HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Res 2364 1974-10-14
I
I
I
-
RESOLUTION NO. c:?3~ 1
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SEAL BEACH OENYING APPEAL A-2-74.
(SURFSIDE COLONY, LTD.)
WHEREAS, Variance Application No. V-13-74 for four stories in thirty-five feet,
a chimney encroachment into a required side,yard at the second level, a sun
screen over Surfside Colony leased land and an elevated walkway at the second
floor level in the R-l zone of Surfside was filed. The property is described
as Lot 79, Block A, Surfs ide Colony. Variance was approved; and
WHEREAS, Surfs ide Colony, Ltd., P.O. Box 235, Surfside, CA, duly filed an
appeal application on Planning Commission approval of the elevated walkway at
the second floor level; and
WHEREAS, a public Iwaring was advertised as required by law and held before the
City Council on August 26, 1974. Written information was reviewed and oral
comments were received by the City Council; and
'WHEREAS, the matter of A-2-74 was referred back to the Planning Commission and
,on September 4, 1974, the Planning Commission considered the applicant's appeal
and the City Council's findings; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, by Resolution No. 865, recommended that the
City Council deny the appeal and conditionally approve the variance request
based on the following findings:
1. The Planning Commission affirms its findings contained in Resolution No. 848.
2. The facilities proposed at the first level are of a utilitarian nature and
would not constitute living quarters in the traditional sense.
3. The granting of the variance shall not adversely affect the General Plan
in that the site is proposed to be developed as a single family residence
in conformance with the General Plan.
4. The subject lot is located on "A" rO\1 which is distinguished' from the rest
of the Colony in that the houses on "A" row are situated on the beach
between the ocean and the first street parallel to the shore. Almost all
of the dwellings on "A" row are cOJ:lstructed on pilings, unlike other
residences in Surfside Colony.
5. The subject lot is smaller than many of the lots in "A" row.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Seal Beach
does deny the appeal and uphold the Planning Commission's conditional approval
of Variance V-13-74 with the following conditions:
1. Stairway between the first floor and the main living area to remain
unenclosed.
2. Land Use Agreement limiting the property to a single family residence with
provisions for annual inspection.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City'~ncil of ~e City of Seal
a regular meeting thereof held on the ~ day of C::Jet:i:;l.e/J ,
the following vote: ~
. ;; (!
AYES: Councilmen ", -
NOES: Councilmen
ABSENT: Councilmen
Beach at
1974, by
,