Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Min 1990-04-04 II e. . CITY OF SEAL BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION MIHUTES APRIL 4, 1990 The regularly scheduled meeting Commission was called to order by the City Council Chambers. of the Seal Beach Planning Chairman Sharp at 7:30 p.m. in PLEDGE OF AT.T.Rr.'IAHCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Forsythe. ROLL CALL Present: Chairman Sharp Commissioners Rullo, Forsythe Absent: commissioner Fife (Excused absence due to business travel). Resignation: Commissioner Emmett suggs resigned for health reasons. His resignation was effective on March 26, 1990. Also Present: Lee Whittenberg, Director, Dev. Srvcs. Department Quinn Barrow, Esq., city Attorney's Office Barry Curtis, Admin. Asst., Dev. Srvcs. Dept. CONSENT l'AT.18IIlAR 1. MIHUTES OF MARCH 21, 1990 MOTION by Rullo; SECORD by Forsythe to approve the Planning COmmission Minutes of March 21, 1990 with a correction to page 10 to state "he said he was not sure". MOTION CARRIED: 3 - 0 ABSENT: Fife PUBLIC HEARING 2. DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT of the GENERAL PLAN , , Staff Recort Mr. Whittenberg delivered the staff report. Mr. Whittenberg indicated the Housing Element is a portion of the City'S General ~ which is required under State law provisions. He reviewed Government Code mandates, State law requirements, Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) requirements and responsibilities. e' .' . Page 2 - Planning Commission Meeting - Minutes of April 4, 1990 SCAG projections indicate that 494 new housing units should be built in the City of Seal Beach between January 1988 to June 1994 to meet the demand for new families desiring to move into the community. Of these 494 units, 62 units are needed for very low income families (very low income is 50% of Orange County median income), 122 units are needed for low income (low income is 80% of the Orange County median), 110 units are needed for moderate income families (moderate income is 120% of the Orange County median) and 200 units are needed for upper income families. The main focus of the Housing Element, regarding programs, relates to providing sufficient areas and sites to meet the demands for 494 units. Then trying to find ways to assist the existing families in the communi ty. SCAG, in their Reaional Housina Needs Assessment (published every 5 years by SCAG) indicated these figures reflect targets that a city needs to show it is trying to achieve in good faith. If these units are not provided then ~hose goals are re- evaluated by SCAG every 5 years. They will come out with a new set of projected needs based on new population growth within the Southern California area. Through State law provisions there is an appeal process through SCAG to challenge their numbers to have them adjusted based on specific concerns and specific situations that exist within a communi ty that would not reasonably allow a community to reach those goals within the 5 year period of time. The numbers were first submitted to cities for review by SCAG in mid-1988. The numbers became official on 7-1-88 and at that point all the cities in the Southern California region had a ninety (90) day period of time to prepare a specific list of documentation to SCAG to question those numbers for revision. When the 90 day period of time has run, SCAG has sixty (60) days to review those numbers and make a determination on the original numbers should remain or new numbers could be developed. The City of Seal Beach did not act in 1988 and therefore those numbers are locked in numbers at this time and cannot be challenged as part of the Housing Element. In late 1992 to early 1993 SCAG will issue new numbers. In the meantime, the City will be collecting the appropriate information based on the requirements of State law to see if the figures are reasonable for Seal Beach. We would act, if necessary, in that 90-day time period. The 1990 Census figures will give us very updated information at that time to do our analyses with. The two major areas of concern are the provision of 62 units for very low income, the 122 units for low income and the 110 units for moderate income families: 294 housing units. Two major possible areas to meet these needs are (1) moderate income units on the remaining five-acre portion of the Hellman property that now is in oil extraction. High density zoning would allow 20 units per acre on those 5 acres for 100 units: (2) potential low or moderate income units on the Bixby properties. Other areas/programs would involve small infill developments within the existing community. - . . page 3 - Planning Commission Meeting - Minutes of April 4, 1990 The Redevelopment Agency, in future years, will have to start developing some programs to provide assistance to low and moderate income families. There's a provision under Redevelopment law where 20% of the tax increment funds through the Redevelopment Agency must be set aside for low and moderate income housing. To this point the Agency has been paying prior existing debts for previous projects. Until these debts are paid off the City is excused from setting aside these funds for the housing programs. These funds can be used for rental assistance, acquisition, land write-down costs for new construction to bring the cost of housing down to an affordable level. The major constraints faced in Seal Beach are availability of land, high cost of land, financing costs, construction costs. Mr. Whittenberg discussed the five points of the City's housing strategy. *** commission Comments Chairman Sharp noted a key issue in the Draft Housing Element is that it's a guideline and not a demand. commissioner Rullo presented a list of amendments that he had drawn up for the Draft Housing Element and wants added to the Housing Element for State consideration. paae 19 - Add after second caraarach: Seal Beach has historically absorbed a significantly greater share of multi-family residential units in comparison to the abutting market area. There is an imbalance of multi-family apartment-type units in the city. Such units have the potential to be rental units and Seal Beach should establish to attempt to create a more balanced housing stock with development of single family detached homes (not mUlti-family) on any remaining raw land. Mr. Whittenberg said the Draft Housing Element has been sent to the State for review as required by State law. They have a 45 day review period of time to review the document and make comments. The comment period ends on April 23, 1990. If this Public Hearing makes major/substantial changes to the Housing Element it would require re-submission to the State Department of Housing and Community Development which would then start another 45 day review period. The City's problem is the existing court judgment gives the City 120 days to adopt a new Housing Element. Staff's concern is that if the State has two 45 day review periods there is very little time left to review the State comments, make whatever changes are appropriate and rehear the Housing Element before the Planning Commission and City Council and meet the 120 day deadline. . . . Page 4 - Planning Commission Minutes of April 4, 1990 Mr. Rullo asked what would happen the City missed the 120 deadline? Mr. Barrow said that at the present time the court has not signed any judgement so the time has not officially begun to run. If the city gets close to the 120 day period we're supposed to request additional time from the court. We don't know how the court would respond to that. Secondly, the city has never had to go back to the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and the law is unclear as to what happens in this new process. The City Attorney's Office and staff are concerned that we don't want to give any perception to the State that while we're giving them one document the City is planning to adopt something else. We want to be sure what we're giving the State, with minor changes here and there, is what gets presented to the City Council. Mr. Rullo referred to page 36, Land Use Designation. He said if there was another group there showing potential units, in low density the City could have 6,699 units, in medium density the City could have 513 and in high density 18,518 which totals 25,730 units and could have 70,000 more persons in the City. If we adopt this Housing Element and certain housing groups get together and say "there's some way we're going to make you stick to this plan" what are we going to do? Mr. Whittenberg indicated this document now reflect current zoning standards and would allow more than one single family home per parcel of land in the Old Town area. This is not staff's understanding of the goals of the Old Town area. That's what we have to show in the Housing Element to keep this document consistent with the Land Use Element. Mr. Rullo referenced page 44, Item B. Proaram. He said this should be changed to "single family detached houses to promote a more balanced housing stock in the City". Also, 25 units per acre (indicated in the paragraph below) should be changed to "8 homes per net residential acre on such parcel". We want to get away from high density --- such as three story condos. Mr. Whittenberg indicated the numbers shown for future housing needs within the community --- the City needs to provide programs that will indicate that there's a potential to meet the need for very low, low and moderate income housing units that are needed in the community. Based on SCAG numbers that we must use at this time we need to show there's a way to develop 294 units in a 5 year period of time. What normally meets those levels are apartments and condominiums. If the document that is submitted to the State clearly indicates that the City is not going to try to reach those goals during that period of time it's very easy then for the document to be found not in conformance with State guidelines and then the City's put in a position of not being able to issue permits for any housing. That would impact the Mola project and other persons wanting to build single family homes. Mr. Rullo said "guidelines" seem to wind up becoming the law. The City has been sued for not having the Housing Element updated on time. We could be sued by other housing groups. Mr. Whittenberg . . . Page 5 - Planning Commission Minutes of April 4, 1990 said staff wants to develop document that's acceptable under state guidelines that will put the City in a position of not having the current cloud on development in the community exist. This document can be revised up to four times per year. Mr. Sharp said there's over 6,000 units in Leisure World, not counting the high-rise three-story apartments. Ms. Forsythe said that out of 14,000 households, 7,824 were low to moderate income households. These figures are based on the 1980 SCAG figures. Mr. Whittenberg said SCAG looks at different types of housing. They have several different categories -- elderly, large families (5+ persons) etc. The numbers identified in this document for existing needs relate more towards those family needs than for the elderly primarily because the City has Leisure World which meets a very large portion of the need for this City and the surrounding area. Mr. Rullo referenced page 57, Five-Year Ouantified Housing Ob;ectives, "...3,774 dwelling units, by 1994". He suggested reducing 795 to 595 to have the sentence read "...595 housing units could be constructed in the city and abutting housing market area". Mr. Whittenberg said he was not aware there's a way to transfer some of the housing need to another jurisdiction because they also have existing needs that they're working under. There might be some way under a joint powers agreement between cities to share the need. The 795 figure --- staff expects 500 of these units to be upper income housing units. Staff's intent is to get this Housing Element adopted and then start working on the next update. Ms. Forsythe said she read Mr. Rullo's modifications and agrees with them. He has personalized a generic Housing Element. She is specifically concerned (page 48) with the bonus incentive. She said she didn't think builders needed at 25% incentive to build in Old Town. On page 33, where would the "100 multi-family dwelling units" be going? Mr. Whittenberg said one of the programs indicates this may go on the remainder of the Hellman Ranch property. Could HCD require us to add the 100 low to moderate housing units? Mr. Barrow said HCD's function is advisory --- to review the Housing Element that's been sent to them and make certain findings. Such findings are to be considered by the City Council. Mr.Whittenberg said we have not heard back from HCD and expect some preliminary comments by the end of this week. Mr. whittenberg said the density bonuses is a mandated requirement of State law. Staff suggests you look at your density provisions in the Old Town area because with the RHD and RMD that exist now there's the potential for mUltiple units on those lots. If you change the density to one unit per lot you eliminate that area from being eligible for that type of a program. . . . Page 6 - Planning Commission Minutes of April 4, 1990 Public Hearina Chairman Sharp opened the Public Hearing at 9:07 p.m. Jim Funk * Old Town. Seal Beach Mr. Funk said the City is developing a document acceptable to the State but which the City has no intention of implementing. Mr. Funk spoke in favor of incorporating Mr. Rullo's amendments (copies of amended pages, plus cover memorandum, attached for reference) to pages 19, 34A, 36, 36A, 42, 443, 44, 45, 46, 48, 49, 51, 54, 57, 58, 65. A major concern of Mr. Funk's was providing low and moderate income housing given the high cost of land in the city of Seal Beach. He spoke of beach amenities and small town quality of life in Seal Beach versus an inland community. He urged prompt review of the Land Use Element. He said he felt, once this Housing Element is adopted, it would open the way for bringing suit against the City to force the zoning to be consistent with the Land Use Element and the Housing Element of the General Plan. He indicated that if the citizen input doesn't count and the Planning Commission input doesn't count then there exists a situation where the Public Hearing could be declared a sham. people could say they didn't get their opportunity to present their case and even if they did get their opportunity you couldn't amend the document because you're fixed on a date ... Five minute recess: meeting resumed at 9:07 p.m. Bruce stark * Old Town. Seal Beach Mr. Stark said we should have had Public Hearings before we sent this document to the State for review. He indicated he would like a definition of the term "potentially vacant property". He said "nothing could salvage this plan. .. if you adopt it and don't live up to it then you're going to have Bixby or Mola ... suing you to live up to it". Environmentalists and others concerned with Housing Elements could sue the city because this Housing Element was not prepared in good faith but was prepared as a paper exercise to satisfy a 120 day requirement by the court. Mr. Stark referenced a case from Marin county that would not allow pro- rating low income housing to one part of the County nor to one part of a city --- it must be spread out. This document (at page 46) makes Old Town the impact area for rooming houses for the homeless and he suggested spreading out the low income housing. Ms. Forsythe asked Mr. Stark if he had read the Housing Element. Mr. Stark said he had read it twice. Ms. Forsythe asked what changes Mr. Stark would make --- what are we neglecting? Mr. Stark said "granny flats" in Old Town should be eliminated, turning Old Town and the Hill into rooming houses. He felt not enough people . . . Page 7 - Planning commission Minutes of April 4, 1990 have seen this document and review it. His recommendation is to tabling this Housing Element, going back to the judge and ask for an extension so we can produce a viable Housing Element. Charles Antos * 210 8th Street. Seal Beach Mr. Antos indicated the following: Page 36 - This table is incorrect. shows a total acreage designated categories and this shows 1446 --- The previous Housing Element of 1456 acres in the three it's ten acres off somewhere. page 46 - Program F. - Strike the words "multi-family housing" in the second line. If it is going to be left in as a program he recommends getting rid of mUlti-family housing and deal with some existing structure and get rid of the impact area leaving it in the downtown census tract and substitute "city-wide". On financing, there are Federal, State and Redevelopment funds available. The City has had permissive programs in the past. There's a fear now that if these permissive programs are retained then somebody may walk in and want to do them. Page 47 - Program H. - Second unit "granny flats". This should not be used as a program to legalize illegal units within the City no matter where they are. Page 48 - Density Bonuses. After the word "moderate income households" add "upon issuance of a Conditional Use Permit" and this should be City-wide. This needs a PUblic Hearing so the neighbors know what's going on. He agrees this Housing Element should not be adopted tonight. He recommends workshop sessions to look at any comments be held. James Goodwin * 1405 Crestview. Seal Beach Mr. Goodwin expressed the sentiment that the city needs moderate income housing that teachers, post office workers, beginning doctors, lawyers, engineers can afford. We need a diversity of people. If we want to live in the spirit of the new environmental legislation ... cuts down on the deposit of environmentally hazardous elements in the air from automobiles etc. It's a good idea to cut down on driving time. On page 36 the income figures show you'd have to be earning $113,000 to afford a $360,000 house. For example, teachers make a top salary of about $40,000 per year. The median income in Orange county is about $40,000 per year. 120% of that means you could afford a $240,000 house with 50% of your income allotted to it. . . . Page 8 - Planning commission Minutes of April 4, 1990 Marilvn Hastinas * 121 12th street. Seal Beach Ms. Hastings said the latest statistics show "lout of every 9 people in the United States live in the State of California right now today. To provide housing for all these people, including low and moderate income people that are coming here, flooding in here from other states in the Union is almost an overwhelming, unattainable task". Mitzie Morton * 153 13th Street. Seal Beach Ms. Morton asked why the city didn't appeal the SCAG figures in 1982? Did Mr. Rullo or Mr. Sharp, who were on the Planning commission in 1988, read the SCAG report in 19881 Mr. Whittenberg said the SCAG report came to the Planning Department but staff cannot find any record that a special action was taken on it at that time. Mr. Whittenberg said there's a time within which the City has an opportunity to challenge those numbers if they feel that's appropriate. In 1983 or 1988, when those time periods were available, staff now cannot guess whether an action was considered and rejected or not even considered. Most cities don't even challenge the numbers because it's a very difficult process to challenge the numbers successfully. The issue is providing adequate information to SCAG to indicate there are really strong overriding reasons why those numbers should be changed. In 1982 the numbers indicated for very low/low/moderate income family for new construction within the community was 714 housing units. Today it's 294 today. There has been a large drop as determined by SCAG without any City input. From this point on staff is very cognizant of the issue and will be providing appropriate information at the time it's appropriate to do that in the future. Ms. Morton asked how SCAG gets there figures on existing low housing? Staff said the figures were derived from statistical projections from the 1980 Federal census. Ms. Morton asked about "granny units". Staff replied a "granny unit" is an accessory living unit that's attached to a single family residence. They can only occur on single family residentially zoned properties. They require a CUP and a Public Hearing for approval. The can have a kitchen facility. They are a legal living unit but it is limited to persons of a certain age, primarily for elderly. We must allow them somewhere. "Granny flats" must have the appropriate parking. Ms. Morton recommended consideration of the Rullo amendments. . . . Page 9 - Planning Commission Minutes of April 4, 1990 Michelle Funk * 215 1/2 Tenth st.. Seal Beach Ms. Funk said a Public Hearing is expected to generate amendments due to the input. The reason we have a Public Hearing is to alert and educate the public. She urged adoption of a unique small town Housing Element. Chairman Sharp closed the Public Hearing at 10:03 p.m. *** MOTION by Sharp to accept the draft Housing Element as presented and instruct staff to take all the public comments and the Rullo amendments and study them with the City Attorney. These cOlUlents are to be incorporated at the very top of the draft When it goes to the City Council so they have these to deal with at their Public Hearing. If the Council and staff feels these comments or amendments are appropriate without disrupting the court's time schedule that they be done at Council level instead of Commission level. MOTION CLARIFIED by Whittenberg - Staff is to take the comments received tonight both from the public and Commissioner RUllo (provided to each member of the Commission earlier) aJlendllents, evaluate those along with the comments we will eventually receive from the State Department of Housing and Community Development and recoJIIJIIeDd incorporation of those itelllS that we feel can be incorporated into the document and still l18ke it a legally defensible good faith effort to cOlllply with the provisions of State law. MOTION FAILED for lack of Second. Ms. Forsythe said the public has not had ample time to review the modifications. There are many more things to consider in this Housing Element. She wanted the things that came out incorporated before she agrees to send this to the City Council. Mr. Whittenberg reiterated the mandatory elements of the General Plan can be amended four times per year. Mr. Sharp asked staff for clarification on the amendment process. Mr. Whittenberg indicated the numbers that are difficult to deal with are the numbers relating to the provision of future housing. Those numbers cannot be modified and still expect the State to review the document and say we're in compliance with provisions of State law. The first thing the State looks at are the SCAG numbers; You can amend the document on program activities, other funding sources etc. Mr. Rullo said he would like this issue held over two weeks to the Planning Commission meeting of April 18, 1990. . . . Page 10 - Planning Commission Minutes of April 4, 1990 Chairman Sharp re-opened the Public Hearing on the advice of the City Attorney to allow further public input. Marilvn Hastinas * 121 12th Street. Seal Beach Ms. Hastings asked if the City can appeal to SCAG? Mr. Whittenberg said not at this time. This needed to have been done 90 days after July 1988. When can we appeal to SCAG again? Staff said it will be whenever SCAG comes out with their next version of the Reaional Housina Needs Assessment - probably late 1992 or early 1993. stanley Lasowskv * Leisure World Mr. Lasowsky says low income housing is usually hi-rise buildings and they are usually damaged extensively by the tenants. After awhile these buildings get demolished and single family houses replace it. Housing should be built on the needs of the people and not on a statistical basis. Mr. Rullo asked Mr. Whittenberg if, before the April 18th Planning Commission meeting, he could come up with any numbers that would look like what we really should have in low/medium/moderate new construction? Mr. Whittenberg said realistically no. Tentative estimates only could be provided because there's no valid data since the 1980 census on income levels and housing cost levels. The Public Hearing was closed. The City Attorney reviewed the issues discussed tonight, and possible actions of the Planning comission to take an action this evening, or continue to April 11 or April 18 to allow staff to prepare appropriate amendments. MOTION by Sharp to resubmit his prior and clarified motion. MOTION WITHDRAWN for lack of a Second. MOTION by Rullo; SECORD by Forsythe that the Public Hearing be reopened and the Draft Housing Element be carried over to the April 18, 1990 Planning Commission meeting at 7:30 p.m. MOTION CARRIED: 3 - 0 ABSERT: Fife Mr. Barrow clarified there is no legal requirement to re-notice this Public Hearing. MOTION by Sharp; SECOJID by Forsythe to hear C01ll1lli ssion COncerns at this time. MOTION CARRIED: 3 - 0 ABSERT: Fife . . . Page 11 - Planning Commission Minutes of April 4, 1990 COMMISSION CONCERNS Chairman Sharp read a statement prepared by himself to be printed in the newspaper: Hr. Galen Ambrose, during the March 26th city Council meeting when asked to identify the source of his allegations that Bolsa Avenue was to be widened named me. He further said that I was cautioned not to elaborate. I did not then, or at any time, say Bolsa Avenue was going to be widened. At no time has anyone ever stopped me from stating my position on an issue before the Planning commission. (Signed/James Sharp, Chairman. ) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Jerrv Anderson * 1301 Sandcicer. Seal Beach Mr. Anderson expressed his continued dismay with the "doghouse" near his home. Mr. Whittenberg advised that staff has been discussed the matter with the City Attorney and they are continuing their review. Mr. Barrow indicated the City Council has placed this item on their agenda for April 9, 1990, so there will be further discussion on this matter. The Council has instructed the City Attorney's Office to investigate whether there's been any misrepresentation on the part of the applicant, so it's not appropriate to discuss that at this time. We will be giving a report to the Council on April 9th or at a subsequent meeting. Your comments and concerns should be given to Lee Whittenberg. The Council wants another report from staff. You and your neighbors could present your petition to the Council. Hr. Curtis said the owner of the house is requesting it be put off until the Council meeting of April 23 for religious reasons. This would be up to the Council. Mr. Anderson asked ".. .but is it possible that we might get that decision before 10:30 at night? Can that be said at the start of the meeting?" Mr. Barrow said it's within the discretion of the City Council. He suggested Mr. Anderson might also want it continued two weeks until the homeowner could be present also. Staff could recommend to the city Council that (1) the item be continued and/or (2) an announcement be made at the beginning of the meeting to request the Council address the issue at the beginning of the meeting. SCHEDULED MATTERS There were no scheduled matters. - . - Page 12 - Planning commission Hinutes of April 4, 1990 STAFF CONCERNS 3. CORDITIONAL USE PERMIT 3-90 909 OCEAN AVENUE * PAPA JOE'S PIZZA staff Recort Mr. curtis delivered the staff report. This is a request by Daniel Schecter to continue operating as a walk-up/take-out restaurant (as it has in the past) with the option of placing up to two (2) to five (5) seating tables in the present waiting area of the restaurant, enlarging the waiting/eating area up to 300 square feet. By placing seating area in the restaurant this nullifies the establishment of a walk-up/take-out restaurant and would require the parking requirements for regular restaurants ... one parking space for every 100 square feet of gross floor area. As it is now, the restaurant is required to have one parking space for every 300 square feet of gross floor area (as a regular retail space would). Staff is requesting guidance from the Commission on two options it could pursue: (1) to allow no seating without the provision of one space per 100 square feet of gross floor area; or (2) staff should initiate a Zone Text Amendment which would allow a broader definition of walk-up/take-out restaurants. commission Comments Mr. Sharp said he felt if they put in seating they should be required to have the required amount of parking. Mr. curtis said the issue here is whether, by putting one space in the restaurant they should provide 9 additional parking spaces. Or if the one table in the area adjacent to it should be the only area considered restaurant and the rest of the area considered retail. This request is unique because it does cater to beach related foot traffic. Mr. Rullo said we'd be opening another "can of worms". It's a restaurant. If he puts one table in he needs 9 parking spaces. McDonald's, for example, could break their area down into who's standing and who's sitting. Ms. Forsythe asked staff what the arrangement was when it was Corky's. Mr. Curtis replied Corky's had in-lieu parking to the sum of 8 parking spaces but he never officially participated in the City's in-lieu program so the variance was nullified. There are some delicatessens in Old Town (Old Town Wine & Gourmet) where the seating area was considered restaurant space and the rest of the building was considered retail. His in-lieu parking was only the sum of 3 parking spaces because he only had 300 square "feet of restaurant area. There is somewhat of a precedent for this request. - . . Page 13 - Planninq commission Minutes of April 4, 1990 Mr. Sharp noted that business was two or three different businesses within the same room rather than a one-owner business. Mr. Curtis said that was correct. Mr. Sharp said that does not compare to this request. Therefore, if they put the tables in they must conform to the regulations. Hs. Forsythe said this could be a "snowballing" effect. Mr. Curtis aqreed this gave staff enough guidance. *** 5. 209 MAIN STREET * GREEN PEPPER RESTAURAHT staff Renort Mr. Curtis delivered the staff report from the Building Department which deals specifically with 209 Main Street but raises a broader issue. At the beginning of 1992 the State will require all non- structurally reinforced buildings to be reinforced to meet seismic safety requirements. As the ~ currently is written for non- residential structures no structural alterations, remodels or additions are allowed unless those alterations, remodels or additions brings the building into complete conformity with the ~. Therefore, since the Green pepper's request doesn't bring the buildinq into complete conformity with the ~, the proposed modifications would not be allowed. Staff is recommending the commission authorize staff to initiate a Zone Text Amendment to allow non-residential structures to perform structural alterations, whether seismic or safety related, which improve the structural stability of such structures while not increasing the non- conformity. This would not require them to brinq it into complete conformance, which is very difficult in Old Town because they can't meet the parking requirements. Mr. Sharp asked if the Green Pepper's request would brinq it into conformity with what the State will require in 1992? Hr. curtis said if they were allowed to remodel it would. That would be the purpose of the remodel. They are aSking to add square footage also, which staff would recommend against. Mr. Sharp said he has reservations about not just demolishing it again and starting over. He also understands that would bring them parking problems. Mr. Curtis said the Zone Text Amendment staff has in mind would require a Conditional Use Permit. It would allow buildings to be built as they were originally, while still meeting State seismic requirements. It would allow the Commission review authority to bring the building into conformity with the existing street-scape on Hain street. Ms. Forsythe asked staff what the existing street scape on Hain Street is? Mr. curtis said at the present time there is no architectural review board for the City and that would allow the . . . Page 14 - Planning Commission Hinutes of April 4, 1990 Planning Commission some architectural review authority, through the Conditional Use Permit process. Hr. Rullo and Ms. Forsythe said they would like staff to submit a Zone Text Amendment to the Planning Commission. Hs. Forsythe said she knows the Green Pepper is an old building but she would not like to see the building change as it is somewhat of a landmark on Main street. ADJOUlUlMEllT Chairman Sharp adjourned the meeting at 10:55 p.m. Respectfully Submitted: C\ ~:, ~OFillmann - ""'---- Secretary Department of Development Services *** These Minuts are tentative and are subject to the approval of the planning Commission. *** The Planning Commission approved the Minutes of April 4, 1990 on April ~ 1990. 4- r-- . ..llow ".bers of t~. Pl.DD1D, Ca.-l..laD Sub3act: A.lld.Dt. to tb. BO\l.lq El..nt. Att.c..d ara ., prapaaal. for ."Dd.Dt. to tba Raualns 81..Dt far ~our caD.ldaratlaD. I .... ..varal Sta.. of coacern. but ., kay 8OcISflc.tloD. pertaSn to att..,tll1s tc: saSIl . bal.Dc. 111 our ca..ulllty'~ ~au.1DS .tack. n. dr.ft Hauslna Ela.nt lc1.ntUSe. Seal "acll .. ..vSq ana of Ua .1,...1. percantasa. of .ultSf..l1y \lnSt. SII t~. bau.ll1S ..rk.t araa. "at, "b. c1Taft Rau.SIIS 81e..nt raea_nds SDcraa.lq ".S. parcentasa ., acldSas acre law SlIca.. raD".l .Dd bSS~ dall.lty "JPe .ultlfaa11y unit. "a tb. Hell.n lancb .ncl BSxby Old laDcb propertS.. aDd Surf.Sd. aDd Old Town SII order to provlc1. .ddStSanal baual.. for low SDca. paracD. lD a beacll ca.-uDlt~. /" _~r.Dtly, t~e c1Taft Ra\lal" El...Dt cI~. Dot take SDta CODaScler.tSoD ".a waSq\la cSrcuastaDc.. of . baac~ ca..uDSty w1t~ . .Satory of takSna OIl . larpr .hara of llUau..Uy unit. ill coaparSaon "a tbe abuttSas a.o,.iDI _rllet.. In., opSDion, "lie draft does Dot f\llly account for ".. ~Saua carrylas capecSty of "lie posrapbSc ar.a, ".. a.aSl.bl1Sty of affordable land, .DvlraDaeDt.l coDatralDt., aDd tb. "snStude of "be "r.ffSc proble.. wllSeb wo\lld be .ncouDtered lD "b. e..Dt tlle eSty cI.v.loped to t~e ultS..t. cI.Dslty perattt.d \lDder tbe curreDt Gener.l .1.D -- . denssty wlllc~ would .llow aDre than 25,000 cI..lllq. and ~O, 000 par.on.. .1.... r.vSew tll~ dOC....Dt and ., aussa.t.d 8OcISfloatSOIl. wbSc~ are 1IDclarl1n.d lD t~a docu.tDt ~or .... of ldaDtSf1catlOD. .Joe hUo ,r-... ATTACHMENT to Planning COIIIDission Minutes of April 4. 1990 De "dna .Ul l.tS.OII Ud Coli... ..~ ...t enoo.l2) aftd a..t (lito.") ...... t~.ft. eac:b 0.h1.. ...11on .11\11. I..nr ......vl.lon. .t!UIlftt ',0" -.a.n 10M lot.. ..1'..... ...11 v.. nW"vld.. 1.. tbe 1.10'. .n. Ut. CoU... PulL ..S....mood. "... ..".1.... .... tbe ...d ItI.,.. De LeI'1aI" .01'1' ('''.0'' and ....MOI' Ul00...) t..act. "~ ....,..... ..elu.lv.lr _1Utun, ".,S'.nthl "'Sta. Ioabun Wol'1' we INnt in tIl. "1'1)' 1110'. and ... a pllM" ,.a.I'lnUal ,..tl~u.nt COUWtltr 101' "1'.0... la ,IU' of ... 111II ol'er. fte 11IU~ oondaini_ co.'l.... vi~1n Ua. aOllMOI' call.U trlct alao prlaal'U, catar to an 01'..., "ult populaUon. lou.ll11 vl~1n \ba ...1 "acb 'aval .a.pon. .taU. 1"5.'2) couS." .f .1",1. fun, 1... .n' ulllted per,oMel ...... ..rtl..a. be eDBe'1ua1cll s. tha<t ..1 ".~h ... Jllat.or1cal1v ~""~r'-4 . .f,DlfteAmtlv treater ahara af ~ltif..l1y r..1daml1al UB1~. tB co~rt&CD to ~h. .bu~tlft' ..rk.~ ar.a. Th.r. f. .. l_hal.Be. af ~lt1!..~lv~.p.rt"Dt-tv~ umit. lD ~h. CI~91 Such gait. hay. the toteftttal ~a be rental UD1~s. And. ...1 ".eh ahou14 ..tabl18h poiSe!.. ~D .t~.Bbt to cr..te a BOr. ~l.Dc.d hDU.1~ _tack w1~h d.Y.l~..~t Df .i~.l. '..11y d.t.e~.d .D". (BoB-~ltifaB11v) eD aav r...lml.. raw i.ad. . . ..... .1.. ... ".zazo.dla, a..; i', J.. \1"" . . lIoud", ""leh ,rovi'" I zeuona!)l. POUItt of priv.cy tor "~a OCc:\lp.llt. ahO\lld cOllteln .t b.at .a ..ny 1"I1n .a \ban 81" ....aon. in tile IIR..hol.. lathroou, poI'Q.., ...na, Mlconl.., t"Y.rs .nd "aU rooas .n not conalel.red ill ..t.nJftinl ~. ...~10 of peraon. to 1'00". .. d.Uned ~y \b. Vnited '''t.a Departaent of .oud", aIld VrMn Dev.lop.ant and ~. .tat. DepartMltt of .OQa1", .nd Co.-unity Dev.lop..nt, oval'erCMIiftt abta vbln I .,.Ul", lII'Ii~ i. iMabited ~ "1" \b.1I 1.01 pers... "I' I'ooa. As ahown ill 'I'.b1. t ~.r. b.. Men a ..cr.... 1ft tIl. n\aaber of ..raons par 1'001II in tIl. C1ty _tw..n U70 aJMI 1110. nb eh.",. na c.u..d ~y Mth .11 incr.... in av.r.,. uII1t ala. aMI . ..er.... In aver.,. bO\l..bol' aS... 'Uy . ..paell. ear ...1tl.. BIl\S 110. of "r.Dft.J~llfftB ani~ Avor.,. 180. of 110. of .eea.,aw.llfftB Dftf~ "r.eft.J.~ 1170 1'''. 1.10 1.07 1.tI 1.'1 J.' t.t B/A 0.1 0.5 MIA . 8OUItCl: V.,. CeU1aa, "71 'ped.l C'MUS. AltbOUl)h Uab data beUeat.a ~.t w.ruMI.. b not . alpUle.nt '1'0111.. City""i'., it .... ftOt ..eh'. tM po.d~iUtJ Uaat ovozcrCMIecl unite ..r a1at vitllln ...1 lea.. 1. ,e In Saal "ach ~h. land price. a~. .x~r...lv ~l.h 1B ec~rf.oft ~c ~he lDla~d comaun1t1.. of ~he hau&1n. ..rk.~ area. Home price. reflect ftO~ only ~h. value of the .e~u.l .h.l~.r. bu~ ~h. w1111a.n... of ~he r.ft~.~. and ho..ownera ~a pav mora to live D8ar the b8ach. .xp.r1.~ee 1.... .mo.. .n1ov a "._11 'town at.IDOBph8re". aDd hay. conventent access t.o the 22. .05 aDd e05 Fr..wavs. Pl.... Bote that ~he ..dlan income of houaeholds in Seal Beach Is not .1,~~fleant.lv different ~han Oran,. Count.y eyeD t.hou,h the cost. 01 houA!nR 16 h1Rher 1n ca~r1BOD 'to mo.~ Don-beach communit.ies. The r.a60~ for ~h15 difference 1. ~bat Seal Beach r.s1de~ts are w1111DR to pay ~re far. dwelllnR (which would be ch.a~r 1n a non-beach ec~~1t.v) because of the .~~r. .men1~1.s found 1n ~he communi tv. Th~a. affordable hou&1DR in se.l Beach 1& DO~ as a~~a1nable fOT low 1~eQme persons 1D cD~.r1son ~D Don-beach eoamun1t1es. u~less ,ov.r~--n~ is w11l1DR to .t~e~t massive housln, .ybsid1zes Dr 1~ose ai,n1ficant ~rD,r.ms of r.d1.trlbu~1oD 01 W8al~h to permit less afflu.D~ ~T&OnS ~Q live a~ ~he beach. WheB BOre affordable land and .h.l~.r 1& available at lDc.~1onB 1n ~h. abu~~1DR hou.1~R market are.. ~be 8ubsldlz1D. of lew 1DCO" ~r.DD. to I1ve 1D . more .~ns1v. house nearer ~he beach ~T.&ent. ~h1lo.~~h1eal tlt6sues ~o both Rovernment and citizens. The auestieD 1s should. municipal .overnment 01 . b.aeb COBBUDitv auc:h as Seal Beach be expected to finance aDd I)rollOt.e 11e... ccn.t.ruct1Dn of ~w.:llDR& at relat.ivelv .rea~ eX~DS8 in relat.1DD to less eXDeDs1velv I)rlced inland aT.as ln order ~o perm1t low lncome ~rSQns ~o 11ve next to Bore wealthy DerSODS (or I)8rSObS w1111nR ~o .~eDd a hiRher ~TcentaRe of household income for not only shelter but a1.Dlf1cant amenities) iD . beach communi tv. Rat.her ~han at.teJII'Dt. t.o create !lou.inR fOT addit.10Dal "very low" and "loW" income DerSODS eD land a8 .KneD.lve as &50 t.o .100 !)Ar SQuare ~oo~ af lot. area in Seal B.ach. it. would a~~ar too be BOre economical aDd bet~.r u.. af l181t.d reaource. for all level. ~f woverllDent t.o ~oBO~./.uba1d12e auch hous1nR in nOD-b8ach co..un1~1.. with land ~riee. .~.r~lD' as low as .8 ~r foot.. A wi.. .eona.ie. ~ol1cv WDuld apD8ar "to be for beach eft Ie. Buch as S.al Beach ~o 8up~ort local DrOIT." to ..lnt.ain ..I.tlDR .f~ordable houa1DR aDd .ul)uor~ '.d_ral. ~at. and County ~Tq,ra.. of houslnR I)roduetioD for law iDcome ~r.OD. at. lacatioDS of 1..5 _.!)eD_lve land and Bearer canters of blue collar .~loVBen~. In ~his Banner. subsidies and land cost write downs ~o create houslDR for low iDcome per.en. WDuld be BOre 11kelv _pent tar adeauatoe. __I. aBd ..n1~arv hous:n. rather than . martial aub.1dv for beach ."D1t1... . itA it ... ..........,al ...."....,. , tNs. "11lomla Letlalatur. baa ..1...t.. to cltl.. an. oth.r local ,urladlcUOft. Qaciflc n.pon.l~lUtl.. a'" . _rul" ..Olmt of .lac~atlon.r.r author It, oY.~ the ..v.lop..nt and ... 01 1.n'. ftnllp land u.. ...lpaUona, 10nl119 ~.",lr...ntl. INU'S", cod.., .eY.l....nt procedur.., ~.qul~..."t., .M IH., local ,vladlcUona lafluenc. tIl. loc:aUOft, .."aSty, type, "abel', ..aUty and ....ar.Me or ....11'llJ 1IIIlt. wUhll1 th.lr boun'arl... '11'I... anS.., ill turn, ~ a"act tII. co.t alld avaUab~Ut, or hou.lq. ..1.1 lAD' ,.. ca.trel. ['~ ,. ,.... J"&":..i ~ ~.. i ft. loAn' Ua. Il...nt 01 tII. Seal ".ch Gen.ral Plan Hta lorth Ul. elty'. poUcl.. for pld.l1l9 loeal ..v.lop..nt. 'I'h... poUcl.., t...tb.~ with ..l.U... 10111"" ..tuU.h th. HOlmt and 'S.t~buUon or lalld to M aUoc.tod for various u... tIlrou,hout MJI. elty. a.sl'.nUal "v.lop..nt In 'eal "ach :is ,.raltteell under ~o followl... lalld u.. cat09orl.. In accordanc. with th. loAn' U.. 11.....t 01 the GeM~al Plan: I'&aU II La.. a.. 8..I...~ieB. IIlnlolD Gro.. 'Iota 1 , or :.an. U.e LotAna Allow.ble Acl'.. ",tal eSt, :at.aDP'V hr a"it: a.... i t:.v De.le. ~P..fI. ..ow denalty .,000 ..f. I/ac 117.4 11.1 1.. denalty 1,500 ..f. U/ac '0.2 0.4 il,h .....itJ' l,no ..f.. 10-3J/ec .n., '.1 Percent or 'lotal Clt, Acr.a,. IIlnu. .11 i t:.'PV :IS. 1 1.1 14.1 fotal I.UI.I 1'.5 I'.' ~ou.lft9 npply and coet are wraaUy ."octed ~lf tbe UOWIt of land ...l....t.. for u.S'_Ual ... and \b. .analty "wlell dev.lop.nt 1. ~ltted. 1ft ...1 ".c:Il, ....1'11' 10 parce"t of the eity'. l.nd ena 1. ...1INted for naidenU.l land u... 10IIeY.~, Ull. fll\lre S. IIUvod 'lMIVard ., tho YOI")' 1.1'9. 1.'" ar.. '..,oted to .UU.r.r ..., 1..., 1,000 ac~.. Or ....1'11' " parcent 01 the City'. total \ _ land ana. Of tile total .....SUt.1")' l.nd in ..a: INeIl, aUlhUl' . _~. tJaan 10 percent ~.. ..l1pateeS for n.l'.nUal .... ~. " ~:. ~.:"';: :~~~:. e~.~WC=:l ~;1::~ :::~:":a:~:.:':" a ~::;~t:~ Iw 1-....,3D .~11t... alUl as ...... .. '10...GOO w.r..... .Ill ~b Cl~". . Pot.DUal 1Ja1t.. ete" tlSS 11,lS11 as. "SO . The .x1.~ift. Land u.. Bl."n~ ~r.l~. as manv .a 25.730 dw.l1iftRS ~c be d..elaDed In ~h. Cl~v. Ap~rax1..t.lv 18.518 of ~~... dwel1iDRS would M hl,h densit.v a"Dartment.s and/or 81M11 "st..eked" eando2l1nlum dwalltbR.. If tbe Cl~Y 1. ultimately dev.lo~d eOD.I.t.D~ w1~h ~he Land Us. Ble..nt.. _xlst.1n. Bet residential densSti.. In Seal Beach are .SOD. the hi.hest. If DO~ ~h. hl,h..t. in Dr_DRe County. And. lD the event ~h. d..iRa.ted reE1dent,lal ~ra~rtv ift ~h. COBBUDltv Is d.v.:a~d to the Baxl.u. density ~r.ltt.d bv the Land Use Blement. th. Bet r.&lde~tl.1 densit.v would be t.he hl.he.~ in DraDR. County. This density exceeds the abilitv af t.he community to re.8onablv accommodate ~raffle in and throURh the City and exceeds the abilitv to ~Tcvlde a r..sDft8ble l1v1nw eDv1ronmeDt fer c1~12.D. 1D a beach commun1~Y. A partial .1ti.8~1on of ~h1& ~Dtent1al Dver d.velo~men~ would be to ~lan rema1n1DR vacant ~arcel&. such .s ~he Hellman Ranch and Bixbv Old Ranch Dro~rties. at densities not to exceed sinRle-fami1v detached residential standards. This would helD to ..1D~a1n ~he IDnR-~erm economic. aocial and environmental Btab111~v of the C1t.v. . . ~-+. . : \ 'i"A .~ '"... --,--' , . . .. _aD.ra. ............ 'lbi. .ection of tho el...nt Nt. fo~ tIl. City'. '0118, policie. and pr09r... for addre..i", ~opraYioualy identifiod ai.tin;, futun .nd apechl bOY. in; need. in ...1 "aOb, and ~e .uUfied .'ective. ~It tIIo City anUcipato. aObiaYi", with .....I'd to houd",. ftai. .tr.toV)' I'apr..ont. . aonUNd.",. ..01vin9 end "lni"9lul allon on ~o part 01 ~o City to facUit.to the ..aUabiUty 01 laOYdn; for all type. of boy.eholda, to i.provo ~e .aUty of ex1l1t1n; !loudn;, and to aaintain ~e pIIy.ieal .tnctul'e and .florellability of tho .xi.U", houd... atock. 1.1 8oal. To Ba1nta1n ~he .x1.tf~ war1_tv af hous1nr ~vpes ~Dr al] inco.. lev81. and ~a hel~ reRa1n a balance in the ratio of BUl~1fa.11v ~a de~.cb.d dwel11n.s in ~he hous1DR _tack bv Dera1tt1nR anlv 81ftRle ~.m1]v detaehed hOBes The proper basi. for any plln of ac ion i. a well-integrlted ..t 01 ;011., to .xpre.. the desire. and a.pirations of the coamunity. The City'S ;oal., which ar. on.i.tent vith the ;oals .st.bU.hod by the State 01 eaUlorni , ,ivo diroction to the City'. hou.ing pr09r.., .nd aro a. foll .: 1. '"'I f.r all 'IIU.. 1&".11 n the lhitod a.ount of r..lining v.cant or redeveloplble l.nd 1n the City. To a.sist 1n and facilitate the developaent 01 housing affordable to low .nd moderate inco.e bou.ehold.. 3. To a.sist lower income hou.eholds in continuing to afford their oxi.ting hou.ing. 2. t. To a..i.t and facilitate the con.ervation, pre.ervation and i.provement of the City'. exi.ting bou.ing .tock. S. To promote e;UIl houdng opportunities for all parsons, re;lrdle.. 01 race, 1'0U;ion, .ex, ..rital .tltus, anco.try, national ori;in or color. I.a aouo. .1.. In oreller to progro.. towlrd tho .ttlinaent of it. ,oIl., tho C1ty ba. cOIIIlitted it.eU to spacific poUci.. .nd pr..r.... While tile ,oIl. .1'0 ,onoral atat..ent. thlt rove.l c~ity valuo. or lde.l., thl! poUcies pn..nt.d berein aro acre .pacific .nd action-orionted. 'l'ho.e poUcie. havo, in tun, ".n usod to translate tho ,oa1s into apecific, ti.e-oriented progr.... .:a . . . . ft. poUci.. and 8Uppo~UftI '~OCJn.. "'v. ".n .~.nla.d a~ound tIl. fiv. ,oal. arUcul.ted abovo. 'De acUon. to .. ......no.n ~ tIl. City ..v. ".n .rOlra... ~o '.clUtate ....l...nt.tion and ...lu.t. .1'011'.... POI' uch 'I'OlJI'U, the anticip.t.d ppact, r..pondbl. a,.ncy, potaU.l fundi", and .cb.dul. for a.ch .ction i. di.cu...dr in addition, ~. ar.. of s.pact (i..., Citywide 01' c.naln c.n.u. ~nct.) .... .1.0 been identifi.d. l.a.1 Goal. puilU.t. tll. d.v.lop..llt of . .ad.ty of lIoualllg typ.. for all 11100.. la..l. Oil tlla li.itad ..OUllt of r...illillg ..C.llt or r"a..lopabl. 1... 1. tll. City. l.a.I.1 Polici.. and 8 balanced hou.1DR .~ock. while tak1nR care DO~ ~a .xceed e~v1TonD8nt.l. ~raff1c and carrvina canac1tv constrains. - U.e the Land .e El..ent of the General Plan and tha aoning ordinanc to pl'ovid. .d.qu.t. .it.. for. v.ri.ty of bou.ing type. - Wh.r. .ppropri.t., oncourage the r.design.tion of v.cant 01' und.rutili..d non-r.sid.ntial landa to resid.ntial u.., with allowable d.nsiU.. to .ddre.s Vae City'S needs far a ~Te balance haus1ng steck. - Provide coap.tibi11ty of r.sidenU.l ar.a. with .urrounding use. throu,h the .eparation of incoapatible use., construction of .dequate buff.n and oth.r land u.. control.. - Encour.ge the infilling of vacant r..idential land. - Encoura,. the rocycling of und.ruUli..d resid.ntial 1.nd, where .uch r.cycling i. con.i.tat with ostabU.had 1.nd u.. pl.n.. - Provid. all ro.id.nU.l ar..s wit.h .d.quat. public f.ciliti.s and ..rvic... - Provid. for ad.qu.t., fr..ly .cc...ibl. open .pace within r.a.onabl. distanc.. of all c...unity r..idonts. 43 . 1.1.1.1 h..~... '\ A. .1'_1'__ "Ulh. ,.. CI'". ....1'.1 ~l.. a' a.ala, .~.I...o. ,. 'I'OYI.. ...~.t., .ult&bl. .It.. I.~ ... .0u.I.g ....tnoU.. . ..tlel..t.a ~_.ae~: 'rovl.lon of adequate .1te. for the constncUon of up to 500 n.w ..rket-nte re.ld.nU.l unl~ ov.r lbe next five y..rs. J:.D.e~ &r.a: Cltywld., with e..phasis on C.nsu. Tract '15.04. ....011.1111. ....lIel..: S..l "ach Pl.nn~ng COMission .ne! Clt)' Council. .llIalleill..: 'l.nnlng Dep.rt..ent budge:. .e,.aul.: Ongoing_ .111.1e f..11., d.tached hous1n. ~o ~raBO~e . ~re balanced haua1D, stock in ~he Citv. . a. .1'0"1'_: Co.tuet pubHe u e.t.ral.. t.. .ppropri.t..... aa "..U t. .f~. p.tbg t'e .ell... ....1.a.r ~.I'o.l for uses I.elual.g ~e. tl.l '.velop..nt, win . ,OI'Uo. .f t.. .1t. oo..ld.r.' f. ....,., ."...~I. .. 1.... i..... .......1... ..~Iel..~.a J:...e~: The po..ible red..lgnation of .pproxl..tel)' 35 .cre. of the H.ll..r. ....lnd.r parcel to r..id.nUal and other .ppropriat. lL~ u..., to pemit the d.v.lop..nt of _,. ,_ 118 n, _...1 t.. _eo __",I. p.l_d, 'Rel.'iR, ". r....i'R.'i.n .f o"r..ia.~.l~ 5 oer.. \6 MIlL '&ndt~ uaU&J\th.1 (IS llt.':U/uu} . It .....i'R.'.., lav.r ift.... '...in, wa~' ~I foeilitat.. .R' .Re'."," .J! "'a I .... ....ioll .f \Ill II.U..R ...ain'a. .i'. "hr.." _"li.otien af Fra,r... t'.I.I.I(AJ. 1.1.1.I(a) an. 1.1.1.,(eJ~~.~~e:t~:~:c~ro:et J:aaae~ &r..: C.nsus Tr.ct "4.04. auch Darcel. ..._..1111. &....el..: Planning Depert..nt, Pl.nnlng eo.al..10n, City Council. ."..IUI18..: Depart..nt bud,.t. 1"3-1"4 .ell.llut_: . 44 . C .r..r_1 co.'.o~ '-1&0 ...~l.,. u ..t.nia. tll. . appro'l'l.t..... ... .....fit. of ~o'..ip.tb, ponlo.. or ~Ia. .l~ 01. "'ola .~..1 '01' .... i.ol,..I., eo.I'..tl.l .....l.,...t, Yln a portio. of ,.. .U. ....J.tu.. fol' .,..... ....lly 1a...I.. .".r.".. t. a...w i..... .........A. l~r d.ft.1~v hau81D' ~rav1d1~. ~RPO~~uB1~1.6 for ~ft.. DWDerah1p. aIlUel,.t.l!I J..a.t.: ft. po.dbl. nd..i",aUoft of .pproxlaately '0 acrea of the BiXby Old .anch parc.l ~o ro.ld.ntlal and oth.r .pproprla~. land ...., ~o ponlt the 'eyelop..n~ 11,.. au 1IR1\. .R .nll ,"..1. . ."Il '.R.'''Y ...UuUal (I! .1Ii\./aeu) . If .....t'n.te., l~'.r I".... ....t", vIM1. .. t.eilit6t.' all' .11'...".' ." "Il. I a... ,.rti.n .f "hi aiM~) ait. thrl.,h ..plteati6n af Pr..~&m. 5.I.r.I{A) al\'. 5.1.1.I(a) . laDaet ar..: C.naua Tract 1100.12. ...DOftIU,l. all.llei..: Planning Department. Planning Co..iasion, City Council. ~~lIallei.a: Depart..nt budget. ....aul.: 1990-1992. ~he dev.lq~..~t._~ ~er-t~ dwel11n,s at a density Dot ~o ..c..d 8 dwellinRs Der lIet residential aere on sueh ~reel D. .roar_: ".. aoallllg a.e otll.r lue .a. ooatl'ol. to O..UI'. t,. eoa,atibl1ltJ .f roale..tlal 01'... .Itll aUl'l'ou.el.g ..... bUei..t.l!I I.D.et: CI'.ation .nd .aintenance of desiratlle living are.., physlcaUy .eparated or otherwise prot.cted fro. lnco.patible uaes. . %_..et ar..: Citywide. ".ea..i.!_ aDaBel..: COJIlIIbalon. 'lanning Depart..nt. Planning .1..lIlelall: Dep.rt..nt budget. ontoing. ..Il.aul_: .5 . F. . G. . z. ~._.-. RIU.. _"I~o_..tal a. otll 'l"Oo.IIU,... t. ....,.. tII." .n ... ~..I'.. ,,.091... witll ......t. ,..11. '..llltl.. ..".1....." ""I.. .1 ''''.10''..''. .,.. II .."1.... .. btlel..t.. ~.et;: b.llro ~ot now roo d.nU.l 'I'oj.ct. .1'0 'I'ovld.d with public foclliti.. and rvlc.o. r...~t a...: Citywldo. _illaBel.a: a......iat. &o..el..: 'lonning Dop.rt...nt. Dopart..nt budget. ae...ut.: On,oin9. ~:t~:~:1::~~:1:;~: ~:~:~D;~::Tft--n~.l .roor_r IDv.ati,ate "e t..aibility of ae~i"la,\ .Dd ,..troflttiD, aD o.iatiD, avlti-f..ily lIovaiD9 .truetvr.\for ua. aa -'la,le a.o. OeeupaDey. lIov.iD9 to facl1itat. 'OU.1Dg for tll. 1I...1..a an. p.raoa. iD a... of ...rg.Del .'.1". bUef...t.d r..aat: If deterained to lie f.adb1e, cl'.aUon of up to 20 sin910 1'0011 d"'el11"9 un Us pl'ovidin9 housing affordable to v.ry low and low 1ne..e per.on., includi~g poraons who ore hOlldes. and/or in ne.d of t..porary or e.ergency ohelter. iiI..l...JI..~h USl abut.Ulur laa.eta a.r.a: "I RaUl I'rll." "1_ .... "'rk.t Ara. . .e.Do..U~l. Jr.o.llI:i..: Planning Department: .edlev.lopll.nt Agency. Pader.l. B~a~.1 CDUDtV. Ad1aCADt elt!.. fUBda: .f.ftanllf.oo:~..develop..nt tax incr.ment fund.. 8e'betlul., un-un '.oo._r CODtl.lI. to ..eoura,. tile us. of iu.vaUve lu' us. . '.ollai~.. a' .oaatruotio. a.t'o'a Claela.io, a.oufaetur.. 0,. faeto~ ~ilt lIousia9) "0 alalal.e 1I01l.la, ooat.. btiel.ot.. ra.oat: aeduction in housing cost. through Innovativo pl.nnin, and construction technique. without co.praising basic ho.lth, ..f.ty and a..th.tic considerationo. b.llet a...: Citywido. a..DO..lat. ".Ollf...: Planning Doport..nt. ,l...el.a: Dep.~nt budget. onvoill9. ......1.: .. . ~ar .-dtcal ~ac111~i.. aDd ..tDr .BDID9B8b~ ~r~uDt~i.. ia ~.. ~.1~ ..rJr.~ alWa. . . . . ." ..1.1.1 '"'~'" -I. a.... vito. ad.auat.. 1.lid aftd .ee.D~.bl. ear.!.. aftd ~r.tf1e ~. eD.dit.l~ft. ~ th. .DU.f~. "rk.~ area. A. fr-.-I ".ou~.,. ~II... 0" ..,....tJ ....... 02 oUn D..aU... lo~ 1I0u.ia, d.". o,..at. 1..vqN'l'nli, 1.. aD' .0C.~.t. aa.... ..It.. bUe".at.. hltaet: n.lon of .ffordabl. lIouaing .upply th~ou,h proviai of denaity _nu... of .t l...t 25' or oth.r lnc.ntiv. Auto..tic den.ity bonu.es .re .uthodaed Ily Gov.r.....t Code ..cUon nus, a1 au, which provide. for .uch incr....d den.iUe. for .ny pro'ect ln which .t le..t 25 percent of the unit. will lie .vail.blo to low .nd Dodo~.te Incoae hou.oholds. I..aet &..a: eitywid.,~Yit. ..p...'s .R C.R.~. Tr..'. 1.3.04 ~..d IIS.eS. .azul abut't1nfr BOU8:t1l1r Xark.t Ar... a...on.i~l. &a.nel..: 'oal "ach 'lanning Depart.on~ .alld CaUD~Y Gov.r~"n~al AIr.Dei.s. Plnaaelaa: Depart..nt budg.t. 'e~.aul.: 1"0-1"4. f I " ~'.I r . . , . B. 'roa...: ...l.t ,~i.at. .ov.lop.~., "t. .~ofit .a. Donprot! t, ia .ocudag fun'iIl, for 'b Co.olop..at .a'/or oceup..c, of .ffor.abl. 1I0u.in, 'IIrou,. IUD.O. ...01'.1, .tat. .a. local ,r..t, 10.a, .ort,a,. l1Iar..t.., ... ot..r r.lev.at 1I0u.ia, ..volo,..at .1'0'1'.... bUehlat.. llIIl.aet: Expan.ion of .ffordable houaing opportunitio. for vory low, low .nd .oderate income hou..hold. Ily public1aing .uch pr09re.. .nd ...i.ting dov.lop.r. in ..king .pplication for th... heaet &..a: Citywid.'Iv'", -'rlla." .R .afl.~. "r..". -..1.... &.11.11 '11. II. ,,_d .hut.t.i~, Rauat.~ "rkat. &2"'... a...oa.U.l. &a.nel..: ...1 ".ch 'laMing Departaelly alid. CDUIlt." Cav.rlll"'l1t.al ".BeS... Pla..elaa: CDIG fund. and depart..nt bud,et. .e..aul.: On901ft9. .. - rr_r_1 ....d.... ,.. . o~'.~ to f..llltato .o'.~ato S..... ....1 . . C. .t .f lu' u. o,,-.It. 1..1'"....t. ....'n.'I.. .f ".., I... I.. D' . . bUd,.t.. h.a.t.: Production of affordablo bou.inV for ".ry low, low .nd lIOd.rato ill!co.. bouMhol,.. %..aet .ar..: Citywido'#I vi 'Il .,"..h ... .....-.. 1I~&.'. .'1.11 aRt ..1.... ..d .bu~~1~. .au_1B. "rk.~ Ar... .......i.1. .....1..: S..l ".ch Planning ~part..nt. ,i...lleh,a: CDBG aneS r.d.v.lop..nt tall incr...nt fund.. I.h.aul.: 1"'-1"4. . L ! ~, i : . l.a.1 Go..l, ~o a..l.t lov.r I.eo.. 'ou..bol.. 1. ooati.uia; to affor' t.b.ir ..i.ti.; .ou.i.;. l.a.S.1 "11ei.. - Where po.sibl., and to the ext.nt r..ourc.s .1'. .v.il.~l., a..i.t City r.sidents in ..curing d.cent, ..f. .nd .ffordabl. hou.inv. . I.a.s.a .1'091'''. A. 'rollr_: Coatl.u., D' I.cr..... ."ar..... of. 'b. .".11abilitl of ~..t.l ...1.t.... for 1...1 ~..i..at.. bUdD.tea J;..aet: R.duction in hou.ing ...ist.nc. n..d. by continuinv to contr.ct with the Orange County Hou.in9 Authority to .d.inist.r tb. Section . 80usin9 A..ist.nc. Pr09ralll, .nd by publ1cilin; the .van.bility of the pro;r... ....d on pa.t lIistory and .nticipat.d incr....cS int.r.st due to publicity .fforts, tIl. pro;r.. 90.1 is for 25 y.ry low incoae llou..hold. to ... ..si.ted par y..r. ~i. lev.l of ..si.tanc. includ.. both eld.rly bous.holds and fuilie.. ~..et ar...: Citywide. ....o..i.h .all.ael..: ...1 ".ch Pluming ~partll.nt' Oran,. county Hou.in; Autbority. rb..llCbll: II (Ed.Uft9) Housing b.istance Provra.. .e'-..1I1_: OnIol.... . .. . . . . .' ..... ......1 1.1...1 ...1. .. udat ... 1..UU.t. ... .....".U.., >>n..".U.. ... _~"_..t .r ... CltJ'a _bU., ....l.. .bolt. '\ - "Uel.. Encoura,e the .aintenance and ~ehabilitation of .xi.ting owner-occupied and ~ental hou.in, Where feaaible. '~OIIote the re.oval and replace.ent of tho.e aub-atandard units Which cannot be rehabilit.ted. Inv.sti,.te and JNraue progra.s .nd fundi", aource. Ivanable to a.abt in the i.prove..nt of reaidenUal propeny. Encoura,e the continued aUordability of rental unit. rehabilitated with public funds. !:Ilcoura,e A .i~u_.ra,...thl converaion of exlatln, apan.ent units to condOlliniUIIs where euch converdon wU tiaiRbll .11. - - - - - Investi,ate and puraue progra.. designed to .Iintlln and/or 1.pr existing housing units to w households. fundi", source. the afforlSlbility of and aceSerata in cae 'rOfr... reduce ~h. aver .ub~19 of Don-owner ~V~ DUl~1fa.11v units and 1ncr..se opDcrtun1t1es for home awn.rahiD fer all income lavalB. A. .roar_: Co.tbu. to ,ubUeh. .,llll .all ."al1~le low lDte~est r.labilitatloD 10a.s fo~ o..er-oocu,ie. ~esi.l.ce.. allUdDate. taDaat: .ehabilitation of deteriontld lousing in the City and reduction in the nUllber of ownar-occupiad units requiring rehabilitation, and thl provbion of decent hou.in, for lower lnoOllI ho.ecn.-nen. fte progra. loal b the rehabilitation of U units over the next five years. :bI.act. area: Citywide, with e.pha.is on Census '1'ract ttS.05. "~_II.llle _1I.III1I.s: Orange County IlIA. "al "ach 'lannin, Depan.ent. 11...1111111: COIG runds. ......1.: 1"'-1".. . al " . :. r. ~r.llr_1 ...U... ..f.~._..t .f 'Ia. 01_"0 CO...lal_ Co.".~.lo. ..1...... ..~I.I..~.. ~..e~: tr..arvatlon of affo~abl. r.nt.l unit. and prov1aion of fln.nci.l and othal' a..iot.nca for hou.ahold. dbplac.d by condollinlUJ1l conver.lon activity. ~D.et. ar..: citywida. ...D6..1~10 all..elo.: ...1 ".ch Planning Dep.rt.ant. .1...eI811: Depart.ant budget. 8e'oaula: Ongoing. ..autre ~h. ..1D~.DaDce D~ ..ceB~ hOUB1DR w1~h1D a ..~1.fY1D. livin. .ftV1rDn"D~ for housaholda af all iDeo.. ,rou~. in ~he City throu.h .ftfOrc."D~ ~ Bu11d1n. Code. aDd .~reD.~heD.d Zon1n, Cade. which raau1r. .d.aua~. ~r.m1se ..iat.nanc8. G. .::Clr_: \.. ....in _.. n.I......' .f aU I'v ... ......u ..__... IInlla, 11.". ...IT" .Ir ....U.... "a ,.. 1..al ::::::~.'::::',":.,,~. 68':1::a:, '~al:al '::'I::='a:::.~:: ....11.... .c c...... ~l\. . &B~le~e.~.4 ~...c~: 1"'R'i.~ .. .ff...a~l. keuaiRI ., t~i. ,r.,r... ill,l..'A",I'A vlll ~, .AI,iA, aA' ia aAUei...'" " .....It iA 'Ill .....h....f1' .f ."nMi..Ul) 18 l.~.r iR.... lIAi'. .nn..lly. rD..et. ar..: Citywid., with omph..i. on Cans\ls Tracts.. "5.04 and "5.05. ....o..I~lo aae.el..: S..l ..ach Planning Dapart.ent. rhaaehll: Depanaont budget and contributions tr01ll davelopera. aDd ~1D.. fraB bu11d1n. aDd zan1aa cDde Y1al.~oT&. 8e,.aul.: l"0-ltt4. ---Th. .~-BC. af .ubs~aDdard dwell1Df UB1~. fB ~h. haua1aR ~Dck. . ~l.h level D~ ..tnt_DaDe. aDd uDk..~ a~ ~~ houat~ .~DOk~ a~d "1D~.naDc. ~ ::u:: .nd viable residential .elahborhoods Cd.cont. ..~.. and Ii b ). . .4 .(.:;. . . . c. k_r_. .,..ti..... .tiU.. 'II. 1I0.al.. l.fonoU.. ..4 e.f.nol .."S... .rr..... ., tII. 0...... 00..." .n.la, .utllo..St, r... ........ ...kl., affo.....l. ....'al ... ,u"ollo.. .0..1.,. ~ btlel..t.. ~.D.et: l'I'ovi.ion .f bINd", nf.rral ond oth.r ...l.t.ne. to low and .oderate lncoae bou..hold. ..eking affordable bou.in,. :' . b..at ar..: Clt)'Wide. .e.ao.al.l. aa..et.a: ...1 "ach PlalUlin, Depart.ent and Oru9O COUDty .ouoin, Authority. .i...etaa: Department bud,et. .c~..ul.: On,oin,. "5 '.J ~i.e-Y.o.. guo.tifl.. Bouala O~~ectl.e. ~ Th. quantified objective. thot re anticipated to re.ult from i:pl.lllenhtion of the C1ty'. curre t (lUll-ltll') bousing action plan are .\UIIIIlarh.d in Table. 20 an 21. A. the.. table. indicate. the action plan could r..ult in the rehabilitation and i.prov..ent of 175 dwelling unit., and the on..rvotion of 3,77. dwelling anit.., by 1914. Furthenore, new dwa11i1l9 unit. could be constructed in the City over the next five year.. The.e unit. would include both .arket Ite and affordlble bou.ing (including " .... unit. affordable to low inco.e hou..hold.), and prov ide for a ...an,e of bou..hold type. i,.., .1derly/bancUcapped, o.all ra.ilie. and 10r,e fa.ili..) aDd .bu~~1D. .au_faR "rk.t Ar.. fte City'. 1.1t-1f.. quantifi.d objective. for the d.velopaant and construction of bousin, is ..t forth In "eble 20, ba..d upon 1IIIpl..entation of the bou.ing progra.. in Section. 5.2.1 and 5.2.2 .r thi. El...nt. . 57 - .' ~: . " - WULl '0 eu..~lfi.. o_'.e~t..--.aU.i.8 Ba..t~....~ , ~eJ8~a1ft v.rv lev 11m! .ed.rat.. 1J1:I~r 5.2.1.2(A) 5.2.1.2(1) 5.2.1.ue) 5.2.1.2(') 100 ~ JI8" ? . ,,1M" ~ . 50 . 13 7 ~.2..1.2fH\ 15 10 TOTAL ..,fIr " . ~ 22. .JH 60 500 . .ew Gpper-income Gnits that are anticipated to be developed pursuant to Programs 5.2.1.2(1) and 5.2.1.2(C) are reflected in the quantification for Program 5.2.1.2(A), in order to avoid double- counting of housing Gnits. . . -- '" . .. ~able 21 sets forth the quantified objectives of the City of ..a: leach with respect to the improve.ent of housing during the ~.'S-ln4 time frue, based Gpon imple.entation of the housing F=o;ra.s in Section 5.2.4 of the Ele.ent. I'ULI II auaft~ifi.4 Oh~.c~i..--.Du.i~a ~.er09".lIt I'rnaraftl Varv tow Ie MDd.rat.e lJ'eta1 1.2.4.2{A) 10 20 10 U 5.2.4.2(8) 5 15 :aD S.2.4.2(e) 30 30 10 1.2.C.2(H) 5 20 25 _.2.6.21'1\ 10 2D sa . 'I'O'1'Alr 60 105 10 175 .. e . e . . . . . .. V'.,. ... ",. i' II I-~. .. ~ ... I .. .. \ I s. COntinue to atiliae ~tal a..i.tance fund. to .ablidia. _bUe ... ....ce ftnta1a. ~r.. i8 ont01" no 1011 and aodarat. nc_e .DUa.holda "va "en a..i.ted ~ tbi. prOfra.. .Ublidile lov/aoderat. inc.. .ouain; conltrucUon thr01l,h t..pl..entation of .ell..n 'pecific Plan. Rot y.t 1I1pla.nt.d, the ..11..n 'pacUic Plan was aUblt.nti.lly aodified, which pr.clud.d incorpor- aUnt lov/~erate inco.e .ou.in, into the portion of the pro:lect approved in 1"'. '!'he prOlraJII can .Ull be i.pl_ented on the Hell.an ae.ainder Parcel. I.. Co.et.l 80u.i8' 101i07 Z.pl....t.tio. ...iew .tat. law (CaUfornh GOYerNllent Code, '.ction '55'0) rell\llres that the City include 1n its Housing Ele.ent certain infor.ation re4Jarding the nullber of houaing units d.veloped and d.l!loU.hed, and the .ff.ct of th1a activity on housing affordable to low and aoderate incoJlle pereons. During the period fro. J.nuary 1, 1'82 through DeceJDber 31, 1'89, apprcximately 355 new houaing units were approved by the City for conatruction within the coaatal aone, none of which were rell\lired to be develop.d and ..intain.d aa housing .ffordable to low and aoderate inco.. per.ona. During the .... period, the City pe:naitted to delloUah .pproximately 75 .ousing proj.cts within t . coaatal lone, none of which vera occupied by low and moderat incoJlla peraona, and the City did not ~aquire th. developera and J ndowners to provide any replac..ent .ouain, unita for low and a rate income peraona becau.e no 10101 and aoderate peraona had been i.placed by the de.olition.. F~pArt.v DWIlera . .5