HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Ord 802 1970-02-16
I
I
I
ORDINANCE NO. 802'
AN ORDINANCE OF TfIE CITY OF SEAL BEACH
ESTABLISHING ALLOWABLE LAND USES APPLICABLE
TO CERTAIN PROPERTY BY ADOPTING A PRECISE
PLAN NO. PP-I-69.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH OpES HEREBY ORDAIN:
Section 1. Precise Plan PP-I-69 is hereby adopted. Precise Plan No. PP-I-69
shall consist of map sheet numbered lA and 1 through 12 attached and the following
list of conditions and regulations: '
1. Those findings and conditions state~ in Resolution No. 385 of the
Planning Commission of the City of Seal Beach.
2. Additional conditions established by the City Council of the City
of Seal Beach and listed below.
Those findings and conditions stated in Resolution No. 69-13 of
the Redevelopment Agency of Seal Beach.
,
Section 2. All maps, plans, applications and reports stated in Section 1
above are made a part hereof and are incorporated herein with the same force and
effect as though set forth in full herein. :
I
Section 3, The City Clerk of the City of Seal Beach is hereby directed to
cause this ordinance and attached exhibits to be ~oste~s required by law.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED thi s 'of \ ...?lU,~, 19--;:zP
,
,
ATTEST:
~~~f;/s''-{;C~{~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss
CITY OF SEAL BEACH )
I, Jerdys Weir, City Clerk of the City of Seal Beach, hereby certify that the
foregoing ordinance was adopted, passed, and approved by the CitY~UnCil of the
City of Seal Beach at a meeting thereof held on tlie I/-, day of~ oA'-U'A'A...;;ro---
lr(2, by the following vote: '--' '
AYES: Councilmen LOA.ee..:.. ~:>-~-,..,.<-&-"_'" ~""~-......./
~
NOES: Councilmen ~~/'ce-..J
ABST.AHl: Councilmen (i..,,'::'#C~1
,
,
~I ~d~",
' A..../ '7A"J" C-t.
. y ,Clerk
I
I
I
i
i
I
L_ .
RESOLUTION NO. 385 '
,
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH APPROVING PRECISE PLAN
APPLICATION NO. PP-1-69 AND RECO~IENDING SAID
PRECISE PLAN TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITY
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR ADOPT-ION.
I
WHEREAS, in the matter of the request for approva1 of, a Precise Plan for certain
property, known as the Dot~ Chemical Co. property, ,lying adjacent to the San Gabriel
River and the old Pacif~c Electric Railroad and R~ght-of-Way in the City of Seal
Beach, the Planning Commission of the City of Seal Beach does report as follows:
,
1.
I
Subject case was initiated by R & B Development Co., 11570 West Olymp~c Blvd.,
I
Los Angeles, for Dow Chemical Co.
2.
Proposed developer of the property is the
I
abov,e stated R & B Development Co.
I
3. Legal description of the property is attached ias Exhibit "A".
,
4. Subject case is to adopt a Precise Pl.an for subject property. Property is
currently being rezoned by change of zone actron CZ-1-69, from M-2, Industrial,
to R-4, High Density Residential. Said Preci~e Pl.an shall be an integral part
of the zoning and shall govern the use and development of subject property.
I
Precise Plan mnp sheets numbered l.A and 1 through 12 are submitted as a part
of the proposed Precise Plan. I
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission findings are as follows:
, . I
1 Consideration of this application for approval as Precise Plan No. PP-1-69 shall
be considered sufficient to serve as concurredt review and action on the
required Schematic Plan (Stage 1) and Prelimin'ary Development Plan (Stage 2)
required by the Redevelopment Participation Ag~eement for the parcel.
2. The proposed de~elopment is in basic conforman1ce with the General Plan and
the Redevelopment Plan.
3.
The proposed development will not be detrimental to the character of the zone
and neighborhood and will enhance property val6es.
, I
Because of size and scope of the proposed deve[opment many of the requirements
of the zoning ordinance are not strictly or logically applicable.
Matters 'requiring special determination or var~an~e approval from provisions
,
of Zoning Ordinance No. 628 or the Riverfront Redevelopment Project are as
follows: I
(a) The 'recreation building is determined as being a main building, therefore
,not limited on height. I,
(b) ~'o encroachments are required into the 18 foot exterior sideyard along
future First Street. These will consist bf 10 foot setbacks located at
I '
the proposed parking structure and the exit structure of the ajoining
I
apartment building. These minor encroachments are acceptable.
4.
5.
'-
,
r- -
I
',I
,
I'
Ord~nance ~umber
.'
,
1.__ ...
R~solution No. '385 - 2
(c)
,
Two temporary advertising signs of 10' ~ 20' each are proposed. Not more
than 6 temporary on-site directional signs, maximum 50 square feet each or
total maximum of 200 square feet are proposed. These signs to be removed
not later than 30 days after City issuance of final certificate of occupancy.
This is in excess of the amount allowed by Code. Because of the magnitude
I
and scope of the project tile proposed amount of signing is acceptable,
I
subject to the Planning Commission review of actual designs and locations.
'I
,
Two permanent on-site identification sighs are proposed. These signs are
double faced, 63 square feet per face, i~ternally lighted, free standing.
-The area is in excess of the code allowance. Because of the nature and
location of this development the proposed amount of permanent I.D. signing
is acceptable, subject to Planning Commi~sion review of actual designs
I
and locations. I '
A tennis pro shop is proposed on-site, serving tenants only. This use is
determined to be a proper, acceptable an~ integral use as part of this
Precise Plan. I
(d)
(e)
(f)
!
" ,
A laundry and drycleaning pick-up station is proposed on-site, serving
tenants only. This use is determined to! be a proper, acceptable and
integral use as part of this Precise Plan.
, , ,I
A temporary ~railer leasing office is proposed on-site for a period of
4 to 6 months, until some permanent strubtures have been completed. Due
to ,the nature and location of the projec\t this i~ determined to be an
acceptable temporary use. ,
Intermittant catering of food and alcoho[ic beverages will be on-site,
serving tenants only. No permanent licehse will be issued for this
activity. Because of the location and the nature of the planned and
management-sponsored conlmunity programs provided in this development,
this is considered an acceptab~e use. I
The zoning code indicates a maximum of 10 units allowed per site in R-3
zones. This provision is not applicablel to the R-4 zone.
I
The zoning code requires a minimum of 700 square feet of floor area per
dwelling unit in the R-4 Zone. Subject ~pplicat1on proposes a range of ---
apartment sizes, with the smallest (bachklor unit) being 405 square feet~
The average size for all units is 687 sqhare feet. With the recreation
I
building, plus balconies, patios, hallways, stairs, etc. included, the
average is 912 square feet per unit. Inl addition a large amount of planned
recreation areas is planned on-site outdoors. Due to the scope and over-
,
all planned nature of this project and the large amount of common area
d ' '
facili~ies an amenitie~ provided, the apartment unit sizes are acceptable
as submitted. I
'The zoning code and redevelopment plan requirements for parking ratio are
. , .
1:5 to I, with adequate guest parking. Proposal is for 1:5 to 1 rat~o,
including guest parking. Approximately 30 spaces are available for curb
parking along First Street. Applicant ipdicates considerable parking usage
experience in the range of 1.'3 to l.t,: 1. At a usage of 1.1,: 1 for permanent
tenants, the proposal provides 0.1:1 on-site spaces for visitors (56 sp~ces).
Based upon evidence of previous usage experience submitted by applicant, and
staff investigation of actual liS age of similar projects, the proposed plan
(g)
,~.~ .
(h)
(i)
(j)
(k)
r -
I
I
"I" (s)
, ..
Ordinance Number'
I
L.
Resolution No. 385 - 3
is acceptable.
(1)
The zoning code requires all residential zone parking to be in a garage or
=ca~port. The Redevelopment Plan requires 1:1 covered parking. The proposal
requests approval,of open parking, except for 32 spaces in the lower level of
the parking structure. Applicant indicates that it is not possible to place
structures (carports) along the northwesterly 'side of the parcel, adjacent to
the river, since title company will not insure such structures on the Long
Beach side of th~ city line until title is cleared. Applicant also states
that experience indicates the advisability of providing open parking for such
large projects in drder to enhance security ~nd aesthetics. For tile reasons
above stated and the fact that this is a unique parcel due to the city line
which crosses the property, the proposal for open parking is acceptable, subject
to future review by the Planning Commission and the Redevelopment Agency when
title is cleared (see conditions of approval below).
(m)
The zoning code..requires 9 foot by 20 foot parking spaces with adequate access.
Policy has been for adequate access to be determined as 24 foot wide drives
for 900 parking. ' Redevelopment Plan calls for 190 square feet of parking space
per auto. Subject proposal is for 24 foot wide aisles, all spaces to be 20
feet deep (including 2 foot overhang over curbs), 75% of spaces to be 8'6"
wide (for standard cars) and 25% of spaces to 7'9" wide (for compacts and
sports cars(. Based upon applicant experience and investigation by staff this
is determined to be acceptable criteria for parking and access drives.
I
tenants will require parking space
to the ocean and marina. Proposal
propert~ line.' This is acceptable
. I '
The zoning code requires an alley to the rear of multiple residential properties.
The nature of subject development provides adequate on-site circulation,
therefore the alley requirement is waived. I
(n)
It is to be expected that numbers of
boat trailers, etc. due to proximity
54 tandem spaces' along the southwest
meeting this need.
for
indicates
for
(0)
(p)
The Redevelopment Plan allows no parking within required setback areas. The
proposed parking is open, except for one structure. If adequate landscaping
is provided this provision can be reasonably waived.
,
(q)
The Zoning Code and the Redevelopment Plan r~quire acceptable landscaping of
all parking areas. The first site plan submitted (dated 11-20-69) indicates
a band of landscaping around the complete site periphery of a minimum width of
5'. The revised sketch site plan (dated 12-1-69) does not indicate these land-
scaped strips. Such landscape strips around the complete periphery are hereby
determined to be necessary. (See conditions lof approval below.)
Proposal indicates most of the development will be constructed initially as
Phase I, with the remainder to follO\~ as Phas: 2. This is acceptable providing
that. all parking facilities on the total site and all access lanes be constructed
as ~art of Phase 1.
At the duly advertised public hearing on 12-3-69, no written protests were
received. Two oral protests were made, by Mr. Laurel Linn, 487 Galleon Way,
and Mr. Robert L. Phillips, 495 Galleon Way. Their basic objection was to the
proposed occup!'ncy of the apartments by "singles.-orlly".
(r)
;
1
"'I
I
Ordinance ~umber'
L.
Resolution No. 385 - 4
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Precise Plan No; PP-1-69 (also being considered
as Stage 1 Schematic Plan and Stage 2 Preliminary Development Plan required by the
Redevelopment Participation Agreement for subject parcel) is hereby approved and,
recommended to the Redevelopment Agency and the City Council of the City of Seal
Beach for approval, subject to all findings listed above, and subject to the
,rollowing conditions: '
1.
Stage 3, Final Deyelopment Plan, as required'by th~ Redevelopment Participation
Agreement for subject parcel, shall be submitted to the Planning Commission and
the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Seal Beach for review and approval
prior to issuance 9f any city building permits. Since the Precise Plan has
re~eived advertised public hearing, consideration of the Final Development Plan
will be by Plan Review procedure, without advertised public hearing being
required.
2.
The Redevelopment Participation Agreement for subject property shall be
modified as follows: To eliminate reference to electrical transmission lines
adjacent to'the site. The schedule of development be modified to conform to ..,.,
present schedules. ,Provision be added that >the City of Seal Beach and/or 'the'
. ., t I, _ .
Redevelopment agency of the City of Seal Beach shall not be responsible for any
, financial losses; etc. if First Street is n~t' extended i~ time to conform ~ith
applicants schedule, but the City will continue to use its best efforts to
acquire and construct First STreet.
"
3.
, ,
All utilities within the project shall be installed underground.
,4.
Developer shall not commence work on site until final soils map, report and,
construction specifications, prepared by a professionnl soils engineer, has
.. . ,. ~ .'
been submitted and approved by the City Engineer. All site grading and soils
,
preparation work shall be under the direct supervision of said soils engineer.
." .
s.
Uncovered parking'is allowed on-site until,such time that title is cleared thus
allowing construction of shelters on the Long Beach side of the City boundary
line. At said time the Planning Commission and Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Seal Beach shall review the total development for reconsideration of
the need for covered parking. Should such need for covered parking be found
to be unnecessary, no further action shall be required by the developer.
Should it be detc;lrmined that such covered parking is necessary then developer
shall proceed to construct approved parking shelters within a period of six
months from date of said dete~lination. These shelters shall be at the ratio
of l:l'and shall be located at SUcll spaces on site as are determined acceptable.
6.
,
In addition to general site landscaping, a strip. of landscaping at least 5 foot
in width shall be provided on-site around the complete periphery of the property.
l ' I
7. Owner and/or developer shall grant to the City. in fee, a strip of land 10 feet
, wide along the side of the ~arcel abutting Pacific Coast Highway and a similar
10 foot,wide strip abutting the future FirstlStreet side of the property.
8. Accbss for [ire apparatus shall be provided as required by the Fire Department
and'subject to approval of structural adequaty by the City Engineer.
,
j_n
j-
I
I'
1
Ordinance Number
, '
I
I
L..
Resoluti9n No. 385 - 5
9. Fire' fight'ing facilities such as hydr:mts and water mains shall be subject
to approval by the Fire Department and City, Engineer.
10;' All landscaped areas shall be provided with ,an underground sprinkling system.
11. Final plans for landscaping shall be subject to approval as part of Stage 3,
,Final Development Plans. Actual installation of landscaping shall be subject
to inspection and"approval of materials and methods oy the Director of
Planning and Engineering.
12. Developer shall construct a raised center t~affic island in Pacific Coast
Highway from the North City Limits to future First Street intersection. Said
traffic island sha~l include approved landscaping, complete with underground
irrigation system. City shall cooperate with developer in obtaining necessary
permit from State Division of Highways. !
'13. All on-site improvements of an engineering type, such as paving, walls, parking
areas, vehicle traffi~lays, walkways, grading, drainage, underground water
system, underground sewage system, outdooe lighting, etc., shall be subject to
plan review, approval, and construction inspection by the Director of Planning
and Engineering.
14. Developer shall construct and maintain an irrigated lancjscaped "beauty spot"
at the most northerly corner of the property" adjacent to Pacific Coast
Highway and the San Gabriel River. '
15. Developer shall pay all fees required by City Codes and regulations, including
but not limited to, building, electrical, plumbing, plan check, excise, etc.
and an engineering plan check and inspection fee of 2% of the estimated value
of all on-site engineering type improvements such as listed in No. 13 above,
including landscaping. I
16.
The 10 foo~ wide strips of land listed in
and maintained by the developer including
Item 7
street
I
above shall be landscaped
trees.
17. Developer and 'City shall agree that all conditions indicated herein and approved
by adoption of the map sheets constituting Precise Plan No. PP-1-69 and any
conditions approved by the City Council and Redevelopment Agency are acceptable
to all parties and shall be controlling conditions in the development of this
site. ~ written agreement shall be executed including all said provisions.
lS, ^ parcel map shall be provided by the developer, creating the proposed building
site and indicating the 10 foot strips along'Pacific Coast Highway and First
Street as separate parcels. Parcel Map shal~ be recorded prior to issuance of
building'permits.
19. An adequate corner cut-off at the intersection of Pacific Coast lIigh,.ay and
First Street shall be granted to the City.
20. After approval of Stage 3, Final Development Plans,'by the Planning Commission
and Redevelopment Agency minor changes in site, plans may be approved by the
Dirrlctor of Planning and Engineering. If ot~er than minor changes are made
,
in the proposed development, a new site development plan application shall be
filed which replects the revisions made. .1
I
,
.--
I'
'I
I
Ordinance Numbe~
I
L.
Reso11tion No. 385- 6
ADOPTED AND APPROVED tqis 3rd'day of December, 1969.
Chairman o! the Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was' duly adopted at a regular
meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Seal Beach which was held on
Wednesd~y, December 3, 1969, and carried by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioners: .
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
Barton, Knapp, Lanning, Morris
None
Crowley
Secre~ary of the Planning Commission
,,-
~
..
;" (- ".," ,) ",':; . '. '~''', ,
'. , " 'E,' t..!: ',' ~~ ',\:.':,\ " .',' ,: ',~, ,,':' .,,',' .. """.''' ,',: "
. ... I, t.t.....!:.!.." i'
... ...., . . .'. ..' . ..~.
, :., ])}M;Cmr.'l'IOJ.I 01;" OnilJ.!G1~ C00l-l'J.'Y. MID r:a3 IIJ-!GEI.ES COllI,m~ l'!10l'm5'}.'x ":: (
, ':~rPi>,~~.'\\l;h!~, ;<~y,;..:t} ))r.i~~~r~.;; . ; . . ..::~':''.-':''; :.:.; ..':
I..' ,))~ I :~ihor,H: POl't:i,ojw or Lot; 2 and '{;il~ area. ',labeled ':~iSv.n Gnbr'lcl " ",:J, ,":
, ':>. 'Ij:i,ve:L'Il: of '~:hc ~kn G~\hl':i.c), EX(;ClIl>:i,o,1 of )fnp1eciJ" iil thd cHy,,: ,".
''':;''',: ,;of':,Seul,- E~t\ch. 'cQtint:y of OJ:'~nGe j sk,\;3 of Cf:',liforrd.[',J, EW .: ..', ;" .,,:
::,',:" __ j)e'r me.p, roc:ordf.cl 1,11 ,boe,!. '{' p~(Ge 31 ~f I,i1occllanCOl\rJ Ihpr,. ,"
, in the' ofrlcc of th:~ couni;y rCC(lN~el" of sa1.c1 cOllnt:y. EJ,nd
thor-c- .Pol'{:1.oris of T"ot 1 o.nd,'tl:le 2~O'.fo6t Stl'1.p lE',bcled "Snn"
: G~,l))"icl n:i,ve~,1I :l.n,~'ri.\ct t!o'- 107'(. :i,n the city' of l,on~ Ilec:',ch. ':">::~,
, ,..~o,~mty of ~,os .An~clc~. state or CE'.1Hoy'n:i,a,' e,l'; per ,m~:p rc- ,:, ,~'. "', , :
,'corded :i,n book HI page 195 of !,laps. :l.n the office of the' _ "-'.':'
, ' '" : ~ county recorder of L'os Angeles county. desCl'ibeq as a whole
as follo\"m:
,
,. ~
,...
, -
'..'~I',
, .-
"
!': .'
I"
Ordinance ~umbec'
i
L
, ,
.
:,~'j\r
, ,
- :'BeBinn:l.ne; at the most sOlltherly corner of Parcel 19 of Rccor~,
,,' of Survey. recorded in book '5/1 p:l.e;e 26 of Record of Sm'vcys.,
recol'c1.s of Los Angeles County j thence along; the soutlnles t.er1y
," bounctLry of Parcels 19 and l"{ of sa1,d Record of Survey. N01't.h
, 1120 181 00" \'!est 502.3'{ feet. to the most \'lestcrly corner of
, ..said Parcel J.7j thence along the northi';csterJ.y boundary of ..'
,': d:latd Parcel 17 as follOl'IS: .North 53/1~ 00\ 30" E~st ,1230.37 ,:,
, ,feet and northeasl;C'rJy 51.'08 feet alone; a cUl;ve concave no1'th- ," "
';"'lesterly hav1.ng a 'radius of 21100.00 feet. to a Hnc extending , ,.., _,
:,' ,tlesterly at rieht angles Trom. andlpassinr; thl'ough a potnt on.
", . the nort:herly prolonba,tion of .-'that certain course in the ,center
line of Calii'ol'n-J.a Sta t.e H),gh\'lay. shown on: Los Angeles, C;ol,mty
Surveyor's ?ftap B-350. Sheet 2., 'op .('i1e~,in the Qffi!;:'e, of the'
county engineer of ,Los Angeles county, as bearIng South 10 201
50" East 846.32 feet (said certain,'course .hav':l.ng a bear'inc;. of
South 10 161 50" l<:ast for purposes lor this descrlptj.on). said
point beine; distant nOl'thcrly, along sald proloJ:}gation 119.20
'feet 'from the northerly terminus of sa"i.c1 cOUI'Sej thence along
said line so extending. North ,880 43' ,10" East 111.08 feet to
.'that,..ccrtain course shm':n as ,halTing a bearj,ng and length of
"NorEh .1160 2111 01" r!est 988.60 feet" on C.L.B. D:{G', E 2/13.03
filqd in the 'City Engineer I s Offtce of the City of Long B~ach.
cert'ifiec1 by F'rancois D. Uzes~ L;S.!j thence alan;?; said last
" ment:l.oned certain course. South,I160 2LII 01" East 8/1,/19 feet
to the westerly line pf said.hereinbefore mentioned CaJifornia
,,State lIigi11'lay. 100.00 feet \'lj.:C1,e j "then~e' along said high'1ay as
f911ows: southerly 59.60 feet along'a curve concave Westerly.
having a rad:i.us of 1950.00 feet and tangent to satd ClU've
South 10 16' 50" East 386.59,feet to the southeasterly l:l,ne
, ' .. of sa,iel Pal'cel 19; thence along said, southeasterly Ene. South
." 540 lllp 2011 \'lest 10'(9.58 feet to the point of be(;tnning.
." .~::
:, ..
"
,
.:':'. ....
~ .
'.
-.
....
.
~
."., .
.,
r
" '
,"
.
.
.
, '
1--' ,
-"
Ordinance Number
, ,
RESOLUTION NO. 69-13
A RESOLUTIDr-1 OF TIlE REDEVELOPMENT AGErlCY OF
THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH APPROVIIlG PRECISE PLAN
NO. PP-1-69 FOR A PORTIOiI OF THE RIVERFRONT
REDEVELOPfiEilT PROJECT. '
WHEREAS, the Agency has undertaken redevelopment activities pursuant to the
California Community Redevelopment lal~; and
..
I
,~IHEREAS, the Agency ha~ prepared a Redevelopment Plan for the proposed Riverfront
~edevelop~~nt Project; and !
WHEREAS, said Redeveloprr.ent Plan provides for the.p.articipation in the redeveloprr.ent
,of the Project area by the ol'mers of property therein if. the o~mers agree to
redevelop their property. in accordance with the RedevelopMent'Plan; and
~!HEREAS, the 001'/ Chemical Company, owners of property within the 'Riverfront
Redevelopment Project area have executed a Participation Agreement with the
Agency for redevelopment of property described in, attached Exhibit "A", and have
designated the R & B Development Company as their, authorized agent in Matters
concerning the redevelopment of said property; an~ '
~!lIEREAS, a requirement of said participation agreement is the submission of
construction plans in three stages; schematic, preliminary and final; and
,
I
, . . .._\....! "
~lHEREAS,. R 1\ B Development Company has submitted ,as ,P,recise.,P'lan Jl.ppliea-tion "
No. PP-1-69 an extensive set of site development ~nd architectural development
plans: and i
, liHEREJIS, the Planni ng Commi ssi on of the City of Seal~ li~a,ch ~as 'approved Preci se
Plan No. PP-1-69, ~Iith the finding that said plan~ are sufficient to be considered
as meeting the requirements for both the schematic and pre-liminary construction '
plan stages, and have reconmended approval by the:Agency, subject to a number of
finding~ and conditions. t ,-, .'
;
, -
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: I
Section 1. 'Precise Plan PP-1-69 is hereby approved. Precise Plan No.
PP-1-69 shall consi,st of map sheets numbered 1,1\ aod 1 through 12 and the follo~/ing
list of conditions and regulatio~s: I
I .
A. Those findings and conditions stated in Resolution No. 385 of the
Planning Commission of the City of Seal Beaell,
I
Section 2. The follol-ling amendments in t~e "O.mer's Participation Agree-
ment" covering the la~d to be developed under PP~1-69:
I
,
A. The requirement of undergrounding or removal of First Street
utilities at no cost to the developer be eliminated from tile agreement;
B. The developer to dedicate ten feet:(10') of property along the
projected First Street extension and ten feet (10') of property along
Pacific Coast Highway without cost to the City of Agency at or near the
tir~ of approval of working drawings; I
C.' Provisions relating to the relocation of the city's sel~age
trea~ment plant are to be eli~inated from th~ participating agreement;
D. The developer and Agency and City to enter into an agreement
for the life of the project whereby the adja4ent property in the City of
long Beach is to be used exclusively as shO\'rrj on the preliminary plan;
, "
1
I,
I
.
. .
Orqinan~e.Number
. '
..
Page 2
E. The provision of the participation' agreement relating to the
developer not being required to commence construction if First Street
and the relocation of the sewage treatment ~lant were not financed be
eliminated; 1
F. 'The Participation AgreeMent provisions relatin!l to developer
termination of agreement if financing not available be ~liminated or
modified to provide commencement of development within ,six (6) months
of approval of working drawings; I '
G. That t~e City/Agency is to proceed with acquisition of First
Street right of ~ay adjacent to development IWith all deliberate speed, to
construct one-half of street as soon as pos~ible after receipt of deeds
to the property, City/Agen~y, to use best,ef~orts to secur~ remaining
right of way and construct t\10 lanes of street for balance of First Street
to Marina Drive, C1ty to request 'right of ~ntry' and permission for
construction road from fiarina Drive to Coast High\'/ay for use of developer,
and City/Agency to have the option of constt.ucting to either an ultimate
100' or 120 I road\'/ay and to have the opti on :of cons tructing two 1 anes
complete between r.larina Drive and Coast f1igh\'/ay, or a full high\'/ay ~ection
adjacent to the proposed development; i
H. The acceptance of the 32 covered p,arking spaces as a permitted
variance and minor modification of the Redevelopment Plan;
I. The acceptance of the proposed 84i parking spaces, plus 37
tandem spaces, plus parking facilities for b'oats, trailers, and motorcycles'
as meeting the Redevelopm,en,t.Plan provisions' for. off,7,st.r~et parking of .
tenants ana guests; I ' ' "
, J. The acceptance of the size of par0ing spaces proposed, 630
spaces at 8l-.' x 20' and 212 spaces at 7-3/4 'I x 20 I, \1aS a minor modifi cati on
and vari ance to the Redev,~,l opment Pl an and \'/aS accepted...and arproved;
K. That Sheet Hl of the prorosed pl anI as adopted and arrroved as
Precise Plan PP-1-69 be added and approved vlith said rlan..
Section 3. All maps, plans, apPlicationJ and reports stated above are
made a part hereof and are incorporated herein \'/ith the same force and effect
as though set forth in full herein.
PASSED, Jl,PPROVED ArlO ADOPTED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Seal Beach
at a meeting thereof held on the day of I ,19 ,by the
follO\~ing vote: ' --.- - -
AYES:
NOES:
ABSEIlT:
Chai rman
Secretary