HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Res 2664 1977-05-09
.. ""..
I
1
1
.
RESOLUTION NO. db.6,!
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SEAL BEACH APPROVING TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP NO. 9814.
WHEREAS, the application was duly filed by the City of Seal Beach, 211
Eighth Street, Seal Beach, for the subdivision of the present
City Corporation Yard site located at 300 1st Street; and
WHEREAS, the site is 3.5 acres in area; is zoned R-1-3000, and is
proposed to be subdivided into 35 lots; and
WHEREAS, 35 single family residences are proposed to be constructed in
a manner that is architecturally compatible with the surrounding
development of Bridgeport; and
WHEREAS, after the preparation of an Initial Study the city staff
determined that a Negative Declaration would fulfill the
requirements of C.E.Q.A. because development has already
occurred on the site and the topography has been altered,
the streets have sufficient capacity to handle the additional
traffic, utilities are readily available, the project will be
architecturally compatible with Bridgeport, and the project
will not have a substantial negative-effect upon the
environment; and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Quality Control Board of the City reviewed
the proposed project on Ma~ch 17, 1977, and concurred with the
determination that a Negative Declaration was appropriate for
thi's development; and
WHEREAS, on March 1, 1977, the City's Park and Recreation Commission
reviewed the proposed development and considered the issue of
park land and voted to recommend to the City Council that in
lieu fees be paid, and used in conjunction with fees from
future subdf'visions to expand Marina Park; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of a Negative
Declaration, conditional approval of Planned Unit Development
PUD-1-77, and Tentative Tract Map 9814 for the project on
April 20, 1977; and
WHEREAS, the City Council makes the following fi'ndings regarding
the project and the tentative tract map.
1. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and complies
with the type of use and density prescribed for this site, and will
provi'de additional residences within the area.
2. The site is physically suitable for development; the land is flat
and it is located in a developed area with existing streets, utilities,
and residences located adjacent to the project site.
3. The site is suitable for the proposed density of development; other
projects of similar density have been constructed adjacent to the
project si'te and are compatible with the area.
4. The design of the subdivision will not cause substantial environmental
damage because the project site is presently developed. The
redevelopment of the site will not have a significant effect on the
environment.
-,.
1
1
1
... ~'...
. .
,
Resolution Number
~~t: ~~
ayor