Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPublic Comment from JO8NI Just Think The Water Thing Is Inevitable. The City Is Being Forced To Ship In Water At High Cost Already. I Am Concerned About The Well Closest To The Coast Due To Saltwater Intrusion, So I Hope That Is Not A Bad Investment In The Longer Term Future. I Am Concerned With The Burden On College Park East's Water System Given The New Developments In Los Alamitos And The Proposed Development In The Seal Beach Housing Element. I Am Sad If Any Leisure World Resident Truly Cannot Afford The Water Increases Rather Than Simply Being Inconvenienced. Is There Potential To Micro-flnance Scholarships Or Grants To Residents In Need? I Agree With My Neighbor That The Naval Weapons Station Is Not Contributing Equally When You Really Think About Water Rates And Land Development Potential. I Do Not Attribute Malice As They Are Clearly Busy Doing Their Own Thing. Could My Proposed Medical Facility Be A Beneflcial Solution For All Parties? Does Anyone Else Have Any Big Picture Proposals/Ideas They Are Willing To Share In City Council Meetings? For The Water Thing, I Would Have Liked To See Words Like Inter- District Equity Guarantee Or Rate Stabilization Reserve To Make Residents Feel More Comfortable. Inter District Equity Guarantee: Embedding a pro rata surplus sharing covenant in the master service agreement automatically redistributes any revenues above debt service, reserve targets, and operating margins among the flve co located districts based on their proportional usage, with annual reconciliation overseen by a joint technical committee. Rate Stabilization Reserve: Establishing a dedicated reserve that requires deposits of revenues exceeding budgeted expenses, debt obligations, and a modest operating margin smooths customer rates across flscal cycles, with withdrawals for rate relief, capital needs, or emergencies authorized by supermajority board vote and disclosed in an annual public report. Could The Anduril And Saronic Technologies Be Used in dual purpose civilian/military cooperation? For Example, cleaning up the garbage in the San Gabriel River or shipping sand onto our beaches? Surely, this would beneflt them as well being able to collect data mapping the coast/have clearer lines of sight/go through training exercises pretending the trash is a target/shipping aid across the world/etc. I See And Appreciate How The City Council Agenda Is Clickable And Goes To The Timestamp Where The Item Was Addressed In The City Council Meeting Video. Thank You. Both Republicans And Democrats Weaponize Terrible Processes For Their Own Propaganda Rather Than Fixing The Process Itself. This is How Blockchain Could End Voter Fraud Forever (14:19) - Charles Hoskinson & Shaun Ryan https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8rt_up6Yrgg The Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GENIUS_Act Money Talks - David Graeber https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0sGWsZIWbU David Graeber on a Fair Future Economy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YynqVvgZYI Secrecy strategies: Global patterns in elites’ quest for confldentiality in offshore flnance https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0326228 build your own encrypted, off-grid radio network with the Hytera HR652 DMR repeater https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JntdvDhmx8I there's already a uci health in los alamitos, maybe they would be open to contributing to building something across the street from leisure world with navy, csulb, and tongva/kizh/gabrielino holistically https://news.uci.edu/2025/07/21/uc-irvine-tapped-to-bring-psychedelic-therapy- education-to-nursing-students/ This company in santa cruz/watsonville grows sungrown and greenhouse with very affordable prices; i have not tried their product yet myself so I can't give my cosign, but they also grow blueberries and potentially other crops with a holistic approach https://www.coastalsunfarm.com/ Gavin Newsom - Governor of California | SRS #218 @2:12:52 Psychedelics Discussion (Medical Supervision Alone Being Treated As The Ideal Solution Without Decriminalization Is Dangerously Uninformed And Destroys The Possibility Of Holistic Societal Healing - Look At The State Of Our Medical System Currently, Look At The Criminality Of The Pharmaceutical Industry, Look How Unaffordable/Long The Waitlist Is For Treatment In Oregon - Why Should The Same Mental Health Providers/Government Who Have Largely Pushed Extended Use Of Antidepressants/Benzodiazepines/ADHD/Etc. And Created A Terrible Legal Cannabis Regulatory Framework Be Rewarded For Their Ineffective Treatment Strategies? How Will The Current Medical System Help Someone Integrate A Religious Experience? Religion, Local, And Native Culture/Ecology Must Be Involved. I Think There Is A Dangerous Faction That Want To Make A New “Scientiflc” Priestly Class Of Perennialists With Exclusive, Expensive Degrees/Programs Sanctioning Legal Access To Entheogens. They Are Not Religion.) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BBq3Q_fHSU 
 https://www.psychedelicpassage.com/ (Sinfully Scientiflcally Named) Psilocybe Allenii – Observed Growing Naturally In Anaheim, California (Gabrieleño Tribal Territory) https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/243703004 (Sinfully Scientiflcally Named) Psilocybe Ovoideocystidiata – Observed Growing Naturally In Huntington Beach, California (Gabrieleño Tribal Territory) https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/267154893 (Sinfully Scientiflcally Named) Psilocybe Allenii – Observed Growing Naturally In Los Angeles, California (Gabrieleño Tribal Territory) https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/4676262 (Sinfully Scientiflcally Named) Psilocybe Cyanescens – Observed Growing Naturally In Los Angeles, California (Gabrieleño Tribal Territory) https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/41867522 Psychedelic Mushrooms in Africa - Hamilton Morris https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPs4sr1aeoY The country’s flrst mushroom casket was buried last week in rural Maine https://www.pressherald.com/2025/06/04/the-countrys-flrst-mushroom-casket-was- buried-last-week-in-rural-maine/ Weed & Wine (FULL FILM)https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbU1p2-Q2m0 Is There A Darkness Retreat In Seal Beach? This Could Be Healing For Local First Responders/Military/Elderly/Mental Health/Explorers/Etc. 1. If Darkness Retreats Produce DMT, Have You Given Thought To DMTx In Relation To The 9 Month Darkness Of The Womb? 2. Given DMT's Effect On Neuroplasticity And The Environment's Effects On Epigenetic Inheritance, Could DMT Be The Substrate Through Which The Environment Communicates Non-sensory/Extrasensory Information For The Developing Fetus? ビシビシ JO8N On Monday, July 14th, 2025 at 3:05 PM, JO8N <JO8N@proton.me> wrote: “Real-time opportunities for the public to address the board are required” - Even Though AB 2449 Is Addressing Teleconferencing, “Real-time” Applies To In Person Attendance As Well. https://www.rwglaw.com/media/publication/102_Nick%20- %20CSDA%20Article%20AB%202449.pdf Is There An Up To Date Attorney Contract With Hourly Rate Available? Regardless, I Think It Should Be Re-negotiated To Include Additional Extra Hours Free Of Charge To Exclusively Pursue Creative Legal Frameworks Given Public AI Legal Tools To Roughly Sketch And The Uniquely Local Opportunities The City Can Provide (Regulatory Innovation, Adaptive Governance, Municipal Entrepreneurship, Legal Entrepreneurship, Home-Rule Experimentation, Regulatory Sandboxing, Collaborative Lawmaking, Strategic Preemption Navigation, Outcome-Based Regulation, Interjurisdictional Micro -Grants, Etc.). Is The Contract With The Firm, Not The Speciflc Attorney? If So, I Think The City Should Also Pursue These Creative Legal Frameworks With Access To The Entire Firm’s Staff. https://www.sealbeachca.gov/Portals/0/Documents/Human%20Resources/Labor%20Agr eements/City%20Attorney%20Contract.pdf?ver=2020-06-12-080752-477 We don't know what's happening with forests: ESA Imaging Satellite https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YfqvsVgtThQ https://www.esa.int/Applications/Observing_the_Earth/Space_for_our_climate/ESA_unveil s_longest-ever_dataset_on_forest_biomass How Water Makes This Town Flood-Proof | WSJ Pro Perfected https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mv_IiESpyY What is Going on with California’s Water!? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVaQiEkSkFY Could Puquios/Qanat be used in our modern water systems? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puquios
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qanat Is there any risk of saltwater intrusion into our well, as over pumping in northern california has caused? https://cawaterlibrary.net/document/increasing-threat-of-coastal-groundwater-hazards- from-sea-level-rise-in-california/ Sage Pressure Geothermal Energy - Able To Use Old Oil Wells Like In Seal Beach? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4gLxHTqdX4 Fervo Energy Announces Technology Breakthrough in Next-Generation Geothermal 2023 https://fervoenergy.com/fervo -energy-announces-technology-breakthrough-in-next- generation-geothermal/ Panthalassa Ocean-2, a full-scale prototype deployed off the Washington coast scalable to Terrawatts https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7Pmgq2JKbI 2025: The end of our world as we know it | Peter Leyden (I agree with the premise, but i disagree with his conclusion; I think its flnancial capitalism —> universal basic income flxing time poverty for government participation creating more fair capitalism; representative democracy —> direct liquid democracy with no one getting to write their name on the ballot decreasing power of parties/political action commitees; and nation states —> global psychedelic religions forming a global flrst amendment, which the state must submit to, Under GOD) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zoCpFfOH04 Our City Council Should Be Voting To Make Political Proclamations With All 5 In Agreement Like: Massive, thousand page omnibus appropriations bills from Democrats And Republicans undermine transparency by denying both members and the public adequate time to review each provision—and to understand how special interest PAC funding or donor commitments may have shaped them (GovExec). Critics note that this “broken” process, in which Congress bundles dozens of unrelated measures into a single package, precludes meaningful public input and masks the true costs and infiuences behind each policy choice (Manhattan Institute). https://www.govexec.com/management/2025/05/top -democrats-congress-decry-white- house-lack-transparency-spending-plans/405643/ https://manhattan.institute/article/the-omnibus-spending-bill-is-symptomatic-of-a- broken-congress How "Non-Proflts" Are Scamming America -501c3 501c4 527 PAC, NGOs Lose 5% To Fraud https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZmvQcq0yP0 Foreign Agents Registration Act https://www.justice.gov/nsd-fara Rep. Massie Introduces Legislation Requiring Political Candidates to Disclose Dual Citizenship https://massie.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=395713 Nuclear Information Project with the Federation of American Scientists in Washington, DC On Israel; stockpile of roughly 90 warheads ; not part of the Non Proliferation Treaty and does not undergo UN inspection???????? https://thebulletin.org/premium/2022-01/nuclear-notebook-israeli-nuclear-weapons- 2022/ Departments Should Be More Integrated Rather Than Fighting For Budget - Polymaths - I Propose once a week/month (day can be voted on), department to department trade of staff members - (pay is the same for the staff members, and in any emergency, everyone goes back to their rightful place); also, a once a month where department heads bring up one problem/innovation they are stuck/interested in, and the other department heads have to give their opinions through the perspective of that speciflc department head as if it is a debate and they are for it and the speciflc department head must act as if they are against it https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20191118-what-shapes-a-polymath---and-do-we- need-them-more-than-ever UNODC World Drug Report 2025: Global instability compounding social,
economic and security costs of the world drug problem https://www.unodc.org/unodc/press/releases/2025/June/unodc-world-drug-report-2025_- global-instability-compounding-social--economic-and-security-costs-of-the-world-drug- problem.html Typo Pg 19 https://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and- analysis/WDR_2025/WDR25_B1_Key_flndings.pdf World Drug Report 2025 https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/world-drug-report-2025.html Overprescribed Youth “ADHD Treatment” In The United States Is A Gateway To Methamphetamine/Amphetamine/Cocaine IMO https://www.adhdadvisor.org/learn/adhd-statistics-and-facts https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/72/wr/mm7213a1.htm The Crumbling Business of Marijuana - (Seal Beach Sun Grown On Kizh/Tongva/Gabrielino Land With Locals/Natives, Only City Tax No State/Federal Ever, Limited Designated Smoking/Consumption Cafe Locations, And Consumption Laws Equal To Alcohol In Restaurants —> Native/Locally Grown Entheogens With Veteran/Active Duty Therapy For Naval Weapons Station, End Of Life Palliative Care For Leisure World, And Working With Cal State Long Beach Researchers) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=niQ7mk13xew Programming Using AI https://v0.dev/ Erebor Crypto Bank - USD Stablecoin for Seal Beach City overseen by Seal Beach Police creating unmatched security with biometric conflrmation only to be usable for shopping locally, especially secure for vulnerable Leisure World residents —> have ownership of all local data storage able to be leveraged —> using same underlying technology, have separate local resident political system to eventually have direct liquid democracy https://www.reuters.com/business/tech-billionaires-led-by-palmer-luckey-launch-new- bank-rival-svb-ft-reports-2025-07-02/ building on social media sites is on rented land vs building on email/city website is on land you own —> same goes for data storage An open source, off-grid, decentralized, mesh network built to run on affordable, low- power devices (Uses bluetooth I believe; possible use in emergencies?) https://meshtastic.org/ Harvard Professor Explains The Rules of Writing — Steven Pinker https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBQPnvmaNcE Money Did Not Come From Barter - It Came From Blood Feuds- L. Randall Wray https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-D5FERQzU4 Why Mushrooms are Starting to Replace Some Things https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jI2LC3WTryw ‘Too Much Going On’: Autistic Adults Overwhelmed by Nonverbal Social Cues https://drexel.edu/news/archive/2025/July/Autistic-Adults-Overwhelmed-by-Nonverbal- Social-Cues JO8N On Monday, July 14th, 2025 at 2:49 PM, JO8N <JO8N@proton.me> wrote: Dear GOD: I Write To Notify The Seal Beach People Of Multiple Serious Legal Violations Committed By Attorney And Police During Multiple Seal Beach City Council Meetings, And To Demand Immediate Remedial Action. My Claims Are Fully Documented By Audio/Video Recordings, Public Eyewitnesses, And Written Correspondence. I Request A Written Response Immediately From The Date Of This Letter, As You Have Ignored All My Previous Email Requests For Response, In Denial Of THE SPIRIT. I. Constitutional Violations – Police Intimidation And Chilling Of Free Speech 1. Police Intimidation Violating My 1st Amendment Right By Chilling Free Speech At Public Assemblies Repeatedly Due To Viewpoint Discrimination Before/During My Public Comments Has Been Taking Place For Years: (A) Directing An Officer To Use A Police Dog To Speciflcally Target My Person/Belongings/Scent Without A Warrant Or Reasonable Suspicion Of A Crime Additionally Violating My 4th Amendment Right, (B) Directing An Officer To Move Behind The Sight Line Of The Camera To Sit In The Public Audience Exactly When I Gave My Public Comment, (C) Physically Moving Directly Next To My Person In The Public Audience Section Before My Public Comments At Two Separate December Meetings In Order To Add Extra Intimidation During The Pressure Of Much Greater Audience Attendance Than Usual, High Ranking Government Officials’ Attendance, And Holiday Performances, (D) Suggesting/Telling Me Not To Write My Name Down In Order To Be Called Upon To Give My Public Comment. 2. Such Targeted, Repeated Shows Of Force In Plain View Of Camera And Attendees Constitute Unlawful First Amendment Retaliation And Intimidation In Violation Of The United States And California Constitutions, Including The Tom Bane Civil Rights Act (Cal. Civ. Code § 52.1). II. Brown Act Violations – Disruptive Responses Directly To My Public Comments 1. By Discussing My Public Comment On The Record Without First Placing It On A Publicly Noticed Agenda And Giving Me A Chance To Respond, The Lawyer Engaged In Unauthorized Discussion Of A Non Agendized Item, A Clear Violation Of Gov. Code § 54954.2. The Disruption Denied The Validity Of My Public Comment Regarding My Church’s Sacramental Use Of The Flesh And Blood Of JESUS CHRIST (Sinfully Scientiflcally Named Psilocybin Mushrooms)—A Legally Protected Religious Practice—Thereby Engaging In Viewpoint Discrimination In Direct Contravention Of Gov. Code § 54954.3 By Misfeasance In Office (Misusing Lawful Authority), Misrepresentation By Omission (Fraudulent Concealment) Of Material Facts, And Acting Ultra Vires (Beyond Lawful Authority). The Attorney Issued A Blanket Legal Statement Asserting That “Psilocybin Mushrooms”— Referred To By Their Non-Religious, Sinfully Scientiflc, Secular Name—“Are Illegal In California.” This Statement Was Delivered Without Addressing The Constitutional Protections Afforded To My Religious Practice, And Was Made In Direct Response To My Public Comment Of Religious Liberty Concerning The Flesh And Blood Of JESUS CHRIST. This Disruptive, Unlawful Response To My Public Comment Effectively Undermined The Legitimacy Of My Sincerely Held Religious Beliefs And Sacramental Use Of JESUS CHRIST's Flesh And Blood. It Promoted A Preference For Traditional Or Mainstream Interpretations Over Nontraditional Spiritual Practices. It Also Violated The Establishment Clause And Free Exercise Clause Of The First Amendment To The United States Constitution, Which Together Prohibit Government Hostility Toward Minority Religious Practices, Government Endorsement Of One Religious Interpretation Over Another, Interference With Religious Expression In A Public Forum, And The Chilling Of Protected Religious Speech. Furthermore, The Attorney Omitted Critical Legal Context, Implying That My Religious Practice Was Categorically Illegal Under State Law—When In Fact, The Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) And The Gonzales V. O Centro Espírita Beneflcente União Do Vegetal (UDV) Supreme Court Decision Provide A Clear And Recognized Pathway For Religious Exemption To Controlled Substance Laws. The UDV Case Affirmed That A Sincere Religious Use Of A Federally Controlled Substance May Not Be Prohibited Without The Government Meeting The Highest Level Of Legal Justiflcation—Known As Strict Scrutiny. The Burden Is On The Government To Show A Compelling Interest And That It Has Chosen The Least Restrictive Means To Advance That Interest. By Failing To Disclose This Legal Framework, The Attorney Not Only Misled The Public, But Also Attempted To Dismiss My Constitutionally Protected Religious Rights Through Misrepresentation And Selective Omission (Fraudulent Concealment). This Public Statement, Issued By A Government Official In A Civic Forum, Not Only Dismissed The Spiritual Framework I Had Explicitly Articulated, But Also Attempted To Reframe My Protected Religious Exercise As A Criminal, Secular Matter—Thus Chilling My Religious Speech, Discrediting The Legitimacy Of My Sacrament, And Reinforcing State Entanglement With Religious Interpretation, Contrary To The Principle Of Government Neutrality In Religious Matters. 2. At The Council’s Request For Additional Information Concerning My Comment, Police Misrepresented The Legality Of Secular Psilocybin Mushrooms In California, Fraudulently Concealing Successful Decriminalization Mandates In The California Cities Of Oakland, Santa Cruz, Arcata, Berkeley, And San Francisco, Thereby Misleading The Council In Breach Of Gov. Code § 54954.2 And § 54954.3, And Committing Ultra Vires (Beyond Lawful Authority) Misfeasance In Office. III. Procedural Rule Making And Ultra Vires Acts Regarding The “Well” 1. The Boundary Of The “Well” Is Neither Deflned In State Law Nor Codifled In Local Ordinance To My Knowledge; It Is A Purely Procedural Matter For Council Action. Despite Repeated Requests For The Speciflc Municipal Code Section Authorizing Any Such Boundary, None Exists. 2. Police And Attorney Unilaterally Expanded The Logical And Symmetrical Boundaries Of The “Well” Beyond Any Council-Adopted Rule To Contract The Public Area Unlawfully—An Ultra Vires Act And Clear Misfeasance In Office. Wells Are Round, The Symmetrical City Clerk’s Desk Is Clearly A Public Area With Forms To Fill Out, And Logically There Is Clearly A Public Trashcan Outside The Police Desk That I Never Went Beyond. This Police And Attorney Action Amounts To Abuse Of Process, Misrepresentation Of Law, And Abuse Of Authority. IV. Defamation And Abuse Of Qualifled Privilege 1. When I Sought To Speak In Order To Correct The Fraudulent Concealment In The Record (II.2.), I Peacefully Stood Outside The “Well” In A Public Area. After Being Told To Move Because I Was In The “Well”, I Did Not Move, So I Requested A Written Memorandum Of The “Well” Boundaries From The City Municipal Code. Instead, The Attorney Sent Me And Three Other Government Employees A Letter Maliciously Defaming My Character By Falsely Alleging I Was “Intimidating” “Police”, “Disrupting” The City Council Meeting, And Refusing A “Lawful Order”. Because I Was Peacefully Standing In A Clearly Public Area Keeping My Body To Myself Gesturing And Whispering In Active Listening To The City Council Meeting (With No Action By Council To Remove Me Or Claim Disruption), Attempting To Follow The Public Participation Procedure Of An Agendized Discussion Pursuant To The Brown Act To Correct The Fraudulent Concealment In The Record (II.2.), And Refusing An Unlawful Order Not In The City Municipal Code Or Given By City Council, The Entire Attorney Letter Is Illogical Malicious Defamation Designed To Intimidate, Chilling My Free Speech. I Have Not Returned In Person To City Council Since I Do Not Trust The Hostile Environment Created Through Maliciously, Falsely Labeling Me A Person “Intimidating” “Police”. In Addition, As I Was Simultaneously Publicly Criticizing The New Enforcement Of The Daylighting Parking Law Without Painted Curbs, My Free Speech Is Clearly Protected By Gov. Code § 54954.3 (c): The Legislative Body Of A Local Agency Shall Not Prohibit Public Criticism Of The Policies, Procedures, Programs, Or Services Of The Agency, Or Of The Acts Or Omissions Of The Legislative Body. 2. This Written Accusation—Sent To Me And Three Government Employees—Constitutes Libel Per Se, An Abuse Of Qualifled Privilege, Intimidation Chilling My Free Speech, Creating A Hostile Environment, And Actual Malice, Causing Harm To My Reputation And Giving Rise To A Defamatory Tort Action Seeking Injunctive Relief. V. Demand For Relief Accordingly, I Hereby Demand That The Seal Beach Government Immediately: 1. Investigate And Correct Any Unlawful Intimidation Tactics Used By Police And Attorney To Chill My Free Speech, Including Blocking My Email Messages To Government Officials And Staff In Late 2024, Cited On The Record Of A City Council Meeting. 2. Retract The Attorney’s Defamatory Allegations In Writing And Issue A Corrective Notice To All Recipients, Cited On The Record Of A City Council Meeting. 3. Provide The Speciflc Municipal Code Section Describing The “Well” Boundary Or Formally Adopt One Via Council Resolution, Cited On The Record Of A City Council Meeting. 4. Cease And Desist Further Illegal Brown Act Violations, Restore Viewpoint Neutrality Through Correction Of The Record To Include Previously Omitted Information, And Legally Agendize Public Discussion Of The (Sinfully Scientiflcally Named) Psilocybin Mushroom For Secular Local Decriminalization In Order To Equally Welcome And Respect Everyone’s First Amendment Rights. 5. Implement Training For All Government Officials And Staff Through Reading This Entire Letter, Cited On The Record Of A City Council Meeting. VI. If You Fail To Respond In Writing Immediately Or Refuse To Remedy These Violations, I Will Consider Pursuing All Available Administrative And Judicial Remedies, Including But Not Limited To: 1. Filing A Formal Brown Act Complaint With The County District Attorney And Attorney General. 2. Initiating A Civil Rights Action Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 And The Tom Bane Civil Rights Act (Cal. Civ. Code § 52.1) Up To $25,000. 3. Filing A Defamation Lawsuit For Libel Per Se Up To $25,000. 4. Seeking Injunctive Relief, Damages, And Attorney’s Fees. 5. Lastly, I Am Under No Obligation To Prove My Religious Exemption Through Any Man Made Legal Mechanisms Unless And Until I Deem The Matter Ripe. My Exercise Of Faith Exists Prior To And Beyond Civil Authorization, As Declared In The Declaration Of Independence, Protected By The United States Constitution, And Recognized By Legal Precedent. This Is Anchored In The Foundational Principle That Religious Liberty Is An Inalienable Right, Not A Privilege Bestowed Or Regulated At The Discretion Of Any Government. Peace And Love To Everyone That Lives And Works In Seal Beach. Very Truly GOD’s, JO8N On Monday, June 23rd, 2025 at 3:29 PM, JO8N <JO8N@proton.me> wrote: Psilocybin Mushrooms in Their Natural Habitats - by Paul Stamets https://www.target.com/p/psilocybin-mushrooms-in-their-natural-habitats-by-paul- stamets/-/A -94272297 Waska: the cost of spiritual healing in the Amazon https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jG6B0o1QfQ This Deadly Drug Can Also Erase Addiction ‘Virtually Overnight’ | WSJ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBz2TTEdFSs Two Videos Above Are Why I Advocate For Locally Grown And Facilitated GOD Given Medicine. Marcus Finnie | The Art of Listening Drum Clinic https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oimZ5dzewic The REAL Danger Of The Post WWII Consensus And Is It Too Late? | Jonathan Pageau https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ug88C6Zgcs See the stunning flrst images from the Vera C. Rubin Observatory https://www.technologyreview.com/2025/06/23/1119129/flrst-images-vera-c-rubin- observatory/ Why That Scary Statistic Might Not Mean What You Think – Understanding Scientiflc Risk and Probability in the Media https://caveatscientia.com/2025/04/02/why-that-scary-statistic-might-not-mean-what- you-think-understanding-scientiflc-risk-and-probability-in-the-media/ Cancers can be detected in the bloodstream three years prior to diagnosis https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/newsroom/news-releases/2025/06/cancers-can- be-detected-in-the-bloodstream-three-years-prior-to-diagnosis Students For Sensible Drug Policy - Just Say Know Drug Education https://ssdp.org/our-work/just-say-know/ D.A.R.E. Drug Abuse Resistance Education T.R.U.T.H. Teaching Responsibility Uniting Trusted Healers I'll Let You Know How Its Going With A Lawyer, JO N On Monday, June 9th, 2025 at 10:53 PM, JO8N <JO8N@proton.me> wrote: Record High: Study Finds Growing Cannabis Use Among Older Adults (7% Of 9500 = ~665 Residents Of Leisure World May Have Used Cannabis In The Last Month; Assuming A Rough Conservative Guess Of 1/4 Oz Usage Per Month Per Currently Using Resident @ $40 Per Month For Locals = $319,200 And Potential For Deferring Leisure World Water Increase To Cannabis They Are Likely Already Buying That Goes Exclusively To Paying For Water/Sewer (Are Leisure World Residents Even Allowed To Grow Cannabis?); Ability For Cannabis Grower To Negotiate Volumetric Water Rate With Increased Usage For Growing https://www.nyu.edu/about/news-publications/news/2025/june/cannabis-use-older- adults.html Superwood is Here! This Amazing New Material Could Change The World! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n4-v3ntYZAs MIT engineers develop a new battery-free solar desalination system, capable of producing up to 5,000 liters of water per day > a solution for remote areas https://ecoinventos.com/nuevo-sistema-de-desalinizacion-solar-sin-baterias-capaz-de- producir-hasta-5000-litros-de-agua-al-dia/ Dietary Sugar Intake and Incident Type 2 Diabetes Risk: A Systematic Review and Dose- Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2161831325000493 KILL Every Mosquito In Your Whole Yard | GUARANTEED SAFE METHOD For 1 Gallon Mosquito Spray Repellent: (*In this video I made for 4 gallons) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oBPWGPmpE40&t=741s The Delivery Drones Are Finally Here https://www.fiyzipline.com/
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAh-zCpmERY "It's Happening Now" - The Unstoppable Threat: Inside the Sinaloa Cartel's Unstoppable Submarine War (Ironclad) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-3CP0aTETak Dino Mavrookas - Fmr. Navy SEAL (DEVGRU) / CEO of Saronic Technologies | SRS #205 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJsbSC20Gv0 GPS devices, trackers, and other Iridium satellite communicators https://www.iridium.com/product-type/personal-communicators-messengers-trackers/ Please Forward The Following To Dave Min: Psilocybin-assisted treatment for alcohol dependence: a proof-of-concept study https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25586396/ Part 1: Korea’s Magic Mushrooms 한국의 환각버섯 https://medium.com/%40Hong_Gildong/part-1-koreas-magic-mushrooms- %ED%95%9C%EA%B5%AD%EC%9D%98- %ED%99%98%EA%B0%81%EB%B2%84%EC%84%AF-b5259491d35d Current situation regarding psychedelics and magic mushroom in Korea https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11862319/ Hong (2021) The Psychoactive Mushrooms of Korea https://www.scribd.com/document/617371685/Hong-2021-The-Psychoactive- Mushrooms-of-Korea Magic mushrooms are woven into the historical and contemporary cultural fabric of Korea. There are many Korean fables regarding the 웃음버섯 (useum beoseot), or laughter mushroom. The famous Korean mycologist 조덕현Dr. Cho Duck-Hyun wrote an excellent paper on the legends of poisonous and magic mushrooms in Korea titled 독버섯의 비밀, or The Secret of Poison Mushrooms. It’s only available in Korean language, but I highly recommend reading it if you can get it translated. You can flnd it here: http://www.kacn.org/data/story/500403.pdf My favorite account in Dr. Cho’s paper is an ancient story in which nuns at a Korean Buddhist monastery go mushroom hunting in the mountains around the monastery. They combine all their mushrooms into a big pot of soup and become wildly intoxicated after consuming the soup. In contemporary times, magic mushrooms occasionally appear as plot devices in Korean television shows. For example, in one episode of the Korean drama 푸른거탑, or Blue Tower, an army platoon was stricken with uncontrollable laughter and hallucinations after consuming wild “laughter mushrooms.” You can watch the 2-part episode on YouTube: Part 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x6KcxYzWT8w Part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PeaRDTCcKo (Note: viewers outside Korea might need a VPN linked to Korea to watch the videos) The local Korean names of magic mushrooms often reveal the social attitudes towards these mushrooms from 미치광이버섯속 or “maniac mushroom” for the Gymnopilus genus and 환각버섯속 or “hallucinogen mushroom” for the Psilocybe genus, as well as “laughter mushroom” for some Gymnopilus and Panaeolus species. Despite the cultural signiflcance of magic mushrooms in Korea, international mushroom literature demonstrate a limited knowledge of magic mushrooms native to Korea. Gastón Guzmán’s “A Worldwide Geographical Distribution of Neurotropic Fungi”, which is one of the biggest global reviews of magic mushrooms, only lists four magic mushrooms from Korea and the famous book “Psilocybian Mushrooms of the World” by Paul Stamets makes no mention of Korea. In neighboring Japan, on the other hand, Guzman mentions 28 potential magic mushrooms and Stamets cites 10. Such inconsistencies likely stem from a number of factors, including limited access to or familiarity with Korean sources, and a comparatively larger breadth of relevant Japanese sources. Nevertheless, Korean mycological sources do mention the existence of numerous, potentially magic mushrooms in Korea. In upcoming blogs, I will investigate and review 26 potentially magic mushrooms found in Korea. There is a lot of interesting and exciting information to be shared, and I hope to set the record straight! Are We Going To Have A Proclamation For Every Ethnicity And Religion? JO8N On Monday, May 26th, 2025 at 3:04 PM, JO8N <JO8N@proton.me> wrote: This Is Your Final Warning. Fear GOD. Legal Action Will Be Considered If The Public Record Is Not Corrected Through These Acknowledgments During The Seal Beach City Council Meeting On 5/27/25: 1. I Request Public Acknowledgment Of Ongoing Seal Beach Police Intimidation To Chill My 1st Amendment Right To Free Speech At Public Assemblies Because Of Viewpoint Discrimination Before/During My Public Comments For Years And Guarantee Of An Immediate End To These Behaviors Or Similar: (A) Directing An Officer To Use A Police Dog To Speciflcally Target My Person/Belongings/Scent Without A Warrant Or Reasonable Suspicion Of A Crime Additionally Violating My 4th Amendment Right (B) Directing An Officer To Move Behind The Sight Line Of The Camera To Sit In The Public Audience Exactly When I Go Up To Give My Public Comment (C) Physically Moving Directly Next To My Person In The Public Audience Section Before Public Comments At Two Separate December Meetings In Order To Give Me Extra Intimidation During The Pressure Of Greater Audience Attendance Than Usual And Holiday Performances (D) Suggesting/Telling Me Not To Write My Name Down In Order To Be Called Upon To Give My Public Comment 2. I Request Public Acknowledgment Of A Previous Lie By Omission From Seal Beach Police Stating That Psilocybin Mushrooms Are Completely Illegal In California And A Correction Of The Record Stating The Whole Truth That The California Cities Of Oakland, Santa Cruz, Arcata, Berkeley, And San Francisco Have Successfully Mandated Personal Use And Possession Of Certain Psychedelics As The Lowest Law Enforcement Priority. 3. I Request Public Acknowledgment Of The City Attorney's Failure To Recognize At Best And Complicit Encouragement At Worst Of The Ongoing Seal Beach Police Intimidation Speciflcally Directed At Me, A ~27 Year Resident. 4. I Hereby Request A Public Acknowledgment From The City Attorney Regarding Prior Acts Of Omission And Potential Violations Of My First Amendment Rights. Speciflcally, These Violations Occurred Immediately After I Publicly Announced The Religious Nature Of My Practice And The Founding Of My Church. Following This Declaration, The City Attorney Issued A Blanket Legal Statement Asserting That Psilocybin Mushrooms—Referred To By Their Non-Religious, Secular Name—Are “Illegal In California.” This Statement Was Delivered Without Addressing The Constitutional Protections Afforded To Religious Practice, And Was Made In Direct Response To My Religious Expression Invoking The Name Of JESUS CHRIST. This Action Effectively Undermined The Legitimacy Of My Sincerely Held Religious Beliefs And Sacramental Use Of JESUS CHRIST's Flesh And Blood. It Promoted A Preference For Traditional Or Mainstream Christian Interpretations Over Nontraditional Or Indigenous Spiritual Practices. It Also Violated The Establishment Clause And Free Exercise Clause Of The First Amendment To The United States Constitution, Which Together Prohibit Government Hostility Toward Minority Religious Practices, Government Endorsement Of One Religious Interpretation Over Another, Interference With Religious Expression In A Public Forum, And The Chilling Of Protected Religious Speech. Furthermore, The City Attorney Omitted Critical Legal Context, Implying That My Religious Practice Was Categorically Illegal Under State Law—When In Fact, The Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) And The Gonzales V. O Centro Espírita Beneflcente União Do Vegetal (UDV) Supreme Court Decision Provide A Clear And Recognized Pathway For Religious Exemption To Controlled Substance Laws. The UDV Case Affirmed That A Sincere Religious Use Of A Federally Controlled Substance May Not Be Prohibited Without The Government Meeting The Highest Level Of Legal Justiflcation—Known As Strict Scrutiny. The Burden Is On The Government To Show A Compelling Interest And That It Has Chosen The Least Restrictive Means To Advance That Interest. By Failing To Disclose This Legal Framework, The City Attorney Not Only Misled The Public, But Also Attempted To Dismiss My Constitutionally Protected Religious Rights Through Misrepresentation And Selective Omission. This Public Statement, Issued By A Government Official In A Civic Forum, Not Only Dismissed The Spiritual Framework I Had Explicitly Articulated, But Also Attempted To Reframe My Protected Religious Exercise As A Criminal Matter—Thus Chilling My Religious Speech, Discrediting The Legitimacy Of My Sacrament, And Reinforcing State Entanglement With Religious Interpretation, Contrary To The Principle Of Government Neutrality In Religious Matters. This Act Of Governmental Overreach Echoes The Historical Violation Of Indigenous Religious Freedom On This Land—An Ongoing Legacy Of Cultural Suppression And Spiritual Violation. Lastly, I Assert That I Am Under No Obligation To Prove My Religious Exemption Through Man-Made Legal Mechanisms Unless And Until I Deem The Matter Ripe. My Exercise Of Faith Exists Prior To And Beyond Civil Authorization, As Protected By The Constitution And Recognized By Precedent. This Is Anchored In The Foundational Principle That Religious Liberty Is An Inalienable Right, Not A Privilege Bestowed Or Regulated At The Discretion Of The State. 5. I Request Public Acknowledgment Of Two Separate Brown Act Violations. During (4), The City Attorney Gave A Public Response To My Public Comment Without Agendizing The Item To Give Me A Chance To Respond With The Omitted Information. During (2), The City Mayor Gave A Public Response To My Public Comment In Which Police Were Asked About Psilocybin Mushrooms. This Item Was Not Agendized And I Was Not Given The Chance To Respond With The Omitted Information. Because The Item Was Illegaly Agendized Twice Without A Public Hearing, I Request A Legal Placement On A Future Agenda With A Chance For The Public To Speak. If The Public Record Is Corrected By Acknowledgment Of All 5 Issues, Behaviors Are Promised To Change, And Placement On A Future Agenda Occurs During The Seal Beach City Council Meeting On 5/27/25, I Will Drop All Consideration Of Legal Action With Handshakes Of Forgiveness. 42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Civil Action For Deprivation Of Rights https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1983 https://steeringlaw.com/police-misconduct-attorney-seal-beach/ https://www.moseleycollins.com/police-misconduct-lawyer-in-seal-beach-ca.html https://pba.memberclicks.net/search-member-directory#/ https://flrstamendmentcoalition.org/ https://www.terrapinlegal.com/ https://www.theflre.org/ https://www.aclu.org/ Satan Drives Out Satan All Around Me The I AM Holds Me Together Sin Tempts You With Momentary Peace Division Never Lasts Forever Love Verbatim Word For Word Literally, In The Flesh And Blood Remember Ear Cut By Sword Here Forever, Good Is Evil's Judge ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ If theft is still a problem in the Target shopping center, it might be time to look into employees giving tips/insider theft. Can Amazon's security be consulted to see vulnerabilities in Target shopping center as I believe Amazon uses Palantir? If the water and sewer rates are passed, we need to see recognition of exactly where the funds are going to certain parts of the city - I foresee a situation in the future when other, more recently built parts of the city need new pipes and I want a record of the fact that the more recently built parts of the city helped fund older parts of the city before. 

If that many pills shown in the drug take back are over prescribed by big pharmaceutical companies, how is that not considered racketeering conspiracy with big insurance companies?

 Make an AI Police Lawyer like siri that can be a real time intermediary for police officers and citizens to talk with together in 99% of the time non-violent interaction. In regards to drug enforcement, the best defense is a good offense - right now alcohol is your offense when it should be cannabis - alcohol is a gateway to cocaine/meth/opioids and cannabis is a gateway to psychedelics. Why This Russian Drone Developer Isn’t Impressed by U.S. Tech ([Probably Some Propaganda In There] Fiber Optic Cable Drone Seems Most Applicable For Civilian Police - Better Connection, No Enemy Jamming/Detection, More Battery Because Video Feed Does Not Take As Much Energy; Or Large Mother Drone To Improve Connection/Distance Of Wireless; Starlink Naval Drones; Lasers To Destroy Drones) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmfNUM2CbbM Police warn of small cameras camoufiaged in yards across the country https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEQircxHdHQ Experimental drones developed in Chicago area to neutralize mass shooters, disable weapons https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eiz2GzAEVbg Is This An Organized Crime Syndicate? James Freeman (Local Public Government Is Better Than The Alternative Or Else It Would Create A Vacuum With Less Accountability/Standards/Morality/Etc., But It Is Not The Best - Religion Is) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NaPJKi_MW0 How Police Control the Media (Overly Liberal Video Among Some Overly Republican Videos, But Copaganda Has Obvious Truth In Seal Beach With Terrible Local Journalistic Integrity Regarding My Experience So Far, Unless There Has Been Publicly Published Writing About Cannabis/Psychedelics That I Have Not Seen) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8NB0IW8ihS0 Tim Tebow - Fighting For Our Children | SRS #199 Shawn Ryan Show https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeVFs0dVcCc Notorious Green Beret’s WARNING to Soldiers Coming Home Johnny Glenn Julian Dorey (IMO Adrenaline Addiction Through Constant Survival Competition At War Creates Hyper- vigilance Devoid Of Rest With GOD That Does Not Integrate Into The Marathon Of Life) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0NnjKXZRFc The Real Threat: Why the U.S. Could Declare War on Chinese Gangs (w/ Former DEA, Ray Donovan) Ironclad https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ToKNiaMqfwA Why Other Countries LAUGH at American Homes (Build New Headquarters By The Beach Out Of Concrete/Local Earth Geopolymer) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTghEBfZ_D8 
 Wasp 3D-prints eco-homes from local raw earth for $1K https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4MLJs1KRa0Y In 2018, the team printed their flrst home in 10 days using local earth (30% clay, 40% silt, 30% sand), 40% chopped rice straw, 25% rice husk, and 10% lime. “Gaia” cost 900 euros (1,000 dollars) in materials for 30 meters of wall. The round-shaped structure relied on a wooden roof and beams for support. Why 3D Printing Buildings Leads to Problems (Modular Prefab Concrete For Non-Unique Building Parts + 3D Printed Concrete For Unique Building Parts Seems Like Sweet Spot) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhAwPFIUF_4 Comment: “I’ve worked closely with a leading concrete 3D printing company for several years now, so I hope my insight into the actual construction process provides some perspective. First, one clariflcation: There is no gravel aggregate in 3D printing concrete. It is only sand. You're right that the vertical integration is very strong in this industry, but there is already internal pressure to break that up. I expect in 10 years or so, you'll see more open-access tools available to architects and construction companies alike. I can't be too speciflc and honor my non-disclosure agreements, but there is recognition that the ability for architects to play with shape is very limited for now, which also limits the primary advantage of concrete 3D printing over other methods: complex shapes cost the same as simple ones. The primary reasons IMO for the vertical integration is 1) that there has been a high learning curve for the industry and 2) the business case relies on minimizing labor costs and the strategies for dealing with that are still being prototyped. Normally trivial things like laying foundations, running plumbing, tying roof timbers into the frame, and lintels as you mentioned, are difficult for concrete 3D printed construction. It's only in the last year or so that acceptable, repeatable solutions have been identifled for most of these and are flnding their way into standard design practices. But even then, there are still maybe 5 or 10 years more of on-the-ground construction needed to establish best practice. It's not too different from the way building materials and building science radically changed in the 1980's, leading to a decade of extremely poorly built houses prone to water damage and short lifespans. It wasn't until maybe 20 years after that best practices for high-quality construction had been standardized. I would push back on the lack of repairability, though. This has always been an issue with concrete construction, and it's likely to become increasingly common for plaster or stucco flnishes to be applied to internal walls, allowing for intrusive renovations to be reintegrated. Structural stability is not likely to be an issue since all walls have reinforcement every half meter anyway and often exceed building strength standards by an order of magnitude. Further, virtually all concrete 3D printing for now is slab-on-grade construction, which already has the same repairability issues you mention but is already widely adopted and has best practices for dealing with things like electrical and plumbing repair. I would also point out that the timber frame construction that we love so much is largely an anomaly unique to the U.S. where wood is abundant and cheap. Concrete 3D printed homes have the (so far unrealized) potential of being many decades or centuries more durable than frame buildings, which will change the design requirements that often contribute to design choices that later need renovations and repairs. I would also push back on the criticism of how windows and doors are seated in the concrete homes. I don't doubt that many early concrete 3D printed homes were sealed with silicone only, but 1) the gap between windows and walls is already standard in frame construction and addressed with shims, spray foam, and trim and 2) the 3D printing companies have already started to adopt the same building techniques used by frame construction. Echoing much of what you said, IMO concrete 3D printing has a high potential for unique design that won't be unlocked until architects are given freer access to the tools and pre- fab construction is a necessary companion to this industry, but there is still a lot of building science that is being worked out. There are already some serious advantges, such as all walls having a native R40 insulation rating, but these will be tempered by the inherent limitations. I don't expect to see a rapid adoption of 3D printed construction for another 5 or 10 years and for the U.S. market share to cap around 20% and primarily remain in the residential and light commercial construction spaces. I also think that the current bare- wall aesthetic will fall out of favor out in that timeframe since it will prove difficult to clean. I also expect that environmental costs will remain high as long as cement production relies on fossil fuels and concrete aggregate relies on mined sand. I also expect that a future use case for heavy construction is using 3D printing to create forms for much thicker concrete constructions, particularly for foundations, buttresses, and pillars, such as you see in airport construction.” I Investigated Utah’s DEADLY Soda Addiction… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BlNJc_OLbYw https://playactivate.com/ Increased sedentary behavior is associated with neurodegeneration and worse cognition in older adults over a 7-year period despite high levels of physical activity https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/alz.70157 Parkinson's patients who take 'magic mushrooms' see key beneflts, study flnds https://www.foxnews.com/health/parkinsons-patients-who-take-magic-mushrooms-see- key-beneflts-study-flnds Trump surgeon general pick praised unproven psychedelic therapy, said mushrooms helped her flnd love https://www.cnn.com/2025/05/15/health/casey-means-psychedelic-therapy Military Land Is 4,336 Acres Or 60.7% Of Seal Beach... JO8N On Monday, March 31st, 2025 at 6:34 PM, JO8N <JO8N@proton.me> wrote: On Sunday, March 23rd, 2025 at 4:53 PM, JO8N <JO8N@proton.me> wrote: Dear Lisa, Nathan, Joe, Ben, Patty, Patrick, Mike H., Nick G., And Gloria, I am writing to formally express my concerns regarding what I believe to be ongoing violations of the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code § 54950 et seq.) during public meetings conducted by Seal Beach’s City Council. The fundamental purpose of the Brown Act is to ensure that the public has the ability to meaningfully participate in local government proceedings, which includes the right to make public comments and receive fair treatment under open meeting laws. Speciflcally, I wish to address the following concerns: 1. Inability to Respond to False or Misleading Statements: * It has been observed that after I make public comments, members of the council and/or city staff respond to my remarks. However, I am not afforded the opportunity to address their responses within the same meeting, effectively silencing my ability to correct or clarify statements that may be false, misleading, or deceptive by omission. This directly undermines the principle of open and meaningful discourse as envisioned by the Brown Act.
 * The California Supreme Court has reinforced the importance of open and fair discussions in McKee v. Los Angeles Interagency Metropolitan Police Apprehension Crime Task Force (2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 354, where the court emphasized that restricting public input while allowing government officials to comment without challenge is inconsistent with the transparency goals of the Brown Act.
 2. Prohibition on Addressing Staff: * The restrictions placed upon me and other members of the public from directing comments toward city staff—especially when they are the ones providing statements that require public scrutiny—appear to be an unreasonable and arbitrary limitation on public participation. Furthermore, this may give the staff a feeling of false sense of security protecting their statements from legal scrutiny. The Brown Act does not prohibit the public from addressing staff members during public comment, and such restrictions seem inconsistent with its purpose of transparency and accountability.
 * In Chaffee v. San Francisco Library Commission (2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 109, the court affirmed that public participation is a fundamental aspect of government meetings and should not be unduly restricted, emphasizing the need for fairness in addressing public concerns.
 3. Discussion of Public Comments Without Proper Agenda Notice: * Members of the council have engaged in discussions regarding my public comments without flrst properly agendizing the topics I address. This practice violates the Brown Act’s requirement that discussions and deliberations on non-agendized items not take place, as it deprives the public of advance notice and the ability to participate fully in the discussion. 
 * I am grateful that the city council is listening and willing to speak even momentarily in response to public concerns. However, even an extremely time-limited agendized discussion would add fairness and transparency to misleading statements by staff. By failing to agendize discussions about my comments, the council is creating an imbalance in the exchange of information, which the Brown Act seeks to prevent.
 * Additionally, in my public comments, I am using meta-communication to agendize the process by which we agendize. The term “agendize” itself is a completely made-up word that devalues public discourse and refiects a bureaucratic approach that obstructs meaningful public participation rather than facilitating it. This concern aligns with the ruling in White v. City of Norwalk (1990) 900 F.2d 1421, where the court emphasized that public meetings should foster meaningful participation and that arbitrary restrictions on discourse can infringe upon First Amendment rights. 
 * The word "agendize" does not appear anywhere in the Brown Act (Government Code § 54950 et seq.). The law refers to "placing an item on the agenda" or "agenda requirements," but "agendize" is not an official legal term. It is a bureaucratic jargon word that has become commonly used in government settings but lacks formal recognition in the Brown Act itself. 
 4. Process for Placing an Item on the Agenda: * The process for placing an item on a city council agenda varies by jurisdiction, but under the Brown Act, it does not require a unanimous decision by the council. Instead, different cities have different policies: * Individual Council Members: Some cities allow one or two council members to request an item be placed on a future agenda. The exact number required depends on the city’s local rules or policies. For example, in Los Angeles, a single council member can introduce a motion to be considered in a future meeting. Similarly, in San Diego, two council members are required to place an item on the docket.
 * Majority Vote: In some cities, adding an item to a future agenda requires a majority vote of the council at a meeting. This process ensures that council members collectively decide whether an issue warrants further discussion. The City of Berkeley, for instance, follows this model, requiring a majority vote to place an item on the agenda.
 * Courts have upheld the importance of agenda-setting transparency. In Preven v. City of Los Angeles (2019) 32 Cal.App.5th 925, the court ruled that public participation in government decision-making is a core right under the Brown Act, reinforcing that the public and individual council members must be given fair opportunities to introduce topics for discussion.
 These practices create an unfair and unbalanced environment where public voices are effectively suppressed, while city officials retain unrestricted latitude to control discourse without public challenge. Such actions may constitute a violation of both the letter and spirit of the Brown Act. I respectfully request that the city review its meeting procedures and take immediate corrective actions, including: * Allowing public speakers the opportunity to address responses made to their comments within the same meeting.
 * Eliminating any restrictions that prevent members of the public from addressing staff when their statements are at issue.
 * Ensuring that discussions related to public comments follow proper agenda procedures to comply with the Brown Act’s transparency requirements. * Switching to Individual Council Member placing of items on the agenda to emphasize the sanctity of every individual living in Seal Beach
 Failure to address these issues may necessitate further action, including but not limited to submitting a formal complaint to the appropriate oversight agencies and seeking legal remedies to ensure compliance with state law. I appreciate your prompt attention to this matter and request a written response outlining the steps the city will take to address these concerns. Please respond within 30 days of receipt of this letter. P.S. Still Waiting On That Seal Beach City Legal Document Stating The Boundaries Marking The Well. Your Opinion About Me And My Right To Stand In A Public Area Moving My Body Completely To Myself Is Worthless Without The Written Proof Of The Well Boundary. I Submit The Evidence That You Are Able To Be That Close To Gloria’s City Clerk Area, And In Fact, Encouraged To Be In Order To Pick Up, Fill Out, And Submit Necessary Documents, Including Supplemental Material For Public Comments. My Standing In The Exact Symmetrically Opposite Area Was Supplemental Material For My Public Comment About The Decriminalization Of Psilocybin Mushrooms And The Agenda Item Of Daylighting. Lastly, The Wells I Have Seen Are Round In Shape And Symmetrical Without Parts Hanging Off The Side (To Conveniently Fit Your Narrative) 42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia. ןמא ןמא ⍾ י ו 8 נ ן Ἰωάνν8ς
 Jo8annes
 JO8N On Tuesday, March 18th, 2025 at 6:11 AM, JO8N <JO8N@proton.me> wrote: Dear Lisa, Nathan, Joe, Ben, Patty, Patrick, Mike H., Nick G., And Gloria, I am writing to formally request an investigation into a matter of signiflcant public concern regarding potential interference with my ability to communicate with city officials. Speciflcally, I have reason to believe that my emails to members of the Seal Beach City Council and city staff may have been intentionally blocked or flltered by someone within city administration in the Fall/Winter of 2024. As a resident of Seal Beach, I understand that I have a right to communicate with my elected representatives and city staff regarding matters of public interest. Any directive or policy that restricts this communication raises serious legal concerns under the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code §§ 54950–54963), the California Public Records Act (CPRA) (Government Code §§ 6250–6270), and the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. The Brown Act ensures transparency and public participation in local government. Blocking my emails to city officials may constitute an unlawful restriction on my ability to engage in civic matters and access public information. Likewise, the CPRA mandates that governmental communications be open for public scrutiny. If city staff have deliberately restricted my access to communicate with officials, it could be an unlawful attempt to circumvent public records laws and governmental accountability. Furthermore, the First Amendment guarantees my right to petition the government for redress of grievances. Any action taken by city staff to suppress my communication, particularly if done based on viewpoint discrimination, could amount to a constitutional violation. Relevant case law, such as Lindke v. Freed and O'Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier, suggests that when public officials act in their official capacity, they must not engage in viewpoint-based censorship, including blocking communications from constituents. To ensure transparency and accountability, I respectfully request an internal review and disclosure of the following: 1. Any internal directives, policies, or communications instructing city staff or IT personnel to block, fllter, or otherwise restrict emails from my email address jo8n@proton.me or any other speciflc senders.
 2. A list of email addresses, domains, or individuals that have been blocked from contacting city officials and staff in the last year.
 3. Any internal discussions or justiflcations for implementing such restrictions, including whether such actions were directed by city officials or staff members.
 4. The criteria and procedures used by the city’s IT department to fllter or block external communications.
 If such a policy or directive exists, I request an explanation of its basis, legal justiflcation, and the process by which it was implemented. If no such directive exists, I ask that immediate steps be taken to ensure my emails are properly received by their intended recipients. I would appreciate a written response within 30 days conflrming the receipt of this request and outlining the next steps in addressing this matter. If necessary, I am willing to flle a formal Public Records Act request to obtain relevant documentation. Thank you for your attention to this important issue. I look forward to your prompt response and a resolution that upholds public trust and the right to open communication with our local government. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=GOV§ionNu m=54950 https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180SB31 https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CONS§ion Num=SEC.%202.&article=I ןמא ןמא ⍾ JO8N On Monday, March 10th, 2025 at 6:44 AM, JO8N <JO8N@proton.me> wrote: Dear Lisa, Nathan, Joe, Ben, Patty, Patrick, Mike H., And Nick G., Police intimidation that chills free speech is well recognized under First Amendment jurisprudence. In Healy v. James, 408 U.S. 169 (1972), the Supreme Court held that government action that deters individuals from participating in public discourse—whether through direct harassment or other forms of coercion—can violate First Amendment rights. In Feiner v. New York, 414 U.S. 632 (1974), the Court underscored that police conduct which disrupts or deters political expression, even if ostensibly aimed at maintaining order, must not infringe on the constitutional right to free speech. Moreover, Ward v. Rock Against Racism, 491 U.S. 781 (1989) illustrates that any regulation or enforcement action must be content neutral and carefully tailored to avoid suppressing speech based solely on its message. These cases establish that if police officers single out individuals for the content of their speech or for the topics they plan to address—such as advocating for "psilocybin mushroom" decriminalization, Religious Freedom, Jesus Christ or discussing other politically charged issues—the resulting intimidation can constitute an impermissible infringement on First Amendment protections. Additionally, lower court decisions have consistently found that law enforcement actions that create a chilling effect on political participation are subject to strict scrutiny. When officers position themselves near a speaker, not to maintain public safety but to deter expression, it may be seen as targeted harassment. In December 2023's Seal Beach City Council Meeting, Mike H. of police staff entered the public section of the council chambers. He decided to sit near me when the choir sang. In December 2024's Seal Beach City Council Meeting, Mike H. entered the public section once again. He decided to stand directly next to me during the National Anthem and when the choir sang. As I was in two completely different places in the room each year, this establishes a patterned targeting that could potentially be viewed as apparent police intimidation that chills my free speech before my public comment. In addition, Nick N. and Yosa of police staff have entered the public section of the council chambers directly behind the podium in view of the camera numerous times. This happened exactly during my public comment, to the point where I took time away from my allotted time to acknowledge the repeated pattern. I can only assume that this was a directive given by Mike H. of police staff due to his body language and the potential intimidation's regularity. “Settle matters quickly with your adversary who is taking you to court. Do it while you are still together on the way, or your adversary may hand you over to the judge, and the judge may hand you over to the officer, and you may be thrown into prison. Truly I tell you, you will not get out until you have paid the last penny." (Matthew 5:25-26) ןמא ןמא ⍾ JO8N On Sunday, March 9th, 2025 at 2:22 AM, JO8N <JO8N@proton.me> wrote: Dear Lisa, Nathan, Joe, Ben, Patty, Patrick, Mike H., And Nick G., I am formally requesting a correction of the public record pursuant to the Brown Act (California Government Code § 54960.1) due to misleading and incomplete statements made by city staff during the February 10, 2025 Seal Beach City Council meeting. Additionally, I am raising concerns regarding a potential violation of my First Amendment religious rights in connection with a previous statement made by the city attorney when I publicly announced my Church’s use of "psilocybin mushrooms" as one of its sacraments. Summary of Brown Act Violation During public comment, I addressed the council regarding the decriminalization of "psilocybin mushrooms". After I had flnished speaking, Lisa asked Mike H. from police staff a clarifying question about the legal status of "psilocybin mushrooms". He responded by stating that "psilocybin mushrooms" are illegal under California law but failed to mention that multiple California cities, including Oakland, San Francisco, Santa Cruz, and Arcata, have decriminalized "psilocybin mushrooms" for years. This omission misled the public and the council by falsely implying that local governments lack the ability to deprioritize "psilocybin mushrooms" enforcement, which is demonstrably untrue. This is not the flrst time city officials have engaged in misleading statements regarding "psilocybin mushroom" law. One year ago, after I announced the formation of my church, which uses "psilocybin mushrooms", "N,N-Dimethyltryptamine", and "N,N-DMT/MAOI" as sacraments, the city attorney similarly responded that "psilocybin mushrooms" are illegal under California law—without acknowledging religious protections under federal law. Furthermore, both the city attorney and police staff failed to disclose critical personal information that I presented regarding my own case: I was hospitalized after consuming a psychedelic but not charged with any crime (which I am eternally grateful for) and also found in possession of "psilocybin mushrooms" and "N,N-DMT" within Seal Beach. The repeated omissions by both the city attorney and police staff created a false narrative that "psilocybin mushroom" decriminalization has not been successfully implemented in some California cities and ignored key evidence—including my own experience—showing that local authorities have already adopted compassionate de facto decriminalization practices for the well being of residents. Potential First Amendment Violation Under RFRA & Gonzales v. UDV (2006) My concern goes beyond transparency violations under the Brown Act. The city attorney’s response a year ago, when I announced the formation of my church, raises serious questions about whether my First Amendment religious rights were dismissed or undermined in violation of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) and the Gonzales v. O Centro Espírita Beneflcente União do Vegetal (UDV) Supreme Court case. Legal Precedent: Religious Use of Controlled Substances In Gonzales v. UDV (2006), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a religious organization could legally use a federally controlled substance ("ayahuasca") under RFRA protections, as the government failed to demonstrate a compelling interest in prohibiting its religious use. Under RFRA (42 U.S.C. § 2000bb -1), the government cannot substantially burden religious exercise unless it can prove a compelling government interest and that the restriction is the least restrictive means of achieving that interest. The DEA and federal courts have recognized that some religious groups may legally use controlled substances like "peyote" and "ayahuasca" under these protections. By failing to acknowledge these protections when I announced my church, the city attorney omitted critical legal context, implying that my religious practice was categorically illegal under state law—when in fact, federal law provides a pathway for religious exemptions. This potential suppression of my religious expression in a public forum could be seen as a violation of my First Amendment rights. Requested Corrective Actions To remedy this issue, I formally request the following: Public Correction of the Record – The city must acknowledge the omission and issue a formal correction clarifying that: Multiple California cities have already decriminalized "psilocybin mushrooms" despite state prohibition. Religious protections exist under RFRA, and the UDV case established that religious use of controlled substances may be legally protected under federal law. Agenda Item for Further Discussion – Given the misleading statements made by city officials, I request that the council place "psilocybin mushroom" decriminalization on a future agenda to ensure the discussion is based on accurate and complete information. Accountability for Repeated Omissions – The city should implement training or procedural safeguards to prevent city officials from selectively omitting key legal and factual information, especially when addressing the contents of public comments. Legal Review of First Amendment Implications – The city should review its public statements and policies regarding religious use of controlled substances to ensure compliance with RFRA and Supreme Court precedent. Legal Basis for Brown Act Complaint Under California Government Code § 54960.1, the city has 30 days to correct this violation or face potential legal action to nullify any decisions made under misleading or incomplete information. Failure to acknowledge and correct this omission could be interpreted as a continued effort to obscure public access to truthful and balanced information, violating the core principles of the Brown Act. I request a written response acknowledging receipt of this letter and outlining the corrective actions the city intends to take. I appreciate your attention to this serious matter and look forward to your response. ןמא