HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Res 2646 1977-02-14
, ~
"I'
"
I
1_
~~
:::-.....-
RESOLUTION NUMBER dlt,/k
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ENDORSING
THE PRIORITY PLAN FOR EXPENDITURES FOR
JURISDICTIONS WITHIN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE
FROM THE NEJEDLY-HART STATE, URBAN, AND
COASTAL PARK BOND ACT OF 1976.
WHEREAS, SB 3121 approved by the Governor of the State of California on
June 24, 1976 created the Nejedly-Hart State, Urban, and Coastal
Park Bond Act of 1976; and
WHEREAS, the voters of the State of California on November 2, 1976 adopted
the Nejedly-Hart State, Urban and Coastal Park Bond Act of 1976
and authorized the issuance of bonds in the amount of $280 million
to provide funds to acquire, develop, and restore real property
for state and local park, beach, recreational and historical
purposes; and
WHEREAS, approximately $6.9 million of these funds will be available for
use by Orange County and its cities and districts for the acquisi-
tion and development of high priority projects; and
WHEREAS, Section 5096.127 of the Public Resources Code requires that each
County of the State submit-a priority plan of expenditures to the
State Department of Parks and Recreation prior to June 30, 1978;
and
WHEREAS, the plan must be approvedJby at least 50 percent of the cities and
districts within the County representing at least 50 percent of
the population of the cities and districts, and by the County Board
of Supervisors; and
WHEREAS, similar provisions were required for State Beach, Park, Historical
and Recreational Facilities Bond Act of 1974 and after numerous
meetings more than 50 percent of the jurisdictions and representing
more than 50 percent of the population agreed that the expenditure
plan should provide approximately 29 percent of the available funds
to Orange County in recognition of its regional park responsibility
as well as its local park responsibility and the remaining 71 per-
cent to be made available to cities and districts on an equal per
capita basis except that no jurisdiction would receive less than
$19,000; and
,WHEREAS, the Orange County Division, League of California Cities, Ad Hoc Task
Force for Prop. #2 met January 14, 1977 and adopted the attached
priority plan for expenditures by unanimous vote;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Seal Beach
hereby approves the priority plan for expenditures for Orange County as
identified above. Said plan is attached hereto and made a part hereof.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of th~/City of Seal Beach,
Ca~ifornia, at a meeting thereof held on the /~ ~, day of
c:iti..l1vU7' ,1977, by the following vote:
,
I
I
-I
RESOLUTIDN NUMBER ~~~
Page 2.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT: Councilmen
....::J~.'~; F: ~&:~--../
Mayor
.~
;:- .,f
)
I
)
I
Resolution Number
Proposed Priority Plan of Expenditures
1976 State Bond Act
Based upon the 1976 Special Census, the estimated $6.9 million of 1976
State Bond Act monies have been allocat~d using the ratio of city popu-
lation to County population after allocating $2 million to the Coullty
Regional Park Program.
City
Population
Allocat i on
Anaheim
Brea
Buena Park
Costa Mesa
Cypress Park and Recreation District
Fountain Valll'Y
Fullerton
Garden Grove
Huntington Beach
Irvine
Laguna Beach
La H3bra
La Palma
Los Alamitos
Newport Bl'ach
Orange
Placlsnt i a
San Clemente
San Juan Capistrano
Santa Ana
Seal Beach
Stanton
Tus ri n
vi 11 a Park
\o:l'stminster
Yorba Linda
136,382
21,920
61 ,656
76,404
46,112
52,814
94,475
118. 179
151,500*
35,393
16,422
43,208
14,744
10,903
63, JOl
82,661
3l,281
22,lOO*
13,658
179,499
27,671
23,l50*
29,799*
6,841
67,437
23,266
562,624
62,799
176,6110
218.892
132,108
151,308
270,664
338,575
434,936
101,398
47,048
123,788
42,241
31,236
180,780
236,818
89,618
63,315
39,129
514,252
79,275
66,323
85,372
19,613
193,202
66,655"
$
Sub-total-Incorporated Arl'a
1,510,581
$4,327,709
Sub-tot aI-Unincorporated Area
Total Estimated County Population
211,513
1,722,094
605,970
$4,933,679
*City did not participate in the 1976 Special Census, consl'quently have supplied
a 197b estimated population based on a Cl'nsus performed in 1973 or 1974.
The above dollar figures may changl' slightly when the state provides the exact
amount of the allocation to thl' county. Th,' percentag" distribution would re-
mai n unchanci,C'd.
UII.:rm30Ia(l)
,)