HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Res 2107 1972-06-12
I
I
I
.
,
RESOLUTION NO. ~ I () 1
A RESOLUTION OF TIlE CITY COURCIL OF THE CITY OF
SEAL BEACH AFFIRMING PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 627 AND DENYING APPEAL NO. A-2-72
FILED BY ROBERT DALTON/UNITED RlMlDELING SYS'l'EMS
FROM PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF VARIAlfCE NO.
V-15-72 TO PERMIT A ROOM ADDITION AT THE REAR OF
A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE WHICH WOULD CAUSE THE
MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE PROVISIONS TO BE EXCEEDED.
WHEREAS, in the matter of Appeal. Application 1'10. A-2-72, 'the Planning Caamission
of the City of Seal. Beach did report as follows:
1. Subject case initiated by Robert P. Dalton, 633 Island View, Seal Beach, CA.
2. Subject property described as Lot 196, Tract 2590, cClllllllonl;r known as
633 Island View Drive.
3. Subject proposal is to permit a room addition in an R-l Zone with lot
coverage of 44'.
4. MaxiDIUIII lot coverage in this district and zone is 40'.
5. Thz:ee persons spoke in favor of the proposal, no one spoke against it.
6. No phYsical hardships could be demonstrated due to shape, size, topographY
or location of subject property.
WHEREAS, on April 19, 1972 the Planniug ClllIIIIIissiori'of theo'City of.Seal Beach.did
deny Variance No. V-15-72 on the basis that the applicant failed to demonstrate
hardship; and
WHEREAS, the applicant subsequently appealed the Planning Commission's decision
to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, 'the matter of 'the appeal from the Planniug ClllIIIIIission's denial of Variance
V-15-72 came before the City Council for Public Heariug at i'ts regular meetiug
of MB.Y 22, 1972, and at1;er receiving testimo~, the City Council lawfully concluded
and closed said pUblic hearing.
BOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED b;r the City Council of the City of Seal Beach as
follova:
1. All notices required b;r law and b;r ordinance of the appeal and public heariug
by the City Council upon this matter have been given, posted and mailed as
required by law, and
2. Each finding heretofore made by the Planniug CoDaission is true and each such
finding was and is supported by substantial evidence, and
3. The appeal of Robert Dalton/United Remodeling Systems from the Seal Beach
Planning CaDlllission Resolution No. 627 is denied, and the action of the Seal
Beach Planning Collllllission adopting its Resolution Bo. 627 is atf'irmed.
of Seal Beach,
, 1972, b;r
PASSED, APPROVED ABD ADOP'.rED by the City Council of the i 11
California, at a meeting thereof on the b2d,dq of
the following vote:
~'
AYES: Counci
NOES: 0 Councilmen
ABSENT:, '. CoII,!ICt-lmen- ~'
.. ..--. ... ....~-:........
~ ~. ~Io ~...':._
o ...,
~,~
-'
;"~10
~: .......
~~ -
-'-': ';...:
.....
~
-'
. :"
. ,