HomeMy WebLinkAboutEmailed Comment from JO8N1
Brandon DeCriscio
From:JO8N <JO8N@proton.me>
Sent:Monday, July 14, 2025 8:05 AM
To:Lisa Landau; Nathan Steele; Joe Kalmick; Ben Wong; Patty Senecal; Patrick Gallegos;
Michael Henderson; nghirelli@rwglaw.com; Gloria Harper; Brandon DeCriscio; Karen
Pickering; Ask City Hall; budget; info@sealbeachchamber.org; Joe Bailey; Alexa Smittle;
Barbara Arenado; Iris Lee; Tim Kelsey; Shaun Temple; Deb Machen; Anthony Nguyen;
Nicholas Nicholas; Mike Ezroj; Julia Clasby; ctuchalski@bestversionmedia.com; editor2
@sunnews.org; cpenaorg@gmail.com; Brian Gray; Nick Bolin; hr@sealbeachca.gov;
Megan Coats; Jessica Salvador; Chris Hendrix; sealbeachcityrotary@gmail.com;
info@bestversionmedia.com
Subject:Public Comment Part 2 - Big Picture Sensemaking Agenda - Seal Beach City Coucil
Meeting 7/14/25
Follow Up Flag:Follow up
Flag Status:Flagged
“Real-time opportunities for the public to address the board are required” - Even Though AB 2449 Is
Addressing Teleconferencing, “Real-time” Applies To In Person Attendance As Well.
https://www.rwglaw.com/media/publication/102_Nick%20-%20CSDA%20Article%20AB%202449.pdf
Is There An Up To Date Attorney Contract With Hourly Rate Available? Regardless, I Think It Should Be Re-
negotiated To Include Additional Extra Hours Free Of Charge To Exclusively Pursue Creative Legal
Frameworks Given Public AI Legal Tools To Roughly Sketch And The Uniquely Local Opportunities The
City Can Provide (Regulatory Innovation, Adaptive Governance, Municipal Entrepreneurship, Legal
Entrepreneurship, Home-Rule Experimentation, Regulatory Sandboxing, Collaborative Lawmaking,
Strategic Preemption Navigation, Outcome-Based Regulation, Interjurisdictional Micro-Grants, Etc.). Is
The Contract With The Firm, Not The Specific Attorney? If So, I Think The City Should Also Pursue These
Creative Legal Frameworks With Access To The Entire Firm’s Staff.
https://www.sealbeachca.gov/Portals/0/Documents/Human%20Resources/Labor%20Agreements/City
%20Attorney%20Contract.pdf?ver=2020-06-12-080752-477
We don't know what's happening with forests: ESA Imaging Satellite
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YfqvsVgtThQ
https://www.esa.int/Applications/Observing_the_Earth/Space_for_our_climate/ESA_unveils_longest-
ever_dataset_on_forest_biomass
How Water Makes This Town Flood-Proof | WSJ Pro Perfected
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mv_IiESpyY
What is Going on with California’s Water!?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVaQiEkSkFY
Could Puquios/Qanat be used in our modern water systems?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puquios https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qanat
Is there any risk of saltwater intrusion into our well, as over pumping in northern california has caused?
2
https://cawaterlibrary.net/document/increasing-threat-of-coastal-groundwater-hazards-from-sea-level-
rise-in-california/
Sage Pressure Geothermal Energy - Able To Use Old Oil Wells Like In Seal Beach?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4gLxHTqdX4
Fervo Energy Announces Technology Breakthrough in Next-Generation Geothermal 2023
https://fervoenergy.com/fervo-energy-announces-technology-breakthrough-in-next-generation-
geothermal/
Panthalassa Ocean-2, a full-scale prototype deployed off the Washington coast scalable to Terrawatts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7Pmgq2JKbI
2025: The end of our world as we know it | Peter Leyden (I agree with the premise, but i disagree with his
conclusion; I think its financial capitalism —> universal basic income fixing time poverty for government
participation creating more fair capitalism; representative democracy —> direct liquid democracy with
no one getting to write their name on the ballot decreasing power of parties/political action commitees;
and nation states —> global psychedelic religions forming a global first amendment, which the state
must submit to, Under GOD)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zoCpFfOH04
Our City Council Should Be Voting To Make Political Proclamations With All 5 In Agreement Like:
Massive, thousand-page omnibus appropriations bills from Democrats And Republicans undermine
transparency by denying both members and the public adequate time to review each provision—and to
understand how special-interest PAC funding or donor commitments may have shaped them (GovExec).
Critics note that this “broken” process, in which Congress bundles dozens of unrelated measures into a
single package, precludes meaningful public input and masks the true costs and influences behind each
policy choice (Manhattan Institute).
https://www.govexec.com/management/2025/05/top-democrats-congress-decry-white-house-lack-
transparency-spending-plans/405643/
https://manhattan.institute/article/the-omnibus-spending-bill-is-symptomatic-of-a-broken-congress
How "Non-Profits" Are Scamming America -501c3 501c4 527 PAC, NGOs Lose 5% To Fraud
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZmvQcq0yP0
Foreign Agents Registration Act
https://www.justice.gov/nsd-fara
Rep. Massie Introduces Legislation Requiring Political Candidates to Disclose Dual Citizenship
https://massie.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=395713
Nuclear Information Project with the Federation of American Scientists in Washington, DC On Israel;
stockpile of roughly 90 warheads ; not part of the Non Proliferation Treaty and does not undergo UN
inspection????????
https://thebulletin.org/premium/2022-01/nuclear-notebook-israeli-nuclear-weapons-2022/
Departments Should Be More Integrated Rather Than Fighting For Budget - Polymaths - I Propose once a
week/month (day can be voted on), department to department trade of staff members - (pay is the same
for the staff members, and in any emergency, everyone goes back to their rightful place); also, a once a
3
month where department heads bring up one problem/innovation they are stuck/interested in, and the
other department heads have to give their opinions through the perspective of that specific department
head as if it is a debate and they are for it and the specific department head must act as if they are
against it
https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20191118-what-shapes-a-polymath---and-do-we-need-them-
more-than-ever
UNODC World Drug Report 2025: Global instability compounding social, economic and security costs
of the world drug problem
https://www.unodc.org/unodc/press/releases/2025/June/unodc-world-drug-report-2025_-global-
instability-compounding-social--economic-and-security-costs-of-the-world-drug-problem.html
Typo Pg 19
https://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/WDR_2025/WDR25_B1_Key_findings.pdf
World Drug Report 2025
https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/world-drug-report-2025.html
Overprescribed Youth “ADHD Treatment” In The United States Is A Gateway To
Methamphetamine/Amphetamine/Cocaine IMO
https://www.adhdadvisor.org/learn/adhd-statistics-and-facts
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/72/wr/mm7213a1.htm
The Crumbling Business of Marijuana - (Seal Beach Sun Grown On Kizh/Tongva/Gabrielino Land With
Locals/Natives, Only City Tax No State/Federal Ever, Limited Designated Smoking/Consumption Cafe
Locations, And Consumption Laws Equal To Alcohol In Restaurants —> Native/Locally Grown
Entheogens With Veteran/Active Duty Therapy For Naval Weapons Station, End Of Life Palliative Care For
Leisure World, And Working With Cal State Long Beach Researchers)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=niQ7mk13xew
Programming Using AI
https://v0.dev/
Erebor Crypto Bank - USD Stablecoin for Seal Beach City overseen by Seal Beach Police creating
unmatched security with biometric confirmation only to be usable for shopping locally, especially
secure for vulnerable Leisure World residents —> have ownership of all local data storage able to be
leveraged —> using same underlying technology, have separate local resident political system to
eventually have direct liquid democracy
https://www.reuters.com/business/tech-billionaires-led-by-palmer-luckey-launch-new-bank-rival-svb-
ft-reports-2025-07-02/
building on social media sites is on rented land vs building on email/city website is on land you own —>
same goes for data storage
An open source, off-grid, decentralized, mesh network built to run on affordable, low-power devices
(Uses bluetooth I believe; possible use in emergencies?)
https://meshtastic.org/
Harvard Professor Explains The Rules of Writing — Steven Pinker
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBQPnvmaNcE
4
Money Did Not Come From Barter - It Came From Blood Feuds- L. Randall Wray
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-D5FERQzU4
Why Mushrooms are Starting to Replace Some Things
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jI2LC3WTryw
‘Too Much Going On’: Autistic Adults Overwhelmed by Nonverbal Social Cues
https://drexel.edu/news/archive/2025/July/Autistic-Adults-Overwhelmed-by-Nonverbal-Social-Cues
JO8N
On Monday, July 14th, 2025 at 2:49 PM, JO8N <JO8N@proton.me> wrote:
Dear GOD:
I Write To Notify The Seal Beach People Of Multiple Serious Legal Violations Committed By
Attorney And Police During Multiple Seal Beach City Council Meetings, And To Demand Immediate
Remedial Action. My Claims Are Fully Documented By Audio/Video Recordings, Public
Eyewitnesses, And Written Correspondence. I Request A Written Response Immediately From The
Date Of This Letter, As You Have Ignored All My Previous Email Requests For Response, In Denial
Of THE SPIRIT.
I. Constitutional Violations – Police Intimidation And Chilling Of Free Speech
1. Police Intimidation Violating My 1st Amendment Right By Chilling Free Speech At Public
Assemblies Repeatedly Due To Viewpoint Discrimination Before/During My Public Comments Has
Been Taking Place For Years:
(A) Directing An Officer To Use A Police Dog To Specifically Target My Person/Belongings/Scent
Without A Warrant Or Reasonable Suspicion Of A Crime Additionally Violating My 4th Amendment
Right,
(B) Directing An Officer To Move Behind The Sight Line Of The Camera To Sit In The Public
Audience Exactly When I Gave My Public Comment,
(C) Physically Moving Directly Next To My Person In The Public Audience Section Before My Public
Comments At Two Separate December Meetings In Order To Add Extra Intimidation During The
Pressure Of Much Greater Audience Attendance Than Usual, High Ranking Government Officials’
Attendance, And Holiday Performances,
(D) Suggesting/Telling Me Not To Write My Name Down In Order To Be Called Upon To Give My
Public Comment.
2. Such Targeted, Repeated Shows Of Force In Plain View Of Camera And Attendees Constitute
Unlawful First Amendment Retaliation And Intimidation In Violation Of The United States And
California Constitutions, Including The Tom Bane Civil Rights Act (Cal. Civ. Code § 52.1).
II. Brown Act Violations – Disruptive Responses Directly To My Public Comments
1. By Discussing My Public Comment On The Record Without First Placing It On A Publicly Noticed
Agenda And Giving Me A Chance To Respond, The Lawyer Engaged In Unauthorized Discussion Of
A Non-Agendized Item, A Clear Violation Of Gov. Code § 54954.2. The Disruption Denied The
Validity Of My Public Comment Regarding My Church’s Sacramental Use Of The Flesh And Blood
Of JESUS CHRIST (Sinfully Scientifically Named Psilocybin Mushrooms)—A Legally Protected
Religious Practice—Thereby Engaging In Viewpoint Discrimination In Direct Contravention Of Gov.
Code § 54954.3 By Misfeasance In Office (Misusing Lawful Authority), Misrepresentation By
Omission (Fraudulent Concealment) Of Material Facts, And Acting Ultra Vires (Beyond Lawful
Authority).
5
The Attorney Issued A Blanket Legal Statement Asserting That “Psilocybin Mushrooms”—Referred
To By Their Non-Religious, Sinfully Scientific, Secular Name—“Are Illegal In California.” This
Statement Was Delivered Without Addressing The Constitutional Protections Afforded To My
Religious Practice, And Was Made In Direct Response To My Public Comment Of Religious Liberty
Concerning The Flesh And Blood Of JESUS CHRIST. This Disruptive, Unlawful Response To My
Public Comment Effectively Undermined The Legitimacy Of My Sincerely Held Religious Beliefs And
Sacramental Use Of JESUS CHRIST's Flesh And Blood. It Promoted A Preference For Traditional
Or Mainstream Interpretations Over Nontraditional Spiritual Practices. It Also Violated The
Establishment Clause And Free Exercise Clause Of The First Amendment To The United States
Constitution, Which Together Prohibit Government Hostility Toward Minority Religious Practices,
Government Endorsement Of One Religious Interpretation Over Another, Interference With
Religious Expression In A Public Forum, And The Chilling Of Protected Religious Speech.
Furthermore, The Attorney Omitted Critical Legal Context, Implying That My Religious Practice Was
Categorically Illegal Under State Law—When In Fact, The Religious Freedom Restoration Act
(RFRA) And The Gonzales V. O Centro Espírita Beneficente União Do Vegetal (UDV) Supreme
Court Decision Provide A Clear And Recognized Pathway For Religious Exemption To Controlled
Substance Laws. The UDV Case Affirmed That A Sincere Religious Use Of A Federally Controlled
Substance May Not Be Prohibited Without The Government Meeting The Highest Level Of Legal
Justification—Known As Strict Scrutiny. The Burden Is On The Government To Show A Compelling
Interest And That It Has Chosen The Least Restrictive Means To Advance That Interest. By Failing
To Disclose This Legal Framework, The Attorney Not Only Misled The Public, But Also Attempted
To Dismiss My Constitutionally Protected Religious Rights Through Misrepresentation And Selective
Omission (Fraudulent Concealment). This Public Statement, Issued By A Government Official In A
Civic Forum, Not Only Dismissed The Spiritual Framework I Had Explicitly Articulated, But Also
Attempted To Reframe My Protected Religious Exercise As A Criminal, Secular Matter—Thus
Chilling My Religious Speech, Discrediting The Legitimacy Of My Sacrament, And Reinforcing State
Entanglement With Religious Interpretation, Contrary To The Principle Of Government Neutrality In
Religious Matters.
2. At The Council’s Request For Additional Information Concerning My Comment, Police
Misrepresented The Legality Of Secular Psilocybin Mushrooms In California, Fraudulently
Concealing Successful Decriminalization Mandates In The California Cities Of Oakland, Santa Cruz,
Arcata, Berkeley, And San Francisco, Thereby Misleading The Council In Breach Of Gov. Code §
54954.2 And § 54954.3, And Committing Ultra Vires (Beyond Lawful Authority) Misfeasance In
Office.
III. Procedural Rule Making And Ultra Vires Acts Regarding The “Well”
1. The Boundary Of The “Well” Is Neither Defined In State Law Nor Codified In Local Ordinance To
My Knowledge; It Is A Purely Procedural Matter For Council Action. Despite Repeated Requests For
The Specific Municipal Code Section Authorizing Any Such Boundary, None Exists.
2. Police And Attorney Unilaterally Expanded The Logical And Symmetrical Boundaries Of The
“Well” Beyond Any Council-Adopted Rule To Contract The Public Area Unlawfully—An Ultra Vires
Act And Clear Misfeasance In Office. Wells Are Round, The Symmetrical City Clerk’s Desk Is Clearly
A Public Area With Forms To Fill Out, And Logically There Is Clearly A Public Trashcan Outside The
Police Desk That I Never Went Beyond. This Police And Attorney Action Amounts To Abuse Of
Process, Misrepresentation Of Law, And Abuse Of Authority.
IV. Defamation And Abuse Of Qualified Privilege
1. When I Sought To Speak In Order To Correct The Fraudulent Concealment In The Record (II.2.), I
Peacefully Stood Outside The “Well” In A Public Area. After Being Told To Move Because I Was In
The “Well”, I Did Not Move, So I Requested A Written Memorandum Of The “Well” Boundaries From
The City Municipal Code. Instead, The Attorney Sent Me And Three Other Government Employees
A Letter Maliciously Defaming My Character By Falsely Alleging I Was “Intimidating” “Police”,
“Disrupting” The City Council Meeting, And Refusing A “Lawful Order”. Because I Was Peacefully
6
Standing In A Clearly Public Area Keeping My Body To Myself Gesturing And Whispering In Active
Listening To The City Council Meeting (With No Action By Council To Remove Me Or Claim
Disruption), Attempting To Follow The Public Participation Procedure Of An Agendized Discussion
Pursuant To The Brown Act To Correct The Fraudulent Concealment In The Record (II.2.), And
Refusing An Unlawful Order Not In The City Municipal Code Or Given By City Council, The Entire
Attorney Letter Is Illogical Malicious Defamation Designed To Intimidate, Chilling My Free Speech. I
Have Not Returned In Person To City Council Since I Do Not Trust The Hostile Environment Created
Through Maliciously, Falsely Labeling Me A Person “Intimidating” “Police”. In Addition, As I Was
Simultaneously Publicly Criticizing The New Enforcement Of The Daylighting Parking Law Without
Painted Curbs, My Free Speech Is Clearly Protected By Gov. Code § 54954.3 (c): The Legislative
Body Of A Local Agency Shall Not Prohibit Public Criticism Of The Policies, Procedures, Programs,
Or Services Of The Agency, Or Of The Acts Or Omissions Of The Legislative Body.
2. This Written Accusation—Sent To Me And Three Government Employees—Constitutes Libel Per
Se, An Abuse Of Qualified Privilege, Intimidation Chilling My Free Speech, Creating A Hostile
Environment, And Actual Malice, Causing Harm To My Reputation And Giving Rise To A
Defamatory Tort Action Seeking Injunctive Relief.
V. Demand For Relief
Accordingly, I Hereby Demand That The Seal Beach Government Immediately:
1. Investigate And Correct Any Unlawful Intimidation Tactics Used By Police And Attorney To Chill
My Free Speech, Including Blocking My Email Messages To Government Officials And Staff In Late
2024, Cited On The Record Of A City Council Meeting.
2. Retract The Attorney’s Defamatory Allegations In Writing And Issue A Corrective Notice To All
Recipients, Cited On The Record Of A City Council Meeting.
3. Provide The Specific Municipal Code Section Describing The “Well” Boundary Or Formally Adopt
One Via Council Resolution, Cited On The Record Of A City Council Meeting.
4. Cease And Desist Further Illegal Brown Act Violations, Restore Viewpoint Neutrality Through
Correction Of The Record To Include Previously Omitted Information, And Legally Agendize Public
Discussion Of The (Sinfully Scientifically Named) Psilocybin Mushroom For Secular Local
Decriminalization In Order To Equally Welcome And Respect Everyone’s First Amendment Rights.
5. Implement Training For All Government Officials And Staff Through Reading This Entire Letter,
Cited On The Record Of A City Council Meeting.
VI. If You Fail To Respond In Writing Immediately Or Refuse To Remedy These Violations, I Will
Consider Pursuing All Available Administrative And Judicial Remedies, Including But Not Limited To:
1. Filing A Formal Brown Act Complaint With The County District Attorney And Attorney General.
2. Initiating A Civil Rights Action Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 And The Tom Bane Civil Rights Act (Cal.
Civ. Code § 52.1) Up To $25,000.
3. Filing A Defamation Lawsuit For Libel Per Se Up To $25,000.
4. Seeking Injunctive Relief, Damages, And Attorney’s Fees.
5. Lastly, I Am Under No Obligation To Prove My Religious Exemption Through Any Man Made
Legal Mechanisms Unless And Until I Deem The Matter Ripe. My Exercise Of Faith Exists Prior To
And Beyond Civil Authorization, As Declared In The Declaration Of Independence, Protected By The
United States Constitution, And Recognized By Legal Precedent. This Is Anchored In The
Foundational Principle That Religious Liberty Is An Inalienable Right, Not A Privilege Bestowed Or
Regulated At The Discretion Of Any Government. Peace And Love To Everyone That Lives And
Works In Seal Beach.
7
Very Truly GOD’s,
JO8N
On Monday, June 23rd, 2025 at 3:29 PM, JO8N <JO8N@proton.me> wrote:
Psilocybin Mushrooms in Their Natural Habitats - by Paul Stamets
https://www.target.com/p/psilocybin-mushrooms-in-their-natural-habitats-by-paul-
stamets/-/A-94272297
Waska: the cost of spiritual healing in the Amazon
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jG6B0o1QfQ
This Deadly Drug Can Also Erase Addiction ‘Virtually Overnight’ | WSJ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBz2TTEdFSs
Two Videos Above Are Why I Advocate For Locally Grown And Facilitated GOD
Given Medicine.
Marcus Finnie | The Art of Listening Drum Clinic
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oimZ5dzewic
The REAL Danger Of The Post WWII Consensus And Is It Too Late? | Jonathan
Pageau
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ug88C6Zgcs
See the stunning first images from the Vera C. Rubin Observatory
https://www.technologyreview.com/2025/06/23/1119129/first-images-vera-c-rubin-
observatory/
Why That Scary Statistic Might Not Mean What You Think – Understanding Scientific
Risk and Probability in the Media
https://caveatscientia.com/2025/04/02/why-that-scary-statistic-might-not-mean-what-
you-think-understanding-scientific-risk-and-probability-in-the-media/
Cancers can be detected in the bloodstream three years prior to diagnosis
https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/newsroom/news-releases/2025/06/cancers-
can-be-detected-in-the-bloodstream-three-years-prior-to-diagnosis
Students For Sensible Drug Policy - Just Say Know Drug Education
https://ssdp.org/our-work/just-say-know/
D.A.R.E. Drug Abuse Resistance Education
T.R.U.T.H. Teaching Responsibility Uniting Trusted Healers
I'll Let You Know How Its Going With A Lawyer,
JO ౷౸౹N
On Monday, June 9th, 2025 at 10:53 PM, JO8N <JO8N@proton.me> wrote:
Record High: Study Finds Growing Cannabis Use Among Older
Adults (7% Of 9500 = ~665 Residents Of Leisure World May
Have Used Cannabis In The Last Month; Assuming A Rough
Conservative Guess Of 1/4 Oz Usage Per Month Per Currently
8
Using Resident @ $40 Per Month For Locals = $319,200 And
Potential For Deferring Leisure World Water Increase To
Cannabis They Are Likely Already Buying That Goes Exclusively
To Paying For Water/Sewer (Are Leisure World Residents Even
Allowed To Grow Cannabis?); Ability For Cannabis Grower To
Negotiate Volumetric Water Rate With Increased Usage For
Growing
https://www.nyu.edu/about/news-
publications/news/2025/june/cannabis-use-older-adults.html
Superwood is Here! This Amazing New Material Could Change
The World!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n4-v3ntYZAs
MIT engineers develop a new battery-free solar desalination
system, capable of producing up to 5,000 liters of water per
day > a solution for remote areas
https://ecoinventos.com/nuevo-sistema-de-desalinizacion-
solar-sin-baterias-capaz-de-producir-hasta-5000-litros-de-
agua-al-dia/
Dietary Sugar Intake and Incident Type 2 Diabetes Risk: A
Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of
Prospective Cohort Studies
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2161831
325000493
KILL Every Mosquito In Your Whole Yard | GUARANTEED SAFE
METHOD For 1 Gallon Mosquito Spray Repellent: (*In this
video I made for 4 gallons)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oBPWGPmpE40&t=741s
The Delivery Drones Are Finally Here
https://www.flyzipline.com/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAh-zCpmERY
"It's Happening Now" - The Unstoppable Threat: Inside the
Sinaloa Cartel's Unstoppable Submarine War (Ironclad)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-3CP0aTETak
Dino Mavrookas - Fmr. Navy SEAL (DEVGRU) / CEO of Saronic
Technologies | SRS #205
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJsbSC20Gv0
GPS devices, trackers, and other Iridium satellite
communicators
https://www.iridium.com/product-type/personal-
communicators-messengers-trackers/
9
Please Forward The Following To Dave Min:
Psilocybin-assisted treatment for alcohol dependence: a
proof-of-concept study
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25586396/
Part 1: Korea’s Magic Mushrooms 한국의 환각버섯
https://medium.com/%40Hong_Gildong/part-1-koreas-magic-
mushrooms-%ED%95%9C%EA%B5%AD%EC%9D%98-
%ED%99%98%EA%B0%81%EB%B2%84%EC%84%AF-
b5259491d35d
Current situation regarding psychedelics and magic
mushroom in Korea
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11862319/
Hong (2021) The Psychoactive Mushrooms of Korea
https://www.scribd.com/document/617371685/Hong-2021-
The-Psychoactive-Mushrooms-of-Korea
Magic mushrooms are woven into the historical and
contemporary cultural fabric of Korea. There are many Korean
fables regarding the 웃음버섯 (useum beoseot), or laughter
mushroom.
The famous Korean mycologist 조덕현Dr. Cho Duck-Hyun
wrote an excellent paper on the legends of poisonous and
magic mushrooms in Korea titled 독버섯의 비밀, or The Secret
of Poison Mushrooms. It’s only available in Korean language,
but I highly recommend reading it if you can get it translated.
You can find it
here: http://www.kacn.org/data/story/500403.pdf
My favorite account in Dr. Cho’s paper is an ancient story in
which nuns at a Korean Buddhist monastery go mushroom
hunting in the mountains around the monastery. They combine
all their mushrooms into a big pot of soup and become wildly
intoxicated after consuming the soup.
In contemporary times, magic mushrooms occasionally
appear as plot devices in Korean television shows. For
example, in one episode of the Korean drama 푸른거탑, or
Blue Tower, an army platoon was stricken with uncontrollable
laughter and hallucinations after consuming wild “laughter
mushrooms.” You can watch the 2-part episode on YouTube:
Part 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x6KcxYzWT8w
Part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PeaRDTCcKo
10
(Note: viewers outside Korea might need a VPN linked to Korea
to watch the videos)
The local Korean names of magic mushrooms often reveal the
social attitudes towards these mushrooms from
미치광이버섯속 or “maniac mushroom” for the Gymnopilus
genus and 환각버섯속 or “hallucinogen mushroom” for the
Psilocybe genus, as well as “laughter mushroom” for some
Gymnopilus and Panaeolus species.
Despite the cultural significance of magic mushrooms in
Korea, international mushroom literature demonstrate a
limited knowledge of magic mushrooms native to Korea.
Gastón Guzmán’s “A Worldwide Geographical Distribution of
Neurotropic Fungi”, which is one of the biggest global reviews
of magic mushrooms, only lists four magic mushrooms from
Korea and the famous book “Psilocybian Mushrooms of the
World” by Paul Stamets makes no mention of Korea.
In neighboring Japan, on the other hand, Guzman mentions 28
potential magic mushrooms and Stamets cites 10. Such
inconsistencies likely stem from a number of factors, including
limited access to or familiarity with Korean sources, and a
comparatively larger breadth of relevant Japanese sources.
Nevertheless, Korean mycological sources do mention the
existence of numerous, potentially magic mushrooms in
Korea.
In upcoming blogs, I will investigate and review 26 potentially
magic mushrooms found in Korea. There is a lot of interesting
and exciting information to be shared, and I hope to set the
record straight!
Are We Going To Have A Proclamation For Every Ethnicity And
Religion?
JO8N
On Monday, May 26th, 2025 at 3:04 PM, JO8N
<JO8N@proton.me> wrote:
This Is Your Final Warning. Fear GOD. Legal
Action Will Be Considered If The Public Record Is
Not Corrected Through These Acknowledgments
During The Seal Beach City Council Meeting On
5/27/25:
1. I Request Public Acknowledgment Of
Ongoing Seal Beach Police Intimidation
To Chill My 1st Amendment Right To Free
Speech At Public Assemblies Because Of
Viewpoint Discrimination Before/During
11
My Public Comments For Years And
Guarantee Of An Immediate End To These
Behaviors Or Similar: (A) Directing An
Officer To Use A Police Dog To
Specifically Target My
Person/Belongings/Scent Without A
Warrant Or Reasonable Suspicion Of A
Crime Additionally Violating My 4th
Amendment Right (B) Directing An Officer
To Move Behind The Sight Line Of The
Camera To Sit In The Public Audience
Exactly When I Go Up To Give My Public
Comment (C) Physically Moving Directly
Next To My Person In The Public Audience
Section Before Public Comments At Two
Separate December Meetings In Order To
Give Me Extra Intimidation During The
Pressure Of Greater Audience
Attendance Than Usual And Holiday
Performances (D) Suggesting/Telling Me
Not To Write My Name Down In Order To
Be Called Upon To Give My Public
Comment
2. I Request Public Acknowledgment Of A
Previous Lie By Omission From Seal
Beach Police Stating That Psilocybin
Mushrooms Are Completely Illegal In
California And A Correction Of The
Record Stating The Whole Truth That The
California Cities Of Oakland, Santa Cruz,
Arcata, Berkeley, And San Francisco Have
Successfully Mandated Personal Use And
Possession Of Certain Psychedelics As
The Lowest Law Enforcement Priority.
3. I Request Public Acknowledgment Of The
City Attorney's Failure To Recognize At
Best And Complicit Encouragement At
Worst Of The Ongoing Seal Beach Police
Intimidation Specifically Directed At Me,
A ~27 Year Resident.
4. I Hereby Request A Public
Acknowledgment From The City Attorney
Regarding Prior Acts Of Omission And
Potential Violations Of My First
Amendment Rights. Specifically, These
Violations Occurred Immediately After I
Publicly Announced The Religious Nature
12
Of My Practice And The Founding Of My
Church.
Following This Declaration, The City
Attorney Issued A Blanket Legal
Statement Asserting That Psilocybin
Mushrooms—Referred To By Their Non-
Religious, Secular Name—Are “Illegal In
California.” This Statement Was
Delivered Without Addressing The
Constitutional Protections Afforded To
Religious Practice, And Was Made In
Direct Response To My Religious
Expression Invoking The Name Of JESUS
CHRIST. This Action Effectively
Undermined The Legitimacy Of My
Sincerely Held Religious Beliefs And
Sacramental Use Of JESUS CHRIST's
Flesh And Blood. It Promoted A
Preference For Traditional Or Mainstream
Christian Interpretations Over
Nontraditional Or Indigenous Spiritual
Practices. It Also Violated The
Establishment Clause And Free Exercise
Clause Of The First Amendment To The
United States Constitution, Which
Together Prohibit Government Hostility
Toward Minority Religious Practices,
Government Endorsement Of One
Religious Interpretation Over Another,
Interference With Religious Expression In
A Public Forum, And The Chilling Of
Protected Religious Speech.
Furthermore, The City Attorney Omitted
Critical Legal Context, Implying That My
Religious Practice Was Categorically
Illegal Under State Law—When In Fact,
The Religious Freedom Restoration Act
(RFRA) And The Gonzales V. O Centro
Espírita Beneficente União Do Vegetal
(UDV) Supreme Court Decision Provide A
Clear And Recognized Pathway For
Religious Exemption To Controlled
Substance Laws. The UDV Case Affirmed
That A Sincere Religious Use Of A
Federally Controlled Substance May Not
Be Prohibited Without The Government
Meeting The Highest Level Of Legal
13
Justification—Known As Strict Scrutiny.
The Burden Is On The Government To
Show A Compelling Interest And That It
Has Chosen The Least Restrictive Means
To Advance That Interest. By Failing To
Disclose This Legal Framework, The City
Attorney Not Only Misled The Public, But
Also Attempted To Dismiss My
Constitutionally Protected Religious
Rights Through Misrepresentation And
Selective Omission. This Public
Statement, Issued By A Government
Official In A Civic Forum, Not Only
Dismissed The Spiritual Framework I Had
Explicitly Articulated, But Also Attempted
To Reframe My Protected Religious
Exercise As A Criminal Matter—Thus
Chilling My Religious Speech,
Discrediting The Legitimacy Of My
Sacrament, And Reinforcing State
Entanglement With Religious
Interpretation, Contrary To The Principle
Of Government Neutrality In Religious
Matters. This Act Of Governmental
Overreach Echoes The Historical
Violation Of Indigenous Religious
Freedom On This Land—An Ongoing
Legacy Of Cultural Suppression And
Spiritual Violation.
Lastly, I Assert That I Am Under No
Obligation To Prove My Religious
Exemption Through Man-Made Legal
Mechanisms Unless And Until I Deem The
Matter Ripe. My Exercise Of Faith Exists
Prior To And Beyond Civil Authorization,
As Protected By The Constitution And
Recognized By Precedent. This Is
Anchored In The Foundational Principle
That Religious Liberty Is An Inalienable
Right, Not A Privilege Bestowed Or
Regulated At The Discretion Of The State.
5. I Request Public Acknowledgment Of Two
Separate Brown Act Violations. During (4),
The City Attorney Gave A Public Response
To My Public Comment Without
Agendizing The Item To Give Me A Chance
14
To Respond With The Omitted
Information. During (2), The City Mayor
Gave A Public Response To My Public
Comment In Which Police Were Asked
About Psilocybin Mushrooms. This Item
Was Not Agendized And I Was Not Given
The Chance To Respond With The
Omitted Information. Because The Item
Was Illegaly Agendized Twice Without A
Public Hearing, I Request A Legal
Placement On A Future Agenda With A
Chance For The Public To Speak.
If The Public Record Is Corrected By
Acknowledgment Of All 5 Issues,
Behaviors Are Promised To Change, And
Placement On A Future Agenda Occurs
During The Seal Beach City Council
Meeting On 5/27/25, I Will Drop All
Consideration Of Legal Action With
Handshakes Of Forgiveness.
42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Civil Action For
Deprivation Of Rights
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/19
83
https://steeringlaw.com/police-misconduct-
attorney-seal-beach/
https://www.moseleycollins.com/police-
misconduct-lawyer-in-seal-beach-ca.html
https://pba.memberclicks.net/search-member-
directory#/
https://firstamendmentcoalition.org/
https://www.terrapinlegal.com/
https://www.thefire.org/
https://www.aclu.org/
Satan Drives Out Satan All Around Me
The I AM Holds Me Together
Sin Tempts You With Momentary Peace
Division Never Lasts Forever
Love Verbatim Word For Word
Literally, In The Flesh And Blood
Remember Ear Cut By Sword
Here Forever, Good Is Evil's Judge
15
-------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------
If theft is still a problem in the Target shopping
center, it might be time to look into employees
giving tips/insider theft. Can Amazon's security
be consulted to see vulnerabilities in Target
shopping center as I believe Amazon uses
Palantir?
If the water and sewer rates are passed, we need
to see recognition of exactly where the funds are
going to certain parts of the city - I foresee a
situation in the future when other, more recently
built parts of the city need new pipes and I want
a record of the fact that the more recently built
parts of the city helped fund older parts of the
city before.
If that many pills shown in the drug take back
are over prescribed by big pharmaceutical
companies, how is that not considered
racketeering conspiracy with big insurance
companies?
Make an AI Police Lawyer like siri that can be a
real time intermediary for police officers and
citizens to talk with together in 99% of the time
non-violent interaction.
In regards to drug enforcement, the best defense
is a good offense - right now alcohol is your
offense when it should be cannabis - alcohol is a
gateway to cocaine/meth/opioids and cannabis
is a gateway to psychedelics.
Why This Russian Drone Developer Isn’t
Impressed by U.S. Tech ([Probably Some
Propaganda In There] Fiber Optic Cable Drone
Seems Most Applicable For Civilian Police -
Better Connection, No Enemy
Jamming/Detection, More Battery Because
Video Feed Does Not Take As Much Energy; Or
Large Mother Drone To Improve
Connection/Distance Of Wireless; Starlink Naval
Drones; Lasers To Destroy Drones)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmfNUM2
CbbM
16
Police warn of small cameras camouflaged in
yards across the country
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEQircxHd
HQ
Experimental drones developed in Chicago area
to neutralize mass shooters, disable weapons
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eiz2GzAEV
bg
Is This An Organized Crime Syndicate? James
Freeman (Local Public Government Is Better
Than The Alternative Or Else It Would Create A
Vacuum With Less
Accountability/Standards/Morality/Etc., But It Is
Not The Best - Religion Is)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NaPJKi_M
W0
How Police Control the Media (Overly Liberal
Video Among Some Overly Republican Videos,
But Copaganda Has Obvious Truth In Seal Beach
With Terrible Local Journalistic Integrity
Regarding My Experience So Far, Unless There
Has Been Publicly Published Writing About
Cannabis/Psychedelics That I Have Not Seen)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8NB0IW8ih
S0
Tim Tebow - Fighting For Our Children | SRS #199
Shawn Ryan Show
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeVFs0dVc
Cc
Notorious Green Beret’s WARNING to Soldiers
Coming Home Johnny Glenn Julian Dorey (IMO
Adrenaline Addiction Through Constant Survival
Competition At War Creates Hyper-vigilance
Devoid Of Rest With GOD That Does Not
Integrate Into The Marathon Of Life)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0NnjKXZR
Fc
The Real Threat: Why the U.S. Could Declare
War on Chinese Gangs (w/ Former DEA, Ray
Donovan) Ironclad
17
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ToKNiaMqf
wA
Why Other Countries LAUGH at American
Homes (Build New Headquarters By The Beach
Out Of Concrete/Local Earth Geopolymer)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTghEBfZ_D
8
Wasp 3D-prints eco-homes from local raw earth
for $1K
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4MLJs1KRa
0Y
In 2018, the team printed their first home in 10
days using local earth (30% clay, 40% silt, 30%
sand), 40% chopped rice straw, 25% rice husk,
and 10% lime. “Gaia” cost 900 euros (1,000
dollars) in materials for 30 meters of wall. The
round-shaped structure relied on a wooden roof
and beams for support.
Why 3D Printing Buildings Leads to Problems
(Modular Prefab Concrete For Non-Unique
Building Parts + 3D Printed Concrete For Unique
Building Parts Seems Like Sweet Spot)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhAwPFIUF
_4
Comment:
“I’ve worked closely with a leading concrete 3D
printing company for several years now, so I
hope my insight into the actual construction
process provides some perspective.
First, one clarification: There is no gravel
aggregate in 3D printing concrete. It is only sand.
You're right that the vertical integration is very
strong in this industry, but there is already
internal pressure to break that up. I expect in 10
years or so, you'll see more open-access tools
available to architects and construction
companies alike. I can't be too specific and
honor my non-disclosure agreements, but there
is recognition that the ability for architects to
play with shape is very limited for now, which
also limits the primary advantage of concrete 3D
printing over other methods: complex shapes
cost the same as simple ones. The primary
18
reasons IMO for the vertical integration is 1) that
there has been a high learning curve for the
industry and 2) the business case relies on
minimizing labor costs and the strategies for
dealing with that are still being prototyped.
Normally trivial things like laying foundations,
running plumbing, tying roof timbers into the
frame, and lintels as you mentioned, are difficult
for concrete 3D printed construction. It's only in
the last year or so that acceptable, repeatable
solutions have been identified for most of these
and are finding their way into standard design
practices. But even then, there are still maybe 5
or 10 years more of on-the-ground construction
needed to establish best practice. It's not too
different from the way building materials and
building science radically changed in the 1980's,
leading to a decade of extremely poorly built
houses prone to water damage and short
lifespans. It wasn't until maybe 20 years after
that best practices for high-quality construction
had been standardized.
I would push back on the lack of repairability,
though. This has always been an issue with
concrete construction, and it's likely to become
increasingly common for plaster or stucco
finishes to be applied to internal walls, allowing
for intrusive renovations to be reintegrated.
Structural stability is not likely to be an issue
since all walls have reinforcement every half
meter anyway and often exceed building
strength standards by an order of magnitude.
Further, virtually all concrete 3D printing for now
is slab-on-grade construction, which already has
the same repairability issues you mention but is
already widely adopted and has best practices
for dealing with things like electrical and
plumbing repair. I would also point out that the
timber frame construction that we love so much
is largely an anomaly unique to the U.S. where
wood is abundant and cheap. Concrete 3D
printed homes have the (so far unrealized)
potential of being many decades or centuries
more durable than frame buildings, which will
change the design requirements that often
contribute to design choices that later need
renovations and repairs.
19
I would also push back on the criticism of how
windows and doors are seated in the concrete
homes. I don't doubt that many early concrete
3D printed homes were sealed with silicone
only, but 1) the gap between windows and walls
is already standard in frame construction and
addressed with shims, spray foam, and trim and
2) the 3D printing companies have already
started to adopt the same building techniques
used by frame construction.
Echoing much of what you said, IMO concrete
3D printing has a high potential for unique design
that won't be unlocked until architects are given
freer access to the tools and pre-fab
construction is a necessary companion to this
industry, but there is still a lot of building science
that is being worked out. There are already some
serious advantges, such as all walls having a
native R40 insulation rating, but these will be
tempered by the inherent limitations. I don't
expect to see a rapid adoption of 3D printed
construction for another 5 or 10 years and for the
U.S. market share to cap around 20% and
primarily remain in the residential and light
commercial construction spaces. I also think
that the current bare-wall aesthetic will fall out
of favor out in that timeframe since it will prove
difficult to clean. I also expect that
environmental costs will remain high as long as
cement production relies on fossil fuels and
concrete aggregate relies on mined sand. I also
expect that a future use case for heavy
construction is using 3D printing to create forms
for much thicker concrete constructions,
particularly for foundations, buttresses, and
pillars, such as you see in airport construction.”
I Investigated Utah’s DEADLY Soda Addiction…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BlNJc_OLb
Yw
https://playactivate.com/
Increased sedentary behavior is associated with
neurodegeneration and worse cognition in older
20
adults over a 7-year period despite high levels of
physical activity
https://alz-
journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.100
2/alz.70157
Parkinson's patients who take 'magic
mushrooms' see key benefits, study finds
https://www.foxnews.com/health/parkinsons-
patients-who-take-magic-mushrooms-see-key-
benefits-study-finds
Trump surgeon general pick praised unproven
psychedelic therapy, said mushrooms helped
her find love
https://www.cnn.com/2025/05/15/health/casey
-means-psychedelic-therapy
Military Land Is 4,336 Acres Or 60.7% Of Seal
Beach...
JO8N
On Monday, March 31st, 2025 at 6:34 PM, JO8N
<JO8N@proton.me> wrote:
On Sunday, March 23rd, 2025 at
4:53 PM, JO8N
<JO8N@proton.me> wrote:
Dear Lisa, Nathan,
Joe, Ben, Patty,
Patrick, Mike H., Nick
G., And Gloria,
I am writing to formally
express my concerns
regarding what I
believe to be ongoing
violations of the Ralph
M. Brown Act
(Government Code §
54950 et seq.) during
public meetings
conducted by Seal
Beach’s City Council.
The fundamental
purpose of the Brown
Act is to ensure that
the public has the
21
ability to meaningfully
participate in local
government
proceedings, which
includes the right to
make public comments
and receive fair
treatment under open
meeting laws.
Specifically, I wish to
address the following
concerns:
1. Inability to Respond
to False or Misleading
Statements:
* It has been
observed that after I
make public
comments, members
of the council and/or
city staff respond to my
remarks. However, I
am not afforded the
opportunity to address
their responses within
the same meeting,
effectively silencing my
ability to correct or
clarify statements that
may be false,
misleading, or
deceptive by omission.
This directly
undermines the
principle of open and
meaningful discourse
as envisioned by the
Brown Act.
* The California
Supreme Court has
reinforced the
importance of open
and fair discussions in
McKee v. Los Angeles
Interagency
Metropolitan Police
Apprehension Crime
Task Force (2005) 134
Cal.App.4th 354,
where the court
emphasized that
restricting public input
while allowing
government officials to
comment without
challenge is
inconsistent with the
22
transparency goals of
the Brown Act.
2. Prohibition on
Addressing Staff:
* The restrictions
placed upon me and
other members of the
public from directing
comments toward city
staff—especially when
they are the ones
providing statements
that require public
scrutiny—appear to be
an unreasonable and
arbitrary limitation on
public participation.
Furthermore, this may
give the staff a feeling
of false sense of
security protecting
their statements from
legal scrutiny. The
Brown Act does not
prohibit the public from
addressing staff
members during public
comment, and such
restrictions seem
inconsistent with its
purpose of
transparency and
accountability.
* In Chaffee v. San
Francisco Library
Commission (2005)
134 Cal.App.4th 109,
the court affirmed that
public participation is a
fundamental aspect of
government meetings
and should not be
unduly restricted,
emphasizing the need
for fairness in
addressing public
concerns.
3. Discussion of Public
Comments Without
Proper Agenda Notice:
* Members of the
council have engaged
in discussions
regarding my public
comments without first
properly agendizing
23
the topics I address.
This practice violates
the Brown Act’s
requirement that
discussions and
deliberations on non-
agendized items not
take place, as it
deprives the public of
advance notice and
the ability to participate
fully in the discussion.
* I am grateful that
the city council is
listening and willing to
speak even
momentarily in
response to public
concerns. However,
even an extremely
time-limited agendized
discussion would add
fairness and
transparency to
misleading statements
by staff. By failing to
agendize discussions
about my comments,
the council is creating
an imbalance in the
exchange of
information, which the
Brown Act seeks to
prevent.
* Additionally, in my
public comments, I am
using meta-
communication to
agendize the process
by which we agendize.
The term “agendize”
itself is a completely
made-up word that
devalues public
discourse and reflects
a bureaucratic
approach that
obstructs meaningful
public participation
rather than facilitating
it. This concern aligns
with the ruling in White
v. City of Norwalk
(1990) 900 F.2d 1421,
where the court
emphasized that public
meetings should foster
meaningful
24
participation and that
arbitrary restrictions on
discourse can infringe
upon First Amendment
rights.
* The word
"agendize" does not
appear anywhere in
the Brown Act
(Government Code §
54950 et seq.). The
law refers to "placing
an item on the
agenda" or "agenda
requirements," but
"agendize" is not an
official legal term. It is
a bureaucratic jargon
word that has become
commonly used in
government settings
but lacks formal
recognition in the
Brown Act itself.
4. Process for Placing
an Item on the
Agenda:
* The process for
placing an item on a
city council agenda
varies by jurisdiction,
but under the Brown
Act, it does not require
a unanimous decision
by the council. Instead,
different cities have
different policies:
* Individual
Council Members:
Some cities allow one
or two council
members to request an
item be placed on a
future agenda. The
exact number required
depends on the city’s
local rules or policies.
For example, in Los
Angeles, a single
council member can
introduce a motion to
be considered in a
future meeting.
Similarly, in San
Diego, two council
members are required
25
to place an item on the
docket.
* Majority Vote: In
some cities, adding an
item to a future agenda
requires a majority
vote of the council at a
meeting. This process
ensures that council
members collectively
decide whether an
issue warrants further
discussion. The City of
Berkeley, for instance,
follows this model,
requiring a majority
vote to place an item
on the agenda.
* Courts have
upheld the importance
of agenda-setting
transparency. In
Preven v. City of Los
Angeles (2019) 32
Cal.App.5th 925, the
court ruled that public
participation in
government decision-
making is a core right
under the Brown Act,
reinforcing that the
public and individual
council members must
be given fair
opportunities to
introduce topics for
discussion.
These practices create
an unfair and
unbalanced
environment where
public voices are
effectively suppressed,
while city officials
retain unrestricted
latitude to control
discourse without
public challenge. Such
actions may constitute
a violation of both the
letter and spirit of the
Brown Act.
I respectfully request
that the city review its
meeting procedures
and take immediate
corrective actions,
including:
26
* Allowing public
speakers the
opportunity to address
responses made to
their comments within
the same meeting.
* Eliminating any
restrictions that
prevent members of
the public from
addressing staff when
their statements are at
issue.
* Ensuring that
discussions related to
public comments
follow proper agenda
procedures to comply
with the Brown Act’s
transparency
requirements.
* Switching to
Individual Council
Member placing of
items on the agenda to
emphasize the sanctity
of every individual
living in Seal Beach
Failure to address
these issues may
necessitate further
action, including but
not limited to
submitting a formal
complaint to the
appropriate oversight
agencies and seeking
legal remedies to
ensure compliance
with state law.
I appreciate your
prompt attention to this
matter and request a
written response
outlining the steps the
city will take to address
these concerns.
Please respond within
30 days of receipt of
this letter.
P.S. Still Waiting On
That Seal Beach City
Legal Document
Stating The
Boundaries Marking
The Well. Your
27
Opinion About Me And
My Right To Stand In
A Public Area Moving
My Body Completely
To Myself Is Worthless
Without The Written
Proof Of The Well
Boundary. I Submit
The Evidence That
You Are Able To Be
That Close To Gloria’s
City Clerk Area, And In
Fact, Encouraged To
Be In Order To Pick
Up, Fill Out, And
Submit Necessary
Documents, Including
Supplemental Material
For Public Comments.
My Standing In The
Exact Symmetrically
Opposite Area Was
Supplemental Material
For My Public
Comment About The
Decriminalization Of
Psilocybin Mushrooms
And The Agenda Item
Of Daylighting. Lastly,
The Wells I Have Seen
Are Round In Shape
And Symmetrical
Without Parts Hanging
Off The Side (To
Conveniently Fit Your
Narrative)
42 U.S. Code § 1983 -
Civil action for
deprivation of rights
Every person who,
under color of any
statute, ordinance,
regulation, custom, or
usage, of any State or
Territory or the District
of Columbia, subjects,
or causes to be
subjected, any citizen
of the United States or
other person within the
jurisdiction thereof to
the deprivation of any
rights, privileges, or
immunities secured by
the Constitution and
laws, shall be liable to
the party injured in an
28
action at law, suit in
equity, or other proper
proceeding for redress,
except that in any
action brought against
a judicial officer for an
act or omission taken
in such officer’s judicial
capacity, injunctive
relief shall not be
granted unless a
declaratory decree
was violated or
declaratory relief was
unavailable. For the
purposes of this
section, any Act of
Congress applicable
exclusively to the
District of Columbia
shall be considered to
be a statute of the
District of Columbia.
ןמא ןמא
⭼⭽⭾⭿⮀⮁⮂
ၒၓ ⯴⯵⯶
⍾
י ו 8 נ ן
Ἰωάνν8ς
Jo8annes
JO8N
On Tuesday, March
18th, 2025 at 6:11
AM, JO8N
<JO8N@proton.me>
wrote:
Dear
Lisa,
Nathan
, Joe,
Ben,
Patty,
Patrick,
Mike
H.,
Nick
G., And
Gloria,
I am
writing
to
29
formall
y
request
an
investig
ation
into a
matter
of
signific
ant
public
concer
n
regardi
ng
potenti
al
interfer
ence
with my
ability
to
commu
nicate
with
city
officials
.
Specifi
cally, I
have
reason
to
believe
that my
emails
to
membe
rs of
the
Seal
Beach
City
Council
and
city
staff
may
have
been
intentio
nally
blocke
d or
filtered
by
someo
30
ne
within
city
admini
stration
in the
Fall/Wi
nter of
2024.
As a
residen
t of
Seal
Beach,
I
underst
and
that I
have a
right to
commu
nicate
with my
elected
represe
ntative
s and
city
staff
regardi
ng
matters
of
public
interest
. Any
directiv
e or
policy
that
restrict
s this
commu
nicatio
n
raises
serious
legal
concer
ns
under
the
Ralph
M.
Brown
Act
(Gover
31
nment
Code
§§
54950–
54963),
the
Califor
nia
Public
Record
s Act
(CPRA
)
(Gover
nment
Code
§§
6250–
6270),
and the
First
Amend
ment of
the
United
States
Constit
ution.
The
Brown
Act
ensure
s
transpa
rency
and
public
particip
ation in
local
govern
ment.
Blockin
g my
emails
to city
officials
may
constit
ute an
unlawf
ul
restricti
on on
my
ability
to
engage
32
in civic
matters
and
access
public
informa
tion.
Likewis
e, the
CPRA
mandat
es that
govern
mental
commu
nicatio
ns be
open
for
public
scrutin
y. If city
staff
have
deliber
ately
restrict
ed my
access
to
commu
nicate
with
officials
, it
could
be an
unlawf
ul
attempt
to
circum
vent
public
records
laws
and
govern
mental
accoun
tability.
Further
more,
the
First
Amend
ment
33
guarant
ees my
right to
petition
the
govern
ment
for
redress
of
grievan
ces.
Any
action
taken
by city
staff to
suppre
ss my
commu
nicatio
n,
particul
arly if
done
based
on
viewpoi
nt
discrimi
nation,
could
amount
to a
constit
utional
violatio
n.
Releva
nt case
law,
such
as
Lindke
v.
Freed
and
O'Conn
or-
Ratcliff
v.
Garnier
,
sugges
ts that
when
public
officials
34
act in
their
official
capacit
y, they
must
not
engage
in
viewpoi
nt-
based
censor
ship,
includin
g
blockin
g
commu
nicatio
ns from
constit
uents.
To
ensure
transpa
rency
and
accoun
tability,
I
respect
fully
request
an
internal
review
and
disclos
ure of
the
followin
g:
1. Any
internal
directiv
es,
policies
, or
commu
nicatio
ns
instruct
ing city
staff or
IT
person
35
nel to
block,
filter, or
otherwi
se
restrict
emails
from
my
email
addres
s
jo8n@
proton.
me or
any
other
specific
sender
s.
2. A list
of
email
addres
ses,
domain
s, or
individu
als that
have
been
blocke
d from
contact
ing city
officials
and
staff in
the last
year.
3. Any
internal
discuss
ions or
justifica
tions
for
implem
enting
such
restricti
ons,
includin
g
whethe
r such
actions
were
36
directe
d by
city
officials
or staff
membe
rs.
4. The
criteria
and
proced
ures
used
by the
city’s IT
depart
ment to
filter or
block
externa
l
commu
nicatio
ns.
If such
a policy
or
directiv
e
exists, I
request
an
explan
ation of
its
basis,
legal
justifica
tion,
and the
proces
s by
which it
was
implem
ented.
If no
such
directiv
e
exists, I
ask
that
immedi
ate
steps
be
37
taken
to
ensure
my
emails
are
properl
y
receive
d by
their
intende
d
recipie
nts.
I would
appreci
ate a
written
respon
se
within
30
days
confirm
ing the
receipt
of this
request
and
outlinin
g the
next
steps
in
addres
sing
this
matter.
If
necess
ary, I
am
willing
to file a
formal
Public
Record
s Act
request
to
obtain
relevan
t
docum
entatio
n.
38
Thank
you for
your
attentio
n to
this
importa
nt
issue. I
look
forward
to your
prompt
respon
se and
a
resoluti
on that
uphold
s public
trust
and the
right to
open
commu
nicatio
n with
our
local
govern
ment.
https://l
eginfo.l
egislat
ure.ca.
gov/fac
es/cod
es_dis
playSe
ction.x
html?la
wCode
=GOV§
ionNu
m=549
50
https://l
eginfo.l
egislat
ure.ca.
gov/fac
es/billT
extClie
nt.xhtm
l?bill_id
=20172
39
0180S
B31
https://l
eginfo.l
egislat
ure.ca.
gov/fac
es/cod
es_dis
playSe
ction.x
html?la
wCode
=CON
S§ionN
um=SE
C.%20
2.&artic
le=I
ןמא ןמא
⭼⭽⭾⭿⮀⮁⮂
ၒၓ ⯴⯵⯶
⍾
JO8N
On
Monda
y,
March
10th,
2025
at 6:44
AM,
JO8N
<JO8N
@prot
on.me
>
wrote:
D
e
a
r
L
i
s
a
,
40
N
a
t
h
a
n
,
J
o
e
,
B
e
n
,
P
a
t
t
y
,
P
a
t
r
i
c
k
,
M
i
k
e
H
.
,
A
n
d
N
i
c
k
G
.
,
P
41
o
l
i
c
e
i
n
t
i
m
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
t
h
a
t
c
h
i
l
l
s
f
r
e
e
s
p
e
e
c
h
i
s
w
e
l
l
r
e
c
o
g
42
n
i
z
e
d
u
n
d
e
r
F
i
r
s
t
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
j
u
r
i
s
p
r
u
d
e
n
c
e
.
I
n
H
e
a
l
y
v
.
J
43
a
m
e
s
,
4
0
8
U
.
S
.
1
6
9
(
1
9
7
2
)
,
t
h
e
S
u
p
r
e
m
e
C
o
u
r
t
h
e
l
d
t
h
a
t
g
o
v
44
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
c
t
i
o
n
t
h
a
t
d
e
t
e
r
s
i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
s
f
r
o
m
p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
45
i
n
g
i
n
p
u
b
l
i
c
d
i
s
c
o
u
r
s
e
—
w
h
e
t
h
e
r
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
d
i
r
e
c
t
h
a
r
a
s
s
m
46
e
n
t
o
r
o
t
h
e
r
f
o
r
m
s
o
f
c
o
e
r
c
i
o
n
—
c
a
n
v
i
o
l
a
t
e
F
i
r
s
t
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
47
n
t
r
i
g
h
t
s
.
I
n
F
e
i
n
e
r
v
.
N
e
w
Y
o
r
k
,
4
1
4
U
.
S
.
6
3
2
(
1
9
7
4
)
,
t
h
e
C
48
o
u
r
t
u
n
d
e
r
s
c
o
r
e
d
t
h
a
t
p
o
l
i
c
e
c
o
n
d
u
c
t
w
h
i
c
h
d
i
s
r
u
p
t
s
o
r
d
49
e
t
e
r
s
p
o
l
i
t
i
c
a
l
e
x
p
r
e
s
s
i
o
n
,
e
v
e
n
i
f
o
s
t
e
n
s
i
b
l
y
a
i
m
e
d
a
t
50
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
o
r
d
e
r
,
m
u
s
t
n
o
t
i
n
f
r
i
n
g
e
o
n
t
h
e
c
o
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
i
o
51
n
a
l
r
i
g
h
t
t
o
f
r
e
e
s
p
e
e
c
h
.
M
o
r
e
o
v
e
r
,
W
a
r
d
v
.
R
o
c
k
A
g
a
i
n
s
t
52
R
a
c
i
s
m
,
4
9
1
U
.
S
.
7
8
1
(
1
9
8
9
)
i
l
l
u
s
t
r
a
t
e
s
t
h
a
t
a
n
y
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
53
i
o
n
o
r
e
n
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
a
c
t
i
o
n
m
u
s
t
b
e
c
o
n
t
e
n
t
n
e
u
t
r
a
l
a
n
d
c
a
r
54
e
f
u
l
l
y
t
a
i
l
o
r
e
d
t
o
a
v
o
i
d
s
u
p
p
r
e
s
s
i
n
g
s
p
e
e
c
h
b
a
s
e
d
s
o
l
e
l
55
y
o
n
i
t
s
m
e
s
s
a
g
e
.
T
h
e
s
e
c
a
s
e
s
e
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
t
h
a
t
i
f
p
o
l
i
c
e
o
f
f
56
i
c
e
r
s
s
i
n
g
l
e
o
u
t
i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
c
o
n
t
e
n
t
o
f
t
h
e
i
r
s
p
e
57
e
c
h
o
r
f
o
r
t
h
e
t
o
p
i
c
s
t
h
e
y
p
l
a
n
t
o
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
—
s
u
c
h
a
s
a
d
v
o
c
a
t
58
i
n
g
f
o
r
"
p
s
i
l
o
c
y
b
i
n
m
u
s
h
r
o
o
m
"
d
e
c
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
,
R
e
l
i
59
g
i
o
u
s
F
r
e
e
d
o
m
,
J
e
s
u
s
C
h
r
i
s
t
o
r
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
i
n
g
o
t
h
e
r
p
o
l
i
t
i
c
60
a
l
l
y
c
h
a
r
g
e
d
i
s
s
u
e
s
—
t
h
e
r
e
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
i
n
t
i
m
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
c
a
n
c
o
n
61
s
t
i
t
u
t
e
a
n
i
m
p
e
r
m
i
s
s
i
b
l
e
i
n
f
r
i
n
g
e
m
e
n
t
o
n
F
i
r
s
t
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
62
n
t
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
.
A
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
l
y
,
l
o
w
e
r
c
o
u
r
t
d
e
c
i
s
i
o
n
s
h
63
a
v
e
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
l
y
f
o
u
n
d
t
h
a
t
l
a
w
e
n
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
a
c
t
i
o
n
s
t
h
a
64
t
c
r
e
a
t
e
a
c
h
i
l
l
i
n
g
e
f
f
e
c
t
o
n
p
o
l
i
t
i
c
a
l
p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
i
o
n
a
r
65
e
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
t
o
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
c
r
u
t
i
n
y
.
W
h
e
n
o
f
f
i
c
e
r
s
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
t
h
e
66
m
s
e
l
v
e
s
n
e
a
r
a
s
p
e
a
k
e
r
,
n
o
t
t
o
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
p
u
b
l
i
c
s
a
f
e
t
y
b
u
t
67
t
o
d
e
t
e
r
e
x
p
r
e
s
s
i
o
n
,
i
t
m
a
y
b
e
s
e
e
n
a
s
t
a
r
g
e
t
e
d
h
a
r
a
s
s
m
e
n
68
t
.
I
n
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
2
3
'
s
S
e
a
l
B
e
a
c
h
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
,
M
69
i
k
e
H
.
o
f
p
o
l
i
c
e
s
t
a
f
f
e
n
t
e
r
e
d
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
c
o
70
u
n
c
i
l
c
h
a
m
b
e
r
s
.
H
e
d
e
c
i
d
e
d
t
o
s
i
t
n
e
a
r
m
e
w
h
e
n
t
h
e
c
h
o
i
r
s
a
71
n
g
.
I
n
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
2
4
'
s
S
e
a
l
B
e
a
c
h
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
,
M
72
i
k
e
H
.
e
n
t
e
r
e
d
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
o
n
c
e
a
g
a
i
n
.
H
e
d
e
c
i
d
e
d
t
73
o
s
t
a
n
d
d
i
r
e
c
t
l
y
n
e
x
t
t
o
m
e
d
u
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
A
n
t
h
e
m
a
n
d
74
w
h
e
n
t
h
e
c
h
o
i
r
s
a
n
g
.
A
s
I
w
a
s
i
n
t
w
o
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
l
y
d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
t
p
75
l
a
c
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
r
o
o
m
e
a
c
h
y
e
a
r
,
t
h
i
s
e
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
s
a
p
a
t
t
e
r
n
e
d
76
t
a
r
g
e
t
i
n
g
t
h
a
t
c
o
u
l
d
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
l
y
b
e
v
i
e
w
e
d
a
s
a
p
p
a
r
e
n
t
p
77
o
l
i
c
e
i
n
t
i
m
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
t
h
a
t
c
h
i
l
l
s
m
y
f
r
e
e
s
p
e
e
c
h
b
e
f
o
r
e
m
y
p
78
u
b
l
i
c
c
o
m
m
e
n
t
.
I
n
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
,
N
i
c
k
N
.
a
n
d
Y
o
s
a
o
f
p
o
l
i
c
e
s
t
79
a
f
f
h
a
v
e
e
n
t
e
r
e
d
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
c
o
u
n
c
i
l
c
h
a
m
b
e
80
r
s
d
i
r
e
c
t
l
y
b
e
h
i
n
d
t
h
e
p
o
d
i
u
m
i
n
v
i
e
w
o
f
t
h
e
c
a
m
e
r
a
n
u
m
e
r
o
81
u
s
t
i
m
e
s
.
T
h
i
s
h
a
p
p
e
n
e
d
e
x
a
c
t
l
y
d
u
r
i
n
g
m
y
p
u
b
l
i
c
c
o
m
m
e
n
t
82
,
t
o
t
h
e
p
o
i
n
t
w
h
e
r
e
I
t
o
o
k
t
i
m
e
a
w
a
y
f
r
o
m
m
y
a
l
l
o
t
t
e
d
t
i
m
e
t
83
o
a
c
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
e
t
h
e
r
e
p
e
a
t
e
d
p
a
t
t
e
r
n
.
I
c
a
n
o
n
l
y
a
s
s
u
m
e
t
h
a
84
t
t
h
i
s
w
a
s
a
d
i
r
e
c
t
i
v
e
g
i
v
e
n
b
y
M
i
k
e
H
.
o
f
p
o
l
i
c
e
s
t
a
f
f
d
u
e
t
85
o
h
i
s
b
o
d
y
l
a
n
g
u
a
g
e
a
n
d
t
h
e
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
i
n
t
i
m
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
'
s
r
e
g
86
u
l
a
r
i
t
y
.
“
S
e
t
t
l
e
m
a
t
t
e
r
s
q
u
i
c
k
l
y
w
i
t
h
y
o
u
r
a
d
v
e
r
s
a
r
y
w
87
h
o
i
s
t
a
k
i
n
g
y
o
u
t
o
c
o
u
r
t
.
D
o
i
t
w
h
i
l
e
y
o
u
a
r
e
s
t
i
l
l
t
o
g
e
t
h
e
88
r
o
n
t
h
e
w
a
y
,
o
r
y
o
u
r
a
d
v
e
r
s
a
r
y
m
a
y
h
a
n
d
y
o
u
o
v
e
r
t
o
t
h
e
j
u
d
g
89
e
,
a
n
d
t
h
e
j
u
d
g
e
m
a
y
h
a
n
d
y
o
u
o
v
e
r
t
o
t
h
e
o
f
f
i
c
e
r
,
a
n
d
y
o
u
m
a
90
y
b
e
t
h
r
o
w
n
i
n
t
o
p
r
i
s
o
n
.
T
r
u
l
y
I
t
e
l
l
y
o
u
,
y
o
u
w
i
l
l
n
o
t
g
e
t
o
91
u
t
u
n
t
i
l
y
o
u
h
a
v
e
p
a
i
d
t
h
e
l
a
s
t
p
e
n
n
y
.
"
(
M
a
t
t
h
e
w
5
:
2
5
-
2
6
)
92
א
מ
ן
א
מ
ן
⭼⭽⭾⭿⮀⮁⮂
ၒၓ
⯴⯵⯶
⍾
J
O
8
N
O
n
S
u
n
d
a
y
,
M
a
r
c
h
9
t
h
,
2
0
2
5
a
t
2
:
2
2
A
M
,
J
93
O
8
N
<
J
O
8
N
@
p
r
o
t
o
n
.
m
e
>
w
r
o
t
e
:
D
e
a
r
L
i
s
a
,
N
a
t
h
a
n
,
J
o
e
,
B
e
n
,
P
a
94
t
t
y
,
P
a
t
r
i
c
k
,
M
i
k
e
H
.
,
A
n
d
N
i
c
k
G
.
,
I
a
m
f
o
r
m
a
l
l
y
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
i
n
g
a
c
o
r
r
e
c
95
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
r
e
c
o
r
d
p
u
r
s
u
a
n
t
t
o
t
h
e
B
r
o
w
n
A
c
t
(
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
G
o
v
e
r
96
n
m
e
n
t
C
o
d
e
§
5
4
9
6
0
.
1
)
d
u
e
t
o
m
i
s
l
e
a
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
i
n
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
m
a
97
d
e
b
y
c
i
t
y
s
t
a
f
f
d
u
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
1
0
,
2
0
2
5
S
e
a
l
B
e
a
c
h
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
m
98
e
e
t
i
n
g
.
A
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
l
y
,
I
a
m
r
a
i
s
i
n
g
c
o
n
c
e
r
n
s
r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
a
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
v
99
i
o
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
m
y
F
i
r
s
t
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
r
e
l
i
g
i
o
u
s
r
i
g
h
t
s
i
n
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
a
100
p
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
m
a
d
e
b
y
t
h
e
c
i
t
y
a
t
t
o
r
n
e
y
w
h
e
n
I
p
u
b
l
i
c
l
y
a
n
n
o
u
n
c
101
e
d
m
y
C
h
u
r
c
h
’
s
u
s
e
o
f
"
p
s
i
l
o
c
y
b
i
n
m
u
s
h
r
o
o
m
s
"
a
s
o
n
e
o
f
i
t
s
s
a
c
r
a
m
e
n
t
102
s
.
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
B
r
o
w
n
A
c
t
V
i
o
l
a
t
i
o
n
D
u
r
i
n
g
p
u
b
l
i
c
c
o
m
m
e
n
t
,
I
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
e
103
d
t
h
e
c
o
u
n
c
i
l
r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
d
e
c
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
"
p
s
i
l
o
c
y
b
i
n
m
u
s
h
r
104
o
o
m
s
"
.
A
f
t
e
r
I
h
a
d
f
i
n
i
s
h
e
d
s
p
e
a
k
i
n
g
,
L
i
s
a
a
s
k
e
d
M
i
k
e
H
.
f
r
o
m
p
o
l
i
c
e
s
105
t
a
f
f
a
c
l
a
r
i
f
y
i
n
g
q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
a
b
o
u
t
t
h
e
l
e
g
a
l
s
t
a
t
u
s
o
f
"
p
s
i
l
o
c
y
b
i
n
m
u
s
106
h
r
o
o
m
s
"
.
H
e
r
e
s
p
o
n
d
e
d
b
y
s
t
a
t
i
n
g
t
h
a
t
"
p
s
i
l
o
c
y
b
i
n
m
u
s
h
r
o
o
m
s
"
a
r
e
i
l
107
l
e
g
a
l
u
n
d
e
r
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
l
a
w
b
u
t
f
a
i
l
e
d
t
o
m
e
n
t
i
o
n
t
h
a
t
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e
C
a
l
i
f
108
o
r
n
i
a
c
i
t
i
e
s
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
O
a
k
l
a
n
d
,
S
a
n
F
r
a
n
c
i
s
c
o
,
S
a
n
t
a
C
r
u
z
,
a
n
d
A
r
c
109
a
t
a
,
h
a
v
e
d
e
c
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
i
z
e
d
"
p
s
i
l
o
c
y
b
i
n
m
u
s
h
r
o
o
m
s
"
f
o
r
y
e
a
r
s
.
T
h
i
s
o
110
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
m
i
s
l
e
d
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
n
d
t
h
e
c
o
u
n
c
i
l
b
y
f
a
l
s
e
l
y
i
m
p
l
y
i
n
g
t
h
a
t
l
o
111
c
a
l
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
s
l
a
c
k
t
h
e
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
t
o
d
e
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
z
e
"
p
s
i
l
o
c
y
b
i
n
m
u
s
h
r
112
o
o
m
s
"
e
n
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
,
w
h
i
c
h
i
s
d
e
m
o
n
s
t
r
a
b
l
y
u
n
t
r
u
e
.
T
h
i
s
i
s
n
o
t
t
h
e
f
i
r
113
s
t
t
i
m
e
c
i
t
y
o
f
f
i
c
i
a
l
s
h
a
v
e
e
n
g
a
g
e
d
i
n
m
i
s
l
e
a
d
i
n
g
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
r
e
g
a
r
d
114
i
n
g
"
p
s
i
l
o
c
y
b
i
n
m
u
s
h
r
o
o
m
"
l
a
w
.
O
n
e
y
e
a
r
a
g
o
,
a
f
t
e
r
I
a
n
n
o
u
n
c
e
d
t
h
e
f
o
115
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
m
y
c
h
u
r
c
h
,
w
h
i
c
h
u
s
e
s
"
p
s
i
l
o
c
y
b
i
n
m
u
s
h
r
o
o
m
s
"
,
"
N
,
N
-
D
i
m
e
116
t
h
y
l
t
r
y
p
t
a
m
i
n
e
"
,
a
n
d
"
N
,
N
-
D
M
T
/
M
A
O
I
"
a
s
s
a
c
r
a
m
e
n
t
s
,
t
h
e
c
i
t
y
a
t
t
o
r
117
n
e
y
s
i
m
i
l
a
r
l
y
r
e
s
p
o
n
d
e
d
t
h
a
t
"
p
s
i
l
o
c
y
b
i
n
m
u
s
h
r
o
o
m
s
"
a
r
e
i
l
l
e
g
a
l
u
n
118
d
e
r
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
l
a
w
—
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
a
c
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
i
n
g
r
e
l
i
g
i
o
u
s
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
u
119
n
d
e
r
f
e
d
e
r
a
l
l
a
w
.
F
u
r
t
h
e
r
m
o
r
e
,
b
o
t
h
t
h
e
c
i
t
y
a
t
t
o
r
n
e
y
a
n
d
p
o
l
i
c
e
s
t
120
a
f
f
f
a
i
l
e
d
t
o
d
i
s
c
l
o
s
e
c
r
i
t
i
c
a
l
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
t
h
a
t
I
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
121
e
d
r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
m
y
o
w
n
c
a
s
e
:
I
w
a
s
h
o
s
p
i
t
a
l
i
z
e
d
a
f
t
e
r
c
o
n
s
u
m
i
n
g
a
p
s
y
c
h
e
122
d
e
l
i
c
b
u
t
n
o
t
c
h
a
r
g
e
d
w
i
t
h
a
n
y
c
r
i
m
e
(
w
h
i
c
h
I
a
m
e
t
e
r
n
a
l
l
y
g
r
a
t
e
f
u
l
f
o
123
r
)
a
n
d
a
l
s
o
f
o
u
n
d
i
n
p
o
s
s
e
s
s
i
o
n
o
f
"
p
s
i
l
o
c
y
b
i
n
m
u
s
h
r
o
o
m
s
"
a
n
d
"
N
,
N
-
D
124
M
T
"
w
i
t
h
i
n
S
e
a
l
B
e
a
c
h
.
T
h
e
r
e
p
e
a
t
e
d
o
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
s
b
y
b
o
t
h
t
h
e
c
i
t
y
a
t
t
o
r
n
125
e
y
a
n
d
p
o
l
i
c
e
s
t
a
f
f
c
r
e
a
t
e
d
a
f
a
l
s
e
n
a
r
r
a
t
i
v
e
t
h
a
t
"
p
s
i
l
o
c
y
b
i
n
m
u
s
h
r
126
o
o
m
"
d
e
c
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
h
a
s
n
o
t
b
e
e
n
s
u
c
c
e
s
s
f
u
l
l
y
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
e
d
i
n
s
o
127
m
e
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
c
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
i
g
n
o
r
e
d
k
e
y
e
v
i
d
e
n
c
e
—
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
m
y
o
w
n
e
x
p
e
128
r
i
e
n
c
e
—
s
h
o
w
i
n
g
t
h
a
t
l
o
c
a
l
a
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
i
e
s
h
a
v
e
a
l
r
e
a
d
y
a
d
o
p
t
e
d
c
o
m
p
a
s
129
s
i
o
n
a
t
e
d
e
f
a
c
t
o
d
e
c
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
p
r
a
c
t
i
c
e
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
w
e
l
l
b
e
i
n
g
o
f
r
130
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
.
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
F
i
r
s
t
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
V
i
o
l
a
t
i
o
n
U
n
d
e
r
R
F
R
A
&
G
o
n
z
a
l
131
e
s
v
.
U
D
V
(
2
0
0
6
)
M
y
c
o
n
c
e
r
n
g
o
e
s
b
e
y
o
n
d
t
r
a
n
s
p
a
r
e
n
c
y
v
i
o
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
u
n
d
e
132
r
t
h
e
B
r
o
w
n
A
c
t
.
T
h
e
c
i
t
y
a
t
t
o
r
n
e
y
’
s
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
a
y
e
a
r
a
g
o
,
w
h
e
n
I
a
n
n
o
u
n
133
c
e
d
t
h
e
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
m
y
c
h
u
r
c
h
,
r
a
i
s
e
s
s
e
r
i
o
u
s
q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
s
a
b
o
u
t
w
h
e
t
h
134
e
r
m
y
F
i
r
s
t
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
r
e
l
i
g
i
o
u
s
r
i
g
h
t
s
w
e
r
e
d
i
s
m
i
s
s
e
d
o
r
u
n
d
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
135
i
n
v
i
o
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
R
e
l
i
g
i
o
u
s
F
r
e
e
d
o
m
R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
A
c
t
(
R
F
R
A
)
a
n
d
t
h
e
136
G
o
n
z
a
l
e
s
v
.
O
C
e
n
t
r
o
E
s
p
í
r
i
t
a
B
e
n
e
f
i
c
e
n
t
e
U
n
i
ã
o
d
o
V
e
g
e
t
a
l
(
U
D
V
)
S
u
p
137
r
e
m
e
C
o
u
r
t
c
a
s
e
.
L
e
g
a
l
P
r
e
c
e
d
e
n
t
:
R
e
l
i
g
i
o
u
s
U
s
e
o
f
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
l
e
d
S
u
b
s
138
t
a
n
c
e
s
I
n
G
o
n
z
a
l
e
s
v
.
U
D
V
(
2
0
0
6
)
,
t
h
e
U
.
S
.
S
u
p
r
e
m
e
C
o
u
r
t
r
u
l
e
d
t
h
a
t
a
r
139
e
l
i
g
i
o
u
s
o
r
g
a
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
c
o
u
l
d
l
e
g
a
l
l
y
u
s
e
a
f
e
d
e
r
a
l
l
y
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
l
e
d
s
u
b
140
s
t
a
n
c
e
(
"
a
y
a
h
u
a
s
c
a
"
)
u
n
d
e
r
R
F
R
A
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
,
a
s
t
h
e
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
f
a
i
141
l
e
d
t
o
d
e
m
o
n
s
t
r
a
t
e
a
c
o
m
p
e
l
l
i
n
g
i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
i
n
p
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
i
n
g
i
t
s
r
e
l
i
g
i
o
142
u
s
u
s
e
.
U
n
d
e
r
R
F
R
A
(
4
2
U
.
S
.
C
.
§
2
0
0
0
b
b
-
1
)
,
t
h
e
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
c
a
n
n
o
t
s
u
b
s
143
t
a
n
t
i
a
l
l
y
b
u
r
d
e
n
r
e
l
i
g
i
o
u
s
e
x
e
r
c
i
s
e
u
n
l
e
s
s
i
t
c
a
n
p
r
o
v
e
a
c
o
m
p
e
l
l
i
n
144
g
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
a
n
d
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
i
o
n
i
s
t
h
e
l
e
a
s
t
r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
145
i
v
e
m
e
a
n
s
o
f
a
c
h
i
e
v
i
n
g
t
h
a
t
i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
.
T
h
e
D
E
A
a
n
d
f
e
d
e
r
a
l
c
o
u
r
t
s
h
a
v
e
146
r
e
c
o
g
n
i
z
e
d
t
h
a
t
s
o
m
e
r
e
l
i
g
i
o
u
s
g
r
o
u
p
s
m
a
y
l
e
g
a
l
l
y
u
s
e
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
l
e
d
s
u
147
b
s
t
a
n
c
e
s
l
i
k
e
"
p
e
y
o
t
e
"
a
n
d
"
a
y
a
h
u
a
s
c
a
"
u
n
d
e
r
t
h
e
s
e
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
.
B
y
148
f
a
i
l
i
n
g
t
o
a
c
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
e
t
h
e
s
e
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
w
h
e
n
I
a
n
n
o
u
n
c
e
d
m
y
c
h
u
r
c
h
149
,
t
h
e
c
i
t
y
a
t
t
o
r
n
e
y
o
m
i
t
t
e
d
c
r
i
t
i
c
a
l
l
e
g
a
l
c
o
n
t
e
x
t
,
i
m
p
l
y
i
n
g
t
h
a
t
m
y
150
r
e
l
i
g
i
o
u
s
p
r
a
c
t
i
c
e
w
a
s
c
a
t
e
g
o
r
i
c
a
l
l
y
i
l
l
e
g
a
l
u
n
d
e
r
s
t
a
t
e
l
a
w
—
w
h
e
n
151
i
n
f
a
c
t
,
f
e
d
e
r
a
l
l
a
w
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
p
a
t
h
w
a
y
f
o
r
r
e
l
i
g
i
o
u
s
e
x
e
m
p
t
i
o
n
s
.
T
h
152
i
s
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
s
u
p
p
r
e
s
s
i
o
n
o
f
m
y
r
e
l
i
g
i
o
u
s
e
x
p
r
e
s
s
i
o
n
i
n
a
p
u
b
l
i
c
f
o
r
u
153
m
c
o
u
l
d
b
e
s
e
e
n
a
s
a
v
i
o
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
m
y
F
i
r
s
t
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
r
i
g
h
t
s
.
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
e
154
d
C
o
r
r
e
c
t
i
v
e
A
c
t
i
o
n
s
T
o
r
e
m
e
d
y
t
h
i
s
i
s
s
u
e
,
I
f
o
r
m
a
l
l
y
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
t
h
e
f
o
l
155
l
o
w
i
n
g
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
C
o
r
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
R
e
c
o
r
d
–
T
h
e
c
i
t
y
m
u
s
t
a
c
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
e
156
t
h
e
o
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
a
n
d
i
s
s
u
e
a
f
o
r
m
a
l
c
o
r
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
c
l
a
r
i
f
y
i
n
g
t
h
a
t
:
M
u
l
t
i
p
l
157
e
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
c
i
t
i
e
s
h
a
v
e
a
l
r
e
a
d
y
d
e
c
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
i
z
e
d
"
p
s
i
l
o
c
y
b
i
n
m
u
s
h
r
158
o
o
m
s
"
d
e
s
p
i
t
e
s
t
a
t
e
p
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
i
o
n
.
R
e
l
i
g
i
o
u
s
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
e
x
i
s
t
u
n
d
e
159
r
R
F
R
A
,
a
n
d
t
h
e
U
D
V
c
a
s
e
e
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
t
h
a
t
r
e
l
i
g
i
o
u
s
u
s
e
o
f
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
l
e
d
160
s
u
b
s
t
a
n
c
e
s
m
a
y
b
e
l
e
g
a
l
l
y
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
e
d
u
n
d
e
r
f
e
d
e
r
a
l
l
a
w
.
A
g
e
n
d
a
I
t
e
m
161
f
o
r
F
u
r
t
h
e
r
D
i
s
c
u
s
s
i
o
n
–
G
i
v
e
n
t
h
e
m
i
s
l
e
a
d
i
n
g
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
m
a
d
e
b
y
c
i
t
162
y
o
f
f
i
c
i
a
l
s
,
I
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
c
o
u
n
c
i
l
p
l
a
c
e
"
p
s
i
l
o
c
y
b
i
n
m
u
s
h
r
o
o
m
"
163
d
e
c
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
o
n
a
f
u
t
u
r
e
a
g
e
n
d
a
t
o
e
n
s
u
r
e
t
h
e
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
i
o
n
i
s
b
a
s
164
e
d
o
n
a
c
c
u
r
a
t
e
a
n
d
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
.
A
c
c
o
u
n
t
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
f
o
r
R
e
p
e
a
t
165
e
d
O
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
s
–
T
h
e
c
i
t
y
s
h
o
u
l
d
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
t
r
a
i
n
i
n
g
o
r
p
r
o
c
e
d
u
r
a
l
s
a
f
e
166
g
u
a
r
d
s
t
o
p
r
e
v
e
n
t
c
i
t
y
o
f
f
i
c
i
a
l
s
f
r
o
m
s
e
l
e
c
t
i
v
e
l
y
o
m
i
t
t
i
n
g
k
e
y
l
e
g
a
167
l
a
n
d
f
a
c
t
u
a
l
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
,
e
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
l
y
w
h
e
n
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
i
n
g
t
h
e
c
o
n
t
e
n
t
s
168
o
f
p
u
b
l
i
c
c
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
.
L
e
g
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
o
f
F
i
r
s
t
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
I
m
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
–
T
169
h
e
c
i
t
y
s
h
o
u
l
d
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
t
s
p
u
b
l
i
c
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
p
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
r
170
e
l
i
g
i
o
u
s
u
s
e
o
f
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
l
e
d
s
u
b
s
t
a
n
c
e
s
t
o
e
n
s
u
r
e
c
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
w
i
t
h
R
F
R
171
A
a
n
d
S
u
p
r
e
m
e
C
o
u
r
t
p
r
e
c
e
d
e
n
t
.
L
e
g
a
l
B
a
s
i
s
f
o
r
B
r
o
w
n
A
c
t
C
o
m
p
l
a
i
n
t
172
U
n
d
e
r
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
C
o
d
e
§
5
4
9
6
0
.
1
,
t
h
e
c
i
t
y
h
a
s
3
0
d
a
y
s
t
o
c
o
173
r
r
e
c
t
t
h
i
s
v
i
o
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
r
f
a
c
e
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
l
e
g
a
l
a
c
t
i
o
n
t
o
n
u
l
l
i
f
y
a
n
y
d
e
174
c
i
s
i
o
n
s
m
a
d
e
u
n
d
e
r
m
i
s
l
e
a
d
i
n
g
o
r
i
n
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
.
F
a
i
l
u
r
e
t
175
o
a
c
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
e
a
n
d
c
o
r
r
e
c
t
t
h
i
s
o
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
c
o
u
l
d
b
e
i
n
t
e
r
p
r
e
t
e
d
a
s
a
c
o
n
176
t
i
n
u
e
d
e
f
f
o
r
t
t
o
o
b
s
c
u
r
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
t
r
u
t
h
f
u
l
a
n
d
b
a
l
a
n
c
e
d
i
n
f
o
177
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
,
v
i
o
l
a
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
c
o
r
e
p
r
i
n
c
i
p
l
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
B
r
o
w
n
A
c
t
.
I
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
a
178
w
r
i
t
t
e
n
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
a
c
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
i
n
g
r
e
c
e
i
p
t
o
f
t
h
i
s
l
e
t
t
e
r
a
n
d
o
u
t
l
i
n
i
n
179
g
t
h
e
c
o
r
r
e
c
t
i
v
e
a
c
t
i
o
n
s
t
h
e
c
i
t
y
i
n
t
e
n
d
s
t
o
t
a
k
e
.
I
a
p
p
r
e
c
i
a
t
e
y
o
u
r
a
180
t
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
t
o
t
h
i
s
s
e
r
i
o
u
s
m
a
t
t
e
r
a
n
d
l
o
o
k
f
o
r
w
a
r
d
t
o
y
o
u
r
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
.
181
א
מ
ן
א
מ
ן
⭼⭽⭾⭿⮀⮁⮂
ၒၓ
⯴⯵⯶
⍾
J
O
8
N