HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Min 2003-10-27
I
I
I
10-27-03
Seal Beach, California
October 27, 2003
The regular adjourned City Council meeting scheduled for 6:30
p.m. this date was canceled as there were no Closed Session
items in need of consideration.
clerk
Seal Beach, California
October 27, 2003
The City Council of the City of Seal Beach met in regular
session at 7:06 p.m. with Mayor Campbell calling the meeting
to order with the Salute to the Flag.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Mayor Campbell
Councilmembers Antos, Doane, Larson, Yost
Absent: None
Also present: Mr. Bahorski, City Manager
Mr. Barrow, City Attorney
Mr. Whittenberg, Director of Development
Services
Mr. Danes, Director of Public Works/City
Engineer
Captain Schaefer, Police Department
Mr. Vukojevic, Deputy City Engineer
Ms. Yeo, City Clerk
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Councilman Yost requested that Item "N" be. removed from the
Consent Calendar as he would be abstaining from vo~ing on
that item, Councilmember Larson requested the removal of Item
"M" for separate consideration, and Councilman Antos
requested that Item "I" be removed. Antos moved, second by
Doane, to approve the order of the agenda as revised.
AYES:
NOES:
Antos, Campbell, Doane, Larson, Yost
None Motion carried
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Councilman Yost announced that he and Councilman Antos will
be holding a community informational meeting in approximately
three weeks relating to the Department of Water and Power
property, the purpose is to provide a historical background
of the site including issues and facts, an opportunity for
the public to express their views, no decisions will be made
or position taken. Mayor Campbell noted receipt of a
communication from the Orange County Superior Court who are
recruiting members for the Grand Jury, applications are
available. The Mayor mentioned also that notice has been
10-27-03
received that the Air Force will be flying in approximately
one hundred aircraft to the Joint Forces Training Base for a
meeting on October 30th, the same aircraft will be departing
on November 2nd.
PRESENTATION - 2002/2003 MADD DEUCE AWARDS
Captain Schaefer introduced Ms. Gail Martinez and Ms. Kay
Salitore, representatives of the MADD organization, and award
recipients Officer LindaSu McDonald and Corporal John Scott.
Ms. Martinez explained that it is not the objective of their
organization to go after people who drink rather to monitor
drinking and driving, her son was killed by a repeat drunk
driver offender ten years ago at age thirteen and the
daughter of Ms. Salitore was killed a few months later, they
share an objective to remove drunk drivers from the roads,
and made reference to an accident on the 405 Freeway this
past weekend where an entire family was the victims of a
person under the influence traveling at one hundred twenty
miles an hour. The Captain mentioned having responded to the
Allison Salitore incident that occurred at Valley View and
Lincoln, it is shocking to think that there are over
seventeen thousand such occurrenc,8s each year, and while
these two officers are being recognized for making over
twenty-five DUI arrests this past year cumulatively during
their law enforcement careers they have arrested over
thirteen hundred people for driving under the influence, that
is the number of such tragedies that people in Seal Beach
will not have to endure. Ms. Martinez noted that the Deuce
Award arose from a suggestion of a Santa Ana police officer
in the 1990's, the intent was to recognize the officers that
are committed to removing drunk drivers from the road, the
award is given for removal of twenty-five to ninety-nine
drivers in a year.
I
I
Ms. Martinez presented Officer McDonald with the Deuce Award
for twenty-five arrests this past year, her fourth
consecutive Deuce Award, also Corporal Scott for twenty-seven
DUI arrests this past year, his eighth consecutive Deuce
Award and a three time Century Award recipient for one
hundred or more such arrests. Councilman Larson inquired if
there are any particular streets were these arrests take
place, and can it be determined where the people have been
drinking. The Captain said research showed that a number of
DUI accidents occur .on the southerly portion of Seal Beach
Boulevard and on Pacific Coast Highway, with regard to the
drinking location the Captain responded that the DUI report
requires that question to be asked, and a recent analysis did
not point out one specific location as there is so much
through traffic in Seal Beach. A suggestion was made that
large signs be posted at each end of Pacific Coast Highway to
advise that Seal Beach is strict on drunk drivers, possibly
that could be a discouragement. It was noted that the night
shift officers do look at areas where the problem is more
frequent.
I
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Mayor Campbell declared the Public Comment period open. Ms.
Laura pelegrenie said she was present to speak to the
proposed dog area for Arbor Park, some issues and concerns
with the proposal, her feeling is that this proposal should
be delayed until such time as these issues have been
'addressed. Ms. pelegrenie stated that the boundaries of the
area delineated had not been discussed with the group dog
owners and the people who came before the Council for some
type of consideration for their animals, after looking at the
.,;,'?,. ..,;. .:. "'1<', ~'I/':....
10-27-03
I
Park it is believed that the fence line proposed could be
moved over twenty feet or more and still not infringe on
soccer or baseball, maintenance was not discussed with this
proposal, dog parks that are of this size, which is extremely
small, tend to be over used, maintenance is an issue that
needs to be discussed before any proposal is approved by the
Council, things like seating, fertilization, aeration, and
rotation of times when the Park would be closed so that the
turf could rest and regenerate. Another issue that is of
tremendous concern to her as well .as the other dog owners is
the location of the water fountain, the proposal that they
were provided indicates that the fence line will go around
the current drinking fountain with some kind of extension
from the fountain into the dog park, that a concern because
according to the rules the people are liable for their
animals, which is understandable, this however puts an
additional burden on the dog owners by having a drinking
fountain that is accessible to children so close to the dog
park. Ms. pelagrenie offered that animals have very basic
needs, food, water, and shelter, when those things are
threatened animals can become assertive, that is the case
with the dog watering facility, a single space that could be
used by multiple dogs, being too close to the drinking
fountain, this could be an issue for the dog owners trying to
maintain a safe environment within the park, a safety concern
for children, a liability issue for the City and the dog
owners. She said it is important to have specific criteria,
since this is a pilot project it needs to be specifically
known what it means to pass or fail this project, it is
understood that there will be a zero tolerance policy with
regard to dogs using Arbor Park, and that it will be a duty
of the dog owners to not only police within the dog park but
also police Arbor Park proper, the people are not police
officers, or animal control, or in a position to carry
weapons, and to confront people who may be breaking the law
can also be a liability for the dog owners as well as the
City. Her belief is that the draft rules are incomplete and
that there are specific rules that should be added to the
list that will make it a much better situation for the City
as well as the owners, an example would be that no dog should
be left unattended in the park, she is aware of situations
where dog walkers drop off four or five dogs, they leave to
pick up four or five other dogs and then pick up the first
group of dogs, that is one of several rules that need to be
added. Ms. Pelagrenie again asked that a vote be delayed on
this matter. Mr. Craig Adler, Seal Beach, agreed that some
of the points made by the previous speaker were valid, his
belief is that the proposal has not been thought through
clearly, the people are likely being set up to fail,
therefore he would ask that this matter be tabled for further
consideration of additional information to be provided by the
dog group rather than the few who met informally, there are
more rules that need to be implemented, safety issues, there
is no way that Arbor Park could be policed for dog droppings,
yet if the dog owners fail to do that they lose the park,
this issue needs more effort, more thinking, a possibly more
resources on their end. Ms. Joyce Parque, Seal Beach, said
there is an important election coming up in March in College
Park East, College Park west, and Leisure World, she hopes
that people will get involved, it is a chance to change the
direction of the City, similar to the direction change for
the State, an important election, important issues, one
question should be that there is more money coming to the
City yet less services being provided, so where is the money
going, for instance when the beach is not cleaned, grass is
I
I
10-27-03
growing in the streets year after year, when restrooms are
not cleaned, Main Street is allowed to deteriorate with dead
trees and bark, the residents pay for that yet ultimately the
property values will decline, the reason that property values
went up is that there is a beach, a pier, and a Main Street.
Ms. parque mentioned the grocery store strike over medical
benefits, the benefits in Seal Beach went up for one person
from $266 to $333 per month, for two persons from $439 to
$550, for a family plan from $574 to $720, she feels that the
employees do not co-pay, Seal Beach is generous with
benefits, she will talk about benefits and pensions, the
public needs to know when these things are being voted on.
She claimed that for over twenty years there have been
Christmas lights on Main Street, that costs money, it costs
money to have a dog park, it costs money for the police to
patrol the dog park, from a letter in last weeks paper it
seems they can not even patrol Main Street for U-turns, if
the City is willing to pay for a dog park then why not put
lights on Main Street, there is a proposal too to have
businesses sponsor Christmas light decorations. Ms. parque
asked who was in charge of moving the sand from the Sand
Castle event, who paid for it, also, does Charles Abbott and
Associates have their own insurance, they should have $10
million, they should stamp plans, the taxpayers are
responsible if they make an error in reviewing plans. Mr.
Dave Bartlett, representing Bay City Partners in their
request to further downzone the property at First and Marina
from one hundred fifty hotel rooms to the proposal for
thirty-nine homes. Mr. Bartlett expressed appreciation to
Councilmembers Yost and Antos for proposing to schedule a
community meeting with regard to that proposal in the next
few weeks. Mr. Bartlett offered that when he first became
involved with the project he stated that the DWP Advisory
Committee needed to be involved, the Council and community
expects it, the Committee was formed in the early 1980's to
provide recommendations, analysis, review and forum for
public participation, a Council resolution adopted in 1983
states in part that 'a committee shall be established to
provide citizen input and review of all matters relating to
the Specific Plan.' He said this is a feasible project for
the DWP site which the Committee can now become involved
with, that is what the Council should now consider, the
proposed project includes permanent dedication of public
access to the City's beach parking lot, permanent dedication
and access to the San Gabriel River trail where none
currently exists, water quality features to capture and
retain urban runoff to meet the State's new standards and
guidelines, open space, thirty-nine homes which is 3.6 units
per acre, twenty units per acre are allowed directly across
the street, this is a low density project, a reduction of
traffic trips of up to two hundred percent that the hotel
would have generated, significantly less light, glare and
noise that would be associated with commercial uses, this is
a down zoning. with the City's acres of beaches and the
challenging fiscal condition that all are aware of, a City
park at this location would not seem appropriate therefore a
smaller open space was proposed by Bay City Partners which
can be used at no cost or liability to the public, also, the
project could contribute up to $400,000 in park fees that
could be used at any public park. Mr. Bartlett said there
are passionate and reasonable positions on both sides of the
project yet the pros and cons should not be debated under
Public Comments, again expressed appreciation for proposing a
community meeting, however they would also request that the
Advisory Committee be reconvened even though a committee is
I
I
I
10-27-03
I
not appropriate for every project but because of the history
it is appropriate for this project and now is the time for it
to be established, up front in the planning process. Ms.
Rita Brenner, Trailer Park, cited Mr. Bartlett as speaking
softly and directly, and said it is too bad that there has to
be separate meetings to discuss the pros and cons of
something. Ms. Brenner made reference to the Executive
Director report on the Agency agenda with regard to responses
to questions relating to the Trailer Park, one was the
infrequency of audits over the years, that is something that
the residents had mentioned, the audits dealt with
redevelopment, the question is why were they infrequent, the
same attorney firm was here then that is here now, another
issue was that the Coastal Commission document was mission
and could not be located, is there any reason that someone
can not request the document again. She said that the non-
status issue is unclear between Line and the homeowners, her
understanding is that the survey that Line is going to use
for obtaining a loan or going to some government agency is
something that many residents did not sign and they have
falsely categorized a number of people as low, low, which
they are not, some that are low, low are wrongly categorized
as moderate, there is something wrong that she would request
be looked into. Again, the residents are paying for
everything, the bonds, the MPROP, etc., there is a
Redevelopment Agency to help the low and moderate income
residents have good homes but the residents end up paying for
everything. Ms. Brenner questioned whether the issue of the
rents has come up as it is strange that new people coming
into the Park are paying less rent than those that have been
in the Park for many years, there is something wrong. There
being no further comments, Mayor Campbell declared the Public
Comment period to be closed.
I
COUNCIL ITEMS
I
RESOLUTION NUMBER 5179 - AMENDING PROCEDURAL RULES - CONDUCT
OF COUNCIL MEETINGS
The City Manager presented the staff report, 'noted that this
item was at the request of Councilman Doane to revise the
procedural rules for the conduct of Council meetings, the
three main points are to delete the Announcement section
which can then be accomplished under Council Comments, change
the caption for Public Comments to Oral. Communications, and
then move the City Manager and staff reports and Council
Comments up on the agenda after the Oral Communications
section. Councilman Doane explained that the Oral.
Communications terminology is used throughout Orange County
as well as on the agendas for the other agencies within the
City of Seal Beach, the change to Public Comments has caused
some confusion in that some people do not understand that
Public Comments is the same as Oral Communications, his
preference is that this be changed back .to be uniform with
the references throughout the County and within the City.
with regard to the proposed change to the sequence of
categories on the agenda, often a member of the public will
ask a question during Public Comments, the Brown Act does not
allow the Council to respond at that time however a response
can be made under.CouncilComments at the end of the meeting
yet by then the person may have left the meeting, his feeling
is that this may be something the Council can do for the
public so that they will feel there is more communication.
He has noticed also that there have recently been things
brought up during Announcements that would be better brought
forth during Council Comments.
7
10-27-03
Councilman Doane moved to incorporate the three changes by
the adoption of Resolution Number 5179 entitled "A RESOLUTION
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA,
ESTABLISHING PROCEDURAL RULES FOR CONDUCT OF COUNCIL
MEETINGS." Councilman Yost seconded the motion.
Councilman Antos requested that consideration be given to a
change to Section 12, subsection 'a', third to the last line
of the Section to read 'nor disturb a member while speaking',
striking the words 'or refuse to obey the orders of the
presiding officer,' and confirmed that this would be an
amendment to the motion. Councilman Antos stated that he has
no problem complying with the Charter or the rules and
regulations adopted by the Council yet it has been made clear
that the Mayor intends to conduct the meeting in the manner
she wants, in the past there have been comments made that
both as Mayor and Agency Chair the established rules of the
Council and Agency have not been complied with, again, he
will abide by the Charter a~d adopted rules and regulations
of the Council and Agency yet he can not see a reason for him
to 'obey the orders of the presiding officer.' The Mayor
responded that she could not recall ever giving an order, yet
there have been times when she had discretion she has used
that discretion, that is within the discretion of the Chair
on a discretionary item, and said she did not agree with the
request proposed. The City Attorney advised that the motion
failed for lack of a second to the amendment.
I
Vote on the original motion:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
Campbell, Doane, Larson, Yost
None
Antos Motion carried
I
APPOINTMENT - CIVIL SERVICE BOARD - DISTRICT TWO
Councilman Larson nominated Ms. Esther Cummings as the
District Two representative to the Civil Service Board for
the unexpired term ending July, 2006, and so moved.
Councilman Antos seconded the motion.
AYES:
NOES:
Antos, Campbell, Doane, Larson, Yost
None Motion carried
APPOINTMENT - DEPARTMENT OF WATER and POWER ADVISORY
COMITTEE - DISTRICT FIVE
Councilman Doane moved to appoint Mr. Michael Levitt to the
Department of Water and Power Advisory Committee as the
District Five representative. Councilman Larson seconded the
motion.
AYES:
NOES:
Antos, Campbell, Doane, Larson, Yost
None Motion carried
It was confirmed to Councilman Larson that this is the same
committee that a speaker made reference to under Public
Comments.
I
CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS "E thru "N"
The City Attorney read in full the title of Ordinance Number
1509 and Ordinance Number 1506. Doane moved, second by
Antos, to approve the recommended action for items on the
Consent Calendar as presented, except Items "I, M, and N",
removed for separate consideration.
I
I
I
10-27-03
E.
Approved the waiver of reading in full of
all ordinances and resolutions and that
consent to the waiver of reading shall be
deemed to be given by all Councilmembers
after the reading of the title unless
specific request is made at that time for
the reading of such ordinance or resolution.
F.
Approved the minutes of the October 13, 2003
regular meeting.
G. Approved the introduction and adoption of
Ordinance Number 1509 entitled "AN ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH REPEALING CHAPTER
1-B OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH,"
(Election Campaigns). By unanimous consent,
full reading of Ordinance Number 1509 was waived.
H.
Approved the introduction and adoption of
Ordinance Number 1507 entitled "AN ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, MOVING THE DATE OF THE 2004
PRIMARY MUNICIPAL ELECTION FROM THE LAST
TUESDAY OF MARCH TO THE FIRST THURSDAY OF
MARCH"
and
Approved the introduction and adoption of
Ordinance Number 1508 entitled "AN ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY COUNCI OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE
HOLDING OF A PRIMARY MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO
BE HELD IN THE CITY ON TUESDAY, MARCH 2nd,
2004, CONSOLIDATED WITH THE STATEWIDE PRIMARY
ELECTION ON SAID DATE, FOR THE ELECTION OF
CERTAIN OFFICERS OF THE CITY AS AUTHORIZED
AND REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE CHARTER
OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH"
and
Adopted Resolution Number 5177 entitled "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ORANGE TO
CONSOLIDATE A PRIMARY MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO
BE HELD ON MARCH 2nd, 2004 WITH THE STATEWIDE
PRIMARY ELECTION TO BE HELD ON THAT DATE
PURSUANT TO SECTION 10403 OF THE CALIFORNIA
ELECTIONS CODE"
and
Adopted Resolution Number 5178 entitled "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING REGULATIONS
FOR CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE PERTAINING
TO CANDIDATES STATEMENTS SUBMITTED TO THE
VOTERS AT THE PRIMARY MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO
BE HELD ON TUESDAY, MARCH 2nd, 2004, AND IF
NECESSARY, AT THE GENERAL (RUN-OFF) ELECTION
ON MAY 11th, 2004."
By unanimous consent, full reading of Ordinance
Number 1507, Ordinance Number 1508, Resolution
Number 5177, and Resolution Number 5178 was
waived.
J. Approved regular demands numbered 43912
through 44094 in the amount of $977,659.57,
ADP payroll demands numbered 6250149 through
10-27-03
6250237 in the amount of $181,788.99, and
authorized warrants to be drawn on the
Treasury for same.
K. Received and filed the Monthly Investment
Report for September, 2003.
L.
Adopted Resolution Number 5181 entitled "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SEAL BEACH APPROVING REVISIONS TO THE
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE
CITY OF SEAL BEACH AND THE CONFIDENTIAL/
SUPERVISORY/PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL
EMPLOYEES (SEAL BEACH SUPERVISORY AND
PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION) AND
REPEALING ALL RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT
THEREWITH." By unanimous consent, full
reading of Resolution Number 5181 was waived.
I
AYES:
NOES:
Antos, Campbell, Doane, Larson, Yost
None Motion carried
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
ITEM "I" - RESOLUTION NUMBER 5180 - OPPOSING LEGISLATION _
DRIVER'S LICENSES - ILLEGAL ALIENS
Councilman Antos expressed his support for the proposed
Resolution and moved to approve Resolution Number 5180
entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA, OPPOSING THE RECENT LEGISLATION TO
PROVIDE CALIFORNIA DRIVER'S LICENSES TO ILLEGAL ALIENS AND
SUPPORTING THE REPEAL OF'SAME." Councilman Doane seconded
the motion.
I
AYES:
NOES:
Antos, Campbell, Doane, Larson, Yost
None Motion carried
ITEM "M" - RESOLUTION NUMBER 5182 - BUDGET AMENDMENT 04-13-
TRIAL DESIGNATED CANINE USE AREA - ARBOR PARK
Councilman Larson recalled that when the Council considered
the soccer field agreement at Arbor Park there were a number
of dog owners present who objected on the grounds that there
had not been a public hearing irrespective of the fact that
the soccer group was paying a substantial amount of money
towards the development of the Park, the dog group was
insistent that there be a hearing, the city to the north
approved a motion that there should be a public hearing, he
would agree that there should be a hearing, he had certain
questions and the speakers under Public Comments raised some
points that he felt should be looked into, he would support
holding a public hearing to look into those issues and that
the City of Los Alamitos be invited to attend to present
their points. Councilman Larson mentioned that the staff
report states that the Police Department will strictly
enforce no unleashed dogs within the designated field area
and the suggested regulations state that no unleashed dogs
can be in the parking lot however can be unleashed in the
designated area, that seems to be inconsistent, he would also
like to have an opinion as to the legality of limiting the
use of the dog park to Seal Beach residents, he does not
understand why Seal Beach should provide a dog park for the
City of Los Alamitos or Rossmoor, they have done little to
support any Seal Beach programs, also, there seems to be no
reimbursement as there is with the soccer area, therefore he
would tend to object to having a special park for a special
I
._........~, ,._--~.
10-27-03
purpose, the dog owners, that could eventually cost up to
$12,000.
I
Councilman Larson again expressed support for holding a
public hearing at which time the interested parties would
have the opportunity to express their feelings for or
against, understand the regulations, and so moved.
Councilman Antos seconded the motion.
I
Mayor Campbell noted the referenced paragraph relating to
leashed dogs within the designated area, which she said the
language should read '...Once constructed, the Police
Department would strictly enforce no dogs within the
designated field area... " delete the word 'unleashed'. The
Mayor made reference to some of the issues raised with regard
to the fence, maintenance, location uf water, the fact is
that where the water fountain is, and trying to not have this
become an expensive proposition, the fence would go around
the fountain, would not be up against the fence, there would
be a wider area around it, and then a water line would go
into the dog park, if the fence were to be located twenty
feet over that would require constructing a new water
fountain which could be expensive, moving water lines too is
expensive, it needs to be kept in mind that the City is
proposing to provide this area on a limited four to six month
trial basis and to work out any problems, at the end of that
period it would be reviewed and a decision made as to whether
to go forward with the dog park, if the decision is to go
forward then the City Code would need to be amended with
regard to dogs. Mayor Campbell mentioned that the
regulations limit an owner to three dogs at anyone time,
they are not to be left unattended, there is no leash
requirement while the dogs are in the dog park. She noted
that there were a couple of people in attendance at the
recent meeting that refuse to take their animals to the
easterly end of Arbor Park because they want them to run the
soccer field, yet the soccer field is an active recreation
area, Gum Grove Park is a passive recreation area with no
baseball, soccer, etc. activities, Arbor Park is a regional
soccer facility and the City can enforce its dog ordinance
for public health and safety reasons, the users of the dog
park will need to self-police to some degree, inform those
who are being irresponsible of the regulations, if some
persons consistently insist on running their animals on the
soccer field the City should be notified so that they can be
cited. Mayor Campbell mentioned that if complaints are
received from AYSO or the baseball people of continued dog
droppings in Arbor Park during the trial period then
obviously this proposed accommodation can not be done, yet
this is an opportunity' to give the dog owners a section of
the Park, also, should this start costing too much money
there will not be support from the Council, and could there
be a cost involved for the dog owners, that is a possibility.
In conclusion, Mayor Campbell offered that any hearing
relating to the Park was likely about 1978 when the area was
first leased and the City has not changed its ordinance since
then as to what is allowed on that field, if there is a call
that dogs are in the Park the police are obligated to respond
because the City ordinance does not allow dogs in the parks.
I
Vote on the motion to hold a hearing:
AYES:
NOES:
Antos, Doane, Larson, Yost
campbell
Motion carried
10-27-03
ITEM "N" - ORDINANCE NUMBER 1506 - ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT
03-2 - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - TWO STORY CABANAS
Councilman Yost advised that he would be abstaining from
voting on this item. Antos moved, second by Campbell, to
adopt Ordinance Number 1506 entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY OF SEAL BEACH AMENDING CHAPTER 28, SECTION 28-2319,
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR TWO-STORY CABANAS (ZONE TEXT
AMENDMENT 03-2)." By unanimous consent, full reading of
Ordinance Number 1506 was waived.
I
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
Antos, Campbell, Doane, Larson
None
Yost Motion carried
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
No report was presented.
CITY MANAGER REPORT
No report was presented.
COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilman Antos requested that the City Manager check with
Seal Beach TV-3 with regard to telecasting the Redevelopment
Agency meetings. With regard to the sand removal from the
Sand Castle event, Councilman Antos inquired as to the cost,
is the City paying for the removal or has it been billed to
another party. The City Manager responded that the cost was
$4,500, it is not being billed in that the City did this as
an abundance of caution, the report said the sand was not
contaminated, the Chamber said it was not contaminated, it
was a decision of the City to remove that sand, yes it could
be billed, would the Chamber be under obligation to pay,
probably not. Councilman Antos said he felt it should be
billed as the City did not provide authorization to put any
contaminants of any type on the beach. Mayor Campbell
countered that the white glue that was used was not a
contaminant, it is non-toxic, the issue has been blown out of
proportion.
I
CLOSED SESSION
No Closed Session was held.
ADJOURNMENT
It was the order of the Chair, with consent of the Council,
to adjourn the meeting until November 10th at 6:30 p.m. to
meet in Closed Session if necessary. By unanimous consent,
the meeting was adjourned at 8:05 p.m.
clerk
Approved:
I
Attest:
City Clerk _I