Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPublic Comment from Matthew Terry“The presentation talked about setting rates in proportion to land use or acreage, but unfortunately, sewer rates are based on estimated sewer discharge and that's how your rates are set for the sewer based on their estimated proportion of use of that pipeline, not on land use. Because you could have a big empty base with nobody on it and maybe they're not using a sewer. So, there's nothing better to set rates on than sewer use compared to estimating sewer use from land use.” “So, then it would be our opinion that they are being correctly charged.” "Yes." no wrong again the entire presentation was about water, the word sewer wasn't said once 1,000 ft?250 ft 10,000 ft?250 ft 100,000 ft?250 ft Myth: The Naval Weapons Station is being charged a fair share for water services because it's billed based on its usage. fun fact, this should be one word if it's in reference to the show Myth 2: There is no better way to charge rates than based on usage. FACT: While the NWS is billed according to its direct water usage, this approach overlooks the significant amount of frontage that the NWS occupies along the city's water lines (over 10% of all lines). Since the frontage that the NWS occupies along the water lines cannot be developed, this results in higher bills for all other ratepayers, as the fixed costs are evenly spread over a smaller base of ratepayers. FY 2030 Bimonthly Naval Weapons Station Bill: ~$53,000 Average Seal Beach Resident Bill: $338.70 ~$53,000 / $338.70 = 157 Homes 157 x 25 Feet = 3,925 Feet 3,925 Feet there is no better way to charge rates than based on usage