Project - Addendum to the City of Newport Beach General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report Newport Beach, CA I City of Newport Beach RELEVANCE TO THIS PR03ECT ► Coastal.City ► In-Fill/Redevelopment ► Peer Review of Multiple Applicant - Prepared Studies REFERENCE Matthew Schneider Principal Planner City of Newport Beach 949.644.3219 mschneider@newportbeachca.gov PSOMAS PROJECT DATES 12/2021 to 03/2022 The Ritz Carlton Residences Project-Addendur[r to the City of Newport Beach General Plan I Update Environmental impact Report Psomas prepared an Addendum to the City of Newport Beach General Plan Update EIR pursuant to CEQA for the Ritz -Carton Residences Project within the 9.53 -acne VEA Newport Beach, A Marriott Resort and Spa. The project proposes conversion Of up to 36 percent of the existing 532 hotel rooms to hotel branded residences. The existing southernmost building, Harbor Landing, would be demolished to accommodate construction of the new residential building. The demolition of the Harbor Landing building and interior reconfiguration of the Harbor Point building would result in reduction of 159 hotel units (i.e., removal of 133 units from Harbor Landing and reduction of 26 units of 153 units from,Harbor Point). The new 22 -story building would include 159 hotel branded residences, but the total units would remain at 532. The new building is proposed to be up to approximately 295 feet in height, including rooftop appurtenances. The hotel parking would be provided at a 6 -level (4 levels subterranean and 2 levels above ground), 403 -space parking structure, which will replace the existing parking structure. For the hotel branded residences, a new 5 -level, 429 -space subterranean parking structure would be constructed adjacent to the new building. The proposed project site would include extensive landscape and hardscape areas with pedestrian circulation. The conceptual landscape plan would include,a hierarchy of plant materials including trees, vines, shrubs, and turf throughout the project site and irropen space areas. Additionally,,a new 8,000-square-foot.event lawn would be located along the southern boundary of the property near the new residential building and hotel pool area. The new event lawn would be used for outdoor events with the added function as a terminus for the fire access road. PSOMAS 5 Hutton Centre Drive Suite 300 Santa Ana, CA 92707 714.751.7373 www.Psomas.com Balancing. the Natural and Built Environment April 25, 2022 splanner@sealbeachca.gov Art Bashmakian, AICP Project Manager CITY OF SEAL BEACH Community Development Department 2118th Street Seal Beach, CA 90740 Subject: Cost Proposal for the Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Dear Mr. Bashmakian: Psomas is in receipt of the City of Seal Beach's (City's) Request for Proposal (RFP) for preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed Old Ranch Country Club Specific Plan (Project or proposed Project). Psomas submits the attached Cost Proposal under separate cover. We appreciate the opportunity to propose on this interesting and important project, -and we look forward to collaborating with the City and the Applicant on a successful CEQA EIR process. As a Vice President, Jim Hunter, is authorized to sign the City of Seal Beach's Professional Services Agreement for Psomas. As Project Manager for this contract, Alia will be the primary contact person responsible for day-to-day management for the environmental services pursuant to the City's RFP. Please contact Alia by phone at 714.481.8055 or by email at Alia.Hokuki@Psomas.com should you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, PSOMAS Jim Hunter Vice President Alia Hokuki, AICP Senior Project Manager 5 Hutton Centre Drive Suite 300 Santa Ana, CA 92707 Tel 714.751.7373 www.Psomas.com l?.siln,��,�,�.,� Y..4 g=8 8 88 8888800 8888 SSS 0O88001F' Z C -il P IL Z Lu sInA rd it F E p ,2 = p nU2 tl m8 a'f m C < - D U O o C Oa La a 6. N fJ =.9 y- as F 95� c e F F G F C V 7 c 9. L Y. .....+i ..R• ,.z'.i; .. '; & i; r 8 c ? 5 a t �: m EU1. zQ _ '^ y o Y• s. -.� XdP:•.y'e�: w `;., ."_ .:� F' ]� o i 6 0. ¢ a < U J z i s O < ii IE- 0. . F"'•"'rr7;-.a r•gx'F^k..'h _.. g..Rr 'LyG F y� � Z - FN � ' 4'nT.�"� r•,q,'nJ�;;. �w `4's ,#? s � � _ < O � � � o a � ..i r N e � � a ,�z '^ � . y.y. ,X:y�;:',;C,4N,�•x.... ''d`>m: Fi a .0 3 a � m s � a' � �, � � 3 � � � .� � �ti 'figrs :F f'. it LyV .' YS' $in; _.:.''�:tis4+�.y; A•:":;e td a Z O to i eY" �•'• < F �.' H < F < F < F < F � 5 VISKf �icri RESOLUTION 7398 A RESOLUTION OF THE SEAL BEACH CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH PSOMAS FOR A PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT WHEREAS, the City of Seal Beach (City) has determined that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) must be completed as a part of a development proposal for the property known as the Old Ranch Country Club; and WHEREAS, the City issued a Request for Proposals to obtain a qualified consultant to develop the EIR, and received one proposal; and WHEREAS, the City desires to enter into an agreement with the proposer Psomas (Consultant) to conduct and complete a Program EIR; and, WHEREAS, Consultant is a highly qualified consulting firm, specializing in environmental analyses and will serve the needs of the City; and, WHEREAS, City and Consultant wish to enter into -this -Agreement for Consultant to provide Environmental Impact Reports, with compensation;not to exceed the amount of $238,393, as provided herein. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH DOES HEREBY RESOLVE: Section 1. The City Council hereby approves the Professional Services Agreement with Psomas as set forth in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as through set forth in full, with a two-year term extending from August 1; 2022 through July 31, 2024, and providing Psomas compensation for the term an amount not to exceed $238,393. Section 2. The Council hereby directs the City Manager to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Seal Beach City Council at a regular meeting held on the 25th day of July, 2022 by the following vote: AYES: Council Members: Kalmick, Massa -Lavin, Moore, Sustarsic, Varipapa NOES: Council Members: None ABSENT: Council Members: None ABSTAIN: Council Members: None Joe Kalmick, Mayor STATE OF CALIFORNIA } COUNTY OF ORANGE } SS CITY OF SEAL BEACH } I, Gloria D. Harper, City Clerk of the City of Seal Beach, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is the original copy of Resolution 7318 on file in the office of the City Clerk, passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting held on the,2�th day,of July, 2022. loria D. Homer, City Clerk C Client#: 25181 PSOMAS ACORD. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCEDATE(MM/DDNYYY) INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACTOR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, 8/16/2022 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder, is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(les) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer any rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER Greyling Ins. Brokerage/EPIC 3780 Mansell Road, Suite 370 Alpharetta, GA 30022 CONTACT NAME: Sabrina WynnPHONE 470.785.2254 A�-- AJCNo Ext : A!C No E-MAIL Sabrina.Wynn@greyling.com INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# INSURER A: National Union Fire Ins. Co. 119445 INSURED Psomas INSURER B: Everest National Ins Co 110120 INSURER C : 555 S. Flower Street INSURER D: Suite 4300 INSURER E: Los Angeles, CA 90071 INSURER F: UUVIzKAGtS CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 22-23 Rr-vlgl 1N MIIIVIRPR- THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACTOR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. �7R TYPE OF INSURANCE INSR IU POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF M�D� LIMITS A X1 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS -MAGE OCCUR GL5268212 4/01/2022 0410112023 EACH OCCURRENCE $1,000,000 _ PREMISES EaE�urr occurrence) $SOOIOOO MED EXP (Any one person) s25,000 PERSONAL& ADV INJURY S1,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PR - POLICY a JECT El LOC GENERAL AGGREGATE S2,000,000 PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG 52,000,000 S OTHER: • AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY CA4489706 0410112022104/01 02 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT 2 OOO 000 Ea accident S , , _ BODILY INJURY (Per person) S ANY AUTO IX OWNED SCHEDULEDBODILY AUTOS ONLY AUTOSAUTOS ONLY X NON -OWNED AUTOS ONLY INJURY (Per accident) S PROPERTY DAMAGE S Peraccidont S B X UMBRELLALIA6 X OCCUR XC8C000043221 0410112022 0410112023 EACH OCCURRENCE S1s000,000 AGGREGATE $1,000,000 EXCESS UAB CLAIMS -MADE DED X RETENTION S1 O 000 S A WORKERS COMPENSATION IA AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY YIN ANY PROPRIETORIPARTNERIEXECUTIVEWC015893765(CA) OFFICERIMEMBER EXCLUDED? � N I A WC015893764` AOS) 4/01/2022 4/01/2022 04/01/202 04/01/202 X spETARTuTE OTH- jER E.L. EACH ACCIDENT S1 OOOOOO E.L. DISEASE- EA EMPLOYEE S1,000,000 (Mandatory in NH) If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $1,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached If more space is required) Psomas Project # 3SEA000800, Project Name: Old Ranch Country Club. City of Seal BeachCity, its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, designated volunteers and those City agents acting as independent contractors in the role of City officials are named as Additional Insureds on the above referenced liability policies with the exception of workers compensation where required by written contract. (See Attached Descriptions) City of Seal Beach SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN 211 Eighth Street ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. Seal Beach, CA 90740-0000 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ©1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2016103) 1 Of 2 The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD #S33808021M3253402 SBRU1 DESCRIPTIONS (Continued from Page 1) Should any of the above described policies be cancelled by the issuing insurer before the expiration date thereof, we will endeavor to provide 30 days' written notice (except 10 days for nonpayment of premium) to the Certificate Holder. The above referenced liability policies with the exception of workers compensation and professional liability are primary & non-contributory where required by written contract. Waiver of Subrogation in favor of Additional Insured(s) where required by written contract & allowed by law. SAGITTA 25.3 (2016/03) 2 of 2 AC40 E® CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE(MMO)DnYYY) 8/15/2022 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(les) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER AssuredPartners Design Professionals Insurance Services, LLC 3697 Mt. Diablo Blvd Suite 230 Lafayette CA 94549 CONTACT NAME: Karin Thorp PHONEFAX A/c No Ext): AIC No): EAo�REss: DesignProCerts@AssuredPartners.com INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # INSURERA: XL Specialty Insurance Co. 37885 License* 6003745 INSURED PSOMAS INSURER B : PSOMAS 555 South Flower Street, Suite 4300 INSURER C: INSURER D: Los Angeles CA 90071 INSURER E: '' INSURER F: -PREMISES MED EXP (Any one person). S COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 1886360459 REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL IND SUBR WVD POLICYNUMBER POLICY EFF MM/DD POLICY EXP MM/DD/YYYY LIMITS COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE S CLAIMS -MADE OCCUR '' DAMAGE TO 111T11 Ea occurrence S -PREMISES MED EXP (Any one person). S PERSONAL & ADV INJURY S GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE S PRO - POLICY F—]LOCPRODUCTS POLICY ❑ - COMP/OP AGG S $ OTHER: AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT S Ea accident BODILY INJURY (Per person) S ANY AUTO OWNED SCHEDULED AUTOS ONLY AUTOS BODILY INJURY (Per accident) S PROPERTY DAMAGE S Per accident HIRED NON -OWNED AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY S UMBRELLA LIAB OCCUR HCLAIMS-MADE EACH OCCURRENCE S AGGREGATE S EXCESS LIAR DED I I RETENTION $ Is WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y / N ANYPROPRIETORIPARTNERIEXECUTIVE PEROTH- STATUTE ER E.L. EACH ACCIDENT S OFFICER/MEMBEREXCLUDED7 F (Mandatory In NH) N / A E.L. DISEASE -EA EMPLOYEE S E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT S If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below A Professional Liability Claims Made Y DPR9983805 10/15/2021 10/15/2022 JPerClalm $1,000,000 I Annual Aggregate $1,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS /VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, maybe attached if more space Is required) 3SEA000800, Old Ranch Country Club Specific Plan EIR Seal Beach, CA. reoTtrl!`ATC uer nGQ CANCFI I ATION 3n Dav Notice of Cancellation tJ 1ySS-LU1b AUUMU GUMI-UKtAI IUN. AU rlgnis reservea. ACORD 25 (2016/03) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN City of Seal Beach ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. Attn: David Greene AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 211 Eighth Street Seal Beach CA 90740 .� 671P tJ 1ySS-LU1b AUUMU GUMI-UKtAI IUN. AU rlgnis reservea. ACORD 25 (2016/03) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD This endorsement, effective 12:01 a.m., 10/15/2021 forms a part of Policy No. 2PR9 Issued to PSOMAS by XL Specialty Insurance Company. THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. POLICY CANCELLATION — NOTICE TO DESIGNATED ENTITIES This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: PROFESSIONAL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND NETWORK SECURITY LIABILITY POLICY—ARCHITECTS, CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS Section XI. OTHER CONDITIONS, Paragraph A. Cancellation is amended by the addition of the following: In the event that the Company cancels this Policy for any statutorily permitted reason other than non- payment of premium, the Company agrees to provide thirty (30) days' notice of cancellation of this Policy to any entity with whom the NAMED INSURED agreed in a written contract or agreement would be provided with notice of cancellation of this Policy, provided that: 1. The Company receives, at least fifteen (15) days prior to the date of cancellation, a written request from the NAMED INSURED to provide notice of cancellation to entities designated by the NAMED INSURED to receive such notice and; 2. The written request includes the name and address of each person or entity designated by the NAMED INSURED to receive such notice. This endorsement does not apply to non -renewal of the Policy, cancellation at the INSURED'S request, or to cancellation of the Policy for non-payment of premium to the Company or to a premium finance company authorized to cancel the Policy. Furthermore, nothing contained in this endorsement shall be construed to provide any rights under the Policy to the entities receiving notice of cancellation pursuant to this endorsement, nor shall this endorsement amend or alter the effective date of cancellation stated in the cancellation notice issued to the NAMED INSURED. All other terms and conditions of the Policy remain unchanged. LDD 452 1116 Page 1 of 1 9/22/20215:07:30 PM © 2016 X.L. America, Inc. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied without permission. rre„�• �a•Iua PSnMAS ACORD. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MMIDDIYYYY) 8176/2022 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: if the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer any rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER Greyling Ins. Brokerage/EPIC ON NAAME CT Sabrina Wynn PHONE No Ext470.785.2254 AIArc No): C 3780 Mansell Road, Suite 370 E-MAIL W.nn re IIn ADDRESS: SabrinaY @g Y g•com INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # Alpharetta, GA 30022 INSURER A: National Union Fire Ins. CO. 19445 04/0112023 EACH OCCURRENCE I S1,000'.000 INSURED INSURER 13. Everest National Ins CO 110120 Psomas 555 S. Flower Street Suite 4300 Los Angeles, CA 90071 INSURER C INSURERD: INSURER E: INSURER F rnvconr_cc rFRTIFICATF MIIMRI=R- 77-73 REVISION NUMI3EK: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACTOR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO: ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE 'IAND R yjryp POLICY NUMBER MNWDY EFF MWDDY EXP LIMITS A X1 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY I GL5268212 D410112022 04/0112023 EACH OCCURRENCE I S1,000'.000 CLAIMS -MADE a OCCUR PREMISES EaEcNccTuErrOence S500 000 MED EXP (Anyone person) S25 000 PERSONAL&ADV INJURY ( 51,000,000. GENERAL AGGREGATE 52,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY � JECT 1:1 LOC PRODUCTS -COMP/OPAGG 52,000,000 OTHER: I S AAUTOMOBILE LIABILITY CA4489706 4101/2022 04/01/202 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT _2,000,000 Ea accident ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY (Per person) S OWNED SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY (Per accident) S AUTOS ONLY AUTOS HIRED NON -OWNED IX PROPERTY DAMAGE S Per accident AUTOS ONLY I f AUTOS ONLY ( I S B XI UMBRELLA LIAR I X OCCUR I i XC8C000043221 4/01/2022 04/01/202 EACH OCCURRENCE S1,000,000 �==1 EXCESS LIAB ' CLAIMS -MADE AGGREGATE $_7,000,000 F—IDED I X RETENTION S1 0,000 I 5 A WORKERS COMPENSATION I WC015893764(AOS) 4/01/2022 04/01/202 X PEA LITE R oTH- AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY OFFIPERIMEMBERPARTNIDED ECUTIVEa WC015893765(CA) 4/01/2022 04/01/202 E.L. EACH ACCIDENT S1,000,000 N/A� E.L. DISEASE EA EMPLOYEE S1,000,000 (Mandatory in NH) - If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT 51,000,000 T DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) Psomas Project # 3SEA000800, Project Name: Old Ranch Country Club. City of Seal BeachCity, its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, designated volunteers and those City agents acting as independent contractors in the role of City officials are named as Additional Insureds on the above referenced liability policies with the exception of workers compensation where required by written contract. (See Attached Descriptions) Ci of Seal Beach SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE City THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN 211 Eighth Street ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. Seal Beach, CA 90740-0000 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE V IUt1t5-LU-ID AUUM J I A%Jm. hU nyu,a raac,.... ACORD 25 (2016103) 1 of 2 The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD #S33808021M3253402 SBRU1 DESCRIPTIONS (Continued from Page 1) Should any of the above described policies be cancelled by the issuing insurer before the expiration date thereof, we will endeavor to provide 30 days' written notice (except 10 days for nonpayment of premium) to the Certificate Holder. The above referenced liability policies with the exception of workers compensation and professional liability are primary & non-contributory where required by written contract. Waiver of Subrogation in favor of Additional Insured(s) where required by written contract & allowed by law. SAGITTA 25.3 (2016/03) 2 of 2 #S3380802/M3253402