HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Min 2000-08-28
8-14-00 / 8-28-00
I
The Director of Public Works explained that at present the
City is awaiting additional dirt, that is coming from the
sewer project, City crews will then amend the soil, install
an irrigation system, there is about two hundred fifty
fifteen gallon trees anticipated, the size is a requirement
of the grant, as a result, in addition to beautification it
is hoped that this will slow traffic speeds as well, the
intent is to use ground cover rather than turf, turf uses
more water and labor, ground cover will also add color, there
will be some hardscape, the Recreation and Parks Director has
been working with the tree committee, some architects, and
the Parks Supervisor on this project. Councilman Boyd
mentioned that if there are other opportunities for medians
in the community he would like to see a variation of turf and
ground cover use, it is understood that the continuation of
the greening of the Bolsa parkway will take place this year
as well. with regard to the time frame for the Boulevard
improvements, the Public Works Director reported that the Gas
Company phase is nearly complete, the sewer line replacement
will be finished shortly thereafter, it is a week ahead of
schedule, all southbound lanes should be open this week, the
northbound possibly the following week, then the paving phase
which as yet does not have a start date. To Councilman
Larson's inquiry as to something taking place on Westminster
Avenue, the Public Works Director stated that it is a Long
Beach project, possibly the bridge, and there was work too by
the Orange County Water District on some injection wells.
Mayor Campbell thanked the City crews for the weeding in the
Lampson Avenue center divider.
I
ADJOURNMENT
By unanimous consent, the Council adjourned the meeting until
August 28th at 6:15 p.m. to meet in Closed Session relating
to employee negotiations. The meeting was adjourned at 11:10
p.m.
CJ
ex-off"cio clerk
Seal Beach
Approved:
---fJWJ~; ~ ~
Mayof
Attest:
I
Seal Beach, California
August 28, 2000
The City Council of the City of Seal Beach met in regular
adjourned session at 6:15 p.m. with Mayor Campbell calling
the meeting to order with the Salute to the Flag.
8-28-00
ROLL CALL
Present:
Mayor Campbell
Councilmembers Boyd, Doane, Larson, Yost
Absent:
None
Also present: Mr. MCIntyre, Interim City Manager
Mr. Barrow, City Attorney
Ms. Yeo, City Clerk
I
CLOSED SESSION
The City Attorney announced that the Council would meet in
Closed Session to discuss the items identified on the agenda,
a conference with the City's labor negotiator pursuant to
Government Code Section 54957 and a conference with legal
counsel relating to existing litigation, Ruby's Diner,
pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a). The Council
adjourned to Closed Session at 6:17 p.m. and reconvened at
7:00 p.m. with Mayor Campbell calling the meeting to order.
The City Attorney reported the Council had discussed the
items previously identified, gave direction, and no other
reportable action was taken.
ADJOURNMENT
It was the order of the Chair, with consent of the Council,
to adjourn the meeting at 7:01 p.m.
I
Approved:
~cdk~lfl)~
Attest:
Seal Beach, California
August 28, 2000
The City Council of the City of Seal Beach met in regular
session at 7:04 p.m. with Mayor Campbell calling the meeting
to order with the Salute to the Flag.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Mayor Campbell
Councilmembers Boyd, Doane, Larson, Yost
I
Absent: None
Also present: Mr. McIntyre, Interim City Manager
Mr. Barrow, City Attorney
Mr. Whittenberg, Director of Development
Services
8-28-00
I
Mr. Badum, Director of Public Works/City
Engineer
Chief Sellers, Police Department
Mr. Dorsey, Assistant to the City Manager
Ms. Beard, Director of Recreation and Parks
Ms. Arends-King, Director of Administrative
Services
Mr. Corbin, City Manager's Office
Ms. Yeo, City Clerk
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
The Interim City Manager mentioned being made aware of a
request as of this date from the office of the Grand Jury for
a response to the Jury report relating to urban runoff, noted
the need for a written request for an extension of time to
respond, and requested that this issue be placed on the
agenda to authorize either the Mayor or City Manager to make
said request. The City Attorney noted that this issue came
to the attention of the Council after the posting of the
agenda and requires action prior to the next City Council
meeting. Yost moved, second by Boyd, to add the Grand Jury
response request to the agenda as Item "G-1".
AYES:
NOES:
Boyd, Campbell, Doane, Larson, Yost
None Motion carried
Boyd moved, second by Larson, to approve the order of the
agenda as revised.
I
AYES:
NOES:
Boyd, Campbell, Doane, Larson, Yost
None Motion carried
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Councilman Yost noted that the Ray Bay Surf Classic will be
held on September 9th and 10th, applications are available at
the surf shops and Lifeguard headquarters. Mayor Campbell
mentioned the Muscular Dystrophy telethon over the upcoming
weekend, to which she has volunteered her time for several
years, and invited anyone having some time to devote to this
cause to contact her for a telethon representative, and
directions, or, suggested that they make a donation.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Mayor Campbell declared Public Comments open. Mr. Glen
Clark, Trailer park,"noted the upcoming Sand Castle event, a
wonderful event, many Trailer Park residents helped last year
and will likely do so again this year, people attend from all
over, and invited the community to join in. There being no
further comments, Mayor Campbell declared Public Comments to
be closed.
I
PRESENTATION
Mayor Campbell read in full the Proclamation citing the month
of October, 2000 as "Seal Beach Days" and October 7th, 2000
as "Seal Beach Founder's Day. Ms. Carla Watson mentioned
that on October 7th there will be a parade and events on the
greenbelt. Ms. Emily Allebaugh-Frazier noted there is need
for more sponsors and persons to work the booths. Councilman
Boyd expressed appreciation to the Founders Day committee
that works year after year on this celebration.
POLICY MANUAL
Councilman Boyd noted this is an item carried forward from a
prior meeting, this will basically create a binder to contain
8-28:"00
city Council policies to be available at all public counters.
He mentioned that the Council had been provided copies of
prior policies from a manual initiated by the City Manager in
about 1990/1991, recent Council adopted policies such as the
investment policy, historic structure preservation policy,
and encroachment policy will be included in the manual, for
those policies in the prior manual he would recommended that
they be reviewed/revised for future Council consideration as
to their appropriateness at this time for placement in the
manual, thus discussion of the prior policies be postponed to
a future date. Councilman Boyd asked for Council consensus
to establish the policy manual. Councilman Larson indicated
he would have questions relating to the prior policies as to
the amount of liability insurance, the policy relating to the
hours of closure for alcoholic beverage establishments is a
blank, in fact that is specifically non-existent inasmuch as
each establishment is different. Councilman Larson noted
that the policy states that a telephone number is to be made
available for those establishments, his preference would be
an after-hours telephone number. Councilman Boyd again
pointed out that the prior policies had been provided Council
as background, no action is requested at this time, and noted
that the new manual proposes seven categories and will
contain an annual message from the Mayor, will also be
included on the web site. Yost moved, second by Boyd, to
adopt the format for the City Council policy manual.
I
AYES:
NOES:
Boyd, Campbell, Doane, Larson, Yost
None Motion carried
APPOINTMENT - CITIZENS PARTICIPATION COMMITTEE - DISTRICT TWO
Councilman Larson moved to appoint Ms. Allene Harding as the
District Two representative to the Citizens Participation
Committee for the full term of four years expiring July,
2004. Councilman Boyd seconded the motion.
I
AYES:
NOES:
Boyd, Campbell, Doane, Larson, Yost
None Motion carried
CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS "D" thru "G-1"
Doane moved, second by Larson, to approve the recommended
action for items on the Consent Calendar as presented.
D. Approved the waiver of reading in full of
all ordinances and resolutions and that
consent to the waiver of reading shall be
deemed to be given by all Councilmembers
after reading of the title unless specific
request is made at that time for the
reading of such ordinance or resolution.
E.
Approved regular demands numbered 28840
through 29087 in the amount of $885,567.33,
payroll demands numbered 8870 through 9066
and 9000359 through 9000370 in the amount of
$276,886.53, and authorized warrants to
be drawn on the Treasury for same.
I
F. Approved the minutes of the August 9th
adjourned meeting, and the August 14th
special, adjourned, and regular meetings.
G. Adopted Resolution Number 4834 entitled "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SEAL BEACH DECLARING WORK TO BE COMPLETED
8-28-00
I
AS TO PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PROJECT
#814, SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD SEWER MANHOLE
RECONSTRUCTION, CONTRACT ENTERED INTO
BETWEEN STEVE BUBALO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,
INC. AND THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH." By
unanimous consent, full reading of Resolution
Number 4834 was waived.
G-1. Authorized the City Manager to prepare a
letter to be forwarded to Superior Court
Judge Jamison requesting an extension of
time to respond to the Orange County Grand
Jury Report entitled "Rainy Seasons First
Flush Hits the Harbors of Orange County."
AYES:
NOES:
Boyd, Campbell, Doane, Larson, Yost
None Motion carried
I
PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED AMENDMENT - DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT /
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 15797 - BIXBY OLD RANCH TOWNE
CENTER PROJECT - RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION TIMING - ORDINANCE
NUMBER 1467 / RESOLUTION NUMBER 4833
Mayor Campbell declared the public hearing open to consider a
proposed amendment to the Bixby Old Ranch Towne Center
Project Development Agreement and Vesting Tentative Tract Map
15797. The City Clerk certified that notice of the public
hearing was advertised and mailed as required by law, and
reported no written communications received relating to this
matter. The Director of Development Services presented the
staff report and noted the Planning Commission consideration
of this item under public hearing on August 9th, the intent
of the item is to amend the Development Agreement that was
entered into with the Bixby Ranch Company for the Bixby Old
Ranch Towne Center project, more specifically with regard to
the phasing of timing of permit issuance fqr residential
construction as it is related to the construction of the
commercial structures in the shopping center. He mentioned
that the development agreement was adopted by ordinance
therefore amendment thereof is also required by ordinance, at
the time the development agreement was approved the Council
also approved a tentative tract map for the residential
component of the project that contains a similar condition
therefore amendment of the vesting tentative tract map is
proposed by adoption of a resolution. He noted Council has
been provided a copy of the Planning Commission staff report,
draft minutes, and the Commission Resolution recommending
approval of the change by a four to one vote. The Director
explained that Section 3127 of the development agreement does
not allow the issuance of a building permit for the
residential component in Area D prior to the approval of
interior lath and drywall inspections for the commercial
retail areas A, the Target Store, B the Ralphs Market, E the
Bed, Bath and Beyond, and F the Sav-On Drug Store, the major
building pads of the shopping center. The Director clarified
that at the time of placing this provision in the development
agreement Bixby had previously proposed a residential only
project on the site and the concern was if the City were to
grant permits for both the commercial and residential that
only the residential would be built and the commercial would
not, the provision was to assure that the commercial would
occur. The Director made reference to a letter from the
Bixby Ranch Company explaining their reasons for believing it
was appropriate to make this change given the fact that at
the time of the initial approval of the conditions the City
had not been considering residential development on that
I
8-28-00
site, rather the proposal was for a church facility to which.
the Council determined to not be an appropriate land use thus
the change from institutional use to residential use,
subsequent to that there was the CEQA litigation, the
initiative effort, all of which caused considerable delay,
the feeling of Bixby is that at this point it is no longer
necessary to retain that condition. The Director mentioned
that as part of the staff review the EIR was looked at for
any discussion of the phasing issue, it was discussed also
with Culbertson Adams Associates, the City's selected EIR
consultant for the project, their opinion was that there are
no substantial changes proposed, the basic project
description would not change if the condition were
eliminated, there is no new information that was not known at
the time that has been entered into the record prior to the
certification of the EIR that would impact the certification,
with the recommendation of Culbertson Adams the staff has
determined that the proposed change to the phasing complies
with CEQA therefore no further CEQA analysis is necessary.
with regard to the status of the project to date, the
Director reported that Kitchell Development has taken title
to Development Area A, the twenty-six acre shopping center,
and two portions of Area B, eight acres designated for
commercial at Lampson and Seal Beach Boulevard, they have
proceeded with preparation of grading plans, have completed
rough grading, the infrastructure plans are now in the
Engineering Department for utilities, roadway improvements,
driveway points, etc., Kitchell has in turn transferred title
to Target Corporation for their structure, they now own that
site in fee title. In terms of timing for the anticipated
construction schedules for the residential and commercial
components of the project, Kitchell as the primary developer
for the remaining stores in the shopping center expects to
have the construction plans for all of the other buildings to
the City for plan check review in October of this year with
anticipation of obtaining building permits to commence
construction in November with the intent of having those
buildings completed for businesses to open in a March and
April, 2001 time frame. The Director noted that should the
proposed amendments be approved, Centex Homes would
anticipate submitting grading plans for the seventy homes in
September with actual grading in November, building plan
submittal for plan check in November as well in anticipation
of building permit issuance by February, 2001, it would then
be approximately five to six months until the homes would be
occupiable. The Director said, as brought to the attention
of the Planning Commission, it is felt these are policy
determinations of the City, questions are did the delays
caused by the CEQA lawsuit change the circumstances under
which the condition was imposed, is it desirable for the
residential development to proceed without the completion of
a large portion of the major commercial tenant structures,
is it desirable for the residential development to proceed
prior to and/or parallel to the construction of the major
commercial tenant structures, and, does the progress of the
commercial development on the site make it clear that
commercial development will be completed concurrently with
residential development, to that the Director stated that
from a land planning standpoint, staff, in reviewing this
request with the office of the City Attorney, could find no
adverse effect from an approval of the amendments, and again,
the staff feels this is a policy issue for the City Council.
The Director noted that an alternative was presented to the
Planning Commission should they have felt there should be
another level of completion by Kitchell Development prior to
I
I
I
8-28-00
I
granting the amendment requested, which was that no activity
on the residential component could take place until the
building permit was issued for Target, that is no longer an
issue in that the building permit was issued this past
Friday. Should the Council adopt the recommendations of the
Planning Commission, the Director noted there could be
beneficial impacts, there would be a shorter time period of
traffic disruptions along the Boulevard due to a shorter
construction period, rather than the commercial and then the
residential construction they would occur nearly at the same
time, a shorter period of dust generation, noise impacts,
specifically from the residential construction, a shorter
period of air quality impacts, and less conflict on new
businesses while the residential construction takes place.
The Director mentioned that information received this date is
that on July 14, 2000 Bixby sold the twenty-six acre site to
Old Ranch Towne Center, LLC, which is an Arizona limited
liability company, the City has a copy of the grant deed,
that same day Kitchell Development transferred title of the
Target building area to Target Corporation, the City has the
recording number of that grant deed, the final grading permit
for the Towne Center was issued this date by the Public Works
Department, the building permit issued on Friday is numbered
18495, in order to obtain the permit Target Corporation paid
to the City for said permit $678,016.75, $457,130.06 of that
is the Transportation Development Impact Fee that will be
placed in a separate account designated for the bridge
widening. To an inquiry of Councilman Doane, the Director
explained that there had been a rough grading permit
previously issued for the entire site, with the issuance of
the final grading permit there were some drainage issues at
the southerly end of the Center in the vicinity of where
Ralphs will be located, there were no issues relating to the
Target building area, the Engineering Department then agreed
that a foundation permit could be issued while resolution of
the drainage issue at the southerly end continues. To the
question of Councilman Yost relating to curtailment of urban
runoff, the Director of Public Works explained that the
grading plan addresses drainage in its entirety, all of the
drainage from the commercial site drains to the golf course
retention basin, prior to flowing onto the golf course the
development has been required to install Stormseptors, which
is a sediment catch basin, for oil/water separation and
debris removal, this is beneficial to the golf course as well
as water quality, however anything that does not get picked
up by these devices will filter through the basin, therefore
the vast majority of suspended pollutants in the water system
will probably filtrate into the ground surface of the golf
course, a good system with the retention basin. The Mayor
inquired about the issues with the channel from the air base.
The Public Works Director stated that the grading of the golf
course has been separated from the grading of the commercial
site, the City is still working to resolve the issues on the
golf course, working with the AFRC, the Army Corps of
Engineers, to resolve the channel issues, from a technical
perspective it is solved, it is now essentially getting
agreement from the AFRC to resolve the issues and seek
permission to make certain changes on their property, and
confirmed that the City is working with the Bixby Company for
resolution and is working with the military.
I
I
Mayor Campbell invited members of the audience wishing to
speak to this item to come to the microphone and identify
themselves for the record. Mr. Ron Bradshaw, Bixby Ranch
Company, the applicant for the amendment of the development
8-28-00
agreement, stated that the issues that have been discussed by
staff have basically covered the request for the
modifications. Mr. Bradshaw referred back to 1998 when the
agreement was approved at which time the City determined that
residential was a more appropriate use than the church
institutional use, there was then the request by the City to
ensure that the commercial went forward, that was not an
issue at the time. He noted that what has happened in the
ensuing two years was the CEQA lawsuit brought by the City of
Los Alamitos, the community of Rossmoor, and the Rossmoor
Center, they directed objection to a number of issues however
did not object to the residential. During that period of
time Bixby was also seeking a builder for the residential
component, and given the amount of time, it is felt what has
been found is a quality residential builder for the seventy
homes. Mr. Bradshaw expressed his belief that short of the
issuance of a building permit all of the grading for the
residential could move forward anytime, it just could not go
forward from the slabs up in terms of building, a problem
however at this point is the transfer of title of the
property, Bixby Ranch Company to Centex, they are being held
up due to a condition in the development agreement that is to
be performed by Kitchell and Target, which is an issue for
Centex in terms of them moving forward and a delay of the
residential component. He offered that the project could
move forward to lessen the number of impacts on the street
improvements, the work on the Boulevard could be done in one
phase and prior to the residential being in place, if Target
were to open in May of 2001 all of the street improvements
could be done, including signalization, by the end of 2000 or
early 2001, Target will need the signals for their opening,
and the subsequent opening of the other majors will be about
two months following Target. Mr. Bradshaw said what will
also come about with this development agreement amendment is
that following this consideration Bixby will be coming in
with a new parcel map for the residential component that will
show one additional parcel, the community television studio
and the north Seal Beach police substation, that facility can
not move forward until there is a parcel map and approval to
move forward with the residential as that facility is a
component of the residential, his feeling is that the overall
benefit of concluding the disruption of the benefits that are
outlined in the development agreement, the path along the
windrow, the work on the Boulevard, etc., it makes sense to
have all of this come together at one time, the City to then
receive the benefits of the conditions that it imposed prior
to a date that would be more uncertain if the home builder is
not allowed to move forward.
I
I
By unanimous consent, a recess was called at 7:47 p.m. The
Council reconvened at 7:59 p.m. with Mayor Campbell calling
the meeting to order.
Ms. Janice Shackle, Centex Homes, the residential developer,
for this project, stated that Centex is looking forward to
doing the project, the schedule that was presented would
allow them to open the models in June of 2001, the prime
selling season, the concern is if the performance of Centex
is held contingent upon the performance of another that
Centex has no control over that and they may not be able to
meet the schedule. Mr. John Unrath, Dogwood Avenue, noted
that it has been said that the transfer of property has taken
place between the Bixby Company and Target, the document
numbers quoted relating to the transfer were 720, reference
was made to documents 713 and 716 in the presentation, yet at
I
. .~ ..
I
I
I
8-28-00
the time that research took place the only document on file
at the County Recorders office was the 720 document, not the
713 or 716 documents, the 720 document is a Memorandum of
Developer Rights Agreement between Target Corporation and Old
Ranch Town Center, which makes the statement that the owner
grants,the devel~per the 'option' to purchase the property,
an opt~on, to th~s he suggested that before consideration is
given to approve the amendment that documents 713 and 716 be
in hand to verify that the transfer of title has taken place.
Mr. Unrath made reference to the schedule that estimates a
Target opening as April/May 2001, homes anticipated to open
by June 2001, to him there is not much difference in the time
frames whether the amendment is granted or not, thus by the
time the lathe and wallboard are up it makes little
difference in terms of building the houses, also, the City
loses the only leverage to assure that the commercial
development actually occurs, in his opinion there should be
no opportunity given to cancel the commercial development,
and asked that there be clarification of the term option.
There being no further comments, Mayor Campbell declared the
public hearing closed.
In response to Mayor Campbell, the Development Services
Director confirmed that the City has copies from the
Recorders Office of the referenced 713 and 716 grant deed
documents. At the invitation of Council, Mr. Bradshaw made
reference to the statement of there only being a two month
difference in the time schedules, which he clarified that
that would be the case if the requested amendment is granted,
if that does not occur the actual processing on the
residential project will not start until about February,
2001, which ends up to be a seven to nine month period of
time, there will not be completed streets, the police
substation and cable studio will not have been started,
therefore the impact is much greater than two months.
Councilman Boyd asked if there is any negative fiscal impact
to the City by accelerating the development schedule. The
Director said he could not think of one, the commercial
development will proceed irregardless of the Council
decision, what actually could be seen is a positive fiscal
impact because the title would likely transfer to Centex
Homes sooner which would result in an earlier adjustment of
the property tax value, also building department and traffic
fees that would be realized sooner. Councilman Boyd stated
he would support the amendment to the development agreement
for the reasons that it is felt there has been adequate
assurances that the commercial development will proceed, that
was the spirit and intent of that condition being placed in
the agreement initially, also, as can be seen by the housing
market in Seal Beach there is a shortage, as well as in the
County, this is an addition of seventy quality homes, sixteen
of which will have an affordability clause for mortgage
assistance, this is an opportunity for additional housing and
a contribution to affordable housing.
Councilman Boyd moved to approve the introduction of
Ordinance Number 1467 entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
SEAL BEACH AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY AND THE BIXBY RANCH COMPANY, DELETING SECTION 3.1.2.7 -
PROJECT PHASING (TIMING OF RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION) RELATING
TO THE OLD RANCH TOWNE CENTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN"
and
to adopt Resolution Number 4833 entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH DELETING CONDITION
NUMBER 2 (PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS) OF CITY
8-28-00
COUNCIL RESOLUTION NUMBER 4735, VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
NO. 15797 (BIXBY OLD RANCH TOWNE CENTER DEVELOPMENT)."
Councilman Larson seconded the motion.
Councilman Doane said he believed that the reasons brought
out by the Development Services Director are valid and that
this provides an improved time frame. Mayor C~pbell n~t7d
that she did not vote for the project, the subJect cond~t~on
was placed in the development agreement for a reason, and in
her opinion the developer should be held to it. Councilman
Yost mentioned that he had suggested the condition at the
request of the District Four EQCB representative on behalf of
the Mayor due to a concern with regard to the possibility
that residential development would hasten Closing of the
Base, however the commercial is going forward and he would no
longer have concern. By unanimous consent, full reading of
Ordinance Number 1467 and Resolution Number 4833 was waived.
I
AYES:
NOES:
Boyd, Doane, Larson, Yost
Campbell
Motion carried
The City Attorney advised that Ordinance Number 1467 would be
presented for second reading at the next meeting.
CONSULTANT INTERVIEWS - CITY MANAGER RECRUITMENT
The City Council commenced interviews with representatives of
three recruitment firms, Mr. William Avery, William Avery and
Associates, Mr. David Harris, Shannon Associates, and Mr. Bob
Murray, Bob Murray and Associates. Each of the interviewees
presented an overview of the qualifications of their firm,
history of recruitments and references, personal professional
backgrounds, involvement of the City Council, and others if
desired, in the recruitment process, steps to be taken to
develop a candidate profile, search strategy, advertising
campaign and recruitment brochure, ICMA and Western City are
candidate sources, the recruitment process would include
contact with potential candidates, personal interviews,
candidate assessment, reference checks, recommendation to
Council of candidates for the position, final interviews,
selection, negotiations, employment agreement, etc. It was
pointed out that it is the Council who will establish the
guidelines as to the type person desired with regard to
skills, competencies, experience, background, personality,
character traits, etc., and the recruitment process generally
takes between four to six months. With regard to the typical
longevity of a City Manager the response was four years or
longer, a Council workShop could be arranged subsequent to
the hiring of the City Manager to develop criteria as to
Council expectations and desires, that also makes the
evaluation process easier, the cost of facilitating a
workshop is in addition to the recruitment fee, in response
to a question as to what would be the primary factor that
would bring a key City Manager to Seal Beach, the response
was compensation, professional growth and challenge, the
environment, commonalities of interest, also, there needs to
be a clear understanding up front of the costs of living in
the Southern California area, a national search would not be
recommended, start with Orange County then expand throughout
the State.
I
I
Councilman Boyd mentioned that following the departure of the
prior Manager there have been residents that suggested using
Long Beach State for the recruitment process, basically an
in-house process, that is thought to be the process of the
last recruitment. The City Attorney recalled that the
-. ..,<
I
I
I
8-28-00
recruitment was in-house, the Council having established a
sub-committee, they may have had some assistance from the
University. Given the potential cost of about $20,000 to do
a successful recruitment, Councilman Boyd said if the Council
determines to use a consultant for the search and recruitment
he would think that issues beyond the process should be given
thought, the compensation level, the role and
responsibilities of the City Manager internally, as well as
expectations being just a few, the position of City Manager
is political, administrative, emotional, and physically
challenging, this would allow the recruiting firm to go out
and promote Seal Beach. Mayor Campbell offered that there
will be interviews by the consultant of the members of the
Council individually, then collectively, and at that time the
Council can find the commonality of what is being sought in
terms of a City Manager, her feeling would be that the
compensation package, etc. should be discussed with the
recruiter at that point. Councilman Boyd suggested that
possibly a market survey should be done of Orange County now,
review cities of a fairly like size, maybe even special
districts and other jurisdictions, possibly look at that
before becoming too involved with a consultant, he personally
has some hesitancy at spending up to $20,000 for a process
that has been done before for less, in his opinion this
Council has demonstrated that it can work together
effectively, regardless of personalities or issues, the
Council has made some tough decisions, it may be beneficial
for the Council to discuss issues beforehand, the
expectations, the challenge of revenue generation,
infrastructure, etc., yet a Manager who is going to leave
Seal Beach as small as the person found it. Councilman
Larson confirmed that the recruiter needs to know the range
of salary and benefits to respond to questions of candidates
as to living expenses, housing accommodations, separation
pay, etc., the Council needs to come to agreement on the
issues otherwise the City will not realize the best
candidate. Mayor Campbell suggested that the Interim City
Manager do a survey of other cities as to salaries and
benefits. Councilman Yost asked that housing subsidies be
addressed as well, that being a means of augmenting salary
without augmenting benefit when attracting people to a high
income area. The Mayor said in lieu of a housing loan her
preference would be relocation expenses. with regard to
compensation, Councilman Boyd said his intent is to pay for
performance, he would want a Manager that understands that
performance is the issue, the City has a good staff, these
people need to be empowered to make decisions, involve as
many people as possible in the decision making process, the
department heads, the labor management representatives. The
Interim Manager noted that all of the consultant
representatives indicated they would be meeting individually
and collectively with the Council, that is the time when
directions need to be given, also, legal counsel advised that
such discussions could be conducted in closed session. To
the question as to the preference of the Council with regard
to using consultant services, there was a majority indication
in favor of, with a comment made that there be as much
interaction as possible, possibly incorporating an element of
team building for the Council as well. with regard to a
salary/benefits survey, Council suggested all of the coastal
cities, cities of like size in Orange County, Los Angeles and
San Diego counties as well. It was confirmed that the
Council could meet in closed session prior to the next
meeting for further discussion.
8-28-00
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
No report was presented.
CITY MANAGER REPORT
The Interim City Manager reported being advised that the
2000/2001 budget is about to go to print, should be available
to the Council by next meeting.
COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilman Doane stated he has been remiss in promises to the
Leisure World residents with regard to publication of news
articles, he intends to commence writing articles again, his
focus will be on business opportunities in the community in
regards to shopping locally, and he would encourage all
members of the Council to instill the importance of local
shopping to the City's tax base, the City receives one cent
on every retail dollar spent, an improvement of that will
help the General Fund. Councilman Larson noted that there is
currently a bus that transports Leisure World residents to
Rossmoor, presumably that will serve the Bixby Center as
well, and inquired if there is an opportunity to extend that
type of service to Main Street. Councilman Doane responded
that there is route 42 that offers a senior rate certain
hours of the day. Councilman Boyd mentioned his interest in
pursuing federal or State transportation funds to fund an
inner-city shuttle service that would run from North Seal
Beach to downtown for those who do not drive, there are other
cities that do this. Councilman Doane mentioned that former
councilmember Hastings had been looking into some type of a
trolley system. Councilman Boyd also encouraged persons that
shop nice stores in other areas to tell the operators they
are from Seal Beach and why that type of business would
likely thrive in this community, Main Street being a
prototype environment for the next twenty years, an example
would be the Sideboard, a culinary store recently located in
the 300 block of Main Street. Councilman Doane mentioned
that the Chamber of Commerce mixer will be at the Sideboard
next Thursday. Councilman Yost expressed appreciation to
staff for the All City Swim Meet, run very well and
successful. He mentioned receiving a letter from the
resident of 601 Bayside Drive, directly across from the
school, with regard to someone making a right turn onto
Bayside from Bolsa, went over the sidewalk and crashed into
his wall, this not the first time, and his concerns were with
traffic safety, to that Councilman Yost said the letter would
be forwarded to the Traffic Committee and Police Department
for follow up. With regard to the newspaper letter relating
to meetings of the San Gabriel Rivers and Mountains
Conservancy, Councilman Yost reported their meetings are
open, they are posted on the web site of the Secretary of
Resources, he has given updates during Council meetings and
is on his web site as well. Relative to that same topic said
it was reported at last meeting that on August 10th there was
a bus trip from the top of the San Gabriel River dam and
ended at Rivers End Cafe, stated he made two telephone calls
to the local paper to alert them that the Conservancy was
coming however they did not respond, at the Cafe an update
was given on water quality, during the route each person
spoke of issues within their given area inasmuch as the
Conservancy is split between Los Angeles and Orange counties
plus the interest of those in the mountains and those at the
beaches, there is now an executive director and there will
likely be offices in Azusa and in Long Beach. councilman
Yost mentioned that he had also given the local paper
information relating to a local interest story with regard to
I
I
I
~.' .'
8-28-00
I
the smallest baby ever, less than two pounds, that was put on
bypass in Orange County, had the heart defect repaired and
has now gone home, and two of the professionals that made the
procedure possible are Seal Beach residents, however the
paper has yet to run the story. Mayor Campbell inquired
about a Conservancy gathering at the Brea Council Chambers at
the same time as the League Conference. Councilman Yost said
he had no information however that may relate to the $15
million allocated to the Conservancy thus far, an anticipated
$10 million may be designated to the lower Los Angeles River,
however that is not yet decided. Making reference to web
sites of other cities, Councilman Boyd suggested that some
funds be allocated to upgrade the Seal Beach web site, making
it user friendly, a common means for persons to access
information today. He suggested also that thought be given
to publishing a community newsletter once or twice a year to
disseminate information to the public rather than merely
relying on the local media. Councilman Yost said he does
that on his personal web site and Mayor Campbell stated she
publishes a newsletter every four to six weeks. Councilman
Yost announced that he is appealing the Starbucks approval by
the Planning Commission for the reasons of the traffic data
submitted, suitability of the site for a Starbucks,
suitability of the parking lot to maintain a queue and
function as a parking lot, effect on the surrounding traffic
circulation and safety, effect that Starbucks would have on
existing businesses, and consistency with the General Plan
and Main Street Specific Plan, he also asked that the City
Attorney look into other cities which have contemplated
and/or passed anti-predatory business ordinances and
legislation. Mayor Campbell complimented the just released
fall Recreation brochure. Response to a question of
Councilman Larson was that the tree in College Park West is
down.
I
CLOSED SESSION
The holding of a second Closed Session was unanimously waived
by the Council.
ADJOURNMENT
It was the order of the Chair, with consent of the Council,
to adjourn the meeting until Monday, September 11th at 6:00
p.m. to meet in Closed Session. By unanimous consent the
meeting was adjourned at 9:30 p.m.
C't Clerk and
the City of
clerk
I
Approved:
-IJcd.A:r{~ ~ ~
Ma or
Attest: