HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Res 07-29 2007-06-20
RESOLUTION NO. 07-29
O,f>/CI-
/114<
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH APPROVING
HEIGHT VARIATION 07-4, PERMITTING THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A NON-HABITABLE
ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE TO HOUSE AN
ELEVATOR AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY
DWELLING AT 235 15th Street
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE:
SectIon 1. On Apnl 4, 2007, Mr. George Brown submitted an apphcatIOn for
Height Vanation 07-4. The proposed project would allow for the construction of a non-habitable
architectural feature m excess ofthe 25-foot height limit. SpecIfically, the apphcant proposes to
construct a 8-ft. 4-in. by 4-fi 4-m. elevator enclosure to exceed the height hmlt by 5 feet; 7 feet
is the maXImum heIght vanation penmtted. At the Plannmg Commission meetmg of May 9,
2007, the Planning CommissIOn dlfected the applicant to reVIse the submItted plans to reduce the
square footage of the elevator enclosure and elimmate portions of the exterior walls of the
enclosure to reduce the vIsual Impact of the structure. The revised plans reflect these changes,
but after revlewmg the house plans as origmally drawn, the apphcant detemlined that an
addItIonal Uoot would need to be added to the elevator enclosure to accommodate the elevator
car and appurtenant mechanical eqmpment. As a result of thIS additIonal height mcrease, It
became necessary to resend hearing notices to all property owners and occupants withm 300 feet
of the subject property informmg them of the modification to the original plan and delay the
hearing until the regular meetmg of June 20, 2007.
SectIon 2. Pursuant to 14 Cahf. Code of Regs. ~ 15025(a) and ~ I1.A of the
Clty's Local CEQA GUldelmes, staff has detennmed as follows: The application [or HeIght
VariatIOn No. 07-2 IS categorically exempt from reVieW pursuant to the Cah[omia Environmental
Quahty Act pursuant to 14 Calif. Code of Regs. 9 15303(a) (New ConstructIOn of Small
Structures), because the apphcation is for the constructIOn of three (3) or less smgle family
dwelhngs in an urbanized area; 9 15305 (Minor AlteratIOns in Land Use Limitations) because the
request IS for a mmor alteratIon m land use hmitations 111 an area with an average slope of less
than 20% and no changes 111 land use or denSIty are mvolved, and, pursuant to S 15061(b)(3),
because it can be seen WIth certainty that there is no possibility that the approval may have a
significant effect on the enVIronment.
SectIOn 3. A duly notIced public hearmg was held before the Planmng
Commission on June 20, 2007 to consider Height Variation 07-4. At the public hearing the
lof4
Planllll/g CommlSSlO/I ResolutlOlI No 07-29
Height VanatlOn 07-4
235 - 15tlr Street
June 20. 2007
Plannmg CommISSIOn received mto the record all eVidence and testimony provided on this
matter
Section 4.
The record of the hearIng indicates the followmg:
(a) On Apnl 4, 2007, Mr. George Brown submItted an
applIcatIOn for HeIght VanatIOn 07-4.
(b) The Applicant IS requestmg to construct an 8-ft. 4-m. by 4-
ft. 4-m. elevator enclosure to exceed the height limit by 5 feet at 235 15th Street, 7 feet IS the
maximum height variatIon pemlItted.
(c) The subject property is descnbed as 235 15th Street, Seal
Beach, California. Smce thIS IS a newly created lot as a result of a subdIVIsion (Case No. TPM
2005-237), an Assessor's Parcel Number has not yet been assigned to this lot. The subject
property IS located m the Residential High DenSIty (RHD) Zone, m an area generally referred to
as "Old Town"
(d) The subJect property is rectangular in shape with a lot area
of approxImately 2,500 square feet.
(e) The surroundmg land uses and zonmg are as follows
NORTH, SOUTH,
EAST & WEST
Slllgle and multiple family dwellings located in the Residential
HIgh Density Zone (RHD).
(f) The proposed elevator enclosure will have similar roof
lines, roofing material, and siding that is architecturally compatible WIth the new home.
(g) The proposed elevator enclosure compnses approximately
32 square feet and is located at the nonh Side of the building, WIth the roofline being flush with
the north buildlllg wall and the enclosure walls set back approximately 20 feet 7 lllches from the
front (east) of the buildll1g, 10 feet 6 inches from the south bmldmg wall, and 56 feet 7 lllches
from the rear (west) buildmg wall
SectIon 5. Based upon the evidence m the record, includll1g the facts stated In
S 4 oft1lls resolution and pursuant to S 28-2317(D) of the City's Code, the Plannll1g CommIssion
hereby finds as follows:
(a) Height Vanation 07-4, as conditioned, is consistent WIth
the provisIOns of the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan, which provides a "High
Density ReSIdential" designatIOn for the subject property and penmts sll1gle and multiple family
reSidentIal uses. The use is also consistent with the remaining elements of the City's General
20f4
Plannmg CO/1unlsslOn ResolutIOn No 07-29
Height VarwtlOn 07-4
235 - 151h Street
June 20. 2007
Plan as the polIcIes of those elements are consIstent with, and reflected 1l1, the Land Use
Element. Accordmgly, the proposed use IS conSIstent WIth the General Plan.
(b) The proposed non-habItable architectural feature, as
conditIOned, IS architecturally in keeping with the remainder of the structure, with the roof pitch,
roofing matenals and sidlllg archItecturally compatIble wIth that of the remalllder of the
structure
(c) The proposed elevator enclosure, as condItIoned, IS
appropriate for the character and llltegnty of the surrounding neighborhood
(d) No habitable living space IS provided withlll the structure.
(e) The proposed architectural feature, as condItioned, IS
approximately 32 square feet m area and IS located at the north sIde of the bUlldmg, With the
enclosure walls set back approximately 3 feet from the north buIlding wall, 20 feet 7 inches from
the front ofthe bUllding, 10 feet 6 111ches from the south building wall, and 56 feet 7 ll1ches from
the rear building wall.
(f) The proposed non-habItable architectural feature, as
condItIoned, does not sIgmficantly impair the primary view of any property located within 300
feet of the subject property.
SectIOn 6. Based on the foregoing, the Planmng CommIssIon hereby approves
Height Variation 07-4, subject to the following condItions:
1 Height Variation 07-4 is approved for the construction of a non-habItable architectural
feature for an approxImately 32 square foot elevator enclosure up to 5 feet in excess of
the 25-foot heIght limIt, with the rooflll1e flush WIth the north bUlldll1g wall and enclosure
walls set back approximately 3 feet from the north buildll1g wall at 235 15th Street, Seal
Beach.
2. All construction shall be in substantial compliance with the plans approved through HV
07-4.
3. There shall be no habitable space pemlitted withm the architectural feature.
4. ThIS Height VariatIOn shall not become effective for any purpose unless an "Acceptance
of ConditIOns" fonn has been SIgned by the apphcant 111 the presence of the DIrector of
Development Services, or notarized and returned to the Planmng Department; and untll
the ten (10) day appeal period has elapsed.
5. The applicant shall mdemmfy, defend and hold harnlless City, ItS officers, agents and
employees (collectively "the City" hereinafter) from any and all claims and losses
whatsoever occurring or resultmg to any and all persons, firms, or corporations furnishing
30f4
Planl1lng COlnl1llSSlOn ResolutIOn No 07-29
Height Vm WtlOl1 07-4
235 - /5/h Street
June 20. 2007
or supplying work, serVIces, materials, or supplIes 111 connectIon with the performance of
the use pennitted hereby or the exerCIse of the nghts granted herein, and any and all
claIms, lawsUIts or actIOns ansing from the granting of or the exercise of the rights
permitted by thIS HeIght VariatIon, and from any and all clallns and losses occurring or
resultmg to any person, firm, corporatIon or property for damage, inJury or death arismg
out of or connected with the perfomlance of the use pennitted hereby. Applicant's
obligatIOn to mdemmfy, defend and hold hannless the City as stated herem shall include,
but not be lImited to, paymg all fees and costs incurred by legal counsel of the City's
choice in representing the City in connectIOn WIth any such claims, losses, lawsUIts or
actions, expert witness fees, and any award of damages, Judgments, verdicts, court costs
or attorneys' fees m any such laWSUit or actIOn.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Seal Beach
at a meeting thereof held on the 20th day of June 2007 by the following vote:
AYES: CommissIoners Deaton, Massa-Lavitt, and Roberts
NOES. Commissioners None
ABSENT: Commissioners Bello
ABSTAIN: CommIssIoners None
Ji~~~~
Ellery Deaton
Chairperson, Planning CommissIOn
****
40f4