HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Res 3131 1982-02-22
.
, .
RESOLUTION NO. 3/3/
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL
BEACH APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 82-100l
I
WHEREAS, an application was duly filed by Ponderosa Homes, 2082 Business
Center Drive, Irvine for Tentative Parcel Map #82-l00l; and
WHEREAS, the property is described as a portion of the Hellman Specific
Plan area and is located north of Marina Hill (legal description
on file); and
WHEREAS, the proposal is to subdivide the Hellman Specific Plan area into
three residential parcels, two roads, two parks and one oil pro-
duction site; and
I
WHEREAS, the purpose of the parcel map is to provide a method to: purchase
residential land, purchase road rights-of-way and to convey park-
land to the City of Seal Beach; and
WHEREAS, on February 3, 1982, by Resolution #l25l, the Seal Beach Planning
Commission unanimously approved and recommended to City Council
approval of Tentative Parcel Map #82-l001; and
WHEREAS, the City Council makes the following findings regarding the map:
l) An environmental impact report was prepared on the project
which showed no significant environmental effects which could
not be mitigated. The City Council finds that all feasible
mitigation measures identified in the environmental impact
report which are applicable to the project, will be undertaken.
2) A Specific Plan was prepared on this project and adopted by
the City Council.
3) The project is considered consistent with the City's General
Plan because the General Plan shows a variety of land uses,
densities, roads and parks for the site which can be imple-
mented with the parcel map.
4) The project is consistent with the City's Redevelopment Plan
in that land uses, densities and intensities shown on the
Redevelopment Plan are the same as those on the approved tract
map that concurs with the currently proposed parcel map.
5) The site is physically suitable for the proposed development
because the environmental impact report studies found no
problems that could not be mitigated.
6) The site is suitable for the proposed density of development
because the City's infrastructure is capable of accepting
the proposed density of development. All studies contained
in the environmental impact report show that the proposed
densities can be accommodated.
I
7) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial
environmental damage as all mitigating measures contained in
the environmental impact report to protect the environment and
prevent environmental damage will be implemented.
8) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause serious
public health problems because all necessary utilities and
services are available to serve the project.
~ ,
I
I
I
,
.'
Resoiutio~ No. .:3/3/
Page Z -----
9) The design of the subdivision will not conflict with ease-
ments, acquired by the public at large for access through,
or use of, prope.rty within the proposed subdivision because
all easements will be adequately preserved and maintained or
new easements created.
lO) The discharge of waste from the subdivision into the existing
community sewer system will not violate existing requirements
prescribed by the local regional water quality control board
pursuant to Division 7 of the Water Code because the require-
ments will be met by implementing the approved tract map.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, THAT the City Council does hereby approve
Tentative Parcel Map #82-l00l, subject to the attached conditions shown
as Exhibit "A".
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the,C\ty Council of the
at a meeting held on the ~~~ day of
1982 by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmember(s)
NOES: Councilmember(s)
ABSENT: Councilmember(s)
it of Seal Beach
-----
ATTEST:
.
Resolution Number
.
.'
EXHIBIT "A"
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PARCEL MAP #82-l00l
I
1. An irrevocable offer to dedicate Parcel "C" and Parcel liD"
for street purposes shall be offered to the City on the
final parcel map. The offer to dedicate shall include a
temporary construction easement and permanent slope easement
as required by the City Engineer.
2. The exact location and configuration of the fault zone shall be
as designated in the revision to the rpeort on "Evaluation of
Surface Faulting Potential" by Medall, Aragon, Worswick &
Associates, Inc. dated December 14, 1981.
3. Conform to the requirements of the Orange County Sanitation
District as specified in the District's letter dated January
26, 1982.
4. The final determination as to the location of the power
transmission lines shall be to the satisfaction of the City
Council.
I