HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Min 2003-04-28
4-14-03 / 4-28-03
conference.
Antos moved, second by Larson, to excuse the absence of
Councilman Yost from the next meeting.
AYES:
NOES:
Antos, Campbell, Doane, Larson, Yost
None Motion carried
I
CLOSED SESSION
No Closed Session was held.
ADJOURNMENT
It was the order of the Chair, with consent of the Council,
to adjourn the meeting until Monday, April 28th at 5:00 p.m.
to conduct a Council workshop and meet in Closed Session if
deemed necessary. By unanimous consent, the meeting was
adjourned at 9:13 p.m.
&
Clerk and ex-offi 0
the City of Seal Beach
Approved:
~~~~
Mayor
Attest:
I
Seal Beach, California
April 28, 2003
The City Council of the City of Seal Beach met in regular
adjourned session at 5:45 p.m. with Mayor Larson calling the
meeting to order with the Salute to the Flag.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Mayor Larson
Councilmembers Antos, Doane
Absent:
Councilmembers Campbell and Yost
councilmember Campbell arrived at 5:50 p.m.
The absence of Councilman Yost from this meeting was excused
by action of the Council on April 14, 2003.
I
Also present: Mr. Bahorski, City Manager
Mr. Barrow, City Attorney
Mr. Danes, Director of Public Works/City
Engineer
Mr. Vukojevic, Deputy City Engineer
Ms. Arends-King, Director of Administrative
Services I'
Ms. Yeo, City Clerk
I
I
I
4-28-03
WORKSHOP - WATER RATE STUDY
The Director of Public Works commenced a presentation of the
Water Rate Study, noted that the study has been in progress
for the past two years, the water utility has been operating
at a deficit in both operations and maintenance as well as
capital funds given the need to upgrade the infrastructure.
*
The Director noted that the service area is
approximately 7,400 acres and serves a population
of just under 30,000 people, the entire corporate
boundary of Seal Beach is served by the City
utility except for a small portion west of Seal
Beach Boulevard which is served by Southern
California Water consistent with the Rossmoor
Shopping Center;
* The replacement value of the operating system is
estimated at $100 million, there is an approximate
seventy.. miles of pipe ranging from 6 to 8 inches in
diameter, there are three separate well sites, two
booster pump stations, one imported water connection
where water is received from the Metropolitan Water
District, there are two reservoirs, over six
hundred fire hydrants, over twelve hundred valves;
*
With regard to imported water, the connection is
actually located in the City of Westminster, a
shared connection with other agencies, the City's
maximum flow is two and a half million gallons per
day, the City also works with the West Orange
County Water Board in addition to paying the MWD cost
of water, the City also pays based upon a technical
capacity charge for what could be taken from the
feeder line;
*
Councilmember Campbell made reference to the water
obtained from the Metropolitan Water District and
inquired if that is imported from the Colorado River,
and how much water is from well water - the response was
that it used to be that seventy-five percent was from
the ground and twenty-five percent from MWD, that has
now changed and is sixty-six percent of water from
the ground and thirty-four percent from MWD - question
was also asked if there are any particular areas of
the City that gets one source over the other, she had
once been of the belief that College Park East received
only Colorado River water, the remainder of the City
received well water - the response was that when the
City goes to MWD it is full service and the wells are
shut down;
*
There are three wells, range in age from twenty-five to
forty years old;
*
There are two booster pump stations, they provi.de for
adequate pressure in the system;
*
There are two reservoirs, one is on City property
however basically surrounded by the Navy base, it
is used to regulate the imported water supply
connection and to supply water to the Navy booster
station for pressure, the second reservoir can be
seen from the .Freeway, is partially under ground,
stores about four million gallons, it stores the
ground water pumped from the Leisure World and
4-28-03
Beverly Manor wells, also supplies water to the
Beverly Manor booster station, the two reservoirs
store somewhat less than seven million gallons;
*
with regard to transmission and distribution, there
is nearly seventy miles of pipe consisting of
various types of material, some have been replaced,
cast iron is being replaced with PVC, there are
transmission lines that are prone to breaks that
are spiral steel coated lines;
I
* There are less than five thousand meters, the majority
are in Old Town and College Park East, there is
also a small number of commercial meters, about
two hundred eighty-five;
* There exists a Water Master Plan, the entire system
was modeled, there are a little more than $13.5
million of projects, an example of some projects
would be a well north of the 405 Freeway adjacent
to college Park East at the golf course, the word
'SCADA' is a remote access system to control the pumps
as well as the controls at those different stations,
it is proposed to do some reservoir protection
upgrades, some electrical upgrades that are needed,
engine replacements, transmission line
replacements, and as part of the asset management
system the GIS information is being used;
*
with regard to the age of the system, it was noted
that most of the system goes back to the 1950's,
there is mercury switch technology of some of the
controls, it is desired to upgrade many of the
facilities that are beyond their useful life, some
upgrades are necessary to keep the system working.
I
Mr. Zeki Kayran, AKM Consulting, was introduced and commenced
the rate study phase of the water study.
* The water bill has two components, one is the
commodity charge for the quantity of water used by
each customer, the other is the standby or capital
fund charge;
* The commodity charge is to recover the cost of
operating and maintaining the system, it pays
for .the purchase of water needed, pays for the
ground water from the Orange County Water District,
for utilities, personnel, maintenance and billing,
vehicles and equipment, also pays for compliance with
regulations and obtaining permits;
*
The commodity rates are charged on each unit of water,
each one hundred cubic feet or seven hundred fifty
gallons, an average single family unit in Seal Beach
uses twelve units per month, there is a tiered rate
structure, first adopted in 1997, an example is if a
customer uses zero to twelve units in a month they pay
the lowest rate and the rates increase as to the amount
of water used, the only thing that is allowed in the
existing rate structure is an adjustment for the
purchase of water, the rest of the rates have been
unchanged since 1997;
I
I
I
I
4-28-03
* The standby fee is used for capital improvements, also
established in 1997, it pays for improving the system,
wells, reservoirs, water lines, booster stations, and
engineering management;
*
In 1997 the standby charges were established by meter
size, for a small size meter the charge is $7 per month
for residential, $7.50 per month for non-residential, as
the meter size increases so does the standby charge;
* Approximately $600,000 is collected per year in
standby fees, it can be seen that that is short of
what is needed for capital improvements;
* Water is obtained from two sources, approximately
4,200 acre feet is used per year, actually more
than seventy-five percent was used for several years
and there is an additional charge for portions above
the seventy-five percent, the remainder was imported
water through the connection with the Metropolitan
Water District;
*
Recently because of the drop in Orange County ground
water and potential for sea water intrusion into the
groundwater basin, the Orange County Water District
had to take some very strict measures, one of those
was to reduce the amount of ground water that can be
pumped by each agency therefore the amount dropped
from seventy-five percent to sixty-six percent, that
will likely remain in force for several years until
the ground water levels recover and without the
concern of a salt water intrusion, the effect of
this on Seal Beach is about $200,000 per year based
on the 4,200 acre feet of water use;
*
As can be seen, the revenues generated through
commodity charges have averaged about $2 million,
and in four out of the last five years that has been
less than the expenditures of the water enterprise,
the capital fund charge generates a little over
$600,000 per year;
*
Why do the rates need to be changed - the existing
commodity rates do not cover expenses, and have not,
as shown on the chart.for the past four out of five
years there was a significant shortage of revenue,
the only adjustment made was for purchased water,
other than that there has been no adjustment since
1997, had there been an adjustment for inflation the
rates would have increased by about twenty percent
at a three percent inflation rate or about fourteen
percent at two percent;
*
There are more regulations that need to be complied
with, there are increased operation and maintenance
requirements, as new regulations are put into place
more things need to be done, and the existing rates
do not generate the revenue needed to operate the
system and provide a reliable water supply for the City
of Seal Beach;
*
The capital fund charges much less than the needed
capital improvement projects, the system needs are
not only capacity but also its condition, the rates
were established upon a much smaller capital improvement
4-28-03
program which was based on some minor capacity
improvements, that is why they are as low as they are,
the system is old and as it approaches having exceeded
its useful life it has to be replaced, otherwise making
major repairs costs more money than replacing the system
in a planned manner;
*
The existing rates for an average family is twenty
units for a three-quarter or five-eighths meter,
$20.60 per month, the recommendation is the rates
shown on the table that starts with an almost
thirty percent increase, then after the sixth year
the City will basically be at the rate of inflation
or lower, and although it shows more than a hundred
percent increase in the six years in todays dollars
that is a little less than the increase;
I
*
Many agencies are increasing their water rates, there
is awareness of several of these, La Habra as an
example raised their water rates by thirty percent,
they will have subsequent increases in the coming
years, the Southern California Water Company plans
an increase of their rates, they serve a portion of
Seal Beach, and the company that does water surveys
in the State of California, based upon their survey
for 2003, the average water bill in California is
$30.33, which is higher than the average bill in
Seal Beach;
*
Reference was made to the graph showing the projected
increases in rates based upon 2003 dollars;
I
*
As to where the income goes, the largest portion is
operation and maintenance expenses, about thirty-
three percent, water purchases are about twenty-
eight percent, the proposed capital improvements
will cover about thirty-two percent, the utilities
are about five percent, and capital outlay is two
percent of the water bill;
*
There are many factors that affect the differences in
rates between agencies, there is no precursor that
covers all, social supplies are an important issue
whether using ground water or imported water, there
is about $200,000 difference between the seventy-
five percent and the sixty-six percent, the shape
of the service area, the geography and elevation is
important, Seal Beach is flat, there are no elevated
storage reservoirs, therefore the pumps need to be
operated constantly to maintain pressure in the
system, that is a cost that other agencies do not
experience, the age of the system is important,
Seal Beach has a system that has exceeded eighty
years of age, how the water is metered is important,
the manner of treatment;
I
*
How are the improvements financed, pay as you go or
debt financing, again elevations are important as
that affects pumping requirements, this is mostly a
built out City, the number of customers certainly
has an impact on the rates and the necessary level
of reserves; ,
There are several recommendations - that the coJncil
adopt the Capital Improvement Program, the funding
*
4-28-03
I
alternatives as presented in the rate study report,
and the change in water rates, also recommend that
the fiscal budget policy include developing
reserves, one hundred percent of the annual operation
and maintenance expenses, also one hundred percent of
the annual capital improvement budget within a ten
year period, this could be accomplished within a
shorter period with increased rates;
*
Also recommendation that the six year program shown on
Tables 15 and 16 be adopted, that will assure that the
Capital Improvement Program that is recommended will be
implemented and that revenues cover the cost of
operating and maintaining the system, recommendation
also that the Resolution have an allowance to make
additional changes if significant changes occur.
The Public Works Director explained that the only action
required at this time is to schedule a public hearing
for either May 12th or a later date, offered to meet
with any groups regarding the water rate issue, noted too
the request to allow the rate increase over a five year
period so at the end of that period the rates can be steadied
so that they can be level and the City can be at a point they
need to be with regard to covering both operations and
capital expenditures for the long term.
I
Councilman Antos said he would assume that when the water
rates are modified there will be some resolution, and
expressed his concern with including some of the potential
options where if something comes up the fees are
automatically raised, his feeling is that fees should be
raised if there is a significant failure in the system or
increase of cost from a supplier, the public should have the
right to be informed and express their opinion, he would not
be comfortable having an automatic escalator. Councilmember
Campbell said she does not have a concern with the escalator
in that when water or sewer pipes go they must be repaired,
there is no choice, if there is a delay in paying for that
the only ones being fooled is yourself and the residents
because one can pay now or pay considerably more later, the
City would be well advised to set up a reserve account so
that when there is such an occurrence there is not an
excessive bill for repair, her feeling is that that would be
a prudent way to approach such situations as far as the
residents are concerned, she would concur with the
recommendation. Councilman Antos countered that the revised
resolution says it would allow for annual adjustments without
going to the public for a significant increase in the water
purchase, production or utility costs, that should be pointed
out to the public whether it be during a budget study session
or another time. The City Manager noted that a pass through
provision already exists, an additional line could be added
to the resolution to provide for a pass through however that
that would need to be submitted to the City Council
indicating why the adjustment is necessary, notifying the
Council and public of the change, that would be an additional
safeguard. Councilmember Campbell again mentioned that when
pipes break they need to be fixed, if there is not a
mechanism in place to spread the cost reasonably the City
would be letting the residents down. The Manager noted as an
example when electric costs spiked the City was impacted, as
the consultant pointed out the City pumps constantly because
of the flatness of the City, it is felt that flexibility
should be built in, it is believed that something can be
I
4-28-03
crafted to build in safeguards as well as the pass through
with justification, and noted that there are a number of
things going on with regard to water, the Colorado River
issue, what the Secretary of the Interior may do, etc. At
the request of the Manager, there was an indicated consensus
that a public hearing on the water rate study would be
acceptable for May 12th or it can be moved back.
CLOSED SESSION
No Closed Session was held.
I
ADJOURNMENT
It was the order of the Chair, with consent of the Council to
adjourn the meeting at 6:45 p.m.
Approved:
~~~
yor
Attest:
I
Seal Beach, California
April 28, 2003
The City Council of the City of Seal Beach met in regular
session at 7:07 p.m. with Mayor Larson calling the meeting to
order with the Salute to the Flag.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Mayor Larson
Councilmembers Antos, Campbell, Doane
Absent:
Councilmember Yost
The City Council took action at the prior meeting to excuse
the absence of Councilman Yost from this meeting.
Also present: Mr. Bahorski, City Manager
Mr. Barrow, City Attorney
Mr. Whittenberg, Director of Development
Services
Mr. Danes, Director of Public Works/City
Engineer
Chief Sellers, Police Department
Ms. Arends-King, Director of Administrative
Services
Mr. Vukojevic, Deputy City Engineer
Mr. Cummins, Associate Planner
Ms. Yotsuya, Assistant City Manager
Ms. Yeo, City Clerk
I
4-28-03
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Councilman Antos requested that Items "L" and "M" be removed
from the Consent Calendar. Doane moved, second by Larson, to
approve the recommended action for items on the Consent
Calendar as presented, except for Items "L" and "M", removed
for separate consideration.
I
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Antos, Campbell, Doane, Larson
None
Yost Motion carried
ANNOUNCEMENTS
There were no announcements.
PROCLAMATION
Mayor Larson proclaimed the week of May 4th through May 10th,
2003 as "Brain Tumor Awareness Week" and so moved.
Councilman Antos seconded the motion.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Antos, Campbell, Doane, Larson
None
Yost Motion carried
I
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Mayor Larson declared the Public Comment period to be open.
Pastor Shoemaker, Grace Community Church, called attention to
problems that Grace Community Church has encountered with
Ampco, the company under contract with the City to operate
the 8th and 10th Street beach parking lots. Pastor Shoemaker
said on two occasions the Church has sought fair and
reasonable arrangements at an equitable price to provide off-
street parking for people attending church on Sunday
mornings, however Ampco was willing to provide annual parking
passes at a cost of only $210 per pass, yet the Church wanted
to purchase sixty passes for which the company wants over
$12,000, this is triple the price that the City charges for
an annual pass that allows unlimited use of the lots, the
passes that were offered for $210 each would be good only on
Sunday mornings, not unlimited use. Pastor Shoemaker
mentioned also that for Easter services Ampco wanted to
charge the Church $12 per pass, the cost double the regular
fee that individuals pay for an all day pass in a beach lot,
and they were to be valid only until 1:00 p.m. The Pastor
claimed that the company is found to be unreasonable and
impossible to deal with, does not serve the best interests of
the community or the community's constituents, he is also
aware that the payment machines in the lots are sometimes out
of order, in one case of which he is aware of the machine
would take the money but not issue parking passes. Pastor
Shoemaker noted that the Church is paying a substantial
amount of money to shuttle people from outlying parking lots
to church on Sundays, they are willing to pay for such
legitimate expenses, yet do not want to be dealt with
unreasonably by a greedy parking concession. Pastor
Shoemaker requested that the City leadership look into this
matter and ensure that the City's constituents are dealt with
in an equitable and reasonable manner, this is especially
important when a constituent of the community is making a
conscientious effort to mitigate parking difficulties and is
willing to expend a considerable amount of money to do so.
Ms. Kim Masoner, Chamber President, reported this past
Saturday was the largest Car Show crowd ever in sixteen
years, thanked all persons who helped to make this sixteenth
Car Show a tremendous success, those who came out at 6:00
a.m. to help mark the streets, distributed Car Show
I
4-28-02
information, manned the goodie bags, the Police and Fire
Departments, the parking crew, the car owners, the residents
for being understanding and attending this fun filled day,
and the businesses for understanding the last minute car
location changes. Mr. Steve Masoner apologized for not being
a good measurer, on Friday it was found that the middle of
the street parking for the Cars would not work in that there
was inadequate room for a fire lane, they did their best to
make as many people happy as possible, it is known that there
will always be some that will not be supportive of the event,
his wife conducted a survey of many residents and business
owners, has received comments from many of them, the event
does bring sales tax into the City. Mr. Masoner reported
that also on Saturday there were two hundred forty-five
people volunteering for the monthly beach cleanup, the
cleanup continues to grow, it is amazing to see people come
from allover, if the trend continues this year there will be
more participants than the previous two years combined, to
date the City has been saved almost $100,000, his wife has
visited over twenty-eight high schools and middle schools
this year, they have come aboard and this program will
continue to grow and they will learn about reduce, reuse, and
recycle, especially pleasing is to see local residents
participate, even if it is once a year, that too saves the
residents and the City money, the participation brings the
community together whether it be the beach cleanup or the Car
Show, and makes Seal Beach the great and special City it is.
Ms. Joyce Parque, Seal Beach, acknowledged having received
the letter from the attorney in response to her letter
regarding the Brown Act. She requested that the City start
keeping meetings of Closed Sessions, and she will be writing
another letter under the Equal Protection clause of the
Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. Ms. parque
mentioned too the $1 million that the City will not get back,
that money could help with the grass in the streets in Old
town, there are no curbs, and inquired as to where the $1
million came from, the City or the Agency. She said she also
wanted to talk about the $5 million in pension funds for the
fire and police, made reference to a newspaper article
relating to safety personnel salaries and benefits, it says
that since 1999 they give more money to get officials elected
and every year their pensions are increased, this City is $5
million in debt for the pension funds, how is that going to
be paid, a budget was adopted yet already over a million
dollars has been spent that was not in the budget, in
Sacramento they want the pensions paid on the property tax
bills, people are not going to vote for that, so the proposal
now is a user fee, there is a bill also so that police
personnel can get one hundred percent of their salary at age
fifty, how are these things going to be paid. It is the
taxpayers that pay all of the bills, pay good salaries and
benefits, the former Manager lived here, paid property tax,
kept the landscaping up, had the trees cut, had lights at
Christmas, yet it is now said there is no money to cut the
trees. Mr. Jim Caviola, Seal Beach, claimed to have the
letter from the Department of Housing and Community
Development regarding the Trailer Park, acknowledged that he
is seeking to get the Redevelopment Agency closed down either
during this term of office or the next, the letter says that
the Trailer Park Resident Ownership Program MPROP $1 million
commitment of funds to Linc Housing and the City of Seal
Beach expires May l, 2003, and the Department does no.t intend
to extend the commitment in that there is no progress' towards
meeting the MPROP loan closing conditions, that means' that $1
million more has been lost to the Trailer Park, it is' also
I
I
I
4-28-03
I
known that the Redevelopment Agency was fined $640,000 for
not doing its job, this money has been lost, what bothers him
is that he sees no remorse, no apology, no concern, those are
property taxes that are being displaced, disappeared, someone
was supposed to get the closing done, there was an attorney,
staff, the Council. He mentioned that in an earlier meeting
the Planning Department was asked to work on a trailer design
for the Park, the amount of resources that are being diverted
to this low income housing scheme under the Redevelopment
Agency property tax diversion is incredible, it is not fair
to the residents, the City, or the County, said he wants the
Agency closed down and he will work to do so, again, to not
acknowledge that the City has lost $1.6 million is wrong, it
is part of the Agency scheme, yet no one will go to the
seminars. Ms. Sue Corbin, Seal Beach, agreed that there was
a duty to perform, there has been thirty years of negligence
with regard to the Trailer Park by the law firm. Ms. Corbin
said she wished to speak on free speech or the lack thereof,
U.S. versus Twinning lays out all of the rights that are
secured by citizens, eight rights and privileges, number six
is the right to inform U.S. authorities, federal judiciary,
of violations of its laws, when there is a violation of free
speech there is a right to seek relief, it is a violation of
the Constitution, this has already been done, the Council did
not want a person to talk about the tennis courts that the
citizens will be paying for. The Council has no
constitutional training, cities do not like civil rights
suits because they are powerful, yet the Council tries to
silence the citizens, this exceeds authority, now the
attorney's office is not going to represent the former member
of the Council, which exceeds authority, the Council is
improperly executing a local custom and law, what is needed
is constitutional training to protect the City. Mr. Glen
Clark, Trailer Park, referred to the comment of a prior
speaker that the $1 million loan is lost, to that he said the
speaker is incorrect, that was a loan made by the Agency to
Line Housing and it will be paid back over time, as far as
the MPROP portion of this is concerned the State is willing
to send that money down to repay that loan immediately yet
they needed to have a number of people in the Trailer Park
sign off that they supported that, unfortunately there have
been some in the Park that have worked against having that
happen, because of that there are not enough signatures at
this point to obtain the loan from MPROP, however that money
is not lost to the City, it is a loan that will be repaid
over a period of time with interest. Mr. Clark explained
that the $1 million was loaned to Line in 2000 to assure that
the residents could purchase the Park, a bridge loan only, to
be repaid, loaned by the Agency not the Council, there are
some eleven hundred pages of documentation relating to that
transaction. There being no further comments, Mayor Larson
declared the Public Comment period to be closed.
I
I
CITY COUNCIL ITEMS
There were no Council Items.
CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS "B" thru "N"
Doane moved, second by Campbell, to approve the recommended
action for items on the Consent Calendar as presented, except
for Items "L" and "M", removed for separate consideration.
B. Approved the waiver of reading in full of
all ordinances and resolutions and that
consent to the waiver of reading shall be
deemed to be given by all Councilmembers
4-28-03
after the reading of the title unless
specific request is made at that time for
the reading of such ordinance or resolution.
C. Approved the minutes of the regular meeting
of April 14th, 2003.
D.
Approved regular demands numbered 41632
through 41763 in the amount of $462,061.58,
ADP payroll demands numbered 3065886 through
3065982 in the amount of $95,746.78, and
authorized warrants to be drawn on the
Treasury for same.
I
E. Received and filed the Monthly Investment
Report for March, 2003.
F. Received and filed the annual Development
Traffic Impact Fee report.
G. Approved the second reading and adoption of
Ordinance Number 1496 entitled "AN ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH AMENDING SECTION
5-30, NO. 35, TABLE l5-A, OF CHAPTER 5,
ARTICLE l, OF THE CODE OF SEAL BEACH,
COMPRISING PART 2 OF TITLE 24 OF THE
CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, THE 2001
CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE." By unanimous
consent, full reading of Ordinance Number
1496 was waived.
H.
Approved the second reading and adoption of
Ordinance Number 1499 entitled "AN ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH ADOPTING ZONE CHANGE
03-1, CHANGING THE ZONING DESIGNATION FROM
GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C-2) AND LIMITED
COMMERCIAL (L-C) TO LIMITED COMMERCIAL/
RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY (L-C/RMD) AT 209
THROUGH 309 SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD." By
unanimous consent, full reading of Ordinance
Number 1499 was waived;
and
Approved the second reading and adoption of
Ordinance Number 1500 entitled "AN ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH CHANGING THE
DESIGNATION OF THE LIMITED COMMERCIAL (L-C)
ZONE TO THE LIMITED COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL
MEDIUM DENSITY (L-C/RMD) ZONE AND REVISING
THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE LIMITED
COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY (L-C/RMD)
ZONE (ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 03-1)." By
unanimous consent, full reading of Ordinance
Number 1500 was waived.
I
1.
Approved the second reading and adoption of
Ordinance Number 1501 entitled "AN ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH AMENDING CHAPTER
28 (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE SEAL BEACH CITY
CODE, AMENDING SECTIONS 28-402, 28-701, AND
28-802, RESTRICTING THE MAXIMUM SIZE OF A
GARAGE IN THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH." By
unanimous consent, full reading of Ordinance
Number 1501 was waived.
I
4-28-03
Adopted Resolution Number 5124 entitled "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SEAL BEACH AMENDING THE POSITION
CLASSIFICATION PLAN TO INCLUDE THE POSITIONS
OF ACCUNTING MANAGER AND MANAGEMENT ANALYST/
HUMAN RESOURCES." By unanimous consent, full
reading of Resolution Number 5124 was waived.
J.
I
Bids were received until April 22, 2003 at
10:00 a.m. for the 2002/2003 Annual Street
Seal Program, Project Number 50153, at which
time they were publicly opened by the City
Clerk as follows:
K.
Doug Martin Contracting
Co., Inc.
Pavement Coating Co.
American Asphalt South,
Inc.
Roy Allen Slurry Seal,
Inc.
Sudhakar Co. International
$ 97,030.00
$ 98,992.70
$102,952.60
$104,156.30
$115,873.10
Awarded the bid for the 2002/2003 Annual Street
Seal Program, project Number 50153, to the
lowest responsible bidder, Doug Martin
Contracting Co., Inc., in the amount of $97,030.00
and authorized the City Manager to execute the
agreement on behalf of the City.
I
N.
Denied the claims for damages of Irwin S. Paris,
Jeff Deckner, and Shirley Varon.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Antos, Campbell, Doane, Larson
None
Yost Motion carried
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
ITEM "L" - AWARD OF BID - MARINA DRIVE BRIDGE
REHABILITATION - PROJECT NUMBER 49676
Bids were received until April 8, 2003 at 10:00 a.m. for the
Marina Drive Bridge Rehabilitation, Project Number 49676, at
which time they were publicly opened by the City Clerk as
follows:
Alt. A
Griffith Company $7,589,892.00
Shimmick Construction
Co., Inc. $7,840,126.00
MCM Construction,
Inc. $8,320,030.00
Banshee Construction
Co. $10,366,975,30
.1
Alt. B
$7,136,999.00
$7,202,119.00
$7,798,862.00
$7,736,975.50
Councilman Antos inquired if the funding for this project
comes from a grant, and in the past there have been staff
discussions as to where the contractor is going to store his
equipment, has that been decided. The Director of Public
Works responded that it is twenty percent City funded and
eighty percent federally funded, the twenty percent funded by
ten percent each from the cities of Seal Beach and Long
Beach. To the question as to where the staging area for the
contractor and his equipment will be, the Deputy City
Engineer explained that that was not specified in the
contract documents, it will be up to the contractor to
4-28-03
determine the location for equipment storage and staging
area, their choice will then need to be approved.
Antos moved, second by Doane, to award the bid for the Marina
Drive Bridge Rehabilitation, Project Number 49676, to the
lowest responsible bidder, Griffith Company, in the amount of
$7,589,892.00, reaffirmed the construction management
contract with Jacobs Civil, Inc., and authorized the City
Manager to execute the agreements on behalf of the City.
I'
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Antos, Campbell, Doane, Larson
None
Yost Motion carried
ITEM "M" - OLD RANCH TENNIS CLUB CONCEPTUAL PLAN
The City Manager explained that the request relating to this
item is for ratification of the prior action and direction of
the Council, staff has also provided an outline as to how the
RFP and survey will work, the survey has been held up as it
is desirable to receive the proposals first, the bid
alternate is $250,000 therefore there would be no need for
the survey if the proposal is over that amount, staff will
work on putting together the survey, it will likely be
mailed. Councilman Antos noted that at such time as the
proposals are received they will be considered by the Council
for final action, the Manager confirmed that to be correct,
there will be alternate bid items that will need to be given
consideration as well. Councilman Doane asked if anything
has been done with regard to obtaining proposals from private
tennis facility operators. The Manager responded that staff
is working on the RFP, developing alternatives, it should be
completed by Mayor June and then distributed, there is also
a list of potential operators. Antos moved, second by Doane,
to reconfirm the Council action of March 10, 2003, and
receive and file the staff report relating to the process for
the tennis center facility improvement/operations request for
proposals and the survey of public improvement needs within
College Park East.
I
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Antos, Campbell, Doane, Larson
None
Yost Motion carried
S';
MAY 26. 2003 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Since the May 26, 2003 regular City Council meeting date
falls on Memorial Day, there are scheduling conflicts with
the May 27th date, options were presented to Council to
either cancel the second meeting in May of this year,
reschedule the meeting to Wednesday, May 28th, or reschedule
the meeting a week earlier to Monday, May 19th. To an
inquiry as to whether the Boeing project is scheduled for
that meeting, the City Manager responded that that may have
been the desire of Boeing however issues remain that need to
be resolved before their public hearing is scheduled, there
are no other pertinent items scheduled for that meeting and
even if something arose a special meeting could be called.
Doane moved, second by Campbell, to cancel the second meeting
in May, 2003.
I
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Antos, Campbell, Doane, Larson
None
Yost Motion carried
4-28-03
I
SPECIAL EVENT - MUSIC ON MAIN - STREET CLOSURE
The City Manager requested that if there are any issues with
this event or special conditions it would be best for them to
be raised now before the permit is issued. Councilman Antos
reported having received a number of concerns and complaints
last year with regard to the street closure, not with the
Music on Main. He noted that he could not see justification
to close a street for a few hours in the middle of the week
for an event, his preference would be that it be held at
Eisenhower Park where there is adequate room or seek
permission from a Main Street business to use their parking
area, Planning Commission meetings are also held on Wednesday
evenings, people attend them and there would be an
inconvenience to find parking, there are Wednesday night
events that have taken place for many years at Grace Church,
it is an inconvenience to close the street, he would request
that the location of this event be changed, possibly use the
Bank of America or Hennessey's parking area. Councilmember
Campbell requested that the Chamber/Business Association
President speak to how many people attend this event and why
the Central Avenue location was chosen. Ms. Kim Masoner,
President, offered that Eisenhower Park has been used, it was
too cold and windy, the residents did not like the noise, it
was too close, the parking lots are too small, between three
to five hundred people attend these free music events, the
Church has indicated they have no problem with Music on Main
nor does the Fire Department. Councilmember Campbell said it
would seem that this event would be a.benefit to the
merchants. To a question of Councilman Doane to any
anticipated problems relating to the Planning Commission
meetings, the Development Services Director responded that
Music on Main has been held for a number of years and he has
not heard complaints from anyone attending the Commission
meetings that there was difficulty finding a parking place.
To a comment made from the audience, Councilmember Campbell
explained that she had asked Ms. Masoner to respond to
specific questions, not for her opinion, the questions were
to gain information. Campbell moved, second by Doane, to
receive and file the staff memorandum with a comment made
that it is a great activity for the City. There were no
changes made to the special activity request for Music on
Main.
I
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Campbell, Doane, Larson
Antos
Yost
Motion carried
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
No report was presented.
I
CITY MANAGER REPORT
The City Manager clarified that the MPROP loan is not a loss
of the City's $1 million, that he has reviewed the Trailer
Park documents for many years past, the loan documents are
very specifically written, the loan bears the same interest
rate as the MPROP loan and will be repaid commencing in 2006,
the referenced $640,000 came from the regular Redevelopment
Agency tax increment and flows into the low/moderate income
housing fund, that is pursuant to State law. The Manager
extended an invitation to anyone wishing to review the
documents with him. With regard to the MPROP, said he found
a December, 2000 staff report that described how the MPROP is
supposed to work, however stated there are many documents, it
is a difficult issue to follow and understand, a great number
of bond writers, official statements, etc., and mentioned
4-28-03 / 5-12-03
that he will be providing a report to Council with regard to
specific questions posed.
COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilman Antos said he believed that the complaints that he
receives this year relative to the street closure he will
refer to his fellow councilmembers. Mayor Larson requested
that the City Manager look into the problems cited relating
to the Beach parking lots and the Grace Church. The Manager
agreed to do so.
I
CLOSED SESSION
No Closed Session was held.
ADJOURNMENT
It was the order of the Chair, with consent of the Council,
to adjourn the meeting until May 12th, 2003.at 6:30 p.m. By
unanimous consent, the meeting was adjourned at 7:5l p.m.
clerk
Approved:
~~~
Mayor
I
Attest:
Seal Beach, California
May 12, 2003
The City Council of the City of Seal Beach met in regular
adjourned session at 6:30 p.m. with Mayor Larson calling the
meeting to order with the Salute to the Flag.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Mayor Larson
Councilmembers Antos, Campbell, Doane, Yost
Absent:
None
Also present: Mr. Bahorski, City Manager
Mr. Barrow, City Attorney
Ms. Yeo, City Clerk
I
CLOSED SESSION
The City Attorney announced that pursuant to the Brown Act
the City Council would meet in Closed Session to discuss
Items A and B identified on the agenda, a conference with
legal counsel with regard to existing litigation, City of
Seal Beach versus Ribal, and with regard to two caseslof
anticipated litigation. The Council adjourned to Clobed
Session at 6:31 p.m. and reconvened at 6:52 p.m. with' Mayor