HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Res 5570 2007-07-23
RESOLUTION NUMBER 5570
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SEAL BEACH APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 07-2, A REQUEST
TO ALLOW A 7-FooT HIGH WALL ALONG THE STREET SIDE
AND REAR YARD PROPERTY LINES AT 429 BERYL COVE
WAY
THE CITY COUNCil.. OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH DOES HEREBY FIND AND
RESOLVE:
I
Section 1. On March 2, 2007, Nora and Leo Varshavsky applied for
Variance 07-2 seeking to construct a 7-foot high block wall along the street side yard and
rear yard property lines where a 6-foot high wall is currently allowed ("Project") at 429
Beryl Cove Way ("subject property"), located in the area of the City designated as
Planning District 5.
Section 2. Pursuant to the Seal Beach Municipal Code, the City may
approve a variance request, subject to finding that the standards being modified or waived
by the variance does not adversely affect the General Plan, that special circumstances
applicable to the property would deprive such property of privileges enjoyed by other
property in the same vicinity and zone, and the granting of a variance will not constitute a
grant of special privilege. The proposal conforms to the density requirements of 1 unit
per 5,000 square feet of lot area and the minimum lot size of 5,500 per unit in the District
5, Residential Low Density (RL) zone.
Section 3. Pursuant to 14 Calif. Code of Regs. ~ 15025(a) and ~ II.A
~f the City's Local CEQA Guidelines, staff has determined as follows: The application
'for Variance No. 07-2 is categorically exempt from review pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act pursuant to 14 Calif. Code of Regs. ~ 15305 (Minor
Alterations in Land Use Limitations) because the request is for a minor alteration in land
use limitations in an area with an average slope of less than 20% and no changes in land
use or density are involved; and, pursuant to ~ 15061(b)(3), because it can be seen with
certainty that there is no possibility that the approval may have a significant effect on the
environment.
I
Section 4. After a duly noticed public hearing held on April 4, 2007,
the Planning Commission adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 07-18,
conditionally approving the requested 7-foot high walls, subject to certain conditions
designed to ensure compatibility with surrounding uses, the community in general, and
the General Plan.
Section 5. The Applicant duly filed a notice of appeal, objecting to the
condition imposing a setback along Marlin Avenue for the approved 7-foot high wall.
Section 6. The City Council considered the appeal at a duly noticed
public hearing held on June 25, 2007. Numerous speakers, including the applicant, spoke
in favor of the application. In addition, the City received several letters in support of the
proposed project.
Section 7.
The record of the hearing indicates the following:
(a) On March 2, 2007, Nora and Leo Varshavsky applied for Variance
07-2 with the Department of Development Services and are seeking approval to construct
a 7-foot high block wall along the street side yard and rear yard property lines where a 6-
foot high wall is currently allowed.
I
(b) The subject property contains approximately 5,600 sq. ft. and is
located on the southwest comer of Beryl Cove Way and Marlin Avenue (429 Beryl Cove
Way).
(c) The subject property contains an existing, legal, single-family
residential home with an attached 2-car garage.
" "
,~.. .
". !"
Resolution Number 5570
(d) The subject property has 100 feet of frontage on Marlin Avenue
and 56 feet of frontage on Beryl Cove Way. The "front" of the lot is on Beryl Cove Way,
even though the garage entry is from Marlin Way.
(e) The surrounding land uses and zoning are as follows:
All Directions except North: Single-family residential homes located in the
Residential Low Density (RLD) Zone.
I
North:
McGaugh Elementary School in the Public Land
UselRecreation (pLUIR) Zone.
(f) The Seal Beach Municipal Code Section 28-2316 sets forth the
following requirements regarding heights of walls for properties located in the in the
Residential Low Density Zone, District I:
Front Yard Abutting Street
3.5 feet high in required 18-foot front
setback area (Section 28-2316.A.l.b)
Side Yard Not Abutting Street
6 feet high (Section 28-2316.A.2.a)
6 feet high (Section 28-2316.A.3.a)
6 feet high (Section 28-2316.A.2.b)
Rear Yard Not Abutting Street
Side Yard Abutting Street
(g) The Code allows fences to be higher than the above requirements
in certain specified areas in Section 28-2316.B.8. The subject property is not located in
any of the specified areas where a higher fence is allowed.
(h) Marlin Avenue adjacent to McGaugh School has 45 feet of right-
of-way, and has 60 feet of right-of-way westerly of Riviera Drive.
I
(i) The playground area for McGaugh Elementary School is located
across Marlin A venue from the subject property. The playground is approximately 2' -7"
higher in elevation than the subject property, and has a chain link fence separating the
playground area from Marlin Avenue. The change in grade elevation between the subject
property and home and the school results in a lack of privacy due to the ability of persons
on the school grounds to be able to clearly see over the street-side fence and directly into
the private yard area and living areas of the home. In addition, Marlin Avenue adjacent
to McGaugh School has 45 feet of right-of-way, IS feet less right-of-way than westerly
of Riviera Drive. The reduced street WIdth results in the school facilities being located
approximately IS-feet closer to residences than exist along the Riviera side of the school
grounds.
(j) The subject parcel is one of 4 parcels that do not directly face the
school playground area along the south side of Marlin Avenue. There are 5 parcels that
have their front yards facing the school playground, and therefore do not have the main
bedroom areas or their outdoor yard areas visible from the elevated playground area of
the school.
I
(k) The subject property is approximately 2'-7" lower in elevation
than the school playground, resulting in a lack of normal privacy for use of the yard area
and the living areas of the home on the subject property that are visible from the
playground area. The request for a 7-foot high wall with a maximum length of 53 feet
from the rear property line, and a 7 -foot high extension of that wall across the back of the
subject property, is being made to allow for an adequate wall height for the privacy of the
homeowner in their yard and home. The strict application of the wall height
requirements would restrict the nonnal enjoyment and u~e of their yard area and the
living areas of the home.
(I) Oral evidence was presented at the public hearing as to the
potential negative impacts created by the requirement to set the property line wall along
Marlin back and landscape the setback area. Photographic evidence was presented at the
Resolution Number 5570
public hearing demonstrating how water and landscaping in similar situations within the
neighborhood result in standing water, and staining of sidewalks and walls.
Section 8. Based upon the facts contained in the record, including those
stated in Sections 1 through 7 of this resolution and pursuant to ~~ 28-2316, 28-2500, 28-
2501, and 28-2502 of the City's Code, the City Council hereby finds as follows:
(a) Variance 07-2, as recommended, is consistent with the provisions
of the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan, which provides a "Residential Low
Density" designation for the subject property and permits residential land uses in
accordance with certain development standards. The proposed 7-foot high wall with a
maximum length of 53 feet from the rear property line along Marlin Avenue and the
proposed 7 -foot high wall across the back of the subject property will allow for the
continued use of the residential property with the ability to maintain a reasonable level of
privacy, which is one of the goals of the Land Use Element. The use is also consistent
with the remaining elements of the City's General Plan, as the policies of those elements
are consistent with, and reflected in, the Land Use Element. Accordingly, the proposed
use is consistent with the General Plan.
I
(b) Because of the special circumstances applicable to the property,
including the location of the playfields for McGaugh Elementary School directly across
the street from the subject property, the playfield being approximately 2'-7" higher than
the subject property, and the reduced right-of-way width of Marlin Avenue adjacent to
the school, the strict application of the Zoning Code deprives the property of privileges
enjoyed by other property in the same vicinity and zone. Specifically, the subject
property has the side and rear yards visible from the school playfield and as a result the
side and rear yards and main living areas of the subject property are clearly visible to
persons on the playfield. The reduced street width adjacent to McGaugh School results
in the playfield areas being located approximately IS feet closer than would exist if
Marlin Avenue was built at the width of 60 feet, as exists west of the school facility. The
strict application of the wall height requirements would result in a loss of normal privacy
at a residential use in a residential zoning district.
(c) The granting of this variance will not constitute a grant of special
privilege inconsistent with other limitations on other properties in the same vicinity and
zone, given that only 4 other properties in the vicinity have similar lot orientations, and
because the variance allows the subject property to maintain useable outdoor recreation
areas and utilization of interior living spaces roughly equivalent to that of the standard
parcels in the surrounding area.
I
(d) The subject property is unique physically in that it is one of 4
parcels that do not directly face the school playground area along the south side of Marlin
A venue. There are 5 parcels that have their front yards facing the school playground, and
therefore do not have the main bedroom areas or their outdoor yard areas visible from the
elevated playground area of the school.
(e) The variance, as recommended for approval for the provision of a
7-foot high wall with a maximum length of 53 feet from the rear property line along
Marlin Avenue and a proposed 7-foot high wall across the back of the subject property
would not be detrimental to adjoining properties as the variance requested on the street
side property line would allow for a wall I-foot higher than is currently permitted to be
located in the same location. The requested variance along the Marlin A venue side of the
property will not be detrimental to adjoining properties, as the nearest properties on the
Marlin Avenue side are across Marlin Avenue, which is 45 feet in width, and the
requested variance consists of a 1 foot increase in the height of a wall, and encompass a
total length of 53 feet. Marlin Avenue west of McGaugh School has 60 feet of right-of-
way.
I
(f) The granting of the requested variance for the proposed 7-foot wall
across the rear property line occurs in an area where the privacy Intrusion issues from the
elevated playfield slide equipment allow for viewing into the rear yard of the subject
property, resulting in a loss of privacy in this area of the property unless the requested
variance were to be approved.
I
I
'l40l. ....
..,
" .
Resolution Number 5570
(g) The granting of the requested variance, as conditioned, will allow
for the continued use of the residential property with ihe ability to maintain a reasonable
level of privacy for those areas of the home that are directly visible from the elevated
playfield areas and elevated playground equipment located at McGaugh School.
Section 7. Based upon the foregoing, the City Council hereby
approves Variance No. 07-2, subject to the following conditions:
1.
Variance 07-2 is approved for the construction of a maximum 7-foot high street
side property line wall with a maximum length of 53 feet from the rear property
line and a 7-foot high wall across the rear property line at 429 Beryl Cove Way.
2. All construction shall be in substantial compliance with the plans approved
through Variance 07-2.
3. This Variance shall not become effective for any purpose unless an "Acceptance
of Conditions" form has been signed by the applicant in the presence of the
Director of Development Services, or notarized and returned to the Planning
Department; and until the 10 day appeal period has elapsed.
4.
If any claim, action or proceeding (collectively "action") is instituted by a third
party or parties challenging the validity of the this approval, Developer and City
shall cooperate in defending any such action. City shall notify Developer of any
such action against City within ten working days after City receives service of
process, except for any petition for injunctive relief, in which case City shall
notify Developer immediately upon receipt of notice thereof. Developer shall
indemnify, hold harmless and defend City, and any of its officers, employees or
agents for any action by a third party or parties brought to challenge the Project
Approvals; provided, however, that if City fails promptly to notify Developer of
any action against City, or if City fails to cooperate in the defense, Developer
shall not thereafter be responsible for City's defense. Developer shall reimburse
all of City's defense costs including, without limitation, court costs, attorney's
fees incurred by counsel selected by the City, and expert witness fees. Developer
shall promptly pay all monetary awards, judgments, verdicts, court costs and
attorneys fees that may be awarded in such action.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of Seal Beach, at a
meeting hereof held on the 23rd day of Julv ,2007 by the following vote:
A YES: COUNCil..MEMBERS.O/fdzu, ~ ~. J4a..k, 7fdvn.
NOES: COUNCil..MEMBERS ~
ABSENT: COUNCil..MEMBERS ~
.~cJ)L,{\~
Mayor
~
ity Cler~
~~
I
STATE OF CALIFORNIA .}
COUNTY OF ORANGE } SS
CITY OF SEAL BEACH }
I, Linda Devine, City Clerk for the City of Seal Beach, California, do hereby certify that
the foregoing resolutions is the original copy of Resolution Number 5570 on file in the
office of the City Clerk, passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of
Seal each at a re lar meeting hereof held on the 23rd day of Julv ,2007.