Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Min 1964-06-10 .1 . . nmtJTED OF PL.ANND1G C0I1UISSION I1mTmG OF JtmE 10, 1964 '!'he Seal Beach Planning Comm.:tsslon met 1n regular session on Wednesda7. June 10. 1964.. in the Oouncil Cham bel' at C1t,. Ball. P1'8aenti Rai Boeger, Rud:.r Avila. Edw8l'd Twining. and SeoretQ!7 John Sb'atroJlld Absent: W1l11~ ~~r1son The mGeting was oalled to ol'da:r at 7~40 Polio bJ' Chairman Boese".. The minutes ot the meeting held on Uay- 110' 1964.er8 approved as presented. The .8C1'e1;;81'7 8lmOUD.ced that the applioation from Louis Av1l1tt to~ a Conditional Use Permit had been v1th4rawn and tb8 pUbllo he8JD1ns scheduled fo'lI' this meeting wlla oanGe1M. Iea Pa.bl1o Heeing lID Robert C. NeiU9 VQ%tianoe fo~ s14CQ'arcl setbaok and excess maz1mum lot cove:rage Robert C. BaiU t Ite.que at8 varianoes on a paroel described as Lot 338, Tract 2590 rw ~8) a five toot si4e7aztd setback illstead of su toot. and (b) 8&'1 axcess ot 370 squan feet "'e~ the allowable W'ximnm J.o.t eoverage of 40$0 The setbaok JlJequest c ontOl'mS to the l'eoommended amendment made b1 the Planning OoomlsaloD and scheduled tor pu.blic heax-ins ber~e the City Couno11 Oft JUDe lS. No protests were ~eoelved. !he Commission t.l~ that the pztop05ed house would be 0Bh asset to the area. 1-11>. TW'1niDs moved that; the 0cmm1sa1oD approve both nquestso lot-a Avila seocm4e4 the motiOD end 1 t paased unan1mous11 '" the mambelSs pl'esent" II. Public He8l"1ag ... IJ.t;t. and J.fJta. E. La Shuck, Use Var1ance fo~ motel and Velano.a for rear led setback !1r. and lire. E. Lo Shuok Itequest a Use Variance to allow a motel iA 0...1 Zone II and a Varlal'1C8 trom sa eaxa yard setback requirement to allow P1'Otws1011 of new bul1d1ng to w1thin 61'&8t of the HUl prope~ line as sham em plot plans subm1tted @Ii a P81'o81 46801'1"4 88 Pwtl0Da of Lots 47, 49, SlD .$3 and 5S and aU or Lots 57" 59 8l1d 61, Block 210, Trllat No. 10. One objection waa made at the me.tins b1 8 pl'Opertr owner 1n the &%'ea. Afte~ vleu1ng the plans. sever&l other oWnGl'S felt that s1noe this 1. an expansion of an ex1stlDg motel it neule! be 8rA 1mPJ,Oovement ar:t4 vo1ced the~ approval. IIr. /.vila moved end lIr. Tlf1nlng seconded the motion that the use vo1anoe be granted sUbjeot to con:f'11'Bl8t1on b7 the CI1i7 Counc1l and the zaeo JG.l'd setbaok varIance be gt-snted{J both conditional on a l"e8l'l'anc;emsnt ot the parkIng area to ElL low thl'oug'b. access from. Bay Blvd. to the aUeyo P8X'k1ng spaces with an Bfoot t.,idth '11111 be allowed 11' neoesB&rJ to :maet the above req1ll11'ement. The motion passed unan1nlous17 by the members PHsent. . III. Public llemag .. Amendment to Ord1nance lio. 626" Jlrtlo1e 18 An amendment TllU considered to modU1 the tront 7axvd setback reqube- menta in R~l Zone s Distriot II to oonform wIth deed restrictions in allori.ng a front attaohed, side 8nt1'1 881'agG up to ten teet f1'om the front property line. 1'here were no ob3ections 01' protests mac1e. lIr. Tlr1n1ng moved that the Oomm1asloD rocommend. the toUewing amendo ment to ~t101e 18. Ordinance Boo 628 to the CltJ' Council. 14-. Av1la seconded the motion. (Addition to Article 18) ~ Section 1010.2 .. li'l'ont Yard I!od1ticat1oD8 "R_1n Zone. D1atr1ot II libel'8 a garage 1s attached to the tront elevation ot and is oonstructed. as an intesral pet ot a dwelling house in an uRall n Zone Ii> D1stxalct 1Io and U said Baraga struoture hall its vehioular entrance on elthel" of 1ts 81des~ It maJ' enc1'08ch into the l'eQu11ted 'J:>ODt ,._d to a Une ten teet (lOV I tram and parallel to the front prope~ liD. o't the peoeJ.ct (Add1tlon to Zoning Schedule) A symbol shall be affixed to the aub...heacti.ng "Front" unde~ the bead- Ing to'/} IVI.anlYrJ111R Y81Dd D1manslons to'if YQld Abutt1Bllg Stl'eet O~ Highw4\Ja to rete~ to the above added seot10D (Section 181002). The motion was pused unanimously b7 tho membeJ:08 ~esen1;. DI 0 Inf'0%"1I181 Co:umunlcatlons HI'S. I~ndoza 19taqueated information 1n regard to buUd1ng an apartlllent over a g81'&ge 1n the l'eOlt of her lot in a Ollll2 Zone. Several comments trom audienoe questioning legallt1 of extcmt10n of JohnBs Food. !ting building into l'equh'ed load1Dg rlMSe The matter was d1scussed b7 the oomm1ssion. This also led to disoussion of enfO:fl08o ment ot ord:tnGDCU to prevent the blocking of 8111&78 fo~ loDS periods ot time. ~l'e being DC further bUSiness, the meet;iD.g was ad30umed at 9:15 P.Mo ~~Ja~"- Reo~d1Dg SeolDetaP,J . . ~ J~ K; /rt}/'